►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
Is
everybody
ready,
SLC
TV
we're
good
to
go
William
all
right.
Welcome
to
today's
Redevelopment
Agency
Board
meeting
due
to
the
ongoing
practice
of
social
distancing,
RDA
meetings
will
continue
to
be
entirely
remote
like
this,
which
means,
although
we're
not
all
together
in
person
or
all
together.
Here
there
is
a
new
requirement
to
identify
emergency
conditions
under
HB
5,
0
0
2,
to
address
why
our
board
meetings
are
being
held
remotely
rather
than
at
an
anchor
location.
I
am
going
to
read
a
public
statement.
B
I
Amy,
Fowler
Rd,
a
Board
of
Directors
chair,
hereby
determined
that
conducting
the
RDA
board
meeting
at
an
anchor
location
presents
a
substantial
risk
to
the
health
and
safety
of
those
who
may
be
present
at
said
anchor
location,
the
World
Health
Organization,
the
President
of
the
United
States,
the
governor
of
Utah,
the
Salt
Lake
County
Health
Department
Salt
Lake
County
mayor
and
the
mayor
of
Salt
Lake
City
have
all
recognized.
A
global
pandemic
exists
related
to
the
new
strain
of
coronavirus.
B
Sars
CoV
2,
due
to
this
state
of
emergency
caused
by
the
global
pandemic
I
find
that
conducting
a
meeting
at
an
anchor
location
under
the
current
state
of
public
health
emergency
constitutes
a
substantial
risk
to
the
health
and
safety
of
those
who
may
be
present
at
that
location.
Moreover,
the
city
and
county
building,
which
is
that
anchor
location
for
our
board
meetings,
is
presently
closed
for
regular
occupation
due
to
damages
sustained
during
the
March
twenty
twenty
eighth
grades.
B
As
my
official
statement
of
why
we're
doing
this
so,
although,
as
always,
we
are
conducted-
as
it
has
been
the
last
few
months,
conducting
our
meetings
electronically
and
it
is
different
and
less
familiar
than
our
in-person
public
process.
We
are
still
an
open
and
public
meeting.
We
welcome
all
members
of
the
public
who
may
be
watching
our
usual
life.
Video
feeds
on
the
City
Council's
agenda,
page
YouTube,
SLC,
TV
or
Facebook
life.
B
B
Public
comments
can
also
be
submitted
written
to
the
RTA
offices
at
p,
o--
box,
one
four,
five:
four:
five:
five
Salt
Lake
City
Utah,
eight
four
one
one
for
your
comments
about
any
RDA
business
or
if
you
have
any
feedback
to
give
us
4:30
today's
meeting.
Please
contact
us
so
just
to
if
this
is
your
first
time
on
one
of
our
electronic
virtual
WebEx
RDA
meetings,
I'll
go
through
the
process
a
little
bit
about
public
comment.
Bobby
will
be
handling
our
public
comments
today
and
he
will
be
our
host.
B
He
will
identify
the
callers
in
the
order
that
they
have
arrived
via
WebEx.
He
will
state
the
name
of
the
first
person
to
comment
followed
by
the
next
commenter,
who
can
then
prepare
to
speak
when
the
meeting
host
unmutes
when
the
meeting
host
unmutes
you
and
lets
you
know
it's
your
turn.
Please
state
your
name
and
indicate
the
topic
you're
speaking
on
and
then
the
two-minute
timer
will
begin
at
the
two-minute
mark.
Real
will
announce
time
and
your
microphone
will
be
muted
since
we're
connecting
electronically.
B
B
Rta
meetings
have
certain
guidelines
to
make
sure
that
people
feel
comfortable
and
safe
to
participate
in
this
new
way
of
conducting
the
public's
business.
To
help
facilitate
our
comment
period,
please
be
respectful
to
others.
Please
avoid
yelling
making
any
racial
slurs,
obscene
or
defamatory
remarks.
We
want
this
experience
to
be
as
positive
as
possible
for
everyone
and
be
respectful
of
what
people
are
saying
and
give
them
the
opportunity
to
make
those
statements.
C
B
We're
moving
through
our
agenda
quite
quickly.
We
don't
have
any
other
public
hearings
at
this
time,
so
we'll
go
to
item
c1.
This
board
members
is
just
in
a
informational
section
for
the
Central
Station
predisposition
property
report.
We
brought
this
up
in
June
I
believe
it
was,
and
it
was
sort
of
just
a
written
information.
I
suggested
that
if
anybody
have
questions
or
comments,
they
reach
out
to
Danny
I
wanted
to
put
this
back
on
to
see.
D
D
So
our
goal
with
this
reuse
plan
is
to
essentially
improve
the
neighborhood
intensity,
provide
some
kind
of
sense
of
place
through
a
cohesive
development
plan
for
both
our
property,
as
well
as
the
UTA
properties,
and
also
include
some
options
for
housing.
So
I
will
ask
Tammy
if
she
has
anything.
She
would
like
to
add
to
that
and
then
we'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Oh.
