►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting - 2/26/2020
Description
Planning Commission Meeting - 2/26/2020
A
C
D
E
E
E
F
So
you
will
see
some
new
faces
around
just
wanted
to
let
you
know
that,
hopefully
they'll
be
on
start
on
field
trips
and
stuff,
so
you
can
get
to
meet
them
and
and
see
them,
and
they
can
learn
about
what
our
Planning
Commission
does.
But
I
wanted
to
bring
that
up.
Also,
the
the
next
Planning
Commission
agenda
looks
relatively
light,
meaning
there's
only
like
three
or
four
items,
so
it
will
hopefully
give
you
summary
of
our
annual
report
and
that
we
do
every
year
that
kind
of
rehashes
everything
we've
done
all
the
stats.
F
How
long
Commission
meetings
are
all
that
fun
stuff,
how
we
helped
achieve
City
goals?
But
after
that
we
have
huge
agendas,
so
big
projects
we
have
some
some
of
the
some
very
large
projects
that
are
either
have
been
submitted
or
are
imminent
to
the
city
and
because
we
had
so
many
applications
in
the
tail
end
of
last
year.
That
will
just
be
ripe
for
Planning
Commission
approval
or
review
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
you
guys
have
that
on
your
radar.
F
We
do
expect
one
new
planning
Commissioner
to
be
appointed
in
the
next
few
weeks.
We
don't
know
the
dates
yet
and
once
that
name
is
publicly
announced
we'll
be
able
to
let
everybody
know
who
that
is,
but
so
that'll
be
beneficial
for
us.
We
will
still
have
one
vacancy
and
that
vacancy
the
mayor
would
like
to
try
to
reach
out
in
try
to
get
a
commissioner
who
lives
on
the
on
the
west
side
of
the
city.
So
we
were
more
geographically
diverse.
That
way,
so
that's
all
I
have
there's
any
questions.
A
Thank
You
Nick,
okay,
we're
going
to
move
on
to
the
public
hearing
portion
of
our
agenda.
Just
a
reminder.
If
you
would
like
to
speak
any
of
the
public
hearings
on
any
of
the
agenda
items
its
how
full,
if
you
complete
one
of
these
white
cards
that
are
located
outside
the
door,
it's
not
required,
but
it
just
helps
us
run
the
process.
G
A
You
don't
have
to
fill
out
a
card.
This
just
helps
facilitate
the
process,
and
so
just
to
give
you
a
little
bit
more
detail
on
how
we
run
the
public
hearings,
we
announce
each
agenda
item,
we
have
staff
come
up
and
give
a
presentation.
We
then
have
the
applicant
come
up
and
speak
to
us
for
10
minutes.
We
then
open
it
up
for
public
comments.
If
there's
a
member
of
a
community
council
who's
present,
we
give
them
five
minutes
to
to
speak.
A
Then
we
open
it
up
for
general
comments
from
the
public
and
each
person
has
two
minutes
in
which
to
provide
their
comments.
Okay,
let's
get
started.
The
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
an
Adu
at
approximately
1712
South,
one
thousand
each
case
number
PLN,
PCM
2019,
zero,
zero,
six
five
and
we
have
Kelsey.
H
Okay,
so
the
property
owner
representative
is
requesting
a
conditional
use
approval
to
construct
a
four
hundred
and
thirty-two
square-foot
ATU
in
the
rear
yard
of
the
property
located
at
1712
South
1000
s.
The
subject:
property
is
located
in
the
r15
thousand
single-family
zoning
district
and
just
south
of
the
Westminster
Park
on
the
west
side
of
1000
s.
H
This
is
a
photo
of
the
existing
structure
and
the
primary
elevation
of
the
ad
you
staff
has
received
several
public
comments
regarding
concerns
about
parking
congestion
and
public
safety.
The
applicant
has
identified
that
the
provided
parking
will
be
located
on
1,000
yeast,
which
is
permitted
per
the
Adu
ordinance.
So
in
summary,
staff
is
recommending
that
the
Planning
Commission
approved
the
conditional
use
as
proposed
and
with
the
understand
outlined
in
the
staff
report.
Okay,.
I
Questions
one
Kelsey
I
think
it
would
have
been
good
if,
in
those
photos,
we
could
have
had
some
showing
the
alley-
okay
and
showing
the
existing
rear
structures.
The
aerial
they
were
obscured
by
the
trees,
I
I
went
by
I,
don't
live
far
from
there,
and
it
would
have
been
helpful
to
have
that
in
the
review
in
the
packet,
the
IG's,
the.
I
Are
planning
on
demolishing
that
they
were
plannin
demolished,
I,
think
the
reason
I
think
that
would
have
been
much
more
helpful
in
reading
the
staff
report
to
have
those
visuals
was
because
I
have
a
question
and
you're
just
gonna
have
to
refresh
my
memory
on
this.
What's
what
is
the
ordinance
say
regarding
the
size
of
the
Adu
and
the
lot
size,
because
I
know
it's
limited
by
the
square
footage
of
the
home,
but
it's
also
constructed
by
the
lot
size
and
so
I
wanted
to
follow
up
and
get
that
clarification.
For
me.
H
So
in
the
r15
thousand,
it's
forty
percent
and
for
the
rear
yard,
it's
50
percent
of
the
rear
yard
can
be
covered
by
ID,
well,
a
detached
structure,
whatever
that
may
be,
or
the
combination
of
the
detached
structures.
So
the
proposed
Adu
does
meet
the
square
footage
requirement
and
all
the
other
zoning
regulations
as
far
as
rear
yard
coverage
and
lot
coverage
things,
but
there's
not
a
just
to
clarify.
There's,
not
a
base,
lot
square
footage
requirement
for
an
Adu
okay,
any.
J
J
I
Okay,
so
I
want
to
follow
up
on
the
public
comments
that
were
part
of
the
report
and
because
there's
an
alley
behind
this
other
garage
is
the
house.
Adjacent
access
is
their
garage
via
this
alley.
So,
with
a
lot
coverage
in
mind,
can
the
ATU
be
in
place
and
allow
for
a
parking
spot
that
is
accessible
from
the
alley?
Yeah.
J
K
I
I
But
now
that
you
have
a
new
architect,
who's
going
to
be
here
often
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
for
us
to
see
better
renderings
of
how
that
space
interacts,
because
when
we're
looking
at
these
in
a
single-family
residential
zone,
we're
looking
at
how
this
is
going
to
function
on
the
site,
and
so
just
those
spatial
drawings
of
how
many
feet
in
this,
and
that
are
helpful.
But
they
don't
do
quite
good
job.
There's
three
B
si
tu
applications.
You
could
refer
to
that.
Give
us
some
better
visual
yeah.
I
A
K
K
Think
we'd
all
like
to
start
to
cut
down
the
amount
of
time
that
we
spend
on
the
is
rake.
Is
there
about
the
same,
every
time,
different
location,
but
same
structure
and
so
yeah?
The
comments
are
greatly
appreciated
and
we'll
we'll
start
to
kind
of
streamline
the
submission
packet,
as
we
move
forward
with
these
to
make
sure
that
it's
taking
less
of
your
time
to
review
and
helping
you
guys
visually
understand.
What's
going
on
with
it.
So
that's.
A
A
G
L
This
lot
is
only
4,700
feet,
not
even
5,000
square
feet.
I
think
that's
what
makes
it
feel
so
tight.
The
driveway
along
the
side
of
the
house
is
only
5
feet
wide
as
it
goes
past
the
house,
so
it
can't
I,
don't
know
what
the
garage
has
ever
been
used
for.
I
can't
drive
that
well
anyway,
I
just
we
think
it's
too
small.
L
We
had
some
comments.
It's
interesting.
My
letter
said
we
didn't
have
any
comments
and
then
I
see
that
I
attached
several
comments.
So
no
accounting
for
what
I
say,
I
think
we
want
better
drawings.
Then
then
we
have
I
think
for
me
to
be
able
to
see
the
relationship
of
the
building
in
the
backyard
compared
to
other
buildings
on
other
houses.
L
Nearby
really
helps
to
be
able
to
get
a
feel
for
the
property
because
driving
by
it's
really
hard
to
see
into
the
back,
and
we
didn't
feel
like
we
can
just
walk
up
the
driveway
and
take
a
look
so
sort
of
grudgingly
we.
We
approve
this
because
it
does
meet
the
standard,
but
I
don't
think
it
I
think
you
know
there's
another
one
in
sugarhouse,
maybe
I'll
bring
you
the
pictures
when
it's
finished,
we're
cramming
things
onto
too
small
a
lot
and
I,
don't
think
it's
it's
making
for
pleasing
living.
B
Lin
Schwartz
sugarhouse
community
council.
This
is
a
very
small
lot
and
the
ad
you
will
make
it
feel
very
crowded.
The
distance
between
the
house
and
the
ad
you
may
seem
like
a
good
distance,
but
30
feet
is
not
that
much
since
the
garage
will
be
demolished
and
the
driveway
is
too
narrow
for
parking
cars.
All
the
cars
will
be
parked
on
the
street
and
once
again,
the
stated
purpose
of
the
Adu
ordinance,
which
is
to
provide
affordable
housing,
will
not
be
met,
as
this
will
be
rented
as
a
market
rate
unit.
Thank.
A
D
D
Don't
know
what
else
and
he
over
the
over
time
has
rented
out
rooms
and
there's
lights
in
the
basements
always
must
be
still
continuing
to
rent
out
rooms.
I
just
don't
think
that
on
the
corner,
they
have
a
house
and
they
have
two
back
there:
two
cars
in
or
forward
but
back
into
the
street,
and
they
have
an
apartment
in
the
basement.
D
And
then
you
go
a
little
house
and
then
you
have
a
duplex
three
of
the
kids
used
to
skateboard
on
the
on
Blaine
Avenue,
because
the
streets
too
busy
and
the
Nets
house
has
a
family
and
the
husband,
wife
and
two
teenagers.
