►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
There
isn't
any
location,
an
anchor
location
that
is,
in
our
opinion,
safe
enough,
given
all
of
the
health
matters
and
wanting
to
keep
our
public
safe,
where
people
could
attend,
so
we're
going
to
keep
doing
this
remotely
until
we
all
figure
this
out
and
as
always,
while
we
are
conducting
our
meetings
electronically,
and
it
is,
although,
after
nine
months
of
doing
this,
it
seems
a
little
bit
more
familiar.
B
It's
not
quite
the
same
as
all
of
us
being
in
the
same
room,
but
that
certainly
does
not
mean
that
this
is
not
an
open
and
public
meeting
and
we
want
everyone
in
the
public
who
may
be
watching
to
consider.
Looking
at
our
our
agenda
page,
our
youtube,
slc,
tv
or
facebook
live
to
be
a
part
of
our
meetings.
We
are
glad
to
have
you
here
with
us
and
hope
that
you
and
yours
are
all
staying
safe.
B
I
do
want
to
remind
everyone
that
you
can.
You
can
mail
us
written
comments?
They
can
be
submitted
to
the
rda
offices
at
p.o
box,
145
455
here
in
salt
lake
city
at
841111.
B
Your
comments
can
be
about
any
rda
business
or
if
you
have
feedback
that
you'd
like
to
give
us
regarding
today's
meeting,
please
feel
free
to
contact
us.
Of
course
you
can
also
email,
our
council
staff
or
email
any
one
of
us
board
members.
If
you
would
like,
if
you're
not
aware
of
how
our
electronic
process
goes,
then
I
will
go
ahead
and
explain
it.
B
Our
meeting
host
will
identify
the
callers
if
there
are
any
callers
for
our
comments
in
the
order
that
they
have
arrived,
he
will
state
the
name
of
the
first
person
to
comment
followed
by
the
next
commenter,
who
can
then
prepare
to
speak
when
the
meeting
host
unmutes
your
line
and
lets
you
know
it's
your
turn.
Please
state
your
name
indicate
the
topic
you
are
speaking
on
and
the
two
minute
timer
will
begin
at
the
two
minute
mark.
We
will
announce
time
and
your
microphone
will
be
muted
since
we're
connecting
electronically.
B
There
may
be
some
delay
between
people's
comments
and
discussion
items
more
so
than
usual.
Rda
meetings
have
guidelines
to
make
sure
people
feel
comfortable
and
safe
to
participate
in
our
new
way
of
conducting
the
public's
business.
Giving
these
unusual
circumstances
to
help
facilitate
our
comment
period.
Please
be
respectful.
Please
avoid
yelling,
making
racial
slurs
upset
obscene
or
defamatory
remarks.
We
want
everybody
in
this
public
and
open
meeting
to
feel
welcome
to
give
their
opinion
to
the
board
members.
That's
what
we're
here
for
and
with
that.
A
Give
me
one
moment
we
had
somebody
just
sign
in
here
at
the
last.
Second,
I'm
just
checking
to
see
what
they
are
here
to
speak
to.
B
Sweet
we,
I
think
we
had
to
be
done
by
3
30.
It
looks
like
we
might
be
so
our
next
item
in
business
is
public
hearing.
We
don't
have
any
public
hearing
so
we'll
move
on
to
our
rda
business
item
number
one
is
approval
of
the
minutes
from
july
14,
2020
and
september
29th
2020.
I
would
look
for
a
motion.
B
A
A
B
C
Good
afternoon,
thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
We
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
be
here.
It
does
feel
a
little
weird
since
we
skipped
last
month.
So
hopefully
you
don't
get
used
to
that
kind
of
break
from
us
and
we
we
anticipate
we'll,
keep
moving
forward,
so
don't
get
too
comfortable.
C
This
first
item
we
have
for
you
today
is
an
update
to
our
real
real
property
disposition
policy.
I'm
going
to
turn
the
time
over
to
court
utley
our
senior
project
manager,
who
will
go
through
what
those
proposed
revisions
are
to
the
policy
and
together
we'll
be
able
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
have.
F
Sounds
good
thanks,
danny
yeah,
the
the
board
adopted
a
land
use
disposition
policy
in
2016.
F
and
it
controls
how
the
agency
disposes
of
property
and
applies
to
all
rda
owned
parcels,
and
what
we
had
hoped
to
do
today
was
really
just
talk
about
a
couple
of
proposed
revisions.
There
there's
no
action
to
be
taken
today.
It's
just
a
briefing,
but
the
two
items
that
we
wanted
to
discuss.
Potential
changes
were,
firstly
to
authorize
long-term
ground
leases
as
a
form
of
land
disposition.
F
That's
not
something
that's
currently
outlined
in
the
in
the
current
policy,
and
it
would
give
us
a
certain
amount
of
flexibility
if
we
could
contemplate
that
as
we
were
structuring
real
estate
transactions,
the
other
item
would
be
to
just
really
clarify
or
or
double
down
on
the
language
and
the
policy
regarding
the
price
of
rda
lands
when
we
exclusively
negotiate
so
no
proposed
change
there
as
much
as
just
clarifying
language
in
the
policy.
F
Regarding
that
item,
as
you
know,
the
acquisition
and
disposition
of
property
is
really
one
of
our
primary
tools
as
a
redevelopment
agency,
and
it
does
give
us
a
fair
amount
of
control
and
therefore
is
one
of
our
more
valuable
tools.
We
can
control
the
location
of
a
project
we
can
control
when
it's
constructed.
We
can
control
the
use
of
the
building,
specific
design
parameters
to
me,
place,
making
objectives,
and
it's
very
important
for
us
as
we
implement
our
mission
values
and
revitalizing
neighborhoods.
F
The
majority
of
our
transactions
are
done
through
for
sale
transactions,
where
we
transfer
title
of
property
in
exchange
for
a
fee
of
closing.
But
what
we're
proposing
is
to
add
ground
leases
to
that.
So
ground
leases
are
very
common
in
the
real
estate
industry,
particularly
with
very
high
value
properties
like
in
a
central
business
district,
for
example,
and
they're,
typically
very
long
term
in
nature,
like
50
to
up
to
99
years
and
essentially
what
they
do
is.
F
The
rda
would
continue
to
control
the
land
upon
which
a
developer
would
come
in
and
own
and
construct
a
property,
a
redevelopment
project
and
the
developer
would
still
be
responsible
for
the
construction,
the
financing,
the
repairs,
the
renovations,
the
taxes,
the
insurance,
just
as
if
they
owned
the
property,
but
we
would,
as
an
agency,
receive
an
ongoing
revenue
stream
there.
F
I
think,
there's
two
important
factors
here.
One
would
be
that
it
would
allow
us,
as
an
agency,
to
see
the
long-term
value
increase
of
our
properties,
because
we
would
continue
to
own
them
and
it
would
allow
our
private
sector
partners
to
develop
a
project
on
rda
property.
Without
the
upfront
cost
of
acquisition.
F
We
would
handle
the
redevelopment
process
similar
to
a
for
sale
transaction.
We
would
still,
you
know,
contemplate
a
particular
property
that
that
was
timely
for
redevelopment.
F
We
would
categorize
it
as
tier
one
or
tier
two
as
it's
identified
in
the
existing
policy,
and
we
would
report
that
to
the
board
accordingly
market,
the
property,
just
as
we
would
before
sale,
transaction
and,
of
course,
follow.
What's
called
the
sales
price
protocol
that's
identified
in
the
in
the
existing
policy?
F
So
that's
what
we
would
like
to
do
with
regard
to
long-term
ground
leases
and
the
other
potential
revision
to
the
policy
would
have
to
do
with
exclusive
negotiations
and
really
what
we're
trying
to
do
there
again,
not
a
change
to
the
policy,
but
really
just
clarifying
that
when
we
exclusively
negotiate
dispositions.
F
F
So
those
are
the
two
proposed
revisions.
They
are
shown
in
red
line
format
as
an
exhibit
to
the
administrative
transmittal
which
is
in
your
packet,
and
I
would
certainly
be
interested
in
discussing
this
further
with
you
now
and
if
you
have
any
questions.
G
I,
like
this
court
and
danny.
I
appreciate
it
the
long-term
lease.
My
question
is
for
developers
that
come
to
work
with
the
rda
when
they
come
a
lot
of
the
times
a
lot
of
their
performa
or
their
borrowing
capacity
is
used
against
the
property
itself.
So,
on
a
long
term
lease.
How
do
you
see
that
helping
or
hindering
a
developer?
That's
the
first
question,
and
secondly,
do
you
see
the
long-term
lease
the
rda
doubling
down
and
having
to
do
more
in
investment
for
this
type
of
a
lease
agreement?.
F
Well,
it
certainly
hurt
helps
the
developer,
our
private
sector
partners,
as
they're
financially
structuring
a
project.
I
think
that's
the
point
you're
making,
because
the
that
large
upfront
sum
of
money
wouldn't
be
required.
You
know
there,
but
instead
an
ongoing
payment,
so
I
think
it
creates
greater
flexibility.
