►
From YouTube: Redevelopment Agency (RDA) of Salt Lake City - 9/24/2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
Get
started
just
want
to
announce
start
by
announcing
a
quick
change
to
the
agenda.
We're
gonna
start
with
general
comments
first
and
then
we'll
go
into
approval
of
the
minutes
and
then
the
rest
of
the
agenda.
But
thank
you,
everybody
for
joining
us
for
today's
meeting
of
the
Redevelopment
Agency
of
Salt
Lake
City
Board
as
I
said,
we'll
start
with
general
comments.
I
have
several
comment
cards
here
and
I'll
call
names
two
at
a
time
so
that
you
know
who's
next
and
the
first
card
that
I
have
is
P
dash
down.
B
You
for
hearing
me
today
for
those
who
don't
know
my
name
is
Pete
Ashdown
I
run
X
mission.
I
have
been
a
downtown
resident
business
and
and
home
for
the
past
25
years,
I
have
had
a
front
row
seat
on
the
Utah
Theater
and
the
broken
promises
that
have
been
made
in
regards
to
the
Utah
theatre
and
I'm
coming
here
today.
B
To
beg
you
to
consider
preserving
that
theater
I
am
stunned
to
hear
the
RDA
say
that
60
million
dollars
is
too
expensive
when
the
Eccles
theater
cost
a
hundred
and
sixty
million
dollars
did
not
go
to
vote
and
was
also
destroyed.
A
contributing
building
to
downtown
Salt
Lake
City
I
strongly
believe
the
reason
it
didn't
go
to
vote
it's
because
it
wouldn't
have
passed.
If
you
tear
down
the
Utah
theater,
we
will
lose
our
last
chance
to
have
a
grand
movie
theater
in
Salt
Lake
City,
something
that
is
desperately
needed
here.
B
Sundance
when
they
showed
Apollo
11
did
not
have
a
70
millimeter
film,
projector
theater
in
town
that
they
could
show
that
at
any
70
millimeter
films
that
you
want
to
see.
You
have
to
go
to
our
neighbor
Boise
and
if
Boise
can
have
a
70
millimeter
that
film
theater
I
think
Salt
Lake
should
have
one
too.
We
have
the
Utah
Film
Center.
We
have
salt,
we
have
Sundance.
We
should
be
thinking
about
this
and
I.
Don't
unlike
the
Echo
cedar,
I,
don't
think
it
shouldn't
go
to
vote
I
think
it
should
go
to
vote.
I.
B
Think
the
public
should
have
a
say
about
the
fate
of
the
Utah
theatre,
because
once
it's
gone,
it's
gone
and
if
it's
gone,
we
will
never
have
another
chance
for
a
grand
theatre
in
Salt,
Lake
City
like
they
have
in
Minneapolis,
like
they
have
in
Los
Angeles
like
they
have
in
Denver.
We
need
one
here.
Thank
you.
Thank.
D
D
We
submitted
an
application
for
a
request
for
three
million
dollars
for
our
city,
plaza,
slash
high
rise
project
that
we're
doing
in
combination
with
housing,
connect
the
new
name
of
the
housing
authority
of
the
county
of
Salt
Lake.
This
project
dan
neckerman,
will
talk
a
little
bit
more
to
what
the
project
is
and
a
little
more
of
the
specifications,
and
such
I
would
like
to
bring
to
your
attention
that
of
the
ten
point,
seven
million
dollars
that
was
posted
for
the
NOFA.
Only
six
point:
two
million
dollars
was
awarded
the
other
four
point.
D
Five
million
was
set
aside
for
areas
of
high
opportunity
and
from
what
I
understand
in
talking
with
staff,
no
one
applied
for
those
funds,
and
we
are
asking
that
if
there
is
an
opportunity
to
open
up
those
funds
that
we
might
be
considered
to
have
what
was
being
recommended
by
the
committee
covered.
There
are
four
projects
that
were
awarded.
D
We
were
number
five
and
so
we're
hoping
that,
within
the
scope
of
those
in
the
tier
that
the
committee
is
recommending
that
that
may
be
an
opportunity
that
some
of
those
funds
could
be
open
for
use
for
the
city
plaza
project
and
our
executive
director,
Dan
Ackerman
will
speak
more
to
the
scope
of
the
project.
Thank.
A
D
Now
with
Denver
Street,
where
we
took
12
units
of
existing
almost
market
rate
housing
and
are
about
to
open
22
units
for
the
severe
and
persistent
mentally
ill,
we
worked
with
the
neighborhood
to
do
that.
Pamela's
place
under
construction,
a
hundred
units
of
permanent
supportive
housing,
which
is
really
the
next
step
out
of
our
new
Resource
Center
sites,
capital
homes,
which
you
helped
us
with
and
invest
it
in
the
old
capital
motel
94
units,
where
we
have
full
funding.
D
But
it
will
move
that
property
out
of
an
old
HUD
program,
called
public
housing
and
into
a
new
HUD
program
called
rad,
which
is
not
only
about
our
bottom-line
going
forward.
It's
also
a
better
quality
of
life.
So,
as
Joe
said,
we
came
close
time
to
gaining
funding
and
we
would
like
to
if
there
are
additional
funds.
A
B
Troy
Hart
housing
connect,
formerly
Housing
Authority,
the
County
Salt
Lake
and
I'm
just
here,
just
to
continue
to
speak
about
the
new
Plaza
partnership
and
the
high-rise
and
City
Plaza,
which
is
a
protection
of
two
hundred.
Ninety
nine
units
of
affordable
housing,
providing
units
at
30%
or
below
of
AMI
the
typical
average
income
for
the
tenant
sort
of
living
at
those
two
towers
at
this
point
time
is
11,000
648.
B
A
B
A
A
F
The
RDA
administration
is
presenting
to
bond
resolutions
for
the
board's
consideration.
The
first
resolution
proposes
to
refund
the
RDAs
outstanding
tax,
increment
revenue
bonds
series
2013
issued
to
finance
Eccles
Theatre
back
in
2013.
If
the
refunding
is
successful,
the
RDA
could
expect
to
receive
approximately
2.2
million
in
savings
over
the
next
12
years.
After
the
refunding
is
completed,
the
RDA
will
be
bringing
an
interlocal
agreement
to
the
board
that
will
need
to
be
amended
to
reflect
a
new
debt
service
schedule.
F
The
RDA
contributes
a
portion
of
the
debt
service
and,
after
the
refunding
is
completed,
we'll
be
bringing
an
interlocal
agreement
that
will
also
need
to
be
amended
to
reflect
their
new
debt
service
schedule.
If
the
refunding
is
successful,
that
RDA
could
expect
to
receive
approximately
18,000
in
savings
over
the
next
three
years.
A
E
H
E
In
in
refinancing
or
in
that
exploration,
found
capacity
to
fund
additional
projects
that
fit
within
the
bond
themselves
and
I'm
thinking
of
the
McLellan
trail
that
we
funded
five
six
years
ago
that
had
been
designed
and
talked
about
for
22
years
or
something
and
never
saw
the
funding
in
a
refinance
scenario.
Correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
and
we
found
enough
capacity
in
that
refinancing
to
and
that
the
trail
fit
appropriately
in
the
bond
description
to
be
able
to
do
it.
E
I
I,
don't
know
that
the
bond
is
so
specific.
What
I
will
tell
you,
though,
is
that
this
refund
will
help
the
RDA
immensely
they're
going
to
become,
if
acun
tight
in
their
debt
service
at
a
certain
point
in
time
and
I
think
this
will
help
eliminate
that
tightness
or
the
general
fund
happening
to
subsidize
the
RDA.
So
I
think
this
will
help
you
levy
eight,
that
it's
one
of
the
reasons
that
we
didn't
come
back
with.
E
E
A
E
I
I
A
That's
fine
all
right!
Thank
you
thanks
for
the
clarification,
sorry
about
that.
That's
okay!
So
now
we'll
move
to
agenda
item
our
third
agenda
item,
which
is
actually
number
c7,
which
is
a
loan
to
CW
urban
for
project
located
at
378,
West,
300,
south
and
joining
us
at
the
table.
We
have
Allison
Rowland
from
counsel
staff,
Danny
walls
and
Susan,
landmark
RTA
staff,
good.
I
Basically,
this
is
a
more
traditional
RDA
supported
project,
in
the
sense
that
the
gap
loan
that's
proposed
is
to
further
the
board's
goal
of
increased
homeownership
and
economic
development
for
the
neighborhood,
where
it's
located.
This
is
this
does
not
have
an
explicit
and
deed
restricted,
affordable,
housing
component.
So
we
wanted
to
point
that
out.
We
also
wanted
to
point
out
that
the
public
benefit
interest
rate
reduction
on
the
proposed
loan
would
be
just
negative,
0.5
percentage
points.
A
G
Alright,
well,
thank
you
for
your
time
this
afternoon
to
consider
the
loan
request
for
the
olive
project
located
at
378,
West,
300,
south
and
just
two
things
before
I
get
started.
One
is
that
we
have
members
from
CW
urban
in
the
audience.
If
there
are
questions,
Josh,
green
and
Darlene
Carter
are
here
today
and
then
also
the
Finance
Committee.
The
RDAs
finance
committee
reviewed
this
loan
request
on
August
1st
and
recommended
approval
of
the
loan
request,
so
we'll
just
jump
right
into
their
project.
G
Those
120
unit
breakdown
is
shown
here.
This
is
kind
of
a
lot
of
information
on
one
slide
about
the
project,
but
I'll
just
go
through
it
kind
of
quickly
120
units,
32
of
which
would
be
priced
as
studio
units
at
about
$270,000
36
one-bedroom
units
that
would
be
at
about
320
22,
one-bedroom,
plus
den
units
priced
at
about
350,000
and
20
unit.
22
bedroom
units
priced
at
about
400
thousand.
The
final
ten
units
would
be
penthouse
units
at
about
five
hundred.
G
Seventy
thousand
the
plan
is
for
the
building
to
be
FHA
approved,
which
includes
some
restrictions,
including
no
nightly
rentals
are
allowed.
You
would
have
a
maximum
of
30%
investor
owners
in
the
project,
so
the
majority
of
the
project
would
be
owner-occupied
and
no
individual
owner
could
own
more
than
10%
of
the
total
units.
E
J
That
is
the
nature
of
those,
and
so
it
really
only
came
into
play
or
as
part
of
the
conversation
in
this,
because
it's
home
ownership-
and
these
were
some
of
the
questions
that
the
Finance
Committee
had
in
terms
of
how
do
we
restrict
these
from
becoming
rentals?
How
do
we
keep
these
from
becoming
VRBO
units?
So
that's
why
this
was
presented
as
part
of
the
terms
with
FHA.
So.
E
J
Necessarily
pushback
in
terms
of
just
trying
to
understand
how
we
would
our
goal
and
being
part
of
the
funding
sac
of
this
is
because
we
want
to
promote
the
homeownership.
This
is
not
by
nature,
an
affordable
housing
project
as
much
as
addressing
our
priority
of
trying
to
bring
homeownership
into
downtown,
and
so
as
part
of
the
Finance
Committee's
consideration
of
that
they
wanted
to
make
sure
that
if
we
were
involved
in
the
project,
what
guarantees
did
we
have
of
getting
and
ensuring
that
that's
was
going
to
be?
E
Want
to
thank
the
Finance
Committee
for
and
say
that
I
would
love
to
see
more
of
these
type
of
guarantees
and
projects
that
come
before
us,
especially
when
there's
no
affordability
built
into
them
when
we
can
get
what
I
think
is
a
better
public
benefit
out
of
the
ownership
and
having
an
active
ownership,
not
an
investor
ownership
as
a
majority.
So
let's
see
more
of
this.
G
The
construction
cost
for
this
project
is
just
under
33
million,
and
the
timeline
is
laid
out
here.
Building
permits
are
currently
pending
approval
with
the
city
undergoing
the
second
round
of
comments.
Cw
urban
anticipates
breaking
ground
in
late
2019
late
this
year
and
with
an
18-month
construction
schedule.
G
G
It's
just
north
of
Pioneer
Park
at
the
corner
of
300,
South
and
400
west,
and
this
is
the
corresponding
site
plan
and
then
the
fun
part
are
the
pretty
pictures
of
the
renderings,
and
so
we
can
look
at
those
and
what
it
look
like
when
it's
built.
This
is
the
North
elevation.
You
can
see
the
retail
space
on
the
ground
floor
and
then
housing
above
and
then
the
project
shown
looking
from
fourth
west
at
the
West
elevation.
G
This
slide
just
has
a
summary
of
the
proposed
loan
terms:
there's
a
more
complete
term
sheet
in
your
packets
for
with
the
loan
terms
and
I
apologize.
There's
a
typo
here
in
the
first
line
the
amount
is
up
to
3.3
million,
not
3.33,
and
then
the
interest
rate
on
July
24th
when
the
packet
was
put
together,
was
at
four
point,
eight:
two
percent.
When
we
subtract
out
the
half
percent
public
benefit
interest
rate
reduction
for
economic
impact,
it
leaves
a
final
interest
rate
of
four
point.
G
Three:
two
percent:
the
term
is
thirty
six
months
and
the
collateral
and
guarantees
include
a
second
position:
mortgage
lien
and
a
personal
guarantee
from
the
owner
of
CW
urban,
and
that
is
all
I
have
in
terms
of
presenting
the
loan
terms
and
happy
to
try
to
answer
any
questions
or
if
CW
urban
can
answer
any
questions.
Mr.
K
Cherrick
my
question
was
in
regards
to
kind
of
just
to
piggyback
afoot
board
member
Mendenhall
said
who's
going
to
enforce
the
percentages
on
the
rents.
If
somebody
is
renting
more,
if
they're,
renting
more
than
thirty
percent
of
the
units,
for
you
know
monthly
rentals,
who
does
that
in
house
management
or
yeah.
