►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Formal Meeting - 10/02/2018
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Welcome
to
the
City
Council
meeting,
thanks
for
being
with
us
tonight,
as
always
we're
going
to
start
with
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance.
We
have
a
Scout
troop
here
to
lead
it
for
us
tonight.
Its
troop
190
from
the
yel
crest
area
led
by
Darrin
Bell.
Would
you
guys
mind
leading
us
in
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance
today?
Let's
all
rise.
A
A
A
B
My
name
is
Andrew
klaahsen
and
I
go
to
you
into
elementary
school.
What
do
you
like
about
Scouts?
You
just
learn
a
lot
that
is
very
helpful,
like
in
your
daily
life.
B
A
B
A
B
B
A
Thank
you
both
for
being
leaders
and
volunteering,
and
thank
you,
young
men
you're,
of
course
welcome
to
stay
for
the
whole
council
meeting.
If
you'd
like
to
they're
always
very
exciting
and
tonight
will
surely
be
such
or
thank
you
if
you
need
to
go,
and
we
appreciate
you
leading
in
our
Pledge
of
Allegiance
tonight,
we
usually
do
a
welcome
and
review
of
the
standards
of
conduct.
This
doesn't
look
like
too
rowdy
a
crowd
tonight,
but
I'll
just
review
them
for
consistency's
sake.
Please
don't
hold
up
very
big
signs
to
block
people's
views.
A
If
you
have
something
you
want
to
give
to
the
council
a
handout
just
raise
your
hand
at
the
point
that
you're
going
to
come
up
and
make
comment
and
one
of
our
staff
members
can
get
it
from
you
and
distribute
it
to
us.
Don't
come
up
to
the
desk,
please
everybody!
When
we
get
to
the
public
comment,
you
get
two
minutes.
You
can't
give
your
time
to
someone
else
and
I
think
the
last
thing
that
comes
to
mind
is
that
a
lot
of
this
furniture-
and
certainly
the
artwork
in
here
is
historic.
A
So
please
be
respectful
of
that,
but
I
trust
you'll
all
be
great
guests
here,
and
we
appreciate
you
being
with
us
tonight
so
we're
gonna
start
with
Section
B
now,
which
is
our
public
hearings.
We
have
an
ordinance
consideration
for
budget
amendment
number
one
for
fiscal
year,
2018
19
I,
don't
have
any
comment
cards
on
that
particular
item.
Is
there
anyone
who's
here
to
speak
to
the
budget?
Amendment
number
one
raise
your
hand:
okay,
council
members,
I
look
for
a
motion,
madam.
F
A
I
have
motion
by
councilmember
luke
account
second
by
councilmember
Rogers,
any
discussion
all
in
favor
aye
any
opposed
that
passes
and
we're
on
to
item
2,
which
is
a
resolution
for
the
revised
public
benefits
analysis
for
donation
to
the
homeless,
Resource
Center,
again,
I
don't
have
any
cards.
Is
there
anyone
here
who's
here
to
speak?
To
that
particular
item
and
madam.
B
Chair,
yes,
I
have
some
new
information
on
that
one.
We
need
to
work
with
the
attorney's
office
to
revise
that
analysis,
just
tweak
it
a
little
bit
and
so
we'll
be
relisting
it
on
the
October
16th
agenda,
so
I
think
at
this
time
the
council
doesn't
need
to
take
action.
If
there's
anyone
here
to
speak
to
it,
you
can
certainly
take
their
comment
that
will
okay
16
then.
A
A
motion
by
councilmember
kitchen
in
a
second
by
councilmember
Johnston,
any
discussion,
everybody
in
favor
aye
any
opposed,
not
one
passes
item.
Three
is
a
resolution
for
a
proposed
amendment
to
the
interlocal
agreement
with
Salt
Lake
County
on
the
tenth
east
senior
senator
and
Cindy
Cromer
is
here
to
speak
to
that
she's.
The
only
card
I
have.
So
if
anyone
wants
to
speak
on
this
one
raise
your
hand
and
we'll
get
you
a
comment
card.
Thank
you.
Miss
Cromer,
I
think.
G
This
is
the
third
time
I've
been
the
only
speaker
on.
My
name
is
Cindy
Cromer
and
I
live
very
close
to
the
property
in
question
on
tenth
East
I'm
speaking
here
tonight,
to
ask
you
to
undo
an
agreement
which
I
believe
never
should
have
occurred
for
the
past
three
years.
I
have
relentlessly
argued
that
the
parcel
at
237
South
10th
East,
should
not
be
split
into
two
portions.
Now
the
city
in
the
county
have
come
to
the
same
conclusion
for
different
reasons
than
my
own
I.
G
Don't
agree
with
the
reasons
but
I'm
relieved
that
we're
all
agreed
about
the
immediate
solution
which
is
to
undo
the
deal,
the
property
at
237,
South
10th,
the
East
was
a
private
Tennis
Club
many
years
ago,
very
exclusive.
