►
Description
To view the agenda for this meeting please use this link https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
It's
tuesday
march
8th,
happy
international
women's
day
to
the
women
that
are
present
and
thank
you
for
all
the
men.
The
support
as
women
in
this
life
so
excited
that
we're
celebrating
that
today,
internationally,
we
welcome
the
members
of
the
public
who
are
in
person
and
who
may
be
watching
our
usual
video
feeds
online.
I'm
happy
that
we
have
returned
to
a
hybrid
meeting
approach.
A
It
is
nice
to
be
meeting
again
in
person
and
to
be
here
with
members
of
the
public.
My
fellow
board
members
and
city
staff,
hybrid
board
meetings
allow
people
to
join
online
through
webex
or
in
person
at
the
city
and
county
building
in
this
days
following
covet
regulations,
we're
still
making
some
adjustments.
A
A
We
start
our
rda
meetings
with
comments
to
the
board.
Your
feedback
is
always
welcomed
and
you
can
share
that
with
the
world
anytime
by
mailing
the
council
office
at
p.o
box,
1458,
5476,
salt
lake
city,
utah,
eight
four
one,
one
one
one,
one
four
excuse
me
5476
or
emailing
us
at
council
that
comments
slcgov.com
or
by
calling
our
24
hour
phone
comment
line
at
801,
535
7654.
A
A
These
are
guidelines
to
help
our
meeting
progress
in
an
orderly
civil
efficient
way
and
want
to
give
everybody
the
opportunity
to
voice
their
opinions
without
feeling
intimidated.
In
order
to
achieve
this,
our
rules
of
the
quorum
begin
from
the
moment
you
arrive
in
person
or
into
our
virtual
meeting.
A
The
rda
world
respects
all
points
of
view,
and
we
welcome
new
insights.
Please
be
respectful,
avoid
yelling,
profanity
or
making
racial
slurs,
obscene
or
defamatory
remarks.
If
you
violate
this
rule,
your
line
will
be
muted
or
you
will
be
asked
to
stop
if
you
feel
you
need
to
use
profanity
or
disrespectful
remarks
to
express
your
point.
A
You're
welcome
to
email,
ward
members
or
call
our
comment
line.
In
addition,
our
staff
will
request
your
name
during
the
webex
registration
process
to
limit
disruption.
Your
name
cannot
include
a
message
or
violate
our
rules
of
the
quorum.
If
your
name
doesn't
meet
this
requirement,
then
our
staff
will
make
contact
with
you
to
gather
the
information
from
you
for
those
joining
in
webex.
Please
monitor
your
chat
in
case.
We
try
to
reach
you.
A
Scott
corpani
from
our
staff
is
helping
to
moderate
the
meeting
and
will
be
messaging
with
the
attendees
to
coordinate
on
any
questions
with
your
commenting.
Registration
staff
is
handling
a
number
of
tasks.
Please
limit
messages
to
technical
issues
and
minimal
changes
to
your
registration
taylor
hill
on
our
staff.
Will
we
will
be
calling
the
names
of
those
who
wish
to
comment.
A
We
will
call
names
of
people
joining
on
webex
and
in
person
based
on
the
order
of
registration
or
received
comment
cards
when
it
is
your
turn
to
speak,
taylor
will
announce
your
name
for
people
in
webex.
She
will
unmute
your
line
and
you
may
begin
for
people
in
person.
Please
step
up
to
the
podium
and
if
you
have
a
mask,
please
feel
free
to
remove
it
before
making
a
comment.
A
A
A
A
C
A
A
Item
number
two
is
a
resolution
and
we'll
receive
a
follow-up
briefing
about
amendments
to
the
housing
development
loan
program
follow-up.
The
proposed
amendment
would
add
standards
for
the
distribution
of
emergency,
gaap
financing
funds
and
charge
the
rda
finance
committee
with
review
of
applications
for
this
funding.
The
purpose
is
to
ensure
these
funding
requests
are
reviewed
in
a
consistent
matter
at
the
table.
We
have
not
allison
today,
unfortunately,
but
jennifer
bruno
danny
walls,
tracy
trent
and
lauren
parisi.
D
B
B
So
staff
is
not
proposing
to
add
any
additional
standards
related
to
this
emergency
gap.
Finite
financing,
but
in
order
to
ensure
that
these
funds
are
used
for
projects
that
are
that
have
a
last-minute
gap,
these
funds
could
be
subject
to
a
shorter
conditional
commitment
period.
That's
something
I
think
board
member
mono
had
brought
up
at
the
last
meeting,
and
that
would
ensure
that
loan
closing
would
happen
in
a
quickly
after
board.
Approval,
and
this
limited
conditional
commitment
period
would
naturally
support
projects
that
are
further
along
the
way
and
have
financial
commitments
in
place
again.
B
So
rdsf
rdasaf
is
not
proposing
to
add
any
additional
standards
related
to
emergency
gap
financing,
but
we
are
still
proposing
to
mend
the
housing
development
loan
program
policy
to
clarify
and
direct
reviews
of
applications
to
the
rda
finance
committee,
and
with
that
I
can
take,
we
can
take
any
questions.
Thank.
E
Say
something:
can
you
tell
us
how
how
this
is
modified
or
influenced
by
the
concerns
raised
by
the
attorney's
office,
about
the
how
the
funds
are
handled
in
terms
of
staff,
approvals
versus
board
approvals,
and
things
like
that?
Did
that
influence
how
this?
How
your
recommendation
came
out
and
is
the
administ?
Is
the
attorney's
office
concerns
included.
B
Yeah,
so
we
we
most
of
the
our
proposal
is
based
off
of
the
discussion
from
last
board
meeting.
It
seemed
like
there
wasn't
a
lot
of
appetite
to
shorten
the
process
too
much
than
that.
We
still
wanted
to
take
all
the
projects
back
for
board
approval,
so
we
maintained
that
process
and
I
think
there
was
a
lot
of
time
spent
in
developing
this
housing
development
loan
program
policy.
So
we
felt
like
the
policy,
does
provide
a
great
process
to
for
loans
to
kind
of
go
through
the
process.
B
C
C
D
G
A
H
A
E
A
A
So
that's
why
so
cindy
will
will
do
at
the
end
said?
Okay
thanks!
So
we
are
moving
on
to
item
number
three
and
it's
informational,
we're
receiving
an
introductory
briefing
about
the
proposed
housing
development
funding
strategy
for
fiscal
year.
2223
the
housing
development
funding
strategy
includes
a
projected
amount
of
revenue
to
be
allocated
to
each
housing
fund
for
the
upcoming
fiscal
year
proposed
housing
funding
priorities
for
the
upcoming
fiscal
year
and
the
proposed
funding
allocations
for
specific
housing
activities
for
the
upcoming
fiscal
year.
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I'll.
Just
be
brief.
Allison
had
a
much
more
extensive
introduction,
but
I'll
just
be
brief.
This
was
this
is
a
follow-up
to
the
discussion
last
year
that
the
intention
that
you
guys
set
your
funding
strategy
earlier
prior
to
the
development
of
the
annual
budget,
but
it
will
inform
what
is
presented
in
the
annual
budget.
