►
From YouTube: Transportation Committee - 3 April 2019
Description
Transportation Committee - 3 April 2019
Agenda and background materials can be found at http://www.ottawa.ca/agendas.
A
Good
good
morning,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
good
morning,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
and
welcome
to
the
Transportation
Committee
for
Wednesday
April
3rd,
this
is
our
second
committee
meeting
of
this
term
of
Council.
Are
there
any
declarations
of
interests?
None!
Thank
you.
So
much.
We
do
have
regrets
from
councillor
flurry.
We
have
confirmation
the
minutes
from
first
of
March,
2019.
B
A
Thank
you.
We
have
communications
or
three
items
in
response
to
increase
received,
see
you.
Thank
you
very
much
item
number
one
is
the
parking
cycle,
study
and
pilot
project.
This
is
he
doesn't
want
to
speak
anymore.
Okay,
counselor,
who
believe
in
has
a
very,
very
quick
question
on
this.
Would
you
like
to
hold
it?
Okay,
well,
councillor
Dean's.
A
Item
number
two:
we
have
a
presentation
from
staff
item
number
three:
there
was
a
presentation
from
staff
item
number
four:
is
the
planning
infrastructure
net
economic
development
work
plan
for
2019
any
questions?
No,
so
the
transportation.
Can
you
receive
part
six
of
this
report?
Does
this
receive
receive?
Thank
you.
A
A
Item
number:
seven
is
the
counselors
item.
Did
you
want
to
speak
to
this
counselor?
So
item
number
seven
is
a
speed
reduction
on
Central
Park,
any
questions
noses
Kerry
Kerry.
Thank
you
and
then
we've
got
counselors
items
and
some
additions
to
the
agenda
after
that
yeah
I
believe
councillor.
Cavanaugh
wants
to
speak
to
that
right.
So
will
robot,
okay.
So
going
back
to
item
number
one
with
parking
cycle
study,
pilot
project.
A
C
C
So
since
it's
a
pilot,
I
was
just
sort
of
imagining
ways
that
we
might
not
have
to
initiate
a
zoning
change,
which
is
costly
and
using
staff
time.
So
I
was
just
wondering
if
we
could
not
maybe
just
give
passes
to
people
that
were
interested
in
piloting
this
for
three
years.
Anybody
that
wanted
to
use
them.
Maybe
we
should
3040
passes
whatever
you
think
people
are
going
to
want
and
then,
of
course
it
would
just
be
a
first-come,
first-served
basis,
but
it
would
just
save
the
taxpayers.
D
Through
uture
on
the
the
parking
spots
right
there,
definitely
we
have
to
change
some
of
the
parking
signs
and
some
of
that
cost
is
for
staff
time
to
monitor
this
pilot
program.
The
zoning
change
itself,
I,
don't
think
it's,
but
it's
an
opportunity
for
the
rest
of
the
city
of
the
public
to
to
know
what
this
change
is
happening
to
give
up
passes,
there's
a
cost
to
that
as
well,
and
there's
the
cost
to
monitor
that
I.
Think
$11,000
is
it's
just
an
estimate
of
the
the
internal
cost
that
pilot
project
were
to
proceed.
C
Distribute
them
to
anyone
who
had
an
interest
in
it
and
then
it
would
just
be
first-come.
First-Serve
I
mean
I,
think
the
same
thing
I
just
I,
don't
know
how
much
is
owning
change
costs.
I
know
from
my
own
constituents
Amos
had
to
initiate
a
zoning.
Change
comes
with
a
price
tag
and
I
just
wondered
if
there
was
a
way
of
saving
the
taxpayers
that
amount
of
money-
that's
all,
but
if
your
time
you
know
then
fine.
Yes,
that's
right
here.
E
You
mr.
chair
my
questions
along
the
same
lines,
I
when
I
read
the
report
on
money
and
why
we
can't
just
do
this
this
year.
This
was
a
question
that
was
raised
last
year
by
councillor
Wilkinson,
and
my
thought
to
this
was
we're
almost
creating
a
bureaucratic
process
here.
Why
do
the
people
need
passes?
E
Can
we
just
not
sign
10
spots
or
whatever,
and
it's
first-come
first-serve
and
they
get
in
there
as
soon
as
you
start
doing
passes,
it
puts
me
in
mind
of
the
goldpass
program
with
OC
Transpo,
which
works
very
well,
but
people
pay
for
those
passes
and
I'm.
Not
so
sure
people
want
to
pay
for
a
pass
to
leave
there
kind
of
summarize,
so
they
can
bike
to
work.
So
on
just
one
known
as
a
pilot.
D
D
A
G
I'm,
just
going
to
provide
a
brief
presentation
on
the
enhancements
to
the
temporary
traffic
calming
program
that
started
in
the
last
term
of
council
has
been
that
has
been
funded
going
forward.
This
new
this
program
in
its
enhancements
will
allow
us
to
continue
to
install
and
implement
many
of
the
same
temporary
traffic,
calming
measures
that
were
installed
during
the
last
term
of
council,
as
well
as
a
few
additional
items
going
forward.
We'll
continue
to
be
able
to
install
the
speed
display
boards.
G
These
are
boards
that
are
installed
at
the
side
of
the
roadway
to
notify
drivers
of
the
speed
at
which
they're
driving.
It
also
provides
some
feedback
or
has
the
opportunity
to
provide
some
feedback
related
to
the
speed
that
are
operating
and
the
appropriate
speed.
So
we
typically
use
pictogram
smiley
faces
or
unhappy
faces
to
provide
some
additional
information.
G
G
G
G
To
slow
down
for
us
signs
provide
a
similar
type
of
notification
to
motorists.
These
are
mostly
placed
in
residential
areas
to
let
drivers
know
that
there's
the
potential
for
children
or
other
road
users
in
the
vicinity,
then
we
have
the
planters
which
we've
used
to
create
chicanes
along
the
roadway.
These
are
physical
measures
that
will
help
reduce
the
speed
along
the
coridor.
G
G
There
is
the
implementation
of
warranted
pedestrian
crossovers
that
are
not
able
to
be
funded
through
the
pedestrian
crossover
program,
minor
roadway
modifications,
usually
widening
of
shoulders
or
that
sort
of
thing
in
the
rural
areas
Gateway
signage.
This
is
one
of
the
new
measures
that
we're
introducing
this
year
as
part
of
the
temporary
traffic
calming
program
last
year,
council
approved
a
report
to
allow
the
usage
of
this
sort
of
signage,
the
Gateway
signage,
to
implement
speed,
limit
changes
within
residential
areas.
G
The
funding
for
it
is
is
limited
under
our
existing
operating
budget,
and
so
this
provides
an
opportunity
for
councillors
to
implement
this
more
quickly
than
under
our
operating
budget,
we're
also
introducing
permanent
speed,
humps
or
tables.
These
will
we'll
work
with
Road
services
and
their
contractors
to
implement
these
median
narrowings
as
well
or
pedestrian
refuge.
Islands
also
will
be
working
with
Road
services
to
implement
these
going
forward.
A
summary
of
the
implementation
that
was
undertaken
over
the
last
term
of
Council.
She
was
close
to
1600
locations
implemented
through
this
program.
G
A
E
You
mr.
chair
two
questions
for
you:
the
pink
signs
that
you're
showing
that
I
think
work
on
the
street
I
think
we're
getting
good
results
with
it.
The
question
I
have
what
it
is.
The
quality
of
the
paint
like
I
had
some
painted
bass
late
summer
early
fall,
and
now
your
staffer
telling
me
I
have
to
repaint
them,
so
that
cost
is
going
to
add
up
as
we
get
more
and
more
locations,
so
I'm
just
wondering
what
we're
doing
about
trying
to
find
a
better
quality
paint.
H
H
So
if
you
want
a
busier
road
like
a
collector,
then
we
don't
expect
that
the
paint
will
need
to
get
refreshed
quicker
than
if
you're
on
a
local
residential
street
where
the
traffic's,
not
as
as
much
so
there's
there's
a
there's,
some
different
things
that
we
can
look
at
doing
to
try
to
fix
that
and
we'll
bring
that
forward
at
the
next
committee
meeting.
So.
E
Committee
next
month,
okay,
my
second
question
for
you
is
other
ideas
like
the
stuff
that
you've
got
there
as
Phil
knows,
I
was
one
of
the
early
adopters
of
a
lot
of
that
stuff
six
years
ago.
The
thing
that
I'm
noticing,
though,
is
when
they're
out
there
for
a
while
they
tend
to
lose
their
effect.
So
I
think
we
have
to
keep
coming
up
with
fresh
ideas,
because
it's
something
new,
for
example
the.
G
We'll
continue
to
review
and
add
new
items
as
they
become
available
last
year
and
over
the
last
couple
of
years
we
piloted
the
silhouettes,
as
you
mentioned
in
your
Lord,
as
well
as
some
3d
speed
humps.
So
we
will
continue
to
look
at
opportunities
every
opportunity,
that's
available
to
us.
Okay,
Thank.
I
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
chair.
It's
probably
one
of
the
favorite
topics
in
my
memoir
Ward
is
traffic
calming
and
everybody
wants
it,
and
I
tend
to
have
a
very
long
list.
I
want
to
know
what
the
backlog
looks
like
in
terms
of
right
now
of
requests,
because
you've
talked
about
how
many
are
out
there,
but
what
kind
of
backlog
do
we
have
in
terms
of
people
that
still
neighborhoods
that
still
want
that
are
on
waiting
lists.
G
I
H
The
temporary
traffic
coming
we
work
with
the
counselors
to
identify
the
locations,
and
today
we
haven't
found
that
backlog
specific
to
this
program.
Maybe
we
can
sit
down
if
you
want
to
review
the
locations
in
your
ward
and
and
we'll
come
up
with
a
plan,
we
do
work
with
the
counselors.
We
do
collect
traffic
data.
H
If
you
know,
if
there's
a
requirement
to
to
install
measures-
and
we
can
see
what
the
speed
operating
speeds
are
to
sort
of
prioritize-
okay,
which
is
sort
of
the
ones
that
seem
to
be
based
on
the
data,
did
you
want
to
move
forward
with?
