►
From YouTube: Planning Committee - June 12, 2018
Description
Planning Committee meeting – June 12, 2018 – Audio Stream
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas.
A
They
welcome
everyone.
This
is
a
public
meeting
to
consider
the
proposed
comprehensive
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaw
amendments
versus
items,
2
3,
4,
6,
8,
&
9
on
today's
agenda
for
the
items
just
mentioned.
Only
those
who
make
all
submissions
today
or
written
submissions
before
the
amendments
are
adopted
may
appeal
the
matter
to
the
local
planning
Appeal
Tribunal.
In
addition,
the
applicant
may
appeal
the
matter
to
be
a
Local
Planning
Appeal
Tribunal.
A
If
counsel
does
not
adopt
an
amendment
within
150
days
of
receipt
of
the
application,
rizzoli
and
210
days
for
an
official
plan
amendment,
a
comment
sheet
is
available
at
the
door
for
anyone
wishing
to
submit
written
comments
on
these
amendments,
they
wanted
to
add
something
else.
Today.
Things
have
changed
around
here,
a
little
bit
with
the
demise.
A
If
you
will
of
the
OMB
and
the
resurrection,
if
you
will
at
the
local
tribunal
and
what
I
think,
it's
importantly,
do
is,
if
you
have
any
motions
on
any
items,
let's
do
today
so,
if
anyone's
sitting
there
with
the
motion,
you
intend
to
put
forward
later
do
it
now,
because
it
will
give
the
colleagues
the
opportunity
to
see
it.
The
public,
that's
here
their
opportunity
to
see
it
and
the
applicant
certainly
the
opportunity
and
the
right
to
see
it
and
speak
to
it.
A
Okay,
so
that's
going
to
be
something
new
on
than
anything
all
the
time,
so
that
all
of
us
so
there's
a
level
playing
bill
anyway.
So
if
you
have
any
motions
bring
them
forward,
if
you,
if
you
think
of
motions
as
you're
listening
to
the
delegations,
immediately
bring
them
forward
so
that
staff
have
a
chance
to
see
them,
certainly
we
all
are
better
or
better
at
serving.
A
If
we
are
all
aware,
okay,
so
any
declarations
of
interest,
none
confirmation
of
minutes
the
minute
64
from
the
22nd
of
May,
2018
and
ek,
am
number
1
we're
holding
that
for
presentation.
We,
it
is
the
official
plan
in
zoning
amendments
for
Cleary
and
the
orchard
stations
area.
I.
Think
there's
people
here
that
that
have
been
involved
in
our
interested
in
having
that
SAP
presented.
Number
two
is
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment
929
Richmond
Road
and
108
Woodruff
Avenue
I
do
have
a
delegation
in
opposition,
so
we'll
hold
number
two.
A
B
A
B
A
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
If
it's
okay,
I
can
go
right
to
the
therefore
be
it
resolved
that
the
planning
committee
recommend.
The
council
approve
an
increase
to
the
expenditure
Authority
for
capital
project,
stormwater
management,
rehabilitation
and
environmental
compliance
funded
from
the
stormwater
drainage
development
charge.
Reserve
fund
item
three
point:
zero:
five,
four,
four
and
delegated
authority
to
the
general
manager,
planning
infrastructure
and
economic
development
to
enter
into
a
third
party
emphasis
agreement
with
South
kannada
development
corporation
for
the
design
and
construction
of
the
hope
side.
A
A
C
Other
motion
on
that,
whereas
this
report
listed
on
today's
planning
committee
agenda
would
normally
rise
to
Council
for
consideration
its
meeting
on
June
27
2018
and
whereby
the
delay
finalizing
the
detail,
this
report
and
whereas
it
is
desirable
to
expediate
the
consideration
of
this
report
by
Council.
To
avoid
any
further
delay,
therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
the
Planning
Committee
recommend
council
suspend
notice
required
under
Section
29
back
at
3
and
34.
Does
one
of
procedure.
Bylaw
2016,
3,
7
7,
consider
this
report
at
its
meeting
on
13th
of
June.
C
The
reason
for
this
folks
is
this
is
over
3
year
old
issue.
We,
as
the
chair,
alluded
to
bill.
It's
a
requirement
to
put
a
pipe
in
from
the
Greenbelt
to
take
the
stormwater
and
get
it
down
to
our
stormwater
pond.
The
we
asked
the
developer
to
put
the
pipe
in
for
us
and
agreed
upon
price
when
he
went
in
to
put
the
pipe
in
another
contractor
and
bridge
I'm
going
to
take
the
risk
and
name
them
had
put
their
pipes
where
our
storm
water
pipe
was
supposed
to
be
so.