F
I
don't
think
it
means
we
would
do
all
of
our
transactions
as
ground
thesis,
but
it's
something
to
kind
of
consider
as
we
as
we
structure
them,
and
it
would
also
be
something
we
would
consider
as
we
structure
any
kind
of
agency
incentive
or
agency
participation
in
the
project
and
then
to
your
second
question,
remind
me
what
that
was.
Would
it
affect
how
what
would
be
required
of
them?
Is
that
the
I?
I
don't
think
so?
F
I
mean
I
think,
we're
always
striving
to
get
the
best
we
can
out
of
projects
and
ultimately,
that
comes
down
to
money
right,
whether
that's
you
know
mid-block
walkways
or
in
the
instance
of
the
the
255
south
state
street
project,
we're
going
to
hear
about
today,
affordable
housing.
F
So
I
I
don't
think
it
would
necessarily
change
the
what
we
might
require
of
them
in
terms
of
the
actual
bill
project.
Maybe
we
could
get
more.
I
don't
know
I'd
be
interested
in
danny's
perspective
on
that.
C
I
would
agree
with
that
and
director
rogers.
I
think
that's
a
good
point,
because,
while
we're
talking
about
long-term
ground
leases,
just
as
it
relates
to
changes
in
our
policy,
I
think
you
bring
up
an
interesting
option
that
it
also
provides
us
potentially
the
opportunity
to
do
more
of
a
partnership
with
the
developer.
C
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
So
my
recollection
on
the
disposition
of
adjacent
property
was
that
we
were
going
to
make
a
change,
not
a
clarification
based
on
sort
of
what
a
lot
of
public
comment
that
we
heard
based
on
the
utah
theater,
that
if
it
was
of
a
certain
size
or
or
something
like
that,
if
it
was
like
bigger
than
the
the
adjacent
property
was
bigger
than
the
principal
property
that
we
would
open
it
up
for
an
rfp.
D
Is
that
what
are
your
thoughts
or
what?
What
happened
to
that
discussion?
Is
that
still
this?
Doesn't
this
wouldn't
do
that.
C
No
it
what
we
propose
right
now
does
not
alter
anything
with
regard
to
that,
and
the
reason
for
that
is
and
analysing,
can
jump
in
here
and
and
provide
some
additional
insight,
as
we
work
with
the
attorney's
office
to
to
look
at
the
policy
and
look
at
it
in
the
terms
of
the
the
public
comments
and
what
some
of
the
the
comments
and
questions
were
from
the
board
of
directors.
At
the
time
we
went
through
and
determined
that
the
policy
pretty
much
already
provides
for
the
opportunity
to
do
that.
C
As
court
mentioned
that
anytime,
we
would
exclusively
negotiate.
We
still
have
to
identify
a
property
as
a
tier
one
or
tier
two.
We
are
now
proposing
to
clarify
that
the
board
obviously
has
any
right
as
far
as
approving
any
right
down
and
then
within
the
clarifying
of
the
property
and
its
size
and
and
whether
it's
tier
one
or
tier
two
we
do
within
the
policy
right
now
have
to
bring
that
to
the
board
for
approval
prior
to
entering
into
that
disposition.
C
The
issues
as
we
looked
at
them
with
relation
to
utah
theater
is
the
board,
and
the
administration
made
a
lot
of
the
approvals
on
those
agreements
to
exclusively
negotiate
prior
to
the
creation
of
this
policy.
So
this
policy
now
provides
for
what
we
think
the
board
and
the
the
community
wanted
to
have
those
checks
and
balances.
C
But
we
we
were
down
the
path
on
utah
theater
prior
to
this
policy
being
adopted
by
the
board.
So
I
would
invite
allison
to
fill
any
gaps
or
provide
any
additional
information
if
I've
missed
it,
but.
A
Yeah
thanks
danny
sorry,
I'm
not
gonna.
This
is
allison
from
the
city
attorney's
office.
My
internet
is
slow,
so
I
won't
turn
on
my
camera.
A
The
only
clarification
that
I
think
is
worth
making
is
just
a
dovetail
off
of
what
danny
just
said
about
how
the
utah
theater
that
that
negotiation
happened
before
the
disposition
policy
was
in
place,
and
so,
if
the
negotiation
had
happened
with
this
disposition
policy
in
place,
then
the
decision
would
have
come
before
board
for
approval
because
because
it
would
fall
under
the
disposition
price
protocol
that
the
sale
is
would
have
been
reduced
more
than
10
percent.
D
Okay,
well
like
what
we
heard
from
the
community
was
that
that
there
was
like
never
an
option
for
well.
D
I
understand
that
there
were
negotiations,
that
you
know
with
potential
non-profits
and
things
like
that,
but
that
there
was
no
like
open
bidding
or
whatever,
and
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that
if
this
that
this
clarification
would
address
that,
even
if
it
isn't
so
so
you're
saying
this
would
address
it
as
long
as
it
was,
we
were
asking
for
a
more
of
a
more
10
or
more
mark
down
from
the
market
rate.
Is
that
correct.
A
Yeah,
that's
right
and
so
sorry
danny
you
can
jump
into.
But
if
the
property
is
discounted
more
than
10
it
would
come
to
the
board
for
approval
of
that
discount,
and
so
there
would
be
that
open
discussion.
D
Okay,
but
that's
still,
I'm
still,
I'm
sorry,
I'm
still
having
a
hard
time
understanding
how
that's
different,
because
we,
because
we
as
an
rda
board,
did
write
down
the
we.
We
did
approve
the
write
down
for
the
utah
theater.
So
if
you
have
a
situation
where
we're
looking
to
just
to
dispose
of
an
adjacent
property
and
the
adjacent
property
is
larger
than
the
principal
property,
and
that
was
what
we
had
talked
about
and
the
size
of
those
like
triggering
the
difference.
D
C
B
Danny
is
it
I'm
looking
at
the
the
proposed
resolution-
and
I
guess
it
looks
to
me
like
the
only
ways
that
an
exclusive
negotiation
can
even
be
triggered
is
if
it
falls
in
line
with
one
of
these
six
trigger
points.
If
you
will-
and
this
was
I'm
getting
a
thumbs
up
from
court,
which
always
makes
me
happy
so-
and
this
was
not
the
policy
before
utah
theater
was
negotiated.
Correct.
E
Yeah
thanks
chair
fowler
in
the
in
this
case,
where
there
is
exclusive
negotiation
and
bay
agency
is
coming
to
board
for
approval.
Does
the
public
have
a
chance
to
provide
input
on
that,
or
is
that
something
that's
done
in
a
closed
session
where
the
public
wouldn't
even
know
about
it?.
E
Yeah
the
decision
to
exclusively
negotiate
with
an
adjacent
property
owner
is
there
any
chance
for
the
public
to
say
we
really
care
about
this
property
and
we
want
something
different
to
happen
to
it
or
that
that's
not.
That
goes
within
a
closed
session,
because
it's
disposition
of
real
property.
C
B
B
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
to
danny
and
court
for
looking
at
this.
I
think
in
looking
at
at
the
redlined
version.
It
really
is
addressing
some
of
the
concerns
we
had
and
I
appreciate
the
long-term
lease
I
think
that's
a
definite
asset
for
us
as
an
rda
and
as
a
city
as
well.
So
thanks
everyone,
and
can
my
r
allison
give
us
next
steps
on
this?
What
is
what's
our
timeline
here.
B
I
mean
I
mean
our
staff
this
one
right
here,
steph
I
mean
you
allison.
H
Dang
because,
unfortunately,
I
am
not
involved
in
the
real
disposition,
the
real
property
disposition.
Oh,
I
think
no,
I'm
I'm
working
on
the
next
issue.
I
Maybe
tuesday
I
could
chime
in
with
just
a
little
bit.
I
know
I
think
that
that
there
wasn't
necessarily
an
urgency,
there's
not
a
specific
item
that
is
in
front
of
the
rda
staff
to
be
for
you
guys
to
need
to
adopt
this
tonight.
But
if
you
feel
comfortable
adopting
it
tonight,
then
you
could
or
if
board
members
need
more
time.
Then
I
think
that's
fine
too,
but
maybe
danny.
B
I
would
like
to
get
this
a
version
of
this
adopted
in
off
the
plates
and
into
working
progress
as
an
actual
policy
before
the
end
of
the
year.
So
I
don't
know
how
board
members
are
feeling
about
taking
action
today
or
if
we
could
would
want
to
put
it
on
next
month's
agenda
for
action.
In
case
board,
members
want
to
reach
out
to
to
danny
in
court
on
a
couple
of
the
third
things,
any
opinions
from
board
members.
There.
D
A
B
B
Awesome
next,
our
next
agenda
item
is
the
brinshore
development
at
255,
south
state
street.
It
I'm
looking
at
my
name's
agenda
and
it
looks
like
half
of
danny's
staff
is,
is
here
for
this
presentation,
so
I'm
just
going
to
turn
it
over
to
allison
and
danny,
and
let
you
guys
let
us
know
who's
next
after
that
great.