But
at
this
point
we're
not
aware
of
any
backlog
but
I'd
like
to
you
have
to
sit
down
with
you
to
review
the
we.
I
Do
have
the
councilor
budget
that
just
got
bumped
up
a
little
bit
but
I
feel
you
know
people
wonder
like.
Why
is
there
a
separate
budget
city
budget
and
then
that
a
councilor
budget,
it
sort
of
just
sort
of
feels
like
Peter
and
Paul
like
the
it's
the
same?
Is
it
the
same
kind
of
request?
What
is
the
difference.
H
Area
traffic
management
program
and
that's
a
project
and
I
think
there's
a
report
coming
and
presentation
on
that.
The
next
item-
our
program
here
is
meant
to
be
more
short-term
fixes.
So
it's
not
doing
big
studies
in
terms
to
see
what
the
impacts
of
the
measures
will
be.
It's
more
to
say:
I've
got
a
problem
on
the
street
with
speeding
or
other
other
things,
and
we
can
put
something
in
very
quickly
and
so
for
that
specific
program.
The
the
temporary
traffic
calming
program
that
utilizes
the
$50,000
for
each
counselor.
H
I
A
Counselor,
this
was
a
policy
decision
that
council
made
five
or
six
years
ago
so
that
there
could
be
a
quick
response
to
emerging
community
needs
without
having
to
go
through
the
bureaucracy
and
red
tape.
Oh
studies,
because
counselors
I,
think
of
you
as
the
counselors
know
their
neighborhoods
better
than
anyone
else,
and
these
measures
can
typically
be
to
be
deployed
much
faster.
B
Thank
you.
Thank
you
mr.
chair,
and
thank
you
staff
for
the
presentation
and
also
meeting
with
us
prior
to
today's
committee.
One
question
Krista
on
slide
10.
When
you
talk
about
the
minor
road
deficiency
improvement
in
the
and
I
think
that
applied
to
a
lot
of
roads
in
ordinary
problem
is.
Are
we
still
allowed
to
use
that
funding
allocated
for
council
to
do
that?
Because
the
last
time
we
had
to
get
a
special
exemption
from
council
to
allow
you
some
of
that
funding
to
be
able
to
do
the
pavement
there.
G
Typically,
you're
allowed
to
fund
this
type
of
an
initiative
through
the
temporary
traffic
calming
program
if
it's
related
to
a
traffic
calming
situation
as
well.
So
we
would
usually
do
the
improvements
in
order
to
help
facilitate
the
installation
of
signage
or
other
traffic.
Temporary
traffic
calming
items.
B
Everything
would
improve
traffic,
let's
be
honest:
it's
not
safety
for
traffic
and
and
especially
for
if
you
have
a
bicycle
on
my
shoulder,
it's
raw
and,
and
sometimes
we
use
some
of
our
funding
to
to
close
that
gap
with
bicycling
can
lead
you
to
a
try,
Park
and
Ride
or
on
the
other
transit
day.
So
my
question
to
you
in
the
past,
we
were
not
allowed
to
use
that
money
without
coming
to
Council
for
exemption.
Is
this?
This
is
still
available
to
be
used.
Yeah.
H
2015
talked
about
this
and
similar
to
this
has
carried
over,
so
it's
meant
to
do
some
very
small
enhancements
like
like
you
mentioned
for
my
cycle.
You
know
to
fill
in
that
gap
in
the
road,
so
that
would
still
be
permitted
through
this
program
as
it
has,
it
wasn't
lost
from
account
so
that
hasn't
changed.
Okay,
that's.
J
Thank
you
very
much
mr.
chair,
so
Phil
one
of
the
things
that
really
catches.
My
attention
is,
you
explained
it's
a
temper
traffic
calming
measure
and
they
were
talking
about
speed,
humps
and
tables,
so
I'm
having
trouble
figuring
out
how
how
that's
a
temporary
once
it's
there,
it's
there
as
I
understand
it
may
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
we
we
don't
have
a
city
process
for
the
removal
of
speed,
humps
or
tables.
Is
that
correct,
yeah.
H
That's
correct
and
so
there's
a
review
process
in
terms
of
before
you
put
them
in
we're
going
to
want
to
do
some
consultations,
so
we
would
recommend
doing
a
petition
process
for
that
streets
of
a
understand
that,
when
a
speed
this
this
type
of
device
is
going
in,
it
was
sort
of
comments
we've
received
back
from
from
councils
and
residents
in
terms
of
is
there
other
low-cost
type
of
solutions
that
may
be
more
permanent,
so
we've
got
the
the
speed.
Humps
is
one
example.
We
also
have
the
median
medians.
H
These
are
measures
that
won't
impact
trainers,
because
once
you
started
acting
drainage,
then
they
become
higher
cost.
So
we've
had
situations
in
the
past
where
we've
had
a
wide
road,
we'd
like
to
put
out
concrete
medium
to
try
to
narrow
the
work
to
provide
a
pedestrian
refuge,
and
these
are
the
opportunities
to
put
those
measures
and
so
the
speed
humps
again,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
there's
an
issues
we
collect
data
we'd
work
with
the
war
counselor
to
determine.
Is
it
something
that
you
want
to
do?
H
J
So
to
follow
up,
you
said
more
low
cost.
You
and
I
have
talked
about
this
a
lot
over
the
years.
Can
you
maybe
share
just
how
much
the
speed
hump
per
table
might
cost,
and,
and
also
it's
my
understanding,
it's
a
single
one
would
be
the
job
so
you're
working
at
two
or
three
going
in
so.
Can
you
give
us
a
sense
of
what
that
kind
of
costs
might
be
so.
H
At
this
point,
the
cost
we
see
for
these
that
we're
installing
is
between
five
and
seventy
eight
thousand
dollars
for
location.
So
in
terms
of
the
numbers
that
does
become
a
challenge
if
you've
had
a
very
long
street,
so
we
would
need
to
work
with
the
councilor
and
maybe
that
this
you
know
the
council
decides
that
this
might
be
a
sort
of
de
la
solution.
H
You've
tried
out
to
temporary
things
and
we
don't
see
the
reductions
fees,
but
when
we
found
with
all
the
other
measures
that
we've
implemented,
they
tend
to
be
very
well
in
reducing
speeds
in
terms
of
the
measures
that
we
implement.
So
again,
it's
working
with
the
council
side.
Some
counselors
may
want
to
use
them.
Others
may
not,
but
it
sits
at
the
purview
of
the
council,
the
council
to
decide
and.
J
Then
the
last
question
in
this
part
of
the
report
is
again
when
we've
talked
about
this
in
the
past.
At
this
committee
and
the
council,
one
of
the
one
of
the
big
issues
has
been
emergency
vehicles,
fire
trucks,
ambulances
you
know
and
the
impact
that
a
speed
table
or
hump
can
have
on
response
time.
So
we
are
what
we
are
emergency
services
on
this
particular
initiative.
We
address
their
concerns.
H
Local
residential
streets,
so
we
wouldn't
see
the
one
collectors,
at
least
to
this
program:
no
arterioles.
It's
basically
meant
to
be
just
a
you
know:
low
volume,
roadway
or
a
residential
street
that
that
people
feel
they
have
speeding
concerns
on.
But
before
we
were
implement
that
we
would
consult
with
fire.
H
It
won't
be
on
any
bus
routes
and
so
will
consult
with
fire
transit,
as
well
as
others
to
make
sure
in
roads
to
make
sure
that
there's
no
issues
assuming
there's
no
issues
and
we
could
proceed
if
too
hard
and
we
would
sit
down
with
the
councilor
and
go
over
those
things.
And
and
if
it's
a
showstopper
look
at
potential
other
options
in
terms
of
trying
to
to
deal
with
the
issue,
that's
at
hand.
Okay
and.
J
J
A
traffic
calming
initiative
goes
in
that
there's
enforcement
to
follow
so
was
that
contemplating
this
do
we
have
a
system
now
where
we
can
say
to
o-p-s
we're
putting
up
a
new
speed
board
at
this
corner
on
this
street,
where
she
canes
or
whatever
we'd,
like
you
out
there
for
the
next
couple
of
days
to
monitor
hand
out
tickets
if
necessary,
or
even
give
warnings
to
people?
You
know
part
of
us
sort
of
an
educational
outreach.
Do
we
have
that
in
place
and
if
we
don't
have
that
in
place?
H
What
we
do
with
the
speed
Wars
we
we
provide
them
all
the
information
they
they
receive
complaints.
They
look
at
all
the
data.
So
all
the
speed
here
that
we
do
collect
in
the
city
they
have
access
to,
and
then
it
allows
them
to
do
some
some
proactive
enforcement
based
on
the
complaints
they
get
in
terms
of
being
proactive.
When
we
put
measures
in
that's
something
that
you
can
take
away
and
work
with
police
to
see,
if
that's
feasible,
yeah.
J
C
Processes
that
council
egg
line
had
in
terms
of
this
being
a
temporary
program
or
a
seasonal
program
to
calm
traffic
on
residential
streets
and
yes
and
and
I've
I've
the
existent
program.
There's
two
things
about
it.
That
I've
concerned
myself
with
one
that
there's
no
evaluation
or
analysis
of
how
those
measures
did
in
terms
of
meeting
their
objectives
of
slowing
the
traffic
and
also
did
they
create
safety
concerns
in
those
neighborhoods.
C
Certainly,
the
flex
takes
the
seven
flex
takes
work
better
on
some
streets
than
they
do
on
another,
but
there's
never
any
follow-up
at
the
end
of
the
season
before
they're
taken
out
with
the
neighborhood
to
see
if
they
want
them
to
be
put
back
in
if
they
think
they
were
effective,
lift
they
think
they
created
more
hazards
than
he
solved.
So
I
thought
I.
C
Think
the
program
would
benefit
from
some
evaluation
or
analysis
at
the
end
of
the
season
before
those
are
taken
out
and
I
did
have
a
conversation
with
the
man
before
the
budget
about
putting
new
tools
in
the
tool
kit,
because
I
think
after
a
while.
