►
From YouTube: Ottawa Police Services Board – June 27, 2016
Description
Ottawa Police Services Board meeting – June 27, 2016 – Audio Stream
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas.
A
A
We
do
have
have
a
little
note
here
from
our
chief.
The
chief
cannot
be
here
this
evening,
he's
in
the
Agra
fall
for
the
materia
sociation
of
Chief
of
Police
Conference
he's
been
sworn
in
as
the
president
of
important
roles
in
policing
and
I
wanted
to
congratulate
the
chief
earlier.
He
was
selected
as
the
president
area
chief
of
police,
so
he
will
be
back
in
tomorrow
for
the
North
American
leaders
summit,
which
is
for
our
record
item
number.
A
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Item
number
five
out
of
a
pre-service
annual
report.
2015
the
Ottawa
Police
Service
Board,
received
this
report.
An
online
version
for
information
see
thank
you
item
number
six
complying
with
the
ministry
standard,
2015
annual
report,
the
auto
Police
Service
Road
receive
this
report
for
information
to
say
thank
you.
A
Thank
you
and
we
do
have
other
communication
from
the
interior,
Association
of
Police,
Service,
Board
or
ApS
B,
and
proposed
change
to
the
Highway
Traffic
Act.
Also
as
a
correspondent
is
there
correspond
receive.
Thank
you.
So
we
go
to
item
number
two
I'm,
the
chair
of
their
governing
policy
committee.
We'll
introduce
this
item.
Man,
member
Nicholson,
Thank.
B
B
We
also
looked
at
a
survey
which
had
been
done
by
the
Canadian
Association
of
police
governance.
We
reviewed
pertinent
legislation.
Police
services
act
the
empty
power.
We
looked
at
all
of
the
legal
implications.
We
looked
at
things
like
the
definition
of
a
meeting
before
we
came
to
this
recommendation
that
we
are
presenting
to
the
board.
B
Today
we
think
meetings
of
the
Police
Services
Board
have
always
been
advertised
and
held
in
public
with
all
of
the
agenda
and
minutes
publicly
available
and
members
of
the
public
of
Oregon
welcome
to
attend
and
speak
at
board
meetings
and
matters
within
the
jurisdiction
of
the
board.
Carlier
board
has
four
committees
each
comprised
of
three
members
that
meet
as
required.
They
have
no
decision-making
authority
and
the
board
has
been
following
current
practices
amongst
Police
Services
Board.
B
With
regard
to
the
holding
of
these
meetings
as
a
result
of
questions
recently
received,
the
move
undertook
this
review
of
our
procedures
and
we
think
it's
important
as
a
committee
that
it,
the
public,
sees
that
civilian
governance
is
acting
is
happening
so
in
the
interests
of
openness
and
transparency.
These
are
the
recommendations
that
we
are
making
to
the
board
today,
and
you
know
I
turn
it
over
for
further
discussion
if
needed.
Okay,.
A
B
B
Sorry,
we
made
publicly
available
to
provide
transparency
as
to
what
can
be
discussed
in
closed
sessions
versus
public.
That
committee,
cheers
on
a
routine
basis,
provide
an
update
on
committee
meetings
at
regular
board
meetings
and
at
minutes
of
committee
meetings,
be
included
on
the
board's
agendas,
public
or
confidential
depending
on
the
subject
matter,
and
that
the
content
of
the
myths
of
these
committees
consists
of
the
essence
of
the
subject,
the
outcome
and
a
summary
of
the
rationale
for
the
outcomes.
So
that
is
our
recommendation
to
the
board.
So.
B
C
If
you
think
these
are
working
sessions,
they're
not
committee
meetings,
I
mean
the
working
session
is
what
you
call
something
that
has
no
voting
capacity,
etc.
Normally,
we
wouldn't
even
have
you
introducing
this
to
tell
you
the
truth,
because
it's
just
a
working
group,
so
did
you
consider
just
abandoning
working
groups?
We.
C
Going
to
suggest
that
that's
what
we
do
and
we
have
all
the
work
come
here,
I
think
on.
Otherwise,
what
we're
doing
is
setting
up
a
system
which
we
have
rarely
have
public
come
to
speak
to
our
police
services
for,
and
so
maybe
we
would
get
more
people
coming
out
to
the
Police
Services
Board,
where
there's
more
people
the
media
is
there
etc
and
there's
more
engagement
in
the
process,
a
lot,
less
work
for
staff,
and
we
just
forego
about
and
just
just
have
before
us
that
maybe
we'd
have
to
have
more
presentations.
C
I
would
suggest,
but
but
certainly
this
presentation
could
be
limited
as
they
should
be
five
minutes
and
maybe
we'd
have
more
people
I.
Don't
think
that
we're
going
to
get
more
people
out
and
I,
don't
think
we're
going
to
get
more
media
and
I
think
that
it's
it's
something
that
should
have
been
considered
at
the
time
of
the
decision-making,
but
just
to
cancel
the
committee's
you.
C
Maybe
maybe
the
person
do
you
want
to
have
the
person
up
to
speak?
