►
From YouTube: Built Heritage Sub-Committee - Tuesday, June 9, 2020
Description
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas.
A
Please
note
that
those
who
do
not
need
to
participate
in
the
meeting
can
also
watch
it
on
the
livestream
on
the
Ottawa
City
Council
YouTube
channel
a
reminder
to
participants
to
please
keep
your
microphones
muted
until
I
call
on
you
to
speak.
I
will
provide
each
committee,
member
with
the
opportunity
to
ask
questions
and
comment
on
each
item
in
order
in
which
they
raise
their
hand
and
zoon
committee
members
will
be
called
on
first,
followed
by
any
other
members
of
council
who
have
joined
this
meeting.
A
Four
panelists
the
raise
hand
option
is
found
at
the
bottom
of
the
participants
list
for
attendees.
You
will
find
the
raised
hand
button
at
the
bottom
of
your
zoom
window
for
those
calling
in
press
star
nine.
To
raise
your
hand,
the
committee
coordinator
and
I
will
be
watching
for
those
cues,
the
usual
five
minutes
speaking
limit
will
apply.
Members
are
also
reminded
to
submit
any
motions,
visual
supports
or
declarations
of
interest
in
writing
to
the
coordinator
at
their
earliest
convenience.
A
Although
the
deadlines
have
passed
for
residents
to
register
to
speak
and
provide
written
submissions
to
the
subcommittee,
residents
may
still
make
submissions
to
Planning
Committee
on
item
3,
246,
Gilmour,
Street
or
written
submissions
to
Council
on
items,
1
2,
&
4.
If
you
have
technical
difficulties
signing
in
to
the
meeting,
you
can
contact
the
clerk's
office
at
committees
at
Ottawa
CA
or
by
calling
6
1
3
5
8
0
2,
4
2,
4
extension,
2,
2,
9,
5
3.
A
As
you
know,
this
position
was
once
occupied
by
my
predecessor,
Tobey
Nussbaum,
and,
given
the
number
size
and
importance
of
heritage
conservation
districts
in
my
ward,
I'm,
very
proud
to
have
been
selected
as
chair
by
my
council.
Colleagues.
I
would
also
like
to
acknowledge
our
most
immediate
past,
chair
of
this
subcommittee
member
Gower,
who
served
during
a
period
when
this
subcommittee
was
dealing
with
very
contentious
files.
A
His
depth
and
breadth
of
thoughtfulness
concerning
heritage
and
the
application
of
policies
bylaws
and
ensuring
that
the
public
were
fairly
consulted
was
deeply
appreciated
and
will
continue
to
be
highly
valued
around
this
table.
Serving
in
this
position,
along
with
other
subcommittee,
members,
provides
a
unique
opportunity
to
actively
protect
built
heritage
of
a
unique
and
distinct
nature
in
our
city.
A
Pursuing
the
protection
of
built
heritage
of
a
unique
and
distinct
character
ensures
the
protection
of
buildings
that
represent
a
combination
of
aesthetic,
historical,
cultural
and
social
importance
and
significance
of
Ottawa's
Historic
Places
from
the
past,
as
well
as
ensures
protection
for
present
and
future
generations.
But
I
also
want
to
applaud
our
professionals,
city
staff
and
all
committee
members
subcommittee
members
for
their
past
current
and
continued
efforts.
C
A
B
B
D
You
I
realized
that
on
the
file
of
860
Colonel
buy
drive
in
January
2012
when
the
city
expressed
its
intention
to
designate
I,
was
retained
by
the
then
owners
of
the
property
and
wrote
an
opinion
in
February
2012
that
the
position
of
designation
was
not
justified
and
therefore
I'd
like
to
declare
interest
in
this
in
this
file.
Even
though
I've
been
inactive
on
it
for
eight
years.
A
Then
the
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
planning
infrastructure
and
economic
development,
right-of-way
heritage
and
urban
design
services
report
on
heritage
permits
issued
through
delegated
authority
2019.
We
have
received
no
submissions
or
requests
to
speak
on
this
item.
Can
staff
please
provide
an
overview
of
this
report.
E
Certainly
good
morning,
chair
and
members
of
the
committee
in
2015,
the
City
Council
delegated
the
authority
to
approve
certain
types
of
applications
under
the
Antarian
Heritage
Act,
the
general
manager
of
a
planning
growth
management
department,
which
is
currently
the
planning
infrastructure
and
economic
developer
permit.
The
delegated
authority
process
requires
an
annual
report
on
the
permit
issue
through
delegated
authority.
This
report
is
before
you
today
provide
information
on
heritage
premise
issued
through
delegated
30
and
2019.
Next
slide,
please,
as
a
summary
and
2019
106,
hedged
permits
were
issued
under
delegate
authority
to
staff.
E
80
of
these
refer
a
variety
of
alterations,
ranging
from
window
replacements
to
auditions
an
additional
additional
26
heritage
permits
were
issued
as
part
of
the
city's
heritage
grant
program
for
building
restoration.
As
you
can
see,
some
photos
on
the
slide
there
we
have
the
window
replacements
done
last
year
supports
restoration
as
well
as
tin,
roof.
A
complete
list
of
all
the
hairs
permits
issued
in
2019
under
delegated
authority
can
be
found
and
document
one
of
the
staff
report.
Thank
you.
A
E
Were
if
it
would
be
possible
to
release
this
every
quarter
instead
of
every
year,
just
because
it's
just
quite
a
number
of
permits
for
the
most
part,
I
I
I,
understand
why
it's
done
just
once
a
year,
but
I
think
it
might.
There
might
be
benefit
to
releasing
releasing
the
list
three
times
a
year
or
four
times
a
year,
just
to
sort
of
able
to
monitor
that
a
little
bit
more
I
guess
I
believe
we
cannot
do
that.
The
delegated
authority
of
our
law
requires
annually
celui
require
an
alteration
to
the
bylaw,
but.
A
G
A
E
In
2016
City
Council
approved
procedures
regarding
the
Heritage
Register,
this
included
staff
repairing
an
annual
report
that
addresses
all
removals
of
properties
from
the
Heritage
Register.
During
the
previous
year,
section
27
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act
states
that,
prior
to
the
removal
of
reference
to
the
property
from
the
Heritage
Register
cancellous
consultants,
municipal
heritage
committee,
all
properties
removed
from
the
Heritage
Register
must
be
approved
by
council.
This
report
is
before
you
today
to
fulfill
these
requirements.
E
Next
slide.
There
are
three
ways
in
which
a
property
can
be
removed
from
the
Heritage
Register.
The
first
is
property
owner
on
a
request
in
this
process.
In
order
for
a
property
to
be
moved
right
in
order
to
request
a
removed
from
the
property,
probably
from
the
Heritage
Register.
The
property
owner
must
complete
the
form
for
building
lists
on
the
Heritage
Register,
as
submitted
to
the
planning
parish,
planning
branch
staff,
evaluate
this
request
and
make
a
roommate
recommendation
to
built
here
just
subcommittee
and
Council.
E
E
The
property
owner
must
submit
a
notice
of
intention
to
demolish
a
listed
building.
West's
form
has
been
submitted,
staff
have
60
60
days
during
which
to
determine
if
the
building
should
be
recommended
for
designation
under
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act,
the
ward
councillor
and
the
charity
built
edges
subcommittee
are
consulted.
The
staff
determined
that
the
building
does
not
merit
designation.
No
report
was
repaired
unless
requested
by
the
ward
councillor
or
a
chair
of
the
built
heritage
subcommittee.
What's
the
60
day
period
has
passed,
a
demolition
permit
can
be
issued.
E
The
building
remains
listed
on
the
Heritage
Register
until
it
the
disavows,
the
third
and
final
way
to
be
removed
from
the
Heritage
Register.
Is
a
staff
initiated
removal
when
staff
identified
errors
on
the
register,
they
won't
sue
them
in
the
report
recommending
council
moving
from
the
Heritage
Register
next
five,
please.
