►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting - August 26, 2020
Description
Salt Lake City Planning Commission Meeting - August 26, 2020
A
A
B
B
This
is
a
virtual
meeting
via
webex,
it's
the
planning
commission
and
it
officially
starts
now.
If
you
input
the
link,
it's
your
web
browser,
you
can
join
the
meeting
as
an
attendee.
You
will
come
in
muted.
You
can
also
visit
our
website
and
go
to
the
planning
commission
agenda
in
minutes
to
also
find
that
link.
A
There's
a
tiny
little
hand
in
the
lower
right
hand
corner
of
your
box,
and
we
will
see
that
you
would
like
to
speak
to
that
item
and
and
we'll
go
ahead
and
unmute
you
there.
If
you'd
like
to
send
in
comments,
we'd
be
happy
to
read
those
into
the
record,
and
you
can
do
so
by
sending
it
to
planning.comments.slcgov.com.
A
A
A
B
A
C
So
we
now
have
the
members
of
the
commission
that
we
expected
to
be
here.
Okay,
so
now
we
are
I.
I
must
also
say
that
I
am
the
vice
chair.
The
chair
of
the
commission
is
out
of
town
this
week
and
will
not
be.
I
will
not
be
presiding,
so
we'll
move
to
the
report
of
the
chair
and
the
vice
chair,
and
since
I
am
both
today
I
have
to
say
I
don't
have
a
report
so
I'll
go
on
to
the
report
of
the
director
nick
or
michaela.
C
One
of
those,
and
probably
the
most
significant
is,
if
you
remember,
there's
a
proposal
to
increase
building
heights
in
the
gmu
zone
that
they
went
to
the
planning
commission.
Several
months
ago,
the
city
council
has
had
several
briefings
on
it,
they're
going
to
be
holding
a
public
hearing
soon,
and
it
appears
that
they
are
more
than
likely
going
to
to
vote.
To
approve
that
proposal.
C
The
planning
commission
made
a
negative
recommendation
on
it,
primarily
because
increased
right
without
any
kind
of
design
review
process,
and
so,
as
part
of
that
discussion,
the
council
is
going
to
be
asking
us
to
revisit
building
heights
in
all
of
the
downtown
zones
and
surrounding
areas.
So
that's
going
to
be
a
fairly
significant
project.
C
C
They've
didn't
have
a
lot
going
on
in
july
and
we
only
have
a
few
meetings
yeah
but
they've
started
to
ramp
up
on
zoning
and
other
things
that
have
come
for
the
planning
commission,
so
we'll
have
a
lot
more
activity.
I
think
we've
had
seven
or
eight
things
over
the
last
two
meetings.
So
most
of
those
are
the
smaller
zoning
changes,
but
hopefully
we'll
start
seeing
some
more
of
that,
and
that's
it.
Thank
you
nick.
C
Can
you
give
us
some
kind
of
update
on
what
the
planning
commission
agenda
looks
like
for
the
next
month
or
so
or
two
months
yeah?
So
we
have
a
lot
of
projects
that
are
in
various
stages,
and
you
may
have
noticed
that
there
were
some
that
were
initially
on
this
agenda
and
then
pulled
within
the
last
few
days
we
do
have.
We
still
have
a
number
of
things
happening.
E
A
A
A
Also
postponed,
so
if
you
are
a
person
who
is
here
for
that
particular
project
that
we
will
not,
the
planning
commission
will
not
be
hearing
that
having
a
public
hearing
on
that
today
or
or
hearing
any
testimony
about
it.
So
now
we
are
going
to
start
with
the
rosewood
park
alley
and
street
vacation
pln
pcm,
2019-010
and
pln
pcm
2019-010
excuse.
H
Me
zero
one,
zero
three,
seven
and
chris
earl
is
presenting
this
chris,
madam
chair.
Before
we
begin
yes,
if,
if
at
the
last
planning
commission
meeting,
we
read
the
the
covid
statement
that
we're
required
to
read
now
in
order
to
meet
remotely,
does
anybody
remember
if
we
did
that?
Last
time
we
did
nomination
lasts
for
30
days,
we're
going
to
need
to
we're
going
to
read
that
before
we
proceed
I
have
if
I
can
share
my
screen,
I
can
give
you
the
template
from
which
to
read.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
I
brenda
k,
sheer
vice
chair
of
the
planning
commission
and
chairing
the
meeting
today,
hereby
determined
that
conducting
the
planning
commission
meeting
at
the
anchor
location
presents
a
substantial
risk
to
the
health
and
safety
of
those
who
may
be
present
at
the
anchor
location.
The
world
health
organization.
F
The
president
of
the
united
states,
the
governor
of
utah,
the
salt
lake
county
health
department,
sutley
county
mayor
and
the
mayor
of
salt
lake
city
have
all
recognized.
A
global
pandemic
exists
related
to
the
new
strain
of
the
coronavirus
sars-cov-2,
which
we
know
is
coveted
19.,
but
due
to
the
state
of
emergency.
