►
From YouTube: Ottawa City Council – June 11, 2014
Description
Ottawa City Council meeting – June 11, 2014
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas
A
A
B
A
A
C
D
B
B
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
D
E
E
E
F
E
B
E
E
E
E
D
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
D
G
J
E
G
D
D
B
B
I
I
H
C
I
B
I
B
H
B
B
B
B
B
D
D
D
D
K
B
B
Almighty
God,
let
us
work
together
to
serve
all
our
people
due
to
preside
in
North,
Ave,
L,
sound
off
and
abusive
illness
plan.
Colleagues
I'd
ask
that
you
remain
standing
to
join
me
in
a
moment
of
silence.
Honoring
the
three
Royal
Canadian
Mounted
Police
officers
were
laid
to
rest
yesterday
in
Moncton
New
Brunswick,
fabulous
George,
the
Javan
dole
Douglas
James
L'arche
and
Dave
Joseph
Ross.
B
D
B
Well,
thank
you
very,
very
much
Samara
that
was
beautiful
at
this
time,
I'd
like
to
invite
miss
Doreen
Lovano
to
the
podium
for
this
meetings.
Mayor
city
builder
award
presentation,
as
well
as
her
city,
councilor,
Jan,
harder,
serve.
I
know
if
you'd
like
to
come
forward
as
every
to
see
Jan
harder.
I
would
also.
B
It's
my
pleasure
today
to
congratulate
a
very
worthy
recipient
of
the
mayor
city
builder
award
for
this
council
meeting
and
it's
great
Doreen
that
you
have
a
number
of
members
of
your
family
with
you
here
to
celebrate
with
you
to
say,
Doreen
has
been
an
active
member
in
the
bar
Haven
Lions
Club
would
not
do
justice
to
the
selflessness
and
leadership
she
brings
to
her
community
over
the
past
20
years.
She
has
at
one
point
held
every
position
in
the
bar
havens.
Lions,
although
she
has
been
dealt
a
numerous
personal
setbacks.
B
D
B
On
behalf
of
the
bar
Haven
Lions,
during
created
the
annual
mother-daughter
gala,
celebrating
its
10th
anniversary
this
year,
the
mother-daughter
gala
has
raised
over
$100,000
in
support
of
the
Queensway
Carlton
Hospital
Foundation,
and
it
continues
to
grow
throughout
the
years.
Doreen's
leadership
has
brought
a
personal
touch
to
the
event
that
has
embraced
not
just
mothers
and
daughters,
but
women
from
all
corners
of
our
city
and
beyond.
B
As
a
cancer
survivor
herself,
miss
Livanos
tireless
dedication
of
the
mother-daughter
gala
and
cancer
care
was
recognized
through
a
consultation
room
in
the
Queensway
Carlton
hospital
being
named
in
tribute
to
the
gay.
Despite
her
personal
health
challenges,
Doreen's
hard
work
only
begins
only
begins
with
the
mother-daughter
gala,
the
gala
Mary
fille
Nick
Luna.
Despite.
D
B
The
local
food
cupboard
leading
the
bar
Haven
Family
Fund,
a
supporting
cancer
outreach
programs
or
training
a
service.
Animal
Doreen
embodies
the
definition
of
kindness
and
community
spirit.
My
best
wishes
and
continued
success
for
the
mother-daughter
gala,
as
well
as
all
of
your
future
endeavors,
and
it's
my
pleasure
on
behalf
of
your
colleague
and
my
colleague
and
your
friend
Jan
harder
to
present
you
with
the
mayor
city
builder
award.
Congratulations.
G
G
B
So
what
I
think
it's
great
that
so
many
members
your
family
are
here
during?
Why
don't
you
all
come
down
and
we'll
get
a
big
family
portrait
here?
The
whole
family,
the
four
grandkids
I,
know,
sisters
and
brothers-in-law
from
Cornwall
are
here
I.
Think
we'll
just
move
this
thing
over
here.
Sure
I
can
do
this
whoops.
B
B
Our
second
and
final
presentation
is
the
city
manager's
Award
for
Excellence
in
Alaska
Kent
to
come
forward.
Today
we
have
a
wonderful
opportunity
to
recognize
City
of
Ottawa
employees
for
their
outstanding
contributions
both
to
the
organization
and
to
the
community.
There's
a
volatile
tree
and
magnific.
Okay
on
the
ground
woman,
we.
B
Does
great
work
day
in
and
day
out
for
the
residents
of
Ottawa,
we
can't
celebrate
them
all,
but
each
year
we
celebrate
a
few
of
the
city's
top
performers
as
a
way
to
say
thank
you
and
hopefully
to
inspire
others
to
do
even
more
as
nominated
by
their
peers.
These
are
employees
who
create
an
energy
that
is
invaluable
to
our
organization.
It
gives
me
great
pleasure
to
share
with
you
the
recipients
of
this
year's
city,
manager's
award
of
excellent
just
as
over
the
roof
aircon.
That's
where
I
live.
B
Represent
the
highest
distinction
a
city
employee
may
receive
under
the
employee
recognition
program
which
acknowledges
efforts
to
go
above
and
beyond
the
already
impressive
standards
set
by
their
colleagues.
This
year's
awards
recipients
were
recognized
in
several
categories:
Lillooet
de
cette
mas.
This.
B
Goes
to
an
employee
who
puts
the
needs
of
residents
first
in
delivering
top
quality
service
to
the
public.
The
cut
the
category
demonstrating
leadership
recognizes
city
employees
who
lead
the
way
in
making
the
corporation
a
fantastic
place
to
work.
And,
finally,
the
category
turning
ideas
into
results
recognizes
efforts
to
benefit
the
city
through
innovation.
The
last
category
was
changed
this
year
to
ensure
separate
awards
for
internal
and
external
initiatives.
In
previous
years,
community
initiatives
have
been
traditionally
received
have
traditionally
received
more
recognition
than
internal
ones.
B
The
city
manager
made
the
change
to
ensure
that
we
continue
to
recognize
and
celebrate
the
important
innovations
that
happen
both
inside
and
outside
City
Hall,
on
behalf
of
the
count
of
my
colleagues
on
city
council,
I'd
like
to
take
this
opportunity
to
congratulate
not
only
the
four
Award
recipients,
but
all
257
of
this
year's
nominees
as
well.
I
now
ask
Kent
Kerr
Patrick,
who
will
have
the
honor
of
announcing
the
recipients.
Mr.
city
manager,.
F
Employees
being
recognized
for
their
expertise,
their
commitment
and
their
outstanding
examples
of
service
excellence.
The
nomination
process
this
year
was
very
difficult.
Kombu
Bouvet
imagine
a
yun,
a
PI,
a
facility
choisir
catheter,
afina
least,
but
we
succeeded
in
identifying
a
winner
in
each
of
the
four
categories
and
it's
my
pleasure
to
present
the
winners
to
you
today.
F
This
year's
prize
for
making
people
a
priority
is
awarded
to
a
member
of
the
healthy
sexuality
and
risk
reduction
unit
of
Ottawa
Public
Health,
a
Dean
Reynolds,
a
Dean's
work,
with
an
advocacy
for
the
city's
at-risk
residents,
has
led
to
a
more
open
dialogue
and
improved
harm
reduction
health
services
for
individuals
who
are
often
marginalized.
Thank
you,
a
Dane
for
your
perseverance
and
determination,
finding
community-driven
solutions
to
assist
marginalized
residents
and
come
on
down.
Please.
F
Okay,
thank
you
for
the
category
of
turning
ideas
into
results.
In
a
word
category
that
recognizes
initiatives
in
the
wider
community.
The
award
is
presented
to
the
private
parking
enforcement
agency
program
team
and,
if
I
could
ask
you
to
come
down,
why
I
tell
people
while
you've
been
present
you're
being
presented
with
his
award,
said
to
keep
Emmys
imply
the.
F
Common
ticketing
system
for
all
private
parking
facilities,
one
whereby
private
agencies
can
issue
city
parking
tickets.
The
team
has
ensured
that
residents
and
visitors
have
clear
recourse
to
dispute
tickets.
I'd
like
to
thank
the
team
for
developing
a
solution
that
strikes
an
important
balance
between
meeting
interests
of
residents
and
private
businesses.