And
so
you
go
down
the
street.
There's
just
no
parking
and
there's
in
the
cars
and
the
kids
come
to
the
park
and
getting
across
17
south
is
just
take
your
life
in
your
hands
and
so
I.
D
Don't
think
they
should
be
allowed
to
put
more
cars
on
the
street
because
there's
already
too
many
cars
on
the
street
and
it
becomes
just
a
hazard
because
I
walk
all
the
time
and
crossing
17.
It
was
just
a
pain
and,
with
he's
already
has
a
basement
with
the
rentals
that
he
does
and
now
he's
going
to
put
this
in
the
backyard
and
take
up
more
parking
in
front
of
ten
theis.
Oh
I'm,
sorry,
that's
how
I
feel.
So.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
Thank.
C
I
noticed
their
proximity
and
placement
on
the
site
in
Tran
in
respect
to
where
public
transport
is
I
think
it's
maybe
not
unfair,
but
maybe
a
pre
consideration
to
think
that
someone
who
may
rent
these
a
to
use
or
inhabit
these
a
to
use
won't
have
a
vehicle
and
that
in
that
sugarhouse
area,
I
personally
lived
there
too
I'm
about
two
blocks
up,
not
everyone.
There
has
a
vehicle
and
I
believe
that
in
the.
C
Use
are
designed
to
limit
impacts
and
protect
neighborhood
character.
I
believe
that
the
placement
of
the
ad
you
to
the
left
of
the
driveway
minimizes
its
impact
and
the
bus
line,
one
line
up
on
1100
South,
is
viable
for
a
tenant
who
may
not
have
a
vehicle
so
I
believe
the
vehicle
concern,
maybe
a
little
bit
of
a
predisposition
towards
an
individual
who
may
rent
it
to
have
a
vehicle
I
believe
it
should
be
approved.
C
N
I
Zachery
Dussault:
well,
that's
the
first
having
backup
on
this,
but
I'd
also
like
to
present
an
additional
layer
of
additional
transportation
options
for
this
site.
Besides
the
assumption
that
we
have
at
these
meetings
that
whoever's
gonna
own
this
or
rent
this
unit
has
a
car,
they're
gonna
drive
it
everywhere.
They're
gonna
ruin
the
neighborhood
with
their
extra
car.
N
This
site
is
20
minutes
biking
to
downtown
20
minutes
planning
to
the
you
10
minutes,
biking
to
the
sugarhouse
business
district,
I
think
that's
a
pretty
reasonable
distance
for
a
bike,
commute
I!
Think
it's
quite
possible.
You
could
live
here
without
owning
a
car
I
think
the
Adu
meets
the
standard
and
it
increases
housing
and
overall
housing
stock.
More
housing
stock
will
increase
affordability.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
H
H
E
H
E
F
An
enforcement,
so
if
somebody
has
a
basement
apartment
and
they're
proposing
an
Adu,
they
would
they
would,
by
default,
not
be
able
to
do
the
ATU
because
they
wouldn't
be
authorized
by
the
code
to
do
it.
So
it's
very
challenging
to
prove
that
there
actually
is
a
basement
apartment
in
some
place.
It's
perfectly
within
a
property
owner
and
a
home
owners
right
to
rent
out
portions
of
their
property
by
city
ordinance.
You
can
have
up
to
three
unrelated
people
living
in
your
dwelling.
F
I
J
Yeah
definitely
discussion:
I
can
have
with
him
absolutely
I,
don't
see
any
issue
with
that
I,
don't
know
how
he'll
feel
about
moving
it
closer
to
his
home
for
the
sake
of
privacy,
but
I
definitely
think
I
could
discuss
that
with
him
and
bring
it
to
his
attention,
because
I
definitely
think
we
could
have
a
parking
stall
back.
There
makes
sense
to.
F
I
You
know
I
think
the
conditional
use
standard,
though,
is
us
identifying
detrimental
impacts
through
the
report
through
public
comments,
and
if
a
majority
of
those
comments
are
solely
focused
on
parking,
then
it
is
our
job
as
a
Planning
Commission
to
investigate
ways
to
mitigate
that
detrimental
impact
and
in
this
way,
we're
talking
about
providing
an
off
street
parking
to
do
that.
So
the
legal
standard
for
those
conditional
uses
is
that
these
are
the
discussions
we
should
be
having
no.
I
That's
been
identified
in
this
conditional
use
application
and
there
is
a
way
to
mitigate
it
that
takes
that
away
and
by
providing
that
off
street
parking
via
the
alley,
which
is
why
I'm
also
one
of
the
reasons
why
I
really
always
generally
oppose
Ali
vacations
is
because
we
want
to
be
using
them
for
these
type
of
things,
I
would
I
mean
I
would
be
happy
to
strongly
encourage
that
you
do
that
and
in
the
future
you
know
for
very
urban
sites.
Like
this,
you
look
into
those
a
little
bit
harder,
yeah.
J
I
I
J
I
just
for
other
projects,
I
want
to
clarify,
there's
been
a
lot
of
you
know
doing
the
on
street
parking
because
there's
been
some
back-and-forth,
the
zoning
about
what
was
required
for
tandem
parking
in
a
driveway
and
we've
come
to
find
out
now
that
it
is
specifically
allowed
for
a
to
use.
So
that
is
something
that
we
can
also
start
showing
on
our
site
plans
as
parking
on
site.
For
this.
I
Yeah
tandem
parking
is
allowed
and
I
do
think
that
there
are
some
neighborhoods
like
this.
The
next
one
doesn't
quite
hit
this
mark
right.
Where
you
do
have
I
mean
there
is
off
street
parking
available.
I
live
right
near
there.
I
know
there
was
off
street
parking
available,
but
when
you
know
the
neighbors
get
more
concerned
about
that,
that's
this
type
of
a
neighborhood
where
you
do
have
a
lot
of
uses
and
then
with
the
park,
and
you
have
a
lot
of
traffic
foot
and
cars
pay
attention
to
that
more.
I
E
A
E
J
A
B
C
L
A
O
E
A
O
A
B
J
B
J
Had
some
landscaping
plans
on
I
think
he
kind
of
want,
because
his
property
is
so
big.
He
wants
to
kind
of
like
a
gated
off
rear
yard
area,
but
he's
kind
of
been
going
back
and
forth
and
so
and
I
didn't
have
the
time
to
reflect
those
landscaping
plans
on
the
site
plan.
But
definitely
we
can
make
it
known
to
him
that
it's
best
to
have
a
walkway
of
some
sort,
but
I
know
he
did
want
to
enclose
the
area
off
a
little
bit
to
provide
privacy
for
the
primary
dwelling
was.
J
E
The
only
reason
to
really
I
mean
I
don't
have
to
bring
my
landscape
plans
to
the
Planning
Commission
either,
but
I
think.
The
reason
that
we're
interested
in
this
is
because
we
want
to
know
where
how
the
application
who
lives
here
is
going
to
park
and
how
they're
going
to
approach
it
if
they're,
not
if
there
is
a,
as
we
were
saying
if
they're
parking
they're
expected
to
park
tandem
in
the
existing
garage,
then
they're
not
going
to
walk
all
the
way
around
the
house
right
yeah.
E
K
K
K
G
A
O
A
Q
G
Live
at
1041,
Briarcliff,
Avenue
I
live
next
door
to
that
house.
On
the
west
side,
I've
been
in
that
home
made
my
wife
since
2004.
When
we
purchased
the
house.
The
neighbors
here
gave
us
a
block
party
when
we
moved
in
from
day
one
when
Ella
Dennis
and
his
wife,
his
mother,
lived
there
when
they
sold
the
house,
they
sold
it
to
them.
G
The
thing
that
they
came
out
he
said
to
me
to
my
face:
is
that
we're
gonna
rent
this
out
till
LD
is
students
from
the
earliest
college
I
yet
got
to
see
one
okay
I've
had
to
pull
these
in
my
yard,
I
gave
him
the
okay
they've,
been
in
my
neighbors
short
looking
for
people
that
they
rent
to
right.
Now,
as
we
speak,
they're
renting
rooms
right
now,
okay,
so
it's
been
like
that
all
the
time
just
the
day
that
they
bought
the
house.
G
My
nephew
came
to
visit
me
six
years
ago
and
there's
five
black
girls
in
the
yard.
In
the
driveway
fighting,
he
called
me:
I
work
for
Danville
Development,
I
work
for
Hood
housing.
Ok,
sixteen
years
I
come
home.
It
was
a
group
of
girls
out
there
scratched
up
just
add
another,
not
told
him
to
stop
and
bade
him
stop.
They
went
in
when
my
wife
came
home,
I
told
her.
She
went
next
door
and
talked
to
the
people
that
lived
in
house
the
two
young.
Ladies,
they
lived
in
the
house.
G
G
I've
had
to
pull
these
showed
me
pictures
soap,
Lake,
Police,
Department
and
I
told
me
anytime.
You
need
to
go
on
my
yard,
you
go
into
it
in
regards
to
this
house
cuz.
They
rent
out
rooms
I'm
on
my
back
porch
one
hundred
twelve
thirty
one
o'clock
in
the
morning.
Cuz
I,
don't
sleep
good,
I'm,
gonna
sleep
good!
Thank
you,
sir.
Okay,
don't
let
me
explain
ma'am
I
wake
up
my
car
door,
closed,
I,
hear
Carter
closed,
I'll,
go
out
and
look
my
right
on
my
four
focused
cuz.
It
slowly
goes
off.
G
A
L
My
name
is
Suzanne
O'conner
I
live
at
10:47,
Briarcliff
Avenue,
my
husband
and
I
have
been
there
33
years
and
I
grew
up
in
the
home,
so
I've
actually
lived
there
60
years
out
of
the
whole
time,
I've
known
every
neighbor,
that's
ever
lived
there.
The
people
that
owned
this
home
and
I
don't
know.
I,
don't
see
them
here,
though,
I've
never
met
them.
