►
From YouTube: Planning and Housing Committee - January 31, 2023
Description
Planning and Housing Committee - January 31, 2023
A
Good
morning,
everyone
I
think
we'll
get
underway.
It
is
a
beautiful
morning
we'll
do
some
City
Planning
before
we
get
underway.
I
would
like
just
to
acknowledge
that
Ottawa
is
located
on
the
unseated
and
never
surrendered
territory.
The
Algonquin
National,
whose
culture
and
presence
have
nurtured
and
continue
to
nurture
this
land.
A
A
Here
so
this
is
a
public
meeting
to
consider
the
proposed
comprehensive
official
plan
and
Zoning
a
bylaw
amendments
listed
as
items
4.1
5.1
to
5.4
on
today's
agenda
for
the
item.
It's
just
mentioned
only
those
who
make
oral
submissions
today
or
written
submissions
before
the
amendments
are
adopted,
May
appeal,
the
matter
to
the
Ontario
land
tribunal.
In
addition,
the
applicant's.
A
A
In
addition,
the
applicant
May
appeal
the
matter
to
the
Ontario
land
tribunal.
If
Council
does
not
adopt
an
amendment
within
90
days
of
receipt
of
the
application
for
a
zoning,
bylaw,
Amendment
and
120
days
for
an
official
plan
amendment
to
submit
written
comments
on
these
amendments
prior
to
their
consideration
by
City
Council
on
February
8
2023.
Please
email
or
call
the
committee
or
Council
coordinator
Declarations
of
interest
to
understand
councilor
Johnson
as
a
declaration
to
make.
A
A
Thank
you
so
the
agenda
today
postponements
and
deferral.
We
are
going
to
deal
today
with
the
zoning
bylaw
Amendment
for
535
Chapel
Street.
We
have
a
presentation.
There
are
delegations
to
it
and
there's
a
correspondence
so
we'll
hold
that
item
the
zoning
bylaw
Amendment
for
15
25
and
1533
goth
Avenue.
A
F
G
A
At
4149
strand
her
drive,
we
don't
have
any
presentation,
delegations
or
correspondence
that
is
to
an
approvement
amendment
to
the
zoning
bylaw
for
part
of
the
property,
as
shown
in
document
one
to
permit
an
automobile
automobile
dealership,
as
outlined
in
document
two.
Is
that
item
carried
carried,
oh
I'm,
sorry
I
should
just
ask
the
applicants
are
available
to
speak
to
the
item.
Adam
Thompson
Murray
challenge,
Jeff,
Pablo,
David,
Johnson,
serial
leader,
gentlemen.
A
A
H
I
A
The
new
zoning
bylaw
revised
work
plan
timelines.
We
do
have
a
presentation,
so
we
will
hold
that
item
so
coming
back
to
the
agenda,
then
from
the
top.
The
first
item
is
with
respect
to
535
Chapel
Street
councilor
Johnson
has
declared
a
conflict
so
we'll
just
allow
her
to
leave
the
room,
and
then
there
is
a
technical
motion
from
Council
that
councilor
Gower
will
move
and
allows
councilor
Governor
to
put
that
on
the
table.
Now.
H
Okay,
so
this
is
a
technical
motion,
whereas
the
report
seeks
approval
of
an
additional
story
to
an
existing
2.5
story,
building
to
add
five
additional
residential
units
and
whereas
a
technical
amendment
is
required
to
correct
two
errors
in
document.
Two
of
the
report,
therefore,
be
it
resolved
that,
with
respect
to
the
report,
amend
document
2
by
substituting
in
section
2b3,
the
word
rear
with
interior
side
and
substituting
Clause
D
with
Clause
H
immediately
following
section
161
15
and
be
it
further
resolved
that,
pursuant
to
subsection
3417
of
the
planning
act,
no
further
notice
be
given.
H
A
J
Thank
you
very
much
and
good
morning.
Everybody.
The
zoning
Amendment
for
today
is
at
535
Chapel
Street,
just
a
brief
overview
of
the
locations
located
on
the
east
side
of
Chapel
Street
between
Mann
Avenue
and
Templeton
Street
in
the
Sandy
Hill
Neighborhood,
the
properties
currently
occupied
by
two
and
a
half
story.
Apartment
dwelling
four
units.
The
surrounding
area
is
generally
characterized
by
residential
units
ranging
from
Singles
to
low
rise.
Commercial
Plaza
is
located
to
the
South.
A
planned
unit.
J
J
Besides,
a
specific
exception
would
allow
a
minimum
lot
area
of
232
square
meters,
a
minimum
lot,
width
of
7.6
meters,
minimum
side,
yard
setback
of
zero
meters
on
one
side
and
0.8
meters
on
the
other
and
a
minimum
rear
yard
setback
of
six
and
a
half
meters.
And
it's
important
to
note
that
those
required
zoning
relief
is
simply
a
recognition
of
the
existing
site
context
and
the
placement
of
the
building
as
it
exists
today.
J
While
the
situation
is
made
better
by
the
changes
proposed
to
the
building,
it
still
requires
reduction
or
a
relief
from
this
provision
and
just
a
quick
overview.
It
is
the
proposal
is
consistent
with
official
plan
policies.
It's
consistent
with
the
Sandy
Hill
secondary
plan
policies,
and
it
is,
it
supports
the
intent
of
the
zoning
bylaw.
Thank
you.
A
K
No
worries
at
all:
okay
good
morning
my
name
is
Tyler
yakichek
I'm,
a
planner
with
Photon
planning
and
design
making
the
presentation
on
behalf
of
Smart
Living
properties.
We
will
quickly
review
the
existing
property
in
context.
The
proposed
development
requested
relief
and,
if
necessary,
review
the
supporting
policy
next
slide.
Please
JC's
covered
this,
but
we'll
quickly
go
over
it
again.
The
subject
property
is
located
in
the
Sandy
Hill
Neighborhood
within
600
meter
radius
at
the
least
LRT
station.
K
K
Next
slide,
please,
the
proposed
development
will
improve
the
number
of
residential
units
to
seven
batchel
units
into
four
bedroom
units
regarding
the
exterior
of
the
site,
the
Redevelopment
will
include
a
new
tree
planting
at
the
front
of
the
property,
11
bicycle
parking
spaces
and
a
purpose-built
garage
storage
structure
at
the
rear.
The
development
will
also
improve
the
shared
area
to
the
north
of
the
property
by
creating
a
shared
Pathway
to
improve
access
degree
of
the
building
and
a
bicycle
storage
structure
for
the
neighboring
property
again,
which
is
also
owned
by
Smart
Living
Next
slide.
K
K
All
of
the
conditions
are
consistent
with
the
light
fabric
of
the
surrounding
neighborhood
and
do
not
represent
a
departure
from
the
existing
character
of
the
area
and
are
consistent
with
the
established
setback
in
the
area.
The
proposed
development
Works
toward
generally
improving
the
condition
of
the
site,
namely
with
the
addition
of
an
improved
shared
pathway,
bicycle
parking,
a
dedicated
garbage
storage
area,
a
new
tree
planting
and
an
introduction
of
articulation
on
the
front
of
the
side.
K
Ultimately,
the
proposed
development
intensifies
an
existing
site
in
an
area
that
is
within
600
meters
of
Rapid
Transit
within
a
walkable
distance
to
other
amenities
and
help
support
the
intensification
goals
set
out
in
the
official
plan
policing.
Both
the
official
plan
and
secondary
plan
support
the
proposed
development
and
it
meets
the
purpose
of
the
R4
Zone
next
slide.
Please
so
JC
has
already
covered
the
policy.
So
I
believe
that
is
the
conclusion
of
the
presentation
and
we're
happy
to
answer
questions
when
necessary.
A
L
K
L
K
L
So
I
just
wanted
to
be
able
to
make
that
comment
and
just
say
that
again,
whether
it's
in
Sandy
Hill
or
in
Centertown,
that
I
represent
we're
just
seeing
more
and
more
of
these
applications
for
really
really
tiny
units,
and
it's
really
really
hard
to
get
developers
to
build
anything
bigger
to
allow
more
than
one
person
to
live
in
a
home
like
that.
So
I
just
wanted
to
put
that
on
the
table.
Thank
you
very
much.
K
A
D
K
M
N
But
as
also
a
former
member
of
action,
Sandy
Hill
SLP
is
known
as
sort
of
the
Sandy
Hill
slumlord.
To
be
very
blunt,
their
units
are
known
for
noise
complaints,
rats,
garbage
and,
to
be
honest,
they
are
using
our
already
stretched
resources
to
ensure
that
they
can
build
these
super
tiny
units
and
not
have
to
deal
with
any
of
the
consequences.
So,
for
example,
our
highest
number
of
311
calls
in
Sandy
Hill
are
always
to
Smart
Living
properties.
This
has
been
since
2014
again
in
includes
things
like
rats
garbage
noise
Etc.
N
What
Smart
Living
is
trying
to
do
with
this
application
is
two
things
they're
trying
to
weaponize
our
very
our
very
serious
housing
shortage,
while
exhausting
City
resources
to
deal
with
the
problems
that
they
help
create.
In
fact,
we
are
going
to
court
in
a
couple
of
weeks,
because
Smart
Living
is
actively
trying
to
take
back
a
bylaw
that
we
have
in
Sandy
Hill
to
keep
garbage
inside
units.
This
is
a
bio
that
we
have
very
specific
to
Sandy,
Hill
that
the
last
Council
voted
on,
because
they
want
to
ensure
that
garbage
can
go
outside.
N
So
what
they're?