C
D
C
Three
years
old,
so
that's
why
we're
asking
the
riser
to
tomorrow
to
get
to
clear
the
deck
on
this
and
if
I
could
take
a
moment.
I
want
to
thank
Tim
mark
for
his
excellent
work
over
three
years
to
bring
this
to
a
resolution.
It's
a
it
wouldn't
happen
without
them.
So
I
really
appreciate
his
efforts
and.
A
So
on
the
motion
to
send
us,
the
council,
well
as
a
carry
and
I,
should
have
asked
Andrew.
Vinson
Andrew
are
you
here?
Oh
yeah,
sorry
yeah
I
had
you
here,
but
you
were
only
here
to
speak
if
you,
if
we
got
stuck
in
the
weeds
or
the
stormwater
on
or
something
okay.
Thank
you.
So.
The
next
item
is
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment
part
of
175
and
part
of
375
March
Valley
Road.
This
is
to
the
golf
course
as
a
temporary
use
for
a
three-year
period
going
to
bei
have
any
questions.
Is
it
Carrie,
perfect?
A
Okay,
then
we
have
the
zoning
for
applying
the
mature
neighbourhoods
overlay
to
lands
within
the
Dow's
Lake
Linden,
Lee,
Vanier
and
Overbrook
areas.
Is
this
Carrie?
Thank
you,
the
next
one.
If
we
have
and
then
just
on
that
I
was
talking
to
some
staff
this
morning
and
they
are
going
to
look
beyond
this
area.
You
know
sort
of
like
we're
doing
as
a
you
know
what
we
look
at
info1,
we
what
it
looks
like
and
that
kind
of
thing
so
there's
some
flexibility.
There,
Thank
You
mr.
wises,
good
luck
with
your
daughter's
play.
A
Next
step
is
Island,
Park,
Drive,
Island,
Park,
Crescent
and
harmer
Avenue
self,
minimum
front
yard
set
block
provisions
and
we
do
have
see
we
do
have
professor
Paul
Forester
here
if
needed.
Oh,
we
have
another
person,
know
who's
n
stone,
and
so
both
gentlemen,
where
are
you
ok?
So
if
there's
a
parent
to
carry
this,
you
are
happy
with
that.
A
A
Okay
and
then
last
item
on
the
list
of
the
highly
name:
change
application
to
change
the
name
in
Statesville
of
class
Winterset
place
to
a
Laplace,
Alan
Moore
place,
and
this
one's
been
vetted
etcetera,
etcetera.
Anyone
have
any
questions
on
it
for
councilor
capping
there
they
carry
okay,
good
all
right,
so
we
will
go
back
to
the
beginning
and
have
a
presentation
on
the
official
pilot
zoning
amendments,
Clary
and
new
orchard
stations
area,
and
then
would
mention
that
deputy
mayor
and
councillor
Mark
Taylor
is
here
today.
A
E
This
item
is
the
new
area,
specific
policy
for
the
community
orchard
stations
area,
which
encompasses
the
neighborhoods
that
surround
two
new
stations
on
the
line
to
West
extension
Confederation
line
to
west
west
of
West
will
the
file
lead,
is
Emily,
Davies
and
alternate
available
for
presentation.
Thank
you.
F
Right,
thank
you,
everyone.
So
clearly,
your
should
study
kicked
off
in
June
of
2016.
We
had
two
public
open
houses
and
two
online
surveys.
We
had
working
group
meetings
as
well
as
technical
advisory
meetings
and
the
draft
official
point
amendment
and
zoning
bylaw
amendment
was
released
to
the
public
in
February
for
public
comment.
F
The
study
area
is
up
on
your
screen.
It
extends
from
clearly
Avenue
to
the
east,
the
Ottawa
River
to
the
north,
sir
Johnny
McDonald
ugly
to
the
west
and
Byron
argumented
to
the
south.
The
study
includes
five
different
communities,
including
ambleside
Woodruff,
North's,
wood,
Park,
McKellar
park
and
Collinwood.
There
are
two
words
included
in
this
area:
Ward
15
in
catch
a
city
and
Ward
17
Bay,
and
her
two
LRT
stations
of
ale,
a
mentioned
earlier
at
Cleary
Avenue
and
North
Avenue.
F
The
area
specific
policy
that
were
introducing
as
part
of
the
official
plan
amendment
includes
different
land
uses
land
use
designations
for
the
area.
The
Amba
site
area,
which
is
in
the
kind
of
yellowish
to
the
north,
is
an
apartment.
Neighborhood
designation.
The
right
area
is
a
station
area
designation
surrounding
the
upcoming
LRT
station.
