►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session - 03/1/2022
Description
To view the agenda for this meeting please use this link https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
It's
nice
to
be
meeting
again
in
person
and
to
be
here
with
our
members
of
the
public.
My
fellow
council
members
and
City
staff,
hybrid
Council,
means
allow
people
to
join
online
through
WebEx
or
in
person
at
the
city
and
county
building,
we're
continuing
to
watch
coveted
rates
to
make
the
safest
choice
for
all
of
us.
A
If
you're
here
joining
us
on
site,
the
council
is
still
taking
some
precautions
to
maintain
healthy
business
operations
and
work
environments.
While
the
masking
requirements
are
changing,
we
are
still
balancing
the
safety
of
everyone
who
may
be
joined
us
in
person.
We
expect
the
situation
will
continue
to
evolve
and
we
will
be
continue
and
we
will
continue
to
update
our
practices
and
guidelines
as
well.
For
now,
we
are
requiring
a
mask
or
face
covering
even
if
vaccinated
for
City
staff
and
people
here
for
briefing
items.
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
Two
counties
in
the
state
are
still
high,
San,
Juan
and
I
can't
remember
the
other
one,
but
because
we're
in
medium,
we,
according
to
CDC,
can
adjust
our
own
City
guidelines,
which
is
pending
an
update
right
now
for
City
buildings
to
allow
people
to
be
without
mask
if
they
desire
in
City
buildings,
but
that
hasn't
just
happened.
Yet.
B
30
percent
of
kids
are
fully
vaccinated
in
the
county,
which
is
up
a
little
bit
from
26.7
percent,
just
at
the
beginning
of
February
and
you'll,
see
in
just
a
second
when
we
show
the
ZIP
code,
Salt
Lake,
City,
ZIP
code
updates.
Those
numbers
are
really
stagnant.
So
to
see
this
much
of
an
increase
in
the
younger
population
and
the
county
is
great.
We
can
go
to
the
next
slide
again.
Just
a
screenshot
from
the
county
health
department,
dashboard
for
Salt
Lake
City,
confirmed
cases
so
going
in
a
great
trajectory
next
slide.
B
B
C
C
C
The
Jordan
River
will
be
the
priority
in
the
next
few
weeks.
A
lot
of
folks
have
moved
to
the
Foothills
in
the
Jordan
River,
since
the
recent
Camp
cleanups
have
happened,
and
some
of
that
is
about
proximity
to
Dave
Riverside
Library
to
backman
Elementary
daycare
a
little
south
of
there.
Some
other
places
like
that.
You'll
also
see
that
Michelle
Hoon
wanted
to
make
sure
we
talked
about
that.
There
are
resources
provided
at
whenever
the
health
department
comes
out
of
the
city
to
help
clean
or
Abate
a
camp.
C
This
is
some
of
the
overflows
we've
talked
about
before
Saint
Vincent
De
Paul.
These
are
24-hour
numbers
in
the
last
24
hours,
I've
gotten
they've
had
93
people
in
and
out
of
St
Vincent
de
Paul,
which
is
abnormally
High.
Admittedly
so
there's
a
lot
of
folks
coming
in
and
out
during
the
night
time
the
motel
rooms
the
update
there
is.
C
Last
week,
the
city
worked
with
the
road
home
to
open
up
10,
more
beds
in
the
Ramada
in
a
new
room,
so
the
fire
marshal
did
an
extraordinary
job
getting
out
there
immediately
one
day
to
try
and
make
sure
and
work
through
some
issues
to
make
that
happen
so
doing
everything
we
possibly
can
to
help
get
as
many
beds
online
as
possible.
Each
night
Andrew.
C
C
So
there
is
technically
some
more
rooms
there
if
they
got
fixed
and
they
were
allowed
to
use
them,
but
they're
running
a
wrap
against
their
cap
right
now
they
are
working
with
the
city
and
communicating
daily
or
weekly
whenever
they
forecast
having
some
issues
with
numbers
and
if
they
have
turnaways
we're
getting
those
numbers
as
well.
So
we
know
what
we're
looking
at
next
slide.
C
This
is
the
medically
vulnerable
people
housing
program.
I
want
to
bring
this
up
because
the
Salt
Lake
Valley
Coalition,
then
homelessness
sent
out
a
one-pager
to
legislators
in
the
last
week.
Talking
about
this
program
idea-
and
this
is
basically
modeled
up
to
the
current
Ramada
they're
working,
where
you've
got
a
number
of
beds
set
up
for
folks
who
are
targeted
because
of
their
medical
needs
and
age.
So
they've
got
a
bunch
of
beds
and
see
the
bottom.
There
focused
on
individual
rooms
for
those
aging
medically
frail
needing
different
types
of
care.
C
Underlying
health
condition
needs
those
kind
of
things.
That's
what
Ramada
is
doing
right
now,
both
for
folks
who
are
unsheltered
also
in
the
Resource
Centers
and
moving
them
into
those
rooms.
They'd
like
to
make
this
program
permanent
in
a
permanent
location
that
they
own
Okay,
so
looking
at
200
beds
for
this
purchasing
or
renovating
an
existing
hotel,
motel
somewhere
in
the
county,
based
on
what
they
can
find
and
what
the
funding
is
they've
got.
C
Currently
today,
there
is
a
request
at
Salt
Lake
County,
that
the
Salt
Lake
County
mayor's
office
is
making
to
the
County
Council.
For
six
million
dollars
towards
this
effort,
they're
also
looking
at
asking
the
state
for
funds
as
part
of
the
state
allocation
for
a
deeply
affordable
housing
that
one-time
coveted
money,
they've
got
so
they're
actively
searching
for
options
to
make
this
a
reality
going
forward
on
a
permanent
way.
They'd
still
potentially
need
more
overflow.
C
This
doesn't
solve
all
of
that,
but
the
Ramada
isn't
a
good
example
of
a
place
where
they
can
do
this
program
and
some
overflow
beds
in
those
common
conference
areas.
So
I
want
to
put
that
in
front
of
you
all.
So
if
you
hear
about
this
or
see
it
coming
up,
it
is
an
active
planning
processor
going
through.
A
C
At
it,
so
what
they're
talking
about
right
now
is
having
it
be
permanent,
essentially
for
folks
who
have
these
medical
needs,
so
it'd
be
housing,
they
have
to
work
through
the
operations.
Funding
costs
those
kind
of
things,
but
it's.
If
you
take
about
take
all
of
the
folks
who
are
experiencing
homelessness,
both
in
the
shelters
and
outside,
and
then
you
say
all
right:
how
are
we
going
to
address
the
individual
needs?
B
C
C
So
the
in-between
is
meant
to
be
temporary
kind
of
recuperative
care
so
that
you're
not
supposed
to
necessarily
live
there
entire
life,
although
some
people
are
end
of
life
and
therefore
it
is
temporary
that
way
right.
This
would
be
sort
of
in
some
ways
hitting
a
similar
population,
but
maybe
not
quite
some
terminal
times
larger
numbers
in
some
ways
and
also
it's
housing,
so
different
type
of
services,
the
in
between
really
is
focused
really
on
medical
needs.
This
would
have
some
medical
component,
but
also
other
needs
attached
to
it.
C
Point
is
really
looking
at
something:
that's
more
deeply
affordable,
but
not
necessarily
always
with
the
term
permanent
supportive
stuff
there.
They
do
have
support
on
site,
but
they're
not
actively
going
just
for
folks
with
medical
conditions.
The
point
actually
is
purposely
going
for
folks
who
are
over
65,
so
age-wise,
yes,
Veterans
as
well.
C
That
may
overlap
as
well,
but
they're,
not
targeting
this
medical
need,
and
that's
one
of
the
issues
in
the
system
is
that
we've
got
a
large
number
of
individuals
who
are
in
their
60s
who
are
homeless,
who've
been
homeless
for
a
while
and
just
age
and
life
catches
up
health-wise
in
some
ways,
and
so
that's
in
need.
We
don't
really
fully
meet
right
now
in
the
homeless,
Services
System.
B
B
To
say
this
isn't
an
issue
just
for
these
three
cities,
but
that
we
we
need
to
be
at
the
table
more
collectively,
but
we'll
see
whether
or
not
that
can
withstand
the
pressures
of
this
bill,
which
also
include,
of
course,
the
mitigation
funding,
support
proposal
so
far
for
the
homeless,
Resource
Center
host
City.
So
it
is
a
it's
a
big,
very
big
bill
with
a
lot
of
levers
on
it,
many
of
which
I
feel
are
looking
to
preempt
local
Authority,
specifically
in
Salt
Lake,
City
and
yeah.
Go
ahead.
Please
after.
D
Session
is
there
any
strategy
for
us
to
engage
with
the
provider
Community.
It's
felt
a
little
bit
like
survival
of
the
fittest
with
Survivor
needs
pitted
against
our
community's
needs.
Sorry
do
I
say
the
providers
needs
it,
and,
and
I
really
don't
like
that
Dynamic,
when
we
should
all
be
on
the
same
side
of
this
and
I
admit
that
I
have
felt
resentful
at
times
towards
the
providers
who
seem
to
be
selling
out.
D
Our
constituents
in
the
name
of
what
I
know
for
them
must
be
really
difficult
bottom
line
budgets
that
they
have
to
make
work,
but
it
just
seems
to
me
like
we
could
probably
do
better
if
we
all
convened
outside
of
session
when
the
guns
aren't
to
our
Collective
heads
and
really
talked
about
how
to
balance.
There's
a
lot
of
tensions
to
balance
and
the
compassion
right
now
is
all
aimed
at
people
who
are
homeless
and
rightfully
so.
They
require
a
lot
of
compassion,
but
it's
not
a
well-rounded
compassion.
D
B
C
Yeah
I
mean
that's
happening
every
day.
I'll
say
that,
honestly,
today,
there
is
a
meeting,
that's
ongoing
about
all
the
funding
state
county
cities
involving
City
staff
as
well.
We
have
ongoing
discussions
with
the
providers,
the
Coalition
and
state
about
overflow
on
a
weekly
basis
and
needs
funding
where
it's
at
this.
Obviously,
the
long-term
planning
concept
is
also
happening
simultaneously.
C
What's
different
about
what's
happening
right
now,
is
that
generally,
that
doesn't
involve
a
lot
of
other
cities
now
South
Salt
Lake,
obviously
in
Midvale,
because
they
have
Resource
Centers
are
at
the
table,
sometimes
well
outside
of
what
the
mayor's
done
recently,
it's
hard
to
get
other
cities
part
of
that
discussion.
So
this
has
gotten
a
lot
of
discussion
with
a
lot
of
cities.
I
think
15
of
18
worth
that
conference
of
mayor's
meeting
on.
C
D
B
This
city
council
is
going
to
be
considering
a
policy
that
might
prohibit
future
permanent
Resource
Centers,
and
one
of
the
ways
in
which
this
bill
and
its
current
iteration
is
not
good
for
Salt
Lake
City
is
that
it
basically
incentivizes
the
city
to
prohibit
permanent
Resource,
Centers
or
temporary
Resource
Centers
because
it
does
not
provide
any
support,
does
not
provide
sufficient
support
or
perhaps
any
support,
depending
on
how
it
shakes
out,
and
that
is
too
that
it's
not
just
too
bad.
It's
inhumane,
it's
inhumane,
so
we're
working
so
hard
and
I.
Thank
the
council.
B
C
C
A
E
E
This
is
really
the
first
time
I've
been
here
four
years
now
that
we've
and
every
year
we
talk
about
homelessness
and
every
year
we
talk
about
Solutions
but
in
my
opinion,
the
first
year
that
we've
actually
had
some
support
from
other
municipalities,
and
it
may
not
be
next
year
or
the
next
year.
But
hopefully
those
dialogues
will
continue
and
people
will
see.
We
pointed
out
yesterday
that
this
is
doable.
E
Salt
Lake
City's
been
doing
it
for
a
really
long
time
and
it's
not
just
our
burden,
but
it's
everybody's,
and
there
was
some
at
least
from
some
municipalities
of
recognition
that
they
too
can
do
it
in
their
cities
to
support
their
residents
that
are
ex,
that
are
unsheltered
or
experiencing
homelessness.
So
I
think
that's
like
the
Ray
of
Hope.
That
I
have
in
all
of
these
discussions
is
that
we
really
are
having
some
valuable
discussions
with
other
municipalities
and
sometimes
during
the
difficult
45
days.
A
B
Thank
you
for
bringing
that
up,
councilmember
Fowler,
because
this
is
a
special
moment
that
I've
never
seen
before
in
the
county,
where
other
cities
who
are
not
host
cities
are
saying
we
might
be
willing
to
be
a
part
of
this,
and
it
will
not.
Last
I.
Don't
predict
that
this
this
support
will
last
and
what
is
so
tragic
about
the
potential
of
this
direction
that
the
legislation
is
going
is
if
it
disincentivizes
those
very
conversations
that
are
happening
by
saying.
B
If
you
host,
we
now
will
have
the
authority
to
come
in
and
override
your
conditional
use
capacity
limits
that
are
really
a
contract
between
you
as
a
council
and
your
citizens
who
host
in
that
Community
we're
going
to
override
that
and
potentially
we're
not
going
to
give
you
any
financial
support,
we're
just
going
to
make
you
do
it.
