►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Council Work Session - 09/13/2022
Description
To access agendas please go to https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
Salt
lake
city
and
welcome
to
the
13
september
2022
work
session
meeting
to
keep
everyone
healthy
and
safe.
We
continue
to
host
hybrid
meetings.
Our
meetings
are
public
and
you
are
welcome
to
join
us
in
person
or
by
watching
from
the
council's
agenda
page
facebook
youtube
or
sl
c
tv.
We
hope
you'll
continue
to
join
us
in
whichever
manner
you
feel
most
comfortable.
This
is
a
work
session
meeting
during
which
there
is
no
public
comment.
The
next
opportunity
for
public
comments
is
during
our
7
p.m.
Formal
meeting
on
next
tuesday
september
20th.
A
We
welcome
your
feedback
anytime
by
mailing
us
at
people,
box,
145,
476,
salt
lake
city,
84114,
emailing
us
at
council.comments
at
slcgov.com
or
calling
our
124
hour
phone
comment
line.
801
535,
765
written
comments
we
receive
on
agenda
topics
are
shared
with
council
members
and
post
it
to
our
website.
Slc
council
dot
com.
A
A
B
I
think
that
you
have
our
slides,
yep,
that's
perfect,
so
we're
going
to
start
out
today,
as
we
always
do
with
our
covid19
update.
So
you
can
go
to
the
first
slide
and
some
some
more
positive
news
is
that
cases
in
the
u.s,
as
well
as
cases
in
utah,
are
down
by
24
and
25
respectively,
according
to
the
new
york
times
tracker.
So
that's
pretty
positive.
Moving
on
to
the
next
slide,
there
is
a
new
booster
available
and
I
think
that
there
are
some.
B
B
One
of
the
questions
that
comes
up
is:
what's
the
difference
between
pfizer
and
moderna,
between
the
boosters
and
there's
no
practical
difference
between
the
two
just
a
difference
in
the
age
that
it's
available
to
so
pfizer
is
available
to
ages,
12
and
up
moderna
18
and
up.
Does
this
omicron
specific
booster
entirely
replace
other
boosters,
so
this
booster
shot
is
a
bivalent
vaccine,
which
means
that
it
targets
two
versions
of
the
coronavirus,
the
original
strain
and
the
omicron
sub-variants
ba4
and
ba5.
B
How
long
should
you
wait
to
get
the
new
booster
if
you
recently
had
a
shot
or
got
coved
that's
as
soon
as
two
months,
but
ideally
between
four
and
six
months
after
either
of
those
events
and
then
regarding
children
under
12,
kids
under
the
age
of
12,
currently
cannot
receive
the
new
booster
children
between
the
ages
of
5
and
11
will
get
the
previous
booster.
The
cdc
recommends
that
they
get
the
shot
five
months
after
their
second
dose,
and
then
children
under
five
are
not
eligible
for
booster
shots.
B
B
Okay,
so
in
comparison
to
last
week,
just
a
couple
of
stats
to
note
33
people
are
hospitalized
this
week,
which
is
down
from
down
16
hospitalizations
from
last
week
and
then
right
now
we're
sitting
at
a
point
where
27.6
of
eligible
people
are
up
to
date
on
their
covet
vaccine.
So
if
you're
interested
in
other
statistics
around
this,
this
is
all
available
on
the
salt
lake
county
health
department's
website.
B
B
B
The
planning
commission
has
recommended
that
the
city
council
adopt
the
proposal
and
the
transmittal
is
being
worked
on.
Ballpark
ballpark's
stationary
plan
planning
commission
has
forwarded
the
recommendation
to
adopt
with
the
modification
to
increase
density
on
main
street
north
of
1300
south.
The
briefing,
as
you
know,
is
scheduled
for
today
shelter
zoning
public
draft
for
the
proposal
for
the
new
shelter
zoning
is
expected
to
be
released
for
a
45-day
comment
period
near
the
end
of
september
north
point,
small
area
plan
update
planning,
commission
public
hearing
anticipated
as
anticipated
for
october.
B
An
informational
briefing
with
the
council
is
scheduled
for
the
20th
of
this
month.
The
adus
accessory
dwelling
unit
modifications.
This
is
the
update
zoning
regulations
related
to
adus,
initiated
by
the
planning
commission.