F
The
second
award
for
turning
ideas
into
results
celebrating
initiatives
within
the
corporation
is
awarded
to
a
leader
in
the
design
and
delivery
of
the
city's
elearning
program.
Lorraine
white
elearning,
which
offers
an
alternative
to
webinars
and
traditional
instructor-led
training,
is
both
cost-effective
and
flexible,
offering
employees
the
opportunity
to
take
and
revisit
training
based
on
their
own
schedules.
Lorraine's
hard
work
has
already
resulted
in
the
delivery
of
over
45
training
solutions.
F
F
The
people
in
this
corporation
recognized
Mona's,
very
strong
work
ethic,
her
leadership,
behaviors
and
her
mentorship
efforts
very
well
and
I
just
like
to
add
to
that
that
no
one
wanted
for
a
long
time
and
we've
both
worked
in
the
municipal
finance
industry
for
many
many
years,
and
that
that
recognition
for
leadership
and
commitment
is
one
that
is
widely
held
outside
of
the
corporation
as
well.
Mona's
recognized
as
a
leader
in
the
municipal
finance
world
and
throughout
her
career
and
today.
So
thank
you
very
much.
F
K
G
Counselor
Hobbs
here
counselor
McRae,
yeah
counselor
mishchenko,
councillor
Hume
yeah.
I
G
B
See
we
have
coordinates
for
the
28th
of
May.
That's
on
the
process
for
bowl
event,
with
May
carried
a
declaration
of
interest,
including
those
originally
arising
from
prior
meetings.
Nicole
Nicole
feed
antenna,
none
communications
as
presented
regrets,
no
regrets
filed
to
date,
motion
introduced
reports,
most
important
present
as
shoulder
up
all
councillor
Thompson
second
bike
out
Sergio,
please
I
think.
B
Come
back
to
that
agricultural
Rural
Affairs
Committee
report
number
42
couple
in
the
middle
calendar,
the
committee
did
electrical
silver.
D
is
a
federal
appointment
of
fence
viewers,
not
fence
sitters
fence
viewers
carried
or
we
have
oh
I'm.
Sorry,
we
have
a
Doug
Thompson
motion,
counselor
Thompson,
as
a
motion
on
fence
viewers,
I.
B
I
Yes,
I,
don't
have
any,
but
I
have
Don
the
screen,
whereas
the
line
fences
Act
required
that
the
renumeration
of
fence
viewers
be
fixed
by
bylaw,
therefore
be
resolved.
At
recommendation,
two
of
agricultural
committee
report
41
item
to
be
deleted
and
a
following.
Subs
substituted
therefore,
provided
that
the
remuneration
of
Finch
viewers
who
are
not
city
staff
shall
be
at
a
minimum
fee
per
viewing
of
$100
per
fence
fewer
with
an
additional
$20
per
hour
after
the
first
five
hours.
B
On
the
motion,
okay,
okay
I
see
the
media
up
there.
This
is
a
great
feature
story.
I
just
know
it
interviewing.
The
fence.
Viewers
on
the
report
is
amended
carried.
Thank
you
finance.
An
economic
development
committee
report
number
44
upon
the
dog,
kennel
cut
the
committee
data
analysis
to
develop
mall
number
three
capital
adjustments
in
closing
a
project
city
tax
and
REITs
support
it,
and
there
are
two
motions,
I
believe
technical
in
nature.
Does
anyone
have
any
issues
of
substance
to
deal
with
this?
Otherwise,
we'll
we'll
come
back
to
it,
so,
council
egg?
K
Mr.
mayor,
it's
basically
an
adjustment
to
a
project:
nine
zero.
Six,
four
six
zero
be
resolved.
That
document
to
be
amended
to
include
the
transfer
of
eight
hundred
thousand
dollars
from
nine
zero.
Six:
four:
six:
zero
trenchless
rehabilitation,
sanitary
project
to
fund
the
installation
of
sanitary
sewers
as
part
of
the
road
to
reconstruction
works
on
st.
Joseph
Boulevard
between
highway
174
and
trim.
Road.
B
Questions
or
comments
on
the
motion
as
presented
carried,
thank
you
and
the
report,
as
amended
by
I
carried
adopting
LC
item
number
four
recreation
complex
remediation
project.
Positive
images
are
shown
the
complexity
of
fifth
Goulburn
carried
Thank
You
Kelsey
cadre.
A
planning
committee
report
number
71,
a
zoning
12
sterling
Avenue
zone
as
dues
Avenue
sterling
carried
item
number
six
site
plan,
Control
bylaw
update
regular,
most
regular
mall,
so
leg
remote.
That
showed
the
plan
to
give
a
test,
show
message
or
councillor
Hume
as
a
motion
of
deferral,
yeah.
A
Mister
man
I'm
sorry
to
do
this,
but
in
considering
the
site
plan
bylaw
there
should
have
been
a
section
in
the
by
law
with
respect
to
letters
of
undertaking
that
has
been
inadvertently
left
out
of
of
the
bylaw.
We
don't
have
time
today
to
craft
a
resolution
to
put
it
back
in
consistent
with
a
staff
report,
so
we're
just
asking
that
you.
We
delay
this
for
one
cycle
and
we'll
have
an
appropriate
motion
that
ensures
that
the
bylaw
is
consistent
with
with
the
staff
report
and
that's
seconded
by
Councillor,
harder,
hey.
B
B
Next
time,
transportation
committee
report
number
38,
Napolitano
talked
with
the
community.
They
trust
fall.
Coordination
of
snowgo
programs
carried
item
number
nine
growth
of
city
fleet
for
asphalt,
repair
units
carried.
Does
anyone
wish
anything
to
be
removed
from
the
bulk
consent
agenda,
as
presented
in
your
package
on
the
boat
consent
agenda
as
presented
carried?
B
Okay?
So
we're
back
at
planning
committee
report
number
70,
a
reform
of
assault
desaad
the
committee
date,
low
management
development
charges,
background
study
and
bylaws.
What
I'm
going
to
recommend
us
was
outline
of
leaving
the
procedural
memo
is
that
we
have
a
number
of
technical
amendments
and
some
other
amendments
I'm
going
to
ask
the
movers
of
those
amendments
to
present
them,
explain
them,
and
if
anyone
has
questions
we'll
go
motion
by
motion
and
I
believe
counselor
Hume
is
taking
a
seat
by
John,
Moser
and
his
colleagues.
B
So,
as
you
know,
we
required
these
amendments
to
be
in
ahead
of
time
so
that
we
could
have
staff
comment
on
them.
So
the
first
motion
is
item
number
one:
development
charges,
background
study
and
bylaws
moved
by
councillor,
Hume
seconded
by
Councillor,
harder,
Kelsey
Hume.
Would
you
like
to
introduce
your
first
motion
and
I
believe
everyone
has
these
either
electronically
or
paper
copy?
So
if
we
could
put
councillor
Humes
mic
on,
please
he's
at
the
delegates
table.
A
Just
as
I
think
I
got
promoted,
mr.
Mann
I
can't
get
the
mic
to
work.
Mr.
mayor,
if
I
can,
just
before
we
get
to
the
motions
I'd
like
to
thank
some
members
of
council
staff
for
their
help
and
support
in
bringing
to
you
today,
a
new
development
charge,
bylaw
that
meets
councils
goals
and
objectives
with
respect
to
public
transit,
the
charge
that
you
see
in
the
bylaw,
that
is
before
you
fully
funds
the
development
charge
component
of
our
public
transit
project,
which
is
in
keeping
with
your
direction.
Mr.
A
mayor
that
we
ensure
that,
when
phase
2
of
LRT
is
ready
to
go,
that
we
would
have
our
funding
in
place.
This
is
a
component
of
that
funding
and
achieves
the
direction
that
you
gave
the
sponsors,
the
rest
of
the
bylaw
that
you
see
before
you
is
was
led
by
a
group
of
of
council
sponsors,
including
myself,
councillor
Clark,
councillor,
Hobbs,
tell
self
sanitary
councillor,
hubely
and
councillor
God
ring
I,
don't
know
how
many
times
we
we
met,
but
they
were
quite.