According
to
my
neighbor
born
in
1915,
the
city
acquired
the
property
in
1927,
and
it
continued
to
be
a
mecca
for
tennis.
While
a
Stegner
lived
in
the
neighborhood
and
played
tennis
there
in
1963,
the
property
became
the
home
to
the
first
building
dedicated
to
the
needs
of
senior
citizens
in
the
state.
G
The
building
is
designed
by
Burch
Beale,
who
also
worked
on
this
building.
By
the
way,
more
recently,
the
Salt
Lake
City
Council
provided
CDBG
funding
to
bring
the
building
into
a
DEA
compliance
somewhat
and
zero
escape
the
first,
the
front
yard.
This
open
space
has
a
rich
history
and
is
in
a
part
of
the
city
where
we
simply
are
not
going
to
be
able
to
acquire
additional
open
space
ever
the
city
has
on
the
land,
since
1927
continuously.
G
For
the
past
three
years,
I've
been
on
this
mission
about
the
inappropriateness
of
splitting
the
property
between
the
city
and
the
county.
I
want
to
thank
city
employees
who
have
very
patiently
provided
updates
regarding
the
transfer
of
the
property.
In
response
to
my
relentless
and
numerous
phone
calls,
I
also
want
to
thank
the
city,
attorneys
I,
don't
know
the
appropriate
legal
terms.
But
if
you
go
into
an
agreement
through
a
public
process,
then
you
need
to
extricate
yourself
from
the
agreement
in
front
of
the
public,
which
is
what
is
happening
right
now.
G
A
C
B
A
A
H
My
biggest
concern
is
that,
especially
in
district
6,
there
are
a
lot
of
people
who
simply
do
not
understand.
What's
about
to
happen
here.
I
understand
that
apparently,
six
out
of
the
seven
representatives
on
the
City
Council
are
really
for
this
as
soon
as
possible,
and
I
would
really
like
to
recommend
that
you
take
more
time
I.
Think
not
only
my
district,
but
everybody
else
in
the
city
deserves
better
than
what
is
apparently
proposed
right
now.
There's
a
lot
of
questions.
I
intend
and
have
contacted
a
number
of
people
and
asked
them
simply.
H
I
said
what
do
you
know
about
this
and
they
don't
know
anything
and
I've
been
out
of
town
for
pretty
much
the
last
four
months,
so
I
haven't
kept
up
on
what's
going
on
either
but
I.
Really
it's
not
that
I'm
opposed
to
this
I
just
think.
What's
apparently,
on
the
board
at
this
point
is
not
good
enough
for
anybody
and
I
would
really
appreciate
it.
H
If
you
would
take
some
time,
get
more
public
input,
especially
from
my
residential
neighborhood
and
those
who
simply
are
not
aware
of
the
potential
impact
to
our
residential
neighborhood
I've
lived
on
the
same
corner
in
Salt
Lake
for
32
years
I
raised
all
of
my
kids
in
this
neighborhood
I
love,
my
residential
neighborhood
and
I.
Instead
of
being
a
discriminatory
kind
of
thing,
I
think
it's
part
of
the
diversity
of
living
opportunities
in
Salt,
Lake
and
I
would
just
appreciate
it.
H
If
you
would
take
a
step
back
think
about
the
collateral
impact
that
may
not
be
intended,
but
could
be
really
negative
to
well-established
single-family,
home
neighborhoods
and
before
you
think,
I
just
love
single-family
homes
I
want
you
to
know.
I
have
lived
in
a
duplex
for
32
years
on
the
same
corner.
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
that.
I
just
want
more
time
and
I'm
gonna
bring
as
many
people
as
I
can
here
on
the
16th.
Thank.
A
I
Good
evening,
Council
I'm
I'd
like
to
thank
you
and
for
mr.
turbit
for
taking
for
being
patient
during
the
process
of
amending
Adu
ordinance.
I
have
followed
this
process
over
the
course
of
multiple
months
in
two
years,
so
I.
Thank
you
for
not
giving
up
on
it.
I
also
want
to
thank
you
for
creating
a
balanced,
thoughtful
and
conciliatory
amendment.
I
know
that
there's
nothing
on
this
amendment
that
didn't
come
without
debate
and
without
real
thought.
During
a
housing
crisis,
the
solutions
you
consider
an
error
in
the
thousands
of
units
right.
I
You
often
vote
on
apartment
complexes
in
the
in
the
thousands,
and
although
it's
unclear
the
impact
of
this
amendment,
it's
safe
to
say
it
will
never
reach
the
same
capacity
as
a
high-rise
apartment
building.
So
then
you
might
ask
yourself:
why
not?
Why
vote?
Yes?
What
would
impact?
Could
this
possibly
have?
I
was
raised
by
a
single
immigrant
mother
who
raised
five
children
in
a
modest
single-family
home
in
84
104
at
73
years
old
she
finds
herself
in
a
precarious
predicament.