E
C
F
F
I
was
just
wondering
how
you
perceive
an
happening
and
if
you
already
have
developers
of
expressed
interest-
and
you
have
an
idea
as
to
do
you
think
it's
gonna
be
like.
What's
the
intention,
you
think
it'll
be
one
developer,
doing
all
three
of
them
or
will
get
multiple
people
involved
in
it?
I
guess
the
question
is
how
big
of
a
scale
of
a
development
are
we
going
to
see
here
is
in
making
your
little
things?
F
E
Everyone
I
shared
a
map.
Can
everyone
see
the
map
great?
So
there
are
three
distinct
zones
that
will
go
out
with
the
RFP
and
as
director
Amano
mentioned,
a
development
team
can
submit
a
proposal
for
all
three
zones
or
pick
one
of
the
zones,
and
it
will
be
through
the
selection
process
that
the
ultimate
decision
is
made,
whether
to
go
with
one
master
developer
on
all
three
zones
or
kind
of
do
a
la
carte
and
in
terms
of
the
scale
of
development.
E
The
preferred
development
scenario
or
the
build-out
will
be
based
on
the
plan
that
urban
design
associates
established
a
little
while
ago
in
partnership
with
WF
RC,
&
UTA.
So
the
scale
of
the
development,
whether
it's
a
master,
developer
or
separate
development
teams
for
each
zone,
will
be
based
on
that
plan.
C
C
So
or
you
are
unmuted,
if
you
have
a
comment,
please
feel
free
to
share
it
now.
Okay,
can
you
hear
me
all
right?
Yes,
thank
you.
Okay,
yeah
I,
don't
have
any
comment,
but
I
am
obviously
very
interested
and
how
things
progress,
so
I'll
just
be
paying
attention
to
what
you're
doing,
staying
informed
and
then
participate
in
once
you
get
the
RFP.
B
B
We
have
Allison
from
the
council
office,
Dani,
Tammy
and
Tracy
from
our
DJ
and
Jen
and
I
believe
is
around
in
case.
What
can't
there's
any
questions,
and
these
two
topics
are
that
are
the
eight
housing
framework
that
has
been
being
worked
on
for
the
last
year,
at
least
or
so,
and
also
the
Northwest
quad
housing,
tax,
differential
and
four
borders
and
people
listening.
Part
of
the
reason
that
we
wanted
to
do
this
together
is
because
it's
almost
a
chicken
in
an
egg
which
comes
first
in
which
do
we
talk
about
first,
so
I.
B
Imagine
that
one
discussion
will
lead
into
the
other
and
will
kind
of
be
going
back
and
forth
ish,
but
this
will
really
be
the
first
time
I
think
we
have
3060
minutes
total
for
this
whole
discussion.
I
think
it
will
be
one
of
the
first
times
that
we
kind
of
can
delve
in
a
little
deeper
into
the
Northwest
quad
policy
for
the
housing
framework
there
and
how
that
will
interact
with
the
housing
framework
that
RDA
has
put
together.
B
C
D
All
yours,
I
will
okay.
Thank
you.
I
will
just
introduce
Tammy
and
Tracy
and
follow
up
on
what
you
said.
Madam
chair,
that
the
housing
framework
has
been
an
ongoing
conversation
with
the
board,
as
we
have
developed
that
and
more
recently,
at
the
board's
request,
we
were
asked
to
take
a
look
at
either
providing
some
information
or
an
opportunity
within
this
context
and
a
board
meeting
to
you
kind
of
a
gathering
of
data
and
information
as
a
relation
northwest
quadrant.
D
B
E
Great
thanks,
madam
chair,
as
Danny
mentioned,
this
is
a
follow
up
to
a
very
long
conversation
that
we've
been
having
on
housing.
It
was
back
in
December
of
2017,
actually
that
the
RDA
board
directed
our
DEA
staff
to
develop
a
draft
housing
allocation
policy
for
the
board's
review
and
that
really
kicked
off
an
ongoing
discussion
on
affordable
housing
policy
between
May
2018
and
February.
E
2020
RDA
staff
brought
a
series
of
briefings
to
the
board
and
these
briefings
included
topic
topics,
including
statutory
housing
requirements,
previous
funding
allocations,
programs
and
tools,
and
there
was
a
lot
of
policy
discussion
that
was
included
in
these
briefings
and
then.
Finally,
in
February
of
2020,
we
brought
a
draft
Salt
Lake
City
Housing
implementation
framework
that
was
jointly
developed
by
kin
community
and
neighborhoods
hand,
housing,
a
neighborhood
development
and
the
RTA,
and
this
framework
really
laid
out
the
common
understanding
of
how
housing
implementation
would
work
across
city
divisions
and
departments.
E
2Rt
a
specific
frameworks
that
we
hope
can
be
moved
forward
to
actually
policy
resolutions.
The
first
framework
is
a
draft
housing
allocation
framework
that
would
establish
housing
accounts,
clarify
the
requirements
of
these.
Each
of
these
sources
of
funds
outline
eligible
activities,
define
priorities
and
kind
of
create
a
process
for
allocating
housing
funds
through
the
annual
budget.
