►
From YouTube: Built Heritage Sub-Committee - September 10, 2019
Description
Built Heritage Sub-Committee Meeting - September 10, 2019 - Audio Stream
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas.
A
Good
afternoon,
everyone,
an
unusual
afternoon
meeting
of
the
built
heritage
subcommittee
for
September
10th,
call
the
members
to
order
I'd,
also
like
to
acknowledge
that
Ottawa
is
built
on
the
unceded
territory
of
the
Algonquin
Anishinabe
nation
and
I'd
like
to
thank
the
Algonquin
people
for
their
hospitality.
Srimad,
a
Cellini,
a
la
Vida
wasa,
two
of
servant,
le
12,
no
say
de
la
nación,
Algonquin
Anishinabe,
Asia
tienen,
el
cielo,
marciella
purple
algo
que
posso
no
pitas
hospitality.
A
A
Okay.
The
first
item
on
our
agenda
today
is
new
construction
in
the
Cathedral
Hill
Heritage
Conservation
District
at
412
SPARC
Street.
We
do
have
a
brief
staff
presentation
and
we
also
have
several
delegations
who've
signed
up
to
speak
I
want
to
remind
any
members
of
the
public
who
haven't
yet
signed
up,
there's
a
sign-in
sheet
at
the
door
on
the
side
of
the
gallery
there
and
please
sign
up.
B
B
The
subject
property
is
a
is
a
through
lot
between
Queen
and
SPARC
Street
in
the
Cathedral
Hill
Heritage
Conservation
District,
which
was
designated
in
1989
and
the
subject.
Property
is
also
located
beside
Christ
Church
Anglican
Cathedral,
which
was
designated
in
1977
under
part
four
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act,
the
Cathedral
Hill
Heritage
Conservation
is
the
city's
smallest,
consisting
of
only
eight
buildings
in
2010
windmill
developments,
working
with
the
property
owner,
the
Anglican
Diocese
of
Ottawa
initiated
a
development
plan
for
the
church
own
land.
This
aerial
view
shows
the
development
to
date.
It
includes
the
I.
B
Still
can't
do
that,
though
it
includes
the
21
story:
apartment
building
with
with
townhouses
below
and
a
new
church
hall
at
the
this
is
all
at
the
west
end
of
the
property
and
also
a
semi-detached
structure
that
was
part
of
the
original
district
is
included
at
the
base
of
the
tower
facing
south
towards
Queen
Street.
The
surface
parking
lot
to
the
east
of
the
Cathedral
is
the
site
of
the
proposed
development.
B
B
This
view
shows
the
the
parking
lot
when
viewed
from
the
east
towards
the
21
story.
Condo
building
that
was
built
in
after
the
approvals
in
2011
and
the
Cathedral,
which
is
a
as
I
said,
part
for
building.
It
was
designed
by
Ottawa
architect,
King
arnoldii
and
is
a
very
good
example
of
the
Gothic
Revival
style.
It
is
built
of
local
Nepean,
sandstone
and,
and
it's
so
it
has
its
character.
Defining
elements
facing
sparks
Street
is
the
tower
and
the
steeple.
B
This
is
the
third
time
proposal
for
a
building
on
this
surface.
Parking
lot
has
been
before
built
heritage
subcommittee
or
its
predecessor,
the
Ottawa
built
heritage,
Advisory
Committee,
so
the
previous,
the
first
approval
was
given
in
2011.
It
was
for
an
office
building
both
of
the
previous
approvals
have
been
for
office
buildings
again.
This
shows
an
illustration
of
the
property
at
the
time
of
approval.
B
These
were
all
approved
by
Bill
territory,
subcommittee
planning
committee
and
City
Council
and
heritage
permits
were
issued,
so
this
is
the
first,
the
first
iteration
and
within
a
couple
of
months
it
was
superseded
by
this
this
office
building.
There
are
elements
of
both
of
these
that
have
continued
through
the
current
project,
including
this.
This
version
had
a
curved
front
facade
which
so
it
would
open
up
towards
the
steeple
of
the
of
the
of
the
Cathedral
and
the
previous
version.
B
You
had
a
stone
base
which
echoed
the
stone
of
the
of
the
of
the
Cathedral,
so
these
are
again
four
runners,
but
neither
of
them
were
built.
So
again,
this
properties
designate
under
part
five
and
any
application
and
says
to
alter
designated
here
at
heritage
building.
But
what
I
really
meant
was
to
for
new
construction
and
heritage
district
requires
City
Council
approval.
