►
From YouTube: Planning Committee – April 26, 2016
Description
Planning Committee meeting – April 26, 2016 – Audio Stream
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas.
A
A
Okay,
welcome
everybody.
This
is
a
public
meeting
to
consider
the
proposed
comprehensive
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaw
amendments
listed
as
Ida's
one,
two
four
and
five
on
today's
agenda
for
the
items
listed
above.
Only
those
who
make
all
submissions
today
or
written
submissions
before
the
amendments
are
adopted
may
appeal
the
matter
to
the
entire
municipal
board.
In
addition,
the
applicant
may
appeal
the
matter
to
the
entero
Municipal
Board.
A
A
Okay,
we
have
a
first
item
up.
Is
the
Official
Plan
of
Zoning
at
flood,
plain
mapping,
updates
phase
1
and
it
was
deferred
from
the
last
planning
meeting
and
we
have
a
couple
of
developers
that
are
here
today
that
want
to
speak
but
may
not
have
to
speak
Marcel
Denham
a
hi
myself,
so
I
know
that
you've
had
conversations.
I
mean
this
is
late-breaking
news.
A
A
B
A
As
you
know,
the
this
item
is
before
us,
because
the
province
mandates
that
we
do
the
conservation
authorities
tell
us
what
what
the
the
floodplain
is
and
our
job
is
the
mapping
of,
and
so
this
case
we
have
outstanding
the
carp
restoration
project.
We
don't
have
that
information
available
to
include
in
the
map.
What
we're
saying
today
is
when
that
comes
forward.
Mr.
Schmitt,
we
are
going
to
you're
going
to
change
the
mapping.
At
that
point,
we
don't
have
yes,
counselor
couch
a.
C
A
D
A
D
Thing
is:
is
the
work
is
starting
on
the
carp,
restoration,
I'm,
not
sure
what
the
timing
for
the
completion
once
once
it
is
completed,
the
adjustments
will
be
made
to
the
flood
plain
mapping
and
as
councilor
tyranny
has
indicated
interaction.
We
will
at
that
time
bring
forward
the
report
that
would
make
that
modification
to
reflect
the
new
floodplain
that
would
be
established
based
on
the
implementation
of
the
restoration
plan.
So
as
soon
as
that
gets
done,
not
sure
what
the
timing
is
for
completion.
Mr.
Heer,
why
you
might
know,
hang.
A
On
a
second
okay
councillor,
Wilkinson,
do
you
want
to
speak
on
this
item
while
holding
it
then
I'm
holding
this
item?
Thank
you.
No!
It's,
okay,
because
then
we're
going
to
go
to
count
mr.
Hurd
wires
going
to
speak.
Then
other
people
gonna
want
to
ask
questions.
We're
holding
the
item.
Unfortunately
again,
late-breaking
news.
Second,
one
is
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment
part
of
980
Earl,
Armstrong
Road.
A
There
you
are
hang
on
a
second
I
think
you
are
only
speakers.
This
is
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment
for
part
of
1980
Earl
Armstrong
Road,
and
we
also
have
councillor
cactus
here.
Who
is
the
councillor
for
cluster
south,
the
p.m.
and
we
also
have
the
vice-chair,
has
in
his
hands
a
deferral
motion,
so
I'm
going
to
suggest
that
we
have
the
deferral
motion
followed
by
the
applicant.
Mr.
Kelly
and
Miss
Jarvis
speak
to
the
deferral
motion
on
why
they
don't
want
to
have
different
that
on
the
floor.
I
know
that
councillor
cactus
as
some
comments.
A
E
A
A
A
A
Next
one
we
have
speakers
its
designation,
the
former
out
of
just
Sharon
synagogue,
375
King,
Edward
Avenue
under
part
4
of
the
entero
Heritage
Act,
the
next
one,
if
the
application
for
demolition
and
new
construction
at
16
Sweetland
Avenue.
This
was
before
the
built
heritage
committee
and
it's
a
property
designated
on
a
part.
Five
of
the
interior
Heritage
Act
and
located
in
the
Sweetland
Avenue
district
constructs
Wheatland
Avenue
Heritage
Conservation
District.
Does
anyone
want
to
have
any
questions
on
this
or
can
we
carry
this
item?
A
Okay
and
then
we're
eight
and
then
a
nine
story
was
the
application
for
new
construction
at
140,
Howard
Street.
It's
a
property
also
doesn't
meet
under
part
5
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act,
and
this
one's
located
in
the
Rockland
Park
Heritage
Conservation
District.
Does
anyone
have
any
questions
on
this
one?
It
was
carried
by
belt,
Heritage
Committee.
Is
it
caring?
Thank
you.
Number
10
is
the
application
to
alter
the
Hungarian
embassy
at
306,
Metcalf
Street.
A
A
A
A
Number
twelve
is
the
Heritage
Register
procedures.
Does
anyone
have
any
questions
want
to
hold
this
one?
No,
okay,
so
is
it
it's
is
it
Kerry?
Thank
you
and
number.
Thirteen
is
the
planning
his
heritage
permits
issued
through
delegated
authority
in
2015.
Anybody
have
any
questions
or
is
this
received?
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
then
we
have
the
motions
of
which
notice
has
been
previously
given,
which
we'll
deal
with
after
our
regular
agenda.
Okay,
so
we'll
go
back
to
the
floodplain
and
I
think
that
mr.
Hawai
I
was
going
to
give
us
and-
and
just
so
you
know,
mr.
McGuire
is
still
on
this
file,
even
though
he's
technically
moved
into
a
different
area,
because
he
is
the
one
that
knows
the
very
soul
of
this
project.
I
would
say,
and
so,
even
though
he
moved
into
another
area,
it
benefited
us
but
greatly
to
have
his
expertise,
stay
with
it.
D
A
A
D
D
A
G
B
B
The
technically
amendment
I'll
just
get
to
therefore
be
resolved.
The
document
one
proposed
the
official
plan
amendment
be
amended
by
deleting
policy
three
in
Section
two
details:
Part
B
of
the
amendment
and
replacing
with
the
following
text.
Three,
the
policies
for
the
floodplains
also
apply
our
areas
of
the
floodplain
success
that
are
not
mapped
by
the
conservation
authority
and
therefore
be
identified
as
schedule
K,
and
not
the
overlay
of
the
comprehensive
zoning.
B
A
A
Okay,
let's
go
on
now
to
zoning
bylaw
amendment
part
of
988,
Earl,
Armstrong,
Road
and
I'm,
going
to
I've
already
mentioned
that
vice-chair
Chinese
gonna
move
a
deferral
and
I
mentioned
that
miss
Jarvis
and
mr.
Keller
and
the
audience
and
want
to
speak
but
I'm
going
to
go
to
the
counselor
for
the
war
to
speak
first
on
why
this
item
should
be
deferred,
Thank.
D
You,
chair
and
colleagues,
as
you
probably
know,
the
Riverside
south
community
design
plan
is
in
the
process
of
being
finalized,
I'm
pleased
with
some
of
the
progress
that
we've
made
with
the
local
developers
in
the
area
as
well
as
City
stop
but
they're
still,
some
final
touches
that
need
to
be
completed
and
as
many
of
no
Riverside's
health
is
on
the
fastest
growing
communities
and
there's
a
lot
of
potential
there.
So
I
want
to
ensure
that
we
have
that
right.
D
H
It's
a
question
directly
related
to
what
Kakashi
just
said.
That
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
To
me.
I
just
mean
from
the
report,
which
says
the
CDP
will
be
considered
by
planning
committee
an
uncounseled
on
the
same
agenda
as
this
report,
which
clearly
didn't
happen
in
this
meeting,
but
I
just
a
question
for
councilor
caucus.
Would
it
make
more
sense
to
bring
this
item
at
the
same
meeting
as
the
CDP
is
considered,
as
the
report
suggests,
which
would
mean
holding
this
until
June.
D
I'm
trying
to
find
the
balance
because
I
know
for
the
applicant
to
they're
interested
in
moving
forward
I
think
it
does
make
sense
to
time
it,
but
I
think
you
know
we
can,
depending
on
the
progress
that
happens
between
now
and
then
I
think
that
is
a
reasonable
compromise.
But
it's
hard
to
say,
depending
on
how
those
discussions
go
in
the
next
couple
of
weeks.
You
know
staff
might
have
other
comments
as
well,
so
I'd
be
interested
in
hearing
what
they
might
have
to
say
on
that
yeah.
A
And
also
the
report,
while
you're
reading
that,
if
you
remember
the
CDP,
was
supposed
to
come
before
us
Riverside
said
last
month
and
we
determined
that
it
wasn't
ready
yet
so
that
wording
probably
didn't
change
in
the
report
that
ties
it
together.
But
from
my
perspective,
I,
don't
see
this
tied
to
this
CDP.
There
just
is
more
work
to
be
done
to
move
forward
to
the
next
step.
Mr.
moody,
did
you
want
to
make
any
comment.
I
No
madam
chair
I
think
the
ward
councillors
identified
the
the
desires
of
the
applicant
to
move
forward
as
timely
a
basis
as
possible
and,
as
things
continue
to
solidify
with
respect
to
the
CDP,
you
know
I
think
we
will
be
achieving
clarity.
I
think
we
are
goal
right
now
is
to
achieve
clarity.
You
know,
based
on
this
deferral
motion
before
this
would
come
back
to
the
meeting
in
May,
and
you
know
through
that
process.
I
A
So,
as
you
hopefully
heard,
the
deferral
is
only
till
the
next
planning
committee
meeting
and
thank
you,
Miss
Jarvis,
for
all
the
work
that
you've
labored
on
in
the
last
few
days
is
difficult.
When
you're
trying
to
pull
different
people
together
to
get
concurrence
from
more
than
one
company
and
having
you
know,
everybody
in
the
same
place
at
the
same
time.
So
really
that's
the
reason
we're
taking
this
pregnant
pause.
If
you
will
and
wait
until
the
next
committee,
so
we
can
make
sure
that
we
have
that
done.
Go
ahead.
A
A
On
yes,
excellent
thanks
very
much,
that's
good
to
hear
thanks
for
coming
out
today
and
continue
on
I
know
that
mr.
moody
has
been
working
very
hard
with
you
on
this
file
too,
as
long
as
as
well
as
the
certainly
the
counselor
has
been
very
involved
thanks.
