►
From YouTube: Committee on Rules 6-12-2018
Description
The Committee on Rules of the Council of the City of Philadelphia held a Public Hearing on Tuesday, June 12, 2018 to hear testimony on the following items:
Agenda: https://phila.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=601942&GUID=D6BCE3DE-8F64-48CD-8D0C-F2E98DFC35C6
Committee on Rules
Chair: Councilman Bill Greenlee (At Large)
Vice Chair: Councilman Mark Squilla (1st District)
A
B
A
C
Bill
number
one:
eight:
zero
one:
zero:
zero;
an
ordinance
to
amend
the
Philadelphia
zoning
maps
by
changing
the
zoning
designations
of
certain
areas
of
land
located
with
an
area
bounded
by
Broad
Street
Susquehanna,
Avenue,
13th,
Street
and
Diamond
Street.
Further
to
adapt
the
master
plan
amendment
for
Temple
University
and
to
approve
the
construction
project
on
the
site
proposed
for
rezoning
and
to
approve
the
removal
of
previously
prank
planned
construction
projects
from
the
master
plan
and.
D
A
C
Bill
number
1,
8
0
4
2
3
an
ordinance
to
amend
the
Philadelphia
zoning
maps
by
changing
the
zoning
designations
of
certain
areas
of
land
located
with
an
area
bounded
by
the
Delaware
River
Pennypack
Street
extended
State
Road
Ron
Street,
Frankfort,
Avenue,
Academy,
Road
and
Linden
Avenue
extended.
Thank.
E
This
area
is
in
the
North
Delaware
district
plan,
which
was
adopted
by
the
Planning
Commission
on
March
2016.
The
district
plan
process
included
a
vetting
of
almost
all
the
proposed
changes.
Philadelphia
City
Planning
Commission
will
consider
bill
number
one
804
to
3.
That's
meeting
of
June
12th
this
year,
where
the
staff
will
recommended
for
approval
and
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank.
E
A
A
E
F
Good
morning
my
name
is
Stanley
cywinski
I
am
the
president
of
the
upper
hallsburg
Civic
Association
God,
all
right
good
morning,
council,
president
and
city
council.
Again,
my
name
is
Stanley
cywinski
I
am
the
president
of
the
Opera,
House
or
Civic
Association
I'm
here
today
to
present
testimony
for
our
community
on
the
unilateral
remapping
and
rezoning
being
proposed
in
our
district.
That
issue
for
today's
hearing
that
issue
for
today's
hearing
are
the
changes
listed
on
I.
Believe
you
have
the
map
map,
a2
and
b2.
F
The
map
is
actually
on
my
page
10.
It
shows
a
large
portion
of
property
currently
owned
by
the
Marci
family,
being
changed
from
residential
RS
d3
to
ICM,
X
and
C
a2,
which
is
a
proposed
plan
for
all
Wawa
site.
Now,
let
me
get
to
why
I'm
here
objecting
to
this
proposal
on
behalf
of
the
community
of
Upper
Holmesburg
back
in
2010,
City
Planning
implemented
the
upper
house
Berg
2035
plan.
As
you
know,
the
2035
initiative
was
a
future
looking
view
of
our
community.
F
For
about
a
year,
multiple
meetings
at
multiple
locations
were
planned
on
our
future
direction,
the
town
hall
meetings
and
breakout
sessions.
It
was
a
collaborative
effort
between
city
agencies
and
neighboring
communities.
In
the
end,
it
produced
a
document
called
the
upper
Holmesburg
north,
the
neighborhood
goal
and
strategies
report.
If
it's
something
you
need
to
have,
City
Planning
does
have,
and
I
do
have
one
copy
here.
F
That
report
resulted
in
a
crystal
clear
decision
on
the
properties
in
question
that
they
should
remain
residential,
RS
d3,
and
that
was
the
preferred
zoning
designation
by
all
the
communities
involved.
So
at
this
time
we're
at
least
until
some
additional
compelling
information
can
be
provided
to
our
community.
We
respectfully
request
that
city
council
does
not
support
this
bill.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
C
E
Counselor
Greeley
remember
the
Rules
Committee
I'm
Marta
Gregor
school,
with
the
City
Planning
Commission
bill
number
one
804
to
4
rule
men's
sections,
14
603
of
the
Philadelphia
Code
use
specific
standards
by
amending
the
number
of
curb
cuts
permitted
for
certain
zoning
districts.
The
bill
proposes
to
allow
additional
curb
cuts
for
new
or
expanded
vehicle
fueling
stations
that
are
located
on
property,
zoned,
C,
a1
or
CA,
auto
oriented
commercials
if
two
or
more
fuel
pumps
or
more
than
1500
square
feet
of
floor
area
or
paved
area
are
added
to
an
existing
vehicle
fueling
station.
E
These
amendments
will
apply
to
that
fueling
station.
Additionally,
both
new
and
existing
vehicle
fueling
stations
must
have
300
or
more
lineal
feet
of
street
frontage
along
a
single
Street
for
the
new
standards
to
apply
the
amendment.
This
amended
section
allows
for
two
curb
cuts
for
every
street
frontage
of
the
property.
As
long
as
the
two
curb
cuts
are
separated
by
a
minimum
of
100
feet
and
have
a
maximum
width
of
24
feet
per
curb
cut.
There
provides
both
ingress
and
egress
or
12
feet
per
curb
cut.
E
E
A
Make
sure
all
the
t's
across
okay
all
right
got
you
any
questions
for
mr.
Gorski
on
this
bill,
seeing
none
anyone
else
here
to
testify.
I'm
bill
number
one:
eight
zero,
four,
two
four
seeing
none
before
we
go
to
our
next
bill.
Please
let
the
record
reflect
Council
Blackwell
is
president
I
know
she
has
a
bill
coming
up
in
a
few
minutes:
Thank
You
mr.
Marconi.
Our
next
bill.
Please
bill.
E
It
seeks
to
correct
zoning
to
match
existing
land
uses
and
is
consistent
with
the
community
goals
and
recommendations
of
the
Lower
South
District
plant
Planning
Commission
staff
has
worked
with
the
leadership
of
the
metrans
stadium,
neighborhood
Civic
Association
on
this
remapping
Philadelphia
City
Planning
Commission
considerable
number,
one,
eight,
oh
four,
to
six
at
its
meeting
of
May
15th
of
this
year
and
recommended
it
for
approval
and
I'd,
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
at
this
time.
Thank.
A
E
Council
member
Greenlee
member
of
the
Rules
Committee
I'm
here
to
testify
I'm
bill
number
1
804
to
7,
which
was
introduced
in
the
City
Council
on
May
3rd
of
this
year
by
Councilman
O'neill.
This
bill
Reserve's
part
of
the
Parkwood
neighborhood
in
the
lower
for
north
east
planning
district
of
philadelphia.
It
seeks
to
match
the
existing
the
zoning
with
the
existing
land
use
that
is
consistent
with
the
community
goals
and
recommendations
of
the
far
northeast
districts
plan.
E
A
E
Chairman
green
lay
members,
Rules
Committee,
Marty
Gruber
asked
you
at
the
Philadelphia
City
Planning
Commission
I'm
here
to
testify
on
bill
number
one:
eight,
oh
four,
five
one
which
is
reintroduced
in
the
City
Council
on
May
10th
of
this
year
by
councilmember
Blackwell
bill
number
one,
eight,
oh
four.
Five
one
approves
a
special
purpose:
institutional
Spinz
district
master
plan
amendment
for
the
university
of
pennsylvania
to
permit
the
construction
of
three
adjacent
buildings
collectively
referred
to
as
the
new
College
House
West.
The
project
site
is
3900.
E
246
Walnut
Street
will
occupy
much
of
the
existing
open
space,
southeast
of
the
intersection
of
walnut
and
South
40th
Street.
The
development
will
expand
the
districts
occupied
area
by
42,000
542
square
feet.
That's
gross
floor
area
by
two
hundred
forty
five
thousand
square
feet
together.
The
buildings
will
serve
as
a
Stewart
student
dormitory
for
the
University
and
will
include
associated
uses.
The
arrangement
of
the
buildings
will
create
a
public
green
space.
E
The
Civic
design
review
committee
held
a
meeting
on
this
project
on
April
3rd
of
this
year,
where
this
project
was
seen
for
the
second
and
final
time:
completing
the
Civic
design
review
process.
Philadelphia
City
Planning
Commission
considered
Bill
number
one
804
51,
that's
meeting
of
April
17th
of
this
year,
where
they
recommended
it
for
approval
I'd,
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
at
this
time.
All.
A
D
You
we
are
happy
to
support
this
bill.
As
has
been
noted,
it
amends
the
master
plan,
which
means
it's
in
pen
areas,
so
it
doesn't
affect
for
the
most
part.
Of
course
it
will
service
the
area,
but
it's
in
the
pen
area,
so
it
doesn't
affect
anyone
else
and
I
also
wanted
to
thank
you
all
for
agreeing
or
for
considering
holding
the
first
bill,
and
that
was
because
one
of
the
members
of
council
wants
to
amend
it
and
has
not
yet
prepared
the
amendments
that
they
request.
Thank
you.
I'm.
A
H
E
Way
parking
works
for
the
universities
is
its
parking
for
the
entire
district.
So
when
you
build
a
new
building,
there's
a
parking
requirement,
but
it
doesn't
have
to
necessarily
be
right
next
to
the
building
where
you're
putting
it
Penn
has
over
double
the
required
parking
and
has
what
over
doubled
double
the
required
parking.
Okay,.
H
A
Thank
You
Councilwoman
any
other
questions
for
mr.