B
B
So
both
both
groups
raised
issues
regarding
the
first
design
and
and
the
changes
that
were
implemented
due
to
are
due
to
are,
as
a
result
of
our
comments,
were
the
introduction
of
stone
at
the
podium
to
reflect
the
townhouses
of
the
at
the
base
of
the
21
storey.
Building,
the
the
include
the
reintroduction
of
curved
front
facade
the
substitution
of
glass
at
the
southwest
corner
of
the
condo
to
lighten
up
lighten
up
the
building,
to
provide
a
greater
contrast
between
the
steeple
and
and
the
proposed
new
building.
B
But
I
should
also
note
that
another
another
difference
between
the
current
proposal
and
the
initially
approved
applications
were.
It
is
now
roughly
eight
point
five
meters
higher
than
the
previously
approved
buildings.
One
of
the
ways
we
mitigated
this
increase
in
height
was
that
there,
at
the
suggestion
of
the
urban
design
review
panel,
that
upper
penthouses
story,
which
is
amenity
space,
was
made
to
be
much
lighter
to
to
diminish
the
effect
of
the
increased
height.
B
This
is
just
views
from
from
various
vantage
points.
You
see
here
quite
clearly
the
the
curve
and
the
effect
that
it
has
an
opening
up
views
towards
the
cathedral.
This
is
the
view
from
from
the
east,
showing
the
proposed
buildings,
the
21
storey
condominium,
building
that
is
complete
behind
it
and
the
the
green
space
that
you
see
in
front
is
currently
a
surface
parking
lot,
and
it
is
also
zoned
quite
high
for
around
20
storeys
I
think.
So
there
is
a
lot
of
density
on
on
this
block
already.
B
There
were
changes
also
made
at
the
suggestion
of
UD
RP
and
heritage
staff
to
to
make
the
the
the
parking
the
approached
the
parking
garage
and
the
area
above
it
more
compatible
and
more
on
a
scale
with
the
existing
buildings
on
the
site.
This
is
the
the
site
plan.
Just
further
illustrates
the
philosopher's
walk
and
the
treatment
of
the
of
the
public,
the
public
realm
and
ants
Park
Street.
B
This
is
an
elevation
that
shows
the
relative
height
of
the
of
the
the
new
building
and
the
steeple
of
the
existing
Cathedral,
and
here
there
were
have
been
questions.
I
should
add
that
that
there
are
view
playing,
as
we
know,
there
are
protected
views
in
the
City
of
Ottawa.
This
respects
all
protected
views,
the
the
views
for
the
long
views
from
beach
with
cemetery.
B
This
does
not
answer
that,
if
you
plain
and
it
doesn't
it
it's
not,
it
does
not
affect
any
of
the
views
of
Parliament
Hill,
so
these
are
sort
of
befores
and
afters
roughly
of
the
of
the
site.
So
on
the
left,
you
see
here
the
current
view
from
just
over
the
portage
bridge
and
then
on
the
right,
an
artist's
impression
of
the
building
as
it
in
its
in
its
proposed
location
to
the
east
of
the
Cathedral
and
here
again
from
a
farther
view.
B
In
terms
of
consultation,
the
the
usual
process
was
followed.
Heritage
Ottawa
was
notified
of
the
application.
Their
comments
were
received
yesterday
and
were
I
think
circulated
as
part
of
the
package.
Neighbors
within
30
meters
of
the
property
were
notified.
The
center
town
citizens
Community
Association,
was
notified,
as
was
the
ward
councillor.
I
should
also
add
that
this
is
the
subject
of
a
of
a
rezoning
which
will
be
in
front
of
the
Planning
Committee
on
September.
B
There
is
so
our
recommendations
today
are
to
approve
the
application
to
construct
a
new
building.
We
recommend
this
because
the
building's
design
and
simple
expression
creates
a
background
building
that
complements
the
cathedral
and
allows
it
continued
to
be
adornment
dominant
element
of
the
of
the
Heritage
Conservation
District.
The
Queen
Street
portion
of
the
project
respects
the
character
of
the
streetscape,
and
the
the
improvements
to
the
public
realm
through
philosopher's
walk
will
not
only
enhance
the
immediate
setting
of
the
of
the
proposed
building,
but
also
the
the
Heritage
Conservation
District
as
a
whole.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
You
Sally
we're
gonna,
come
back
to
staff
after
delegations
for
questions
and
comments.
I
do
want
to
invite
up
delegation.