E
D
This
is
just
a
technical,
zoom
question
and
that
is
I
found
it
quite
difficult
to
hear
the
staff
report
because
of
the
distance
between
the
speaker
and
the
microphone.
Would
it
be
possible
and
others
may
have
the
same
problem?
Would
it
be
possible
that
the
testing
of
the
voice
becomes
done
so
that
all
could
hear?
Thank
you
very
much
and.
A
A
Ideally,
I
should
be
using
a
headset
but
I'm
not,
but
but
as
we
as
we
really
start
to
adjust
to
this
platform,
I'm
certain
that
the
presentations
will
be
better
and
better,
but
that
should
be
taken
and
noted
that
we
should
definitely
try
to
announce
it
and
try
to
speak
towards
towards
the
microphone.
I.
Just
thought
just
for
clarity.
I
just
want
to
ensure
that
the
member
did
get
the
gist
of
the
of
the
report.
A
A
This
report
is
scheduled
to
be
presented
to
Council
on
June
24th
2020.
The
next
item
number
three
is
an
application
for
new
construction
at
246,
Gilmour
Street,
a
property
located
in
the
center
town,
Heritage
Conservation,
District
designated
under
part
five
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act.
Can
staff.
Please
provide
an
overview
of
this
report.
I
will
then
ask
that
members
of
the
public
make
their
submissions
after
the
presentation.
J
Thank
you
and
good
morning.
The
application
in
front
of
you
today
is
for
new
construction
at
2:46,
Gilmore
Street
next
slide.
The
property
is
located
in
the
center
town,
Heritage
Conservation
District,
which
was
designated
under
the
under
part.
Five
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act
in
1997
next
slide.
Here's
a
location
map
the
property
is
vacant
through
lot
between
Gilmore
Street
and
Lewis
Street
and
is
located
to
the
east
of
Metcalf
Street.
J
J
These
are
some
photos
of
the
block
of
Gilmore
Street,
looking
east
and
west
to
the
east
is
a
surface
parking
lot
for
the
Elven
Street
public
school
across
the
street.
To
the
north
is
the
Public
Service
Alliance
of
Canada
building
and
to
the
west
is
a
three-story
apartment
building,
which
is
a
category
two
building
in
the
HCD
next
slide.
This
is
a
site
plan
of
the
proposal.
It
is
somewhat
a
regular
in
plan
because
of
the
recessed
entrance
and
an
internment
internally
accommodated
parking
space.
J
However,
the
appearance
of
the
building
is
a
rectangular
building
in
plan
inform
the
proposal
will
also
require
a
zoning
bylaw
amendment
and
safe
plain
control.
The
zoning
bylaw
amendment
is
anticipated
to
be
considered
by
planning
committee
and
council
together
with
this
heritage
report.
At
upcoming
meetings.
J
J
J
Just
some
brief
policy
analysis,
which
is
expanded
on
in
the
report.
The
proposal
meets
the
center
town,
Heritage
Conservation,
District
guidelines.
The
design
is
contemporary
of
its
own
time
and
sympathetic
to
the
Heritage
character
of
the
area.
It's
a
modern
interpretation
of
a
typical
center
town,
red
brick,
flat
roofs
building
contemporary
elements
such
as
large
rectangular
windows,
the
entranceway
with
metal
columns
and
straight
canopy,
and
middle
paneling.
Accents
sympathetic
design
elements
are
inspired
by
nearby
heritage
buildings
such
as
the
cornices
sails
and
lentils,
brick
detailing
and
material
palette,
which
includes
brick
and
stone.
J
The
building
reflects
the
character
of
said
to
town,
although
it's
somewhat
taller
and
narrower
in
its
design.
The
flat
roof
form
it's
typical
of
center
town
and
the
apartments
found
throughout
the
area.
There's
a
photo
on
the
screen
there
of
some
of
the
apartment
buildings
filmed
just
north
on
Metcalf
Street.
J
The
building
is
six
storeys
in
height.
You
see.
The
guideline
is
the
building
should
normally
be
three
to
four
storeys
in
height
to
reflect
the
intent
of
the
HTV
guidelines.
A
step
back
was
added
at
the
third
storey
and
to
reflect
the
Intendant
with
guidelines
and
the
building
to
the
west.
The
scale
of
the
building
is
appropriate
for
its
immediate
surroundings
and
is
a
whole
building
should
reflect
each
or
u-shaped
patterns
of
earlier
development.
J
J
The
center
town
HD
plan
also
encourages
infill
development
to
reestablish
the
streetscape
continuity.
As
you
can
see
on
this
elevation,
the
building
is
up
there
on
the
top
right.
The
proposed
new
building
fills
a
vacant
lot
in
the
ETD
and
contributes
to
the
overall
urban
fabric
of
the
center
and
HCV
x5
staff
review
the
proposal
using
the
standards
and
guidelines
the
new
building
conserves
the
heritage
value
of
the
center
town
HDD
and
is
compatible
with
the
character
of
the
area
next
slide.
J
The
center
town
community
design
plan
has
guidelines
related
to
new
buildings
in
this
area.
The
proposal
meets
the
guidelines
because
it
uses
step
backs
to
transition
to
adjacent
building
heights.
It
uses
compatible
materials
such
as
the
brick
and
stone
dimension.
It
minimizes
use
in
height
of
blank
walls
and
as
a
modulating,
facade
and
step
backs,
that's
compatible
with
the
surrounding
heritage
structures.
J
A
C
C
So,
as
it's
mentioned,
it's
the
sites
in
a
unusual
location,
it's
sort
of
to
the
east
of
the
main
heritage
area
of
the
Senate
Town
district,
not
too
far
from
Elgin
Street
I've
noticed
the
oval-shaped
building
to
the
north,
which
is
a
is
I,
guess
quite
an
iconic
building
in
itself
and
a
series
of
60s
70s
apartment
buildings
that
show
us
of
higher
scale
toward
toward
Elgin
Street.
The
site
is
quite
challenging.
C
There's
there's
a
fairly
considerable
grade
drop
off
between
Gilmore
and
Lewis,
and
so
the
design
needs
to
respond
to
those
two
conditions,
as
well
as
to
the
buildings
along
Metcalf.
So
the
four
story
building
there
I'll
go
to
the
next
slide,
please.
So
the
challenge
in
this
case
is
to
place
a
lot
of
the
circulation
elements
in
the
center.
So
we
have
a
sofa,
double-loaded
or
scissor
stare
in
the
center.
C
As
is
being
mentioned,
there
was
considerable,
an
engagement
with
city
heritage
staff
and
with
the
community
to
look
at
a
series
of
issues
and
concerns
in
terms
of
the
adjacent
school
and
materiality
so
I
would
say.
The
result
that
we
have
today
is
I
serve,
represents
a
lot
of
input
or
in
participation
from
from
staff
and
community
to
get
here.
C
So
these
are
some
I
guess
modeling
of
the
design
proposal
in
the
adjacent
context.
So
we
can
see
the
series
of
quite
eclectic
buildings,
mostly
so
60s
70s
buildings,
to
the
east
side
of
Mecca
off
the
lower
heritage.
Building
to
the
to
the
West,
which
itself
special
east
side
is
in
is
in
somewhat
poor
condition,
and
our
hope
is
also
by
by
design
is
we
can
improve
the
circulation
connection
between
the
two
buildings
and
so
tidy
that
up
the
school
is
seen
in
the
foreground
in
this
image.
C
The
idea
again
is
not
shown
in
some
of
our
renderings,
but
there
will
be
a
landscape
buffer
between
our
building
and
the
school
parking
area,
as
well
as
a
lot
of
Gilmore
Street
next
slide,
please
so
again,
a
streetscape
study
of
unpeeling
the
street
and
the
on
the
lower
image.
You
see
the
12
story,
building
and
then
more
to
the
east.
The
commercial
buildings
that
corner
Elgin
Street,
as
well
as
in
empty
parking,
lots
and
I
think
it's
to
be
expected
that
over
time,
these
Lots
will
intensify
as
well
as
some
development
along
Eldin
Street.