Gorsky
on
this
bill.
Seeing
none
anyone
else
here
to
testify
on
build
number
one:
eight,
zero,
four,
five
one
seeing
none!
Thank
you!
I'm
gonna
bet
the
request
of
the
sponsor
we're
gonna
go
back
to
bill
number
one:
eight
zero!
Four,
two,
three
and
I
want
to
recognize:
councilman,
Eamon,
Thank.
I
I
And
again
mr.
chair
I
apologize
for
going
out
of
order.
It's
usually
it's
sort
of
unprecedent
and
stand
again.
You
know
my
apologize
to
you
for
not
having
the
opportunity
to
you
know,
get
a
couple
things
on
the
record.
So
if
you
can
explain
to
Michael,
if
you
can
explain
the
project
in
brief
and
I
just
want
to,
you
know
after
you
explain
the
project
you
know
and
working
with
the
community
I
wanted
to
also
make
a
comment.
Please
identify
yourself.
G
A
G
Michael
Cooley
of
the
prop
Rothko
group,
the
proposed
project,
consists
of
subdividing
or
relocating
lot
lines
on
the
what
is
referred
to
as
the
Marcie
tract
on
Frankfort
Avenue,
between
Academy
Road
and
Linden
Avenue.
It's
approximately
27
acre
parcel
currently
currently
used
for
the
operation
of
the
Marcy
construction
and
paving
company
I'm,
looking
to
subdivide
approximately
2
acres
off
of
the
corner
at
the
intersection
of
Frankfort
and
Academy,
and
redevelop
the
2
acres
for
a
prototypical
Wawa
cubanía
store
with
fueling
stations.
I
And
mr.
cywinski,
thank
you
for
for
being
here
you
and
your
executive
board.
I
know:
we've
had
several
meetings
regarding
you
know
the
quality
of
neighbor
in
access
and
and
safety
of
the
community.
I
don't
know
if
you
wanted
to
add
anything
but
I
wanted
this.
You
know
state
for
the
record
that
we
there
has
been.
You
know
some
conversations
and
in
an
event,
in
the
event
that
there
is
a
community
benefits,
agreement
worked
out
for
the
remapping
for
the
specific
project,
and
you
know
the
needs
of
the
community
and
the
developer
agreement.
F
I
mean
our
community
is
open
to
dialogue
on
these
issues.
We
we
know,
no
issue
was
set
in
stone,
I
mean
the
doesn't
cost
us
anything
to
talk
and
if
we
could
certainly
put
together
a
community
benefits
agreement
that
addresses
some
of
the
concerns
that
we
have
already
talked
about.
I
think
that
we
can
reach
some
common
goal
and
probably
move
this
thing
forward
and.
I
I
appreciate
it,
we
work
on
a
lot
of
things
this
year
with
upper
Holmesburg
and
your
organization
and
the
members
of
the
community
have
been
nothing
but
fantastic,
with
having
an
open
dialogue
and
and
really
trying
to
partner
up
with
with
businesses
in
my
office.
So
I
appreciate
you
taking
the
time
and
come
it
down
here,
and
hopefully
we
can
come
up
with
some
sort
of
agreement
moving
forward
and
really,
you
know,
add
to
the
benefits
of
the
community.
So
I
appreciate
you
both
and
thank
you
so
much
for
later.
Yeah.
A
C
E
Carnelian
members
of
the
Rules
Committee
Marty,
Greg
or
ski
with
philosophy,
City
Planning,
Commission
I'm
here
to
testify
I'm
bill
number
one:
eight,
oh
four,
five
four,
which
was
introduced
in
the
City
Council
on
May
10th
of
this
year
by
councilmember
Hina.
This
bill
razón,
is
part
of
the
ashton
neighborhood
and
the
lower
far
north
east
planning
district
of
Philadelphia.
It
seeks
to
match
the
exist:
the
zoning
with
the
existing
land
use
and
a
carriage
appropriate
development.
That's
consistent
with
the
community
goals
and
recommendations
of
the
far
northeast
districts
plan.
E
A
C
Number
one:
eight
zero,
four:
nine
six,
an
ordinance
amending
title
14
of
the
Philadelphia
Code
entitled
zoning
and
planning
to
revise
her
provisions
of
chapter
14,
600
entitled
use
regulations
by
amending
exceptions
to
use
tables
for
green
roofs
and
making
related
changes
all
under
stern
terms
and
conditions.
Mr.
E
Council
Greeley
remember
the
Rules
Committee
I'm
Marty
Gregor
ski
with
the
Philadelphia
City
Planning
Commission,
we're
here
to
test
file
bill
number
1,
804
96,
which
was
introduced
in
the
City
Council
on
May
17th
of
this
year
by
councilmember
Reynolds
Brown
bill
number.
One
804
96
will
expand
the
applicability
of
the
existing
green
roof
density
bonus
such
that
it
would
become
available
to
existing
buildings
or
expansions
of
existing
buildings
with
a
footprint
of
5,000
square
feet
or
more.
E
This
would
be
in
addition
to
the
current
restriction,
which
otherwise
limits
the
bonus
to
new
construction,
involving
a
minimum
of
five
thousand
square
feet
of
earth
disturbance.
The
amendment
is
consistent
with
the
bill
that
created
this
bonus.
One
507
four
five,
which
was
an
American
recommended
for
approval
by
the
Planning
Commission
at
its
meeting
of
October
20th
2015.
E
It
also
is
consistent
with
subsequent
amendment
amendments
build
numbers,
one,
seven,
zero,
four,
nine
five
and
one
seven
zero,
eight
one
eight,
which
were
also
recommended
for
approval
by
the
Planning
Commission
at
its
meeting
of
June
30
2017
and
October
17
to
2017
respectively.
Therefore,
at
its
meeting
of
June
12th
this
year,
the
staff
will
recommend
bill
number
1-800
for
nine
six.
Four
four
approval
as
an
item
in
the
court
of
a
previous
policy
and
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
A
A
The
law
department
looks
at
them
exchanges,
okay,
and
we
want
to
make
the
lawyers
happy
too.
Yes,
okay,
I
believe
miss
Marconi,
there's
one
other
person
that
wanted
to
testify.
Is
that
true,
always
a
great
touch,
not
here?
Okay,
so
what
we
have
written
testimony
from
the
Building,
Industry,
Association
and
also
from
sustainable
business
network
in
support
of
this
bill?
Is
there
anyone
else
here
to
testify
on
bill
number
one:
eight:
zero,
four,
nine
six
seeing
none!
Thank
you!
Miss
Marconi!
Please,
our
next
bill
bill.
C
E
Counselor
Greenlee
remember
the
Rules
Committee
a
Mardi
Gras
Gorsky,
with
the
philosophy
City
Planning
Commission
here
to
testify
about
number
one:
eight,
oh
four,
nine
eight,
which
was
introduced
in
the
City
Council
on
May
17th
of
this
year
by
councilmember
Blackwell,
but
number
one,
eight.
Oh,
four.
Nine
eight
amends
the
Philadelphia
zoning
code
by
amending
chapter
fourteen
three
hundred
administration
and
procedures,
section
14
three:
oh
three,
common
procedures
and
requirements.
E
Young
this
bill
will
state
the
procedures
for
administrative
review
process
for
cases
that
were
previously
approved
by
the
Zoning
Board
of
Adjustment,
where
applicants
want
to
modify
the
scope
of
their
original
approval.
These
rules
are
currently
included
in
the
internal
regulations
of
the
CBA.
This
bill
will
move
them
to
the
zoning
code,
while
the
staff
is
generally
supportive
of
this
bill.
We
would
like
to
delete
the
section
giving
the
Zoning
Board
Chair
the
sole
right
to
overrule
Illinois's
decision,
which
could
lead
to
questions
regarding
the
transparency
of
this
process.
E
D
You
we
are
very
pleased
on
this
bill.
It
looks
like
everybody
agreed
we're
pleased
at
the
law
department,
with
advice
from
the
administration
prepare
the
amendments,
we're
so
pleased
that
now
council
can
be
involved
when
it
comes
out
before
the
administrative
review
can
be
heard.
We've
got
to
be
notified
as
well
and
after
so
all
the
way
around
we
were,
we
were
included.
D
So
we
can't
hear
about
zoning
notices
after
the
fact
that
things
happen
and
decisions
were
made
without
the
district
council
person
knowing
so
we
are
grateful
that
this
is
one
of
those
bills
where
everybody
came
together,
we're
grateful,
we
don't
know
what
precipitated
that,
but
we're
glad
it
happened,
and
we
say
thank
you
and
hope.
The
committee
will
positively
consider
it
as
well.
Thank.
A
A
J
J
J
J
There
are
no
reporting
statistics
for
the
number
and
frequency
of
administrative
review
requests.
Nor
do
we
have
any
publicly
available
data
on
how
many
permits
have
an
issue
through
the
process,
but
anecdotally.
We
understand
that
in
the
early
years
there
the
administrative
review
requests
were
very
rare,
however,
in
the
past
year,
or
so
they
are
now
coming
in
at
three
to
four
every
week.
What
exactly
is
administrative
review,
and
why
do
we
characterize
it
as
a
process
subject
to
abuse?
The
administrative
review
is
supposed
to
come
into
the
picture.
J
The
rules,
written
administrative
review
should
be
a
very
rare
event.
Basically,
the
administrative
review
should
only
be
sought
when
there
has
to
be
a
a
reduction
in
one
aspect
or
another
of
the
plan:
less
residential
units,
smaller
building
dimensions,
a
reduced
number
of
commercial
or
industrial
uses.