What
a
tragedy
at
a
moment
when
we
have
other
cities
finally
coming
to
the
table.
So
that's
what
we're
hoping
to
be
able
to
resolve.
F
That
would
be
way
more
helpful
than
what
it
was.
Then
people
understood
that,
and
we
understood
with
the
with
the
conditional
use
that
we
approved
a
previous
Council
people,
that
some
of
us
were
not
here
that
if
we
had
these
Resource
Centers
captured
at
a
certain
number
in
in
the
design
of
the
building
to
be
designed
around
200
people
or
300
people,
then
we
would
have
extra
room.
They
will
have
extra
rooms
and
extra
space
for
the
services
that
they
needed.
Mental
health
help
exercise
food
counseling.
All
of
those
things
are
that
providers.
F
And
now
we
are
at
a
point
where
the
service
providers
are
changing
their
minds
and
they're,
saying
that
that's
no
longer
the
case
and
that
we
should
just
add
more
people
and
that's,
what's
very
frustrating
to
me,
especially
in
my
district,
where
we've
been
so
welcoming
of
many
research,
centers
of
many
shelters
of
many
services
and
types
of
housing
to
help
our
less
privileged
neighbors,
so
I
want
you
I
want
you
guys
to
know
that
we've
been
working
really
hard.
Thank
you
to
the
staff.
F
C
I
didn't
get
your
last
Mr
chair,
I
know
we
didn't
get
into
the
heart
of
this.
If
there
are
questions
we
get
happy
to
answer
them
offline,
about
where
the
legislation
is
now
and
I
want
to
clarify
that
the
providers
are
not
running
the
bill
and
so
they're
not
changing
their
mind
about
putting
in
the
same
place.
There's
a
obviously
a
legislator
running
the
bill
to
get
to
a
heart
of
a
difficult
discussion
right
now,
so
I
just
want
to
be
clear.
The
provider
is
not
asking
necessarily
for
this
themselves.
C
Put
it
this
way,
the
providers
are
struggling
to
do
what
they're
being
asked
to
do
with
what
they've
got,
which
means
they
don't
have
staff.
They
don't
have
money
and
they're
being
asked
by
multiple
bodies
from
the
state
on
down
to
solve
this,
and
they
can't
do
it
the
way
they're
being
asked
to
do
it
so
they're
coming
to
A
solution
that
makes
rational
sense
based
on
what
they're
being
given,
but
may
Mountain
be
what
they
would
even
want
in
Ultimate
times
right.
H
I
know
a
lot
of
Advocates
are
in
support
of
this
bill,
and
it
doesn't
seem
to
me
that
this
bill
addresses
the
what
we
hear
a
lot
of
times
from
people
coming
and
talking
to
us
about
having
trauma-informed
care
that
is
going
to
get
people
connected
with
services
and
I
I.
Don't
see
how
this
I
mean
as
somebody
who
works
in
that
area,
this
doesn't
seem
like
trauma
like
this
is.
This
is
consistent
with
that
at
all.
H
B
H
Okay,
that's
I
mean
that's
my
feeling
as
well.
If
we're
saying
that
we're
gonna
take
away
the
spaces,
that
of
the
shelters
that
are
the
are,
what
we
specifically
designed
or
what
what
before
I
was
on
the
council.
What
council
members
and
the
mayor
designed
and
what
the
Architects
and
Community
designed
was
to
have
spaces
that
were
going
to
humanize
and
welcome
people,
have
spaces
for
dogs?
Have
Ample
Storage,
have
ample
office
space
for
on-site
Services
rather
than
just
warehousing
people,
and
this
seems
to
go
totally
against
that.
C
You
get
used
sometimes
to
doing
what
you
can
with
what
you've
got,
and
you
make
choices
at
times
that
you
may
not
do
an
ideal
situation,
but
under
scarcity
models
when
you're,
given
the
choice
of
trying
to
get
people
in
and
not
what
you.
Ideally,
this
is
what
I
want.
This
is
what
I
have
to
do
with
what
I've
got
so
I'll
try
and
make
it
fit.
C
So
it's
not
necessarily
people
saying
from
the
advocacy
side
or
the
the
provider
side
saying
this
is
the
model
that
everybody
wants.
It's
the
model
that
they're
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
do
with
what
they've
got
right
now.
So
it
is
a
bigger
discussion.
Council,
member
and
I.
Don't
disagree
with
the
mayor,
I
think
from
a
provider
perspective.
If
I
was
there?
Yes,
smaller
facilities
with
all
the
resources
we
need
is
exactly
what
needs
to
happen,
and
this
is
not
necessarily
that.
H
I,
just
if
the
ultimate
goal
is
we
want,
we
don't
want
people
to
freeze.
You
have
to
have
a
way
that
those
people
are
going
to
want
to
come
into
a
shelter
as
opposed
to
taking
the
risk
on
their
own
and
having
a
shelter.
That
you
know
is
whether
it's
a
permanent
shelter
or
an
emergency
shelter
that
doesn't
meet
those
needs.
I,
don't
see
how
that
reaches
the
goal
of
keeping
people
from
freezing
I.
Guess
that's
the
disconnect
that
I
don't
understand!
You
don't
have
to
answer.
It's.
H
A
G
A
J
Thank
you,
everyone.
My
name
is
Ravi
Sharma
and
before
we
get
started,
we
would
just
like
to
say
from
the
beginning
of
our
team's
application
process.
For
this
grant.
We
have
recognized
the
central
role
that
Jordan
River
plays
in
the
Salt
Lake
Valley
and
have
thus
chosen
to
make
the
River
Central
to
our
program
as
well.
For
thousands
of
years,
this
River
has
been
the
lifeblood
of
our
Valley.
J
It
has
played
a
vital
role
in
supporting
some
of
our
City's,
most
diverse
ecosystems,
providing
transportation
across
our
Valley,
as
well
as
supplying
people
with
food,
water
and
shelter
for
countless
Generations,
regardless
of
their
ancestry.
We
thank
you
for
allowing
us
to
present
today
and
if
you
could,
please
hold
questions
till
the
end
we
can
get
through
our
slides
and
then
open
the
floor.
J
So,
who
are
we
Olivia
block
is
a
grant
funded
program,
we're
based
out
of
Mayor
mendenhall's
office,
and,
as
Weston
mentioned,
we
have
two
Americorps
Vistas
and
a
fellow
as
well
as
a
city
lead
that
oversees
our
program.
Some
of
our
major
Partners
within
the
city
are
also
the
public
lands
department
and
our
homeless
engagement
and
response
team.
J
J
As
you
can
see
here,
our
phases
are
laid
out
one.
The
first
one
is
this
summer
for
five
thousand
dollars
total
to
be
dispersed.
The
second
one
would
be
this
fall,
and
next
winter
for
ten
thousand
dollars
total
and
our
final
phase
of
next
summer
increases
to
a
total
of
fifteen
thousand
dollars
available.
J
G
So
what
does
this
all
look
like
I'm,
going
to
share
some
previous
examples
of
what
other
love
your
block
programs
have
done.
So
our
first
example
is
in
Richmond
California,
as
you
can
see
in
the
pictures
on
the
left,
the
community
painted
a
mural
and
you
could
see
the
beach
and
the
mountains,
how
beautiful
it
looks,
and
then
they
also
did
a
chalkboard
that
the
community
used
to
say
what
do
you
love
about
North
Richmond
and
they
put
I
love
the
people.
G
G
There
was
nothing
there,
it
wasn't
used
for
the
community
and
in
the
year
2014
the
love,
your
block
program
came,
and
they
were
able
to
make
it
in
this
beautiful
garden
that
the
community
uses
and
even
now
they
still
have
access
to
a
tool
shed
that
the
liver
broke,
love
your
block
program,
helped
fund,
and
our
final
example
is
another
park
on
the
left.
As
you
can
see,
this
was
owned
by
the
city,
but
the
community
members
were
not
passionate
about
it
or
they
didn't
have
opportunities,
they
didn't
have
the
resources.
G
So
some
potential
projects
for
our
city
include
painting
bark
benches,
creating
Community
Gardens
and
little
food
pantries
A,
Tool,
Shed
lending,
Community,
cleanups,
painting,
murals
yeah.
They
your
imagination
is
a
limit,
anything
is
open
and
how
can
you
help?
We
asked
that
if
you
could
share
this
information
with
stakeholders
and
community
members
recommend
an
area
to
remediate
apply
for
a
mac
program.
Collaborate
on
an
Outreach
event,
hosted
event
and
volunteered
an
event.
G
Some
FAQs
is:
can
we
apply
for
more
than
one
Grant?
Yes,
you
may
apply
for
more
than
one
Grant
per
phases.
What
are
sites
available
for
the
projects?
Projects
must
take
place
along
the
Jordan
River
quarter.
Can
individuals
outside
of
the
West
Side
apply?
Yes,
but
we're
prioritizing?
Applicants
from
the
Westside,
Community
members
and
project
must
take
place
along
the
Jordan
River
quarter.
If
you
have
any
questions,
please
reach
out,
our
email
is
up
there.
G
So
thank
you
so
much
for
your
time,
we'll
send
these
slides
in
a
follow-up
email
and
urge
you
to
share
this
program
and
our
contact
information
for
members
of
the
community,
and
if
you
notice
on
the
PowerPoint,
we
had
hidden
beavers
and
it
would
be
awesome
if
you
could.
Let
us
know
if
you
were
able
to
find
it.
Thank
you.
I
K
Thank
you.
I
I
got
the
chance
to
walk
the
latest
section
of
my
district
with
the
love
your
blog
program
and
I
was
impressed
by
the
amount
of
interest
there
was
I
I
believe
that
pretty
much
everybody,
almost
everybody
opened
their
door
and
loved
it.
So
I
I
appreciate
the
administration
and
seeking
on
this
and
and
and
trying
to
make
a
push
for
this
I
appreciate
Western
on
the
team,
the
Vista
fellows
and
everybody
else.
K
D
I
want
to
amplify
what
council
member
police
says.
This
is
an
example
of
how
the
investment
doesn't
have
to
be
massive
amounts
of
dollars
to
demonstrate
to
this
community
that
you
care
about
them,
and
it
really
is
a
small
thing
that
goes
a
long
way
it
addressed.
This
community,
in
particular,
is
on
the
front
lines
of
the
last
topic
that
we
covered
exhaustively
and
I.
Just
want
to
thank
Western
like
your
Outreach
to
the
West.
Side
typically
is
just
so
stellar
and
the
team
that
you've
assembled
here.
I
E
Thank
you,
I'm
very
excited
about
this
project
and
I
just
want
to
say
Ravi
over
20
years
ago,
right
after
I
graduated
college
I
was
an
Americorps
Vista
in
Everett
Washington,
and
some
of
my
very
best
friends
are
still
my
very
best
friends
from
that
time
and
some
of
the
opportunities
that
I
got
in
just
being
a
Community
member
and
having
some
of
that
Outreach
is
invaluable
and
one
of
the
reasons
that
I
probably
am
here
right
now.
So
thank
you
for
volunteering
as
an
Americorps
Vista
and
an
Alum.
Thank
you
for
that.
E
A
L
L
L
Go
Council
today,
I'd
like
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
our
our
use
of
force
report
that
we
released
last
Friday,
but
I
want
to
give
you
a
quick
summary
of
that.
The
Salt
Lake
City
Police
Department
next
slide,
please,
the
Salt,
Lake
City
police
department
is,
is
constantly
striving
to
take
a
data-driven
approach
to
policing.
We
do
that
through
our
comstat.
It's
National
best
practice
to
use
data
to
drive
your
decisions
to
look
for
Trends
in
crime
hot
spots.
L
A
lot
of
that
comes
through
our
compstat
as
we
look
at
use
of
force,
it's
very
nuanced
and
it's
more
than
just
a
number
on
a
page,
and
so
that's
why
I
asked
deputy
chief
Scott
morkos
to
undertake
this
analysis
of
our
use
of
force.
Data
from
2020
to
2021
and
I
I
need
to
point
out
that
Scott
is
a
PhD
candidate
up
at
the
University
of
Utah.
L
It's
one
that
is
is
is
locally,
it
probably
leads
locally
Statewide
and
nationally,
but
as
of
2020,
when
mayor
Mendenhall
challenged
us
through
the
executive
order
to
take
a
look
at
our
policy,
I
want
you
to
know
that
we
made
even
more
changes
and
I
want
you
to
know
that
it's
improved
next
slide
use
of
force
report.
The
Salt,
Lake
City,
Police
Department,
used
force
in
less
than
one
percent
of
all
calls
handled
in
2021.
L
orce
was
was
only
used
in
point
five.
Seven
percent
of
all
those
calls.
That's
a
you
know.
That's
you
know
a
half
percent
of
hundreds
of
thousands
of
calls
that
we
want
on
and
I
want
you
to
know
what
that
means
is
our
officers
are
doing
fantastic
and
an
exceptional
job
in
in
using
force
or
in
in
applying
these
policies
in
the
work
they
do
here
in
Salt,
Lake
City
next
slide.
L
Salt
Lake
City,
Police,
Department
use
of
force
was
13.52
percent
below
what
we
would
have
expected
when
considering
the
increase
in
other
relevant
variables.
So
if
you
look
at
the
calls
for
for
the
calls
for
service
that
we
handled
it
was
over
174
000
calls
for
service.
