►
From YouTube: Built Heritage Sub-Committee - Tuesday, August 11, 2020
Description
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas.
A
A
You
will
find
the
raised
hand
button
at
the
bottom
of
your
zoom
window
for
those
calling
in
please
press
star
9.
To
raise
your
hand,
the
committee
coordinator
and
I
will
be
watching
for
those
cues,
the
usual
5
minute
speaking
limit
will
apply.
Members
are
also
reminded
to
submit
any
motions,
visual
supports
or
declarations
of
interest
in
writing
to
the
coordinator
at
their
earliest
convenience.
A
C
B
A
B
A
C
C
C
C
C
The
two
houses
to
the
east
in
the
top
photo
on
the
right
represent
mid
to
late
20th
century
construction,
which
developed
about
the
same
time
as
189
stanley,
but
much
later
than
the
rest
of
the
historic
subdivision,
and
that's
slightly
likely
due
to
the
rail
line
that
ran
along
the
rear
of
these
lots.
As
you
can
see
in
the
1928
aerial
photo
on
the
left
next
slide,
please
here's
another
photo
of
the
north
side
of
stanley
avenue
across
the
street
and
to
the
east.
C
C
C
Next
slide,
please.
So
these
are
the
east
and
west
elevation
the
sides
of
the
buildings
again,
both
buildings
will
essentially
match
each
other
next
slide
in
terms
of
landscaping.
The
proposal
does
require
some
alteration
to
the
existing
property.
The
plan
on
the
left
shows
the
existing
with
the
red
circles,
noting
three
trees
that
require
removal,
and
these
trees
are
either
smaller
in
poor
condition
and,
as
shown
on
the
proposed
landscaping
plant
to
the
right,
these
will
be
replaced
with
new
trees.
C
Additional
landscape
changes
include
the
removal
of
the
existing
driveway
to
be
replaced
with
two
new
narrow
walkways,
which
are
very
typical
for
the
area
as
well
as
new
areas
of
lawn
and
planting.
In
both
the
front
and
rear
yards
next
slide,
so
staff
have
reviewed
this
proposal
against
the
policies
and
guidelines
in
the
new
edinburgh
hcd
plan,
as
outlined
in
the
report
and
have
determined
it
meets
its
intent
and
objectives.
C
C
Although
the
proposal
requires
some
modification
to
the
existing
landscape
staff
are
the
opinion
that
the
green
character
of
the
hcd
will
be
conserved
and
enhanced
by
the
retention
of
the
existing
tree.
The
removal
of
the
driveway
and
the
introduction
of
additional
staff
landscaping
in
both
the
front
and
rear
yards
next
slide.
C
C
A
cultural
heritage
impact
statement
was
prepared
in
support
of
this
proposal
by
commonwealth
historic
resource
management
and
staff.
Concur
with
the
findings
of
the
chis
next
slide
in
terms
of
consultation,
this
project
was
part
of
our
pre-consultation
pilot
program
and
that's
a
new
program,
the
heritage
planning
branch
implemented
last
year.
C
The
word
counselor
heritage,
ottawa
and
the
community
association
were
notified
of
this
application
and
offered
the
opportunity
to
provide
formal
comments,
and
those
have
either
been
included
in
the
report
or
provided
to
you
directly.
Neighbors
within
30
meters
were
also
notified
by
mail
in
advance
of
today's
meeting,
with
an
opportunity
to
comment
next
slide.
C
A
E
E
I
really
don't
have
a
lot
more
to
add
to
mackenzie's
presentation.
I
think
it
was
she's
covered
all
of
the
points,
and
but
I'd
like
to
make
a
couple
of
observations.
Some,
I
think
it's
important
just
having
a
look
at
this
and
the
process
that
we
went
through
as
the
proposed
development
is
contextual
and
fits
into
the
character
of
stanley
avenue,
given
its
location,
backing
backing
on
to
stanley
park.
The
two-story
duplex
duplexes
are
optimum
in
the
terms
of
usability
and
amenity
of
site
functionality.
E
Thank
you
very
much.
The
this
is
a
contemporary
interpretation
of
the
existing
housing
stock
that
is
highly
respectful
of
the
neighborhood
at
a
time
where
there
is
a
very
real
housing
shortage.