F
C
C
C
C
C
The
subdivision
was
planted
in
1887,
but
never
developed
as
a
tent
intended
development
in
the
area
did
not
follow
the
street
pattern
that
the
plaque
created,
leaving
the
dedicated
streets
and
alleys
within
rosewood
park
disconnected
from
a
road
network
system.
The
streets
and
alleys
within
the
park
exist
only
on
paper.
They
were
never
constructed
as
intended
and
do
not
physically
exist.
C
C
This
slide
shows
the
kinney
and
gurley's
improved
plat
that
was
recorded
in
1887.
It
shows
how
the
parcels
were
originally
planted.
The
pop
out
shows
the
area
of
the
platte
where
rosewood
park
is
located.
You
can
see
the
parcel
streets
and
alleys
shown
here,
but
they
don't
physically
physically
exist
within
the
park.
C
C
B
B
F
A
A
H
Will
be
presenting
this,
madam
chair
before
chris
begins,
I
have
ian
percy
as
the
primary
presenter
webex
is
not
allowing
me
to
make
a
panelist.
Oh
so
ian,
I
can't
even
ian
hello.
Yes,
I'm
here,
I
am
not
able
to
make
you
a
panelist.
Does
max
have
your
presentation,
if
not
you
may
want
to
pop
out
and
rejoin
the
meeting.
A
A
B
A
To
vacate
a
small
triangular
portion
of
the
alley
of
budding
the
west
side
of
the
property
at
740
west
900
south.
This
is
not
a
request
to
vacate
the
entire
alley.
The
applicant
is
requesting
to
vacate
this
portion
of
the
alley
in
order
to
acquire
the
property
to
square
off
the
southwestern
corner
of
his
property.
To
prepare
for
future
development.
A
K
K
Located
at
740
west
900
south
this
parcel
is
one
of
11
that
will
be
included
in
a
proposed
commercial
and
multi-family
residential
development.
The
applicant
has
been
working
with
the
rda
for
the
redevelopment
subject
site.
This
redevelopment
will
include
the
rehabilitation
of
two
existing
vacant
buildings
which
will
allow
for
restaurant
and
retail
uses.
The
inclusion
of
the
portion
of
la
that
is
requested
to
be
vacated
will
allow
the
applicant
to
provide
the
required
off-street
parking
for
this
portion
of
the
development.
K
F
K
K
K
The
chairs
of
the
glendale
community
councils,
early
public
notice,
was
sent
to
the
property
owners
and
residents
within
300
feet
of
the
project
area
and
planning
staff,
hosted
a
virtual
open
house
on
the
salt
lake
city
website
to
gather
public
comment.
No
public
comment
was
received
by
planning
staff.
K
K
And
that
presentation,
thank
you
is
the
applicant
here.
Would
you
like
to
speak?
He
or
she
yeah?
This
is
max.
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
we
can.
Oh
great
sorry,
I
had
a
bad
connection,
which
is
why
ian
was
in
there.
You
know
I'm
just
gonna.
You
know
I've
been
for
you
guys
before
I.
I
think
this
is
my
second
or
third
time.
I'm
max
kreth.
I
represent
the
property
owners.
K
We
should
get
there
pretty
pretty
soon,
hopefully
within
the
next
few
weeks,
and
obviously
I
think
at
you
know
squaring
off
the
lot
would
just
make
the
pres
you
know
we
can
obviously
create
access
off
the
alley
for
those
two
buildings
I
think
just
be
being
able
to
square
off.
The
lot
would,
I
think,
be
very
advantageous
to
just
a
presentation
and
just
bring
it
and
so
we're
we're
hopeful
that
we
can
actually
get
that
little
wedge
under
control.
That's
pretty
much
all
I
have
to
say
thank
you.
K
K
K
K
Okay,
so
we
have
no
one.
I
want
to
thank
you,
chris,
for
bringing
we're
bringing
the
history
of
this
project
up.
People
should
know
that
the
planning
commission
has
already
heard
and
approved
many
aspects
of
this
project,
so
I'm
going
to
close
the
public
hearing
and
open
it
up
to
the
planning
commission
for
questions
and
comments.
K
K
I
moved
that
the
planning
commission
forward
a
positive
recommendation
to
the
city
council
for
the
alley
vacation
proposed
in
plnp
cm
2020-00268,
with
the
condition
listed
in
the
stalker
part
I'll.
Second,
that
I
have
a
motion
from
sarah
and
a
second
from
carolyn,
we'll
proceed
to
a
vote:
amy,
yes,
maureen.
K
Matt,
yes,
sorry,
thank
you.
Okay,
thank
you
to
motion
passes
and
now
we
will
move
on
to
number
item.
Number.
Five.
Excuse
me.
Item
number
three
items
number
three.
Four
and
five
have
been
withdrawn
from
the
agenda,
so
we
will
now
move
on
to
the
zoning
map
amendment
at
approximately
1301
and
1321
south
state
street.
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
E
E
G
Staff
finds
that
the
development
under
the
cc
zone
does
not
encourage
the
type
of
development
that
the
different
master
plans
call
for
and
that
the
type
of
development
in
the
home
base
zone
the
un
to
has
the
potential
for
additional
housing
to
be
more
sustainable,
because
it's
going
to
be
in
a
on
a
very
crucial
corner,
with
a
lot
of
transportation
alternatives
and
to
be
safer,
because
there
will
be
more
eyes
on
the
street
and
a
better
design
that
also
will
affect.