Trying
to
do
is
get
rid
of
the
rules
that
were
put
in
place
specifically
to
help
solve
problems
that
they
helped
create.
I
think
we
need
to
send
a
strong
message
to
Smart
Living.
We
have
to
let
them
know
that
our
city
is
not
a
place
for
them
to
Simply,
make
profits
and
not
deal
with
the
problems
that
they
help
perpetuate.
Thank
you.
A
A
I
Thank
you
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
speak
before
the
planning
and
housing
committee
about
whether
the
proposal
for
535
chapels
should
be
approved.
The
current
apartment
building
has
four
units
on
a
lot
which,
according
to
Geo
Ottawa,
has
a
frontage
of
7.62
meters,
depth
of
30.47
meters,
total
area
of
232.21
square
meters
and
a
side
yard
of
0.29
meters.
I
According
to
the
standards
under
r4ubs,
a
lot
does
not
meet
the
minimum
standards
for
a
three
unit
building.
It
is
a
small
lot
which
is
over
built,
starting
in
2021
neighbors
of
535
chapel
and
action.
Sandy
Hill
were
Ash,
have
written
city
planners
expressing
concerns
about
the
proposal
to
add
another
floor
and
create
a
non-unit
building.
Chief
among
these
concerns
are
the
lot,
is
only
half
the
minimum
lot
size
and
half
the
lot
width
for
a
proposed
9
to
12
unit
building
the
rear
yard
setback
is
three
quarters
of
the
zoning
requirements.
I
The
project
changes
create
far
too
significant.
A
deviation
from
the
zoning
bylaw
to
be
acceptable.
The
zoning
bylaw
was
amended
and
approved
by
the
city
in
2020,
after
extensive
work
by
political
leaders,
City
staff
and
members
of
the
public.
Why
engage
in
this
effort
if
a
nine
unit
building
can
be
approved
for
this
small
site?
Approval
would
set
a
bad
precedent
not
only
for
Sandy
Hill
but
for
other
Ottawa
neighborhoods.
I
Since
a
side
yard
for
this
proposal
is
less
than
20
percent
of
the
minimum
side
yard
requirements,
waste
management
is
to
be
addressed
through
site
plan
control,
garbage
and
recycling
would
be
stored
in
a
garbage
storage
structure
at
the
back
of
535
Chapel,
where
garbage
can
be
tossed
between
pickups
items
would
be
removed
via
the
neighboring
property
at
533
Chapel.
This
does
not
seem
to
be
a
satisfactory
arrangement,
especially
as
there
have
been
problems
with
rats
and
student
garbage
at
this
and
adjacent
properties.
I
Further
Ash
asks
this
committee
to
not
approve
the
proposed
nine
unit
building,
since
the
proposal
meets
only
half
the
minimum
lot
size
and
lot
width
of
the
zoning
requirements
and
is
below
other
minimums.
It
deviates
too
far
from
zoning
requirements
and
would
set
a
bad
precedent
since
side
yard
requirements
cannot
be
met,
site
plan
control
is
proposed
for
Waste
Management
with
a
garbage
storage
Arrangement,
which
poses
many
concerns.
I
I
would
add
that
the
developer
is
proposing
to
create
some
tiny
units.
Now
I
noticed
in
the
earlier
presentation
by
the
proponent
that
it's
talking
about
PSI
7
Bachelor
units
documents
we
had
before
talked
about
five
Bachelor
units,
and
these
would
be
tiny
they'd,
be
from
218
to
272
square
feet
or
an
average
of
234
square
feet,
and
at
that
point
one
unit,
which
was
a
one-bedroom
unit,
would
be
223
square
feet
or
below
the
the
minimum
four
area
for
separated
spaces
under
the
Ontario
building
code.
I
Such
small
units
are
targeted
at
a
more
transient
demographic
and
reduce
the
potential
flexibility
of
the
housing
stock.
This
is
contrary
to
the
Sandy
Hill
secondary
plant
and
the
recently
approved
city
of
Ottawa
official
plan,
which
talked
about
the
need
to
accommodate
a
more
diverse
population
with
housing
options
for
different
housing
types.
Thank
you
for
your
attention.
I'm
open
to
questions.
A
N
Okay,
sorry,
can
you
hear
me
now?
Okay,
I,
just
wanted
to
thank
Marilyn
for
coming
out
today.
I
think
we
all
know
that
when
members
of
the
community
come
to
these
kinds
of
meetings
are
often
taking
time
off,
work
they're,
taking
time
away
from
their
families
and
their
normal
responsibilities.
I
believe
Marilyn
can
also
confirm.
N
I,
don't
have
the
minutes
of
every
action,
Sandy
Hill
meeting
in
front
of
me,
but
Smart
Living
is
discussed
at
practically
every
Community
Association
meeting,
not
only
for
the
various
problems
we
have
on
their
properties,
but
the
various
bylaw
infractions
that
we
deal
with
every
single
day
and
again.
I
just
want
to
thank
her
for
coming.
I
want
to
thank
the
members
of
Sandy
Hill
for
coming
together
and
discussing
openly
the
problems
we
have
with
this
developer
and
I
hope
we
can
have
a
better
relationship
with
them
going
forward.
Merci,
beaucoup.
L
I
It
would
also
perhaps
make
it
easier
to
have
internal
garbage
storage
within
the
building,
and
that
would
be
more
consistent
with
the
arrangements
that
councilor
plant
had
mentioned,
and
it's
something
that
Ash
has
written
about
and
would
support
So
smaller
units
are
a
smaller
number
of
units.
I
should
say
would
be
better
going
forward
for
this
lot.
L
A
A
O
P
Chair
if
I
made,
the
application,
that's
before
us
is,
is
specific
to
a
site.
Planning
staff
are
not
familiar
with
all
of
the
interactions
that
the
city
may
have
with
Smart
Living
property
and
the
nature
of
the
comments
provided
by
the
ward,
counselor
speak
to
bylaw
or
operating
requirements,
and
that's
something
that
planning
wouldn't
be
intimately
familiar
with.
If
it's
the
will
of
committee,
we
would
be
happy
to
engage
with
with
bylaw
services
to
see
if
they
can
provide
a
some
sort
of
a
summary
with
respect
to
that.
P
But
I
would
also
flag
that
the
the
committee
the
application
is
before
the
committee
today
is,
is
what's
to
be
considered,
as
opposed
to
the
broader
picture
of
all
of
their
other
operations
and
sites.
We
do
try
to
look
at
these
objectively
and
and
look
at
them
on
their
planning
merits
on
a
site-specific
basis.
Yeah.
O
I
appreciate
that
and
I'm
aware
that
we
are
here
to
make
a
decision
on
whether
this
application
meets
planning
merits
or
not,
but
I'm
still
interested
to
know
what
the
history
is
with
this
Corporation
and
the
city.
If
the
city
is
engaged
in
a
number
of
matters,
sometimes
you
can
use
an
application
as
leverage
to
address
existing
challenges
that
exist
in
the
community,
not
trying
to
deny
an
application
rather
trying
to
understand
the
context
that
exists.
O
F
You
and
I
agree
with
what
councilor
brockington's
trying
to
get
at
I.
I
agree.
This
is
planning
committee.
So,
on
that
note,
the
setbacks
that
that
Resident
was
talking
about
and
the
having
the
garbage
inside
can
I
understand
is
the
garbage
going
to
be
inside
or
outside.
Given
that
there
is,
there
is
an
existing
bylaw.
They
may
be
challenging
it
right
now,
but
is
it
currently
in
this
design?
The
garbage
Insider
outside.
J
F
Okay,
I
think
we
need
to
get
clear
information
on
that
before
we
get
to
council
as
well.
Just
if
that
is
an
existing
bylaw,
then
this
application
should
work
with
that.
Bylaw,
whether
it
changes
or
not
in
the
future
is,
is
a
separate
matter.
The
other
is
about
the
setbacks
that
are
allowed.
So
that
is
fundamentally
why
this
is
in
front
of
us,
because
they're
asking
for
something
that
is
not
wouldn't
be
allowed
right
now.
F
So,
given
what
the
resident
talked
to
us
about,
what
they're
asking
for
in
terms
of
those
setbacks
is,
is
exactly
why
this
is
in
front
of
us.
I
mean
I,
understand,
there's
a
change
to
how
many
units
would
be
available
here
and
the
size
of
the
units,
everything
else,
but
there
that
is
also
in
in
part
of
this
application,
or
is
that
all
still
site
plan.
J
The
number
of
units
is
not
a
factor
of
the
in
this
zoning
by
law.
Amendment
we
are,
or
what
planning
and
housing
committee
will
be.
Considering
are
the
setbacks
for
the
footprint
that
is
currently
existing
today.
Therefore,
it
is
a
recognition
of
an
existing
footprint.
They
are
adding
an
additional
story
to
the
building.
However,
the
height
is
permitted
for
the
proposed
use.
F
So,
but
because
they're
asking
for
these
setbacks
that
potentially
prevents
them
from
putting
garbage
inside
the
building
because
they're
using
it
for
additional
units
instead
of
a
space
for
the
garbage.
This
is
what
I'm
trying
to
get
at
so
I
understand
we're
going
to
get
more
information,
we'll
hear
more
Council
about
the
relationship
between
this
company
and
our
bylaw
services.
But
does
this
if
we
approve
this
today?
Q
Foreign
Mr
chair
members
of
members
of
committee
I,
have
met
some
of
you,
so
I'll
introduce
myself
by
Andrew
McRae
manager
of
development
review
Central.
To
answer
that
question,
we
have
to
remember
that
the
proposable
force
is
for
an
existing
apartment
building
and
it's
an
addition
of
a
third
floor
on
top
of
that.