The
purple
area
is
traditional,
Main
Street
or
introducing
institutional
mixed-use
for
the
Unitarian
campus
in
a
blue
and
low-rise
and
mid-rise
residential
uses
on
the
south
side
of
byron,
including
a
couple
institutional
uses.
F
The
highlights
of
the
land
use
policies
that
were
including,
as
well
as
similar
zoning
provisions,
include
introducing
or
reintroducing
floorspace
index
as
part
of
the
inca
site
area.
Source
base
index
previously
existed
prior
to
our
valuation
and
we're
looking
to
bring
it
back
for
that
area
and
introduce
some
policies
to
guide
future
infill
development.
The
institutional
mixed
use
area,
which
is
the
unitarian
campus,
we're
looking
to
provide
policy
direction
for
maximum
heights
at
the
time
of
future
redevelopment,
as
well
as
some
info
policies
to
ensure
proper
transition
to
the
Woodruff
north
community.
F
The
traditional
Main
Street
segment
of
the
study
area,
we're
looking
to
include
some
policy
direction
for
maximum
Heights
for
future
development,
while
recognizing
the
ongoing
development
applications
of
azure
and
homestead.
By
providing
grandfathering
clauses
within
the
policy
this
station
area
and
traditional
and
a
segment
of
the
traditional
main
streets,
we
are
looking
to
introduce
density
redistribution.
F
So
there's
about
five
or
six
sites
that
we're
looking
to
introduce
that
density
redistribution,
to
we're
also
looking
to
apply
the
mature
neighbourhoods
overlay
to
the
surrounding
residential
communities
outside
of
the
study
area,
as
well
as
apply
the
maximum
or
areas
at
parking
requirement,
which
is
essentially
is
reduced.
Parking
requirements
for
the
area
I
also
wanted
to
quickly
note
that
we
are
moving
forward
with
removing
the
proposal
from
micro
retail
on
the
south
side
of
byron.
That
was
initially
part
of
these
staffs
proposal.
F
A
A
Lincoln
fields,
it's
been
both
over
the
decades
but
anyways
Lincoln
fields
of
being
a
big
study
area,
what
14
acres
or
something
like
that
and
on
a
higher
level
so
and
imagining
a
lot
of
density
and
height,
because
it's
beside
a
very
large
transit
station
at
Lincoln
fields
and
with
the
height
of
ambleside
that
it
currently
is
I'm
wondering
why,
instead
of
ramping
up
towards
it,
there's
almost
a
flat
area
just
to
the
west
of
Woodruff,
but
not
much
height.
What
was
your
thinking
or
not?
Sorry,.
F
Just
so,
we
have
been
not
back
on
the
screen
here
so
to
be
so.
This
is
Woodruff.
I,
believe
right
here,
and
there
are
number
properties
to
the
east
of
Woodruff
is
that
is
that
what
you're
mentioning
to
the
west
of
the
good?
There
are
a
number
of
properties
to
the
west
of
would
rip
here
that
also
have
very
tall
buildings.
There's
Park.
A
F
B
F
E
So
what
we're
doing
is
allowing
on
the
Lots
that
are
larger
and
can
support
color
buildings,
the
ability
for
people
to
come
in
and
have
the
flexibility
to
reshape
what
the
zoning
allows
them
to
do
into
something
more
of
a
Main
Street
kind
of
frame
and
a
taller
element
deepen
deeper
inside
into
the
lot,
but
that
would
take
place
through
a
owning
process
so
that
we
have
a
chance
to
to
treat
each
of
these
sites
one
by
one.
Thank.
A
A
In
addition
to
you
know
what
I
normally
leave
I
ask
that
anybody
has
any
motions
at
all
as
they
come
in
here
that
they
share
them
and
as
you
prepare
them
after
a
while
listen
to
delegations
or
the
application
shop
at
the
time,
so
that
the
colleagues
have
time
to
look
at
staff.
Certainly
do
the
delegations
do
and
and
the
applicant
as
well,
so
this
one
go
ahead
at
counter
Libra.
Please.
E
Share
so
technical
amendments
on
the
support
where,
as
report,
this
report
recommends
zoning
changes
to
apply
to
the
mature
neighbourhoods
overlay
to
the
adjacent
residential
neighborhoods
to
the
query
and
Orchard
light-rail
transit
stations
and
whereas
the
western
boundary
was
erroneously
placed
down
the
middle
of
Edgewood.
Avenue,
therefore
be
it
resolved.
The
planning
committee
recommend
Council
approved
that
the
western
boundary
be
adjusted
to
include
the
western
portion
of
Edgewood
Avenue
and
that
location
map
for
document
preview
replaced
by
the
attached
and
be
approved
and
resulted
to
be
no
further
notice.
