►
From YouTube: Redevelopment Agency (RDA) Meeting - 9/11/2018
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
A
One
two
three
eyes
on
me:
thank
you
all
right!
Thank
you
all
for
joining
us
today.
We
are
going
to
kick
start.
Our
meeting
today
with
general
comments
to
the
board
of
directors.
I
have
one
comment
card
today.
So
if
you
would
like,
if
you're
in
the
audience
and
would
like
to
speak
to
us,
please
grab
a
green
comment
card.
Fill
it
out
and
a
staff
member
will
bring
it
to
me.
But
we're
gonna
kick
start
this
meeting
with
a
two-minute
comment
by
Tamra
Wharton,
so
Tamra.
If
you
wouldn't
mind
coming
up
to
the
mic.
D
And
why
they're
being
passed
out?
This
is
a
fascinating
meeting,
because
I
used
to
be
the
air
quality
Ombudsman,
with
small
businesses
for
da
Q
so
and
on
modeling.
We
draped
data
in
color
and
showed
it
in
a
video,
so
there's
a
way
to
show
impact.
We
worked
with
a
space
dynamics
lab,
so
it's
very
interesting
anyway.
I'm
excited
that
you're
looking
at
air
quality
because
we
need
clean
air.
D
So
today,
I
am
approaching
you
and
thanking
you
again
for
all
that
you
do
for
us
I'm
doing
kind
of
it's
a
beautiful
day
in
the
neighborhood
not
always,
and
I
was
going
to
be
like
mr.
Rogers,
but
you
have
a
councilmember
Rogers,
so
I
don't
want
to
upstage
that
but
I've,
given
you
a
packet
and
if
I
can
just
kind
of
show
you
this
is
the
morning.
This
is
this
morning,
so
the
first
page
is
you
could
see.
There
was
a
this.
D
Is
a
homeless
camp
right
there
in
one
of
the
alleys
either
side
of
me?
The
second
was
I,
don't
know
something
dismantled.
The
third
is
lingerie
in
the
bushes.
The
fourth
is
behind
me
is
a
man
that
I
didn't
even
notice
and
then
he
started
moving
and
he
was
sleeping
in
the
alleyway
and
I
asked.
If
he's
okay,
and
he
said
he
was
but
and
the
the
fifth
one
or
six
one
is
my
neighbor.
D
She
has
a
box
cutter
in
her
hand,
she's
not
threatening
me,
but
she
was
dismantling
a
homeless
camp
behind
her
house
this
morning.
This
was
not
planned.
This
is
this
is
just
my
neighborhood,
and
so
she
was
behind
her
house
and
she
met
with
his
business
owner
and
he
or
the
business
employee,
and
he
was
helping
her
dismantle
that
and
then
the
next
one
is
a
picture
of
that's
Everest
collision
and
they've
done
this
beautiful
mural,
and
so
we
believe
in
art
in
our
neighborhood,
because
it
has
only
been
tagged
once
and
we.
D
We
appreciate
that
and
then
the
next
one
second-to-the-last
is
a
picture.
We've
had
so
many
problems
in
so
much
crime
and
such
threat
in
our
inner
neighborhood
that
this,
my
neighbor,
has
put
her
mailbox
to
take
nailed
it
to
a
tree
in
front
of
her
house
in
the
park
strip,
so
that
no
one
will
because
people
were
sleeping
in
behind
her
house
and
the
last
page
is
sadly
a
woman.
That's
on
the
street
and
we're
seeing
this
constantly
I
haven't
slept
well
for
a
long
time
because
we're
managing
our
neighborhood
we're
working
hard.
D
Since
I
talked
to
just
recently
my
neighbor
was
beaten.
He
went
in
the
back
yard
to
stop
someone
from
urinating
in
the
alley
and
he
was
jumped
by
three
people
and
he
was
brutally
beaten
and
his
orbital
bone
was
broken.
There
was
an
assault
the
next
week
on
a
corner
corner
and
we
had
to
have
five
officers
there
and
that
same
week,
my
same
neighbor,
dis,
Anton,
dismantle
the
homeless
camp
behind
her
house
and
then
a
tree
fell
on
me.