First,
I,
don't
I
just
was
asking
the
question
because
I
didn't
know
if
they,
because
I
haven't
seen
anything
until
this
report
came,
live
I
have
not
been
talked
to
about
it,
etc.
So,
when
I
received
that-
and
they
only
had
an
opportunity
to
review
my
agenda
on
the
weekend
by
planning
tomorrow,
I've
got
a
lot
of
priorities.
C
So
I
read
the
whole
thing,
I
thought:
how
did
we
get
to
here
so
quickly
and
why
did
we
doesn't
seem
like
there's
a
compelling
reason
why
you
have
to
other
than
the
fact
that
there
was
some
noise
in
the
media?
So
I'm
saying
is:
if
that
is
something
that
we
are
concerned
about,
we
always
have
the
media
here
they
come
out
for
us
for
sure.
Why
not
just
have
any
discussion
here?
Thank
you.
D
We
did
actually
questions.
I
asked
of
staff
was
whether
or
not
they
thought
the
committee.
The
working
committees
was
helpful
to
them
and
they
felt
that
it
was
because
the
discussions
are
can
be
quite
lengthy
at
time
and
I
think
would
be
very
difficult
in
a
public
board
meeting
to
have
the
kind
of
fissile
discussion.
It
certainly
couldn't
be
restricted
to
five
minutes.
D
We
often
have
meetings
that
go
on
for
an
hour
or
more,
but
even
the
star
presentations
tend
to
be
very
much
back
and
forth,
and
so
we
do
have
very
folsom
discussions
and
I
think
it
gives
an
opportunity
for
us
to
get
a
much
better
understanding
of
the
issue.
I
think
it
would
be
very
difficult
to
have
that
kind
of
really
important.
E
A
We
all
understand
three
board
members
do
not
make
decision,
that's
just
a
working
group
or
a
committee
who
have
mechanical
questions
to
the
staff
and
work
with
the
staff
and
try
to
to
go
little
bit
more
detail
because
we
come
to
their
board
meeting
and
it
seems
like
we
have
other
things
to
do
then
go
up
and
mechanical
afterthought.
It's
still
section.
A
35
of
the
police
service
F
gives
the
chair
of
the
committee
the
flexibility
if
they
feel
this
item
need
to
be
in
camera
at
the
call
of
the
chair
between
moving
camera,
like
just
like,
we
do
in
the
board
and
discuss
those
item
in
camera.
But
that's
that's!
That's
an
option
is
always
available
under
Section
35,
but
we
in
the
in
the
area
where
everyone
is
going
for
and
the
ministry
more
and
more
asking
for
more
transparency
and
an
accountability.
A
A
F
Because
we
want
to
have
some
discussions
at
the
same
time,
I
think
we
all
received
the
distributions
of
presentations,
and
sometimes
you
know
quite
lengthy.
You
know
thirty
three
slides
long
if
you
can
learn
to
work
with
those
presentations
to
make
them
shorter,
I
I.
You
know,
after
speaking
with
with
cancer
hooray
I'm,
starting
to
think
the
same
way.
Then,
as
chaired
the
library
board,
I
have
ad
hoc
groups
to
get
some
of
this
extra
work
done,
but
everything
gets
done
at
the
table
and
I
know
the
police
board's
a
bit
of
a
different
monster.
F
They
got
different
rules
as
same
with
Ottawa
Public,
Health
I'm,
starting
to
think
the
way
that
that
councillor
harder
is
said.
We
can
accommodate
I
hate
to
use
that
term.
But
if
we
were
to
start
a
little
bit
earlier,
reduce
the
slide
presentations
and
got
right
down
to
the
discussions,
we
can
get
everything
within
the
same
meeting.
That's
just
a
personal
view
and
I'll
wait
to
see
if
there's
any
other
discussions
around
the
table.
Mr.
chair,
maybe
you
wanted
a
to
give
some
feedback
on
that
as
well.
Hear.
C
A
motion:
do
you
want
me
to
read
it
sure
that
working
groups
be
disbanded
and
all
work
come
before
it
will
PS
regular
board
meetings
and
just
to
speak
to
the
question
of
confidentiality
as
it
was
mentioned,
when
we
have
our
board
meeting,
we
have
confidential
issues
which
camera
issues
which
we
move
for
the
same
thing.
Any
of
those
will
just
go
into
that
same
segment.
Thank
you.
Thank.
G
You
Jay
I
just
had
a
quick
few
quick
comments,
but
from
some
of
the
discussion,
I
have
many
ones
which
will
be
fun.
I
was
just
curious,
I
read
the
report
and
I
mentioned
posting
this
up
subcommittee
meetings
on
the
city
on
the
website.
This
was
kiss.
I
could
get
a
clarification
if
there's
any
de
agenda
site
as
it
handles
the
board
meeting,
or
is
it
just
a
one
page
somewhere
on
the
auto?
Please
CA
they
say
for
that,
because
I
will
just
filled
into
some
of
the
projects.
I
do
no
question.
G
I
had
is
just
a
clarification,
perhaps
instructions
for
the
committee
chairs
on
page
five
in
the
background
yeah
a
closer
to
the
end.
