►
Description
To access agendas please go to https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
A
We're
going
to
start,
it
is
september,
13th
205.
We
welcome
you
guys
to
today's
redevelopment
agency
board
meeting
to
keep
everybody
healthy
and
safe.
We
continue
to
host
hybrid
rda
meetings.
Our
meetings
are
public
and
you're
welcome
to
join
us
in
person
or
by
watching
from
the
city
council's
agenda,
page
facebook,
youtube
or
slc
tv.
We
hope
you'll
continue
to
join
us
in
whichever
manner
you
feel
most
comfortable.
A
We're
in
agenda
item
a
which
is
comments,
and
so
we
begin
our
meeting
with
comments
to
the
board.
I'd
like
to
remind
you
that
written
comments
may
be
submitted
to
rda
offices
via
mail
to
p.o
box,
145476,
salt
lake
city,
utah,
84114
or
emailing
us
at
council
that
comments
at
slcgov.com
or
by
calling
our
24-hour
phone
comment
line
at
801-535-7654.
A
We
are
accepting
your
comments
in
person
and
through
webex,
and
for
those
whose
only
option
is
to
call
in
staff
will
be
monitoring
a
separate
telephone
line.
I
want
to
mention
our
rules
of
the
quorum
as
well.
These
are
guideline
guidelines
to
help
our
meeting
progress
in
an
orderly
civil
efficient
way.
We
want
to
give
everyone
the
opportunity
to
voice
our
opinions
without
feeling
intimidated.
A
A
If
you
violate
this
rule,
your
line
will
be
muted
and
you
will
be
asked
to
stop
if
you
feel
you
need
to
use
profanity
or
disrespectful
remarks
to
express
your
point.
You're
welcome
to
email,
board
members
or
call
our
comment
line.
In
addition,
our
staff
will
request
your
name
during
the
webex
registration
process
to
limit
disruption.
Your
name
cannot
include
a
message
or
violate
our
rules
of
the
quorum.
If
your
name
doesn't
meet
this
requirement,
then
our
staff
will
make
contact
with
you
to
gather
that
information
for
those
joining
in
webex.
A
Please
monitor
your
chat
in
case.
We
try
to
reach
you.
Scott
corpani
from
our
staff
is
helping
to
moderate
the
meeting
and
will
be
messaging
with
the
attendees
to
coordinate
on
any
questions
with
your
commenting.
Registration
staff
is
handling
a
number
of
tasks,
so
please
limit
messages
to
technical
issues
and
minimal
changes
to
your
registration.
A
Taylor
hill
on
our
staff
will
be
calling
the
names
of
those
who
wish
to
comment.
We
will
call
names
of
people
joining
on
webex
and
in
person
based
on
the
order
of
registration
or
received
comment
cards
when
it
is
your
turn
to
speak.
Taylor
will
announce
your
name
for
people
in
webex.
She
will
then
mute
your
line
and
you
may
begin
for
people
in
person.
Please
step
up
to
the
podium
and
if
you
have
a
mask,
please
feel
free
to
remove
it
before
making
a
comment.
A
A
B
A
All
right
we're
moving
on
to
item
one
sorry
we
did
that.
So
thank
you
taylor
for
that,
and
we
are
now
at
the
public.
Sorry.
Are
there
any
other
comments
in
person?
Okay,
I
don't
see
anybody.
We
are
now
at
the
public
hearing
portion
of
our
agenda.
We
only
have
one
public
hearing
item
b1
resolution,
rda
budget
amendment
number
one
for
fiscal
year,
2022
the
same
rules
of
the
quorum
applies
to
our
public
hearing
portion.
D
A
Right
well,
thank
you
very
much.
So
we
are
at
item
b1.
The
resolution
are
the
a
budget
amendment
number
one
and
for
some
reason
I
have
it
listed
twice.
Then
I
have
it
listed
twice.
A
Maybe
we
should
maybe
we
give
some
time
to
danny
and
rd
stuff,
I'm
not
sure
jen
what's
happening
because
I
have
it
twice.
I
have
it
here
and
then
I
have
it
here.
D
F
A
Right
so
I
have
a
motion
to
close
the
public
hearing
by
board
member
mano
and
second
by
remember,
fowler,
I'm
going
to
roll
called
petro.
A
A
All
right,
I
have
a
motion
by
board
member
and
seconded
by
war.
Member
wharton.
I
want
to
roll
call,
I'm
going
to
start
with
fowler.
Yes,
wharton.
Yes,
yes,
yes,
yes,
petro,
yes,
and
I'm
a
yes
all
right.
So
we
number
two
and
now
we're
back
at
the
table
with
ben
that
key
with
danny
was
aaron
and
mary
beribeth
and
mike
burns.
The
floor
is
yours.
D
So
the
the
update,
since
the
first
briefing,
is
the
one
million
dollars
of
additional
funding
to
cover
the
cost
increases
of
marmalade
plaza.
This
is
a
new
public,
open
space.
It
was
proposed
by
the
administration
to
pull
funding
from
the
revolving
loan
fund,
720
000
and
from
the
arctic
court
infill
home.
This
would
be
a
new
single-family
home
and
that
would
be
280
thousand
dollars.
D
So
one
million
total
and
the
board
had
asked
at
the
last
briefing
could
park
impact
fees
be
used
instead
of
those
other
funding
sources,
which
is
a
way
for
the
council
and
the
rda
board
wearing
different
hats
to
use
the
city
and
the
rda
financial
tools
together
for
one
project,
rda
staff
checked
with
the
public
lands
department
and
reviewed
the
city's
impact
fee
plan.
The
answer
is
yes.
The
project
is
fully
eligible
for
parks
impact
fees.
D
H
D
H
D
D
We
would
have
the
impact
fees
sent
to
the
rda
and
then
in
the
next
rda
budget
amendment
we
would
swap
the
funding
sources.
This
would
allow
the
bid
to
move
forward
based
on
the
construction
timing
and
to
do
the
funding
source.
So
just
wanted
to
be
clear.
That
you'd
see
this
item
a
couple
more
times.
Didn't.
D
D
D
D
D
There's
also
a
policy
question
about
the
arctic
court:
the
home.
If
the
board
wanted
to
continue
discussing
discussion
about
the
potential
development
of
that
site,
some
members
have
mentioned
the
community
land
trust.
Maybe
an
accessory
dwelling
unit
could
be
put
on
the
property
and
how
much
additional
funding
would
be
needed.
There's
currently
280
000
for
developing
that
home.