I
I
It's
for
this
sweet
woman
and
many
others
who
would
otherwise
fall
between
the
housing
policy
cracks
who
were
hard
to
accommodate
when
you
were
trying
to
plan
for
the
thousands
it
is
for
these
people
that
you
vote.
Yes,
I
would
implore
you
to
vote.
Yes,
it
will
have
a
very
meaningful
impact,
even
if
it
is
not
a
large
impact.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
J
J
F
Generally,
approve
the
amendment
to
change
the
accessory
dwelling
units
to
be
more
inclusive
of
a
larger
geographic
area.
I
think
the
restriction
to
have
my
low
fixed
rail
is
is
too
narrow.
I
think
the
fixed
rail
quarters
are
already
doing
their
job
by
housing.
The
high-density
developments
that
we
see
all
over
town
and
I
think
that
more
generally
spreading
accessory
dwelling
units
throughout
the
city
I
think
we
can
spread
out
the
densification
of
the
city
and
I
think
that's
generally
a
good
thing.
F
F
A
B
K
K
A
L
L
That's
been
going
on
in
the
county,
particularly
over
the
past,
maybe
seven,
eight
years,
I
think
for
the
people
who
are
currently
homeowners
in
the
county
should
have
an
opportunity
to
develop
their
own
homes
if,
if
for
all,
the
people
involved
in
neighborhoods
in
regard
to
all
the
issues
that
have
to
be
concerned
in
terms
of
I,
guess
what
building
permits
spaces
and
regulations?
And
if
people
are
considerate
of
each
other
space,
you
know
with
parking
with
building
with
views
which
Heights
dimensions
and
permits.
I.
L
Think
people
adding
on
to
their
own
homes
would
be
a
lot
more
aesthetic
and
important
to
the
people
living
there
into
the
neighborhood.
Rather
than
putting
up
these
big
apartment
buildings
that
they
are
in
sugarhouse,
almost
on
any
corner
downtown
on
fort
south
they're,
quite
I,
think
unappealing
and
quite
unaesthetic,
but
I
think
they're
just
trying
to
serve
a
purpose,
maybe
providing
housing
for
people,
but
also
I
think
the
opportunity
for
a
business
to
be
renting
or
selling.
L
A
Thank
you
and
I
see
of
another
comment
card.
You
can
hand
both
of
those
to
Cindy
Lou
and
we'll
call
you
up
for
your
next
one
as
well,
one
more
any
more
everyone.
If
anyone
wants
to
speak
on
ad
use,
you're
all
welcome
to
come
on
up
state,
your
name
we'll.
Have
you
fill
out
a
comment
card
afterward?
Please
good!.
K
One
of
the
things
that
I
think
is
important
is
what
was
mentioned
earlier
about
just
the
integrity
of
the
neighborhoods
and
it
matters.
But
what
I
can
tell
you
is
that
I've
been
living
in
my
house
and
sugar
house
for
four
years
now
and
I
walk
my
dog
a
lot
and
what
I've
noticed
is
that
there
are
a
considerable
number
of
duplexes
out
a
single
fan.
K
We
homes,
not
duplexes,
but
like
mother-in-law,
apartments
at
a
single-family
homes
in
my
neighborhood
that
you
don't
even
notice
driving
around
it's
only
when
I'm
walking
my
dog
that
I
have
finally
realized.
How
many
are
there,
and
so
as
a
homeowner
I
would
like
to
do
that.
It's
interesting
I
live
across
the
street
from
a
duplex
and
all
up
and
down
my
street.
Our
mother-in-law,
apartments
that
have
valid
addresses
and
right
now,
I
think
I'm
understanding
I'm
not
allowed
to
do
that
in
my
place.
K
K
A
A
M
Name
is
Rebecca:
I
bought
a
house
by
Liberty
Park
about
a
year
ago
has
a
really
large
backyard
and
I
was
like.
This
is
gonna,
be
perfect.
I
can
add
another
unit,
I
came
into
the
Zoning
Department
here
and
I
was
shut
down
and
every
solution
that
I
tried
to
provide
to
create
more
housing,
because
I
know
that
there
is
a
housing
shortage.
My
friends
are
experiencing
it.
M
Also,
another
thing
that
I've
been
looking
into
is
the
construction
costs,
with
the
lumber
being
so
expensive
right
now,
accessory
dwelling
unit
is
gonna
cost.
Maybe
two
hundred
two
hundred
fifty
thousand
dollars
to
construct
I'd
like
you
to
really
consider
some
alternative
housing
options
for
tiny
homes
and
even
shipping
container
homes.
M
If
they're
aesthetically,
pleasing
and
fit
within
some
sort
of
rule
or
guideline
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
we
should
just
throw
you
know
dumps
everywhere,
but
but
really
consider
those
options
and
align
ourselves
with
Portland
and
in
in
Seattle
and
actually
being
able
to
afford
an
accessory
dwelling
unit.