The
second
policy
framework
we
have
in
your
pocket
is
a
draft
housing
development
trust
fund
program
framework,
and
this
really
stems
from
the
recent
allocations
that
the
Council
on
the
board
has
provided
the
RDA
for
the
sales
tax
funds.
E
Those
have
been
dropped
into
an
account
called
the
housing
development
trust
fund.
When
the
council
on
board
allocated
these
funds,
the
intent
really
was
to
create
a
one-stop-shop
program
or
housing
development
within
Salt
Lake
City.
So
this
framework
would
do
that.
It
would
combine
all
the
different
sources
of
housing
that
the
sea
has
for
affordable
housing
development
to
create
establish
a
one-stop
shop
program
so
to
delve
more
into
these
frameworks,
this
is
the
kind
of
an
outline
of
the
RDA
housing
application
framework
and
there's
a
lot
going
on
in
this
chart.
E
But
really
that's
a
factor
of
different
sources
of
housing
funds
and
the
fact
that
we
have
to
keep
these
funds
in
separate
accounts
as
her
statutory
requirements
so
which
we
have
been
doing.
The
framework
would
just
add
on
another
account
to
what
we
already
have,
which
is
the
northwest
quadrant
housing
account,
and
these
different
sources
of
funds
have
different
requirements
as
to
how
these
funds
are
used
with
different
eligible
activities.
E
Different
ami
targets
that
sort
of
thing,
so
the
policy
would
establish
the
four
accounts,
clarify
the
statute
and
regulatory
requirements
for
each
account
and
then
look
at
what
programs
act
and
activities
the
RTA
currently
has
and
define
by
account
which
program
and
activities
are
eligible
and
then
establish
high-level
funding,
priorities
per
account,
and
we
envision
these
high-level
funding
priorities.
Since
this
is
a
policy
that
will
be
ongoing
over
time,
these
would
be
pretty
general,
for
example,
with
the
northwest
quadrant
housing
account.
We
have
heard
the
board.
E
Our
sense
is
that
the
board
really
wants
to
focus
these
funds
and
neighborhoods
adjacent
to
the
northwest
quadrant
that
will
be
impacted
by
northwest
quadrant
development.
So,
for
example,
a
funding
priority
of
the
northwest,
quadrant
account
could
be
to
prioritize,
but
those
funds
for
neighborhoods
west
of
I-15.
E
This
policy
would
also
establish
kind
of
a
strategy
on
an
annual
basis
for
coordinating
allocating
housing
funds,
and
it's
on
the
annual
basis
that
the
board
could
get
more
specific,
with
policy
priorities
for
funding,
for
example,
on
an
annual
basis.
We
could
look
at
all
the
funds
that
are
available
and,
if
there's
a
strategic
site
acquisition
that
the
board
may
want
to
go
after,
we
could
break
down
different
funding
objectives
on
an
annual
basis,
so
it
flows
from
the
accounts
down
to
how
the
funds
would
be
annual
annually
allocated.
E
The
second
framework
in
your
pocket
is
for
the
housing
development
trust
fund
program.
So
what
we
have
right
now
with
the
RDA
are
a
few
different
programs
for
the
development
of
affordable
housing.
This
policy
of
it
moves
forward
would
replace
those
different
programs
and
centralize
all
of
the
resources
for
affordable
housing
development
into
one
program
that
would
be
permanent,
revolving
and
annually
renewable,
and
this
really
is
intended
to
do
what
the
board
has
been
asking,
which
is
to
centralize
resources
for
affordable
housing
development.
E
E
G
Just
really
appreciate
our
TA
staff.
Putting
this
together
I
know
that
it's
been
a
lot
of
back
and
forth.
A
lot
of
conversations
making
sure
this
northwest
quadrant
tax
differential
is
then
discussed.
So
I
really
appreciate
staff.
Doing
that.
My
question
is
by
talking
about
annual
reporting.
Is
that
what
if
we
wanted
to
bring
it
up
more
than
one
time
during
the
year?
Is
that
something
that
we
can
do
as
a
board
instead
of
an
annual
checkup
or
discussion?
Yeah.
D
We
could
do
that
right
now,
currently,
I
believe
we
do
our
loan
portfolio
and
our
property
reports
twice
a
year,
and
so
we
certainly
could
have
that
same
frequency
or
or
more
depending
on
how
the
board
wanted
to
do
it
and
I
think
this
Tammy
said
if
the
funding
requests
go
out,
maybe
twice
here,
then
that
might
make
more
sense
as
well
to
kind
of
have
those
conversations
aligned
with
those
funding
offerings.
This.
G
That's
in
district,
1
and
I
just
want
to
remind
everybody
about
that,
but
and
I
didn't
make
a
big
stink
about
it
when
I
probably
should
have
done
made
it
bigger
stink
about
it,
but
just
making
sure
that
we
focus
these
funds
where
they
should
be
focused
and
they
be
focused
there
in
perpetuity.
And
this
is
this
is
a
great
statement.
I
think
from
us
saying
these
funds
will
be
funded
in
the
West
Side
west
of
I-15
in
perpetuity
until
the
access
to
opportunities
are
equal
across
the
city.