C
Primarily,
you
know
gain
a
stone
base,
red
brick,
exterior
lintels
and,
as
of
dark,
charcoal
covered
colored
flashings,
the
use
of
muntin
windows
as
well
to
respect
the
Heritage
character
district.
Next,
please,
this
is
image,
shows
the
relationship
to
the
adjacent
existing
heritage
building
and
the
side
facing
the
school
parking
lot.
There
was
considerable
discussion
about
sort
of
modulating
this
easterly
facade,
to
provide
some
planar
relief
and
to
animate
in
relation
to
the
views
that
are
going
to
be
seen
from
the
park
and
Elgon
Street
thanks.
C
C
E
C
K
Thank
You
chair
and
just
before
I
begin
I
just
wanted
to
offer.
My
warm
welcome
to
you,
as
a
member
of
both
our
committee
and
chair,
so
welcome
mr.
Martin
I
assume
you're
the
architect.
I
am
yes,
okay,
thank
you.
How
much
discretion
do
you
have
in
the
design
and
look
of
your
building?
I
know
you're
within
the
district
and
there's
pressure
to
present
a
building
that
more
or
less
conforms
with
the
look
of
the
neighborhood,
but
how
much
discretion
do
you
have
to
present
something
that
isn't
almost
a
carbon
copy
of
some
neighboring
buildings.
C
The
you
know
terms
are
going
for
a
much
more
contemporary
expression.
We
certainly
had
some
of
those
discussions
with
with
stuff
and
I
would
say.
The
approach
on
this
building
I
would
consider
it
more
of
a
fabric
building.
It
doesn't
need
to
draw
attention
to
itself
and
become
some
kind
of
signature
piece
that
it
would
almost
compete
with
the
public
service
building
to
the
north,
which,
in
my
view,
is
the
more
signature
landmark.
K
A
L
Thank
You
mr.
chair
members
of
committee
and
and
I'll
be
brief,
because
I
do
believe
that
the
focus
of
the
discussion
today
needs
to
be
on
the
design
of
the
building
and
you've
heard.
The
presentation
from
your
staff
and
you've
heard
the
presentation
from
the
project
architect
on
the
efforts
that
we've
taken
to
ensure
that
that
the
design
of
the
building
fits
into
the
center
town
heritage
district.
So
I'm
just
going
to
speak
to
one
specific
aspect
of
the
design
of
the
project
and
that's
the
building
height
and
I.
L
Certainly
we
acknowledge
that
under
the
heritage
overlay
that
the
zoning
bylaw
limits
redevelopment
to
the
size,
the
footprint,
the
massing,
the
height
of
the
former
building
on
the
property,
which
is
a
two
two
and
a
half
story.
Single-Family
home
I,
think
we'd.
All
agree
that
a
redevelopment
of
that
scale
would
be
inappropriate
on
this
property
and
in
this
day
and
age
and
in
fact
the
center
town
secondary
plan
identifies
this
property
as
having
the
potential
to
develop
to
a
up
to
nine
stories.
L
And
that's
where
we
started
with
this
project.
In
our
discussions
with
City
Planning
staff
and
heritage
staff,
we
started
with
a
nine-story
proposal,
but
as
a
result
of
those
discussions
and
decisions
made
by
our
client,
we've
reduced
the
scale
of
the
building
to
a
six
story.
Building
I
think
we're
certainly
comfortable
with
the
six
story.
Building
heritage
staff
are
comfortable
with
the
six
story
building
and
so
are
your
planning
staff
and
they
will
be
bringing
forward
the
appropriate
recommendations
for
rezoning
to
Planning
Committee
on
June
25th.
L
At
the
same
time
that
this
report,
the
recommendations
coming
out
of
this
committee
meeting
rise
to
planning
committee
and
I
think
the
one
other
consideration
I
think
you
know
all
the
councillors
on
this
call
this
morning
or
in
this
meeting
this
morning,
we're
very
active
in
the
discussions
about
the
new
Official
Plan
and
the
direction
we
need
to
go
with
the
new
Official
Plan
and
how
important
it
is
for
us
to
increase
the
amount
of
growth
that
we're
accommodating
through
intensification
within
the
urban
area.
And
this
is
a
really
good
example
of
a
project.
L
That's
moving
in
that
direction,
rather
than
a
small,
three
or
four
story,
building,
what's
being
proposed
as
a
six
story,
building
with
22
units
in
it
with
a
mix
of
units
including
some
two-bedroom
units,
which
could
be
rented
to
families
with
children
who
would
actually
be
able
to
maybe
even
attend
the
school
next
door.
So
simply
to
say,
mr.
L
chairman
Martha,
the
committee
that
we're
very
comfortable
with
the
pros
proposed
building
height
and
obviously
very
confident
that
the
design
of
the
building
meets
all
of
the
expectations
of
the
neighborhood
of
the
community
and
of
the
heritage
district
plan.
We've
had
many
conversations
with
the
community
association
and
with
councilor
McKenney,
who
is
a
member
of
your
committee
about
this
project,
and
we
look
forward
to
a
favorable
recommendation
of
this
committee
and
moving
forward
with
the
project.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
A
If
not.
Thank
you
so
much
for
your
for
your
delegation.
Thank
you
appreciate
it.
The
public
submissions
are
now
closed.
Does
the
committee
have
any
questions
for
staff
and
I
know
that
member
Brockington
had
expressed
a
interest
in
asking
question
and
of
course,
since
the
ward
councillor
is
here,
councillor
McKinney
I
am
certain
that
we
we
might
hear
from
councillor
McKinney
as
well.
K
J
K
J
As
Robert
architect
on
the
proposal
mentioned,
they
originally
did
come
in
with
a
nine-story
building
in
the
Heritage
that
had
significant
concerns
with
how
that
building
related
to
the
adjacent
building
and
the
district
as
a
whole.
So
we
were
much
more
supportive
of
a
building
at
six
storeys,
which
relates
to
its
immediate
surroundings
and
Incentive
town
in
general,
through
the
through
the
the
center
town
secondary
plan.
It
does
permit
up
to
nine
stories,
but
we
think
that
this
is
a
reasonable
compromise
between
heritage
conservation
and
intensification.
J
K
Okay,
thank
you
and
when
we
receive
this
type
of
proposal,
which
is
within
a
Heritage
Conservation
District
is
the
goal.
When
it
comes
to
the
look
of
the
building
to
be
as
close
as
possible
with
some
of
the
neighboring,
you
know
time
period,
buildings
themselves,
are
you?
Do
you
frown
upon
a
modern
look
or
is
the
goal?
This
is
built
heritage
subcommittee
to
entertain
applications
that
more
or
less
blend
in
with
the
existing
look
of
other
buildings.
K
J
Our
goal
is
not
to
dictate
a
specific
style
of
contemporary
or
maybe
a
more
historicist
sort
of
look.
What
we
have
to
do
is
ensure
that
any
proposal
that
is
submitted
meets
the
applicable
heritage,
policies
or
guidelines.
So
in
this
case
that's
the
center
town
HCD
plan
the
standards
and
guidelines
in
the
center
town
CDP,
which
has
a
guidelines
about
infill.
J
So
we
look
for
that
balance
of
sympathetic,
distinct
and
contemporary,
so
this
one
is
probably
more
compatible
than
than
this
thing,
but
we
ensure
that
if
it
is
that
direction
that
we
look
for
contemporary
elements
as
well,
so
that
it
is
still
of
its
own
time,
so
the
metal
paneling,
the
larger
windows,
the
middle
entrance
is
sort
of
echoes
the
porch.
So
when
I
mentioned
in
my
presentation,
it's
a
modern
interpretation
of
that
flat.
J
D
Yes,
thank
you
chair
and
also
want
to
welcome
you
to
for
the
committee
and
this
chair,
it's
great
to
have
you
here.
I
just
very
quickly
want
to
wrap
up
by
I'm
supportive.
This
application
I
think
that
it
is
an
excellent
example
of
what
we
like
to
call.
You
know
gentle
intensification.