So
we
can
provide
more
housing
for
other
people,
because
I've
definitely
looked
at
the
costs
and
comparables
of
all
the
different
options,
and
that
would
be.
A
N
N
You
know
what
I
had
to
get
all
my
neighbors
to
sign
off
on
that
I
had
to
repave
a
parking
spot
that
you
know
wasn't
ideal
because
it
you
know
it
heats
up.
It
was
dirt.
Now
it's
now
it's
paver
stones.
It
certainly
looks
nice.
A
lot
nicer
now,
but
I
couldn't
afford
it
at
that
point
in
time.
So
you'll
hear
a
lot.
I'm
sure
you've
probably
heard
a
lot
about
parking
in
the
avenues,
and,
oh,
my
god,
if
we
have
another
duplex
and
the
avenues,
the
sky's
gonna
fall.
N
Well,
it's
not,
and
you
know
there
is
parking
in
the
avenues.
If
somebody
has
to
you
know,
Park
a
block
away
and
walk
back
to
their
house.
It's
not
the
end
of
the
world,
and
so
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
look
at
the
details
of
the
updated
Adu
ordinance,
but
in
general
I'm,
very
supportive
of
it.
It's
environmentally
friendly.
It
adds
to
infill
and
you
know,
sort
of
reduces
sprawl
and
also
for
many
homeowners
like
myself,
it
it's
what
made
it
affordable
for
me
to
live
in
Salt
Lake.
So
thank
you.
Thank.
A
O
You
it's
great
to
be
with
you
this
evening.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
share
some
brief
comments.
There's
not
a
lot
of
things
that
bring
me
in
front
of
the
council,
as
you
know,
but
affordable
housing
is
one
of
those
and
particularly
addressing
the
root
causes
of
homelessness,
I'm,
a
big
champion
and
supporter
of
accessory
dwelling
units.
As
you
know,
I've
spoken
to
you
about
it
before
worked
on
the
previous
legislation
which
we
have
on
the
books.
O
Now
we
know
from
that
previous
work
that
we
did,
that
we
haven't
been
overwhelmed
as
a
city
and,
in
fact,
if
anything,
we've
been
underwhelmed
with
a
number
of
accessory
units
that
have
been
added
to
our
housing
stock.
I
urge
you
to
move
forward
and
adopt
the
accessory
dwelling
unit
ordinance
to
remove
as
many
barriers
as
you
can
to
make
it
ubiquitous
throughout
the
city.
I
can
speak
from
my
own
neighborhood,
which
has
dozens
and
dozens
of
accessory
units,
many
of
which
predate
the
1995
zoning
change.
I
love
my
neighbors
that
live
in
these
units.
O
They
provide
rich
tapestry
to
our
neighborhood
they're,
my
kids,
music
teachers,
their
students.
They
provide
babysitting
and
a
lot
of
other
things
that
serve
our
community
very
well,
they're,
our
friends
and
neighbors
and
I
hope.
We
have
many
more
opportunities
to
see
this
kind
of
increase
in
housing
that
has
minimal
impact
on
neighborhoods
and
has
virtually
no
detriment,
and
we
have
great
experience
well
over
a
century
of
accesory
units
throughout
the
city
that
are
working
very,
very
well.
O
Some
of
my
know
may
not
be
legal
because
that's
a
challenging
process
to
legalize
them
and
I
hope
that
process
can
be
addressed
through
this
as
well
to
make
existing
units
become
functional
and
unlegal
as
well.
Good
luck
with
your
deliberations
I
encourage
you
to
adopt
this
and
do
it
swiftly
and
do
it
really
ubiquitously.
Thank
you.
Thank.
D
I
just
bought
a
place
on
First
Avenue,
it's
about
12
East
and
it
it
had
an
apartment
down
the
basement
about
800
square
feet
from
about
1950
to
95
and
I.
Guess
one
of
the
neighbors
complain
about
parking,
and
so
they
came
out
and
shut
it
down
so
anyway.
I
think
it
would
be
a
great
benefit
for
the
well.
For
me,
definitely
I
I
had
a
tenant
move
out
of
the
upstairs.
You
know
when
I
moved
in
and
she
can't
afford
to
live
in
the
avenues.
D
She's
getting
really
cheap,
rent
there
and
I
felt
bad
for
she
has
nowhere
to
go,
but
I
mean
what
could
I
do
I
can't
let
let
her
live
downstairs,
because
it's
not
legal.
It's
got
a
kitchen
and
everything
it's
not
been
used
in
20
years.
I
think
it
could
be
definitely
how
for
the
homeless
situation,
I
think
it's
unfair
to
build
all
these
great
units
for
homes,
people
sure
they
have
their
problems,
but
the
same
people
that
are
struggling
to
pay
their
mortgage
have
to
have
to
subsidize
all
these.
