►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting - 01/23/2019
Description
Planning Commission Meeting
A
C
D
A
E
G
I
did
have
a
list
of
things,
I
wanted
to
update
the
commission
on
and
they
can't
open
the
document,
so
I'm
gonna
try
to
do
it
from
memory,
but
basically
it
was
about
some
of
the
upcoming
projects,
city
initiatives
that
we
have
this
year
kind
of
on
our
plate.
That
we've
prioritized
some
of
those.
You
know
a
little
bit
about
already
and
that
you've
had
briefings
on
things
like
that,
so
a
whole
new
parking
ordinance.
G
We
have
the
converting
some
of
our
zoning
districts
to
a
form
based
approach
which
you've
had
a
briefing
on
that
as
well.
But
then
we
also
have
a
couple
of
pretty
sizable
items,
one
an
adaptive,
reuse,
ordinance.
That
applies
not
just
only
to
historic
buildings
but
outside
of
our
low-density
residential
neighborhoods,
also
to
existing
buildings
to
make
it
so
that
they
can
be
more
easily
reused
instead
of
demolished
and
things
like
that,
but
also
in
historic
districts,
providing
some
leeway
on
how
we
may
be
able
to
do
things.
G
Like
add
some
add
some
dwelling
units
in
exchange
for
preserving
some
of
our
historic
structures,
and
things
like
that,
so
that's
coming.
There's
also,
we've
been
we're
working
on
a
an
affordable
housing
overlay
that
would
potentially
increase
density
and
some
zoning
districts
provided
either
existing
dwelling
units
are
preserved
and
existing
structures
are
preserved
or
they
are
included
in
new
development.
G
So
that's
going
to
there's
a
lot
of
technical
analysis
involved
with
that
part,
but
it
will
essentially
allow
for
more
affordable
units
to
incentivize
the
market
for
providing
more
affordable
units
instead
of
having
to
rely
on
government
subsidies
for
for
those
units.
So
that's
that's.
Coming,
there's
also
likely
to
be
some.
You
may
be
familiar
with
the
life
on
state
project.
That's
probably
going
to
be
going
through
an
adoption
and
some
zoning
amendment
process
this
year
as
well
or
the
State
Street
corridor
has
kind
of
been
long
ignored
frankly,
but
from
a
zoning
perspective.
G
So
we're
also
looking
at
that
as
well.
So
those
are
gonna
be
some
pretty
big
projects
over
the
next
12
months
that
don't
know
that
we'll
be
able
to
get
all
of
them
done
a
lot
of
its
dependent
on
our
private
application
workloads,
and
just
so
you
know,
we've
we
almost
as
of
January
15th.
We
almost
had,
as
many
land-use
applications
submitted
this
January
as
we
did
all
of
last
January,
so
kind
of
caught
us
by
surprise
a
little
bit.
G
G
That's
why
we've
over
the
past
few
years,
you've
seen
some
changes
in
processes
and
things
like
that
and
some
improvements
to
some
our
zoning
codes.
Those
things
will
will
continue
mainly
because
when
we
rely
on
volunteers
such
as
Planning,
Commission,
Landmarks
Commission,
there's
only
so
much
that
we
can
reasonably
expect
to
get
out
of
that,
and
so
that's
part
of
how
we
have
to
balance
development
in
the
city.
So
what
are
those
things
that
are
critical
to
go
to
go
through
the
public
process
and
what
can
go
through
more
of
a
staff
level
public
process?
G
Most
of
those
applications
do
involve
some
sort
of
notification
either
to
direct
neighbors
or
similar
to
what
we
notice
for
the
Planning
Commission
it's
just
there.
The
approval
process
is
done
at
the
staff
level.
So
as
far
as
City
Council
items
that
are
upcoming,
the
the
biggest
thing
that
they
have
on
their
plate
is
the
everybody's
favorite
term.
The
Elio
masa
nari
changes.
These
basically
are
assisted
living
regulations.
Things
like
that.
There's
some
group
home
things
involved
with
that.
G
That's
been
relatively
problematic,
especially
for
existing
facilities,
because
we're
essentially
limiting
where
those
the
beds
where
people
who
need
need
the
assistance
can
be,
and
so
we're
seeing
a
big
problem
with,
with
those
things
being
able
to
locate
in
our
city.
So
there's
a
proposal
inform
the
council
there's
also
a
fairly
large
open
space
ordinance,
which
some
of
you
may
remember
from
over
a
year
ago.
That
touched
almost
every
section
of
our
zoning
code.
G
So
basically,
what
that
does
is
clarify
terms,
open
space,
an
open
space
area
and
the
requirements
in
the
base
districts,
as
well
as
I'm,
defining
some
of
the
uses
and
dealing
with
some
of
our
things
that
are
happening
in
our
parks
and
and
things
like
that.
So
those
are
the
two
big
things
that
the
City
Council
will
be
tackling
over
the
next
few
months.
G
She
will
fill
out
that
the
remainder
of
that
term,
which
is
this
calendar
year,
it's
up
for
election
and
in
November
and
for
those
that
don't
know
she's
a
former
planner
in
the
planning
division
office
who
left
us
several
years
ago
and
went
and
started
a
couple
of
her
own
businesses,
and
so
she
she
brings
a
pretty
lengthy
education
and
professional
experience
with
land
use
and
planning
issues,
so
should
be
interesting.
That's.
A
H
H
So
the
purpose
of
the
or
of
the
petition
is
to
clarify
some
of
existing
language
in
the
ordinance
and
also
it
one
of
the
purposes
is
to
increase
and
improve
participation,
while
at
the
same
time
ensuring
a
timely
review
for
applicants
of
different
types
of
projects
within
the
city
and
give
you
some
more
histories.
So
the
Planning
Commission
saw
this
item
back
in
May
of
2017.
H
That
item
was
tabled
for
some
additional
information
at
that
meeting.
Planning
Commission
asks
for
a
few
things
for
a
definition
of
an
engagement
activity
as
well
as,
let
me
make
sure
I
list
them
all,
assessing
whether
to
include
other
application
types,
creating
an
overall
public
engagement
ordinance,
as
opposed
to
one
just
focused
on
the
community
councils,
and
write
the
recognized
organizations
in
discussing
the
proposal
with
the
city's
civic
engagement
team.
H
So
at
so,
the
planning
staff
provided
a
briefing
back
in
November
of
2018,
and
we
addressed
some
of
those
items
and
we
also
provided
an
overview
of
the
proposed
changes
and
I
think
we
received
a
lot
of
support
from
Planning
Commission,
so
the
drought
that
you
see
is
very
has
not
changed
much
from
the
one
that
was
before
you
in
November,
so
just
to
kind
of
go
over
some
of
the
big
ideas.
This
has
been
completely
reorganized
and
rewritten
from
the
last
Planning
Commission
public
hearing
in
2017.
H
So
the
current
rules
for
early
notification
only
address
recognized
organizations
and
it
doesn't
focus
necessarily
on
budding
neighbors
or
any
other
methods
of
informing
the
public.
So
we
moved
all
of
their
court
requirements
within
the
zoning
ordinance
to
ensure
that
all
of
our
zoning
applications
can
follow,
have
a
proper
early
notification
process.
H
So
so
here
are
some
just
main
ideas:
we've
we
are
allowing
a
total
of
45
days
for
public
engagement.
So
right
now
we
have
some
language.
That's
just
unclear.
It
just
says
that
we
can't
hold
a
public
hearing
within
45
days,
but
we're
solidifying
this
process
to
allow
at
least
45
days
for
public
engagement.
H
So
other
details,
we
included
a
purpose
statement
for
why
we
are
adding
some
of
this
language.
We
clarified
the
application
types
we
added.
Two
other
additional
application
types
that
would
have
to
go
through
this
process.
All
the
other
ones
are
in
our
place
still
so
we're
not
changing
any
existing
application
types,
there's
a
list
of
exception
so
for
different
circumstances.