C
So
I
did
want
to
ask
that
question
like
what
what
can
we
do
to.
I
know
it's
already
kind
of
a
smallish
lot,
because
I
think
it
was
subdivided
from
the
house
on
arctic
court
or
maybe,
but
that
might
have
been
because
those
lots
were
combined.
But
anyway
point
is
it's
not
very
big?
I
You're
right,
it
has
been
subdivided.
It
is
a
fairly
small
lot.
We
do
have
plans
already
drawn
up
that
have
been
already
approved
by
the
historic
landmarks
commission,
so
as
a
board.
What
we
would
do,
regardless
of
of
this
action
here
today,
we
would
obviously
need
additional
funds
to
move
that
project
forward.
I
I
C
E
E
I
still
think
that
the
arctic
court
project
would
be
a
really
good
opportunity
for
us
to
not
actually
build
the
house
and
and
deal
with
all
of
the
cost
overruns,
but
to
use
the
land
as
put
the
land
out
for
an
rfp
to
similar
to
what
we
did
with
that.
I
think
it
was
1084
jefferson
or
whatever
nine
something
jefferson
street,
but
not
just
for
somebody
that
wants
to
build
a
house
and
say
here's
free
land,
but
somebody
that
wants
to
build
a
house.
E
And
that
way
we
don't
actually
have
to
put
any
more
money
and
we
just
offer
the
land
out
to
somebody
that
can
build
it
themselves
and
they
can
so
I
I
think
so
I
think
we're
still
looking
for
a
place
for
this
280
000
to
go
and
I'm
sure
that
we'll
be
able
to
find
that.
But
I
think
that's
that
money
seems
much
less
restricted
than
impact
fees
would
be.
E
So
I
I
do
like
still
moving
around
the
impact
fees
and
figuring
out
another
place
for
this,
but
I
don't
think
I
personally
think
it
should
be
an
arctic
card.
I
think
that
the
that
a
private
owner
or
developer
can
pull
off
that
project
faster
than
we'd
be
able
to,
and
we
could
still
get
public
benefits
from
that.
But
that's
just
my
thought
and
it
certainly
would
need
staff
input
as
to
whether
or
not
that's
feasible.
I
Yeah
on
honestly,
we
have
not
gotten
to
start
looking
at
the
specifics
of
that
disposition
of
property
right
now
as
much
as
identifying
that
pot
of
funds
is
an
available
source
for
finishing
marmalade
plaza.
Our
intention
is
when
we
come
back
and
request
those
funds
to
have
additional
information
on
what
that
proposed
use
would
be
the
process
and
then
even
how
we
could
incorporate
affordability
in
that.
So
it
seems.
E
A
Anybody
else
any
other
comments.
I
have
a
question
danny
so
when
this
all
hap,
if
the
board
says
yes
to
using
capital,
sorry
impact
fees
and
then
that
releases-
a
million
dollars
correct
back
to
the
rda
budget
and
do
you
have
plans
for
that?
Are
those
restricted
that
million
dollars.
D
So
the
million
dollars
is
in
two
parts:
the
280
000
for
the
arctic
court
single
family
home
we've
been
discussing,
which
I
think
that's
a
future
discussion
about
how
to
best
use
those
funds,
the
other
seven
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
dollars
right
is
proposed
to
come
from
the
revolving
loan
fund.
So
after
the
budget
amendment
steps,
it
would
go
back
to
the
revolving
loan
fund
to
be
available
for
future
loans.
Return.
A
Loans,
yep,
okay,
perfect
yep,
all
right,
so
we
do
need
to
take
a
vote
on
this.
D
F
Madam
chair,
I
move
that
we
approve
the
use
of
impact
fees
for
the
marmalade.
No,
no
sorry.
E
F
A
Well,
there
you
go.
We
have
a
motion
by
board
director,
mano
and
seconded
by
board
director
dugan,
as
I
said
by
for
director
bano,
so
I'm
gonna
roll
called
this
petro.
Yes,.
D
D
D
While
that's
being
pulled
up
the
reason
we're
able
to
talk
about
this
in
the
public
session
is
because
the
parcels
are
already
under
contract
with
the
state
for
purchase
there.
We
go
so
the
parcels
that
we're
discussing
are
in
development
site
number
four.
This
is
at
the
corner
of
300,
south
and
500
west,
and
it's
the
three
parcels
that
have
the
diagonal
hash
marks
and,
as
you
can
see,
a
couple
of
those
parcels
are
needed
to
construct
a
new
city
street.
D
The
final
designs
for
station
center
are
not
yet
available,
but
based
on
the
current
designs,
I
think
they're
about
70
complete
the
total
estimated
cost
for
all
of
the
upgrades
in
the
public.
Right-Of-Way
is
15
million
dollars,
so
15
million
dollars
is
the
need,
there's
nine
and
a
half
million
dollars,
that's
already
been
appropriated
for
it,
and
using
3.9
million
from
that
source
for
purchasing
these
parcels
would
further
reduce
it
to
about
five
and
a
half
million.
D
So
there
would
then
be
a
10
million
dollar
funding
gap
and
it's
been
previously
discussed
that
the
sale
of
some
or
all
of
the
rda
property
in
station
center,
the
proceeds
could
be
used
to
fill
that
funding
gap.
What
is
done
with
the
proceeds
is
a
decision
for
the
board
board.
Members
have
previously
discussed
an
interest
in
some
of
station
center
being
a
separate
rfp
for
smaller
sites
for
smaller
firms
to
have
access
to.
D
E
I
The
scale
and
scope
of
those
is
not
known
yet
until
we
really
have
a
clear
understanding
of
what
we're
looking
to
build
there
and
as
part
of
our
overall
goals
and
objectives.
So
we
share
in
that
desire.
That's
our
plan,
we're
not
necessarily
looking
to
put
it
out
as
part
of
one
large
parcel
of
development,
but
rather
looking
at
opportunities
for
how
that
could
be
split
and
provided
as
smaller
pieces
that
are
available
for
different
types
of
development.
What
that
exact
structure
is
right
now,
though,
we're
not
entirely
sure.
A
E
Guess
I'm
comfortable
voting
on
it
and
approving
that
I
and
just
signaling,
but
that's
still
what
I
would
like.
I
don't
know
I
mean
I
don't
know
if
that's
what
the
rest
of
the
board
would
like
either,
but
I
I'm
still
interested
in
that,
and
so
hopefully,
as
those
discussions,
materialize
and
and
like
I've
said
before
I
think
doing
one
giant
building
or
one
giant
development.