D
Yeah,
director
Rodgers,
if
I,
can
follow
up
on
that.
That's
specifically
question
number
one
in
tammy's
Lewis's
is:
are
there
high
level
priority
correction
items
that
would
like
to
put
on
on
these
fundings
and
then,
obviously,
as
you
said,
you
have
the
opportunity
of
any
time
to
pivot
on
that,
based
on
what
you
want
to
target
in
any
given
year,
but
you
could
certainly
put
that
there's
a
high
level
priority
and
objective
for
the
funds.
C
I'm
interested
in
in
affordable
homeownership
for
these
funds.
You
know
in
the
Northwest,
from
the
northwest
quadrant
in
the
area
to
give
opportunities
to
lower-income
families
to
start
building
wealth
as
they
own
properties
and
they
work.
You
know
you
might
have
people
were.
You
know,
workforce
that
and
might
need
a
place
to
be,
that
didn't
leave
that
so.
G
Chair
just
to
follow
up
with
honor
I'd
love
it
if
our
staff
and
our
TA
staff
I
think
they
they
have
an
idea
of
where
I've
really
tried
to
push
in
homeownership
affordability
as
well
as
market
rate.
But
if
the
rest
of
the
board
members
are
okay,
I
would
love
for
them
to
come
back
with
some
policy
ideas
and
how
that
we
can
not
just
use
this
money
as
a
one-shot,
but
use
it
as
an
opportunity
for
us
to
make
something
out
of
it.
G
Like
we've,
never
done
this
before
we've
never
had
the
opportunity
to
discuss,
you
know
hey,
you
know
we
can
actually
do
affordable
marker,
affordable,
homeownership
market
rate
homeownership
so
that
we
build.
You
know
neighborhoods
right,
but
also
do
apartments,
and
that
makes
we
have
affordable
and
market
rate
of
renters
ship.
But
in
turn
that
that
money
is
used
and
you
create
economic
development-
I
mean
there's
a
lot.
C
H
Thanks
for
the
Taoiseach
now
this
might
be
a
real
basic
question,
but
how
do
we,
when
we
look
at
the
projects?
How
do
we
balance
the
housing
with
business
development
systems
and
and
areas
that
just
don't
become
an
island
of
just
housing
and
they're
separate
from
everybody
else,
but
the
business
side
of
the
house
daycares?
How
the
house,
the
green
space?
How
do
we
incorporate
then
and
grade
the
projects
on
that
marin?
Instead
of
just
hey,
we
go,
we
got
a
thousand
apartments,
but
they
have
no
place
to
shop,
eat
or
grow.
H
E
Can
take
a
shot
at
answering
that
I
would
say
that,
with
tax
increment
funds
that
are
used
for
housing
within
RTA
project
areas,
we
definitely
take
a
more
involved
approach
in
making
sure
there's
a
right
mix
of
Housing
and
Economic
Development
and
open
space
and
other
activities
other
good
urban
design,
high-level
architecture
within
the
RTA
project
areas.
However,
citywide
funds
used
outside
of
already
a
project
areas.
E
We
have
a
little
bit
less
control,
because
our
funds
outside
of
project
areas
can
really
only
be
used
on
the
affordable
component
of
a
project
being
80%
ami
or
below.
So
we
have
really
outside
of
project
areas
focused
on
the
affordable
housing
piece.
That
being
said,
I
think
there's
room
to
still
implement
some
policy
priorities
on
what
what
projects
you'd
like
funding
directed
to
outside
of
RDA
project
areas
as
well,
yeah.
H
F
Thanks
I
appreciate
discussion,
I
he's
interested
in
what
director
Rogers
is
talking
about
with
trying
to
focus
the
funds
on
the
west
side,
because
that
brings
up
an
equity
piece
that
I
think
we're
all
really
focused
on
right
now,
making
sure
that
word
for
a
building
of
all
areas
within
the
city.
It's
one
thing,
I'm
struggling
to
understand,
and
maybe
I
just
need
to
learn
a
little
bit
more
myself
is
that
is
it
you
know
in
terms
of
like
helping
communities
grow,
is
it
best
to
to
focus
affordable
housing
in
certain
areas
or
be?
F
You
know
some
of
those
services
in
supportive
networks
that
would
help
families
in
and
communities
of,
color
and
other
people
that
have
traditionally
been
sort
of
under
supported,
help,
support
them
and
and
grow
better
I
think
I've
got
to
balance.
I
mean
I'm
interested
in
figuring
out,
so
I,
don't
know
that
it's
focusing
affordable
housing
dollars
only
on
the
west
side
makes
complete
sense,
but
discussion
I,
guess
I'm,
not
sure
what
could
make
it.
G
There
I'd
love
to
kind
of
answer
that
it's
not
if
you
look
at
how
much
money
is
coming
in
the
first
year.
It's
it's
nothing
to
shout
about.
Okay
and
it's
gonna
be
a
long
time
until
something
comes
up,
but
there's
opportunities
first,
discuss
bonding.
You
know
off
of
that.