H
If
there's
an
emergency
or
there's
a
legislative
deadline
for
us
to
to
accomplish
some
of
these
changes,
they
would
not
have
to
go
through
that,
but
it's
a
pretty
small
list-
and
there
are
just
other
some
other
minor
clarifications
and
subdivision
clarifications
to
make
sure
they
all
reference.
The
right
sections
and
whatnot.
H
Here's
a
just,
a
quick
flowchart
to
kind
of
help.
You
understand
what
the
process
would
be,
and
this
is
also
located
within
your
packet
I-
believe
it's
an
attachment,
B,
so
just
kind
of
briefly
I
can
run
through
a
quick
scenario.
If
we
were
to
receive
a
planned
development
application,
the
applicant
would
submit
submit
the
completed
application
it
would
be
assigned
to
a
planner.
We
would
ensure
that
the
application
was
complete
once
we
verified,
we
have
all
the
information
that
we
need.
H
H
If
they
decide
that
they
do
not
want
that
or
if
the
project
is
actually
a
citywide
project
or
impacts,
multiple
City
Council's
or
it's
in
the
industrial
part
of
the
city,
we
would
just
kick
it
to
an
outer
city
sponsored
outreach
event,
so
we
would
notice
so
again
it
they
would
just
go
through
one
of
these
channels.
If
it
doesn't
go
through
a
Community
Council,
we
would
make
sure
it
goes
to
a
outreach
event.
So,
after
that,
we
could
schedule
the
Planning
Commission
meeting
and
then
have
it
and
go
from
there.
H
All
right
and
then
so,
just
to
note
some
of
the
the
public
process
involved
with
this,
that
we
did
have
an
completed
email
or
we
did
send
out
emails
to
all
the
individuals
that
have
been
a
part
of
this
from
the
beginning.
We
all
we
reached
out
to
all
their
recognized
organizations
and
we
held
an
open
house
back
in
July
and
I
attended
these
Salt
Lake
Community
Network
meeting
back
in
August
in
terms
of
public
comments.
All
of
these
are
either
located
in
your
Dropbox
or
within
the
staff
report,
but
some
of
the
general
comments.
C
H
Of
the
comments
talked
about
kind
of
the
additional
time
and
cost
concerns
with
with
the
change.
There
are
also
some
general
concerns
about
signage
where
to
find
information,
and
then
we
did
have
an
one
public
comment
that
noted
that
they
want
to
require
notice
for
all
residential
demolitions
to
be
included
in
that
all
those
details,
there's
a
few
more
comments
within
your
packet
and
in
the
drop
box.
H
A
C
Thank
you,
I
think
you
know.
The
sugarhouse
community
council
has
taken
advantage
of
the
early
notification
project
at
least
a
hundred
times.
Probably
200
I
don't
know,
and
we
find
it
very
valuable
because
it
helps
us
get
more
information
about
a
project
from
the
developer
and
the
developer
can
improve
the
project
based
on
our
feedback
before
it
actually
comes
to
you
guys.
So
I
think
this
is
a
very
worthwhile
project
and
we
appreciate
it
a
lot
I.
C
C
It
just
seems
to
work
better
22nd
west
Tracy
explained
to
me,
and
my
guess
was
pretty
right:
there's
not
much
out
there
now,
but
I'm
wondering
if
there's
some
other
language
that
can
be
used
instead
of
just
saying,
except
for
anything
west
of
22nd
west,
as
eventually
there'll
be
something
out
there,
or
maybe
you
just
built
in
a
time
line
where
three
years
from
now
you
review
it.
After
they
start
building
and
the
postcard
issue,
I've
heard
people
say
many
times
well,
I
never
got
a
postcard
and
I
got
a
call
from
the
you
know.
C
The
person
would
say:
I
got
a
call
from
the
guy
who
owns
the
house
next
door
to
me
and
he
didn't
get
a
notice.
Tracy
says
postcards
and
letters
are
forwarded,
but
I'm
not
sure
that
always
works.
So
I
worry
about
that
and
I.
Don't
like
the
idea
of
the
side
out
in
the
middle
of
a
muddy
field
and
I'm
driving
by
seventh
east
and
the
signs
way
over
there
and
there's
no
place
to
park
and
stop
and
have
to
go
around
the
block.
C
And
then
it's
way
out
in
the
muddy
field
and
I
don't
want
to
traipse
out
there.
So
I,
don't
know
what
it
says
so
I'm
wondering
if
there's
some
other
way
that
things
can
be
on
a
website
somewhere.
That
just
gives
the
basic
information
but
says
this
address
and
again
think
of
an
empty
lot.
If
you
drove
by
an
empty
lot.
What
would
be
the
number
of
that
lot?
C
I
So
my
name
is
Cindy
Cromer
former
deputy
director,
sherry
Coffey,
was
working
on
the
revisions
to
this
ordinance
at
the
time
of
her
death
last
year.
As
was
often
the
case,
sherry
was
dealing
with
a
project
without
glamour
which
was
unlikely
to
generate
gratitude
from
anyone.
The
current
ordinance
was
written
in
marginal
English.
It
was
the
Achilles
heel
when
Charlie
Square
Ventures
proposed
expanding
on
the
block
south
of
the
shopping
center.
Some
of
you
were
here.
Then
there
were
plenty
of
problems
with
that
proposal.
There
were
four
structures
in
the
way.
I
At
the
time
all
of
them
were
considered
contributory.
The
proposal
was
to
mimic
Disneyland
and
a
style
which
is
definitely
not
a
product
of
its
own
time.
The
use
of
the
zone
which
had
been
never
been
contemplated
outside
the
RDAs
project
area,
the
absence
of
any
buffering
for
a
low-density
edge
on
the
historic
district
I
could
go
on
and
on
this
consumed
years
of
my
life,
but
the
most
likely
way
to
slow.
The
process
was
to
ask
the
state
Ombudsman
for
property
rights
to
intervene.
I
Regarding
the
failure
to
follow
requirements
of
the
notification
ordinance,
we
did.
The
Ombuds
been
agreed
with
us,
and
here
we
are
that's
what
brought
us
to
this
point.
Many,
but
not
all,
of
the
issues
from
the
charlie
square
proposal
have
now
been
modified
or
mitigated.
I
am
fully
supportive
of
looking
at
engagement.
More
inclusively,
I
am
very
familiar
with
community
councils
and
the
diversity
across
the
ones
in
the
city
and
all
of
the
responsibilities
for
notification
for
engagement
cannot
be
delegated
to
them.
I'm.
I
Also
supportive
of
moving
the
notification
requirements
to
21a,
where
people
like
me,
who
are
interested
in
land
use,
can
actually
find
them.
I
remain
opposed
to
the
300-foot
distance,
which
I
have
been
for
years
because
of
the
extensive
land
banking
in
the
city
very
frequently.
The
applicant
is
related
to
the
abutting
property
owners,
and
you
get
quite
far
from
the
proposed
site
before
you
encounter
someone
who's
not
related
to
the
applicant.
So,
based
on
my
experience,
I
would
ask
you
to
look
at
the
black
face
or
660
feet.
H
Currently,
they
are
only
in
English,
yes,
but
sometimes
for
bigger
projects.
We
do
try
to
have
some
flyers
and
things
like
that
in
Spanish,
and
we
do
have
a
few
people
in
our
office
that
do
you
speak
Spanish
to
kind
of
accommodate
any
questions
that
come
up
or
the
spanish-speaking
population.
So
thank.
B
You
so
Tracy
I
have
a
couple
things.
This
one
is,
and
this
probably
wouldn't
be
written
into
the
notification
process,
but
when
you
do
the
notice
for
the
postcards
currently
trying
to
find
anything
on
the
city's
website
is
just
really
hard
that
you
provide
some
direct
link
to
where
they
need
to
go,
or
you
have
a
different
public
facing
access
to
the
website
so
that
people
can
get
that
information.
B
H
Well,
so
anything
that
we
have,
that
is
scheduled
for
an
open
house.
We
have
all
them
it.
We
have
information
sheets
and
we
have
all
the
associate
items
that
are
associated
in
the
planner
who's.
Working
on
that
that
information
is
on
the
open
house
website.