D
These
5,000
incredibly
nice
units
in
sugarhouse.
Well,
we're
not
allowed
to
have
renters
help.
Pay
the
tax
for
for
the
homeless
people
so
anyway,
I
just
I'm,
really
grateful
for
all
the
people
that
come
out
to
support
this
and
I
am
grateful
for
the
council
for
your
the
direction
that
you're
moving
on
this,
and
that's
all
thanks.
Thank.
A
A
A
C
Thank
you
for
thank
you
for
being
here
tonight.
It's
nice
to
have
you
with
us
and
I,
also
wanted
to
thank
you
for
your
comments
to
the
grainery
district
for
the
mural
program
on
Saturday.
That
was
a
fun
event
and
I
feel
like
the
RTA
staff,
did
a
really
great
job
at
organizing
that
so
I
hope
that
you'll
share
that
with
everybody,
I
do
have
a
question
and
it's
more
of
a
technical
question,
I'm
curious
about
the
location
of
the
current
Road
home
and
why
the
administration
opted
not
to
exercise
their
option
for
purchase.
B
C
Think
the
reason
why
this
is
of
interest
to
me
it's
for
number
reasons.
You
know
we
cared
a
lot
about
this,
this
neighborhood,
but
this
falls
squarely
within
the
Depot
district,
RDA
project
area
and
as
the
board
chair
of
the
Redevelopment
Agency
I
would
have
appreciated
a
conversation
about
that
and
I
know
that
the
other
board
members
probably
would
have
loved
to
engage
on
that
as
well,
because
we
do
have
strategic
plans
for
that.
Neighborhood.
B
A
Any
other
questions
for
the
mayor.
Okay,
then
we'll
move
on
to
comments
to
the
City,
Council
and
I
have
two
cards
here,
one
from
Steven
pace
and
the
second
from
Bernie
Hart.
This
is
the
part
of
the
council
meeting
when
anybody
can
come
talk
to
us
about
anything.
You
want
the
council
to
hear
for
two
minutes,
Steven
pace.
If
you
want
to
come
up,
please
do
take
your
two
minutes
and
Bernie
we'll
hear
from
you
after.
Q
My
name's
Steven
pace,
181
B
Street
on
an
adjoining
property
at
222,
4th,
Ave,
I'm,
pretty
sure
I've
got
the
biggest
piece
of
flat
residential
ground
that
has
no
use
in
the
avenues
in
Salt
Lake.
It's
got
two
buildings
on
it
that
the
city
declared
to
be
City
historic
sites.
I
thought
in
my
innocence
that
I
might
be
able
to
rehabilitate
them.
City
said,
don't
know,
know
for
the
past
bunch
of
years.
The
best
idea
I
could
get
from
Planning
and
Zoning
on
what
to
do
with
that.
Q
Land
is
to
build
a
community
vegetable
garden
which
may
make
sense
on
some
planet,
but
I,
don't
think
on
this
one.
That
seems
to
be
more
away
for
that
planning
and
zoning
to
tell
you
to
basically
pee
up
a
rope.
I've
looked
at
this
a
bit
harder
and
determined
that
there's
sort
of
an
ugly
little
secret
about
trying
to
get
land
and
I
wanted
to
buy
something
from
the
city,
and
that's
that
it's
a
lot
easier
to
steal
land
than
it
is
to
buy
it
from
Salt.
Q
Lake,
City
and
I've
got
all
kinds
of
examples
about
that.
You
don't
have
to
surveil,
and
you
don't
have
to
have
proof
of
purchase.
You
can
apply
to
zoning
without
actually
owning
the
ground
and
get
a
permit
to
build
on
it,
and
so
I
look
closely
at
the
land
surrounding
me
and
you
have
to
survey
the
ground
in
order
to
know
exactly
where
the
property
lines
are
and
where
the
buildings
are
to
see
how
much
of
that's
going
on.
On
my
blog,
there
are
three
substantial
buildings
that
are
encroaching.
Q
One
of
them
is
built
mostly
on
city
ground.
There's
a
house,
that's
about
5
feet
onto
its
neighbor's
property,
I've
looked
elsewhere
in
the
avenues,
and
that
is
going
on
all
over
that
messes
up
mortgage
financing,
title
insurance
and
all
kinds
of
other
stuff.
Now
this
is
not
me.
That's
saying
this
in
the
packet
that
I
passed
out,
I
did
a
grandma
search
on
the
property
that
I've
got
and
sure
enough.
Q
Q
Well,
if
I
could
just
finish
by
saying
that
if
anybody
wants
to
talk
more
about
this
or
see
how
to
look
up
stuff
for
their
own
land
to
see
whether
or
not
there
are
approachment
saw
on
it,
I
stick
around
for
a
little
while
and
be
glad
to
show
you
how
to
do
it.
It's
pretty
easy
everything,
but
the
survey
which
cost
some
money.
Thank
you
thank.