First
increment,
that
comes
in
there's
a
lot
of
opportunities
and
looking
at
you
know,
funding
different.
G
Idea-
and
this
is
just
my
idea
and
staff-
can
come
back
and
talked
about
it,
but
it's
not
about
the
affordable
housing
money
would
be
used
to
build,
affordable
housing
right.
It
would
be
affordable
for
sale
units.
It
would
be
a
for
sale.
You
know
affordable
rental
as
well,
but
in
the
other
part
we
could
invest
in
market
rates.
You
have
your
have
people
who
have
homeownership
that
are
affordable
as
well
as
market
rate,
so
you're,
creating
that
balance
that
network
in
these
areas,
but
in
opportunities.
G
When
you
sell
those
those
units,
you
then
reinvest
that
to
create
economic
development
for
stores
or
for
business
opportunities
in
that
same
development.
So
it's
not
just
a
one
shot.
Where
we're
saying
here
developers
we
want
15%
of
your
units
at
market
rate,
I
mean
affordable,
affordable
for
50
years.
It's
actually
us
investing
in
the
communities
and
creating
neighborhoods
that
have
businesses
and
opportunities
to
grow.
I.
E
I
didn't
mean
to
interrupt
you,
but
I
did
want
to
point
out
that
there
are
some
policies
that
the
board
has
implemented
to
encourage
a
mix
of
incomes
and
a
diversity
of
housing
on
the
west
side,
for
example,
overnighter
Motel
redevelopment
as
part
of
allocating
the
site
acquisition
funds
for
that
project.
The
board
mandated
that
only
50%
of
the
units
could
be
deed,
restricted,
affordable
housing
to
encourage
that
site
to
be
mixed
income
in
our
current
NOFA
policy,
which
the
Housing
Development
Trust
Fund
policy
would
replace.
E
B
Then,
thank
you
Tammy,
so
I
think
then
I
think
would
be
helpful
now
if
we
move
to
the
Northwest
quad
presentation,
because
those
are
kind
of
two
different
things
that
we're
talking
about
and
we
I
think
the
board
means
to
discuss,
discuss
a
little
bit
more
after
the
presentation
about
what
kind
of
policies
we
want
to
see
that
that
is
direct
to
that
10%
coming
out
of
the
Northwest
quad.
So
maybe
we
can
do
that
whoever's
in
charge
of
presentations.
That's
Tracy's.
D
I
C
I
So
we
compiled
demographic
housing
info
focused
on
the
neighborhoods
adjacent
to
the
northwest
quadrant,
which
are
primarily
Salt,
Lake
City's,
West,
Side
neighborhoods.
So
we
looked
through
the
many
city
adopted
master
plans
associated
with
the
west
side.
Data
from
the
Kempsey
Gardner,
Policy,
Institute
and
lytec
Awards
I'm
throughout
the
years,
and
to
summarize
West
Side
neighborhoods
in
general,
compared
to
the
rest
of
the
city,
is
growing
at
a
slower
rate.
I
In
terms
of
the
eligible
uses
differential
pursuant
to
state
code,
17
c1
for
12-plus
funds
must
be
used
to
provide
housing,
affordable
to
households,
earning
80%
ami
in
below
and
within
these
parameters.
These
funds
could
be
used
towards
affordable
housing
to
acquire
properties
for
construction
rehabilitation.
This
could
also
be
used
to
land
grant
or
contribute
money
to
housing.
I
The
board
may
wish
to
consider
general
funding
priorities,
as
Tammy
mentioned
in
her
presentation-
and
here
are
just
some
considerations
for
general
priorities
for
the
northwest,
quadrant
housing
tax
differential
I.
Think
we've
heard
a
lot
about
just
prioritizing
neighborhoods
that
are
adjacent
to
the
northwest.
I
Quadrant
I
won't
go
through
all
of
these,
but
these
are
just
kind
of
some
considerations
that
the
board
can
consider
so
back
to
this
again,
this
northwest
quadrant
account
just
falls
in
with
falls
under
they
overall
already
a
housing
allocation
framework,
and
with
that
we
can
kind
of
continue
the
discussion
and
answer
any
questions
you
may
have
about
how
these
slides
Tammy.
Did
you
add
anything
to
do
this
discussion.
E
Though
I
may
add,
as
the
board
also
may
wish
to
consider
that
these
funds
could
use
to
remove
for
lack
of
a
better
term
undesirable
land
uses,
for
example,
how
the
board
allocated
funds
to
acquire
the
overnight
or
motel
so
I
think
that's
an
example
of
how
these
are
affordable
housing
funds.
You
can
very
much
still
use
them
to
improve
neighborhood
ends
and
the
opportunity
to.
F
E
State
statute
there's
a
little
bit
gray
on
this,
but
by
practice
the
RDA
has
tried
to
keep
if
it's
not
within
a
project
area.
The
proportion
of
portal
housing
funds
in
alignment
with
the
affordable
housing
component
for
the
project.
So
if,
for
example,
if
the
contract
was
only
10%,
affordable
housing,
we
wouldn't
want
to
fund
50%
of
the
project
and.