Existing
apartment
building
I
don't
want
to
speak
on
behalf
of
the
applicants,
but
I
can
imagine
it
would
be
very
difficult
to
retrofit
the
existing
building
to
put
waste
indoors
with
the
additional
units.
Q
What's
before,
you
is
a
proposal
that
has
a
design
with
a
rear
yard
accessory
building
where
garbage
is
internalized
in
that
building,
it's
not
in
the
principal
building,
but
it
is
indoors
and
controlled,
and
the
side,
yard
and
rear
yard
variances
are
indicative
of
the
existing
footprint
of
the
building.
That
addition
going
up
on
the
third
floor
is
required
to
match
those
existing
setbacks
with
the
story
going
straight
up.
In
one
sense,
those
two
items
are
not
directly
related.
F
L
Thank
you,
and
so
as
a
new
counselor
and
a
new
member
of
this
committee,
I'm
just
curious
if
City
staff,
so
when
we
have
a
situation
where
a
certain
neighborhood
is,
is
flooded
with
an
overabundance
of
a
very
specific
kind
of
housing,
not
even
speaking
about
who
living
lives
there,
but,
let's
say
very
small
micro
units.
What
tools
do
we
have
as
a
planning
committee
or
as
Council
to
have
an
impact
on
that
mix?
Is
that
something
that
needs
to
be
added
to
the
official
plan?
L
Is
that
because
I
we're
having
a
conversation
here
on
one
hand,
it's
about
a
simple
variance
request
in
regard
to
setbacks,
we're
actually
having
a
broader
conversation
about
a
particular
landlord
and
a
particular
type
of
housing
that
is
obviously
over
represented
in
Sandy
Hill.
So
it's
more
of
a
general
question
not
about
the
specific
application,
but
instead
of
arguing
about
setbacks,
is
there
a
way
to
have
an
impact,
as
a
planning
committee.
L
J
A
L
A
N
Correct
me,
if
I'm
wrong,
but
the
the
garbage,
the
garbage
units
that
we
have
already
I'm
just
going
to
give
an
example
at
29
Russell,
where
they
also
have
an
application
and
I
know
we're
talking
about
the
application
today.
This
is
also
an
area
where
we
have
problematic
issues
with
garbage
most
of
their
units
in
Sandy
Hill.
We
have
also
very
serious
issues
with
garbage,
and
so
what
I'm
trying
to
get
at
and
what
I'm
trying
to
imply
today
is
that
we're
not
going
to
solve
this
issue.
N
We've
been
trying
to
resolve
it
since
2012
and
we're
not
going
to
resolve
it
today
by
not
or
approving
this
application,
I'm
just
trying
to
sort
of
say
a
larger
message
that
this
is
a
very
problematic
developer
in
the
area
in
the
sense
that
they
don't
feel
like
bylaw
rules,
especially
on
the
issue
of
garbage,
apply
to
them
and
they're
actively
trying
to
overturn
them.
And
so,
if
we're,
you
know
in
counselor,
leaper
and
I
we're
having
a
discussion
early
at
counselor
last
week.
N
Can
we
talk
about
sort
of
social
issues
in
the
context
of
planning
applications
and
vice
versa?
If
we
have
any
tools
today
in
which
we
can
compel
them
to
sort
of
agree
to
better
rules
around
garbage,
that
would
be
very
helpful
and
I
would
be
open
to
having
those
discussions,
but
so
far
it
has
been
radio
silence.
Q
D
Thank
you,
yeah
well,
I
I
have
one
in
my
in
my
ward,
smart,
smart
living
and
it
did
start
off
as
problematic
and
we
worked
with
them
to
resolve
issues,
but
it's
not
as
it's
not
Sandy
Hill,
where
there's
there's
many
of
them.
It's
only
because
we're
in
proximity
to
Algonquin
College.
My
question
is
about,
and
this
is
really
more
of
a
bylaw
question,
but
in
terms
of
the
garbage
we
just
had
our
presentation
yesterday
on
Solid
Waste
Management,
and
is
it
mandatory
recycling?
I
I?
D
D
J
Mr
chair,
oh
well,
I'm,
not
completely
equipped
to
answer
the
last
part
of
the
question.
The
first
part
relating
to
whether
or
not
there
are
recycling
facilities
proposed
for
the
building.
I
can
say
that,
although
the
this
proposal
is
affected
by
Bill
23
in
that
it
is
no
longer
required
to
go
through
site
plan,
it
did
go
through
siteland
review,
for
you
know,
let's
say
through
95
of
the
process
before
Bill
23
came
into
effect.
J
During
that
time
it
was
reviewed
by
Waste,
Management
Services,
and
there
are
required
there
were
requirements
for
green
bin,
balloon
blue
bin
black
bins,
which
are
implemented
into
this
final
version
of
the
site
plan.
All
that
to
say
that
those
the
waste
storage
area
is
large
enough
to
accommodate
those
bins
shown
on
the
plants.
D
P
Chair,
excuse
me
we're
happy
to
connect
with
bylaw
to
provide
some
guidance
with
respect
to
enforcement
Provisions
as
part
of
that
package
of
information
that
we'll
be
providing
to
committee
members
ahead
of
time.
You
know
responding
to
the
operations
of
these
buildings
is,
is
outside
of
the
direct
control
of
planning
and
we're
happy
to
get
that
information
and
and
provide
it
to
the
members
of
committee.
D
S
Thank
you
chair,
and
thank
you
for
being
here.
Forgive
my
ignorance
for
this,
but
the
bylaw
about
garbage
having
to
be
stored
indoors
is
that
within
the
enclosures
of
the
building,
as
per
the
site
plan
or
or
sorry
as
per
whatever
is
drop
whatever
the
drawing
is
there
or
is
there
some
weird
definition
that
the
applicants
can
kind
of
play
with.
J
Mr
chairs,
section
143
of
the
zoning
ballot
requires
some
sort
of
properties
to
store
garbage
inside
the
main
building.
Specifically,
so
you
couldn't
a
proponent,
couldn't
store
it
in
a
accessory
structure
and
call
it
in
inside
the
building
for
the
purpose
of
that
section.
That
being
said,
developments
in
in
excess
of
five
units
are
not
subject
to
that
provision.
Therefore,
in
this
case,
they
are
allowed
to
have
garbage
stored
in
an
accessory
structure.
J
H
H
A
A
Yeah
and
I
think
that's
that's.
An
important
point
is
that
in
refusing
an
application
committee
or
counselor
are
going
to
be
required
to
provide
reasons
for
the
refusal
that
will
stand
up
to
the
scrutiny
of
the
Ontario
land
tribunal,
so
something
to
consider
as
we
move
ahead
with
a
vote.
I
see
no
further
questions
for
staff.
A
D
O
L
A
So,
with
that
item
I,
don't
know
if
counselor
Johnson
can
hear
us,
but
councilor
Johnson
we'd
invite
your
presence
back
in
the
room,
we'll
move
on
to
the
zoning
bylaw
Amendment
for
15
25
and
1533
goth
Avenue
in
this
instance
I
understand
that
the
applicants
will
be
making
the
presentation
so
I
don't
have
a
a
stat
presentation.
Today
there
is
a
technical
Amendment
on
this
one
counselor
or
vice
chair
Gower.
Could
I
ask
you
to
just
put
that
on
the
table.
Please!
Yes,.
H
A
technical
Amendment,
whereas
the
applicant
has
advised
the
further
requirement
for
a
site-specific
exemption
that
reduces
the
minimum
setback
for
any
wall
from
1.8
meters
to
0.6
meters
and
whereas
staff
have
no
objections
to
this.
Proposed
reduction
therefore
be
resolved.
That
respect
to
the
report,
the
planning
and
housing
committee
amend
document
2
by
adding
a
clause
to
column
five
exceptions
XXX
one
and
xxx2
with
the
following
wording.
A
If
anyone,
if
anyone
is
able
to
let
counselor
Johnson,
know
that
We've
resumed
debate,
oh
I
see
counselor
Johnson.
Thank
you
very
much
so
with
that
what
I'm
going
to
do
is
I'm
going
to
move
straight
to
the
proponents
who
are
going
to
make
a
presentation.
My
understanding
is
that
Nadia
desanti
is
here
to
do
that.
Nadia.
Are
you
online.
A
R
Thank
you.
Thank
you
Ms
Crozier
good
morning,
Mr
chair
and
members
of
planning
and
housing
committee.
My
name
is
Nadia
desanti
I
am
a
practice
lead
at
wsp
in
Ottawa.
I
am
also
here
today
with
Miss
Carrie
Lewis
executive
director
from
intramural
health
of
Ottawa.
Next
slide,
please,
in
terms
of
site
context,
the
proposed.
R
At
1525
goth
Avenue,
the
existing
there
is
an
existing
detached
Walling
there
that
would
be
demolished
just
in
terms
of
area
context.
We
do
have
an
Institutional
use,
that
being
Gabrielle
Roy
Public
School
to
the
north
of
the
site,
and
the
residential
area
consists
of
one
and
two-story
residential
mix
of
uses,
including
detached
and
semi-detached
dwellings.
Next
slide,
please.
R
So
the
property
at
1525,
Garth
Avenue,
is
occupied
by
a
two-story
detached
dwelling
with
vehicular
access
onto
goth,
Avenue
and
I'll
show
the
vehicular
access
a
little
bit
more
in
the
proposed
like
plants
later
in
the
presentation,
the
building
and
the
site
at
1533
golf
Avenues
occupied
by
you
know
a
one
and
a
half
story.