They
were
up,
16.33
percent
arrests
were
up,
4.6
percent,
resisting
arrests
and
assaults
on
police
officers
were
up.
2.01
percent
with
that,
given
our
use
of
force
was
down
13.52
percent
next
slide
use
of
force.
L
next
slide
and
use
of
force
in
43
percent
of
the
cases
a
use
of
force
incidents
occurred
when
somebody
was
actively
fighting
or
engaging
with
their
officers.
That
means
punches,
kicks
pushing
officers
and
the
other
43
percent.
So
86
percent
of
the
use
of
force
was
used
in
in
these
type
of
situations.
L
D
Chief
Brown
for
civilians
like
me,
who
aren't
clear,
can
you
clarify
what
exactly
constitutes
use
of
force?
Is
that
mean
that
you
know
they
didn't
have
to
discharge
a
weapon?
Does
it
mean
that
they
didn't
like?
If
someone
did
they
have
to
wrestle
him
to
the
ground?
You
know
what
what
is
use
of
force.
L
Yeah,
council
member,
it
can
be
any
if
somebody
subjects
themselves
to
to
being
placed
in
handcuffs
without
any
resistance.
That's
not
use
of
force,
but
if
we
have
to
use
physical
Force
if
we
have
to
use
an
impact
tool,
a
taser,
even
if
we
point
a
firearm
at
somebody
best
considered
a
use
of
force
that
we
document
using
a
wrap
restraint
system
that
really
protects
our
officers
and
them
from
hurting
themselves
as
the
use
of
force.
L
So
anything
other
than
just
putting
somebody
passively
or
into
handcuffs
without
any
resistance
would
be
something
that
we
would
document
tasers
and
many
times
we
architaser
that
it
brings
people
into
compliance.
So
it's
a
whole
Myriad
of
things.
But
that's
what
we
consider
and
that's
what
we
document
in
our
use
of
force.
M
Mr
chair
Chief
Brown.
Thank
you
for
those
that
information
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
so
I'm
understanding,
you're,
saying
the
Salt
Lake
Police
Department's
use
of
force
was
13
lower
than
was
that
just
some
kind
of
National
Standard,
and
does
that
mean
that,
like
the
National
Standard
for
percentage
of
calls
on
which
forces
used
is
0.64
am
I
understanding
those
numbers
right,
yeah.
G
M
A
N
Foreign,
thank
you.
So
this
is
just
a
brief
update
about
our
drought
and
water
supply
forecast,
as
we
start
wrapping
up
the
winter
season
and
head
into
spring
and
summer.
As
you
might
recall,
we
had
a
very
severe
drought
last
year
and
one
of
the
things
I'll
mention
is
you
know
a
drought
isn't
always
specific
to
the
single
year
it
could
take.
N
If,
if
we
looked
at
it
in
the
last
projection,
our
percentages
would
look
lower.
So
that's
why
the
asterisk
is
there
because
we're
not
comparing
Apples
to
Apples
in
terms
of
comparing
to
period
of
record
averages,
but
there
is.
There
is
some
good
news
in
that
our
soil
moisture
has
increased
and
we're
forecasting
a
better
runoff
than
last
year.
N
We
also
look
at
three-month
projections
to
look
at
precipitation
and
temperature.
Those
have
those
are.
Those
are
significant
factors
in
terms
of
water
resources,
water
supply
and
water
demand
and
the
March
April
and
May
projection.
Right
now
shows
precipitation,
Outlook
being
below
normal,
and
the
March
April
May
projection
for
temperature
is
above
normal,
so
both
of
those
things
just
point
to
this
persistent
drought
that
we're
seeing
in
Utah.
This
is
also
a
regional,
persistent
drought.
N
We
still
have
a
couple
or
a
few
more
weeks
of
potential
for
a
snowpack
to
increase
and
potential
for
our
weather
conditions
to
improve,
and
so
right
now
we're
just
giving
you
an
update
on
where
we
are
projecting,
but
that
could
change
in
the
next
few
weeks
and
so
we'll
we'll
keep
making
sure
that
you're
updated
I.
Just
wanted
to
remind
you,
too,
that
the
city
declared
a
stage
two
drought
response
per
student
to
our
drought.
N
Contingency
plan,
as
you
might
remember,
we
have
five
stages
of
drought,
response
with
stage
stage,
one
being
the
first
stage
and
as
droughts
or
water
shortages
get
worse
stage,
five
would
be
the
most
restrictive
straight
stage
stage.
Two
is
a
voluntary
stage
for
homeowners
and
businesses
that
has
some
mandatory
restrictions
for
government
facilities
and
institutions.
N
We
saw
a
really
great
response
from
our
own
City
in
terms
of
last
year's
stage:
two
drought
response
with
significant
water
savings
throughout
our
parks
and
public
lands,
and
golf
courses
and
Facilities
I'm
not
recommending
that
we
leave
stage
two
at
this
point.
I
think
we
need
to
see
what
the
rest
of
the
winter
and
spring
bring
us
in
terms
of
snowpack
and
precipitation,
see
if
those
three-month
outlooks
for
temperature
and
and
precipitation
hold
true
to
what's
being
projected
right
now
by
NOAA.
M
N
A
A
And
that
concludes
our
update
from
the
admin
item.
Number
two
is
the
equity
update
and
we
don't
have
an
update
for
today's
briefing
so
move
on
to
item
number
three,
which
is
a
council
briefing
regarding
the
assessment
of
the
Central
Business
Improvement
area
and
at
on
the
screen
we
have
Ben
and
Lorena.
P
Thanks
Mr
chair,
the
Central
Business
Improvement
area
is
funded
through
two
special
assessments:
one
for
economic
promotion
activities
and
operations.
Another
for
Holiday
lighting
maps
are
available
on
pages,
24
and
25
of
the
transmittal.
It
shows
the
assessment
area,
boundaries
and
the
downtown
holiday
lighting
locations.
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
G
G
Having
said
that,
I
also
want
to
say
that
this
process
is
a
process
that
has
allowed
us
to
work
with
many
other
departments,
including
Council
staff,
Treasurer's
Office,
the
recorder's
office,
the
city
attorney's
office,
and
then
we
have
outside
entities
that
have
supported
the
effort,
boniful
research
and
Gilmer,
and
bell
with
Bond
Council.
Having
said
that,
from
an
economic
development
point
of
view,
this
Central
the
cbia,
also
known
as
the
special
assessment
area.
G
So
if
you
hear
both
are
pretty
much
interchangeable,
it
is
an
incredible
tool
for
our
community
and
I
would
have
to
say
that
during
covid-19,
through
the
many
activities
that
were
taking
place,
such
as
the
farmers
market,
such
as
the
Block
open
streets,
the
ambassadors
program,
all
the
stools
that
were
used
through
our
contract
with
the
farmer's
all
our
contracts.
Excuse
me
with
a
downtown
Alliance,
really
brought
an
incredible
sense
of
community.
G
A
Thank
you,
I
just
want
to
make
a
comment
that
this
item
will
be.
Oh,
this
is
Ali
did
I
have
a
question.
Okay,
sorry.
This
item
will
be
also
on
our
unfinished
business
side
of
the
formal
side
and
the
one
gentleman
property
owner
will
be
there
to
State
his
case
and
we'll
have
an
opportunity
at
that
point,
to
ask
questions
to
everybody
at
that
point.
So
that
will
be
the
unfinished
sections
of
the
formal
meeting.
G
Q
Q
So
this
is
a
follow-up
briefing
on
February
1st,
the
council
had
a
Works
had
a
public
hearing
where
you
received
many
comments
from
the
public,
both
expressing
support
and
some
concern
and
requests
for
amendments
on
this.
What
we
hope
to
do
today
is
staff
had
gone
through
those
comments,
and
we
have
a
few
items
that
we
just
want
to
go
over
with
the
council
for
consideration
that
could
be
included
in
the
final
draft.
Many
of
the
comments
as
you'll
see,
as
you
probably
saw
on
the
staff
report,
we
recommend
not
adopting
because
they
go.
Q
They
are
counter
to
what
the
council
had
directed
staff
to
be
doing
in
the
first
place.
So
it's
all
right
with
the
council
I'll
just
step
through
the
outline,
that's
in
the
staff
report,
and
you
can
give
us
Direction
on
what
you
want
included
in
the
final
draft
and
if
there's
any
questions
for
clarification,
we
can
provide
those
as
well.
Q
So
the
first
item
was:
we
received
requests
to
better
identif,
better
Define.
What
adjacent
Property
Owners
means.
We
learned
through
this
process
and
Matt.
You
can
jump
in
and
correct
me
when
I'm
misstating
this
some
of
the
companies
when
they
come
in
and
start
installing,
fiber
they'll
access
the
conduit
at
a
certain
point
and
then
they
blow
it
through
the
entire
block
and
sometimes
I
guess
it
can
be
upwards
of
a
couple
blocks.
Q
What
they're
concerned
about
is
notifying
every
house
every
apartment
along
that
stretch
because
they
said
we're
not
going
to
really
impact
most
people.
It
will
be
at
that
point
where
we
enter
the
conduit
and
then
where
it
will
be
pulled
out,
and
so
one
of
the
questions
was.
Is
the
council?
Would
you
be
comfortable
with
making
a
change
to
for
to
better
identify
what
the
adjacent
property
is
means
is
that
where
they're
accessing
the
conduit
or
do
you
still
prefer
the
properties
along
that
entire
route
receive
notification
of
the
project.
D
It
a
thumbs
up
go
ahead.
Could
we
create
a
classification
in
this
case
where
those
who
are
right
next
to
the
where
it
goes
in
maybe
get
notices
at
their
door?
But
maybe
we
just
like
stake
signs
along
the
Route
or
something
for
those
who
have
a
general
concern
because
we
might
not
think
they're
impacted,
but
invariably
something
happens
and
there's
an
impact
to
explain.
R
I,
it's
it's
possible,
I!
Think
what
we
were
trying
to
really
identify
here
is
who's
really
being
affected.
I.
Think
one
of
the
things
we're
talking
about
here
is
as
they're
boring
through
the
site
or
along
the
road
in
front
of
people's
homes.
The
homes
may
not
see
any
work,
that's
being
done,
but
something
may
happen
underground
that
we
have
to
come
back
later
or
someone
has
to
come
back
later
and
address
them.
So
there
are
there's
some
weird
differences.
R
So
this
is
I,
don't
know,
I
think
it's
probably
not
a
bad
idea
to
maybe
work
a
little
bit
of
trying
to
better
Define
it
I
think
Kimberly
has
really
done
an
outstanding
job,
putting
this
audience
together
and
trying
to
break
it
down,
so
we're
really
identifying
those
that
really
are
affected
by
whatever
works
going
on
and
it's
I'm
trying.
We
keep
going
back
and
forth
on
this
definition.
A
M
G
Is
to
answer
the
question,
or
maybe
given
another
example
when
Google
Fiber
was
installing
fiber
in
the
right-of-way,
they
did
put
up
like
construction
kind
of
barrier
signs
along
the
route
of
where
they
were
installing,
so
that
people
would
know
that's
what
was
happening.
It's
something
that
probably
could
happen.
Although.
E
G
Wouldn't
be
possible
for
the
city
to
necessarily
verify
that
it
has
happened.
So
one
of
the
goals
of
this
ordinance
would
be
to
provide
notice
that
we
can
verify
was
delivered.
So
I
think
that
would
be
something
that
we
could
consider
requesting
in
addition,
but
there's
no
way
to
really
verify
that
on
every
route.
So
just
a
thought.
M
So
I
think
in
those
conditions,
I
do
think
that
the
verified
notice
is
necessary,
where
I
suppose
I
could
go
either
way
on
where
it's
I
think
whatever
that
machine
is.
That
goes
underneath,
where
it
doesn't
actually
break
the
surface
of
the
ground
or
the
road
I
think
I
could
go
either
way
on
that.
But
is
the
ordinance
as
drafted?
Or
is
this
amendment
to
the
ordinance
as
drafted,
going
to
cover
those
situations
where,
like
Google
for
Google
Fiber,
where
the
surface
of
the
road
and
the
ground
were
were
Disturbed.
R
R
Out
fiber
companies
do
bore
their
facilities
into
the
ground,
so
they
they
set
up
in
one
spot.
They
push
they're
boring
through,
and
so
they
can
do
a
couple
blocks
at
a
time,
maybe
depending
on
how
good
the
soil
is
and
that's
that
it
I
don't
think
they're
I
think
that's
the
only
case
that
we're
really
trying
to
deal
with
is
where
there's
construction
in
front
of
a
homes,
but
the
homes
aren't
feeling
or
seeing
the
construction.
The
activity
that's
occurring
in
front
of
their
homes,.
M
Okay,
two
follow-up
questions:
one
did
we
not
I
I,
remember
where
we
were
about
to
pass
this
I
think
a
year
ago,
and
we
said
well,
the
below
ground
work
is
important
as
well
referring
to
Google
Fiber.
Did
the
previous
draft
of
the
ordinance
already
consider
that
above
ground
work
was
the
was
the
terminology
just
confusing?
For
me.
Q
M
Thanks
I'm
glad
we
didn't
spend
a
year
for
you
know
for
something
that
was
already
resolved
before
and
the
second
follow-up
question
is:
do
we
know
that
that
that
trenching,
that
the
underground
work
that
does
not
disturb
the
surface?