You
know
how
it
interacts
with
the
street.
G
L
L
A
concern
about
gentrification
of
this
area
also
I'll
received
one
phone
call
that
did
not
oppose
specifically
the
rezoning,
but
it
it
had
a
concern
about
a
piecemeal
approach
of
rezoning
that
area
and
then,
after
I
sent
the
staff
report,
I
also
received
a
email
from
the
the
rda
in
favor
of
this
rezoning.
Also,
this
is
my
presentation
and
I'll
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
might
have.
L
Thank
you,
god,
you
are
there
any
questions,
your
staff
at
this
time.
I
know
the
rda's
again,
you
kind
of
hit
there
on
the
end
a
little
bit.
Let
me
just
dive
a
little
bit
deeper.
For
me,
the
rda
is
doing
a
whole
reason,
read
redo
of
state
street.
The
whole
area
needs
to
be
revitalized
and
revived,
and
just.
L
L
So
this
is
nick?
I
can.
I
can
weigh
in
on
that.
It
certainly
is
one
of
our
priority
projects
to
start
many
other
things.
We
need
to
have
the
resource
to
be
able
to
do
that,
and
so
you,
you
may
have
recalled
a
process
that
the
city
did
with
in
conjunction
with
south
salt
lake
from
I
think
it
was
two
years
two
years
ago
now
to
it's
called
the
life
on
state
project
which
created
master
plan.
We
do
plan
on.
A
A
Of
projects
that
we
need
to
try
to
re-prioritize
how
we
work
and
what
we
work
on
and
the
types
of
things
that
frankly,
we
require
to
go
through
a
process
in
order
to
get
to
that
work,
and
so
that's
some
of
the
things
that
we're
working
on
outside
of
of
this
particular
project.
It
just
so
happens
if
these
applicants
are
further
ahead
than
the
city
in
this.
J
A
H
B
A
J
A
And
I
I
don't
know
anybody
more
excited
about
it
than
what
the
owner
is
and
I
think
that
the
steps
that
have
been
taken-
the
research-
that's
gone
into
it.
This
is
going
to
be
a
desirable
project.
Adding
one
more
story
to
the
height
of
the
project
actually
allows
for
this
project
to
become
more
affordable.
A
M
Okay,
I'm
not
sure
if
I'm
on
or
not
you
are
mike.
Okay.
Thank
you
am
I
allowed
to
speak
now
or
not
or
absolutely
okay.
So,
basically,
yeah
we've
been
there.
Since
1975
the
restaurant
was
built
by
my
father.
We
acquired
the
property,
the
south
of
us
when
it
was
after
it
had
been
separated
from
the
apartments
which
was
back
in,
let's
see
2010.
I
believe
it
was
that
we
did
that,
and
you
know,
since
we've
been
there
and
I've
been
there
since
day,
one
of
75
it
just
you
know.
M
I
looked
at
my
building
and
I
decided
I
need
to
do
something
with
it
and
either
I
could
spend
some
money
and
give
it
a
cosmetic
look
or
I
could
do
something
that
I
think
would
make
a
big
statement
to
that
whole
area,
which
is
provide
some
good
housing,
actually
really
good
housing
for
a
low
price,
that's
kind
of
the
same
mantra
we
have
at
the
restaurant
and
we
would
provide
retail
all
the
way
on
the
bottom
plenty
of
parking
within
the
structure.
None
of
it
would
be
visible.
M
We
I've
done
a
lot,
a
lot
of
investigation
on
this,
and,
on
top
of
it,
I
think
that
it's
a
great
location
to
me.
It's
kind
of
the
entrance
of
the
city
right
there,
heart
of
the
city
at
least,
and
you've
got
great.
You
know,
location
when
I
say
you've
got
tracks
just
down
the
street
from
me.
You've
got
bus,
stops
right
along
state
street
everywhere.
You've
got
connections
to
you,
know
main
arteries
of
I-80
and
I-15
just
down
state
stream,
just
down
13th
south
you're.
M
You
know,
I
think
it's
great
if
somebody
wants
to
work
downtown
where
they
could
be
there
in
five
minutes
bike
or
or
train
or
you
know
bus.
So
I
mean
I
look
at
it
and
you
know
at
first
we
were
looking
at
hotel
or
something
you
know
more
in
the
hospitality
business
like
we're
in
now,
but
I
definitely
think
that
this
would
be
the
overall
better
use
of
that
property.
M
Unfortunately,
in
order
to
do
things,
we
need
a
little
bit
more
height
in
order
to
make
the
whole
thing
work
and
I'm
trying
to
keep
this
as
the
low
end
on
the
scale
of
purchasing
a
house
and
right
now
or
an
ownership
of
a
condo.
I
should
say,
and-
and
I
think
I
can
achieve
that
if
we
can
get
that
little
bit
of
height-
and
I
always
want
to
give
to
me
the
most
for
the
least
and
and
that's
what
my
intention
is.