The
planning
commission
public
hearing
is
scheduled
for
september
14th,
which
is
tomorrow
the
affordable
housing
incentives.
B
This
is
the
adding
zoning
incentives
to
promote
the
construction
of
more
affordable
housing
and
we're
working
on
establishing
a
stakeholder
group
to
identify
solutions
to
the
issues
raised
during
the
public
process.
The
goal
is
to
spend
one
month
with
the
stakeholder
group
and
then
take
that
new
information
and
research
into
an
updated
draft
to
the
planning
commission
later.
This
fall
next
slide.
B
Some
exciting
news
with
love
your
block,
the
first
four
mini
grants
have
been
awarded
the
jayhawks
central
church
of
the
nazarene
poplar
grove,
community,
council
and
glendale
mountain
view,
clc
have
all
received
their
grants
and
the
love
your
block
team
is
going
to
work
with
them
to
complete
their
projects,
which
is
really
exciting
and,
at
the
same
time,
the
love.
Your
block
team
is
getting
ready
for
the
next
mini
grant
application,
which
will
be
open
in
december
and
run
through
january
of
next
year.
B
Next
slide
salt
lake
city,
public
lands
department
has
initiated
the
development
of
new
trail
heads
and
amenities
at
five.
Existing
look
access
locations,
victory,
road,
bonneville,
boulevard,
lasalle,
dome,
18th
avenue,
hilltop
road
popperton
park,
and
immigration,
trailhead
and
public
lands
would
like
the
community's
input
on
the
amenities
that
they'd
like
to
have
prioritized
at
these
trailheads
and
there's
a
survey
that
should
be
available
on
the
feedback
page
that
folks
can
go
to
it's
open
until
the
30th
of
this
month
and
next
slide.
B
Housing
slc
has
had
some
great
initial
engagement,
3348
responses
and
actually
came
from
a
very
demographically,
appropriate
and
proportionate
segment
of
the
population.
B
They're
going
to
take
these
the
survey
data
and
work
with
the
thriving
in
place
team
and
their
information
and
their
data,
and
for
a
second
phase
just
jointly
with
the
two
efforts,
since
they
have
some
crossover,
they
also
noted
that
they,
the
housing
slc
team,
did
a
reddit
housing
ama,
where
they
had
121
comments
and
8
100
post
views,
so
it
was
pretty
successful.
B
Next
slide
are
the
upcoming
events
was
a
busy
weekend.
This
last
weekend
and
september
continues
to
be
busy.
Of
course,
ninth
and
ninth
street
festival
on
the
17th,
the
classic
car
show
the
ballpark
is
going
to
be
on
the
16th
and
the
groove
in
the
grove
on
the
24th
marmalade
jam
fest
on
the
24th.
Among
so
many
other
fun
things.
C
C
These
are
short
this
week
and
then
some
verbal
updates,
as
well
so
you'll,
see
kayak
court.
Is
this
friday,
our
regular
scheduled
third
friday
of
the
month
resource
fair
last
week
at
pioneer
park?
You
can
see
some
of
the
the
partners
who
were
there
with
us.
Big
thing
they
were
surprised
by
is
the
need
for
hamburgers.
They
had
a
volunteer
group
who
did
a
lot
of
the
the
lunch
and
it
was
really
well
received.
They
did
go
back
for
seconds
to
buy
some
more
so
the
other
piece
rapid
intervention
team.
C
We
have
a
full
schedule
every
week,
but
it's
a
lot
of
sites.
That's
why
I
haven't
listed
them
all
here,
so
we
shared
that
with
the
council
every
week
about
where
they're
going
at,
to
do
engagement
with
the
vr
outreach
teams
and
also
the
concurrent
cleaning
around
those
as
well
so
you'll,
probably
see
a
lot
more
around
the
river
parks
obviously
still
are
hot
spots
right
now
for
the
foreseeable
future,
probably
the
other
things
to
update
the
council
on
are.
We
are
at
september
14th.
C
I
believe
today
about
a
month
out
from
the
traditional
13th
about
a
month
out
from
the
traditional
opening
of
st
vincent
de
paul
for
winter
overflow.
Generally,
that's
october,
15
to
april
15th,
based
on
our
conditional
use,
permit
there
that
generally
signals
the
start
of
all
the
overflows
as
well.