We
do
have
a
few
like
a
current
initiatives,
page
that
we
try
to
focus
on
kind
of
some
of
the
bigger
projects
too.
H
B
G
B
What
I
think
I
wish
that
somehow
that
was
communicated
to
Lin?
Look
that
this
wasn't
even
in
it's
not
anything
you
can
do.
She
should
be
barking
up
some
other
tree
for
that
one,
and
then
I
also
wanted
to
follow
up
on
a
comment
that
Junie
made
and
just
inquire.
What
kind
of
signage
do
you
put
on
on
the
physical
property?
So
we
put.
H
I,
don't
know
what
the
sizes
and
it's
not
standardized
like
it's
certain
size,
but
it's
like
this
big
and
we
have
the
petition
number.
We
have
the
address
number.
We
have
the
planner
that
you
can
contact
for
that
again,
it's
not
perfect,
but
it
is
another
one
method
to
allow
people
to
to
ask
questions
about
what's
happening
on
that
project
or
on
that
site.
J
G
G
The
one
of
the
problems
that
we
we
have
is
that
if
it's
not
associated
with
an
address,
it
won't
show
up
and
if
it's
a
property
that
has
had
multiple
land
use
applications
for
some
reason,
it's
kicking
them
out
and
we'll
only
show
the
first
one
and
that
first
one
may
have
been
in
1974.
So
we're
not
because
it's
something
we're
not
controlling
we've
had
some
issues
with
it
that
we're
trying
to
we're
trying
to
nuclear.
B
G
I
think
one
of
one
of
our
goals,
whether
this
proposed
ordinance,
gets
adopted
or
not,
is
defined
ways
to
improve,
particularly
our
what
we're,
calling
an
open
house
and
allow
that
to
kind
of
expand
and
change.
One
of
the
things
that
we're
gonna
start
doing.
This
in
better
weather
is
having
more
onsite
open
houses.
So
we've
tried
to
have
the
open
house
night
where
we
have
three
or
four
projects
that
creates
a
hold
and
other
types
of
issues.
G
Well,
it
may
be
great
somebody's
coming
for
one
project.
They
may
learn
about
something
else,
but
we've
we've
had
a
lot
of
negative
feedback
about
it
and
so
we're
trying
to
find
ways
that
we
can
do
those
things
better.
They
don't
require
ordinance
changes,
but
what
this
project
is
looking
at
is
trying
to
fix
some
of
the
glaring
holes
in
our
current
process.
For
example,
there's
nothing
in
our
ordinance
that
requires
next-door
neighbors
to
be
notified
of
an
open
house.
There's
just
no
requirement
for
it.
G
Now
we
by
practice
do
it,
but
we
don't
want
to.
We
want
to
ensure
that
that
practice
stays
long-term,
regardless
of
any
change
that
may
happen
in
the
planning,
division
or
administration's
or
whatever
that
doesn't
go
away
without
some
sort
of
process
to
do
it.
So
those
are
the
types
of
things
that
we're
trying
to
fix.
You
know
Tracy
identified
a
number
of
the
other
ones
as
well,
but
we
are
certainly
always
open
to
those
internal
changes
and
fixes
that
we
can
do
that.
G
F
So
I
have
a
question
about
whether
the
planning
department
has
considered
the
obligation
to
have
the
application
submitted
as
the
trigger
point,
as
opposed
to
a
point
in
time
prior
because
it
seems
to
me
if
you're
an
applicant
and
you
spent
the
time
to
pull
that
together.
You're
already
pretty
far
down
your
design
path
right
and
then
to
then
go
out
for
your
public
outreach.
F
G
F
Early
on
I
mean
I,
guess
I,
don't
understand
why
if
you've
got
a
big
project
and
you've
got
a
concept,
why
I
couldn't
go
to
a
pre-application
meeting
with
the
Planning
Department
structure,
a
public
engagement
process
before
you
actually
submit
anything,
so
you
can
get
feedback
on
massing
and
scale
and
design
elements
before
you
go
through
the
process
of
designing?
That's
that's
my
only
question.
G
E
E
F
D
F
B
K
B
E
I
have
a
related
question
in
this,
so
when
I
think
I
asked
this,
one
came
back
like
back
in
May.
The
45
days
gets
true.
When
that
case
is
complete.
Does
that
mean
the
developer,
then
in
general
is
then
just
kind
of
sitting
and
tolling
their
thumbs
for
45
days
waiting
for
this
public
process
to
happen,
or
is
there
other
things
that
are
happening
that
they
normally
have
to
work
through
with
your
office
or
other
places?
So
it's
they
still
engaged
in
doing
work.
They
would
normally
have
to
do.
We've
just
tried
to
notify.
E
H
Usually,
where
they're
working
it's
a
pretty
iterative
process,
so
we'll
maybe
bring
up
any
issues
that
we
see.
We
also
route
that
out
to
all
the
other
city
departments
for
their
comments.
So
when
we
get
that
back,
we
also
you
know
we
work
with
the
applicant
to
try
to
make
any
changes
that
are
necessary.
So
it's
it's
more
of
it's
more
of
an
iterative
period
where
we're
working
with
hear.
E
From
developers,
sometimes
at
Salt
Lake
City's
challenging
to
work
through
just
because
of
our
timeline
in
process,
and-
and
some
of
it
probably
is
true-
and
some
was
also
perceptions
and
some
of
it's
just
the
nature
of
where
a
built
out
city
and
there's
just
other
complications
come
with
it.
But
in
your
opinion,
does
this
processes
45
days
that
we're
kind
of
pushing
it
through
here?
E
H
Probably
be
similar
to
what
they
already
experienced
right
now,
our
ordinance
isn't
clear.
It
just
says
you
can't
hold
a
public
hearing
within
45
days,
so
we
still
have
to
wait
that
45
days
anyways.
It
just
clarifies
that
and
we
just
kind
of
solidify
that
you
have
45
days
Frankie
for
engagement
and
I'm
a
decision
and.
G
Impact
on
the
time
it
takes
from
submit
all
to
approval
is
actually
waiting
for
applicants
to
update
drawings,
and
so
usually
that
happens
there
identify
those
are
all
identified
within
the
first,
probably
three
to
four
weeks
of
this
45
day
period
and
then
there's
a
there's,
a
checklist
of
comments
and
gets
sent
out
and
the
majority
of
applications
have
to
make
some
kind
of
change
just
to
meet
even
basic
requirements,
and
that's
the
hold
up.
Usually
that's
why
you'll
may
see
something
on
an
agenda
and
then
it
gets
pulled
because
they
couldn't
quite
get
there.
G
G
I
mean
we're
far
different
to
build
something
in
an
urban
in
Phillip
situation
versus
a
Greenfield
that
a
lot
of
the
communities
in
Utah
are
dealing
with,
and
so,
when
we're
dealing
with
the
same
types
of
developers,
sure
it
might
be
easier
to
build
in
Lehigh,
but
they
have
a
nine
acre
site
with
plenty
of
lay
down
yard
and
everywhere
to
put
their
property,
whereas
if
you're
building
on
a
20,000
square
foot
site
in
the
in
the
middle
of
downtown,
where
do
you
stage?
Are
your
construction
equipment?
G
You
got
to
find
a
place
right
and
that
is
in
and
of
itself
is
challenging.
So
it's
just
a
different
animal.
Our
processing
times
have
decreased,
I
can't
remember
the
exact
date
but
or
the
exact
number
of
days,
but
back
in
I
think
it
was
2010.
The
items
are
gonna
Planning
Commission
were
around
a
hundred
and
twenty
days,
so
we've
decreased
that
pretty
significantly
forty
percent
and
just.
E
G
G
Applications
that
are
the
most
impacted
by
the
forty
five
days
are
the
conditional
uses
that
don't
really
require
any
new
construction
bars
downtown,
have
to
sit
and
wait
45
days,
even
though
we
never
get
any
comments
on
them.
So
that
that
you
know
the
answer
to
that,
isn't
to
try
to
fix
it
through
the
SS
to
make
them
permit
it.
But
that's.