A
On
the
item
is
a
carry
on
the
motion.
Signs
are
caring
and
live
on
the
item
as
amended
as
a
carry,
and
you
know
it
now
and
then
I
should
have
gone
with
comments
before
that,
but
I
don't
think
it
matters
we're
carrying
it,
but
both
of
you
have
done
a
lot
of
work.
Who
wants
to
go
first,
okay,
councillor
to.
G
G
Many
we
have
representatives
from
the
Woodruff
north
community
here
today
want
to
thank
them
for
being
involved
in
this
study,
as
well
as
all
the
other
neighborhoods
and
I
want
to
thank
LA
and
Emily
and
the
staff.
It
has
been
a
tremendously
hard
job
for
them
to
do
what
is
essentially
a
conceptual
view
of
the
future
development
in
this
corridor.
Well,
they
have
live
development
applications
coming,
you
know
throughout
the
quarter,
which
can
be
contemplated.
Now
you
know
to
the
chairs
comment
about
height,
I,
think
working
with
the
community.
G
The
staff
really
tried
to
split
the
difference
and
said
look.
This
is
an
area
where
we
do
to
realize
that
there's
going
to
be
some
intensification
because
of
the
two
LRT
stations
that
clear
a
new
orchard,
but
the
views,
the
vistas
that
are
provided
from
the
residential
neighborhoods
particularly
would
park
in
Collingwood
that
have
a
view
of
the
river
have
a
view
of
the
gâteau
hills.
G
They
wanted
to
ensure
that
we
didn't
have
an
unbroken
wall
of
tall
buildings
on
the
one
side
of
Richmond
and
I
also
want
to
thank
the
staff
for
working
with
the
community
councilor
leaper
myself
to
remove
the
retail
portion
that
was
originally
contemplated
to
go
in
on
the
south
side
of
the
corridor.
Byron
I
think
it
just
makes
much
better
sense
with
all
of
the
opportunity
that's
going
to
emerge
on
the
Main
Street
richmond
side
that
that
this
would
be
the
ideal
place
and
certainly
in
the
future.
G
If
businesses
come
along
and
you
know
they
can
certainly
apply
if
they
they
feel,
there's
a
need
on
byron.
But
I
think,
throughout
the
study
and
working
with
the
community,
we
feel
there's
going
to
be
a
good
mix
of
intensification,
modernization
and
also
the
preservation
of
what
you
know
the
LRT
coming
through
here
outside
of
the
downtown
core.
G
E
E
It's
been
really
a
couple
of
years
and
I
think
it's
important
to
note
that
not
only
have
we
been
at
the
planning
study
that
many
of
the
consultations
were
also
looking
at
the
complete
street
treatment
for
Richmond,
as
well
as
the
violin
park,
when
Europe
started
by
the
New
York
redevelopment
and
at
the
same
time
many
members
of
compeller
Park
will
also
be
engaged
in
ongoing
discussions
about
the
alignments
of
the
LRT.
It's
a
lot
happening
and
I
want
to
thank
the
color
community
association,
particularly
for
theirs,
increasingly
sophisticated,
mature
and
pragmatic
approach
to
this.
E
We
know
that
we're
one
to
get
denser
and
taller
and
I
think
be.
The
lack
of
opposition
that
we're
seeing
today
is
really
indicative
of
the
degree
to
which
this
has
been
a
very
good
collaboration.
I
would
be
remiss
if
I
didn't
take
advantage
of
this
opportunity
as
well
to
once
more
raise
the
fact
that
the
city
now
owns
727
query,
which
is
near
our
transit
station,
and
that
that
makes
an
awesome
opportunity
for
affordable
housing
moving
forward.
E
So
we
have
some
clear
direction
not
from
this
planet
from
the
OMB
about
how
it's
all
that
development
can
get.
But
I
do
hope.
The
staff
are
looking
at
it
and
I
know
they
can
add
it
as
an
affordable
housing.
Your
transit
opportunity,
my
thanks
to
staff
projecting
so
many
balls
in
the
air
throughout
this
process.
A
E
D
Good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
committee,
as
well
as
members
of
the
public,
as
Derrick
has
said,
my
name
is
Laurel
McCray
I'm,
a
planner
and
development
who
the
US
and
I've
been
in
the
file
lead
on
this
zoning
bylaw
amendment
for
929,
Richmond,
Road
and
108.
What
Jeff
Avenue
bloomers
before
you
on
the
screen
illustrate
the
subject
property,
which
is
highlighted
in
yellow
it
is
West.
D
This
image
illustrates
a
little
bit
of
the
development
that's
taking
place
in
the
quarter
right
now,
along
Richmond
Road.