M
If
you
see
the
amenities
that
we
had
planned,
you
know
I
mean
there's
going
to
be
like
a
second
roof
top
area
for
people,
amenities
where
it's
going
to
be.
You
know
barbecue,
spas
things
like
this,
so
that
people
can
enjoy
up
above
the
the
street
level
there,
and
I
think,
it'd
be
a
really
great
project,
and
I
think
it's
really
needed
in
that
in
that
area,
that
that
design,
currently
of
of
my
building
on
the
that
it's
called
state
street
plaza.
M
It's
just
a
very
poor
design,
and
I
hate
to
put
money
into
something
that
is,
is
that
poorly
designed?
It
really
would
be
great
and
and
I'd
be
really
happy
as
heck,
and
I
think
the
community
would
as
well
after
speaking
to
him.
So
I
would
hope
and-
and
you
know
wish
for
your
guys
to
to
definitely
you
know-
give
us
the
next
step,
which
would
be
revitalizing
that
corner
it's
a
tough
project,
but
I
can
do
it.
M
M
M
M
M
M
Okay,
thank
you.
So
it
is
unanimous
in
favor
of
the
applicant,
so
we
will
make
a
recommendation.
Excuse
me!
Yes,
we
will
admit
this
is
a
recommendation
to
city
council
for
the
approval
of
a
zoning
map
amendment,
and
so
we
will
move
on
to
our
number
seven
item
on
the
agenda:
the
adu
and
special
exception
at
approximately
1362
south
1300
east.
M
All
right,
can
you
see
my
screen?
Yes,
we
can
all
right.
So
dwight
e,
on
behalf
of
the
property
owner,
is
requesting
conditioning
conditional
use
approval
for
a
detached
accessory,
drawing
unit
and
special
exception
approval
to
allow
grading
and
retaining
walls
that
exceed
the
maximum
permitted
height
of
four
feet.
The
subject
property
is
located
at
1362,
south
1300
east
and
is
in
the
r15
000
single
family
residential
zoning
district.
There's
an
existing
single
family
home
on
the
property
which
is
currently
vacant.
M
The
house
will
be
undergoing
a
renovation
at
the
same
time
as
the
construction
of
the
adu.
The
adu
will
have
one
bedroom
and
is
approximately
640
square
feet.
It's
16
feet
4
inches
in
height
and
will
be
located
in
the
rear
yard
of
the
subject,
property
special
exception
approval
may
be
granted
administratively.
The
staff
has
referred
the
petition
to
the
planning
commission,
because
the
construction
of
the
edu
as
proposed
is
dependent
on
the
requested,
requested
grading
and
retaining
walls.
M
The
planning
commission
has
final
decision
making
authority
for
requested
special
exceptions.
Staff
recommends
approval
of
the
conditional
use
of
the
detached
edu
with
the
conditions
outlined
in
staff
report.
Staff
also
recommends
approval
of
the
special
acceptance
request
for
grading
retaining
walls
exceeding
poor
human
height.
M
The
subject
property
is
located
on
the
corner
of
harrison
avenue
and
1300
east.
The
property
is
approximately
9
300
square
feet
in
size.
The
east
side
of
harrison
avenue
has
significantly
steep
slopes,
which
is
why
special
exceptions
are
being
requested
to
create
a
buildable
area
for
the
epu.
The
subject:
property
has
an
average
slope
between
26
and
46.
M
Under
current
code
properties,
with
more
than
a
30
slope
are
considered
unbuildable,
which
makes
this
property
unique
staff
recognizes
that
if
the
rear
yard
is
to
be
used,
special
exceptions
will
be
required.
Staff
has
worked
extensively
with
applicants
to
reduce
the
visual
impact
of
the
proposed
retaining
walls.
Since
the
first
proposal,
the
retaining
walls
along
the
street
front
have
been
reduced
in
height
and
additional
terraces
have
been
added.
The
applicant
has
also
proposed
land
speaking
between
the
sidewalk
and
retaining
walls
along
harrison
avenue
and
between
the
new
property
line
and
retaining
wall
yard
setback.
M
The
landscaping
will
help
hold
the
grading
in
place,
mask
the
overall
height
of
the
walls
and
create
a
barrier
between
the
subject,
property
and
adjacent
property
to
the
west.
The
details
of
each
retaining
wall
will
be
described
in
the
upcoming
slides
and
so
residents
are
concerned
about
the
viability
of
building
on
such
a
steep
lot.
They're
also
opposed
to
having
the
required
parking
space
on
harrison
avenue
rather
than
on
site,
so
over
parking
in
the
street
in
a
steep
slope
comparison,
they
believe
adding
an
additional
car
cars
would
be
a
safety
hazard.
M
The
transportation
division
stated
that,
while
parking
on
site
is
preferred
based
on
the
radius
dimension,
stone
a
vehicle
could
not
turn
into
the
proposed
space
of
the
original
site
plan.
However,
based
on
the
dimensions
shown,
there
is
more
than
required
20
feet
of
depth
to
back
out
if
the
vehicle
were
to
pull
in
perpendicular
to
the
street,
and
then
they
also
said,
even
though
the
adjacent
street
has
a
slip
to
it,
parking
on
the
street
would
not
be
an
issue
if
parking
is
done
on
site
the
site
just
sight.