P
Just
want
to
say
that
I
met
with
mr.
pace
and
what's
what
mr.
pace
is
trying
to
do,
is
actually
restore
a
historic
property
and
would
be,
but
for
the
fact
that
it
collapsed
over
time
would
be
trying
to
preserve
the
thing
that
our
ordinance
are
trying
to
protect.
But
because
of
the
way
the
ordinance
is
written
is
not
able
to
do
that
and
we've
been
trying
to
go
through
as
much
as
we
can
in
the
administration.
P
A
R
You
I've
been
here
a
number
of
times,
voicing
concerns
about
the
homeless
situation
in
Salt
Lake.
Two
years
ago
we
started
a
program
over
at
the
library
you
think
of
it
as
our
Tai
Chi
program,
but
we
think
of
it
as
an
o1
project,
we're
looking
at
new
diet,
new
ideas
about
human
behavior
and
new
ideas
about
who
we
are
for
us.
It's
a
big
deal
and
I
thought
I'd
update
you
on
what
we're
doing.
R
Over
the
last
two
recent
two
weeks
we
service
there
had
165
different
individuals,
join
our
Tai
Chi
Program
at
the
Rio
Grande.
This
is
different
individuals,
the
Rio
Grande
at
the
library
we've
been
averaging
45
people
a
day,
six
five
days
a
week
and
a
physical
activity
program
that-
and
we
and
in
this
program
we
do
not
recruit.
We
do
not
go
out
and
look
our
outreach
comes
about
by
people
bringing
their
friends
to
us.
They
come
to
us.
There
is
no
outreach.
R
We
have
two
people
currently
in
detox
over
VOA.
We
have
one
person
on
the
way
the
relapse
rates
on
for
addiction
and
all
existing
programs
are
very
high.
We
one
of
our
people
that
just
been
off
spice
now
for
about
three
months,
is
organizing
a
different
type
of
recovery
type
program
and
we'll
be
doing
that
as
another
program.
In
addition
to
what
we're
doing,
we
are
also
starting
an
eleven
eleven
project.
R
That
is
a
program
that
will
be
for
almost
exclusively
for
people
that,
because
of
the
recent
geo
information
and
the
rest
for
people
that
have
been
arrested
a
minimum
of
eleven
times
and
have
been
on
on
the
street
or
in
jail
at
least
eleven
years.
It
was
led
Monday
by
somebody
that
had
been
arrested,
100
times
and
has
20
years
of
homelessness.
He
is
one
of
our
leaders
we're
going
to
be
expanding
our
community
service
program
to
include
other
courts.
A
N
My
name
is
Dave
eltis
I'm,
here
to
speak
on
the
item
you
have
under
your
new
business,
which
is
the
state
street
CRA.
I
would
like
to
ask
you
to
please
not
pass
that
tonight.
Please
don't
suspend
the
rules.
Please
do
have
a
public
hearing
on
this,
because
I
don't
think
that
the
state
streets
CRA,
is
really
ready
for
passage.
It
does
not
mention
bicycles
in
there.
N
It's
an
oversight
that
I
find
bewildering.
Given
you
know
this,
the
city's
attempt
to
you
know
become
more
climate,
positive,
more
sustainable,
more
healthy
and
the
CRA
doesn't
mention
that
at
all,
except
for
in
brief
pass
in
crossing
of
State
Street.
It
mentions
nothing
about
bike
lanes
on
State
Street.
It
references
the
life
on
state
references,
the
life
on
state
document.
N
It's
it's
just
not
an
acceptable
document,
as
it
currently
sits
so
having
bike
lanes
on
State
Street,
it's
better
for
air
quality,
the
new
homeless,
shelter
on
seven
South.
You
know
it
needs
bike
lanes
on
seven
south
and
on
State
Street
to
access
it.
You
could
actually
go
in
tomorrow
with
a
can
of
paint
and
paint
bike
lanes
on
seven
south,
because
there's
enough
room
there,
but
because
of
politics,
the
last
time
around
they
did
not
put
bike.
O
N
A
F
A
L
L
Are
there
any
envisioning
that
the
city
has
for
all
the
apartment
buildings
that
are
being
built
over
the
past
few
years?
I've
heard
that
there
may
be
a
need
for
additional
housing
in
Salt,
Lake
City,
but
really
the
aesthetics
that
they
have
is
just
really
I.
Think
pretty
ugly
I
think
and
I'd
be
really
interested
in
the
feedback
of
how
these
apartment
buildings
are
constructed
with
the
purpose
and
functions
that
they're
supposed
to
be
serving
second
would
be
bicycles,
I
heard
the
other
gentle
mention
I
know.
L
Our
police
department
probably
has
a
lot
more
to
do
than
we
all
know
about,
but
how
about
what
bicycle
privileges
that
bicyclists
have?
How
about?