E
E
J
I
think
that
the
nature
of
formal
housing
also
contributes
to
the
percentage
Darrin
most
affordable,
housing
we've
looked
at
has
to
be
done
through
financing
through
the
high
tech
process
and
they
have
their
own
set
of
criteria
that
designate
how
much
you
based
on
the
project
so
there's.
So
we
have
one
layer
on
our
side
about
how
much
to
contribute
to
a
project.
Don't
lie.
Tech
and
other
partners
also
have
requirements
about
what
they
will
financial,
nobody
wouldn't.
J
So
it's
a
little
bit
combination
there,
I
I
support
or
member
Rodgers
concept,
I
think
there's
some
details.
They
worked
out
about
how
we
do
a
pitch
for
rent
and
horse
sale
pieces
in
projects
and
then
how
we
designate
that
for
sale
projects
would
come
back
into
used.
The
cycle
that
I
think
we
also
need
to
be
clear
about
prioritization.
J
You
can
say
we're
priority.
The
legal
requirement
is,
it
doesn't
have
to
be.
They
watched
a
live
15.
We
need
to
be
more
clear
about
the
geographic
boundaries
order.
Prioritization
sounds
like
we
would
prioritize
that,
but
in
some
cases
it
wouldn't
necessarily
have
to
be
used
in
that
area,
or
instance.
Here
were
the
first
ten
years
there
may
not
be
much
money
coming
back,
you
got
one,
could
it
be
used
to
backfill,
say
central
business,
district
funds
or
other
funds
in
the
RDA
later
on
that
are
used
now
upfront.
C
D
Sorry,
a
typing
so
I
make
sure
I
can
follow
up
on
these
things.
To
answer
the
question
I,
yes,
you
can,
you
can
do
a
few
different
things
number
one
I.
You
can
always
borrow
from
other
project
areas
so
long
as
you
do
repay
it
or
have
the
intention
to
repay
it.
So
you
can
certainly
leverage
additional
funds
in
the
early
years,
as
director
Roger
said,
depending
on
the
source
and
the
stream
of
funds,
you
could
potentially
even
go
out
and
either
do
a
bond
or
just
do
traditional
bank
financing.
D
If
you
feel
confident
that
you
have
a
steady
enough
revenue
stream
and
then
to
the
extent
of
revolving
the
funds,
understanding
that
there's
a
priority
for
home
ownership,
that's
not
necessarily
the
only
way
you
could
create
a
revenue
stream
that
could
continue
to
circulate
funds.
You
could
buy
property,
maintain
ownership
of
it
and
turn
around
and
just
lease
it
to
developers,
and
then
those
annual
lease
payments
become
your
ongoing
revenue
stream
that
you
could
continue
to
circulate
into
the
program.
J
Thank
You,
Danny
I
would
encourage
us
to
take
a
long
view
of
this
as
well.
I'm,
not
sure
if
we
say
we
want
a
prioritizing
for
ten
years,
I'm,
not
sure.
That's
enough
time,
I
think
if
we're
talking
about
systemic
investment
in
communities
of
color
or
low
income
neighborhoods,
it's
gonna
take
a
long
time
partially,
because
there's
not
a
lot
of
turnover
here
they
mentioned
or
the
demographics
are.
These
are
a
higher
percentage
of
home
ownership,
which
means
they
don't
turn
over
every
year,
and
so
we
have
to
invest
in
the
long
term.
J
B
K
Right
which
I'm
sorry
just
to
point
out
you
could
you
could
create
that
policy,
and
then
future
boards
could
change
him
right
through
their
sort
of
public
decision-making
process.
The
only
way
you
can
really
legally
bind
future
councils
or
boards
is
bonding.
Unfortunately,
because
that's
like
a
contract
with
payments
associated
with
it,
at
least
that's
the
only
one
we've
been
able
to
think
of.
G
F
I
I
completely
agree
with
changes
like
goal
for
creating
equitable
access
opportunities
on
the
east
and
west
side.
I.
Just
am
not
sure
that
I'm
that
I
see
it
we're
spending
affordable
housing
dollars
on
the
west
side
creates
that
equitable
access
it
to
me
it's
other
dollars
that
would
create
economic
development
and
create
business
nodes
on
the
west
side.
F
That
would
start
to
become
Zach
that
equitable
access
and
if
we
look
at
affordable
housing,
I
mean
even
if
we
look
at
like
our
school
schools,
PTSA
is
funded
right,
the
more
we
can
get
less
like
more.
We
can
get
market
rate
housing
in
that
area.
The
more
we
start
to
create
those
opportunities
for
communities
on
the
west
side,
so
I'm,
absolutely
a
hundred
personnel
on
board
with
the
idea
of
creating
equal
opportunities,
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
how
affordable
housing
does
I
think.
B
Or
Danny
or
Tracy,
or
anyone
smart
Jen.
Anyone
smarter
than
me
can
explain
this
if
I'm
wrong,
but
that
10%
of
the
housing
of
that
tax
increment
is
just
the
start
of
what
we
could
help
offer
to
offset
costs
for
developers.