E
I
I
On
behalf
of
staff,
if
I
may
respond
to
that
directly
staff
shares
that
desire
and
concern.
We've
heard
that
from
the
board,
we
understand
that
that's
the
preference
and
the
direction
you'd
like
us
to
look
at.
Even
in
our
conversations
with
a
larger
developer,
we
were
still
incorporating
the
idea
of
splitting
pieces
off
for
development,
so
that
is
in
response
not
just
of
what
we
see
as
the
best
way
to
develop
this.
But
in
response
to
your
concerns
and
others
from
the
board
of
how
to
build
this
into
something.
That's
really
impactful
in
the
neighborhood.
A
Yeah,
I
think
I
think,
a
lot
of
us
from
where
I've
heard
to
are
in
that
have
that
desire
as
well
to
see,
and
so
I
think
it's
still
preliminary
like
danny
said,
but
it's
going
forward
with
that
in
mind,
so
so
stay
tuned
for
what
director
dugan
do
you
have
any
other
comments?
Any
other
comments,
okay,
so
anybody
ready
to
make
a
motion
for
for
this
request.
A
All
right,
I
have
promotion
by
board
member
mano
seconded
by
board
member
fowler,
I'm
going
to
roll
called
petro.
Yes,
dugan,
yes
manu.
A
Yes,
fowler,
yes
and
I'm
a
yes
and
that
passes
unanimously
as
well.
So
thank
you.
We're
moving
on
to
item
number
three,
which
is
a
seller's
note
and
gap
loan
for
spark
development
at
1500,
west
north
temple.
A
J
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair,
thank
you.
So,
as
you
mentioned,
this
is
the
seller's
note
and
gap
loan
discussion
for
spark
at
1,
500
west
north
temple
in
this
briefing
you'll
consider
adding
a
total
of
eight
million
in
financing
for
brent
short
development
for
their
spark
project.
J
The
rda
staff
proposes
a
four
million
dollar
seller's
note,
which
most
of
the
of
the
board
members
have
have
discussed
in
the
past,
but
I
think
some
of
the
some
of
you
newer
ones
have
not.
It
would
allow
brinshaw
to
repay
the
rda
for
the
original
purchase
price
of
the
land
over
30
years
at
1.25
interest.
J
The
remaining
four
million
would
take
the
form
of
an
emergency
gap
loan,
which
is
to
reflect
the
construction
cost
increases
that
we
all
know
about,
but
in
this
case
they're
estimated
to
raise
project
costs
from
about
70
million
to
93
million.
J
J
K
Wait,
thank
you
so
much
allison.
We
have
a
really
brief
presentation
for
you
and
the
majority
of
the
board
members
have
seen
it,
but
not
everyone
and,
of
course
it's
for
the
public
as
well,
and
I
wanted
to
note
that
we
do
have
branch
short
development
here
for
questions.
If
you're
interested
whitney
weller
senior
vice
president,
it
should
be
online
and
david
brent
principles
with
us
in
in
the
room
as
well.
So
I
will
hand
it
off
to
kate
to
get
started
great.
L
Thank
you.
As
was
mentioned,
this
project
is
located
at
1500
west
north
temple.
If
taylor,
if
you
want
to
go
to
the
next
slide
here,
we
have
a
vicinity
map
that
shows
you
that
location
within
the
north
temple
project
area.
This
parcel
is
just
over
two
acres,
which
makes
it
a
tier
one
or
parcel,
and
it
was
decided
by
the
city
master
plan
that
this
would
be
an
ideal
spot
for
a
signature,
transit
oriented
development.
L
Just
as
some
background
bryn
shore
is
one
of
the
largest
affordable
housing
developers
in
the
country.
They
have
built
over
seven
thousand
units
of
of
housing
and
their
focus
is
on
strengthening
neighborhoods
they
for
this
particular
project.
It
is
a
predominantly
female
lead
team,
so
that's
exciting.
They
also
have
over
50
percent
of
their
development
staff
is,
is
also
female.
Let's
go
ahead
and
go
to
the
next
slide,
so
what
we're
looking
at
today
is
we're
going
to
go
through
high
level
of
the
the
background
of
the
spark
project.
L
It's
funding
sources,
the
affordable
components
of
it
and
the
public
benefits
that
we
have,
along
with
that,
we'll
talk
about
the
rda
contributions
to
the
project
and
we'll
look
at
finalizing
those
financing
terms
and
then
the
additional
gap
financing
that
is
needed
here
that
main
objective
of
looking
at
what
is
needed
in
those
additional
funding
areas
is
what
we
hope
to
have
your
approval
on
today,
due
to
the
unprecedented
inflation
and
shipping
and
labor
costs
they
they
do
have
that
gap
that
we'd
like
to
talk
about.
Let's
go
to
the
next
slide.
L
Here
we
have
that
project
timeline.
You
can
see
in
2017
that
pristine
location
for
a
transit-oriented
development
was
acquired
and
put
out
for
rfp
the
next
year,
with
it
being
awarded
to
brynshore
with
the
first
nofa
that
they
received
being
awarded
that
same
year
and
then
the
following
year.
They
received
an
additional
nofo
or
housing
development
loan
program
funding,
so
they
have
received
two
two
of
these
loans
been
awarded.
L
Two
of
those
loans
and
they've
also
received
over
40
well
they've
been
awarded
over
42
million
dollars
in
litec
funding,
which
was
awarded
in
2021
and
with
those
funds
they
will
be
finalized,
hopefully
at
the
end
of
the
year.
L
L
L
That
is
a
major
public
benefit
that
will
be
seen
here.
It
will
be
about
a
four
thousand
dollar
square
foot.
Space
they'll
also
have
five
thousand
square
feet
of
neighborhood,
serving
retail
a
mid
block
crossing
right
b
to
the
north
of
the
building,
and
both
public
and
and
private
plaza
space
within
the
project.
L
The
building
will
have
a
high
focus
on
sustainability.
They've,
been
their
plans,
have
been
awarded
enterprise,
green
community
and
energy,
star
multi-family,
new
construction
designations.
They
also
will
be
including
structured
parking
and
they
have
included
davis
bacon,
fair
wages
in
their
uses
category
of
of
their
budgeting.
G
L
So
davis
bacon,
fair
wages,
is
for
low,
it's
focused
on.
G
K
G
G
L
L
L
L
You
can
see
within
the
closer
part
of
the
of
the
green
space
that
that
public
plaza
and
then
just
behind
it,
the
the
private
residential
courtyard
area
that
will
be
a
level
up
from
from
the
other
area.