A
We
met
a
number
of
times,
both
as
a
group
to
recommend
policy
changes
and
there's
one
policy
I'm
going
to
highlight
for
you,
and
we
met
with
industry
on
numerous
occasions
throughout
this
process,
to
discuss
with
them
the
development
charges
by
law
and
to
see
if
we
would
be
able
to
resolve
any
concerns
that
they
may
have
you
assisted
by
the
city.
Treasurer
was
similar
mr.
mark
John,
Moser
and
and
our
Big
Brain
Gary
Baker
helped
us
make
sure
that
we
had
navigated
the
tricky
waters
of
the
of
the
development
charges.
A
I
would
say:
well,
that's
not
really
what
our
policy,
so
he
was
able
to
bring
us
back
to
sort
of
the
straight
and
and
now-
and
he
was
a
great
resource-
is
a
great
resource
for
that
for
the
city
with
respect
to
development
charges
within
this
and
mr.
mayor
get
to
emotions,
there
are
two:
there
are
three
things
you
should
really
really
know.
First
of
all,
within
the
storm
of
charge
by
law
contains
a
policy
to
add
some
discipline
to
the
to
the
process
of
granting
exemptions.
A
If
you've
seen
the
background
study
between
2009
and
2013,
the
city
granted
some
90
million
dollars
in
exemptions
from
de
l'alma
charges
in
the
past,
we
have
never
been
able
to
recover
those
funds
and
those
are
lost
to
our
growth
projects
and,
as
a
result,
we
have
had
to
increase
the
amount
of
funding
to
those
projects
from
the
taxpayer.
We've
never
been
able
to
recover
those
funds.
A
A
So
the
council
would
be
making
sure
that
the
development
charges
were
fully
funded
and
if
there
was
a
taxpayer
contribution
to
be
made,
but
it
is
made
in
the
year
that
those
exemptions
are
given
instead
of
trying
to
scramble
and
find
the
resources
when
the
individual
project
comes
to
comes
for
funding.
That's
that's
a
fairly
major
policy
change
that
we
wanted
to
highlight
for
you,
the
second
one
we
want
to
the
second
two
things.
I
want
to
say
to
you
mr.
A
mayor,
is
that,
although
we
worked
very
hard
to
achieve
consensus
with
the
or
will
come
home
builders
and
with
the
building
owners
and
managers
Association,
we
were
not
able
to
achieve
consensus
on
really
two
main
main
items.
One
main
items
from
the
homebuilders
perspective
is
the
costs
of
a
project
including
the
contingencies,
the
cost
of
materials
that
was
still
there
was
a.
A
We
were
not
able
to
come
to
an
agreement
on
our
numbers,
appropriate
discussions
are
still
going
on
and
we're
hopeful
that
we
we
may
be
able
to
resolve
that
issue,
but
we're
not
gonna
be
able
to
resolve
it
in
time
for
council
to
consider
any
changes
to
the
bylaw
before
the
old
bylaw
expires.
However,
we
fully
expect
this
bottle
to
be
appealed.
A
The
quantum
of
the
charge
in
funding
and
some
of
the
other
minor
changes
of
benefit
to
existing
and
other
things
in
our
opinion,
need
to
appeal
and,
as
a
result,
we
can
continue
to
talk
about
some
of
the
major
issues
and,
if
appropriate,
deal
with
them
through
settlement
discussions
that
we
would
bring
to
committee
and
council.
The
second
thing
I
should
tell
you,
is
that
we
were
not
able
to
come
to
an
agreement,
as
we
have
in
the
past,
with
the
building
owners
and
managers
with
regard
to
an
incentive
for
non
residential
development
specifically
office.
A
A
development.
The
building
owners
and
managers
have
been
successful
in
the
previous
two
bylaws
of
having
a
incentive
for
office
development
in
the
neighborhood
of
19%
reduction
from
the
theoretical
full
charge
in
keeping
with
the
direction
that
growth
should
pay
for
growth
to
the
maximum
allowable
under
the
law.
We
were
not
able
to
come
to
an
agreement
with
with
respect
to
discounting
or
incenting
the
the
charge,
so
we
expect
that
we
would
see
an
appeal
from
the
building
owners
and
managers
with
respect
to
that
item.
A
Those
two
issues
aside,
the
the
sponsors,
worked
very
hard
and
were
able
to
resolve
a
number
of
thorny
issues
manufacturing
in
the
high-tech
sector.
Some
of
the
other
issues
around
stormwater
in
in
the
in
some
of
the
other
areas,
the
issue
around
parks,
the
construction
of
parks
in
in
new
growth
areas,
where
parks
are
going
to
be
constructed
faster
and
available
sooner
within
the
development
process.
There
was
a
number
of
things
that
were
achieved
with
this.
With
this
bottle.
A
Unfortunately,
we
could
not
achieve
them
all
and
I
wanted
to
highlight
the
two
main
areas
where
we
were
not
able
to
achieve
success,
but
because
we
believe
that
this
will
by
lab
will
be
appealed.
We
believe
that
there
is
an
ability
for
ongoing
discussions
on
those
points,
and
hopefully
we
will
be
able
to,
if
appropriate,
bring
a
resolution
to
you
later
in
the
summer
or
early
fall.
So
mr.
mayor
I
think
mr.
mark
can
can
identify
motion
number
one
with
respect
to
the
Monahan
stormwater
facility.
C
Chair
I'd
be
pleased
to
go
through
and
provide
an
explanation
of
these
motions
one
by
one.
If
you
wish,
please
do
Thank
You.
Mr.
mayor
mr.
mid
mr.
chair,
the
first
motion
deals
with
the
Monahan
stormwater
facility,
which
is
a
stormwater
facility
funded
by
development
charges
and
the
sewer
rate
within
councillor
who
bleeds
Ward.
As
staff
went
through
it.
There
was
a
need
to
provide
additional
funding
to
take
care
of
both
a
quality
concern
that
exists
at
this
time,
as
well
as
well
as
to
accommodate
additional
growth.
C
When
these
lands
were
acquired,
there
was
a
development
potential
associated
with
them
that
would
have
contributed
to
the
monahan
stormwater
facility
and
there
should
have
been,
in
staffs
opinion,
a
contribution
to
the
cost
of
the
stormwater
facility
in
the
amount
of
approximately
three
hundred
and
thirteen
thousand
dollars,
and
so
this
motion
provides
additional
funding
to
address
the
quality
concerns.
It
provides
an
increased
contribution
from
developers
to
address
growth
and
a
contribution
in
respect
to
the
barter
woodcore
park.
In
respect
to
the
last
item,
mr.
C
mayor,
there
was
a
technical
error
in
the
bylaw
and
the
motion.
The
contribution
should
be
made
to
the
southerly
lands
which
are
area
B
and
therefore,
in
recommendation
two,
which
is
on
your
screen,
it
now
says,
make
the
contribution
to
area
B
rather
than
area
a
and
the
emotion
that
was
originally
provided
to
members
of
council
last
wednesday.
A
Mr.
Chen
I
think
that
if
you
want
these,
emotions
stand
on
their
own.
So
if
you
want
to
carry
them,
if
you
want
to
take
them
questions
to
them,
will
you
can
carry
them
and
then
we
can
move
on
if
no
one
wants
to
speak
to,
and
that
might
be
a
process
that
would
focus
the
discussion
to
the
specific
motions
at
hand.
Okay,.
D
C
D
D
C
Mr.
chair,
this
is
simply
a
reallocation
of
funds
within
an
existing
development
charge
project,
a
greater
amount
of
work
is
going
to
be
done
in
Phase,
two
than
was
initially
planned,
and
so
money
is
being
moved
from
phase
three
to
phase
two
and
respect
of
these
self
Nepean
collector
sanitary
sewer.
But
again
this
is
within
the
overall
funding
envelope
established
for
this
project
and
does
not
result
in
an
increase
in
the
development
charge.
Thank.
D
C
But
if
the
work
is
associated
with
manufacturing,
someone
may
be
using
the
screen,
but
he
or
she
is
at
the
same
time,
testing
something
physically
or
resulting
in
something
being
produced.
That
seems
to
be
of
an
industrial
category
and
would
pay
the
lower
rate
after
several
iterations
and
going
back
and
forth
between
boma
and
city
staff
and
the
sponsors
group,
we
were
able
to
arrive
at
the
definition
that
everybody
agrees
upon
and
that
is
attached
in
motion
number
four.