This
development
shows
that
density
can
be
provided
at
a
scale
and
a
massing
that
respects
even
the
most
established
neighborhoods,
I'm
pointing
out
here
the
the
the
blue
arrow
off
to
the
left-hand
side.
E
E
This
is.
This
is
an
interesting.
This
is
a
comparison
and
mckenzie
mentioned
the
discussions
that
were
held.
It's
a
comparison
of
the
initial
three-story
flat
roof
design,
and
next
to
that
is
the
the
revised
two
story
and
gable
proposed
proposal.
Illustrates
the
extensive
revisions
undertaken
by
the
developer
to
conform
to
the
guidelines
and
to
retain
the
mature
street
trees
on
the
property,
and
my
comment
here
is
that
the
guidelines
work.
It's
it's
a
very
positive.
Can
I
go
to
the
next
slide?
Please.
E
E
Given
its
position
next
to
the
park,
the
scale
of
the
development,
the
palliative
finishes
and
materials,
the
the
units
will
conform
comfortably
into
the
neighborhood
and
support
the
character,
defining
attributes
of
new
edinburgh
heritage
conservation
district
with
similar
setbacks,
color
palette
and
traditional
front
verandas.
I
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak.
I
I
trust
that
you'll
see
this
as
a
as
a
positive
introduction
into
the
community
and
approve
these.
This
proposal.
A
F
Neca
also
supports
the
statements
contained
in
section
5
of
the
excellent
and
detailed
cultural
heritage
impact
statement
prepared
by
mr
stewart
and
his
firm.
Those
are
the
extent
of
my
comments
for
now.
Mr
chair.
Obviously,
we're
happy
to
answer
questions
but
hope
that
the
committee
will
endorse
the
recommendations
from
staff.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
G
Good
morning,
thank
you
very
much
good
morning,
chair
king
and
to
the
subcommittee
members.
My
name
is
jonathan
blake
and
I
live
at
185
stanley,
which
is
the
residence
directly
beside
the
proposed
development,
and
I
just
I
I
have
one
question
really.
It
boils
down
to
one
question
on
the
the
letter
that
the
city
sent
on
the
27th
of
july
indicates
that
the
number
of
units
will
be
six
units
within
the
two.
G
G
G
Then,
finally,
from
a
cultural
heritage
impact
statement
for
189
stanley
avenue
section
4.1,
it
reads:
the
bylaw
requires
that
when
a
building
is
in
the
overlay
is
removed,
it
must
be
rebuilt
with
the
same
character
at
the
same
scale.
Volume
massing
and
it
says,
volume
again,
I'm
presuming
that
that
might
be
an
error
floor
area
and
in
the
same
location
as
existed
prior
to
its
removal
or
destruction,
and
I
would
put
it
to
you
that
fitting
eight
units
into
this
space
does
not
appear
to
be
consistent
with
the
direction
provided
under
that
bylaw.
G
For
the
massing
and
volume
of
this.
And
if
the
review
is
was
looked
at
and
evaluated
from
the
from
the
perspective
of
six
units,
then
I
think
it
calls
into
question
whether
this
should
be
looked
at
from
and
and
revert
to
the
baseline.
That
may
have
been
presented
to
the
reviewers,
including
yourselves.
G
I
think
that
there's
been
a
lot
of
work
and-
and
I'm
not
opposed
to
the
development,
so
it
and
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
positive
and
I
I
think
it
does
fit
in
to
the
overall
look
and
feel
of
of
of
the
neighborhood.
My
concern
is:
is
that
it's
going
to
dramatically
change
with
the
the
very
large
density
of
having
eight
potential
residences
in
an
area
that
is
actually
quite
small.
I
think
there's
been
some
references
to
the
fact
that
it's
wide
the
lot
is
wide,
but
it's
not
particularly
deep.
A
H
Good
morning,
everybody
thank
you,
mr
chairman,
and
the
committee
for
the
opportunity
to
participate
in
this
in
this
meeting,
and
thank
you
actually.
This
is
I'm
now
realizing
the
this.
This
pre-consultation
pilot
program
has
has
actually
been
a
really
positive
step
forward.