If
you
will,
you
know
it
replaces
demolished
home,
but
it's
and
and
when
we
talk
about,
you
know
compatible
yet
distinct,
but
a
year
ago
we
were
having
that
conversation
around.
D
What
was
that
much
more
contentious
application
in
front
of
us
and
it's
you
know
it's
somewhat
subjective.
Obviously,
but
if
you
look
at
this
building
and
its
surrounding
environment,
you
know
center
town
really
is
unique
in
its
in
its
you
know:
red
brick
cladding,
it's
flat
roof
its
hu
shaped
buildings,
and
this
one
really
I
believe
is
compatible
with
that
I
appreciate
council
brockington
questions
around.
Why
not
a
bit
more
height?
You
know
we
do
want
intensification,
but
this
is
a
narrow,
a
lot
and
I
think
that
you
know
what
we've.
D
What
we've
landed
on
here
really
does
fit
well
into
into
this
streetscape,
and
it
doesn't
detract
from
the
building
across
the
street
on
film
or
the
PSAC
building.
So
it's
you
know
it
is.
It
is
compatible
with
adjacent
buildings
and
and
the
overall
heritage
context
of
center
town,
so
I'm
very
happy
to
to
support
it,
and
it's
said
we'll
go
through
planning
committee
with
very
minor
zoning
bylaw
amendments
and
expect
that
expect
it
to
pass
there
as
well.
So
thank
you.
Everyone.
A
A
This
report
will
be
presented
to
Planning
Committee
on
June
25th
2020.
Our
next
item
number
four:
is
the
designation
of
860
colonel
by
drive
under
part
4
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act.
Can
staff
please
provide
an
overview
of
this
report.
I
will
then
ask
that
members
of
the
public
make
their
submissions
after
the
presentation.
F
Good
morning,
mr.
chair
members
of
the
committee,
the
report
before
you
today
is
related
to
the
potential
designation
of
860
colonel
by
drive
under
part
4
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act.
As
you
may
remember,
from
the
staff
report,
staff
are
recommending
that
the
committee
recommend
that
council
not
proceed
with
the
issuance
of
a
notice
of
intention
to
designate
this
property
next
slide.
Please
860,
colonel
by
drive,
is
located
on
the
south
side
of
the
Rideau
Canal
along
colonel
black
drive,
an
old
Ottawa
South.
F
You
can
see
the
building
and
its
location
shown
here
outlined
in
red
with
a
blue
star
next
slide.
Please
this
image
gives
you
a
sense
of
the
block.
It
is
located
between
Rosedale
and
Grosvenor,
and
there
are
a
series
of
historic
buildings
in
this
area
as
well
as
some
contemporary
buildings.
It's
set
back
from
the
Rideau
Canal
by
a
large
landscape
buffer
and
it's
at
the
top
of
a
small
hill.
Next
slide,
please,
the
house
at
860,
colonel
buy
drive,
was
constructed.
F
Circa
1908
1909
is
a
two
and
a
half
story,
red
brick
house
with
a
limestone
foundation
and
has
a
hip
roof
and
the
front
facade
features
a
two-story
rectangular
bay
with
gable.
The
gable
includes
bridge
board
and
returned
eaves
with
a
round
headed
window.
The
large
rectangular
windows
features
stone,
sills
and
simple
brick
loose
waters.
The
front
facade
of
the
house
also
features
a
two-story
porch
with
round
columns,
dental
cornice
and
capped
with
a
pediment.
It
has
deep
overhanging,
eaves
and
a
red
brick
chimney.
There's
a
one-story
addition
at
the
rear
of
the
building.
F
As
I
just
mentioned,
the
building
is
located
on
the
crest
of
a
small
hill
adjacent
to
the
Rideau
Canal.
It
is
set
back
well
from
colonel
by
dr
viola
and
the
canal
by
a
large
landscape
buffer
circuits
history.
The
house
was
occupied
by
a
series
of
civil
servants
of
this
as
people.
The
development
of
these
larger
houses
facing
the
Rideau
Canal
and
the
driveway
dug
demonstrates
expanding
upper-middle-class
interested
in
the
cities
next
slide.
Please.
F
This
slide
provides
some
background
on
the
history
of
site
history
for
860
Colonel
I
Drive
in
2012.
The
previous
property
owner
proposed
demolition
and
new
construction
on
this
site
staff
raised
concerns
with
the
compatibility
of
the
proposed
building
with
the
established
character
of
the
neighborhood,
the
previous
owner
previous
property
owner,
entered
into
an
agreement
with
the
city
to
work
with
heritage
staff
to
reline
refine
the
design
to
make
it
more
compatible.
F
This
proposal
never
ended
up
proceeding
in
2013
working
with
the
old
Ottawa
south
community
association,
Section
60
of
the
zoning
bylaw
was
added
to
Carl
by
drive
between
Bank
Street
Bronson
Avenue.
The
role
of
the
Heritage
overlay
is
to
ensure
that
new
development
is
compatible
through
appropriate
form
scale
and
massing.
The
Heritage
overlay
overlay
does
not
protect
buildings
from
demolition
and
buildings
that
are
subject
to
the
Heritage
overlay
have
no
status
under
the
interior,
Heritage
Act
in
2017.
F
Through
the
city's
heritage
inventory
project,
the
property
was
added
to
the
Heritage
Register
as
a
non
designated
listed
property
in
2019.
The
current
property
owner
made
an
application
to
the
committee
of
adjustment
for
minor
variances
to
permit
a
new
building
on
the
site
committee
of
adjustment.
Granted
some
of
these
variances,
the
owner,
appealed
the
decision
of
the
committee
of
adjustment
to
the
land
use
planning,
Appeals
Tribunal,
who
issued
a
decision
granting
the
requested
variances
in
February
of
2020
in
April
of
2020.
F
F
This
is
the
first
report
of
this
type
that
staff
have
provided
to
the
built
heritage
subcommittee
as
a
result
of
our
updated
Heritage
Register.
As
you
heard
in
the
earlier
report
regarding
updates
to
the
register,
the
council
approved
process
is,
as
shown
in
this
slide.
You
may
remember
that,
in
order
to
demolish
a
property
listed
on
the
register,
the
property
owner
must
provide.
The
city
was
at
least
60
days
notice
in
advance
of
obtaining
a
demolition
permit.
F
The
property
owner
submitted
the
completed
form
for
buildings
on
the
Heritage
Register
on
April
27th
2020
staff
acknowledged
receipt
of
the
notice
and
the
60
day
timeline
required
under
the
OHA
started.
Staff
are
familiar
with
the
property
and
had
provided
comment
throughout
the
planning
process
that
they
did
not
believe.
The
building
was
a
strong
candidate
for
designation
and
would
not
be
initiating
the
designation
process
unless
requested
by
council
staff,
followed
the
council
approved
process
by
advising
both
councilor
Menard
and
chair
king
of
the
proposed
demolition
and
advised
both
councillors.
F
That
staff
would
not
be
proceeding
with
a
designation
report
unless
requested.
Councilmen
are
requested.
A
report
des
regarding
designation
of
this
property
as
a
result
of
the
process
process
staff
prepared
the
report
before
you
today
with
our
professional
recommendations
regarding
designation
of
this
property.
The
next
steps
in
this
process
are
consideration
of
this
report
by
the
built
heritage
subcommittee
and
City
Council.
If
council
concurs
with
staff,
the
designation
process
will
not
be
initiated
and
a
demolition
permit
may
be
issued
any
time
after
June
27th.
F
I'm
now
going
to
give
you
an
overview
of
our
analysis
of
the
property
and
what
how
we
determined
that
we
do
not
feel
that
it
is
a
strong
candidate
for
designation
next
slide.
Please
Ontario
regulation
on
906,
which
is
attached
as
document
to
to
the
staff
report.
It's
used
to
evaluate
properties
for
designation
under
part
four
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act.
The
regulation
states
that
quote
a
property,
may
be
designated
under
Section
29
of
the
Act
if
it
meets
one
or
more
of
the
criteria.