We
have
a
three
people
representing
the
applicant
Carl
Bray
Cheri
Edwards
and
Victoria
Lucas
from
Bray
Heritage,
CSW,
Landscape,
Architects
and
Reichman
seniors
housing
respectfully,
and
they
have
a
short
presentation
as
I
understand
it
and
then
there'll
be
an
opportunity
for
committee
members
to
ask
any
questions
to
the
applicant.
C
C
C
It
was
apparent
that
unless
you
curved
the
facade
you
weren't
going
to
be
able
to
see
the
cathedral
until
you
were
practically
on
top
of
it,
so
that
whole
notion
of
modeling,
the
massing,
became
an
integral
part
of
the
overall
scheme,
but
I
want
to
step
back
a
little
further
and
just
say:
what's
the
point
of
conservation
here,
it's
not
just
about
bricks
and
mortar
the
church,
the
cathedral,
the
diocese,
continues
to
own
these
properties.
This
is
part
of
their
ongoing
survival.
C
If
you
want
to
put
it
that
way,
and
even
more
so
it's
the
basis
for
not
just
keeping
the
cathedral
and
all
its
activities
going.
It's
also
the
basis
for
some
of
the
outreach
activities
that
the
cathedral
in
the
diocese
a
whole
will
do
in
the
Greater
Ottawa
community,
affordable
housing,
various
aid
programs.
That
kind
of
thing.
So
unusually,
it
is
part
of
a
much
longer
legacy.
C
It's
not
just
about
individual
property
development
and
then,
in
terms
of
the
use,
the
change
from
commercial
to
a
seniors
residence
I
think
offers
many
many
benefits
and
again
fostering
what
a
church
does.
So
you
have
a
volunteer
base.
Quite
frankly,
in
a
retirement
home
you
have
a
number
of
synergies
that
you
wouldn't
have
necessarily
with
a
commercial
operation.
C
It's
a
heritage,
Conservation
District
by
being
one
of
the
earliest.
It
is
very
light
on
specifics
and
and
that's
the
discussion
at
Sally
and
I
and
others
have
had
throughout
the
long
process.
How
do
you
put
in
appropriate
development
in
a
heritage
conservation
district
that
is
so
vaguely
defined,
and
so
that's
another
reason
why
it
was
important
to
have
these
discussions
from
the
beginning
and
throughout
the
process
and
I'm
very
pleased
to
see
that
that's
been
the
case.
It
is
a
part
of
the
world.
C
That's
been
identified
for
higher
density
development
and
you,
as
you
can
see
from
from
some
of
the
illustrations,
I'll
just
move
through
them
very
quickly.
You've
already
seen
them
before,
but
the
primary
thing
to
keep
in
mind
and
look
at
this
one,
particularly
you
will
be
seeing
this
against
a
number
of
other
higher
buildings,
and
so
one
of
the
ways
to
make
the
church
stand
out
is
programmatic,
and
this
is
much
of
what
I've
been
talking
about
previously,
but
also
visually.
C
So
the
curved
facade
is
part
of
it,
carrying
a
datum
of
a
stone
podium
and
keeping
the
top
of
that
podium
consistent
with
the
datum
line
of
the
lower
part
of
the
Cathedral,
and
also
the
townhouses
trying
to
keep
the
Queen
Street
side
with
the
the
datum
of
the
residential
buildings
on
that
side.
So
those
are
ways
of
making
it
fit
in
also,
of
course,
there's
been
a
great
deal
of
emphasis
on
the
public
realm.
C
This
Sally
pointed
out
and
here's
the
case
where
you
want
to
make
this
part
of
the
world
come
alive
year
round
and
throughout
the
day,
and
so
the
types
of
synergies
that
I
mentioned
previously
are
made
as
possible
as
much
as
possible,
with
the
streetscape
layout,
with
the
making
very
attractive
linkages
between
the
two
streets,
making
as
much
public
space
in
front
of
the
cathedral,
linking
it
to
the
front
of
the
retirement
home
and
the
residential
on
the
other
side.
So
having
a
part
of
SPARC
Street.
C
That
really
is
an
extension
of
the
public
realm
and,
to
some
extent,
complements
what
happens
on
the
other
side
of
the
retaining
wall
down
at
the
garden
of
the
problem.
He
wraps
up
mr.
bring
my
last
slide
here.
We
live
in
Canada,
so
much
of
the
time
the
cathedral
is
going
to
be
seen
at
night
and
the
way
the
building
has
been
designed
and
the
way
that
the
public
sphere
works
with
it
will
help
the
cathedral
stand
out
and,
as
you
can
see
in
this
illustration,
the
Cathedral
is
proud
in
in
the
proposed
design.