So
this
is,
I
guess
what
you
could
consider
the
first
step
towards
what
may
be
presented
to
you
in
the
annual
budget,
which
will
be
in
may
so.
That'll
turn
it
over
to
rda
staff.
I
So
just
to
start
with
a
little
bit
of
background.
The
rda's
housing
allocation
funds
policy
contains
the
processes
and
guidelines
for
coordinating
and
allocating
different
sources
of
housing
funds
and
also
established
the
rdas
for
housing
funds
that
you
can
see
here
on
the
left
side
of
the
screen,
and
that
includes
our
primary
housing
fund,
secondary
housing
fund,
west
side,
community
initiative
fund
and
the
housing
development
fund.
I
So
our
funding
policy
also
dictates
that,
prior
to
the
annual
budget
process,
the
rda
annually
presents
to
you
all
the
rda
board,
a
housing
development
funding
strategy,
and
this
includes
the
three
components
on
the
right
side
of
the
screen
here.
So
that's
again,
the
projected
amount
of
revenue
to
be
allocated
to
each
of
those
four
housing
funds
and
that's
approved
with
the
rda
budget,
ultimately.
I
Secondly,
the
housing
priorities
for
the
upcoming
fiscal
year,
that's
approved
as
a
separate
resolution
and
then
finally,
the
funding
allocations
for
specific
housing
activities
to
carry
out
those
priorities
for
the
upcoming
fiscal
year
and
that's
also
approved
those
are
approved
as
line
items
in
the
rda
budget.
So
today's
conversation
will
really
be
focused
on
determining
your
housing
priorities
for
this
upcoming
fiscal
year,
along
with
the
housing
activities
that
we
can
use
to
accomplish
those
priorities.
I
I
So
you
may
wish
to
discuss
whether
you
are
in
alignment
with
the
proposed
priorities
or
wish
to
remove
or
replace
one
of
the
priorities,
and
I
do
want
to
again
mention
that
these
can
be.
These
will
be
updated
every
year
as
a
part
of
every
year's
annual
funding
strategy.
They
could
potentially
remain
the
same.
But
again
this
is
focused
on
this
upcoming
fiscal
year
next
slide.
I
So
now,
we'll
move
on
to
the
housing
activities
to
facilitate
these
housing
priorities.
Staff
is
proposing
four
housing
activities
that
could
potentially
be
funded
this
year,
and
so
those
include
a
shared
equity
housing
model
so
to
promote
home
ownership
and
wealth
building,
the
rda
will
explore
establishing
some
form
of
a
shared
equity
program
or
partnership.
I
This
is
likely
to
be
a
component
of
the
west
side
community
initiative,
but
still
in
the
research
phase
sec.
The
second
activity
is
land
acquisition
and,
of
course,
land
acquisition
is
always
an
important
part,
or
always
an
important
housing
activity
and
will
be
used
to
target
multiple
priorities,
including
ownership
projects,
family
housing
and
missing
middle
housing
through
the
released
the
release
of
a
request
for
proposals
where
we
can
specifically
request
these
types
of
certain
types
of
housing
dependent
on
the
given
parcel
and
the
needs
of
the
surrounding
area.
I
I
I
One
thing
to
consider
with
this
program
in
order
to
really
target
either
family
housing
or
deeply
affordable
housing,
or
both
you
could
potentially
choose
to
make
those
items
thresholds
of
the
competitive
nofa
process
this
year,
similar
to
last
year,
we
made
sustainability
a
threshold,
and
this
year
we
have
our
sustainability
policy
in
place.
So
that
will
be
a
component
anyhow,
but
anyway,
you
can
consider
making
those
two
items
a
threshold,
as
those
are,
could
potentially
be
a
housing
priority
of
yours
this
year.
So
it's
a
way
to
accomplish
that
next
slide.
I
So,
for
example,
missing
middle
housing
can
be
accomplished
through
adu
assistance,
but
land
could
also
be
acquired
specifically
for
the
development
of
missing
middle
housing,
types
like
town
homes
or
a
fourplex,
or
something
of
that
nature.
So
we're
hoping
to
that.
These
activities
will
really
accomplish
multiple
priorities
next
slide,
and
then
this
graphic
really
just
sums
up
the
components
of
fiscal
year:
23's
annual
housing
funding
strategy
and
again
we're
focused
on
the
the
clusters
to
the
right
of
the
screen,
the
the
prior
housing
priorities
and
housing
activities
today
next
slide.
A
Right
well,
thank
you.
That's
awesome,
I
think,
for
the
presentation.
I
have
questions.
I
have
one
question
about
the
adu
assistants.
I'm
sorry,
I
got
distracted
for
a
moment,
but
I
think
we're
having
a
presentation
later
from
the
planning
division
about
what
happened
last
year
with
adu
applications
and
probably
they
will
tell
us
or
they'll,
give
us
an
idea
of
what's
not
working.
Why
we're
not
getting
more?
Are
you
aware
of
those
right
now,
and
maybe
this
project
tackles.
A
J
A
J
All
thank
you
so
much.
I
I
do
feel
like
this
incorporates
a
lot
of
the
discussions
we've
had
previously.
I
have
a
question
about
the
difference
between
family
housing
and
missing
middle
housing,
because
in
my
brain
those
overlap
significantly.
So
can
you
help
me
understand
that
why
those
are
two
individual,
separate
things.
I
C
J
C
C
But
I've
been
thinking
more
about
that's
great.
We
have
it
on
housing,
but
does
the
land
acquisition
in
the
missing
middle,
incorporate,
purchasing
land
and
then
leasing
that
land?
So
we
can
have
a
storefront
locally
owned,
storefronts
or
community
services,
provided
so
that
the
housing
actually
has
some
place
to
go
nearby?
They
don't
have
to
take
transit.
I
Yeah,
that's
a
great
question
and
I
think
we
could
do
kind
of
either
with
these
dollars
with
the
housing
dollars.
I
do
think
it'll
be
more
focused
on
the
housing
component,
but
I
think
it
definitely
could
still
fund
a
mixed
use
development
if
the
if
the
lot
allows
for
that,
but
I
do
also
think
we'll
we're
working
on
our
commercial
loan
program
as
well,
and
so
we
could
focus
on
those
more
commercial
components
next
to
housing
with
that
program
too,
if
that
makes
sense.
C
C
J
I
wanted
to
comment
on
the
threshold
question.
I
I
think
I
am
supportive
of
that
so,
but
just
wanted
to
clarify.
We
are
saying
if
we
set
a
threshold
that
means
of
our
general
nofa,
taking
out
the
emergency
gap,
financing
that
we
just
talked
about,
I
assume
that
no
projects
would
even
be
considered
unless
they
either
include
deeply
affordable
or
family-sized
housing,
not
necessarily
both,
but
obviously
if
they
have
both.
J
B
B
Yeah,
well,
I
would
say
the
high
opportunity,
I
think,
as
we've
seen
in
the
last
few
years,
it's
been
pretty
difficult
to.