Mr.
chair.
C
D
C
Number
five
mr.
chair
deals
with
the
area
east
six
stormwater
area,
specific
development
charge.
This
is
an
area
that
is
roughly
between
Mayor
Blair,
Road
and
tenth
Line
Road
in
Orleans.
There
was
a
concern
amongst
the
developers
that
there
was
not
sufficient
money
attached
to
this
project,
and
so
the
the
total
budget
was
increased.
The
developers
were,
developers
were
actually
seeking,
approximately
twenty
four
million
dollars,
but
then
staff
and
the
developers
representatives
had
a
series
of
discussions.
C
It
was
agreed
that
certain
works
could
be
redo
removed
from
the
project
which
are
the
east
and
west
trunks,
and
that
brought
down
the
cost
by
some
three
million
dollars
and
the
developers.
Although
the
total
cost
allocated
to
the
project,
is
only
some
19
million
dollars,
the
developers
are
hopeful
that,
through
the
tender
process
for
work
going
forward,
they
can
reduce
the
cost
from
21
million
dollars
to
the
19
million
dollars
allocated
in
respect
to
the
west
front
sewer.
C
This
was
a
sewer
that
was
oversized
by
mental
communities
Inc
in
association
with
a
road
project
done
by
the
city,
and
so
Minto
brought
forth
the
position
that
it
should
be
paid
out
of
the
road
development
charge
and
staff
agreed.
So
what
this
motion
does
is
it
takes
out
the
two
projects-
east
and
west
trunk,
and
allocates
the
West
trunk
to
the
10th
line
road
project
and
prevents
mental
to
be
repaid
for
the
construction
of
oversizing,
of
a
sewer
which
benefited
the
construction
of
a
city?
Road,
hey.
D
C
First
of
all
that
the
total
growth
could
be
increased
from
approximately
85,000
square
feet
to
the
total
of
129
and
51,
so
some
180,000
square
feet,
which
provides
a
greater
base
to
divide
the
charge
over.
Secondly,
the
split
between
residential
and
non-residential
was
changed
from
95
percent
residential
5%
non-residential
to
97
percent
residential
3%
non-residential.
C
This
has
effect
also
of
reducing
the
non-residential
charge,
so
that
is
now
six
dollars
and
two
cents
per
square
foot
for
the
non
industrial
category
and
somewhat
less
for
the
industrial
category.
I
will
note
mr.
chair
that
discussions
with
the
residential
landowners
in
Richmond
are
ongoing
and
that
will
undoubtedly
leave
to
Anna
lead
to
an
appeal,
but
on
the
non-residential
side
our
progress
has
been
made
and
this
motion
is
recommended
by
staff
to
council.
D
C
Mr.
chair,
as
part
of
the
overall
background
study,
it
was
determined
that,
as
as
we
saw
earlier
today,
and
we
said
of
tenth
line
road-
that
it
is
appropriate
that
the
roads
portion
of
the
development
charge
absorbed
the
cost
of
the
stormwater
that's
generated
by
the
road
founders.
Avenue,
formerly
known
as
the
north-south
arterial
and
the
Fernbank
humidity,
had
come
forward
to
committee
and
council
for
a
front
ending
agreement
which
was
at
eleven
point
one
sixty
five
million
dollars.
C
Subsequent
to
that
was
the
decision
to
include
in
the
roads
component
the
stormwater
charge,
which
is
an
additional
eight
hundred
thousand
dollars
so
to
provide
the
authority
for
the
front
end
agreement
in
respect
to
the
stormwater
charge
to
match
up
with
a
background
study,
it's
requested
to
increase
the
front
end
Ian
agreement
authority
to
not
eleven
point:
nine
six,
four
million
dollars.
Mr.
chair.
D
C
Subsequent
to
the
release
of
the
background
study,
it
was
determined
that
1.1
million
dollars
in
fish
habitat
compensation
would
need
to
be
done.
This
is
100
percent
funded
by
developers
through
the
development
charge,
and
so
it
is
requested
that
the
charge
be
increased
to
reflect
the
1.1
million
dollars
in
fish
habitat
compensation.
D
D
A
Yeah,
maybe
if
just
for
ease
of
dealing
with
these
the
last
two
items,
items
9
and
items-
10,
probably
the
ones
that
are
going
to
spark
the
most
discussions.
If
you
could
take
item
number
11,
we
could
dispose
of
that
one
and
then
item
12
has
to
come
last
after
we
debate
nine
and
ten.
That
would
at
least
get
all
of
the
non-contentious
staff
motions
out
of
the
way,
and
you
could
focus
on
items
that
nine
and
ten.
B
C
Mr.
mayor,
if
I
can
assist,
this
was
a
matter
that
came
to
resolution
between
the
release
of
the
staff
motions
on
Wednesday
of
last
week
and
the
deadline
for
council's
motions
on
Friday.
So
this
was
a
motion
written
by
staff
that
councilor
Qadri
agreed
to
introduce
area.
Six
is
the
is
an
urban
expansion
area
sell
to
the
Fernbank
area?
C
Within
this
Hitsville
area,
there
is
to
be
a
storm,
a
cemetery
sewer
pumping
station
intended
for
that
development
staff
reviewed
the
matter
and
just
and
determined
that
it
was
appropriate
to
include
it
in
the
background
study
and
that
tentatively,
that
the
time
frame
for
the
compensation
would
be
2018,
but
that
date
would
be
reviewed
based
upon
affordability
and
the
progressive
development
in
the
area.
Staff
are
therefore
recommending
this
motion
to
council
councillor.
H
Mr.
mark
has
a
some
depth,
emotion,
very,
very
well.
The
only
thing
I'm
going
to
add
to
it
is
that,
in
terms
of
the
pumping
station
issues
in
my
ward,
having
an
ongoing
issue,
you
know
affecting
his
OD
an
oil
pump
station
and
another
one
in
Ferentz.
So
I
think
this
is
a
good
motion
and
I
think
I'm,
nothing
I'm.
Looking
for
support
from
my
colleagues,
you
know
to
approve
this
motion.
B
Okay,
thank
you.
So
we
have
a
motion
by
councillor
Qadri,
saying
by
councillor
Hugh,
supported
by
staff.
Any
other
questions
or
comments
on
the
motion
carried
adopt
a
dissent
by
a
councillor
play
and
Ann
Thompson.
Okay.
The
next
motion
is
number
12,
moved
by
councillor
Hume
seconded
by
Councillor,
harder.
L
Motion
is
on
your
screen
and
it's
basically
to
delete
the
proposed
exemption
development
charge,
exemption
for
land
around
the
stations,
and
the
theory
was
that
the
development
charge
at
a
development
charge
exemption
around
the
stations
would
encourage
development
quicker
for
for
those
areas
to
help
reach
our
goals.
I
have
a
number
of
problems
with
this.
First
of
all,
we
have
a
principle
that
development
charges
are
supposed
to
be
paid
by
everybody,
because
every
new
unit
of
development
brings
demand
on
our
services
and
those
services
have
to
be
paid
for
one
way
or
the
other.
L
L
B
B
A
Thank
you,
mister
man,
first
of
all,
in
the
last
development
charge
by
law,
this
exception,
which
is
a
50%
reduction
in
the
roads
component
of
the
development
charge
for
apartments,
only
is
coupled
with
the
requirement
to
only
provide
one
parking
spot
for
those
those
apartments.
So
it's
a
two
pronged
approach
to
getting
developing
around
translations
and
reducing
the
required
parking.
The
sponsors
group
looked
at
this
and
in
terms
of
the
reduction
last
time
was
on
the
entire
transit
network
or
the
rapid
transit
network.
I
should
should
clarify
the
period
of
the
bylaw.
A
The
exemptions
amounted
to
some
5.8
or
5.9
million
dollars
in
the
reduction
in
the
roads
and
related
services
component.
So
when
the
sponsors
looked
at
it
and
they
looked
at,
they
tried
to
balance
off
the
the
the
exemption
with
the
desire
to
promote
a
growth
around
the
translation.
The
recommendation-
and
it
is
before
you
was
to
reduce
the
exemption
from
its
broad
base
to
strictly
the
Confederation
line
and
the
Confederation
line
stations
and
the
at
the
time.