4,000
foot
pound
tree
fell
on
me,
so
I've
been
busy
after
my
fire,
but
we're.
D
What
we
would
like
to
do
is
to
do
some
sort
of
surveying
of
our
alley
and
because
we
are
now
to
be
hopefully
a
CRA
area,
we
would
like
to
know
if
we
checked
indicating
the
alley
we
wanted
to
know
if
we
can
get
it
so
that
we
don't
have
through
traffic,
and
we
were
told
that
that's
not
allowed
by
the
city.
So
we
wanted
to
know
if
we
could
be
an
experimental
area
for
you,
because
we
have
to
have
80%
of
homeowners
in
agreement
and
we
we
definitely
want
to
do
this.
D
D
1487
South
Edison
I'm,
the
house
that
had
the
big
fire
and
I've
been
working
on
that
for
the
last
year
and
a
half
going
on
two
years
now
and
built
a
built,
a
fence
and
tried
to
make
my
home
safe.
But
we
have
people
that
are
constantly
moving
in
and
trying
to
trying
to
survive.
And
we
understand
that.
Thank.
D
A
Thank
you
very
much
and
I.
Don't
have
any
more
comment
cards,
but
we
did
I
did
receive
an
email
from
George
Chapman,
which
I
forwarded
to
the
board
members
for
your
reading
pleasure
all
right.
We
do
not
have
any
public
hearings
today,
so
we
are
moving
right
along
to
item
c1,
which
is
an
update
from
Danny
Watson
David
Ortega
on
the
Utah
theater
redevelopment
project.
How
we
doing
today
doing
great
thanks
great!
You
want
to
kick
start
us.
Danny
I
would.
F
Love
to
this
item
is
in
response
to
written
briefing
that
we
actually
submitted
as
part
of
our
August
packet.
Due
to
time.
Obviously,
we
were
not
able
to
address
it.
Then
we
understand
there
might
be
some
questions
from
the
board.
Just
a
little
background
on
the
purpose
of
the
briefing
we
provided
that
as
an
informational
item
for
the
board.
Obviously
there
is
a
lot
of
interest
and
we
have
received
a
lot
of
questions
from
board
members
regarding
the
status
of
the
Utah
theater
project.
F
So
we
thought
it'd
be
helpful
to
provide
that
update
and
that
memo
it
was
really
just
to
kind
of
give
a
sense
of
where
we're
at
in
terms
of
the
the
property,
the
agreement
we
have
with
the
developer
right
now,
what
the
agency
has
done
over
the
past
year
and
a
half
plus,
as
well
as
some
of
the
other
studies
and
information
that
has
been
done
on
the
property.
So
what
we
hope
to
do
as
part
of
our
next
steps
is.
F
We
are
working
with
the
downtown
Alliance,
who
is
putting
forth
a
survey
regarding
the
theater,
putting
information
out
along
with
this
memo
and
doing
that
in
conjunction
with
preservation,
Utah,
just
to
gather
some
public
input
and
sentiment
in
terms
of
the
theater
and
the
project,
and
we
hope
to
use
that
as
well
as
all
the
information
that
we
have
gathered
and
start
determining
what
our
next
steps
are
and
sitting
down
with
Heinz
development.
As
we
look
at
the
property
so
David,
you
have
anything
to
add.
B
F
G
F
And
that's
that's
really
kind
of
one
of
the
purposes
of
the
surveys
also
just
to
get
that
information
out
there
in
terms
of
the
the
theater
itself
is
not
historic,
there's
just
not
enough
characteristics
remaining
in
the
building
to
have
it
qualify
as
a
National
Register
for
historic
structure.
So
that
was
number
one
number
two
is
just
kind
of
put
out
there,
the
information
of,
if
you
were,
to
preserve
the
theater.
What
would
that
potentially
cost?