F
It
is
important
to
note
here
that
the
regulation
does
not
say
that
a
municipality
must
designate
a
property
that
meets
the
criteria
only
that
in
a
heritage,
planning
staff
have
reviewed
860
kernal
by
using
Ontario
regulation
all
906
and
have
determined
that
it
narrowly
meets
the
criteria
for
design
and
physical
value.
As
a
representative
example
of
Edwardian
classicism,
the
property
does
not
meet
the
criterion
for
historical
or
associative
value,
as
it
does
not
have
direct
associations
with
theme,
event,
person
or
entities
that
is
significant
to
the
community.
Further,
the
architect
of
the
building
is
unknown.
F
Finally,
staff
found
that
the
property
meets.
The
contextual
criterion
is
one
of
a
group
of
houses
along
the
Rideau
Canal
in
Ottawa.
So
one
of
the
goals
of
the
city's
heritage
program
is
to
tell
Ottawa
stories
through
our
historic
buildings
and
to
provide
meaningful
touchstones
to
our
past
staff.
Strongly
feel
that
the
story
told
by
this
building
is
well
represented
through
the
cities
listed
and
designated
buildings.
I
just
want
to
show
a
few
contextual
examples
on
the
following
slides.
This
is
not
meant
to
be
an
exhaustive
analysis
of
our
heritage
register.
F
F
Sorry
excuse
me
comparable
examples
of
buildings
listed
on
the
city's
Heritage
Register
in
Ottawa,
East,
End,
old,
Ottawa
Seth,
they
are
architectural,
is
similar
to
860
colonel
by
a
search
of
our
Heritage
Register
database
shows
that
an
old,
otherwise
South
and
East
there
are
over
40
residential
brick
buildings
that
are
two
and
a
half
stories
with
gable
base
of
these
40
buildings.
20
of
them
have
been
classified
as
Edwardian
class
assistants
style
next
slide.
Please.
F
There
are
also
comparable
properties
that
are
designated
under
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act.
On
this
slide,
you
can
see
the
Burpee
house
at
22,
read
of
Terrace,
which
is
designated
under
part
four
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act
in
Park
fruits,
design
value
as
an
example
of
the
Edwardian
classicist
style
in
the
Glebe.
The
Clement
estate,
East
Heritage,
Conservation
District,
is
designated
under
part
five
of
the
Act
in
part,
from
the
examples
of
Edwardians
classicist
architecture.
These
two
examples
are
along
leave.
Avenue
next
slide.
Please,
the
properties
on
this
side
are
not
necessarily
comparable.
F
Stylistically
with
860
Colonel
buy,
but
all
of
them
represent
the
types
of
houses
constructed
along
the
canal
in
the
19th
and
early
20th
centuries.
The
first
photo
is
six
McLeod
Street,
which
is
a
substantial
property
constructed
in
the
Edwardian
style.
At
the
intersection
of
McLeod
Street
and
the
Queen
Elizabeth
driveway,
the
house
is
oriented
advantage
of
the
driveway
and
the
canal.
The
second
photo
is
echo
Bank
at
700,
echo
Drive,
while
it
was
constructed
much
earlier
than
860
Carl
by
its
contextual
value,
is
similar
in
terms
of
its
location
overlooking
the
canal.
F
The
final
photo
on
this
slide
is
the
landmark
queel
Terrace,
an
exuberant
Victorian
row
house,
located
along
Queen
Elizabeth
driveway
separated
from
the
canal
by
a
landscape
buffer.
All
of
these
houses
are
stronger
representations
of
the
contextual
values
associated
with
860
Colonel
buy
drive
next
slide.
F
Please
Kelso
Renard
is
aware
of
the
recommendations
of
this
report
and
I
see
that
he
is
here
on
the
call
today
and
staff
notified
both
the
Ottawa
South
Community
Association
and
heritage
Ottawa
of
the
proposed
designation
I
know
that
the
committee
has
received
several
submissions
from
community
members
in
Ottawa
South.
In
conclusion,
staff
do
not
believe
that
860
Colonel
buy
is
a
strong
candidate
for
designation
as
it
narrowly
meets
the
criteria
for
designation.
The
criteria
again
do
not
require
the
municipality
to
designate
a
property
only
that
they
may
designate.
F
Given
the
long
history
of
this
file,
staff
believe
that
it
is
late
in
the
development
process
to
initiate
the
designation
of
this
property,
as
the
owner
has
been
already
been
through
minor
variants
and
elta
proceedings.
So,
in
conclusion,
the
recommendation
is
that
the
built
heritage
subcommittee
recommend
that
council
not
proceed
with
the
issuance
of
a
notice
of
intention
to
designate
under
part
four
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act
happy
to
answer
any
questions
the
committee
might
have
Thank.
A
I
Good
morning,
mr.
chair
and
members
of
the
committee,
we
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
make
representation
and
requests
of
the
built
heritage
subcommittee,
recommend
that
council
not
proceed
with
the
issuance
of
a
notice
of
intention
to
designate
860
colonel
by
tribe
under
the
part
for
the
Ontario,
Heritage,
Act,
I'm,
John,
Stewart
and
I'm.
Here
today.
Speaking
on
behalf
of
the
owner
of
the
property,
shame,
shame
curry,
860
colonel
buy
drive,
I
think
you
could
call
it
a
pattern
book,
Edwardian
classicism,
it's
a
solid
two
and
a
half
story.
I
Red
brick
house
constructed
in
1908
1909,
so
located
on
the
north
edge
of
Ottawa
South,
overlooking
the
colonel
buy
drive,
so
the
property
is
at
a
higher
elevation
and
is
set
back
from
the
edge
of
the
Rideau
Canal
by
a
large,
mature
landscape
buffer
that
includes
colonel,
buy
drive.
The
building
cannot
be
seen
from
the
canal
and
the
only
partial
glimpses
are
available
as
one
moves
along
the
drive.
The
Rideau
Canal
is
at
a
greater
than
30
metre
setback
and
is
not
impacted.
I
The
property
has
been
through
a
series
of
development
approvals
dating
back
to
2012
when
the
building
was
first
proposed
for
demolition.
I
think
remember,
Podolski
mentioned
he
was
part
of
that
process
in
2013.
As
a
result
of
a
zoning
study,
this
section
of
colonel
by
dry
between
Bank
Street
and
Bronson
Avenue,
was
rezone
to
apply
the
Heritage
overlay
under
Section
60
is
only
by
law.
In
2017,
the
property
was
listed
on
the
City
of
Ottawa
Heritage
Register
in
2020
l-pad
overturned
the
2019
committee
of
adjustments
decision
and
grant
a
variance
to
the
Heritage
overlay.
I
The
decision
was
based
partially
on
the
evidence
of
city
staff
statement
at
that
hearing
that
the
department
did
not
have
concerns
with
the
demolition.
Today's
meeting
and
the
report
submitted
by
staff
confirms
the
city's
position.
The
property
was
considered
using
criteria
for
designation
under
Ontario
regulation-
oh
nine,
oh
six
and
concluded
that
is
not
a
strong
candidate
for
destination.
This
assists.
This
assessment
is
consistent
with
City
star's
previous
indication
that
there
was
no
intention
to
initiate
the
designation
process
for
this
property.
I
This
has
been
an
active
file
since
2012
requiring
a
public
process
culminating
in
an
appearance
before
the
tribunal,
where
my
client
was
encouraged
to
abandon
its
plans
for
a
semi
detached
dwelling
in
favor
of
a
single
detached
home.
The
Heritage
overlay
accomplished
what
it
was
meant
to
accomplish,
because
public
review
criticism,
commentary
and
revision
of
plans.
I
The
proposed
dwelling
has
been
designed
by
the
firm
of
Hoban
architects
in
a
careful
and
sensitive
manner,
and
it's
a
permitted
use
of
the
property.
This
is
a
purchase,
prestigious
Street
that
is
composed
of
an
eclectic
mix
of
architectural
styles
and
built
forms.