Group
home
there
is
an
existing
hedge
along
the
Eastern
property
line
and
trees
along
the
northern
property
line.
Detached
dwellings
are
located
to
the
east
and
west
of
the
site.
R
So
this
is
the
existing
development
at
1533
Goff
Avenue.
So
this
is
the
one
and
a
half
story
group
home
and
there
are
10
parking
spaces
to
the
rear
of
the
property.
The
the
driveway
from
goth
Avenue
leads
to
the
back
of
that
property
where
the
parking
is
located
next
slide,
please,
the
proposed
development
of
1525
golf
Avenue
is
for
a
two-story
low-rise
apartment
with
approximately
10
units.
R
The
image
on
the
right
is
the
proposed
site
plan
and
you
can
see
the
existing
driveway
that's
shown
in
White,
and
the
proposed
driveway
access
off
of
that
existing
driveway
is
shown
in
the
darker
gray,
so
it's
going
towards
the
west
of
the
property
and
that
leads
to
nine
parking
spaces.
So
in
behind
the
proposed
development,
1525
Bath
Avenue
slide
please,
as
mentioned
the
proposed
development,
would
consist
of
10
self-contained
units,
six
one
bedroom
units
and
four
two
bedroom
units.
Four
of
those
units
would
be
visible
or
barrier-free
spaces.
R
There
would
be
a
multi-purpose
room
with
kitchenette
a
laundry
room.
There
were
also
the
office
space
for
Interval
houses,
operations
and
administration,
an
exterior
amenity
area.
There
would
be
access
to
the
existing
children's
playground,
which
currently
exists
at
1533,
goth
Avenue
and
some
on-site
resident
services.
So
in
total
both
of
the
parking
lots,
both
the
proposed
and
the
existing
would
be
a
total
of
19.,
so
10
existing
at
1533
and
9
proposed
with
the
new
development
and
that
nine
includes
residents,
spaces,
visitor
and
barrier-free
spaces.
R
R
This
is
a
view
of
the
elevation
from
the
looking
from
the
south
next
slide,
please
and
from
the
East
next
slide.
Please
and
from
the
website
next
slide.
Please,
the
site
is
designated
in.
The
new
official
plan
is
outer
Urban
transect
with
neighborhood
overlay.
The
existing
zoning
is
residential.
Second
density,
Zone,
Sub,
Zone
and
a
low-rise
apartment
is
not
a
permitted
use
in
this
next
slide.
R
R
These
are
the
details
of
the
proposed
zoning
Amendment
for
1525
goth,
Avenue
I
realize
I
have
17
seconds
left
the
next
slide.
Please
and
here's
the
proposaling
for
1533
goth,
Avenue,
again
prohibiting
a
low-rise
apartment
as
well
as
other
uses
for
that
state
next
slide.
Please
thank
you
very
much
happy
to
answer
any
questions,
as
well
as
with
our
clients,
Carrie
Lewis.
Thank.
A
U
Everyone
thank
you
so
much
for
considering
our
application
today.
Interpol
House
of
Ottawa
is
a
shelter
for
women
non-binary
to
Spirit
and
gender,
diverse
folks
and
their
dependents
fleeing
violence.
We've
been
operating
in
the
city
of
Ottawa
since
1976
and
I'm
sure.
It's
no
surprise
to
any
of
you
that
we
are
struggling
to
provide
space
to
people
when
they
need
it.
Most.
Last
year
we
turned
her
away:
941
individuals
seeking
safe
space
and
the
continue
the
the
problem
continues
to
intensify.
U
We,
our
hope,
with
this
project,
is
to
create
10,
Independent
Living
Spaces,
where
folks
can
move
from
this
emergency
shelter
that
currently
exists
into
second
stage
housing,
where
they
can
have
some
Independence,
while
they're
waiting
to
obtain
permanent
housing
which,
as
I'm
sure
you
all
know,
is
really
challenging
in
this
day
and
age.
Rents
are
on
a
affordable
and
most
of
the
folks
that
we
serve
rely
on
subsidized
housing
and
the
wait
times
continue
to
increase
just
for
context.
10
years
ago,
the
average
day
in
our
shelter
was
about
12
weeks.
A
D
D
D
D
U
A
A
C
Committee
members
and
counselors
for
your
time
today,
I
did
not
intend
to
speak
to
this
matter
today,
as
I
thought
prior
discussions
with
City
officials
to
be
given
proper
consideration.
But
after
reading
a
recommendation
for
you
to
me,
I
realized
that
this
is
not
the
case.
My
voice
in
the
collective
voice
of
goth
residents
has
been
disregarded,
undermined
and
misrepresented.
As
the
committee
will
see,
there
is
a
big
safety
issue
here
that
has
been
completely
glossed
over
without
justification.
C
I'll
preface
my
comments
by
saying
that
I
understand
the
general
direction
set
forth
by
Ontario's
provincial
policy
statement
in
the
city's
new
official
plan
regarding
intensification
and
public
transit.
However,
this
should
by
no
means
lead
to
compromised
safety
in
our
community
and
that's
exactly
what
this
recommendation
allows
for.
In
the
supporting
documentation
you
received,
the
city
highlighted
resident
concerns
over
an
increase
in
traffic,
but
deemed
that
there
was
no
issue.
C
However,
I
made
it
very
clear
to
City
officials
that
my
concerns
weren't
just
about
an
increase
in
traffic,
but
also
the
fact
that
inadequate
parking
is
an
existing
problem
that
is
creating
very
dangerous
conditions
for
the
safe
mobility
of
pedestrians.
Cyclists
and
vehicles
on
golf
collaborate,
an
18-wheeler
truck,
makes
weekly
deliveries
to
1525
and
1533
golf.
This
truck
is
unable
to
enter
the
driveway,
because
vehicles
are
parked
alongside
the
1533
property
and
not
in
designated
parking
space.
There
are
more
than
four
or
five
cars
a
Time.
C
The
result
is
that
the
truck
remains
on
the
road
and
completely
blocks
off
access
to
my
property
or
neighboring
properties
will
maneuver
haphazardously
if
the
resident
approaches
the
driver
and
impedes
visibility
for
vehicles
and
pedestrians.
Overall.
This
is
compounded
by
the
fact
that
there
are
vulnerable
individuals
at
my
residence,
as
well
as
the
neighboring
residents
that
require
ambulatory
attention
for
time
to
regularly
again
I
stress
here.
This
is
on
a
weekly
basis.
C
These
deliveries
are
not
on
occasion
and
presumably
with
the
addition
of
10
dwelling
units,
and
the
problem
will
only
magnify
in
terms
of
offloading
time
and
additional
deliveries
bearing
in
Miami's
safety
concerns.
I
can't
comprehend
why
the
city
would
go
ahead
and
justify
to
you
that
quote
the
reduction
in
residential
parking
has
been
determined
to
be
suitable.
Let
me
be
very
clear
that
this
isn't
just
a
few
parking
spots.
C
This
is
12
spots
in
total
to
be
frank,
I'm,
baffled
by
the
complete
disregard
to
safety
here
by
the
applicant
and
City,
particularly
when
you
consider
that
multiple
residents
have
voice
concerns
about
parking
multiple
times
of
photographic
evidence.
The
site
attracts
a
high
volume
of
young
children
commuting
as
it's
surrounded
by
three
neighboring
schools,
a
community
center
and
the
like,
and
the
proposal
contributions,
policies
and
principles
on
safety
are
set
forth
in
the
provincial
policy
statement
and
new
official
plans.
C
Let
me
remind
everyone
that,
while
they
are
directives
around
intensification,
Redevelopment
and
active
Transportation,
there
is
accompanying
language
about
avoiding
or
mitigating
risk
to
Public
Safety,
there's,
not
a
single
substantive
reference
to
avoiding
or
mitigating
risk.
In
the
city's
recommendation.
For
some
unknown
reason,
City
officials
allowed
the
applicant
to
dictate
this
recommendation
on
its
own
terms.
Whether
this
is
a
systemic
issue
or
not
I,
don't
know,
but
the
City
Deferred
to
whatever
the
applicant
had
to
say
to
justify
its
development
plans.
C
It
placed
more
value
on
the
applicant's
hypotheticals
on
what
constitutes
adequate
parking
over
factual,
unified
concerns
raised
by
golf
residents.
It
placed
more
value
on
limiting
parking
due
to
site
restrictions,
as
opposed
to
concerns
around
safety,
all
of
which
has
led
to
a
very
questionable
recommendation
that
is
neither
supported
by
Fault
by
policy.
C
Nor
fact,
given
these
very
concerning
emissions,
it
begs
the
question
what
else
has
been
omitted
that
the
Canadian
counselors
benefit
from
investigating
further
this
entire
proposal
and
recommendation
hinges
on
inaccuracies,
and
it
is
deeply
concerning
because
it
comes
with
the
extent
of
Public
Safety
and
the
safety
of
children
in
our
community.
This
is
without
question
completely
unacceptable.
C
So
I
asked
the
applicants
to
be
staff.
Community
members,
members
alerts
how
we
possibly
reach
the
conclusion
that
it
is
okay
to
undercut
parking
space
in
this
proposal.
Why
are
we
not
enforcing
the
minimums
up
prescribed
to
facilitate
a
safe
space
for
our
residents
and
particularly
our
children?
Why
is
the
city
okay,
with
compromising
safety,
when
other
feasible
options
are
available?
This
proposal
includes
the
demolishment
of
1525
golf.