H
Thanks,
madam
chair
I'll,
start
out
with
just
a
brief
introduction,
because
I
think
this
is
a
this-
is
a
loan
modification
for
bridger
at
that
for
branch.
Our
development
at
255,
south
state
I'll,
see
if
I
can
get
that
out
of
my
mouth.
There
are
a
lot
of
moving
parts
in
this.
So
I'll
give
you
a
very
general
overview
and
then
I
think
the
rda
staff
is
better
able
to
get
into
details.
H
Now
brynn
short
is
requesting
an
additional
amount
of
rda
support,
1.15
million-
and
this
is
part
of
the
developers,
broader
strategy,
to
cover
what
has
turned
out
to
be
some
large
increases
in
project
costs.
The
total
number
of
new
units
would
remain
the
same
at
190,
but
168.
H
Actually,
a
larger
number
of
units
would
be
affordable
to
give
you
some
information
on
the
the
loan
itself.
It
would
be
classified
as
emergency
gap
funding
and
drawn
from
the
central
business
district
project
area
commercial
development
fund.
I
believe
that
is
a
mouthful,
and
this
would
be
in
addition
to
the
previously
approved
13.4
million
dollars
of
board
support
of
rda
support,
which
includes
three
elements.
H
One
is
a
five
million
dollar
rda,
seller's
note
and
danny
and
court
can
can
scold
me
further
for
this
mistake
if
necessary,
but
that
is
an
rda
seller's
note
not
a
write
down.
I
apologize.
That
was
a
mistake,
just
an
oversight
in
the
staff
report,
so
that
is
a
seller's
note.
In
other
words,
it
will
be
paid
back,
there's
also
a
two
million
dollar
loan
that
came
from
the
notice
of
funding,
availability,
the
nofa
and
then
a
6.4
million
dollar
loan
from
the
rda
revolving
loan
fund.
H
B
Before
we
turn
it
over
sorry,
I
did
notice,
as
I
kind
of
scanned
all
of
the
panelists,
that
david
and
whitney
from
brinshore
are
here
with
us,
and
I
wanted
to
welcome
them
and
to
thank
them
for
taking
time
out
to
join
us
today.
For
this-
and
I
mean
I
gush
over
this
project
and
all
of
the
hard
work
that
both
david
and
whitney
put
into
their
community
outreach
in
this
in
this
particular
project.
So
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
for
being
here.
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
thank
you
allison.
I
won't
spend
a
lot
of
time
because
I'm
gonna,
I
think,
it'd
be
better
served
to
jump
in
with
the
court's
description
and
then
mountain
chairs
indicated
the
developers
were
here
to
do
a
quick
presentation
as
well
and
yes,
you
are
right.
We've
kind
of
taken
the
election
night
coverage
approach
for
this
item
where
we
figured
we
would
just
stock
the
table
with
as
many
experts
and
analysts
as
possible.
So
we
didn't
want
to
just
have
one
attorney.
C
We
figured
three
would
be
better
and
couple
staff
members
thrown
in
and
the
developers.
So
we
are
certainly
here
to
answer
any
questions
and
with
that
I'll
turn
it
over
to
court
and
just
touch
on
a
few
of
the
other
high
level
items,
and
then
I
think
we'll
get
to
the
developers
to
to
provide
some
background
on
on
how
we
got
here
and
and
what
the
request
is.
So
thank
you
again
in
court.
It's
your
show.
F
Thank
you,
madam
chairs,
as
alison
was
just
mentioning
it's.
The
board
did
approve
the
the
financing
packaging
for
brynshore
in
july
of
I'll
I'll,
say
that,
since
that
time,
broomshore
has
been
very
busy
kind
of
putting
this
project
together.
F
F
The
they've
also
been
putting
together
their
all
their
financing
for
the
project
and
and
interviewing
contractors,
and
that
kind
of
work
there's
still
a
funding
gap,
and
that's
why
we're
here
today
and
that's
due
partly
to
we-
have
a
more
refined
picture
of
what
the
project
has
been
designed
to
be
now.
The
rda
did
ask
a
lot
of
brynshore
as
a
developer.
Here,
there's
a
very
broad
mix
of
affordable
units
in
this
project,
all
the
way
down
to
20
ami.
F
There
is
a
mid-block
walkway.
There
is
rehabilitation
of
the
kramer
house,
which
is
a
a
brick
two-story
structure.
That's
listed
on
the
national
historic
register,
that's
located
on
the
back
or
the
eastern
end
of
the
property.
So,
anyway,
the
a
lot
asked
of
brinshore
and
they
they've
designed
the
project.
There
has
been
some
impacts
due
to
the
pandemic.
F
F
We
would
like
to
close
and
get
a
project
underway
and
built
on
this
project
on
this
property,
so
brynshore's
they've
gone
out,
they've
secured
a
bunch
of
additional
financing,
they've
cut
some
costs
where
it's
been
feasible
and
they've
nearly
doubled
their
contribution
to
the
project,
as
I
said,
still
a
funding
gap
and
so
they're
requesting
an
additional
1.15
million
from
the
rda
that
would
be
emergency
gap
financing,
which
would
mean
that
we
would
only
utilize
or
allow
them
to
utilize
this
funding
if
it
was
necessary
at
the
time
of
closing.
F
F
Those
things
are
nearly
finalized,
but
in
order
for
us
to
hit
that
end
of
the
year
deadline,
we
wanted
to
get
this
emergency
gap
financing
in
place.
So
the
project
was
not
delayed
and,
as
allison
mentioned,
the
additional
funding
would
come
from
the
central
business
district
project
area,
commercial
development
loan
fund,
which
has
a
1.4
million
dollar
balance.
At
this
time,
finance
committee
looked
at
it
on
october
23rd.
F
They
thought
it
looked
pretty
good,
and
so
we
are
here
today
with
a
resolution
for
you
to
consider
if
it's
appropriate,
madam
chair,
we
could
now
turn
the
time
over
to
brimshore.
They
do
have
just
a
few
slides
to
walk
us
through.
That
will
show
us
the
project.
B
I
think
I'd
agree.
We
have
a
few
new
council
members
and
even
though
we
are
board
members,
even
though
we
send
out
the
information
a
little
earlier
and
said
hey,
this
is
going
to
be
on
the
radar.
I
think
getting
a
little
presentation
from
david
and
his
team
will
kind
of
bring
up
to
speed
and
see
the
work
that
they've
done.
So
I
think
that
would
be
great
appreciate
it
david.
A
I
think
whitney's
going
to
make
the
presentation
I'll
just
preface
it
by
saying
I
love
this
project,
I'm
so
desperate
to
build
it
and
make
something
special
about
it.
I'm
sorry
that
we
have
to
come
back
to
ask
for
something
in
addition,
and
we
will
try
our
best
not
to
have
to
draw
it
down,
there's
a
chance
that
we
won't
have
to,
but
this
is
this
is
insurance
because
it
has
to
close
by
the
end
of
the
year.
A
J
Chair,
thank
you
for
the
very
warm
welcome
we.
We
are
happy
to
see
you
all.
We
miss
you
all.
We
miss
salt
lake
city,
really
it's
been
very
hard
not
to
be
able
to
travel,
and
but
we
are
doing
our
best
and
hope
that
this
will
pass
and
we
will
be
there
soon.
J
I
also
want
to
acknowledge
that
link.
Patton
is
also
on
the
call
who
is
an
integral
part
of
our
team
and
we've
all
been
working
diligently
to
get
to
this
point.
With
some
of
you
on
this
exam
and,
of
course,
court
and
his
team
and
danny.
A
J
J
J
A
J
So
you
know
our
project
vision.
I
think
again,
folks
are
aware
of
and
danny,
I
think,
danny
and
court.
Both
did
a
nice
job,
but
we're
really
trying
to
really
help
revitalize
this
part
of
the
city
of
the
downtown,
by
not
only
providing
residential
with
a
mixed
income
from
very
low
income
up
to
market
rate,
but
also
trying
to
bring
in
commercial
activity
and
programming
that
will
bring.
J
J
J
We
have
a
hunt,
still
190
units
168,
affordable,
22
market,
and
then
we
have
reduced
our
commercial
square
footage
from
a
little
over
20
000
down
to
15
000.
To
just
make
it.
You
know,
make
the
project
more
affordable
and
financiable.
I
should
say,
but
still
expecting
to
include
some
food
food
spaces,
cultural
arts
and,
of
course,
educational
programs
for
our
residents.
A
J
Yes,
yes,
we
also
which
we'll
get
into
this
reduced,
are
below
ground
parking
down
to
71,
but
did
include
10
commercial
spaces
on
the
first
floor.
Next,
please.
J
We'll
just
go
through
these
quickly.
I
think
these
are
just
a
few
handful
of
renderings.
Obviously
this
is
the
hole
that
hopefully
about
30
days
from
now,
we'll
see
a
lot
of
activity.
This
is
the
this
is
obviously
the
site
and
that's
a
little
cramer
house,
the
little
red
brick
building
in
the
back.