The
yellow
arrow
highlights
our
subject:
property
directly
to
the
left
of
it
with
the
red
star
is
an
existing
nine
story:
rental
apartment,
that's
on
Richmond,
Road,
moving
east
so
to
the
right
Dale
Richmond
Road.
D
We
have
an
existing
11
story,
apartment
building
illustrated
by
the
blue
star,
the
green
star,
below
that
there
is
a
current
site
plan
proposal
for
and
another
11-story
building
that
will
replace
the
surface
parking
lot
and
further
to
the
right
with
the
two
I
guess:
yellow
orange
mustard
stars
is
the
Kristi's
development
that
you
saw
before
you
last
year
for
a
five
and
twenty
four
story.
Building
that
clearly
has
zoning,
but
there
is
no
site
plan
application
in
for
that
development.
D
So
some
important
things
to
highlight
would
be
the
introduction
of
a
four-story
podium
on
the
right
hand,
side.
The
podium
is
anchored
by
a
Richmond
in
Woodruff,
whereas
before
it
was
only
a
2-storey
podium,
as
shown
on
the
left-hand
side
before
there
was
also
rest
of
a
transition
to
the
Woodruff
North
community,
which
was
a
very
important
factor
for
us
and
how
this
building
would
play
a
role
in
the
community
since
it
is
kind
of
at
the
gateway.
D
So
now
there
are
several
step
backs
proposed
at
the
fifth
fourteenth
and
nineteen
stories,
so
we
feel
that
this
transition
is
much
better
to
the
community
community
than
it
did
previously
on.
The
left
is
the
site
time
right
now,
and
it
has
changed
several
times
since
November
and
on
the
right
is
a
rendering
of
the
North
elevation
that
directly
faces
Woodruff
North.
So
you
can
see
there
there's
a
home
in
the
bottom
right
hand,
corner
that
is
the
closest
to
the
building
right
now,
so
you
can
see
that
there
is
the
four-story
podium.
D
That's
facing
Woodruff
walk
is
kind
of
right
between
the
building
and
that
tree
there,
it's
a
publicly
accessible
walkway,
so
the
four-story
podium
abuts
that
and
then
it
steps
back
what
they
said
earlier
at
the
5th
14th
and
19
so
transitioning
a
little
bit
better.
A
few
other
comments,
I'd
like
to
highlight
the
introduction
of
a
four
and
a
half
metre
wide
landscape,
rear
yard
setback,
but
a
bunch
would
just
walk
as
well
as
the
podium,
and
that
again
is
feedback
that
we've
heard
from
the
public.
So
I
just
didn't.
D
Read
there
I
circled
where
the
transition
will
start
at
the
15th
story
and
right
above
that
is
the
under
the
important
garage
before
the
entrance
was
not
enclosed
in
the
podium.
It
was
open
to
the
public,
and
now
it
is
just
enclosed
so
that
there's
something
that
we
think
positively
addresses
the
application
may
be
happy
to
take
any
questions.
A
Thank
you
I
think.
Well,
we
do
have
a
public
delegation,
so
I
think
we'll
go
there
first.
So
if
anyone
has
any
questions
for
Miss,
McQuaid
or
mr.
moody
just
hang
on
to
them
till
after
their
delegation
we
actually
have
Diana
lebreton
Diana.
You
can
come
on
forward
civilus
care
right
beside
Jon,
miss
McQuaid.
A
Someone
so
I
think.
Is
this
your
first
time
coming
here?
Yes,
I
thought
so
I
don't
recognize
you
and
I.
Don't
work
measure
name
and
I've
been
here
for
a
long
time.
So
I
just
wanted
to
tell
you
that
it's
five
we
had
five
minutes.
Everybody
gets
the
same
amount
of
time
to
speak
yeah.
Are
you
ready?
Okay,.
H
H
In
my
previous
statements,
I
have
mentioned
that
the
proposed
building
is
just
too
hard
and
too
dense
for
this
section,
the
site
being
located
at
a
major
intersection.
He
can't
proposed
20-story
rent
does
not
blend
with
the
streetscape
along
Richmond
Road,
nor
does
it
blend
with
the
low-rise
residential
adjacent
neighborhood
of
wood
with
North
wood.
Listen
wise
is
a
unique
pocket.
Community,
it's
comprised
of
108
residential
bail-ins,
the
tallest
building
in
Arkham
is
only
a
three-story
residential
property.
H
So
how
does
a
20-story
166
rental
building
blend
with
our
community
or
the
communities
north
on
the
south
side
of
Woodruff?
The
previous
and
proposed
building
the
Azur
was
approved.