A
At
that
point,
the
sponsors
and
staff
felt
that
they
have
struck
the
appropriate
balance
between
the
the
financial
requirements
of
the
development
charged
by
law
and
the
desire
to
locate
growth,
where
you
really
want
it,
because
we
want
to
see
growth
at
those
Tod
areas,
and
this
is
another
tool
to
ensure
that
that
growth,
specifically
residential
growth,
occurs
because
we
know
that
development
at
those
transitions
is
going
to
be
part
of
the
success
of
LRT
program
and
the
investment
that
were
making
there.
So
that
was
the
rationale
behind
the
reason
to
provide
the
exemption.
A
When
we
looked
at
the
value
the
entire
transit
network
was
5.9.
We
felt
that
if
we're
going
to
the
Confederation
all-
and
it
would
be
less
than
there
than
that-
so
it
seems
to
be
an
appropriate
balance
of
the
need
to
provide
or
the
to
provide
encouragement
to
see
apartment
development
on
our
transit
stations
and
recognizing
the
financial
reality
of
the
developer
charged
by
law.
I,
don't
know
if
mr.
Moser
wants
to
add
anything
to
to
that.
From
from
his
perspective,.
H
Yoshua
elekid,
as
cherry
humid
said,
is
that
he
would
just
from
a
strategic
point
of
view,
we
spend
a
lot
of
time
on
the
Confederation
stations
during
all
the
pre-planning
in
terms
of
laying
down
the
strategy
for
the
land
use,
also
laying
down
the
heights.
What
kind
of
zoning
that's
in
place
so
that
people
could
come
and
just
develop.
So
this
we
view,
there's
just
one
more
tool
that
we
can
use
to
help
development
take
place
around
the
transit
stations.
B
L
G
G
G
G
G
H
No,
you
were,
shall
we,
we
don't
know
the
exact
number
again,
there's
the
12
stations
and
it
would
be
hard
to
say
how
many
properties
when
we,
when
we
did
the
all
of
the
CD
piece
for
those
areas.
We
were
looking
at
an
area
800
meters
around
it.
So
there
would
be
considerable
number
of
properties
involved.
L
C
H
H
Think
you
or
should
relates
more
to
everything,
isn't
a
straight
line,
and
so
when
we
did
the
review
of
it,
there's
areas
that
have
physical
barriers
so
that
it
went
to
you
know
a
larger
area
to
get.
If
you
will
the
ability
to
get
to
it
so
went
from
68,
because
in
sometimes
just
that
the
physical
barriers
that
are
that
are
there.
L
A
First
of
all,
we
spoke
into
the
City
of
Vancouver
and
in
the
and
Vancouver
does
not
collect,
develop
majorities
for
transit
and
therefore
does
not
have
any
transit
related
incentives,
but
the
this
flows
from
our
last
by
law,
the
that
we
have
had
an
exemption
or
an
incentive
in
lost
by
allot
to
incent
transit
along
development
along
the
transit
way
within
600
meters
straight
line.
But
if
you
are,
if
you
have
to
walk
more
than
800
meters,
you
don't
qualify
for
the
exemption.
So
it's
a
pretty
focused
exemption
around
our
transit
stations.
H
Mr.
Merrit
we've
had
certainly
looked
at
this
in
a
number
of
number
of
studies
that
we've
done
the
last
one
that
we
did
was
last
year
where
there
was
the
idea,
the
IBM
starting
the
Smarter
Cities,
where
we
did
look
at
how
we're
going
to
be
able
to
have
development,
take
place
around
the
around
the
stations
and
one
of
the
you
know
from
a
long
list
of
items
that
they
spoke
to
and
spoke
to
in.
H
Their
board
was
yeah
things
like
having
the
zoning
in
place
having
a
quick
development
view
process,
and
they
didn't
include
that
having
reduced
development
charges
as
a
gain,
the
assistant
house
development
take
place.
So
a
good
bit
from
a
theoretical
point
of
view.
Look
you
looked
at
it
in
terms
of
how
we're
going
to
help
you
know
people
get
in
there
early.
H
The
other
point
just
want
to
mention
in
some
ways:
it's
yes,
it's
incentive
to
be
able
to
have
people,
do
good
development
take
place,
but
it's
also
an
incentive
to
have
people
not
provide
additional
parking.
So
we
try
to
in
this
relates
to
apartments
where
you
know
in
advance
of
a
station.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
the
right
amount
of
parking
is
provided
and
not
more
than
they're
needed.
This
is
one
way
of
being
able
to
accomplish
that.
H
L
L
A
A
Mic
on
sorry,
mr.
Mehra
I
just
wanted
to
for
fear
of
prolonging
this
counsel.
Surely,
but
one
of
the
things
that
we
are
finding
and
counsel
hard
to
may
be
able
to
speak
to
it
is
that
this
incentive
and
and
she's
got
a
motion
that
widens
the
incentive
because
she's
seeing
it
happen
along
the
transit
way
in
her
in
her
constituency,
where
you're
getting
developers,
building
on
a
trans
way,
higher
Heights
and
a
more
a
density,
they're
coming
and
saying
you're,
giving
that
away.
A
I'm
planning
on
that-
and
this
is
why
I'm
developing
in
that
in
that
area,
I,
can
think
I.
Think
it's
the
Kappa
Nelly
proposal,
long
field
station
has
been
predicated
on
and
and
went
there
because
of
the
incentives.
So,
if
you're
looking
at
an
example,
that's
if
you
look
for
an
example
there's
one
in
our
own
backyard.
Don't.
H
Thank
you
how
much
mr.
mayor,
it's
not
often
that
I
agree
with
councillors
relly,
but
today
is
gonna,
be
one
of
those
days.
I
personally,
don't
understand
how
at
the
beginning
of
this
presentation
were
complaining
about
having
given
away
ninety
two
million
dollars
and
development
charges
through
exemptions
and
the
process
is
recommending
another
exemption,
it's
so
a
question
to
miss
similar.
What's
the
finance
departments
view
of
these
kinds
of
exemptions.
G
Mr.
mayor
being
conservative
in
nature,
the
finance
view
is
always
we
before
not
to
give
money
away.
But
we
understand
this
is
a
development
tool
that
mr.
Moser
is
looking
for
to
be
able
to
encourage
development
in
that
area.
And
given
you
a
significant
investment
in
the
Confederation
line,
he
would
like
to
see
and
I
guess.
The
rest
of
the
city
would
like
to
see
that
we
use
whatever
we
can
to
make
certain.
The
growth
goes
down
and.
G
There
is
no
real
risk
in
implementing
this
exemption.
The
should
stop
calling
it
an
exemption
because
it
isn't
it's
actually
just
a
reduction.
There's
no
risk
in
implementing
this
reduction.
The
city
is
not
funding
the
share
that
is
being
forgiven,
and
so
it
ends
up
just
falling
on
to
the
next
bylaw,
as
we
make
an
adjustment
to
the
reserve
fund
balance
to
make
it
to
give
credit
for
the
fact
that
this
reduction
happened
during
the
life
of
the
bylaw,
but.
H
G
This
would
result
in
additional
debt,
and
what
would
happen
is
the
only
debt
we
put
on
for
development
charges
is
when
a
project
comes
in
higher
than
we
have
in
the
background
study.
So
that
is
the
portion
that
gets
allocated
debt.
The
rest
of
it
ends
up
being
a
charge
against
the
reserve,
and
so,
if
there
aren't
sufficient
funds
in
the
reserve,
the
reserve
ends
up
being
in
a
deficit
and
that
deficit
gets
incorporated
into
the
next
charge.
So
this
would
not
result
in
the
issuance
of
debt
by
the
city.
G
H
Well,
as
I
said,
I'm,
not
a
big
fan
of
this,
it
seems
to
me
that
it's
as
councillor
Shelley
said
these.
These
property
owners
have
hit
the
jackpot.
It's
like
subsidizing,
someone's
lot
of
max
away
and
after
they've
won
the
big
one.
They've
won
the
one,
the
big
one,
so
I'm
not
going
to
be
I'm
supporting
of
the
motion.
I,
don't
support
this
reduction.
It
just
doesn't
seem
to
make
any
sense
to
me.