M
Distance
issues
at
the
driveway
would
need
to
be
addressed.
Staff
asked
the
applicant
to
adjust
their
plans
to
accommodate
the
parking
on
site,
but
they've
stated
that,
in
order
to
create
that
buildable
area
for
the
adu,
the
proposed
retaining
walls
need
to
remain
where
they
are.
The
placement
of
the
walls
wouldn't
allow
for
the
adequate
turning
radius
and
also
block
the
required
sight
distance
triangle
for
a
vehicle
to
back
up
which
would
create
a
safety
hazard
professor
in
cars
on
harrison.
M
The
applicant
is
now
proposing
to
use
the
legal
arms
marking
which
is
shown
and
then
on
this
site
plan,
I'm
going
to
go
through
each
section,
but
the
retaining
walls
requiring
special
exception
approval
which
are
in
the
required
setbacks,
are
in
red
and
then
the
buildable
areas
in
orange
so
here
are
renderings
of
the
proposed
edu,
which
also
show
what
the
renovated
family
home
will
look
like
upon.
Completion,
the
rear
and
eastern
walls
of
the
adu
will
be
built
into
the
slope
of
the
property.
M
M
So
here
are
photos
of
the
existing
family
home
which
faces
1300
and
then,
as
you
can
see,
I'm
moving
down
the
photos
that
harrison
is
quite
steep
and
and
then
also
the
existing
homes
are
built
into
the
slope.
The
bottom
row
shows
the
existing
retaining
wall
along
the
southern
border
of
the
subject:
property
against
the
sidewalk.
J
M
B
M
N
Imposing
the
original
plans
proposed
two
retaining
walls,
nearly
eight
and
nine
feet
tall,
and
we
asked
this
applicant
to
create
more
terraces
and
reduce
the
exposed
height
of
each
wall
to
under
six
feet.
Applekin
was
able
to
accomplish
this
outside
of
wall
number
five.
This
section
of
wall
is
a
little
over
seven
feet
tall,
but
can't
be
reduced
any
further,
because
the
top
of
the
wall
hits
the
existing
grade
of
the
upper
area
of
the
property,
and
it
also
ties
into
a
retaining
wall
which
is
within
the
global
area.
N
Okay,
so
we're
moving
north
across
the
property.
Let's
see,
this
slide
includes
a
rendering
of
the
proposed
adu
and
the
retaining
walls
along
harrison
avenue.
There
are
walls
requiring
special
approval
or
outlined
in
red,
and
those
were
the
ones
I
discussed
in
the
previous
slide,
and
then
you
can
see
how
wall
number
five
hits
the
existing
grade
and
ties
into
the
the
perpendicular
wall
and
the
eastern
side
wall.
The
adu
82
will
be
built
into
the
retaining
wall
that
runs
perpendicular
harrison.
N
The
majority
of
this
wall
is
located
within
the
buildable
area,
but
the
section
where
the
arrow
is
planting
is
within
the
required
side,
yard
area
and
needs
special
exception
approval.
This
section
of
wall
is
just
under
10
feet
tall
and
then
the
nine
and
a
half
foot
wall
to
the
east
is
within
the
buildable
area
and
does
not
require
special
exception
approval
and,
as
I
mentioned
before,
the
entrance
of
the
adu
is
32
feet
away
from
the
property
line
and
if
you're
standing
at
the
entrance,
the
slope,
the
existing
slope
is
38.
N
J
J
J
J
J
M
Reduce
its
visual
impact
and
to
create
between
the
property
adjacent
to
the
west,
the
existing
grade,
along
with
the
line,
will
not
be
altered.
An
applicant
is
also
not
proposing
to
change
the
existing
fence
along
the
rear
property
line.
The
front
portion
of
the
french
fence
is
wood
and
then
the
back
half
is
chain
link.
The
landscaping
will
be
in
front
of
the
chain
link
section
of
fencing,
okay,
and
here
is
a
site
elevation
from
north
to
south,
showing
the.
N
Same
retaining
wall
requiring
approval,
as
I
mentioned
before,
the
existing
grade
along
the
property
line,
will
not
be
altered,
but
I
outlined
it
in
red,
so
it
does
increase
as
you
move
south
and
another
site
elevation
of
the
same
wall,
and
it
shows
the
slope
of
the
property
is
approximately
46
percent.
And
then
you
can
see
the
grade.
N
Approval
and
then
finally,
this
is
the
last
section
of
the
property
where
special
exception
approval
is
being
requested.
The
three
terraced
retaining
walls
along
the
northern
property
line
are
within
the
required
side
yard
area.
Each
wall
is
approximately
five
feet:
tall
five
to
five
and
a
half,
and
they
tie
into
the
rear.
Retaining
wall
discussed
in
the
previous
three
slides.
N
N
So
I
mailed
the
notice
of
the
adu
application
on
may
26
2020
to
properties
then,
and
then
I
also
mailed
it
to
the
east
liberty
park,
wasatch
hollow
and
yale
crest
community
councils.