G
That's
a
local
ordinance
in
fact
state
law
and
includes
a
provision
that
that
a
land
use
applicant
can
once
their
application
is
complete.
They
can
request
a
decision
with
within
45
days,
and
this
45
days
makes
it
so
the
city
could
not
comply
with
state
law.
We
haven't
had
that
happen,
yet
at
least
to
my
knowledge,
but
part
of
this
would
allow
us
to
comply
with
state
law.
If
we
need
to
no
thanks.
J
Also
curious
about
something
that
Judy
brought
up
about
the
large
projects
that
might
impact
more
than
just
like
the
neighboring
community
councils.
Is
there
and
I,
don't
know
how
you
would
measure
that
and
figure
out
what
what
project
is
something
that
needs
to
go
more
broadly.
Is
there?
Is
there
a
way
for
council
community
councils
to
be
on
some
sort
of
notification
list
for
everything
so
that
they
get
everything,
even
if
it
would
be
a
lot,
but
they
would
at
least
get
everything
that
goes
to
the
public?
We.
H
J
G
G
J
E
H
J
G
That
would
be
really
challenging
for
us
to
make
sure
that
we're
being
equitable
and
how
we
do
that.
You
know
I,
don't
know
that
the
distance
matters
all
that
much
I,
know
and
I
will
try
to
track
this
down.
I
know
that
sherry
did
a
survey
and
kept
stats
of
the
number
of
notices
we
send
out
at
the
300
and
the
number
of
touch
points
that
people
contacted
us
and
participate
in
the
process
based
on
those
notice
and
I
want
to
say
it
was
down
in
like
the
1
and
2%.
G
J
D
N
G
Like
that
and-
and
we
didn't
didn't
seem
to
make
any
kind
of
impact,
we
think
that
the
biggest
impact
that
we're
gonna
make
is
by
having
those
more
on-site
or
we
can
sit
out
there
for
an
hour
and
a
half
or
whatever,
at
a
convenient
time.
For
that
neighborhood
discern
for
those
neighbors
to
walk
across
the
street
and
ask
us
about
a
project
and
talk
to
us.
And
then
we
get
the
information
that
way.
L
D
D
O
Good
evening,
commission
members
I
think
everyone
here
probably
remembers
me,
but
I'm
Lois,
Cogan
I
am
the
director
of
Salt
Lake,
City's
trails
and
natural
lands.
Division.
I
don't
have
a
PowerPoint
for
you
today,
but
if
it
seems
appropriate,
I
thought
I
would
give
about
a
six
or
seven
minute
recap
or
summary
of
the
key
points
from
the
Salt
Lake
City
Foothill
trail
system
plan
and
then
allow
you
to
turn
it
over
to
the
public
comment.
That
seems
appropriate
excellent.
Thank
you.
O
So
the
Salt
Lake
City
foothills
trail
system
plan
was
created
in
large
part
to
address
many
of
the
issues
currently
facing
the
lands
and
trails
in
our
foothills,
open
spaces
and
the
development
and
implementation
of
this
plan.
We
believe,
is
fully
consistent
with
the
specific
policy
guidance
and
recommendations
of
the
1992
Salt
Lake
City,
open
space
master
plan.
The
the
vision
of
the
plan
is
the
foothills
Natural
Area
will
prefer,
provide
a
variety
of
recreational
trail,
experiences
for
all
ages
and
abilities,
while
managing
the
foothills
environmental
resources
for
future
generations.
O
O
The
plan
area
includes
about
6,000
acres
of
canyons
and
foothills
bordering
the
northern
and
eastern
limits
of
Salt
Lake
City,
with
the
north
plan,
boundary
being
Salt,
Lake,
City's,
north
boundary
and
extending
southward
to
emigration
Canyon.
We
anticipate
that
the
foothill
open
spaces
between
emigration
and
parlays
canyon
would
be
addressed
in
the
future.
With
a
plan
update,
Salt
Lake
City
is
the
largest
landowner
within
the
plan
area.
The
plan
area
includes
lands
managed
by
Salt
Lake,
City,
Public
Utilities
and
also
by
Salt
Lake,
City
trails
and
natural
lands.
O
O
Our
public
outreach
during
the
plan
process
included
a
year-long
trail
user
survey
extending
from
June
2016
to
June
2017.
We
conducted
stakeholder
interviews,
user,
intercept
surveys,
a
statistically
valid
randomized
survey
of
citywide
residents
and
a
week-long
workshop
with
representatives
from
37
different
stakeholder
groups.
O
We
also
received
feedback
via
direct
email,
an
online
mapping
and
survey
platform,
additional
stakeholder
interviews,
presentations
to
various
boards
and
councils
and
to
open
houses.
In
all.
We
received
over
5,000
public
comments
on
our
trail
system
plan.
To
date,
we
do
intend
to
seek
City
Council's,
formal
adoption
of
the
foothills
trail
system
plan
eventually
and
we're
working
towards
that.
O
The
plan
recommendations
are
for
a
proposed
trail
network
in
the
foothills
Natural
Area
that
combines
the
rehabilitation
of
existing
unsustainable
routes
with
recommendations
for
new
sustainable
trails
and
when,
when
fully
constructed,
this
proposed
trail
system
would
include
65
miles
of
new
trails
and
41
miles
of
existing
trails.
For
a
total
system,
length
of
106
trail
miles,
the
most
unsustainable,
existing
social
trails
would
be
decommissioned
to
mitigate
erosion.
We
anticipate
the
trail
system,
including
a
mix
of
multi-directional,
shared
use,
trails,
uphill,
mountain
bike,
multi-directional,
hiking
trails,
mountain
bike,
only
trails
and
hiking
only
trails.
O
Finally,
the
plan
also
includes
three
habitat
study
areas,
where
biological
impact
assessments
will
be
conducted
prior
to
new
trail
construction
in
order
to
inform
trail
alignments
and
mitigate
disruption
of
native
species.
Our
anticipated
cost
to
construct
the
full
trail
system
is
2.8
million
dollars
and
that
does
not
include
trail
head
improvement
costs
because
those
have
not
yet
been
estimated.
We
plan
to
do
that
a
future
date.
O
The
trail
system,
maintenance
and
management
costs
are
estimated
at
about
four
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
dollars
annually
due
to
budget
limitations
agency
requirements
and
putting
together
the
necessary
multi
jurisdictional
agreements.
This
plan
implementation
of
this
plan
is
going
to
need
to
be
phased
over
a
period
of
we
are
anticipating
about
six
to
ten
years.
O
We
conducted
a
detailed
review
of
the
foothill
trail
system
plan
draft
in
the
fall
of
2018
staff
from
parks
and
public
lands,
Salt
Lake,
City,
public
utilities,
watershed
division,
the
transportation
division
and
the
Planning
Division
all
participated
in
that
review,
which
concluded
in
early
December
of
this
past
year.
Our
staff
are
still
in
the
process
of
making
some
changes,
but
the
diversion
the
current
draft
that
is
available
online-
and
it
was
shared
with
you
a
couple
of
weeks
ago-
does
include
the
most
substantive,
substantive
updates.
O
O
D
G
G
A
A
P
My
name
is
Yvette
rain
I'm
here,
on
behalf
of
the
Wasatch
mountain
Club,
to
voice
our
support
for
this
project.
The
project
is
very
much
aligned
with
what
we're
about
which
is
non-motorized,
basically
recreation
in
the
Wasatch
Mountains,
as
well
as
education
for
the
public,
access
for
the
public
etc.
So
we're
very
well
aligned
and
in
support
and
we're
also
aligned
with
many
of
the
other
organizations
that
this
will
impact,
such
as
the
National
Forest,
Service,
Bonneville,
shoreline
Trail.
P
A
K
First
of
all,
I
think
it's
really
important
that
the
maps
themselves
have
an
indication
that
these
trails
are
for
non
motorized
vehicles
that
the
motorized
transport
is
prohibited.
It's
mentioned
within
the
plan
and
that's
certainly
appropriate,
but
these
maps
are
the
things
that
people
are
going
to
carry
around
in
their
pocket
and
and
that
designation
isn't
mentioned
on
the
maps.