G
K
J
G
L
M
Do
you
want
any
more
clarity
on
the
restrictions?
Okay,
one
thing
I
wanted
to
point
out
is
that
there's
two
different
things
at
play?
One
of
the
things
that
we
felt
really
strong
about
is
that
if
we
build
this
building,
we
wanted
the
project
to
be
FHA
approved,
so
that
a
homeowner
in
Salt,
Lake
City,
would
have
the
opportunity
to
put
down
and
minimum
downpayment
and
get
and
get
financed.
M
Now,
in
addition
to
that,
because
of
the
actual
type
of
ownership
of
their
project,
the
plot
is
actually
a
condo,
so
there's
two
different
restrictions:
there's
that
what
FHA
requires
as
far
as
an
investor,
that's
actually
that
you
can
have
up
to
50%
of
your
building,
be
investors,
but
because
our
project
is
a
condo
plat,
there's
additional
restrictions
on
top
of
a
condo.
So
that
may
be
why
there's
maybe
been
a
discrepancy
that
seems
a
little
lower.
M
We
have
to
adhere
to
the
highest
level
of
condo
restrictions
to
receive
Fannie
and
Freddie
financing,
and
that
is
that
no
more
than
30%
of
the
units
at
any
time
can
be
non
owner
occupied
as
well
as
not
more
than
one
person
can.
No
more
than
10%
of
the
building
that
will
be
mandated
through
not
only
the
loan
officers
on
the
take
out
financing,
but
actually
the
HOA
in
terms
of
the
HOA.
We
do
do
a
pro
rata,
so
the
larger
the
unit,
the
more
you
would
pay
in
terms
of
the
fee.
M
So
we
do
try
and
think
someone
who
has
a
smaller
unit
is
going
to
pay
slightly
less.
We
only
do
that
on
the
on
a
portion
of
the
HOA,
because
there's
certain
amenities
that
everybody
in
the
building
can
enjoy.
So
those
the
fees
for
those
are
spread
throughout,
and
then
anything
that
would
have
to
do
with
the
service
of
the
building
is
actually
done
on
the
square
footage
of
your
unit
or.
E
A
house
thank
you,
I
wanted
to
ask
you
all
we
have
you
up
here:
the
facade
materials
and
what
I
always
hop
onto
Google
Maps
when
we're
looking
at
a
proposal
and
no
matter
what
direction
I
go,
whether
east
or
west,
on
300,
south
or
north
or
south,
there's
brick
buildings
surrounding
even
the
Homewood
Suites.
Probably
the
newest
building
in
the
area
is
majority
brick
facade.
So
can
you
talk
to
us
about
the
the
context?
The
neighborhood
context
of
the
facade
that
we
see
here,
yeah.
M
M
Hard
to
tell
so
one
of
one
of
the
things
we
felt
really
really
strong
about
is
that
we
could
tie
it
into
what
we
feel
like
the
Gateway
district
is
all
about,
and
so
all
well
the
picture
looks
a
little
shiny,
that's
about
70%
white
brick,
so
the
only
stucco
facade,
that's
actually
on
the
unit
is
primarily
on
these
towers.
But
if
you
just
zoom
in
a
little
closer
you
can
see,
all
of
that
is
actually
brick,
not
not
cinder
block.
It's
not.
M
The
bottom
level
is
going
to
be
concrete,
so
we
feel
like
it's
going
to
tie
into
the
kind
of
natural,
somewhat
industrial
feel
that
that
neighborhood
has
provided,
but
have
a
little
bit
of
a
fresh
take
on
it
as
well.
So
we're
hoping
we
can
pay
honor
to
what
was
there
and
do
something
new
as
well.
Thank.
E
E
M
F
Thank
you
this.
This
is
awesome.
I
just
want
to
I
have
questions
on
two
things:
one
is
a
commercial
space,
the
3,000
square
foot.
What
do
you
envision
there
and
invision
they're
gonna?
Allow
the
tenants
to
change
it
up
a
little
bit
if
possible,
because
this
is
what
we're
seeing
all
along
like
this
is
like
this
is
over.
All
the
building
looks
good,
at
least
to
me,
but
we
see
these
kind
of
generic
bottoms
that
retails
portion
of
it
and
it's
kind
of
like
we
want
before
you
build.
They
will
be
awesome.
F
M
Commercial
component
is
actually
going
to
be
owned
by
the
developer.
Our
desire
is
to
put
in
some
sort
of
food
service
light
light
beverage
food.
We
have
the
same
desire
to
make
it
something
that
would
be
an
amenity
to
the
residents
and
bring
some
vibrancy
and
walkability.
We
see
people
coming
in
and
out
of
those
doors
all
the
time,
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
chicken
in
the
egg
when
it
comes
to
the
commercial
brokers
on
actually
getting
an
LOI
for
this
space.
M
You
know
I
will
say
on
in
another
neighborhood
that
we
had
a
commercial
space
in
the
central
ninth
neighborhood
that
is
under
contract
right
now.
You
know
we
really
held
out
for
the
tenant
that
we
felt,
like
would
best
add
to
the
vibrancy
of
the
community,
as
opposed
to
just
putting
the
first
person
who
came
along
and
we're
really
excited
for
that,
and
our
commitment
is,
do
the
same
on
this
building.
Let's.
F
F
M
F
Then
the
second
question
I
have
or
third
I
guess,
I'm,
not
sure
where
I
am
at
Thank
You,
Bree
and
construction,
because
this
is
a
very
busy
street,
especially
at
the
farmers
market
time.
Do
you
envision
that
you're
gonna
shop,
a
portion
of
the
street
at
all,
you
know,
Harmons
here
that
they
have
shut
down
on
the
northern
part
of
the
street?
Is
that
way
what's
gonna
happen
here
too,
or
we.
M
Have
a
GC
on
board
and
our
commitment
is
to
build
the
actual
property
on
site
with
all
of
our
projects.
There
may
be
times
that
one
to
two
night
throughout
there
could
be
some
shutdowns
from
type
5
to
10
p.m.
for
some
utilities,
but
we're
not
planning
on
using
any
neighboring
streets
for
staging
areas
throughout
the
project
we're
planning
on
using
the
actual
site.
H
A
Gonna
happen.
Okay,
why
Andrew
am
I
cutting
you
off,
though
I'm
sorry,
so
why
a
lot
of
times
we
do
RDA
projects
in
areas
that
are
still
sort
of
transitioning,
but
a
lot
of
people
would
say
that
this
area
is
already
kind
of
really
turned
a
corner.
So
why
is
this
specific
area,
something
that
the
RTA
should
invest
in.
G
J
Just
probably
gonna
reiterate,
the
comment
earlier
is
providing
for
home
ownership
in
downtown
I
mean
you're
right
that
this
has
seen
some
development
I
think
with
what
we're
investing
is
a
city
in
Pioneer,
Park,
I
think
with
what
you're
seeing
in
the
surrounding
area.
I
think
the
focus
of
this
now
is
making
sure
that
we
are
providing
the
full
range
of
housing
opportunities
within
downtown
and
for
this
to
come
to
us
to
provide
home
ownership.
It's
arguably
just
a
construction,
take
out
loans,
short
term
with
minimal
interest
rate
reduction.
J
M
M
M
I,
don't
have
a
great
reason
of
why
there
isn't
a
solar
component
and
one
of
the
amenities
actually
to
the
space
is
that
I'm
about
a
third
of
the
roof
is
actually
going
to
be
a
rooftop
patio.
So
that's
the
real
large
amenity
of
it.
We
just
felt
like
if
I
were
to
live
there,
what's
important
to
me
more
than
like
a
pool
or
a
bowling
alley
or
chef's
lounge
it.
M
It
would
be
to
have
a
beverage
and
enjoy
the
view
of
the
city,
and
so
it
does
have
two
different
ways
up
to
the
top
and
that's
a
large
component
of
it,
and
we
just
in
the
effort
of
transparency,
didn't
explore
solar
panels
because
it
is
a
four
cell
project
that
may
be
a
little
bit
more
difficult
to
divide
up
under
the
actual
home
ownership
and
the
HOA.
It
just
wasn't
something
that
we
explored,
although
I'm
sure
it
would
be
a
great
idea.
It
just
wasn't
something
that
was
realized
through
the
project's
development.
N
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Welcome.
Thanks
for
the
presentation,
I
had
two
questions
and
maybe
a
little
broader.
The
first
one
one
is
about
the
homeownership
component
and
the
enforcement
of
that
piece.
So
if
I,
if
I
read
correctly,
anis
I
read
here
that
no
more
than
10%
of
the
total
units
can
be
held
by
one
particular
can,
for
particular
investors
each
hold
10%.
That.
K
M
I
will
tell
you,
you
know,
on
the
last
two
years,
we've
kind
of
been
on
a
blaze
around
downtown
Salt,
Lake,
City
and
trying
to
do
for
sale,
housing.
M
Most
of
our
residents
are
people
who
live
in
our
units
and
their
primary
occupants
that
it's.
We
have
never
there's
no
advertisement
that
you're
gonna
see
from
us.
That's
calling
for
investors
to
come
to
our
projects,
we're
calling
for
people
who
want
to
live
downtown
and
be
a
part
of
this
city.
Are
there
one
or
two
potentially
in
every
project,
and
this
project
could
be
more
I
would
say?
Yes,
that
could
be
an
option.
That's
not
our
goal.
It's
not
who
we
market
to
we're.
M
N
Talk
to
me
about
enforcement,
then,
from
an
HOA
perspective,
if
it's
based
on
a
to
a
model,
I,
don't
know
the
model
you're
thinking
about
it's
a
it's
a
voting
issue
right.
You
can
change
bylaws
by
the
HOA
and
therefore
that's
my
question.
But
how
do
you
enforce
that?
Because
the
the
nightly
rentals
thing
is
tricky
with
the
state
restrictions
on
how
you
enforce
it
right?
You
can't
do
certain
things
to
figure
out
if
they're,
not
a
rental.
Well,.
M
I
would
say
the
number
one
way
we're
gonna
enforce.
It
is
actually
through
the
takeout
financing.
Lender
I
mean
someone
have
to
would
have
to
falsify
a
loan
application
to
get
through.
We
would
be
stopped
the
funding
of
any
future
homeowner
being
able
to
get
a
loan
if
we
weren't
in
compliance
with
those
FHA
guidelines
and
what
a
condo
requires,
and
so
that's
that's,
pretty
serious.
M
The,
although
the
constructions
18
months
we
haven't
been
over
our
skis
on
what
the
velocity
of
the
project
is
so
I,
think
we've
been
conservative
with
how
many
we're
going
to
sell
a
month.
If
you
fill
up
the
building,
primarily
with
owner-occupants
the
first
time
around,
then
what
the
resale
is
like
later
I
think
is
more
telling
you
know,
there's
not
a
lot
of
units
that
exchange
hands
at
places
like
City
Creek
or
even
the
broccoli
Park
lofts.
N
M
We
have
a
pre
sell
around
six
months
prior
to
the
building
being
complete
and
so
I
do
feel
that
we,
we
are
very
close
to
our
construction
budget
within
a
month
from
now
by
October
11
we'll
have
a
ga
P
for
our
contract
from
our
contractor.
So
these
are
true
construction
costs
and
there's
not
a
major
concern
of
a
huge
cost
overrun
that
would
trickle
over
to
revenue
having
to
be
raised
to
cover
it.
I
mean
we're
at
the
final
sage.
M
N
Thanks
for
answering
all
those
I
apologize
for
the
multiple
questions
after
the
second
pieces
of
a
sustainability
and
people
have
talked
about
different
elements
already,
but
tell
me
what
efforts
you
have
made
about
the
either
demolition
of
the
current
site,
construction
of
the
new
site.
And
how
are
you
addressing
those
issues?
Both
the
construction,
also
going
forward
with
gaseous
electric
electrical
use?
Those
kind
of
things
any
sense
of
that
in.
M
Terms
of
sustainability
of
the
demolition,
and
that
is
in
the
hands
of
our
third-party
contractor.
The
way
demolition
works
is
that
the
demolition
contractor
gets
to
take
all
the
advantages
of
reusing
the
interior
of
the
building.
So
we
we
don't
necessarily
get
any
benefit
of
recycling
or
reusing
those
units
in
terms
of
sustainability.
You
know
we
are
going
to
have
some
efficiencies
and
the
type
of
insulation
that
we're
putting
in
the
building.
M
Unfortunately,
some
of
those
certifications
have
been
a
little
onerous
on
all
of
the
things
that
they
require,
but
we
do
have
a
handful
of
electrical,
a
chair,
sorry,
HVAC
components
and
insulation
that'll
help
even
our
appliances
that
we
put
in
our
energy-saving.
But
you
know
that's
that's
really
the
extent
of
what
we've
done
on
sustainability.
Okay,.
N
N
L
E
Of
course,
yes
just
I'll,
second
that
and
it's
in
a
councilmember
board
member
Johnston,
what
you
bring
up
echoes
what
we've
talked
about
in
a
few
past
board
meetings.
This
project
decide
when
we're
giving
0.5%
interest
rate
reductions
for
environmental
initiatives
taking
on
by
a
project
we
we
must
be
more
aggressive
about
this
I
mean
we
need
to
not
only
in
those
interest
rate
reduction
scenarios,
but
when
we're
coming
to
loan
he
hit
the
nail
on
the
head.
Buildings
are
our
next
big
hurdle
for
air
quality
and
we're
not
asking
for
anything
here.
Really.
J
That
I
think
I
think
all
the
comments
and
questions
regarding
sustainability
and
demolition
are
absolutely
valid.
I.
Think,
given
the
City
stance
on
sustainability,
it's
absolutely
a
priority
that
we
need
to
figure
out
how
to
start
providing
as
a
function
of
our
projects,
I
think
to
the
defense
of
this
project.