The
proposal
will
result
in
the
a
new
home
that
is
responsive
to
and
an
extension
of,
the
high-end
property
nature
of
this
residential
area.
In
this
case,
the
Hoban
esque
built
form
is
an
established
part
of
the
character
of
the
neighborhood.
I
In
fact,
the
design
elements
of
the
proposed
dwelling
are
very
similar
to
that
of
the
residential
structure
located
on
the
abutting
property.
Eight
five
eight
colonel
buy
drive
as
well
as
seven
other
properties
along
this
section
of
colonel
buy
drive.
In
conclusion,
the
owner
of
the
property
has
diligently
followed.
I
A
G
In
terms
of
the
review
of
the
context,
the
both
the
design
and
contextual
value
values
for
a
value
evaluated
under
regulation
or
906
and
you've
demonstrated
clearly
that,
in
terms
of
the
design
value
of
the
Edwardian
classicist
example,
the
context
within
the
city
or
larger
areas
there
that
you
know
there
are
other
excellent
examples.
But
my
question
is:
within
the
zoned
heritage
overlay
itself,
along
colonel,
buy
drive
between
Bank
and
Bronson.
That
context
are
there
examples
of
this
design
type.
F
F
There
are
a
variety
of
houses
along
this
stretch
on
both
sides
of
the
canal
within
the
heritage
overlay
that
have
been
included
on
the
city's
heritage
register
as
non
designated
listings
I'm,
not
aware
of
the
exact
style
of
every
single
one,
but
in
this
stretch
along
colonel,
buy
I
would
say
this
may
be
the
only
remaining
one.
Many
of
the
buildings
are
more
substantial,
as
you
may
know,
and
I
would
say
there
isn't
a
real
unifying
style
along
here
or
on
the
other
side.
F
G
You
yeah
I
mean
that's
part
of
its
significance
really
and
part
of
its
charm
is
that
all
of
the
buildings
are
not
of
the
type.
But
thank
you
for
answering
that
question
and
clarifying
that
it
remains
the
only
only
organ
classicists
design
in
within
the
overlay
area
and
I
do
appreciate
how
much
time
the
owner
has
put
into
this
started
back
in
2012.
But
the
predecessor
to
our
of
our
current
committee
is
the
is
the
committee
that
actually
recommended
it's.
G
The
old
Ottawa
South
pursue
a
heritage
overlay
for
this
stretch
alone,
colonel
buy
drive
and
so
I
do
feel
compelled
to
ask
a
few
questions
other
about
how
a
city
staff
manage
change
within
peace,
the
Heritage
overlay
area,
and
how
does
the
city
determine
what
level
of
change
an
area
can
absorb
while
still
retaining
its
dominant
sense
of
heritage,
character
of
the
stretch,
which
is
what
part,
which
is
what
the
Heritage
overlay
existing
to
try
and
respect?
I.
G
F
Through
you,
mr.
chair,
the
Heritage
overlay,
as
you
know,
is
a
tool
under
the
zoning
bylaw
that
is
meant
to
protect
things
more
in
the
realm
of
character
in
terms
of
form
scale
massing
height,
as
opposed
to
the
buildings
themselves,
so
the
buildings
themselves.
Obviously
it's
a
disincentive
to
demolition
in
that.
F
If
you
want
to
build
anything
different
than
what's
there,
you
require
minor
variances
from
the
committee
of
adjustment,
but
staff
evaluate
those
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
as
this
is
not
a
Heritage
Conservation
District,
there
are
no
broad
policies
or
and
and
heritage
values
and
attributes
that
have
been
attributed
to
this
area.
So
it's
not
from
a
heritage
perspective,
looked
at
on
a
sort
of
more
broad
scale
perspective,
it's
looked
at
in
terms
of
the
building
itself
and
they
sort
of
form
scale
and
massing
of
the
existing
building
versus
what
is
proposed
as
a
replacement
building.
F
So
it
isn't
a
Heritage,
Conservation,
District
and
it
doesn't
include
it
hasn't,
had
the
research
and
and
analysis
that
would
go
into
a
heritage
conservation
district
plan
in
terms
of
outlining
what
those
heritage
values
are,
what
the
attributes
are
that
we
would
be
trying
to
protect.
So
it
is
a
zoning
tool,
as
opposed
to
sort
of
a
more
detailed
heritage,
conservation
tool.
F
B
Yes,
Thank
You,
chair,
I
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
the
the
issue
of
precedence
on
this
particular
decision
to
designate
or
not
designate
I
know.
Staff
have
indicated
that
it
does
narrowly
need
the
criteria
for
designation
under
design.
However,
they
also
raised
various
blind
circumstances
that
may
or
may
not
have
impacted
this
decision
for
me
going
forward.
If
this
is
a
staff,
as
indicated
one
of
the
more
distinctive
residences
of
this
type,
and
it
is
not
being
designated,
is
this
decision
likely
to
affect
future
decisions
by
setting
any
kind
of
precedent.
F
Thank
you
for
the
question
three
mr.
chair.
Each
each
building
that
is
considered
for
designation
under
par
for
the
Heritage
Act
is
analyzed
for
its
own
on
its
own
merits
and
how
it
meets
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act
Ontario
regulation.
Oh
nine!
Oh
six,
one
of
the
reasons
that
the
committee
is
seeing
this
file
come
forward.
It's
not
that
it's
the
only
one
that
we've
ever
said
no
to
it's.
F
It
is
that
these
decisions
that
are
made
at
the
staff
level
are
usually
left
at
the
staff
level
and
then
reported
through
the
designation
refusals
memo
that
comes
forward
twice
a
year,
and
it's
actually
on
this
agenda
that
we
haven't
had
any
until
now
for
this
year.
So
normally,
unless
requested
by
the
ward
councillor
the
chair
of
the
committee,
these
reports
don't
come
forward
in
terms
of
precedents.
A
D
F
D
Okay,
so
what
is
the
difference
between
the
decision?
This
staff
recommendation
named
today
as
opposed
to
2019
on
the
Heritage
overlay?
Well,
what
is
it
yeah,
I
guess
what
I
know
what
I'm
getting
at
is
I,
just
wonder
if
the
decision
would
have
been
different.
Had
this
property
been
designated
under
part,
four
I
may
be
I'm
asking
you
to
speculate
on
that,
but.
F
D
H
Very
much
chair
and
again
just
wanted
to
welcome
you
to
the
committee.
Congratulations
on
the
new.
The
new
position,
so
I
did
want
to
say
that
there
were
several
submissions
on
this
building,
but
on
the
website
a
lot
of
the
delegations
that
we're
going
to
come
forward
saw
that
they
could
do
either
just
speak
or
write
in,
and
so
that's
why?
You're,
not
seeing
delegations
I'm
just
getting
confirmation
now
through
email,
I,
know,
I,
don't
think!
H
That's
actually
the
case
that
they
can
do
both
but
I'm
getting
a
bunch
of
emails
saying
we
thought
we
could
do
either/or.
So
that's
why
you're
not
seeing
a
lot
of
delegations
here.
I
know,
residents
and
city
staff,
were
you
know
very
hard
to
create
the
Heritage
overlay
in
this
area
and
get
it
passed
by
council
and
city
staff
agreed
with
that
overlay
in
this
area
and
so
I
guess
to
city
staff?
F
F
The
request
was
brought
forward
to
what
was
the
Ottawa
built
heritage,
Advisory
Committee
at
the
time
the
predecessor
to
this
committee,
with
a
recommendation
from
staff
that
we
did,
that
it
did
not
merit
designation.
The
Ottawa
built
heritage,
Advisory
Committee
agreed
with
that
recommendation
from
staff
and
instead
suggested
to
the
community,
who
were
quite
interested
in
protecting
character
along
this
stretch
that
they
explore
other
options,
be
it
a
heritage
overlay
through
the
zoning
bylaw
or
a
Heritage
Conservation
District
under
part.
F
The
interior
Heritage
Act
through
work
working
with
the
community,
and
they
had
a
city
assisted
in
providing
and
planning
consultants
to
help
them
do
a
zoning
study
along
here.