Thanks.
H
C
Mr.
mayor,
if
the
reduction
were
taken
out
of
the
ba
ba-
and
there
was
a
desire
council
for
whatever
reason
some
years
later-
to
reinstate
it-
there's
a
process
requirement
that
one
has
to
go
through,
so
there
would
have
to
be
a
background
study
generated
notice
of
it,
given
a
public
meeting
held,
but
having
met
that
process
requirement.
Yes,
it
could
be
reinstated.
Subsequently,
okay,.
J
You
mr.,
have
they
I
just
wanted
to
mention
that
I
have
a
motion
coming
up.
That
would
sustain
the
current
practice
along
our
rapid
transit
corridors,
and
so
I
won't
be
supporting
the
sure
le
motion.
In
fact,
I
want
you
to
consider
where
the
real
Rapid
Transit
is
going
to
be
for
the
next
20
years.
At
least
it's
going
to
be
from
tönnies
to
Blair.
J
Do
we
not
want
to
have
intensification
along
those
transit
ways?
I'll
tell
you
that
in
the
case
of
Bar
Haven
at
the
long
field
station
and
at
several
years
now
go
at
least
four
or
five
that
we
had
campanelle
command
there
bought
from
the
Ottawa
Community
Land
Development
Corporation?
Yes,
it's
true
in
the
agreement.
It
doesn't
say
that
we're
going
to
give
the
reduction,
because
there
was
an
assumption
that
it
wasn't
going
to
change
so
that
kind
of
wording
was
not
necessary
within
it.
J
We
now
are
going
to
say
you
know
what,
when
that
deal,
we
made
that
gave
us
an
eight
story.
Apartment
building
I
know
that
doesn't
sound
like
much
when
you
have
there
what
we're
gonna
build
on
hindenburg
and
s
history,
but
when
you
get
stack
tones
as
you're,
how
thing
now
that's
going
in
the
right
direction,
because
that
means
less
cars.
J
That
means
convenience
for
people
and
people
that
move
there
are
getting
a
more
affordable
product
which,
for
Haven
traditionally
doesn't
have
a
mix
other
than
very
marginally,
for
people
to
live
work
and
play
in
that
community.
Many
of
the
people
that
work
in
the
retail
stores,
the
mass
majority
of
them
do
not
live
in
bar
Haven.
They
do
come
out
in
the
bus.
I
would
like
them
to
be
able
to
afford
to
live
there.
J
So,
just
to
give
you
an
example
in
the
Campanelli
situation
that
long
field
station,
the
difference
for
him
is
the
transportation
credit
per
unit
was
about
$2,500
and
the
increase
is
about
$1,800,
so
they're
going
to
be
hit
with
both
increases,
which
is
on
a
two-bedroom
apartment.
I,
don't
like
that!
J
I
could
tell
you
I,
can't
even
tell
you
if
I
have
any
two-bedroom
apartments
today,
I
don't
but
on
honest
building
that
they
would
build
a
65%
increase
in
the
cost,
so
the
unit
would
go
from
$7,800
unit
to
12,000
now
you're,
taking
away
from
people
who
actually
would
like
to
live
in
a
beautiful
community,
that's
surrounded
by
parks
in
a
developed
community.
That
already
has
the
schools
already
has
the
splash
pads
already,
as
a
sports
field
already
has
the
shopping
and
right
on
the
transit
route?
That's
what
this
means.
J
It
also
means
down
at
the
stranded
station,
where
I
have
zoning
in
place
for
ten-story
apartment
buildings
and
now,
just
beyond
that
in
councilor
durations
area,
we've
just
recently
passed
a
16-story
building.
These
are
game,
changers
and
I.
Think
it's
what
we
want
the
cost
according
to
chair
Hume
and
mr.
Moser,
in
the
conversation
we
had
yesterday,
is
5
million
dollars
to
stay
the
way
we
are
today.
J
My
motion,
if
it
gets
to
see
the
light
of
day,
will
say:
let's
leave
what
we
have
today,
because
it's
working
in
the
is
where
we
want
people
to
be
getting
out
of
cars
when
you
want
the
developers
to
be
building
product
that
they
not
really
building,
they
aren't
building
those
kinds
of
product.
Otherwise.
So
in
this
case,
if
with
the
shirali
motion
goes
through,
then
I'm
read
to
you
the
the
fact.
The
absolute
fact
with
one
developer
is
doing
something
that
I
believe
that
we
want
him
to
do.
Thank
you,
Thank.
K
Thank
you.
Mister
ma'am
leave
it
to
councillor
Sher
Ali
to
take
us
into
some
interesting
twists
on
how
we
should
pay
for
things
and
the
interesting
twist
really
here
is
the
original
premise
that
we
started
all
this
growth
should
pay
for
growth,
and
so
one
of
the
first
things
we
do
is:
how
do
we
reduce
that?
Or
how
do
we
diminish
that
principal
and
part
of
it
is
hey?
Let's,
let's
give
everybody
a
break
if
they're
closer
to
transit
and
that's
actually
a
good.
K
It's
probably
a
good
approach,
it's
an
incentive
in
terms
of
trying
to
get
the
kind
of
development
we
want,
but
we
see
we
see
what
happens
when
we
do
those
kinds
of
incentives
in
the
downtown.
The
downtown
core
was
a
good
example.
We
want
to
stimulate
growth
down
there,
so
we
gave
a
break
on
development
charges.
K
We
became
actually
a
victim
of
our
own
success
because
it
worked
way
better
than
we
expected
him
by
the
time
we
put
the
brakes
on
it
was
every
developer
was
charging
through
the
door
trying
to
get
in
on
the
action
this
one
here
is.
Is
that
is
even
more
interesting
because
our
own
staff
have
put
forward
a
white
paper
on
funding
potential
about
four
LRT
and
we
talked
about
the
off
uplift
and
value
and
miss
Shepherd's
I
submitted
during
the
when
we
talked
about
LRT
funding.
K
I
submitted
a
study
from
outside
of
Canada
that
talked
about
how
LRT
could
be
paid
for
and
I
think
at
the
time.
You
agree
that,
yes,
as
property
values
increase,
we
should
be
benefitting
from
some
of
that
and
using
it
to
pay
for
LRT.
This
actually
goes
the
opposite
way.
It
basically
says
yeah,
let's
encourage
growth
around
LRT
and
but
let's
reduce
the
let's
reduce
the
cost,
so
I'm
looking
at
what's
happening
around
the
province
a
little
bit
and
interesting
enough.
Mr.
K
mayor,
your
former
call,
the
minister
Minister
Murray
went
into
Hamilton
to
convince
them
how
good
their
LRT
would
be
in
terms
of
uplifting
their
values
and
that's
what's
100
percent
funding
from
the
province.
If
we
want
to
talk
about
for
funding
for
LRT,
maybe
that's
the
place
to
start
and
he's
having
trouble
convincing
them
there
and
they're,
not
even
so
on
incentives
out
there.
The
the
other
study,
that's
out
there
talks
about
how
developers
should
be
paying
upfront
for
some
of
these
for
some
of
the
transit
improvements.
That's
not
happening
here.
K
We're
actually
swinging
the
pendulum,
the
other
way
trying
to
say
we're
so
convinced
of
our
transit
initiatives
that
we're
gonna
subsidize
you
to
develop
around
their
transit
stations,
I
really
hate
to
say
about
any
councillor,
sure
Elly's,
actually
right
for
a
change.
Thank
you
and
mr.
mayor.
If
you
want
to
comment
on
fair
funding
from
the
province,
feel
free
to
because
we'll
take
a
hundred
percent
for
LRT
any
day.
I
Thank
you
next
speaker
is
caster
cherry
channel.
Thank
you
very
much,
I'm
pleased
to
join
the
club
of
people
who
might
have
been
wrong
some
times
in
the
past,
but
I
think
we're
right
on
this.
One
I
take
council
how
those
points
to
heart,
but
I
think
that
was
then-
and
this
is
now
I-
think
we're
at
a
point.
I
A
city
that
needs
to
encourage
people
to
build
near
transit.
We
are
at
a
tipping
point
of
our
transit
becoming
so
effective
and
so
attractive,
as
well
as,
unfortunately,
depending
on
how
you
look
at
it
at
a
tipping
point
where
congestion
is
now
so
severe
in
some
areas
that
the
incentive
to
live
near
transit
already
exists.