They
did
not
seek
the
sustainability
interest
rate
right
down,
and
so
that
has
not
been
a
function.
This
is,
for
all
intents
and
purposes,
a
pretty
cookie
cutter
loan
with
just
one
write
down.
J
I
think
this
is
a
great
segue
into
our
next
item,
which
is
the
strategic
framework
and
the
metrics
and
the
policy
and
the
priorities,
because
that
absolutely
is
something
that
both
from
the
administration
and
the
City
Council,
that,
if
you
want
to
start
putting
that
as
a
policy
item
for
RDA
funding,
then
we
would
accept
that
challenge
to
figure
out
how
to
incorporate
that
in
projects
at
whatever
level.
We
think
we
need
to
require,
and
not
just
incentivize,
which
is
the
way
we're
structured
right
now.
So.
A
Yeah,
just
and
again
and
I'm
sorry
to
keep
going
back
to
smaller,
but
something
that
you
did
say
is
that
you
didn't
and
you
didn't
consider
it
for
the
project
and
that
you
it
might
be
difficult
to
divide
that
up
in
the
future.
So
what
if
people
who
buy
in
this
property,
you
know
down
yet
down
the
road
as
solar
becomes
more,
hopefully
a
lot
more
on
every
building
in
our
city?
Will
there
be
ways
to
incorporate
it?
If
that's
what
the
residents
want
or
if
the
HOA
wants
I
would.
M
H
Okay,
I
want
to
thank
my
vice
chair
for
starting
the
meeting
without
me
and
for
carrying
on
and
I
apologize
for
being
late.
I
just
wanted
a
couple
two
cents
here
and
that
I'm
really
excited
for
home
ownership.
It's
one
of
the
things
that
we
lack
a
lot
of
the
opportunities
to
actually
have
home
ownership
within
our
downtown
and
in
our
city
we
have
seen
a
lot
of
rentals
go
up
and
I
think,
particularly
in
the
area
where
this
home
ownership
is
going
to
be.
H
It
will
really
help
stabilize
some
of
that
area
that
we're
really
trying
to
focus
on
and
and
create
a
space
for
everybody.
So
I'm,
looking
forward
to
this
I,
also
appreciate
that
this
is
a
loan
and
you're
gonna
pay
us
back
with
interest.
So
thanks
for
that
and
alright,
and
so
it
okay
I'm
gonna.
Let
Anna
do
this
and
then
we're
gonna
move
on,
because
we
have
a
really
full
agenda,
so
nope
you're
good,
but.
F
This
my
councilmembers
bring
a
good
point
and
what
what
is
it
going
to
take
if
you're
willing
to
be
our
poster
child
and
start
with
some
green
alternatives
or
additions
to
this
building
that
the
architect
could
revise
and
put,
and
then
we
can
actually
start
having
this
conversation
even
more?
What
we're
gonna
start
later
today,
regardless,
but
would
would
you
be
interested
in
being
our
poster
child,
the
one
that
spearheads
this
new
policy
for
buildings
in
Salt,
Lake
City,
that
are
funded
by
with
RDA
money?
M
Sure,
there's
something
we
can
do
just
in
the
effort
of
integrity.
I
wouldn't
want
to
commit
to
something
in
this
moment
right
now
that
I
couldn't
fully
realize
what
I
can
say
is
CW
urban
is
100%
committed
to
residents
downtown
and
if
you
know,
there's
directive
given
by
the
RDA
absolutely
we
should
be
our
first
call
on
how
we
can
incorporate
some
of
those
into
our
existing
buildings.
J
J
I
know
it's
disappointing
to
see
a
project
like
this,
get
to
this
point
without
having
incorporated
that,
but
we
as
an
agency
right
now,
are
structured
to
incentivize
projects
that
are
looking
to
do
it.
We
are
not
structured
to
require
it,
and
so,
if
that's
the
direction
we
want
to
proceed,
then
I
think
we
need
to
do
that
as
part
of
a
larger
policy
discussion
and.
H
I
want
to
touch
on
that
real
quick
is
that,
as
you
mentioned,
to
go
for
this
project
did
not
come
in
seeking
any
sort
of
write
down
or
any
sort
of
percentage
off
of
the
interest
interest
rate
loan
based
on
environmental
standards.
That
is
one
of
the
factors
that
we
often
times
as
an
RDA
will
give
that
point.
Five
percentage
right
down
for
this
project
did
not
come
in
asking
or
looking
for
that.
H
It
came
in
with
the
fact
that
it
was
an
economic
impact
in
that
we
were
putting
home
ownership
in
the
downtown
area
in
the
Pioneer
Park
area.
So
I
agree
with
your
sentiments
Danny
that
that's
a
that's
a
policy
discussion
that
should
happen
way
before
we
have
somebody
here,
we're
we're
looking
at
a
motion
to
approve
or
not
approve
the
loan
that
they
have
negotiated
and
worked
on
so
I'm
going
to
at
this
point,
ask
for
a
motion.
H
H
I
know
that
we
have,
because
of
me
having
to
run
out
real
quick,
switched
up
the
agenda
quite
a
bit.
We're
gonna
switch
it
up
again
and
go
to
the
Utah
theater,
because
I
know
that
there
are
people
here
waiting
and
we
can
go
to
the
framework
and
policy
later
that's
more
of
an
internal
discussion,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
I'm
also
respectful
of
the
time
of
people
who
are
here
to
hear
the
discussion
on
Utah
theater.
So
if
we
can
move
to
that
agenda
item,
please
okay,.
J
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Thank
you
board
members.
Tammy
comes
up
to
the
table.
I
will
just
tee
this
up
by
saying
that
our
last
update
to
the
board
I
was
in
September.
2018
you'll
recall
that
the
discussion
at
that
point
primarily
focused
on
the
option
at
the
time
of
preserving
the
theater
and
identifying
the
range
of
costs
necessary
to
both
preserve
the
elements
within
the
theater.
J
But
overall,
the
sentiment
was
that
the
amount
of
public
investment
that
would
be
needed
to
save
the
theater
made
this
arguably
cost
prohibitive,
and
so
we're
here
today
with
the
item
to
present
a
proposal
for
demolition
of
the
structure
while
preserving
elements
within
the
new
project
coming
from
the
theater,
as
well
as
what
additional
public
benefits
could
be
incorporated
in
the
project
moving
forward.
So
getting.
H
J
H
E
In
recognition
of
the
public
comment
that
we
received
today
and
some
of
the
feedback
I
think
probably
many
of
us
have
received,
as
this
conversation
has
been
coming
along
in
the
background
conversation
because
I
don't
think
even
Charlie
was
elected
after
this
was
acquired
and,
of
course,
we've
been
updated
along
the
way,
but
the
narrative
of
broken
promises
in
the
acquisition
process
or
any
of
the
feasibility
or
other
use
efforts
and
investigations
that
the
city
did
had
were
their
promises
made
or
something
along
those
lines
to
use
types
or
preservation
of
the
building.
And
what?
E
J
I
I
would
say:
I
was
not
here,
for
that
did
not
negotiate
that
acquisition.
So
I'm
not
going
to
speak
to
the
specifics
that
were
part
of
the
commitment
at
the
time,
other
than
to
say
that
it's
my
understanding
that
the
RDA
purchased
the
property
with
the
intent
to
explore
the
feasibility
of
preserving
the
theater.
That
was
what
the
original
intention
of
the
previous
owner
was.
That
was
our
interest
in
acquiring
the
property.
E
As
it
was
required,
acquired
prior
to
the
Eccles
and
I
know,
this
was
before
your
time
also
when
DJ
was
leading
the
RDA,
how
concurrent
or
their
discussions
about
where
the
theater
that
what
is
now
the
Eccles
theatre
would
go
and
obviously
there's
a
decision
made
to
not
put
it
at
the
Utah
theatre
site.
But
how
did
these
two
theater
house.
J
Understanding
it
was
on
a
permanent
preliminary
list
of
possible
sites
where
the
Broadway
theater
could
be
located,
and
it
was
eliminated
very
early
on
for
the
same
reason
that
the
Capitol
Theater
was
eliminated,
which
was
access
stage,
ability,
loading
and
unloading
and
so
I.
Don't
think
it
was
part
of
the
conversation
for
very
long
because
of
that
reason
that
it
is
landlocked
and
when
you
understand
the
echos
theater
in
the
load
in
and
load
out
for
Broadway
performances,
this
in
capital
theater
we're
never
going
to
meet
that
requirement.
A
J
That
was
the
basis
for
the
2014
study,
with
the
county
for
the
film
Center
and,
and
that
was
the
beginning
of
our
analysis,
of
what
the
significant
cost
would
be
of
just
preserving
the
theater
doing
the
seismic
upgrade
before
you
even
start
doing
any
improvements
for
the
end-user
itself,
so
that
was
determined
that
that
had
a
significant
cost
associated
with
it,
even
if
you're
just
doing
a
theater.
So.
J
That
was
in
the
ongoing
effort
to
reach
out
to
end-users
and
there's
a
lot
of
interest
in
the
building.
There's
a
lot
of
sentiment
to
save
the
building
in
the
history
as
people
come
in
and
understand
and
identify
the
costs
that
it
is
very
difficult
to
find
an
end
user.
Who
is
able
to
support
the
debt
service
associated
with
the
construction
costs
of
not
only
preserving
it
but
building
it
out
for
their
specific
use.
Q
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
so
I
was
around
in
2014.
I
didn't
know
that
the
RDA
did
work
extensively
for
or
with
the
Utah
Film
Center,
and
also
the
Utah
Film
Society,
and
in
looking
at
potentials
for
some
sort
of
partnership
with
either
of
them.
I
think
that
you
know
a
grand
theater
for
movies.
You
know
made
sense
to
me.
It
still
makes
sense.
Q
Q
That
was
that
was
my
hope
as
well,
that
you
know
we
would.
We
would
look
at
a
full
restoration
and
that
cost
continued
to
rise
and
every
partner
that
I
know
the
RTA
reached
out
to
the
city
reached
out
to
none
of
them
seemed
willing
or
able
to
come
up
with
the
kind
of
revenue
that
was
necessary
to
put
into
that
building.
I.
Q
Also
think
that
you
know
in
acknowledging
what
what
Pete
Ashdown
said
in
his
public
comments,
that
was,
you
know
the
original
site
of
the
Eccles
theatres
I
mean
now
that
was
the
that
was
the
discussion
about
you
know
and
Randy
horiuchi
and
I'm,
quoting
Randy.
Who
are
you
right
now
regularly
called
it
the
big-ass
theatre
that
he
wanted
to
see
downtown?
Q
It
was
in
that
building
that
I
mean
it
was
that
facility,
that's
what
that's
what
they
wanted
to
do,
for
whatever
reason
the
previous
administration
wanted
to
move
forward
with
something
across
the
street
that
did
take
down
two
historic
buildings,
one
of
which
was
in
pristine
condition
that
never
should
have
been
never
should
have
been
taken
down,
and
so
you
know
we
demolished
a
litter
legitimately,
not
that
this
isn't
legitimately
historic.
It
is
but
a
historic
building
that
didn't
need
as
much
work
or
any
work
over
doing
something
on
this
side
across
the
street.
Q
Q
Alright,
so
I
know
that
I
know
that
during
this
time,
I
have
looked
toward.
You
know
for
opportunities
as
a
board
member
to
to
preserve
this
building
that
I,
my
first
tour
I
fell
in
love
with
it.
This
is
where
I'm
pretty
sure
this
is
where
I
saw
Star
Wars
in
1977.
When
my
aunt
took
me,
I
was
four
years
old,
and
that
was
that
was
the
last
time.
You
know
that
so
I
I
have
very
fond
personal
memories
of
that
site,
and
it
was
really
excited.
Q
A
So
I'm
gonna
invite
you
to
be
really
candid,
because
my
first
choice,
I
mean
I,
would
love
to
have
like
a
premiere
movie
venue
downtown
as
well.
The
the
first
time
I,
remember,
going
to
a
big
theater
was
the
villa
which
is
now
a
rug
gallery
and
I'm
just
sad
that
we
don't
have
any
of
these
in
our
in
our
city,
and
so
what
would
it
take
to
other
than
just?
A
You
know
a
sixty
million
dollar
investment
to
make
this
a
workable
site
for
a
movie
theater,
and
you
can
also
talk
about
the
inside
because
right
now
it's
the
the
actual
theater
part
has
been
split
into
right
to
create
what
was
originally
one
theater
to
create
two
screens.
So
what
would
it?
What
would
it
take
to
do
that.
J
Aside
from
either
having
a
partner
who
has
somewhere
between
50
and
80
million
dollars
to
invest
in
a
project,
that
partner
would
also
need
to
be
an
end
user
that
is
willing
and
able
to
operate,
something
that
there
is
market
demand
for
and
so
I
think.
While
speaking
candidly,
it's
very
easy
to
speak
nostalgically
about
the
villa
and
historic
movie,
theaters
I
think
the
bottom
line
is
what
you're
seeing
with
the
market
and
megaplex
is.
Is
that
there's
not
a
demand
anymore
for
single
screen,
movie,
theaters
and
I?
J
Think
you
can
absolutely
look
to
see
if
there's
an
operator
who
could
do
that
as
part
of
a
larger
operations,
whether
it's
just
movie
or
whether
it's
concert
or
whether
it's
promoters,
but
typically
what
you
find
is
that
the
people
who
are
structured
to
be
that
operator
and
or
nonprofit
do
not
have
the
capacity
to
also
carry
60
plus
million
dollars
in
debt
service.
And
that's
before
you
even
get
to
the
other
issues
regarding
the
site
in
terms
of
parking
and
in
terms
of
what
we
would
be
doing.