Even
those
big
display
signs
people
just
get
so
used
to
them
and
they're
they're
ubiquitous
now
so
people
they're
easier
to
ignore
so
I
did
think
that
we
needed
to
refresh
the
toolkit
and
have
have
more
measures.
C
Loeb
councillor,
elgar
I'm,
not
sure
that,
what's
being
proposed
as
food
tables
and
the
center
medians
are
actually
temporary.
They
look
more
permanent
to
me
than
temporary
and
I
know,
even
through
the
area,
traffic
management
studies
that
we
have
done
and
where
we've
implemented
implemented,
food
tables
that
it's
a
mixed
bag.
Yes,
they
maybe
address.
Some
swelling
of
traffic
is
temporary,
like
they
slow
down
to
go
over
the
hump
and
then
I
got
it
to
make
up
the
time
they
lost.
C
But
actually
it's
not
necessarily
always
well
received
by
the
people
that
live
on
this
street
because
they
don't
want
them
in
front
of
their
house.
They
don't
want
the
additional
greenhouse
gas
emissions
from
people
gunning
it
after
and
they're,
not
necessarily
loved
everywhere
and
I'm,
not
sure
that
the
public
is
going
to
necessarily
love
them
popping
up
like
daisies
in
the
springtime
either
through
this
program.
So.
C
What
do
we
choose?
That
I
was
kind
of
hoping
we
would
go
with
the
more
temporary
one
site
they
have
at
Lansdowne,
Park
that
you
screw
them
into
the
road,
and
then
you
take
them
out
at
the
end
of
the
season,
so
they
don't
get
in
the
way
of
winter
operations
and
they're
kind
of
more
temporary.
So
what
are
we
going
with
something
that
seems
more
like
an
ATM
measure
than
it
does
a
temporary
traffic
calming
measure.
H
H
So
I
know
that
we
tried
one
last
year
and
in
Statesville,
where
we
we
knew
the
road
was
get
resurfaced
so
that
the
residents
weren't
too
sure
if
they
want
to
have
the
speed
hump,
because,
as
you
mentioned,
you
know
some
some
people
love
them,
but
the
people
who
live
there-
sorry
like
them,
so
they
they
politics.
We
will
put
that
there.
There
was
consensus
on
the
street
that
they
thought
it
should
be
there.
H
So
when
every
construction
came
in
and
the
resurfacing
they
put
them
in
in
permanently
this,
this
was
added
as
a
tool
in
terms
of
another
option.
To
do
it's
not
to
say
something
something
that
it
counts.
It
has
to
do
with
DNA.
This
whole
program
is
up
to
the
councilor
side.
Some
counselors
may
say
you
know
what
I
want
to
I
want
to
try
putting
in
some
in
other
councils
may
say
we
don't
want
to
do
it,
so
this
doesn't
say
you
need
to
do
it.
H
G
Have
done
some
evaluation
of
the
measures
that
we've
implemented
through
the
last
term
of
counsel?
We
did
a
lot
of
before-and-after
studies
to
determine
the
effectiveness
of
the
measure,
so
we
do
have
some
information
on
that.
We
can
provide
that
to
you.
If
you
like,
did
you
do
any
of
my
ward?
Yes,
we
should
have.
We
were
targeting
every
location
for
implementation
and.
G
Use
the
ATR
of
our
tools
to
collect
speed
and
volume
data
before
and
after
implementation,
so
we
can
compare
the
reduction
in
speed
and
increase
in
compliance
if
there
was
any
after
implementation
for
all
new
measures
that
we
will
be
piloting
like
the
3d
speed
hope
we
did
last
year,
the
silhouettes.
We
will
continue
to
do
that
that
form
of
data
collection
and
we
are
doing
a
comprehensive
reef
review
right
now
of
all
of
these
speed
board
data.
We
should
finish
that
by
the
end
of
the
year.
Ok.
C
Well,
I
actually
think
that's
really
good.
I
mean
these
are
measures
that
are
intended
to
slow
traffic
or
create
awareness
of
the
drivers,
driving
habits
and
to
that
end,
I
think
you
know
that's
doing
what
what
you
want
it
to
do,
but
I
think
the
evaluation
perhaps
needs
go
a
little
further
than
that,
because
all
members
of
council
I'm
sure
it's
not
just
me-
get
lots
of
feedback
from
the
residents
in
the
area
about
the
impact,
especially
those
flex,
takes
some
see
them
like
they
don't
work.
C
It's
not
a
one-size-fits-all
program.
They
work
better
on
some
streets
than
they
work
on
others
and,
depending
on
the
characteristics
of
a
street,
they
can
turn
into
a
slalom
course
for
some
people
you
can
have
buses
going
on
the
long
side
the
flex
takes
because
they
can't
get
through
when
there's
cars
parked
on
the
street,
and
we
get
a
lot
of
feedback
about
anecdotally,
perhaps
about
safety
concerns
with
those
flex
ticks
on
some
streets,
and
so
the
type
of
tool
that
you're
using
to
evaluate
just
the
reduction
in
speed
is
maybe
not
capturing.
C
What
I
think
needs
to
be
captured
in
terms
of
the
evaluation,
which
is
where
the
public
thing
do?
They
think
this
street
is
appropriate?
Should
those
measures
go
back,
I,
try
and
do
that
every
year,
I
try
to
do
a
survey
on
the
street
to
say:
do
you
want
these
back?
Where
they
did
they
did
they?
You
know
result
in
what
you
hoped
for
or
not
and
I
want
to
say
most
of
the
streets
where
we
put
flag
sticks.
People
don't
want
them
because
they
said
when
I
was
campaigning.
Last
fall
actually
I.
C
Just
think
that
we
need
to
understand
the
impact
more
than
just
from
speed,
I
think
they
are
doing
what
they're
primarily
primarily
intended
to
do,
which
is
reducing
traffic,
but
are
they
creating
other
roadway
hazards
that
I
think
that's
what
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
understand
with
anything
we
do
so
I
guess!
That's!
That's
it
for
me.
D
Might
be
jumping
a
little
bit
ahead
here
and
I
know
you're
working
on
the
pilot
floor
photo
radar.
I
was
just
curious
as
to
whether
that
will
be
coming
out
of
the
TTC
budget
or
if
that
would
be
another
budget,
and
if
us
as
councilor,
should
start
thinking
about
whether
we
should
be
allocating
money
towards
that
in
future
seasons.
D
G
G
M
That
we
make
quite
quite
a
heavy
use
of
it.
My
questions
about
thermoplastic
technology
and
it
seems
to
be
that
it
provides
the
best
value
for
a
TTC
budget
as
though
the
installations
are
more
resilient
than
paint.
But
right
now
our
school
zones
and
bike
lane
thermoplastics
are
available
to
us.
Are
the
plans
to
design
or
procure
additional
designs?
Perhaps
something
like
stop
ahead.
Speed
limit
indicator
of
seniors
crossings
that
sort
of
thing
they
seem
to
be
quite
resilient
and
provide
the
best
value
for
our
money.
G
A
N
Very
much
chair,
thank
you
for
the
report.
This
is
really
important.
Work
that
you're
doing
and
so
I
think
we've
made
tremendous
progress
in
the
last
several
years
on
this
program,
so
I
just
wanted
to
thank
you
for
all
that
you
do
this.
This
is
obviously
important
for
injuries
for
deaths.
Even
a
minor
increase
in
speed
drastically
increases
the
severity
of
injuries
and
potential
deaths
that
occur.
So
this
is
such
an
important
program
for
the
City
of
Ottawa.
N
One
question
I
had
just
as
around
the
planters
because
I'm
in
agreement
with
the
report
and
everything
else
on
the
planters
I've
had
constituents
suggests
that
they're
a
little
bit
ugly,
the
head
tab,
but
they
may
want
to
put
them
in,
but
putting
that
piece
on
their
street
may
not
may
not
be
the
best.
Are
there
other
options
for
the
planters,
wooden
planters
or
other
options
we
could
put
in?
That
may
be
a
little
bit
nicer.
G
We
can
certainly
investigate
other
forms
of
planters
start
more
stylish
ones.
Okay,
the
neighborhood
signs
a
contract
to
plant
it.
So
there
is
an
opportunity
to
make
it
look
very
nice
through
the
plantings
that
are
selected,
but
we
could
certainly
look
at
the
style
of
the
planters
themselves.
Okay,.
M
Thanks
Jeff,
first
off
again,
thank
you
for
for
the
program.
I
do
really
appreciate
having
the
TTC
program
available.
It
allows
us
to
be
very,
very
nimble.
I'm,
not
gonna
push
back
at
the
recommendation
to
include
speed
bumps
in
the
tool
kit.
It
does
mean
for
some
of
us
that
it's
it's
a
more
challenging
conversation
with
residents.
The
I
am
a
big
fan
of
flex.
Sticks
I,
think
they
cost.
You
know
a
third
of
what
a
speed
bump
would
and
councillor.
Cavanaugh
was
asking
about
backlog.
M
I
think
I've
still
got
60
streets
that
are
looking
for
traffic,
calming
measures
that
we
are
slowly
addressing
year
after
year,
I'm
gonna
have
to
say
no
to
a
lot
of
requests
for
speed
bumps,
because
that's
just
going
to
take
that
much
more
money
out
of
my
TTC
budget
that
I
could
be
using
to
do
two
or
three
streets
at
a
time
with
with
the
flexi
sticks,
but
you
know
each
councillors
gonna
take
their
own
approach
to
it.
That's
the
the
beauty
of
this
program
is
it's
very
nimble,
very
counselor
centric.
M
It
allows
us
to
work
quickly
so
having
it
in
the
toolkit
is.
Is
clearly
something
that
you've
heard
one
question
is
around
the
planters
are
not
necessarily
the
aesthetics
of
them
in
my
office,
so
you
show
a
picture
on
one
of
these
pages
of
the
shakyas
that
you've
created
with
the
planters,
and
this
tell
us
that
you
have
put
out
15
planter
locations
in
the
past
three
years.