J
The
bill
contains
the
same
procedure
as
the
current
regulations.
Although
I
haven't
seen
the
amendment
so
I
don't
know
if
there
are
specific
changes
that
I
haven't
seen
at
this
point.
Basically,
the
problem
comes
not
when
L
and
I
is
looking
at
administrative
review
requests,
but
when
it
gets
kicked
up
to
the
Zoning
Board
and
the
chair
takes
a
look
at
it.
While
the
chair
is
supposed
to
follow
the
clear
language
of
the
regulations,
and
now
it
would
be
the
same
as
in
the
bill.
Recent
examples
demonstrates
that
the
process
is
very
broken.
J
We
wanted
to
bring
to
your
attention
to
cases
in
particular.
They
both
occurred
in
West
Philadelphia.
One
is
happening
right
now
at
dealing
with
the
Apple
storage
building
in
at
780
South
52nd
Street.
That
case
was
originally
granted
of
variance
back
in
2012
under
the
old
zoning
code.
Before
we
even
pad
a
new
zoning
code,
it
was
for
112
apartments
and
92
parking
spaces
and
there
was
significant
community
opposition
at
the
time.
Five
years
later
before
any
construction
was
done.
J
The
developer
went
behind
the
communities
back
through
administrative
review
and
bumped
up
the
number
of
units
from
a
hundred
and
twelve
to
one
hundred
fifty-three.
That
was
done
in
April
of
2017
L&I
refused
it
correctly
because
it
didn't
meet
the
criteria
for
administrative
review,
but
then
it
went
to
the
Zoning
Board
chair
at
the
time,
Carrollton
area
and
she
approved
it
in
December
of
2007.
A
A
A
J
The
problem
still
is
that
this
is
done
secretly
behind
closed
doors
without
any
public
input,
so
whether
it's
we
do
think
it's
a
better
practice
to
have
the
entire
CBA
do
it,
but
the
problem
isn't
whether
it's
the
chair
or
the
CBA.
The
problem
is
that
there
is
no
public
input
and
no
effective
input
by
the
community
for
something
that
basically
needs
to
go
before
the
community.
The
whole
essence
of
the
zoning
code
was
recreated
in
2012
to
give
a
formal
role
to
community
input.
J
So
in
this
case,
Councilwoman
Blackwell
has
appealed
this
this
determination
and
we
are
going
to
have
a
hearing
before
the
Zoning
Board
in
the
near
future.
Our
RC
o
Kings
testing
spirit,
didn't
even
exist
in
2012.
So
when
we
tried
to
appeal
it,
we
were
told
hey
the
only
people
who
could
appeal
it.
This
is
under
the
current
regulations.
Are
the
groups
or
the
people
that
showed
up
at
the
zoning
board
in
2012?
J
Obviously,
not
many
people
are
going
to
be
in
the
same
location
or
if
there
is
still
going
to
even
be
on
the
earth
at
that
point,
so
the
the
legislation
now
does
require
that
all
the
current
are
ce
o--'s
be
given
that
notice,
which
is
which
is
really
a
very
positive
changes
to
why
we
we
support
the
legislation.
The
second
one
happened,
also
in
West
Philly
when
for
in
the
territory
of
West
Philly
pride
at
38th
and
chestnut
at
Hamilton
Court.
J
In
that
case,
the
developer
came
in
and
said
they
have
basically
a
large
apartment
building
filled
with
college
students
and
they
got
an
approval
with
variance,
and
then
they
came
back
to
the
Zoning
Board
with
administrative
review,
and
they
said
we
want
to
put
a
roof
deck
for
that
would
accommodate
scores
of
college
students
right
on
Chestnut
Street
and
the
Zoning
Board,
granted
them
administrative
review.
We
were
lucky
to
find
out
about
it
just
kind
of
surreptitiously
and
we
were
able
to
appeal
it
and
we
got
the
Zoning
Board
to
reverse
that.
J
Lastly,
mr.
chairman
and
members
of
the
committee,
we're
asking
council
to
call
to
call
hearings
to
do
an
investigation
on
the
nature
of
administrative
review.
This
legislation
is
a
good
first
step
of
what
we're
seeing,
especially
in
the
last
year,
is
an
onslaught
of
applications
for
administrative
review
to
really
circumvent
the
public
community.
J
Accountability,
that
is
the
cornerstone
of
our
zoning
code,
so
we
would
hope
that,
whether
it's
this
committee
or
perhaps
that's
going
to
be
the
Illinois
committee,
would
do
an
investigation
on
on
the
the
prevalence
and
and
the
and
the
the
impact
of
administrative
review
applications
on
the
whole
zoning
codes
integrity.
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
L
A
C
E
Good
morning,
counselor
Greeley
members
in
the
Rules
Committee
of
Mardi
Gras
Gorsky,
with
the
Philadelphia
City
Planning
Commission
here
to
testify
on
bill
number
1-800
501,
which
was
introduced
in
the
City
Council
on
May
17.
This
year
by
councilmember
Heenan
number
1-800
501
will
amend
chapter
14
500,
the
Philadelphia
Code
entitled
overlay
zoning
districts
by
creating
a
new
overlay
entitled
/fa,
o
Frankfurt
Academy
overlay
district.
E
This
bill
allows
all
permitted
curb
cuts
in
an
area
bounded
by
Frankfort
Avenue,
the
Delaware
Expressway
ramps,
Linden
Avenue
and
Torres
Dale
Avenue
to
be
a
maximum
of
30
feet
wide.
Currently,
the
zoning
code,
curb
cuts,
may
only
be
24
feet
wide
if
they
provide
ingress
and
egress
and
12
feet
wide
fair.
One
way.
The
City
Planning
staff
believes
that
the
proper
mechanism
for
relief
from
the
curb
cut
provisions
is
through
the
Zoning
Board
of
Adjustment
process.
Rather
than
amending
the
code
for
a
single
property.
E
A
You
any
questions
seeing
none
anyone
else
here
to
testify
on
bill
number
one:
eight:
zero,
five
zero
one,
seeing
none
if
I
could
ask
everybody
the
level
starting
to
get
a
little
high
here
about
12
people
talking
at
the
same
time.
Mr.
Huntington,
thank
you
he's
not
listening
to
me,
but
please
thank
you.
I
appreciate
it.
Thank
You,
councilman
team,
okay,
take
care
501
our
next
bill.
Please
miss
mark
owns
dole.
C
Number
one:
eight
zero
five
zero
three:
an
ordinance
to
amend
the
Philadelphia
zoning
mass
by
changing
the
zoning
designations,
a
certain
areas
of
land
located
with
an
area
bounded
by
Blue,
Grass,
Road,
Grant,
Avenue
Ashton
row
will
test
Road
Walsh
Road.
Do
a
Street
Revere
Street
Tremont
Street
Leonard
Street
in
Walsh,
Road
Thank.
E
Morning,
council
really
remember
the
Rules
Committee
I'm
Marta
Grigore
ski
with
the
Philadelphia
City
Planning
Commission
here
to
testify
on
a
bill
number
one
805
zero
three,
which
was
introduced
in
the
City
Council
on
May
17th
of
this
year
by
Councilman
Heenan.
This
bill
reserves
part
of
the
whole
circle
and
Ashtyn
neighborhoods
in
the
lower,
far
northeast
planning
district
of
Philadelphia.
It
seeks
to
match
the
zoning
with
the
existing
Lane
use.
That
is
consistent
with
the
community
goals
and
recommendations
of
the
far
northeast
districts
plan.
E
A
C
E
Good
morning,
councilman
gray,
late
members
of
the
Rules
Committee
I'm
Marty
Gore
Gorsky,
with
the
finale
City
Planning
Commission
I'm
here
to
testify
I'm
bill
number
1-800
505,
which
was
introduced
in
the
City
Council
on
May
17th
of
this
year
by
Councilman
Jones.
This
bill
Rizzo
is
part
of
the
hattington
Carroll
Park
and
Morris
Park
neighborhoods
and
west
Planning
District
of
Philadelphia.
E
The
bill
is
intended
for
correct
corrective
remapping
purposes
and
advancement
of
the
goals
and
recommendations
of
the
West
district
plan,
specifically
to
preserve
existing
single-family
housing
match
zoning
to
existing
land
use,
concentrate,
concentrate
and
strengthen
commercial
Carter's
and
promote
multifamily
uses
along
commercial
corridors
and
transit.
Philadelphia
City
Planning
Commission
will
consider
bill
number
one
805,
oh
five,
and
it's
meeting
today
where
the
staff
will
recommend
it
for
approval.
E
A
C
Bill
number
one:
eight,
zero,
five,
zero,
six
and
ordinance
to
amend
the
master
plan
for
the
river
road,
residential
mixed
use,
area
bounded
by
them
uncover
Montgomery,
County
line,
a
railroad,
right-of-way,
shoma
and
Avenue,
and
the
Schuylkill
River
to
approve
a
subdivision
in
the
construction
of
a
utility
project.
Thank.
A
E
Morning,
Marty
crew
Gorsky
with
the
Philadelphia
City
Planning
Commission
here
to
testify
on
bill
number
one
800
506,
which
was
introduced
in
the
City
Council
on
May
17th
of
this
year
by
councilmember
Jones
bill
number.
One
800
506
amends
the
rmx
two
master
plan
for
the
River
Road
residential
mixed
use
area,
which
is
located
in
the
area
bounded
by
Montgomery,
the
Montgomery
County
line,
railroad
right
away,
Chaumont
Avenue
and
the
Google
River.
The
master
plan
was
created
by
Bill
number,
oh
802
fifty-five
approved
in
April
2008.