They
sub
rent
to
the
two
women
who
want
to
put
in
this
tiny
house.
They
in
turn
rent
rooms
in
their
basement
by
the
month.
L
So
there's
any
number
of
people
from
two
cars
to
four
cars
added
to
the
traffic
on
our
street.
Besides
the
two
cars
of
the
two
women
that
live
there,
I
guess
on
a
permanent
basis,
the
man
whose
name
is
on
the
home,
Erik
Choi,
has
never
lived.
There
he's
always
rented.
It
I've
got
pictures
here
of
the
first
snowfall.
How
there's
no
parking?
We
can't
get
a
garbage
truck,
let
alone
a
snow
plow.
It
can't
get
past
my
driveway,
my
neighbor
mr.
L
Jones,
or
my
neighbor
Elaine
Y
coughs
house
to
plow
the
street
because
it
sits
in
a
corner
where
there's
about
this
much
space
before
Elaine's
driveway
and
mr.
Jones's
driveway,
and
they
park
there
and
they
put
their
cans
there.
There
is
no
access,
the
access,
they're
saying
they
want
to
use
it's
going
to
infringe
on
Elaine
white
coughs.
Driveway.
They
don't
have
one
and
they've
got
a
root
beer
Shack,
that's
on
wheels
parked
in
their
driveway.
Now
next
to
Eddie
Jones's
house,
to
where
his
car
barely
fits
in
his
own
driveway.
A
G
So
when
you
come
down
that
Street,
both
streets
are
so
narrow
if
cars
are
parked
on
both
sides
of
the
road,
only
one
vehicle
can
use
the
street
the
center
of
the
road,
which
is
almost
cause
vehicle
to
vehicle
and
vehicle
to
bicycle
accidents
due
due
to
not
being
able
to
see
clearly
what
is
coming
around
the
corner.
Can
I
walk
over
there?
G
G
G
Garbage
pickup
is
affected.
The
garbage
guys
have
talked
to
me
and
asked
why
do
they
park
like
that?
I,
don't
know
snow
more
route
and
removal
is
effected
with
cars
parked
on
the
street
at
that
corner.
My
wife
was
almost
hit
on
that
corner.
I'm,
a
retired
city,
employee,
37
years
with
the
engineering
division.
I
know
what
a
street
looks
like
Thank.
N
Zack
Dussault
speaking
in
favor
of
this
petition.
The
main
reason
I'm
in
favor
of
this
petition
is
because
Rose
Park
doesn't
really
have
a
lot
of
transportation
options.
Besides
the
car
currently
and
unfortunately,
that's
due
to
their
low
density
I
believe
that
the
more
density
that's
brought
to
Rose
Park,
the
better
it
can
be
served
by
transit,
the
better
can
be
served
by
bike
lanes,
I.
N
Believe
the
last
city
council
meeting
a
bond
was
approved
for
raised
bike
lanes
on
600
north,
so
hopefully
that'll
become
a
better
bicycle
corridor,
but
unfortunately
there
are
people
in
Rose
Park
who
have
to
rely
on
the
poor
public
transit
that
Rosa
Park
has
I
believe
they
only
have
two
bus
routes,
ones
clockwise,
one
it's
counterclockwise,
and
they
just
have
to
rely
on
that
because
that's
their
economic
situation
and
I
think
that
more
housing
in
Rose
Park
would
make
it
a
more
desirable
place
to
live.
Make
it
a
better
quality
of
life
and
I.
N
Also
just
wanted
to
address
what
Amy
said
in
the
last
ad.
You
application
you
guys
job
as
commissioners,
isn't
really
just
to
listen
to
complaints
of
neighbors.
Your
job
is
to
decide:
is
this
good
for
this
city
or
not,
and
the
city
as
a
whole
needs
more
housing?
We
need
to
rely
on
cars,
less
and
I.
Just
think,
remember,
when
you
make
your
decision
take
a
holistic
view
of
it.
It's
not
just
the
neighbors
that
complain.
It's
everyone
else
that,
frankly,
doesn't
show
up
to
these
meetings.
Thanks
thank.
A
L
Elayne
Wyckoff
I
live
at
10:33,
Briarcliff,
Avenue
next
door
to
the
house
in
question,
I
believe
in
the
hearing
for
the
previous
dwelling.
It
was
mentioned
that
if
they
rent
rooms,
then
an
Adu
is
not
permissible.
They
do
rent
rooms
and
have
consistently
the
driveway
that
they
they
showed
a
picture
that
there
could
be.
There
is
room
for
a
driveway
on
the
east
ish
side
of
the
house.
There
is
only
one
driveway
entrance
there
and
that's
my
driveway.
There
is
not
room
for
another
driveway
entrance
off
the
street.
L
The
the
density
problem,
yes,
but
the
public,
transportation
and
and
bike
lanes
they're
talking
about
are
on
the
perimeter
of
the
neighborhood,
not
on
the
neighborhood
streets.
The
neighborhood
streets
are
narrow.
Barely
can
two
cars
pass
if
there's
nobody
parked
and
there's
parking
on
both
sides
of
the
streets
all
over
the
neighborhood.
L
So
those
those
amenities
that
could
be
improved
are
not
pertaining
to
the
neighborhood
itself,
where
we
live
and
drive
every
day,
and
the
last
thing
is
the
little
space
between
Eddie's
driveway
and
their
driveway,
which
is
a
double
driveway,
and
then
my
driveway,
that
space
is
not
big
enough
for
a
car,
but
there
always
is
a
car
there,
and
so
they
hang
over
our
driveway
as
it
is.
So
we
have
a
hard
time
by
backing
out
of
our
driveway
without
running
the
risk
of
hitting
their
car.
L
C
My
name
is
haagen-dazs
bhava
I'm,
a
architecture
student
at
you
going
back
to
the
hole
density,
su
I,
think
density
is
a
healthy
way
to
evolve
a
city
and
a
salt
lake
city,
especially
his
growing
year
by
year,
and
cases
like
this
only
help
teach
us
how
to
adapt.
You
know
a
growing
city
like
Salt,
Lake,
City
is
and
going
back
to
the
issue
about
that
tight
corner
and
not
being
able
to
see
you
know
if
a
car
is
coming
or
not
or
for
child's
coming
or
not
more.
C
A
A
O
So
that
was
a
question
fairly
early
on
with
this,
just
due
to
the
comments
from
the
neighbors
and
looking
into
it
a
little
further,
it's
not
something.
We
would
normally
check
or
verify
too
extensively
at
this
point,
but
we
did
get
a
letter
back
stating
that
the
homeowner
on
record
that
it's
his
sister
that
he
rents
to
and
when
you
go
through
our
ordinance
and
look
at
that
that
qualifies
as
owner
occupancy
that
meets
our
definitions,
and
so
with
that
you
know,
and
then
it,
as
was
mentioned
on
the
previous
one.
O
P
O
D
O
So
the
two
things
so
there
was
two
different
versions
of
this.
The
early
version
actually
showed
a
parking
stall
located
behind
the
home
here
and
there
would
be
space
to
do
it.
There's
there's
a
carport
there's
a
kind
of
a
garage
and
then
a
carport
here.
Those
would
count
as
the
two
required
stalls
for
the
home
and
then
they
could
by
ordinance
park
tandem
in
the
driveway
that
would
be
allowed.
O
O
F
E
So,
by
my
reckoning,
it
looks
like
that
parking
space
is
in
front
of
somebody's
driveway.
Is
that
correct?
Because
that's
that's
what
the
aerial
photography
shows,
which
is
pretty
accurate
most
of
the
time
if
you
zoom
in
on
that
aerial,
you
can
see
again.
This
is
a
problem
of
not
having
accurate
plans,
site
or
site
plans
that
show
enough
information
for
us
to
make
appropriate
decision
and.
O
O
B
Might
be
a
question
for
the
applicant,
but
maybe
you
can
answer
it.
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
if
it
would
be
under
for
you,
but
they
were
showing
us
where
there's
a
side
entrance
in
the
fence,
but
that
appears
to
be
on
the
neighbor's
property
as
well.
Do
you
know
so?
That's
they
have
to
go.
They
ad,
you,
that's
the
fence.
It's
on
this
side.
B
O
E
A
E
O
F
G
E
L
A
O
I
I
So
I
think
this
is
a
follow
up
from
some
of
the
comments
I
made
earlier.
That
I
will
clarify
you
know
what's
before
us
is
a
conditional
use,
and
in
that
standard
we
are
tasked
with
identifying
detrimental
impacts.
Public
comments
is
one
way
in
which
we
do
that,
because
that
is
what
we're
looking
at
when
we're
contemplating
these
conditional
uses.
I
think
that
we
could
have
stood
a
lot
better
documentation
for
photography
of
where
all
these
lines
happen.
I
So
in
the
future,
maybe
we
can
get
some
better
photos
in
the
staff
report,
or
at
least
more
comprehensible,
just
more
of
them,
so
I'm
wondering
if
we
can
to
mitigate
this
impact
that
we've
heard
about
I
mean
we
can't
do
anything
about
who
they
run
to.
We
can't
do
anything
about
that
as
long
as
they
meet
the
ordinance
of
that
it
is
a
family
member
and
that
qualifies
as
family.
I
F
Probably,
wouldn't
matter
because
just
looking
at
that
dimension
of
how
much
street
frontage
they
have
I,
don't
think
that
they
could
legally
park
a
car
there
and
the
standard
is
that
for
that
on
streets
all
to
start
to
to
basically
be
available.
It
has
to
be
a
legally
located
on
street
parking.
Spot
buts
means
driveway.
Spacing
you
got
to
get
your
tires
within
all
of
those
things,
twelve
inches
of
the
curve
and
with
the
curve,
that's
so
I,
just
don't
think
it's
going
to
meet
that
code.
I
F
If
if
they
don't
have
a
legal
spot,
but
that,
but
that
doesn't
mean
that
you
don't
that
the
Commission,
because
then
it
shifts
it
on
site
or
if
they're
within
a
quarter
mile
I
think
a
quarter
mile
of
transit.