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
Those
gorgeous
mountains
in
the
background,
so
on
the
on
the
right
on
the
first
floor
will
be
our
management,
office,
lobby
area
and
community
room
and
then
on
the
left
on
the
first
floor
is
our
you
know,
we're
probably
in
a
food
hall,
so
that'll
be
sort
of
the
introduction
and
then
above
that
will
be
space,
for
I
think
right
now
is
planned
for
the
film
society
who
will
be
officing
there
who's
over
in
the
broadway
center.
J
So
this
is
a
view
I
always
say
that
we
would
be
standing
on
awesome,
cougars
or,
like
campos,
coffee,
rooftop,
looking
down
into
the
plaza
area
here,
we're
just
showing
like
a
farmer's
market
and
activity.
J
I
think
yes,
court
did
a
great
job
of
you
know,
kind
of
explaining
that
our
construction
costs
came
in
pretty
significantly
higher
than
we
expected
about
six
months
ago.
So
we
did
put
the
project
out
to
bid
to
make
sure
that
we
were
getting
good
numbers
and
it
turned
out
that
we
were
that's
just
where
the
market
is
due
to
covey.
J
Material
concerns
supply
chains,
so
we
went
out
to
bid
we've
got
good
numbers
here
is
a
snapshot
of
what
we
have
lined
up
today,
which
is
essentially
97
of
the
financing,
which
includes
both
nine
and
four
percent
tax
credits,
bonds.
And
then
we
have
all
the
soft
funding
from
only
walker,
the
city,
the
state
and
the
county.
J
So
I
think
when
we
brought
this
to
you
last
time,
we
only
had
that
were
in
place.
So
we've
we've
made
a
lot
of
progress
and
we
have
put
in
a
lot
of
applications
and
multiple
applications
for
some
entities
to
try
to
raise
enough
funding
to
make
this
project
work.
A
J
So
again,
we've
got,
we've
got
affordable
units,
we've
got
the
mid
block,
walkway
elevation,
which
we're
very
excited
about
and,
of
course,
the
commercial
space
on
both
main.
You
know
on
the
first
floor
of
both
development,
both
buildings
and
then
the
subterranean
parking
so
just
trying
to
trying
to
create
energy
and
a
place
where
people
can
want
to
come
to,
but
also
keeping
the
parking
down
below
so
that
we
don't
have
that
eyesore
and,
of
course,
preserving
the
kramer
house,
which
is
which
is
really
a
nice
touch
that
we're
able
to
do.
J
So
our
unit
mix
really
hasn't
changed
very
little.
The
only
real
change
that
we've
made
is
there
was
originally
a
unit
on
the
second
floor
of
the
kramer
house,
an
affordable
unit,
but
because
the
the
restaurant
tenant
who's
very
interested
in
the
space
who
we
have
an
initial
letter
of
intent
from
you
know,
once
they
kind
of
laid
out
all
their
space
with
the
kitchen
and
the
tables,
the
bathroom,
they
really
didn't
have
enough
room
to
make
it
a
viable
business.
J
So
utah
housing
corp,
was
generous
and
allowed
us
to
move
that
unit
to
the
four
percent
to
the
north
tower,
thereby
giving
the
restaurant
both
floors
so
the
whole
building,
and
then
in
exchange
we
added
an
extra
tax
credit
unit
in
the
north
building,
so
other
than
that.
We've
really
maintained
this.
This
mix
between
20,
you
know
all
the
way
from
20
ami
up
to
market
rate,
with
a
really
nice
balance
throughout
each
tier
of
income.
J
We
still
pretty
much
the
same
again,
our
the
studios,
a
nice
mix
of
studios,
two
bedrooms,
three
bedrooms
and,
of
course,
ones.
We
even
have
a
few
four
bedrooms
and
then
these
last
ones
we
just
talked
about
you
know
who
can
really?
Who
are
we
looking
at
to
live
in
some
of
these
units?
And
these
are.
These
are
some
examples
that
we
we
came
up
with
last
year
to
just
give
an
idea
of
you
know
somebody
working
at
harman's
grocery
store
and
what
kind
of
unit
they
can
afford
a
30
ami.
J
J
And
next,
which
might
be
last
so
these
are
these-
are
the
numbers
you're
most
cons?
You
know
you're
most
interested
in,
so
we
we've
already
been
funded
at
8.4
million
and
we
are
asking
for
the
possibility,
as
david
said,
we
hope
not
to
utilize
the
1.15,
but
we
think
it
was
prudent,
considering
the
urgent
critical
deadline
of
closing
by
the
end
of
this
year.
J
In
order
to
maintain
all
of
our
financing,
we
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
had
some
additional
funding
in
case
there
was,
you
know
if
our
final
construction
cost
came
in
a
little
higher
or
as
david
called
me
this
morning
and
said
that
the
interest
rate
rates
are
spiking,
so
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
a
little
cushion
in
case.
J
We
need
it,
so
the
total
would
be
9.5
million
and
while
a
great
deal
of
it
will
be
paid
off
over
the
next
30
years,
certainly
by
the
end
of
year
30,
all
of
it
would
be
paid
off
and
you
can
see
in
addition
to
the
the
full
amount.
The
starting
balance
of
the
14.5
you'll
also
have
an
additional
4.5
million
in
interest
paid,
so
the
total
of
19
million
and
we're
working
within
your
our
the
rda
loan
program
with
respect
to
terms
and
then,
of
course,
providing
significant
public
incentives
and
benefits.
A
J
We
are
on
target,
we
are
in
the
green
you
kind
of
go
down
to
the
closing
area
in
the
green
september
through
december.
That's
where
we
are
today
and
certainly
looking
to
get
started
on
construction
by
the
end
of
this
year.
If
not
really
we're
looking
to
close
in
early
december
december.
10Th
is
currently
our
closing
date.
J
J
F
Yeah,
really,
what
we
were
showing
here
was
a
change
to
the
affordable
units
and
then
sort
of
the
how,
as
a
percentage
breakdown,
how
the
because
the
project
cost
has
gone
up
so
much
the
rda's
contribution.
F
Even
with
the
1.15
additional
funding
approved,
it
is
a
little
bit
lower
than
what
it
used
to
be
as
a
percentage
again
and
that
the
developer's
contribution
has
gone
up
from
previous.
K
Yes,
thank
you
buddy.
I
appreciate
that
presentation
and
I
appreciate
the
spread
of
the
different,
affordable
housing.
I
like
that.
The
family
housing
there's
a
number
of
family
housings,
three
and
four
bedroom
housing
for
across
the
board,
and
that's
that's
appreciate
because
we
do
need
to
continue
to
press
for
the
family,
housing,
affordable,
housing
in
all
places
of
the
city.
On
the
parking
side,
we
went
from
118
down
to
81
spots.
K
J
Yeah,
no
very,
very
good
question,
so
the
first.
The
first
answer
is:
there's
no
well
certainly
for
the
affordable
units,
there's
no
charge
for
parking,
and
we
will
have
to
work
through
to
ensure
that
that
folks,
who
want
parking
and
have
parking.
J
The
actual
the
zoning
is
zero
parking
due
to
our
location
right
near
public
transit.
So
we
are
way
above
what's
required
and
you
know
it's
always
good
to
offer
more
parking.
But
we
were
able
to
save
a
considerable
amount
of
money
by
reconfiguring
the
parking
garage
just
really
based
on
the
fact
that
there's
an
existing
structure
down
in
that
hole
and
the
cost
to
remove
it
is
pretty
substantial.
J
So
we're
going
to
leave
a
portion
of
it,
which
we
think
is
is
a
is
the
right
condition
and
I
know
dave
and
I
talked
a
little
bit
about
whether
we
could
put
in
stacked
if
it
ever
came
to
it,
and
we
wanted
to
put
in
those
stacking
car
machines
that
might
be
a
possibility.
But
but
all
in
all
we
are
we're
offering
a
great
deal
of
parking.
Considering
the
zoning
and
location.
G
Yes,
ma'am
chair
just
a
question
for
the
rda
staff.
It
sounds
like
the
additional
loan
proposed
to
come
from
the
central
business
district
fund.
What
was
that
going
to
be
used
for
before
this
proposal?.
C
Those
funds
were
originally
allocated
just
to
do
commercial
and
residential
loans
within
the
project
area.
So
we
are
we're
currently
working
on
trying
to
develop
a
loan
program
that
would
start
to
try
to
encourage
people
to
use
what
is
currently
first
floor
vacant
retail
space.
C
And
so
I
would
say
those
funds
were
probably
going
to
be
marketed
in
association
with
that
program
when
we
roll
it
out.
But
I
don't
see
that
happening
until
probably
after
the
next
fiscal
year.
So
we
should
be
able
to
have
a
new
allocation
of
funds
available.
G
My
my
question
comes
from
doing
this
doesn't
mean
we
don't
do
something
else,
and
you
know
I'm
coming
from
a
place
of
north
temple
needing
a
big
investment.
Perhaps
we
want
to
make
sure
we've
got
adequate
funds
for
those
campaigns.