Their
focus
on
design
and
sustainability
can
really
be
seen
in
these
images.
I
feel
let's
look
at
the
next
slide.
L
Thank
you
and
once
again
that
that
retail
fronting
the
commercial
fronting
the
street,
it's
just
a
great
design
for
this
area
and
it
was
selected
by
some
of
you
board
members
and
and
you
get
to
live
in
the
dreams
of
the
others
that
have
moved
on
from
here.
But
let's
go
ahead
and
look
at
the
next
slide
and
I'll
turn
it
over
to
karen
to
continue
the
discussion.
Banks.
K
In
this
slide,
we're
going
to
dive
a
little
bit
more
into
the
impactful
unit
mix
of
this
project
and
there's
200
total
units
with
63
family
size
units
and
50
of
those
or
100
or
excuse
me.
100
units
are
affordable
to
households
at
or
below
60
ami.
This
was
a
requirement
of
the
2017
resolution
that
the
board
passed
when
the
agency
purchased
the
parcel.
K
In
addition,
50
of
the
units
are
affordable
to
households
between
70
and
80
ami.
This
actually
helps
us
reach
another
requirement
that
was
in
the
resolution
that
50
were
of
actually
market
rate,
and
the
way
this
happens
is
because
the
70
80
percent
excuse
me
70
to
80
ami
is
actually
per
litec
standards,
which
currently
is
actually
market
rate
range
for
the
neighborhood.
K
I
forgot
I
was
in
control
of
the
slides,
okay,
so
moving
on
to
the
funding
sources.
This
is
a
high-level
overview
of
how
much
has
gone
into
the
project
and
you
can
see,
there's
really
no
stone
left
unturned.
There
is
city,
rda,
state
and
federal
funding
in
this
project
and
the
pie
chart
is
just
to
help
visualize
the
portions
of
funding
that
are
in
there.
So
that
most
significant
piece
at
about
46
of
project
costs
are
the
42.5
million
litec
award.
K
I
just
mentioned
the
next
largest
amount
is
the
permanent
loan
that
the
developer
gets
from
the
bank.
That's
about
29
and
then
you'll
see
the
green
slices.
There
are
the
rda
portions,
so
the
first
two
kind
on
the
top.
There
are
the
sellers
note
in
the
already
committed
nofa
funds
that
will
explain
a
little
bit
further
in
a
next
slide
and
then
the
the
remaining
portion
is.
Today's
proposed
gaap
loan
for
four
million,
so
our
participation
to
date
is
in
2018.
K
Kate
briefly
mentioned
this:
the
project
was
awarded
inoffa
for
about
two
and
a
half
million
in
2019
it
was
3.9
million,
and
these
are
all
at
two
percent
30-year
term
cash
flow.
So
it's
about
6.4
total
and
these
are
all
paid
back
in
full
plus
interest
and
then
the
seller's
note
financing
is
for
proposed
for
4
million,
and
that
process
was
essentially
established
in
2018
in
our
predisposition
report
for
how
we
would
dispose
of
the
property
in
this.
This
project,
that's
at
1.25
in
a
30-year
term
cash
flow
as
well.
K
K
This
is
largely
for
administrative
function,
it's
much
easier
for
us
and
smoother
to
have
the
same
terms
for
all
the
funds
going
out
the
door,
because
these
will
be
managed
for
30
years
and
the
more
streamlined
and
effective
they
can
be
the
better,
but
this
loan
is
also
paid
back
in
full
plus
interest.
Next
slide.
Please.
K
All
right,
so,
I
think
the
first
question
that
comes
to
mind
is
if
we're
asking
for
an
additional
4
million.
What
is
the
developer
putting
in
so
we
wanted
to
note
the
developer's
contribution
overall
to
the
project
that
first
item
notes
the
they
fund
pre-development.
This
is
about
1.6
million.
This
is
very
helpful,
because
this
is
all
risk
that
they
assume
that
the
agency
does
not
have
to
take
on
about
a
3
million
deferred
developer
fee.
They
have
several
guarantees
and
also
responsible
for
the
commercial
mass
release.
K
Kate
touched
on
this
briefly
in
her
slides,
but,
of
course
we're
here
because
of
the
cost
increases
that
we
are
seeing
just
nationwide.
Unfortunately,
our
projects
aren't
immune
to
it,
so
that
is
essentially
the
the
reason
behind
the
four
million
dollar
request,
and
then
one
thing
that
brent
shore
took
on
once
they
started.
Seeing
those
those
construction
costs
go
up
was
how
we
could
have
some
cost.
K
And
we
just
have
two
slides
left,
but
this
is
the
the
main
one
for
discussion
where,
for
the
four
million
dollar
gap
request
agency
staff
worked
with
our
accounting
team
to
dive
in
and
see
where
we
could
potentially
utilize
funds
to
fill
this
gap
for
this
significant
project
and
as
you
can
see
in
the
chart,
we
have
the
fund
the
program,
the
amount
available.
K
I
did
want
to
note
that
in
2020
the
project
cost
was
about
60
million
and
our
participation
with
the
two
nofas
in
the
land
note
was
about
10.4
and
we
were
at
about
17.5
percent
of
total
project
cost.
Ours
is
actually
for
2022,
because
the
price,
the
price
has
gone
up
to
93
million.
If
we
were
to
include
this
gap
loan,
our
participation
is
actually
a
little
bit
lower.
K
Comparatively
at
about
15.5
percent
for
total
development
cost,
and
then
finally,
I
think
the
question
is
always
well
what
if
we
couldn't
fill
it
or
the
board
chose
not
to
and
further
value
engineering
is
usually
the
next
answer,
and
that
could
save
us
about
65
or
excuse
me
up
to
70
700
000
in
additional
savings,
but
that
would
be
for
the
removal
of
some
of
the
commercial
which
I
know,
staff
the
developer
and
the
board
aren't
especially
interested
in,
but
that
would
be
on
the
table
as
a
way
to
reduce
some
of
the
costs.
A
Anyway,
but
I'm
excited
for
this
project,
we
did
go
to
brinshore
a
few
weeks
ago
for
the
one
here
and
I
think
most
of
us
were
pretty
impressed
with
the
product
that
we're
getting.
So
I
can't
wait
for
this
to
happen
in
north
temple
as
well.
I'm
gonna
open
this
to
the
discussion
as
if
you
guys
have
questions
so
petro
first
and
then
folder,
okay,.
M
So
this
is
my
district
super
excited.