I
have
don't
know
that
this
is.
But
then
they
would
have
to
figure
out
a
legally
located
spot
on
their
property
to
provide
that
park.
India
and.
P
F
P
P
F
The
Commission
you
get
to
decide
that
right.
So
if
you
think
that
a
walkway
is
necessary
to
meet
that
standard,
then
absolutely
you
can
put
again
there's
not
one
shown
you
can
put
a
condition
on
that
that
be
provided
generally.
What
I
some
advice
that
I
would
give.
If
that's
the
approach
you
want
to
take
is
to,
at
the
very
least
say
what
kind
of
minimum
dimension
you
want,
whether
you
know
in
some
basic
details
whether
it
has
to
be.
You
know,
solid
surface
all
the
way
across
that
width.
F
A
P
Mean
I'll
make
a
couple
comments
in
emotion
unless
someone
else
wants
to
so
one
for
staff
and
I
know
this
is
on.
It
seems
like
consistently
we've
had
these
come
forward.
Where
there's
a
question
of
whether
the
owner
is
occupying
and
I
know
it's
an
enforcement,
and
that's
always
been
that
we
were
frozen
forcement,
but
it
seems
like
we're
approving
the
construction,
the
building
and
it
seems
like
we
as
a
city,
need
to
get
a
handle
on
that
enforcement
side,
because
I
think
as
more,
these
are
coming
more
being
built.
P
We
don't
have
and
if
we
can't
enforce
it
and
we're
improving
it,
he
we're
proving
these
based
on.
We
think
what's
happen
and
we
can't
enforce
it.
It's
actually
the
owner,
that's
occupying
or
just
building
more
of
these
and
that's
a
real
problem,
I
think
for
the
ordinance
in
general.
So
we
should
probably
try
to
deal
with
that
as
a
city
on
how
we
pass
that
up
to
the
powers
that
be.
But
you.
P
Sure
you
have
to
so
that's
what
I
won't
comment.
The
second
thing
for
the
public
just
load
these
these
are
conditional
uses,
and
so
we
have
to
define
if
there's
ways
we
can
mitigate
the
impacts.
That's
the
best
we
can
do.
We
can't
we
hate
we
buy
by
state
law,
have
to
move
them
through
and
so
based
on.
P
Okay,
so,
based
on
the
information
in
the
staff
report,
information
is
edited.
The
input
received
in
the
public
hearing
move
the
Planning
Commission
approved
PLN
PCM
2019,
zero,
zero,
nine,
nine
to
conditional
use
permit
for
Briarcliff
Adu
with
the
conditions
in
the
staff
report
and
also
the
additional
conditions
that
the
parking
off
street
parking
stall.
P
D
E
A
E
C
A
F
Anybody
there
are
a
couple
people
who
had
questions
you
can
direct
all
your
questions
to
Eric
out
in
the
hall
as
we
need
to
continue
the
meeting.
But
the
other
thing
that
I
want
to
add
is
that
one
of
the
things
about
conditional
uses
is
what
was
said
was
true.
The
planning
christian
has
to
prove
them
if
any
sort
of
negative
impact
can
be
reduced
but
conditional
uses
if
they
continue,
if
they
create
issues,
nuisances
etc,
they
can
also
be
revoked,
and
so
one
of
the
one
of
the
things
that
the
city
relies
on
with.
F
G
L
Linda
good
evening
so,
as
mentioned,
this
is
a
conditional
use,
approval
request
for
a
detached
accessory,
Dowling
unit
on
a
property
looking
at
235,
East
Hubbard,
which
is
also
in
the
r15
thousand
single-family
residential,
and
that
is
actually
a
current
photo
of
the
single-family
residence.
The
subject
property
the
proposed
attached
ad.
You
would
be
located
in
the
north
east
corner
of
the
rear
yard.
The
building
footprint
is
approximately
432
square
feet.
The
parking
space
for
this
would
actually
be
located
on
Street
along
Hubbard
Avenue.
L
L
L
You
will
see
a
general
review
of
that
whole
entire
rear
yard,
so
you
can
kind
of
see
the
budding
properties
and
to
the
bottom
left
is
standing
on
the
driveway
to
the
existing
driveway
and
looking
towards
where
the
proposed
ad
you
would
be
located.
And,
lastly,
this
is
a
photo
of
the
closest
single-family
dwelling
on
the
adjacent
property,
which
would
be
approximately
15
feet
from
the
pros
ad.
L
You
know
comments
were
received
either
from
the
community
council
or
public
comments,
so
the
proposal
generally
means
all
the
applicable
standards,
as
discussed
in
attachment,
E
and
F
of
the
staff
report
and
based
on
the
findings
and
information
in
the
staff
report.
Planning
staff
is
recommending
the
Planning
Commission
approve
the
conditional
use
request
for
the
proposed
ad
you
what
the
conditions
listed
in
the
staff
report.
This
concludes
my
presentation.
Thank.
I
L
A
N
Zach
do
Sul
I'm
in
favor
of
this
application,
I'd
like
to
propose
a
alternate
transit
vision
for
this
site
or
transportation
vision.
Then
the
car
third
sat
our
correction.
Third
East
is
a
protected
bike.
Lane
that
extends
to
downtown
with
it
looks
like
an
get
to
the
site
to
downtown
approximately
ten
minutes
by
bike.
Ninth
South
has
frequent
bus
service
every
15
minutes
and
again
we're
talking
about
parking
as
the
constraint
for
this
development.
N
A
D
Based
on
the
findings
listed
in
the
staff
report,
it
is
the
planning
staffs
opinion
that
the
overall
project
generally
meets
the
application
of
political
standards
and
therefore
recommends
the
Planning.
Commission
approve
the
Planning
development
request
with
conditions,
and
this
is
regarding
PLN
su
B
2019:
zero,
zero,
zero,
nine.
Ninety
seven.
D
M
D
C
A
R
You,
chairperson,
the
project
site
is
located
at
156
East
900
South
in
his
in
the
corridor
commercial
district,
on
a
corner
lot
along
900
South
and
Edison
Street
the
site,
currently
houses
an
exist.
An
existing
legal
non
complying
building,
which
was
built
in
nineteen
in
the
1960s.
The
applicant
for
the
heathered
lofts
project
is
requesting
to
add
an
inline
vertical
addition
to
the
existing
building
to
create
a
second
and
third
floor
on
the
building.
R
The
proposed
header
lofts
plan
development
will
be
a
three-story
mixed-use
building
with
residential
uses
on
the
third
and
second
floors
and
an
office
and
residential
use
on
the
ground
floor.
The
overall
layout
of
the
site
will
remain
the
same
as
what's
existing
through
the
planned
development.
The
applicant
is
requesting
to
modify
the
front
the
front
yard,
the
corner
side
yard
and
the
rear
yard
setbacks
in
order
to
be
in
line
with
the
existing
building,
which
currently
has
no
setbacks
from
the
property
lines.
The
front
yard
setback
requirement
in
the
CC
district
is
15
feet.
R
It's
also
15
feet
for
the
corner,
side,
yard
setback
and
there's
a
10
foot
setback
in
the
rear
yard.
The
applicant
is
also
requesting
a
modification
to
the
building
height
through
a
planned
development.
It
allows
for
Planning
Commission
to
approve
an
additional
height
of
5
feet
and
the
underlining
zoning
district
allows
for
a
maximum
height
of
30
feet.
The
hunter
lofts
planned
development
proposal
is
35
foot
building
height,
which
lies
within
the
maximum
allowed
in,
through
a
plan,
development.
R
Staff
has
found
that
the
plan
develop
the
proposed
heart
lofts
plan
development
meets
the
objectives
of
the
plan
development
chapter,
in
that
it
facilitates
the
implementation
of
the
central
community
master
plan
through
increasing
pedestrian
mobility
and
accessibility
by
enhancing
a
sense
of
place
through
providing
a
building
which
interacts
with
the
street.
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
include
an
integrated
art
piece
on
the
front
facade
of
the
building,
as
well
as
the
mural
to
the
on
the
East
facade
of
the
building,
which
adjoins
or
fronts
and
alleyway
to
the
east.
R
The
proposal
also
includes
a
greater
percentage
of
windows
along
all
facades
of
the
building
than
what
is
presently
on
the
site
and
it's
a
greater
percentage
than
what's
required
in
that
corridor.
Commercial
zoning
district.
This
improves
a
sense
of
safety
on
the
street
as
it
creates
a
sense
of
visibility
from
the
building
staff
has
received
two
comments
from
surrounding
property
owners
for
the
proposed
plan.
Development
planning
and
transportation
staff
has
found
that
the
proposed
cutter
lofts
meets
the
parking
standards.
Parking
is
not
a
modification
the
the
applicant
is
requesting.
Through
the
plan
develop
process.
R
The
project
meets
the
requirements
for
parking
through
the
transportation
demand
management,
parking
incentives
by
providing
secured
bar
bicycle
stalls,
Locker
and
showers
on
site
and
an
on-premise
daycare.
Shared
parking
will
also
be
used
as
the
proposed
office
will
have
a
different
peak
parking
will
have
different
peak
parking
hours
and
day
peak
days
than
residential
or
resident
residential
or
restaurant
uses.
The
applicant
will
provide
45
parking
stalls.
The
minimum
required
by
the
zoning
code
is
43
stalls.
R
It
is
staffs
opinion
that
the
that
overall,
the
project
meets
the
intent
of
the
zoning
district
and
the
planned
development
standards
with
the
recommended
conditions
of
approval
listed
in
the
staff
report.
Therefore,
staff
recommends
that
the
Planning
Commission
approved
the
planned
development
with
the
following
four
conditions
of
approval.