We've
had
just
one
project
that
has
applied
for
that.
So
if
that
was
a
threshold,
I
think
we
wouldn't
be
getting
very
many
applications,
whereas
I
think
family,
housing
and
missing.
Is
it
missing,
middle,
deep
or
deeply
affordable?
Sorry,
I
feel,
like
those
are
more
easily
incorporated.
You
know
in
a
lot
of
the
projects
that
we
do
see.
E
J
A
I
have
a
question
so
let's
say
we
move
forward
with
this
and
then
middle
of
the
year.
We
nobody
take
us
up
on
this
and
we
have
zero
applications
or
applications
are
not
good
enough,
but
then
all
of
a
sudden,
you
know,
there's
people
waiting
that
you
know
are
doing
other
types
of
housing
or
other
types
of
you
know
have
environmental
benefits
to
you
know
to
the
building
to
the
city.
A
E
And
I
think,
what's
more
likely
to
happen
is
that
developers
could
make
some
slight
adjustments,
those
that
are
in
the
planning
process.
Right
now
may
realize:
oh
well,
we
are.
We
have
a
better
shot
of
getting
that
money
if
we
have
more
family
size
units
or
so
there
there
are
some
tweaks
that
developers
can
make
along
the
way
in
their
planning
and
so
by
by
funding
what
you
prefer
in
terms
of
your
policy,
then
you
are
driving
you're
encouraging
that
outcome.
So
it's
pretty
likely
that
you
will
get
applications
for
this.
E
A
D
And
and
the
staff
has
checked
in
with
the
board
a
couple
of
times
on
that
high
opportunity
area
money
because
it
has
been
a
few
years
and
it
still
has
not
been
fully
spent,
and
so
each
time
the
board
has
the
ability
to
have
that
kind
of
intentional
discussion
and
say.
Is
it
worth
it
for
this
policy
goal
for
this
money
to
stay
there
until
the
right
project
comes
along?
Essentially
so
jennifer
does.
J
J
E
And
you
could,
I
think
you
could
also
decide
to
combine
that
money
with
other
money.
So
you
you
have
flexibility.
The
staff
has
flexibility
to
recommend
different
things,
but
I
think
the
the
east
side
developers
that
I've
talked
to
who
have
been
interested
in
doing
a
development
when
I've
asked
them.
If
they
know
about
the
rda
housing
high
opportunity,
they
may
have
known
about
it
at
one
point,
but
it
isn't
fresh
in
their
minds,
and
so
I
think
it
hasn't
caught
on
yet
in
terms
of
them
really
recognizing
it
as
a
thing.
J
I
mean
I
personally
on
the
high
opportunity.
I
know
that
isn't
really
what
we're
talking
about
here,
but
I,
I
think,
the
policy
goal
and
what
this
before
I
was
on
the
board,
but
what
the
board
did
with
that
was
right.
I
think
the
problem
is
the
definition
of
high
opportunity
zones
and
it's
its
incongruence
with
land
use
mapping
for
where
multi-family
housing
is
legal
in
the
city.
So
I
think
and
there's
a
lot
of
places
where
multi-family
housing
is
legal,
that
I
would
consider
a
high
opportunity
zone
that
are
not
on
the
map.
J
To
those
parts
pieces
of
the
housing
fabric
that
we're
not
currently
getting
anyhow
and
on
again
a
separate
topic,
I
think
that
we
look
at
things
like
the
affordable
housing
overlay
or
just
inclusionary
zoning
to
get
the
moderately
affordable.
I
think
we
need,
I
don't
think
we
need
to
keep
paying
for
moderately
affordable.
I
think
the
developers
pro
formas
are
working
out
well
enough,
including
those
with
other
incentives
or
carrots
or
sticks
or
whatever.
G
Yeah,
I
you
know,
I'm
learning
a
lot,
so
I
you
know
I
will
have
some
follow-up
questions
for
you
guys.
Hopefully
you
guys
have
time
to
help
me
understand
some
of
these
definitions
and
where
these
moneys
come
from
how
they
can
be
spent,
but
they,
you
know
something
I
heard
a
lot
and
is
about
families
not
being
able
to
live
in
our
city
anymore,
and
our
school
district
is
a
good
example
of
you
know
how
that's
showing
in
the
other
side.
G
You
know
families
are
moving
out
of
our
city
and
that's
very
concerning
so
I
I
you
know.
I
want
to
reiterate
what
you
guys
are
doing
here,
and
I
love
this,
because
family,
housing
and
home
ownership
is
really
the
struggle
here,
and
you
know,
if
we
can.
I
and
you
know
you
have
this-
you
know
the
school
board,
you
know
giving
the
tax,
you
know
their
taxes
to
the
rda
and
it's
sort
of
incongruent.
Sometimes
it
feels
like
that
with
those
monies
we're
not
helping,
you
know
what
is
going
to
help.
G
F
I
really
do
like
these
priorities.
I
love
that
we're
coming
back
to
ownership.
It's
been
something
that
when
I
first
got
on,
the
council
was
like
we're
really
pushing
for,
and
then
I
don't
know
seems
like
the
world
ended
in
this
restarting
again,
so
we
can
go
back
to
some
of
those
original
priorities.
So
I
appreciate
that
a
lot
and
I
mean
this.
I
also
really
want
to
say
thank
you
to
this
process.
F
I
I've
as
chair
the
last
two
years
before
this
year
and
going
through
this
process
process
of
saying
we
should
know
what
our
priorities
are
before
we
ever
get
to
the
budget.
It's
something
you
know
we,
I
think
we've
been
trying
to
do
in
a
lot
of
different
departments,
but
I
appreciate
the
that
this
is
what's
happening
with
the
rda
of
here.
F
H
Yeah
I'll
I'd
like
to
take
us
down
a
quick
little
dirt
road
to
is
that
I've
gotten
a
lot
of
questions
about
constituents
and
from
constituents
and
one
who
is
on
the
planning
commission
earlier.
You
had
talked
about
adus
and
making
that
part
of
our
affordable
housing
plan,
and
I
hear
a
lot
of
concern
about
residents
because
we're
limited
in
you
know
once
we
allow
adus,
are
they
going
to
be
used
for
housing?
Are
they
going
to
be
used
for
short-term
vacation
rental?
H
I
don't
know
if,
if
there's
more
strategy
there,
specifically,
they
were
wondering
why
this
isn't
didn't
come
up
in
this
last
legislative
session
as
when
it
was
pretty
adus
were
like
the
hot
topic
of
2021,
so
I
don't
know
if
we
could
maybe
get
an
update
about
that
or
get
a
little
bit
more
information
about
adus
that
we
know
are
being
used
for
housing.
That
would
be
really
helpful
to
me.
So
I'm
sorry
for
that
tangent.
Thank
you.
D
I
think,
to
the
extent
that
the
rda
is
providing
funding
for
or
some
incentives
for
adus,
we
have
a
high
level
of
control
about
how
they
can
be
used
and
like
making
sure
that
is
not
used
for
short-term
rentals.