This
lot
has
been
heartache
on
the
community
facebook
page
for
a
while,
so
seeing
it
resurrected
like
this
will
be
super
exciting.
Can
I
make
a
pitch
for
I
don't
know
what
stage
this
would
be.
We've
been
working
with
another
project.
This
is
a
food
desert
quite
significantly,
and
some
of
that
retail
space
in
there,
even
just
a
bodega
size
where
a
mom
can
send
her
kid
down
to
grab.
M
You
know
some
milk
and
some
bread
really
will
make
a
huge
difference
in
this
area,
but
I'm
not.
I
don't
even
have
criticisms.
I've
gotten
the
chance
to
talk
about
this
project
in
depth
and
love
it,
and
thank
you
for
modeling
what
north
temple
is
deserving
of,
which
is
that
mixed
income,
mixed
use,
where
we
give
people
a
dignified
home,
understand
their
comprehensive
needs
and
also
understand
that
economic
development
has
to
go
along
with
it.
So
thank
you
for
creating
that
model
for
us
to
share
out.
K
Great,
thank
you
so
much
and
brynn
short
is
working
with
our
economic
development
department
in
salt
lake
community
college
as
well,
and
some
local
non-profits
on
filling
that
space.
So
we
can
also
put
in
a
plug
for
for
obadega
as
well
great.
H
I
I
mean
I've
been
excited
for
this
project
since
I
first
came
on
the
council
when
we
first
got
it,
and
I
know
that
it's
been
through
its
own
journey,
this
project,
with
light
tech
and
tax
incentive,
getting
all
of
the
tax
incentives
and
all
of
these
things
and
to
not
give
up
on
it
and,
more
importantly,
to
not
change
the
design
so
that
it
lacks
what
we
want-
and
we
were
just
talking
about
this
earlier
that
so
often
with
all
of
the
prices
going
up,
we
have
developers
come
in
and
say,
okay!
H
H
But
so
often
what
is
on
the
chopping
block
and
darren
was
bringing
this
up
in
a
conversation
earlier
with
us
is:
is
that
public
benefit
and
then
as
much
as
the
prices
are
going
up
from
60
million
to
93
million
we're
not
losing
that
public
benefit?
The
thing
that
like
makes
it
so
that
victoria
can
feel
proud
of
something
so
that
at
the
very
beginning,
when
this
came
to
us,
we
could
say
heck.
Yeah
like
let's
do
this
tomorrow.
H
How
do
we
do
this
more
and
how
does
this
become
the
model
of
what
we
expect
and
want
developers
to
look
like
within
our
city?
So
thank
you,
brynshore.
Thank
you
for
being
steadfast
corrine
and
rda
on
these
projects.
Also
shout
out.
Corinne
was
very
excited
about
this.
The
other
day,
a
majority
female-led
team
and
corinne
said
it
herself.
She
was
like
when
you
are
a
female
in
this
world,
where
the
majority,
like
you're
the
minority
in
these
projects.
H
It's
pretty
awesome
to
see
that
piece
of
that
as
well
and
I
could
go
on
and
on
about
how
grateful
I
am
for
this
project,
how
excited
I
am
both
for
the
one
on
255
and
for
this
one
coming
up.
So
with
that,
I
would
make
a
motion,
madam
chair,
to
approve
the
the
seller's
note,
and
I
can
do
the
straw
pull
afterwards,
but
I'd
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
seller's
note.
Second,.
A
F
A
H
It
made
him
cheer
for
me.
I
also
want
to
say
if
I
can
go
back
to
that.
Well,
it's
not
on
there
anymore,
but
this
light
about
the
creativity.
I
appreciate
from
the
rda
of
not
wiping
out
one
one
of
our
accounts
but
kind
of
finagling
this
together,
but
most
importantly,
the
north
temple.
What
it!
What
do
we
call
that
fund?
The
strategic
plan
like
this
is
what
that
was
for
right.
H
This
is
exactly
why,
three
years
ago
or
two
years
ago
that
we
said,
let's
make
sure
and
james
rogers
was
a
huge
proponent
of
this
saying
we
have
to
have
this
money
allocated
there,
and
this
is
exactly
what
it's
for
that
gap
financing
to
say.
This
is
what
we
want
on
north
temple.
So
with
that,
I
would
make
a
straw
poll
to
approve
the
gap
financing
as
as
proposed
by
the
rda
staff.
A
E
If
I
could
just
make
a
couple
comments,
I
I'm
really
excited
about
this
project
as
well.
I
think
it
does
bring
up
a
few
sort
of
policy
things
that
maybe
we
could
think
about.
One
thing
that
a
lot
of
us
that
went
to
cincinnati
learned
was
that
there's
that
they
have
a
model
where
one
entity
owns
the
retail
space
and
another
entity
owns
the
the
residential
spaces
above
and
I
think
that's
something.
Maybe
we
could
look
at
for
projects
like
this.
E
Perhaps
the
rda
retains
ownership
of
those
commercial
spaces
and
works
with
economic
development,
so
that
we
can
hand
pick
a
great
bodega
that
would
be
a
benefit
to
the
community
where
we're
not
as
profit
driven
as
the
developer
may
have
to
be.
So
I
think
that's
one
one
great
thing.
Second
week
we
I
do
get.
C
E
That
this
is
going
to
happen
on
half
or
most
of
our
projects,
and
we
choose
to
support
the
project,
we're
going
to
keep
choosing
to
support
the
project,
but
that
it
doesn't
always
have
to
be
this,
like
you
know,
if
I
would
be
worried
that
if
a
future
board
doesn't
support
the
project,
then
all
of
this
time
and
effort
and
money
has
been
wasted
and
then
it
gets
stalled
because
that
gap
can't
get
filled
so
some
way
for
us
to
have
a
more
streamlined
way
to
fill.
These
gaps
could
be
interesting.
Can.
H
I
comment
on
that.
Almost
like
a
maintenance
fund
like
how
you
see
yeah,
we
kind
of
a
few
years
ago,
started
saying:
okay,
here's
the
the
budget
of
the
project.
What's
the
ongoing
maintenance,
putting
a
percentage
or
putting
something
towards
that
maintenance
fund,
knowing
that
we're
going
to
have
to
look
at
like
our
streetscaping
right
and
and
knowing
we
are
going
to
have
ongoing
maintenance
costs.
That
may
be
something
that's
a
policy
to
your
point.
That
is
a
great
policy
question.
E
K
Thank
you
so
much
and
we
can
take
those
back
to
the
team
and
get
them
and
see
how
we
get
them
incorporated
thanks.