A
R
Q
Q
We
feel
like
this
is
the
natural
extension
of
downtown
we
and
we
absolutely
love
a
depth
of
reuse,
we're
big
on
it
if
you've
gone
to
any
of
our
other
businesses
in
the
area
like
sapa,
sushi
bar
or
purgatory,
and
our
upcoming
project
food
alley,
that's
around
the
corner
from
hurl
art,
we
believe
in
taking
something
old
and
beautiful
and
making
it
even
better.
You
can't
ever
build
brand
new
what
you
can
deal
with
adaptive
reuse.
Q
So
our
next
project
here
her
art
loft,
is
true
to
form
where
we
would
like
to
take
an
existing
building
and
make
it
beautiful
and
an
extension
of
a
neighborhood
that
is
up-and-coming
thriving
in
within
this
Maven
district
here
so
and
then
that
has
done
an
amazing
job,
walking
us
through
this
process
and
kind
of
presenting
what
it
is.
We've
done
to
get
us
to
this
point
to
present
to
you
guys.
So
if
you
have
any
questions,
I
can
take
any
questions
at
this
time.
Thank.
A
E
Q
E
Q
P
Q
P
Q
The
reason
why
we
felt
was
necessary
to
do
that.
It's
just
the
cost
of
child
care
is
as
astronomical,
and
so
we
wanted
to
make
it.
So
it's
a
well-balanced
thing
for
our
employees
to
people
who
are
a
young
staff
that
we
have
who's
starting
a
family.
So
we
want
to
kind
of
provide
that
subsidized
childcare
for
them.
E
C
So
our
original
parking
requirement
is
67
stalls
or
sixty
four
stalls.
Excuse
me,
we
have
met
a
number
of
Salt
Lake,
City's
transportation
management
strategies
to
have
a
25%
reduction
and
that
and,
as
you
could
see
on
page
nine
of
our
staff
report,
our
table
shows
since
it's
a
mixed-use
building,
that
the
actual
the
maximum
amount
of
stalls
will
be
on
use
of
any
point
in
the
day
will
be
43
the
amount
we
have
supplied
for
the
building
for.
Q
E
F
P
R
A
R
A
Any
other
questions
for
the
applicant
or
staff
at
this
point.
Okay,
thank
you.
We
will
now
move
on
to
the
public
hearing
I'll
open
the
public
hearing
for
this
item.
Is
there
anyone
here
from
well?
First,
let
me
ask:
is
there
anyone
here
from
the
community
council
that
failed
tasks
at
the
past
couple
times?
No,
okay,
so
I
saw
some
hands,
come
up
I'll!
Let
you
go
second
Zac
go
to
the
gentleman
in
the
back.
A
C
My
name
is
Tim
Watt
key
and
I'm,
an
adjoining
property
owner
and
I'm
speaking
in
favor
of
the
project,
there's
already
pretty
vibrant
mixed-use
business
and
residential
and
food
and
beverage
node
already
happening
here
at
the
Maven
district
and
I
think
this
would
be
a
great
addition
to
it,
and
it's
also
good
to
see
that
a
building
is
not
being
torn
down.
If
we
could,
you
do
adaptive
reuse
as
much
as
possible.
I
think
that's
always
a
good
thing
and
the
parking
we've
mentioned
many
times
already
tonight
about.
C
A
K
K
Already
kind
of
burgeoning
district
and
I
won't
talk
about
parking
because
I'm
sure
we're
all
sick
of
hearing
about
it,
but
I
would
support
the
additional
height
and
the
increased
setbacks,
because
I
think
a
building
on
the
sidewalk,
it's
much
better
for
urban
environment
than
being
setback
and
a
little
more
unwelcoming
to
the
pedestrian
to
kind
of
leisurely
stroll
into
these
establishments.
So
thank
you.
Thank.
N
My
favorite
thing
about
this
project,
which
I
didn't
even
know
until
Nick
brought
it
up,
is
the
off
street
parking
removal
after
five
years,
because,
basically,
what
we're
doing
right
now
is
we're
taking
a
strip
mall,
adding
housing
on
top
of
it
and
so
we're
it's
adaptive.
Reuse,
I,
love
that
I
love
that
it's
keeping
an
existing
structure
and
I
also
love
that
the
off
street
parking
across
the
street
once
it's
no
longer
needed,
which
is
obviously
the
hope
with
whatever
we're
doing
here,
will
eventually
be
removed
and
hopefully
replaced
with
some
more
housing.
N
Some
more
mixed-use
development.
I,
don't
have
any
issues
at
all
with
this
project.
I
think
this.
If
we
could
do
this
everywhere
in
the
city,
then
we'd
have
a
much
better
place
to
live.
It
be
much
more
equitable
we'd
be
much
further
along
to
our
goals
of
reducing
emissions,
making
a
more
inclusive
city,
a
safer
city,
one
that
isn't
shackled
to
the
car.
Thank
you
thank.
A
E
A
I
I'm
ready
to
make
a
motion.
Thank
you,
Amy,
just
preface
it
I
also
really
like
the
design
of
this
I
think
it
engages.
Ninth
South
I
can
never
find
where
the
applicant
went
when
I
look
back
up
all
right,
I
think
it
engages
nine
South
really
well
so
I
commend
you
on
that,
and
so
we'll
move
forward.
Based
on
the
findings
listed
in
the
staff
report,
it
is
the
plant
no.
No.
This
is
a
different
layout.
I
Okay,
sorry,
based
on
the
information
in
the
staff
report,
I
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
approved,
petition,
PLN
SUV,
2019,
zero,
zero,
nine,
nine
seven
regarding
the
HUD
lofts
plan
development
in
order
to
comply
with
the
applicable
standards,
the
following
conditions
of
approval
apply.
An
encroachment
permit
will
be
obtained
for
the
eaves
projecting
into
the
public
right-of-way
prior
to
building
permit
approval.
Offsite
parking
will
be
maintained
and
available
to
the
patrons
and/or
residents
of
the
building.
The
design
of
the
project
shall
be
consistent
with
this
staff
report
and
submitted
plan
development
application
prior
to
construction.
I
D
R
S
The
motivation
for
this
request
is
to
allow
additional
land
uses
on
the
properties
and
eliminate
maximum
off
street
parking.
The
subject
properties
are
already
developed
into
two
industrial
buildings
and
the
existing
uses
include
warehouse
host
Rio
toll
sale,
distribution
in
office
which
are
permitted
uses
in
both
the
CG
and
the
em1
zoning
districts
surrounding
the
properties
we
have
CG
and
m1
and
OS,
and
the
adjacent
uses
include
office,
truck
sales
and
rental
warehousing
wholesale
distribution.
S
The
map
on
the
screen
shows
that
land
located
west
of
eye,
215
and
south
of
I-80
is
largely
zone
manufacturing,
which
is
the
light
gray
and
the
dark
grey
on
the
northeast
corner
is
m1,
and
in
this
area
only
the
property
is
located
along
5600
West,
our
Zone
CG,
which
shown
in
red
the
CG
Zone,
was
put
in
place
here
in
1995,
but
these
properties
never
developed
to
form
a
commercial
corridor.
Some
are
so
vacant
and
those
that
have
been
developed
have
have
heavy
commercial
commercial
uses
on
it,
such
as
the
warehouse
and
wholesale
distribution.
S
Therefore,
the
proposed
m1
is
appropriate
and
will
allow
compatible
development
on
those
properties.
The
rezone
would
also
eliminate
maximum
off
street
parking.
The
maximum
applies
to
CG
properties
in
the
area,
but
not
to
those
owned
m
1,
because
the
M
1
property
is
located
west
of
Redwood
Road
are
exempt
from
maximum
parking.
This
exemption
was
adopted
in
2015
in
order
to
support
industrial
development
in
the
area,
so
maximum
parking
is
an
important
tool
to
provide
pedestrian
oriented.
S
However,
in
this
area
it
has
mitad
success
especially
considered
that
the
requirement
only
applies
to
the
cg
zone
properties
and
is
not
really
supported
by
transportation
options
in
the
area
to
the
property
owner.
This
requirement
limits
the
pool
of
tenants
because
parking
lot
expansion
is
limited
on
parking
calculations.
Planning
staff
has
not
received
any
public
comments
regarding
this
application
and
staff
has
assessed
that
the
proposed
zoning
district
is
not
only
appropriate
for
the
area,
but
it
would
also
help
further
the
city's
industrial
growth
plans,
as
discussed
in
the
staff
report,
take
any
questions.
C
C
C
So
this
was
a
tenant
called
Cove
ants.
Cove
ants
is
a
pharmaceutical
manufacturing
company,
as
you
might
imagine,
they
have
pretty
heavy
employment
needs
within
their
spaces,
and
so
when
they
came
and
talked
to
us
about
leasing
in
the
space
which
was
about
fifty
four
thousand
square
feet
in
order
to
accommodate
their
needs,
we
would
have
to
add
more
parking
at
the
time
because
we
had
the
CGT
zone.
C
We
were
unable
to
accommodate
the
request
we
did
put
together
this
map
to
kind
of
show
you
where
additional
parking
would
occur
as
a
logical
kind
of
transformation
of
the
project,
as
it
goes
to
a
higher
build-out
than
just
traditional
warehouse.
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
We're
happy
to
be
here.
We're
excited
to
be
in
Salt,
Lake
City.
This
is
our
first
investment
here.
My
son
goes
with
you,
so
we're
excited.
C
C
A
A
B
C
C
F
Starting
the
timer
should
so.
This
doesn't
sound
like
it's
exciting,
but
this
is
actually
a
very
significant
change
to
the
fire
code.
The
city
is
able
to
make
this
change,
because
this
particular
section
is
in
the
appendix
of
the
code,
and
this
state
legislature
has
authorized
cities
to
choose
whether
or
not
to
adopt
or
adopt
in
modified
form,
the
appendices
so
yay
for
for
the
state
for
doing
something
right
with
fire
code.
Basically,
this
is
we
are
recommending.
F
F
This
is
what
the
current
code
basically
requires
and
why
this
is
an
issue
is
because
there
are
over
18,000
parcels
of
land
in
some
like
city,
where
the
property
line
sits
more
than
30
feet
away
from
the
curb
line.