It's
extremely
difficult
to
get
you
guys
to
say
yes
to
planters.
M
A
couple
of
years
ago,
we
found
that
you
became
the
department
that
says
yes
to
traffic
calming
requests.
You
will
started
working
with
us
on
trying
to
really
push
the
edge
of
where
you
could
put
TTC's,
but
planter
boxes
are
still
something
where
I
don't
think.
I've
been
successful
in
any
of
my
requests
yet
for
planter
boxes
in
the
ward,
maybe
one
or
two.
Why
are
the
planter
boxes
in
creating
that
kind
of
a
scenario
of
the
chicane
or
wound
are
so
difficult
to
achieve?.
G
It
really
depends
on
the
location
of
the
planter
boxes.
We
do
sometimes
have
to
look
at
parking
restrictions
in
order
to
be
able
to
accommodate
a
planter
box
many
times.
We
request
that
a
petition
be
completed
by
the
residents
to
ensure
that
that
is
a
fair
trade-off
for
for
the
residents
of
the
street.
So
at
times
it's
due
to
parking
restrictions
and
no
support
for
that.
Sometimes
we
physically
just
can't
fit
it
in
because
of
the
width
of
the
roadway
other
times
we
do
consult
with
emergency
and
protective
services.
G
M
E
You
mr.
judge
I've,
spoke,
follow
up
on
councillor
Dean's
comments,
because
yeah
disappointing
that
you
had
such
a
negative
experience.
What
about
think
most
councillors
have
had
a
very
positive
experience,
in
fact,
in
my
case,
at
this
time
here,
I
start
getting
emails
and
I've
shared
them.
What
they're
asking
when
they're
going
to
get
that
flex
takes
back,
so
it's
mostly
neighbors
in
my
area
at
least
I've
had
a
very
positive
experience
with
them
and
very
supportive
for
the
program
I'm
wondering
there's
some
numbers
that
I
use
about,
for
example,
on
the
evaluation.
E
You
can
put
your
speed
board
up
in
advance
and
track
the
data
from
how
fast
the
car
is
going
and
so
on
in
that
area,
and
then
you
put
your
speed
board
up
after
it's
implemented
and
you
get
that
information.
The
information
I
remember
from
those
speed
boards
and
I
share
with
the
community
when
they
asked
about
these
things,
is
they
painted
numbers
on
the
street,
I
believe
you're,
getting
a
17
percent
improvement
in
compliance
with
speed
on
it
and
that
flex
takes
I
thought
the
number
was
24%
like
a
very
significant
improvement.
G
G
C
Just
a
Miss
posture,
counselor
Ben
I'm,
not
trying
to
create
the
impression
that's
been
a
negative
experience,
as
I
said,
I
believe
in
flex
takes
do
exactly
what
they're
intended
to
do.
They
slow
traffic
on
streets.
Some
streets
are
just
better
than
others
are
more
suited
to
a
flex
state
than
others
and
I
know.
I.
Think
I
have
a
pretty
good
snapshot
of
what
people
think
I,
actually
value
like
at
the
end
of
this
season
and
ask
people
for
their
feedback.
So
it's
a
mixed
bag
in
some
streets
are
better
than
others.
A
D
Good
morning,
chairman
committee
members,
we're
very
happy
to
be
here
to
present
to
you
the
update
to
the
area
traffic
management
program.
The
last
time
the
committee
saw
this
process
was
back
in
2004
when
it
was
approved,
and
then
what
has
changed
since
then,
we've
have
different
policies,
including
Complete
Streets.
Lots
of
things
have
happened,
and
we
also
had
a
very
many
years
of
looking
at
how
the
old
process
had
functioned
and
they
certainly
needed
some
updates.
D
So
that's
what
we're
presenting
today
and
beside
me
is
Heidi
Cruz,
no
she's,
a
program
manager
of
the
atm,
the
area,
traffic
management
program
and
next
turn
is
Justin.
Smarm
he's
with
on
our
team
as
the
senior
project
manager
on
this
file.
So
with
that
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
Heidi
to
present.
K
K
So,
as
vu
mentioned
in
2004,
council
approved
the
area
traffic
management
guidelines
which
established
a
consistent
approach
to
addressing
requests
for
permanent
traffic
roaming
on
existing
streets.
These
studies
are
managed
by
the
area,
traffic
management
program
and
transportation
planning,
and
this
program
should
not
be
confused
with
the
ward
led
temporary
traffic
calming
program
which
was
just
presented
to
you
a
few
minutes
ago
from
our
colleagues
and
traffic
services.
K
In
the
past,
funding
for
the
area
traffic
management
program
was
limited
and
inconsistent,
which
resulted
in
an
extensive
backlog
of
both
study
requests
and
the
implementation
of
approved
measures.
The
processes
also
resulted
in
smaller,
simpler
projects
languishing
at
the
bottom
of
the
prioritization
list.
The
need
for
an
update
to
the
ATM
program
to
better
meet
expectations
and
manage
limited
resources
was
identified
and
at
in
an
IBD
report
that
was
sent
to
council
in
May
of
2017.
K
So
why
are
we
here
today?
In
2017,
we
implemented
some
administrative
updates
to
the
ATM
program
through
delegated
authority.
One
example
of
this
previous
update
is
that
we
moved
to
a
first
end,
first
out
approach
for
the
implementation
of
approved
studies
rather
than
reprioritizing
each
measure
individually,
as
was
done
in
the
past,
but
since
2017,
the
two
other
broader
components
identified
and
that
IPD
report
have
progressed.
K
So
this
includes
updating
the
processes
used
in
the
area
traffic
management
program,
which
we
are
recommending
to
be
rebranded
as
the
neighborhood
traffic
calming
program
to
reflect
more
accurately
the
program's
focus
and
purpose.
It
also
includes
developing
traffic
calming
design
guidelines
to
guide
Road
designers
in
the
application
of
traffic
calming
whether
it
be
localized
retrofits
through
our
program
or
included
as
part
of
other
general
roadway
design
projects.
So
we're
here
today
to
seek
approval
of
the
new
streamline,
neighborhood
traffic,
calming
study
process
and
the
new
design
guidelines.
K
This
update
was
developed
with
key
stakeholder
consultations.
This
included
meetings
with
all
councillors
and
city
staff
who
worked
with
the
current
ATM
program.
It
also
included
many
collaborative
consultations
with
several
city
departments
or
traffic.
Ami
projects
could
affect
their
work,
programs
or
services
such
as,
for
example,
emergency
services
with,
for
example,
we
identified
key
streets
that
they
use
more
frequently
were
the
toolbox
of
traffic.
Calming
options
should
perhaps
be
more
limited,
also
included
services,
OC
Transpo
maleic.
K
So
here's
a
summary
of
some
of
the
major
topics
stemming
from
the
discussions
with
councillors
and
public
and
city
staff.
We
heard
things
like
we
should
focus
on
streets,
internal
to
neighborhoods.
Most
of
us
live
and
go
to
school.
Education
and
communication
is
important.
We
need
a
robust
toolbox
of
options.
We
should
keep.
The
process
is
simple.
We
should
consider
easier,
quicker
solutions
first,
and
we
should
keep
sales
equitable
by
continuing
to
prioritize
city
wide
based
on
problems
severity
rather
than
by
interest.
But
we
should
consider
including
additional
equity
considerations
in
the
process.
K
So
the
Guardian
principles
of
the
new
neighborhood
traffic
calming
study
process
will
remain
the
same
in
a
sense
that
we
will
continue
to
prioritize
requests
such
that
we
are
focusing
on
the
most
severe
traffic
concerns.
First,
however,
resources
will
now
be
focused
on
local
and
collector
streets
within
neighborhoods,
as
well
as
village
main
streets.
Focusing
our
resources
on
these
streets,
where
small
changes
can
have
a
big
impact,
provides
higher
value.
This
will
permit
more
requests
to
be
addressed,
also
an
alignment
with
the
city's
Road
Safety
and
complete
Street
objectives.
K
This
program
will
focus
resources
primarily
on
addressing
the
issue
of
speeding
traffic
volume.
Concerns
may
be
addressed,
provided
speeding
is
also
evident.
The
process
will
group
simple
and
more
complicated
studies
into
two
separate
buckets.
The
focus
will
be
on
the
smaller,
simple,
simpler
local
traffic,
calming
studies
which
will
address
concerns
related
to
speeding
on
a
specific
street,
whereas
neighborhood
traffic
management
studies
will
address
concerns
related
to
speeding
and
through
traffic
within
a
defined
study,
defined
study
area
I'm,
just
a
specific
street.
K
The
new
neighborhood
traffic
calming
study
process
has
three
main
phases:
the
priest
study
phases
where
requests
for
permanent
traffic
calming
are
first
screened
to
determine
if
they
would
qualify
for
the
program.
The
purpose
of
this
qualifying
process
is
to
make
sure
that
the
city
screens
in
a
manageable
list
of
requests
and
consideration
of
available
resources.
It
is
not
intended
to
imply
that
unqualified
requests
do
not
merit
traffic
coming
as
part
of
a
screen
process
working
with
traffic
services.
K
We
will
continue
to
first
consider
simpler
and
quicker
options
to
permanent
traffic
coming
all
qualified
study
requests
are
then
prioritized
citywide
based
on
problem,
severity
and
equity
considerations.
The
processes
to
both
screen
and
prioritize
study
requests
have
been
streamlined
and
simplified.
Datasets
that
that
did
not
add
value
have
been
removed.
Other
datasets
have
been
added
or
modified
to
better
reflect
current
city
policies,
such
as
considerations
for
cycle.
K
The
last
two
phases
of
the
neighborhood
traffic
calming
process
includes
the
study
phase,
where
we
engage
with
residents
and
potential
solutions
and
the
implementation
phase,
where
the
city
carries
out
the
design
and
construction
of
the
approved
measures.
The
processes
in
these
phases
have
also
been
updated
to
help
both
manage
resources
and
public
expectations.