C
A
A
D
First
of
all
wanted
to
say
that
I
am
very
satisfied
with
what
has
happened
so
far
with
the
Cathedral
Hill
redevelopment.
The
preservation
of
heritage
facades
along
Queen
Street
was
sensitively
handled
the
preservation
of
Roper
house
on
Bronson
Avenue
and
the
opening
up
of
green
space,
maintaining
and
opening
up
a
green
space,
both
sides
of
it
and
the
medium
scale
podium
for
the
townhouses
on
SPARC
Street.
So
all
of
those
things
have
worked
very
well.
I
am
also
very
cognizant
of
the
issues
for
adaptive,
reuse
of
Church
properties.
D
I've
been
involved
in
many
of
those
discussions
within
the
Anglican
Church
of
which
I
am
a
member
and
but
I
know.
I
do
have
a
great
deal
of
respect
for
Barry
Hoban
as
architect
and
also
for
the
reichman's
as
the
operators
of
such
seniors
residences.
My
father
spent
his
last
five
years,
very
happily
in
a
Reisman
residence
and
I'm,
familiar
with
with
other
properties
that
they
have
operated
in
Toronto
and
some
Katherine's.
D
Some
of
them
are
also
matters
for
zoning,
which
will
be
heard
separately
at
Planning
Committee,
but
when
this
building
was
originally
proposed,
as
you
know,
it
was
lower
height
12
instead
of
18
stories.
Now,
although
the
residential
stories
have
been
reduced,
somewhat
I
make
the
height
difference
still
twelve
point
three
meters
higher
than
before.
Now
that's
more
than
mr.
Coates
said,
but
nevertheless,
there
is
a
there
is
an
increase
in
height,
which,
in
close
proximity
to
the
cathedral,
spire
does
have
an
impact.
D
Another
impact,
though,
is
that
the
previous
design
was
designed
with
a
uniform
and
very
calm
background.
The
west
wall
of
the
office
tower
was
intended
to
provide
a
rather
plain
backdrop
with
no
horizontal
lines,
and
only
some
vertical
slit
windows
against
which
the
spire
would
be
viewed
as
as
a
fairly
prominent
feature.
The
new
proposal
seems
to
have
a
much
more
highly
articulated
west
wall,
even
though
there
is
a
portion
that
it
still
incorporates
stone.
It's
also
punctured
by
a
large
number
of
windows
and
there
are
a
lot
of
horizontal
lines
to
that
world.
D
So
I
think
perhaps
a
more
thought
could
be
given
to
that
wall
as
it
affects
the
important
views
of
the
spire
from
Wellington
Street
and
the
Portage
bridge
as
you
approach
from
from
the
West.
Certainly
the
continuation
of
the
curvature
of
the
building
to
provide
a
reasonable
view.
As
you
approach
long
sparc
street
from
the
east
is
good,
the
last
point
isn't
really
a
heritage.
D
Remember
the
Cathedral
is
a
citywide
institution
that
draws
its
membership
from
right
across
the
city
and
also
as
a
venue
for
national
events
as
the
National
Military
Cathedral,
and
also
other
public
events
such
as
concerts
and
so
on.
So
I
have
a
concern
about
parking,
which
is
more
of
a
concern
for
the
rezoning
of
this
site
because,
as
it's
a
residential
building
for
seniors,
first
of
all,
the
absolute
number
of
parking
spaces
has
been
reduced
from
what
was
proposed
for
the
office
building
and,
secondly,
those
spaces
will
not
be
vacant
evenings
and
weekends.
D
A
E
Thanks
for
taking
the
time
to
consider
my
comments,
I'll
make
them
quite
brief.
I
think
we've
already
heard
about
parking
is
an
issue
and
I've
got
I'm
gonna
leave
you
with
some
pictures
of
what
a
typical
Sunday
looks
like
in
this
neighborhood
parking
is
more
than
an
issue
you're
going
to
lose
30
to
50
spots
that
are
currently
existing
right
now.
E
E
If
we
have
the
problem
of
parking
that
we
do
now
in
the
future,
a
fire
truck
will
not
be
able
to
get
into
our
lane
way
at
the
condo
to
be
able
to
get
in
and
do
what
they
need
to
do.
I
would
guess
that
that
would
be
the
same
for
the
retirement
residence,
which
I
would
think,
is
a
more
critical
issue.
So
that's
the
issue
that
I
wanted
to
bring
up
when
we
bought
in
2016,
just
just
as
an
aside
as
how
this
impacts
me.