A
E
Morning,
Amardeep
we've
worked
with
the
City
Planning
Commission
here,
testifying
bill
number
1-800
507,
which
was
introduced
in
the
City
Council
on
May
17th
of
this
year
by
councilmember
Jones.
This
bill
is
intended
for
corrective
remapping
purposes,
an
advancement
of
the
goals
and
recommendations
of
the
lower
Northwest
district
plan,
specifically
to
remap
to
match
the
crew
to
match
to
correctively
rezone,
an
existing
eating
and
drinking
establishment
and
multi-family
residential
uses.
E
E
A
C
Bill
number
one:
eight:
zero,
five:
zero,
nine
in
Wardens
amending
title,
14
and
philadelphia
code
entitled
zoning
and
planning
by
creating
a
new
with
sick
and
nco
neighborhood
conservation
overlay
district
for
the
area
generally
bounded
by
Henry
Avenue
Hermit
Street
Ridge
Avenue
in
the
Wissahickon
Creek.
Thank.
E
You
morning,
Marty,
we
were
stood
with
the
City
Planning
Commission
here
to
testify
on
bill
number
one
805,
oh
nine
was
introduced
in
the
City
Council
on
May
17th
this
year
by
councilmember
Jones.
This
bill
creates
the
slash
NCO
Witek,
a
neighborhood
Conservation
overlay
to
protect
the
walkability
and
aesthetic
character
of
the
Visnjic
and
neighborhood.
It
will
regulate
the
design
of
new
construction
and
major
alterations
to
existing
buildings.
It
promotes
human
scale,
design,
interesting
and
pedestrian
friendly
facades
and
highs
on
the
street,
all
in
close
proximity
to
useful
commercial
destinations,
parks
and
transit.
E
The
following
design
elements
are
regulated
by
this
overlay:
front:
setback,
height,
porch
fronts
and
front
garages
habitable
first
floors,
utility
meters
and
HVAC
screening,
window
inset
and
soul,
projection,
front
yard,
impervious
coverages,
front,
facade
fence
and
wall
materials
and
curb
cut
with
Planning
Commission
of
staff
worked
with
the
Witek
and
interested
citizens.
Association
on
this
bill,
the
fell
off
you
study,
Planning
Commission
will
consider
bill
number
1-800
509
at
this
meeting
today,
where
the
staff
will
recommend
it
for
approval
and
I'd,
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank.
A
C
E
Extension
of
an
overlay
of
the
overlay
boundary
from
Hermitage,
Street
north
to
Paoli
and
other
technical
changes.
The
Planning
Commission
staff
worked
with
the
Roxboro
Development
Corporation
and
nearby
civic
associations
on
this
bill
and
the
Philadelphia
City
Planning
Commission
will
consider
bill
number
one
805
tenants
meeting
today
where
the
staff
will
recommend
it
for
approval.
Thank.
A
C
E
This
new
subsection
would
apply
to
commercially
zoned
Lots
within
the
area
bounded
by
Broad,
Street,
Washington,
Avenue,
13th,
Street
and
carpenter
Street,
the
South
Broad
Street
gateway
expands,
the
allowable
uses
on
the
block
to
include
eating
and
drinking
establishments,
including
both
sit
down
and
takeout
restaurants
accessory
and
non
accessory
structured
parking,
both
above
and
below
ground,
roof
decks
for
residential
and
non-residential
uses.
The
South
Broad
Street
gateway
also
includes
the
following
parking
and
loading
provisions.
E
The
ground
floor
of
any
parking
garage
other
than
those
accessory
to
a
single
or
two
family
dwelling
must
be
occupied
by
an
office,
retail
sales,
commercial
services
or
public
Civic
and
institutional
use.
This
requirement
only
applies
only
the
street
frontage
is
along
Broad,
Street
and
Washington
Avenue
and
does
not
apply
to
areas
occupied
by
entrances,
exits,
curb
cuts
and
waiting
areas,
vehicle
access
and
egress
to
parking
loading
and
trash
storage
areas
or
other
structures
is
only
permitted
to
and
from
carpenter
Street
and
13th
Street.
E
The
Philadelphia
City
Planning
Commission
will
consider
bill
number
1,
805
and
11
at
its
meeting
today,
where
the
staff
will
recommend
against
approval,
since
the
purpose
of
this
bill
is
to
codify
design
intent
of
a
proposed
development
that
has
already
that
already
has
a
zoning
and
you
permit,
via
the
Zoning
Board
of
Adjustment
and
I'd,
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
at
the
time.
Thank.
A
A
M
We've
well,
first
and
foremost
on
the
developer
gate
engaged
in
the
community
benefits
agreement
with
the
community.
It's
already
been
approved
by
the
zoning,
the
only
additional
component
that
will
be
added
as
signage
as
a
part
of
this
particular
process,
so
I'm
pretty
much
mayoress
what
was
already
approved,
with
the
exception
of
science.
You
just
add
it
a
little
bit
right,
yes
and.
M
Thank
you,
and
also
I,
just
want
to
state
for
the
record.
I
think
the
benefit,
also
of
having
the
ordinance
as
opposed
to
just
the
approval
of
zoning,
is
the
EOP
component,
because
this
is
a
massive
project
that
is
going
to
take
place
at
Fort
and
Watson
Avenue
and
normally
the
rezoning
process.
It's
not
a
requirement
under
the
ordinance
in
this
amendment.
M
It
will
be
a
requirement
for
the
developer
to
work
in
partnership
with
the
office
of
equal
opportunity
to
make
sure
there
is
a
level
of
diversity
and
inclusion,
as
a
part
is
process
and
I'm
quite
sure.
My
good
friends
in
the
building
trees
will
work
with
me
and
the
developer
to
make
sure
that
that
process
is
inclusive
and
so
I
just
want
to.
Thank
you
very
much
and
as
for
the
approval
of
this
a
minute.
A
H
M
M
J
A
C
E
A
C
E
Morning,
Marty
grigory
with
the
Philadelphia
City
Planning
Commission
here
testifying
bill
number
one
805,
one
eight,
which
was
introduced
in
the
City
Council
on
May
17th
of
this
year
by
a
councilmember
keyonnah
Sanchez
bill
number
one
805
one
8
amends
the
Philadelphia
zoning
maps.
This
bill
proposed
to
rezone
three
blocks
of
the
existing
single-family
assembly:
semi-detached
houses
within
the
historic
Northwood
district
from
rm3
multi-family
residential
to
RSA,
three
residential
single-family
to
match
the
existing
uses.
E
A
E
Burski
with
the
full
office
City
Planning
Commission
here
to
test
on
bill
number
one
805,
one
nine,
which
is
introduced
in
the
City
Council
on
May
17th
of
this
year
by
Councilwoman
Kiana
Sanchez.
This
bill
risottos
parts
of
the
fair
Hale
and
Kingston
neighborhoods
in
the
North
Planning
District
of
Philadelphia.
It
seeks
to
promote
development
and
preserve
uses
that
are
consistent
with
the
community
goals
and
the
recommendations
of
the
north
district
plan.
E
A
E
Morning,
Marty
Brewers
cave
with
the
Philadelphia
City
Planning
Commission
here
to
testify
I'm
bill
number
one.
Eight,
oh
three,
four
six
was
introduced
in
the
City
Council
on
April
12th
of
this
year
by
councilmember
Greenlee,
but
number
one
eight.
Oh
three.
Four
six
contains
a
number
of
proposed
technical
changes
to
the
follow
feed
zoning
code.
E
This
document
includes
recommended
changes
to
clarify
uses
in
the
zoning
code,
advance,
appropriate
planning
and
development
goals
and
protect
neighborhood
character,
fell
off
via
City
Planning
Commission
consider
bill
number
one:
eight,
oh
three,
four
sentence,
meaning
of
May
15th
of
this
year
and
recommended
for
approval,
not
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank.
A
So
we'll
have
all
the
technical
amendments:
okay,
until
the
next
time
for
technical
amendments
and
just
for
the
record,
we've
had
a
briefing
on
this
that
we're
all
council,
members
and
staff
were
invited
to
to
hear
the
presentation
on
this.
Any
questions
see
none.
Anyone
else
here
to
testify.
I'm
bill
number
one:
eight
zero,
three,
four
six
sing,
none
miss
Marconi
on
next
bill.
Please
bill.
E
I'm
marty
kovarsky
with
the
philadelphia
city
planning
Commissioner
here
to
testify
I'm
bill
number
one
804
63,
which
was
introduced
in
the
City
Council
on
May
10th
of
this
year
by
councilmember
Squealer
bill
number
1,
804
6-3
amends
the
philadelphia
zoning
code
by
making
technical
changes
to
the
size
and
sighting
of
roof
decks
access
structures.
This
bill
increases
the
allowable
size
of
a
pilot
house
by
35
square
feet
to
125
square
feet,
as
well
as
allowing
for
an
extra
40
square
feet.
If
an
elevator
is
installed,
the
location
of
the
pilot
house
is
also
regulated.
E
No
longer
will
be
allowed
within
5
feet
of
the
rear
building
line
and
will
be
allowed
to
move
within
an
allowable
zone
on
the
roof.
So
long
as
the
setbacks
of
met
full
office,
City
Planning
Commission
will
consider
bill
number
1,
804
6
3
at
its
meeting
of
June
12th
of
this
year,
where
the
staff
will
not
recommend
it
for
approval
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank.
E
N
Name
is
James
Moran
ski
I'm,
the
president
of
the
building
Industry
Association
of
Philadelphia,
which
represents
residential
home
builders,
presidential
contractors,
suppliers.