I
Therefore,
the
incentive
to
develop
and
sell
or
rent
near
transit
hubs
already
exists,
so
I
believe
we
are
now
just
past
the
point
where
we
need
to
be
encouraging
people,
and
you
could
use
the
word
subsidized
people
to
try
to
get
the
ball
rolling.
The
ball
is
rolling.
That
is
happening
now
sure
there
will
be
some
stations
that
are
less
attractive
than
others.
It
will
come,
others
will
be
immediately
successful
and
I
think
we're
just.
We
are
literally
shortchanging
ourselves
and
the
taxpayers
as
a
city
if
we
are
offering
incentives,
subsidies
that
just
aren't
necessary.
I
D
I
G
You
and
mr.
mayor
well,
I
too,
agree
with
that
councillor
sure
alley
that
I
think
it's
unnecessary
to
provide
this
incentive.
I
think
the
incentive
that
we're
providing
along
the
Confederation
line
is
the
2.1
billion
dollars
in
funding
to
build
that
line.
And
you
look
at
cities
like
Vancouver
who
built
the
Canada
Line.
They
haven't
offered
any
further
incentive,
but
they've
had
a
huge
uptake
in
projects
along
that
line,
because
there's
an
obvious
benefit
and
I'm.
G
Looking
at
my
own
ward
at
the
transit
way
in
South
case,
what
we're
currently
doing
a
community
design
plan
and
I'm
looking
at
the
density
that's
being
proposed
for
that
single
site
and
they
I
mean
we're
in
the
early
stages.
But
the
draft
I've
seen
has
numerous
numerous
high-rise
buildings
on
the
site
somewhere
in
the
order
of
30
well
to
give
the
owners
of
that
property
that
kind
of
uplift
and
value
of
their
property
by
up
zoning
it.
G
To
that
extent,
if
that's
not
incentive
enough,
what
is
because
that
has
got
to
be
better
than
any
649
lottery
going
like
that's
a
huge
uplift
in
value.
But
you
know
what,
if
you
actually
put
all
of
those
new
residents
there,
you
put
all
those
new
condos
there.
You
bring
all
that
density
to
that
area.
Well,
frankly,
you're
gonna
need
some
road
connections.
You're
gonna
need
some
psychopaths.
You're
gonna
need
that
stuff,
and
now
we're
saying:
oh,
the
tax
payer
is
going
to
pay
for
that.
G
Not
the
people
that
are
going
there
and
I
don't
think.
That's
right,
I
think
dents
I
think
development
needs
to
pay
for
itself
and
that's
the
principle
that
we
have
enunciated
around
here.
I
think
we've
already
created
huge
incentives
through
the
investments
that
we've
made
in
public,
transit
and
I.
Don't
think
we
need
to
do
more
and
I
think
it'll
be
followed,
because
if
it's
successful
it's
going
to
be
hugely
expensive
for
the
taxpayer
and
that's
what
I
think
council
Israelis
fight.
Thank
you.
A
H
Back
in
the
day,
there
wasn't
a
lot
of
incentive
around
the
nodes,
so
you
didn't
see
a
lot
of
building,
but
we
are
doing
that
with
with
the
rezoning.
It
is
a
gift
from
God
for
them.
They're
gonna
have
the
opportunity
not
to
jump
through
the
bureaucratic
planning
hoops
that
we've
had
to
put
them
through
up
to
this
point,
and
that's
that's
their
gift,
that's
what
they're
getting
out
of
the
deal,
but
when
I
go
to
Transportation
Committee
and
ask
for
three
million
dollars.
H
I
think
that's
kind
of
our
goal
is
to
get
people
onto
this
new
train,
rebuilding
and
there's
no
money
for
it.
I
have
a
harder
time
saying:
well,
you
know
what
there's
a
possibility
of
DC
money's
coming
in
we'll
just
give
that
away.
That's
money,
I
could
use
for
that
cycling
line
so
again,
I'll
be
supporting
the
account
sir
Shirley's
motion
on
this
one
for
anything
to
build
it
out.
She.
A
Councillor
Clark
that
job
I'm
supposed
to
be
identified
in
2004
by
law.
The
sponsors
and
staff
actually
recommended
that
you
discontinue
this
incentive
council
put
it
back
in
in
in
2004,
we
maintained
it
in
2009
and
we've
scoped
and
with
the
recommendation
before
you
is
scoping,
it
back
to
focus
and
what
what
was
thought
to
be
captious
priority,
which
is
promoting
promoting
transit,
oriented
development
by
reducing
only
the
road
component
of
the
development
charge
by
50%,
and
not
other
so
you're,
reducing
the
load
component,
the
roads
will
the
road
money
will
will
rise.
A
A
H
It
seems
to
be
that
I
went
along
with
this
because
I,
like
most
of
you,
want
to
see
good
development
around
the
transit
notes,
I'm
hearing
the
other
side
of
the
argument
that
that
incentivizing
anything
that
was
my
base
position
to
start
with.
Is
that
incentive
it
don't
need
they
give
incentives
or
discounts
or
whatever
you
want
to
call
them,
because,
frankly,
they
have
an
attractive
community
and
they
will
build
there
and
they
will
by
not
having
to
pay
into
that
incentives.
H
What
we
have
to
do-
and
you
passed
a
motion
earlier-
we'll-
have
to
pick
it
up
out
of
our
ordinary
everyday
budget
and
feed
it
back
into
the
development
charge
fund,
so
they'll
balance
it
so
you've
got.
You
have
two
sides
of
this
one
on
your
annual
budget
exercise
you're
going
to
ask
for
money
to
do
things,
and
it's
not
going
to
be
there
from
development
charges
budget
if
we
reduce
the
intake.
So
it's
my
it's
my
opinion,
then
incentives
as
far
as
development
charges
are
not
a
good
idea.
H
I'm
gonna
make
major
arguments
of
it
in
the
sponsors
group
and
I.
Probably
shouldn't
make
one
today,
but
was
clear-cut.
If
you
move
to
reduce
development
charges
everywhere
anywhere,
you
will
have
to
pay
for
it
when
the
time
comes
to
do
various
projects,
and
so
mr.
Shelley,
despite
the
fact
that
I
never
agree
with
them,
has
a
point.
I.
D
L
C
C
L
Basically,
landowners
around
the
transit
stations
are
receiving
a
huge
windfall
and
that's
certainly
enough
incentive
that
doesn't
get
them
to
develop
nothing
well
in
any
tax
break
that
we
give
the
landowners
around
the
the
transit
stations
has
to
be
paid
for
by
existing
taxpayers.
So,
ironically,
the
people
benefiting
from
the
service,
the
people
who
live
in
and
the
landowners
around
the
new
transit
stations
would
be
the
only
ones
not
paying.
L
B
Thank
You
councillor
I'm,
going
to
support
the
motion
for
some
of
the
same
arguments.
I
think
the
incentives
are
there,
we're
certainly
rolling
out
the
red
carpet
as
we
build
the
Confederation
line
and
I
think
that
in
of
itself
is
enough,
and
secondly,
if
we
find
that
this
is
not
acting
as
a
magnet,
we
have
every
right
as
a
council
or
future
council
to
reconsider
this
and
offer
incentives
at
that
time.
So,
on
the
motion,
yeas
and
nays,
please.
G
H
H
H
B
A
Mayor
before
you
go
to
the
last
motion,
and
the
last
reports
like
you
just
had
I
want
to
bring
two
committees
council's
attention.
Just
three
last
points
that
that
wraps
up
the
the
development
charges
and
it's
not
related
to
the
charge,
but
it's
related
to
the
ongoing
activities
of
and
what
what
flow
from
the
work
that's
been
done
related
to
the
next
term
of
council
priorities
coming
out
of
planning
and
growth
growth
management.
The
sponsors
group
has
recommended
to
mr.
A
Moser
and
his
team
that
we
take
a
look
at
the
management
and
use
of
front
ending
agreements
how
development
charges
I
used
to
pay
back
when
you
enter
into
those
front
Agreements
a
review
of
the
brownfields
policy
in
the
next
term
of
counsel
and
trying
to
wrestle
to
the
ground.