It's
a
14
story,
93
building
and
it
would
complement
the
streetscape
on
Richmond
Road
and
it
would
also
complement
the
streetscape
on
the
drift.
It
would
be
the
Gateway
to
our
community.
In
my
opinion,
this
building
should
not
be
built
at
this
major
intersection
in
the
urban
planning.
H
In
the
urban
design
review
plan.
They
stated
that
there
is
complexity
of
the
Seder,
which
has
three
prominent
edges.
They
were
struggling
with
the
radical
changes
from
the
previous
proposal,
which
is
the
azure.
Some
of
the
panel
members
comment
about
the
height
and
orientation
of
the
building,
and
the
proposed
service
parking
is
not
conducive
with
the
site.
H
The
panel
also
wanted
mass
reductions
on
some
of
the
visual
impacts
of
this
building.
I
believe
that
the
building
the
way
it
sits
right
now
it
is
an
attractive
building,
but
it
does
not
be
as
the
there
is
a
beautiful
building.
This
building
would
end
up
being
an
eyesore.
Our
community
I
would
also
like
to
touch
on
the
traffic
issues
as
a
weapon
in
the
board
revolve
anew
for
over
20
years.
The
traffic
flow
on
the
street
on
Woodruff
has
drastically
increased
light.
H
Rail
will
not
eliminate
the
traffic
problems
on
this
street
because
the
majority
of
the
cars
that
are
in
front
of
my
house
have
Quebec
plates
on
them
because
they
are
travelling
to
where
they
work.
It
takes
me
ten
minutes
to
get
out
of
my
driveway
in
the
morning
when
I
return
the
evening
I
turning
left
to
go
north
on
the
wood,
truss
I
can't
even
get
through
the
light.
This
proposed
building
has
two
accesses
one
on
Woodruff,
one
on
which
we
wrote
both
are
entering
into
turning
lanes.
It
is
going
to
be
disastrous.
H
The
bill
needs
to
be
downstate.
It's
a
little
bit
too
big
I
believe
the
traffic
issues
that
will
occur
is
a
death
drop.
I've
lived
there
long
enough,
I've
seen
cars
smashing
to
the
old
building
that
was
there
smashing
to
the
Kentucky
Fried
Chicken
it
used
to
be
on
the
other
corner.
This
is
going
to
be
a
nightmare,
there's
just
too
much
density,
also
as
an
appraiser
for
thirty
years
in
the
city,
I
do
not
know
of
one
other
high-rise
building,
20
storeys,
situated
on
such
a
small
site
on
a
major
interception.
H
I
believe
the
city
needs
to
intensify
and
I
agree
with
the
totally,
but
let's
select
a
building.
Let's
go
back
to
the
original
plan,
which
was
very
attractive
and
was
very
conducive
to
our
neighborhood
I'm,
hoping
that
you
do
not
approve
this
building.
It
will
be
an
eyesore
for
those
people
who
live
on
Woodruff.
H
Also,
the
house
residential
house
right
beside
this
building
he's
had
it
up
for
sale
now
for
over
a
month,
everybody
along
that
Street,
our
property
values,
are
going
to
go
down
drastically,
not
just
on
Woodruff
but
those
houses
there
abutting
this
property.
So
please
reconsider
approving
this.
Thank
you.
I.
A
F
H
D
A
A
H
H
A
D
H
With
you
in
that
aspect,
however,
I
sit
at
that
corner
to
turn
the
last
many
times
onto
Woodruff.
We
have
an
advanced
2l,
which
only
allows
two
cars
through
everybody
runs
the
lights
you
can't
even
get
through
so
now
we're
just
going
to
compound
it
with
cars
coming
out
there,
so
that
intersection,
wouldn't
have
to
be
reworked
system
and
whatnot
would
have
to
be
reworked
to
allow
to
to
rectify
any
issues
that
may
be
caused
by
this
same
yeah.
G
Well,
thank
you
very
much
and
thank
you
for
coming
and
providing
your
insight
as
well.
I
just
want
to
you
know
that
this
is
a
planning
committee
hearing
with
respect
to
this
particular
planning
file,
as
it
sits
right
now,
but
to
sit
the
area
in
context
committee
just
approved
kind
of
that
broader
tapestry
of
what
will
be
happening
in
this
corridor
over
the
fullness
of
time,
this
entire
street,
so
Richmond
Road
in
the
intersection
right
in
front
we've
long
known,
have
been
problems
in
this
area
and
as
part
of
the
stage
to
work.
G
This
entire
corridor
is
being
essentially
removed
and
replaced
with
a
complete
Street
which
is
going
to
have
a
very
present
amount
of
traffic
controls.