So
then
you
are
sort
of
requiring
these.
You
kill
you!
Potentially
you
could
require
these
other
benefits
for
the
community
in
order
for
them
to
one
get
the
that
particular
tax
on
for
intial
but
$2
from
other
places
that
we
might
have
right.
K
D
And
you
in
the
overnighter
project,
they're
proposing
to
do
a
daycare
as
part
of
their
first
floor,
retail
use,
and
so
that's
Jenna
I
think
you
just
hit
it
on
the
head.
That's
I
think
the
easiest
way
to
kind
of
think
about
it
exactly
is
a
combination
of
what
Tammy
and
Amy
just
said
is
in
any
project.
D
The
RDAs
role
may
be
only
10
or
20
percent
of
the
overall
funding
of
the
project
cost,
but
as
part
of
us
providing
that
funding,
we
can
also
require
other
conditions
within
the
project
or
we
can
go
out
and
whether
it's
our
own
additional
funds
or
the
funds
of
other
partners.
We
can
then
try
to
pull
in
other
source
of
the
funds
that
could
provide
those
opportunities
and
metrics
that
aren't
just
strictly
tied
to
housing
and
whether
that's
you
know
the
daycare
or
other
uses.
B
I
just
lay
your
hand
and
I'll
get
with
you
and
just
sounds
like
a
tide
to
that.
Danny
I
think
you
know
last
year
and
for
the
year
prior
to
that,
the
RTA
staff
worked
really
hard
on
our
missions
and
values
and
and
sort
of
what
the
public
benefits
are
and
what
kind
of
incentive
you
get
depending
on
what
sort
of
public
benefit
you're,
providing
right
and
and
I
think.
D
Yeah
and
I
think
you
know
one
of
the
easiest
ways
we
try
to
just
think
of
it.
Is
you
obviously
want
more
opportunities
on
the
west
side?
You
have
a
lot
of
the
housing
there.
Now
you
have
more
homeownership
and
I.
Think
people
realize,
and
you
have
more
market
affordability
there.
So
you
want
to
infuse
that
with
the
opportunity
side
and
you
want
more
affordable
units
on
the
east
side
and
so
across
the
city
you're,
balancing
where
you
want
affordable,
housing
and
versus
where
you
have
a
need
for
the
opportunities
and
and
for
success.
J
Yeah,
thank
you.
Man
chair.
My
fundamental
concern
goes
back
to
the
chart
about
where
lights,
like
projects
are
currently
being
located,
they're,
not
on
the
west
side.
There's
not
they're,
not
capital.
Coming
in.
What's
up
people
are
not
investing
over
here,
whether
it's
low
income
or
marker
rate
purity.
You
got
to
find
a
way
to
get
capital
over
here.
Otherwise
it
doesn't
matter
what
our
plans
are.
I
think
I'm
deeply
invested
in
the
council
side
of
looking
at
low
income,
housing
overlay
for
the
city,
I'm,
not
sure.
That's
enough,
huijun,
arizona's
gotta
be
discussion.
J
I
think
there
are
policy.
Discussions
need
to
be
had
to
make
sure
that
across
the
city
right
now,
though,
no
one
is
putting
in
money
west
and
that's
a
huge
problem
core.
So
folks
who
are
living
in
west
side
aren't
getting
any
benefits
period,
whether
it's
a
billy
mix,
use
retail
in
the
first
floor,
any
sort
of
investment
and
that's
a
huge
problem.
J
I,
don't
think
this
money
itself
is
gonna,
be
substantial,
it's
gonna
be
incremental
and
now
it
grows,
and
so
it
could
be
twenty
to
thirty
years
before
you
see
a
large,
we
gotta
have
this
plus
other
funding
coming
here.
It's
gonna
have
to
be
a
lot
more
than
it
is
really
make
a
dent
in
the
equity
issue.
So
I
fully
support
the
concept
else
to
work
out,
but
I
think
we
do
have
to
have
that
fall
of
that
stick
to
our
guns
about
mixed
income
across
the
city
period.
H
If
we
try
to
make
them
too
big,
then
they
just
overcome
everything.
If
you
had
them
smaller
than
a
small
business
feels
like
they
can
own,
that
and
people,
you
know
they
stay.
You
live
within
a
probably
a
five
block
area.
So
if
you
go
too
big,
then
it
just
becomes
overwhelming
and
and
it
takes
forever
to
grow.
H
But
if
you
had
a
smaller
project-
and
you
could
say
hey
that
smaller
project
grows
a
little
bit
wider
and
it
takes
couple
blocks,
another
small
project
grows
so
I'm
concerned
with
trying
to
look
at
building
of
a
big
city
quickly,
instead
of
small
little
seeds
and
living,
they
laying
those
plants
grow
and
giving
them
a
lot
of
water.
Therefore,
that
one
small
five
block
area
and
five
block
area
and
I'm
I
told
it
I.
Just
my
thoughts
on
the
development
of
the
growth
is
back
to
Angie's
point
and
no
one's
gonna
develop
out
there.