The
issue
allowed
the
costs
of
projects.
You
know
we
the
whether
it's
hazel
beam
road
in
casa,
congress
area
or
lime,
Bank
Road,
our
roads
and
our
networks
are
getting
larger
and
larger
and
much
more
costly.
A
So,
council,
councillor
hubely,
has
agreed
to
out
of
the
develop
charge
sponsors
group
to
take
on
the
championship.
If
you
will,
during
the
next
term
of
counsel
of
a
review
of
those
standards
to
determine
once
and
for
all
what
is
an
affordable,
Road
and
wrote
and
development
charge
projects,
because
we're
costly
faced
with
the
issue
of
our
roads
are
too
costly.
A
Our
infrastructure
is
too
costly
because
our
standards
are
gold-plated
and
council
hubely
will,
after
during
the
next
term
of
council,
create
a
council
working
group
similar
to
the
development
charge
of
sponsors
and
with
the
support
of
mr.
Moser
and
his
team.
Try
to
wrestle
that
issue
down
so
that
we
can
come
to
a
common
consensus
among
our
residents
among
members
of
council
and
among
the
development
industry
is
what
is
the
appropriate
level
of
standards
for
for
our
infrastructure.
So,
mr.
A
B
To
you
and
I
echo
Kelsey
Humes,
thanks
to
the
your
colleagues
who
were
members
of
the
sponsors
committee,
they
put
in
a
lot
of
work
and
also
the
you
council
Hume.
Thank
you
for
your
leadership
on
this.
So
you
have
the
final
motion.
As
do
we
not
have
number
12
still
before
us,
so
if
you'd
like
to
just
introduce
that-
and
a
second
of
my
counts
are
hardier.
A
C
B
A
B
Mr.
Mann,
okay,
any
questions
or
comments
on
the
Hume
harder
motion
on
the
motion
adopt
a
carried.
Thank
you
very
much
and
thanks
to
our
staff
for
their
work
as
well.
So
the
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
planning
committee
report
number
72
have
on
the
middle
us
all
dues
to
communicate:
loeben
yzma
zoning
11
31
Tehran
Road.
We
have
a
motion
by
councillor
Wilkinson
seconded
by
Councillor
hubely
councillor
Wilkinson.
If
you'd
like
to
introduce
your
motion
and
explain
what
it.
E
E
The
existing
house,
which
is
part
of
this
development,
was
a
six
metre
setback
and,
although
this
is
saying
is
that
we
should
be
consistent,
that
the
front
of
these
areas
should
be
the
six
metre
setback,
because
part
of
the
whole
community,
which
is
a
residential
community,
is
that
you
have
very
large
and
setbacks
along
Tarin
Road.
There
are
already
three
appointments
that
were
at
one
point
of
the
site
of
it
is
on
Tehran
Road.
They
are
all
set
well
back,
the
two
existing
ones
and
the
one
that
was
just
approved
by
council.
E
His
van
I
could
tell
you
the
owner
is
a
personal
friend
of
mine.
I
can
work
with
him
on
things
to
get
the
modifications
that
this
would
require
and
make
sure
that
it
would
work.
I
would
also
say
this
is
not
opposed
to
intensification.
I
already
have
I,
think
22
apartment
buildings
in
my
ward,
which
is
more
than
anybody
else
outside
the
Greenbelt
and
ten
of
those
are
seven
stories
are
more
including
ones
at
15
stories
height.
E
Interesting
enough
is
already
changing
because
they
found
the
market
is
not
what
they
expected,
and
that
happens
they're
already
reducing
the
number
of
units
they're
going
to
have
because
of
that
they're
changing
the
outline
of
the
building.
So
isn't
in
this
one
once
they
start
marketing,
you
are
going
to
find
changes
happening
and
if
we
have
the
setback
the
way
it
should
be
on
this
one,
then,
as
we
do
those
changes
which
I
sure
will
come,
then
we
can
do
them
within
the
context
of
the
community.
So
it's
just
asking
here
that
we
dues
Paul.
E
What
is
the
community
standard
along
this
particular
road
and
have
that
six
metre
setback
so
the
development
will
fit
in
to
the
community?
It
will
require
some
footprint
changes
to
the
buildings
and
I'll
work
with
the
developer.
To
make
sure
those
happen
that
he'll
be
satisfied
with
it.
I
can
tell
you
I've
spoken
to
him.
I
did
yesterday.
They
don't
want
to
make
any
changes
or
anything
I
understand
that
he's
got
the
plan
again.
E
D
E
Spoken
with
staff
here
today
and
you
didn't
ask
them
if
they
say
what
they
say:
they
are
comfortable
with
the
three
meters
that
they
approved
to
start
with.
They've
said
that
they
can
make
6
meters
work.
You
can
make
anything
work
in
fact,
and
then
we're
willing
to
work
with
the
developer
on
that
it
would
require
a
bit
have
changed
the
actual
official
plan
whereby
why,
because
and
so
that
way,
they
were
past
that
once
they've
made
those
changes
with
the
developer,
so
it
can
work
it's
consistent
with
the
community.
E
It
may
easily
save
us
an
OMB
hearing,
so
I
think
it's
very
worthwhile
to
do,
and
I
will
certainly
support
the
developer
and
going
ahead
with
what
he
wants
us
to
nine
stories
which
the
community
does
not
really
want,
but
which
he
has
asked
for
to
ensure
that
we
have
that
intensification
that
you're
asking
for
this
is
a
huge
intensification
of.
What's
there
now
and
it's
assistant
that
all
of
my
whole
Ward
has
been
going
this
way,
so
I
think
I
can
give
it
to
other
people
outside
the
Greenbelt.
E
Some
information
of
how
you
can
handle
these
without
causing
problems-
this
is
the
first
one
that
is
caught
in
on
the
end
has
caught
a
major
problem.
We
have
another
one
coming
soon
in
Beaverbrook
as
well,
where
the
developer
has
worked
with
the
community
and
you'll
find
this
when
the
community
would
be
supporting
because
they
worked
out
all
the
kinks
in
advance.
Unfortunately,
that
didn't
happen
here.
The
developer
didn't
want
to
have
any
change
to
what
he
his
dream
was,
and
we
were
not
able
to
do
that.
But
I
know
with
this
one.
E
G
G
G
I
D
B
Carried
motions
requiring
suspension
of
the
rules
of
procedure
Malaysia
also
their
regular
the
procedure
there
any
notices,
a
motion
for
consideration
at
subsequent
meeting.
There
are
a
number
of
them.
I
have
the
first
one
is
by
myself
seconded
by
Councillor
cadre
support
for
manufacturers
seeking
manufacturers
limited
liquor.
Sales
licenses
by
the
glass
license
from
AGCO,
so
this
is
a
requirement
under
provincial
legislation
to
allow
breweries
to
have
a
single
source
options
on
their
premises.
So
we'll
deal
with
that
at
the
next
meeting.
Next
notice,
emotion
is
from
councillor
Thompson
seconded
by
Councillor
Moffitt
councillor
Thompson.
I
You,
mr.
mayor
I,
just
this
is
this
an
issue
that
has
come
up
repeatedly
in
in
rural
areas,
specifically
second
time
in
Osgood,
Ward
and
I.
Just
want
I'll
just
to
reads,
and
it's
I
think
you
have
before
you
just
read
the
therefore
be
resolved
that
city
staff
deny
concurrence
for
this
project
and
its
city
staff
work,
but
tell
us
for
an
alternate
location
that
is
not
in
close
proximity
to
residential
homes
and
schools.
I
B
H
Thank
you
very
much.
Miss
mayor
where's,
the
planning
policy
of
the
province
of
material
is
to
encourage
compact
growth
in
order
to
minimize
the
cost
of
such
growth
and
whereas
development
is
occurring
in
municipalities
outside
the
City
of
Ottawa,
where
such
development
makes
extensive
use
of
Ottawa
infrastructure,
in
particular
roads
in
transit
and
whereas
development
outside
the
city
does
not
contribute
financially
to
the
cost
of
city
infrastructure,
therefore
be
resolved.
The
council
requests
the
minister
of
municipal
Affairs
and
housing
in
sheet
a
places
to
grow
exercise
for
Eastern
Ontario.