It
was
determined
that
the
Heritage
overlay
was
the
most
appropriate
tool
to
achieve
the
goals
of
the
community
as
opposed
to
a
Heritage
Conservation
District,
which
would
have
much
more
strict
rules
and
policies
and
would
take
a
lot
longer
to
create.
So
that's
sort
of
the
origin
story
of
the
Heritage
overlay.
H
That's
very
helpful,
thank
you
very
much
and
just
to
give
more
context
that
the
reason
why
mr.
chair
I
I
had
requested
this
report
is
because
that's
the
way
our
process
works
is
just
doing
due
diligence
when
there's
a
application
for
demolition.
You
request,
you
can
request
this
and
if
it
doesn't
merit
designation,
but
it
doesn't
come
in
front
of
the
committee
and
so
for
me
as
a
new
counselor.
This
was
something
that
I
know
had
been
far
beyond
me
from
2012-2013.
H
A
lot
of
discussions
about
this,
but
I
hadn't
been
to
Heritage
to
discuss
this
and
I'm
still
getting
a
lot
of
community
many
emails
saying
bring.
You
know
we
need
to
make
sure
we're
discussing
this
from
a
heritage
value
of
contexts,
and
so
that's
why
I
brought
it
forward
based
on
the
process
that
staff
had
laid
out.
I
I
do
want
to
go
into
the
report
a
bit,
because
when
you
look
at
document
it
seems
like
staff
are
saying
this
probably
should
be
designated
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
understand.
H
F
F
So,
as
I
said
in
my
presentation,
a
property
may
be
designated
at
least
one
of
the
criteria.
Each
of
the
criterion
have
sort
of
sub
subsections,
so
the
first
one
is
designer
physical
value.
A
property
can
have
design
physical
value
because
it
is
a
rare,
unique
representative
or
early
example
of
a
style,
type,
expression,
material
or
construction
method
displays
a
high
degree
of
craftsmanship
or
artistic
merit
or
demonstrates
a
high
degree
of
technical
or
scientific
achievement.
F
So
in
the
instance
of
860
colonel
by,
as
you
can
see
on
page
beginning
on
page
12
of
the
staff
report,
we
have
provided
the
analysis
of
its
design
value.
So
we've
said
that,
yes,
it
is
a
representative
example
of
Edwardian
classicism,
which
was
a
style
used
extensively
across
Canada
for
domestic
architecture,
from
the
nineteen
hundreds
till
about
1930.
F
So
we've
selected
yes
on
that
one.
When
we
go
to
the
next
section
under
design
value,
which
is,
does
the
property
to
display
a
high
degree
of
craftsmanship
or
artistic
merit?
We
said
no,
it
is
a
simple
house,
as
the
Heritage
consultant
for
the
property
owner
noted.
It
is
a
typical,
perhaps
pattern
book
Edwardian
classicist
house.
So
we
do
not
think
that
it
displays
a
high
degree
of
craftsmanship.
F
The
third
one
is:
does
it
display
it
demonstrate
a
high
degree
of
technical
or
scientific
achievement?
And
we've
said
no
to
this,
as
it
is
a
typical
house,
and
this
category
is
frequently
used
for
a
very
unique
construction
method,
for
instance
or
bridges,
or
that
sort
of
you
know
sort
of
technical
achievement
in
construction
or
design.
So
then,
if
we
move
on
to
the
second
criteria,
so
of
those
three
sorry
subheadings,
it
meets
one
which
is
as
a
representative
example
of
that
were
named
classicism.
F
The
second
criterion
is
that
the
property
has
historical
or
associative
value,
because
one
it
has
direct
associations
with
a
theme,
event,
belief,
person,
activity,
organization
or
institution
that
is
significant.
It
yields
or
has
the
potential
to
yield
information
that
contribute
the
understanding
of
the
community
or
demonstrates
the
work
of
an
architect
builder,
designer
or
theorist.
That
was
significant.
So
if
we
break
those
down
the
first
one,
which
is,
does
the
property
of
direct
associations
with
a
theme
believed
person
etc.
F
We
said
no.
The
property
was
owned
by
a
variety
of
people
throughout
its
history,
staff
have
researched
them
generally
civil
servants,
business
people
typical
what
we
would
call
upper-middle
class
people
of
the
early
twentieth
century
who
were
moving
into
these
new
suburbs
of
the
city
as
they
were
developed
in
the
early
twentieth
century
community
history.
So
does
the
property
yield
or
have
the
potential
yield
information
that
contributes
to
an
understanding
of
a
community
or
culture?
We've
also
said
no
on
this
one.
It
is
a
again
a
typical
house
of
this
time
period.
F
It
you
know,
is
representative
of
the
of
the
houses
built
in
in
this
area.
During
this
period
of
time,
we
have
I'll
speak
about
contextual
value
in
a
minute,
but
that
we've
we
sort
of
considered
that
under
contextual
value
and
then
thirdly,
the
architect
artist,
building
designer
theorist.
We
is
unknown
for
this
building
and
that
may
be
because
it
could
be
a
pattern
book
house.
F
Sorry,
I'm.
Sorry,
this
is
a
very
long-winded
question
to
answer,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
the
committee
understands
the
detail
and
then
the
third
criterion
under
the
Act
is
contextual
value.
So
the
property
has
contextual
value,
because
it
is
important
in
defining,
maintaining
or
supporting
the
character
of
an
area
it's
physically
functionally
visually
or
historically
linked
to
its
surroundings,
or
it
is
a
community
landmark.
F
F
We've
said
yes,
that
the
property
is
physically
functionally
visually
or
historically
linked
with
surroundings.
As
one
of
a
group
of
large
Edwardian
classicist
houses
between
Rosedale
Avenue
and
vault
Street
in
the
early
20th
century,
located
high
on
the
crest
of
the
hill
to
take
advantage
of
the
use
of
the
Rideau
Canal
and
then
the
third
one
is,
is
the
property
and
landmark
and
we've
said
no
to
this
criterion.
The
house
at
860,
colonel
buy
is
essentially
hidden
from
the
street
through
the
setback,
mature
trees
and
location
on
the
slope.
F
H
H
I
assume
staff
are
aware
of
the
MTB
a
associates
report
on
this
building
that
you've
seen
that
in
the
past,
yes,
okay,
and
that
I
believe
was
done
in
2017
that
Day,
2017
or
2018,
and
so
one
of
the
things
they
say
in
there,
which
which
I
just
like
to
get
staff
comment
on,
is
while
there
may
be
justifications
to
dismantle
an
existing
structure
possessing
heritage
value
to
achieve
other
official
plan
objectives,
including
densification.
This
is
not
a
factor
in
this
case.
H
The
area
of
the
proposed
house
is
larger
than
the
current
structure,
but
the
overall
density
is
actually
being
reduced
as
there
are
less
proposed
occupants.
This
represents
ad
intensification
of
the
property
and
therefore
is
a
less
efficient
use
of
municipal
resources,
and
so,
in
this
case
is,
is
that
the
assumption
that
what
we're
what
we're
gonna
see
on
this
property
after
this
is
actually
a
larger
footprint
building
with
less
densification
and
potentially
I,
believe
there's
apartments
in
the
current
home?
Can
you
just
clarify
that,
for
me,.
F
F
So
I
will
say
that
when
we
looked
at
the
building,
we
looked
at
it
strictly,
as
does
this
building
merit
designation
under
the
Heritage
Act
and
not
sort
of
the
broader
kind
of
intensification
type
things
as
far
as
I
know,
the
proposed
use
and
the
property
owner,
or
their
representative
may
be
able
to
answer
this
better
than
I,
can
is
a
single
unit
and
I'm
not
sure
what
if
there
are
multiple
units
in
the
building
right
now
so
I'm,
sorry,
I,
don't
really
have
an
answer
to
that
question.
That's.
I
The
answer
to
your
question
is
simple:
it's
a
it.