J
Cannibalizing,
our
existing
theater
users,
downtown
when
you
think
of
Abravanel
and
Rose
Wagner
in
capital
and
Eccles,
there's
a
reason
that,
within
our
agreement
with
the
county,
we
call
out
any
future
efforts
by
the
agency
to
build
additional
theaters,
because
we
recognize
in
doing
Eccles
that
we
were
already
going
to
cannibalize
in
terms
of
our
entire
entertainment
venues.
And
this
is
a
problem.
J
For
this
reason
and
I
can
make
it
work
financially
with
absolutely
no
parking
and
do
it
in
a
way
that
is
not
going
to
cannibalize
your
other
investments
as
a
city
or
as
accounting
I
say
that,
because,
as
an
RDA,
we
have
invested
already
in
Abravanel
and
Rose
Wagner
and
we're
the
reason
capital
theatre
was
preserved.
So
we
have
identified
the
desire
and
the
need
to
have
these
uses
downtown
and
to
save
important
historic
structures,
and
this
is
one
that
I
think.
J
K
J
J
That
is
a
huge
range
and,
and
admittedly
we
recognize
that-
and
we
have
had
two
contractors
try
to
provide
some
clarity
on
what
that
range
really
is,
but
without
really
getting
in
there
and
and
taking
a
deep
dive
into
what
it
is
and
doing
that
as
it
relates
to
what
your
end
user
is
going
to
be
and
or
to
what
extent
you're
going
to
save
the
theater.
It
is
very
difficult
to
try
to
specify
that
more
than
that
broad
range
and
means
it.
J
O
Would
just
add
the
the
cost
ranges
that
are
in
the
staff
report,
which
go
from
43
million
up
to
70
million.
Do
not
currently
refer
at
reflect
the
construction
inflation
that
we
have
seen
in
the
market,
nor
the
25%
tariff
increase
on
steel,
so
that
range
is
likely
low
in
the
current
environment
as
well.
F
J
Say
that
in
my
two
years
with
the
agency,
we
have
not
reached
out
specifically
to
any
donors
and
that's
twofold
number,
one.
When
I
came
on,
we
were
just
finishing
up
Eccles
and
we
had
understood
that
we
had
really
tapped
into
that
market
very
hard
to
complete
Eccles,
and
our
priority
was
to
one
complete
that
project
and
to
actually
fulfill
those
obligations
that
we
just
signed
on
for
with
those
groups
and
number
two.
J
J
The
assumption
we
made
is
that
we
we
took
what
we
did
with
Eccles
and
what
our
level
of
success
with
that
was,
which
is
arguably
probably
one
of
the
largest
donor
efforts
to
date
for
a
downtown
project,
and-
and
we
took
that
in,
we
assumed
that
we
would
have
that
same
level.
And
so,
even
with
that
there
was
a
gap,
and
so
without
specifically
going
to
donors.
J
H
I'm
going
to
change
the
subject
a
little
bit
from
the
preservation
side.
We've
talked
a
lot
about
this
over
at
least
just
the
two
years
that
I've
been
here
and
I
kind
of
want
to
get
back
to
that
actual
proposal.
That's
before
us
and
because
I
will
have
some
other
policy
questions
when
we
kind
of
get
through
the
proposal
a
little
bit.
So
if
that's
okay
with
everybody
I'd
like
for
Tammy
to
continue
with
this,
but
this
proposal
presentation
sure.
C
So
the
RDA
and
the
LaSalle
group
and
Heinz
did
explore,
as
we
have
just
discussed,
preservation
options
for
the
theater
and
then,
after
we
presented
last
year
kind
of
turned
to
scenarios
on
what
a
new
project
could
look
like
on
the
site
that
reuses
theater
components,
but
that
redevelops
the
site
as
something
else.
And
so
that's
what
we
are
talking
about
today.
So
here's
a
site
map
of
the
Utah
theater
with
the
Kearns
building
to
the
north,
which
is
owned
by
Heinz
and
160
main
to
the
south,
which
is
owned
by
the
LaSalle
group.
C
As
you
can
tell
from
the
map,
the
theater
is
very
constrained
at
the
rear
of
the
building,
as
we've
spoken
about,
there's
limited
access
easement
to
the
site,
but
that's
about
it
and
we've
talked
about
these,
but
just
high
level.
The
redevelopment
barriers
that
we've
identified
are
the
historic
integrity.
C
Structural
modifications
to
the
interior
of
the
building
have
limited
the
theaters
eligibility
for
historic
designations.
We've
talked
about
the
rehabilitation
and
seismic
costs,
the
access
and
parking
and
the
lack
of
an
end
user.
So
in
thinking
through
what
a
new
development
could
look
like
on
the
site,
we
all
recognize
that
it
would
be
a
loss
to
lose
the
theater.
But
what
other
public
benefits
could
we
implement
within
a
new
project?
C
So
we
have
been
talking
with
Heinz
in
LaSalle
about
implementing,
affordable
housing
into
a
new
project
with
potentially
a
minimum
of
10%
of
the
residential
units
as
affordable
to
between
60
and
80
percent
ami
implementing
public
space
into
the
project.
We
talked
about
a
mid
block
walkway
that
would
have
a
public
easement
on
it,
potentially
additional
public
space
added
onto
the
project,
historic
repurposing
of
theater
elements
so
going
into
the
the
project.
C
Reusing
those
elements
that
really
make
the
theater
what
it
is
today
so
potentially
the
stained
glass
ceiling,
some
of
the
other
theater
elements
that
really
would
pay
homage
to
the
previous
use
of
the
site
and
then
Main
Street
activation,
really
putting
in
active
uses
along
Main,
Street,
retail,
commercial
on
the
main
floor,
and
then
the
residential
units
above
and
then
also
looking
at
opportunities
for
structured
parking,
which
potentially
could
be
shared
between
the
Kearns
building
and
the
new
project
on
the
Utah
Theater
site
and
then,
of
course,
implementing
public
art
upholding
the
RDAs
one
percent
for
art
policy
within
the
project.
C
So
next
steps,
if
the
board
wishes,
we
could
move
forward
with
identifying
a
final
purchase
price
for
the
property.
We
have
talked
with
Heinz
in
the
cell,
about
kind
of
quantifying
the
cost
of
public
benefits
that
will
be
implemented
in
the
site.
Looking
at
the
affordable
housing,
mid
block,
walkway
and
archival
and
repurposing
of
theater
elements
and
looking
at
what
that
would
quantify
in
terms
of
Al
and
write
down
potentially
and
bringing
that
back
to
the
board,
we
would
work
with
LaSalle
and
Heinz
to
refine
the
redevelopment
plan.
C
H
P
To
do
that,
and
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
come
and
speak
with
you
if
I
could
I
just
wanted
to
give
two
seconds
on
Heinz
and
Joel
I,
don't
know
if
that
makes
sense.
If
you
wanted
to
give
two
seconds
on
what
you're
doing
is
well,
but
Heinz
was
founded
in
1957
and
we're
an
international
development
firm.
We
have
a
presence
in
214
cities
in
24
countries
and
121
billion
dollars
of
assets
under
management.
P
We've
completed,
acquired
or
have
projects
underway.
Sorry,
47,
multifamily
projects
with
16,000
units
in
29
cities
around
the
u.s.
and
14
of
these
are
high-rise
projects
like
we're
proposing
here
today
and
I
will
just
say
at
the
outset.
Sustainability
is
a
huge
priority
for
us.
Everything
that
we
do
is
certified
at
some
level
either
Energy
Star
lead
we're
putting
a
use
in
our
current
building
right
now,
which
is
well
certified.
P
Some
of
you
may
know
about
that
as
well,
but
sustainability
is
a
huge
priority
for
us
and
would
be
a
part
of
this
project
as
well.
You'll
see
that,
with
some
of
the
open
space
we
show
you
and
then
just.
Lastly,
before
I
turn
over
to
Joel,
I
just
wanted
to
mention
what
we're
doing
at
the
Kearns
building
we've
owned,
the
Curran's
building
since
1988
and
I've
been
affiliated
with
it
for
the
last
15
years.
P
This
is
a
project
that's
near
and
dear
to
my
heart
and
we're
currently
investing
twenty
five
million
dollars
in
that
building
to
preserve
it.
So
when
it
comes
to
historic
preservation,
I
think
what
we're
doing
right
next
door
to
this
project
is
a
good
example
of
when
what
a
priority
it
is
to
hinds
when
it's
feasible
and
when
it's
done
correctly
it
we're
all
for
it
and
so
we're
putting
our
money
where
our
mouth
is
there
Joel
do
you
want
to
say
we're.
R
The
little
guys
on
the
block-
but
you
may
know
us-
we've
been
around
for
years
and
years
and
we're
pretty
low
profile,
but
we've
taken
an
interest
in
the
city.
For
years
in
restoration,
we
took
the
old
Wasatch
broiler
and
grill,
which
turned
into
faustina,
which
was
rebuilt
in
is
now
stanza.
We
took
the
old
antique
building
on
3rd,
south
and
third
east
and
which
is
now
current
fishing,
oyster
and
undercurrent.
These
are
thriving
businesses
now
and
the
buildings
are
beautiful
and
they
were
eyesores.
Cafe.
R
Niche
was
a
laundromat
that
was
dilapidated
and
I
think
vacant
for
several
years,
and
that's
now
cafe
niche
and
we
have
a
tenant
there.
That's
a
great
tenant
and
the
building's
beautiful
and
so
I
think
you
know
our
other
properties.
Oasis
cafe
is
another
gorgeous
building.
That
is
great
for
the
public.
We've
been
involved
with
the
city
and
each
mayoral
administration.
Mayoral
am
I,
saying
that
right
each
administration
in
support
of
the
city,
we
have
a
vested
interest.
R
We
were
the
very
first
people
to
fund
and
sponsor
green
with
rocky
Anderson
the
first
year
that
we
all
went
green
and
we're
highly
involved
in
a
lot
of
the
community
projects
and
I
think
this
is
another
project
that
I
was
the
biggest
proponent,
though
that
I'm
involved
in
theater.
That's
why
I
got
involved
in
the
whole
thing?
R
I
was
the
biggest
biggest
fan
and
I
had
major
major
ideas
of
what
could
be
done
with
that
building
and
we
just
have
seemed
for
five
years
to
run
into
roadblock
after
roadblock
with
company
after
company
and
and
it
does
come
down
mostly
to
finances
and
so
I'm
still.
My
heart
is
into
the
city
you've
seen
or
driven
by
or
been
in
our
restaurants.
We
have
other
real
estate
property
around
the
city
that
that
we
have
renovated
and
made
a
better
place,
and
really
that's
our
emphasis
here
is
we
want
to
continue
on.
R
This
is
such
a
big
project
that
we
had
to
have
a
partner
immediately
and
I
can't
say
enough
about
what
Hinds
has
done:
they're,
good
people
and
not
just
dusty
his
his
people
across
the
board.
If
you
saw
the
project,
I
just
went
and
visited
not
too
long
ago
in
San
Francisco,
it's
spectacular,
and
this
is
still
about
art.
R
The
theatre
was
a
part
of
it,
but
this
is
still
about
art
and
when
you
get
involved,
if
dusty
I
don't
know
if
there's
more
to
show,
but
the
public
space
that
has
been
provided
up,
this
alleyway
is
art
and
it's
something
it's
a
great
gathering
place
that
the
city
really
doesn't
have
right
now
and
so
give
it
your
consideration.
But
you
know
what
our
track
record
is
and
as
long
as
I'm
involved
I'll
make
art
a
huge
part
of
the
project.
R
R
P
Know
I'll
go
through
quickly
and
we
can
reverse
if
you'd
like,
if
I'm
going
too
fast
and
I
will
point
out
just
quickly
since
Joel
mentioned
it.
When
we
started
on
this
several
years
ago,
the
priority
was
really
twofold:
one
is
to
preserve
the
theater
and
I
can
tell
you
with
a
clear
conscious.
We
did
everything
in
our
power
to
preserve
that
theatre
in
terms
of
looking
at
end-users
and
and
costs,
and
all
that
stuff
we
did
everything
we
could
there
the
other
priority
to
activate
Main
Street,
and
so
you
can
see
this
rendering.
P
What
we're
showing
here
is
our
attempt
to
activate
Main
Street,
what
you're
looking
at
going
alongside
the
currents
building
the
existing
current
building
is
a
walkway
that
takes
you
back
into
the
middle
of
the
block,
and
this
walkway
is
a
terrace.
So
it
moves
you
up
as
you
move
back
and
it's
intended
to
be
landscaped
with
platforms,
people
get
any
lunch
or
congregate,
there
will
be
tables
and
things
that
people
that
will
help
people
to
congregate
there,
and
then
we've
got
some
retail
spaces
along
the
side.
We've
got
a
space
that
is
not
determined.
P
Yet
when
I
say
along
the
side
along
the
side
of
the
walkway
we've,
we've
talked
about
this
as
a
place
that
we
might
be
able
to
showcase
some
of
the
elements
that
we
preserve
from
the
theater.
That's
an
idea
and
then
moving
down
Main
Street.
This
would
be
retail
space
on
the
bottom
restaurant
space,
something
that
would
that
would
continue
to
activate
or
further
activate
Main
Street.
Above
on
the
second
level,
we've
got
20,000
feet
of
office
space
contemplated
there
and
that
office
space
could
be
some
other
use.
P
R
About
Pantages
restaurant
that
has
a
lot
of
the
elements
and
a
big
gathering
place.
This
is
becoming
Salt
Lake,
City's
kind
of
theatre
district,
so
we've
still
preserve
a
lot
of
that
history
and
give
homage
to
what
was
there
before
by
providing
a
much
needed,
in
my
opinion,
of
course,
I'm
in
the
restaurant
business
place
for
patrons
that
go
to
echoes
theater
before
and
after
and
gathering
places
for
families
that
give
homage
to
what
we're
trying
to
preserve
in
the
first
place
right.