We
would
like
to
thank
chairman
Greenlee
and
the
members
of
the
committee
on
the
rules
for
the
opportunity
to
testify
before
you
today,
I'm
here,
to
testify
in
support
at
build
number
one
804
63,
which
was
introduced
by
Councilman
Aquila
at
the
BIA
s
request
and
is
designed
to
standardize
how
to
roof
deck
access
structures
commonly
known
as
pilot
houses
are
constructed
in
Philadelphia.
N
This
legislation
provides
some
flexibility
to
the
original
pilots
ordinance,
which
limited
the
extension
to
90
square
feet.
That
size
does
not
accommodate
four
different
stair
configurations
or
the
addition
of
an
elevator
for
rooftop
access
and
thus
currently
requires
needless
returns
to
the
Zoning
Board
for
variances,
due
to
updates
to
the
pilot
house,
design
and
house
layout,
which
happened
after
zoning
permits
are
obtained.
N
The
legislation
gives
the
needed
flexibility
to
allow
various
types
of
stairs
for
changes
in
the
actual
location
of
the
pile
house
ball
for
preserving
the
limitations
that
keep
the
roof
access
simple
and
setback
from
the
front
and
rear
of
the
house.
Standardizing
the
placement
and
construction
of
pilot
houses
is
an
unfortunate
necessity
before
the
recent
legislation,
too
many
reckless
developers
were
creating
oversized
pilot
houses
that
awkwardly
loomed
over
the
street
and
its
neighbors
as
a
way
to
create
an
extra
floor
that
wasn't
allowed
by
code.
N
Build
number
1-800
463
will
help
prevent
those
situations
by
creating
reasonable
standards
that
developers
can
follow
for
easy
roof
access
without
disturbing
the
aesthetics
in
the
neighborhood.
By
setting
the
pilot
house
back
far
enough,
that
it'll
not
be
seen
from
the
street,
the
BIA
supports
bill
number
one,
eight,
oh
four,
six
three,
which
will
benefit
both
residential
builders
and
the
philadelphia
communities,
and
we
thank
councilman
scuola
and
the
staff,
the
Planning
Commission
for
working
us
and
collaborating
with
on
this
proposed
solution.
Thank
you
for
your
consideration
and.
L
And
it's
not
as
though
this
is
an
emergency
issue.
We're
talking
about
pilot
houses
here.
This
is
not
a
budget
item
or
something
that
needs
immediate
attention.
So
those
are
our
thoughts
thought
one
is
we'd
like
to
hear
what
the
Planning
Commission
will
say
in
detail
this
afternoon
and
thought
two
is,
as
we've
advised
council
we're
meeting
tomorrow
night-
and
this
is
one
of
the
items
on
our
agenda.
Thank.
A
J
I
You
mr.
chairman
and
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
get
it
on
the
record.
This
is
slap
has
been
a
on
going
issue
across
the
city
of
Philadelphia,
especially
in
my
in
my
district,
and
you
know
it.
It
seems
to
have
increased.
You
know
concerned
with
community
groups
who
are
an
extension
of
public
participation
and
I.
Don't
think
that
there's
any
kind
of
denial
right
or
misconception
that
you
know
a
an
organization
that
is
governed
by
legislation.
Zoning
legislation
is
certainly
an
extension
of
public
participation.
I
So
my
intention
here
today
and
have
spoken
with
all
members
of
the
committee
is
to
vote
it
out
of
committee
with
favorable
recommendation,
but
I'm
going
to
hold
it
because
we
are
speaking
with
the
administration
as
we
move
forward
because
I
mean
I.
Think
I'd
not
I,
think
I
know
that
they've
recognized
that
it
is
an
extension
of
public
participation
and
it
is
a
real
problem
that
is
increasingly
been
brought
to
light
and,
putting
you
know
some
community
groups
in
not
just
a
jeopardy
of
losing.
I
E
Boarding
Marty
Grigore
ski
with
the
Philadelphia
City
Planning
Commission
I'm,
here
to
test
farm
bill
number
1-800
504,
which
was
introduced
in
the
City
Council
on
May
17th
of
this
year
by
councilmember
Heenan
number
1-800
504
amends
the
Philadelphia
zoning
code
by
revising
section,
14
303
11a,
entitled
register
community
organization
by
providing
funding
for
limited
coverage
insurance
coverage
for
rent
for
registered
community
organizations.
This
bill
proposes
three
changes
to
the
code.
E
It
allows
the
director
finance
to
provide
funding
to
help
offset
the
cost
of
directors
and
officers
insurance
premiums
for
the
registered
community
organizations
are
cos.
It
requires
really
reporting
to
the
council,
president
and
chief
clerk
of
City
Council
regarding
distribution
of
funds
from
the
previous
fiscal
year
at
the
time
of
submission
that
the
proposed
operating
budget
council-
and
it
includes
pc,
pc
regulations
to
create
guidelines
for
regarding
the
disbursement
of
the
funds
in
the
zoning
code,
our
ce
o--'s
are
required
to
hold
meetings
with
zoning
board
applicants
at
these
meetings.
E
Community
members
opinions
are
presented
regarding
the
projects
which
can
influence
the
timeline
for
the
project
or
whether
it
moves
forward.
This
role
opens
our
ce
o--'s
up
to
lawsuits
by
developers.
Most
are
ce.
O--'s
do
not
have
insurance
to
protect
them
against
such
lawsuits,
also
known
as
strategic
lawsuits
against
public
participation
or
slaps
our
ce
o--'s
that
do
have
insurance
pay
for
it
themselves,
which
can
present
a
significant
burden
to
groups.
E
There
are
currently
280
registered
community
organizations
with
the
potential
for
this
number
to
increase,
so
the
bill
has
the
potential
impose
a
significant
burden
burden
to
the
city
as
well.
The
fill
of
the
City
Planning
Commission's
considered
bill
number
one
805
Oh
for
its
meeting
today,
and
the
staff
plans
to
request
45
days
to
review
and
confer
with
the
administration
and
council
office
on
the
feasibility
of
this
bill
and
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank.
A
O
H
E
E
G
I
If
I
get
port
of
information,
Councilwoman
complete,
there
is
an
increased
frivolous
lawsuits
have
been
filed
against
community
groups,
especially
in
neighborhoods
that
have
increased
development
and
where
they
do
not
have
the
technical
support
or
the
wherewithal
to
defend
themselves
when
they,
indeed
their
volunteers
are
SEOs,
not
every
our
CEO
has
insurance.
Some
of
the
more
wealthier
rCOS
are
fortunate
to
do
that.
I
Their
premiums
go
up
to
somebody
like
it's
going
on,
helicopter
rides
or
somebody
has
provided
bungee,
jumping
and
and
amusement
rides.
The
risk
is
extremely
high
and
unnecessarily
and
in
fact
a
you
know,
almost
a
it's
people
at
it
puts
public
concern
citizens
out
of
business,
so
we're
taking
a
look
at
every
option
in
every
form
and
fashion
all
right.
This
way
we
could
protect
our
people,
who
are
governed
by
only
so.
H
That
background
is
helpful,
however,
I
need
the
answer
to
the
question:
how
many
lawsuits
have
been
filed
and
will
the
City
ultimately
be
responsible
for
the
before
any
kind
of
insurance
for
our
cos,
whether
they're,
volunteer
or
know
who's
gonna
be
with
who
who's
gonna
bear
the
weight,
who's
gonna,
carry
them,
carry
the
bill
and
for
insurance,
full
coverage
or
partial
coverage.
I.
Don't.
E
Know
the
answers
to
either
those
questions.
Sorry
I,
don't
know
the
answers
to
either
of
those
questions
and
I
suspect.
That's
what's
gonna
be
worked
out
over
the
summer
as
this
bill
is
held,
you
know,
but
truthfully
I'm,
a
zoning
guy.
That's
finance
information
that
I
probably
won't
even
be
in
the
room
for
those
conversations
and.
H
H
E
H
H
I'm
deeply
uncomfortable
putting
the
city
at
risk,
the
city's
budget
at
risk,
which
is
already
stretch
where
we
can't
honor
many
of
the
charter
chartered
responsibilities
we
had,
and
so
now
to
move
to
a
place
where
we
may
be
possibly
responsible
for
community
groups
and
the
city
carrying
the
weight
of
community
groups
on
his
face
makes
me
very
uncomfortable
and
I
need
to
put
that
on
the
record.
Thank
you.
Thank.
M
The
first
thing
the
developer
will
do
is
use
their
power
to
say,
I'll
sue,
you
I'll
hire
a
lawyer,
and
so
you
know
for
us
to
going
in
this
direction.
I
think
is
a
good
thing.
I,
don't
know
if
we
go
about
capping
the
amount
but
I
think
at
least
started
discussions
to
protect
those
are
most
vulnerable,
particularly
when
you're
dealing
with
levels
of
development.
This
isn't
my
bill,
but
I
just
know
about
dealing
with
this
firsthand
I
know
how
these
developers
operate
and
there
aren't
legitimate
lawsuits.
It's
just.
M
I
know
there
was
one
an
old
city
now
in
terms
of
numbers,
I
know
and
the
Larry
Franny's
is
working
on
something
similar
in
the
past,
but
I
think
in
a
grand
scheme
of
things,
I,
don't
think
no
more,
something
that
were
basically
at
the
end
of
the
day,
treat
like
a
danger,
a
major.
What's
to
worried.
I
want
to
use
man,
then
the
day
thing
gonna
be
a
burden
on
my
budget,
I
mean
it
happens,
but
I
don't
think
to
the
point
where
it's
like
so
significant
death.
You
know
it's
gonna,
be
a
burden.