It
has
a
good
track
record
of
not
actually
breaking
sprinkler
pipes
or
water
mains
or
sewer
Mains?
Is
that
pretty?
R
M
I
guess
maybe
some
more
specifics
on
how
often
that
happens,
could
help
make
the
decision,
because
I
get
because,
given
that
answer
I'm
tempted
to
say,
let's
keep
it
for
every
house
that
could
possibly
affect
it
because
be
affected,
because,
if
all
of
a
sudden
they're
they
have
a
geyser
in
their
front
yard.
That
might
be
good
for
them
to
have
noticed
that
that
was
a
possibility.
A
R
Q
So
what
I
think
I'm
hearing
Matt
is
some
of
the
council
members
like
the
idea
of
of
keeping
it
when
they're,
where
there's
ground
broken
going
into
the
boar
pits
or
into
the
vaults,
notify
those
Property
Owners.
But
everybody
in
between
have
some
of
those
yard
signs
up
every
couple
homes
or
blocks
so
that
if
this
type
of
incident
does
happen,
people
see,
oh,
hey,
there's
a
sign.
That's
telling
me
there's
work
going
on.
Here's
who
my
contact
is
that
what
I'm.
K
Yes,
thank
you,
I
I,
you
know,
I
will
prefer
that
option.
I.
Will
you
know?
Second,
what
councilmember
Mano
said
about
giving
a
little
more
extra
notice,
even
though
that
you
know
hopefully
there's
no
Pacers?
And
you
know
all
these
other
issues
with
us
broken
sewages
and
whatnot,
but
those
things
do
happen
and
I
think
it
is.
The
company
is
doing
this.
K
Work
should
do
a
little
extra
work
on
notifying
the
neighbors
and
there
is
a
lot
of
construction
going
on
and
I
think
it's
a
it's
a
good.
It's
a
sign
of
good
faith
that
we're
trying
to
to
build
a
city
together,
so
I
I
would
prefer
to
give
more
notice
through
the
yard.
Signs
on
the
the
notice
to
the
ones
impacted
immediately
directly
to.
Q
M
M
M
M
M
R
Q
Okay,
the
second
one
will
be
a
lot
easier.
I
I
should
not
have
said
that
I'm
sorry,
there
was
some
concerns
raised
about
who
was
going
to
be
responsible
for
providing
the
notification.
It
was
staff's
understanding
that
the
council's
intent
was
for
the
contractors
to
be
doing
that
work,
the
permit
holders.
So
what
we're
recommending
is
adding
just
a
few
lines
in
there.
That
would
say
they
have
to
be.
It
shall
be
delivered
by
the
applicants.
The
notice
will
be
paid
for
and
delivered
by
the
applicant.
Q
The
work
they
do
Matt
I
might
have
to
let
you
step
in
with
your
expertise
on
describing
this,
but
yeah
Lumen
yeah
a
lot
of
the
work
they'll
do.
Is
they
call
it
lashing
where
they'll
bring
in
the
cables?
And
it's
overhead
work?
It's
not
disturbing.
The
ground
they'll
still
have
to
get
they'll
have
to
provide
they'll
have
to
get
a
permit
to
do
it,
but
they're
saying
we
should
be
exempt
from
having
to
notify
everybody,
because
we're
not
really
having
a
significant
impact
on
the
properties.
Q
Q
D
I'm
not
sure
what
everyone
else's
experience
is
but
like
in
district
one.
There
is
always
someone
doing
something
to
some
poll
in
in
some
place
and
I
think,
even
if
we're
not
requiring
them
to
do
every
household,
something
near
one
of
the
polls
or
some
of
the
polls
makes
sense.
My
neighbors
are
wondering
why
the
trucks
are
there.
Like
some
basic
information
feels
like
a
courtesy
we
could
be
extending
as
people
are
watching
our
city
explode
around
them
in
growth,
explode
positively
with
growth.
Sorry.
M
Q
M
M
R
And
they
want
to
outfit
the
city
as
a
whole,
and
so
their
goal
is
not
like
Google
to
bury
it
in
the
ground,
but
to
hang
their
facilities
from
existing
polls,
and
so
that's
what
they're
asking
for
is.
If
we're
going
to
go
into
neighborhood
we're
just
going
to
string
wire
in
all
that
under
Bill.
That
already
exists.
Add
another
fiber
to
that
that
line.
So
this
is
for
new
work
and
not
necessarily
maintenance
work
it.
G
H
Okay,
so
let
me
just
understand
this,
so
this
contract
company-
oh
so
this
contract
company
goes
around
to
telephone
poles
and
hangs
wires,
but
I'm
guessing
that
they
have
like
a
bucket
in
the
truck
thing
and
that
they
could
still
block
people's
driveways.
They
could
still
be
in
the
way
they
could
still
be
blocking
somebody
who
doesn't
have
a
driveway
from
being
able
to
park
in
front
of
their
house
I
right.
H
Q
K
I
can
hear
my
own
voice
and
I
don't
like
that,
but
so
thank
you.
I
I
agree
with
the
councilman
war
and
I
think
it's
it's
siding
with
notifying
the
neighbors
I
prefer
to
to
sight
on
that,
and
this
is
this
triggers
another
question
for
me.
That
I
would
like
to
ask
and
I
don't
think
that
this
is
the
right,
the
place
or
time
but
I'd
like
to
know
a
little
more
about
why
some
companies
are
using
cable
ground
or
using
cables
below
ground
I.
Don't
think
I
lost
connection.
K
Q
R
I
I
I
can't
really
answer
that
I
think
it
has
everything
to
do
with
probably
their
contract
with
the
polls.
A
lot
of
the
polls
that
are
in
the
city
are
rocking
our
polls.
It's
vastly
cheaper
for
Rocky,
Mountain
Power
to
be
above
ground
and
below
ground
and
with
Rocky
Mountain
Power
in
a
certain
area.
They
rent
out
their
poles.
So
it's
vastly
cheaper
oftentimes
for
many
of
the
utilities
just
to
rent
space
on
that
pole
and
hang
it
from
that
pole,
it
is
pretty
unsightly
I'm,
not
a
big
fan
of
it.
R
R
Some
of
them
recognize
that
being
in
the
ground,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
when
you
service
a
home
that
you're
not
going
to
most
often
service
from
above
ground
that
you're
going
to
service
from
below
ground,
and
so
that
was
Google,
fibers
motivation
of
why
they
wanted
to
bury
theirs.
They
didn't
want
to
spend
the
time
to
work
through
agreements
with
the
poll
owners
they
felt
like
they
had
a
better
opportunity
in
the
ground,
so
it
all
depends
on
the
model
they're
operating
off
of
and
so
I
I.
Q
R
Q
R
So
if
they're
they're
pulling
wire
they're
going
to
set
up
say
at
one
pool
and
they'll
start
pulling
the
wire,
probably
at
a
couple
of
points
and
so
they're
not
occupying
it's
kind
of
like
the
underground
they're,
not
occupying
all
the
space
in
front
of
all
the
homes.
There
are
two
distinct
points
in
the
pulling
wire
from
one
point
to
the
next
Point
are:
is
the
request
to
provide
notice
at
those
points
where
they're
pulling
the
wire
are
along
the
whole
length
of
of
where
they're
pulling
the
wire
all.
H
O
Q
Q
Q
M
E
Q
G
G
H
Sure
I
I
mean
I
I.
Think
a
lot
of
these
questions
can
be
answered
with,
like
I,
think
our
intent
as
a
group
is
pretty
clear
that
we're
not
terribly
concerned
about
overburdening
the
notice
Giver
at
this
point
so
I,
so
yeah,
I
I
think
that
we
can
yeah.
If
we,
if
it's
easier
just
to
say,
tell
everybody,
then
let's
do
it
and
then
carve
out
an
exception,
but
yeah
I
think
it
was
said
earlier
by
councilmember
Pooley,
like
I,
think
we
should
always
err
on
the
side
of
giving
notice.
Q
Got
it
got
it
the
other
ones
in
interest
of
time?
We
don't
need
to
go
through
each
of
them
just
that
they
had
made
suggestions
that
we
felt
were
clearly
contrary
to
what
the
council
was
requesting,
so
staff
is
not
recommending
any
of
those
being
included
at
all.
Obviously,
there
was
one
question
that
was
raised
that
about
the
timing
of
the
notice
they've
expressed
concern
that
this
would
happen
too
soon
when
they're
pulling
a
permit.
Q
Sometimes
that
will
be
about
a
week
or
so
before
the
actual
work
is
done,
and
that
may
cause
confusion
to
the
public,
and
so
they
had
simply
requested
that
it
be
done
later.
The
city
staff
was
pretty
confident
that
the
intent
was.
This
has
to
be
done
at
the
time
of
obtaining
the
permit,
so
that
there
could
be
verification
that
the
notice
was
provided.
R
Q
S
G
Permit
for
Park
cues
from
20
to
31
days
technically,
this
would
involve
identical
ordinance,
changes
to
two
existing
sections
of
city
code
and
the
exam.
The
extension
of
time
would
only
be
allowed
in
exceptional
cases.
Specifically,
the
mayor
would
have
to
approve
an
event
for
a
reason
he
or
she
identifies
in
writing.
I
want
to.
G
S
G
A
I
would
agree
with
that.
Thank
you
and
I
don't
see
any
other
questions
or
comments
from
the
council
members
I
appreciate
it
and
I.
Thank
you
very
much
for
the
answers.
I
was
didn't
realize
how
in-depth
of
a
issue
this
was,
and
so
I
appreciate
the
the
great
questions
and
the
and
the
answers
responses
to
those
questions.
P
R
P
A
G
S
S
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
that
question.
Okay,
no
further
questions
on
that
item.
Thank
you
very
much,
move
on
to
item
number
six,
which
is
the
a
briefing
on
the
amendment
to
oh
excuse
me,
we're
going
to
skip
item
in
six
because
of
due
to
time
right
now,
we're
gonna
move
on
to
item
number
seven,
which
is
the
briefing
on
the
rezone
of
of
approximately
233
West
North,
Temple
Street
and
at
the
or
on
the
screen,
we'll
have
Brian
fomer
and
Nick
Norris
there
they
are
all
yours.
Thank
you.
Mr.
C
Proposal
from
the
administration
to
remove
the
property
you
mentioned
from
the
airport
flight
path,
protection
influence
Zone
a
the
in
the
Airport
Inn,
is
on
the
property
and
is
operating
as
a
hotel.
The
proposal's
intent
is
to
allow
transitional
housing
in
the
hotel
as
part
of
the
city's
goals
related
to
homelessness.
G
G
G
G
If
removed
from
the
influence
Zone,
the
property
would
be
subject
to
all
zoning
regulations
of
the
TSA
muec
zoning
District.
The
primary
impact
is
that
use
is
currently
prohibited
under
the
overlay.
Zone
uses
would
now
be
allowed
if
they
are
permitted
or
conditional
in
that
TSA
Zone.
These
include
a
multi-family
residential.
Some
institutional
uses
would
also
be
allowed
that
are
strictly
prohibited
in
that
airport
overlay
zoning
District.
G
The
suggested
condition
of
this
approval
next
slide,
please
these
are
site
photos
of
the
subject,
property
and
next
slide.
Please,
and
in
closing,
the
Planning
Commission
did
forward
a
positive
recommendation
to
the
city
council,
with
a
condition
related
to
sound
attenuation
and
Nick
and
I
are
both
happy
to
answer
any
questions
at
this
time.
A
G
Okay,
thank
you.
This
particular
property
would
be
used
for
longer
stays
and
is
directed
towards
a
voucher
program,
and
so
I
don't
believe
that
the
intention
is
for
it
to
have
the
type
of
turnover
that
existing
homeless
shelters
encounter.
This
would
be
a
a
longer
stay
type.
Use
I
hope
that
answers
that
question.
E
E
It's
somewhat
distracting,
but
adorable
you're,
fine,
totally
fine,
but
I
think
that
we
need
to
have
a
discussion.
We
have
the
Ramada
Inn
coming
up
right
and
where
it's
supposed
to
be
a
temporary
overflow
shelter
for
vulnerable
people.
Sorry,
you
guys
are
just
getting
the
brunt
of
my
my
planning
division
up.
There
I
know
this
doesn't
pertain
to
what
we're
talking
about
right.
E
This
second,
but
I
think
that
it
does
in
the
way
of
making
sure
that
the
process
has
followed
such
that
we're
not
creating
something
that
is
called
temporary
and
then
it
becomes
permanent
and
then
what
was
a
temporary
land
use.
Rezone
now
becomes
a
question
of
asking
us
to
completely
change
the
zone,
so
just
maybe
a
process
discussion
that
can
happen
with
Administration
and
Us
in
for
future.
Reference.
M
M
A
private
non-profit
has
purchased
a
building
and
is
wanting
to
use
it
for
a
certain
thing
that
our
zoning
code
does
not
currently
allow
and
is
asking
for
a
change
to
our
zoning
code,
which
is
I,
think
the
same
process
as
any
zoning
ordinance
really
I
mean
I.
Think
it's
analogous
to
any
zoning
ordinance.
I.
Think
the
history
of
it
being
used
as
homeless.