C
So
why
not
take
the
opportunity
to
make
safety
a
top
priority
instead
of
cutting
Corners
I,
really
can't
reconcile
how
the
applicant
is
operating
here,
nor
the
city
for
that
matter
and
Views
are
going
I'm
urgently
asking
this
committee
to
reject
this
recommendation
and
facilitate
a
proper
form
for
engagement
on
these
issues.
Any
other
decision
will
simply
conveyed
Ottawa
residents.
Legitimate
safety
concerns
do
not
matter
in
the
city's
assessment
of
development
proposals.
C
A
F
F
I,
don't
know
if
you
know
this
information,
but
the
18
wheelers
you're
talking
about
that
are
creating
some
problems
there.
Do
you
know
what
they're
delivering
that
is
this
a
weekly
sounded
to
me
like
a
weekly
Supply
delivery.
That
would
then
continue
with
this
new
regime.
I'm
just
wondering
more
information
about
this.
Whether
this
could
be
mitigated.
C
Yeah
I
know
this
is
the
weekly
supply
of
some
sort.
It
comes
from
Cisco
trucks,
so
whatever
they
provide
to
the
housing
I'm,
not
sure
again.
The
proposal
that's
going
through
with
respect
to
some
of
the
zoning
bylaw
Amendment,
has
to
do
with
the
creation
of
10
additional
dwelling
units.
So,
as
I
mentioned,
this
problem
is
I'm
only
going
to
magnify
in
terms
of
additional
frequency
deliveries
or
greater
offloading
time.
C
I
will
say,
I'm
quite
disappointed
that,
as
I
mentioned,
this
concern
was
gloss
over
and
nowhere
mentioned
or
presented
to
you
in
the
city
report.
They
took
my
concerns
around
traffic
and
really
grounded
in
the
fact
of
an
assessment
of
increased
traffic
and
sure
that's
part
of
it.
But
I
gave
very
concrete
examples
of
the
issues,
the
very
big
safety
issues,
the
fact
that
I
can't
safely
leave
my
residence
or
enter
it.
C
Neither
can
they
bring
residences,
in
fact,
if
I'm
being
quite
Frank,
I
was
so
incense
yesterday
that
I
called
this
city
planner
Tracy
and
forwarded
a
photograph
showing
the
exact
lineup
of
cars
that
she
confirmed
would
impede
a
safe
delivery
of
these
Goods
so
to
sit
here
and
have
the
Ops
or
the
city
proposed
to
the
reduction
in
residential
parking
has
been
determined
to
be
suitable.
This
is
not
grounded.
C
In
fact,
this
is
now
grounded
in
safety
and
not
just
myself,
but
multiple
residents
have
voiced
this
and
it's
nowhere
present
in
any
of
this
recommendations
and
there's
there's
like
like
this-
is
a
small
Street.
It's
a
side
street.
These
are
weekly
deliveries,
presumably
they're
going
to
increase
or,
as
I
mentioned,
also
Chimes
vary.
If
and
when
a
driver
is
present,
then
there's
quick
maneuvering
of
the
18-wheeler
like
this
is.
C
This
is
incomprehensible
that
that
is
the
recommendation
that
was
brought
forward
to
you
today
with
no
further
discussion
posts
you
can
see
in
their
planning
rationale.
There's
complete
deference
to
what
the
applicant
says
the
applicant
has
other
properties,
so
you
know
they
know
what
they're
talking
about
in
terms
of
parking.
C
No
I
presented
you
with
stocks,
so
did
other
residents
that
their
site
restricted
to
be
quite
Frank,
I,
don't
care
that
they're
State
restrictions,
because
that
doesn't
give
you
justification
to
restrict
12
parking
spaces
at
the
expense
of
safety,
like
that's,
not
the
intent,
like
I,
said
between
some
of
these
policy
directives
that
are
going
on
in
the
province
and
the
city.
Certainly,
and
in
fact
the
language
is
quite
clear:
it
refers
to
land
use
and
promoting
things
like
active
Transportation,
but
in
a
safe
manner.
E
I'm
sorry
I
I
apologize,
I,
can't
I
can't
hear
you
very
well.
I've
requested
headphones
to
be
able
to
hear
you
better.
I
just
wanted
to
get
clarity,
because
I
I
could
hear
the
concerns
about
safety,
but
I'm
trying
to
understand
what
the
dimensions
of
those
concerns
are.
So,
okay
Tanya.
If
you
could
just
clearly
help
me
to
understand.
C
C
C
So
because
of
this
inadequate
parking
and
the
fact
that
all
these
cards,
like
I
mentioned
it,
can
be
four
or
five
sometimes
are
parked
up
at
the
front.
18
wheelers
that
are
making
weekly
deliveries
can't
make
the
turn
to
get
onto
this
property.
So
they're
stuck
with
options
either
block
off
neighboring
properties
and
I'll
also
mention.
There's
a
fire
hydrant
right
there,
so
either
block
that
entirely
off
and
make
the
delivery
or
make
the
turn
and
take
out
the
vehicles
that
are
there.
C
So
I
have
a
real
issue,
because
I've
stressed
this
to
the
city
and
I
have
stressed
this
to
convey
to
the
applicant
why
there
continues
to
be
a
push
for
Less
parking
at
the
expense
of
expensive
safety.
Issues
like
this
isn't
just
like
a
little
cargo
van.
These
are
18
wheelers
this.
This
road,
as
has
been
you
know,
explained
before
you
today,
is
an
access
point
for
many
many
schools,
many
Community
issues
I
have
a
young
child
and
it's
completely
unacceptable.
This
proposal
to
you
that
is
not
grounded.
C
In
fact,
it's
not
grounded
in
policy
measures
around
safety
and
not
what
I
think
the
residents,
and,
in
fact
it's
not
just
myself
communicating
this.
It's
multiple
interested
parties
and
it
hasn't
been
conveyed
to
you
once
that's
a
big
issue
and
what
I'm,
seeing
it's
not
like
the
applicant
has
brought
forward
the
minimum
and
I'm
saying
to
you
City,
the
minimum
is
not
enough.
They
haven't
even
met
the
minimum.
A
V
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
your
delegation.
Today.
It's
not
really
a
question
as
much
as
it
is
just
a
comment
for
clarity
for
the
committee
around
the
weekly
delivery.
So
it
is
a
Cisco
truck.
That's
delivering
food
to
the
existing
shelter.
That's
there
at
1533
goth,
the
application
that's
before
us
is
for
10
independent
apartment
units,
and
so
the
residents
there
will
be
doing
their
own
grocery
shopping,
so
this
application
will
not
generate
additional
delivery.
So
just
a
point
of
clarity.
There.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
counselor
Bradley
does
anyone
else,
have
any
questions
for
Tonya
for
the
delegation
seen
none
Tanya?
Thank
you
very
much
for
coming
out
today,
I'm
certain
that
some
of
these
questions
will
be
pursued
with
staff,
speaking
of
which
Lily
and
Tracy
are
here
with
us.
Does
anyone
have
any
questions
for
the
city
planners
on
the
file
counselor
Bradley.
V
W
Not
everyone
owns
a
private
vehicle,
so
that
is
coming
from
the
applicant
themselves
in
terms
of
City
policy,
as
you're
all
I'm
sure.
Well
aware,
the
city
is
trying
to
encourage
everyone
to
get
out
of
their
private
vehicles
and
to
take
public
transport
and
other
active
modes
of
transportation,
and
so
this
is
in
keeping
with
those
those
policy
directions.
V
Great,
thank
you
and
I
see
that
there's
lots
of
questions
from
my
colleagues
so
before
we
move
on
to
that,
though,
I
just
did
want
to
Echo
my
support
for
this
application.
What's
before
the
committee
is
really
10,
affordable
residential
units
inside
the
green
belt.
To
me
this
is
a
perfect
example
of
what
gentle
intensification
looks.
Like
interval
house
has
been
a
long
time,
neighbor
in
Gloucester,
Southgate
Ward
and
a
good
neighbor
and
I
expect
that
relationship
to
continue
so
I
hope
that
you
will
support
this
application
today.
Thank
you.
H
X
Chair
the
site
has
right.
Besides
a
public
school
across
the
road
from
a
public
school
is
another
Elementary
School
the
site
is
about
a
600
meters
to
Bank
Street,
where
you
find
a
lot
of
China
stations,
grocery
stores,
restaurants
and
potential
employment
uses
as
well,
and
it's
about
the
seven
minutes
walk
into
those
destinations.
X
There
are
policies
throughout
the
official
plan
to
encourage
supporting
ldm
diversity,
different
modes
of
the
transportation
such
as
a
walking
cycling
Transit
as
well
as
driving.
This
is
a
very
modest
development,
is
only
two
stories
of
10
units
that
reduce
the
parking.
The
impact
is
very
minimum.
This
is
the
ideal
location
to
consider
and
encourage
different
choices
of
the
transportation
modes.
H
Okay,
thank
you.
Something
I
want
to
follow
up
on
offline
just
on
some
of
these
reports,
especially
where
there's
a
specific
reduction
in
in
parking
I
think
it'd
be
worth
mentioning
and
reports
coming
to
committee.
What
the
current
and
planned
access
to
Transit
is-
and
this
may
change
in
a
few
years
too-
it's
that's
probably
closer
to
South
Keys
than
to
Leitrim
station,
but
just
to
have
a
full
context
of
what
walkability
and
access
to
Alternative
modes
of
transportation
would
look
like.
So
thanks
thank.
A
S
Thank
you
chair
now.
It's
supplement,
counselor
gowers
comments.
Yeah
the
93
is
one
of
the
more
frequent
local
routes
that
we
have
down
there.
So
it
is
very
well
served
my
questions
more
more
so
for
the
arrangement
when
the
18-wheeler
deliveries
come
in
The
Goth
Avenue
is
obviously
wide
enough
for
for
these
weekly
deliveries.