What
that
means
for
this
particular
section
of
the
code
is
that
any
building
over
30
feet
in
height
needs
to
have
an
aerial
access
road
and
it
has
to
meet
be
no
closer
than
15
feet
and
no
further
than
30
feet
from
the
road.
F
The
proposal
would
be
in
if
there
is
enhanced
and
fire
protections
built
into
the
building
that
that
distance
can
be
reduced
at
both
10
feet
or
increased
to
50
feet.
What
this
means
is
that
we
are
gonna,
stop
seeing
our
park
strips
cut
into
we're,
gonna,
be
able
to
maintain
bike
infrastructure,
our
street
trees
and
a
bunch
of
other
things,
whereas
right
now
we
can't
plus.
It
also
means
that
the
fire
department
legally
and
I,
put
that
in
air
quotes,
because
when
they
respond,
they
use
the
street
for
their
response.
F
That's
that's
where
they
would
prefer
to
be,
at
least
when
they
initially
pull
up
to
to
an
incident,
and
so
one
of
the
things
that's
happening
is
particularly
in
East
downtown.
The
curb
lines
are
being
moved.
Our
on
street
parking
is
going
away.
We've
had
issues
with
bike
lanes
being
removed,
we've
lost
street
trees,
we're
losing
our
green
space
all
because
people
are
moving
the
curb,
sometimes
as
little
as
2
or
3
feet
just
to
meet
this
code.
F
What
this
does
is
that
it
says
that
if
you're
going
to
do
these
things,
which
are
building
code
making
it
so
that
there's
safer
spaces
in
the
building,
if
there
was
a
fire
that
you
can
no
longer
move,
the
curb
you
have
to
either
meet
this
proposed
code
or
the
existing
code.
The
existing
code
still
stays
there.
So,
if
you're
closer
to
30
feet,
you
can
use
the
road
without
doing
anything
different,
and
that
is
really
the
extent
of
the
presentation.
F
So
if
there's
any
questions,
I'm
happy
to
answer
them
and
I
really
wish
I
would
have
remembered
to
let
the
Fire
Department
know
to
be
here
because
they
they
wanted
to.
They
actually
wanted
to
be
here.
They
have
been
the
Fire
Prevention.
Bureau
has
been
an
amazing
partner
and
trying
to
find
this
solutions
to
this
situation,
and
here
we
are
Thank.
E
F
Does
not,
and
the
reason
it
doesn't
is
because
there
is
an
enhanced
techniques
into
the
built
built
into
the
building
in
order
for
the
ferrell
access
road
to
be
further
away.
Furthermore,
we
actually
did
a
study
of
the
latter
reach
for
the
trucks
in
the
areas
where
the
where
most
of
these
parcels
are
particularly
in
the
east,
downtown
and
and
the
with
the
type
of
construction.
That
really
is
creating
this.
It's
really
the
the
smaller
scale
things
the
type
1
the
steel
construction.
A
N
Back
Dussault
speaking
in
favor
I'll
keep
it
short.
It
sounds
like
this
could
really
increase
the
viability
of
certain
structures
in
the
city,
particularly
those
of
higher
height,
and
lots
that
typically
couldn't
get
developed
and
I.
Think
that
is
very
consistent
with
the
goals
of
what
we're
trying
to
do
as
a
as
a
city.
So
in
sport
thanks
thank.
A
E
Will
make
a
motion
Thank
You
Brenda,
based
on
the
information
in
the
staff
report,
the
information
presented
and
the
input
received
during
the
public
hearing
I
move
that
the
Planning
Commission
recommend
that
the
City
Council
approve
the
proposed
amendments
to
chapter
18,
point
4
for
fire
prevention
and
international
fire
code,
as
presented
in
the
staff
report?
Okay,.
C
D
A
R
You,
chairperson,
so
the
purpose
of
this
work
session
is
for
Planning
Commission
to
provide
direction
to
the
applicant,
so
they
can
finalize
their
design
review
proposal
and
bring
the
application
back
to
Planning
Commission.
For
your
final
decision
for
the
design
review,
Salt
Lake
Crossing
is
a
proposed
mixed-use
building
with
residential
office
and
a
restaurant
on
the
ground
floor.
The
building
will
include
six
storeys
total
with
residential
and
office
uses
on
get
through
six
floors
and
a
restaurant
and
parking
and
a
dog
wash
on
the
first
floor.
R
The
site
is
a
corner
lot
with
frontages
along
490,
west
and
200
north,
and
it
is
located
in
the
transit
station
area
urban
center
core
district.
The
project
is
located
in
a
unique
area
of
the
city
where
pedestrian
activity
and
site
visibility
is
currently
limited.
Even
though
the
project
is
located
across
the
street.
From
the
North
temple
front
runner
station
pedestrian
activity
is
minimal
as
those
using
the
front
runner
station
will
directly
access
a
bus,
stop
or
bus
stops
on
the
west
side
of
490
West
before
continuing
to
other
destinations
in
the
city.
R
R
The
this
site
is
also
at
a
location
where
the
pedestrian
and
bicycle
infrastructure
improvements
are
proposed
to
be
made.
The
site
will
be
more
trafficked
by
pedestrians
and
bicyclists
as
the
existing
North
temple
front
runner
station,
the
north
temple
light
rail
station
and
the
bike
lane
aligned
along
300
North
will
be
at
will
be
added
to
by
a
proposed
pedestrian
bridge
on
three
hundred
North,
a
pedestrian
priority
pass
along
300
north
and
an
improved
north
temple,
viaduct
pedestrian,
walkway
and
street
access,
which
will
allow
for
access
to
the
Gateway
to
the
south.
R
The
applicant
is
requesting
for
modifications
to
the
design
standards
in
the
TSA
district.
The
first
is
a
modification
of
the
building
facade
length
facing
a
street.
The
maximum
permitted
Street
facing
facade
length
is
200
feet.
The
applicant
is
proposing
450
building
lengths
along
the
4/9
490
west
facade
the
property
to
the
media
east
of
the
projects.
I
also
has
a
similar
facade
lengths
as
the
proposed
Salt
Lake
crossing
the
upper
flight.
Five
floors
of
the
building
will
have
an
intermittent
step
back,
which
will
create
a
column
appearance.
R
R
So
the
modification
to
the
ground-floor
use
and
visual
interest
requirement
is
also
proposed
to
be
modified.
The
TSA
district
requires
an
80%
ground
floor
use
other
than
parking
along
a
street
facing
facade.
The
TSA
district
allows
for
a
reduction
on
ground
floor
use
other
than
parking
of
60%.
If
25%
additional
visual
interest
or
design
is
proposed
on
the
building,
Salt
Lake
Crossing
is
proposed
with
18
percent
active
ground
floor
uses.
That
would
include
a
cafe
on
200
north
and
a
dog
wash
across
the
street
from
the
dog
from
the
existing
dog
park.
R
Assault
development
is
also
proposing
art
displays
along
the
490
west
facade
in
order
to
activate
the
street
and
provide
pedestrian
interest
to
the
building.
Technically
it
doesn't
meet
the
ground
floor
use
requirement
as
it
doesn't
extend
25
feet
into
the
building.
However,
the
last
two
modifications
salt
development
is
requesting
as
a
modification
to
the
ground,
floor,
glass
and
required
park
required
building
entrances
along
the
street
facing
facade.
R
The
TSA
district
requires
60%
glass
on
the
ground
floor
and
all
of
the
proposed
glass
must
be
transparent
and
provide
at
least
5
feet
of
visual
depth
into
the
building.
The
490
West
facade
on
Salt
Lake
crossing
is
proposed
with
32%
glass,
the
bulk
of
which
will
include
the
art
displays
which
would
be
available
to
local
artists.
R
So,
even
though
many
of
the
design
standards
in
the
TSA
zoning
district
are
being
meant
planning,
staff
still
has
concerned
with
the
ground
floor
along
the
490
West
build
facade.
The
ground-floor
along
this
facade
does
not
meet
a
significant
number
of
required
design
standards
in
the
district,
while
modifying
certain
standards
may
be
appropriate
due
to
the
unique
configuration
of
the
site
and
its
location.
R
Staffs
staff
is
still
concerned
about
whether
the
intent
of
the
design
standards
chapter
of
the
zoning
code
can
be
met.
With
the
number
of
modification
requested
on
the
ground
floor,
I've
provided
a
number
of
questions
that
Planning
Commission
can
consider
when
facilitating
discussion
with
the
applicant
and
to
provide
direction
to
the
applicant
as
well.
The
first
is
involves
the
building
length
and
one
question
is
to
consider
whether
does
exceeding
the
maximum
length
of
the
building
negatively
impact
pedestrian
accessibility
along
490
West.
R
The
second
is
regarding
visual
interest:
do
the
proposed
modifications
to
the
design
standards
allow
for
a
pedestrian
friendly
walkable
site,
or
is
the
proposal
to
still
to
cart
to
car-centric,
with
the
ground-floor
use,
with
limited
active
ground
floor
uses?
Do
the
design
elements
proposed
on
the
building
sufficiently
merit
pedestrian
oriented
Street
and
the
ground-floor
glass?
Our
limited
number
are
the
limit,
limited
ground
floor
uses
and
visibility
to
the
street
detrimental
to
the
accessibility
and
safety
of
pedestrians.
T
T
Yeah,
so
if
you
have
a
chance
to
see
it
but
we're
salt
development,
we
care
very
much
about
what
we
build.
We
care
very
much
about
the
impact
it's
gonna
have
long
after
we're
gone.
We
came
to
a
location
six
years
or
so
ago,
seven
years
ago,
that
had
been
left
in
disarray
as
you
might.
If
you
can
remember
what
was
across
from
West
High
School
and
and
had
a
vision
that
maybe
something
good
could
happen,
we
call
it
the
Forgotten
corner
of
the
city.