I
say
this
because
I've
been
on
trails,
when
we've
had
motorcycles
back
in
the
90s,
we
used
to
see
a
lot
of
four-wheel,
drive
vehicles,
try
and
make
it
up
on
some
of
those
trails.
K
It's
always
a
challenge.
It's
always
an
intrigue
and
I
think
it's
really
important
that
we'd
be
really
clear
to
people
before
they
arrive
at
the
trails
site
that
their
limitations
in
terms
of
their
access
I'd,
also
like
to
emphasize
the
importance
of
how
we
deal
with
existing
trails.
There's
some
inconsistencies
in
the
maps
that
I
think
he'll
probably
be
worked
out,
as
the
final
report
is
prepared.
I've
pointed
out
a
couple
of
those
and
I'd
be
happy
to
to
talk
with
staff
at
the
division
of
Parkson
and
public
lands.
K
But
my
overall
concern
is
that
we
not
look
at
trails
that
are
existing,
but
maybe
haven't
qualified
for
either
be
incorporating
being
incorporated
in
the
map
or
being
actively
or
passively
decommissioned,
and
those
trails
somehow
take
on
a
off-limits
designation
to
them.
There
are
a
number
of
trails
that
provide
loops
for
neighbors,
who
hike
in
in
the
foothills
and
I.
Think
it's
really
important
that,
if
we're
going
to
discontinue
the
use
of
a
trail
that
there
be
a
formal
process
with
some
public
notice
and
comment
as
part
of
that
action,
I
strongly
support
the
plan.
K
Finally,
just
a
comment
about
one
particular
trail,
which
is
the
Sugarloaf
trail,
one
that
I'm
very
familiar
with
him
right
now.
It's
a
shared
access,
but
it's
really
inappropriate
for
that
use
and
I'm,
hoping
that
there'll
be
some
reconsideration
of
that.
It's
got
a
steep
access
which
is
already
eroding
it's
a
very
short
trail
that
almost
a
block,
maybe
a
little
bit
less
than
that
and
is
only
getting
foot
access
now
and
I'm,
hoping
because
of
its
it's
near
location
to
a
number
of
homes
and
the
nature
of
the
trail
that
it
could.
K
Q
My
name
is
Kathleen
Stoddard
I've
been
on
the
Bonneville
shoreline
trail
committee
for
well
over
20
years.
I
think
I
was
started
on
the
construction
committee
when
the
shoreline
trial
started
bill.
The
monitory
line
trial
at
the
terrace
hills
in
Salt,
Lake
City,
and
very
much
appreciate
this
new
master
plan
and
hope
to
continue
helping
to
build
trails
in
Salt
Lake
City.
The
Bonneville
shoreline
trail
has
thousands
of
hours
of
volunteer
hours
and
we
can
hope
to
do
more
and
guarantee
help
to
build
the
trails.
Thank
you
for
your
work
on
this
Thank.
R
R
Unfortunately,
most
trails
have
developed
sort
of
organically,
it's
sort
of
the
nature
of
things,
they're
natural
surfaces
and
we
are
natural
creatures.
However,
we've
come
to
learn
that
you
know,
as
population
grows
and
user
base
grows,
that
we
need
to
have
a
little
bit
more
programmatic
approach
to
it
and
that
we
can
build
things
more
sustainably
and
that
we
can
get
more
people
out
on
the
trails
and
I'd
like
to
applaud
Salt,
Lake
City
and
indeed
everybody
in
this
room.
R
I
mean
I,
see
a
lot
of
people
as
I
look
around
that
have
been
involved
in
this
process
for
a
year
and
a
half,
and
it's
very
exciting,
to
see
that
they're
still
here
and
they're,
so
supportive
of
a
comprehensive
process
that
looked
at
not
only
the
trails
themselves,
but
the
infrastructure
and
transit
necessary
to
facilitate
the
use
of
those
trails.
So
I
really
appreciate
this
effort.
R
A
A
B
J
A
D
A
M
You,
madam
chair
members
of
the
Commission
nice,
to
be
with
you
here
this
evening.
What
we're
looking
at
here
this
item
is
for
a
planned
development
for
spy
hop
and
which
is
a
digital
media,
Student
Center
with
a
community
event
space,
it's
at
208,
West,
900,
south
and
again
it's
a
planned
development,
and
that
is
specifically
because
it's
seeking
relief
for
the
third
level
step
back
requirements
which
we'll
talk
about
and
ground
level
glass
requirements.
M
So
the
property
is
located
an
FPU
n
2
zone
and
is
part
of
the
downtown
master
plan
and,
as
you
know,
specifically
part
of
the
central,
ninth
neighborhood
and
just
kind
of
looking
at
the
surrounding
area
there.
The
the
lot
is
currently
vacant,
but
it's
adjacent
to
a
number
of
different
types
of
development.
There's
you
know
some
several
three-story
multi
tenant
buildings.
You
know
apartment
buildings,
one
to
the
north
and
the
brand-new
one
across
the
street
to
the
east
and
there's
several
other
commercial
buildings
adjacent
to
it
as
well,
at
the
intersection
there.
M
And
then,
of
course
it
is,
you
know
immediately
adjacent
to
the
tracks.
Stop
there
on
two
hundred
west.
So,
as
we
kind
of
look
at
the
site
plan
here,
the
properties,
approximately
0.4
acres
and
the
building
is
proposed
at
about
20,000
square
feet.
I
know
the
applicants
are
here
and
they're
anxious
to
talk
about
the
project
I'll.
Let
them
give
a
little
bit
more
detail
on
the
the
project
itself,
but
approximately
have
150
to
200
students
and
is
proposed
as
47
feet,
tall
just
kind
of
looking
at
this
site
to
give
you
orientation.
M
M
And
this
is
kind
of
looking
from
the
other
angles.
This
is
along
200
West
again,
you
know
many
features
to
be
able
to
kind
of
help
relate
the
building
to
the
sidewalk
in
that
which
will
we'll
take
a
look
at,
and
then
this
is
from
the
rear
kind
of
taken
from
that
alley.
Kind
of
looking
at
the
backside
where
the
parking
is
and
the
traffic
will
actually
pass
underneath
to
200
West.
M
When
we
look
at
the
energy
use
and
generation
of
the
building
itself-
and
you
know
what
technologies
are
implemented
to
help-
you
know
with
pollution
generated
from
the
site
itself-
or
you
know
its
location-
to
be
able
to
take
advantage
of
mass
transit
things
like
that,
and
then
the
reuse
of
a
priority
site.
Saying:
okay,
we
will,
you
know
we're
largely
a
built
out
community.
Are
there
locations
that
can
be
better
utilized
than
they
are
currently
and
that
could
bring
something
better
to
the
table.
M
I
mean
with
the
master
plan,
implementation,
there's
a
lot
of
goals
and
objectives
both
in
the
plan,
salt
lake
document
and
in
the
downtown
master
plan,
and
so
we
take
a
look
at.
You
know
how
it
implements
those-
and
you
know
if
it's
found
to
implement
those
principles,
then
of
course
it
can
be
given
approval
to
move
forward.
So
the
first
item
for
which
they're
seeking
relief
has
to
do
with
this
third
story
step
back
in
the
FB
un-to
zone.
M
It
says
that
any
level
over
the
second
level
needs
to
step
back
a
minimum
of
15
feet
and
the
idea
behind
that
is
that
it
creates
one
some
vertical.
You
know
some
relief
helps
relate
a
little
bit
more
to
the
pedestrian
scale,
so
when
you're
walking
by
you're
not
looking
up-
and
it's
feeling
so
massive-
that
it's
on
top
of
you
step
backs-
creates
a
little
gives
it
a
little
bit
more
of
a
pedestrian
feel
to
it
and
but
that
still
allows
them
to
gain
some
height.
M
M
In
this
particular
case,
the
building
there
are
two
areas
which
would
not
meet
these
requirements,
and
so
the
first
is
right
here,
and
this
is
along
9th
south
and
that
that
portion
in
the
building
is
set
back
8
feet
rather
than
the
15
and
so
kind
of
this
circled
area.