So
right
now,
the
state
of
utah
office
of
homelessness
services
received
the
plan
from
the
conference
of
mayors.
C
Here
locally.
They
officially
did
not
accept
it,
based
on
it
not
having
enough
beds
as
part
of
it.
However,
they
are
going
to.
They
have
signaled
their
intention
to
pursue
using
their
idea
of
the
mill
creek
location,
along
with
using
state
preemption
for
the
current
resource
center
sites
to
increase
the
capacity
in
those
by
25
percent.
C
They
have
talked
to
the
providers
they're
talking
to
us
as
a
city,
because
it
would
require
us
to
do
certain
things
to
allow
that
so
we're
working
through
that
progress
with
them.
They
are
also
working
through
who
the
operator
would
be
of
the
mill
creek
facility,
and
so
they'll
probably
be
talking
about
that
more
publicly
as
we
go
forward
the
next
month,
as
well
as
the
specific
funding
mechanisms
to
make
that
work.
C
The
state
homelessness
council
met
last
week
and
you
may
have
seen
approved
a
number
of
housing
programs,
part
of
the
state
55
million,
as
well
as
talked
a
little
bit
about
the
funding
structure
for
cities,
mitigation
plans
and
also
overflow.
So
there'll
be
a
lot
more
information
in
the
next
few
weeks
about
the
details
of
winter
overflow,
and
then
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
thanked
you
for
joining
us.
C
A
D
Is
there
because
we
didn't
trigger
the
law,
and
this
is
kind
of
a
us
fumbling
through
an
unforeseen
circumstance?
Is
there
any
way
we
can
advocate
for
a
flex
that
doesn't
reach
that
full
25?
C
Yeah,
so
the
statute,
I
believe,
says
that
the
state
can
override
the
local
conditional
use
and
allow
up
to
a
25
increase.
So
it
doesn't
have
to
be
completely
that
much.
It
probably
depends
partially
on
the
on
the
demand
for
service
the
beds
needed
the
gender,
because,
obviously
within
ours,
female
only
at
the
gale
at
the
geraldine
and
then
there's
a
mixed
at
the
gail
miller.
C
So
it
probably
depends
on
who's
asking
for
beds
how
the
mill
creek
facility
works
and
how
full
that
is,
and
then
probably
also
how
quickly
some
of
these
other
options
come
online
in
the
wintertime.
So
I
would
anticipate
there'll
be
a
mixture
of
factors
in
there
about
how
many
beds
they
have
per
night.
D
Would
you
let
us
know
how
to
advocate
alongside
you,
for
that?
Like
I
sure
I
I
get
that
we're
in
this
position,
we
don't
want
anyone
to
be
cold,
but
I
also
get
that
my
predecessors
on
this
council
worked
really
hard
to
earn
the
trust
of
those
communities,
and
I
want
to
violate
that
trust
as
minimally
as
possible.
C
E
Andrew
thank
you
one
comment
and
one
question.
The
comment
is:
thank
you
so
much.
I
heard
really
good
stuff
from
the
pioneer
park
resource
fair.
So
thank
you
to
everybody
who
was
involved.
I
heard
it
was
like
super
successful
super
well
attended
from
the
service
providers
from
the
city
and
then
also
from
clients
that
may
want
to
take
advantage
of
their
resources.
So
I
appreciate
that.
Hopefully
we
can
do
one
again
where
I'm
also
there,
because
we
were
out
of
town.
E
So
I'm
sad,
I
missed
it
the
question
on
just
so
that
the
public-
and
so
I
also
remember
for
what's
the
the
number
that
we
needed,
like
total
for
the
winter
overflow
and
then
and
then
also
so
that
the
preemption
so
hold
on.
Let
me
put,
let
me
think
this
through
there's
a
magic
number:
hey
we're
going
to
aim
for
x
amount
of
beds,
whether
winter,
overflow,
shelter
and
if
we
don't
have,
you
know
to
find
anywhere
else
and
also
the
existing
shelters.
What's
that
number
do
you
remember.
C
Yeah,
so
the
sully
valley,
coalitioned
in
homelessness,
which
has
all
the
providers
who've
done
this
for
years,
based
on
previous
winter's
demands
and
what
we
saw
for
a
decrease
in
motel
beds.