It
excerpts
that
Police
Services,
Act
and
paragraph
four
makes
it
very
clear.
What
paragraph
3
says:
meetings
shall
be
open,
know
no
exceptions
and
then
paragraph
four
provides
the
criteria
for
where
it
may
become
a
closed
meeting
and
the
word
may-
and
that
is
very
critical.
It's
at
the
discretion
of
the
chair
in
their
judgment
later
on.
G
In
the
same
report,
page
nine,
the
same
content
is
referenced,
but
the
paragraph
lead
in
on
on
paragraph
four
is
omitted
and
you
just
see
the
criteria
where
the
Police
Services
Act
allows
a
closed
meeting
to
occur
and
I
think
that's
just
might.
If
a
committee
chair
later
is
referencing
this
policy,
you
might
might
miss
out
that
it's
may
close.
The
meeting
so
study
if
the
instructions
after
this
point
to
the
commuters
could
always
clarify
that
there
is
no
provincial
law.
G
That
says,
meetings
must
be
closed
at
any
time,
because
there's
always
that
public
interest
of
balance
and
I'd
hate
to
say
I
have
a
committee
chair.
Just
you
know
busy
day
lots
of
stuff
to
do
and
just
make
that
mistake
of
closing
meeting
when
perhaps
not
realizing
they
could
have
kept
it
open.
Had
they
wanted
to
so
I
was
just
a
clarification.
G
Also
I'm
pretty
sure
was
a
procedure
that
will
always
know
about
a
closed
meeting.
I.
Think
closed
meetings
are
fine,
there's,
always
a
good
reason
for
it.
I
trust
the
chairs
discussion.
Just
I
would
like
to
know
if
that
that
transition
into
and
out
of
close,
would
always
be
part
of
the
records
just
so
the
public
can
know
that
a
an
item
was
considered,
just
as
it
does
in
the
city
today
and
then
finally,
I
think
I
think
this
is
a
great
idea.
G
The
bulk
of
my
comments
here
come
from
having
read
the
the
report
and
at
this
point
in
a
city
equivalent
at
this
point,
I
would
be
addressing
full
council
which
doesn't
happen
at
City
Council.
It's
at
that
point.
It's
too
late
for
public
input.
The
board
is
different.
The
board
accepts
public
delegations
at
this
time
and
I
just
find
it
kind
of
ironic
or
funny
that
all
of
my
comments
here
today
would
have
been
directly
applicable
at
the
the
next
time.
The
procedures
subcommittee
considers
a
review
of
this
policy.
G
I
would
actually
attend
the
policy
subcommittee
to
offer
my
comments
on
the
draft
report,
at
which
point
there's
more
time
for
that
exhaustive
discussion,
I'm
sorry,
member
Smallwood
mentioned
and
the
chair
that
you
know
that's
when
I
could
have
attended
for
20
minutes
and
had
this
back
and
forth.
It's
interesting
not
in
a
5
minute
constraint
and
offer
had
the
opportunity
to
do
that
and
then,
by
the
time
it
rises
to
this
board.
G
It's
all
been
cleaned
up
and
it's
great
and
off
it
goes
or
you
starts
at
public
feedback
because
by
then
the
media
have
had
an
opportunity
to
cover
the
subcommittee.
You
know
more
information
is
made
public.
Maybe
the
public
is
really
engaged
and
they
still
have
the
opportunity
to
come
here
and
I.
Think
there's
just
only
good
things
come
from
that
and
then
I
think
if
I
had
more
time,
I
wasn't
keeping
track
thirty
seconds.
G
Okay,
I
was
just
curious
about
the
the
board
recently
amended
its
rules
of
procedures
to
allow
a
delegation
such
as
myself
to
present
to
the
chair
through
the
executive
director
an
agenda
for
consideration.
That's
not
otherwise
on
an
agenda
which
I
find
a
very
good
practice
gives
the
board
an
opportunity
to
address
an
issue
that
isn't
otherwise
rising
to
the
board.
As
just
case
of
that
policy,
that's
moved
to
the
board,
I,
don't
know
if
it's
ever
been
utilized
yet
would
carry
down
to
the
subcommittee's.
G
So
if,
for
instance,
if
I
just
had
an
issue
on
this
item,
I
could
email
the
executive
director
and
through
them
through
them
the
chair
to
say,
would
you
like
to
consider
this
may
be
it
for
next
time
at
the
subcommittee
level,
and
maybe
that's
just
something
for
the
board
to
consider
just
an
idea
yeah.
It.
A
Is
the
same
procedure
was
sort
of
done
and
then
the
board
is
procedure.
So
the
kid
the
committee
of
the
working
group
is
the
same
procedure,
because
this
is
actually
our
board
procedures
to
fall
through
there
any
question
to
their
presenter
to
the
presenter
to
mr.
O'donnell,
okay,
mr.
O'donnell,
thank
you
very
much
for
joining
tonight.
A
C
Group
I,
don't
think
this
is
not
for
your
miss
talking
about.