E
Personally,
when
we
bought
in
2016,
we
were
aware
of
the
plan
to
go
to
a
certain
height
and
we
actually
consciously
bought
the
higher
level,
because
we
wanted
an
unobstructed
view
of
Parliament
Hill,
that's
important
to
me
and
we
paid
a
premium
for
that.
Every
floor.
You
go
up
you're,
paying
more
money,
so
this
has
now
cost
me
$30,000
give
or
take
to
have
a
view.
That's
about
to
be
obstructed,
there's
nothing!
You
can
do
about
that.
E
What's
gonna
be
put
up
there,
the
changes
that
have
been
made
and,
more
importantly,
the
safety
of
the
residents
not
just
in
our
building
but
the
building
next
door.
So
I'll
leave
these
with
you
thanks
very
much
for
your
time
and
by
the
way.
Mr.
chair,
thank
you
for
your
acknowledgement
of
the
traditional
land
here.
A
F
Was
just
following
up
mr.
chair
on
on
the
speaker's
point
about
some
of
the
site
plan
issues
when
this
goes
to
site
plan
with
respect
to
unobstructed
access
for
emergency
vehicles?
We
don't
usually
talk
about
site
plan
here,
but
Ken
staff,
or
even
the
local
councillor,
just
acknowledged
that
one.
The
concerns
are
legitimate.
The
concerns
are
real
and
that
there
will
be
a
plan
to
ensure
that
all
building
was
in
the
vicinity
will
be
unobstructed,
so
I'm
not
sure
who
I'm
addressing
that
to.
G
G
But
what
to
keep
in
mind
is
that
these
are
existing
streets
that
function
today
and
they're
built
in
accordance
with
city
standards
and
if
there's
issues,
I
think
that
the
residents
are
speaking
about
you're,
probably
looking
at
a
situation
where
cars
are
parked
illegally,
which
in
that
case
you
know,
emergency
vehicles
would
have
to
deal
with
that
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
as
that
arises.
So
from
a
pure
design
point
of
view,
access
is
not
an
issue
when
they
go
for
a
building
permit.
G
That
is
also
part
of
the
review
of
that
application
process
where
you
have
to
meet
the
Ontario
Building
Code,
which
has
a
significant
component
about
fire
access,
the
ability
to
connect
to
a
hydrant
and
that
sort
of
thing.
So
it's
going
to
be
reviewed
at
multiple
facets
through
site
plan
and
permit.
H
Thank
You
chair,
thank
you
for
asking
that
question
that
was
mine
as
well.
I
just
want
to
go
back
to
the
height
from
2011
to
today
and
the
difference
in
meters,
and
what
does
that
mean
in
terms
of
the
delegate,
the
resident
who
just
showed
up
said
that
you
know
obviously
there
when
we
move
in
when
we
purchase
anything,
we
know
what
a
certain
block
of
land
is.
Our
parcel
is
zone
four,
and
we
can.
You
know,
plan
for
that.
H
If
you're
living
on
the
11th
floor
and
something
is
only
allowed
to
go
up
9,
you
can
assume
that
you'll
continue
to
have
that
2
floor
site.
But
so
what
does
this
mean?
Do
we
know
or
like
in
terms
of
Cathedral,
Hill
and
other
residences
in
the
in
the
area?
How
far
up
have
we
gone
in
and
what
is
the
level
of
obstruction.
B
Mr.
chair,
I
I
will
attempt
this
and
if
I
get
it
wrong
and
room
will
tell
me
the
actual
number
of
meters,
so
the
when
the
zoning
was
approved
for
the
office
building,
it
was
approved
at
a
height
of
55
meters,
and
the
current
height
is
63
point
five.
So
the
difference
is
8
meters,
which
is
about
two
well
in
Florida
ceiling
like
we
don't
like
talking
in
stories
because
it
depends
on
what
the
use
is,
but
it
is
8
meters
which
would
be
2
ish
stories,
3
stories
yeah.
So
that's.
H
I
Yes,
so
we
saw
a
new
rendering
this
afternoon
at
night,
with
with
lighting
demonstrating
compatibility
between
the
two
buildings
and
I
was
just
curious,
given
the
sightlines,
the
fact
that
this
is
playing
in
a
unique
role
in
the
capital
realm
and
the
streetscape
the
view
from
the
river
is
there
a
lighting
plan
or
any
kind
of
thematic
that's
being
submitted
as
part
of
this
development?
That
would
help
tie
the
two
together
as.
B
J
Not
a
question
mr.
chair,
but
just
a
comment.