It
was
intended
initially
as
a
as
a
duplex
and
the
owner
withdrew
that
application
and
then,
as
in
in
response
to
the
Heritage
overlay
and
he's
building
a
single-family
home
at
the
moment,
I
believe
there
are
short-term
tenants.
They
they
were
University
students
and,
at
this
stage,
I
think
the
building
is
empty.
H
H
Okay
and
then
in
terms
of
might
just
I
have
one
just
last
question
to
staff
is:
is
around
because
staff
did
a
lot
of
work
on
this
on
this
Heritage
overlay,
the
community
put
a
lot
of
time
into
it
made
sure
they
wanted
to
get
it
right
because
of
these
situations
that
kept
happening
where
they
they
saw
heritage,
value
homes
not
being
kept,
and
so
if
this
property
is
demolished
in
it
and
the
larger
structure
is
built
on
it,
what
what
is
the?
What
is
the
potential
to
further
protect
this
area?
H
F
3
mr.
chair,
in
the
current
situation,
in
terms
of
the
Heritage
overlay
as
I
said,
it's
a
zoning
tool
and
it
doesn't
actually
protect
buildings
themselves.
That
being
said,
there
are
many
buildings
in
this
stretch
that
are
listed
on
the
city's
Heritage
Register
now
under
Section
27
of
the
Act
as
a
result
of
the
Heritage
inventory
project.
If
the
committee
or
council
were
interested
in
further
protecting
this
area,
there
could
be
an
exploration
of
some
other
tools
that
we
have
at
our
disposal,
which
are
a
heritage.
F
Conservation
District,
though
I
I
wasn't
involved
in
the
analysis
in
2011,
but
my
understanding
at
the
time
was
that
it
was
determined
that
that
was
not
appropriate
here,
but
without
doing
for
the
research
I
wouldn't
build
a
comment
on
whether
or
not
it
is,
and
then
the
other
option
of
a
tool
could
potentially
be
what
we
call
a
cultural
heritage,
character
area
which
is
a
tool
in
the
Official
Plan,
which
is
sort
of
like
design
guidelines.
We
have
one
in
Sandy
Hill.
It
has
varying
levels
of
varying
degrees
of
success.
F
It
doesn't
have
the
teeth
of
a
Heritage
Conservation
District,
but
it
would
provide
additional
guidelines
that
property
owners
would
be
subject
to
if
they
were
going
to
demolish
and
rebuild,
but
it
wouldn't
necessarily
still
wouldn't
protect
from
demolition.
So
really
the
only
tool
to
protect
from
demolition
is
is
designation
of
the
reject.
E
As
part
of
the
package
that
we
received,
we
did
not
receive
any
information
on
the
future
development
or
the
report
from
MTB
a,
but
my
understanding
is
that's
not
newly,
like
that's
not
really
to
be
considered.
Today
we
were
just
independently,
considering
whether
to
designate
or
not
designate
the
property.
So
I
don't
know.
I
just
wanted
to
get
some
clarity
on
that.
F
Yes,
that's
correct
three
or
mr.
chair
that
the
issue
before
the
committee
today
it
has
nothing
to
do
with
the
new
development
that
is
outside
of
the
committee's
purview.
It
has
already
been
approved
by
the
land,
use
planning,
Appeals
Tribunal.
So
what
is
before
the
committee
today
is
whether
or
not
this
building
should
be
designated
under
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act.
G
Eric
keeps
muting
me.
This
is
just
a
comment
for
my
colleague
member
Conforti.
Just
if
you
are
interested
in
the
MTB
a
a
report
which,
in
fact
is
dated
august
2019,
it
was
included
with
the
comment
letter
that
came
in
from
the
ottawa
south
community
association.
They
included
the
report,
but
it
was
definitely
written
as
part
of
the
community's
presentation
to
elpac.
G
A
Thank
You
vice-chair
Quinn
and
I
did
have
if
there
are
no
other
questions.
I
did
have
a
few
questions
to
staff.
One
being
around.
This
style
of
Edwardian
classism
being
well
represented
in
buildings,
are
either
designated
subjected
to
requirements
of
the
Heritage
overlay
or
listed
on
the
Heritage
registry
throughout
the
city.
I
was
just
curious.
I
know
that
there
might
not
be
other
examples
of
this
building
in
this
exact
heritage
overlay.
But
I
was
just
wondering
if
you
could
speak
to
the
potential
of
this
type
of
style
of
building
in
the
general
area.
F
Sure,
as
I
showed
in
my
presentation,
this
is
quite
a
common
building
style
of
issues.
Very.
It
was
used
a
lot
throughout
Ottawa,
particularly
this
sort
of
two
and
a
half
story
of
a
birthday,
and
as
I
mentioned
in
the
presentation
just
within
ottawa,
south
and
east,
we
did
a
search
of
our
heritage
register
database.
There
are
over
40
buildings
with
that
sort
of
same
two
and
a
half
story
form
with
a
gable
bay
and
and
of
those
forty
about
twenty
of
them
are
classified
as
Edwardian
classicist.
F
Unfortunately,
for
our
designated
buildings,
we
don't
have
the
same
sort
of
database
that
I
can
sort
of
search
for
Edwardian
classicism.
So
it's
based
on
our
own
knowledge,
which
is
why
I
showed
a
couple
of
examples
there
of
typical
buildings
that
look
very
similar
to
to
the
one
we're
looking
at
today,
one
at
20
to
read
of
terrorists
in
your
ward,
chair,
King
and
two
others
on
Clement
Avenue,
also
in
in
Council
Menards
weren't,
so
I
guess
I.
F
A
F
Yes,
mr.
chair,
we
have,
through
the
heritage
inventory
project
we've
created
a
database
of
over
about
3,000
listed
buildings
and
common
sort
of
tombstone
data
has
been
collected
on
every
single
one,
which
is
like,
for
instance,
cladding
material,
roof
style
number
of
stories,
architectural
style.
So
we
have
that
for
our
listed
buildings,
but
it
is
something
that
I
think
over
time.
F
We
would
like
to
build
for
our
designated
properties,
but
it
is
a
very
big
job
because
we
have
four
thousand
designated
properties
and
we
have
a
lot
of
that
data,
but
it's
not
sort
of
codified
in
a
searchable
database.
So
it's
a
it's
kind
of
a
bringing
us
into
the
21st
century
project,
but
right
now
we're
not
there.
We
just
have
to
kind
of
use
our
own
memory.
A
Thank
you
for
that,
and
they
think
that
the
maximal
number
of
tools
that
we
could
bring
to
this
situation
would
be
would
be
helpful.
So
that's
why
I
asked
a
question
and
whether
that
could
potentially
be
done
in
the
future.
The
last
question
I
had
concerned
I,
guess
the
historical
or
the
associated
value.
How
much
does
that
factor
into
the
decision
or
the
recommendation?
Sorry
that
you
are
bringing
to
us
two
subcommittee
I'm
just
wondering
if
you
could
speak
to
that.
F
F
A
B
A
Thank
you.
So
this
report
was
scheduled
to
go
to
Council
on
June
24th
2020,
but
it
will
go
to
planning
based
on
this.
This
vote
any
in-camera
items
noting
that
none
were
submitted.
We
now
move
to
information
previously
distributed.
The
committee
has
received
two
memos,
one
on
designation,
refusals
2020
and
one
providing
an
update
on
bill,
108,
more
homes,
more
choices,
Act.
These
memos
have
been
listed
on
the
agenda.
If
there's
a
need
to
discuss
these
items,
that
would
require
a
vote.
A
A
If
there
are
no
increase,
then
we
will
move
on
to
other
business
zoning
bylaw
amendment
and
site
plan
control
proposal,
summary
35
and
37
William
Street
and
62
York
Street.
There
is
a
planning
circulation
on
the
agenda
which
was
distributed
to
members
prior
to
the
meeting.
Members
of
the
public
had
the
opportunity
to
comment
through
DevOps
on
ottawa
CA
a
related
heritage.
Application
was
heard
at
the
subcommittee
in
february
2020.
Is
there
any
other
business.