F
And
as
you
read
in
the
memo,
the
seismic
upgrades,
there
is
something
that
has
not
necessarily
been
addressed
specifically
in
some
of
those
reports.
So
we
think
that
that's
a
significant
question
mark
that
would
need
to
be
explored
further
and
then
also
a
lot
of
the
cost.
Estimates
that
are
provided
in
the
report
do
not
call
for
restoration
of
the
theater
as
much
as
just
preservation
of
what's
left
and
those
are
two
very
different
things
in
terms
of
just
preserving,
what's
in
place
versus
actually
trying
to
restore
what
was
once
the
theater.
F
H
My
follow-up
question
to
that
is,
and
we
received
three
scenarios
correct
we're
waiting
on
the
third
I
think
from
the
staff
report
is
which
on
which
I
read,
but
once
that
preservation
report
comes
back
and
it's
transparent
for
the
public
to
see.
Do
we
have
besides
those
two?
Do
you
have
other
ideas
that
the
RDA
can
present
to
the
board
and
moving
forward
and
19
to
negotiate
with
LaSalle
and
get
that
all
taken
care,
not.
F
H
I
guess
for
the
future,
for
me:
is
there
once
the
preservation
study
comes
back
and
it
says
there
really
isn't
anything
worth
preserving.
Is
there
anything
in
the
interim
that
we
could
working
with
with
Heinz
and
LaSalle
group,
to
see
what
we
can
do
to
streamline
that
process
to
help
move
it
forward.
H
F
I
Okay,
so
I
mean
having
been
in
there.
There
are
definitely
certain
things
that
we
for
sure
want
to
preserve.
Right,
I
mean
like,
even
if
we
don't
preserve
it,
as
a
theater
like,
regardless
of
how
the
preservation
study
kind
of
survey
comes
back,
I
mean,
are
there
elements
of
that
that
we
can
still
deserve,
and
even
if
we
don't
preserve
the
whole
building,
yeah.
I
B
So
the
essence
of
the
survey
is
to
basically
figure
out
if
air
support
any
scenarios
that
we've
looked
at
or
I
point
to
a
very
significant
financial
gap
for
preservation
of
the
theater.
So
what
we
want
to
find
out
is
how
much
support
would
there
be,
for
you
know,
a
subsidy
in
the
tens
of
millions
of
dollars
to
preserve
the
theater
right,
because
that
is
really
our
only
resource
at
this
point.
Okay,.
E
B
F
F
C
B
A
We'll
the
questions
be
cared
only
around
preservation,
so
will
there
be
an
alternative
presented
as
well
as
example?
This
property
is
worth
X,
Y,
&
Z,
and
we
might
really
get
this
many
affordable
units
or
something
else
out
of
it
are
you?
Are
you
gonna,
be
I
mean
cuz
if
you're
only
asking
if
it's
worth
preserving,
you're
gonna
get
a
certain
kind
of
answer.
If
you
need
to
balance
it
out,
I
assume
right
so.
F
At
this
time
there
there
aren't
those
options.
That's
what
we're
gonna
determine
is
the
next
steps.
This
is
the
first
step
for
us
to
as
part
of
our
agreement
looking
at
preserving
the
theater.
This
is
what
we
want
to
put
out
there.
I
should
mention
also
that
this
survey
is
going
to
be
put
out
on
basically
a
web
page
on
the
downtown
lines,
so
there'll
be
a
portal
to
the
survey
and
on
that
web
page
that
you
go
to
will
be
all
of
the
other
information
that
we
wish
to
provide.
F
F
Will
we
will
bring
the
report
or
the
findings
back
to
the
board
so
that
you
know
exactly
where,
where
those
were
and
that's
essentially
we're
working
with
downtown
Alliance?
Who
has
taken
the
lead
on
that
survey
and
pulling
in
us
and
preservation
Utah
to
help
be
the
the
moderator
for
that
and
the
facilitator
for
that
web
page?
F
B
Just
to
provide
a
little
back
a
little
bit
of
background,
the
the
current
agreement
basically
stipulates
to
thanks
we're
going
to
do
our
due
diligence
on
what
it
takes
to
preserve
the
theater
and
we're
gonna
try
to
figure
out
what
can
be
built
next
to
the
theater,
and
so
that
that
is.