K
Updated
engagement
strategies
such
as
online
surveys
are
being
used
to
reach
a
broader
audience,
making
it
easier
and
convenient
to
provide
feedback
which
will
help
increase
participation
in
the
project.
The
limits
of
each
study
area
will
be
more
refined
to
focus
efforts
on
the
most
problematic
locations
within
the
boundaries
of
each
request
and
finally,
as
previously
indicated,
the
implementation
of
all
approved
traffic
calming
plans
completed
as
part
of
study
phase,
will
generally
proceed
on
a
first
in
first
out
basis
within
the
available
annual
program
funding
levels.
K
K
So,
as
previously
indicated
as
part
of
this
program
update,
we
have
also
developed
traffic
calming
design
guidelines.
We
are
one
of
the
first
modes
polities
to
develop
such
comprehensive
guidelines
specific
to
traffic
calming
traffic.
Calming
measures
can
potentially
be
implemented
on
city
streets
in
a
number
of
ways,
as
standalone
projects
through
our
program
through
Road
renewal
projects
or
as
part
of
development.
The
purpose
of
the
design
guidelines
is
to
establish
consistency
in
a
consideration,
design
and
application
of
traffic
calming
independent
of
the
proponent
or
team
that
is
implementing
the
measures.
K
The
guidelines
adopt
existing
national
guidelines
to
include
Ottawa
specific
guidance
developed
in
consultation
with
key
stakeholders.
They
are
intended
to
help
resolve
long-standing
competing
interests,
as
well
as
reduce
the
repetitive
back-and-forth
technical
reviews
that
we
have
experienced
on
individual
projects.
A
toolbox
of
measures
have
been
included
to
help
educate
stakeholders
by
highlighting
the
primary
potential
advantages
and
disadvantages
of
each
measure,
implementation
considerations
and
Ottawa
specific
context.
Considerations
for
the
various
measures
that
can
be
considered
on
city
streets
proactively.
K
In
this
reference
documents,
guidance
is
provided
with
respect
to
the
consideration
of
primary
road
network
efficiency
such
as
transit
routes,
key
emergency
response
streets
and
road
maintenance
and
operational
requirements.
So
just
those
examples,
the
guidelines
provide
recommendations
for
the
minimum
size
of
pinch
points
on
streets
depending
on
their
operational
needs
or
certain
vertical
elements
such
as
traditional
speed,
humps
are
not
recommended
because
of
the
nature
of
the
street,
either
being
a
high
frequency
transit
route
or
a
key
emergency
response
street
identified
by
emergency
services.
K
K
The
traffic
calming
design
guidelines
will
improve
the
consistency
and
apply
of
traffic
calming
measures,
regardless
of
who
the
proponent
is.
They
will
also
be
another
source
of
Ottawa,
specific
guidance
to
Road
designers
when
using
a
complete
Street
approach
to
assess
potential
improvements
for
all
road
users.
K
Upon
Council's
approval
of
this
program
update,
we
will
finalize
the
documentation
for
the
new
neighbourhood
traffic,
calming
study
process
and
the
traffic
calming
design
guidelines
so
that
they
can
each
be
posted
on
the
city's
website.
We
will
proceed
to
re-screen
Andrea
privatize,
all
current
study
requests
and
advise
ward
councillors
accordingly,
so
we
can
finalize
the
status
of
each
current
study
request
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
moving
forward.
All
new
requests
will
follow
the
new
qualification
and
prioritization
processes.
A
O
Thank
You,
mr.
chairman,
my
name
is
Alex
Cohen
I'm
here
representing
the
Federation
of
citizens
associations.
This
is
an
umbrella
group
of
community
associations
across
the
city
we
have
50.
Members
would
like
to
make
a
small
correction
to
the
report.
We
were
consulted
in
this
process.
Monroe
police,
who
participate
in
this
process.
We
are
in
support
of
the
record
of
the
report,
but
the
reference
in
the
report
refers
to
the
Federation
of
community
associations.
That's
not
us.
We've
been
around
for
30
years.
We
are
the
federation
of
citizens,
associations,
federal,
so
there's
Association.
O
Cv
certainly
is
support
of
this
part
of
this
program
as
I
think
it
comes
as
no
surprise
to
any
councilor
here
that
the
number
one
issue
in
communities
is
traffic-calming
we're
getting
more
and
more
cars.
People
expect
to
get
from
A
to
B
as
fast
as
they
did
in
the
past,
and
it's
not
always
possible,
given
both
the
growth
of
City
congestion
and
there's
a
very,
very
heightened
awareness
of
traffic,
speed
volume
and
safety
in
our
neighborhoods.
The
Federation
has
surveyed
its
members.
This
comes
up.
O
Traffic
comment
comes
up
as
the
number
one
issue
amongst
our
members,
so
supporting
the
program
before
us
was
pleased
to
see
that
it's
going
to
be
more
efficient,
it's
going
to
be
more
streamlined.
The
problem
lies
with
the
fact
that
there's
no
more
money
going
into
this
program
we
have
because
of
limited
funding.
Over
the
years
we've
been
able
to
do
two
or
three
projects
a
year.
There
is
an
extensive
backlog
and
is
frustrating
our
members
that
they
have
identified
programs.
Some
of
them
are
in
the
queue
and
it
takes
four.
O
It
seems
to
take
forever
before
there's
that
project
is
acted
upon
just
last
month.
We
will,
before
this
committee,
asking
for
more
resources
to
go
into
traffic
calming
to
address
that
issue.
So
as
much
as
we're
pleased
to
support
this
report,
you
need
to
put
the
money
to
make
sure
that
the
program
works,
because
it's
unconscionable
that
communities
must
wait
five
six
years
before
their
project
comes
to
the
top
of
the
list.
So
this
is
a
good
good
report.
O
P
A
M
A
quick
comment:
John
thanks
again
for
your
input
on
this
I
lived
when
was
going
to
university
at
4:36
clients
on
the
other
side
of
50,
Kohlberg
and
I.
Do
remember
a
couple
of
the
incidents
that
you're
mentioning.
This
is
a
particularly
bad
area
for
traffic
and
so
I
want
to
let
you
know
that
we
really
appreciate
even
put
on
this
subject.
A
D
K
N
Good
morning
show
we're
pleased
to
be
here
to
ride
committee
and
update
on
review
the
road
activity
by
Allah.
The
relativity
bylaw
is
one
of
the
city's
key
bylaws
and
regulate
the
use
of
our
roads,
particularly
during
construction
activity
and
the
installation
of
utility
work.
This
has
been
a
substantial
project.
The
staff
have
been
undertaking
over
the
course
of
nine
months,
led
by
my
team
I'll,
introduce
Linda,
Carter
program
manager
of
right
away
on
my
far
left
well
McLaughlin,
our
Barbie
specialist,
who
has
been
a
lead
on
this
project
for
the
team
and
Kevin
lamer.
N
Who
is
the
program
manager
inspections?
It's
been
an
integrated
project
to
a
staff
from
across
the
organization,
including
staff
from
infrastructure
services,
Road
services
and
traffic
services
through
also
here
in
the
gallery,
to
provide
support,
as
required
so
at
that
I
will
turn
it
over
to
mr.
McLaughlin
to
lead
you
through
a
brief
presentation.
Thanks.
J
J
With
respect
to
development,
there
is
no
opportunity
within
the
bylaw
currently
to
require
a
developer
to
resurface.
The
road
cuts
that
have
been
done
in
association
with
a
development
to
provide
for
an
improved
surface
reinstatement-
and
this
has
a
particular
impact
on
local
roads,
where
there
is
a
prevalence
of
infill.
J
The
review
of
the
bylaw
is
proceeding
in
three
parts
or
has
three
integrated
parts.
I
should
say.
The
first
is
is
obviously
the
review
of
the
bylaw
itself
and
a
comprehensive
review
of
all
of
its
elements,
and
this
has
included
a
review
of
similar
regulations
and
other
municipalities
across
Canada
to
determine
best
practices.
J
The
second
is
a
comprehensive
review
of
the
business
processes,
including
a
comprehensive
review
of
the
fees,
as
well
as
the
pavement
degradation
fees.
The
third
is
a
move
to
increase
or
augment
the
oversight
of
inspections
related
to
road
activity
and
loan
cuts,
and
this
involves
transferring
the
responsibility
for
low-cut
reinstatement
inspections
from
traffic
services
to
the
inspections,
branch
of
the
right-of-way
heritage
and
urban
design
service
area.
J
The
review
is
being
conducted
in
two
phases.
The
first
phase
is
centered
around
the
necessary
amendments
to
address
immediate
operational
needs,
as
well
as
the
development
resurfacing
and
to
begin
the
inspection
transition
from
traffic
services
over
to
the
inspections
branch
in
related
to
recovery
and
statements.
These
are
the
topics
of
the
report
before
you
today.
The
second
phase
will
focus
on
a
comprehensive
review
of
the
fees.
J
As
mentioned,
the
amendments
proposed
in
this
report
are
intended
to
address
immediate
operational
needs
related
to
achieving
the
objectives
of
the
bylaw
and,
in
particular,
establishing
resurfacing
requirements
for
development.
This
includes
amendments
in
relation
to
pavement
degradation
fees
and
restrictions
on
cuts
into
new
pavement
traffic
management
enforcement
tools.
Public
notification,
as
well
as
the
resurfacing
by
developers
and
I'll
touch
on
each
of
the
each
of
these.
In
the
the
slides
following
this
one,
the
the
amendments
are
proposed
to
come
into
effect
on
the
1st
of
July
this
year.
J
This
is
to
ensure
staff
have
time
to
complete
the
necessary
business
processes,
as
well
as
undertake
the
necessary
training
to
ensure
that
these
amendments
are
implemented
successfully,
as
well
as
to
provide
notice
education
and
an
opportunity
for
transition
for
stakeholders
as
part
of
augmenting
the
oversight
of
Road
cuts.
The
report
recommends
the
creation
of
two
inspector
positions
which,
along
with
1/3
inspector,
come
in
from
traffic
services,
would
provide
for
a
team
of
3
inspection
staff
responsible
for
local
company
and
statement
inspections.