This
is
more
for
mr.
white
from
being
on
many
many
boards
in
my
elective
time
and
other
things,
there's
a
very
big
difference
between
the
committee
meeting
and
a
working
group,
and
so
if
these
are
now
going
to
be
called
what
was
formerly
a
working
group
that
is
now
formally
going
to
be
a
formal
working,
sorry
committee,
then
I
can
see
that
the
same
rules
would
apply
and
somebody
could
come
and
speak
about
something
entirely
not
on
the
agenda
at
a
working
group.
C
H
C
But
mr.
white
they're
not
they're,
not
working
groups,
so
we
have
Committees
of
Council.
Well,
mr.
O'donnell,
anybody
in
the
room,
any
of
us
can
go
and
speak
alternatives,
for
example
we're
going
to
speak
okay,
but
then
we
have
sponsors
groups,
okay,
which
are
working
groups
and
the
sponsors
groups,
for
example,
on
building
better
smarter
suburbs,
building
better,
revitalize
neighborhoods
the
transportation
master
plan,
the
official
plan
development
charge
all
those
sponsor
groups
where
we
have
a
mix
of
people.
We
might
have
somebody
from
the
federation
community
associations.
C
We
may
have
three
or
four
councilors
and
three
people
from
the
industry
different
parts
of
Industry.
That's
a
working
group,
that's
not
advertised!
That
is
a
working
group
and
staff
use
that
for
technical
purposes
for
building
purposes
to
understand
where
they
need
to
go.
That's
always
been
my
opinion
of
the
work
that
was
done
with
the
exception
of
a
couple
that
would
never
be
public
anyways,
like
the
complaints
committee
or
Human
Resources
right
that
never
would
anyways
so
I
really.
So
are
we
going
to
call
these
now?
C
C
A
A
A
D
A
Myself
now
so,
the
motion
fails
on
the
on
the
item
itself.
Item
number
two,
that
date
time:
location
of
the
committee
meeting:
titan
quet,
okay,
thank
you
and
now,
and
one
decent
member
have
that
dissent.
Okay,
and
now
we
go
to
item
number
one,
the
chief
has
verbal
report
and
I
believe
the
acting
chief
shoe
Skinner
will
deliver
the
message
on
behalf
the
chief
chief.
E
Thank
You
mr.
chair
good
evening,
everyone
I
have
a
short
verbal
report
for
this
evening,
I'm
going
to
begin
with
some
excellent
and
quick
thinking,
police
work
by
two
of
our
officers
in
mid
June.
This
year,
district
investigator
Evan
hung
in
central
patrol
constable.
Kinga
Jonah
responded
to
a
call
and
Overbrook
apartment
where
they
encountered
a
man
thought
to
be
armed.
After
entering
the
residence,
the
officers
encountered,
the
man
a
bedroom,
he
had
his
back
turned
to
them.
His
gun
was
concealed
and
he
was
trying
to
flee.
E
Here
is
a
dangerous
situation,
and
both
officers
made
the
split-second
decision
to
tackle
him,
causing
the
gun
to
fall
to
the
floor.
He
was
found
with
180
grams
of
cocaine
and
a
loaded,
9-millimeter
handgun.
Our
officers
have
a
tough
job
to
do,
and
this
is
an
excellent
example
of
how
dangerous
and
volatile
situations
can
occur
every
day.
In
this
case,
their
training
experience
paid
off.
E
Federal
Police
Service
has
a
great
deal
of
experience,
maintaining
security
and
order
at
large
public
events,
but
even
for
our
service
this
week
week
will
be
extraordinarily
busy
as
we
support
the
North
American
leaders
summit
and
Canada
Day.
As
was
announced
Friday,
there
will
be
some
major
traffic
disruptions
related
to
Mouse.
We
have
been
working
with
our
partners,
businesses
and
the
city
to
minimize
the
impact
on
residents
and
visitors.
I'd
like
to
take
this
opportunity
to
thank
all
of
our
members.
E
Who've
been
working
alongside
our
partners
in
preparation
for
two
major
about
Tabac
events
this
week.
Finally,
I
wanted
to
provide
a
short
update
on
consultations
related
to
the
service
initiative.
We
were
very
pleased
to
hear
from
over
800
residents
to
our
online
questionnaire
and
about
200
stakeholders
through
the
consultation
sessions
meetings
and
presentations.
E
Here
are
a
few
of
the
key
things
we
heard.
There
is
a
need
to
ensure
that
we
improve
information
sharing
with
the
community
that
we
continue
to
build
relationships
with
the
community
and
they
will
maintain
and
improve
proactive
policing
and
engagement
activities
in
any
new
matter.
These
are
all
excellent
points
and
we
are
ensuring
the
model
reflects
those
comments,
we're
now
compiling
and
analyzing
the
feedback
and
the
royal
P,
providing
a
summary
of
those
in
our
quarterly
update
to
you
in
July.
Subject
any
questions,
that's
the
report
for
this
evening.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
D
A
E
D
E
There
are
many
drivers
valve
on
discipline
and
their
crime.
Severity
index
is
reflective
of
the
change
in
our
society
that
people
have
become
more
violent
and
the
people
that
are
actually
captured
by
the
police
tend
to
be
people
who
are
than
crime
they
often
which
results
in
longer
sentences
and
that's
what
the
crime
severity
index
is
built
upon.