M
We
can
maybe
come
up
with
a
way
to
cap
a
number,
but
I
do
believe
that
the
ABS
community
person
from
me
witnessing
this.
They
have
to
have
a
tool
to
fight
back,
because
once
you
had
a
lawsuit,
everybody
gets
scared,
don't
wanna
go
to
court
and
the
next
thing
you
know
they
walked
away,
but
that
developer
gets
to
flex
and
move
forward,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
comment
on
it.
M
Only
because
I
witnessed
it,
I
watched
it
and
you
know
for
it
to
come
up
in
this
in
this
body
and
I
know
we
usually
fight
for
the
underdogs
I
think,
there's
least
something
worthy
of
a
discussion
in
terms
of
moving
the
ball
forward
to
protect
those
people
who,
just
at
the
end
of
the
day
when
I,
have
a
say-so
against
Big
Time
developers
who
come
built
inside
their
neighborhood.
So
just
want
to
say
that
for
the
record,
thank
you.
A
A
I
I
This
really
isn't
going
to
have
a
significant
or
much
of
an
impact
on
the
budget
whatsoever.
You
know
we
we
do
a
lot
of
mandates
around
here.
That
has
a
tremendous
burden
on
the
budget.
You
know
this
is
about
protecting
people.
You
know
all
kinds
of
people,
whether
you're
middle-class
neighborhood
and
we're
a
poor
under
underserved
neighborhoods.
This
is
this
is
a
people
protection.
You
know
type
of
spirit,
legislation
that
tries
to
force
us
to
come
up
with
a
creative
way
to
ensure
that
neighborhoods
are
represented.
I
You
know
without
being
put
out
of
business
by
you
know,
people
who
are
you
know
bad
actors
and
there's
a
lot
of
bad
actors
are
out
there
who
were
full
of
greed
and
not
taking
any
consideration
the
little
people
who
are
just
trying
to
be
block
captain's
and
serve
as
civic
leaders
and
in
their
community.
So
this
is
this
is
not
an
administrative
piece
of
legislation
or
bill.
This
is
a
council
driven
piece
of
legislation
that
has
been
brought
to
us.
I
N
A
You
councilman
and,
as
was
stated,
more
work
will
be
done
with
this
over
the
summer,
so
the
councilman
is
not
requesting
this
to
be
he's
requesting
have
become
out
of
committee
today,
but
not,
but
he
said
he
would
hold
it
on
on
the
calendar
over
to
summer.
Thank
you.
Anyone
else
here,
testifying
this
bill
all
right.
Why
don't
you
both
come
up?
Please.
L
Steve
Huntington
on
Vice
Shara,
the
Crosstown
coalition
here
to
thank
councilman
Heenan
for
his
hearings
on
this
issue.
The
Crosstown
represents
31.
Our
CEOs
insurance
and
exposure
to
lawsuits
were
one
of
the
four
items
we
identified
when
we
incorporated
in
2014
to
work
on.
We
literally
drafted
working
with
Senator
Farr
nazy,
the
anti
slap
bill.
That's
been
stalled
in
Harrisburg
for
the
last
two
years
and
in
response
to
council
woman,
Reynolds
Browns,
appropriate
questions
about
the
number
of
lawsuits.
L
I
can
only
suggest
that
one,
a
single
lawsuit
can
sink
an
our
CEO,
because
in
my
previous
career,
I
was
a
lawyer
specializing
in
representing
insurance
companies.
The
the
costs
of
the
defense
can
drive
up
the
premiums
to
make
insurance
unaffordable
so
that
councilman
Heenan
suggestion
of
somehow
giving
a
hand
to
purchasing
private
insurance
is
certainly
a
way
to
go
an
option
that
could
be
explored.
I
think
there
are
a
number
of
ways
to
address
this
problem
and
I'm
hopeful
that
over
the
summer,
we'll
be
able
to
come
up
with
some
good
solutions.
Thank.
B
Your
name
in
preference,
just
Erwin's
president
found
that
it's
suing
dolphining
organization
just
to
Chechen.
That
issue
about
insurance.
I
know
things
change
from
time
to
time,
two
different
elected
official,
but
the
chew
and
bell
for
neighborhoods.
They
stood
behind
with
this
since
1981,
and
we
weren't
told
that
we
had
to
have
liability
insurance
to
be
in
RCL
and
we
fought
to
get
liability
insurance
and
we
asked
our
members
every
year
to
donate
$20
because
of
our
course
of
income.
B
But
I
say
there
is
a
way
if
the
city
can
help
us
with
paying
this
that'd
be
a
blessing,
but
we
were
told
and
we
have
it
from
1981-
we've
been
paying
for
liability
insurance
that
covers
our
organization.
So
I'd
like
to
talk
with
you.
Maybe
you
can
help
us,
but
I
just
had
to
say
something.
Please
help
us.
We
don't
wanna,
be
a
sinking
ship.
If
something
do
happen,.
C
Q
Good
morning,
Thank
You
mr.
chairman,
good
morning,
everyone
and
I
wanted
to
thank
everyone
for
attending
this
very
important
conversation
and
to
hear
about
this
piece
of
legislation.
As
a
district
council,
member
I
often
encounter
zoning
issues
that
easily
could
have
been
avoided
simply
by
by
closing
an
existing
loophole,
and
that
is
the
purpose
of
this
bill.
When
we
reformed
zoning
about
2013-2014
I
believe
we
got
most
of
it
right.
Q
However,
over
the
years,
I
have
been
made
aware
of
the
loopholes
that
less
scrupulous
developers
and
their
agents
have
used
to
go
around
the
community
and
force
a
project
on
a
neighborhood.
This
bill
is
the
RCO
protections
bill,
it
protects
developers,
it
protects
communities
and
it
is
simply
an
update
of
the
work
that
was
done
years
ago.
On
the
zoning
code
reform.
Let
me
explain:
there
are
essentially
five
things
that
this
bill
will
do
number
one.
Q
It
requires
effective
property
owners
that
developers
will
make
sure
that
effective
property
owners
will
receive
a
certificate
of
mailing
and
forming
them
them
of
the
date
and
time
of
the
meeting
this
eliminates
the
complaint.
I
wasn't
notified.
There
is
proof
there
is
verification.
This
is
one
of
the
biggest
issues
that
we
have
as
a
district
council
office
that
people
say,
I
was
not
notified,
and
this
is
something
I
believe
is
easily
fixable.
The
third
thing
that
this
piece
of
legislation
would
do
is
require
a
large
sign
on
the
front
of
the
property
signage
information.
Q
It's
always
a
good
thing
and
again
this
is
protection
for
both
the
developer
and
the
community.
So
one
of
the
concerns
that
we
heard
from
the
administration
is
well:
how
can
we
distribute
these
signs,
we're
going
to
a
system
where
you
can
print
your
sign
from
home?
That's
the
way
the
technology
is
moving
and
that's
what
the
future
and
the
vision
is
for
zoning.
Q
Is
that
you'll
be
able
to
print
your
document
out
at
home
I'm,
assuming
that
the
city
isn't
going
to
be
providing
the
bright
orange
paper
that
is
provided
right
now,
when
you
have
your
document,
that's
to
be
posted,
and
so
my
question
is:
is
it
just
going
to
be
a
white
sheet
of
paper?
That's
posted
that's
supposed
to
provide
adequate
notice
and
says
that
there
is
a
hearing.
There's
information
about
this
project.
That
is
not
the
kind
of
notification
that
we
need.
Q
We
need
to
give
people
every
opportunity
to
attend
hearings
and
to
attend
our
CEO
meetings,
and
that
is
what
we
are
attempting
to
do
here.
The
sign
has
to
be
up
21
days
before
the
hearing.
That's
the
fourth
thing
that
we
wanted
to
address
so
basically
right
now,
if
I
apply
for
Zoning
January
first
and
receive
my
refusal,
I
may
have
my
rco
meeting
with
the
community
or
February
first,
my
zoning
hearing
might
not
be
until
June,
21st
and
so
I
don't
have
to
post
my
sign
until
June
1st.
Q
Q
Last
but
not
least,
we
are
requiring
the
City
Planning
Commission
to
notify
by
regular
mail
all
property
owner
whose
base
zoning
district
is
changed
by
council
ordinance.
Again,
this
is
about
notification.
This
is
easy.
The
city
notifies
you
individually
or
publicly
when
we
do
pretty
much
everything
else.
Regarding
your
taxes,
if
you
have
to
move
your
car,
if
there's
a
change
in
or
if
there's
utility
work
in
the
neighborhood,
if
there
are
street
closures,
we
post
signs
when
we're
closed
for
holidays,
we
can
certainly
give
notice
that
we
are
rezoning
your
property.
Q
This
is
a
consumer
notice,
and
so
we
don't
think
that
any
of
these
things
are
out
of
the
boundaries
or
you
know
a
burden
to
the
city
of
Philadelphia.
I
did
want
to
jump
ahead
of
mister
for
gorski's
testimony
a
little
bit.
One
of
the
things
that
you
notice,
or
that
you
make
note
of
in
your
testimony,
was
that
there
could
be
a
citywide
notification
to
every
property
owner
and
the
bill
has
been
amended.
We
have
offered
an
amendment,
so
that
would
no
longer
be
the
case.
Q
Q
We
would
certainly
always
want
to
work
with
you,
but
we
haven't
seen
what
is
being
done
to
address
these
issues,
and
so
this
bill
is
a
an
exact
reflection
of
of
that
that
we
haven't
seen
what
has
been
opposed
by
the
Planning
Commission,
and
so
we
offer
this
bill
and
it's
amendments
so
that
we
can
get
the
change
that
we
need
when
it
comes
to
zoning.