You
know,
according
to
the
standards,
would
need
to
either
go
back
an
additional
7
feet
or
seek
relief,
and
what
what
the
challenge
is
here
is
this.
M
Of
course,
you
can
see
that
there's
a
large
rooftop
patio
and
garden
area,
and
this
also
serves
as
a
community
event
space.
So
right
in
right
in
this
area,
there
will
be
like
an
overhead
door
like
a
garage
style
door
that
will
open
up
and
it
allow
for
that
to
be
a
flexible
space.
For
the
you
know,
people,
events
and
whatnot.
This
particular
area
includes
media
control,
sound
and
lighting
controls
and
moving.
It
would
mean
one
obviously,
that
the
indoor
portion
of
the
space
would
be
smaller,
but
it
would
necessarily.
M
Would
just
create-
and
you
know,
in
their
proximity
to
the
the
way
the
doorways
go
into
the
stairwell
over
here.
Just
all
that
would
need
to
be
reconfigured
and
it
would
really
disrupt
the
overall
use
of
that
to
be
able
to
kind
of
flow
in
and
out
between
the
two,
the
indoor
in
the
outdoor
space
along
200
West.
This
portion
here
is
an
equipment
room,
and
so
it's
got.
M
The
building
is
just
see,
has
got
solar
panels
on
the
roof
here,
and
so
a
lot
of
the
mechanical
equipment
related
to
those
is
located
in
this
room.
It
needs
to
be
on
that
third
story
and
the
way
just
kind
of
looking
above
way
the
parking
is.
This
would
again
would
either
have
to
cut
into
that
community
space
or
it
can
be
located
here.
This
works
well
because
it's
again
adjacent
to
like
the
fire,
riser
room
and
the
emergency
exiting
on
this
Northside.
So
you
know
this
portion
does
not
step
back
at
all,
but
relocating.
M
That
would
create
a
hardship
in
that
that
you
know
the
site
wouldn't
even
be
reconfigured
it
would,
they
would
need
to.
You
know
build
another
portion
of
the
building
or
lose
some
parking
or
just
you
would
you
know
it
would?
It
would
not
be
easy
to
accommodate
with
what's
happening
here
in
considering
this,
we
look
at
okay.
M
Well,
so,
what's
being
done
to
help,
you
know
what
we're
getting
in
return
and,
of
course,
in
this
case
working
a
very
large,
open,
third
storey
patio,
and
that's
something
that's
you
know
goes
above
and
beyond
what
would
normally
be
required
at
the
15
feet.
This
becomes
a
large
community
gathering
space
which
is
identified
in
in
the
master
plan.
As
saying
you
know,
that's
something
that
they'd
like
to
see
is
a
place
where
the
community
can
gather
and
whatnot.
So,
let's
see
the
next
one
deals
with
the
ground
floor,
glass
requirements.
M
So
currently,
the
ordinance
reads
is
needing
60%
glass
and
that's
defined
as
a
zone
from
2
feet
to
8
feet
that
that's
where
you
counted,
and
so
that's
kind
of
depicted
in
the
red
here
as
to
what
that
area
is,
and
they
they
come
short
of
that
glass
requirement,
but
kind
of
in
lieu
of
that,
and
there's
several
reasons
that
we'll
talk
about
that
and
know
of
that.
What
they're
proposing
is
that
the
glass
would
be
taller
on
that
first
floor.
M
So,
across
this
space
here
it'd
be
up
to
10
feet
and
closer
to
the
corner.
Here
it
would
be
up
to
14
feet,
and
so,
although
that
doesn't
necessarily
change
the
percentages,
because
obviously
you
know
they
would
health
so
in
that
same
zone
have
additional.
You
know
the
concrete
material,
but
it
would
create.
You
know
that
much
more
glass
and
opening
and
and
light
that
would
transmit
out
to
the
public
space.
M
The
challenges
with
these
areas
relates
to
what's
on
the
inside,
and
so
this
is
a
recording
studio
and
they've
got
challenges
with
you
know,
with
the
tracks
coming
by
another
traffic,
and
things
looks
like
that.
They've
got
to
be
able
to
use
that
concrete
for
sound
deadening
to
help
make
that
space
actually
functionable
without
it.
You.
G
M
It
could
cause
some
problems,
this
area,
you
also
see
it,
does
slant
in
kind
of
inviting
people
into
that
space,
and
they
proposed
you
know
concrete
seating
out
there.
So
they've
really
tried
to
do
other
things
to
help
activate
the
space
and
make
it
feel
inviting
at
a
pedestrian
scale,
and
then
you
know
even
the
second
floor
with
that
perforated
metal
and
allowing
the
light
to
come
out
this.
M
It
should
still
be
a
very
inviting
area
and
then
just
the
fact
that
that
you
know
the
kind
of
the
programming
behind
the
glass
is
a
recording,
studio
or
they've
got
their
sound.
Staging
and
they've
got
different
components
that
will
actually
be
interesting
to
be
next
to,
rather
than
just
dead
space
that
looks
in
on
a
hallway
or
something
rather
or
so,
and
this
is
similar
pretty
much
the
same
situation
on
the
second
west
side
of
the
glass
and
the
heights
and
in
that
kind
of
area.
M
A
couple
other
considerations
that
are
mentioned
in
your
staff
report,
just
things
that
would
need
to
be
taken
care
of
as
you
enter
in
the
parking
from
the
alley
to
the
west.
There's
some
parking
stalls
located
here
and
the
way
these
are
laid
out
at
this
angle.
It
would
require
when
people
are
backing
out
to
do
part
of
their
maneuvers
in
the
alley,
and
that
is
prohibited
by
the
ordinance
and
so
we're
asking
that
they
shift
the
parking
a
little
bit
further
to
the
east.
M
So
all
parking
maneuvers
backing
maneuvers
and
that
can
happen
on
site
and
this
area
is
currently
is
a
little
courtyard.
There's
some
bike
parking.
There's
things
like
that,
but
it's
not
required
landscaping.
It's
not
a
required
courtyard.
Those
elements
could
be
spread
out
or
or
shifted
a
little
bit
differently
or
just
configured
without
affecting
the
overall
site
and
still
allowing
the
the
parking
to
function
properly,
and
the
second
relates.
M
The
drive
aisle
as
it
meets
the
public
street
be
no
wider
than
twelve
feet
and
they
had
a
proposed
when
believe,
is
15,
and
so
we're
recommending
that
that
we
narrowed
I'm
sorry
be
narrowed
through
increased
landscaping,
striping
or
material
changes,
and
that
also
would
create
a
little
safer
situation
here,
as
these
doors
exit
ones
for
the
fire,
Iser
ones
for
exiting
stairwell,
that
they
would
have
a
little
buffer
so
that
a
vehicle
couldn't
be
coming
here
and
you
swing
open.
The
door
and
I
think
that.
M
And
considering
this
again,
we
kind
of
look
at
how
is
it
fulfilling
the
goals
of
playing
salt
lake
in
downtown
master
plan,
and
this
is
definitely
underutilized
land
in
an
area
that's
starting
to
emerge
with
more
and
more
development,
it's
kind
of
an
up-and-coming
area
in
that
central
ninth
area
and
feel
that
this
is
a
use
that
helps
fulfill
a
lot
of
the
goals
it.
You
know,
of
course,
is
located
next
to
the
public
transit
and
there's
very
few
parking
stalls.
They
anticipate
that
most
of
the
students
will
use
public
transportation
to
get
there.
M
There
are
a
lot
of
efficient
technologies
built
into
this
building.
It's
got
active
and
passive
solar,
so
the
passive
solar
includes,
like
Sun
shield,
so
that
you
know
in
the
in
the
summer
the
windows
are
shaded
in
the
winter,
it's
collecting
light
to
help
heat
the
building.
The
trees
on
the
rooftop
help
shade
the
building
the
windows
are
set
to
open,
so
they
can
use
cool
air
to
come
in
and
you
really
uses
a
lot
of
green
technology.