I
have
to
thank
the
staff
for
making
the
presentation
and
I
also
have
followed
the
Cathedral
Hill
development
initiative
for
over
a
generation
and
I
think
that
having
the
the
the
conservation
district
approved
and
having
these
incremental
interventions
I
think
are
all
part
of
a
very
wise
strategic
plan
by
the
city
and
with
the
Anglican
Diocese
to
conserve
the
Cathedral,
to
consider
Roper
house
to
conserve
some
of
the
facades
of
the
houses
along
Queen,
Street
and
I.
J
Think
that
this
component
of
it
is
one
that
I
think
is
very
creditable
and
I
just
like
to
draw
attention
to
the
success
that
is
manifesting
itself
in
this
location
in
this
part
of
the
city.
Overlooking
the
Breton
flats
and
the
you
know
the
LRT
station
when
it
opens
entity
if
philosopher's,
walk,
is
able
to
conduct
some
people
from
centre
town
to
the
LRT
station.
It
will
be
quite
successful
and
worth
philosophizing
about
anyway.
I'm
gonna
support
the
motion.
Thank
You.
B
Mr.
chair
I'd,
like
to
thank
mr.
Podolski
plus
also
I,
have
given
two
papers
on
actually
the
development
of
Cathedral
Hill
and
the
incredibly
cooperative
way
of
dealing
with
with
the
site
that
started
as
mr.
Brady
stated,
with
with
when
windmill
was
developing
the
West
End
and
has
continued
through
the
development
of
this
property.
So
I
often
hold
it
up.
As
a
an
example
of
you
know,
the
best
in
heritage
developments,
Thank
You,
member.
A
Quinn
you're
good
anyone
else
for
the
question
or
comment:
okay,
I
go
back
to
what
mr.
Bray
began
his
presentation
with
many
iterations
and
a
collaborative
approach
here
and
I
think
they've
achieved
a
good
balance
between
the
heritage
between
the
needs
of
the
diocese
and
as
well.
The
changing
demands
of
the
market,
so
I
think
it's
a
the
end.
Result
of
something
that's
sensitive
to
the
context
would
be
a
positive
for
this
part
of
the
center
town.
Are
the
report
recommendations
carried
carried?
Thank
you.
So
this
item
rises
to
planning
committee
on
September
26th.
A
The
second
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
phase
three
Clem
o
state
preliminary
Heritage
study.
We
do
have
a
presentation
from
the
planner
Leslie
Collins
and
no
speakers
registered.
Yet
if
there
is
anyone
here
who
wants
to
wants
to
make
a
presentation,
please
sign
up
at
the
desk,
we
have
one
piece
of
Correspondence
on
this
file
submitted
by
David
Fleming
on
behalf
of
heritage,
Ottawa.
K
K
Just
a
bit
of
background
for
you
today.
It's
part
of
a
three-phase
study
of
potential
age
CDs
in
the
Glebe
directed
by
Council
in
2004
phase
1
was
completed
in
2012
and
resulted
in
the
designation
of
the
Clem
OMA
state
east
Heritage
Conservation
District,
which
is
east
of
Bank
Street
surrounding
Central
Park
phase.
2
is
currently
underway
with
expected
completion
at
the
end
of
2019,
and
it
includes
Clem
O
Avenue
between
Bank
and
Bronson,
as
well
as
monk,
hland
and
Linden
Terrace.
K
K
Just
a
little
bit
of
history.
This
part
of
the
city
developed
as
development
moved
south
along
Bank
Street
in
the
late
19th
century,
as
market
gardeners
began
to
subdivide
their
lands,
the
arrival
of
the
electric
streetcar
on
Bank
Street
in
1891
that
when
talento
Park,
really
had
a
significant
impact
on
the
pace
of
urbanization
around
here,
the
lands
and
the
Glee
were
mostly
owned
by
large
estates.
Around
the
turn
of
the
century,
there
were
three
main
historic
associations
for
the
study
area
and
I'll.
Just
give
you
a
brief
overview
of
each
one.
K
K
Central
Park
itself
was
identified
for
creation
in
a
1903
report
by
Frederick
Todd,
which
I'll
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
later
and
was
completed
in
1912
after
Patterson
Creek
was
drained,
east
of
Bank
Street
and
and
a
small
portion
of
this
study
area
was
owned
by
the
states
of
William,
Powell
and
Adelaide
Clementi
to
develop
a
significant
number
of
houses
around
this
area
and
west
of
Bank
Street.
One
of
the
interesting
things
here-
and
this
is
within
the
study
area-
is
that
the
grade
is
very
different.
K
The
relationship
of
the
houses
to
the
park
is
not
nearly
as
strong
as
it
is
east
of
Bank
Street.