But
how
does
the
truck
maneuver
itself
in
and
out
of
the
property?
Do
you
know.
W
Through
you
Mr
chair,
thank
you
for
the
question
I've
been
advised
by
by
interval
house
at
the
Cisco
delivery
truck
does
come
weekly
and
up
until
the
fall
of
of
last
year,
the
truck
used
to
back
in
to
down
the
driveway
and
deliver
their
their
groceries.
However,
apparently
there's
a
new
driver
now
that
isn't
comfortable
backing
in
and
it's
for
that
reason
that
I've
been
told
that
that's
why
the
vehicle
has
been
parked
on
the
street
and
has
yes
been
blocking
driveways
in
order
to
make
the
deliveries.
W
According
to
interval
house,
they
have
indicated
along
the
driveway
they've
placed
some
small
little
pylons
to
ask,
or
as
a
reminder
to
to
the
employees
not
to
park
along
the
driveway,
to
give
a
wider
width
to
allow
greater
comfort
for
the
Cisco
truck
to
be
able
to
back
in,
and
that's
how
they've
been.
You
know,
trying
to
ensure
that
it
does
get
off
the
street.
W
My
understanding
well
I,
can't
say:
I,
don't
I,
don't
live
there
personally,
I've
I've
Been
Told
that
the
Cisco
truck
still
is
sometimes
on
the
street.
There
is
a
delivery
coming
today,
so
I
don't
know,
apparently
every
Tuesday
they
get
their
deliveries.
So
I
can't
say
for
certain
how
that
has
been
working.
W
T
U
U
Since
that
time
we've
been
putting
out
pylons
along
along
the
right
side
to
make
sure
just
to
remind
people
staff
not
to
park
there
and
as
far
as
I
know,
it's
only
been
a
couple
of
times
since
the
fall
that
they
have
parked
on
the
street.
There
was
one
time
because
one
of
our
neighbors
was
having
their
laneway
resurfaced
and
there
were
some
very
large
trucks
that
the
Cisco
truck
couldn't
get
around.
U
That
said,
I
was
on
vacation
for
two
weeks,
so
my
staff
were
telling
me
that
the
truck
came
down
the
laneway
and
that
it
hasn't
been
an
issue,
but
one
of
the
things
that
I
have
done
in
the
past
has
provided
my
cell
phone
number
to
our
neighbors
and
I
will
actually
deliver
that
again
today.
Just
so
that,
if
it
keeps
happening,
they
can
text
me
and
I'll
go
talk
to
the
driver
right
away.
U
S
Yeah
supplementary
comment:
is
there
any
way
to
maybe
work
with
Cisco
to
get
a
use,
a
smaller
vehicle
or
or
is
the
number
of,
or
is
the
amount
of
supplies
that
gets
delivered
like?
Does
that
actually
warrant
the
full
18-wheeler?
Or?
Is
it
more
a
question
of
the
rooting
and
all
that
all
that
logistical,
good
stuff.
U
A
S
D
D
This
is
not
permanent
housing.
What
were
our
goal
of
the
city
is
Affordable
permanent
housing?
Is
this
considered
to
be
well?
This
is
supportive,
supported
housing
in
a
shelter
type
category,
but
secondary,
and
it
is
necessary,
but
the
the
object
is
to
get
these
families
into
permanent,
affordable
housing.
Is
that
not
correct
foreign.
W
W
I
would
assume
yes
and
potential
that
that
the
residents
do
need
some
additional
support.
There
will
be,
there
will
be
counseling
available
for
these
women
as
they
transition
from
the
group
home
to
the
transitional
housing.
So,
potentially,
there
is
a
need
for
them
to
have
additional
support
before
they
actually
move
into
a
permanent
housing
situation.
D
F
Yeah
thanks
and
I
think
that
conversation
even
I
know
it
was
details,
councilor,
leaper,
but
I.
Think
it
sorted
out.
You
know
just
now.
We
have
a
commitment
from
the
the
people
who
will
be
working
there,
that
they'll
look
into
that
I'm.
Sure
counselor
Bradley
will
look
at
all
options.
You
know,
maybe
there's
a
No
Parking.
No
stopping
you
know,
there's
a
lot
of
solutions
to
that
stuff.
I
actually
have
a
question
on
the
technical
Amendment,
because
I
didn't
quite
understand
it.
F
It
seemed
like
quite
a
technical
Amendment,
but
if
it
is
simply
just
that
there
was
an
error
in
the
report
and
that
at
any
wall
that
this
measurement
could
be
changed,
it's
not
something
that's
being
added
in
just
as
an
extra
thing
to
the
application.
It's
really
just
the
there
was
an
error
in
the
application.
W
Through
Mr
chair,
yes,
thank
you
for
the
question.
Yes,
there
was
an
error
in
that
I
believe
through
some
rejigging
of
the
building
on
site,
that
the
building
did
get
shifted
a
little
bit
back
towards
the
rear
of
the
property
and
in
doing
so,
brought
the
rear
wall
of
the
Residential
Building
closer
to
the
private
way,
which
is
the
driveway
into
the
parking
and
in
such
it
created
an
issue,
a
non-compliance
issue
with
the
zoning,
and
so
that's
it
was
just
recently
discovered.
F
F
Okay,
so
maybe
we
can
change
that
between
now
and
Council,
but
I
just
I
found
that
strange
I've
never
seen
that
in
in
a
technical
Amendment
for
something
to
just
say
any
wall
could
just
mat.
You
know
just
with
this
amendment
change,
so
if
that
could
be
very
clear
as
to
what
wall
they're
talking
about,
because
I
appreciate
that
you
know
somebody
didn't
recognize
that
and
there
has
to
be
a
change,
but
any
wall
is
a
little
much.
A
A
E
W
W
E
Thank
you
for
the
answer
to
that
question,
also
being
in
an
outer
Urban
transect,
which
is
making
me
very
excited.
We
have
the
opportunity
to
create
this
gentle
density
that
the
city
so
desperately
needs,
but
my
residence
in
college
Ward
are
concerned
about
pressures
on
infrastructure
on
street
parking
on
visibility
on
plows
being
able
to
get
through,
you
can
substitute
18
wheeler
for
a
plow.
You
can
substitute
18
wheeler
for
an
emergency
vehicle.
E
These
are
all
real
design
issues
that
come
with
with
the
outer
Urban
transects,
but
we
will
be
looked
at
to
create
the
density
that
some
other
neighborhoods
cannot
afford
for
this
middle
missing
middle,
and
so
we
will
have
to
address
these
real
pressures
for
neighbors
and
I.
Look
forward
to
being
able
to
wrestle
through
this
on
future
applications.
A
Councilor
Johnston:
are
there
any
further
questions
of
staff?
Does
anyone
wish
to
make
any
further
comment
on
this
application?
I've
asked
that
the
motion
go
up
in
its
final
form.
The
amending
motion
before
we
vote
on
that
is
that
amending
motion
carried
thank
you
and
on
the
main
motion,
I'll
just
ask
for
a
vote.
Please,
foreign.
Q
Y
A
A
Y
So
these
changes
include
as
of
right
permissions
for
up
to
three
dwelling
units
on
all
residential
Parcels
of
land
that
have
Municipal
Water
and
Sewer
services.
This
change
to
the
ACT
has
redirected
staff
resources
from
the
new
zoning
bylaw
to
address
immediate
amendments
that
are
needed
to
the
current
zoning
bylaw
to
recognize
recognize
permissions
for
up
to
three
units.
Y
There
are
also
impacts
associated
with
this.
These
new
development
rights
and
staff
see
a
need
to
address
those
impacts
so
that
as
Redevelopment
occurs
according
to
the
permissions
in
Bill
23
that
impacts
associated
with
these
increased
number
of
units
can
be
addressed
because
they're
not
currently
contemplated,
in
particular
for
the
R1
and
R2
zones.
This
change
the
planning
act,
has
also
triggered
the
need
to
re
rework
the
residential
Provisions
that
were
prepared
to
date
for
the
new
zoning
bylaw.
Y
So
the
second
issue
that
came
out
of
Bill
23,
that
is
causing
additional
work
for
staff,
is
a
new
requirement
that
the
city
update
current
zoning
and
protected
major
transit
station
areas
or
pmtsas
within
one
year
of
such
areas
being
designated
in
the
official
plan.
So
we
had
pmtsa
is
designated
in
the
official
plan
and
those
designations
came
into
effect
on
November
4th
of
last
year.
Y
So
we
have
until
November
4th
of
this
year
to
implement
zoning,
to
reach
the
to
ensure
that
the
density
targets
and
for
pmtsas
can
be
implemented
through
the
zoning
bylaw
pmtsas
that
do
not
have
adequate
zoning
for
those
areas.
The
zoning
biolum
report
will
be
brought
to
council
before
November
4th
2023
to
apply
zoning
that
can
achieve
those
density
targets
and
failure
to
meet
that
timeline
will
result
in
those
amendments
no
longer
being
sheltered
from
appeal
to
the
Ontario
land.
Y
Tribunal
Bill
23
also
implemented
limitations
on
Municipal
authority
to
regulate
building
design
through
site
plan
control,
and
this
shifts
some
of
the
weight
for
design
related
issues
that
could
be
regulated
through
zoning
to
the
zoning
battle.
These
are
issues
that
could
have
been
dealt
with
through
site
plan
control,
and
now
the
zoning
teaming
is
having
to
think
figure
out.