D
I'm
still
a
class
as
to
why
we
seem
not
change
in
one
year,
just
like
I
I'm,
not
sure
if
I
got
more
gangs
coming
into
town,
is
that
I
said
increased
gang
activity
I've
just
wondering
what
could
be?
Why
we're
seeing
that
change,
and
is
this
something?
That's
that's
a
trend
or
is
it
just
is
it
may
be
a
blip
that
happened
in
the
last
year
and
that's?
Why
not
go
see
it
again?.
E
Say
that,
from
a
statistical
point
of
view,
we'd
have
three
years
with
the
statistics
to
be
able
to
so
that
it
was
a
trend
that
was
happening
but
from
from
a
crime
severity
perspective,
people
people
spend
their
whole
careers
trying
to
determine.
You
know
why
crime
goes
up
and
down
and
subject
to
to
a
master's
presentation
or
know
why
crime
increases
I'm,
not
sure
that
I
could
adequately
answer
that
question.
E
A
E
The
annual
report
actually
breaks
it
down
word
by
word,
and
you
can
see
that
some
some
words
have
a
slightly
increase
but
I.
Think.
If
you
actually
look
at
the
annual
report,
you
will
see
that
it's
a
general
increase
throughout
the
city
and
will
that
be
comparable
to
other
cities
in
Ontario
I
mean.
Is
there
the
same
sort
of
type
of
statistics
across
Canada
or
around
the
area
of
Norwegian?
Well,
I
think
it's
very
difficult
to
compare
one
city
to
another.
C
C
C
You
go,
oh
my
god,
what's
happening
bar
even
bring
out
the
tanks,
but
it's
one
incident
and
it's
very
rare
bar
Haven
really
and
in
many
suburban
areas,
graffiti
and
vandalism,
all
your
crimes
and,
of
course,
the
traffic
ones,
speeding
all
the
time
and
that
sort
of
thing,
so
you
just
have
to
be
very
careful
how
you
interpret
this
because
I
think
what
we're
seeing
in
the
report
is
that
we
live
in
a
very
safe
city.
Our
police
are
doing
a
great
job.
C
A
You
thank
you
number
thank
you
very
much,
acting
chief
and
on
the
chief
of
Verburg
report.
You
see,
thank
you
very
much
and
we
do
have
a
presentation.
I'll
turn
it
to
the
acting
chief
to
introduce
her
her
folks
to
item
number
three
implementation
of
Ontario
regulation:
50,
8/16,
collection
of
a
late,
find
information
acting
chief
thank.
E
You
very
much
mr.
chair,
you'll,
see
before
you
and
you've
met
there.
This
pair
before
they've,
presented
to
you
a
number
of
times.
We
have
the
inspector
mark
Patterson
and
there's
a
phantom
who
are
going
to
provide
you
information
on
the
interior,
iteration
and
the
updates.
As
far
as
the
board
is
concerned,
inspector
parson,
thank
you
both
for
your
welcome.
I
I
And
we
had
a
province-wide
consultation
for
Street
checks,
salinization
from
July
to
September
2015,
the
implementation
of
o-p-s
Street
check,
engagement
and
consultation
plan
and
from
this
consultation
time
we
submitted
is
to
the
province
and
October
2015
aware
the
Ministry
of
Community,
Safety
and
crushin
Services
released
a
draft
figuration
for
consultation
and
opiate
Services
Act,
and
that
was
entitled
election
either
information
certain
circumstances,
prohibition
and
duties.
That
draft
regulation
was
put
on
for
45
a
consultation
period
again
for
key
stakeholders
and
citizens
to
provide
their
input.
I
In
March,
22nd
2016
mention
a
few
notes
for
new
regulations,
collection,
identifying
information,
certain
circumstances,
again,
Priya's
prohibitions
and
duties
releases
in
Ontario
regulation.
5816
includes
rules
for
voluntary
public
police
interactions.
Identifying
information
is
collected
by
officers
also
includes
prohibitions,
including
arbitrary
collection
of
identifying
information,
as
well
as
training
and
reporting
and
policy
requirements.
There's
also
no
dysregulation
to
amend
the
police
conduct
section,
release
Services
Act.
I
The
regulations
do
not
apply
by
an
officer's
conducting
an
investigation
to
into
an
offense
the
reason
they're
suspected
or
has
being
committed,
or
in
other
circumstances,
at
a
specific
day
at
1:00
in
the
regulation,
for
example,
if
the
person
is
legally
required
to
provide
information,
for
example,
during
the
traffic,
stop,
I'm
gonna
lie
with
traffic
doc
or
if
the
person
is
under
arrest
for
being
detained
or
any
officers
executing
a
warrant.
Those
are
two
other
examples.
I
Autonomy
and
orientation,
the
regulation
has
very
aggressive
timelines,
taking
into
effect
two
phases
in
part
on
July,
1st
and
then
again
in
four
by
January
1st
2017.
The
other
police
is
very
well
positioned
for
the
first
outline
July
1st
2016,
which
includes
application
interpretation
of
this
regulation.