Very
much
so
you've
heard
that
everyone
is.
This
item
deferred
until
the
first
meeting
in
May
Carrie
thanks
counselor
caucus.
A
J
A
J
A
K
Madam
chair
planning,
committee
and
council
are
vested
with
the
authority
to
deal
with
complaints
under
the
development
charges
Act,
and
this
is
the
first
such
one
to
come
to
committee.
In
this
term,
one
came
to
a
Community
Council
in
the
last
term.
It
deals
with
173,
Armstrong
and
175
Armstrong
road.
There
was
a
demolition
of
one
building
and
the
construction
of
two
units
on
the
property
development
charges
by
law
provides
that
one
can
receive
a
credit
for
a
demolition
if
it
occurred
within
ten
years
prior
to
the
building
permit
being
issued
for
the
new
construction.
K
K
E
J
K
J
J
J
The
I
know,
interestingly,
that,
that
before
I
go
on
to
this
slide,
that
there
is
an
assertion
that
ten
years
has
passed,
but
not
really
a
justification
contained
in
the
report.
Having
said
that,
this
slide
simply
sets
out
the
legal
basis
for
this
and
an
answer
to
councilor
brought
infants
question
as
to
why
this
matter
comes
before
committee.
J
What
the
act
lays
out
is
that,
if
there
is
a
concern
about
the
application
of
the
Act
and
the
bylaw
comes
before
council,
and
only
after
that,
is
there
an
ability
to
go
to
the
Ontario
Municipal
Board.
If
there's
still
a
dispute
next
slide,
please
again
still
setting
it
out,
you
have
the
ability
you
have
to
hold
a
hearing,
and
then
you
can
either
dismiss
the
complaint
or
rectify
any
incorrect
determination
or
error.
That
was
the
subject
of
it.
Next
slide,
please
so
173
to
175,
Armstrong
Street
is
owned
by
the
Brea
family
and
mr.
J
Brea
was
intending
on
redevelopment
redeveloping
it
the
charge.
The
development
charges
required
by
the
city
were
just
showed
a
$45,000
next
slide,
so
the
demolition
was
completed
on
or
about
May.
The
28th
2004,
the
properties
were
purchased
in
2011
in
2013.
Mr.
Brea
van
contacted
an
O'connor
of
the
planning
department
in
then
April
mr.
Brea
van
received
correspondence
from
a
second
member
of
the
planning
department
and
then
met
with
her
on
June
3rd
2013
I'm.
Sorry,
I,
don't
have
that
name
by
the
end
of
July.
Mr.
J
J
The
building
department
then
indicated
in
December
that
the
building
permit
should
not
be
applied.
For
now,
the
the
issue
will
become
in
part
on
the
technical
side
is
what
is
development
for
the
purposes
of
the
bylaw,
but
at
this
point
certainly
planning
staff
and
the
building
department
was
aware
that
development
was
occurring
in
a
larger
sense.
It
wasn't
construction,
but
that's
not
the
word.
That's
used
in
the
bylaw
who
was
development
in
February
that
in
February
of
the
2014
mr.
J
J
Mr.
Shen
takes
a
different
position
and
opposes
the
application
for
development
in
the
fall.
Mr.
Bryant
Brea
is
hospitalized
again
in
March
of
2015.
Mr.
Brea
is
granted
the
severance
and
subsequently
the
building
permit
is
issued
in
September,
and
the
complaint
was
filed
in
November
of
2015
now
next
slide.
J
So
what
the
bylaw
provides
is
where
residential
development
occurs
on
a
site
with
which
involved
within
the
immediately
immediately
previous
ten
years.
The
question
is
going
to
be
what
is
in
fact,
development,
and
it
the
bylaw
itself
does
not
refer
to
the
issuance
of
a
building.
Permit
what's
happening
here
is
that
an
old
structure
is
being
replaced
with
a
new.
Ultimately,
development
charges
are
about.
J
Contributing
to
strain
on
city
infrastructure-
that's
not
happening
here;
there
is
no
additional
call
on
roads
or
utilities
or
other
services
funded
by
development
charges
on
by
this
construction,
and
so
the
question
then
becomes
is
what
is
development
next?
Next,
okay
development
is
defined
as
construction,
erection
or
placing
of
one
or
more
buildings.
Now
that
has
the
effect
of
increasing
the
size
of
usability
and
includes
redevelopment
now,
but
the
question
is:
when
does
that
begin?
J
J
J
A
You
mr.
Markin
I
just
wanted
to
point
out,
as
you
can
tell
I've,
given
this,
but
not
mr.
mark
mr.
Paul
and
I've,
given
you
longer
than
the
usual
five
minutes,
because
the
five-minute
rule
always
applies
except
in
this
case,
we
you
know,
I
was
giving
you
more
flexibility
due
to
the
judicial
nature
of
this
item.
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
A
K
You,
madam
chair,
the
mr.
marker,
if
you
could
last
all
like
mr.
Palin's
presentation,
he
talks
about
the
potential
delays
due
to
change
of
staff.
Now
we
know
in
the
city
files
can
change
ownerships,
but
there's
not
necessarily
delays.
Because
of
that
there
was
a
new
review.
Was
there
any
signs
that
things
were
delayed
because
of
the
change
to
stop.
K
K
It
looks
to
me
like
we're
talking
about
delays
by
changing
over
staff,
but
there
was
also
a
big
factor
here.
I
think
it's
a
change
of
ownership
under
the
previous
owner,
no
applications,
no
plans
for
development
at
all
is
that
correct
for
the
first
eight
years
that
is,
information
received
from
mr.
Paul
and
I.
Don't
have
that
information
myself?
Okay,
because
to
me,
madam
chair
ten
years,
sounds
like
an
awful
long
time
to
figure
out
what
you're
going
to
do
with
a
piece
of
property.
K
D
Madam
chair,
the
staff
concern
has
been
expressed
from
the
beginning
by
the
initial
staff.
Members
and
I
do
have
the
email
correspondence.
The
initial
staff
comments
from
miss
O'connor
was
requesting
a
German,
so
more
information
can
be
seeking
or
to
formalize
a
more
well-rounded
opinion
of
the
file.
As
a
result,
once
the
information
came
in
and
I
was
assigned
as
a
stayer
planner,
my
response
to
the
applicant
from
the
beginning
or
sale
was
concerned
due
to
the
law
size
concerned
a
to
write
due
to
the
loss
ice.
It
was
very
small
size.
A
I
I
would
I
think
I
would
just
ask
mr.
pollow
into
to
weigh
in
it's
two
different
things.
One
was
a
concern
was
expressed
and
it
took
a
while
to
get
more
information
versus
your
assertion
that
the
the
messages
that
were
being
received
were
being
were
different
from
one
planner
to
the
next.
Is
it
your
assertion
that
the
the
applicant
could
have
made
these
timelines?
Had
there
not
received
different
messages,
and
can
you
just
provide
me
some
clarification
as
to
what
was
different
there
as.
J
I
said
I'm
not
here
to
place
all
of
the
blame
on
city
staff.
This
was
a
a
coincidence
of
illnesses
of
mr.
Brea
and
and
the
the
fact
that-
and
forgive
me-
I-
saw
this
file
for
the
first
time
this
morning
at
8:30,
but
I
am
advised
by
my
colleague
mr.
Roberto
that
what
happened
in
2014
was
that
when
mr.
J
mr.
Shen
took
over
a
responsibility
within
the
planning
department
that
that
he
reversed
the
position
previously
taken
I
have
no
reason
to
dispute
what
he
has
just
said.
That
is
the
information
that
I
have.
But
I
do
want
to
share
this
with
the
committee
in
the
law
of
legal
non-conforming
uses,
which
does
not
apply
here,
but
I
just
want
to
sort
of
address
a
philosophy.
J
Changes
of
ownership
of
the
file
within
the
planning,
department
and
I
acknowledge
that
those
things
happen,
but
where
the
courts
have
looked
at
legal
non-conforming
use.
They've
said
in
circumstances
like
that
we
are
going
to
grant
that
this
use
is
is
continued
because
this
person
really
tried
to
get
this
done,
and
this
individual
really
did
try
to
get
this
done
and
tried
to
do
it
within
the
timelines
and
I.
Think
at
the
end
of
the
day.
J
The
thing
that
that
needs
to
be
borne
in
mind
is
that
what
is
almost
complete
now
on
the
property
does
not
put
additional
strain
on
the
infrastructure
of
the
city,
which
is
what
development
charges
are
there
to
pay
for,
and
so
I
guess
what
I'm
asking
this
committee
is
to
say.
You
know
what
this
is
a
one-off
there's,
no
additional
strain
on
the
city's
infrastructure.
We
don't
really
need
the
money
to
pay
for
anything,
regardless
of
whether
we
may
have
a
technical
ability
to
ask
that
it
be
paid.
J
That's
really
what
this
is
about.
This
isn't
about
needing
new
roads
or
new
Rapid
Transit
or
new
water
pipes
to
service
what
is
being
built
on
this
property,
because
that
was
all
paid
for
before
and
that's
what
I'm
asking
this
committee
to
consider
is
the
intersection
of
unfortunate
timing,
real
effort
and
the
fact
that
the
city
doesn't
need
the
money.
A
K
Madam
chair,
the
the
the
proposition
of
mr.
Paulin
put
forward
is
one
that
is
heard
from
time
to
time.
Each
additional
unit,
I
would
respectfully
submit,
does
put
demand
our
on
additional
services,
and
so
there
addition
granted
it's
modest,
but
each
additional
unit
puts
our
demand
on
the
facilities
of
the
Picard
center,
the
Phyllis
facilities
of
Britannia
or
Lemire.
It
is
the
incremental
change
from
each
unit.
That
is
the
basis
of
the
development
charges.
K
Bylaw
board
jurist
board
jurisprudence
does
allow
municipalities
put
a
time
limit
on
credits
for
demolition,
and
so
this
council
has
adopted
a
policy
in
the
bylaw
of
a
credit
for
ten
years,
which
I
know
changes
to
only
five
years.
Looking
back
in
2019,
and
so
my
comment
would
be
madam
chair,
that
the
charging
of
units
in
an
infill
situation
is
well-founded
and
justified
in
the
bylaw.
Thank.
K
C
K
C
I
You,
chair
and
I
would
encourage
my
colleagues
to
vote
against
the
staff
recommendation.