Madam.
E
Think
I
can
say:
we've
had
several
conversations
about
how
do
we
get
more
balcony
activations
on
Main
Street
in
particular,
for
restaurants
or
bars?
Second-Story
activation,
so
I
brought
that
up
in
a
small
group
meeting
I
know
it.
I
know
this
is
a
rendering
and
at
some
point
it
becomes
too
late
in
the
design
process.
But
if
you
could
find
a
way
to
activate
that
second-story
balcony
space
I
think
eyes
on
the
street,
but
also
just
the
the
liveliness
of
it.
R
Was
characterized
earlier
as
a
preliminary
sketch
to
give
homage
to
these
guys?
They've
spent
hundreds
of
thousands
of
dollars,
and
this
is
a
fourth
or
fifth
generation.
It
isn't
a
sketch,
they've
they're
really
zeroing
in
on
it,
and
we
love
this
idea.
This
thought
I
I
want
you
to
keep
talking
so
that
you
pressure
it.
Q
Q
I,
fundamentally,
disagree
and
I
think
that
you
know
your
projects,
one
of
the
things
that
I
really
like
about
you
as
developers
is
your
projects
around
the
country.
You've
you've
been
able
to
incorporate
into
mix
and
to
show
that
that
works.
Part
of
that
is,
is
you
know,
looking
at
the
skyline,
you
know
we
now
have
another
office.
Building
that
or
another
you
know
that's
been
announced.
Just
a
couple
of
blocks
away
that
is
going
higher.
I
would
I
would
challenge
you
to
to
look
at
doing
something
that
is
going
to
be
iconic.
Q
That
is
going
to
help
that
is
going
to
dominate
so
that
when
people
look
at
the
Salt
Lake
City
skyline
and
they
see
your
project
they
can.
You
know
we
can
point
to
it
and
say
this
demo.
You
know
this
demonstrates
that
you
can
have
a
real
mixed-use
project
that
you
can
have
market
rate
units
working
to
you
know
where
people
living
together
with
units
that
are
that
are
much
more
affordable.
Q
There
are
incentives
that
you
are
gonna
be
getting
from
the
RDA.
That
is
something
that
that
I
would
really
challenge
you
to
make
this,
not
just
you
know,
incorporating
art
on
the
street,
but
this
is
I
mean
this.
This
is
part
of
the
theater
district,
but
I
think
the
entire
building
ought
to
be
viewed
as
art
and
I
want.
It.
Q
I
want
to
see
something:
that's
different
from
Salt
Lake
that
we
don't
have
that's
not
just
your
standard
building
the
the
high-rise
renderings
that
you've
that
you've
included
are
good,
they're,
they're
unique,
but
I
would
like
you
to
do
something
that
there
really
is
going
to
stand
out,
since
this
would
be
replacing
something
that
that
that
does
have
a
storied
history.
I
want
I,
want
you,
this
project
to
be
storied
as
well
and
I
want
it
to
be
I,
want
it
to
be
iconic,
so
I
that
I've
told
that's
something.
A
A
K
P
Okay,
so
the
open
space
you're
looking
at
on
this
rendering,
sits
on
top
of
the
parking
structure,
and
you
can
see
that
if
you
can,
if
you
can
recognize
the
Kearns
building
on
the
left,
our
proposed
project
is
on
the
right
and
so
directly
to
the
west
or
below.
The
current
building
is
the
current
current
parking
garage
and
it
has
about
70
stalls
in
it
and
so
that
what
we're
proposing
would
include
a
demolition
or
replacement
of
those
parking
stalls
and
then
to
the
right
is
obviously
the
property
behind
our
proposed
project.
K
H
One
of
the
things
I
sort
of
as
we're
kind
of
giving
some
feedback,
and
one
of
the
things
that
I
would
look
at
is
you
know
we
kind
of
talked
about
this.
They
may
include
preservation
as
a
public
benefit
versus
they
will
include,
and
so
I
think,
if
we
as
a
board,
decide
to
kind
of
give
that
go
ahead
of
what
Tammy
was
saying
of
moving
forward
and
kind
of
working
out.
Some
of
these
details
kind
of
want
to
make
sure
that's
defined
a
little
bit.
H
That's
the
lawyer
hat
in
me,
right
of
like
the
may
versus
the
will,
and
so,
but
it
is
important
as
you've
seen
to
the
board
into
the
public
that
we
we
do
really
try
to
preserve
and
I
appreciate
what
Joel
was
saying
about
the
buildings
that
you
have
preserved
and
I
appreciate
all
of
the
I've
been
in
the
curtains
building
after
its
renovation
and
appreciate
what
Hines
has
done
to
preserve
that
so
I
trust
that
there
will
be
those
elements.
It's
just
I
like
to
again.
J
What
are
some
of
the
additional
benefits
and/or
upgrades
to
that
that
we
like
to
see
and
that's
where
we
call
into
question
the
public
space
on
top
of
the
parking
structure.
To
what
extent
is
that
built
as
part
of
the
project
and
or
to
what
extent
could
we,
as
a
city
or
an
agency,
provide
additional
participation
to
take
that
not
just
from
a
resident
amenity
to
potentially
a
public
downtown
amenity?
To
what
extent
could
we
incorporate
additional
units
and/or?
J
So
that
would
be
the
next
piece
that
would
come
to
the
board,
because
all
of
that
would
have
to
meet
with
your
approval
as
far
as
what
the
agency
contribution
is,
and
so
that's
where
we
as
a
staff
working
with
Hines,
are
challenged
to
come
back
to
you.
We
appreciate
this
input
because
then
that
allows
us
to
identify
what
your
priorities
are
and
then
incorporate
those
with
Hines
and
dusty
will
tell
you
that
Tammy's
been
beating
them
up
on
it.
A
lot
so
board.
N
Yeah
often
gets
confused
a
lot
so
I
apologize.
Sorry,
chair
to
your
point,
Danny
I,
appreciate
that
I
think
that
I'd
like
to
see
a
lot
more
fleshed
out
and
what
we're
getting
for
affordability.
I
know.
We
had
some
discussion
and
one-on-one
about
that,
and
we
didn't
have
details
at
the
point
about
the
offsets
the
cost
offsets
for
doing
more
units
at
a
higher
rate,
fewer
units
for
a
lower.
What
what
threshold
can
we
do
down
here?
It's
pretty
rare
to
have
this.
The
second
piece
was
I
know.
N
N
I
know:
there's
a
pen
right
now,
there's
idea,
Pantages
signage
of
the
the
walkway
and
maybe
some
internal
things,
but
a
walk
by
I
can't
tell
anything
other
than
a
glass
two
and
a
half
story
facade
because
I'm
not
going
to
see
the
tower
from
there
and
I'm
struggling
with
that
piece
on
just
a
personal
walking
streets
level.
I
know
we
want
glass
to
engage
whatever
business
is
inside
what
the
outside
I
get
that
piece,
but
it
feels
very
sanitized
compared
to
what
we're
replacing
and
I'm
struggling
with
the
placemaking
piece
a
lot.
N
So
if
you
could
address
that
and
more,
it
may
be
difficult.
I'm,
not
sure
how
you
do
that
I'm,
a
social
worker
acting
as
a
city
councilman,
asking
I,
was
already
a
board
member
here
when
I
walk
into
that
building.
I
have
no
sense
of
that
history
period.
From
what
I'm
seeing
right
now
I
know
it's
initial
rough.
It
doesn't
give
me
a
place
and
it
doesn't
stand
out
from
not
from
the
tower
perspective.
I
give
the
tower
design
for
the
light,
and
all
that
that's
great,
but
from
a
tan,
Main
Street
activation
piece.
P
Fair
concern
and
we
welcome
that
feedback,
I
think
we've,
we've
we've
not
done
a
sufficient
job,
clearly
showing
to
you
the
vision
for
what
jewels
restaurant
may
become.
As
he
pointed
out,
I
think
the
idea
is
create
a
place
that
will
highlight
much
of
the
theaters
history
that
will
be
visible
through
the
glue
through
the
glass.
They
have
some
patio
space
there
on
the
street
front.
N
It'd
be
important
piece
for
me
as
a
board
member
to
I'm
talking
about
getting
rid
of
the
theater
for
a
lot
of
reasons.
We're
talking
about.
There's
gonna
have
to
be
some
more
details
to
really
help
that
public
process
and
discussing
it
and
board
member
mental
Health's
comment
about
that.
Third
level.
Terrace
completely
removes
to
the
street
piece,
so
I'm
struggling
with
that
and
making
sure
we
address
that
piece
them
Danny.
The
other
thing
we
talked
about
the
small
group
was
in
the
context
of
Main
Street
or
three
blocks
around
this
area.
J
N
F
Thank
you.
So
this
is
in
my
district,
so
I
appreciate.
That's
all
the
comments.
I
think
I
feel
the
same
way.
I
I
do
I
do
struggle
with
this
project.
As
you
know,
the
constituents
are
not
super
excited
about
losing
this
project.
I
mean
this
building
you're,
presenting
something
that
it's
reasonable
in
a
way,
but
I
think
it
is
in
district
4
we're
losing
a
lot
of
historic
buildings,
and
if
we're
gonna
end
up
losing
this
one,
it
has
to
be
more
iconic.
F
It
has
to
be
a
star
of
this
show
and
it
has
to
have
also
the
checklist
that
we
have
and
plus
more
of
wants
and
desires,
and
also,
and
also
the
money
that
we're
gonna
get
for
it
like
it
can't
just
it
feels
like
we
wanted
to
do
something
good
in
the
past
by
acquiring
this
property,
and
we
haven't
been
able
to
preserve
it.
So
now
we're
at
the
point
that
we
need
to
sell
it
because
it
doesn't
make
any
sense.
F
But
it's
that's
where
I
struggle
with
everybody
being
mad,
most
people
being
money
in
the
community
and
also
with
a
situation
that
we
have
that
it's
pretty
reasonable
and
it
could
happen
so
I
appreciate
all
my
on
my
and
the
board
members
comments.
I
want
to
see
more
next
meeting,
something
that
it's
that
seals
the
deal
for
me
because
right
now,
I'm
not
at
a
point
that
it's
self
yet.
Thank
you
remember.
Mendenhall
I
have.
E
I-I've
been,
as
you
know
here,
a
little
bit
longer,
not
as
long
as
Charley,
but
long
enough
that
we've
been
through
two
administrations
holding
this
property
and
a
lot
of
conversations
with
different
organizations
and
companies,
preservation,
Utah
philanthropic
opportunities
that
didn't
pan
out
and
I.
Don't
want
to
see
a
third
administration
sit
on
this
property.
The
theater
is
gone.
There
are
some
relics
of
the
theater,
but
I
fell
through
the
floor
when
I
went
in
to
tour
this
thing
up
to
my
hip,
but
there
is
an
audit
theater
there.
E
This
is
a
much
bigger
ask
if
we
were
to
say
we're
gonna,
we're
going
to
ask
a
non-profit
or
a
couple
nonprofits
to
help
us
raise
sixty
million
minimum
plus
be
able
to
operate
and
manage
the
investment
after
it's
made
and
I.
Don't
think!
That's
been
successful
for
us,
I
wanted
to
mention
after
councilmember
Johnston's
comments.
I
too,
want
to
see
I
with
on
all
of
the
the
investment
of
a
restaurant
there.
E
I
want
to
see
some
acknowledgment
of
that
history
that
isn't
going
to
turn
over
with
tenant
occupancy
in
the
retail
portion
and
I
would
I
would
refer
to
across
the
street
to
you
where
we
made
the
mid-block
entry,
but
really
on
Regent
Street
itself,
where
we
worked
hard
as
Redevelopment
Agency
to
integrate
the
history
of
Regent
Street
literally
into
the
new
Regent
Street.
So
you'll
see
all
different
types
and
materials
of
installation
giving
nod
to
the
newspaper
history
and
other
activities
that
happened
on
Regent
Street.
E
H
J
J
H
P
H
L
L
L
L
L
H
O
O
B
Well,
thank
you.
We're
here
today
asking
the
board
to
consider
a
resolution
to
adopt
what
we
refer
to
as
the
guiding
framework.
It's
a
strategic
document.
We
presented
it
to
the
board
in
some
small
group
meetings
in
the
spring
we
presented
to
our
advisory
committee
as
well
as
it
at
board
meeting
formally
in
May,
it's
presented
on
the
screen
up
there
I
believe
you
also
have
copies
in
your
packet.
B
B
There's
three
parts
to
it.
There's
a
new
mission
statement:
there's
some
value
statements
that
really
get
to
the
economic,
social
and
neighborhood
built
environment
impacts
of
our
work,
as
well
as
a
process
to
help
us
evaluate
projects
based
on
the
number
of
public
benefits.
They
create
happy
to
go
into
more
detail
if
you
feel
like
that's
necessary
or
we
can
take
some
questions.
I.
H
Just
want
to
say,
I
know
how
I've
said
it
every
single
time
that
you've
presented
this
court
I've
said
it
in
every
small
group
meeting
but
I
know
how
hurt
all
of
you
have
worked
on
this
framework.
I
know
that
you
have
taken
the
last
year
and
a
half
probably
to
really
listen
to
the
concerns
of
the
council,
to
create
a
formula
and
a
way
that
we
can,
by
which
all
of
us
can
under
which
I
guess
all
of
us
can
operate,
and
I
truly
appreciate
it.
A
H
H
A
Madam
chair,
we've
all
I,
think
had
the
opportunity
to
meet
with
our
DEA
staff
over
this
I
think
this
is
a
really
good
synthesis
of
information
and
decisions
and
sort
of
a
general
direction
that
our
DEA
is
already
on.