Particularly
this
year,
came
up
with
the
number
of
400
beds
for
single
adults.
E
C
I
haven't
seen
the
final
number
from
the
fire
marshall
over
there,
but
we're
assuming
at
least
a
hundred
beds.
It
may
be
slightly
higher
than
that.
A
C
Yeah
the
calm
work
was
initially
that
if
the
the
goal
was
400
beds
find
a
location
that
could
take
care
of
all
those
or
a
mixture
of
location.
That
could
do
that
many
beds.
So
through
their
process
they
identified
a
number
of
locations,
but
then
sorted
through
and
figured
out
that
there
weren't
all
of
them
were
feasible,
so
they
landed
on
one
which
could
only
accommodate
this
many
so
when
they
submitted.
Obviously
wayne
ederhauser
in
the
state
office
looked
at
it
and
knew
this
beforehand,
but
said
this
is
not
enough
beds.
C
Therefore,
we've
got
to
use
our
preemption
options
to
make
up
the
difference.
Essentially
yeah.
D
C
Yeah
and
I
think
our.
C
D
C
Yeah,
so
I
I
think
it
was
mentioned
earlier
during
the
press
conference
that
there's
a
couple
of
positives
to
come
out
of
the
process.
One
is
obviously
what
you
brought
up:
that
a
number
of
cities
were
actively
participating,
offering
options
working
through
some
details.
It
was
tough
work
which
is
which
is
new.
It's
also
yielded
some
further
discussions
about
other
options
later
on
for
housing,
other
things,
which
are
very
positive.
C
I
think
the
second
thing
that
came
out
of
that
was,
if
that
didn't
work,
the
legislation
built
in
a
backstop
that
somebody
was
responsible
in
this
case
the
office
of
homeless
services.
The
state
level
is
now
responsible,
and
so
that's
new
this
year
as
well,
whereas
before
it
would
sort
of
land
right
and
everyone
would
look
at
each
other
and
say
well
who's
going
to
pick
this
up
for
the
winter
time,
because
we
have
to
do
it.
C
Well,
we've
done
that
the
last
few
years,
in
this
case
the
state
had
a
mechanism
to
use
certain
options,
but
ultimately
it
meant
that
they
were
responsible
instead
of
this
council
or
the
city
or
in
a
city.
I
think
there's
still
some
improvement,
obviously
from
the
con
discussion
most
of
the
cities
agreed
that
it
could
be
vastly
improved
going
forward
and
I
don't
think
anybody
wants
to
re-learn
the
same
lessons
this
year
and
I
know
the
office
of
homeless
services
and
my
discussions
with
them.
They
know
their
position.
They
have
to
do
this.
C
It's
also
not
something
that
they
would
like
to
sort
of
do
a
preemption,
so
I
think
it
could
land
in
a
better
way
going
forward,
especially
if
we
can
get
more
housing,
and
I
think
most
folks
would
agree
that
a
year-round
option
that's
set
would
be
beneficial
for
everybody
going
forward.
So
I'm
still
optimistic
that
this
is
a
further
step
forward
in
this
process
and
we
can
have
a
much
better
experience
even
next
year.
F
This
is
completely
off
this
subject
right
now,
but
something
that
you
mentioned
earlier,
but
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
judge,
robinson
judge
robison
in
our
group
chat
and
coordinating
all
of
the
lawyer
volunteers
and
the
voas,
and
the
prosecutors
and
judges
mentioned
that
last
week's
homeless
resource
fair
because
of
the
work
that
we
do,
both
with
the
homeless
resource,
fair
in
coordination
with
kayak
court.
F
F
You
had
57
cases,
I
mean
it
could
still
be
38
people
with
57
cases,
but
just
a
testament
to
the
work
that
that
the
kayak
court
and
the
the
homeless
resource
fairs
are
doing
and
how
wonderful
it
is
to
be
in
conjunction
with
one
another
so
that
we
have
these
success
stories
where
somebody
gets
their
warrants,
taken
care
of
on
kayak
court
moves
forward
and
assigning
papers
for
housing
the
next
week
so
or
the
next
month,
just
just
to
feel
good.
C
C
So
as
we
get
further
and
further
down
the
list
of
folks
we're
working
with
we're
going
to
find
that
we're
going
to
need
a
lot
of
patience,
a
lot
of
resource
but
what's
happening,
is
proving
correct.