I
think
that
it's
a
broader
question
about
how
we
can
ensure,
like
just
the
city's
adu
ordinance,
does
that
same
thing.
A
All
right
well,
thank
you
so
much,
and
that
was
great
information
and
thank
you
to
the
rda
staff
and
danny
for
you
know,
reading
our
minds
and
and
also
through
our
like,
like
amy,
said
through
our
ramblings.
Sometimes
we
can
get
all
over
the
place,
but
we
do
feel
her
heart.
You
know
with
this
prayer,
this
priority
list
and
the
first
step.
So
thank
you.
Thank
you.
All.
A
A
budget
amendments
happened
several
times
each
year
to
reflect
adjustments
in
the
rda's
budget,
including
proposed
project
additions
and
modifications
and
staffing
changes.
The
amendment
includes
funding
for
development
around
the
ballpark,
an
accessory
dwelling
unit
pilot
program
in
the
nine
line
project
area
and
transferring
the
housing
trust
fund
to
the
rda.
Among
other
items
at
the
table
we
have
been
lucky
and
danny
walls
and
aaron
cunningham,
so
welcome.
Thank
you.
K
K
K
Good
news
is:
all
of
the
preliminary
numbers
show
higher
property
tax
increment
revenue
than
budgeted,
there's
one
exception,
which
is
the
northwest
quadrant,
and
that's
not
entirely
surprising,
because
this
is
the
first
year
we
were
budgeting
revenue
from
the
northwest
quadrant.
So
it
was
an
educated
guess
and
the
actual
numbers
came
in
a
bit
less
than
what
we
thought
they
would.
K
The
additional
and
background
information
section
toward
the
end
of
the
staff
report.
It
has
a
table
with
the
expiration
dates
for
the
project
areas
when
they
stop
collecting
tax
increment.
It
also
has
a
couple
notes
about
which
project
areas
were
extended
when
and
why?
So,
if
you
want
to
reference,
you
know
how
much
longer
does
this
project
area
have
money
coming
in
near
the
end
of
the
staff
report
and
there's
also
a
section
on
state
law
about
the
allowable
uses
for
rda
funds.
So
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
those
two
references.
K
Most
of
the
items
that
are
legally
required,
they
fall
into
three
buckets.
The
first
bucket
is
taxing
entity
payments.
These
are
pass-throughs
that
go
to
the
city
or
excuse
me,
go
to
the
school
district
and
the
county
for
the
most
part,
and
these
are
required
because
of
the
interlocal
agreements
the
rda
has
with
those
taxing
entities,
for
example,
the
agreement
could
say
the
rda
will
keep
75
percent
of
the
tax
increment.
The
other
25
percent
is
passed
through
to
the
other
taxing
entity.
K
This
is
where
a
property
owner
has
an
agreement
with
the
rda
that,
once
certain
conditions
are
met,
then
a
portion
of
their
property
tax
increment
will
be
passed
on
to
them
as
a
reimbursement,
and
this
is
post
performance,
which
means
they
only
get
the
reimbursement
once
the
conditions
are
met
and
the
county
assessor
confirms
higher
property
values
and
then
the
the
third
category
of
legally
required
is
state
law,
the
affordable
housing
set-aside,
it's
often
10
percent
off
the
top.
It
goes
to
the
agency's
primary
housing
fund,
which
can
be
spent
city-wide
for
housing.
K
K
K
So
we'll
start
in
the
central
business
district.
The
first
item
is
a
request
for
306
000
in
additional
funding
for
a
storefront
revitalization
pilot
program,
and
this
is
in
a
holding
account.
You'll
see
several
items
are
in
holding
accounts,
which
means
the
funding
will
come
back
to
you
for
specific
uses
for
your
approval.
But
this
is
adding
the
money
to
that
holding
account.
Knowing
it'll
come
back
to
you
in
the
future,
the
total
budget
for
this
pilot
program
would
be
390
thousand
dollars.
A
L
Excuse
me,
I
think,
the
the
simple
answer
we'll
cover
both
those
questions,
which
is
that
is
what
we're
working
on
right
now,
that
initial
request
in
this
year's
budget
of
83
000
was
really
just
to
start
that
conversation
we're
working
on
kind
of
rethinking
our
entire
commercial
loan
program,
the
existing
one.
In
light
of
all
the
work
we've
done
on
the
housing
side,
we're
now
going
back
to
refocusing
on
and
updating
the
commercial
side
of
loan
financing
and
things
like
the
storefront
activation,
our
adaptive,
reuse,
vacant
properties,
etc.
L
Is
all
part
of
that
discussion
of
identifying
what
we
as
an
agency,
want
our
role
to
be
moving
forward
in
the
future?
What
those
programs
are,
how
we
advertise
that
and
then
basically
this
was
to
start
setting
aside
funds
for
once
we
get
that
rolled
out.
So
it's
great
that
we
now
have
more
money,
but
we
hope
to
have
that
coming
to
you
and
the
board,
and
probably
in
the
next
three
to
six
months,
to
start
that
discussion.
C
L
L
There
are
a
lot
of
pilot
programs
you're
right.
Unfortunately,
we
haven't
had
the
the
time
or
resources
to
get
them
get
to
them
as
quickly
as
we
wanted
to
some
of
our
other
programs
like
the
housing,
I
think,
took
a
little
bit
longer
but
priority-wise.
I
would
say
this
commercial
one's
probably
higher
priority,
because
we
know
there's
probably
greater
demand
on
that
from
private
property
owners
and
developers,
as
well
as
just
our
own
priorities
of
being
able
to
roll
that
out,
not
only
in
cbd
but
in
our
other
project
areas
as
well.
So.
E
One
of
the
things
that
that
this
does
is
it
sort
of
sets
a
bit
of
a
policy
direction
for
the
staff,
and
so
you
are.
You
are
making
a
step
toward
a
final
policy
decision,
because
when
the
policy
parameters
are
prepared
by
the
staff
and
brought
back
to
you
for
your
consideration,
it'll
be
like
you're
confirming
them
as
as
a
kind
of
a.
E
E
J
Since
we're
talking
about
all
the
pilot
programs
right
now
at
once,
I
I
think
I
don't
disagree
with
any
of
the
programs,
but
the
reality
seems
to
be
that
staff
doesn't
have
time
to
work
on
them,
which
I
understand
because
you're
all
doing
very
important
other
things.
But
do
we
need
to
whittle
a
list
down
to
one
or
two
rather
than
several,
so
that
staff
can
actually
meaningfully
work
on
them?
Is
that
a
discussion
that
the
board
needs
to
have,
or
do
we
just
say?
J
We
really
need
like?
Let's
do
one
and
put
all
the
rest
of
the
money
into
family-sized
housing
fund
or
something
like
that
like,
because
I
think
we
can
always
put
money
into
housing
right.
That's
the
one
place
that
everything
can
go
to
so
at
the
expense
of
potentially
not
doing
really
amazing
things.