I
would
look
forward
to
a
motion
that
seeks
to
apply
the
credit
to
just
the
one
unit.
The
the
extenuating
circumstances
here
are
such
that
I
think
we
have
some
wiggle
room
I've
heard
from
mr.
Paul
Irwin
that
there
is
that
room
within
the
law.
I,
don't
think
we're
going
to
be
creating
a
lot
of
precedents.
I
This
is
a
small
builder
tens
of
thousands
of
dollars
for
this
project,
which
has
been
supported
by
the
community,
which
is
an
improvement
in
our
community
versus
what
was
there
is,
is
important.
I
would
ask
my
colleagues
to
reject
that
staff
recommendation
and
take
into
account
those
extenuating
circumstances.
In
this
instance.
A
H
M
You,
madam
chair,
other
I,
would
normally
agree
with
councillor
Nussbaum,
but
while
our
bylaw
may
say
x
y&z
we
sit
here
the
purpose
of
us
hearing
these
applications
is
to
hear
them
on
their
merits
individually.
There's
no
precedent
governing
us.
There
is
no
started
decisis
governing
us.
We
are
here
to
apply
our
discretion
and
exercise
our
discretion
on
the
basis
of
an
individual
case
on
a
case-by-case
basis.
M
M
But
to
this
point,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
people
realize
that
if
all
you
did
was
apply
or
paste
down
a
number
of
of
by
laws
and
regulations,
there
would
be
no
reason
for
us
to
be
sitting
here.
We
are
here
as
the
group
that
exercises
discretion
on
individual
cases
on
a
case
by
case
basis
on
this
type
of
issue.
K
K
A
D
N
D
B
A
A
A
A
H
Okay,
Thank
You
chair.
My
question
is
one
similar
to
questions
I've
asked
on
previous
applications
on
radio
Street
and
it
has
to
do
with
step
backs.
The
central
area
secondary
plan
mentions
that,
where
development
reaches
meeting
to
high
profiles
above
the
street,
it
shall
generally
be
set
back.
The
official
plan
has
guidelines
for
Main
streets
which
talk
about
the
fact
that
above
six
Tori's
buildings
should
be
set
back.
H
Clearly,
if
you
look
along
Rideau
Street,
that
approach
has
not
always
been
applied,
but
that
was
before
I
sat
on
planning
committee,
and
so
given
that
this
is
an
issue
that
I
think
is
important.
You
talk
in
the
secondary
plan
about
a
traditional
shopping
street,
about
wanting
it
to
be
human
scale,
and
so
on.
My
question
is
very
simple
one.
Why
in
this
case,
was
there
not
an
effort
made
by
staff
or
an
insistence
by
staff
before
this
went
to
be
OMB,
to
have
the
applicant
step
back
the
building
on
Water
Street.
I
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
basically,
I
guess
a
little
bit
of
a
thinking
about
the
history.
Although
we
have
policies
within
the
city's
official
plan
and
the
councillor
madam
chair
is
correct,
with
respect
to
step
backs
in
transition
and
how
do
I
obtain
transition
in
buildings
to
make
them
more
compatible,
they
have
to
look
at
the
zoning
in
certain
instances
and
such
as
on
the
subject,
property
and
there's
a
history
to
as
well
of
previous
approvals
for
for
a
building
on
the
site,
but
the
zoning
on
this
site.
I
You
can
actually
probably
trace
back
to
the
times
of
said
to
K,
when
there
is
no
requirement
for
a
front
yard,
and
when
you
had
no
windows
on
your
side
yard,
you
could
go
to
zero
and
that
was
transferred
over
into
the
1998
and
then
into
2008.
So
there
is
a
zoning
potential
rezoning
envelope.
That's
on
that
property,
madam
chair,
that
allows
the
property
owner,
despite
the
policies
you
might
find
to
go
to.
The
basically,
though,
outlines
in
all
four
cases.
Now
this
is
the
MD
zoning
and
there's
a
there's
heightened
limits
that
were
established.
I
The
FSI
was
removed
when
z2k
days
and
put
a
height
limit
on
the
property,
and
basically
so
it's
about
26
27
stories
with
the
zero
lot
lines,
but
being
the
MV
zoning
I
know
it's
been
identified
from
staff
and
perhaps
if
you
could
question
mr.
Smith
on
the
timing,
I
know
there's
a
study
to
be
done.
That
would
better
implement
the
policies
that
you
would
find
on
Main
streets
and
in
the
downtown
there.
In
order
to
obtain
that
transition.
The
councillor
was
talking
about
mr.
C
You,
madam
chair,
yes,
mr.
James
has
mentioned
councillor
miss
bomb.
In
fact,
it
was
this
file
this
application
a
year
or
so
ago,
that
drove
the
thinking
that
resulted
in
the
department
bringing
forward
on
the
work
plan
exercise
that
we
had
last
summer
that
the
partners
work
plan
was
adopted
at
the
July
meeting
of
the
planning
committee
and
in
that
work
plan
is
to
do
a
number
of
studies
that
resulted
from
concerns
raised
by
this
particular
project.
One
was
er
for
study
and
one
was
the
MD
zoning
study
because,
as
mr.
C
James
said,
the
MD
zone
since
essentially
as
a
height
limit,
but
a
box
lot
line
lot
line
and
that
greatly
concerned
us
in
this
project
is
a
manifestation
of
that
existing
zoning.
So
we
fully
intended
mr.
McDowall
to
finish
a
study
of
the
MD
zone
so
that
we
can
incorporate
appropriate
setbacks
at
the
right
Heights.
H
A
D
H
Does
your
client
have
any
interest
in
considering
away
in
which
a
step
back
could
be
incorporated
on
on
Rito
Street
in
order
to
ensure
that
the
experience
on
the
street
is
not
one
where
a
pedestrian
is
looking
up
at
a
looming,
26th
or
building,
but
well
you're,
hiding
your
height
appropriately,
as
one
does
through
step
backs.
Thank.
D
O
Thank
you,
madam
chair
and
members
of
committee,
I'm
speaking
today.
Very
briefly
on
behalf
of
Clara
tomes
Claridge
Holmes,
you
may
know
have
built
two
of
the
high-rise
buildings
to
the
immediate
west
of
this
project.
They're
called
plaza,
3
and
plaza,
4
and
Claridge
contributed,
or
at
least
we
soon
assumed
its
responsibility
to
provide
the
parking
for
the
occupants
of
that
building
and
for
the
visitor
parking
Claridge
also
owns
a
building
across
the
street.
So
the
facts
in
this
case
are
actually
I
thought
just
reading
it
quite
incredible.
O
O
What
you
are
providing
is
12
of
what
the
owner
is
providing
is
12
or
14
of
the
26
visitor
parking.
So
a
project
which
would
have
164
parking
spaces
is
going
to
have
14
it's
an
incredibly
drastic
reduction
in
parking,
and
all
of
that
is
in
an
area,
downtown
Rito.
And
if
you
look
at
the
comments
from
downtown
Rito
and
from
Action
Sandy
Hill,
they
note
two
things.
O
First
of
all
in
that
area
a
lot
of
loss
of
off
street
parking,
all
of
the
public
parking
lots,
or
at
least
a
lot
of
them,
are
being
used
for
development
these
days,
a
good
thing,
but
what
it
means
is
less
off
street
parking
and
also
what
you
find
is
less
parking
on
the
streets.
You
can't
find
a
place
to
park
on
the
street.
You
can't
find
a
place
to
park
off
the
street
parking
has
become
a
problem,
and
when
you
have
a
problem
with
parking,
you
then
have
a
problem
with
traffic
congestion.
O
So
why
is
such
a
drastic
proposal
being
made
in
this
particular
case?
It's
based
on
two
Prem
says.
The
first
premises
is
that
there
will
only
be
students
in
this
property
and
students
do
not
have
cars.
That's
premise,
number
one
and
premise.
Number
two
is
that
this
building
will
always
be
used
just
by
students
forever.
In
a
day
it
will
be
used
only
by
students,
and
our
submission
is
that
both
of
those
premises
are
faulty.
O
First
of
all,
students
usually
or
at
least
a
good
part
of
them,
not
usually
I
thought
it's
the
wrong
word,
but
students
often
do
have
cars,
that's
premises,
number
one
they
actually
do
have
cars,
and
the
second
premise
is
this:
building
is
zoned
and
planned
as
an
apartment,
building
textbook
students,
whatever
the
name
of
the
company,
is
their
business
plan.
As
of
2016
may
be
that
it
we
will
only
market
tenancies
to
students,
but
tomorrow
they
could
change
their
business
plan
or
tomorrow
they
could
sell
it
to
company
X
and
company.
O
X
could
have
that
standard
residential
units
for
the
general
public.
So
premise,
one
and
premise
two
cannot
be
supported
and
your
whole
zoning
bylaw
is
set
up
on
the
premise
that
when
you
have
this
type
of
unit,
so
when
you
have
residential
units
in
a
community,
there's
an
obligation
on
the
owner
and
developer
to
provide
their
share
of
the
burden
of
what
that's
going
to
do
to
the
parking
in
the
community
and
to
the
streets
and
I
think
because
it's
zoned
and
planned
as
an
apartment,
building
you're
setting,
also
a
precedent.
O
I,
don't
see
why
next
developers
won't
come
in
and
seek
this
kind
of
drastic
reduction
as
well
and
you'll
have
a
sort
of
snowball
effect
on
on
parking
and
as
I,
say,
I
think
parking
leads
to
traffic
congestion.
So,
in
summary,
Claridge
has
concerns
about
the
impact
of
this
proposal.
You've
got
written
can
from
downtown
Rito
and
written
concerns
about
from
ash
the
Community
Association
about
the
impact.
I.
O
M
You,
madam
chair,
we
just
went
through
public
consultation
in
my
ward
about
the
potential
removal
of
minimum
parking
requirements
where
we
were
assured.
This
thing
would
never
happen
anywhere
in
the
city
some,
but
my
first
question
dealt
with
the
issue
of
students
because
we
have
them
in
college
board.
That's
why
we're
called
college
work
I'm
wondering
what
you
think
the
incidence
is
of
students
with
vehicles
I,
don't.
O
Have
the
statistics
on
that?
This
is
not
a
residence,
it's
not
zone
institutional.