G
Mike
my
questions
for
rda
staff,
I
know
that
this
is
a
when
we
look
at
it
a
sizable
amount
of
18
million
for
this
project
that
we
are
ourselves
putting
into
for
rda.
My
question
is,
I
don't
know
if
I've
ever
seen
a
project
that
we've
put
so
much
money
or
or
disposition
of
property
into
it.
Can
you
give
me
a
comparable,
or
is
this
something
that
is
an
anomaly
that
we're
looking
at
moving
forward
with
and
that
doesn't
include
the
prior
developer
too,
that
we
pumped
money
into
as
well
so.
C
Yeah,
no
we're
talking
about
14.4
million,
which
is
still
a
lot
of
money,
but
it's
not
the
18..
So
I
want
to
clarify
that,
but
to
your
point,
director
rogers,
this
is
probably
one
of
our
largest
projects.
The
the
next
largest
probably
would
be
the
reimbursement
on
on
the
vivint
smart
home
arena,
but
again
that's
a
reimbursement,
whereas
this
is
a
loan
and
a
seller's
note,
and
so
this
is
a
sizable
investment
for
the
rda
and
into
that.
I
would
say
that
you
know
this.
C
This
is
a
top
priority
project
for
the
rda.
Both
in
terms
of
you
know
not
just
the
the
project
that
failed
before
it,
but
because
of
the
priorities
and
the
benefits
that
that
we
receive.
You
know
it's
not
just
affordable
housing
within
the
downtown,
but
it's
a
broad
range
of
ami
and
unit
types.
It's
you
know
the
mid-block
walkway
and
connectivity
to
edison
and
floral
street.
It's
the
historic
preservation,
it's
the
preference
for
non-profit
uses
on
the
first
floor,
so
you
know
the
the
key
to
this.
C
That
we
think
is
that
it
is
not
cheap
to
put
affordable
housing
in
your
downtown
core.
You
know
there's
a
reason
most
your
affordable
housing
projects
are,
you
know,
stick
frame
over
concrete
podiums
that
once
you
get
into
steel
frame
construction
and
you
know
really
underground
parking,
those
costs
become
significantly
higher,
as
well
as
on
a
site
like
this.
That
does
not
have
easy
access,
and
so
I
think
court's
done
an
amazing
job
with
brinshore
to
really
try
to
identify
how
to
reduce
those
costs.
C
But
there
are
a
lot
of
constraints
on
this
site,
and
so
we
recognize
that
going
in
we
knew
this
is
going
to
be
a
tough
project
to
pull
off.
We
know
that
we
put
a
lot
of
conditions
on
this
property
to
do
it,
and
I
think
the
key
that
that
whitney
pointed
out
really
well
is
that
all
of
this
money
will
be
paid
back
to
the
rda.
This
is
not
a
grant.
This
is
not
write
down.
C
This
is
a
loan
plus
interest
and-
and
you
saw
that
that
interest
is
going
to
come
back
to
the
tune
of
four
and
a
half
million
dollars,
and
so
this
will
provide
a
a
repayment
stream
over
the
years
that
we
can
continue
to
loan
out.
For
additional
projects
so,
but
it
is
probably
the
biggest
project
we've
invested
in.
G
So
don't
get
me
wrong
danny
in
court,
I'm
not
trying
to
put
you
down.
I
just
want
to
bring
to
point
that
this
is
a
lot
of
money
that
the
rda
has
never
really
done
like
for
before.
But
all
of
your
points
are
the
reason
why
I'm
all
in
favor
of
danny,
because
I
hate
to
say
that
projects
are
cursed,
and
I
don't
want
to
say
that
this
project
is
not.
G
B
Thank
you
james,
I'm
gonna,
just
I'll
ask
for
motion
in
a
minute
want
to
see.
If
there
were
was
anybody
else
that
wanted
to
say
anything.
B
I
just
want
to
say
that
it's
very
rare
that
a
project
comes
and
presents
in
front
of
us
and
the
majority
when
we're
looking
at
a
housing
ratio
that
the
majority
of
the
in
the
affordable-
it's
almost
always
the
other
way
around,
where
we
get
22
units
of
affordability,
not
168
units,
and
it
certainly
is
rare
in
my
time
on
the
board
to
have
somebody
come
and
to
present
to
the
board
and
reduce
the
number
of
parking
stalls.
I
I
feel
giddy
about
that,
I'm
just
gonna,
so
I
am
I.
B
I
hope
that
you
don't
need
the
money,
but
I
am
happy
to
continue
supporting
this
project.
I
don't
to
to
james's
point
to
danny's
point.
I
don't
think
that
the
rda's
ever
he's
ever
done
something
like
this,
but
I
also
don't
think
we've
had
a
project
that
has
20
ami
and
market
rate
all
in
the
same
place
and
with
all
of
these
other
great
amenities
and-
and
you
know,
one
of
the
things
we
always
talk
about.
We've
we've
been
talking
about
a
lot
within
the
rda
is
access
to
opportunities.
B
That's
exactly
what
this
is
creating
for
people
as
a
the
pathway
to
have
these
access
to
opportunities,
and
it's
I'm
very
excited.
I
also
really
love
the
rendering
of
these
huge
big
towers
on
either
side
and
then
this
little
itty-bitty
house.
It
reminds
me
of
like
the
up
house
in
the
disney
movie
right
so
anyway,
those
are
all
just
my
giddy
thoughts.
It
was
a
it's
a
feel-good
project
for
me,
so
with
that,
if
there's
nobody
else,
that
wants
to
say
anything,
I
would
look
for
a
motion.
G
B
Second,
okay:
I
have
a
motion
by
board
member
rogers,
a
second
by
board
member
dugan.
I
think
that
was
you
dukes,
so
I
will
do
a
roll
call
board.
Member
rogers.
B
A
B
B
I
We
noticed
the
meeting
the
council
meeting
to
start
at
3
30,
but
we
were
anticipating
that
the
first
item
wouldn't
be
done,
wouldn't
be
started
until
four.
Just
to
give
you
guys
a
little
bit
of
a
cushion.
So
if
you
go
a
little
over
3
30,
I
think
that's
fine.
I
think
there
was
a
presenter
that
is
ready
to
go
right
up
for
that's
right,
though.
Okay
yeah.
B
C
That
is
the
official
technical
title
to
station
center
stuff.
So
thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
thank
you
members
of
the
board
for
the
last
item
as
well.
We
we
certainly
appreciate
that
and
and
we'll
move
that
forward
this
item
before
you
is
an
update
on
the
station
center
design
of
the
infrastructure
improvements,
as
well
as
discussion
and
update
on
some
of
the
maintenance
funding
strategies
that
we
have
brought
to
you
before.
C
We
are
primarily
looking
at
just
updating
the
board
on
some
of
the
thoughts
of
what
the
current
design
that
is
come
forth
from
meetings
with
engineering
and
transportation
is
a
new
idea
for
how
to
treat
the
infrastructure
within
the
station
center
project,
as
well
as
just
a
recap
on
some
of
the
items
that
we
talked
about
previously,
with
some
strategies
for
funding
the
maintenance
of
that
infrastructure
that
cara
will
get
into
both
of
these
are
meant
to
just
give
an
update
to
the
board
and
get
any
direction
on
whether
there
are
any
concerns
or
questions
before
we
continue
to
proceed
moving
forward
with
these.
L
L
Great
thank
you
next
slide.
You
can
already
go
to
the
next
slides
perfect,
so
danny
went
over
what
we're
going
to
be
talking
about
today.
Just
talking
about
an
update
on
infrastructure
plans,
our
consultants
from
loci,
marcus,
pulcifer
and
michael
budge
are
here
to
present
that
concept
and
then,
when
we're
done
with
that,
we'll
talk
about
some
maintenance
funding
strategies
for
station
center.
So
next
slide.
L
Station
center
is
shown
here
in
the
red
box,
it's
located
between
second
south
and
fourth
south
and
500
and
600
west
sandwiched
between
uta's
intermodal
hub
on
the
west
and
rio
grande
depot
on
the
east.
Next
slide.
L
Thanks
proposed
plans
for
station
center
infrastructure
include
streetscape
improvements
for
300
south,
which
is
shown
there
in
the
center
of
this
site
plan,
as
well
as
three
new
streets
that
are
shown
here
that
are
part
of
the
street
network
that
we
plan
to
introduce
here,
and
that
includes
pierpont
avenue
on
the
north
block
market
street,
on
the
south
block
and
then
woodbine
court
running,
north
and
south
between
the
two
blocks.
Our
plans
also
include
upgrading
the
utilities
for
the
size
that
we'll
need
for
the
increased
density
when
the
neighborhood's
redeveloped
next
slide.
L
The
rda
has
been
working
for
several
years
on
infrastructure
plans
for
this
neighborhood,
and
the
design
as
it
is,
is
about
50
to
70
percent.
Complete
we've
been
coordinating
with
other
salt
lake
city
departments
throughout
the
design
to
get
their
review
and
feedback
and,
as
danny
alluded
to
in
recent
meetings
with
transportation
engineering,
the
directors
of
these
two
divisions
suggested
that
for
300
south
we
consider
creating
a
less
linear,
less
car
centric
space
and
prioritize
pedestrians
over
personal
vehicles.