I
Prohibition
of
quotas
is
performed
as
a
performance
measurement
tool,
so
it
in
compliance
with
others.
Quotas
are
not
part
of
ApS
practices
or
policies,
performance
reviews,
commercial
processes
or
transfers.
The
Police
Services
Board
administrator
said
develop
policies
related
to
the
application
of
the
regulation
and
direction
to
the
Chiefs
of
Police
to
develop
procedures
consistent
with
the
board
policy
and
regulation.
I
Tommy,
an
open
invitation
for
January
1st
2017,
all
the
way
means
sections,
including
training,
and
the
amended
Court
of
combat
come
into
effect.
January
1st
2017
as
follows.
Officers
must
inform
the
person
of
their
right
not
to
provide
the
identifying
information.
Also,
this
provide
a
reason
for
requesting
identification.
I
27
June
2017
in
the
report.
Mr.
Alford
document
includes
the
officer's
name
and
identification
and
the
information
I'll
contact
the
UI
PID
and
if
their
concerns
of
a
team
or
action
and
how
to
access
information
officer,
must
also
keep
detailed
records
about
every
interaction
and
failure
to
comply.
These
regulation
could
be
a
code
of
conduct,
violation
for
police
officers.
I
Training
with
regulations
there's
a
substantial
training
requirement
prior
to
January
1st
2017.
The
province
is
appointed
a
round
table
of
experts
with
knowledge
of
human
rights,
community
issues
affecting
you
with
privacy
laws,
curriculum
development,
policing
and
other
relevant
fields
to
provide
input
to
the
development
of
new
training
for
peace.
I
I
I
I
As
well,
at
least
once
a
year,
the
chief
of
police
or
doesn't
has
to
conduct
a
detailed
review
to
the
database
to
verify
compliance
or
the
regulation
of
law.
Access
to
identifying
information
is
going
to
be
restricted,
as
is
found
to
be
if
it's
co-founded,
appropriately
access,
restricted
information
granted
by
the
chief
and
case-by-case
basis
for
specific
purposes.
Examples
are
ongoing
police
investigation,
the
proceedings
complying
with
a
legal
requirement
that
setter
access
to
this
identifying
information
is
also
very
strict
for
five
years
after
Center
to
into
a
police
database.
I
Identifying
information
which
is
collected
contrary
to
the
regulation,
shall
not
be
routine
longer
than
is
reasonably
necessary
to
ensure
the
informations
available
in
circumstances
which
acts
was
which
access
needed
noted.
For
several
reasons.
Some
of
these
include
for
the
purpose
of
increased
investigation.
International
legal
proceedings
anticipated
legal
proceedings,
as
well
as
for
the
purpose
of
evaluating
peace
officers,
performance.
I
I
Next
steps
regulations
present
significant,
unplanned
impacts
on
the
organization,
particularly
untrue
data
management
process.
In
storage
already
reporting,
we
will
continue
working
with
the
police
numbers,
as
well
as
the
potential
partners
to
ensure
compliance
with
the
new
relations
by
January
1st
2017.
These
are
the
application
key
implementation
activities
in
closing
regulated
interactions.
We
need
an
important
tool
for
solving
and
preventing
crime
in
our
community.
I
C
C
They
will
say
you
know,
that's
why
some
children
or
our
skin
that's
why
some
older
people
are
skinned
and
that's
very,
very
informal.
It's
actually
very
restricted
to
a
fairness.
I
think
that
the
public,
as
I
said
in
the
city,
expect,
have
expectations
that
I
think
that
you
meet
99.9
percent
of
the
time
all
the
time.
C
But
when
you're,
in
a
situation
where
you
just
no
information,
you've
got
to
reassure
the
public
through
us,
but
that's
the
information
going
to
go
with
I
mean
this
is
all
nice
and
some
sorry
this
and
some
bureaucrat
at
the
elected
person
in
Ontario
came
up
with
this,
but
really
we
care
about
the
people
in
this
city.
So
how
would
you
respond
to
that?
Has
this
gone
too
far
for
that
to
happen
that
we
know
what
we're
looking
for?
We
have.
C
We
are
in
a
certain
situation,
for
example
where,
on
the
weekend
you
had
the
stabbing
in
there
and
the
and
and
the
knife
attack.
Now
that's
a
little
bit
different.
It's
only
two
people
involved,
and
so
you
they
both
were
hurt,
so
you
got
them
both,
but
if
there
had
been
like
four
people
involved,
okay,
how
would
you
have
gone
after
that?
Who
would
you
have
chased
down
in
the
streets
or
stopped
in
the
streets
and
that
sort
of
thing.
I
I
Can
we
not
myself
and
my
family
demo
many
consultations
if
officers
are
engaged
in
investigating
an
offense
and
it's
been
committed
like
an
example,
you're
stabbing
scenario
smokeable,
then
officers
are
able
to
go
out
announcer,
identifying
information
from
those
people
because
only
active
identifying
the
perpetrators,
whether
suspects
or
victims,
that
involvement
so
wouldn't
be
a
question
there.
What
does
what
this
regulation
is?