Overflow
shelter
makes
it
feel
different,
but
I'm
I'm
struggling
to
see
how
it
actually
is
different.
E
E
E
It
does
certainly
feel
different
because
of
the
ways
that
we
sort
of
had
to
there
was
there
were
some
intricacies
within
that
that
created
something
different,
so
I
think
the
process.
You're
right
is
probably
the
same.
I
think
what
maybe
I'm
asking
for
is
further
discussion
on
how
we
get
from
point
A
to
point
B
when
it
may
not
have
been
something
that
point.
B
may
not
have
been
something
that
the
community
would
have
been
supportive
of
or
or
something
and
I
agree.
I
think
it's
sort
of
like
our
senses
are
heightened
and.
M
Maybe
we
want
to
require
a
higher
standard.
We
maybe
want
to
keep
at
a
higher
standard
properties
that
are
considered
for
a
homeless
shelter
because
that's
a
issue
of
Greater
impact
to
communities.
So
maybe
it's
appropriate
that
we
have
a
different
standard,
but
I
I
I
see
this
process
as
analogous
to
any
other
zoning
ordinance.
The
question
I
have,
if
I
may
Mr
chair,
I,
don't
actually
see
the
airport
flight
path
overlay
in
our
zoning
map
and
I'm
having
a
hard
time
knowing
like.
M
Are
we
removing
just
one
property
that
would
become
an
island
from
that
overlay?
Zoning,
or
is
it
already
on
the
edge
of
that
and
we're
just
moving
the
boundary
I
can't
figure
out
how
to
find
that
in
our
map,
and
maybe
that's
just
a
technical
problem
that
I
have
but
can
somebody
can
we
usually
have
a
diagram
of
like
where
the
path
is
currently
the
overlay
zone
is
currently
mapped
and
where
it
would
now
be
mapped?
How
that
would
change.
A
A
F
We
all
raised
our
eyebrows
and
we
fought
that
because
there
was
a
housing
project
that
would
be
completely
canceled
if
a
shelter
would
be
placed
in
there.
So
I
just
feel
like
we
don't
we're,
not
Equitable
in
our
decisions
in
our
ideas,
in
our
push
for
equity,
for
location,
equity,
for
geographical
equity,
for
helping
people,
both
shelter
and
unshelter.
F
D
D
The
problem
that
I
have
with
it
is
that
it
is
fundamentally
different
to
take
a
special
use
exception
to
make
yourself
at
home
under
that
and
say
well
we're
here
now
anyway,
let's
turn
the
temporary
into
permanent,
especially
when
literally
walking
distance
from
there
I
have
a
node
of
eateries
trying
to
cling
to
life.
You
know
immigrant-owned
eateries,
that
are
trying
to
attract
people
to
the
west
side.
The
lack
of
pairing
with
the
economic
development
opportunity
this
constituency
I,
am
not
contending
that
this
is
a
constituency
who
lives
there.
That's
going
to
brew
in
anything.
D
These
are
really
great
citizens,
but
they're
not
going
to
help
that
business
stay
alive
and
so
we're
creating
those
things
that
we
say.
We
don't
want
to
things
like
food
deserts
when
we
concentrate
this
sort
of
population
in
one
place
and
we're
doing
it
through
back
door.
Zoning
when
we
allow
this
is
a
fundamental
difference
to
me.
It's
not
just
someone
coming
in
and
saying:
oh,
we
want
to
put
you
know,
75
units
here
instead
of
the
35
that's
allowed.
This
is
a
fundamental
thing
that
we
walked
through
a
back
door.
That
undermines
other
goals.
M
Yeah
thanks
looking
at
the
exact
opposite
sort
of
side
of
that
coin.
This
decision
is
to
take
an
overlay
which
was
prohibiting
permanent
housing
because
I
think-
and
this
is
a
question
for
planning.
My
understanding-
is
that,
because
there
was
some
determination
that
that
area
was
too
close
to
the
flight
path
and
for
health,
safety
and
wellness
reasons,
it
wasn't
a
good
place
for
residents
to
live.
M
So
my
concern
is
actually
that
allowing
this
is
saying
we
care
less
about
those
people
and
are
allowing
them
to
live
in
a
place
where
we
wouldn't
allow
other
people
to
live,
and
so
that
is
I'm
getting
to
the
same
I.
Think
it's
for
a
very
different
reason
than
what
I
that
I'm
hearing
but
I
think
I'm
I'm
similarly
concerned
about
the
the
the
Optics
of
saying
well,
because
you're,
an
old
disabled,
poor,
veteran
you,
we
are
fine
with
you
living
in
close
to
a
flight
path.
M
Now
can
I
I
would
like
technical,
like
answers
from
planning
as
to,
if
I'm
understanding
that
correctly.
If
this
was
installed,
because
of
we
didn't
think
that
it
was
good
for
people
to
live
permanently.
That
close
to
a
flight
path
for
their
Wellness,
that's
my
understanding,
but
in
my
understanding
that
correctly
or
incorrectly.
R
L
Zoning
reflects
those
boundaries
of
where
those
lines
are
and
there's,
there's
four
in
a
b
c
and
d
zone
in
those
flight
paths
that
the
A
and
B
restrict
residential
and
as
you
get
further
away
residential
starts
to
be
allowed
with
some
sound
attenuation.
Now
residential
is
allowed
in
A
and
B
if
it's
associated
with
an
agricultural
use.
So,
but
they
there's
still
some
sound
attenuation
measures
that
have
to
be
taken.
L
It's
it's
a
little
more
challenging
for
us
to
put
requirements
on
a
property
owner
who
isn't
the
applicant
like.
It
is
with
some
other
zoning
changes
where
we
can
do
those
types
of
things
and
enter
into
certain
development
agreements
and
stuff,
like
that,
it's
a
little
different
when
we're
dealing
with
existing
building
and
we're
trying
to
remove
a
barrier
that
is
essentially
changing
the
the
business
model
for
how
how
the
property
is
being
used
and
so
that
that's
kind
of
the
focus
of
what
this
request
was
is
right.
A
D
M
L
M
L
A
Okay,
I'm
looking
around
the
room
and
there's
no
other
further
questions.
Could
we
I
one
more
questions
back
to
that
sound
attenuation?
Could
we
check
with
the
current
owners
if
they
have
they've
done
that,
because
I
know
they
did
a
lot
of
rework
on
the
building
already?
Have
they
already
address
the
sound
issues
or
would
they
be
willing
to
address
the
sound
issues.
A
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
A
C
Chair
this
is
a
proposal
to
vacate
in
approximately
five
and
a
half
foot
portion
of
the
public
right-of-way
between
the
sidewalk
and
property
line
at
601
South
900
East,
both
the
600,
South
and
900
East
sides
of
this
corner
property
are
included.
It
should
be
noted.
Pedestrian
and
vehicular
traffic
on
the
sidewalks
and
roadways
would
not
be
impacted
under
this
proposal,
if
approved
by
the
council,
the
property
would
be
sold
to
the
property
owners
at
market
value.
T
As
you
can
see,
the
area
in
yellow
is
the
900,
approximately
985
square
foot
area
that
the
applicant
has
requested
to
be
vacated
by
the
city
within
that
area.
Is
the
privacy
fence
and
front
fence
of
the
property.
That
is
that
that
claims
has
been
there
for
over
30
years
and
staff
was
able
to
verify
through
Google
Maps,
at
least
15
years,
that
you
know
this
was
those
fences
have
been
in
place?
Let's
go
to
the
next
slide.
T
T
This
is
looking
at
900
East,
the
line,
the
property
line,
kind
of
starts
at
the
end
of
that
sprinkler
box
that
cuts
and
then
there's
a
sidewalk
cut.
You
can
see
that
just
to
kind
of
illustrate
where
the
property
line
ends
and
you
can
see
the
fence
has
been
there
for
a
number
of
years,
a
lot
of
overgrowth.
T
And
this
is
just
a
view
of
600
South.
The
impetus
of
this
request
is
the
wood
fence
in
the
rear
yard.
You
can
see
there
it's
beginning
to
Bow
and
deteriorate,
and
they
submitted
a
application
for
the
to
repair
that
and
we're
told
that
it
was
not
on
their
property
and
they
were
given
three
choices:
remove
the
fence
enter
a
lease
agreement
or
request
a
a
street
vacation
for
that
portion
of
the
street,
so
in
that
spot
specifically,
they
want
to
replace
the
fence
and
they
have
chosen
to
submit
this
request.
T
A
couple
things
to
bring
up
this
would
create
an
uneven
block
face
as
far
as
property
lines.
I
can't
really
say
with
certainty
what
the
encouragement
is
on
properties
on
the
Block
that
can
only
be
said
with
a
survey,
but
it
it
can
be
safe
to
assume
at
least
the
property
immediately
to
the
to
the
South
has
a
similar
encroachment
with
that
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
M
Yeah
I'm
surprised
to
see
in
the
staff
report
that
planning
staff
recommended
to
the
Planning
Commission
to
afford
a
positive
recommendation
and
that
that
was
therefore
done.
Can
you
explain
why,
in
this
situation,
we
think
it's
in
this
or
the
professional
opinion
of
planning
staff
and
thereby,
and
also
the
Planning
Commission-
is
that
this
should
be
accepted
because
I
just
see
it
as
I
know
that
the
the
bad
behavior
quote
in
air
quotes
was
done.
M
Probably
multiple
property
owners
previous
to
this,
but
it
does
feel
like
a
situation
where
we're
selling
public
land
that
to
a
property
owner,
because
a
previous
property
owner
did
something
wrong
like
they
shouldn't
have
put
a
fence
outside
of
their
property
line
in
the
first
place.
But
because
that
happened,
we're
saying,
okay,
fine!
You
can
now
have
that
property.
It
just
feels
kind
of
backwards
to
me,
so
why?
Why
were
there
positive
recommendations
forwarded
and
suggested.
T
Okay,
so
first
off
they
from
what
I
understand,
they
have
had
a
lease
agreement
in
the
past
and
there
are
records
of
that
for
this
fence
and
I'm
not
really
sure
what
triggered
civil
enforcement
to
say.
You
know
what
you
need
to
change,
where
your
fence
is
we're
really
just
processing
this
application
and,
as
far
as
staff's
recommendation,
we're
following
I'm
following
what
you
know.
T
Previous
decisions
by
the
city
council,
which
included
a
Street
vacation,
I
believe
on
14th
Avenue
that
was
recently
approved
by
by
this
body
and
kind
of
following
those
same
standards.
As
far
as
the
the
policy,
the
1990s
1999
city
council
policy
for
Street
vacations
master
plan
considerations
and
you
know
kind
of
following
what
what
has
been
done
beforehand.
T
But
additionally,
as
far
as
my
analysis
goes,
it
It
generally
meets
what
what
standards
are
in
place,
and
so
we
really
felt
we
couldn't
did
not
recommend
denial
or
I
felt
I
couldn't
recommend
Denial
in
this
case,
and
it
in
addition
to
that
I
had
a
thought,
but
I
don't
have
anymore
I.
Hope
that
answers
your
question.
G
Okay,
so
I
think
that
that's
important
for
us
to
find
out,
because
if
it
is-
and
they
just
hadn't
paid
their
lease
or
something
like
that,
then
I
would
think
that
the
enforcement
would
be
to
get
them
to
pay
that
lease
payment.
It's
better
for
the
city
to
preserve
its
options
for
them
to
lease
the
ground
than
it
is
for
the
city
to
sell
the
ground.
G
L
Hi
yeah
I
I
can
maybe
provide
some
insight
into
that.
We
are
currently
as
a
department
broader
than
just
can,
but
including
other
departments
who
have
some
sort
of
stake
in
in
our
rights
of
way.
In
situations
like
this
and
encroachments,
we
are
updating
those
policies
about
what
can
and
cannot
go
into
the
right-of-way.
L
Yet,
but
one
of
the
things
that
we
do
here
from
property
owners
who
run
into
this
situation
is
that,
instead
of
paying
some
kind
of
a
lease,
they
would
rather
go
through
this
process
because
see
that
it's
a
more
longer
term
solution
for
them,
and
so
there's
nothing
in
our
code
that
prohibits
somebody
from
going
through
this
process
and
so
I
think.
That's
that's
part
of
the
issue
is
that
the
I
think
some
property
owners
are
would
rather
seek
out
this
exam.
M
G
To
what
council
member
Romano
was
talking
about
so
I
think
it's
really
important.
If
the
administration
could
tell
us
whether
that
lease
program
does
still
exist
for
residential
areas
and
if
it
doesn't,
that
means
something
has
changed.
So
it
helped
to
know
whether
it
was
changed
administratively
or
legislatively
and
then
especially
along
a
major
Street.
It
seems
peculiar
to
have
that
boundary
for
I
mean.
M
T
E
M
T
L
Yeah
that
policy
that
Aaron's
referring
to
is
city
council
adopted
policy
that
wasn't
an
ordinance,
and
so
it's
what
we
have
to
follow,
but
there's
nothing
adopted
in
our
code
that
discusses
interesting
amendments
outside
amendments
to
rights
of
way,
vacations
closures,
Etc
outside
of
when
it
is
included
in
the
subdivision
process.
Okay,.
M
I
guess
I'll,
just
let
the
rest!