J
At
least
in
a
reasonable
timeline,
so
maybe
that
discuss
that
question
that
your
staff
wants
you
to
answer
is
what
we
actually
should
answer
as
the
board
and
and
so
that
we
can
give
you
direction
as
to
work
on
this
one
thing
and
make
it
awesome
and
then
next
year,
we'll
think
about
other
ones.
But
I
mean
I
don't
know
if
this
is
to
this
budget.
Amendment
is
the
time
to
discuss
that,
and
I
guess
that
goes
back
to
the
question
of.
J
Do
we
wait
on
allocating
money
into
all
of
these
additional
things
until
the
general
budget
discussion,
so
we
can
have
that
broader
discussion
of
like
this
year.
We
want
you
to
do
all
the
things
you've
been
doing,
plus
this
one
rather
than
plus
these
12,
which
I
think
we
probably
always
ask
you
for
way
too
much.
But
I
don't
know.
C
C
So
I
I
agree
with
that:
yeah.
If
we
spread
it
out,
we
don't
get
very
far
on
any
of
them,
but
if
we
can
focus
on
a
couple,
we
would
do
better
so
back
to
the
the
idea
that
the
reason
why
I
was
asking
the
the
dandy
on
the
priorities,
if
you
could
align
what
you
think
the
priorities
should
be
along
with
what
we
just
discussed
about
the
housing
priorities
and
how
they
blend
in
together,
and
then
you
know,
lay
out
what
you
think
is
right.
So
then
we
have
some
something
to
start
on.
C
Instead
of
starting
on
with
competing
areas
and
not
a
lot
of
depth
into
our
knowledge
of
what
those
areas
all
encompass,
then
we
have
a
starting
point
just
like.
When
we
did
the
framework
the
priorities
frameworks.
Last
year,
we
already
knew
what
their
23
or
whatever
that
number
was,
and
we
whittled
them
down
to
four
yeah.
L
C
L
I
I
appreciate
the
the
question
and
and
the
direction
of
this
conversation,
because
I
do
think
it's
valid
and
I
think
it's
important,
as
obviously
as
an
agency
and
as
our
staff,
that
we
were
able
to
actually
carry
out
our
priorities
and
objectives,
and
so
I
would.
I
would
first
reiterate
that
a
lot
of
these
pilot
programs,
the
reason
they're
being
funded
in
this
amendment,
is
because
they
were
allocated
or
intended
within
our
current
budget.
L
So,
as
ben
indicated
when
we,
when
we
do
these
budget
amendments,
we
we
try
to
minimize
the
new
stuff
that
we
bring
to
you
and
we
try
to
first
focus
on
what
our
obligations
are
and
then
for
the
ease
of
just
truing
up
this
budget
to
really
just
adjust
the
amounts
that
you
as
a
board,
have
already
approved
to
some
of
these
line
items.
So
I
think
that
needs
to
be
taken
in
context
as
it
relates
to
these
specific
pilot
programs
one.
L
I
I
don't
think
it's
necessarily
an
issue
of
our
resources
and
ability
to
get
to
them
as
much
as
I
indicated,
we
kind
of
took
a
step
back
and
focused
on
other
priorities.
First,
first
and
foremost,
being
the
housing
policies
and
programs
that
I
indicated
two,
if
you
remember,
I
think
we
took
two
or
two
total
stabs
at
redoing
the
guiding
framework,
so
that
was
important
to
get
that
set
up.
L
First
and
foremost,
we
had
our
equity
framework
that
we
wanted
to
make
sure
we
got
done
and
our
sustainability,
so
the
reason
that
those
became
a
higher
priority
versus
working
on
these
pilot
programs
is
because
those
are
the
overarching
goals
and
priorities
that
I
think
you're
talking
about
as
a
board
that
we
wanted
to
get
in
place
first.
So
I
think
we
have
time
to
get
to
these
now
number
one
number
two
like
the
commercial
loan
program
that
exists
today,
so
that
is
really
just
updating
it.
L
Now
that
we've
made
these
other
changes
and
bringing
it
up
to
date
a
little
bit.
So
I
think
that's
important
to
note,
because
that's
not
something
we
intend
to
have
five
or
six
of
these
programs
or
policies
every
year
that
we're
trying
to
figure
out
our
staffing
levels
to
do
as
much
as
we're
trying
to
get
these
now
either
updated
or
created.
L
The
adu
program
is
one
that
we're
required
to
do
as
part
of
nine
line,
so
that's
obviously
one
we
need
to
knock
out
and
then
the
only
other
one,
the
lower
priority
would
be
the
community
and
cultural
incentives
or
initiatives.
I
should
say
that's
one
where,
as
we
look
at
project
areas
like
granary,
what
can
we
do
as
that
project
area
is
coming
to
a
close?
That
kind
of
puts
those
finishing
touches
on
it?
K
I
I
think,
that's
on
the
that's
it
for
the
pilot
program,
so
I'll
keep
going
through
the
items
thanks.
The
next
one
is
a
request
for
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
repairs
at
the
galivan
center,
and
these
are
specifically
for
sewer
lines
and
hvacs
at
several
retail
locations
that
are
owned
by
the
rda
and
rented
out
to
restaurants,
and
I
I
was
going
to
ask
you
before
the
briefing
danny.
L
K
And
then
there's
one
policy
question:
if
the
board
wanted
to
ask
the
administration
if
the
400
000
will
fully
fund
the
project
and
if
any
other
entities
are
contributing
funding,
there's
some
additional
info
at
the
end
of
the
staff
report
about
the
management
structure
of
galivin
center.
Since
there
are
multiple
entities
involved,
I'm
not
sure
if
they're
contributing
funding
or
if
it's
entirely
the
rda.
C
L
C
L
This
is
a
budget
expense
that
we
put
in
the
budget
for
the
hvac
that
we
now
need
more
funds.
For
so
that's
kind
of
more
of
just
cost
increases
okay,
and
then
the
sewer,
I
would
say,
is
probably
a
little
bit
more
emergency,
because
that
is
becoming
more
and
more
of
a
problem
for
the
retail
tenants
that
you
know
nobody.
J
K
J
K
The
first
item
is
150
000.
For
expected
construction
cost
overruns.
This
would
go
into
a
holding
account,
so
it
would
come
back
to
you
when
the
rda
staff
knows
how
much
those
cost
overruns
are,
but
they
are
expected
there's
an
equivalent
reduction
in
the
administration
budget
which
previously
had
this
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars.
K
If
the
board
wants
to
discuss
with
the
administration
to
what
extent
traffic
calming
is
included,
because
when
this
project
was
originally
designed
several
years
ago,
traffic
calming
was
less
of
a
priority
in
the
city
and
some
board
members
may
recall
back
in
the
summer.
One
of
the
cip
projects
you
funded
was
the
capitol
hill
traffic
calming
and
that
project
and
this
project
overlap.
So
there's
there's
two
separate
projects
that
are
both
looking
at
streetscape
improvements
and
traffic
calming
on
300
west,
but
the
capitol
hill
project
is
broader
than
just
300
west.