L
So
I
wanted
to
mention
that
both
matt
castle,
the
director
of
engineering
and
john
larson,
director
of
transportation,
are
here
and
are
available
to
answer
any
questions
that
come
up
so
in
response
to
their
feedback.
We
asked
our
design
consultant
to
come
back
to
us
with
a
concept
for
300,
south
and
wood
biting
court.
That
could
incorporate
these
suggestions,
and
so,
like
I
mentioned
mike
budge
and
marcus
pulsar,
are
here
and
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
them
for
a
presentation
on
that
concept.
M
Point
all
right,
thank
you.
Let
me
see
if
I
can
pull
this
over
to
my
screen
here.
M
Well,
thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
and
board
members
for
allowing
us
the
opportunity
to
present
on
this
fantastic
project
and
show
you
some
updates
of
where
we've
gone
in
the
last
several
months,
in
accordance
to
the
things
that
we
heard
from
our
visits
with
several
different
departments,
and
thank
you
kara
for
your
introduction
to
the
project
so
I'll
be
able
to
go
through
some
of
these
slides
fairly
quickly.
I
think
everybody
on
the
board
is
probably
really
familiar
with
where
this
project
sits.
M
It
currently
lies
between
six
west
and
fifth
west
and
and
second
south
and
fourth
south.
It
pretty
much
occupies
those
two
blocks,
but
what
we're
going
to
focus
on
in
this
presentation
specifically,
is
really
how
we're
addressing
third
south
and
the
new
edition
of
woodbine
on
this
project.
M
As
cara
mentioned,
we
are
currently
roughly
between
50
and
70
cds,
and
this
is
a
snapshot
of
kind
of
where
we're
at
in
terms
of
detailing
the
street.
As
you
can
see
in
this
image
here,
it's
a
highly
designed
street
with
a
lot
of
sight,
furnishings
raised,
planter
beds,
site
lighting,
fixed
furniture.
M
Custom,
paving
patterns,
etc,
etc,
and
these
are
some
illustrations
renderings
of
what
that
street
currently
is.
Looking
like
again
kind
of
these
raised
beds,
fixed
furniture,
custom,
paving
patterns,
etc
that
I
think
all
work
towards
a
very
beautiful
street.
M
I
think
it
I
think
the
design
of
it
is
going
to
be
is
really
beautiful
and
and
will
bring
a
lot
of
unique
characteristics
to
this
development.
M
But,
as
kara
mentioned,
as
we
met
with
several
of
the
departments,
we
got
some
feedback
that
made
us
kind
of
stop
and
rethink
thirds
south
and
woodbine
in
a
new
light.
Some
of
the
things
that
we
heard
were
things
like.
M
M
And
the
car
occupy
their
space
and
then
see
if
we
could
prioritize
the
pedestrian
over
the
vehicle
and
then
how
could
we
use
vegetation
and
plant
material
to
execute
those
those
tasks
so
really
what
it
did
is
it
caused
us
to
go
back
and
rethink
these
two
streets
specifically,
and
so
we
went
back
and
started
to
look
at
precedent
projects
and
imagery
of
projects
that
have
done
this
and
have
done
it
successfully.
M
As
you
can
see
in
these
images,
the
pedestrian
really
becomes
king
in
these
spaces,
and
the
car
is
very
much
secondary,
but
the
car
is
still
allowed
to
occupy
the
space,
but
it
really
lends
itself
more
to
the
the
individual
than
the
car
and
we
looked
at
several
different
projects
that
did
this
at
a
very
high
level,
which
then
gave
us
some
ideas
on
how
to
execute
it
here
on
third,
south
and
woodbine,
and
so
similar
to
what
this
diagram
is
showing
the
way
we,
the
things
that
we
pulled
off
from
looking
at
several
of
these
projects,
is
that
what
if
we
were
to
create
a
flexible
space
that
was
primarily
focused
on
the
pedestrian
and
less
about
the
vehicle,
but
still
allowed
the
vehicle
to
enter
the
the
space?
M
And
so
we
looked
at
third
third
south
in
woodbine,
and
we
said
instead
of
thinking
of
this
as
a
street.
What
if
we
were
to
think
of
it
more
of
a
pedestrian
plaza
that
allowed
cars
to
to
slowly
drive
through
it?
And
how
do
we
do
that?
M
And
so
first
we
said
well
what,
if
we
had
a
unifying
paving
pattern
that
went
from
building
front
to
building
front
and
then
what
if
we
were
to
sprinkle
strategically
sprinkle
trees
throughout
this
pattern,
and
these
trees
would
look
like
they're
randomly
placed,
but
what
they
do
is
they
actually
provide
opportunities
for
outdoor
dining
and
seating,
perhaps
art
installations,
and
essentially
just
larger
gathering
spaces
for
for
the
pedestrian
and
what,
if
these
trees
were
placed
such
that
they
really
dictated
how
the
vehicle
could
could
work
its
way
through
the
project
and
what,
if
we
place
these
trees
and
the
planting
beds
below
them
in
a
way
that
forced
the
vehicle
to
have
to
meander
and
wind
and
weaves
its
way
through
through
the
development,
essentially
forcing
the
car
to
slow
down?
M
And
so
that's
kind
of
you
know
these.
These
are
really
rough
and
conceptual
diagrams,
but
that's
kind
of
the
approach
that
we
took,
which
led
to
our
current
current
design
right
now.
So
what
we'd
like
to
do
is
just
kind
of
show
you
some
renderings
of
what
that
might
look
like
down
in
the
space.
The
top
image
here,
as
you
can
see,
is
as
the
as
the
design
currently
stands.
M
As
you
can
see
it's,
it
is
a
typical
street
and
it
is
really
geared
towards
the
vehicle,
whereas
the
new
concept
down
below
was
an
effort
to
try
to
do
exactly
what
we
heard
to
blur
the
edges
between
the
pedestrian
realm
and
the
vehicular
realm
and
force
the
vehicle
to
kind
of
have
to
wind
its
way
through,
through
the
plaza,
if
you
will
so
here's
some
character
imagery
and
some
renderings
of
what
that
space
might
look
like
feel
like.
M
Again,
kind
of
a
sprinkling
of
trees,
urban
trees
and
or
urban
forest
throughout
the
development
which
we,
you
know,
it
increased
the
amount
of
trees
that
we
had
in
there.
That,
I
think,
will
just
do
nothing
but
benefit
this
project
in
multiple
ways,
but
by
forcing
the
car
to
kind
of
meander
its
way
through.
Like
I
mentioned
earlier,
it
really
does
allow
for
opportunities
to
kind
of
push
out
further
into
the
space
and
allow
for
kind
of
larger
gathering
areas.
M
The
other
thing
that
it
does
is
with
the
the
planting
beds
and
the
trees
situated
as
they
are.
It
actually
allows
us
to
drain
the
site
a
lot
easier
and
because
we
have
larger
planting
beds,
we
have
we
have
quite
a
bit
less
infrastructure
underneath.
M
But
one
of
the
the
charges
that
we've
had
from
the
rda
from
the
beginning
with
third
south
and
woodbine
is
to
design
these
streets
in
a
way
that
it
occupied
a
festival,
character,
and
so
the
top
image
is
based
on
the
the
concept
that
currently
exists.
The
still
would
be
designed
such
that
you
could
close
it
down
and
have
a
farmer's
market
or
street
festival
art
festival,
and
it
still
would
work
really
well
that
way.
M
But,
as
you
can
see,
it
was
kind
of
a
shotgun
approach
where
we
just
would
line
the
tents
up
in
order
to
occupy
that
space,
whereas
the
new
concept,
as
you
can
see
down
below,
we
feel,
creates
a
lot
more
interest
and
makes
this
space
feel
a
lot
a
lot
more
unique
and
different
and
overall,
just
makes
a
better
experience.
I
think
for
future
festivals.
M
So
this
image
here
really
just
is
showing
what
it
would
look
like
on
a
typical
day,
whereas
this
which
is
trying
to
represent
what
it
would
look
like
and
feel
like
during
a
festival
event.
A
M
A
typical
day
what
that
might
look
like
and
feel
like,
and
then
what
this
same
space
could
look
like
and
feel
like
for
farmers,
market
or
an
art
festival
again
typical
day,
and
then
what
that
might
feel
like
and
look
like
the
thing
that
was
probably
the
most
exciting
about
having
the
opportunity
to
revisit
these
two
streets.
M
Is
we
started
to
notice
and
recognize
early
on
that
there
was
a
lot
of
benefits
to
this
new
design,
as
illustrated
in
this
image
here.
M
One
of
the
things
that
we
really
liked
is
that
it
really
does
create
a
new
model
for
giving
prioritization
to
the
pedestrian.
M
I
think
it's
a
model
that
could
be
used
moving
forward
for
the
city,
but
it
also
created
kind
of
a
more
pedestrian
friendly
environment
associated
with
the
intermodal
hub
and
this
transit-oriented
development.