T
Most
local
developers
didn't
want
to
deal
with
the
mess
of
it
touch
it.
We've
we've
since
then
come
in
and
revitalized
that
area
established
what
we
like
to
call
Hardware
district
in
respect
of
the
Salt
Lake
Hardware
building.
That's
there
in
fact
that
this
historic
building
here
is
really
what's
created.
What
we've
designed
on
the
site
itself
so
forth?
West
was
the
first
project
factor
we
had
we
had.
We
chose
a
name.
We
were
torn
not
to
buy
local
marketing
people,
that's
a
bad
part
of
town.
T
You
don't
want
to
go
to
the
west
side
and
we
just
said
no
we're
going
with
its
fourth
west,
we're
very,
very
proud
of
what's
happened
there.
The
next
project
was
hardware
apartments,
both
West
and
East,
and
again
we
wanted
to
do
something
that
was
very
respectful
of
what
was
going
on.
So
we
created
projects
that
you
know
reflected.
Maybe
what
had
existed?
You
know
with
it
with
the
railroad
admin
building
our
warehouses
that
will
reclaim
we
try
to.
T
We
actually
spend
a
lot
of
time
energy
trying
to
figure
that
out,
I
feel
like
we've
done,
that
the
front
building
is
is
is
would
try
to
be
reminiscent
over
like
1930s
ritz-carlton
that
may
have
been
built
in
an
urban
setting
with
the
hole
out
of
a
town
set
of
town
house.
You
saw
it
on
salt
Street
that
we
had
to
build
around
reason.
I'm
sharing
this
is
we
have
a
tremendous
amount
invested
in
this
area.
We
care
very,
very
much
about
what's
being
built
here.
T
It
doesn't
meet
the
letter
of
the
law,
but
when
you
consider
the
fact
that
we
face
a
train
track
and
you
take
a
look
at
the
surrounding
areas
around
neighborhoods,
both
north
and
south
of
us,
I-
think
what
we've
created
here
is
exceptionally
wonderful
and
beautiful
by
the
way
I
love
what
the
young
gallows
projects
brought.
I
love
seeing
those
yes
I.
C
T
C
M
M
We
have
these
micro
parks
that
are
in-between
that
offer
that
additional
waiting
area
space
on
the
in
between.
So
it
does
break
up
that
facade
and
make
sure
that
you're
not
locking
looking
at
a
series
of
parking
along
this
whole
experience,
so
that
the
parking
is
essentially
hidden
beyond
this
again.
Just
we
talked
about
that's
all
kind
of
skip
to
these
either.
M
Some
of
the
images
I
talked
about
the
the
flavor
of
our
project
and
this
again,
some
of
the
the
context
that
is
on
4th
on
the
east
side,
of
where
the
hardware
district
is
and
then
also
on
the
other
side
of
the
tracks.
This
is
what
our
project
faces
on
the
the
west
side
of
the
of
the
Train
of
the
Union
Pacific
line,
and
also
the
the
front
runner
line,
and
it's
this
right
here
being
our
project
site.
M
So
this
is
the
pedestrian
here
we
go
the
pedestrian
access
access
running
through
here,
where
that
bike
lane
and
the
the
pedestrian
bridge
will
be
proposed
and
as
part
of
the
the
ultimate
master
plan
for
Salt
Lake
City,
getting
into
those
just
the
variances
here,
the
as
we
went
for
the
ground
floor.
Use
of
on
our
phase.
1
approach
is
what
we're
looking
at
now
is
trying
to
have
something
that's
economically
viable
for
the
project
parking
has
been
out.
M
Has
it
been
a
common
theme
of
the
of
the
night
here
and
as
of
right
now
to
meet
the
TSA?
Zoning
requirement?
Is
one
stall
per
unit
and
right
now
we're
at
point
six
three
stalls
per
unit
still
hedging
the
bet
on
that
these,
these
units,
that
are
micro
units
and
studios,
that
we're
moving
away
from
the
car
and
some
of
those
stalls
that
we
are
providing.
M
The
phase,
two
that
we
are
sorry
and
again
with
the
art
displays,
is
something
that
is
on
that
that
smaller
scale
allowing
for
public
art
working
with
the
high
school
just
across
the
street,
but
having
something
that
has
visual
interest
for
those
who
were
walking
along.
So
again,
it's
not
just
a
you
know
the
same
kind
of
facade
so.
B
T
T
M
Yeah,
so
we
have
entrances,
so
this
would
still
be
entrances
into
the
the
parking
area
which
is
direct
access
right
behind.
This
is
where
you
get
to
the
elevators
so
from
the
street.
If
you're
a
resident
here,
you'll
be
able
to
get
directly
to
the
to
your
your
resident
watch
where
you
live,
and
then
there's
access
through
the
dog
wash
area
into
here
and
then
also
access
on
the
just
around
the
corner,
actually
here
on
the
on.200
north.
So
these
are.
M
B
M
Go
ahead,
so
the
the
micro
parks
we're
talking
about
is
is
that
you
have
the
the
vegetation
that's
coming
from
down
above
and
then
also
growing
from
below,
and
this
would
be
a
screen
that
is
still
open
to
the
parking.
That's
beyond
this,
but
again
trying
to
find
try
to
find
to
find
that
small
microclimate.
That
is
not
as
harsh
as
what
you
see
across
the
street,
and
then
this
is
our
phase.
M
Two
as
again
is
that
the
the
car
goes
away,
and
we
see
that
that
trend
that
the
retail
will
actually
extend
all
the
way
through
here
and
taking
up
a
full
row
of
parking.
That's
in
there.
So
the
zoning
requires
25
feet
and
this
would
be
26
feet,
depth
and
running
into
the
full
length
of
the
building,
and
so
all
those
storefronts
that
are
holding
the
art
now
become
storefronts
for
for
projects
or
sorry
for
a
retail
space,
or
you
know
whatever
that
that
commercial
use
might
be,
and
then
so
in
just
a
quick
plan.
T
Be
dropping
less
than
0.6.
Three
also
includes
its
parking.
It's
for
public
parking,
two
as
well
inside
the
building,
because
we
see
right
now.
What
happens
is
the
car
is
off?
There's
no
parking
really
much
down
there
already
and
they
just
basically,
if
you
ever
go
down
where
the
buses
are
they
back
up
because
they're
dropping
people
off
and
picking
people
up
right
now,
hard
word
office
is
now
closed
off.
That
parking
lot
know
if
you've
noticed,
but
they
put
the
arms
out
there,
and
so
it
really
started.
T
I
So,
as
you
talk,
one
of
the
variances
are
requesting
is
the
reduction
of
openings,
every
40
feet
to
every
80
feet
and,
and
that
wondering
because
of
all
the
wonderful
greenery,
it's
kind
of
hard
to
determine
how
that
looks
spatially.
You
can
just
kind
of
point
out
some
of
those
entrances
and
why,
over.
M
Yeah
absolutely
so
the
we
have
entrances
to
the
building
that
are
here
here
and
then
and
then
also
right
here
and
then
so.
As
you
can
see,
it
fits
with
the
rhythm
of
the
building
and
trying
to
tie
it
into
the
design
of
the
space
itself.
And
then
we
have
that
Park
area
and
then
here
and
then
here
or
where
those
entrances
are.
B
T
T
You
know
if
you
could
go
back
to
we
had
some
precedent
or
what
was
going.
Some
of
those
shots
in
neighborhood
shot,
there's
a
project
which
just
came
online,
a
block,
I,
guess,
east
of
us
called
sky
house.
We
came
in
a
sky
house
if
you
take
a
look
at
their
street
line
that
meets
your
requirements.
I
mean
there.
It
is
on
the
lower
left
that
that
meets
all
your
requirements.
I'm
just
asking
for
some
help
some
mercy
here.
We're
trying
something
beautiful
can.
F
T
You
know
salt
has
come
to
town,
we
don't
ask
the
city
for
money,
we
don't
ask
for
anything.
We
come
in.
We
try
to
do
the
the
best
beautiful
stuff
we
can
do
the
other
thing.
This
project
is
done.
It's
created
the
most
dense
opportunity
to
create
even
more
doors.
We
will.
We
will
put
1,250
doors
just
in
our
little
space
there
and
that's
what
you
guys.
We
got
the
best
cross
of
transit.
You
talked
about
getting
rid
of
bikes
and
everything.
T
That's
what
we're
doing
here
so
and
we
have
to
have
some
parking
I
mean
we're
already
now
half
of
what
you
know.
We
have
to
have
some
so
to
do
that
we
have
to
have
be
there.
So
the
question
is:
how
do
we
now
deal
with
this
and
then
be
able
to
transform
it
later?
I'm
pleading
with
you
here
a
little
bit,
but
it's
like.
We
are
good
people
and
we
do
great
work
and
I
just
ask
you
to
consider
that
I'm,
sorry
and.
M
That
that
transform
later
is
what
I'll
show
an
in
plan
here,
which
we'd
shown
previously.
So
the
green
is
our
micro
parks
that
we
have
in
the
yellow
that
you're
seeing
here
are
our
just
the
art
spaces
and
then
just
again
that
that
ride
share
those
vehicles
that
we
have
as
we
as
the
project
moves
forward
this
in
as
a
future
date
again
as
the
the
pedestrian
activity
is
increased
by
that
bike
lane
and
by
the
the
pedestrian
bridge
that
happens.
We
will
take
this
this
full.
M
This
parking
I'll
still
allowing
access
to
the
the
level
that's
below
increase
the
amount
of
ride
share
vehicles
that
we
have
and
then
those
entrances
being
able
to
go
to
these
larger
pads,
still
keeping
the
micro,
the
micro
parks
that
we
have,
but
having
that
facade
that
store
front
facade,
fill
behind
it.
So
now
we're
looking
through
the
greenery
just
and
trying
to
activate
the
green
inside
the
space,
the
spaces
themselves.