The
second
significant
association
for
this
area
were
the
Hickey
family.
Much
of
the
study
area
was
actually
owned
as
part
of
the
family's
estate.
They
were
early
Catholic
settlers
in
the
Glebe
immigrating
from
Ireland
in
the
mid
19th
century.
The
streets
in
the
study
area
that
were
part
of
the
state
are
roseberry,
Chamberlain,
Lyon
and
Bank,
and
then
the
third
Association,
as
I
just
mentioned,
is
kumara
Park.
K
So
the
land
along
Powell
Avenue
is
associated
with
William
Powell
in
his
closet,
cousin
Adelaide
Clemmie
developed
kumara
Park
in
the
early
20th
century,
the
klimova
State
East
heritage
conservation
district
is
strongly
associated
with
Lamar
Park.
It
was
part
of
their
original
development.
In
this
advertisement
you
see
on
the
slide.
You
can
see
a
picture
of
Central
Park,
so
east
of
Bank
Street
and
their
development.
They
it
was
really
designed
with
the
park
in
mind.
K
K
So
that
kind
of
leads
me
to
our
preliminary
study
findings
is
that
the
area
doesn't
represent
a
cohesive
cultural
heritage.
Landscape
it
was
built
incrementally
was
not
planned
in
the
same
way
as
we
see
in
the
Heritage
Conservation
District
on
the
east
side
of
Bank
Street
because
of
its
incremental
development.
It
doesn't
feature
buildings
in
any
sort
of
cohesive
style
and
the
park
as
I.
K
Just
mentioned
is
not
an
organizing
feature
of
the
study
area,
so
the
recommendations
of
this
report
are
that
we
do
not
proceed
with
the
designation
of
a
Heritage
Conservation
District
for
this
area.
However,
through
the
course
of
this
project,
we
identified
two
cultural
heritage
resources
that
merit
designation
under
part
four
of
the
Heritage
Act.
K
It's
located
at
the
North
East.
Sorry,
northwest
corner
of
Central
Park
and
Bank
Street,
it's
the
only
building
on
the
west
side
of
Bank
Street
that
actually
has
an
interface
with
the
park
because
it's
significant
grade
change.
You
see
a
much
different
situation
on
this
side
of
the
Bank
Street
and
you'll,
see
in
the
photos
that
follow
that.
Basically,
you
can
walk
right
out
the
door
of
the
Ambassador
Court
and
into
the
park
there's
very
little
boundary
between
public
and
private
space.
K
So
under
in
order
to
designate
something
under
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act
under
part,
four
of
the
Act
has
to
meet
the
criteria
of
Ontario
regulation.
Oh
nine,
oh
six!
This
slide
just
illustrates
how
that
how
this
building
meets
that
criteria?
It
has
design
value
as
a
good
example
of
a
purpose-built
apartment
building
that
was
common
in
the
interwar
period.
It
features
elements
of
the
Art
Deco
style.
K
This
is
just
a
historic
photo
that
you
can
see
the
just
the
edge
of
the
Ambassador
Court
building
as
it
interfaces
with
Central
Park.
So
this
is
1929.
The
building
was
finished
in
1928.
The
park
was
finished
in
1912,
so
the
building
was
clearly
built
with
a
sort
of
to
take
advantage
of
its
location
on
the
park.
K
So
Central
Park
is
the
second
feature
that
we're
recommending
for
designation
under
part
four
of
the
Act.
These
maps
just
soar.
Aerial
photos.
Sorry
show
you
the
way
in
which
the
park
has
changed
from
1928
to
more
recent.
As
you
can
see,
the
top
photo
is
1928.
It
shows
the
park
about
15
years
after
it
was
finished,
its
associated
with
the
early
work
of
the
Ottawa
Improvement
Commission,
and
reflects
the
city
beautiful
movement
that
was
common
in
the
top.
K
At
that
time
it
has
been
altered
over
time
in
terms
of
its
pathways
flower
beds,
that
sort
of
thing,
but
the
original
circulation
paths
and
the
use
of
it
as
a
space
for
passive
recreation
has
remained
so
again,
as
I
mentioned
Ontario
regulation
no
906
is
what
we
use
to
evaluate
properties
for
designation
under
part.
Four
of
the
Heritage
Act
Central
Park
has
design
value
as
a
large
park
designed
for
passive
recreation,
it's
associated
with
the
Ottawa
Improvement
Commission
and
their
work
in
the
early
20th
century
to
beautify
the
Capitol.