This
is
very,
very
important.
Q
A
M
Good
job
councilman
I
just
do
that.
I
have
a
question.
Can
you
just
clarify
for
me
the
certified
mail
component
and
how
does
that
work
and
a
lot
of
times
you
have
certified
mail,
a
recipient
has
to
sign
for
it,
and
so
I
know
when
you're
covering
a
particular
area
for
development
project.
Sometimes
people
are
at
home
some
people.
Sometimes
people
aren't
home.
So
what
happens
is
doing
that
process
and
I'm
assuming
because
it
is
certified,
not
that's
proof
the
develop
that
the
developer
did
their
due
diligence
to
notify
everyone,
so
just
clarify
that
component.
Q
So
it's
not
actually
certified
mail
as
a
certificate
of
mailing
which,
basically
sir
it
you
know.
We
use
the
certified
word,
which
is
a
little
bit
confusing,
but
it's
essentially
the
post
office
guaranteeing
that
they
have
delivered
the
mail
to
your
address.
So
you
don't
have
to
be
there.
You
don't
have
to
sign
for
it.
You
know,
but
essentially
you're
paying,
to
ensure
that
this
mail
is
going
to
be
delivered
to
your
property,
to
your
dress
that
you
have
received
it,
but
no
one
has
to
sign
for
it.
Okay,.
Q
M
Because
I've
done,
we
deal
with
this
as
well,
and
so
that
takes
out
the
way
of
a
developer
who
says
they
want
to
have
because
a
lot
of
times
they
are
hire
people
from
the
neighborhood
right
to
put
flyers
and
people
doors,
so
that
process
was
no
longer
a
partner's
process.
Because
now
you're
going
through
an
official
notification
process,
didn't
know
to
make
sure
everyone
got
notified
for
the
record.
Well,.
Q
Q
Have
received
this
notification,
this
protects
a
developer
so
that
people
cannot
come
into
zoning
hearings
and
say
you
never
notified
me
and
they
can
say.
Oh
yes,
we
did
here's
the
verification
right
here,
but
we
would
encourage
them
to
again.
You
know,
follow
the
law
through
the
certificate
of
mailing
and
also
you
know
they
could
still
hire
folks
from
the
neighborhood
to
go
out
and
canvass
and
to
make
people
aware
of
their
project
and.
M
Just
the
last
thing,
just
for
planning
will
you
guys
be
coordinate
with
the
developer
with
the
certificate
component
for
the
record
as
a
part
of
the
package
that
says
like
normally,
we
would
get
a
letter
from
you.
Email
from
planning
saying
these
are
skills
need
to
be
notified.
The
XYZ
development
is
taking
place
in
the
neighborhood,
so
you
also
have
a
copy
of
this
certificate.
Just
for
the
record
stating
that
everyone
has
been
notified
in
a
particular
area,
we.
M
M
M
It's
like
one-time
development
project
was
going
on
where
half
of
my
block
of
new
and
the
other
half
didn't
know,
and
it
kind
of
did
make
sense,
because
the
project
was
like
pretty
much
in
the
middle,
and
so
it
created
a
whole
lot
of
discontent
on
it
on
the
block,
because
that
day
people
do
want
to
be
notified
about.
What's
going
on,
you
know:
okay,
cool
cool
babies.
Thank
you.
A
E
Fourteen
three
hundred
administration
and
procedures,
section
of
the
zoning
code
by
increasing
the
scope
of
the
one
year
rule,
which
requires
a
time
restriction
before
cases
refused
by
the
Zoning
Board
of
Adjustment,
can
reapply
to
on
on
this
bill
would
add
cases
that
are
dismissed
by
the
CBA
to
the
list
of
cases
covered
by
the
one-year
rule.
This
bill
will
also
require
notification
of
effective
properties
of
by
all
zoning
bills
passed
for
some
proposed
bills.
This
could
be
a
citywide
notification
of
every
property
owner.
E
There
are
several
proposed
changes
to
the
registered
community
organization
process,
including
the
determination
of
the
coordinating
group,
how
notices
are
sent
to
impacted
neighbors
and
what
information
should
be
provided
in
a
notification
letter
and
on
an
additional
carbon
corrugated
cardboard.
Zoning
poster
the
city
planning
Commissioner
is
in
favor
of
increased
transparency
and
better
communication
to
communities
that
are
impacted
by
zoning
changes.
A
new
development
in
neighborhood,
however,
many
of
the
proposed
changes
will
be
onerous
to
the
average
homeowner
seeking
de
minimis
variances.
E
The
notification
process
proposed
include
additional
cost
to
both
the
applicants
and
the
city.
Given
these
outstanding
issues,
the
City
Planning
Commission
staff
is
working
with
councilmember
banner
staff
to
try
to
address
the
concerns
of
the
City
Planning
Commission
staff
and
of
the
development
community.
So
you
play
the
commission
considered
bill
number
one,
eight
zero
to
ninety
five
and
it's
meeting
of
May
15th
of
this
year.
I
recommend
that
it
not
be
approved
and
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank.
A
A
A
A
N
James
Moran
ski
president,
at
BIA,
Thank,
You,
chairman
Greenlee,
and
the
members
of
the
rules
community
for
the
opportunity
to
comment
on
bill
number
of
180
0
to
9
v.
Vi
a
is
the
treated
Association
of
residential
mixed-use
developers
working
throughout
Philadelphia,
as
long
as
as
well
as
professionals
that
provide
development
industry
with
products
and
services
I'm
here
today
to
express
VI
is
concern
over
bill.
One
eight
zero
to
nine
five
introduced
by
Councilwoman
bass
to
make
significant
changes
to
the
notification
process
by
developers
to
the
community.
N
The
bia
was
the
first
organization
to
come
to
council
over
decade
ago
and
ask
for
modernization
of
the
zoning
code.
We
helped
make
that
a
reality
with
several
of
our
members
on
their
zoning
code.
Commission.
We
are
proud
of
our
part
to
initialise
and
working
on
and
pushing
for
this
critical
reform.
Any
good
developer
wants
to
build
something:
that's
supported
by
the
community,
the
zoning,
a
form
provided
critical
community
input
and
notice
for
development
process
and
in
return,
help
provide
certainty
for
developers.
N
We
understand
that
council
members
are
frustrated
with
their
constituents
are
complaining
that
they
had
no
idea
of
the
various
projects
occurring
in
their
neighborhood.
Even
after
many
current
notifications,
the
code
modifications
in
the
code,
but
developers
need
to
know
when
their
outreach
is
done
and
when
they
can
proceed
with
their
project.
Increasing
the
various
notifications
required
will
create
unnecessary
delays
and
development
process
and
thus
increase
the
difficulty
of
residential
building
in
many
parts
of
the
city.
Further,
it
will
not
guarantee
neighbors
participation
in
the
process.
Direct
community
outreach
by
the
are
SEOs
and
concerned.
N
Neighbors
continues
to
be
the
best
way
for
neighbors
to
be
informed.
This
legislation
puts
a
notification
onus
on
the
developer,
as
opposed
to
how
its
currently
shared
by
the
Planning
Commission
and
as
a
second
new
obligation
on
developer,
to
give
notice
of
the
RCO
meeting,
which
has
been
always
done
by
the
coordinating
or
Cl
there's
no
good
reason
or
good
argument
to
make
these
changes
other
than
to
increase
costs
of
developers,
as
the
proposals
will
not
increase
participation
or
raise
awareness
in
any
meaningful
way.
N
The
BIA
believes
focus
should
be
on
streamlining
and
improving
the
process
of
residential
construction
density,
not
adding
unnecessary
and
time-consuming
steps
which
do
not
offer
a
tangible
benefit.
Instead,
the
legislation
has
a
potential
to
dramatically
delay
the
timeline
and
many
projects
throughout
the
city
in
convincing
builders
and
local
residents
and
increasing
project
costs.
The
BIA
has
not
had
sufficient
time
to
consider
the
full
ramifications
of
the
very
comprehensive
amendments
that
were
just
put
forth.
N
We
count
we
caution
that
they
need
to
be
deliberated
carefully,
with
the
full
input
of
the
Planning
Commission
Illinois
zoning
board
and
the
RCO
community.
The
BIA
opposes
bill
number
1,
802
95,
and
we
urge
the
members
of
the
committee
on
rules
to
not
approve
it.
Thank
you
for
your
consideration.
Thank.
A
You,
sir,
before
we
move
to
the
next
two
I
should
put
on
the
record,
because
these
names
were
called
but
I
think
they
were
just
submitting
a
written
testimony,
albert
gerard
of
lower,
more
immense,
exhibit
association
and
chris
borland
of
the
president
of
Somerton
civic
association.
Both
have
written
testimony
in
support
of
this
bill,
Reverend
Williams
I
think
your
name
was
next.
You
want
to
go.
Please.
B
Shoot
one
bill
for
an
able
organization
in
Germantown,
Councilman,
Sidney
bass,
is
a
person
of
the
year.
I
hope
thank
God
for
her
for
sending
this
proposal,
because
those
who
do
not
know
work
with
our
CEOs.
This
is
a
crisis
for
us
and
to
help
eliminate
their
owners.
The
contractors
we
actually
go
out
and
deliver
flowers,
because
the
people
tell
us
a
hearing.
They
have
not
gotten
a
notice
about
the
meaning.
B
If
C,
B
and
C
did
not
go
door
to
door
and
put
them
we're
not
saying
to
help
you
be
a
burden,
but
we're
saying
work
with
the
people.