You
know
what
Danny
mentioned
that
you
know:
there's
limited
options
that
we're
looking
at.
That!
Is
it
because
that's
what
we're
contractually
obligated
to
do?
I.
A
F
I'll
kick
this
off
just
real
fast
in
July,
the
the
board
approved
the
survey
area
for
the
block,
67
project
area
and
moving
forward
with
looking
at
that
as
consideration
for
a
CRA
project
area.
One
of
the
items
that
was
addressed
at
that
point
was
the
preference
for
returning
the
board
with
the
timeline
for
creation
of
that
project
area
and
then
also
there
was
discussion
around
the
RDA
serving
as
facilitator
for
conversations
between
the
developer
and
the
japanese-american
community.
F
J
J
J
So
really,
the
the
the
two
variables
in
this
process
are
to
see
where
we
go
with
with
how
far
we
get
with
this
facilitated
process
and
whether
or
not
we
need
to
have
additional
meetings
which
could
push
that
timeline
out
as
well
as
we
are
going
through.
A
financial
benefit
analysis
right
now,
we've
just
we've
just
gotten
our
consultant
on
board
to
dive
into
the
numbers
and
so
they're
starting
that
process
as
well.
A
C
I'll
go
over
the
steps
that
we're
taking
briefly
and
the
initial
meeting
was
between
our
staff
and
the
facilitator,
to
kind
of
explain
the
history
and
gets
our
brain
wrapped
around
potential
outcomes
and
goals.
And
then
these
individual
meetings
will
be
this
Friday
and
they're
in
between
each
stakeholder
group
in
the
facilitator.
So
they
have
opportunities,
say
their
concerns
or
ideas
and
she
can
set
an
agenda.
C
That's
relevant
and
you
know
most
effective
use
of
their
time
for
the
larger
meeting,
which
will
be
in
the
beginning
of
October,
and
that
will
basically
include
all
the
stakeholders
with
you
know,
hoping
to
drive
for
some
sort
of
outcomes
or
amicable
solutions,
or
at
least
starting
that
conversation.
So
we
know
if
we
need
additional
meetings
or
not
to
come
to
some
solutions
and
then
the
last
step
will
be
presenting.
You
know
that
update
to
you
in
November,
so
I
think
it'll.
C
F
Just
a
quick
update
on
the
inner
local
with
the
county,
if
you
recall
that
was
kind
of
one
of
the
action
items
we
reached
out
to
them
today,
they
are
still
working
with
their
city
attorney
to
review
the
comments
that
came
from
the
board
in
our
discussion
in
July
and
they
hope
to
turn
that
around
and
get
that
back
to
us,
but
they
have
not
necessarily
been
quick
and
that
turnaround.
So
we
were
just
waiting
on
that,
but
we
as
staff
are
still
proceeding
as
if
that
contract
is
in
place
and
honoring.
B
E
E
I
am
wondering
and
I
guess:
I
could
more
to
the
board.
I
think
that
I'm
wondering
how
we
would
feel
about
perhaps
putting
this
and
I
don't
know
that
everybody
needs
to
come
on
our
agenda
every
month
for
the
next
until
the
end
of
the
year,
just
as
we
kind
of
go
through
these
negotiations,
just
for
updates
I
think
that
it's
such
a
big
thing
and
I
know
that
there's
a
lot
of
questions
here
just
so,
we
could
maybe
have
some
updates,
since
we
only
have
three
meetings
I,
it
wouldn't
be
like
that.
E
I
Yeah
I'm
just
a
little
bit
confused
that
about
the
issues.
In
else,
I
thought
the
meeting
with
the
Japanese
community
was
going
to
happen
before
we
move
forward
with
execution.
Do
this?
Oh?
Okay,
sorry,
and
here
it
says
that
that
facilitation
will
begin
immediately
upon
execution,
and
the
first
step
is
to
hold
the
meeting.