Cycling,
segregation,
pedestrian
segregation,
as
well
as
the
elimination
of
all
of
the
kind
of
porous
connections
coming
through
from
Woodruff
from
wood,
Park
out
onto
Richmond,
so
they'll
all
be
sealed,
so
would
parks
access
will
be
from
Woodruff
not
on
to
Richmond.
So
you
know
when
we
did.
G
Well,
that's
part
of
the
stage
to
build,
so
it
would
take
place
between
2021
and
2023.
We
don't
have
exact
timing.
Yet,
although
stage
two
offices
said
because
of
that
complexity
of
the
stretch,
they
would
likely
do
this
at
the
front
end.
But
of
course
that's
ultimately
up
to
the
proponents.
So
for
a
couple
of
years
away,
given
the
given
of
timing
on
the
building-
and
you
know,
the
building
will
probably
exist
for
a
year
or
two
before
the
complete
street
goes
in
okay,.
H
A
H
I
Now,
I'm
here
really
to
answer
questions
I
can
make
a
very
quick
presentation
and
I'll
speak
first
to
the
site
plan
and
actually
the
issue
of
access
to
the
property
through
after
that
public
meeting
that
councillor
Taylor
mentioned,
we
did
some
changes,
significant
changes
to
the
way
the
building
works.
As
mentioned
earlier,
we
increase
their
setback
along
the
pedestrian
that
way
to
ensure
a
constant
green
area
produced
the
number
of
service
partner
areas
in
behind
enclosed
the
access
onto
with
avenue
and,
most
importantly,
we
redesign
the
access
to
the
rear
parking
lot.
I
One
of
the
issues,
of
course,
with
having
the
single
axis
on
Woodruff
and
really
through
transportation,
it
was
our
only
opportunity-
was
to
have
access
to
the
underground
parking
Colquitt
of
Avenue,
just
because
of
the
club
reduced
with
the
property
on
Richmond
Road.
It
really
was
the
only
opportunity.
Well,
we
didn't
want
to
have
it
an
area
that
the
service
vehicles
block
an
already
construct
a
restricted
area
on
Woodland
Avenue.
I
So
we
wanted
all
the
shipping
receiving
the
moving
trucks,
the
garbage
trucks
all
be
able
to
come
in
Richmond
Road,
and
so
we
normally
personal
parking
lot
of
only
12th
service
areas.
We
would
only
have
a
10
foot
wide
service
lane
going
into
it,
so
we
actually
reshape
the
building
output.
A
larger
lane
way
in
that's
a
full
20
wide
to
allow
the
garbage
truck
or
moving
band
actually
park.
There
do
their
whatever
they
have
to
do
and
then
allow
traffic
to
continue
into
that
area.
I
So
that
area,
the
back,
is
really
more
of
a
service
area
to
the
building,
as
opposed
to
parking
it
as
12
parking
spaces
really
to
provide
some
quick,
easy
access
for
the
commercial
on
the
ground
floor.
So
those
are
major
changes
that
took
place
along
with
the
changes
to
the
building,
an
increased
there's,
also
a
requirement
or
a
request
to
increase
the
amount
of
green
space
and
sidewalk
area
along
with
the
value
in
Richmond
Road.
So
we
we
looked
at
opportunity,
set
the
building
back
somewhat
and
to
increase
the
sidewalk
areas
increase
of
the
landscaping.
I
And
then
you
know
this
whole
sidewalk
will
evolve
and
hopefully
get
even
wider
or
once
they
do
the
redevelopment
of
Richmond
Road.
The
other
is
in
the
reshaping
of
the
tower
and
working
with
the
planning
staff
and,
in
particular
comments
from
the
original
UDR
piece
omission.
We
looked
at
how
the
increase
of
the
podium
to
out
more
of
a
street
presence
and
in
a
reduction
of
the
tower
plate,
so
the
actual
tower
plate
for
the
lower
levels
is
less
than
the
maximum
of
750
square
meters.
I
I
You
can
just
see
on
the
image
that
basically
of
that
transitioning
from
the
north
to
the
South
Longwood
of
how
we
step
from
the
fourth
floor,
up
to
50
men
up
to
the
20th
and
again
on
the
rear.
We
also
looked
at
changing
materials
to
reduce
the
mass
of
the
building
and
general
appearance
trying
to
slim.
The
building
down
and
I
am
here
for
questions
as
well
as
specifics.
I
A
I
Oh
absolutely
from
the
receiving
area
they
receiving
Aires
actually
is
right,
front
rate
up
to
the
revenue,
so
we're
some
we're
talking
in
this
area.
It
would
be
the
so
the
trucks
will
be
parking
here.