J
As
regards
payment,
devid,
ation
fees
and
restrictions
on
cuts
into
new
pavement
to
provide
the
committee
with
a
bit
of
context
on
each
pavement,
degradation
fees
are
required
when
a
cut
is
made
into
the
roadway
pavement
and
the
intent
of
this
fee
is
to
compensate
the
city
for
the
impact.
The
cut
has
on
an
accelerated
decline
of
the
pavement.
J
Restrictions
on
cuts
in
a
new
payment
I
mean
that
in
the
case
of
roads
that
have
been
constructed,
reconstructed
or
resurfaced
in
the
last
three
years,
no
local
permits
may
be
issued,
except
in
certain
circumstances,
such
as
in
the
case
of
an
emergency
or
in
relation
to
development
under
the
existing
bylaw.
These
regulations
apply
on
arterial
roads
and
it
is
proposed
that
the
application
of
these
regulations
be
expanded
to
all
roads.
J
With
respect
to
traffic
management,
it
is
proposed
to
expand
the
application
of
the
existing
regulations
around
the
mitigation
of
mobility,
specifically
when
a
traffic
management
plan
is
required
as
part
of
a
road
cut.
Permit
application,
as
well
as
where
restrictions
on
work
during
rush
hour
periods
are
to
apply
under
the
existing
bylaw.
These
regulations
are
applicable
on
arterial
roads,
as
well
as
collector
roads
with
best
routes,
and
it
is
proposed
that
these
would
now
apply
on
roads
classified
as
collectors
and
above.
J
J
Existing
enforcement
tools
that
focus
around
the
issuance
of
fines
are
proposed
to
be
strengthened,
with
amendments
that
clarifies
staffs
authority
to
modify,
suspend
revoke
or
refuse
road
cut
permits,
for
example,
where
an
applicant
has
outstanding
deficiencies
or
outstanding
work
under
previously
issued
permits,
as
well
as
the
authority
to
acquire
the
production
of
documents
to
confirm
the
use
of
materials
that
are
in
compliance
with
the
city
standards.
On
a
similar
note,
at
least
two
securities
and
insurance
requirements
are
also
proposed
to
ensure
that
any
risks
to
the
city
or
mitigated.
J
Finally,
amendments
are
proposed
to
authorize
staff
to
require
a
developer
to
resurface
the
road
cuts
associated
with
their
development,
where
there
are
three
or
more
Road
cuts
in
the
pavement.
The
extent
of
the
resurfacing
will
be
based
on
established
and
consistent
criteria,
and
this
will
have
the
added
benefit
of
providing
clear
expectations
for
developers
with
respect
to
these
and
requirements.
J
As
part
of
the
review,
staff
have
consulted
with
a
number
of
external
organizations
whose
members
work
within
the
city's
roads
and
from
these
organizations
representatives
were
solicited
to
form
a
technical
advisory
committee
to
provide
a
forum
for
both
discussion
and
feedback.
In
relation
to
the
proposed
amendments,
an
internal
working
group
of
staff
and
departments
who
work
within
the
city's
roads
was
also
formed
with
a
similar
objective
and
notice.
Two
groups
representing
residents
and
businesses
with
information
and
background
in
relation
to
the
review
was
also
provided
and
you'll
see
on
the
screen.
J
In
terms
of
next
steps,
staff
will
continue
to
work
towards
the
implementation
of
the
amendments
for
July.
The
first
and
application
going
forward
staff
will
be
continuing
the
stakeholder
and
public
engagement
as
the
review
progresses
into
the
second
phase
as
well
as
beginning.
The
second
phase
is
the
review.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
B
You
I
thank
you
mr.
chair,
and
thank
you
to
staff
for
making
himself
available.
We
met
with
academic
with
most
committee
member
when
you
talk
about
hire
enough
to
inspectors,
and
is
there
some
cost
recovery
when
we
hire
those
folks,
won't
they
go
on
the
road
and
do
their
job?
Is
there
some
kind
of
cost
recovery
on
this.
K
D
The
current
cost
recovery
would
be
through
the
permanent
process
itself,
but
that's
part
of
our
conversation
for
the
second
phase
counselor,
to
look
at
those
two
streams
so
for
projects
that
are
larger
in
duration
and
larger
in
context.
There
may
be
opportunities,
then,
to
look
at
direct
charges
for
the
inspection
fees.
B
B
Seen
in
the
past
is
the
lack
of
inspector
available
to
monitor
and
sometimes
will
cost
the
city
more,
if
don't
have
an
inspector
on
the
site
to
make
sure
protect
our
asset,
and
so
I
was
just
wondering.
It
doesn't
seem
to
include
that
in
your
presentation
there,
either
the
cost
recovery
or
the
cost
saving.
When
you
have
those
people
monitor
and
when
we
see
inspector
monitoring
hours.
D
Yes,
we
would
agree
with
you
that
that
certainly
is
why
we're
doing
that
more
comprehensive
review
of
all
of
those
costs
and
business
process.
In
the
second
phase,
we
needed
to
get
this
initial
work
done
at
least
to
get
the
additional
inspectors
to
assist
us
now.
But
there
is
a
more
comprehensive
fee
review
coming
and.
B
J
And
mr.
chair,
certainly,
we
have
been
notifying
the
Ottawa
Council
of
the
system
proven
areas
as
part
of
this
report
and
then
continue
to
consult
with
them
throughout
the
second
phase
of
this
review
and
as
regards
particular
world
works
and
and
notification
with
respect
to
those,
it
is
the
intent
that,
by
augmenting
the
notice
requirements
to
include
the
ward
councillors
that
they
would
then
push
that
notification
out
to
their
communities
into
the
businesses.
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
chair.
M
Joe,
just
a
very
brief,
thank
you
to
the
team
for
everything
you've
done
nine
months
of
work
to
get
to
this
point
and
I
know,
there's
more
to
come.
I
have
been
pestering
senior
management
about
this
for
several
years
now,
as
the
houses
and
kitchen
Sippy
keep
coming
down
and
getting
replaced
with
with
infill
every
one
of
those
is
a
road
cut.
The
quality
of
our
roads
is
deteriorating.
M
B
A
But
and
councillor
Alcantara
just
said
good
job
meeting
with
all
the
members
of
the
committee.
So
thank
you
for
that
court
and
team.
The
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
councillors
report
review
of
winter
maintenance
standards.
There
is
no
presentation
on
this,
but
we'll
give
councillor
Calvin
on
ensure
an
opportunity
to
speak
to
it
before
we
take
the
polar
delegations.
I
Thank
you
very
much
mr.
chair.
First
of
all,
I
would
like
to
thank
all
the
city
staff,
particularly
mr.
Wylie,
on
his
leadership
on
this.
This
is
obviously
very,
very
timely.
We've
just
experienced
a
very,
very
difficult
winter
and
we've
seen
conditions
we've
never
seen
before.
Our
standards
that
have
been
previously
in
place,
just
didn't,
didn't
cut
it
and
I
think
we
all
recognize
that,
and
it
was
time
for
a
review.
I
One
of
the
big
factors
that
we
had
was
was
ice
ice
was
is
not
something
that
we
have
really
addressed
in
the
standards
and
it's
been
incredibly
difficult
to
deal
with,
particularly
for
pedestrians,
and
it's
something
that
is
very
problematic
in
terms
of
just
getting
to
the
bus
stop
getting
to
school.
It's
it's
stuff,
we've
never
seen.
Climate
change
is
a
big
factor.
I
I
R
Hello,
chairman
transportation
committee
members
I'm
here
representing
ecology,
Ottawa
and
we're
here
to
express
our
support
for
the
motion,
we'd
like
to
thank
first
of
all
councillor
Kavanagh
for
bringing
this
motion
forward
and
also
the
Council
on
Aging's
age-friendly,
pedestrian
safety
and
walkability
committee
for
the
advocacy
on
this
important
issue.
As
we
all
know,
pedestrian
access
is
critically
important
to
a
healthy,
vibrant
and
inclusive
city.
With
climate
change,
the
challenge
of
maintaining
mobility
on
Ottawa's
roads
pathways
and
sidewalks
has
grown
more
difficult
since
the
sea
last
updated.
R
Ottawa's
changing
weather
patterns
have
also
impacted
cyclists
in
Ottawa,
especially
as
year
round
cycling
has
become
increasingly
popular.
Ray's
and
bike
lanes
on
our
roads
are
too
often
I
see
employment,
and
we
know
the
City
of
Ottawa
wants
to
encourage
more
cycling
and
that
safety
is
a
primary
consideration
for
potential
cyclists.
We
also
know
that
the
city's
Complete
Streets
policy
is
designed
to
integrate
cycling
options
into
Ottawa
streets
at
scale.
This
policy
was
developed
2013
long
after
the
last
review
of
the
winter
maintenance
standards.
R
We
were
therefore
encourage
review
of
the
WMS
that
integrates
the
objectives
of
the
Complete
Streets
policy
and
improve
snow
and
ice
remediation
on
ottawa's
bike
paths
and
street
lanes.
We
ask
the
members
of
this
committee
recognize
the
need
to
update
and
improve
the
city's
snow
and
ice
core
standards
and
support
this
motion.
Thank
you
for
your
consideration.
A
M
Can
all
take
advantage
of
having
the
mic
mr.
st.
nei
I
agree
entirely
with
you.
That
said
that
we
need
to
accelerate
this
process.
Counselor
Cavanaugh
does
have
a
motion.
She
doesn't
sit
on
this
committee,
but
I'll
put
it
forward
on
her
behalf
to
amend
the
timeline.
Counselor
Cavanaugh's
motion
reads,
therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
this
item
be
amended
such
that
staff
will
bring
forward
a
report
for
consideration
as
part
of
the
2021
budget.
I
believe
right
now.
The
report
currently
reads:
2022,
so
I'll
put
that
on
the
floor
now.
Mr.
M
Santee
I
do
have
a
question
for
you,
which
is
with
respect
to
the
timelines
and
the
need
to
study.