I'm
the
homeowner
and
resident
at
188
stanley
avenue
one
of
the
truly
historical
properties
in
the
in
the
neighborhood
across
the
road
you'll
have
seen
it
in
the
photographs,
the
white
now
stucco
property
on
the
corner
at
stanley
and
kiefer.
So
I'm
pretty
much
directly
opposite.
H
What
will
be
the
development?
I
will
start
by
just
saying
I
echo
the
comments
and
questions
of
of
mr
blake.
I
am
happy
to
have
been
provided
the
the
ability
here
to
see
what
the
original
design
proposal
was
and
commend
the
various
groups
involved
in
changing
the
the
design
so
that
it
now
looks
like
what
it
looks
like
it
certainly
does
seem
to
fit
much
better.
I'm
not
opposed
to
the
development.
I
agree
with
that.
H
We
need
to
be
able
to
densify,
where
possible
and
intensify
the
city
rather
than
spread
just
more
into
very
important
other
lands
around
the
city.
I
do
echo
mr
blake's
questions
around
the
six
versus
eight
and
the
process
with
which
the
various
approvals
were
taken
and
on
the
basis
of
whether
that
was
the
six
or
the
eight
it
sounds
like
it
might
have
been
on
the
six.
So
I
won't
repeat
what
he
said.
As
for
the
design,
as
I
said,
I
actually
think
it
will
fit
very
well.
H
I
think
that
was
done
conscientiously
with
good
effort
and
adaptation
and
willingness
to
listen.
So
I
commend
that.
I
have
a
question
because
it
was,
I
think
miss
kim
had
mentioned
about.
There
will
be
possibly
minor
design
changes
and
those
will
be
delegated.
I
wondered
what
the
design
space
may
have
been
scoped
out
to
be
within
which
minor
design
changes
could
be
taking
place
that
will
be
delegated.
H
Having
lived
in
the
neighborhood
for
25
years
and
in
this
particular
house,
I've
had
it
since
2011
and
actually
moved
out
for
the
csst
construction,
which
is
a
whole
other
issue,
but
I'm
back
it
is.
It
has
been
possible
to
see
how
some
developments
have
started
out
and
have
changed
from
their
original
proposals
and
I'm
not
going
to
go
into
details,
but
so
that
is
something
that
I
and
many
other
residents
of
the
neighborhood
are
are
are
aware
of,
as
as
dynamics
in
a
development
procedure.
H
So
I
wondered
if
somebody
can
inform
about
the
whether
had
there
have
been
discussions
about
the
scope
of
the
design
space
under
which
so-called
designated
minor
design
changes
can
take
place.
If
that
means
they
can
raise
the
height
of
the
building
and
various
other
things
which
I
know
has
happened
in
other
developments
over
the
years
again.
Thank
you
very
much
for
the
time
to
to
to
to
give
my
comments.
I
commend
the
improved
process.
Hopefully
there
were
lots
of
lessons
learned
from
previous
consultations.
H
I
do
note
that
you
know
this
was
a
very
one
minute
left.
Thank
you
one
very
speedy
between
thursday
when
I
received
the
thing
in
my
mailbox
and
today,
as
somebody
who's
not
following
this
is,
I
have
other
things
on
my
plate
these
days.
So
that
was
a
little
quick.
The
timing
in
over
a
weekend
in
august
is
a
little
strange
if
you're
trying
to
trying
to
do
a
consultation.
H
I
also
would
suggest
I
know
that
you've,
given
a
notice
to
those
of
us
who
are
neighbors
but
segmenting,
the
public
with
immediately
impacted
neighbors
in
a
formal
way,
would
would
also
be
something
to
consider
anyway.
That's
I
think,
most
of
what
I
have
to
say.
Thank
you
very
much
for
the
opportunity
to.
I
Thank
you
sharon
good
morning,
everyone
to
staff,
just
a
question
about
the
number
of
units.
Can
you
just
give
or
clarify
the
you
know
the
history
of
what
was
originally
proposed,
how
that
formally
gets
amended,
how
you
go
back
and
recheck
whatever
studies
or
reports?
Tattoo
have
been
done.
I
know
in
the
grand
scheme
of
things
the
number
of
units
is
small,
but
it
has
been
raised,
and
I
want
to
hear
from
you
how
that
gets
cross-checked.