It's
proving
to
help
people
build
relationships,
get
all
the
details
worked
out
to
get
into
housing
and
that's
the
ultimate
goal
here.
So
as
much
as
this
feels
like
it's
a
slow
and
arduous
process.
At
times
I
thank
you
very
much
for
bringing
that
up
that
there
are
successes
every
day.
Every
week.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Andrew
weston
lindsay
appreciate
that
very
much
moving
on
to
item
number
two,
the
ordinance
on
the
green
street
alley
vacation
brian
fomer
from
the
staff
is
here,
and
I
got
john
and
katya
as
and
nick
probably
online
somewhere.
G
Mr
chair,
this
is
a
proposal
to
vacate
a
t-shaped
alley
between
1300,
south
and
harrison
avenue
and
between
green
street
and
700
east.
The
alley
was
incorporated
into
the
abutting
properties
sometime
after
homes
between
the
alleys,
east
side
and
700.
East
were
demolished
for
udot's
expansion
of
700
east.
I
So
the
reason
for
this
property
for
this
alley
to
be
vacated
started
with
the
applicant,
wanted
to
put
a
garage
in
the
back
of
his
property
and
found
out
that
portion
of
his
property
was
not
actually
his.
It
was
an
alley.
I
This
property
is
zone,
our
r1
5000,
so
it's
a
low
residential,
the
right
now,
the
the
eloquences
of
being
you
know
just
on
on
paper-
and
you
know,
like
it
was
said:
udot
is
abiding
this
property
next
slide.
Please.
I
So
a
little
bit
of
the
background,
this
is
the
subdivision
showing
where
the
alley
was
and
the
blue
line
shows
where
the
actually
the
houses
used
to
be
there
and
that
and
at
that
point
the
alley
was
functioning.
But
now,
since
1960s,
it's
not
next
slide.
Please.
I
I
So
that
just
shows
another
perspective
of
where
the
ali
is,
and
originally
the
prop
the
application
was
just
for
that
north
and
south
piece
of
the
the
section
of
the
alley.
And
but
once
we
saw
that
the
church
also
had
some
portions
of
the
alley
that
needed
to
be
vacated.
When
we
asked
permission
from
the
church
and
included
that
next
slide.
I
This
is
a
drawing
showing
the
ownership
udots.
I
don't
know
if
it's
ownership,
but
the
portion
of
that
udot
got
from
the
city
to
do
the
expansion
and
that's
how
we
came
up
with
the
alley.
Next
slide.
I
So
one
of
the
issues
is
the
disposition
of
the
alley
and
all
the
properties
are
zoned
r1
5000.
So
our
our
policy
is
to
win
the
properties
of
budding.
I
The
alley
are
low,
dense,
low
zoning
residential
is
that
we
divide
the
alley
in
half
and
deed
the
alley
to
each
of
the
abutting
property
owners,
which
that's
what
we're
proposing
and
since
udot's
gonna
get
half
of
the
alley
which
now
is
is
part
of
you
know
the
the
portion
where
the
abutting
property
owners
already
have
you
know,
absorbed
the
alley
into
their
property.
I
You
know
process
would
be
to
go
ahead
and
do
you
know
this
leading
the
the
the
alley
to
each
of
the
abandoned
property
owners
and
then
udot
has
a
process
for
surplus
property
of
their
own,
and
we
would
have
the
property
owners
contact
udot
and
and
have
have
them
go
through
udot's
process.
I
I
So
we
find
that
you
know
the
alley
you
know
fits
in
with
our
policy
and
also
that
you
know
it's
not
being
used
for
any
public.
I
A
Just
just
my
question
is
that
we're
looking
at
the
vacation
of
the
entire
property
to
the
west,
abutting
property
owners
and
the
church
for
the
top
portion
of
the
tea.
A
I
Actually,
when
we
vacate
our
policy
is
to
deed
the
pro
the
the
alley
half
of
the
alley
to
each
of
the
abundant
property
owners.
Udot
is
one
of
the
property
owners
that
the
alia
butts,
but
so
we'll
you
know,
go
ahead
with
the
process
of
vacating
and
deeding
it
to
udot.
But
udot
has
a
process
of
disposing
of
surplus
property
and
they
are
not
interested
in
in
having
the
alley.