It
isn't
actually
immediately
apparent
to
me
how
we
adjust
our
budget
to
spend
on
sidewalk
clearing,
particularly
in
light
of
the
fact
that
the
the
current
sidewalk
standards,
the
current
way
we
plow
our
sidewalks,
are
for
an
environment
that
was
very
different.
M
15
years
ago
we
go
out
and
we
we
try
to
plow
our
sidewalks
and
we
try
to
salt
and
gripped
our
sidewalks
and
I'm
not
entirely
certain
that
simply
spending
more
money
on
more
plowing,
more
salt,
more
grit
is
the
best
way
to
actually
address
winters
that
are
very
different
from
what
they
were
when
I
was
growing
up
in
Ottawa.
If
the
city
were
to
spend
more
money-
and
we
wanted
to
do
it
immediately,
how
would
you
spend
that
money.
Q
M
A
M
I
You
very
much
mr.
chair
and
thank
you
very
much
mr.
Santini
for
coming
out.
I
know
you
never
meant
to
be
a
poster
boy
for
this.
This
motion
was
something
that
came
out
of
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
work.
A
lot
of
observation
of
just
how
serious
the
the
climate
change
has
has
influenced
the
weather
patterns,
as
you
have
pointed
out,
including
tornadoes
everything
else
and
how
we
have
to
take
a
good,
solid,
look
at
it
and
with
with
great
respect
to
do
it
right
away.
I
A
I.
Thank
you
much.
Thank
you
for
coming
out
to
mr.
Santini
and
I
noticed.
You
came
in
before
the
afghulis
started
a
meeting,
and
so
you
may
have
missed
that
after
this
item,
we're
going
to
be
debating
an
item
to
do
an
immediate
review
of
our
operations
for
winter
operations
for
implementation,
this
coming
winter,
and
so
that
might
bring
you
some
some
relief.
Thank
you
very
much
for
coming
out.
Q
P
A
A
O
Thank
you
normally,
with
respect
to
the
organization's
I
represent
it's
not
so
much
that
I
wish
to
make
the
presentations,
but
that
my
membership
in
the
Federation
of
citizens,
associations
have
a
message
to
deliver
and
unfortunately,
unfortunately
is
the
case.
Maybe
they've
chosen
me,
but
shoulder
it
mentally,
so
I'm
here
representing
the
Federation
citizens
associations
I'm
very
pleased
to
support
all
our
association
is
very
pleased
to
support
the
initiative
here
to
review
the
neutral
maintenance
standards.
We
have
been
asking
for
this.
The
Federation
has
been
asking
for
this
for
the
past
two
years.
O
The
city
has
a
transportation
master
plan
that
calls
for
increased,
walking,
cycling,
transit
use,
although
as
a
winter
city,
so
those
goals
don't
apply
just
over
the
summer
months.
They
must
also
apply
in
the
winter
months
and
clearly
we
need
to
change
our
standards
in
order
to
achieve
those
goals
so
that
more
people
can
walk
safely.
Sunday
cycle
I
certainly
use
a
road
safely
in
the
wintertime,
as
well
as
the
offseason
from
winter.
O
The
one
issue
that
I
want
to
bring
to
your
attention
is
the
language:
that's,
as
in
a
staffer
provided
in
council
Washington's
inquiry
about
winter
standards
is
the
second
page
modern
paragraph
or
speaks
to
the
timing.
Given
the
time
requirements
for
extensive
public
and
council
consultations,
scoping
selection
and
completion
of
the
review
reporting,
an
approval
by
Council
and
any
procurement
activities
related
to
the
recommendations
approved
by
council
management.
We
expect
a
revised
maintenance
quality
standards
to
be,
in
effect
for
the
2020
223
winter
season
and
I
noticed
motion.
O
The
initial
motion
that
was
provided
talks
about
having
a
report
for
consideration
that
would
be
going
through
to
the
2022
budget.
So
I
just
want
you
to
folks
to
pause
and
think
of
it.
We've
had,
and
you
expect
people
to
go
through
the
winter
of
2019
2020
from
the
same
standards,
the
winter
of
2020
2021
with
the
same
standards,
and
if
you
adopt
the
stock
proposal,
Twenty
twenty
one,
twenty
twenty
two
in
the
same
standards
no
I
knew
this
is
Ottawa,
will
be
accredit.
O
Things
are
slow,
but
to
expect
residents
of
Ottawa
to
live
through
three
more
winters
with
quality
standards.
That
community
is
not
just
the
FCA,
but
the
Council
on
Aging
and
others
have
brought
to
your
attention
and
said
this
is
not
adequate.
Is
too
long.
So
you
need
to
duck
from
that
as
kind
of
a
leaper
suggesting
a
very
good
step,
still
news,
then
we
want
to
go
through
two
more
winters
without
noted
standards,
so
I
would
suggest
that
you
might
want
to
consider
that
and
that's
my
presentation.
Mr.
Sherman
thank.
A
L
We
don't
have
funding
to
do
the
study.
Currently
we
don't
have
the
scope
done
yet
and
I
actually
thank
councillor
Cavanaugh
for
bringing
forth
emotion,
because
that
does
inform
our
scope.
If
the
motion
does
pass,
we
will
be
scoping.
The
study
costing
this
costume,
not
scope
and
getting
it
into
the
next
budget
cycle,
which
will
start
I'll
remind
counselors,
will
start
in
the
late
summer.
Early
fall
that
budget
will
pass
and
funds
will
be
available
in
January
of
2020.
L
It's
not
a
two-year
study,
it'll
be
a
one-year
study.
There's
as
councillor
Cavanaugh
pointed
out,
it's
a
very
comprehensive
study
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
cover
all
the
details,
because
we
want
to
come
back
to
Council
and
committee,
with
full
flexibility,
full
list
of
options
and
and
different
costing
solutions
for
council
to
consider
and
some
of
the
things
we'll
be
looking
at.
L
You
know:
there's
a
ton
of
data
collection
that
we'll
have
to
do,
for
instance,
if
we're
looking
at
sidewalks
around
transit
hubs
or
residential
roads
that
don't
have
sidewalks
around
schools
that
that
all
has
to
be
collected,
we'll
be
identifying
the
options,
as
I
said
costing.
Resourcing
those
options,
then
we
want
to
consult
fully
with
on
all
the
options
that
we
identify,
then
we'll
be
preparing
a
staff
report
going
to
committee
and
going
to
Council
and
that
it
has
to
be
inputted
into
the
next
budget
cycle,
which
again
will
be
summer
2020.
C
C
Understand
I
mean,
obviously
we
need
to
take
the
time
to
do
this
properly,
but
your
motion,
mr.
chair,
seems
to
be
trying
to
address
some
short-term
mitigation
measures.
While
we
do
the
longer
term
study
is
that
right
and
just
trying
to
understand
the
difference
between
the
two
motions
you
think
we
could
accomplish
with
the
short-term
motion.
While
we
await
the
actual
study
that
considered
kind
of
an
odd
suggesting
well.
A
Thank
you
so
the
motion
that
will
come
after
this
is
to
direct
staff
to
do
an
operational
review
of
winter
maintenance
and
report
back
to
us
late
late
summer
and
early
fall
before
this
winter
season
on
improvements
they
can
make
for
this
winter
season.
I
know
as
the
counselor
for
Cumberland
I've
often
heard.
C
C
L
Yes,
we
do
the
way
I
look
at
is
chair.
Blaze
motion
talks
about
an
internal
review.
Mqs
review
will
definitely
be
an
external
public
review,
but
in
terms
of
the
operational
review
that
we'll
be
conducting
over
the
summer,
we'll
be
looking
at
deployment.
Consistency,
as
the
chair
said,
we'll
be
looking
at
resource
balancing
between
our
four
districts,
we'll
be
looking
at
potentially
geographic
boundaries,
etc.
So
those
are
things
we
can
do
internally
to
better
position
as
ourselves
for
deployment
this
winter.
C
Today,
you
know
the
challenges
that
Thunder
pool
citizens
face
in
winter,
like
this
one
and
I'm
just
wondering.
If
there's
some
way
of
doing
some
mapping
obviously
couldn't
capture
every
one,
but
if
there's
pockets
have
senior
citizens,
for
example,
if
there's
some
standard
that
we
could
be
looking
at
to
assist
those
those
people
in
the
winter
yeah.
L
C
N
Very
much
chair,
we
held
a
snow-clearing
forum
this
on
the
20th
and
it
was
very
successful
in
terms
of
having
the
number
of
folks
that
came
out.
How
do
people
out
there,
mostly
from
urban
wards,
but
the
issues
that
they
were
raising,
certainly
relevant
for
rural
areas
and
suburban
areas
in
the
city.
So
I
just
want
to
thank
mr.
Wiley
mr.
Diaz,
who
was
there
as
well
and
mr.
Gagne,
who
participated
in
that.
N
One
of
the
things
that
came
out
of
that
forum
was
the
need
to
really
review
the
standards
and
there
was
a
commitment
made
there,
and
so
I
just
want
to
get
down
to
the
timing
of
this.
Because
the
motion,
the
motion,
talks
about
part
of
the
2022
budget,
but
but
normally
I
think
we
wouldn't
actually
bring
this
type
of
a
policy
to
the
budget
it
would
be.
It
would
be
before
that
to
make
sure
that
we've
got
our
issues
aligned
and
then
I
also
read
in
an
inquiry
response.
N
I
guess
to
councilor
Brockington
is
inquiry
that
we
may
see
the
maintenance
quality
standards
implemented
as
late
as
the
winter
of
2023,
and
so
I
just
want
to
be
clear
on
that
that
we're
going
to
get
these
new
maintenance
quality
standards
done
this
term
and
that
the
implementation
of
them
will
occur.
This
term.
L
N
Okay
and
I,
just
I,
guess
to
reiterate
I
think
this
may
be
I'm
speaking
out
of
turn
here
chair,
but
I,
think
this
committee
and
this
council
wants
to
see
implementation
this
term.