So
that
makes
it
sound
to
me
like
it's
happening
after
execution.
Two.
F
Different
things,
so
talking
about
that
execution,
we're
talking
about
the
contract
with
the
facilitator,
okay
themselves,
which
we've
kind
of
had
some
preliminary
meetings
that
contract
is
now
executed,
so
we're
fine,
the
execution
of
the
interlocal.
What
the
county
is,
the
document
that
basically
provides
for
the
reserving
of
the
15
million
dollars
coming
from
the
county
to
the
developer
for
the
project
and
within
that
agreement
is
some
deadlines
that
we
have
agreed
on.
I.
G
C
The
individual
meetings
are
to
get
an
understanding,
one-on-one
and
then
the
larger
meeting
its
to
help
set
the
agenda.
So
there's
it's,
you
know
an
effective
use
of
their
time,
but
then
also
it's
really
for
the
to
get
an
understanding
of
where
we
are
in
the
process
where,
if
they're,
if
we're
at
a
point
where
we'll
find
solutions
or
if
it's
still
maybe
it
comes
back
that
you
know
more
conversations
are
needed,
but
so
I
think
it'll,
it'll
kind
of
dictate.
We're
not
sure
exactly
how
it
will
come
out.
Thank.
E
So
this
has
probably
just
heard
the
board
as
well,
but
if
you
know
all
three
of
you
were
there,
we
had
a
meeting
with
leaders
from
the
japanese-american
community
with
a
Richie
group
with
the
mayor
with
us,
with
staff
and
I
want
to
say
that
it
seemed
that
was
very
productive,
so
I
hope
it
was
anyway.
It
seemed
from
our
standpoint
anyway
that
it
was
productive
to
kind
of
have
those
conversations
moving.
E
C
A
You
mind
sharing
the
agenda
once
you
receive
it
with
the
board
and
then
ongoing,
updates,
informally,
I.
Think
that
would
be
really
helpful.
As
you
can
see,
we
all
have
a
real
interest
in
this
item
and
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
on
top
of
it.
So
if
you
could
share
as
much
as
possible
with
us
I'd
be
appreciated
anything
else
board
members
before
we
move
on
okay,
great
thanks,
you
three
thank
you.
We
are
on
to
item
c3,
which
is
the
pricing
terms
for
property
located
at
515
or
300
West.
F
Yeah,
just
what
Kara
is
getting
settled
all
teed
up,
this
is
to
discuss
the
Marmalade
development
515
or
300
west.
This
is
essentially
resolution
approving
allocation
of
a
part
of
the
purchase
price
that
we
would
receive
and
a
write
down
to
offset
the
cost
for
finishing
the
installation
and
construction
of
the
storm
drain.
So
this
is
the
contract
provision
we
have
with
the
developer
right
now.
F
A
A
F
F
Real
quickly,
I'll
go
through
them.
First
and
foremost,
the
request
for
proposals
for
the
Fair
Park
public
market
study
was
released
on
Friday.
The
responses
are
due
on
the
17th
and
we
will
have
a
selection
committee
review
those
and
ultimately
select
a
consultant.
Our
deadline
for
completing
the
work
is
six
months,
so
we've
got
that
moving
along.
We
also
had
the
design
agreement
with
our
alternate
artist
for
the
Regent
Street
public
art
project
that
has
been
executed
and
the
artist
is
Ned
Kahn.
He
was
out
here
last
week
to
meet
with
the
art
design
board.
F
He
will
come
back
out
and
present
his
formal
proposal
to
the
design
board
October
4th,
so
that
is
moving
along
as
well,
and
then
the
agency
has
also
selected
the
developer
for
both
the
255
South
State
Street
project,
as
well
as
the
overnighter
project.
The
developer
name
is
Brynn
Shore
out
of
Illinois
I
have
a
lot
of
experience.
Doing
miss
mixed
use
projects.
What
was
that
Brendon
Shore
B
Rin
sure
they?