Stopping
officers
from
doing
is
going.
I
To
face-to-face
encounter
so
answer
a
question:
it's
going
to
take
education
to
officers
and
a
training
component
that
their
communities
faced
with
as
well.
We
want
to
show
you
a
service
and,
speaking
for
the
acting
chief
appreciated
their
job.
Our
officers
are
continuing
the
job.
Is
it
going
to
be
a
death?
There's
no
training
component.
As
a
we
spoke
to
hear
where
the
officers
are
going
to
be
involved
in
understanding
and
again
focus
on,
it
will
be
addressed.
C
You
do
that
repeatedly.
For
example,
say
much
I'm,
a
bar
Haven
from
my
perspective,
go
a
lot
of
people,
I
mean
it.
My
crime
is
different
than
the
market
for
sure,
let's
face
it,
but
texting
and
driving
okay
or
whatever,
speeding
all
the
time
and
is
consistently
from
a
high
school.
Certain
person
leaves
this
building
a
math.
We've
got
a
the
driving
a
white
Impala
whatever.
So,
if
there
are
ten
impalas
there's
nothing
to
say
that
you
can
stop
all
of
those.
C
If
you
don't
know
which
is
the
Impala
correct,
if
there's
repeated
now,
what,
if
you
do
it
four
days
in
a
row,
that's
still
gonna
be
okay
and
yours
in
your
search
for
I
mean
it
wouldn't
probably
go
to
that
kind
of
access.
I
wish
you
would
but
I'm
pretty
sure
you
wouldn't,
but
it's
just
as
an
example.
I
So
mr.
chair,
in
relation
to
that
question,
you're
going
any
informations
provided
by
the
public.
So
you
know
the
same
services.
Looking
street
checks
right
now
on
high
banana
pass,
where
it's
been
community,
a
sister
or
a
community
members
call
them
and
they've
been
tracking
out
for
that,
particularly
that
particular
example.
You're
giving
the
community
is
telling
us
there's
a
particular
vehicle
speeding
and
giving
us
a
description.
I
Right
now,
fifty
4447
myself,
Karen,
balding
and
I'm
driving
a
Corolla,
then
a
saucer
will
obviously
be
stopping
me
enforcing
the
high
road
traffic
doctor.
That's
necessary
again.
This
this
regulation
comes
back
to
the
fact
where
people
are
stopping
officers
or
stopping
random
opportunity.
For
no
reason,
if
you
have
an
offence,
is
being
investigated
and
you
have
very
to
a
subversive
identification
and
they
have
to
give
that
information.
Then.
C
Is
and
just
one
thing
further:
we
had
the
the
senior
gentleman
who
was
of
a
particular
culture
who
was
obviously
mental
health
issue,
as
we
know
now,
but
he
was
kissing.
Women
at
bus
stops
in
bar
Haven.
Okay,
now
we
had,
you
don't
didn't
know
who
he
was,
but
you
did
have
really
good
descriptions
with
that
information
and
that's
information
coming
from
the
public.
What
you're
telling
me
is
that
that
profile
is
what
you
would
be.
Stopping
people
are
looking
for.
I
Information
suggest
this
suspect
matches
that
description
and
we
have
the
burden.
Those
investigators
stopped
a
person
who
needs
that
description
again.
This
comes
back
to
the
fact
and
if
you
look
at
the
regulations
when
a
conservation
emergently
is
that
person's
there's
a
decision
tree
here,
we're
asking
actually
provide
us
with
a
decision
tree
for
officers
to
have
whether
it's
Ibaka
size
whatever
to
come
to
make
sure
that
they're
following
the
regulations,
so
you
not
stopping
somebody
random
and
arbitrary
to
whatever
their
race
their
sex
is.
I
C
Just
finally,
mr.
chair,
so
that's
that's
good
reassurance.
I
think
that's
really
good
information
and
I
appreciate
it.
You
know
we
find
that
the
provincial
government
and
please
don't
think
I'm
learning
for
any
other
level
of
government
and
why
I
keep
bringing
this
up,
but
they
are,
for
example,
right
now.
They
have
inspectors
that
are
going
into
or
long-term
care
facilities
every
single
day
they
are,
they
are
causing
a
problem
with
the
care
of
the
people
in
those
facilities.
C
I
would
not
want
us
ever
to
be
in
a
position
where,
because
somebody
needs
to
add
some
rules
to
make
them
feel
better,
that
we
are
doing
something
that
isn't
in
the
best
interest
of
the
people
in
this
city.
What
you've
told
me
I
have
assurances
that
that's
not
the
case,
so
thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
E
This
is
not
going
to
stop
you
from
following
your
spidey
sense
if
you're
driving
down
and
will
see
somebody
that
you
feel
that
there's
something
suspicious
or
you
need
to
talk
to
you're
still
going
to
have
an
opportunity
to
approach
that
person.
But
the
way
you
approach
them
might
be
different.
Is
that
what
we're
saying.