Okay,
what
are
the
minimum
thresholds
for
certain
design
related
issues
that
we
should
be
considering
zoning
regulations
for
to
ensure
a
certain
threshold
or
or
quality
of
design
for
new
development?
Y
There
was
another
change
made
through
Bill
23
concerning
site
plan
control,
so
exemption
from
site
plan
control
for
development
of
10
or
a
few
units.
So
we
can
no
longer
those
those
types
of
developments
for
10
or
less
are
no
longer
a
subject
to
site
plan
control,
so
this
once
again
shifts
some
of
the
burden
of
responsibility
for
functional
requirements
for
the
site
that
could
have
been
dealt
with
through
site
plan
control
back
onto
the
zoning.
Y
So
next
slide,
please
so
public
engagement
in
2023
there
will
be
opportunities
for
public
engagement
on
the
new
zoning
bylaw.
This
year
we
will
be
kicking
off
our
public
engagement
events.
Now
that
we
have
a
new
official
plan,
so
discussion
papers
will
be
released
in
q1
of
2023
on
seven
key
zoning
issues
and
they're
up
on
the
screen
in
front
of
you.
Two
of
them
are
relating
to
Neighborhood
zoning,
so
one
on
neighborhood
zones,
one
on
neighborhood
character.
Y
So
when
the
discussion
papers
are
released,
there
will
be
surveys
available
for
each
of
the
discussion
paper.
As
and
as
I've
heard,
a
report
will
be
released
in
Q3
of
this
year
and
I'll.
Note
that
the
release
of
the
discussion
papers,
which
is
delayed
while
we
were
waiting
for
approval
of
the
official
plan
as
it
was
premature,
to
consult
with
the
public
on
zoning
strategies
for
strategies
for
an
official
plan
that
was
not
yet
in
full
force
and
effect.
Y
Next
slide.
Please
further
for
our
public
engagement
in
2023,
we
will
be
releasing
a
neighborhood,
Form
and
Function
report
in
Q2
of
this
year.
The
report
will
include
a
summary
of
various
low-rise
building
forms
that
have
been
modeled
on
a
variety
of
lot
sizes
in
existing
neighborhoods
and
the
development
standards
used
to
produce
such
forms.
This
report
is
intended
to
inform
discussions
on
performance
standards
for
residential
zones
in
in
the
new
zoning
bylaw
and
will
cover
matters
such
as
setbacks,
Building
height
parking
amenity
area,
landscaping
and
trees.
Y
The
neighborhood
form
infection
report
is
being
produced
in
consultation
with
staff
who
are
working
on
the
revisions
to
the
Urban
Design
guidelines
for
low-rise
infill
housing.
The
guidelines
are
intended
as
a
tool
to
help
achieve
design
related
goals
in
the
official
plan
concerning
infill
development
in
residential
areas
of
the
city,
and
we
are
working
with
them.
Y
Y
2024
will
allow
staff
to
respond
to
comments
from
the
public
on
the
discussion
papers
released
in
q1
and
to
respond
to
comments
on
the
neighborhood,
Form
and
Function
paper
and
report
in
q223,
which
will
come
to
this
committee
and
Council
sufficient
time
to
consult
with
the
public
is
essential
to
assure
transparency
of
process
and
to
reduce
the
risk
of
appeals
for
new
zoning
Provisions
that
inadvertently
eliminate
development
rights.
So
the
zoning
bylaw
is
really
where
the
rubber
hits
the
road
with
the
new
official
plan.
It
impacts
every
property
in
the
city.
Y
Y
Y
So
to
sum
up,
staff
are
simultaneously
working
on
draft
Provisions
for
both
the
current
and
new
zoning
bylaws.
To
respond
to
the
changes
to
the
planning
legislation
brought
brought
in
through
Bill
23.
I'd
like
to
mention
that
the
work
plan
for
the
current
zoning
bylaw,
which
is
the
one
we
have
in
effect,
which
was
approved
on
June
25th,
2008.,
that
the
timelines
for
the
work
to
create
that
zoning
ballot
were
were
that
bylaw
was
undertaken
on
timelines
similar
to
what
is
proposed
in
the
revised
timelines
for
the
new
zoning
bylaw.
Y
In
the
report
that
you
see
before
you,
while
zoning
by
the
2008
was
an
extremely
complex
project,
and
it
was
very
well
done,
it
was
less
ambitious
in
scope
than
the
new
zoning
bylaw
as
it
was
a
harmonization
of
the
zoning
ballots
of
the
former
New
municipalities.
So,
generally
speaking,
they
weren't
inventing
anything
new
as
part
of
that
that
bylaw
they
were
harmonizing
the
provisions
of
of
the
former
bylaws.
Y
It
will
also
invite
involves
city-wide
changes
to
land
use
permissions
and
entirely
new
zoning
Provisions,
as
I
mentioned,
to
address
the
changing
economy
and
the
climate
change
and
housing
crises
to
successfully
achieve
these
goals
and
minimize
appeals.
Draft
Provisions
are
currently
in
a
detailed
stage
of
development
and
a
lot
by
lot.
Consideration
of
over
300
Parcels
of
land
in
the
city
will
be
required
by
zoning
staff
over
the
next
three
years.
Y
A
Thank
you
very
much
subject
near
and
dear
to
my
heart
and
some
of
the
most
important
work
that
this
committee
will
oversee
over
the
course
of
this
term
of
counsel.
There
are
no
delegations
today,
however,
I
did
want
to
ask.
This
report
will
be
presented
to
the
Agriculture
and
Rural
Affairs
committee
as
well.
A
O
Y
O
Yeah
I
guess
what
I'm
trying
to
wrap
my
head
around
is
when
a
municipality
has
their
official
plan
approved,
which
we've
done
there's
a
requirement
to
go
through
a
comprehensive
zoning,
bylaw
review,
which
is
what
we're
doing
yes
and
I'm
trying
to
understand.
How
does
that
bylaw
impact
zoning
applications?
And
since
we
are
going
to
be
a
number
of
years
between
the
approval
of
our
op
and
the
approval
of
the
new
modified
bylaw,
how
does
that
impact
or
effect
applications?
O
Will
there
be
any
difference
to
an
application's
outcome
under
the
existing
bylaw?
And
would
the
outcome
be
different
under
a
modified
bylaw,
because
we're
going
to
be
there's
going
to
be
a
gap
so
I'm
trying
to
wrap
my
head?
Is
there
any
impact?
Is
it
all
Aesthetics
or
we'll?
Actually,
impact
applications
and
the
longer
we
wait
to
approve
a
bylaw
could
impact
that's
what
I'm
trying
to
wrap
my
head
around
Mr.
Z
Chair,
if
I
can
jump
in
for
a
second
here,
we
do
have
to
appreciate
that
the
zoning
Bala
is
a
illegal
document.
It
is
the
the
law
of
the
land
as
it
sets,
and
it
will
continue
to
be
the
law
of
the
land
until
it
is
repealed
and
replaced
as
such
of
any
zoning
application
does
come
in.
They
will
provide,
as
part
of
that
planning
rationale
how
that
application
is
assessed
against
the
new
official
plan,
the
official
plan
that
is
now
currently
in
force.
Z
So
any
amendments
to
the
zoning
bylaw
with
respect
to
any
considerations
for
high
density.
Things
like
that
would
be
in
keeping
with
the
policies
of
the
new
official
plan
as
it
goes
forward.
So
the
new
official
plan
does
have
a
guidance
for
new
applications
as
they
go
through.
It
is
the
right
of
a
property
owner
and
a
developer,
to
submit
an
application
to
to
redevelop
the
property
and
have
that
considered
against
the
the
new,
the
new
policies.
O
Okay,
my
communities
are
very
interested
in
this
comprehensive
zoning
by
lab
review
because,
as
Ms
ready
said,
the
the
the
review
will
look
at
lot
by
lot.
So
the
Mac,
the
micro
level
analysis
within
neighborhoods.
Now
that
we've
passed
policy
is
how
do
you
implement
these
changes
Community
by
Community
Street
by
Street,
and
so
what
I'm
hearing
is?
O
O
Y
O
D
D
But
then
we
have
this
extra
layer,
that
of
what
the
province
has
put
down
and
what
I'm
trying
to
get
my
head
around
is
that
they've
already
put
in
to
effect
that
a
property
can
have
the
three
units
on
it,
but
we
are
still,
if
I
understand
we're
still
using
our
current
bylaws
and
we're
not.
We
don't
have
time
to
update
them.
Is
that
correct.
Y
So
part
of
the
redirection
of
Staff
time
has
been
that
staff
working
on
the
residential
zones
have
had
to
put
their
minds
to
a
report
which
will
be
coming
to
Committee
in
before
well
in
Q2
of
this
year
to
make
the
necessary
changes
to
the
current
zoning
bylaw
to
accommodate
the
bill.
23
permissions.
So
it's
basically
just
to
you
know,
remove
the
current
Provisions
in
the
current
zoning
bylaw
that
are
really
have
no
effect
anymore
and
to
and
to
try
to
manage
those
new
permissions
that
are
now
as
of
right.
D
Okay,
so
so
it's
kind
of
an
interim
correct,
okay,
all
right
I
think
that's
important
to
understand.
Apologies
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
get
my
head
around
it,
and
I
and
I've
got
to
explain
it
to
Residents
as
councilor
Brockington
is
saying
and
they're
so
hungry
for
information.
Is
it
possible
to
have
some
kind
of
primer
for
them
in
the
interim,
because
I
think
it's
important
for
them
to
understand
what
the
rules
of
the
game
are
going
to
be?
Y
Z
Thank
you
chair.