That
may
mean
that
presumably
you're
looking
at
students
in
second
year
third
year
graduate
students
could
be
a
whole
array
of
students
and
the
student
population
has
access
to
cars.
These
days,
I
I
don't
have
statistics,
however,.
K
Is
not
marketing
you're
planning
to
market
this
building
to
all
students,
it's
only
to
those
without
cars,
but
they're
being
very
clear
upfront
that
they'll
be
no
parking
in
this
building?
We're
not
asking
for
a
that
will
house
every
student.
They
know
there's
a
huge
issue
with
shortage
of
space,
affordable
space
for
students
in
this
area.
The
university
has
grown
without
considering
housing
for
their
students,
so
we
have
to
do
something
so
I.
K
Also
like
this
proposal,
the
red
flag,
that
one
day
it
could
be
converted
to
apartments
should
be
a
reason
that
we
demand
parking
in
there
now
doesn't
impact
me
the
same
way
as
it
seems
to
be
impacting
you
I'm
thinking
that
down
the
road
just
gets
converted
to
apartments.
Then
they
will
market
it
to
people
that
don't
have
cars
and
will
want
to
use
the
LRT
system
that
will
be
within
walking
distance
of
this
building.
K
O
I
could
respond
to
that.
Certainly
I
think
we
all
agree.
Everybody
in
this
community
agrees
that
we
need
to
have
the
transit
improved
and,
of
course,
a
huge
effort
is
being
made
in
that
regard,
and
in
this
area
people
will
walk,
but
the
point
is:
is
it?
Is
it
and
that
will
have
a
significant
reduction
on
people
with
cars?
And
that's
why,
in
this
area,
you
don't
have
to
provide
a
lot
of
parking
for
275
units?
O
You
only
have
to
provide
146,
so
there's
already
built
into
the
zoning
a
recognition
that
a
lot
of
people
will
walk
and
take
transit
in
this
particular
area.
But
the
fact
is,
and
you're
right
there
won't
be
cut
parking
there,
and
so,
when
I,
when
I
or
someone
else
chooses
to
live
there,
I
do
so
with
that
recognition,
but
I
think
the
problem
is
people
do
have
cars.
O
If,
if
you
don't
have
a
place
to
park,
you
try
to
find
somewhere
else
to
park,
and
so
what
that
means
people
cruise
around
looking
for
offsite
parking,
it
contributes
to
parking
on
residential
streets.
If
it
leads
to
illegal
parking,
it
leads
to
double
parking.
It
leads
to
a
cruising
around
effect
and
the
more
you
take
away
off
street
parking
and
provide
for
cars
as
something
to
be
planned
for
the
impact
increases.
K
But
that's
not
the
issue
that
this
developments
trying
to
deal
with
this
is
trying
to
provide
a
product
to
the
students.
However,
many
there
is
out
there
that
don't
have
cars,
so
I
I'm,
just
I'm,
sorry
I'm,
not
catching
your
argument
and
usually
I
agree
with
everything
you
said,
I'm
wondering
if
it's
me
that's
missing
something
here
or
what's
going
on.
So
thank
you
for
trying
to
answer
that.
Oh.
A
Thank
you
Cal,
so
here,
just
before
you
go
to
councillor,
blame
them
back
to
councillors.
Rally
I
miss
Bobby.
You
know
that
on
the
area
west
of
the
canal
already
they
have
the
right
already
to
build
with
no
parking.
There's
no
parking-
and
this
is
you
know,
I
stat,
on
to
what
councillor
Hillary
was
saying.
This
is
less
than
four
hundred
meters
from
our
number
one
investment
in
stage
one
also
stage
one
there
were
LRT.
If
you're
not
gonna,
do
it.
Yet,
where
are
you
gonna?
Do
it
councillor
play
Thanks.
C
D
C
C
C
I
think
that's
the
concern
right.
If
one
of
the
rationales
is
that
this
will
allow
them
to
offer
lower
rents
to
students
which
I
think
we
all
agree,
they
probably
need.
We
actually
have
no
control
over
that
ability
and
so
I
think
it's
just
one
of
the
concerns
here.
One
of
the
issues
you
have
to
beware
of
walking
in
relating
to
the
conversion
things
I
miss
probably
was
talking
about
later-
is
I.
E
A
But,
as
you
know,
it's
just
like
somebody
will
say
to
me:
you
know
why
don't
we
have
a
Weston
and
bar
Haven,
you
know
why
aren't
you
working
to
get
a
rest
in
the
barn?
Well,
you
know
sure
I
mean
it
is
what
the
market
bears,
that
everybody
has
market
policies
not,
and
this
would
be
available
and
I
would
think.
If
we
can't
do,
we
don't
have
the
right
to
determine
that.
That's
what
the
who
moves
into
these
places?
That
is
a
concern.
I'm
really
going
to
go
back
to
council.
Sure
Allie.
C
Kuching
just
to
just
to
frame
it
I
I,
like
the
crystal
clarity
of
the
product
that
this
building
offers
I
like
that
I
think
it's
better
that
it's
a
zero
or
a
one,
as
opposed
to
a
as
you've
said,
a
little
bit
more
parking,
because
the
the
people
that
will
be
attracted
by
this
product
will
be
forewarned
to
be
forewarned,
is
forearmed
and
and
I.
Don't
believe,
I,
don't
believe
that
they'll
be
trolling
around
Cumberland
and
George
Street
looking
for
parking,
because
they
will
no
worry.
C
If
it
is
a
person
that
has
made
arrangement,
then
they
will
have
rented
a
parking
spot
behind
the
Little,
Theatre
or
or
something
like
that.
So
so
from
that
point
of
you
from
the
marketing
point
of
view,
I
think
I
think
it
is
a
product
and
and
as
a
city
investing
3
billion
and
another
several
billion
in
Phase,
two
with
the
LRT
and
all
the
products
and
services
that
are
in
the
area,
I
think
I
think
it
does
have
a
place.
C
M
Ok,
the
difficulty
I
have
with
us
or
a
few
of
them
one
is
that
I
just
came
out
of
consultations
in
my
ward
run
by
our
staff
about
the
very
same
issue
about
removing
the
requirement
for
minimum
parking
in
the
area
and
to
my
residents
it
was
a
pretty
full
house.
My
community
was
promised
that
this
kind
of
thing
would
never
happen.
M
M
Go
fill
in
two
weeks
is
happening
now.
Okay,
so
I
think
the
staff
who
made
those
representations
to
my
community
needs
to
plug
in
to
what's
actually
on
the
agenda
coming
up.
Secondly,
we
have
in
my
my
landlord,
where
we
have
lots
of
students
in
this
same
situation.
We
have
Monterey
Drive,
which
was
constructed
in
the
70s
with
fewer
parking
spots
and
will
be
required
by
the
parking
bylaw
of
the
day
in
Nepean,
which
was
pretty
generous
down
to
I.
M
Don't
care
about
whether
we're
punishing
them?
It's
the
neighborhood
streets
were
concerned
with
and
they
go
driving
around
every
night
they
park
on
neighborhood
streets.
Yes,
they're
only
allowed
to
be
there
three
hours,
so
all
the
neighbors
have
to
come
out
and
time
how
long
the
cars
are
call
that
the
parking
people
you
have
all
our
officers
out
there
constantly
ticketing
people,
and
you
have
a
constant
problem
that
everybody
complains
about,
but
we
assure
people
will
never
happen.
Okay,
so
this
this
company
moves
in
they
build
their
project
and
what
happens
six
months
from
them.
M
M
A
E
K
K
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out
if
we
do
have
a
commitment
here
that
we're
supposed
to
be
honoring.
That's
all
so.
My
comment
to
this
was,
as
councillor
Blake
confirmed,
that
before
anybody's
moving
into
this
building
phase,
one
of
the
LRT
will
be
running,
so
our
piece
of
this
puzzle
will
be
in
place
and
councilor
blade.
What's
his
reputation
to
it,
that's.
E
A
E
A
D
E
A
A
We
do
have
a
policy
and
its
own
page.
We
have
a
page
ten,
that's
the
site
is
okay,
an
area
east,
a
canal,
but
area
west
of
the
canal,
dwelling
units
in
both
high-rise
buildings
and
mixed-use
bones-
are
exempt
from
parking
all
together.
So
it's
not
precedent-setting.
The
council
has
a
policy
that
says
that,
on
the
other
side
of
the
canal,
okay,.
E
So
just
there's
two
things:
I
just
want
to
talk
about
very
briefly.
One
is
when
this
gets
billed
the
fact
that
miscibility
will
not
have
parking
I,
think
that's
sort
of
a
buyer.
Beware
type
of
issue
where
the
owner
makes
it
well
known
what
amenities
are
in
the
building
that
there's
no
parking.
Then
you
take
that
at
your
own
risk
and
then
you
have
to
if
you
have
a
vehicle
look
for
appropriate
storage
for
that
vehicle.
E
But
the
other
thing
that
I
think
is
quite
germane
to
this
discussion
is
what
counts
or
Sher
Ali
talked
about.
That
is
what
is
the
impact
on
the
neighboring
community,
because
I
think
we
just
can't
think
about
or
focus
our
thoughts
on
if
this
is
going
to
be
an
immediate
accommodation
for
students
that
could
change
at
some
point
and
I
think
we
have
to
think
about
what
the
impact
would
be
not
just
today
on
the
community
about
the
potential
going
forward
in
the
future,
the
demographic
changes
and
more
people
move
and
have
cars.
E
Then
there
is
an
impact
there.
So
again,
what
is
the
responsibility
of
a
City
Council
when
it's
considering
these
types
of
requests
for
parking
provision,
and
so
I
think
going
down
to
just
visitor
parking
is,
is
inadequate
but
I,
don't
know
what
that
balance
is,
because
you
have
quite
a
number
164
originally
proposed
down
to
nothing
for
residents
and
only
14
through
leaders.
E
We
just
know
at
least
my
gut
madam
chair
is
there
will
be
a
requirement
for
parking,
and
so
did
we
force
this
development
now
to
have
X
number
of
spots,
and
that's
something
to
think
about
that.
We
need
to
discuss
so.
I
have
no
issue
approving
buildings
with
reduced
parking,
because
I
do
think
in
the
urban
core.
We
want
to
encourage
folks
not
to
own
the
vehicle
to
to
rely
on
public
transit
and
other
modes.