F
L
L
I
think
at
that
point,
this
300
west
project
is
pretty
much
underway
right
now,
and
so
this
initial
request
was
to
make
sure
we
had
enough
money
in
case
there
were
cost
overruns,
and
so
I
think,
to
ben's
comments
are
spot
on
in
terms
of
figuring
out
what
the
traffic
plumbing
is.
But
this
has
been
designed.
This
has
been
working
with
udot.
This
is
underway,
so
I
don't
know
if
that
really
fits
within
another
conversation.
G
L
Nothing's
a
good
estimate
right
now
as
we're
understanding
in
the
construction
world.
So
I
think,
as
you'll
see
later
in
the
transmittal
and
the
discussion
that
this
150
000
is
also
being
combined
with
the
request
to
reallocate
funds
that
were
put
aside
for
an
infill
housing
project
in
west
capitol
hill.
G
L
D
D
A
L
It
was
always
intended
to
come
online
as
that
housing
development
was
completed
and
not
fully
being
here
for
the
history
of
that.
A
lot
of
that
is
because
of
the
infrastructure
storm
drain
systems.
Utilities
had
to
be
built
as
part
of
that
housing
project.
That
would
then
also
support
this
plaza
and
then
coming
online
at
the
same
time,
because
it
is,
it
is
a
plaza
that
is
so
much
shared
between
the
library
and
the
housing
project
as
an
amenity.
So,
okay,
it
was
just
carved
out
that
way
for
for
construction.
K
K
L
L
So
it's
a
project
that
we
we've
had
plans
on,
we've
had
them
draft
up,
and
that
is
one
that
we
knew
we
were
already
behind
in
terms
of
the
cost
to
construct
it.
So
that's
why
it
has
not
necessarily
happened
yet
and,
as
as
ben
said,
we
are
proposing
to
utilize
these
funds
for
the
plaza
right
now,
because,
as
this
project
area
is
closed
and
not
generating
money,
we
have
limited
funds
that
we
are
able
and
are
eligible
to
use
for
that
plaza.
L
Obviously,
if
we
don't
use
them
all,
they
could
then
go
to
the
infield
house,
but
then
we
also
anticipate
coming
back
to
the
board
with
a
new
request
for
funds
for
that
infill
housing.
But
we
can
then
utilize
housing
funds
for
that
too.
So
the
timeline
of
losing
the
project
area
is
not
as
critical
for
the
house,
because
we
have
other
opportunities
to
allocate
funds
for
that,
but.
L
No,
we
would,
we
would
construct
it
and
sell
it
and
so,
okay.
Clearly,
we
can
take
a
different
approach
too,
to
see
if
someone
else
might
be
willing
to
front
the
money
to
do
it.
But
the
idea
originally
was
that
the
rda
would
front
the
money
to
build
it,
utilize
it
to
accomplish
affordable
housing
by
putting
someone
in
there
that
may
have
to
take
a
little
bit
of
a
subsidy
but
then
ultimately
sell
it
to
the
occupant.
K
H
G
L
G
A
L
K
The
rda
is
looking
at
putting
out
a
rfp
request
for
proposal
for
those
properties,
and
this
would
be
a
separate
rfp
from
one
that
the
rda
has
been
talking
with
the
utah
transit
authority
about
for
properties.
Uta
owns
that's
nearby,
so
this
would
be
a
smaller,
separate
rfp
and
it's
funding
in
anticipation
of
those
rfp
responses,
potentially
needing
public
way.
Improvements
to
the
infrastructure.
K
I
don't
see
any
questions
on
that
one,
so
that
takes
us
to
the
granary
district.
This
is
a
request
for
234
thousand
dollars
for
the
community
and
cultural
initiative
pilot
program.
The
total
budget
would
be
678
000
with
this
additional
funding,
and
this
is
another
pilot
program
where
the
funding
was
originally
added
in
the
annual
budget.
K
The
program
description
is
supporting
public
arts
and
cultural
programming
to
support
community
organizations
in
better
carrying
out
their
missions,
the
granary
district.
It
was
recently
extended
due
to
impacts
of
the
pandemic
extended
by
two
years,
so
it
will
continue
to
collect
property
tax
increment
until
2025.
K
One
other
policy
question
is:
if
the
board
is
interested
in
discussing
with
the
administration,
whether
this
pilot
program
could
contribute
funding
to
redevelopment
of
the
fleet
block
the
fleet
block
is
within
the
granary
district.
The
administration
recently
released
a
request
for
information
rfi,
and
I
think
they're
evaluating
the
responses
to
that
right
now.
A
You
know
I
don't
like,
I
know
that,
there's
a
group
out
there,
a
community
group
that
has
been
working
on
a
on
a
lighting
plan,
so
they're
trying
to
combine
potentially
some
of
our
street
funds
with
some
of
this,
so
to
have
a
more
unified
lighting
right
lighting
posts
along
some
of
the
streets
in
granada
district.
So
I
mean
I
mean
I
would
like
the
funds
to
stay
here,
but
if
the
fleet
block
needs
a
little
bit
of
help,
I'm
not
completely
opposed
that
we
at
in
a
future
meeting.
K
K
K
Then
we
have
block
seventy.
This
is
a
request
for
163
000
for
the
regent
street
parking
structure,
capital
reserve.
It
would
have
a
new
budget
of
263
000
and
there
are
some
agreements.
The
rda
has
about
providing
a
certain
number
of
parking
spaces
to
the
eccles
theater.
So
the
rda
has
some
legal
responsibility
for
funding
to
this
parking
structure.
K
L
This
is
as
part
of
our
lease
with
pri,
for
what
is
their
parking
structure.
We
have
a
an
opportunity
to
lease
a
certain
number
of
stalls
and
that
can
fluctuate
based
on
kind
of
what
the
demand
is
as
year
to
year,
but
as
part
of
that
agreement,
we
also
have
to
agree
to
pay
for
a
pro
rata
share
of
their
maintenance,
so
just
their
ongoing
annual
maintenance
upkeep
of
the
parking
garage
and
then
also
at
some
point
in
the
future.
If
they
decide
to
replace
it,
then
we
can
contribute
to
that
as
well.
K
K
I
think
it's
still
a
couple
years
out,
I'm
not
entirely
sure,
but
the
last
time
we
talked
about
this
in
the
annual
budget.
The
council
was
interested
in
making
sure
the
general
fund
was
fully
reimbursed,
and
at
that
point
it
raises
a
policy
question
about
what
to
do
with
that
revenue.
Once
the
general
fund
has
been
made
whole.
K
What
the
amount
was
used
for
in
the
annual
budget
was
a
million
dollars
transferred
to
the
north
temple
strategic
intervention
fund
that
we
just
talked
about.
So
that's
another
approach
that
could
be
continued
in
future
years,
but
we
wanted
to
raise
this
because
it
is
going
to
keep
coming
back.
It's
a
good
problem
of
having
more
money
to
use.
K
K
C
K
That
takes
us
to
state
street.
This
is
the
first
year
property
tax
increment
is
being
collected
and
an
important
note.
The
amounts
do
not
include
the
county.