C
C
C
Yes,
thank
you,
mr
chair,
so
that
recommendation
is
pretty
standard
for
for
all
of
our
applications,
as
you
can
imagine,
as
the
working
drawings
sort
of
progress
and
for
for
building
code
purposes,
there
might
be
some
minor
tweaks
that
have
to
be
made
for
code
and
things
like
that.
So
and
obviously
we
would
review
the
building
permit
prior
to
issuance.
C
A
A
As
the
ward
counselor,
I
gave,
I
thought
that
this
was
actually
an
excellent
example
of
replacing
a
non-contributing
building
in
a
heritage
conservation
district
with
appropriate
infill
that
actually
really
does
reflect
the
the
design
and
the
streetscape
of
the
of
the
community.
So
that's
just
a
clarification
in
terms
of
some
of
the
comments
that
I
provided
when
I
was
involved
when
our
office
was
involved
with
the
file.
A
J
Okay,
okay,
so
I
hope
the
presentation
is
up
on
screen
there
in
front
of
you
today
is
the
is
an
alteration
for
the
historic
booth
street
bridge
which
is
designated
under
par
for
the
heritage
act.
There's
a
historic
photo
up
on
screen.
There
next
slide
a
location
map.
The
bridge
is
located
in
the
britain
flats
area
beneath
the
new
brook
street
bridge
just
north
of
albert
street.
J
J
J
J
J
The
bridge
is
owned
by
the
city
of
ottawa.
A
2018
structural
review,
identified
serious
structural
deficiencies
in
the
bridge
and
noted
that
the
center
arch
is
in
better
condition
than
the
two
extensions
the
stone
faces
of
the
east
and
west
extensions
were
reported
to
be
inferior
to
poor
condition
due
to
tracking
swallowing
and
morning
lock,
mortar
loss.
You
can
see
some
of
the
the
condition
on
those
photos
next
slide
again,
just
showing
some
of
the
existing
condition.
J
So
that
brings
us
to
the
proposal
in
front
of
us
today,
which
is
to
remove
the
east
and
west
extensions
to
the
bridge
and
rehabilitate
the
original
central
portion
of
the
bridge
as
a
pedestrian,
cycling,
transportation,
link
for
future
multi-use
pathways.
So,
on
the
site
plan
you
can
see
the
from
the
existing
the
width
to
the
proposed.
It
has
been
narrowed.
J
J
This
is
a
cross
section
of
the
bridge.
You
can
see
again
the
proposed
reduction
in
width.
The
two
extensions
which
are
proposed
removed
were
proposed
to
be
removed,
are
were
added
between
1889
and
1910
and
are
approximately
5.5
meters
in
width
next
slide.
This
is
a
west
elevation
that
shows
what
the
rehabilitated
bridge
will
look
like.
It's
unknown,
whether
the
original
central
arch
and
its
elements,
such
as
the
stone
faces
or
spandrel
walls
or
wing
walls
will
be
intact
or
if
it
was
removed.
J
J
Next
slide
staff
review
the
proposal
using
the
standards
and
guidelines.
The
proposal
conserves
the
heritage
value
of
the
bridge
and
combines
sensitive
rehabilitation
and
restoration
to
restore,
reconstruct
and
protect
this
heritage.
This
heritage
resource
the
bridge
is
part
of
the
larger
ottawa
ottawa
waterworks
complex,
which
was
constructed
in
1872
and
as
such.
Returning
it
to
its
original
dimensions
from
the
period
of
historical
significance,
is
appropriate
next
slide.
A
I
J
B
Hi
ian
izzard
from
infrastructure
service
group,
I'm
here
and
available,
but
I
don't
have
a
great
answer
to
your
question:
that's
the
asset
management
group
that
controls
the
funding
for
for
the
bridges
and
really
sets
the
priorities
on
which
infrastructure
gets
it
gets
treated
next.
Unfortunately,
I
really
don't
have
a
a
good
answer
to
your
question,
with,
with
apologies.
I
A
D
D
Hopefully
it
won't
be
a
bridge
under
a
bridge
under
a
bridge
we'll
stop
building
roadways
at
some
point,
but
this
is
kind
of
a
if
you,
if
you
haven't
been
down
here,
you
can
now
because
you
know
we
built,
we've
built
the
lrt
alongside
of
it.