M
S
S
Peter
Karuna
I'm
helping
spy
hop
with
the
development
Cassandra
her
burrow
goon
is
the
executive
director
of
spy,
hop
and
Jason
foster
with
Atlas.
Architects
is
the
architect
for
the
project,
so
we
thought
it
might
be
good
in
case
some
of
you
didn't
have
some
background
on
spy.
Hop
just
to
just
have
Cassandra
give
you
a
quick
overview.
L
Great
yeah,
thank
you
so
much
for
allowing
us
to
be
here
tonight
so
spy
hop
is
a
youth
media,
Arts
and
Education
Center
written.
We
were
founded
in
1999,
and
our
mission
is
to
mentor
young
people
in
the
digital
media
arts
to
really
help
them
find
their
voice
to
other
stories
and
be
empowered
to
affect
the
change
that
they
want
to
see
in
their
lives.
L
So
you
want
to
do
the
next
one
they're
really
kind
of
what
the
way
we
sort
of
describe
who
we
are
as
we
work
at
the
intersection
of
arts,
education,
youth
development
and
workforce
development
again.
Giving
young
people
are
ultimate
goal
is
to
give
young
people
the
skills
and
dispositions
that
they
need
to
succeed
in
life
and
to
provide
an
opportunity
for
them
to
contribute
to
the
Civic
discourse
in
their
communities.
S
S
The
charm
so
has
been
remediated
and
in
its
place
well,
and
it
was
a
former
gas
station
and
I
think
an
auto
repair
shop
as
well.
At
one
point:
that's
now
vacant,
obviously,
but
in
its
place,
will
be
a
new
two
and
a
half
story
building,
as
was
mentioned,
twenty
four
thousand
square
feet,
which
will
be
essentially
a
youth
media
center
for
spy,
hop
and
also
its
phase
two
productions,
which
is
a.
N
S
Was
mentioned
will
have
rooftop
event.
Space
will
serve
about
300
students
a
week
with
various
classes
and
it's
a
great
location
for
spy
hop
because
it's
sort
of
in
the
middle
it's
a
safe
zone
for
for
kids,
who've
come
from
the
East
and
kids
who
come
from
the
West
I.
Think
all
students
feel
comfortable
coming
to
this
location
is
right
at
a
track.
S
Stop
so
as
children,
children,
students
who
don't
drive
can
take
take
the
light
rails
to
get
there,
and
then
it
is
being
designed
to
a
LEED
Silver
standard
and
will
have
solar
power
on
it
as
well,
and
as
was
mentioned,
there
was
a
few
issues
with
a
design.
Actually,
some
of
I
think
zoning
had
been
changed
so
at
least
on
the
step
back
issue
that
the
initial
design
actually
fit
within
the
zoning
when
it
was
designed.
But
then
the
ordinance
changed
as
my
understanding,
so
we
didn't
fit
within
the
zoning
anymore.
S
So,
as
Eric
showed,
this
drawing
were
the
two
ish
issues
on
the
step
back
took
place
and
I
want
to
show
you
the
the
bird's-eye
view
of
that.
So
you
can
see
on
the
lower
left.
Is
that
staircase
and
then
just
to
the
right
is
where
the
event
space
the
indoor
event
space
will
be.
So
if
we
had
to
push
that
door
on
the
lower
left
back,
it
would
cut
into
the
event
space
and
change
the
configuration
and
then
on
the
upper
right
is
the
mechanical
room,
one
of
the
issues.
S
S
The
other
issue
is
the
glazing
requirement,
as
Eric
mentioned,
there's
that
two
to
eight
foot
zone
where
we
don't
meet
the
requirements.
But
if,
if
you
extended
that
zone
where
or
actually
forty
forty
nine
percent,
higher
and
glazing
on
two
hundred
west
and
then
on
nine
hundred
South
would
be
sixty
three
percent
higher
and
the
glazing.
So
we
actually
have
more
glass
than
wouldn't
otherwise
be
required
if,
if
it
weren't
just
in
that
two
to
eight-foot
zone,
there's
just
another
picture
of
that
again.
So.
L
L
Lot
of
depends
on
the
program
a
lot
of
they
don't
get
a
they
leave
with
a
portfolio
that
enables
them
to
get
into
college,
get
a
job
that
is
a
vetted
portfolio
through
you
know,
industry
professionals
come
in
and
sort
of
sign
off.
If
you
will
some
of
the
students
get
some
well
some
of
our
programs,
the
students
actually
do
get
a
school
credit.
If
it's
like
an
internship
that
they're
doing
it
just
varies
from
school
to
school.
A
lot.
L
L
L
Well,
we
actually
have
staff
that
live
within
walking
distance
from
the
building,
which
is
great
but
yeah,
and
then
we
have
currently
we
have
staff
that
actually
take
the
tracks
right
now
to
where
we're
located,
and
the
other
thing
is
we
we
work.
The
program
runs
from
I
mean
we're
open
from
8
a.m.
till
8
p.m.
every
day,
and
so
we
have
staff
coming
and
going
so.
Some
of
our
some
of
our
staff
are
actually
coming
in
at
11:00
and
leaving
at
8:00.
Some
are
coming
in
at
8:00,
leaving
at
5:00.
L
Some
are
actually
traveling
statewide,
so
they're,
not
you
know
necessarily
in
the
building,
so
we're
not
all
in
the
building
at
the
same
time
needing
a
place
to
park,
but
that's
also
a
value
of
ours
too.
Is
you
know
ensuring
that
that
you
know
we
keep
and
maintain
a
healthy
staff?
And
we
support
that
culture,
and
you
know
our
hope
is
that
our
staff
will
be
taking
tracks,
especially
since
all
three
lines
stop
right.
There
I
have.
B
N
We've
designed
it
in
a
way
that
it's
a
specific
drop-off
area
that
can
be
somewhat
more
secure
as
a
means
for
a
parent
drop-off,
especially
for
those
where
we,
when
we're
dealing
with
younger
kids.
That
courtyard
also
has
an
additional
function
which
you're
not
necessarily
seeing
in
the
plans
that
were
shown.
But
there
is
a
gathering
kind
of
lounge
space
right
adjacent
to
that
where
doors
can
open
up
into
that
courtyard.
N
So
it's
really
meant
to
be
sort
of
a
very
flexible
and
user
friendly
space
for
spy,
hop,
and
so
rather
than
is
that
real
estate,
which
would
be
you
know,
I,
think
valuable
to
them.
We're
willing
to
just
basically
drop
a
stall.
We
need
the
bike
function
anyway,
our
work
week,
actually
we've
accommodated
it
in
to
meet
the
requirements
of
zoning,
but
we're
certainly
not
opposed
to
adding
additional
stalls
or
a
bike
capacity
and.
N
N
Necking,
that
portion
down
to
a
12
foot
is
not
a
problem.
It's
a
it's
a
one-way
lane.
Anyway,
we
actually
had
what's
called
a
speed
table
where
that
actually
bumps
up,
so
it's
actually
the
same
height
as
a
sidewalk.
That
stair
is
really
interned.
It
is
more
of
a
convenience
stair,
but
it's
it's
certainly
emergency
egress,
but
the
heavier
traffic
will
probably
be
coming
in
from
other
parts
of
the
of
the
building
anyway,
so
we
don't
see
it
as
a
heavy
use
stair,
but
the
to
make
the
adjust.
N
N
G
D
N
What
you
can't
see
in
the
floor
plan
behind
it
is
there's
actually
a
soundstage,
so
there's
a
large
roll-up
door
there,
where
the
sets
and
material
are
brought
in
and
out
on
a
regular
basis.
What
we
have
also
accounted
for
is
that
they
would
like
to
at
some
point,
eventually
expand
their
set
design
and
construct
ability
or
construction
capabilities
on
site.
N
So
when
we
talk
about
Future
Shop,
that's
that's
what
that's
referring
to
as
well,
so
they
have
a
I
would
say
a
pretty
steady
stream
of
use
for
an
area
where
they
can
just
load
an
offload
kind
of
bulky
stuff.