The
council
know
where
I'm
at
I
I,
when
we
did
this
on
14th
Avenue
I
was
concerned
about
the
precedent
that
it
might
set
and
I
know.
Councilmember
Wharton
had
some
very.
There
were
some
specifics
about
that
application
that
were
brought
up
and
I.
Remember
thinking.
Okay,
in
this
case,
I
would
vote
with
that
because
of
the
specifics
that
were
brought
up.
M
So
I
am
concerned
that
then
that
decision
is
now
being
used
as
precedent
for
other
decisions
elsewhere
in
the
city,
so
I'm
tempted
to
to
vote.
No,
because
I
don't
want
this
to
continue
to
set
a
precedent
where
our
public
right-of-way
gets
all
Jagged
and
where
people
are
again
doing
something.
A
property
owner
is
doing
something
wrong
like
stopping
paying
their
lease
or
building
a
fence
where
they're
not
supposed
to
build
a
fence,
and
then
the
next
property
owner
is
saying
well,
the
last
owner
did
this.
So
can
you
just
make
it?
Okay,
I!
M
G
Mr,
chair
I
would
like
to
suggest
that
we
follow
up
with
with
attorney's
office
on
on
the
home
matter
of
all
associated
with
this,
and
then
we
can
go
back
and
look
at
the
whatever
Council
policy
I'm
drawing
a
blank.
What
what's
the
council
policy
called?
Is
it?
Is
it
the
street
and
Alley
vacation
policy.
A
G
R
A
T
M
A
All
right,
okay!
Thank
you
very
much.
We'll
move
on
to
item
number
10,
which
is
a
briefing
from
the
Sweet
Streets
organization
on
the
20
mile
per
hour,
default
speed
limits
on
city
streets
with
us.
We
have
Taylor
Myron
and
Jonah
from
Sweet,
Streets
organization
and
I.
Think
we
have
a
is
a
Hassan
on
the
introducing
this
or
I,
don't
see
them
on
the
screen
so
Taylor,
it's
all
yours.
R
I
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity.
Is
this?
Okay?
Oh
great,
we
appreciate
the
time
my
name
is
Taylor.
Anderson
I
am
one
representative
from
the
advocacy
group
called
Sweet
Streets
alongside
Myron
Wilson
and
John
a
nardone.
They
are
also
board
members.
Sweet
Streets
is
a
all
volunteer,
non-profit
advocacy
organization
that
focuses
on
our
built
environment,
on
making
our
streets
more
people
focused
more
safe
to
be
a
pedestrian,
a
bicyclist
anybody,
that's
using
the
the
streets
in
Salt,
Lake
City.
I
So
this
next
slide
kind
of
talks
about
why
we're
focused
on
20
miles
an
hour
and
why
we
are
asking
for
a
change
on
What's
called
the
default
speed.
Salt
Lake
City
has
an
ordinance
our
speed
limits
are
set
by
ordinance
at
25
miles
an
hour
and
there's
plenty
of
research
that
we're
going
to
get
into
on
why
it's
important
to
lower
speeds,
as
close
to
20
miles
an
hour
where
people
are
interacting
with
the
street,
it
has
tremendous
safety
implications,
access
implications
and
Equity
implications.
I
These
are
graphs
that
show
the
chance
that
various
age
groups
are
killed
when
they're
hit
by
a
car,
and
this
is
Nationwide
widely
cited
research
on
the
top
end
of
the
left
side.
That's
that
bar
is
showing
results
from
a
20
mile
per
hour
collision
with
the
the
Top
Line
being
a
70
year
old
person,
the
bottom
line
being
a
person
who
is
hit
by
a
car
and
they're
30
years
old,
having
a
three
percent
chance
of
being
killed,
and
then
the
average
right
in
the
middle
is
seven
percent.
I
If
you
look
at
the
graph
on
the
right
hand,
those
go
up
almost
exponentially
when
speeds
reach
30
miles
an
hour
and
higher,
you
can
see
the
bell
curve
and
for
again
our
elderly
residents,
their
risk
is
more
than
tripled
to
37
percent.
With
that
top
line
graph,
it's
just
it's
so
important
to
get
speeds
closer
to
that
20
miles
per
hour.
This
next
graph
on
the
next
slide
also
kind
of
highlights
that
this
is
from
the
U.S
Department
of
Transportation,
and
you
can
see
at
20
miles
an
hour.
I
Your
chances
of
surviving
a
collision
are
about
90
percent.
That
drops
to
20
or
your
likelihood
of
being
killed
when
you're
hit
by
a
car
going
40
miles
an
hour
is
80
percent
again
according
to
the
U.S
Department
of
Transportation.
So
these
are
a
couple
crafts
that
show
just
how
quickly
your
chance
of-
and
this
is
looking
at
fatalities.
We
also
want
want
to
keep
in
mind.
I
I
We're
asking
you
all
city
council
to
make
this
a
priority,
because
it's
popular
high
speeds
in
neighborhoods
is
one
of
the
top
complaints
oftentimes.
It's
the
number
one
complaint
that
the
transportation
division
is
getting
I
know.
A
number
of
you
have
been
hearing
frequently
from
your
constituents
about
high
speeds
in
their
neighborhoods.
Again,
you
might
think
it's
potholes.
It
in
fact
is
high
speeds
of
cars
going
past
people's
houses,
their
schools,
their
churches,
the
places
that
they
shop
they're,
always
calling
the
transportation
Division
and
asking.
How
can
we
bring
speeds
down?
I
I
know
you
all
are
working
on
other
policies
as
well
that
get
to
this.
Another
important
thing
to
remember
is
is
or
to
point
out
the
equity
aspect,
people
of
color
children,
vulnerable
populations,
people,
elderly
people,
people
with
disabilities
and
people
who
live
in
low-income
neighborhoods
are
disproportionately
victims
of
traffic
crash.
I
We're
asking
for
that
paradigm
shift
that
again,
people
are
are
asking
for
so
to
highlight
again
the
point
or
the
reason
this
next
slide
is
just
a
screenshot
from
an
interactive
map
that
you
can
go
to
we've
put
together.
We
call
it
the
Salt,
Lake,
City
traffic
violence
map
and
the
reason
that
we
we
did
this,
which
the
the
map
shows
in
red
people
who
were
killed
in
traffic
crashes
in
Salt,
Lake,
City,
primarily
in
2021,
and
then
in
yellow
people
who
were
injured
in
2021.
I
The
city
has
official
sources
of
data
for
this
that
will
show
as
well,
but
it's
there's
a
lag
time
of
about
two
and
a
half
to
three
years
and
we
wanted
to
show
what's
happening
on
our
streets
right
now,
so
we
started
this
graph
last
year
and
quickly.
It
was
populated
with
dozens
of
of
injuries
and
fatalities.
Unfortunately,
and
I
wanted
to
make
a
side
note
too,
these
are
just
what
we're
hearing
from
media
reports
which
rely
on
police
reports
as
well,
and
we
believe
that
it
over
emphasizes
fatalities.
I
We
think
it
underrepresents
the
amount
of
people
who
are
being
injured
on
our
roadways,
but
really
it's
it's
kind
of
a
striking
indication
of
of
what's
happening
on
our
streets
today
and
the
next
graph
highlights
just
for
pedestrian
traffic
deaths
and
serious
injuries.
This
is
the
official
city
data.
You
can
see
that
it
stopped
in
2019,
but
it
nonetheless
reinforms
that
or
reinforces
that
every
year
dozens
of
people
are
having
their
lives
either
lost
or
permanently
altered
in
on
our
City's
streets
in
every
neighborhood.
I
So
we
want
to
get
to
kind
of
would
this
change
work
on
this
next
slide
and
wanted
to
get
one
point
out
there.
The
the
we
kind
of
talked
about
this
before,
but
the
way
the
the
number
one
thing
that
influences
the
speed
that
people
drive
on
roadways
is
the
design
of
that
street.
Things
like
how
wide
is
the
street.
I
How
wide
are
the
lanes
whether
there
are
obstacles
like
speed,
humps
or
raised
crosswalks
that
are
actually
going
to
physically
slow
cars
down
and
for
decades
we
have
been
building
our
streets
so
that
to
encourage
high
speeds
by
taking
away
those
barriers.
I
know
we've
dabbled
in
traffic
calming
before
we
might
be
looking
at
livable
streets
program,
traffic
calming
2.0
again
in
the
near
future,
but
this
is
that
all
is
going
to
take
decades.
We've
we've
built
ourselves
over
about
a
century
into
the
problem
of
all
of
our
streets
being
designed
for
high
speeds.
I
It's
going
to
take
a
long
time
and
a
lot
of
money
to
build
our
way
out
of
it
and
there's
a
number
of
complicated
policy
questions
that
you
all
are
going
to
have
to
face.
When
you
decide
to
move
in
that
direction,
so
this
is
fast
action
that
is
backed
by
research
and
will
go
into
that
as
well.
We
just
also
wanted
to
point
out
that
this
is
already
being
used
in
multiple
neighborhoods
across
the
city.
I
Six
streets
like
600
East,
actually
Broadway,
300,
South
downtown
some
in
District,
3,
marmalade,
Capitol
Hill
have
speeds
that
are
lower
than
25
miles
an
hour.
So
this
is
actually
like
being
reused
in
real
time.
We
have
pilot
projects
that
are
already
underway
in
the
city,
and
then
we
have
peer-reviewed
research
from
across
the
world
that
really
reinforces
the
fact
that
if
we
made
this
change
as
a
city,
it
would
have
immediate
positive
changes
to
to
improving
safety
city-wide.
I
So
we
just
wanted
to
there's
a
lot
of
text
on
this
next
screen
just
to
highlight
you
can
go
back
if
you,
if
you'd
like
to
look
at
some
of
the
research,
the
key
takeaway
is
that
this
has
been
studied
internationally.
It's
actually
best
practice
to
to
set
your
posted
speeds
at
20
miles
an
hour
where
people
are
interacting
with
the
street
and
it's
been
studied
in
the
UK.
It's
been
studied
in
Portland
Oregon,
and
what
they've
found
is
that
there
are
meaningful
safety
impacts
immediately
without
redesigning
the
street.
D
S
H
J
I
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
so
the
other
question
is
because
that
research
is
really
skewed
toward
the
UK,
which
has
been
leading
the
way
on
this.
This
next
slide
shows
just
how
many
cities
of
varying
sizes
populations
geographies
are
are
doing
this,
including,
as
recently
as
as
last
month,
there's
a
rundown
of
those
cities
and
a
link
to
their
policies
and
and
the
changes
that
they've
made.
I
But
I
also
want
to
point
out
in
this
blue
that
isn't
showing
up
well
on
green,
that
this
is
actually
best
practice,
as
recommended
by
the
World
Health
Organization,
and
endorsed
by
the
United
Nations
over.
A
hundred
countries
have
recognized
that
the
speed
limit
should
be
posted
at
20
miles
an
hour
when
people
are
reasonably
believed
to
be
interacting
with
the
street.
I
When
we
can
expect
people
are
crossing
the
street
places
like
Sugarhouse,
downtown
Etc
I
mean
not
going
to
go
through
every
neighborhood,
but
the
World
Health
Organization,
as
well
as
other
organizations
out
there,
are
recommending
this
change
as
well,
so
to
start
to
wrap
up
with
this
next
one.
How
does
this
change
again?
We
talked
about
this
a
little
bit,
but
you,
as
the
council,
have
the
authority
to
make
the
change
again
right
now
the
ordinance
says
the
default.
I
Posted
speed
is
going
to
be
25
miles
per
hour
and
then
a
city
employee
can
can
make
the
determination,
if
it's
higher
or
lower
than
that,
but
we're
asking
you
have
the
authority
to
set
the
speeds
on
City
owned
and
maintain
streets.
So
this
is
a
potential
ordinance
change
that
could
be
made
and
again
we
just
wanted
to
emphasize
Salt
Lake
City
residents
are
asking
for
safer
streets.
I
We
have
delivered
signs,
we've
collected
petition
signatures
from
every
district
from
every
neighborhood,
particularly
on
the
west
side,
and
we
can
go
into
that
a
little
bit
more,
but
you
all
know
as
well
as
I.
Do
that's
Salt
Lake
City
residents
want
speeds
to
come
down
and
we
just
wanted
to
make
the
request
that
you
all
consider
as
a
council
making
that
change
on
behalf
of
the
city.
The
final
slide
we
just
wanted
to
show
we're
not
alone.
I
A
K
I
more
than
a
question,
thank
you.
Mr,
chair
more
than
a
question
is
you
know:
I
wanted
to
share
my
support
to
this
to
this
Mission
with
the
sweets
streets
team
there
I
wish
I
was
there
to
to
meet
you
in
person,
but
you
know
this
is
very
important
issue.
In
my
district,
they
they
I,
couldn't
tell
you
how
many
people
have
told
me
that
they
don't
feel
safe
in
their
own
streets
in
their
own
sidewalks.
K
Some
people
tell
me
that
people
are
flying
through
residential
neighborhoods,
where
the
speed
limit
is
posted
as
25
and
they're
driving,
30,
35
and,
and
someone
will
say
well,
what
is
the
change
you
know?