I
think
that
it's
it's
hard
to
take
all
of
that
and
and
boil
it
down
into
something
on
one
sheet,
but
I
think
that
that
that
that
our
sat
are
DEA.
A
H
You
and
I
just
want
to
say
I'll
get
to
you
board
member
Johnson
I,
agree,
100%,
board,
member
Wharton
and
and
that
this
I
view
this
as
sort
of
what
that
foundation
is,
that
we
get
to
work
off
of,
but
it's
sort
of
always
a
working
living
document
that
we
continue
and
you've.
We've
heard
it
from
different
board
members
of
what?
What
exactly?
How
exactly
do
we
define
sustainability,
for
example,
or
how
exactly
do
we
define
transit
opportunities?
H
What
does
that
look
like,
but
this
is
sort
of
again
that
floor
that
foundation
by
which
we
can
work
under
and
and
we're
still
building
on
it
right
and
and
we
needed
a
foundation
and
and
I
really
appreciate
getting
that
foundation
in
this
in
what
Chris
said,
was
a
very
synthetic
sort
of
way,
which
is
hard
to
deal
with
all
of
the
things
that
the
RDA
really
does,
and
so
I
I
love
it.
Thank
you.
Man
and
I
continue.
I,
look
forward
to
continuing
kind
of
talking
about
it.
Also
councilmember
Johnston
every
board
member
Johnston.
N
I
agree
all
support
this
I
I
do
want
to
hear
how
this
fits
into
it.
Actually,
the
preceding
step
about
how
do
we
determine
to
create
a
project
area
and
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
factors
in
that,
and
this
does
not
address
that
this
is
about
projects
within
existing
areas
right.
But
how
is
there
a
feedback
loop
that
this
plays
into
a
policy
about
how
we
create
that?
N
That's
a
board
level
decision,
I
guess
because
I
mean
that
may
be
a
part
of
working
with
other
taxing
entities
going
forward
when
they're
starting
to
evaluate
how
they
decide
if
they're
going
to
participate.
How
do
we
line
that?
So
we
are
better
able
to
communicate
with
them
their
interests
and
help
them
understand
why
we
would
choose
a
certain
area
for
or
the
size
of
an
area
or
what
to
include
an
area
so
that'll
be
a
future
discussion.
I
hope
become
a.
H
H
B
H
J
H
J
Needed
to
know
where
to
turn
and
to
look
for
to
come
up
and
join
me
so
as
Kara
is
coming
up
and
I
think
Ben
is
joining
us
as
well,
so
I'll
be
real,
quick
and
just
teeing
this
up.
This
is
a
conversation
and
a
project
that
has
come
before
the
board
over
the
last
few
years
and
in
multiple
pieces
with
regard
to
budget
items,
our
budget
amendment,
as
well
as
some
of
the
land
writedowns
that
we've
approved
for
properties.
J
J
So
really
what
we're
hoping
to
accomplish,
as
we
continue
to
move
this
project
forward,
is
to
identify
where
we
as
an
agency,
want
to
move
for
finalizing
our
current
and
existing
negotiations
with
property
owners,
as
well
as
how
we
potentially
want
to
look
at
marketing
properties
within
the
station
center
area.
So
I
think
Ben,
you're,
gonna,
quick.
O
J
O
Before
I
begin,
there
is
a
hard
copy
of
the
station
center
area
map
in
your
folders.
So
when
there's
references
to
specific
sites,
it's
easier
to
orient
the
station
center
project
is
envisioned
as
creating
three
new
public
streets.
These
are
Pierpont
Avenue,
Woodbine,
Court
and
Market
Street.
There
are
also
reconstructions
of
existing
streets
and
several
other
improvements
to
the
public
right-of-way
such
as
under
grounding
powerlines
utility
upgrades,
widening
sidewalks,
adding
trees,
landscaping,
lighting
and
other
pedestrian
amenities.
O
The
project
is
currently
at
a
70%
design
and
construction
could
begin
as
soon
as
I
guessed
of
next
year.
This
is
located
within
the
Depot
district
project
area,
which
expires
in
2023
on
the
big
screen.
You'll
see
a
summary
table
which
shows
all
of
the
board
approved
funding
for
this
project,
and
this
includes
a
mix
of
direct
investment
in
the
your
improvements,
as
well
as
development
incentives,
specifically
to
land
right
downs
that
the
board
authorized
in
March
of
last
year,
and
an
important
point
is
that
this
is
the
maximum
amount
that
the
board
authorized.
O
The
actual
amount
will
be
determined
based
on
the
final
costs
of
the
public
benefits,
so
those
amounts
could
be
less
in
the
final
accounting.
There
also
could
be
additional
requests
for
funding
related
to
station
center.
So
the
nineteen
point,
two
million
total-
could
include
additional
items
and
go
up.
O
The
last
item
is
maintenance.
The
board
is
expressed
an
interest
in
determining
maintenance
for
large
infrastructure
projects,
especially
ones
that
have
enhanced
amenities
above
what
is
typically
provided
on
a
city
street.
The
station
center
project
does
include
these
enhanced
amenities.
Attachment
C,
which
is
the
last
page
of
the
transmittal,
includes
a
breakdown
of
the
costs
for
these
enhanced
amenities.
O
It's
currently
about
three
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
dollars
ongoing
and
a
one-time
purchase
of
ninety
five
thousand
for
equipment,
the
administration's
recommending
a
Business,
Improvement,
District
or
B
ID,
and
we
noticed
that
the
existing
central
business
improvement
assessment,
which
funds
the
downtown
Alliance,
also
includes
these
two
blocks
of
Station
Center.
So
if
there
were
to
be
a
maintenance
district,
it
would
be
in
addition
to
that
area
that
funds,
the
downtown
Alliance.
B
O
S
So
with
that
framework,
we've
been
working
for
several
years
on
developing
the
design
of
the
infrastructure,
improvements
for
the
neighborhood,
and
this
list
here
kind
of
summarizes
what
this
improvements
are,
but
instead
of
reading
it
I
was
just
going
to
go
through
some
renderings
and
show
you
some
examples
of
what
the
improvements
are.
So
this
is
an
aerial
view
of
the
neighborhood
and
one
of
the
infrastructure
improvements
is
to
widen
the
sidewalks.
S
We
also
other
infrastructure
improvements
include
planting
street
trees
and
putting
in
landscaping
which
you
can
see
in
these
photos,
lighting
and
furnishings.
You
can
see
someone's
sitting
on
a
bench
here
next
to
the
planter
also
to
the
street
trees
and
then
rain,
gardens
and
pervious
pavers
were
included
in
the
design
to
take
advantage
of
capturing
some
of
the
storm
water
for
irrigation,
and
you
can
see
rain
gardens
in
this
image.
S
You
can
see
pervious
pavers
in
these
gray
bands
here,
where
the
trees
are
planted
and
this
trees
are
planted
in
a
tree
trench.
So
it's
not
just
a
tree
grate
like
we
have
in
a
lot
of
our
neighborhoods,
it's
a
long
trench,
that's
where
the
soil
supported
by
this
silver
cell
structure.
So
we
think
that
will
help
those
trees,
thrive.
H
Q
You,
madam
chair,
can
we
go
back
to
that
one?
So
this
is
something
I
would
love
to
see
incorporated
in
other
projects
around
the
city.
You
know,
I
know
that
we're
in
an
RDA
meeting,
but
with
other
projects
as
well,
I
think
I.
Think
it's
great.
My
only
concern
is
that
with
I
just
see
like
an
Incred
amount
of
maintenance
that
is
going
to
be
required
to
keep
it.
Q
Q
S
For
the
long
term
is
to
establish
a
Business
Improvement
District
for
the
neighborhood,
that
would
that
would
provide
the
maintenance
funding,
so
it
would
be
set
up
like
a
special
assessment
area
and
the
the
budgets
that
we've
worked
with
both
parks
and
with
facilities
to
try
to
get
some
estimates
of
what
you
annual
meetings
would
cost
and
the
estimates
range
from
320
to
400
thousand
dollars
a
year.
They
would
definitely
want
me
to
emphasize
that
those
were
estimates
sure.
H
S
H
H
O
H
S
Have
in
fact,
in
2014
I
think
it
was
when
we
sold
the
beehive
brick
building
to
art
space.
The
idea,
then,
was
to
establish
an
owners
association,
but
it
was
also
to
do
maintenance
on
these
improvements,
and
so
that's
probably
where
that
conversation
started.
But
since
then,
in
our
discussions
with
property
owners
that
have
come
and
spoken
to
us
we've,
let
them
know
that
this
is
something
we
intend
to
do
to
make
sure
that
the
neighborhood
could
be
maintained
at
a
higher
level
than
just
bass.
City
services,
I
think.
J
We're
proposing,
but
I
think
that's
important,
because
that
was
the
intention
of
this
discussion
was
to
see
if
the
board
supports
this
as
a
model
for
this
project
to
pay
for
the
maintenance.
And
if
so,
then
we
would
want
to
start
that
process
and
have
that
in
place
prior
to
disposing
of
the
properties.
So
it
is
locked
in
and
people
are
buying
it
with
the
full
knowledge
that
they
are
getting.
That
double
assessment
have.
H
N
S
See
so
on
3rd
South,
that
is
true.
There
is
no
dedicated
bike
lane,
because
for
a
couple
reasons,
that
is
what
we
are
proposing
to
be
the
festival
street
and
as
a
curbless
Street,
and
so
we
and
we
imagine
that
it
will
have
the
feel
of
a
plaza
and
traffic
will
be
moving
very
slowly
on
it,
and
so
it
is.
S
There
are
sidewalks
for
pedestrians,
but
we
imagine
that
bikes
will
be
using
that
roadway
and
the
reason
we
didn't
another
reason
we
didn't
establish
bike
lanes
on
that
road
is
because,
if
it's
closed
off
for
festivals,
we
don't
want
that
to
be
the
primary
bike
way
through
the
neighborhood.
So
so
Market
Street,
which
is
this
street
farther
south,
is
planned
to
have
a
dedicated
bike
lane
and
so
I
don't
know
about
pierpon.
Actually,
I
did
have
to
go
back
and
look
at
that
design
at.
N
G's
Aska
I
didn't
see
a
Market
Street
Street,
rendering
in
the
the
packet.
So
when
I
looked
at
it,
I
saw
one
lane
of
traffic
and
I
get
the
festival
street
needs,
but
I
also
saw
a
water
tray.
Well,
I
see
linear,
scoring
right
off
the
side
of
the
shoulder
of
these
roads
and
then
a
water
tray.
That's
sort
of
an
a
depression
of
some
depth,
I
camera
out
deep.
It
is
right.
N
How
do
we
coexist
within
small
spaces
like
this
they're
meant
to
be
multi-use
without
the
scooters
wrecking
in
the
water
trays
when
they
jump
trying
to
get
to
the
curb
or,
though
about
very
wide
sidewalk,
that's
very
enticing
for
everyone
other
than
the
cars,
even
the
bicycles,
to
sort
of
bypass
the
cars
and
hit
that
sidewalk
I.
Don't
have
the
answer,
but
I
wonder
if
we
could
talk
through
that,
a
little
more
perhaps
in
this
design,
phase
get
a
sense
of
how
we
would
mana
model
this.
S
Yeah
I
think
that's
a
great
idea
and
we
have
coordinated
with
the
transportation
division
throughout
the
process
and
really
the
the
most
concrete
decision
that
we
came
to
is
establishing
Market
Street
as
the
established
bike
path
to
connect
to
3rd
south
on
the
other
side
of
the
Rio
Grande
Depot.
And
the
idea
was
for
it
to
come
along
the
south
side
of
the
archives.
Building.
S
H
A
So
I
am
I
I
kind
of
share
that
can
they
concern
to
you
about
having
another
area
with
SSAS
or
Business
Improvement
Districts
so
and
I
think
that
you
sort
of
ask
this.
But
what
are
the
change?
What
differences
are
being
made
now
that
are
different
than
what
we
were
doing
with
ninth?
Did
you
already
answer
that
are.
A
J
J
Obviously,
the
question
and
concerns
of
what
other
property
owners
on
the
blocks
would
be
concerned
with
in
terms
of
having
that
double
assessment,
but
with
central
9th
or
we
are
coming
in
after
the
fact
of
already
presenting
the
design
and
speaking
to
the
ability
to
construct
it
and
are
now
proposing
to
do
the
sa
a
that's
more
challenging
than
coming
in
today,
with
Station
Center
and
putting
that
assessment
and
before
we
even
sell
the
property.
Okay
and
what.
A
J
A
J
A
S
A
J
J
I
would
say
that
as
a
relation
infrastructure
for
the
public
market
to
the
extent
that
you're
talking
the
streets
and
the
utilities,
obviously
it
directly
supports
development
of
that
property
as
it
relates
to
Pierpont
on
the
north
end.
This
19
million
does
not
include
that
portion
of
Pierpont.
That
would
be
anticipated
to
be
provided
as
part
of
that
development,
possibly
through
an
additional
land
right
down.
But
there
is
nothing
in
these
funds
that
directly
provide
for
the
construction
of
the
public
market
building.
So.
K
K
J
And
I
would
say
in
response
to
that
that
just
looking
at
the
number
to
make
sure
I
get
it
right.
The
only
item
here
that
could
conceivably
provide
a
direct
benefit
to
the
public
market
would
be
how
these
shared
parking
may
or
may
not
be
built
out
for
that
block,
and
so
that
could
be
something
that
arguably
could
be
done
as
part
of
the
block,
all
users
that
benefit
from
it,
and
so
that
may
be
something
that
provides
a
direct
dollar
benefit
to
all
of
the
properties.
J
K
H
S
S
Are
looking
for
direction
on
the
maintenance
funding
strategy?