I
received
comments
from
four
residents
in
the
community.
I
went
back
and
forth
a
few
emails
before
a
total
residence.
A
The
east
liberty
park
community
council
recommends
the
planning
commission
required
the
applicant
to
reinstate
their
original
offstate
off
street
parking
proposal
and
remove
the
parking
from
the
street
wasatch
hallways
that
the
proposal
seems
well
thought
out
and
yell.
Chris
did
not
provide
feedback
because
their
boundaries
more
than
600
feet
away.
It
was
close,
so
I
sent
it
just
to
be
safe
and
then.
F
D
D
D
D
Without
the
I
mean
they
couldn't
really
do
the
idea
without
the
special
exemption,
but
does
it
matter
that
they're
tied
together
or
not
right,
so
the
adu
as
they
proposed
it,
is
dependent
on
the
special
exception
approval
because
of
the
slope
of
the
lot.
There's
there's
really
nothing.
You
can
do
nothing.
You
can
do
in
the
back
of
it
right.
Okay,
all
right
thanks.
D
F
Can
you
hear
me
yes,
great,
I'm
I'm
dwight
e,
I'm
the
architect
working
on
behalf
of
the
property
owner
brandon
shea,
for
this
property,
and
I
guess
if
anyone
has
any
specific
questions,
just
speaking
to
the
question
that
was
just
previously
asked.
Yes,
the
only
way
that
this
adu
actually
really
does
work
is
having
that
retaining
wall
work
done
so
that
we
can
provide
an
actual
buildable
area.
I
Property,
yes,
and
in
fact,
the
the
major
retaining
wall,
that's
in
the
buildable
area,
where
we're
having
to
replace,
because
it's
so
damaged,
that's
the
really
big
10
foot
wall.
That
amanda
has
shown
that
we're
tying
into
on
some
of
these
kind
of
other.
Retaining
the
shorter
retaining
walls
tie
into
that
large
retaining
wall
that
runs
across
the
back
of.
I
But
what
happened
is
in
inspecting
it
basically
because
of
water
damage,
it's
being
blown
out
right
at
the
kind
of
joint
of
the
wall
and
the
footer.
So
that's
we
knew
that
we
had
to
replace
that
retaining
wall,
no
matter
what,
and
so,
as
you
can
see,
and
then
with
the
photos
you
can
see
currently
currently
what
what's
on
the
property
is
they
they
cantilevered
out
extremely
large
porch.
M
M
I
In
the
rear
yard,
setback,
which
is
we'll
be
five
feet
from
essentially
with
the
neighbor's
side
yard,
because
it's
a
corner
lot
do
those
windows,
because
the
slope
do
they
continue
to
look
down
into
the
next
house?
Is
there
any
privacy
concerns
from
the
adu
standpoint
like
looking
down
in
the
house?
That's
below
this,
or
does
it
start
the
hills
kind
of
level
out?
You
know
from
there
and
we're
not
the
neighbors
not
really
concerned
about
privacy
or
other
issues
of
the
adu
being
located
right.
There
right,
I
mean
typically.
N
N
So
if
you
look
at
the
section
yeah,
so
those
windows
that
are
actually
facing
the
property
owner
or
the
the
west
side
property.
Those
were
required
to
be
obscured.
So
you
couldn't
actually
see
through
them.
They
would
provide
just
daylight
only
into
the
adu.
We
did
provide
actual
clear
glass
facing
north
and
south
for
the
for
for
the
adu
inside,
so
that
you
can
have
some
views
out.
N
I
I
Following
the
grade
similar
to
the
grade
that
we're
showing
and
it's
not
where
the
driveway
is
of
the
owner,
so
I
understand
your
concern
about
if
they
were
putting
a
fence
that
fence
is
potentially
lower
than
what
the
six
feet
that
you
want
for
privacy,
but
where
that
fence
is
running
right
now
is
you
know
closer
to
the
grade?
So
you
know,
I
would
assume
that
we
would
cover.
You
know
two
to
at
least
two
to
three
feet
of
that.
I
M
M
A
M
Privacy
of
having
that
wooded
slope
next
to
me,
so
the
question
was
asked
about
whether
the
neighbor
has
privacy
concerns
and
I
would
say
that
I
do
and
I
think
in
particular
not
so
much
on
the
front
part
where
you
were
discussing
it,
but
towards
on
the
rear
of
the
property
where
the
chain-link
fence
is.
I
would
like
to
see
something
of
an
obscure
defense
or
something
replacing
the
chamber.
I
don't
know
if
that's
possible
or
not,
but.
A
N
And
unstable
for
soil,
movement
and
water,
drainage
issues
for
both
their
properties
and
also
parking
is
placed
on
our
street.
Is
this
coming
through?
Okay,
I'm
hearing
heavy
breathing.
I
I
muted
someone
please
continue.
Ma'am
okay
place
is
a
heavy
large
burden
on
the
street
for
the
on-site
parking
component.
E
E
M
I
A
I
M
E
A
For
their
radius,
we
couldn't
ever
originally
pull
in
and
turn
90
degrees,
as
I
originally
hoped
for
so
he
said
there
was
enough
depth
to
then
pull
in
directly
into
the
the
space
off
of
harrison
and
just
pull
directly,
and
there
would
be
enough
depth.