E
So
that's
just
concerns
I
have
now
at
this
point,
but
certainly
there's
no
dispute
that
post-secondary
housing
there's
a
significant
need
across
the
city,
and
there
was
a
three
building
proposal
on
Brookfield
Road
in
my
word
last
year
for
post-secondary
students
and
they
were
providing
ample
parking
at
that
location
and
we
were
600
meters
from
the
Confederation
transit
line,
so
just
some
thoughts,
Madame
chair.
Thank
you.
Thank.
H
Just
just
to
say,
although
I
was
critical
earlier
about
the
lack
of
step
back
I,
think
I
would
defend
in
this
case
the
idea
of
not
having
parking
I,
think
it
makes
sense
and
and
important
to
know.
You
know
we
talked
about
planning
principles
and
the
speaker
who
was
here
hypothesized
or
felt
that
we
were
not
following
good
planning
principles.
I
think
it's
important
to
note
on
the
frontage
on
besser
in
this
case
has
been
dramatically
improved
and
you
now
have
frosted
windows
and
great
access
from
Bester
street.
H
If
you
continue
walking
west
to
the
very
buildings
about
the
previous
speaker
was
speaking
of
you're,
faced
with
a
very
high
blank
wall
which
actually
gives
pedestrians
or
neighbors
nothing
to
look
at
so
in
terms
of
planning
principle,
I
think
we're
doing
a
much
better
job
on
this,
then,
unfortunately,
we
did
on
buildings
for
the
West
on
the
Rideau
streets.
So
for
that
reason,
for
the
reasons
councillors,
you
believe
articulated
I'll
be
supporting
the
staff
recommendation.
Thank.
C
I
A
D
A
A
While
miss
Collins
comes
forward
she's,
a
heritage
plan
on
this,
twenty-one
Withrow,
which
is
a
designation
of
Kilmore
e21
with
row,
a
B
under
part,
five
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act.
That-
and
this
is
a
recommendation
that
came
out
of
built
heritage
subcommittee,
amended.
The
planning
committee
recommend
the
council
issue
a
notice
of
intention,
followed
by
the
next
held
item.
Just
for
your
information
is
the
designation
of
the
former
synagogue
at
375
King
Edward
Avenue.
We
also
have
several
speakers
on
that.
So
just
for
your
information,
okay!
A
A
P
Morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
committee,
my
name
is
Joan
Clark
and
I'm,
president
of
the
City
View
Community
Association.
Today,
I
am
representing
the
people
in
city
view.
Community,
our
slogan
is
a
little
bit
of
country
in
the
city
city
view
is
an
area
that
had
many
of
their
homes
built
for
our
veterans.
Returning
from
serving
our
country
after
World
War,
two
some
of
these
original
owners
still
live
here.
We
also
now
have
many
young
families
moving
in
some
of
these
are
returning
to
the
community
where
they
were
brought
up.
P
We
received
word
last
summer
the
dr.
Roger
passed
away
the
people,
the
community
wondered
what
would
happen
to
that
property,
a
landmark
in
our
community.
We
were
hoping
that
the
family
would
work
with
the
community
to
save
the
house.
That
did
not
happen.
We
became
very
worried
when
we
saw
the
real
estate
ad
announcing
to
developers
that
there
could
be
14
months
for
redevelopment.
P
P
We
were
concerned
once
more
that
when
Dave
Archer
began
destroying
the
wall
that
was
built
original
the
house,
this
destruction
occurred
just
days
before
the
meeting
at
the
Heritage
Committee
and
continued.
As
of
this
past
weekend,
the
destruction
of
the
outer
wall
that
was
a
landmark
entrance
to
this
property.
P
P
The
preservation
of
21
with
Row
is
important
to
me,
and
my
family
I
though
I
know
that
Nepean
was
an
important
town
in
the
Ottawa
Valley
prior
to
Confederation
and
well
before
the
establishment
of
my
town
Ottawa
as
the
capital
another.
As
a
scientist
I
welcome
any
foreign
students
into
our
community,
they
teach
me
a
lot
about
their
cultural
heritage,
I
like
to
teach
them
that
we
too
have
a
historical
and
agricultural
heritage
that
is
not
defined
by
the
tacky
McMansions
popping
up
all
over.
P
Please
let
us
keep
this
building
at
enough
of
the
trees
and
Gardens
to
let
it
stand
is
a
beautiful,
functional
and
educational
reminder.
I
passed
days,
I
live
in
the
city
view
it's
hard
to
believe
that
a
such
a
prominent
and
notable
poet
William
with
Wilfred
Campbell,
once
lived
here
right
in
my
own
neighborhood
I
learned
his
poems
in
school
and
would
love
to
see
his
family
home
Komori
be
given
heritage
designation
in
his
honor
I
hope
the
grounds
he
wrote
so
passionate
about
and
enjoyed
will
also
be
preserved
in
this
designation
for
future
generations.
P
Another
the
fine
stone
house
identified
as
21
with
road
is
a
symbol
of
the
three
of
our
capital.
It
reflects
the
hopes
and
dreams
of
a
generation
that
committed
to
create
the
country
we
now
have
and
so
often
take
for
granted.
A
nation
that
is
not
prepared
to
preserve
traditions
and
touchstones
is
doomed
to
fade
away.
Another.
P
This
building
reflects
more
than
just
this
architectural
form.
It
represents
the
efforts
of
many,
some
humble
and
others
of
higher
calling
brought
together
by
a
project,
in
this
case
to
build
our
fine
residents
for
a
family.
Another.
The
Komori
house
was
built
in
1844,
the
Scott
family.
In
the
early
1900's,
it
became
home
to
Wilford,
William,
Rover
Campbell,
a
renown
Canadian
poet
and
writer,
and
one
of
the
confederation
poets
I.
P
P
A
You
I
just
asked
if
there's
any
well
said,
I
think
that
having
they
comments
that
you
had
from
various
name
and
that
kind
of
history
was
added
added
to
the
picture.
Does
anyone
have
any
questions?
Thank
you
very
much.
Next
up
we
have
witness
davidson
quotes.
Are
you
still
here
come
forward?
Please
you
as
well
have
five
minutes
to
chat
and
who's
on
deck
is
David
Clarke,
Nancy,
Wilson,
David
and
Nancy
here.
Good.
Thank
you.
So
thank
you.
Miss
Davidson.
F
Some
have
said
that
the
claim
of
Herot
cultural
heritage
significance
is
romantically
prejudicial.
They
say
william
wilfred
campbell
an
early
and
significant
Confederation
poet
has
little
claim
to
a
cultural
designation
because
he
only
lived
here
for
three
years.
These
were
the
last
three
years
of
his
life
when
he
wrote
several
significant
poems
Lord
Campbell
was
declared
a
person
of
national
historic
significance
on
the
recommendation
of
the
historic
sites
and
monuments
of
Canada
in
1938.
F
His
grave
in
tombstone
in
Beachwood
Cemetery,
was
paid
for
by
William
Lyon
Mackenzie
King,
a
former
prime
minister.
In
addition,
it
has
been
said
that
heritage
designation
devalues
private
property.
In
fact
it
can
enhance
the
value
of
property,
as
has
been
shown
in
the
past.
There
are
recent
properties
that
heritage
status
has
given
added
value
not
only
to
the
property
itself,
but
also
increase
the
property
values
in
the
entire
neighborhood
in
which
they
stand,
whether
you
call
this
home,
kill,
mori
or
dr.
Rogers
house.
F
The
fact
is,
this
wonderful
old
stone
building
with
its
surrounding
gardens
has.
We
has
with
stood
the
buffets
of
time
for
a
hundred
and
seventy-five
years
next
year
in
2017,
we
will
have
been
a
country
for
only
a
hundred
and
fifty
years.
Dr.
Rogers
home
deserves
Heritage
status
as
an
example
of
historical
significance,
representing
generations
of
growth,
development
and
hard
work,
in
addition
to
its
cultural
and
historic
astra
buttes,
it
has
significant
architectural
features
of
the
air,
which
also
claim
to
Heritage
status.
F
The
current
owners
have
only
recently
said
they
wish
to
see
the
house
preserved.
Why
then,
does
the
mls
listing
of
this
property
not
show
a
picture
of
the
stone
house?
The
listing
only
shows
the
land
as
a
development
opportunity
of
14
Lots,
which
include
the
stone
house
as
a
development.
Lot
I
submitted
a
paper
that
I
found
with
the
reference
on
the
web,
claiming
that
this
old
stone
wall
that
encloses
this
property
is
original
to
the
property
and
I
have
submitted
that
this
property
represents
the
original
settlers
of
this
region.
F
In
view
of
the
fact
that
the
Merivale
area
is
planned
to
double
in
density
in
the
very
near
future
and
is
slated
to
become
the
heart
and
center
of
Midtown
Ottawa,
we
cannot
afford
to
lose
this
most
valuable
historical
ASIS.
This
property
represents
the
culture
of
our
region's
early
hard-working
settlers.
It
represents
our
heritage
and
is
a
precious
landmark
in
the
old
police
village
of
City
View.
This
city
was
built
by
industrious,
forward-looking
people.
We
feel
it
is
imperative
to
preserve
this
tiny,
remaining
portion
of
their
hard
work
and
our
early
origins.
F
F
We
are
each
only
here
for
about
a
brief
time.
I
ask
you:
isn't
it
incumbent
on
us
to
leave
something
of
what
has
been
our
founding
past
to
those
who
come
after
us?
It
has
been
said.
The
best
way
to
build
Ottawa
is
to
balance
growth,
while
maintaining
a
high
quality
of
life
help
us
please
to
preserve
a
piece
of
quality
of
past
and
future
life
in
city
view.
Thank
you.
B
C
Morning,
thank
you.
I'm
a
resident
of
City
View
I
have
been
for
25
years.
I
live
on
Rita
Avenue,
which
is
the
first
Street
north
of
withrow,
and
when
I
walk
out
in
the
mornings
and
I
look
down,
the
street
I
can
see
the
house,
and
it
always
gives
me
a
warm
feeling
to
know
that.
There's
a
bit
of
a
heritage
there's
a
bit
of
a
history
in
city
city.
Here,
it's
not
just
the
wherever
so
I'm
here
to
support
the
heritage.
Designation.
C
The
stone
house
is
an
important
heritage,
landmark
its
predates
Confederation
for
25
years.