M
Again,
as
I
mentioned
by
meandering
the
street
and
slowing
the
traffic
down,
it
introduced
more
outdoor
living
and
gathering
spaces
where
the
residents
and
visitors
and
people
that
would
work
in
this
area
would
have
a
greater
opportunity
to
gather
it.
Simplified
the
drainage
and
infrastructure,
like
I
mentioned
before,
it
incorporates
more
of
a
low
impact
development
strategies.
M
There
was
a
significant
increase
in
the
amount
of
trees,
as
I
mentioned
before,
which
does
nothing
but
help
this
project
in
multiple
ways,
especially
with
the
heat
urban
heat
island
effect,
and
then
it
made
the
programming
a
lot
more
flexible
for
different
types
of
events
and
also
a
lot
more
diverse.
M
One
of
the
things
that
we
found,
though,
going
through
this,
is
that
it
actually
was
a
a
less
expensive
design
overall,
which
we
were
kind
of
shocked,
but
because
it's
in
a
lot
of
ways
it's
a
lot
more
simplified.
M
M
L
Great
thanks
so
much
mike,
I
I
think
we'll
finish
up
with
the
rest
of
the
presentation
and
then
maybe
we
could
talk
about
if
the
board
has
any
questions
about
that
design.
So
so
I'm
going
to
shift
gears
now
and
talk
about
the
next
topic
on
our
presentation.
The
study
we
collect
conducted
earlier
this
year
to
look
at
creating
a
business
improvement
district
for
station
center.
So
bobby,
can
we
go
back
to
that
presentation
and
I
think
it
was
slide
49
we
needed
to
be.
L
L
So,
following
that
presentation,
we
met
with
stakeholders
and
got
some
feedback
and
then
came
back
in
september
and
recommended
that
we
move
forward
with
a
study
to
look
into
the
revenue
generating
capacity
of
a
business
improvement
district
for
station
center.
So
we
wanted
to
see
if
it
could
generate
enough
revenue
to
cover
the
maintenance
costs
and
for
reference.
We've
worked
with
public
services
over
the
past
few
years
to
get
an
idea
of
what
those
costs
might
be
in
their
very
preliminary
estimate.
They
like
me
to
make
sure
that
we
know
it's.
L
A
very
preliminary
estimate
is
around
425
000
per
year.
So
with
that
in
mind,
we
engaged
a
consultant
to
look
at
what
we
could
do
in
station
center.
So
can
we
go
to
the
next
slide
so
for
the
study
we
worked
with
jonathan
springmeier
with
bonneville
research,
and
we
took
each
of
the
rda
owned
station
center
parcels
and
created
three
different
development
scenarios
for
those
they
all
are
meeting
the
existing
zoning
requirements
and
our
increasing
levels
of
density
and
then
for
each
of
those
three
development
scenarios
for
the
parcels.
L
We
applied
three
potential
tax
rates
to
see
how
much
revenue
could
be
generated
by
assessing
those
having
assessments
on
those
parcels.
So
what
that
resulted
in
is
for
each
parcel.
We
ended
up
with
nine
potential
scenarios
of
how
much
revenue
could
be
generated
there
and
then,
when
we
summed
those
up,
what
we
found
was
that
the
rda
owned
parcels
could
generate
somewhere
between
150
000
and
900
000
per
year,
using
the
tax
rates
that
were
suggested
by
the
consultant
and
then
when
we
look
at
it
on
a
parcel
by
parcel
basis.
L
The
average
impact
of
those
assessments
were
between
thirty
thousand
and
a
hundred
seventy
five
thousand
dollars
per
year
on
each
parcel,
so
that
is
looking
at
only
using
the
rda
properties
for
this
business
improvement
district.
So
if
we
gain
the
support
of
other
property
owners
in
station
center,
that
would
increase
the
revenue
generating
capacity
of
the
district,
which
would
then
reduce
the
per
parcel
impact
of
the
assessments.
L
And
then
sorry.
One
thing
I
wanted
to
note
is
that
station
center
is
within
the
central
business
improvement
assessment
area,
which
I'm
sure,
as
you
guys
know,
is
the
saa
that's
applied
and
for
which
downtown
alliance
is
currently
contracted.
L
So,
even
though
the
rda's
parcels
are
currently
tax-exempt
and
are
not
assessed
in
the
cbia
right
now,
our
estimate
of
what
those
assessments
after
redevelopment
will
be
is
that
they
will
range
per
personal
from
fifteen
thousand
to
forty
five
thousand
dollars
per
year.
L
G
What
a
yeah,
so
you
said
that
the
parcels
that
you're
talking
about
would
create
once
they
come
out
of
the
rda
and
being
not
being
tax
exempt.
They
would
create
10
to
20
000
20
10
to
30
000.
Is
that
what
you
said.
L
L
G
Do
we
know
what
those
parcels
are
going
to
generate
property
tax-wise
currently,
and
how
does
this
really?
How
does
this
are
we
looking
at
doubling
the
property
tax,
I
mean
what
the
amount
would
be.
Is
that
basically,
what
it
is
for
the
improvement
you
have
their
property
tax
base
and
then
we're
going
to
double
it
in
order
to
make
those
improvements.
L
From
what
it
is
currently
to
what
it
would
be
post
development,
so
the
prop.
So
there
is
no
property
tax
collected
on
them
currently
because
they're
already
owned,
and
then
I
can
get
back
to
you
about
what
the
property
tax
would
be.
But
I
don't
have
that
in
front
of
me.
G
L
That's
great
and
we
definitely
have
that
information
for
the
study.
What
we
did
is
we
with
our
development
scenarios.
We
then
estimated
what
those
properties
would
be
assessed
at
it
once
they
were
fully
developed
and
then
calculated
the
property
tax
of
those,
so
so
yeah.
We
can
get
back
to
you
with
that.
L
So
I
guess
that
is
the
end
of
my
presentation
and
we
were
just
looking
for
feedback
from
the
board
on
whether
in
these
with
these
two
items,
we're
moving
forward
in
the
direction
that
you're
comfortable
with
and
if
so
then
we
can
keep
moving
and
incorporate
these
ideas
into
our
plans
for
station
center.
G
M
I
don't
think
we
need
per
se.
Well,
let
me
let
me
take
that
back.
M
I
I
really
think
if,
if
we
are
going
to
introduce
retail
on
the
ground
level,
which
I
think
we're
proposing,
I
think
it
would
be
really
hard
for
a
retail
space
to
thrive,
especially
deep
into
those
blocks
without
having
vehicle
access
to
them,
so
we're
hoping
that
vehicles
will
be
allowed,
but
they'll
be
allowed
to
go
through
there
very
slowly,
and
I
don't
know
if
you
noticed
in
the
design
or
not,
but
we're
also
proposing
several
parallel
parking
opportunities
in
there
as
well.
M
L
That
might
also
be
a
question
that
transportation
might
want
to
weigh
in
on-
and
I
know
john
larson's
here,
but
not
putting
you
on
the
spot,
john.
But
if
you
had
something
to
add,
I
wanted
to
mention
that
you
were
here.
E
M
The
way
that
design
is
currently
designed
is
that
those
two
streets,
woodbine
and
third
south
when
they
are
closed
off,
still
allow
access
to
all
the
parking
garages
and
and
parking
for
the
development.
And
so
we
could
look
at
what
it
would
take
to
close
those
down
completely
from
the
automobile.
G
I
also
know
how
confusing
it
gets
when
there's
not
clear
delineation
for
folks-
and
so
I
you
know
not
being
an
expert
in,
but
just
my
initial
thought,
looking
at
this
as
a
pedestrian,
a
cyclist
and
a
driver,
it's
really
not
very
clear
from
rendering
so
far
where
I
should
be
in
real
circumstances,
right,
yeah,
and
so
I'm
all
for
putting
pedestrians
at
the
top
of
the
food
chain
here.
G
I
also
want
to
make
sure
that
they're
not
the
largest
mover
in
that
space
and
they
do
not
going
to
have
the
right
of
way
automatically
in
their
cargo
there,
unless
it's
very
clear
in
certain
ways
how
cars
shouldn't
should
it
shouldn't
act.
So
that's
my
concern
that
initial
rendering,
but
I'm
hoping
to-
I
guess
you
go
forward
on
this.
I
certainly
want
to
support
really
reorienting
the
pedestrian
on
top
of
this
kind
of
usage.
E
Thanks,
I
I
I
think
this
is
an
important
conversation.
I
I
I
would
guess
that
fire
department
would
have
some
concerns
if
we
don't
allow
vehicular
traffic
on
the
road,
but
I
just
wanted
to
say
on
the
design:
I'm
really
excited
to
see
a
street
design
that
doesn't
look
like
another
street.
I
think
that's
one
advantage.
We
have
in
salt
lake
city
with
our
really
wide
right-of-way
that
we
have
the
opportunity
to
create
something
that
doesn't
look
like
a
street
you've
seen
anywhere
else,
and
so
I'm
glad
that
we're.