They
also
be
responsible
for
writing
their
bicycles
responsibly,
and
if
the
police
department
don't
have
the
ability
to
monitor
that
which
is
probably
difficult,
then
maybe
the
citizens
can
take
an
active
part
and
maybe
contacting
the
police,
because
these
bicyclists
are
riding
without
any
lights.
You
had
to
drive
to
writing
in
opposite
directions
on
roads.
L
Restaurants,
neighborhoods
I
know
we're
trying
to
put
up
some
kind
of
Chinatown
over
on
State
Street
I
mean
I
lived
in
Oakland
California
and
San
Francisco
and
Berkeley
I'm,
really
in
support
of
Salt
Lake
City,
developing
their
diversity
and
would
like
to
encourage
buildings.
You
know
to
support
that
enhancement
of
our
diversity.
Here,
three.
A
Great
questions,
one
of
them
the
first
one
I
think
on
the
building-
aesthetics,
maybe
nicked
our,
but
our
council
staff
person
can
chat
with
you
in
the
hallway
and
latter.
Two
about
building
diversity
and
cyclist
education,
I
think
I,
Patrick
Leary
is
raising
his
hand
as
the
chief
of
staff.
That's
more
of
an
administrative
side
and
I.
These
two
gentlemen
can
at
least
get
you
going
in
some
good
directions.
Thank
you
for
being
with
us
tonight.
Robert
Goodman
and
Roberts
card
is
the
last
one
I
have,
but
you
everyone's
welcome.
J
Thank
you
to
the
council.
Recently
I've
been
renting
out
my
guest
bedroom
to
students,
doing
medical
rotations
here
at
the
University
of
Utah
Medical
Center,
and
many
of
them
have
been
very
impressed
by
our
public
transportation
infrastructure,
as
well
as
our
bike.
Lane
infrastructure
and
I
just
wanted
to
speak
in
support
of
that
I
think.
J
The
park,
transportation
and
the
way
we
facilitate
bicycles
and
other
modes
of
transportation
is
really
kind
of
the
jewel
of
the
crown
of
our
city,
and
it
was
really
great
to
receive
that
feedback
from
out-of-towners
and
yeah
I
would
also
support
bike
lanes
on
State
Street
as
well
and
as
May
streets
as
possible.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
E
C
Right
kitchen,
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
yeah.
You
know
we've
been
trying
to
get
both
the
nine-nine
on
the
State
Street
CRA
adopted
for
quite
some
time.
In
fact,
the
first
open
house
I
attended
was
you
know
the
first
month
or
two
of
my
tenure
on
the
City
Council
back
in
2016,
so
this
has
been
going
on
for
a
long
time
and
and
so
I'm
really
anxious
to
get
this
moving.
C
However,
I
think
some
community
members
have
made
really
important
points
with
regard
to
the
lack
of
you
know:
the
mention
of
bicycle
infrastructure
or
investment
in
the
State
Street
CRA
in
particular,
and
I,
see
that
we
have
an
RDA
staff,
member
and
Tammy
Hunsaker
in
the
back
and
I
wondered.
If
maybe
this
was
the
appropriate
time
to
talk
about
how
we
could
begin
to
either
incorporate
bicycle
language.
C
You
know
mentioning
bicycle
and
investment,
something
about
you
dot
and
life
on
state
I,
don't
know
exactly
what
we
need
to
do
here,
but
I
think
it
is
an
important
component
to
this
plan,
and
so
I
would
rather
wait
another
week
or
two.
If
we
can't,
you
know,
if
we
can
in
order
to
get
this
a
you
know,
updated
so
I'll,
let
you
drive
it
from
here,
but
that's
my
concern.
P
Madam
chair
I
I
would
also
ask
that
or
encourage
everyone
if
we
can
just
delay
this
until
our
the
meeting
on
the
16th.
That
would
be
I
think
there'd
be
time
at
our
meeting
on
the
9th
and
I
would
ask
the
chair
of
the
board
and
vice
chair
of
the
board
of
the
RDA.
If,
on
that
date,
we
could
have
a
brief
update
and
dialogue
from
our
DEA
staff
on.
P
C
P
A
Part
of
and
gratefully
UDOT
is
a
part
of
that
discussion,
because
this
isn't
our
street.
That's.
Why
we're
not
just
putting
a
bike
lane
on
there,
because
it's
not
ours
to
put
a
bike
lane
on
and
frankly,
you
dot
being
at
the
table
as
a
pretty
exceptional
opportunity
for
us
to
even
have
a
dialogue
about
the
potential
for
alternative
modes
of
paint
striping
to
include
bike
lanes
on
on
that
roadway.
So
it
doesn't
give
me
so
much
pause
partially
because
it's
not
ours
to
do
and
never
was.
A
Secondly,
because
Salt
Lake
City
doesn't
put
bike
lanes
generally
on
streets
that
have
more
than
four
lanes
which
State
Street.
Is
it?
Isn't
it
isn't
something
that
we
would
typically
do?