If
it's,
if
it
happens,
to
be
that
the
report
comes
at
a
different
time,
I'm
fine
with
that,
but
I
want
I,
want
to
see
it
implemented
that,
before
the
end
of
the
term
in
2022
said,
the
bat
winter
by
2022
is
seeing
the
changes
that
we
need
to
see
so
I
like
the
regardless
of
the
motive,
the
cabin
our
motion.
N
A
You
very
much
just
to
remind
everyone.
The
2022
budget
will
be
tabled
and
debated
in
the
fall
of
2021,
which
means
mr.
Liles
report
will
presumably
be
wrapped
up
before
that
time.
So
it's
really
not
a
two-year
study.
It's
more
like
a
one-year
study,
as
mr.
Wylie
had
mentioned,
and
so
counselor
do
does
it
counselor
do
is
fine
counselor,
leepu
I?
Have
you
down.
M
L
M
The
current
timetable
and
I
just
wanna
make
sure
that
I
understand
the
timing.
Well
in
December
2019
you
are
expecting
council
will
give
you.
You
know
that
quarter
million
dollars
in
order
to
launch
the
study,
correct
and
I.
Don't
doubt
the
council
well
I,
think
I've
heard
for
the
first
time
since
I've
been
elected.
You
know
a
clear
acceptance
by
everybody
around
this
table
that
we
have
to
do
better
on
sidewalks.
So
you
cannot
have
that
study
done,
August
of
2020
them
no.
L
Chair
with
I
mean
to
be
completely
honest.
If
we
took
a
very
appalled
at
a
simplistic
approach
and
just
decided
to
fast-track
it,
we
would
come
up
with
options
like
there
are
four
residential
roads.
There
are
fall,
sidewalks,
of
course,
the
resource,
and
costing
of
that
would
be
quite
substantial
and
I.
L
M
We
had
it
by
August
of
2020.
We
could
get
that
into
the
the
subsequent
budget
cycle,
but
you're
saying
we
just
won't
have
time
and
is
there
no
way
and
I'm
sorry.
This
is
something
that
probably
should
have
come
to
the
table
sooner,
but
accordingly
knows
within
our
budget
seems
like
something
that
we
should
be
able
to
find
sooner.
L
M
E
You
mr.
chair,
you
know
I
think
we
all
went
through
this
last
winter.
I
know,
I
talked
a
lot
with
Kevin's
team
over
sidewalk
clearing
in
my
area
and
I
I
never
had
one
resident
contact
me
and
say:
please
study
this.
Please
get
a
report
done
quicker
on
this.
What
they
asked
me
to
do
was
fix
it
and
get
out
there
and
get
the
sidewalks
clear.
E
I
saw
your
staff
experiment
what
new
equipment
this
year
to
try
to
find
a
way
to
get
through
the
ice
that
was
in
the
sidewalks
and
I
saw
a
lot
of
extra
effort
being
put
in
there.
As
you
mentioned,
you
used
a
lot
of
your
budget
to
bring
out
more
removal
teams
to
try
and
deal
with
this
so
I'm
not
going
to
support
the
Cavanaugh
motion
because
I
don't
think
any
one
of
our
residents
really
want
to
see
a
study.
E
What
they
want
to
see
is
us
do
something
to
fix
this,
and
so
the
chairs
motion
to
have
an
operational
review
and
come
back
before
next
winter,
with
ideas
on
how
we're
going
to
do
a
better
job.
If
we
face
another
winter
like
we
just
did
I
think
it's
the
way
to
go
so
I'll
be
supported
in
the
chair.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
so
DubLi
councilman
I
would
like
to
me
to
clarify
that
the
recommendations
on
what
the
process
will
deliver
will
actually
be
public
in
2021,
because
we
debate
the
2022
budget
in
2021
in
the
fall.
This
year's
budget
is
an
aberration
because
of
the
election
year.
Obviously
councilor
the
ruse
Thank.
F
You
mr.
chair
and
I
will
I
will
be
supporting
the
chair,
a
motion
and
for
few
reason-
and
one
of
it
is
I-
know
that
we've
been
debating
this
and
I
know.
We
did
have
very
hard
winter
mother
nature
tried
us
in
every
every
tools
that
she
have
in
her
and
to
make
our
winter
hard
and
this
year
I
know
the
ice
and
snow
was
was
very
heavy
this
year,
but
I.
F
We
need
to
make
sure
we
need
to
be
able
to
give
those
tools
and
this
ability
to
our
supervisors
and
Road
supervisor
that
any
are
to
be
able
to
deploy
equipment
and
we
cannot
wait
to
have
eight
centimeter
cross
or
because
sometimes
you
will
have
a
freezing
rain
and
Orleans
and
you'll
have
a
snow
in
Canada
or
south,
and
you
know
that
we
cannot
control
these,
so
I.
Hope
for
that.
F
F
C
It's
time
to
do
a
comprehensive
look
at
the
service
standard
in
this
area,
and
that's
going
to
take
time
and
resources,
and
it's
something
that
the
staff
suggest
that
we
do
think
is
timely
to
do
and
we
should
get
on
with
it.
So
I,
don't
know
why
we
wouldn't
do
both
and
that's
just
all
I
wanted
to
point
out.
Okay,.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
so
the
question
before
us
is
actually
the
amendment
to
change
the
report
to
2021
which
staff
say
they
cannot
accommodate.
My
recommendation
is
to
not
support
the
amendment
because
it
cannot
be
accommodated
within
the
work
plan
of
staff
as
it
is
today
and
there
are
not
any
financial
resources
to
accommodate
to
accommodate
that.
N
Just
have
a
further
very
quick
amendment
chair
to
the
main
motion
and-
and
it's
just
to
change
it
exactly
what
you
had
said
before
bring
forward
a
report
for
consideration
not
as
part
of
the
2022
budget,
but
within
2021.
That's
what
we've
heard
from
staff.
That's
what
you
confirmed!
We're
gonna,
see
a
report
in
2021,
just
not
part
of
the
budget,
so
it
would
be
removing
as
part
of
the
2022
budget
and
say
for
consideration
in
2021
and
leave
it
there,
which
is
what
we've
all
confirmed,
is
going
to
happen
here
today.
E
A
A
This
is
a
policy
request.
We
were
asking
staff
to
develop
a
policy,
not
a
nod
of
Finance,
not
a
budget
request,
so
the
policy
document
would
come
back
sometime
in
2021,
which
was
always
the
plan,
because
the
2022
budget
will
be
debated
in
September
or
October
of
2021
and
so
councilor
Menards
amendment
has
no
real
effect,
but
I
don't
care
if
it
passes
one
way
or
the
other.
N
I
L
A
A
Sidewalks
and
whereas
residents
and
councillors
have
highlighted
concerns
with
the
current
operational
approaches
and
identified
a
need
for
more
consistent
service
delivery
across
the
city
and
where
staff
recognized
the
need
to
improve
service
delivery
in
advance
of
refresh
and
the
current
maintenance.
Quality
standards
therefore
be
resolved
that
the
Transportation
Committee
direct
staff
to
conduct
a
service
delivery
overview
of
winter
operations,
including
consistency
of
service
across
the
city
and
report
back
to
the
committee,
with
their
findings
ahead
of
the
1920
winter
season,
is
carried.
B
M
Your
chair,
so
we've
already
received
the
waiver
to
have
this
on
the
agenda.
This
is
with
respect
to
shirring
and
our
rights-of-ways,
where,
as
the
general
manager
of
planning
infrastructure
and
economic
development
does
not
have
within
the
delegation
of
authority
by
law,
the
ability
to
to
enter
into
agreements
to
permit
bike
sharing
services,
where
a
cyclist
pays
for
the
rental
of
a
bike
from
a
station,
often
located
in
the
right-of-way
and
whereas
bike
sharing
promotes
the
goals
of
the
City
of
Ottawa,
cycling
strategy.
M
Review
of
bike
sharing
and
bike
parking
will
begin
in
2019
as
part
of
the
development
of
a
bike
parking
strategy
for
the
City
of
Ottawa.
And
whereas
the
National,
Capital,
Commission
and
city
of
Gatineau
are
also
reviewing
bike
sharing
agreements
and
have
expressed
an
interest
in
developing
a
consistent
approach
for
the
region
and
whereas
the
vendors
will
be
responsible
for
installing,
maintaining
and
removing
bikes
and
dock
with
stations,
and
whereas
the
potential
location
of
the
site
shall
be
reviewed
by
city
staff
to
ensure
all
operational
and
technical
approvals
are
in
place.
M
That
should
the
province
of
Ontario
permit
the
legal
operation
of
electric
scooters
on
public
roadways,
that
city
staff
study
the
regulation
of
electric
scooter,
sharing
and
parking
as
part
of
the
aforementioned
bike
parking
strategy
and
extend
the
bike.
Sharing
pilot
provisions
to
electric
scooter
sharing
companies
as
well
for
2019.
N
The
PRF
has
only
been
installed
within
paved
parking
areas
in
accordance
with
the
NPMs
objective
of
financial
self
sustainability
and
whereas
the
installation
of
sufficient
high
quality
bicycle
parking
at
OC
Transpo
bus
stops
throughout
the
city,
both
within
and
outside
of
paid
parking
areas,
will
encourage
transit,
ridership
and
cycling
by
facilitating
multimodal
use
and
where
a
staff
began.
A
pilot
project
in
2018
by
starting
the
installation
of
ring
and
post
bicycle
parking
at
50.
Oc
transfer
bus
stops
within
the
existing
budgets
and
where
a
staff
believes
that
ring
and
post
bicycle
parking
could
be
installed.
N
Therefore,
be
it
resolved
that
Transportation
Committee
recommend
that
city
council
waive
the
requirements
of
the
city's
municipal
parking
management
strategy
to
install
bike
racks
only
in
paid
parking
areas
and
extend
the
pilot
project
for
2019
to
install
bike
racks
at
up
to
an
additional
50.
Oc
transfer
bus
stops
both
within
and
outside
paid
parking
areas,
as
described
in
this
motion
to
be
funded
from
within
the
existing
parking
operations
budget.