So
you
know
you
can
go
down.
You
can
tennessee
station
in
around
behind
there.
D
You
can
really
get
a
good
look
now
at
the
at
the
waterway,
at
the
aqueduct
that
those
bridges
that
cross
it
tail
races,
the
white
water
rafting.
Just
you
know
just
a
quick
walk
down
down
the
pathways
and
it's
it's
something
that
is
unique
in
in
in
this
city
that
you
can.
You
know
white
water
raft
right
in
the
middle
of
the
downtown,
the
absolute
downtown
you,
you
are
white
water
rafting.
D
So
if
you
haven't
been
down
there,
if
anybody
hasn't
been
down
there,
I
encourage
you
to
go
as
I'm
speaking,
I'm
thinking
to
myself.
Maybe
that's
a
james
clock
that
we'll
have
to
we'll
have
to
put
together,
but
I
do
I
just
wanted
to
thank
staff
for
the
work
on
this,
and
I
was
really
happy
that
the
recommendation
was
to
repair
rather
than
to
replace
it's
again.
D
These
are
unique,
little
bridges
and-
and
at
some
point
you
know,
as
we
continue
to
develop
this
area,
they
will
be
widely
used
and
people
will
wonder
how
we
ever
let
them
you
know,
go
unused
for
as
long
as
they
did.
But
I
guess
we
can
say
that
for
the
whole
of
the
bretton
flats
really,
but
thank
you
and
yeah.
If
anybody
wants
a
tour,
I'd
be
happy
to
physically
distance
a
tour
with
you
through
through
the
area.
A
G
A
Excellent
carried
this
report
is
scheduled
to
be
presented
to
council
on
august
26
2020
our
next
item.
Our
third
item
is:
application
for
demolition
of
347
gilmore
street,
an
alteration
of
278
and
280
o'connor
street
properties
located
in
the
centertown
heritage
conservation
district
designated
under
part
5
of
the
ontario
heritage
act.
Can
staff
please
provide
an
overview
of
this.
J
J
J
There's
a
map
showing
the
properties
they're
located
at
the
northwest
corner
of
o'connor
and
gilmore
street
next
slide
some
photos
of
the
three
buildings.
These
are
the
first
two.
The
building
on
the
left
is
280
okana
street
and
the
building
with
the
green
canopy
is
to
san
diego
county
street,
which
was
designed
by
the
architect.
Frederick
john
alexander.
J
Both
properties
have
a
high
degree
of
architectural
integrity
and
elaborate
detailing,
and
both
are
proposed
to
be
incorporated
into
the
development
next
slide.
This
is
the
photo
of
the
building
at
347
gilmore,
that's
proposed
for
demolition.
All
three
of
these
properties
were
constructed
circuit
1879
to
1901.
J
The
other
photo
shows
the
south
side
of
the
building
at
280
o'connor
next
slide.
These
are
just
some
photos.
Looking
east
and
west
on
gilmore
street,
with
the
red
rectangle
around
the
subject.
Properties
next
slide
a
detail
showing
o'connor
street.
The
first
photo
with
the
sort
of
high
rise
in
in
the
background
is
the
north
portion
of
gilmore
street.
You
can
see
it
features.
Different
buildings
with
different
construction
dates,
varied
heights
massing
and
architectural
styles,
and
then
the
other
photo
is
the
south
side
of
gilmore
street,
which
is
across
from
the
proposal.
J
That
takes
us
to
the
site
plan
and
the
proposal
that's
in
front
of
you
today,
which
is
to
demolish
the
buildings
the
building,
rather
at
347
gilmore
street,
and
integrate
the
buildings
along
o'connor
street
into
a
new
six-story
building.
The
new
building
will
have
65
residential
units
and
underground
parking.
The
application
will
also
require
an
official
plan.
Amendment
zoning
viola,
amendment
and
site
plan
control.
J
J
The
hatching
illustrates
the
portions
that
will
be
demolished
and
the
portions
that
are
not
hatched
will
be
incorporated
into
the
development.
These
portions
of
the
buildings
will
accommodate
five
apartment
units,
and
the
proposal
also
includes
detailed
restoration
of
the
buildings,
including
the
decorative
wood
trim,
gables
porches
windows
and
brackets
next
slide.