There
is
an
orientation
session
coming
forward
for
the
public
that
will
go
through
the
changes
that
are
coming
from
Bill
109,
Bill
23..
The
fact
of
the
matter
is
with
respect
to
Bill
23.
That
is,
of
course,
a
change.
This
effect
at
all
municipalities
and
there's
still
quite
a
bit
of
discussion
over
what
the
magnitude
of
these
changes
might
mean
as
they
go
by
as
different
interpretations
and
legal
and
legal
interpretations
come
through.
Z
Whether
the
waste
management
Provisions
are
responsive
to
that,
whether
the
Landscaping
Provisions
are
contemplating
and
able
to
respond
to
to
what
we're
seeing
rear
yard
parking
for
an
example.
In
many
areas
of
the
city,
there
are
no
restrictions
on
the
extent
of
that
surfacing,
that's
something
when
we
have
more
units
that
are
happening
on
that
lot
than
what
we're
originally
contemplating
in
the
lower
right
scenario.
Whether
or
not
those
are
gaps
that
that
zoning
should
be
stepping
into
control
on
a
faster
basis,
rather
than
waiting
for
the
more
comprehensive
proposal
to
work
its
way
through.
D
Z
Z
AA
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr
chair
and
I'm
sharing
some
of
the
same
concerns
as
some
of
my
colleagues
about
the
timelines.
I
I
understand
it's
going
to
take
time
to
get
this
all
put
together,
but
I
thought
we
would
be
moving
along
a
lot
quicker
and
during
the
election,
I
warmed
a
lot
of
my
residents
up
to
the
new
reality.
That
and
and
Jeff
knows
it,
there's
fluid
as
well.
Our
areas
are
going
to
fuel
this
impact,
probably
the
greatest,
with
all
these
changes.
AA
Y
The
whole
point
of
the
discussion
paper
is
to
talk
about
what
neighborhood
character
means
and
to
from
a
zoning
perspective,
identify
those
particular
issues
that
we
can
deal
with
under
the
planning
act
under
Section
34,
which
is
what
gives
municipalities
the
ability
to
Zone.
There
are
certain
things
that
we
can
deal
with,
that
people
may
think
of
as
character,
but
there
are
other
things
that
we
can't
and
that's
what
the
paper
talks
about
just
to
set,
try
and
bring
some
clarity
to
that
issue.
That's.
AA
Terrific,
you
know
I'll
be
paying
close
attention
to
that
something
that's
become
a
little
more
timely
in
my
neighborhood
and
I
just
want
to
see
how
this
could
get
onto
the
radar.
It's
related
to
Severance
and
corner
lot.
Provisions
I'm
dealing
with
this
I've
had
two
in
a
row
where
you
know
they're
they're,
dividing
properties,
putting
laneways
under
additional
roads.
Is
this
something
that
will
be
examined
as
well:
Corner
law
provision,
but.
H
Thanks
Sheriff,
so
once
this
is
in
place,
the
new
bylaw,
it's
going
to
streamline
the
planning
process,
which
will
mean
less
cost
and
complexity
for
Builders,
which
should
mean
a
lower
cost
to
build
and
building
faster.
So
it's
in
everyone's
interests
to
complete
this
as
quickly
as
possible.
Have
you
explored?
Is
there
any
opportunity
for
outsourcing
some
of
this
work,
bringing
in
Consultants
to
take
pieces
of
it?
What
what
is
the
plan,
or
what
have
you
looked
into
there.
Y
Through
the
chair,
so
we've
brought
to
the
the
development
of
the
zoning
bylaw
to
a
stage
now,
where
I
can
evaluate
which
work
packages
should
be
sent
out
to
Consultants,
to
speed
up
the
work,
to
free
up
staff
time
to
focus
on
the
very
sensitive
work
packages
such
as
the
neighborhood
zones,
which
I
feel
are
best
dealt
with
in-house
by
in-house
staff.
So,
yes,
we
were
at
that
stage
and
I
will
be
sending
out
requests
for
proposals
soon
for
certain
packages
of
zoning
work,
because.
H
Y
As
of
April
of
2024,
we
will
no
longer
be
able
to
collect
fees
for
that
purpose
as
a
result
of
changes
in
Bill
23.
So,
yes,
I
can
absolutely
confirm.
We
will
need
funding
for
the
project
after
that
point
and
I
would
like
to
explore.
Yes
for
sure,
I
would
like
to
explore
additional
funds
for
Consulting.
Y
My
understanding
through
the
chair
is
that
municipalities
will
be
made
whole
to
use
that
language
I
haven't
seen
anything
in
particular
in
relation
to
municipalities
having
in
this
Regard
in
terms
of
having
to
hire
Consultants
to
complete
work
over
because
of
timelines
and
so
I'm,
not
particularly
aware
of
a
specific
fund
available
at
this
time.
But
that
is
something
that
I
could
look
into
and
answer
questions.
Perhaps
someone.
Z
Charge
us
to
just
to
clarify
with
respect
to
that,
the
there
is
a
municipal
streamlining
fund
that
has
been
made
available.
The
city
has
applied
for
that
and
we
have
received
a
portion
of
funding
from
that
to
assist
us
with
the
development
of
the
performance
function,
strategy
that
will
be
coming
forth
with
so
we
have
applied
for
that.
We
were
successful.
Z
We
do
have
funding
sources
coming
from
that
with
respect
to
the
funding
that
the
Carol
mentioned
from
Minister
Clark's
letter,
that
is,
with
respect
to
development
charges
writ
large.
So
that's
something
that
that
we
will
be
looking
at
closely
as
we
find
out
more
details
from
The
Province
about
what
that
might
mean.
H
Okay,
you
touched
on
something
in
your
presentation:
curl
that
I
thought
was
really
important.
Public
consultation
and
you
said
it
would
lead
to
less
appeals.
I
wonder
if
you
could
just
give
us
a
little
more
context
around
that
and
what
that
means
and
and
why
consultation
is
so
important
in
the
in
the
process.
Here.
Y
That,
through
the
chair,
thank
you
I'd,
enjoy
speaking
about
this.
So
part
of
the
success
of
bylaw
2008
250.
The
current
bylab
that
we
have
was
that
it
was
undertaken
over
over
the
course
of
at
least
three
or
four
actually
five
years,
and
that
there
were
several
drops
of
the
bylaw
released
at
approximately
one
year
intervals
and
as
a
part
of
the
public
consultations
that
occurred.
Y
Following
the
release
of
each
of
those
drafts,
staff
undertook
to
respond
to
comments
from
Individual
Property
Owners,
about
specific
Parcels
of
land,
and
they
were
able
to
modify
the
zoning
for,
for
a
variety
of
reasons,
to
satisfy
the
property
owners
and,
of
course
it
was
always
within
the
bounds
of
what
was
the
you
know.
The
official
plan
was
directing.
It
was
to
correct
errors
that
had
been
made
by
staff,
because
there
are
300
000
parcels
and
it
is
very
easy.
We'd
have
to
bat
at
that.
You
know.
Y
That's
an
amazing
success,
and
you
know
that
is
you
know
if
we
are
not
given
adequate
time
to
undertake
this
work,
that
the
work
that
I've
described
the
process
that
was
undertaken
in
the
past
for
the
the
current
bylaw,
we
will
not
bring
a
bylaw
forward
that
will
you
know
pass
through
that
test
as
well,
we'll
we
could
wind
up
with
hundreds
of
Appeals,
and
that
is
something
that
defeats
a
bylaw
It
could
wind
up
being
needing
to
be
repealed?
I
don't
want
to
go
there.
This
is
very
fastidious
work.
Y
It
requires
hours
and
hours
and
hours
and
hours
of
Staff
time
to
be
responsive
to
the
concerns
of
property
owners
and
rightfully
so,
because
we're
affecting
their
development
rights
so
I
want
the
time
to
be
able
to
to
undertake
that
work
and
to
get
that
to
avoid
these
appeals.
That
can
happen
and,
of
course,
appeals
ultimately
are
unavoidable
and
they
and
they
will
come
and
we'll
have
to
deal
with
them.
H
Okay,
yeah
I
know
you're
under
a
lot
of
pressure
from
from
counselors
and
from
the
development
industry
as
well
to
move
as
quickly
as
possible,
but
that's
a
good
reminder
that
it
does
take
time
to
get
things
right.
So
you
know
if,
if
there
is
more
that
you
need
more
support,
funding-wise
or
otherwise
from
committee
or
Council,
please
do
ask
because
this
is
a
really
important
priority
for
Council
in
this
term.
Z
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Council
goward
and
certainly
I
would
encourage
folks
who,
even
if
you're
not
on
the
sponsors
group
reach
out
to
David
and
Carol
and
start
talking
to
staff
about
the
the
official
Plan
update
or
the
comprehensive
zoning
bylaw
update
it's.
It
is
important,
partly
in
response
to
what
counselor
Brockington
said
with
respect
to
what
happens
when
you
have
a
bylaw
zoning
bylaw
that
doesn't
match
the
official
plan.
Well,
we've
been
living
with
that
for
years
right.
A
We
see
multiple
applications
coming
in
front
of
this
committee
for
rezonings
when
simply
looking
at
them.
We
know
that
those
clearly
fulfill
the
intent
of
even
the
last
official
plan
with
respect
to
the
the
thrust
toward
intensification,
the
thrust
toward
development
near
Transit.
Our
new
official
plan
takes
that
further,
but
our
zoning
bylaw
hasn't
kept
up
for
for
many
years
now.
So
it's
it's
not
all
that
unfamiliar
ground
right
now,
the
sooner
we
can
get
the
comprehensive
zoning
bylaw
update,
reviewed
and
passed.