It's
a
significant
landmark
in
the
earliest
registered
municipality
of
the
police,
village
of
City
View
and
the
stone
residence
has
always
been
a
landmark
in
our
community
and
they're
precious
few
heritage,
buildings
left
and
Eastern
Ontario,
let
alone
the
p.m.
let
alone
City
View.
The
acedia
Community
Association
has
addressed
these
problems
in
the
past.
So
I
have
two
reports
that
we
found
that
filing
cabinet
in
the
Nepean
museum
and
one
was
1977
and
one
was
1979.
C
So
the
Heritage
concerns
of
the
people
of
see
he
was
been
around
for
some
time.
I'm
not
gonna,
read
the
whole
thing,
but
I
have
a
couple
of
highlights
that
I
would
like
to
to
read
so
the
first
one
is
the
city
view
tomorrow,
written
in
1977
all
City
View
heritage.
Buildings
should
be
included
on
the
Heritage
Register
of
the
province
of
Ontario
to
ensure
their
continued
existence
and
appropriate
site
areas
to
them.
Keeping
the
character
in
importance
and
Surrey
buildings
should
also
be
specified.
C
Campbell,
but
for
the
last
three
years
before
his
death
in
1918,
he
gave
it
the
name
kill
mori.
This
was
after
the
ancestral
home
in
Scotland
of
his
cousin
John
Campbell,
who
was
the
duke
of
argyll.
The
stone
house
is
currently
owned
by
dr.
and
mrs.
Roger.
This
was
year
in
1977,
and
they
also
indicated
two
small
frame
at
1416,
Withrow
and
other
farm
buildings
which
have
since
gone
in
1979.
There
was
another
report
called
city,
a
request
for
additional
improved
park,
space
local
facilities
to
nurture
and
aesthetically
enhance
the
community.
C
This
was
presented,
published
and
presented
to
the
former
city
of
Nepean
on
page
three
of
this
report.
It
contains
the
residents
approach
to
the
imaginative,
but
realistic
measures
required
to
improve
the
neighborhoods,
visual
and
recreational
standards.
It
is
reflective
of
the
love
and
pride
I
felt
for
the
unique
and
historic
community.
Also
it
talks
about
historic
properties.
Both
buildings
and
land
features
that
permit
permit
people
in
the
community
to
know
more
about
and
physically
experience.
Their
heritage.
C
Cvo
contains
a
number
of
homes
built
before
the
turn
of
the
century
and
which
were
considered
for
heritage
resident
registration.
This
is
in
1979
in
particular.
The
city
must
investigate
long-term
protection
of
the
heritage
home.
The
property
we
throw
potential
future
uses
could
include
the
establishment
of
Nepean
Archives
Museum,
at
least
a
very
fine
piece
of
open
space
and
CEO,
which
should
be
preserved
for
passive
botanical
parkland.
C
These
two
reports
demonstrate
our
long-standing
an
ongoing
commitment
to
preserve
these
mr.
crocker
of
21
withdraw
as
important
to
our
community.
These
reports
originally
requested
a
designation
of
out
Billings
but
they're
gone.
We
asked
the
city
to
support
in
preserving
this
important
landmark.
Thank
you.
B
Q
Cos
when
you
walk
away
from
21
Withrow
today
as
an
adult
I
live
at
16,
the
throw
just
across
from
the
Roger
property
has
little
girl
in
the
50s
and
early
60s
I
used
to
walk
with
my
friends
over
to
the
Rogers
woods
to
play
on
our
Trek.
That
way,
we
walk
the
wall,
balancing
his
kids
to
getting
from
one
end
to
the
other.
It
was
a
game.
It
was
our
past
time
today,
I
sit
at
my
home
and
watch
birds
and
other
wildlife
flip
between
the
trees
on
the
property
at
21.
Q
One
that
had
been
there
before
Canada
began.
It
has
a
no
standing.
Historical
significance
is
what
is
left
of
city's
beginnings
in
Canada's,
north
and
milk
is
considered
a
landmark,
so
remains
dry.
Stalked
Stonewall
would
definitely
be
a
landmark
here
in
our
community
when
looking
at
the
recommendations
for
property,
designation
that
the
farmer
ablates
property
at
175,
Main
Street
the
trees
with
a
big
roar,
a
big
consideration
when
deciding
whether
to
include
the
property
with
the
building
so
sure
the
immature
trees
at
21
with
trails
also
be
including
this
consideration.
Q
It
should
also
be
noted
that
the
owner
has
started
to
clear
these
old
trees
from
the
property
once
lived,
a
21
width
row
and
his
life
at
the
property.
He
bought
a
five
and
a
half
500
acres
of
the
stone
house
as
his
paradise
to
get
away
from
his
government
job
in
the
city.
He
called
it
kill
Morey
a
property
with
his
original
Stonewall,
as
referred
to
in
Historical
Society
of
Ottawa
and
by
Jane
Moore.
Q
It
is
the
place
he
can
enjoy
the
trees
as
good
bring
up
his
family.
He
could
relax
and
ladies
poetry,
much
of
which
was
about
the
beauty
and
aesthetics
of
his
property.
William
Campbell
was
friends
with
other
famous
national
poets,
Archibald,
Lavin
and
Dunn
from
canvas
Scott
and
private
providers.
We
now
know
are
called
the
Confederate
Confederate
poets.
He
was
also
close
family
friend
mr.
Raymond
Mackenzie
and
adored
gray
of
the
great
cup
film.
Q
Unfortunately,
Campbell
died
the
news
morning
in
1918,
but
he
left
behind
a
wealth
of
cultural
heritage
and
his
property
on
narrow
road.
Eventually,
we
early
fifties.
The
property
was
bought
by
another
prominent
person,
dr.
Jay
David
Roger.
He
was
a
well-known
physician
in
Ottawa
area
and
he
lived
in
our
community
until
his
death.
Last
year,
he
and
his
wife
brought
up
their
family
at
21
with
Rhoni
cared
for
and
loved
the
land
trees
in
his
gardens.
Q
This
was
his
home
and
he
walked
the
neighborhood
talking
to
us
with
pride
until
the
last
year
of
his
life.
Dr.
Roger
also
fought
to
protect
land
at
beechwood
Cemetery
this
property
at
21,
which
was
part
of
my
childhood.
As
the
woods
we
played
in
the
rallies
scaled
and
walked
along
the
Halloween's,
we
walked
the
long
drive
way
up
to
the
big
stone
house.
It
was
a
neighborhood
ritual
when
I
eventually
dreaded
my
own
children
and
my
grandchildren
as
an
adults.
It
continues
to
be
part
of
my
life.
Q
It
is
across
the
street
from
me
is
where
dr.
Roger
walked
and
chatted.
It
was
something
we
pass
every
day:
the
beautiful
property,
the
middle
of
our
crazy
world
seconds
from
busy
narrow
road
is
a
sign
of
peace
and
tranquility
right
here
in
the
middle
of
our
hectic
everyday
life,
it
is
a
landmark,
is
a
part
of
the
fabric
of
this
community.
It's
a
beautiful
historic
stone
house.
That
would
be
wonderful,
but
if
the
house
stands
alone
without
a
plan
and
makes
the
address
unique,
the
mesilla
address
unique
and
this
land
is
developed.
Q
What
is
it
lost?
One?
It
loses
the
address
who
love
21
Withrow
would
no
longer
be
the
house
as
its
identity
number
two
and
the
fall
and
winter
II
or
the
house
can
be
seen
still
facing
now.
The
road
on
which
it
was
originally
built
to
do
so
Damien
is
probably,
as
the
poet
wrote
down
the
road.
The
house,
as
it
sits
now,
can
still
see
down
the
narrow
road,
the
original
form
in
arable
farming
quarter
throughout
the
land
they
wants
to
develop.
Q
This
would
be
lost
also
without
the
land,
the
trees,
the
gardens
and
the
beauty
that
William
Campbell
wrote
so
passionately
about
would
be
lost.
The
poet
wrote
about
his
love
for
the
land
he
bought
it
because
of
the
land,
and
although
parts
of
the
property
was
severed
off,
the
remaining
balance
would
be
lost,
as
would
canvas
and
dr.
Rogers
dream
for
the
future.
The
feeling
of
peace
of
continuity
with
our
pasts,
our
cultural
heritage,
would
also
be
lost
forever.
Q
This
continuity
has
crossed
generations
already
and
the
property
that
has
been
steadfast
as
a
place
where
the
people
can
establish
their
location.
This
property
is
a
piece
of
my
heritage
as
it
is
for
many
people
and
I.
Ask
you
to
carefully
consider
the
house
and
the
property
for
designation
as
we
move
forward
when
I
sit
on
my
porch
or
look
out
of
my
window.
I
see
a
beautiful,
mature
trees,
real
stone
stock
country
wall
and
a
little
piece
of
tranquil
country
in
our
fast-paced
world.
This
property
in
the
house
predates
us
all.
Q
A
You
very
much
anyone
have
any
questions
for
miss
Wilson.
Thank
you
for
coming
today
and
I'd.
Ask
Anya
Mahalo
Vic
to
come
forward
and
I
also
want
to
ask
that
you
miss
Collins
I
was
on
the
Heritage
Committee
of
Nepean
private
amalgamation.
I'm,
just
wondering
we
didn't,
have
a
lot
of
heritage
property.
So
why
did
this
never
rise
to
the
list?
Why
was
it
never
recognized
as
a
worthy
and
the
Nepean
township
and
then
TPM
city
of
Nepean
days?
D
Matter
I
wish
Dana
was
here,
as
he
was
the
member
at
the
time,
but
I
think
probably
no
resources,
basically
one
staff
member
doing
it
part-time.
We
had
a
you
know
a
number
of
designations,
but
we
did
not
get
to
all
the
potential
properties
yeah
and
actually
was
days
as
well.
So
there
was
interest
even
going
pre
amalgamation
days.
Q
Welcome
good
morning
my
name
is
ana
Mihailovich
I
live
in
city
view
and
have
a
profound
appreciation
for
stone
homes.
The
stone
home
was
built
to
last
and
will
stand
longer
than
anyone
built
today.
It
is
essential
that
we
protect
and
designate
21
with
Rome
in
its
entirety
as
an
estate
with
heritage
designation,
a
stone
farmhouse
needs
room
to
be.