I
It's
not
just
suspicious
activity
right
because
you
have
them
more
grounds
for
and
it
used
to
be
from
actions
and
I
also
put
articulate
and
say
it's
a
high
crime
area,
that's
pretty
hard
to
define
right
to
begin
with,
but
an
officer
can't
just
say:
I
stopped
in
that
person,
because
this
is
now
for
drug
trafficking.
You
can't
do
that.
As
per
the
regulations,
you
have
to
have
other
information
about
that
to
be
reserved
for
you
to
as
an
officer
to
investigate
and
how
about
face-to-face
interaction.
So.
F
Great
thank
you
very
much
mr.
chair
at
first
of
all,
I
agree
with
them
counselor.
How
there's
a
great
presentation
it
got
right
to
the
points
loved,
seeing
these
kind
of
presentations
I
did
want
to
just
kind
of
highlight,
first
of
all,
I
think
our
city
showed
a
lot
of
leadership
and
comes
to
this
file
and
it's
great
that
the
the
province
wants
to
come
in
and
jump
in
you.
So
they
you
know,
medals
everything.
F
This
arbitration,
everything
else
but
I'm,
hoping
in
this
case
that
they're
actually
looking
at
us
being
the
leaders,
because
I'll
tell
you
I
brought
this
I
brought
a
presentation
to
FCM
which,
on
the
Ontario
caucus
chair-
and
there
was
a
lot
of
people
around-
that
table
from
Ontario,
shall
I
kill.
Please
board
member
in
Toronto
Pam
McConnell,
vice
the
the
right
hand
to
the
to
the
man
in
Toronto
cancer
McConnell.
There
was
a
whole
bunch
of
them
that
were
quite
surprised.
F
The
level
of
work
we've
done
in
this
city
and
I
think
that's
something
that
has
to
be
recognized.
We
got
you
know
we
got
the
president
of
the
internal
Police
Association
setting
right
here.
We
got
the
chief
of
Chiefs
apparently
now
sitting
around
the
table,
so
I
think
we
have
a
lot
of
leadership
and
we
can.
We
can
go
a
long
way
with
this.
I
just
want
to
ensure
that
that's
being
recognized,
you
see
the
province
coming
to
us.
Looking
for
what
we're
doing
as
part
of
what
they're
building
is
a
program
yeah.
I
A
I
So,
as
per
the
regulations-
and
we
talked
about
this
part
of
working
good
mr.
Sher
and
the
issue
is
going
to
be-
is
the
training
for
there's
gonna
be
a
train-the-trainer
component
services
cross
and
Terra
are
going
to
obviously
do
the
training
for
those
officers
and
engage
in
Street
checks.
I
thought
my
officers
and
I
chose
dev
officers,
those
ones
that
are
going
to
obviously
doing
Street
checks.
I
So
that's
gonna,
pan
out
for
how
those
officers
train
first
across
the
service
stream,
a
general
first
that
might
be
a
high
bar
to
set,
but
certainly
those
people
are
gonna
do
Industry
checks.
You
have
to
be
trained
by
that
time.
So
I
must
ask
for
the
regulation.
You
get
that
training
and
then
between
over
three
years-
and
we
don't
know
the
cause
associate
act
because
they
don't
have
the
training.
So
it
was
down
director
general
if
she's
got
any
compensation.
E
Mr.
chair
I
think
it's
an
example
of
an
unexpected
cost
for
us,
because
we,
when
we're
planning
the
budget
we
didn't
have
the
regulation
hadn't
been
released
and
we
weren't
certain
about
the
extent
of
the
the
obligations
that
we'd
have
to
comply
with
in
2016.
So
we'll
be
having
a
look
at
how
we
would
build
in
that
training
to
our
training
calendar
and
what
the
kind
of
investment
we'll
have
to
make
to
train.
E
We
have
roughly
fourteen
hundred
officers
who
would
need
that
training
and
we'll
prioritize
those
who
need
it
first,
but,
along
with
training,
there's
a
significant
data
and
information
management
obligation
as
well,
and
those
are
things
that
were
I.
Think
what
we'll
do
is
summarize
that
for
you,
when
we
do
the
next
update
to
give
you
a
feel
for
the
scope
of
the
cost
in
2016
and
then
as
an
ongoing
obligation
as
well.
We'll
do
our
best
to
balance
the
budget.
We
always
try
and
do
that,
but
we,
this
is
the
year
of
unexpected
costs.
A
Thank
you
very
much
folks
and
so
the
other.
What
Police,
Service
Board
received
this
report
for
information
is
the
item
received?
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you
very
much
inspector
Prosser
and
Laurie
for
your
presentation,
folks
that
that
would
conclude
our
meeting
in
open.
So
this
portion
of
the
public
meeting
has
ended.
A
The
board
will
be
staying
in
this
room
to
consider
in-camera
agenda
we'll
be
reconvening
following
the
in-camera
portion
of
the
meeting
to
report
on
the
board's
review
of
a
complaint
under
Section
69
of
the
Police
Service
Act,
referred
to
by
the
office
of
the
Independent
Police
Review
director
or
RF
PD
start
to
play.
Can
we
ask
you
folks
to
leave
this
room
as
you're
staying
in
it
TT
or
tell
us
through
stayin
and
who's,
not.