So
much
for
your
time.
Thank
you
well,
thank
you.
A
So
much,
ladies,
thank
you
all
right.
We
are
moving
on
to.
We
are
moving
on
to
item
number
four,
which
is
informational
about
the
housing
and
transit
reinvestment
zone
creation
and
at
the
table
we'll
have
kate,
warett,
lauren,
prici
and
danny
walls
and
the
housing
and
transit
reinvestment
zone
work.
It's
it's!
It's
a
new
tool
that
the
rda
may
pursue,
and
there
are
some
areas
in
salt
lake
city
that
we
might
be
be
able
to
use
that
so
go
ahead.
L
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
If
you
want
to
go
ahead
and
pull
up
our
presentation,
taylor,
great
so
housing
and
transit
reinvestment
zones
very
long
term,
for
we
know
them
as
htrz.
If
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
what
we
see
coming
up
here.
This
is
where
the
current
project
areas
are
that
we
have
within
the
city.
L
If
you
want
to
go
to
the
next
slide,
you
can
see
by
2025
we're
going
to
lose
two
of
the
central
salt
lake
project
areas.
Htrz's
provide
us
an
opportunity
to
create
a
slightly
different
version
of
a
project
area,
and
in
looking
at
this,
we
have
some
opportunity
to
potentially
create
these
project
areas
within
those
areas
where
the
others
are
not
going
to
be
present
after
2025
and
in
other
areas
of
the
city
as
well.
You
want
to
go
to
the
next
slide.
L
Okay,
so
what
we
see
here
is
this
new
htrz
tool
was
created
in
2021
and
rede
refined,
quite
a
bit
in
2022,
with
two
different
senate
bill
senate
bills
that
were
passed
together,
they're
known
as
the
act,
so
the
htrz
act
and
with
them
they
they
set
up
some
objectives
and
also
some
requirements
for
these
different
project
areas.
L
I'd
like
to
look
at
those
requirements,
first,
they're
on
the
right
side.
First
and
foremost,
these
project
areas
need
to
be
created
around
a
transit
stop
depending
on
the
different
type
of
transit.
Stop
that
it's
located
near
the
requirements
are
a
little
bit
different,
we'll
look
at
that
more
later,
but
then
they
also
have
a
requirement
for
a
housing
focus.
You
can
see
with
the
land
use.
51
percent
of
the
developable
land
within
the
project
areas
have
to
be
residential.
L
Within
those
50,
there
has
to
be
an
average
of
50
units
an
acre,
and
then
they
have
requirements
on
affordable
housing
and
a
mix
in
unit
types
as
well.
So
these
project
areas
take
our
cras
and
kind
of
buoy
them
up
with
with
those
items,
and
what
you
can
see
on
the
on
the
left
side
are
the
requirements
that
that
the
state
has
in
place
for
these
they're,
really
looking
at
that
public
transit
usage
and
boosting
our
housing
throughout
the
city
really
focused
on
that
conservation
through
trtod,
which
is
an
exciting
opportunity.
M
B
B
Like
a
lot,
our
gmu
we'd
have
to
look
at
it
like.
B
E
E
M
L
Yes,
that
that
focus
on
housing
will
likely
require,
depending
on
where
they
get
approved,
would
likely
require
rezoning
on
this.
We
can
see
this.
The
state
htrz
act
outlines
eligible
uses
of
these
funds
and
we
put
some
of
the
higher
priority
items
towards
the
top
once
again:
housing,
public
infrastructure,
property
acquisition
and
then
general
development
items.
Following
after
that,
and
then
on
the
right
side,
you
can
see
the
different
capture
rates,
it
maxes
out
our
tax
increment
collection
at
80
percent.
L
If,
if
this
project
area,
if
the
htrc
project
area
happens
to
overlay
another
project
area
at
an
existing
cra
project
area,
the
maximum
for
that
parcel
to
participate
would
be
at
that
80
percent
level,
and
then
one
percent
of
that
increment
can
go
towards
a
the
cra
administration
and
the
gap
analysis
that
would
be
a
required
per
the
state
proposal
requirements.
Let's
go
to
the
next
slide,
so
here
you
can
see
some
of
the
different
requirements
based
on
what
type
of
transit
station
the
project
area
includes.
L
With
this
development
standards
very
dependent
on
the
type
of
transit,
stop
it
in
circles.
There's
differences
be
in
the
distance
from
the
stop
that
that
can
be
done.
The
amount
of
acreage
that
can
be
included
the
term
and
phase
length
and
then
the
number
of
htrcs
allowed
per
county.
So
you'll
notice
with
that
front
runner
that
the
number
of
htrz
allowed
per
county
was
not
defined
in
the
state
act.
L
Because
of
that
we're
defining
that
to
mean
that
there
is
no
limit
there,
so
that
that
means
that
the
intermodal
hub
doesn't
have
a
we're,
not
in
a
race
against
other
cities.
We
we
can
do
that
as
it
is
a
priority
without
a
concern
of
a
limitation
dependent
on
what
other
cities
do.
Then
there
is
that
limit
of
eight
at
the
tracks
and
s-line
stations.
That's
shown
here.
Let's
go
to
the
next
slide.
L
Haley,
thank
you.
So
here
we
have
our
the
general
process
in
small
groups.
Some
of
you
asked
who
is
included
in
the
committee.
You
can
see
that
list.
There
shows
you
there
will
be
one
person
from
each
of
those
different
groups
on
on
the
committee
so
step.
One
will
be
submitting
that
htrc
proposal
to
the
governor's
office
of
economic
opportunity
they'll
create
an
htrz
committee
that
will
review
the
proposal
and
they
will
contract
out
a
third
party
to
do
a
gap
analysis
on
the
application
itself
based
on
their
feedback.
L
G
G
L
E
L
I'm
sorry,
let
me
clarify
I'm
being
optimistic
and
yes
only
one
application
has
been
submitted
from
any
any
city
within
the
state
at
this
time,
so
we
have
yet
to
see
how
they
will
be
reviewed.
G
And
to
that
point,
because
there
is
eight
on
the
trucks
line
for
the
whole
county
and
there
is
one
application
submitted.
G
We
want
to
go
as
fast
as
possible.
Is
that
the
the
strategy
here
is
to
try
to
get
them
right,
but
also
fast
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
miss
out
on
an
opportunity
or
what?
What
is
the
strategy?
I
guess
might
be
for
us
to
say.
But
I
mean
what
is
your
best
advice
on
this.