The
two
challenges
I
have
when
I
was
trying
to
lay
that
out
is
by
code.
The
parking
space
has
to
be
10
feet
away
from
the
rear
property
line.
So
that
means
I'm
shifting
any
parking
driveway
to
the
east
into
the
hill.
A
So
I'm
moving
up
the
hill
and
then
that's
what
happened
is.
I
was
then
having
to
deal
with
the
retaining
wall
where
I
had
where,
where
I'm
okay
trying,
I
was
trying
to
adjust
that
lower
retaining
wall,
but
because
transportation
also
has
the
triangle.
The
view
triangle
requirement
where
I
can't
have
anything
above
30
inches.
That's.
I
In
a
10
foot
triangle
from
the
property
line
back
along
the
road
I'm
coming
into
I'm
coming
into
the
retaining
wall,
that
is
now
the
10
foot
retaining
wall,
that's
tying
in
to
actually
then
create
the
adu
pad.
So
that's
the
struggle
I'm
having
I.
I
was
trying
to
actually
continue
to
have
a
space
on
site,
but
I
am
now
actually
hitting
against
two
city
requirements,
which
is
now
giving
me
very
little
room
to
move.
I
Helpful,
I
so
amanda
is:
do
we
have
any
purview
in
dealing
with
that
triangulation
issue
from
transportation,
because
I
honestly
have
I
built
a
garage
with
an
alley
access
in
2007.
I
don't
have
that
triangulation
requirement
and
I'm
fine
getting
in
and
out
of
my
garage
to
the
alley
behind
me.
So
I
don't
know
what
that
requirement
came
into
effect
or
how
what's
the
rule
we
may
have
in
helping
transportation
give
some
some
variance
to
that.
I
don't
know
I'm
just
asking.
I
B
I
Transportation
requirement,
so
I
would
like
to
ask
another
question
relative
to
this.
So
did
we
ever
consider
altering
the
rear
yard
setback
as
a
part
of
this
application
so
that
the
driveway
could
go
right
in
next
to
the
other
driveway
or
the
other
of
the
of
the
of
the
owner
next
door,
which
is
basically
where
it
is
now?
B
C
I
N
I
N
N
E
N
E
Well,
that
actually
wouldn't
apply.
That
would
be
so
this
one.
This
code
is
actually
saying
10
feet
away
from
the
property
line
of
any
intersecting
street.
So
that's
actually
incorrect.
I'm
sorry!
I
thought
I
had
it,
so
I'm
I'm
interested
in
this
approach.
I
certainly
am
not
10
feet
from
my
property
line
at
all.
E
B
E
E
A
N
F
M
I
As
close
to
the
fence
line
of
the
neighbor
of
the
bearing
property
as
as
possible,
I've
never
heard
of
the
10-foot
driveway
set
back.
So
I'm
a
little
bit.
I
don't
think
we've
had
this
issue
before
there
are
lots
of
places
around
where,
where
driveways
are
very
close
to
each
other,
so
can
we?
So?
What
do
you
guys
want
to
do?
I
I
don't
want
to
craft
this
condition,
but
I'm
personally
interested
in
doing
following
what
makes
suggested
that
we
approve
a
condition
where
we
allow
a
pull-in
parking
spot
on
the
west
side
of
the
edu
to
the
in
the
setback.
If
code
allows
us
to
do
that,
I
think
that's
a
pretty
good.
I
don't
want
pretty
good
condition.
I
don't
want
to
verbalize
the
condition,
though,
because
I
don't,
I
think
you
just
did.
E
Well,
I
don't
I
don't
know
if
paul
wants
to
review
my
words,
then
that's
great,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
it
is
appropriately
phrased,
I'm
personally
interested
in
that
approach,
since
we
can't
really
deny
it
and
we're
looking
at
how
do
we
mitigate
any
potential
impacts?
I
also
think
that
gives
another
little
buffer
to
the
neighbor
on
the
west,
but
honestly
there's
so
many
driveways
in
my
neighborhood
that
are
right
next
to
each
other.
I
don't.
E
A
Action
we're
unsure,
I
guess
nick
is
unsure
if
there's
a
provision
in
that
code
that
specifically
allows
or
disallows
us
to
do
that
yeah.
That
makes
me
a
little
bit
nervous
to
to
have
a
condition.
That's
that's
hanging
out
there
depending
on
whether
it
meets
the
code.
So
I
don't
know
if
nick
can
resolve
that
right
now.
I
can
resolve
that
right
now.
That
section
is.
A
Titled
parking
lot
and
it
defines
a
parking
lot
as
an
area
of
parking
with
four
or
more
vehicles.
This
would
not
be
a
parking
lot,
so
it
wouldn't
apply,
so
I
could
make
that
condition
of
just
allowing
a
parking
spot.
Poland
parking
spot
within
this,
the
rear
yard
setback
on
the
western
property
line.
A
H
F
B
B
H
So
obviously,
people
park
in
their
driveways
all
the
time
right
in
that
area,
but
from
a
zoning
perspective,
it's
not
one,
it's
not
a
required
stall.