H
B
Okay,
so
board
members-
and
we
are
almost
out
of
time
for
this
particular
agenda
item
I-
did
want
to
turn
to
the
sort
of
policy
questions
that
Tammy
originally
had
in
her
first
and
the
in
Tammy's
presentation.
It
sounds
to
me
the
first
question
was
kind
of
looking
at
providing
direction
on
our
funding
priorities,
and
it
looks
to
me
that
there's
a
lot
of
discussion
that
I
think
needs
to
continue
happen,
but
I
I
can
hear
the
sort
of
things
that
jumped
out
kind
of
from
everyone.
B
But
the
review
body
should
be
charged
with
reviewing
the
housing
development
trust
fund
program
applications
because,
as
Tammy
mentioned
right
now,
there's
two
different
boards.
If
you
will
that
are
reviewing
applications
and
for
me
it
seems
if
definite
idea
of
putting
his
money
into
RDA
was
to
create
a
streamlined
process
and
let's
continue
to
create
that
streamlined
process
and
have
one
reviewing
entity
whatever
the
you
and
the
administration.
Look
that
that
might
be
the
best
reviewing
entity.
F
F
How
that
works
out,
but
I
would
hate
to
just
say:
oh
board,
that's
working
with
hand!
Your
thank
you
but
go
away.
You
know
like
it
would
like
to
make
sure
we
keep
engaged
the
people
that
are
currently
engaged.
So
I
don't
know
if
that's
combining
the
boards
together
or
how
that
works.
Maybe
that's
too
big
of
a
board.
D
And
if
I
could
jump
in
Madame
chair
our
intent
and
putting
that
on
as
a
policy
items
really
just
to
make
the
board
aware
that
right
now,
just
between
the
different
funding
sources,
you
have
two
different
boards,
and
so
that
does
need
to
be
something
that
if
we
are
to
try
to
accomplish
the
goal
of
the
board,
which
is
to
streamline
the
process
and
that's
certainly,
we
need
to
come
back
and
figure
out
as
part
of
the
policy.
So
I
don't
think
we
have
that
answer
for
you
today.
D
I
will
confess
that
we
jumped
ahead
on
that
item
before
really
even
fully
engaging
and
just
because
we
put
it
down
as
a
potential
policy
question
without
we
haven't
had
that
conversation
yet
and
so
I.
Think.
Madam
chair,
your
point,
that's
just
simply
something
we
want
to
make
sure
we
work
out
on
the
administrative
side,
because
there's
a
balance
there
between
the
transparency,
the
roles,
the
city's
procurement
process
and
whatever
we
propose,
will
either
be
part
of
just
an
agency
policy
or
may
even
need
to
require
changes
on
the
city's
ordinance
side.
D
So
we
just
to
make
you
aware
that,
as
part
of
trying
to
accomplish
the
board's
goal
of
streamlining
this,
that
is
something
that
we've
identified,
that
we
do
have
to
figure
out
internally
and
administrative
Lee,
so
that
we
can
come
back
and
propose
something
to
you
as
a
board
and
potentially
even
a
City
Council.
So.
B
K
B
C
B
C
G
A
A
A
A
B
B
All
those
in
favor
put
your
thumbs
in
the
air
and
I
will
count
it
off.
Chris
Andrew
Darin
on
it
Dan
skip
you
too
James
I'll
have
their
thumbs
in
the
air
and
I
said
to
keep
you
because
I
pointed
to
Danny
Aaron,
but
okay,
so
there
you
go.
Straw
poll
is
unanimously
a
yes
moving
on
report
or
announcements
from
the
executive
director.
B
D
Yeah
sad
to
make
sure
I
was
off
mute.
So
thank
you,
madam
chair.
Just
two
quick
reports
for
the
board.
First
and
foremost,
just
want
to
inform
the
board
that
we
have
already
put
out
on
the
street
the
affordable
housing
funds
arm
our
fiscal
year,
21
budget
through
a
notice
of
funding
availability
just
slightly
under
four
million
dollars
targeted
towards
affordable
housing
development
assistance.
D
Daffy
has
held
a
virtual
meeting
to
provide
an
overview
of
the
application
and
requirements
to
about
15
developers,
and
we
are
accepting
applications
that
are
due
on
August
6th
you'll
recall
as
a
board.
We
put
this
money
out
as
quickly
as
possible
with
that
deadline
in
hopes
that
developers
could
hopefully
put
those
as
part
of
lytec
project
applications
that
they
would
have
a
commitment
of
funds
that
they
could
include
in
that,
so
those
funds
are
on
the
street
and
we're
already
receiving
interest
from
developers
on
it.
D
Second
announcement
is
that
the
agency
has
also
put
out
a
call
for
artists
or
our
art
for
hope:
Salt,
Lake,
City
public
art
project.
This
is
invitation
to
Utah
artists
just
submit
artwork
that
will
be
considered
and
chosen
on
four
foot
by
four
foot
message
squares.
These
squares
will
then
be
displayed
and
installed
in
groups
throughout
the
city
on
RDA
owned
property
on
a
temporary
basis,
and
we
will
also
post
them
within
an
online
gallery.