Negotiations
for
the
county
to
participate
are
still
ongoing,
so
these
amounts
are
just
the
tax
increments
from
the
city
and
the
school
district.
F
Madam
church
yeah
logistical
question,
which
is
weird
that
I
don't
know
the
answer
to
this
is
so
the
county
could
join
in
at
any
time,
yes
and
then
just
receive
their
taxes
like
just
contribute
from
the
time
like.
If
they
came
in
10
years
down
the
road
then-
and
it
was
a
25-year
contract
that
we
already
had
him
play
like
a
that-
we
already
had
in
place
that
they
would
only
be
there
for
15
more
years
or
would
we
negotiate
whatever
the
time
frame
is
with
them
such
that
it
could
be?
L
K
G
K
Correct
it's
a
new
commercial
loan
program.
It
would
be
in
a
holding
account
and
there's
a
policy
question
about
how
this
project
area
specific
loan
program
would
be
different
than
the
revolving
loan
program,
and
the
answer
might
be
depending
on
what
the
policy
says
so
to
to
be
determined.
But
if
there
are
thoughts
that
the
board
wants
to
share,
you
can
certainly
discuss
them
now.
J
K
K
One
important
thing
to
note
the
the
ballpark
itself
and
the
parking
lot
north
of
it
are
not
in
the
state
street
project
area.
They're
carved
out
in
a
separate
inactive
project
area,
but
state
law
does
allow
one
project
area
to
contribute
funds
into
another
project
area.
It
requires
the
board
to
adopt
a
resolution,
finding
that
it
does
benefit
the
contributing
project
area
and
then
the
council
also
has
to
make
a
similar
finding.
K
K
That
takes
us
to
the
nine
line.
It's
also
the
first
year
of
property
tax
collection
for
the
nine
line.
There
are
two
items:
the
first
is
962
000
for
a
property
acquisition
holding
account.
This
would
be
intentionally
flexible,
similar
to
the
north
temple
strategic
intervention
fund.
It's
money
sitting
there
to
allow
the
rda
to
respond
opportunities
as
they
arise,
and
because
it's
in
a
holding
account
it
would
return
to
the
board
for
approval
of
specific
uses.
K
A
couple
examples
that
staff
has
heard
board
members
mention
is
properties
that
could
be
added
to
the
west
side:
community
initiative,
the
community
land
trust
model,
commercial
properties
to
guarantee
rent
affordability,
as
well
as
the
business
districts
and
the
nodes
that
are
identified
in
the
west
side,
master
plan
and
those
nodes
which
most
of
them
are
on.
Ninth
west
or
indiana
avenue,
also
informed
the
boundaries
of
the
nine
line,
so
they
they
relate.
K
This
is
specifically
called
out
in
the
interlocal
agreement
with
the
county
as
one
of
the
performance
benchmarks
that
needs
to
be
implemented
to
release
a
higher
amount
of
money.
The
county.
Would
you
allow
the
rda
to
use
in
the
nine
line,
so
implementing
this
program
in
the
next
five
years
means
the
following
15
years,
the
county's
percentage
of
their
property
tax
increment
that
can
be
used
goes
up.
A
K
That
takes
us
to
piff
program
income
fund,
there's
a
hundred
thousand
dollar
change
in
the
miscellaneous
property
expenses
line
item,
and
this
is
fifty
thousand
dollars
from
an
insurance
reimbursement
caused
by
a
claim
submitted
after
the
overnighter
motel
burned.
The
total
amount
is
a
hundred
thousand,
but
we're
only
getting
fifty
thousand
in
the
insurance
reimbursement.
J
K
J
J
L
L
K
K
K
K
G
L
A
great
question
and
the
easy
answer
to
that
is:
there's
a
little
bit
of
horse
trading
to
get
there.
This
is
one
of
the
projects
in
conjunction
with
the
the
city
departments
that,
when
it
went
out
to
bid
those
bids
and
those
prices
came
back
higher
than
anticipated
in
budgeting,
so
between
the
rda
and
engineering
and
transportation,
they
brought
those
costs
down
a
little
bit,
but
it
was
still
over
budget,
and
so
what
we
identified
as
an
opportunity
here
is
for
the
rda
to
pull
out
some
of
those
expenses
as
they
relate
to
professional
services.
L
So
the
consulting
the
designs,
the
engineering
we
could
fund
those
through
our
administration
amount,
while
the
construction
funds
went
then
to
the
actual
construction,
and
we
were
hoping
at
the
time
that
we
would
be
able
to
cover
it
with
our
annual
budget
allocation,
but
we
weren't,
and
so
that's.
Why
we're
here
today
to
say
that
we've
provided
those
funds,
and
now
we
need
to
replenish
those
as
part
of
this
budget
amendment
so.
J
K
So
two
more
items
next
is
transferring
the
housing
trust
fund
from
the
community
and
neighborhoods
department
to
the
rda.
This
is
two
million
dollars
in
the
housing
trust
fund's
cash
reserves.
So
it's
fund
balance.
It's
savings
account
and
making
it
available
for
use
as
part
of
the
rda's
housing
development
loan
program.
K
This
is
a
follow-up
step
from
two
years
ago,
when
the
council
set
a
policy
direction
to
have
a
one-stop
shop
for
all
housing
development
funding
in
the
city.
This
won't
be
the
last
step
to
transfer
the
housing
trust
fund.
There
are
additional
steps,
there'll
be
a
resolution
coming
to
the
rda
board,
an
ordinance
amendment
coming
to
the
council
and
then
there's
several
administrative
steps
about
transferring
all
of
the
records
from
one
department
to
the
rda.
K
The
policy
question
in
the
staff
report
is:
if
the
board
would
like
additional
details
about
the
housing
trust
fund,
such
as
how
many
loans
are
there?
What
is
the
total
value
of
its
portfolio
and
is
an
aging
report
being
developed
which
would
tell
the
city
how
much
each
year
is
expected
in
repayments
from
those
loans?
So
you
know
what
to
budget
for
as
revenue
each
year
I'm
seeing
nods
there's
interest
okay,.
L
I
would
jump
in
and
just
add
that
as
part
of
the
agency,
we
come
to
use
a
board
twice
a
year
with
a
report
on
our
loan
portfolio.
So
this
will
become
part
of
that,
and
I
think
that
will
be
an
easy
way
for
us
to
report.
This
information
back
to
you
so
appreciate
ben,
pointing
it
out
because
we're
putting
that
together
as
well.
L
Historically,
this
is
was
both
commercial
and
housing,
with
your
your
new
policies,
programs
and
funding
allocations
for
affordable
housing.
The
revolving
loan
fund,
then,
is
part
of
why
we're
coming
back
with
the
new
policy
and
program.
The
revolving
loan
fund
would
then
deal
primarily
with
commercial
and
then
also
for
some
reason.
You
ever
wanted
to
do
market
rate,
housing
and
didn't
want
to
use
affordable
housing
funds.
This
could
be
a
source
of
funding
for
that
as
well.