These
are
the
east
and
south
elevations
on
the
o'connor
street
facade.
J
These
are
the
west
and
north
elevations,
showing
the
interior
sides
of
the
building.
The
first
four
stories
are
clad
in
red
brick
with
evenly
spaced
rectangular
window.
The
top
two
stories
are
clad
and
grey
metal
panels
with
large,
with
large
glazing
windows
or
with
large
glazing,
and
the
fifth
and
six
stories
are
stepped
back
from
the
lower
stories
again
on
the
north
elevation.
It
is
a
little
bit
of
discoloration
where
it
might
look
like
it's
metal
paneling,
but
the
proposal
is
for
four
stories
of
red
brick
next
slide.
J
These
are
some
additional
renderings
showing
the
proposal
next
slide.
This
is
the
building
at
347
gilmore
street,
which
is
proposed
for
demolition.
It's
a
vernacular
interpretation
of
the
queen
and
style
queen
and
revival
style,
and
it's
a
category.
Two
building
in
the
hcd
staff
are
recommending
approval
of
the
demolition
of
the
building
at
347
gilmore
street,
because
the
architectural
integrity
of
the
building
has
been
negatively
impacted
by
several
unsympathetic
additions
and
alterations,
including
the
removal
of
the
original
porch.
J
J
Next
slide,
the
proposal
meets
the
centital
htd
plans,
as
it
uses
brick
veneer
as
the
primary
finish,
which
is
a
typical
palette
material
palette
of
center
town.
It
is
contemporary
in
design
and
distinguishable
and
sympathetic
to
the
surrounding
buildings,
notably
through
the
meaningful
retention
of
the
two
heritage
buildings
along
o'connor
street,
its
use
of
red
brick,
material
and
inspiration
of
design
elements
from
nearby
buildings
next
slide
again
to
reflect
the
character
of
the
of
existing
building.
J
J
J
Next
slide,
another
image
showing
building
heights
to
the
north
of
the
property.
You
can
see
a
10
story.
Building
to
the
west,
then
13
stories,
seven
stories,
six
story
to
the
north
staff
believe
that
the
scale
of
the
building
is
appropriate
to
both
the
immediate
surroundings
and
the
hcd
as
a
whole.
Next
slide.
J
The
last
center
down
htv
policy
is
that
the
guideline
rather,
is
that
the
form
of
building
should
reflect
the
u-shaped
and
h-shaped
patterns.
The
proposed
new
building
has
a
plan.
That's
generally
rectangular
in
form,
however,
the
conserved
historic
buildings
along
o'connor
street
will
retain
that
historic
streetscape
and
the
facade
along
gilmore
street
is
again
articulated
by
bays
and
projections
to
help
reflect
the
rhythm
of
the
existing
gilmore
streetscape.
J
J
The
new
edition
conserves
the
heritage
value
of
the
district
and
is
compatible
with
distinguishable
from
and
sympathetic
to,
the
buildings
at
278
and
280
o'connor
street
staff
also
use
the
centertown
cdp
has
part
of
a
review
which
has
guidelines
related
to
infill
in
the
district.
The
proposal
meets
these
guidelines
through
the
use
of
step,
backs
red,
reclining
and
articulation
of
the
facades
through
project
through
projection,
bays
and
canopies.
J
So,
in
conclusion,
staff
believe
the
proposal
meets
the
applicable
heritage
guidelines,
including
the
centertown
hcd
study
and
the
parks,
canada
standards
and
guidelines.
Staff
recommendation
is
to
approve
the
application
to
demolish
347
gilmore
conditional
upon
documentation
of
the
building
approve
the
application
to
alter
the
buildings
at
278
and
280
o'connor,
subject
to
the
condition
of
the
implementation
of
conservation
measures,
which
are
detailed
in
document
13.
J
A
A
K
We
have
put
together
a
brief
presentation
if
you'd
like
we
can
provide
a
bit
more
context
in
terms
of
planning
policy
and
responses
to
heritage
policy,
but
I
would
thank
anne
for
her
detailed
presentation.
I
think
she
covered
a
lot
of
information,
so
we're
also
happy
to
just
respond
to
any
questions
that
the
subcommittee
might
have.