A
G
J
Yeah,
so
so
dividing
the
alley
in
half
digging
or
giving
whatever
you
call.
What
is
the
indeed,
the
the
the
half
that
that
are
close
to
the
property
and
the
one
half
is
u-dot
and
the
other
half
is
all
of
these
different
owners,
but
udot
is
interested
in
is
not
interested
in
any
of
those
right.
It's
not
interested
in
most
of
that,
except
for
that
little
t
type
place.
I
I
And
I'm
not
sure
you
know
that
they
are
interested;
they
they
just
have
a
little
bit
more
to
think
about.
You
know
whether
they
are
sure
that
they
want
that
little.
They.
J
E
The
comment
thanks
gotcha
thanks
john,
I
miss
you
guys.
I
remember
doing
this
and
I
was
just
commenting
to
there
and
this
happened
so
often
in
salt
lake
city,
where
people
just
build
over
a
piece
of
property
that
might
not
be
theirs.
So
I'm
not
surprised
that
we're
here
again
doing
something
like
this.
So
thanks
for
all
the
explanation
and
and
revisiting
the
subject
that
we'll
see
more
coming.
So
thanks.
A
Yeah,
it
is
thank
you
very
much.
I
don't
think
you
have
any
further
questions
appreciate
that
very
much
all
right.
Thank
you.
So,
council
we're
moving
on
I'm
number
three.
The
re-zone
and
master
plan
amendment
at
16,
south
800,
west,
oh
same
crew.
Yes,
I
was
wondering
why
you
guys
weren't
moving
okay,
ryan.
Kick
it
away.
G
I
So
that's
the
the
yellow
box
is
where
the
site
is,
and
just
underneath
that
on
the
south
is
the
folsom
trail
and
on
top
is
the
is
south
temple
and
the
railroad
freight
trail.
I
I
I
So
right
now
the
master
plan
shows
a
line
in.
I
You
know
that
that
picture
of
where
we
are
of
our
picture
right,
there
is
right
on
top
of
the
site,
but
you're
gonna
see
that
you
know
it's
right
in
between
the
rail,
the
railroad
and
the
folsom
trail,
and
the
zoning
delineation
between
core
and
transition
is
right
on
that
blue
line,
where
the
real
world
is
thank
you
so,
and
so
that's
a
delineation
boundary
for
the
the
two
zoning
districts
and
so
on
the
other
slide.
It
shows
that.
I
I
I
Here
shows
the
difference
land
uses
that
are
allowed
in
both
zoning
districts,
and
it
shows
that
the
the
land
news
that
is
being
proposed
is
allowed
in
both
both
prop
both
zoning
districts.
Next
slide,
please
next.
I
It
shows
the
the
relevant
master
plans
and
mostly
the
north
temple
boulevard
and
where
it
shows
the
reason
for
the
require
the
the
request
for
master
plan.
Amendment
is
because
it
will
change
the
boundaries
of
the
the
zoning
districts
next
slide.
Please.
I
I
I
So
their
recommendation
was
to
approve
this
rezoning
with
one
condition
and
the
condition
is
to
create
development
agreements,
stipulating
conditions
for
what
happens
on
the
periphery
of
the
site
concerning
the
trail,
the
agents
adjacent
roads
and
the
railroad,
and
that
the
unit
configuration
be
at
least
25
percent
with
one
and
three
bedroom
units,
which
was
something
that
the
community
council
has.
You
know
emphasized
in
having.
I
J
For
sure
yes
cosmetically,
I
I
feel
this
area
needs.
You
know
we
have
an
amazing
amenity
here
with
the
folsom
trail
and
I
feel
like
this
project.
Could
you
know,
bring
the
energy
to
this
to
this
trail,
to
activate
it
too,
and
I'm
hoping
that
the
developer
feels
very
strongly,
and
you
have
some
wording
in
there
that
talks
about
the
fossum
trail,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
do
work
with
the
developer
on
activating
the
folsom
trail
that
the
fossum
trail
is
not
the
back
of
the
building.
J
There
is
not
a
wall
there
that
there
is.
You
know
that
they
they
embrace
the
trail,
and
they
also
and
to
me,
it's
very
important-
that
we
also
do
some
activation
of
the
trail,
and
that
means
commercial,
and
I
know
that
they
are
planning
to
do
some
mixed
use
in
there.