So
that's
where
it
gets
a
little
bit
more
problematic
in
trying
to
approve
something
that
is
an
attempt
to
park
a
car
in
that
when
the
ordinance
doesn't
allow
it.
There
is
a
potential
for
a
special
exception
to
authorize
that
parking.
However,
that's
only.
A
On
the
site
and
a
garage
or
guard
isn't
accessible,
obviously
this
rear's
not
going
to
be
accessible,
but
I
believe
they'll
have
a
garage
for
the
home
and
the
adu
ordinance
allows
the
street
to
be
used
for
parking,
and
so
that's
that's
where
the
rub
would
be.
Is
that
the
the
specific
requirements
for
adu.
B
Could
make
it
a
pad
and
we
were
designating
the
actual
parking
space
on
the
street
right
transportation.
Also,
I
mean,
based
on
their
comments,
reading
them
closely
they're
of
the
opinion
that
they
prefer
it
on
harrison
and
and
they
are,
they
prefer
on-site.
Actually,
they
prefer
it
on
site,
but
they
said
the
dimensions
don't
work
as
proposed,
so
that
would
be
a
character
file
right,
so
they're
on
the
street.
B
Yes
yeah.
They
said
they
would
like
it
on
site,
but
they
don't
have
an
issue
with
them
being
in
person,
because
the
dimensions
don't
work,
this
piece
of
property,
exactly
I
feel
like
this-
is
really
frustrating
because
transportation
and
zoning
are
just
not
striving
with
what
you
know:
they're
canceling,
each
other
out
with
reference
to
what
each
other
needs,
and
now
it's
not
anybody's
fault.
But
I
think
that
this
is
one
of
those
instances
where
they're,
not
in
sync
with
each
other
at
all.
B
And
how
can
we
overcome
that
in
our
role
as
planning
commission,
but
also
within
this
petition?
I
don't
know
that
we
can
do
that
tonight,
but
this
is
frustrating
because
these
rules
that
aren't
aren't
connecting
seem
superfluous
and
they
don't.
They
don't
seem
to
really
make
why
you
can't
have
a
curve
cut
with
a
legal
spine
and
this
can't
be
a
legal
spot,
because
it's
a
corner
lot,
it's
just
and
but
it's
not
our
front
yard,
it's
the
rear
yard.
So
I
don't.
B
There
was
a
reason
for
that,
and
and
the
council
at
the
time
decided
that
they
didn't
want
to
allow
that
to
honor
that
we
have
to
apply
that
transportation,
basically
can't
authorize
something
within
the
right-of-way,
like
a
driveway
approach
to
something
that
is
otherwise
not
allowed
by
the
zoning
ordinance
right.
That's
what
they're
saying
and-
and
so
I
don't
know
that,
there's
necessarily
it
may
not
be
a
you
know
you
can
argue
with
the
merits
of
what
the
ordinance
says,
but
I
don't
think
that
there's
a
disconnect
between
planning
and
transportation
or
zoning.
B
B
B
B
B
Before
we
add
the
other
one.
Okay
do
I
have
a
second
for
that?
Second,
is
that
crystal
yes?
Okay,
thank
you!
It's
been
moved
and
seconded
that,
and
so
I'm
going
to
call
him
for
a
vote.
Amy
yeah
maureen
we're
just
voting
on
the
adu
right
now.
Yeah,
sarah,
yes,
andres,
hello,
carolyn,
agree
crystal
yes,
john,
yes,
matt.
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
Until
this
year,
we've
basically
been
breaking
even
at
best
on
our
urban
forest,
with
a
thousand
additional
trees,
we'll
be
growing
our
urban
forest
for
the
first
time
in
too
many
years,
and
by
planting
these
additional
trees
on
our
city's
west
side,
communities
we're
not
only
taking
aim
at
improving
the
environment,
although
that
will
be
a
great
outcome
of
this
effort,
we're
addressing
a
geographic
inequity.
That's
been
allowed
to
exist
in
a
portion
of
our
city
for
far
too.
B
B
For
our
residents
who
live
here
in
this
beautiful
and
friendly
and
diverse
area
of
our
city,
these
trees
might
mean
beautification
or
a
lower
cooling
bill.
During
hot
summer
months.
They
may
mean
a
shady
place
to
have
a
family,
outing
or
perhaps
higher
property
values,
but
they
will
also
surely
mean
a
narrowing
of
an
existing
and
now
an
acknowledged
and
an
addressed
gap
between
the
places
we
live
in
the
city
and
how
our
neighborhoods
look.
B
B
This
bowl
was
made
from
one
of
the
trees
that
came
down
in
the
spring
snowstorm
last
year
by
one
of
our
urban
foresters
on
as
a
hobby
and
a
gift
to
me,
it
symbolizes
for
me
the
potential
of
the
wood
that
goes
to
our
landfill.
Today,
this
urban
wood
reutilization
program
bookended
by
our
new
program
to
grow
our
urban
forest
by
planting
the
tree
by
planting
the
trees
from
seed
really
will
make
our
urban
forestry
program
a
306.