It
was
the
intent
when
originally
built
and
to
take
away
the
land
that
remains
would
be
taking
away
its
identity.
Its
identity
within
our
neighborhood
would
forever
be
lost.
Q
It
would
sit
on
a
small
parcel
of
land
drowned
out
by
the
new
proposed
homes.
At
some
point,
the
city
must
put
value
and
importance
to
the
few
lucky
heritage
homes
that
still
maintain
land
within
the
city.
Why
is
densification
given
more
value
than
historic
preservation?
Recently,
City
View
has
had
over
50
homes,
built
typically
on
large
lots
severed
into
I'm,
not
against
densification,
but
I'm
here
to
say
that
we
must
treat
21
with
Rho
with
respect
respect
to
its
long
history,
our
history,
it
represents
so
much
more
than
just
a
large
lot.
Q
21
with
Roe
has
just
over
2
acres,
but
it
also
has
other
features
that
form
part
of
its
identity
and
have
needed
a
landmark
in
our
community
for
a
very
long
time,
from
the
mature
trees
surrounding
a
property
as
dry,
stacked,
stone
fence
along
two
sides.
It's
a
state
like
presence
and
the
long
winding
lane
way
from
the
streets
surrounded
by
nature.
These
features
are
unique
to
the
property
and
should
be
preserved.
Q
The
city
over
the
last
hundred
years,
with
every
permit
and
severance
granted,
has
allowed
this
home
to
become
what
it
is
today
reduced
to
its
current
2.02
acres.
It
was
originally
a
very
large
dairy
farm
along
the
Miravalle
Road
farming
corridor.
The
original
Scott's
family
farm
could
fit
an
entire
city
view
community
within
its
firm.
Even
the
current
orientation
of
the
home
to
its
surrounding
was
planned
and
approved
by
the
city,
as
the
farmers
developed,
a
city
was
built
around
it.
We
are
now
left
with
what
the
city
has
allowed
it
to
become.
Q
The
irony
is
that
these
are
the
very
reasons
that
the
Heritage
group
has
not
included
the
land.
With
its
recommendation
for
heritage
designation.
It
would
no
longer
resemble
the
original
farm.
The
City
of
Ottawa
should
take
responsibility
for
its
past
decisions
and
not
hold
them
against
a
property
that
is
truly
worthy
of
designation.
I
recommend
that
the
heritage
designation
be
allocated
to
both
the
stone
home
and
the
entire
grounds
that
remained
in
my
research.
This
property
exhibits
all
the
attributes
required
to
be
a
landmark
within
our
community
and
the
City
of
Ottawa.
Q
A
A
N
You
for
giving
the
opportunity
to
speak
I
just
wanted
to
add
some
of
my
comments.
We're
pleased
that
the
Canaria
home
was
being
considered
being
held
for
heritage
designation.
This
original
stone
farmhouse
is
an
old
and
rare
building
that
predates
our
existing
neighborhood
and
represents
the
important
piece
of
Canadian
history.
It's
hard
to
believe
that
the
survey
homestead
was
built
over
one
hundred
and
seventy-six
years
ago,
when
I
was
still
named
itom.
N
The
community
city
was
composed
of
about
14
that
1,400
homes.
My
family
has
lived
here
since
1980,
and
we've
always
been
intrigued
by
this
unique
old
stone
house
centrally
located
in
the
county.
The
guidance
in
house
were
hidden
from
the
road
by
stone
Jurgens,
which
makes
the
property
even
why
I'll
show
you
the
surrounding
land
fames
the
house
and
helps
to
give
it
its
stately
appearance,
I've,
never
passed
away.
Looking
at
the
stones,
won't
blame
me
to
try
to
have
a
go
to
the
property
in
house.
N
It
somehow
magically
transforms
me
to
a
different
time
and
place.
The
existence
of
this
homestead
in
our
community
helps
remind
us
of
those
early
settlers
in
their
heritage,
unique
property
and
sharp
contrast
existing
housing
in
our
community.
Today
it
is
the
building
and
the
natural
elements
that
surround
it
collectively,
make
it
a
true
cultural
heritage
landscape.
It
gives
us
a
sense
of
place.
I've
read
the
play
well
for
Campbell
obtained.
The
estate
was
over
five
acres
and
worked
on
weekends
and
those
days
off
to
transform
the
Left
grounds
into
gardens
and
landscaping.
N
This
property
is
integral
to
the
cultural
value
of
this
house.
Through
subdivision
plan,
375
City
infuse
divided
into
25
foot
Lots,
set
out
in
an
early
2020
century
grid
layout
the
lots
were
service.
Our
dimension
vanship
city
was
made
at
the
post-war
suburban
Bengals
on
5,200
feet.
Let's
about
wide
Lots.
Unfortunately,
the
area
was
designated
were
designed
without
any
thought
to
parkland
or
open
space.
This
property
is
a
good
reminder.
The
past,
before
our
community
behaving
unplanned
suburban
area.
This
may
well
be
the
last
opportunity
to
preserve
some
open
space
in
our
neighborhood.
N
We
believe
that
even
heritage
protection
of
the
stone
house
window,
the
new
subdivision
as
some
12
additional
homes-
will
do
little
to
preserve
this
you
properly.
In
fact,
if
the
house
is
allowed
to
stand
when
you
develop
around
it,
much
of
its
cultural
heritage,
value
and
interest
will
be
lost.
According
to
Ontario
government
designation
of
heritage
properties
is
way
of
publicly
acknowledging
a
puppy's
value
to
a
community
if
the
entirety
property
is
designated
with
this
puppy
had
any
real
value
to
our
community.
Designation
is
also
supposed
to
encourage
good
stewardship
and
conservation.
N
Past
seven,
sensible
juices
puppy
down
to
two
acres.
What's
left
in
conventional
natural
land
must
be
preserved
and
protected,
designation,
an
entire
property.
We
recognize
the
importance
of
the
property
to
the
local
community
and
encourage
good
stewardship
and
conservation.
The
heritage,
significance
of
the
heritage.
Significance
of
this
property's,
not
too
unique
to
either
the
building
or
the
property.
That
is
what
make
this
particular
site
so
special,
this
house
and
land
are
identified
together.
Only
the
entire
property
is
protected,
whether
it
be
any
real
benefit
enjoyment
for
present
and
future
generations.
N
Cancer
must
be
satisfied
and
their
property
needs
at
least
one
criteria
provide
described
in
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act.
This
popular
certainly
meets
the
criteria.
A
property
has
historical
or
associated
value
if
it
has
association
with
a
theme
or
activity
that
is
significant
to
the
community.
This
property
has
a
direct
association,
the
agricultural
heritage
of
our
area
and
also
has
a
direct
association
with
Warfel
crambo,
because
web
nature
and
his
house
and
property
a
property
has
historical
associated
value
if
it
is
physically
functionally
or
historically
linked
to
its
surroundings.
N
This
house
is
definitely
physically
visually
and
historically
linked
to
its
surroundings.
This
can
be
attested
to
by
May
of
today's
submissions
and
the
reaction
of
most
people.
When
you
see
this
unique
property
to
have
contextual
value,
the
property
can
be
a
landmark.
This
property,
with
its
Tomarken
trillion
gardens
of
mature
trees,
is
a
true
land
notch
in
the
center
of
our
neighborhood
and
has
been
for
years.
N
We
understand
that
surrounding
lands
often
include
urban
properties
of
given
Heritage
status.
We
consider
the
designation
of
this
property
vital
to
our
community
to
ensure
that
our
heritage
is
preserved.
Hopefully,
this
unique
land
and
house
may
one
day
become
public
property
for
the
benefit
and
enjoyment
of
everyone.
Isn't
that
what
heritage
is
all
about.
A
P
P
P
Renowned
of
three
years
designated
dr.
Jay,
David
Rodger
house,
her
dad
was
a
loving
advocate
about
our
history,
immensely
happy
in
his
home
and
principally
involved
in
the
saving
of
beechwood
cemetery
and
development
as
Canada's
National
Cemetery.
However,
he
was
foremost
the
individual
to
us
in
that
regard.
P
A
I
I'm
supporting
the
the
recommendation,
as
is
I,
won't
be
seeking
the
designation
of
the
whole
property,
but
that
Stonewall
I've
heard
a
couple
of
different
things
as
to
when
different
elements
of
it
may
have
been
put
in
place.
I
understand
that
you're
keeping
the
stones
that
taking
down
as
you
as
that
wall
comes
down.
Let's.
D
A
Building
at
what
counsel
Reaper
said,
if
you
may
well,
when
you
mentioned
that,
Landon
has
desire
so
likely.
You
know
bar
Haven
and
I,
don't
know
how
recently
I've
been
out
to
Stonebridge
and
watched
how
it
has
built,
but
the
monarch
and
no
madami
they
they
kept.
They
save
this
stone
the
natural
stone
from
that
landscape
and
actually
have
built
hedgerows
which
define
the
community.
A
A
Know
what
one
selling
the
land
we're
not
going
to
designate
this
stone?
We're
just
saying
that
you
have
a
story
to
tell
your
dad
was
proud
of
this
place
and
taking
the
stone
down.
There's
nothing
to
harm
you
from
hanging
on
to
it
and
if
you
are
successful
in
developing
the
property
around
their
home,
if
that's
the
way
that
can
count
in
Council,
go
then
I'm
just
saying
it's
an
added
feature
and.
D
D
D
M
A
M
K
M
One
of
the
one
of
the
few
things
the
peon
was
not
good
at
was
preserving
its
history
and
because
it
was
very
focused
on
development
becoming
a
new
community
and
so
a
lot
of
our
a
lot
of
our
history
didn't
get
protected
because
it
disappeared
quickly,
then
I,
guess
so
yeah
and
in
in
the
late
1980s.
We
were
still
not
focused
properly
on
it
and
then
I
guess.
We
made
a
special
effort
in
the
early
90s
to
try
to
do
something
to
protect
our
history.
M
M
But
as
we
get
to
2017
and
we
celebrate
the
two
hundred
and
twenty-fifth
anniversary
of
Nepean
as
a
surveyed
municipality,
the
older
surveyed
municipality,
the
oldest
survey
municipality
in
eastern
ontario,
we
have
to
look
at
what
we
have
left,
that
we
could
possibly
protect
from
the
heritage
of
Nepean.