This
is
the
existing
public
buildings,
and
so
it
sort
of
shall
and
then
you've
got
I
would
say
about
a
hundred
and
fifty
feet
or
so
to
the
to
the
nearest
residential,
okay,.
B
B
And
I
noticed
that
there
are
no
section
37
benefits
as
a
result
of
the
fact
that
when
you
go
from
the
14
stories
or
the
47
meters
to
the
current
application,
doesn't
qualify
under
section
37
president.
Is
there
a
concern
that
by
roars
are
an
opportunity
that,
if
an
owner
of
the
property
wants
to
come
twice
and
zone
twice
each
time
or
neither
time
qualifying
for
section
37
versus
coming
once
and
going
from
whatever
it
was
to
the
final
product?
B
I'm
just
wondering
a
little
bit
about
whether
our
section
37
policy
is
permitting
or
allowing
one?
The
applicant
did
this
purposely,
but
does
it
not
allow
an
opportunity
to
break
up
an
application
for
rezoning
twice
in
order
to
avoid
section
37
benefits,
because
I
presume,
if
you
were
to
take
the
zoning
from
2011
versus,
what's
being
requested,
now,
probably
would
qualify
for
section
37.
So
I'm
just
wondering
whether
the
policy
anticipates
that
madam
chair
I
don't
believe
it
does.
However,
I'm
happy
to
review
the
policy
and
provide
you
with
a
written
response.
B
A
A
Thank
you,
okay,
so
that
is
all
of
them
as
we
have,
but
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
there
is
a
couple
of
residents
that
came
and
they
were
late
coming
and
they
wanted
to
speak
to
item
number
seven,
which
is
the
overlay
and
of
course,
we've
already
voted
on
that,
but
fortunately,
and
and
this
is
I'm
speaking
to
the
two
of
you.
Fortunately,
you
provided
us
with
a
lot
of
comments.
This
is
this
will
be
treated
the
same
as
if
you
had
sat
here
for
your
five
minutes.
A
What's
going
to
happen,
is
our
committee
coordinator
and
this
company
is
going
to
make
sure
that
we
not
only
do
we
all
have
this,
but
also
all
members
of
council
will
have
this
because
it
would
go
to
council
only
on
the
27th
of
this
month.
Okay,
so
even
though
McKinley
after
we
had
voted
on
it,
your
comments
are
going
to
be
seriously
taken
before
they
full
council
votes
on
it.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
coming
out
and
doing
this
councillor.
Shirley.
B
A
A
So
any
notices
of
motion
for
consideration
at
a
subsequent
meeting
or
any
inquiries
any
other
business
I
will
tell
you
that
the
next
meeting
on
the
26th
is
a
whopper.
We
have
over
20
items,
don't
make
any
other
plans.
I
know
that
it's
it's
it's
prom,
graduation
time
my
grants,
one
of
my
grandson's
included
and
so
I
will
be
scooting
out
for
a
brief
time
to
see
that
is
going
from
grade
6
to
grade
7
anyway.
A
So
if
you're
going
to
have
conflicts
on
that
day,
I
think
we're
also
going
to
be
in
the
city
in
the
council
chamber,
because
we
don't,
we
can't
really
predict.
We
don't
want
people
in
comfortable
and
then
it's
just
easier
to
go
there
in
case
you
have
a
lot
of
people
coming
out.
If
you
have
conflicts
that
you're
going
to
have
to
leave
and
come
back,
please
let
miss
Stephanie
know
so
that
we
can
coordinate
so
we
don't
lose
quorum.
A
B
A
Yeah,
so
what
we'll
do
is
we
have
agenda
clearing
tomorrow,
all
other
sense
of
it.
Then
you
can
talk
about
some.
You
know
logistics
and
stuff,
like
that
and
we'll
give
you
our
best
guess,
but
until
the
death
of
a
delegation
sign
up
really
don't
know
right,
but
we'll
have
a
sense
and
then,
of
course
it's
in
your
hands
too,
and
you
can
help
move
things
along
all
right.
A
B
A
I
know
I
already
told
it
when
that
first
came
out.
It
is
the
deputy
chief,
just
kiner's,
retirement
breakfast
and
and
two
members
of
the
Aqua
Police
Services
Board
are
on
this
planning
committee
and
they
won't
be
able
to
go
either
so,
okay,
that's
why
we
get
paid
the
big
bucks
for
serving
on
the
number
one
community,
all
right,
so
pennant
yeah.
We
don't
get
any
more
money
for
anything,
including
me,
not
a
cent
okay.
So
we
are
adjourned
and
I'll.
See
you
on
the
twenty
will
see
it
Council
tomorrow.