Even
if
we
did
on
that
street,
we
don't
and
I
think
that
the
life
on
state
work
that's
happening
is
going
to
inform
a
very
good
process,
so
I
have
some
confidence.
I
have
greater
confidence
in
the
life
and
state
incorporation
into
the
redevelopment
CR.
The
CRA
plan
than
mr.
Ellis,
expressed
and
I
am
supportive
of
this
passing
tonight.
A
I'm
not
necessarily
going
to
obstruct
this,
but
I
will
point
out
that
if
we
ask
our
TA
staff
to
amend
the
CRA
document,
it's
my
understanding
that
we,
this
thing
starts
all
over
and
we've
got
to
take
a
new
document
to
our
taxing
entity.
Partners
and
that's
not
something
I
want
to
do
this
inclusion
of
bike.
Reference
is
I,
think
it's
already
built
in
by
the
association
to
life
on
State
and
it
being
in
Salt,
Lake
City
and
the
Complete
Streets
ordinance
that
we're
going
to
be
looking
at
again
as
a
council
actually
this
year.
P
And
just
I'm,
not
necessarily
asking
for
any
tax
change
or
anything
like
that.
I
just
felt
that
it
might
be
a
better
place
for
us
to
have
a
little
bit
of
dialogue
than
during
our
formal
meeting
and
I
would
like
to
have
the
opportunity
to
clarify
what
already
is
in
the
CRA
and
life
on
state
and
explain
to
what
extent
bikes
will
be
involved
and
why,
to
the
extent
that
there
this
isn't
bike
centric
enough.
Why
that
is
I
also.
C
Wouldn't
support
sending
us
back
to
the
taxing
entities
and
starting
all
over
though
that
would
be
not
a
good
use
of
time,
but
maybe
there's
an
opportunity
for
us
to
look
at
some
sort
of
intent.
Language
to
attach
to
this
or
I
think
that
it
may
be
worthwhile
to
have
a
conversation
in
the
RTA
meeting.
For
that
reason,.
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I'm,
not
interested
in
abandoning
my
motion,
but
I
would
say
that
you
know
the
proper
protocol
if
either
council,
member
kitchen
or
wharton
would
like
to
make
a
substitute
motion
they're
more
than
willing
to
do
that.
But
I'm
you
know
at
this
point,
I'm
I
hear
what
you're
saying
I
think
that
we
can
do
some
of
that,
but
I
think
we
can
still
pass
this
out.
That
would
be
my
position,
but
if
you're
interested
in
making
a
substitute
motion
go
for
it
are.
A
P
My
substitute
motion
would
just
be
that
we
move
this
for
a
decision
on
the
16th.
I
julienne
us
for
a
decision
on
16th
and
then
on
the
9th
either
do
some
intent
language
or
have
some
dialogue
to
clarify
this
question
about
bikes
in
a
in
a
more
public
way
and
certainly
I,
don't
think,
caused
any
significant
delay
like
sending
it
back
to
the
taxi
annainsea
entities.
P
J
C
C
J
E
Think
in
the
RTA
meeting
we
could
definitely
have
a
discussion
and
clarify
what
exactly
is
in
the
plan.
The
plan
talks
about
improving
safety
and
mobility
at
both
along
the
corridor
and
at
Street
crossings,
so
that
is
in
the
plan.
The
plan
doesn't
identify
specific
projects
for
bike
lanes,
it's
more
of
an
a
goal
about
what
we
want
to
see
occur.
What
type
of
change
we
want
to
see
occur
in
the
State
Street
area?
E
So,
admittedly,
there
isn't
identified
bike
lane
projects,
but
we
could
clarify
exactly
what
is
and
isn't
in
the
plan
and
and
I
guess.
I
would
add
that
one
of
the
triggers
with
17c
the
RDA
code
state
code.
If
there
are
any
significant
changes
to
the
plan,
we
would
have
to
mail
and
notice
back
out
to
each
property
on
our
re
trigger
the
30-day
public
hearing
please.
B
I
would
move
that
we
suspend
the
rules
and
adopt
a
CRA
plan,
but
with
that
motion,
I'd
ask
the
RTA
chair
and
myself
I
guess
to
put
the
this
discussion
on
next
week's
agenda
so
that
we
can
clarify
what
is
in
a
public
setting
what
is
in
the
CRA
and
what
we've
adopted
and
have
talked
about
adopting
that
we
were
not
delaying
this
any
any
longer.
Okay,.
J
C
A
B
A
All
those
in
favor
any
opposed
all
right,
I
believe
that
finalizes
our
activity
as
an
RDA
board
or
as
a
City
Council
in
creating
these
two
new
RTA
project
areas,
which
is
very
exciting.
For
me,
our
section
F
is
unfinished
business
and
we
have
a
request
related
to
the
rezone
of
545
and
555
West
500
north,
and
we
believe
we
have
a
motion.