If
the
people
see
that
they're
not
getting
it
come
out
and
vote
yeah,
your
name
and
we're
saying
this
proposal
is
a
great
blessing
so
on
time,
because
we've
just
been
talking
this
over
year
after
year.
How
can
this
eliminate
the
issues
that
we're
going
through
and
be
more
recognized
in
the
community?
B
N
P
P
With
regards
to
the
amendments,
only
one
comment
after
make
in
general
I
support
these
amendments,
but
the
one
question
I
must
ask,
is
notifying
the
certified
certificate
of
mailing
piece
for
notifying
the
applicants.
I
think
there's
an
opportunity
for
subversion.
There,
too
and
I
think
that
should
be
really
looked
at
again
to
tighten
that
up.
I
think
it
can
be
tightened
up,
because
I
can
right
off
the
bat
I
can
see
a
way
to
get
around
that,
but
on
the
whole,
I
think
this.
These
amendments
are
good.
P
I'm,
sorry,
you
guys
are
inconvenient
I
apologize,
but
at
ba,
however,
but
when
you're
talking
about
communities
who
are
invested,
stakeholders
who
have
substantial
investment
in
their
problems
in
their
community
being
notified
properly
in
a
way
that's
cost
effective
and
and
it's
beneficial
to
both
parties
I
think
needs
considerable
attention.
So
I
think
we
need
to
move
forward
with
better
legislation
to
keep
tightening
this
process
up
so
I'm
supportive.
All
of
these
amendments,
as
it
has
been,
except
with
tightening
up
the
certification
piece.
Okay.
Q
Want
to
thank
you
all
for
being
here
today
and
mr.
Brice
I.
Would
love
to
you
know,
have
a
conversation
with
you
so
that
we
can,
you
know
further,
explore
what
your
concerns
are
and
address
them.
We're
certainly
open
to
working
to
strengthen
what
we
have
already.
So,
if
you
know
you
or
anyone
really
has
any
ideas
that
we
think
could
better
protect,
both
the
community,
the
development
community,
you
know
and
our
neighborhoods,
then
we
would
love
to
have
those
conversations,
so
we're
certainly
open
to
talking
further
Thank
You
councilman.
Your
other
questions.
H
H
H
My
recommendation
would
be
that
you
reduce
that
terrific
idea
to
writing
and
make
the
request
officially
to
City
Planning
or
whatever
the
appropriate
office
is
so
that
our
SEOs
collectively
can
can
raise
the
kind
of
ideas,
good,
bad
and
indifferent
on
how
government
can
or
should
do
better
to
serve
our
SEOs
I'm,
not
a
district
council
person,
I've
learned
to
honor
respect
the
space
that
they
have
to
live
in
daily
and
kudos
to
district
council
people.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
A
A
R
My
name
is
Sandra
paratus
and
I
represent
a
concerned,
community
association,
which
is
what
are
the
original
our
CEO,
so
we
were
freed
from
the
8th
district.
We
have
been
a
part
of
this
process
from
the
onset
and
have
been
able
to
witness
and
help
fine-tune
what
has
been
going
on
to
ensure
that
the
community
is
informed.
R
What
we
know
is
that
volunteers
that
come
members
who
are
a
part
of
the
art
studio
process
should
be
understood
as
volunteers
who
have
to
spend
their
own
personal
time
to
be
a
part
of
this
process
in
this
climate
of
social
apathy.
That
process
needs
to
be
supported
in
every
way.
We
are
up
against
very
savvy
lawyers
developers
who
speak
legalese
and
are
very
intimidating
when
they
contact
the
rCOS
they
are
intimidating
with
regards
to
timelines
with
regards
to
the
law.
R
Notification
is
a
big
part
of
that
intimidation
and
many
developers
use
that
as
a
loophole.
They
simply
don't
do
it.
They
find
reasons
to
know,
send
out
templates
that
have
been
provided
by
the
city
that
contain
absolutely
no
information.
They
rush
the
process
so
that
by
the
time,
the
meeting
that
the
zoning
hearing
is
is
that
comes
up.
The
the
community
meeting
has
been
too
early
or
it
has
been
too
late.
They
are
intimidating.
R
Knowing
that
the
come,
he
has
not
been
notified
and
many
are
ciose
back
down.
Absolutely
we
do
need
some
form
of
insurance
so
that
we
do
not
have
to
be
intimidated.
We
need
more
training
about
how
the
law
actually
works
for
us,
but
any
protection
that
we
can
get
in
that
regard
is
possible.
One
of
the
other
loopholes
is
the
wearing
down
of
the
process.
R
O
O
O
We
believed
the
amendment
were
heard,
small
developers
because
the
fees
are
higher
to
a
cost
of
mailing
individual
meals,
a
notification
to
all
individual
of
neighborhoods
I
know
it's
a
information
usually
set
out
a
list
of
least
a
hundred
neighbors
on
the
list,
and
if
it's
a
dollar
twenty
forty
cents,
plus
stamps
it'd,
be
two
dollars
about
two
dollars
for
each
mail
and
I
mean
and
if
I
guess.
If
the
Arsenal
end
up
canceling
the
RCO
meeting
we
like
to
know
who
would
be
in
charge
of
the
lost
costs.
O
K
K
First
of
all,
we've
got
some
common
issues
and
accounts
of
councillors.
Johnson
also
stated
this
notification,
I
believe,
is
a
joke.
I
believe
that
no
one
has
a
there's,
no
checks
and
balances
on
it.
Just
recently
we
just
had
a
meeting.
Last
week,
half
the
block
got
a
notice
and
half
the
block
didn't
so
in
the
13th
Ward,
our
CEO.
What
we
do
is
we
actually
print
out
our
own
notifications
to
the
block,
because
we've
come
in
to
developers
and
owners
who
have
not
notified
the
committee
themselves.
So
that's
one
of
the
issues.
K
Basically,
what's
happening
is
the
lawyers
and
the
developers
are
coming
in
with
their
interpretation,
and
this
is
what
they're
telling
a
community.
So
so
we
fly
our
neighborhood
and
you
look
at
the
addresses
that
the
Planning
Commission
is
sending
out.
Maybe
we
get
half
a
block,
I
can't
figure
that
out
and
and
some
of
the
ones
right
directly
almost
across
on
the
other
side
of
the
street.
They
don't
get
that
notice.
So
we're
we
can
curb
with
your
amendments.
13Th
ward
are
Co
and
around
an
aria
we
appreciate
you
thank.
D
Just
want
to
thank
the
Councilwoman
for
bringing
up
this
very
important
issue.
I
have
a
tale
of
two
districts:
I
have
one
part
of
my
district,
which
is
in
need
of
a
lot
of
economic
development.
I
have
another
part
of
my
district.
That
says:
we've
experienced
too
much
of
a
good
thing,
and
so
you
have
to
balance
that
and
with
by
right
now,
there's
less
of
an
interaction
needed
between
district
council
people
and
development.
D
People
who
did
the
new
zoning
code
kind
of
wanted
less
interference
from
elected
officials
and
I
understand
how
that
can
happen
until
you
need
it.
So
this
allows
again
greater
reinforcement
of
organizations
to
put
in
check
some
of
the
development
I
went
up
and
did
a
walking
tour
of
one
of
my
and
I'm
careful,
not
to
say
which
part
of
my
district,
but
in
one
part
of
my
history
they
wanted
to
develop
an
old
warehouse
and
the
developer
came
in
and
said,
here's
what
it's
going
big.
D
This
is
what
it's
going
to
look
like
and
they
said
well
the
community
so
well.
If
we
don't
like
that,
we
don't
like
to
build
a
material.
If
we
don't
like
the
density,
what
happens
then?
And
they
said,
then
we
get
mean
about
it
now.
So
what
did?
What?
What
did
they
say
to
you?
Get
me
that
there
is
a
could
and
I
say
this,
because
you
said:
there's
a
bully
mentality
like
get
down
or
lay
down.
D
This
is
how
its
competing
and
I've
got
to
tell
you
here
and
now:
that's
not
how
it's
going
to
be
that
the
the
community
is
going
to
have
the
final
say.
And
yes,
there
are
laws
that
give
developers
certain
property
rights
and
things
like
that,
but
to
the
fullest
end
of
law
to
the
fullest
debt
of
involvement
when
I
had
a
community
having
their
say
and
so
I'm,
just
thankful
that
you
are
empowering
these
organizations
to
be
able
to
to
have
this
say:
okay,.
A
Q
A
Okay,
that
completes
our
public
hearing
much
quicker
than
I
thought.
It's
just
great
I
thought
we'd
be
here
a
lot
while
longer
just
again,
for
the
record
bill
number
is
185
one
five
and
one
six
zero.
Seven
one,
zero
or
he'll
do
to
call
the
chair
at
the
request
of
those
sponsors
that
completes
the
public
hearing
and
we
will
go
into
our
public
meeting
and
the
chair
recognizes
councilman
Heenan
for
motion
on
amendments.
Please.
I
Thank
You
mr.
chair
I,
move
that
the
amendments
to
bill
number
one,
eight,
zero,
four,
two,
three
one:
eight
zero,
four,
two:
four
one:
eight
zero,
four,
five
one,
one:
eight:
zero:
four:
nine
six,
one:
eight
zero:
four,
nine
eight
one:
eight
zero:
five:
zero;
seven,
one:
eight
zero;
five
one:
zero
one:
eight
zero,
five
one,
one,
one:
eight:
zero:
three:
four
six
and
one:
eight
zero.
Four,
six,
three,
also
one:
eight
zero,
two,
nine
five
move
that
the
amendments
be
adopted.
Second,.