And
there
are
very
few
properties
left
that
we
can
designate
that
we
can
use
to
protect
the
the
history
and
heritage
of
the
former
city
of
Nepean
and
what
is
now
part.
M
M
Okay,
so
there's
first-hand
knowledge
of
that.
It's
important
that
we
maintain
at
least
some
link
to
our
past
through
our
belt
heritage
and
while
it
may
not
have
been
a
huge
priority
in
the
80s
and
the
earlier
and
the
foreman
2pn,
it
is
a
priority
now
and
I'd
like
if
this
designation
is
passed
at
this
committee.
M
A
C
A
C
A
B
L
You
mr.
vice
chair,
thank
you
to
the
members
of
Planning
Committee
as
much.
My
name
is
Mark
Luttrell
I'm,
the
principal
of
Latino
heritage,
consulting
which
is
a
heritage
planning
firm
I'm.
Here
with
my
associate
Chrissy
Gianna
representing
the
owner
of
the
property,
the
Ontario
Conference
of
the
seventh-day
Adventist
Church
wanted
to
state
that
we
think
that
there
may
be
a
perception
based
on
some
of
the
media
reports,
that
the
church
is
not
supportive
of
heritage
conservation,
and
we
are
not
here
to
object
to
the
proposed
designation
under
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act.
L
We
understand
that
an
owner's
consent
is
not
required
and
we
understand
that
designation
may
proceed
regardless
of
the
church
and
congregations
concerns,
but
we
would
be
remiss
if
we
didn't
identify
that
both
the
church
and
the
congregation
do
have
some
service.
Some
concerns
about
this
process
and
in
particular
the
church,
has
concerns
with
the
statement
of
cultural
heritage,
value
and
interest
that
is
before
you.
L
It
is
a
former
synagogue,
but
it
is
also
an
act
of
church
and
since
1997,
the
congregation
has
ensured
the
continued
survival
of
the
building
from
which
they
play
an
active
role
in
the
community,
and
this
has
been
at
the
cost
of
several
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
maintenance.
Now
the
community
has
requested
in
writing
for
six-month
deferral
and
we
would
answer
the
committee
seriously
consider
this
request,
request,
relief
or
is
not
intended
to
delay
the
process,
but
instead
to
ensure
that
the
church's
consultative
decision-making
process
is
allowed
more
time
to
consider
and
respond.
L
The
church
and
the
local
congregation
has
recently
taken
a
number
of
key
steps
to
move
this
process
forward
and
would
like
more
time
to
help
the
500
percent
plus
congregation
and
its
ministerial
program
with
the
additional
requirements
of
heritage
designation
within
the
past
month.
The
church
and
the
local
congregation
have
taken
a
number
of
initiatives
to
help
this
process.
They
have
recently
created
a
committee
to
spearhead
the
heritage,
designation,
education,
information
sharing
and
decision-making
process
at
the
local
level.
They
have
retained
our
firm,
which
has
been
retained
for
only
three
weeks.
L
They
have
discussed
both
myths.
We
have
discussed
both
with
staff
and
raised
the
possibility
at
the
municipal
Heritage
Committee,
of
preparing
a
heritage
conservation
plan
for
the
building
to
balance,
heritage
conservation,
best
practices
with
the
congregations
needs
and
again
the
dialogue
with
city
staff
to
further
understand
the
process
and
understands
concerns
with
the
language
currently
included
in
the
statement
of
cultural
heritage,
value
and
interest,
which
is
a
process
that,
in
our
professional
opinion,
still
needs
to
continue.
L
The
church
recognized
that
this
building
has
an
important
story
to
tell
about
arbors
Jewish
community,
whose
history
is
underrepresented
in
Ottawa
and
in
its
built
heritage
inventory.
However,
we
want
to
emphasize
the
importance
of
ensuring
that
this
key
story
is
not
being
considered
well.
Another
underrepresented
communities,
heritage,
a
community
that
wants
to
ensure
its
continued
vitality
and
local
engagement
is
not
recognized.
Thank
you
great.
B
C
R
B
G
S
S
Water
efficiency
kisses
kiss
Olivia,
Autobots,
no
semen,
a
developer,
Archie,
no
gt1
Ivanova
zone,
English,
painter,
kimitaka
phone
and
work
unity
in
the
quest
across
the
Universalist
against
Islam,
but
I
live
openly
with
Jean
de
la
jeunesse
actual
pre-charge
to
see
Timothy,
not
a
significant
a.cian.
It
was
only
power
passing
one
on
the
news
and.
S
Conservation,
humanitarian
SS
of
kisame
you
Sakura,
can
trigger
shot
at
see.
We
got
the
somber
occasion.
She
was
a
lonely.
Pusher
that
may
have
to
pursue.
I
would
see
parallel
hit
last
show
a
lots
of
the
property,
don't
oppose
on
a
park
because
I
have
one
item
so
I've
never
know
communities
or
to
Legion
community.
In
an
operation
such
as
the
city
region,
s,
the
city,
Glee's
remembers,
all
the
pieces
pass
arrived
Mia
and
is
anomalous.
Is
now
given
the
specification
physics
about
smokers,
revelation
a
Celica
motivation.
S
Her
issues
before
can
potentially
see
a
similar
community.
The
ohnkoji
possibilities,
advances
focus
on
the
behaviors
in
department,
dark
activated.
The
proposal
community
francophone
kisses
thank
depressed
gaveta.
He
contributes
carcinogen,
a
plaintiff
Allison
campus
non-committal,
siculus
Prince
battlements
for
capital.
Another
video
on
pompeia
fix
ability,
power,
11
a
physic
to
do
City
disease.
In
my
communication,
effective
about
monitor
him,
no
pursues
Angela's
flourescent
key.
Our
tables
were
available
America
to
convert
homies
of
the
crumbling,
not
even
a
sabbatical.
B
Soon,
as
his
name
I
read
my
staff
to
quickly
comment
on
what
they
wrote
today,
I
think
there's
a
few
different
items
that
we've
heard
some
impassioned
speeches
today.
I,
don't
know
how
much
they
directly
relate
to
the
heritage
aspect
of
things,
but
if
they
can
briefly-
and
it
doesn't
have
to
go
on
for
you
know,
hours
give
us
a
little
bit
of
what
you've
heard
today.
P
Thank
You
mr.
chair
I'm.
Certainly
we
heard
today
concern
about
the
ability
of
the
building
to
adapt
to
to
growing
on
vibrant
congregation
and
I.
Think
that
what
we
can
say
there
is
that
there
is
a
process
to
add
to
the
building.
There
is
room
to
the
rear
and
we
frequently
work
with
with
with
schools
for.
P
The
community
to
build
a
much
larger
school
for
through,
in
addition
to
that
building,
so
additions
to
institutional,
religious
buildings
are
something
that
we
frequently
work
with
and
I'm
sure
that
we
could
work
out
a
way
that
they,
the
congregation,
could
meet
its
growing
needs
and
to
the
building
now
respecting
its
cultural
heritage
value,
and
we
would
certainly
look
forward
to
embarking
on
a
project
like
that.
The
question
of
the
long
term
contribution
of
the
recognizing
the
20
years
of
the
congregation
in
the
building
in
the
history
of
the
building.
P
That's
not
that's,
not
an
enormous
amount
of
time,
but
certainly
between
my
own
counsel.
We
could
probably
write
a
sentence
that
would
be
added
to
the
statement
of
cultural
heritage,
value
and
knowledge
doing
that
the
role
of
the
role
that
the
community
has
played
in
the
last
twenty
years
since
their
acquisition.
Thank.
E
E
E
P
You,
mr.
chair,
the
first
time
that
we
contacted
the
congregation
was
in
May
of
2015.
We
sent
a
letter
to
the
pastor,
just
indicating
that
we
were
interested
in
designating
building
in
the
outline.
The
process
I
subsequently
spoke
with
the
pastor
and
they
requested
a
delay.
So
the
first
time
we
spoke
with
them
was
in
January
of
2016.
We
sent
another
letter
in
February.
We
sent
a
letter
to
mr.
Byrd
each
and
the
director
of
property
and
risk
management
for
the
seventh-day
Adventist
Church
of
Canada.
B
H
Thank
You
mr.
chair,
yes,
I've
got
a
technical
amendment
to
move
forward,
whereas
I'll
just
read
the
the
operative,
whereas
paragraph,
whereas
document
5,
which
is
the
statement
of
cultural
heritage,
failure
requires
minor
technical
amendments,
including
a
change
to
one
of
the
terms
to
be
consistent
with
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act,
clarification
of
the
height
of
the
building
identification
of
the
previous
uses
of
the
building
and
the
contextual
value
of
the
building,
and
to
correct
a
minor
error
in
the
wording
of
the
last
Heritage
attribute,
therefore
be
it
resolved.
H
B
I
Thank
You
mr.
chair,
this
is
a
sorry
motion
to
demolish
an
existing
residential
building
on
small
Avenue.
Normally
a
demolition
permit
isn't
extended
until
a
building
permit
is.
This
is
a
building
that
was
damaged
by
fire.
It
is
sitting
unoccupied
on
small,
it
is
uninsurable
by
the
owner.
They
have
reached
out
to
ask
for
getting
that
the
plans
in
and
the
building
permit
of
a
few
months,
I've
spoken
with
the
staff
with
the
Community
Association
and
with
with
the
owners.
I
Recommend
Council
approve
the
demolition
of
the
existing
building
prior
to
the
issuance
of
a
building
permit
resolve
the
council's
decision
be
subject
to
the
following.
We
understand
to
March
the
entirety
of
building
and
remove
it
from
the
property
if
a
building
permit
is
not
issued
within
60
days
of
the
building
demolition,
the
owner
shall
level
and
landscape
the
property.
I
Implementing
city
approved
best
practices
not
to
damage
or
injure
the
tree
with
grass
and
a
fence
to
prevent
parking
to
the
satisfaction
of
the
general
managers,
planning
and
growth
management
and
see
the
registered
owner
shall
prohibit
any
introduced
on
the
property
until
a
new
building
is
constructed
and
maintained
the
property
in
accordance
with
the
property
standards
by
law.
So
the
conditions
have
been
they're
in
response
to
the
community
who
want
to
ensure
that
it
doesn't
become
an
eyesore
if
it
takes
more
than
a
few
months
to
get
built.
Thank.