If
what
does
it
matter
if
we
change
into
20
to
20
from
25,
but
I
believe
that
it's
so
subconsciously,
many
people
just
drive
a
little
above
the
speed
limit,
and
if
we
can
just
bring
the
average
down,
we
can
save
some
people's
lives
and,
and
that
to
me
is
very
important.
K
So
I
I
would
like
to
to
thank
you
for
presenting
this
to
us
and
I
I
believe
that
this
is
an
important
thing
to
to
do
and
is
to
invite
people
to
use
our
streets
on
our
sidewalks
and
to
feel
safe
riding
the
bike.
We're
always
talking
about
this.
These
things
in
our
community,
so
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
thank
you
and
and
I
think
that
would
love
to
see
the
the
data
that
you
collected
as
far
as
feedback
from
the
communities,
especially
the
West
Side
communities.
K
D
D
Those
who
were
leaving
behind
are
those
that
were
alleging
that
we
want
to
protect
the
two
little
girls
who
were
killed
on
500
North
by
the
speeding
car,
but
whose
family
might
not
find
a
lot
of
buy-in
and
who
might
find
it
onerous
to
be
subject
to
one
more
traffic
stop
and
potential
Bill
if
they
violate
this.
What
sort
of
Outreach
public
education
engagement
so
that
we
are
creating
peers
who
are
equally
invested,
not
constituents
that
we're
saving,
particularly
on
the
west
side,
is
there
is
planned.
D
D
I
I
agree,
and
what
council
member
pointed
out
is
that
everyone
wants
the
safer
streets.
Not
everyone
is
going
to
be
convinced
that
this
is
the
way,
especially
when
it
opens
up
a
potential
Bill
to
them
when
they
get
caught.
Speeding
now
and
running,
to
pick
up
their
kids
from
after
school
and
daycare,
not
only
am
I
the
representative
for
district
one
and
a
Latina
I
run
a
small
non-profit
and
work
with
these
families.
D
Those
who
are
resistant
to
these
sorts
of
things
and
I
don't
want
this
to
be
another
thing
that
we
impose
on
them.
I
want
it
to
be
something
and
I
can
guarantee
you
those
constituencies
that
I
spend
significant
time
with
and
after
a
summer
of
knocking
on
every
door
that
would
open
to
me
it's
a
predictable
constituency
in
my
area
that
has
this
sign
in
their
yard,
and
there
is
a
case
that
we
have
to
win
hearts.
What
is
the
strategy
for
it?
What's
been
done?
All
of
that
sure.
I
No,
it's
a
great
Point
really
and
we
would
never
want
to
inadvertently
create
any
issues
for
anyone
in
the
city.
We
have
targeted
tabling
events,
West
Point.
We
had
a
great
interactions
honestly
with
all
everyone
we
interacted
with
I
was
surprised,
I
expected
some.
While
you
crazy,
we
didn't
get
any
of
that
at
the
West
Point
event.
I
can't
even
remember
when
that
was
because
time
is
so.
I
Okay,
great
yes,
right,
lead
up
to
the
election.
There
were
a
lot
of
campaigns
at
the
event.
Nonetheless,
we
do
Target
the
west
side,
because
we
understand
that
these
are
legitimate
issues,
legitimate
concerns
and
we're
going
to
continue
to
do
so.
We've
been
trying
to
take
steps
to
amp
up
our
public
Outreach,
our
public
events
as
just
a
volunteer
non-profit
group.
We
have
been
thinking
about
this
and
again
I.
You
know,
I
understand
the
concern
about
the
top-down
approach.
I
We
do
believe
fundamentally
that
everyone
has
a
right
to
live
in
a
neighborhood
with
streets
that
are
safe,
where
they're
going
to
be
less
likely
to
be
killed
or
permanently
maimed
by
just
simply
interacting
with
the
street
or
the
word.
You
mentioned
the
two
kids
who
were
killed.
Unfortunately,
there
were
two
kids
who
were
hit
just
trying
to
cross
Fourth
South
on
their
way
to
school
as
well
in
a
school
crosswalk
that
hadn't
been
painted.
Yet
we
aren't
looking
to
to
have
this
be
an
enforcement
action.
I
We
don't
we're
not
calling
on
any
additional
funding
for
police
to
Target
anybody.
As
a
part
of
this,
we
actually
have
called
on
the
city
council
to
start
viewing
streets
as
a
public
safety
issue,
to
maybe
consider
funding
our
future
funds
more
in
the
realm
of
Street
funding
and
changes
that
we
could
make.
But
we
are
100
committed
to
supporting
things
like
councilman
puie's
effort
on
Capitol
Hill
to
take
the
potential
bias
out
of
policing.
I
D
A
K
Oh
it's
my
turn.
Now
I
thought
it
was
mono.
So
no
I,
you
know
I,
understand,
council,
member,
Peter,
wrestler's,
point
I,
don't
know
if
I'm
a
predictable
constituency
of
District
of
this
city,
but
I
have
a
Sweet,
Streets
yard
sign
in
my
yard.
It
might
have
gotten
destroyed
by
the
snowstorms,
but
I
requested
one
a
new
one.
A
couple
weeks
ago.
K
Hopefully,
I
get
one
of
those
soon,
but
I
I
think
that
this
is
a
smart
policy
and
if
we're
talking
about
the
amount
of
enforcement
you
know
we.
We
know
that
there
is
not
a
ton
of
enforcement
for
in
neighborhood
streets
for
speeding,
and
if
so,
we
probably
need
to
talk
to
our
police
about.
You
know
the
motors
and
doing
that
and
we
you
know
we
are
talking
to
them
as
far
as
you
know,
speaking
I'm
talking
to
them
a
lot
about
speeding
and
residential
neighborhood.
K
But,
but
you
know
to
me
when
we
are
talking
about
this
issue,
is
the
issue
of
money
is
below
life
and
an
accident
and
a
life
is
more
important
than
than
someone
getting
ticketed
for
going
over
to
pick
up
their
kids
and
I.
Think
I
think
that
that
is
a
really
important
point
of
view,
but
I
think
we
also
need
to
learn
as
a
society
that
there
are
some
rules
and
that
we
need
to
protect
life.
K
More
importantly,
so
I
that
that's
how
I
see
this
issue
I
know
that
there's
a
lot
of
people
that
are
not
going
to
believe
that
moving
it
from
25
to
20
is
going
to
make
a
difference
but
I
believe
in
in
the
west
side.
This
is
a
huge
issue
and
I
support
this.
This.
This
change
in
policy
and
ordinance
in
our
city.
D
M
Hills
I
wasn't
even
drinking
at
that
point,
but
like
learning,
how
to
be
a
council
member
and
I
was
told
that
you
have
to
get
three
at
least
three
council
members
to
support
something
in
order
to
request
work
on
it.
So
I
don't
want
to
cut
off
the
discussion,
but
I
would
like
to
at
the
end
of
this,
do
a
straw
poll
to
see
if
we
have
at
least
three
council
members
that
are
supportive
of
requesting
staff
to
work
on
this
ordinance.
H
Did
you?
Oh,
my
question
is
just
yes,
I
also
have
one,
but
mine
is
on
the
light
poles
that
my
neighborhood
just
decided
we're
doing
20
on
our
streets.
They
put
them
up
on
every
Pole,
yeah,
they're,
they're,
real
self-starters,
so
but
I
do.
That
does
that
it
does
relate
to
my
question.
I
do
have
a
point
and
it's
that
when
we
change
the
the
speed
limit,
I'm
I'm
worried
you
know,
there'll
be
a
news
article
and
we'll
put
it
in
our
newsletters.
H
But
you
know
we
have
a
lot
of
cut
through
traffic
that
just
isn't
going
to
notice
and
the
speed
limit
signs
are
just
part
of
the
wallpaper
in
other
cities
when
they've
done
this.
Has
there
been
like?
Have
they
done?
Maybe
signs
that
are
a
little
bit
different
that
are
more
to
grab
somebody's
attention
so
that
people
actually
notice
that
the
limit
has
changed
good.
I
Quote
I
mean
I'm,
not
sure,
I'm
happy
to
follow
up
on
that
and
get
back
to
you.
I
I.
Just
do
want
to
point
out.
Portland
did
just
hang
the
regular
signs
for
all
I'm
aware
of,
and
they
did
see
a
meaningful
reduction
of
the
people
that
were
going.
Those
incredibly
dangerous
speeds
above
35
miles
an
hour
I.
H
H
H
P
Just
because
the
UK
did
have
several
cities,
but
I'm
not
sure,
if
I'm
quite
sure
that
their
sign
requirements
are
different
than
ours.
So
there
is
some
research
and
they
were
trying
to
accomplish
the
thing
exactly
that
you're
talking
about
as
something
unique
enough
to
to
grab
people's
attention.
But.
A
M
A
L
E
A
E
One
of
the
things
we
I
was
just
I'm
thinking
about
is
that
if
we
have
an
ordinance
change,
we
certainly
don't
have
to,
but
we
could
have
our
transportation
help
in
some
of
that
Outreach
and
Community
engagement
as
we
look
at
an
ordinance
change
for
this
and
I
think
with
some
of
the
things
as
you
mentioned
Taylor,
you
know,
this
is
a
non-profit
volunteer.
That's
a
group!
That's
trying
to
get
out
there
and
educate
people
and
have
that
Community
engagement
and
I
certainly
appreciate
the
dedication
and
time
and
effort
you've
put
into
it.
E
It
Community
engagement
from
our
transportation
division,
which
is
something
I,
would
like
to
make
sure
we
kind
of
look
at
not
not
overwhelming
our
transportation
department,
but
certainly
helping
with
some
of
the
volunteer
efforts
to
have
some
Community
engagement
and
include
some
of
the
things
that
council
member
Petro
eschler
was
talking
about
making
sure
that
there's
buy-in
from
all
of
the
different
demographics
that
this
will
and
can
affect
in
a
positive
light.
The
other
thing
I
very
quickly,
just
wanted
to
say,
was
I
appreciate
that
you
called
it
traffic
violence.
E
E
It's
been
something
that
has
been
a
priority
in
in
Salt
Lake
City,
and
this
is
another
step
for
implementing
those
complete
streets
where
it
is
more
pedestrian,
friendly
and
and
yes,
there
are
certainly
accidents,
but
there
is
also
this
this
traffic
violence,
which
I
think
it
caught
my
eyes
in
the
corner
of
that
slide.
So
it
was
an
interesting
shift
in
my
my
train
of
thought
on
that
one.
So
those
are
just
my
two
cents.
G
F
D
A
I
do
have
one
I
do
have
one
question:
I
mean
this:
is
a
street
Suites
going
from
25
to
20.?
Has
there
been
thought
and
discussions
in
other
places
where
they
just
blanket
move
all
the
street
speed
limits
down
five
miles
from
40
to
35
35
to
30
30
to
25?
Have
you
have
you
thought
of
that,
or
have
you
seen
that
also,
or
is
that
too
big
of
a
I
don't
want
to
go
that
far?
Maybe
now,
but.
I
I
do
remember
seeing
that
in
a
headline
about
one
of
these
other
cities,
making
the
change
so
I
know
that
it
has
happened.
I
would
double
down
on
what
councilwoman
Fowler
mentioned,
which
we
looked
at
the
expertise
at
the
transportation
Division.
If
they
think
that
would
be
an
improvement,
we
would
be
all
in
favor
of
bringing
down
speeds
on
arterials
and
other
streets
too
yeah,
okay,
100
thank.
A
L
L
There
has
been
there's
kind
of
a
1900s
era
policy
that
we're
slowly
moving
away
from
as
an
industry
and
we're
inactive
City,
which
is
National
Association
of
city
transportation
officials.
It's
been
really.
The
states
have
been
dominating
the
conversations,
and
now
the
cities
have
kind
of
been
stepping
up
and
there's
some
relatively
new
guidance.
So
now
this
West
Temple
on
the
south
end
as
we
we
lower
that
speed
limit.
L
Is
that
changing
speed
limit
Alone?
It's
it's
more
symbolic
than
than
anything
and
I.
Think
like
a
20
mile.
An
hour
speed
limit
would
be
a
really
good
kickoff
for
a
livable
streets
program.
You
know
the
reboot
of
of
traffic
calming
because
I
think
it
would
get
a
lot
of
press
and
attention
and
it
would
be
a
bold
statement.
L
But
then
what
would
really
make
a
difference.
Long
term
is
backing
that
up
with
chain
long-term
changes
to
the
street
design,
so
the
streets
themselves
actually
look
and
feel
differently
to
encourage
people
to
to
drive
slow
and
help
make
it
so
people
feel
uncomfortable,
driving,
fast
and
so
I
think
that
really,
you
need
to
follow
it
up
with
that
ongoing
investment
in
retrofitting
our
streets
to
be
more
human-centered.
A
A
S
S
On
HB
440,
which
is
the
homelessness
bill
the
bill.
You
know
you
received
an
update
at
the
beginning
of
your
work
session
on
how
the
bill
and
the
various
positions
from
the
league
of
cities
and
towns
had
had
finished
yesterday
and
in
the
legislative
process.
Today's
a
whole
new
day,
and
so
a
whole
series
of
additional
things
have
happened
since
yesterday
and
since
you're
briefing
was
taking
place
earlier
in
the
work
session,
HB
440
now
has
a
second
substitute
that
has
come
out.
S
S
Salt
Lake
is
the
only
city
of
the
three
homeless
resource
cities
in
in
Salt,
Lake
County.