L
L
We
do
have
a
presentation
if
we
could
pull
that
up.
I
only
need
to
highlight
the
first
two
slides
that
talk
about
the
new
items
while
that's
coming
up.
I
want
to
make
a
point
of
thanking
aaron,
cunningham,
rda,
financial
analyst
and
mike
burns
within
finance
and
the
rest
of
finance
staff
for
putting
this
together.
They
they
have
been
amazing
in
putting
this
together
and
thank
ben
lutky
too.
L
Who
is
very
gracious
in
meeting
with
us
to
go
over
it,
so
we
could
get
into
some
details
and
explain
it
so
that
we
were
prepared
for
this.
So
what
I
wanted
to
talk
about,
first
and
foremost,
is
a
vice
chair,
chairperson
puey,
going
back
to
your
question
on
the
marmalade
plaza.
The
original
budget
was
1.7
million
dollars
latest
bid
that
we
put
out.
Our
latest
estimate
for
construction
is
2.2
million.
So
to
answer
your
question,
we
hope
that
these
funds
will
cover
that
gap.
L
There
is
a
combination
of
trying
to
redesign
and
cost
engineer
that
a
little
bit,
but
this
would
hopefully
cover
that
gap
when
we
do
go
out
to
bid
so
hope
that
answers
your
question
with
that
two
items
that
we
wanted
to
bring
up
if
you
could
go
to
the
next
slide
is
first
and
foremost,
we
talked
about
this
a
little
bit
in
ben's
presentation
and
one
of
his
policy
questions.
Deals
with
this
is
as
part
of
the
900
south
reconstruction
project.
L
There
have
been
delays
in
terms
of
dealing
with
the
utilities,
primarily
the
undergrounding,
but
also
the
relocation
of
other
utilities
that
has
caused
the
project
to
extend
its
period
of
time
if
you've
driven
down
900
south.
You
know
that
it
is
entirely
ripped
up
right
now
and
is
causing
a
huge
impact
on
those
businesses.
L
You,
as
a
council,
I
believe,
approved
funds
for
construction
mitigation.
We,
as
the
city
economic
development,
has
already
done
one
round
of
those
grants
to
the
businesses.
They
have
come
back
and
asked
that
because
of
these
delays,
if
we
could
potentially
go
back
and
do
another
round
of
that,
200
000
that
you
approved
as
a
council
there's
only
8,
000
left
so
city
staff
have
indicated
that
they
would
obviously
like
to
prioritize
other
projects
to
utilize
those
funds
on,
and
so
this
request
is
to
put
forty
thousand
dollars
aside
to
see.
L
L
J
K
J
J
L
We
don't
have
the
details
on
that
yet
so
we
would
ask
that
this
40
000
is
made
available
for
those
two
initiatives
and
then,
if
the
board
wishes,
when
we
come
back
for
final
approval,
we
can
obviously
provide
details
on
exactly
how
that
would
be
spent
in
the
program
so
that
you
can
approve
that
as
part
of
it.
Okay.
J
L
Oh
and
just
as
the
slide
indicates
up
here,
the
the
idea
would
be
that
again.
West
temple
gateway
is
a
project
area
that
doesn't
collect
any
money.
We
do
have
interest
earnings.
We
would
simply
reallocate
those
interest
earnings
from
where
they
were
going
to
administrative
costs
to
now
going
towards
this
line
item
and
the
reason
we're
able
to
do.
That
is
because,
since
we
have
state
street
and
nine
line
coming
on
right
now
we're
receiving
administrative
costs
and
services
from
those
project
areas
that
we
can
now
go
without
this
forty
thousand
dollars.
L
L
L
L
L
That's
a
hundred
thousand
dollars,
so
that
would
go
towards
paying
that
and
then
the
other
600
000
would
essentially
be
put
in
a
holding
account
for
improvements
to
the
theater
and
and
regent
street,
as
we
look
to
doing
additional
upgrades
and
repairs
and
maintenance
to
the
theater
and
doing
things
on
mccarthy,
plaza
and
regent
street.
So
that
would
be
a
holding
account
that
obviously
come
back
to
the
board,
but
we
would
ask
that
that
hundred
thousand
be
authorized
to
pay
billion
jewelers.
L
So
those
would
be
the
two
items
that
we'd
like
to
include
in
the
final
version.
I'm
happy
to
go
through
all
the
other
slides
that
repeat
everything
ben
said,
and
we
can
quiz
you
to
see
how
good
everyone
remembers,
what
they
were.
Otherwise
we
can.
We
can
pull
up
any
of
them
in
detail
if
you
have
any
additional
questions.
A
A
So
we're
moving
on
to
item
number
five,
which
is
reporting
announcements
from
the
executive
director.
I
don't
see
the
mayor
right
now.
I
think
she
had
something
going
on
rachel.
Do
you
have
any
announcements?
Okay
on
her
behalf,
so
we
have
no
announcements
from
the
executive
director
moving
on
to
item
number
six
report
and
announcements
from
rda
staff,
and
that
will
be
danny.
L
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
We
have
just
a
few
quick
updates
number
one
project
status
report
on
the
650
main
track
station
that
is
currently
being
projected
to
open
late
april.
This
is
a
little
bit
later
than
I
think
what
we
had
anticipated
would
be
a
march
opening,
but
there
have
been
issues
with
supply
chain
delays
for
electrical
parts
of
the
station.
L
L
Which
is,
I
think
the
contractors
are
trying,
but
you
know
all
right
comment,
so
the
other
update
we
have
is
two
quick
rda
staff
mentions.
I
think
I
can't
completely
turn
around,
but
I
want
to
announce
the
hiring
of
kate
warett,
who
is
a
new
project
manager
for
us,
kate
has
some
prior
experience
as
planner
and
most
recently
was
an
analyst
with
lewis
young
and
she
has
done
work
on
impact
fee
studies,
committee,
reinvestment
plans,
municipal
feasibility,
studies,
etc.
So
she
is
a
huge
asset
for
us
to
have.
L
L
Offline
of
course,
second
item
for
update
is
we
are
thrilled
to
announce
the
promotion
of
cara
linsley
to
the
rda
deputy
director.
If
you
know
carrick,
yes,
thank
you
and
feel
free
to
put
her
in
the
hot
seat
if
you
want,
but
I
I'm
not
gonna
do
that.
If
you
know
kerry,
you
know
she's
been
with
the
rda
since
2014.
She
has
a
great
background
in
engineering
is
a
huge
advocate
for
transportation
projects
and
environmental
remediation
and
and
studies.
A
L
A
Any
questions
nope
all
right.
Well,
thank
you.
Danny
we're.
Moving
on
to
item
number
d,
which
is
written
briefings
and
we
have
none
number
item.
Number
e
is
consent,
so
the
following
items
are
listed
for
consideration
by
the
board
and
can
be
discussed
individually
upon
request.
A
motion
to
approve
the
consent
agenda
is
approving
all
of
the
following
items
and
we
would
like
to
set
the
date
for
the
rda
budget.
Amendment
number
two
for
fiscal
year,
2021
22.,
so.