F
They
won
the
bid
for
both
of
the
projects,
one
of
which,
if
you
recall
overnighter,
was
a
request
for
proposals.
Stacey
was
a
request
for
qualifications.
We
are
working
with
them
right
now
to
negotiate
those
agreements
to
get
them
under
contract
and
start
continuing
to
work
with
them
on
putting
their
financing
plan
in
place,
as
well
as
their
design.
F
F
We
will
provide
a
pocket
guide
and
a
map
for
people
want
to
take
a
tour
of
the
area
and
see
all
of
the
artists
and
their
work.
They
will
be
there
and
then
it
is
something
that
the
businesses
and
surrounding
property
owners
are
really
engaging.
Staying
open
later,
opening
up
we're
going
to
have
events
and
we've
done
a
lot
of
work
to
engage
the
community
and
keep
those
businesses
informed.
So
that's
something
we
hope
is
on
everyone's
calendar
Danny.
A
F
Well,
we
can
get
you
the
information
on
that,
but
they're
also
looking
at
doing
a
first
floor
use
with
nonprofits
everywhere
from
a
museum
to
a
community
group
that
provides
music
and
instruments
and
lessons
to
underprivileged
children,
a
food
co-op
user,
looking
at
the
use
for
the
Kramer
structure.
So
it's
a
really
interesting
proposal
that
we're
hoping
actually
comes
to
fruition
and
they
can
move
it
forward.
Great.
F
Did
not
on
State
Street,
it
was
a
request
for
qualifications,
so
we
did
a
slightly
scaled
down
version
of
what
would
be
a
full-blown
proposal,
although
they
did
get
into
some
details
with
their
proposal.
That's
why
a
lot
of
these
ideas
are
still
in
flux.
The
financing
they
did
propose
what
their
structure
is.
F
A
F
No,
not
yet
I
mean
they,
they
mentioned
some
mix
and
that
mixes
a
combination
of
what
our
requirements
were
within
the
RFQ
holding
steady
to
those,
as
well
as
what
their
unit
sizes
may
be,
and
then
all
of
that
is
also
a
factor
of
what
they're
targeting
for
their
income
levels.
So
we
can
do
that
as
a
priority.
G
It
seems
to
me
that
part
of
the
initial
idea
there
was
to
replace
some
sorrows
that
were
vacated
or
demolished
essentially
downtown
and
the
affordable
housing
sub-commission.
That's
working
to
the
state
pamela
Atkinson's
group
has
recommended
350
unit
ones,
I,
don't
know
this
is
nests
or
the
right
place
for
that.
But
I
think
is
our
thinking
forward
on
our
projects
and
ideas
and
may
come
into
play.
Okay,.
H
F
Wasn't
a
specific
reason:
we've
talked
to
them
about
that
right
now
and
they're
kind
of
in
the
same
state
as
we
are,
along
with
other
developers
of
just
kind
of
trying
to
figure
out
what
that
availability
is
and
how
it
could
be
applied
to
projects
so
they're
there.
Looking
at
it
they're
tracking
it
we're
also
starting
to
look
at
ways.
F
We
can
incorporate
it,
but
I,
don't
think
that
was
necessarily
a
catalyst
for
them
coming
in
and
looking
at
our
our
sites
they're
their
motivation
was
they
like
the
Utah
market,
they
wanted
to
come
in
and
they
came
in
and
really
wanted
to
present
some
projects
and
do
it
in
a
way
that
if
they
were
gonna
come
into
the
market
that
it
was
going
to
be
a
significant
project
and
and
start
justifying
expansion
into
this
area.
How.
F
F
A
G
A
G
A
You
very
much
you
very
much
all
right.
I
know
that
dinner
is
ready,
Aaron
and
I'm
chair.
Do
you
want
to
do
dinner
first,
before
we
jump
into
a
council
meeting?
Okay,
just
making
sure
all
right,
so
we're
gonna
break
for
dinner,
and
then
we
start
at
what
time
six
straight
up
all
right.
We've
got
an
hour
all
right,
we'll
see
you
back
here
in
one
hour.