L
L
C
G
G
Queen
is
I
guess,
how
is
that
work
when
we
have
the
the
two
entities
that
are
doing
the
same
thing?
Basically,
that
are
you
know
taking
this
the
tax
increment
from
all
these
agencies
for
redevelopment?
How
is
that
work
when
we
are
overlapping.
L
So
if,
if
a
parcel
is
considered
is
within,
let's
say
the
state
street
project
area
and
it's
participating
at
100
percent
for
the
city's
participation
rate,
then
that
would
none
of
the
city's
tax
increment
could
come
to
the
htrc's
portion.
L
The
htrz
could
have
a
phase
that
doesn't
come
online
until
later
on,
so
that
a
total
of
whatever
maximum
participation
we
want.
Well,
we
need
to
get
the
public
amenities,
we're,
projecting
and,
and
one
would
be
collected
there,
so
phasing
and
then
the
difference
between
whatever
their
current
participation
is
in
the
80
could
be
done.
B
And
I
would
also
add
to
that
we
can
choose
which
parcels
will
be
a
part
of
the
htr
z.
So
it's
not
going
to
be
everything
within
the
circle.
So
once
we
have
a
better
handle
on
the
development
that's
coming
in
and
we're
understanding
the
overlap,
maybe
we
choose
to
choose
parcels
that
are
not
in
the
overlap
just
depending
on
kind
of
what
needs
support.
L
Yeah
yeah,
as
lauren
mentioned
the
whole
circle
that
will
not
be
included.
If
you
remember
back
to
that
table,
there's
a
limit
of
either
125
acres
or
100
acres
per
htrz
project
area.
That
means
that
we
are
going
to
have
the
opportunity
to
select
parcels
that
we
want
to
participate
where
we're
anticipating
some
kind
of
development
to
occur,
to
give
us
the
highest
and
best
opportunity
to
collect
more.
A
L
So
what
we
see
here
is
these
are
the
the
project
areas
that
based
on
feedback
we've
received
as
staff
from
internally
and
from
developers
where,
where
there's
the
most
interest,
however,
if
there
was
another
stop
on
this,
it
would
be
the
north
temple
area
and
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
lauren.
To
talk
about
the
specific,
I
think.
M
Well-
and
I
think
it
would
answer
the
concern
that
is
developing-
that
we
are
once
again
inadvertently
creating
the
communities
we
don't
want
by
concentrating
deeply
affordable
in
places
that
are
not
going
to
be
able
to
attract
grocery
stores
and
sustain
healthy
schools,
and
so
it
might
be
a
tool,
especially
if
we
could
convince
developers
to
be
on
board
with
us
for
that.
That
would
help
combat
some
of
that
developmental
angst.
That's
developing
in
that
area,
yeah.
I
C
Sorry,
just.
E
So
I
understand
the
650
south
main
stop
say
we
chose
that
one
there's
a
lot
of
new
development.
That's
already
happened
there,
so
those
properties
would
not
throw
off
any
increment
right,
so
we
would
exclude
those
or
because
they're
so
new.
Is
there
a
way
to
go
back
like
when
does
that
like
that
seems
like
it
would
play
into
which
ones
we
choose,
because
some
areas
have
already
developed
to
a
point
where
the
increments
actually
going
to
not
be
great.
B
Yeah,
I
don't
think
we
can
go
back
with
the
base
year.
We
can
go
forward
with
the
base
year.
I
think
yeah.
We
just
have
to
look
at
that
and
we
want
to
do
kind
of
a
financial
analysis
of
what
the
tax
increment
will
be,
that
they'll
spin
off.
Maybe
they
will
be
appreciating
quickly,
but
it
is
kind
of
based
on
new
development.
So
we
just
have
to
look
at
that
and
be
strategic
about
the
parcels
we
pick.
B
I
B
That's
a
good
point
all
right.
Okay,
so
I
think
we
can
move
on.
We
have
a
few
more
slides
regarding
the
specific
htrz
areas
that
we're
looking
at
so
taking
into
consideration
the
state's
requirements
that
kate
just
discussed,
as
well
as
the
city's
objectives
staff
has
identified
these
five
potential
locations
where
this
tool
or
really
additional
investment,
could
be
utilized
to
support
again
public
and
private
catalytic
projects.
So
I
will
will
provide
some
high
level
details
on
each
of
these
five
areas.
Right
now
we
can
advance.
B
Oh
here
we
are
all
right,
so
the
first
is
the
intermodal
hub
and
establishing
an
htrz
around
this
hub
is
one
of
the
rda's
top
priorities
to
facilitate
station
center.
But
again
this
doesn't
necessarily
need
to
be
submitted
to
the
state
first,
because
it
doesn't
count
towards
that.
Eight
maximum
within
salt
lake
county
tax
increment
collected
here
could
be
used
for
denser
housing
development.
That's
so
needed
in
such
a
transit,
rich
area.
B
B
Next,
we
have
the
track
station
at
650.
South
main
this
project
area
encompasses
the
majority
of
the
grand
boulevards
that
run
along
fifth
and
sixth
south
tax
increment
here
could
be
used
to
support
the
public
infrastructure
improvements
needed
to
needed
for
these
grand
boulevards,
as
was
directed
in
the
city's
downtown
plan.
B
We've
also
seen
requests
from
private
developers
in
this
area.
B
B
It
encompasses
the
city's
fleet
block
property,
and
here
again
the
ti
could
support
a
future
tracks
extension
depending
on
where
the
lines
end
up
next
slide.
B
Next,
we
have
our
ballpark
stop
here.
Tax
increment
could
be
used
to
support
the
ball
park
itself,
as
well
as
the
development
that
occurs
on
the
city-owned
lot
to
the
north.
Those
two
lots
are
highlighted
in
red
there,
and
ti
could
also
be
used
for
public
improvements
to
increase
walkability
and
overall
safety
of
the
area.
That's
so
important
to
the
neighborhood
next
slide.
B
So
some
considerations
that
we've
thought
about
and
that
the
board
may
wish
to
consider
is
how
can
htrz
creation
be
done
in
the
most
equitable
manner
or
really
support
areas
or
which
areas
might
have
the
most
wide-reaching
impact,
as
opposed
to
benefiting
certain
neighborhoods,
for
example,
allowing
residents
to
live
close
to
work
and
therefore
improving
air
quality
offering
affordable
and
family
sized
housing
units
where
there
typically
might
not
be
things
of
this
nature?
B
Another
consideration
could
be
what
areas
of
the
city
need
investment
to
support,
housing,
transit
and
public
infrastructure.