That
would
face
under
the
bill,
both
the
preemption
and
the
flex
Provisions.
The
flex
provision
would
also
apply
to
south
Salt
Lake,
but
the
preemption
alone
would
would
potentially
apply
to
Salt
Lake
City.
If
the
the
Salt
Lake
County
cities
cannot
agree
on
a
temporary
overflow
plan,
these
are
the
provisions
that
would
that
would
kick
in.
S
There's
a
portion,
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
the
mitigation
funding,
if
it
would
go
to
a
city
that
is
hosting
that
overflow
facility,
and
so
if
it
was
determined
that
it
was
Salt
Lake.
For
instance,
a
portion
of
that
500
000
could
be
siphoned
away
to
pay
for
things
that
weren't
in
the
either
the
original
bill
or
the
first
sub.
So
some
of
those
things
could
be
for
Department
to
Public
Safety,
for
ambulances
and
for
hospitals.
So
it
really
reduces
that
carrot,
though
a
small
carrot
of
500
000.
S
That
was
set
aside
to
be
that
that
site
that
was
selected
under
under
that
mitigation
formula,
I
think
that's
well.
I'll
just
think
it
is
deeply
troubling
from
our
conversations
with
League
of
cities
and
towns
that
that
500
000
would
be
reduced
and
in
particular,
that
there
would
be
potentially
overlapping
law
enforcement
components
dealing
with
these
shelters
so
we're
now
turning
our
attention
to
our
lobbying
effort
in
the
Senate.
A
S
You
know
when,
when
is
the
time
to
you
know,
engage
with
Community
councils
or
other
groups
and
let
them
let
them
know
the
format
the
bill
is
in
is
is
not
one
that's
acceptable,
but
threatens
that
promise
that
Salt
Lake
City
made
between
with
the
with
the
neighborhoods
that
that
host
the
current
homeless,
Resource
Centers.
That
I
would
say
it's
it's
likely
now
we're
in
the
Remain
the
very
few
days
left
in
the
legislative
session.
S
The
session
will
end
Friday
at
midnight,
so
this
bill
won't
have
another
Committee
hearing
on
the
Senate
side
because
of
the
we've
passed
the
time
for
committee
hearings
in
the
session
process,
so
it
will
become
an
effort
to
to
just
Lobby
the
Senate
on
the
floor.
The
full
Senate
on
the
floor
as
it
moves
through
so
for
for
those
that
had
kind
of
texted
asking
questions,
I
would
say
now
is
that
time,
God's.
S
S
We
were
doing
so
side
by
side
with
the
the
league
staff
and
with
lobbyists
for
South,
Salt,
Lake
and
Midvale.
So
those
those
cities
have
have
continued
to
stand
by
us.
I
think
it
was
entirely
a
call
by
representative
Ellison
to
use
his
messaging
on
the
floor
that
that
he
was
making
accommodations,
even
though
the
accommodations
weren't
for
Salt
Lake
City.
S
I
will
also
note
there
was
a.
There
was
a
an
amendment
that
was
tried
specifically
targeting
carving
Out
West
Valley
City
from
being
subject
to
the
the
parameters
in
the
bill
related
to
the
flex
and
the
preemption,
and
it
was
run
by
one
of
the
legislators
representing
West
Valley.
It
failed
on
on
the
floor
because
of
of
comments
from
legislators
that
directed
at
that.
You
know
that
there
are.
A
S
S
Is
they
identify
a
bill
that
is,
that
is
moving
and
other
bills
that
haven't
gotten
drafted
as
fast
that
are
seen
as
being
compatible
might
be
merged
in
so
462
now
includes
this
station
area
plans,
SB
34
plus,
as
well
as
being
the
commission
on
housing
affordability
bill.
So
that
is
a
significant
piece
of
legislation
that
the
league
staff
and
Angela
price
in
particular,
has
been
heavily
negotiating
for
the
last
few
days.
S
S
And
then,
of
course,
the
Inland
Port
bill
is
also
the
other
significant
Bill.
We
we're
still
keeping
a
very
close
eye
on
as
it
moves
through
the
process
and
again
that
has,
at
this
point
all
of
the
technical
Corrections
that
we
have
identified
and
by
we
I
mean
Katie.
Lewis
has
identified
in
her
discussions
with
the
drafting
attorney
and
and
is
also
in
a
in
a
good
position
to
pass
at
this
point
before
they
reach
their
midnight
deadline.
A
E
S
The
animal
bill
we
have
so
that
one
is
HP
476
representative
Joel
Ferry
is
running
that
bill.
The
concerns
that
have
been
identified
for
Salt
Lake
relate
to
ordinances
on
the
books
related
to
horse-drawn
carriages
and
Provisions
related
to
pet
stores
that
the
prohibition
on
selling
puppies
or
kittens
and
instead
requires.
S
O
O
I
A
O
H
A
E
A
G
G
I've
been
practicing
since
2012
for
the
past
eight
years,
my
my
main
focus
has
been
housing
in
a
lot
of
different
forms,
so
high
low
density
for
sale
for
rent,
affordable
market
rate
I've
really
kind
of
designed
it
all.
My
work
has
spanned
in
a
lot
of
different
states
really
with
the
focus
in
the
west,
so
Utah
California
and
Idaho,
and
mainly
been
focused
in
the
Salt
Lake
Valley
the
past
few
years.
G
Living
in
a
time
when
we
have
an
increasing
population
in
our
city,
as
well
as
rising
costs
for
land
and
materials,
so
I'm
just
really
interested
in
Creative
Solutions,
whether
that's
through
non-profit
Partnerships
grants,
architectural
Solutions
I,
think
we're
living
in
a
really
amazing
time
and
I
have
high
hopes
for
the
creativity
of
our
communities
and
for
the
Construction
and
design
industry
and
helping
create
more
affordable.
Solutions.
G
B
B
A
Katie
you're
off
the
hook.
There's
no
questions
for
you
from
us.
Thank
you
for
your
engagement.
We
will
you'll.
Your
name
will
be
on
the
consent
agenda.
This
evening's,
at
our
formal
meeting,
you
need
not
be
present
to
win,
but
you
are
always
welcome
to
join
us
via
WebEx,
so
I
appreciate
that,
but
very
much
your
engagement
have
a
good
night.
Thank.
G
A
G
Work
with
downtown
Alliance
as
the
urban
Affairs
program
manager,
so
downtown
Alliance.
We
represent
over
2500
businesses
and
property
owners
in
the
central
business
district,
we're
charged
with
building
a
dynamic
and
diverse
community,
that
is
the
regional
center
for
culture,
Commerce
and
entertainment,
Under
My
Umbrella.
We
operate
the
downtown
Merchants
Association,
which
convenes
downtown
businesses
on
a
monthly
basis
to
discuss
various
items,
including
activation
and
safety.
My
seat
on
the
board
will
allow
me
to
share
the
perspective
of
our
downtown
businesses
and
property
own
owners.
A
Oh
thumbs
up
Christina.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
engagement
and
your
willingness
to
serve
on
the
board.
Your
name
will
be
on
the
consent
agenda
for
this
evening
and
as
I
told
Katie,
you
need
not
be
present
to
win,
but
we
do.
You
will
be
on
that
seven
o'clock
formal
session.
So
thank
you
very
much
and
have
a
wonderful
evening.
G
A
G
E
Yeah
yeah
I,
don't
sorry
to
interrupt
Ellison
and
to
be
all
confusing
and
stuff,
but
just
reading
the
the
quick
sort
of
memo
I
know
this
kind
of
turned
into
a
written
briefing
instead
because
it's
a
simple
name
change
of
a
department.
But
there
were
a
couple
of
issues
that
were
brought
up,
I
think
by
Allison.
Just
some
policy
questions,
the
first
being
the
there
was
a
lot
of
change
to
the
Housing
Trust
Fund
Advisory
board
when
we
moved
it
over
to
the
RDA
and
I.
E
Don't
think
that
those
policies
have
really
been
looked
out
or
looked
at
like
the
powers
and
duties
have
been
outlined
or
looked
at
since
in
our
memo
it
says
since
2013,
and
so
the
question
is,
if
we'd
like
to
schedule
an
opportunity
for
admin
to
provide
an
update
on
the
Housing
Trust,
Fund,
Advisory,
Board
and
I.
Think
that
might
be
I
would
request
that
Mr
chair,
because
we
did
move
the
Housing
Trust
Fund
over
to
RDA
and
I
would
like
to
know
how
that
is
working
out
and
how
the
board
is
doing.
A
S
R
A
More,
we
have
two
more
appointments,
and
this
is
for
the
airport
board
and
John
Bradshaw
welcome
for
Welcome
to
the
city
council,
hybrid
meeting.
You
have
six
council
members
in
front
of
you
and
you
have
one
on
the
screen
with
you
and
welcome
and
thank
you
for
you
know
applying
and
for
this
Airport
border
position.
Please
tell
us
a
little
bit
about
yourself
and
why
you
want
to
be
on
the
board.
L
Well,
thank
you.
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
have
this
conversation
tonight
and
thanks
to
Mayor
Mendenhall
for
giving
me
the
consideration,
I'm
a
born
and
raised
Salt
Lake,
City,
Utah
guy
and
spent
the
most
the
majority
of
my
life
here
with
a
little
bit
of
time
up
in
Portland,
Oregon
and
I
have
like
any
kid.
I've
always
been
fascinated
with
airplanes.
L
I'm
I
am
a
general
aviation
pilot
and
I've
got
a
couple
of
million
miles
in
the
air
and
much
of
that
on
the
international
side
of
things
too.
So
I
I
have
always
been
very
interested
in,
what's
going
on
with
the
airport
and
and
have
been
really
impressed
with.
What's
been,
you
know,
what's
occurred
there
with
the
rebuild
and
and
I
saw
an
opportunity
that
maybe
I
could
participate
a
little
bit.
L
Is
the
airport
now
moves
into
you,
know
kind
of
this
next
phase
of
completion
and
starts
moving
some
of
that
general
aviation
off
campus
into
the
South
Valley
area
and
Tooele
I
just
have
some
interest
to
watch
kind
of
how
that
works
and
also
the
international
Flair
that
I
think
the
airport
is
going
to
continue
to
have
as
Delta
has
indicated.
So
those
are
you
know,
I
think
those
are
kind
of
my
motives
and
and
I
know:
there's
not
a
big
paycheck
here,
it's
just
more
giving
back
to
the
community
a
little
bit.
A
D
A
Exactly
pull
back
and
stick
the
sky
gets
bigger,
okay,
John!
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
You'll
be
on
this
evening's
consent.
Consent
agenda
no
need
to
be
present
to
win,
but
if
you're
you're
more
than
welcome
to
to
listen
in.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
energy
and
your
passion
for
Aviation.
A
G
G
Not
only
provide
access
to
and
tools
to
opportunities
for
education,
but
it
also
is
a
place
where
we
can
gather
as
a
community
and
learn
and
grow
together
and
I.
Think
that's
a
really
special
thing
that
we
have
in
our
communities
and
I.
Think
it's
really
important
that
we
have
that
access
for
this
city
and
for
people
of
all
ages
to
be
able
to
learn
and
grow
together,
but
also
find.
M
Sarah,
thank
you
so
much
for
applying
for
this
board.
I.
Think
your
role
on
that
board
is
going
to
be
incredibly
important
because
of
the
mayor's
announcement
that
she
wants
to
put
a
library
in
District
Five
and
in
the
ballpark
neighborhood,
so
I'm
very
glad
that
you
will
be
there
to
help
lead
that
effort.
I.
Think
it's
going
to
be
game,
changing
for
the
neighborhood
going
to
be
very
important
to
have
that
District
5
is
the
only
District
that
doesn't
have
a
library,
and
so
it's
about
time.
M
E
Think
I
want
to
commend
that
and
and
tell
you
how
admirable
that
is,
and
it
truly
does
show
the
colors
that
you
have
and
and
the
passion
that
you
have
for
this
city
for
your
residence
and
and
I
know
how
much
education
means
to
you
and
I
think
this
is
awesome
for
you
in
a
great
position
and
again
I,
just
truly
it
100
shows
who
you
are
and
the
genuine
sincere
person
that
you
are
with
a
mound
of
dedication
to
to
your
passions
and
what
you
do
so.
Thank
you.
A
A
Yeah,
yes,
I
think
it
was
a
beautiful
day,
you're
right
thanks
a
lot
so
you're
going
to
be
on
tonight's
consent
agenda.
You
need
not
be
present
to
win,
like
I've
told
everybody
else,
but
you're
more
than
welcome
to
join
us
at
seven
o'clock.
The
Stars
may
be
out,
but
it'll
still
be
a
wonderful
evening.
So
thank
you
very
much
and
have
a
great
evening.
Bye.
A
G
A
A
The
city
we
District
game
mapping
tool
has
been
launched.
A
couple
of
us
council
members
played
with
it
today
and
if
you're
a
nerd
and
you
like
to
play
with
maps
and
do
that,
it's
pretty
exciting
I
had
to
pull
a
couple
council
members
off
the
computer
because
they
were
playing
with
it
so
much
so
they
would
actually
come
to
the
meeting.
So
that
is
out
there.
The
website
will
post
it
on
the
chat,
but
it's
tiny
URL.