E
Finally,
in
this
area,
I
hope
going
to
see
something
that
isn't
a
normal
street.
So
thank
you
for
thinking
outside
the
box
on
that.
I
think
that's
important.
It's
a
missed
opportunity,
other
other
places
where
we
we
have
a
really
unique
condition
in
salt
lake
city
and
we
create
a
normal
stream
on
the
tax
or
the
business
improvement
district
part.
I
just
want
to
understand
how
it
would
work.
I
think
maybe
we
already
addressed
it
and
I
didn't
quite
get
it,
but
typically
with
an
rda
project
area.
E
One
tool
we
use
is
to
give
property
owners
back
their
property
tax,
and
so,
in
this
case,
we're
also
proposing
to
increase
their
property
tax.
So
can
you
just
tell
me,
like,
from
a
high
level
perspective,
how
those
two
tools
are
not
at
odds
with
each
other?
Does
that
make
sense
my
question?
It
seems
kind
of
opposite
of
what
we
normally
do.
I
C
I
I
think
it's
a
great
question
and
it's
kind
of
I
mean
it
is
interesting
from
a
philosophical
standpoint,
and
I
think
my
easy
answer
would
be
simply
that
what
we're
talking
about
there
are
two
different
tools
for
two
different
purposes.
Obviously,
tax
increment
reimbursement
is
a
tool
that
is
wholly
owned
and
controlled
by
the
rda,
and
we
use
that
to
get
public
benefits
and
projects
and
it's
a
pay
for
performance.
C
The
idea
of
of
now
putting
a
special
assessment
or
a
bid
on
these
properties
is
really
one
of
using
utilizing
what
should
be
probably
considered
more
of
a
city
tool
on
rda
property
and
the
advantage
that
we
have
in
doing
it
here
on
station
center
is
because
we
own
the
property.
Now
we
can
put
that
in
place
and
make
that
a
condition
of
when
we
sell
the
property
and
dispose
of
it.
I
And
if
I
could
just
speak
a
little
bit
to
the
kind
of
taxing
process
of
it,
the
the
unique
opportunity
of
having
those
things
attached
to
rda
properties,
the
condition
attached
to
rda
properties
is
that
the
council
can't
just
decide
to
levy
an
saa.
There's
a
state
process
that
says
that
if
40
of
property
owners
protest,
which
is
a
minority
that
that
stops
the
saa
from
proceeding.
In
fact,
the
last
time
the
city
council
tried
an
saa
for
maintenance
was
on
north
temple
and
it
was
stopped
by.
I
I
can't
remember
what
the
percentage
was.
It
was
like
a
heartbreakingly,
close
percentage
and
and
and
then,
if
I
could
just
speak
a
little
bit
to
like
the
the
the
usual
property
tax
reimbursement
amount,
is
a
much
much
greater
sum
than
the
amount
for
maintenance
just
sort
of
in
the
aggregate.
The
amount
needed
for
maintenance
is
usually
such
a
smaller
version,
a
smaller
amount
than
the
amount
needed
to
sort
of
jump,
start
development
and
actually
establish
costs.
I
So
once
the
things
have
been
installed,
the
maintenance,
especially
if
it's
spread
over
a
larger
area,
ends
up
not
being
a
huge
amount
per
property,
especially
if
that
property
owner
that
potential
developer
knows
ahead
of
time.
Okay,
I
may
buy
this
rda
property
or
I
may
have
a
long-term
ground
lease
with,
but
it's
going
to
come
with
a
5
000
a
year
assessment.
You
know
for
maintenance,
and
so
it's
just
that
calculation
that
they
make
ahead
of
time
of
what
do
our
rents
have
to
be
in
order
to
make
that
assessment
work
so.
B
K
Okay,
thank
you.
Thanks
for
the
design-
and
I
I
echo
councilmember
motto's
comments
about
the
design
and
thinking
outside
the
box.
I
really
I
really
appreciate
that
the
landscape.
My
question
goes
back
to
the
stack,
realtors
design
and
they're
building
just
south
of
this.
How
does
that?
How
these
two
marry
up
with
the
street
design
here
the
building
heights
and
all
the
other
discussions
we've
had
with
stackability
on
their
their
property?
K
C
Carrick
can
correct
me,
I
don't
know,
I
don't
think
we've
gotten
to
a
great
level
of
detail
and
discussions
with
stack.
I
think
we
have
presented
the
new
concept
to
them
and
and
let
them
see
what
the
idea
is-
and
I
think,
as
part
of
those
preliminary
conversations
you
know,
I
think
I
think
the
development
would
marry
well
with
this
concept.
I
mean
obviously
we're
talking
about
just
improvements
within
the
right
of
way,
and
so
we
would
hope
that,
obviously
they
would
build
in
a
way,
that's
complementary
to
that.
C
As
far
as
the
the
parking
structure,
we
we
really
haven't,
had
any
further
conversations
with
them
on
that
as
well.
We
we
understand
that
that
is
still
a
desire
of
theirs,
that
we
consider
doing
a
consolidated
parking
structure,
but
we,
we
are
not
necessarily
moving
forward
with
that
or
anticipating
that
right
now
in
any
level
of
design
station
center.
Just
because
we're
not
at
that
point
yet
on
our
property,
so
they
they
obviously
are
a
little
bit
farther
along
and
what
they're
considering
for
their
development
opportunities,
but
the
design
wise.
C
We
would
very
much
hope
that
they
would
engage
and
embrace
this
as
well
as
also
consider
the
idea
of
continuing
to
push
market
street
through
all
the
way
to
600
west
across
their
property.
So
those
are
conversations
we'll
definitely
be
having
with
them
cara
did.
I
did
I
miss
anything
or
screw
anything
up
on
that.
A
L
A
B
Okay,
excellent.
I
think
that's
what
we're
sort
of
hearing
from
everyone-
and
maybe
there
might
be
questions,
but
we
won't
know
that
until
we
get
down
the
road
a
little
further,
no
pun
intended
because
we're
talking
about
a
road.
But
so
I
want
to
thank
mike
and
kara
for
their
presentation.
Always
thank
rda
staff.
We,
I
am
going
to
move
on
to
our
next
items,
because
we're
trying
to
get
to
where
we
need
to
be
number
five
is.
B
It
looks
like
I
need
a
motion
regarding
meeting
remotely
without
an
angry
anchor
location.
D
B
D
A
B
Yes,
board:
member
rogers,
yes-
and
I
am
a
yes
board
member
valdo
morris
is
not
here
today,
so
that
passes.
Do
we
have
any
reporter
announcements
from
you,
madam
mayor.
B
Great
and
do
we
have
any
reports
or
announcements
from
danny.
C
Yes,
if
I
could
report
on
a
few
things
I'll,
do
it
real,
quick
in
the
interest
of
time.
C
First,
we
just
wanted
to
let
the
board
know
that
the
department
of
economic
development
and
the
agency
and
arts
council
and
the
report
has
been
published.
It
is
available
on
our
respective
websites
and
I
think
ben
was
going
to
arrange
for
some
hard
copies
to
be
delivered
if
that
hasn't
happened
already.
So
some
of
you
may
already
have
that.
C
We've
also
completed
our
mandated
november
1
report
to
the
taxing
entities,
which
is
a
requirement
of
state
statute
within
which
we
report
our
collection
and
use
of
tax
increment
on
all
of
our
project
areas,
so
that
has
been
emailed
to
city
council,
chair
wharton,
along
with
all
the
other
taxing
entities
and
partners,
and
it's
available
on
our
website.
C
Next
week.
We
are
hoping
to
have
our
press
release
and
announcement
that
the
art
for
hope
installations
are
complete
and
announced.
These
are
going
to
be
displayed
on
three
rda
properties
throughout
the
city
1500
west
north
temple,
which
is
the
overnighter
motel
site,
255,
south
state
and
our
property
and
sugar
house.
The
di-
and
we
also
have
that
collection
on
our
website
as
well,
and
then
finally,
we
have
a
project
completion
we'd
like
to
announce
that
spyhop
youth
media
arts
center
in
west
temple
gateway
is
done.
C
We
we're
excited
for
that.
We
will
hopefully
have
a
ribbon
cutting
later
in
2021,
but
that
has
obviously
been
delayed,
so
we
will
for
sure
have
that
and
invite
all
of
you
to
attend.
So
that
is
our
announcements.
Unless
there's
any
questions
for
me.
B
Awesome,
thank
you
danny
and
I
don't
have
anything
so
we
do
have
a
written
briefing.
Please
I'm
sure
everybody
looked
at
that
and
double
checking
my
agenda
here,
that's
it
so
I
want
to
thank
everybody
for
joining
our
board
meeting.
I
think
I
will
ask
mr
chair
when
you
want
everybody
to
join
in
to
the
next
meeting.
I
imagine
immediately.
D
Well,
we
do
have
well,
we
do
have
a
guest,
that's
calling
in
at
four
o'clock
and
I'd
like
to
start
before
that.
So
if
we
could
do
a
real
five
minute
break
and
then
meet
back
at
3
50.,
that
would
be
great
thanks.
Everybody
great.