T
I
T
T
I
Reason
I'm
asking
is
because
I
think
that
makes
it
a
little
bit
more
palatable
in
looking
at
your
future
plans
to
activate
that
area
as
the
pedestrian
activity
grows,
and
so,
as
I
consider
in
this
work
session.
You
know
whether
it's
important
or
not
I
think
that
helps
the
the
future
vision
kind
of
feel
that
it
is
going
to
become
more
active
because
I
think
that's
the
intent
for
me
of
the
entrances
is
we
have
business
districts
that
have
way
too
long
the
space
between
doors
and
then
they
become.
I
Nobody
has
any
interest
in
them,
so
I'm
really
looking
at
that
question
in
terms
of
like
how
yeah
you
do
grow
and
how,
then
you
continue
to
activate
to
that
pedestrian,
because
I'm
interested
in
in
making
it
something
people
are
enjoying
walking
by
the
people
want
to
go
to
to
draw
I
wanted
this
to
be
a
draw
to
them,
and
so
that's
why
I
was
just
so.
It
seems
like
you
actually,
then,
are
going
to
be
adding
more
of
that
visual
and
interaction
as
you
grow
with
your
proposed
expansion
vision.
Yes,
okay,
I.
T
Want
to
add
to
that
too,
just
going
back,
we
were
able
to
master
plan.
We
the
operative,
very
lucky,
to
have
contiguous
blocks
to
work
on
it.
So
we
can
master
plan.
What
was
good,
what
the
end
result
was
going
to
be
go
back
to
the
the
stage
it
showed
everything
built
out,
including
station,
because
it's
going
to
impact
what's
going
to
happen
right
right
now,
that's
a
primary
bus!
Stop!
Those
bus
stops
are
going
to
be
Moo.
T
I
With
you
at
the
context
of
the
building,
makes
it
very
different,
feel
yeah
in
the
question
of
what
was
the
intent
to
me
sure
the
intent
of
that
as
I've
seen
it
relate
in
buildings
that
exist,
maybe
our
older,
even
some
newer
ones.
That
is
the
intent
as
I
interpreted
and
look
at
it.
But
the
context
of
your
overall
design
is
creates
a
different
environment.
B
I
agree
with
you,
but
and
what
I
was
saying
is
I'm,
okay
with
those
doors.
What
I
do
have
issue
with
and
so
I
want
to
try
and
figure
out.
Cuz
I
do
love
this
plan.
A
little
like
I,
said:
I
love
what
you
guys
are
doing
in
the
neighborhood,
the
continuous
400
feet,
even
with
those
green
walls
that
bothers
me
a
little
and
I.
Don't
know
if,
because
now
that
I
understand
that
first
floor
is
all
parking,
I
thought
it
was
courtyard
behind.
T
B
I
A
I
T
Just
so,
you
know
we're
not
just
playing
games,
because
we
don't,
if
you,
if
you've,
been
watching
our
projects,
we're
very
serious
about
what
we
do
and
our
intentions
we're
very
intentional
about
what
we
do.
These
art
spaces
that
we
have
before
retail
go
in.
We
have
relationships
with
West
High
School.
We
have
a
mentoring
program
at
our
fourth
west
project,
that
for
the
kids
there
we
have
the
photography
class
that
comes
over.
T
They
can
use
it
because
it
because
our
buildings
are
kind
of
interesting
for
them
to
take
pictures
the
kind
of
period
in
the
1930s
1940s
they
do
it.
We
see
giving
these
spaces
to
them,
possibly
the
other
art
department
of
the
U.
We
see
these
being
activated.
We
see
these,
hopefully
be
something
with
draw
people
to
come
and
check
it
out.
What's
going
to
happen,
seasonally,
so
we're
very
intentional
about
that.
So.
E
M
M
The
facade
that
the
treatment
here
is
is
the
similar
on
the
same
side,
so
you'll
still
have
the
the
same
feel
that's
happening
on
that
we're
taking
the
material
and
wrapping
around,
because
we
are
right
on
the
lot
line.
The
the
micro
parks
are
something
that
will
happen
on
that
side,
but
the
fenestration
treatment
will
be
the
same.
You'll
see
the.
M
A
E
Q
E
E
D
M
E
M
M
M
I
keep
going
back
and
forth.
Hopefully
this
isn't
there
we
go
so
with
that.
Their
menu
building
that
in
connection-
and
so
these
are
the
courtyards
that
are
happening
on
both
sides.
So
it's
not
a
long
that
courtyard
or
sorry
the
the
long
hallway
is
broken
up
by
courtyards
and
that's
what
you
see,
though,
the
vegetation
for
those
my
crowbar.
A
M
E
Asking
these
questions
is
that
I
am
concerned
about
the
pedestrian
experience
and
about
where
the
people
who
are
living
here
and
also
coming
here
are
interesting,
are
coming
in
and
going
out
because
that's
what
actually
determines
you
know
the
what's
on
the
street
I
mean
how
many
people
are
actually
on
the
street.
So
if
we're
saying
that
most
of
the
pedestrians
mm-hmm,
who
are
pedestrians,
will
focus
on
coming
in
on
200.
T
M
This
this
northern
end,
so
this
is
our
utility
yard,
that
is,
that
is
screened
off
and
we'll
have
lots
of
trees.
That
was
part
of
that.
The
comments
that
we
were
responding
to
is
for
the
Capitol
community
district,
our
community
council
I'm.
Sorry,
it
will
have
a
large
helical
ramp
that
gets
you
access
down
down
below.
The
initial
hope
was
to
is
to
you
know
we
understand
with
parking
not
having
that
up,
but
there's
a
really
high
water
table
in
this
area.
That
is,
it
has
been
difficult,
especially
with
the
long
slender
side,
so.
E
M
We
have
there's
the
the
open
space
which
will
happen
here,
which
again
is
part
of
that
utility.
The
back-of-house
area
here,
but
you
can
see
the
property
line,
is
zero
lot
line
again
according
to
the
TSA
requirement,
you
can
see
that
that
there's
a
wedge
shape
that
happens
here,
so
those
micro
parks
get
larger
as
you
get
closer
to
the
north.
B
F
C
M
So
the
main
trash
is
in
the
middle
of
the
building
and
we'll
have
a
divider
there
that
been
through
the
trash
chutes
that
are
inside
and
then
trash
pickup
happens,
we'll
all
be
inside,
and
then,
when
trash
happens,
these
get
wheeled
out
to
the
curb
it'll
get
picked
up
and
the
trash
and
recycling
in
that
area.
Thank.
D
M
The
micro
units
are
about
two
hundred
and
thirty
feet
or
sorry,
two
square
feet
they'll
be
on
the
north
side
of
the
building.
Here
it's
the
target
is
a
kind
of
graduate
students
in
this
area
and
so
they'll
have
my
common
living
space
on
each
floor
will
have
a
full
full
kitchen
or
it's
basically,
two
kitchens
that
are
right
next
to
each
other,
with
the
common
living
space
and
gathering
space
and
also
a
co-working
space
in
there
and
then
so.
M
E
C
M
C
Would
I
would
make
a
comment
about
the
opening
sizes
and
the
spacing
I
do
see
us
forcing
people
to
make
changes
to
that
to
wear
the
whole
facade
is
glass
and
I
would
really
recommend.
We
don't
get
into
that.
I
think
a
lot
of
people
talk
about
human
scale
and
they
don't
achieve
it
because
of
these,
like
two-story
glass
walls
they
put
on
the
ground
level.
I
think
this
actually
does
achieve
human
scale,
and
it's
because
of
the
smaller
openings,
so
I
would
be
an
advocate
for
that.
C
I
also
appreciate
that
the
smaller
Lobby
it's
not
a
whole
corner,
taking
up
the
whole
ground
level
and
saying
thats
public
space,
because
lobbies
aren't
public
space,
that's
private
space,
so
I
did
appreciate
that
being
smaller
and
in
the
corner
and
allowing
for
the
coffee
shops
and
the
other
amenities
which
are
really
important.
So
all.
I
I,
do
really
like
how
this
looks
and
I
think
you
had
a
couple
different
challenges,
one
you
know
you're
you're
trying
to
design
for
the
pedestrian,
but
you
also
need
to
design
for
this
commuting.
That's
going
on
to
have
some
visual
interest
as
like.
Oh
that's,
a
cool
place
like
I
want
to
check
that
out
and
I
really
think
you
achieved
a
lot
of
that,
and
so
for
a
lot
of
your
variances
I'm,
going
to
agree
with
John
on
the
reduce
glass
from
I.
Think
it's
60%
of
30-year
during
32
person.
C
I
I
And
I'll
be
back,
inform,
I'm
sure
yeah.
One
of
my
complaints
is
that
a
lot
of
times,
why
I
think
the
intent
of
these
things
is
we
don't
get
in
my
opinion,
architecture
that
is
looking
at
how
to
achieve
these,
and
this
is
done.
A
really
good
job,
and
so
I
personally
feel
like
these
variances
are
artfully
done
and
playing
out
well
to
activate
this
area
and
I'm
I
feel
really
good
about
it.
Thank.
M
P
Only
question
is
really
for
planning
staff.
One
thing
that
is,
you
I,
think
unique
about
this
project,
because
I
generally
also
hate
long
buildings,
but
its
site
is
different,
where
it
sits
right
along
front
runner
and
along
and
I've
trying
to
spend
a
lot
of
time.
Thinking
about,
and
we
talked
about
pedestrians
and
coming
and
going,
but
is
anyone
gonna
be
walking
along
that
front
facade
really
going
anywhere?
M
T
P
P
F
F
F
C
F
F
Technically
is
considered
a
land-use
code
and
has
to
come
through
the
Planning
Commission,
so
public
utilities
is
pretty
soon
going
to
be
adopting
some
new
federally
mandated
standards.
I'm
guessing
that
none
of
us
here
have
any
clue
what
those
mean
and
frankly,
I,
don't
know
that
we
really
care.
But
well
that's
a
big
assumption
on
my
part,
but
so.