If
that's
an
acceptable
approach
to
the
board,
then
our
next
step
would
be
to
work
with
a
consultant
to
try
to
evaluate
different
assessment
methods
and
look
probably
get
additional
cost
estimates
for
the
maintenance
get
those
to
be
more
nailed
down
and
then
we'll
have
an
idea
of
really
what
the
assessment
area
would
look
like
what
the
impact
would
be
to
each
property
and
we'll
know
better
how
to
move
forward.
So.
K
I'm
sure,
in
addition
to
that,
I
think
that
it's
worth
a
discussion
that
we
shouldn't
have
to
put
this
on
our
TA
staff
to
go
out
and
do
maybe
we
look
at
a
consultant
in
doing
this
process,
because
I,
don't
I,
don't
want
to
overload
the
staff
and
going
out
and
doing
si
si
a
or
a
bid,
and
that
way
it
to
me.
It
takes
clouded
doubt
out
of
everything
and
you
get
a
contractor
in
there
to
do
it
and
your
consultant
to
do
it
and.
B
B
Is
that
there's
no
one
department
that
is
sort
of
perfectly
suited
to
managing
the
si
process
once
it
gets
once
you
have
estimates
in
terms
of
setting
up
all
the
noticing,
you
know
making
sure
the
public
hearings
get
set,
managing
the
sort
of
public
information,
there's
a
lot
of
public
information
that
needs
to
be
shared
and
there's
no
sort
of
one
perfect
place
for
it
to
live
and
I.
Think
that's
where
your
idea
was
coming
from.
If
I'm
recalling
our
conversation
correctly
as
a
consultant
separately,
the
task
to
manage
that
kind
of
process
can.
H
H
H
Isn't
anyone
really?
That's,
not
your
job
is
to
go
out
and
convince
people
to
get
involved
in
this
SAA
idea,
yours
that
you're,
you
know,
and
so
maybe
there's
somebody
out
there
that
does
this
and
we
can
do
put
that
onus
on
them.
So
I
think
there's
sort
of
two
straw
polls
there
does
that
make
sense?
H
Q
H
First
rule
was
oh,
that
we
have
this
deaf
move
forward
and
with
the
consultant
on
doing
the
evaluation
for
the
what
the
essay
would
look
like.
Basically,
all
those
in
favor
thumbs
up
great
there
you
go
and
then
I
think
the
second
shovel
was
come
back
to
us
when
we're
back
to
that
that,
after
that
process
and
we're
getting
ready
for
that
public
input
process,
all
those
in
favor
great
their
direction.
We
did
it
great.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
all
right.
H
H
I
This
is,
as
you
mentioned,
the
NOFA
for
2019,
the
RDA
Finance
Committee
evaluated
12
applications
to
submit
that
were
submitted
for
these
funds.
There
was
a
total
of
ten
point:
seven
million
in
incentives
available.
This
included
both
citywide
funding
for
6.2
million
and
projects
and
high
opportunity
census
tracts
for
4.5
million
the
objective
that
meant
well.
There
are
two
objectives
for
today:
I
think
one
is
that
the
board
acts
on
the
tier
1
funding
during
today's
meeting
to
allow
these
projects
to
list
this
kind
of
support
in
their
lytec
applications
in
October
of
this
year.
H
I
interrupt
you
real,
quick,
Alison,
I
think
just
so
Lehman's
real,
quick
layman's
terms
on
this.
The
resolution
is
for
the
6
million.
We
can
have
a
policy
discussion
on
the
4.5
million.
Sorry
Alison,
but
we've
been
sort
of
using
these
sort
of
short
terms
and
I.
Think
if
we
kind
of
boil
it
down
to
our
short
terms,
we
can
focus
everyone,
and
so
the
the
six
million
and
like
Alison,
mentioned
the
reason
we
need.
The
resolution
is
because
these
developers
need
to
get
that
in
for
their
tax
funding
stuff,
whatever,
like
whatever.
I
H
I
before
you
take
it
away,
can
I
just
have
the
board
I'm
gonna
gonna
again
try
to
focus
us.
Can
we
split
this
into
those
two
different
things?
So
if
we
can
focus
the
first
one
on
the
six
million
that
that
discussion
on
the
six
million?
So
if
you
start
talking
about
the
four
and
a
half
five
point,
the
four
point:
five
million
I'm
going
to
interrupt
you
and
tell
you
to
be
quiet
till
we
get
to
the
next
item.
H
I
I
H
L
Good
afternoon,
so
I'll
just
give
a
quick
overview
of
kind
of
the
process
that
we
went
through
to
to
get
to
this
point,
and
as
Alison
mentioned,
there
was
a
total
of
ten
point,
seven
million
six
point,
two
that
was
available
for
citywide,
affordable
housing
and
then
the
four
point:
five
that
we
will
not
talk
about
right
now
in
terms
of
the
application
process,
it
was
a
competitive
application
process
and
applications
were
released
on
June
24th.
It
was
also
posted
on
the
Utah
procurement
website,
so
we
had
email
blasts.
L
This
next
map
shows
kind
of
the
location
you
can
see,
the
yellow
of
where
all
the
application
and
all
the
projects
for
the
applications
are
located.
This
also
shows
the
higher
opportunity
areas.
The
the
high
opportunities
are
in
the
darker
blues,
and
then
the
lighter
blue
does
show
the
moderate
opportunity
just
for
context.
C
Great
and
as
Alison
mentioned,
we
did
take
all
12
applications
to
the
RDA
Finance
Committee,
the
RTA
Finance
Committee,
considered
the
funding
priorities
that
were
adopted
by
the
RDA
board
in
the
NOFA
policy.
I
believe
that
policy
was
adopted
in
June
of
2018,
so
there's
a
series
of
funding
priorities
that
the
board
included
in
that
policy,
and
we
have
a
discussion
in
the
packet
about
how
each
project
met
those
priorities.
C
But,
in
addition
to
the
priorities,
the
Finance
Committee
also
looked
at
project
readiness,
completeness
and
quality
of
the
application,
financial
need,
project,
viability
and
overall
impact
on
the
community,
and
they,
the
committee
decided
to
rank
their
recommendations
in
order
of
priority.
The
Tier
one
recommendation
is
for
just
over
six
point,
1
million,
and
that
would
allocate
all
of
the
citywide
funds
that
are
available
right
now.
They
did
continue
to
rank
projects.
So
there's
a
Tier
two
recommendation.
C
If
additional
funding
becomes
available,
for
example,
if
you
did
choose
to
reallocate
some
of
the
4.5
or
if
one
of
the
tier
1
projects
didn't
end
up
being
a
viable
project,
it
would
just
bump
down
into
order
of
priority
recommended
by
the
Finance
Committee.
So
looking
at
Tier
one
recommendations,
the
top
project
that
was
recommended
for
funding
as
Central
Station
apartments
by
Gardner
bat,
this
one's
a
549
West
200
south,
and
this
project
is
kind
of
floated
to
the
top
and
priority
of
timeliness.
C
C
This
is
actually
a
rehab
preservation
project
on
block
67
by
Hampsten,
develop
development
partners
and
in
the
NOFA
policy
resolution
you
do
prioritize
new
units
and
mixed
income
projects
higher
in
priority,
but
RDA
staff
and
the
RDA
Finance
Committee
felt
that
this
project
does
bring
value
in
that
it
will
preserve
and
actually
extend
another
50
year.
Affordability
period.
C
For
these
units
and
that's
important
as
the
block
67
development
happens,
this
project
would
net
80
well,
there's
80
existing
units
of
affordable
housing,
so
all
of
those
units
would
be
preserved
as
affordable
and
all
80
units
are
at
60%.
Ami
am
below
the
third
project
in
priority
is
SPARC.
This
is
Bryn
Shore
development.
This
is
one
of
the
RDA
led
projects
on
north
temple.
C
The
RTA
Finance
Committee
did
recommend
this
project
for
funding
for
third
place
just
below
the
requested
amount
of
4.1
for
five
million.
The
committee
recommended
three
million
nine
hundred
and
fifty
six
thousand
just
because,
in
speaking
with
the
developer,
there
was
a
little
bit
more
room
to
defer
the
developer
fee.
So
that's
why
that
recommendations
a
little
bit
different
than
the
funding
request
and
the
final
project
that
was
recommended
for
funding
in
the
tier
one
category
is
Liberty
Wells.
This
is
an
application
from
Community
Development
Corporation
of
Utah.
C
So
those
four
recommendations
would
take
up,
like
I,
said
the
the
majority
of
the
balance
of
the
citywide
housing
funds
and
then,
if
there
are
additional
funds
available,
I
won't
go
through
these
in
detail,
but
there's
City
Plaza,
which
is
the
joint
application
between
the
two
housing
authorities,
the
county
in
the
city
that
we
had
some
public
comment
on
at
the
beginning
of
the
project
that
would
assist
with
the
rehab
of
the
units
in
that
development,
which
are
299
units.
So
that
is
a
great
project
as
well.
C
The
other
two
that
were
recommended
in
the
tier
2,
our
station
Center,
a
project
by
Wasat,
residential
and
another
project.
It's
a
site
acquisition
request
from
Community
Development
Corporation
of
Utah,
and
then
there
were
I
won't
go
into
the
not
recommended,
but
there
are
additional
projects
that
weren't
recommended
for
funding.
I
do
want
to
say
that
all
of
the
applications
we
received
her
great
projects.
N
C
N
C
N
C
N
I'm
trying
to
ask
if
another
entity
came
forward
with
similar
requests,
doing
a
way
to
evaluate
whether
we
would
fund
that
versus
could
we're
funding
150,000
over
we're
out
of
another
part
of
that
tier,
but
how
many
prioritize
that
over
somebody
else
say
Lauren
the
list
who
wanted
a
similar
kind
of
request
do
have
anything
like
that
in
our
policies
or
how
you
go
side,
your
procedures,
I.
Don't.
J
Think
we
necessarily
have
anything
in
the
policy
as
much
as
I
think
that
was
recognition
of
a
project
that
is
proceeding,
that's
what
they
need
in
order
to
continue
to
proceed,
and
candidly
speaking,
it
was
also
a
function
of
a
balance
of
funds
available
after
we
funded
the
first
three
projects,
and
that
was
a
way
to
kind
of
give
that
to
a
project
that
that's
all
they
needed.
It
allowed
them
to
keep
moving
forward
rather
than
provide
10%.
N
N
C
The
no
foot
policy
was
drafted
so
that
the
use
of
funds
can
be
very
flexible,
so
anything
from
pre
development
to
site
acquisition
to
construction
financing.
That
being
said,
timeliness
is
also
one
of
the
funding
priorities
that
you
adopted
within
the
policy,
so
the
Finance
Committee
took
that
into
consideration
when
funding
projects
they
kind
of
prioritize
the
more
shovel-ready
projects
over
like
site
acquisition
loans,
but,
as
Danny
said,
this
was
kind
of
a
balance
of
funds
and
with
is
it's
still
a
good
and
viable
project.
So,
okay.
F
H
K
Madam
chair
I
have
a
resolution
here:
approving
citywide,
affordable
housing
project
funding
allocations,
I'm
of
the
board,
adopt
the
resolution
to
approve
the
citywide,
affordable
housing
project.
Funding
allocations
is
recommended
by
the
RDA
Finance
Committee
and
RDA
staff
if
additional
funding
becomes
available
either
through
the
identification
of
additional
funds
or
if
one
of
the
tier
1
projects
does
not
result
in
a
viable
loan.
The
Committee
recommends
that
the
funding
be
allocated
to
the
tier
2
projects
in
order
of
priority
ranking
I.
H
Have
a
motion
by
board
member
Rodgers
a
second
by
board
member
Luke,
any
further
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
aye
any
opposed
there.
You
go.
Let's
get
some
money
out
there.
Now
we
are
going
to
turn
to
the
discussion
on
the
policy
discussion
on
the
tiered
what
is
deemed
as
the
tier
2.
H
That's
the
4.5
million
dollars
that
has
been
set
aside
for
high
opportunity
areas
and
just
like
just
some
background
for
so
everyone
knows,
since
no
at
all
that
we
went
through
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
wrong
Tammy,
we
went
through
a
couple
of
rounds
and
didn't
receive
any
applications.
We
kind
of
came
back.
H
C
Yeah
actually,
just
yesterday,
we
received
an
application
for
a
high
opportunity,
site
acquisition
loan
and
that
application
is
for
1.8
million.
So,
as
Tracy
said
at
the
top
of
her
presentation,
the
high
opportunity
NOFA
was
left
open
on
an
open-ended
basis
until
further
notice,
so
the
citywide
had
a
deadline
of
August
16th,
but
we've
been
actively
trying
to
solicit
application
for
the
high
opportunity
area.
So
we
do
have
an
application
and
that
will
be
vetted
through
the
typical
process.
So
it
will
go
to
the
RTA,
Finance
Committee
and
then
come
back
to
the
board.
Okay,.
H
E
H
E
I
appreciate
the
options:
a
B,
C
and
D
that
are
on
the
policy
or
on
the
under
the
policy.
Questions
on
page
2
of
our
packet
and
I
would
propose
that
we
attach
ideas,
B
and
C,
with
our
da
taking
a
more
active
and
direct
approach
to
promoting
and
also
the
idea
of
promoting
development
on
city-owned
properties
or
in
conjunction
with
city-owned
properties,
and
then
item
C
is
around
engaging
developers
in
those
areas
by
working
with
building
services,
to
look
at
what
else
is
in
the
pipeline
that
wasn't
considered
for
affordability.
Q
Okay,
so
the
the
concern
that
I
had
the
only
concern
that
I
have
is
I
know
that
you
know
we
have
money
for
million
dollars
that
we
have
not
been
able
to
spend
because
there
has
not
been
interest
or
not
interest,
but
we
haven't
seen
any
action
coming
up.