The
other
thing
as
well,
the
stair
tower
that
is
on
the
ninth
south
side,
is
we
it's
called
the
periscope,
but
that's
also
the
public
entrance
for
public
events,
so
that
could
be
anything
from
a
wedding
to
a
concert
potentially
or
some
other
event.
N
If
caterers,
you
know
we
have
a
catering
kitchen
on
the
third
level.
So
if
a
caterer
pulls
up,
you
saw
float
food
carts.
Anything
of
that
nature.
They
basically
come
in
from
that
loading
area
without
having
to
park
out
on
the
street
or
use
the
parking
stalls
that
are
actually
allocated
for
staff.
So
that's
that's
the
intent
of
that
loading
area
that
did
that
answer.
The
question
I.
D
N
D
M
N
D
N
A
D
A
S
N
D
N
Just
added
expense:
I
mean
it's,
you
know
it's
not
needed
structurally,
it
doesn't
serve
a
purpose.
Is
that
actually
I
guess
here's
the
argument
I'd
make
for
it
by
having
that
open
and
makes
the
alley
less
creepy
I
mean
if
you
really
want
sight
lines,
and
we
are
talking
about
something
that
services
kids
and
that
you're
also
going
to
have
a
daily
engagement
there.
It
just
allows
for
more
eyes
in
that
zone
without
creating
kind
of
a
cave.
If
you
will
in
that
loading
area,.
D
N
It's
you're
right,
but
the
wall
act
I
mean
other
than
I.
Think
I've
got
bigger
problems,
screening
it
and
it's
not
a
loading
dock
that
is
like,
let's
say
a
grocery
store
or
a
heavy
industrial
use.
I
mean
it's
actually
programmatically
part
of.
What's
going
on
with
that
school,
so
it's
you
know
it's
not
a
junk
area,
just
an
access
that
has
the
particular
function
of
bringing
in
stage
sets
or
materials
to
to
do
that
type
of
work
or
catering
function.
If
you
have
an
event
on
level
three.
A
J
Would
based
on
the
information
in
the
staff
report,
the
information
presented
in
the
input
received
during
the
public
hearing
or
lack
thereof,
I
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
approved
PLN
su
B
2018,
zero,
zero,
eight,
seven
five
s
by
a
planned
development
with
the
conditions
listed
in
the
staff
report
I
would
just
is
as
written
is
it
going
to
it?
Does
it
require
the
moving
of
that
work
and
that
you
do
the
bike
lane
instead?
Do
we
need
to
be
specific
with
that?
C
B
Amy
yeah
I'm
I'm
really
excited
for
us
and
I'm
really
excited
about
this
one
and
I
actually
like
how
it
looks
and
I
rarely
like
how
anything
works.
So
you
really
had
like
three
home
runs:
cuz,
I'm
and
I'm
super
thrilled
that
this
surface
parking
lot
is
gonna,
be
going
away.
So
it's
an
emphatic
yes
for
me.
Thank.
T
T
The
property
is
currently
zoned,
B,
P
or
business
park,
and
the
requested
changes
to
commercial
corridor
CC
zoning
property
contains
an
existing
motel
building
that
is
being
used
for
multi-family
housing.
So
that's
a
non-conforming
use
and
they
want
to
rebuild
on
the
property
some
kind
of
multifamily
building,
and
so
they
have
to
change
the
zone
to
one
that
allows
residential
uses
which
aren't
allowed.
T
Currently
in
the
B
P
zone,
there
is
no
specific
site
development
plan
with
this
application
and
it's
just
the
zone
change
not
a
master
plan
amendment
in
conjunction
with
it,
as
it
meets
the
master
plan.
So
for
context.
This
is
the
property
shown
there.
It's
just
the
north,
that's
on
the
east
side
of
Main
Street,
just
to
the
north
of
the
OC
Tanner
property.
A
lot
of
that
area
is
Zone,
B
P,
which
is
an
essentially
a
much
more
industrial
zone
and
then
along
Main,
Street
and
Coatesville.
T
You're
getting
into
more
CC
zoning-
and
this
is
also
in
the
south
straight
State
Street
overlay
corridor
district,
there's
the
existing
motel
on
the
site
and
again
it's
a
nine
unit,
motel
and
predated
the
it
existed
before
this
area
became
Zone,
B
P
other
view
of
it.
As
I
mentioned,
here's
the
zoning
map
and
location
context.
It
is
Zone
B
P,
just
to
the
north
of
it.
The
zoning
changes
to
CC
the
corridor
commercial,
which
is
what
they're
asking
for
and
both
sides
of
Maine.
T
T
So
number
of
things
we
looked
at
zoning
district
comparison,
B,
P
versus
C,
C,
again,
I
mentioned
that
the
existing
motel
is
not
a
allowed
use
in
the
residential
uses,
aren't
allowed
in
B
P.
So
they
would
have
to
change
that
to
accommodate
that
multi-family
use.
They're
looking
for
another
thing
to
point
out
is
that
the
CC
zone
is
much
less
intense
and
scale
and
uses
than
the
B
P
zone.
T
Since
this
is
in
the
State
Street
corridor
overlay,
a
B
P
property
in
that
zoning
can
actually
be
built
up
to
a
90
foot
level,
whereas
the
zoning
they're
asking
for
would
allow
only
30
feet
by
right
and
it
would
have
to
go
through
a
conditional
building,
site
designs
or
a
design
review
process.
To
add
up
to
15
feet.
So
45
feet
would
be
the
maximum
height.
T
Staff
looked
at
the
nature
of
the
nature
of
the
general
area,
the
fact
that
the
property
is
located
along
a
major
corridor
fairly
busy
street
and
that
it's
supported
by
the
central
city,
master
plan
and
other
city
plans.
The
zoning
in
the
zoning
future
zoning
map
in
the
Central
City
master
plan
calls
for
this
area
to
be
community
commercial.
T
Also,
again,
the
provisions
of
planned
salt
lake
in
growing
salt
lake,
our
housing
plan
does
recognize
the
need
for
additional
housing.
So
it
is
supported
by
those
master
plans
and
the
use
does
not
seem
like
it
would
be
incompatible
with
the
adjacent
properties
so
staffs
recommending
the
Planning
Commission
forward
a
positive
recommendation
to
City
Council
for
the
zoning
map.
Amendment.
Q
I
am
Paige
huff
and
I'm.
The
executive
director
of
Alliance
house,
so
18:05
is
a
property
that
we've
had
since
the
early
90s
it
was
purchased
for
our
members.
We
are
a
nonprofit
that
serves
people
with
mental
illness
and
we
own
two
different
housing
properties,
along
with
the
Alliance
house
property.
Q
B
Q
B
I
would
really
I
mean
I
was
looking
at
the
RMF
45,
because
I
felt
like
just
this
is
a
good
site
for
some
height.
That's
not
45
feet
is
you
know
not
extraordinary,
but
that
you
take
advantage
of
that
to
to
build
up
to
provide
more
units,
and
so
so
that's
good
to
know
that
you
can
still
go
up
to
45
feet
with
a
conditional,
say,
review
plan,
but
yeah
I.
Would
you
know
I
would
was
really
hoping
you
think
about
that.
Q
Yeah,
we
definitely
want
to
increase,
obviously
because
the
housing
shortage
is
so
prevalent
and
then
with
our
members
and
their
income
levels.
It's
there's
just
not
affordable
housing.
We
do
have
issues
with
parking
which
is
going
to
impact
how
high
or
how
many
units
were
able
to
build
based
off
at
the
size
of
our
lot.
But
it's
definitely
something
we're
considering
thanks.
I.
A
T
D
F
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion:
Thank
You
Adrian,
based
on
the
findings
and
analysis
and
the
staff
report,
testimony
and
discussion
at
the
public
hearing
I
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
recommend
that
the
City
Council
approve
the
proposed
zoning
map,
amendment
file
PL
and
p
CM
2018,
zero,
zero,
nine,
zero,
four
for
the
property
located
at
1805
South
Main
Street
proposed
zone
change
from
the
VP
Business
Park
zoning
district
to
the
CC
commercial
corridor.
Zoning
district.
A
second.