Specifically,
as
this
is,
what
is
the
tool
was
created
for
what
areas
of
the
city
encompass
specific
sites
where
both
public
and
private
catalytic
development
projects
are
being
planned?
B
Specific
project
and
financial
gap
information
is
needed
to
submit
to
the
state,
so
we
do
want
to
have
areas
where
projects
are
happening.
Similarly,
what
areas
of
the
city
could
leverage
existing
growth
or
other
funding
sources
to
make
the
greatest
impact,
when
it's
reinvested
into
that
area
next
slide?
B
So
this
is
our
plan,
and
we
just
wanted
to
bring
this
to
you
today,
as
kind
of
an
initial
briefing
and
we're
welcome
to
taking
questions
or
any
feedback.
You
have
now.
F
B
A
F
F
And
when
I
look
at
these
stops
here,
you
know
they
got
the
it's
already
built
in
the
transit.
Stop
you
add
the
affordable
family,
housing,
you
add
child
care
or
a
clinic
or
you
know
a
food
place
now
you
have
affordable
living
and
that
really
reduces
the
cost
of
to
a
family
to
support
their
family.
So
I
really
want
to
make
sure
we
press
those
issues.
I
know
they're
part
of
the
rda
guidelines
so
really
need
to
focus
on
those,
so
we're
wrapping
around
that
whole
affordable
living.
G
I
I
think
that
this
is
a
very
interesting
tool
that
you
know
was
created,
and
I
I
also
think
that
you
know
beyond
the
you
know,
inc
housing,
which
is
a
very
important
goal
of
all
of
us.
I
think
the
fact
that
we
can
find
money
for
public
infrastructure
through
this
and
like
big
ticket
items
that
are
very
expensive
for
us
to
to
fund
in
other
ways.
I
think
this
could
be
a
very
good
tool.
G
It
also
is
very
interesting
how
it
works,
and
I
have
opinions
about
that,
but
because
we
are
not
the
ones
who
are
necessarily
loving
for
this,
you
know
it's.
The
developers
are,
but
so
it's
a
very
interesting
too
I'm
very
curious
on
how
it
will
work,
but
I'm
sure
that
we're
going
to
have
to
decide
how.
What
do
we
want
to
see
and
and
married
with
the
developers
wishes,
and
you
know,
I'm
sure
that
some
of
them
will
want
to
do
parking
structures.
G
I
think
I
used
that
word
in
the
last
week
too
many
times,
but
but
I,
but
I
want
to
say
that
we
do
have
lack
of
infrastructure
in
some
parts
of
this
time
of
in
in
the
within
those
circles,
they're
very
expensive
to
to
to
pay
for.
So
I'm
I'm
looking
forward
to
to
find
money
for
for
that,
including
housing,
including
all
the
other
goals
that
we
need
to
meet.
So
thank
you.
A
And-
and
I
think
to
add
to
that-
I
think
also-
you
know
yeah
we're
gonna
have
to
decide
which,
how
we
do
participate
or
what
do
we
use
this
tool
for,
and
we
all
want
a
lot
of
different
things
and-
and
we
also
ought
to
look
at
who's
out
there,
who
are
the
property
owners?
What
are
the
plans
like
you
mentioned
danny?
We
need
to
reach
out
as
well
to
see
what
else
is
out
there
already
happening,
that
doesn't
that
we
don't
necessarily
have
to
participate.
A
So
if
somebody
else
is
already
doing
affordable
housing
with
different
tools,
you
know
out
there,
then
maybe
we
don't
focus
so
much
on
that,
but
we
do
the
infrastructure
that
it's
badly
needed
in
some
of
these
areas
and
and
so
on.
So
it's
I'm
excited
for
the
tool
and
see
how
we
can
use
it,
and
also
I
have
that
feeling
that
there
is
a
little
bit
of
an
urgency
in
the
terms
of
to
set
the
base
the
baseline.
E
I
I
don't
believe
you
can,
I
think
it's
intended
to
be
spent
primarily
within
the
tod,
and
the
reason
I
was
hesitating
is
I
was
trying
to
remember
the
language
if
it's
specific
to
the
statute,
which
I
think
it
is
or
if
it
references
back
to
like
rda
language
and
and
I'm
fairly
confident
that
it's
specific
that
you
have
to
spend
it
within
this
tod.
That's
the
intention
of
okay.
B
A
So
much
that's
awesome,
so
we're
at
items
number
five
report,
announcements
from
the
executive
director
and
maybe
maybe
not
mayor
or
no
no
announcements.
All
right!
Thank
you
for
being
here
report
announcements
from
rda
staff,
so
danny.
I
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
We
have
two
items
just
to
update
the
board
on.
If
I
may,
first
is
to
announce
that
last
week
we
did
release
our
competitive
nofa
of
six
million
dollars,
so
that
is
on
the
street,
that
is,
for
our
housing
development
loan
program.
I
I
So
that's
the
initial
threshold
beyond
that
there's
one
of
two
thresholds
or
both
that
they
can
continue
to
meet
or
have
to
meet
one
is
that
they
either
have
to
have
10
percent
of
their
units,
family,
sized
and
affordable
at
that
level,
or
they
have
to
have
10
percent
of
their
units,
deeply
affordable,
40,
ami
or
less
so.
We've
incorporated
those
priorities.
You
have
it's
on
the
street.
I
We
will
hold
a
virtual
session
this
friday,
where
developers
will
have
an
opportunity
to
come
and
ask
questions.
Deadline
is
october
24th
and
any
details
can
be
found
on
our
website
if
you
want
to
refer
people
to
that,
to
apply
so
available
to
answer
any
questions
at
any
time,
if
you
have
it
or
want
to
refer
people
to
us.
Second
item
is:
last
week
we
also
launched
a
survey
opportunity
for
local
business
owners,
non-profits
and
artists
to
help
learn
about
their
experiences
in
terms
of
leasing,
owning
or
improving
spaces.
I
I
Put
that
out
there
in
terms
of
getting
people
and
stakeholders
to
respond
and
participate
and
engage
with
us
as
staff.
And
then
you
have
a
link
of
that
survey
on
our
website,
and
that
is
also
gets
you
to
not
just
this,
but
the
spanish
speaking
one
as
well.
So
we
would
love
it
if
you
would
help
spread
the
word
to
anyone
in
your
districts
of
participating
in
that.
So
when
we
come
back
to
you
as
a
board,
we
can
have
a
discussion
and
incorporate
that
into
what
the
final
programs
would
be.