K
K
Instead,
it
was
designed
in
a
much
more
formal
way
with
flowerbeds
etc,
but
the
location
was
identified
by
him
and
it
has
contextual
value
as
a
landmark
for
its
size
and
its
location
on
both
sides
of
Bank
Street,
and
it
really
defines
the
context
of
this
part
of
the
Glebe
in
terms
of
consultation,
council
bernard
has
been
circulated
and
concurs
with
the
findings
of
the
study
heritage.
Ottawa
was
notified
of
the
report,
and
I
saw
that
they
submitted
comments
to
you.
K
Carlton
condominium
corporation
822,
who
is
the
owners
of
the
Ambassador
Court,
have
been
consulted
and
have
not
expressed
any
concerns
with
the
proposed
designation
and
Central.
Park
is
city-owned
and
the
area
east
of
Bank
Street
is
already
designated.
So
by
designating
another
city-owned
resource,
we
are
fulfilling
Official,
Plan
policies
about
being
leaders
and
designating
our
own
properties.
K
So
the
fourth
recommendation
was
to
recommend
that
we
consider
two
additional
areas
for
study
that
will
sort
of
round
out
the
study
of
the
klimova
Park
subdivision
in
the
Glebe.
So
on
this
map
you
can
see
in
yellow
the
Clem
oa
State,
East
HCD
and
the
sort
of
blue
hatched
area
are
the
two
additional
areas
that
we
have
identified
through
consultation
with
the
Glebe
Community
Association
to
be
study
for
potential
designation.
I
K
A
K
Thank
You
mr.
chair,
if,
if
built
heritage,
sub
committee,
approves
these
recommendations
today,
they
will
go
to
Council
for
approval.
If
council
approves
the
recommendations,
the
city
will
issue
the
notice
of
intention
to
designate
to
the
property
owners
and
it
will
also
be
published
in
the
newspaper
and
then
that
triggers
a
30-day
appeal
period
during
which
time
anybody
can
appeal.
The
proposed
designation
right
now
as
bill
108
is
not
in
effect.
Yet
any
appeals
to
that
would
go
to
the
conservation,
Review
Board
for
hearing
and
a
recommendation
back
to
Council.
J
One
friendly
question:
you
know
we
all
respect,
Todd,
the
landscape,
architect
and
planner
for
choosing
the
location
for
Central
Park
and
having
an
initial
design,
but
I
think
the
committee
should
probably
learn
just
in
terms
of
overall
city.
Growth
in
planning
is
why
the
park
was
chosen
in
that
location
in
terms
of
land
form
and
its
orientation,
which
is
countered
to
the
grid.
I
think
just
as
a
educational
thing,
sharing
the
thinking
of
through
why
the
park
was
in
that
location
you
know,
and
not
relating
to
the
grid
would
be
very
informative.
K
So,
as
I
briefly
mentioned,
the
park
is
located
on
land
that
was
drained
from
Patterson's
Creek,
so
Patterson
Creek
did
extend
beyond
its
current
sort
of
Inlet
at
just
past
O'connor
Street
and
as
also
as
I
mentioned,
Frederick
Todd
had
recommended
it
more
as
a
bucolic
sort
of
waterside
setting
and
not
as
a
formal
series
of
pathways
and
in
fact,
about
a
year
or
two
after
the
park
was
finished.
The
then
chair
of
the
Ottawa
Improvement
Commission
colburn
Meredith,
spoke
about
how
the
park
was
designed
exactly
how
it
should
not
have
been
designed.
A
Also
wanted
to
convey
counsel,
Menard
SEM.
You
know
there
earlier
today
to
reiterate
that
he's
very
supportive
of
the
recommendations
in
the
report.
So
are
the
report
recommendations
carried
carry.
Thank
you.
So
this
item
rises
to
Council
on
September
25th
as
well.
We
we
have
no
in
camera
items
today.
Are
there
any
notices
of
motion
for
consideration
at
a
subsequent
meeting?
A
Okay,
are
there
any
inquiries
from
members
all
right?
We
in
other
business.
We
did
have
one
planning
circulation
for
58,
Florence
Street.
It
was
distributed
to
members
in
August,
and
members
of
the
public
do
have
the
opportunity
to
comment
on
that
through
dev
apps
on
Ottawa
dot
CA,
and
we
anticipate
that
a
heritage
application
for
that
property
will
come
to
this
committee
at
a
later
meeting.
Are
there
any
other
items
of
business
today,
I'm,
seeing
none
so
on
adjournment?
Is
the
motion
carry
thank
you.
We
are
adjourned.
Thank
you.