I
think
that
one
of
the
one
of
the
discussion
items
that
we've
spent
quite
a
bit
of
time
on
when
we
set
these
parameters
was
ensuring
that
we
have
options
for
affordable
housing
citywide
so
that
we're
not
just
focusing
on
specific
areas.
Q
I
worry
that
if
we,
if
we
open
this
up
too
soon
and
I,
know
that
we've
gone
through
two
funding
cycles,
we're
noting
where
we
have
not
seen
any
applications,
but
the
reality
is.
Is
we
don't
see
many
opportunities
for
affordable
housing
on
the
on
the
east
side
and
by
the
east
side?
I'm,
not
just
talking
about
district
6
I'm.
Talking
about
you,
know
the
east
side,
everything
from
about
seventh
east
east,
so
I,
don't
want
it.
I
don't
want
to.
You
know
completely
tap
that
out
to
potentially
lose
opportunities.
Q
Should
something
come
available.
I
know
that
you
know.
That's
one
of
the
things
that
word
we're
constantly
looking
at
different
options
for
property
that
the
city
could
acquire
for
housing,
and
so
I
would
hate
to
to
spend
this
in
an
area
that
doesn't
fit
with
what
we
had
already
spent
a
long
time
talking
about
and
missing
out
on
that
opportunity.
Q
Understanding,
though,
that
when
we
have
four
million
dollars-
and
you
know
in
the
account
and
we're
not
seeing
as
much
affordable
housing
come
in
that
we're
going
to
be
criticized
for
it,
I
think
that
is
something
that
we
all
are
gonna
have
to
figure
out
and
do
we
do
we?
What
is
more
important
right
now?
Do
we
want
to
to
focus
on
on
the
broader
distribution
of
affordable
housing
citywide,
or
do
we
want
to
MIT?
Do
we
want
to
rush
and
and
put
housing
where,
where
we
have
opportunities?
N
A
struggle
taking
the
first
option
off
the
table
only
because
of
one
particular
expert
location,
frankly
in
sugarhouse
that
based
on
census,
tracts
and
other
changing
demographics,
they're
happening
there
so
rapidly.
Right
now,
it's
surrounded
by
modern
opportunity
areas,
it's
sort
of
a
donut
hole,
but
city-owned
property.
We
have
there,
which
is
rare.
We
have
money
in
a
place.
That's
probably
going
to
end
up
being
a
high
opportunity
zone
with
really
quickly.
N
That's
the
only
reason
that
look
at
a
as
one
of
the
options
I
agree
with
board
member
minute
how
about
the
second
to
needing
perhaps
I,
seen
the
RDA
staff.
If
there's
more
aggressive
ways
to
go
about
this
I'm,
not
sure
there
are
or
not,
but
that
would
be
mildly
concerned
about
not
having
the
first
a
as
well
as
options.
E
E
Encouraging
to
hear
that
an
application
has
come
through
I,
look
forward
to
seeing
if
it
continues
in
the
process
and
where
it's
at
and
what
its
proposing
so
I'm
not
ready
to
keep
to
put
this
money
out
there
so
that
we
can
keep
having
West
in
the
address
of
the
money
or
loaning
out
so
I'm
ready
to
make
a
straw
poll.
If
Madame
chair
is
ready,
I.
B
H
Q
Q
So
if
you
want
me
to
make
a
motion
I'm
happy
to
do
it,
but
what
what
I
want
to
do
quickly,
though,
is
say
that
for
the
council
work
session
we
do
have.
We
only
have
one
item
on
the
agenda,
but
it
is
an
important
item
that
we've
been
waiting
on
for
a
long
time.
So
I
would
just
encourage
everybody
once
we
reopen
this
item
to
be
quick
and
concise
and
and
and
then
we
can
move
forward.
Q
A
E
H
E
Sorry
that
I
wasn't
in
the
room
when
this
came
up
and
I
will
try
to
be
swift,
but
because
what
I
want
to
propose
is
a
change
to
the
mission
of
the
Redevelopment
Agency
I
didn't
want
to
have
it
go
off
to
staff
to
start
working
on
things
and
then
propose
a
change
later
on.
So
what
I
want
to
propose
is
an
echo
of
conversation
we
had
today
and
conversations
we've
been
having
for
some
time
and
it's
an
insertion
of
environmental
sustainability
into
the
mission
of
the
RDA.
E
Environmental
sustainability,
I
proposed
commercial
vitality
and
public
spaces
and
I
make
that
proposal,
because
our
financing
tools
that
we
have,
particularly
through
the
RDA
in
acknowledging
that
buildings
are
about
to
outpace
vehicles
as
the
number
one
source
of
emissions
are
the
greatest
tool.
I
think
Salt
Lake
City
has
in
destroying
that
the
buildings
were
supporting
the
new,
the
future
of
Salt
Lake
City's
buildings
are
at
least
considering
environmental
improvements,
now
the
one
other
spot
just
below
that
on
the
community.
E
Oh
I'm,
looking
sorry
I'm
on
the
on
the
staff
report,
page
too,
but
there's
the
three
core
values
of
economic
growth,
Community,
Impact
and
neighborhood
vibrancy
I
would
also
submit
that
we
insert
environmental
sustainability
into
the
community
impact
value
to
say
we
prioritize
projects
and
programs
that
demonstrate
commitment
to
improving
equity,
environmental
sustainability
and
quality
of
life
for
residents
and
businesses
in
Salt,
Lake
City.
That's
my
proposal
and.
H
J
What
I
was
just
asking
Court
is:
does
it
really
make
sense
other
than
just
being
repetitive,
to
have
it
in
both
places,
and
so
that
was
kind
of
I
think
what
board
member
Mendenhall
was
implying
of
looking
at
the
specific
wordsmithing
of
either
the
placement
within
the
sentence
and/or,
whether
it's
necessary
to
have
it
in
both
the
mission
statement,
as
well
as
the
value
in
goals
and
I
think
we
can
certainly
look
at
that
and,
as
so
far
as
a
word,
smithing
component,
but
Accord,
unless
you
have
anything
to
add
to
that.
So.
B
The
that's
a
loud
mic,
so
the
the
notion
of
sustainability
comes
in
under
the
neighborhood
vibrancy
category
and
I
understand.
There
are
some
overlap.
There's
some
overlap
here.
One
of
the
benchmarks
that
we
would
utilize
in
evaluating
neighborhood
vibrancy
would
be
sustainability,
so
if,
if
I
were
putting
it
somewhere
and
I
like
the
language,
I
think
I
would
put
it
under
the
neighborhood
and
vibrancy,
and
maybe
it
replaces
the
word
sustainable.
F
K
I
guess
my
question
is:
is
it
just
having
it
in
the
document
itself
and
then
coming
back
and
saying
from
the
RDA
standpoint?
What
is
it
that
we're
looking
at
to
really
promote
sustainability
from
this
aspect
of
the
RDA?
Does
that
mean
that
we
are
going
to
require
solar?
Does
that
mean
we're
going
to
require
I
mean
that's
for
me,
that's
what
we're
going
to
come
back
to?
Are
we
going
to
require
something
above
and
beyond
what
the
International
Building
Code
currently
represents
I
think.
J
I
think
that's
a
good
question,
because
I
think
the
issue
we've
struggled
with
or
have
tried
to
address
with
this
mission
statement
is
really
the
separation
of
powers
in
terms
of
what
is
it
that
we
are
here
in
front
of
the
board
to
discuss
as
your
priorities
for
our
mission
statement
and
the
values
and
then
one
of
the
pieces
that
we
take
from
this
and
that
we
have
to
implement
and
create
a
system
for
from
the
administrative
side
of
running
our
programs,
and
so
from
that
standpoint.
I
think.
J
The
reason
that
this
absolutely
helps
us
from
staff
is
hearing
from
the
board
that
you
do
prioritize.
This
is
something
you
want
to
specifically
call
out
both
in
the
mission
statement
and
those
values,
and
so
that
allows
us
as
staff
when
we're
sitting
down
with
developers
we're
looking
to
do
projects.
We
can
absolutely
point
to
that.
In
our
conversations
and
in
our
negotiation
saying,
this
is
a
priority
that
the
board
has
identified.
J
Think
to
your
point
in
terms
of
the
building
code,
that
we
need
to
find
the
balance
between
that
of
what
we
are
requiring
within
the
building
code.
The
city
priorities
are
within
our
own
sustainability
department
and
how
we
are
applying
this
equally
across
all
departments
across
all
projects
and
across
all
city
incentives.
So
that
would
be
my
request
to
staff
that
this
is
not
something
that
we're
looking
at
just
the
RDA
of
solving
as
much
as
this
is
a
larger
policy
conversation
that
happens
both
between
the
board
and
the
City
Council
and
the
administration
of.
H
Ahna,
okay,
so
there
was
something
new
said:
Danny
that
resonates
with
me
a
lot,
and
that
is
that
I.
This
is
a
very
in
my
opinion
and,
as
we
talked
about
earlier
sort
of
the
foundation
that
we
want
to
go
by
and
and
I
obviously
care
about
sustainability,
I'm,
not
very
good,
and
this
again
is
sort
of
the
lawyer
in
me-
I'm
not
very
good
at
just
saying,
let's
wordsmith
this
today
and
so
I
would
move.
H
Then
I'm
making
I
can't
make
it
motion,
but
no
probably
not
I,
then
if
we
are
go,
if
the
board
wants
to
add
sustainability
to
the
mission.
I,
don't
support
for
passing
that
today
and
would
support
putting
this
on
another
agenda
item
so
that
we
can
actually
get
the
language
that
makes
the
most
sense
and
is
correct,
and
so
that's
where
I'm
at
I'm.
H
It's
again,
it's
the
lawyer
and
me
making
sure
that
this
something
that
I
think
we
hope
lasts
for
a
very
long
time
and
is
a
foundation
for
a
long
time
that
has
been
worked
on
for
a
very
long
time
needs
to
be
done
correctly
and
and
any
wording.
We
want
that
to
really
accept
and
be
a
part
of
those
values
so
based
on
us
reopening
this
I
would
not
be
in
support
of
passing
a
resolution
tonight,
I'm
just
letting
never.
N
A
I'll
support
that
as
well.
I
just
want
to
say
too,
though
Erin,
you
missed
my
good
speech,
but
it
was
I
just
hope
that
we
can
add
this
and
sort
of
that.
This
won't
kind
of
derail
and
reopen
like
a
whole,
long,
prolonged
discussion,
because
I
do
think
that
this
is
even
with
the
addition
is
in
line
with
with
what
we
the
direction
that
we're
already
headed
and
is
in
line
with
a
lot
of
the
values.
A
B
J
Q
Q
H
F
H
Adding
sustainability
I
think
everybody
wants
to
add
sustainability
for
me,
I
I
want
to
make
sure
we're
doing
it
with
the
words
that
make
sense
in
how
we
can
move
forward
with
this
and
what
it
means.
So
I
want
to
give
the
staff
the
time
that
they
need
to
add
that
that
in
there
that's
my
hesitation,
Mike.
F
Is
Mike
is
Mike
hesitation
on
the
sustainability
word
here
at
the
neighborhood
bright
vibrancy
is
sustainable,
sustainable.
It
could
be
economic
place
to
stay
I'm
in
you
can
mean
a
lot
of
things,
but
adding
environmental
sustainability.
To
this.
It's
pretty
specific
in
my
mind.
That's
why
I'm
I
will
be
okay
to
have
this
right
now.
I.
E
H
M
H
N
Material
other
words,
you
make
a
motion.
We
make
a
motion
I'll
make
a
motion
to
take
board
member
Mendenhall
statement
as
a
starting
point
for
insertion
in
to
the
staff
and
also
perhaps
asked
to
clarify,
within
the
livability
benchmarks,
descriptions
on
a
sustainability
to
flush
that
out
in
line
with
environmental
sustainability
that
that's
where
we
define
it
in
here,
which
probably
isn't
specific
enough
in
some
ways,
just
to
make
sure
they're
coherent
with
each
other
and
we're
not
at
odds
at
all.
Can.
J
N
Values
but
then
the
literally
benchmarks
also
have
all
the
benchmarks
and
the
descriptions
next
to
them.
That
might
be
helpful
to
make
sure
those
align
with
anything
you
put
into
the
mission
statement
and
the
values
that
make
sense
the
specific
wording,
because
right
now,
sustainability
is
the
word
we're
using.
If
we
change
that
to
say
environmental
sustainability
or
something
else
make
sure
it
reflects
it
in
there
as
well,
can.
A
I
make
a
friendly
amendment,
you
said:
can
we
use
what
counts?
Remember
Mendenhall
suggests
as
a
starting
off
point
I.
Can
we
just
use
that
language
and
you
come
back?
If
there's
a
concern,
you
can
tell
us
about
the
concern,
but
we
come
back
with
the
expectation
that
we're
going
to
vote
with
that
language.
Sure.
Thank
you.
J
Yes,
just
real
quickly
wanted
to
speak.
To
last
week,
the
RDA
assisted
the
Arts
Council,
with
hosting
a
walking
tour
of
neighborhood
artwork
within
the
North
Temple
project
area
primarily
included
our
public
art
on
North
temple
under
the
freeway
viaduct,
but
it
was
a
event
that
also
guided
leadership
and
staff
through
additional
art
pieces
gallery,
mural
sculptural
pieces
within
the
neighborhood.
J
J
So
the
artist
Ned
Kahn
is
working
and
we'll
be
installing
that
piece
on
the
north
side
of
the
Walker
Center
parking
garage
over
the
next
five
ish
weeks,
depending
on
the
difficulty
of
that.
But
we
are
trying
to
target
a
late
October
date
for
some
kind
of
community
celebration
and
unveiling
of
that.
So
we
will
be
keeping
you
updated
on
that.
So
you
have
that
date
and
can
attend
other
than
that.
Unless
there
are
questions,
that's
our
reports.