J
Maybe-
and
I
know
asking
them
to
put
a
you
know
a
5
000
square
feet
supermarket
in
there
I
mean
that
would
be
great
welcome
to
the
neighborhood,
but
I,
but
I'm
something
small,
something
that
could
you
know
bring
amenity
to
the
neighborhood
in
there
would
be
looking
forward
to
the
future.
I
know
that
there
are
some
risks
in
there
and
I
get
it,
but
that
will
be
very
important
to
that
community
and
obviously
affordability,
but
I
think
we're
you
know.
J
A
That
there'd
be
some
off-street
parking
instead
of
on
street,
because
the
way
they're
folsom
trail
and
the
railroads
are
taking
up
some
of
the
available
on-street
parking
positions.
And
I'm
not
sure
if
the
commission
is
going
to
add
that
to
a
development
agreement.
Along
with
the
25
at
two
to
three
bedrooms
or
not.
G
A
I
Yes,
at
the
planning
commission,
they
said
that
they
would
be
okay
with
doing
a
development
agreement.
K
I
think
what
councilmember
we
brought
up
is
an
interesting
question,
because
if
I'm
understanding
tsa's
own
and
it's
complex
zones,
so
I
don't
understand
all
of
it.
So
I
don't
understand
it
first
of
all,
but
I
think
it
has
a
lot
of
things
about
street
activation
and
what
happens
on
street
facing
facades,
but
where
this
is
facing
a
street
and
a
trail
it
does.
Does
it
have
anything
requiring
activation
along
that
trail,
and,
if
so,
is
that
some?
G
No,
I
don't
think
we
did
it.
Obviously,
the
tc
is
almost
highly
focused
on
activating
the
street,
and
so
the
design
standards
are
much
much
higher
and
a
trail
is
in
the
street
right.
So
I
think
that
if
it
was
something
important
to
you
that-
and
you
know
the
planning
commission,
I
think
their
recommendation
kind
of
was
speaking
and
alluding
to
that.
But
it
didn't
really
come
right
out
and
say
that
this
trail
side
should
be
treated
like
a
street
with
design
standards
and
uses.
K
And
I
don't
know
exactly
what
that
would
mean
for
the
development
if
we
said
this
trail
for
this
property
is
considered
a
street,
but
maybe
that's
where
we
start
and
if
that
is
not
a
problem
for
the
development
and
it's
good
for
the
community
that
I
think
that'd
be
a
great
thing
to
add.
A
D
J
To
that,
like
the
river
is
something
that
I
feel
very
strongly
to
so
when
we're
doing
development
across
along
the
river,
the
trails,
I
think
this
should
be
all
embracing.
We
used
to
look.
You
know
many
of
the
development
to
the
river
and
sorry
we're
going
off
topic,
but
it's
usually
looking
away
from
the
river
look.
J
A
G
To
fbun2
or
form-based
urban
neighborhood
district
to
develop
a
walkable
urban
mixed
use,
neighborhood
that
would
be
known
as
the
other
side
village.
Now,
please
note.
This
briefing
is
for
the
proposed
zoning
amendment.
Only
the
council
was
briefed
on
the
public
benefits
analysis
related
to
the
village
at
last
week's
meeting,
and
I
believe
the
applicants
are
in
the
audience
and
available
if
you
had
questions
for
them,
and
I
will
now
turn
it
over
to
david.
H
H
Get
the
presentation
queued
up
brian
okay,
next
slide,
okay,
so
this
would
be
a
rezoning
of
two
portions
of
city-owned
property.
Both
of
them
are
zoned,
pl
or
public
lands,
and
it
includes
37.1
acres,
total,
that's
28.5,
acres
on
the
parcel
at
1850
west
indiana,
as
well
as
8.6
acres
at
1965,
west
500,
south
and
again
you
mentioned
it's
for
the
development
of
a
walkable
urban
neighborhood
known
as
the
other
side
village,
and
there
isn't
a
specific
site
development
plan
under
review
next
next,
oh
there
we
go.
H
So
I
have
two
maps
here
that
kind
of
show
you,
the
property,
show
you
the
two
properties
and
tried
to
the
right
side
is
a
little
bit
of
a
zoom
in
to
put
a
little
bit
of
context
on
location.
This
is
west
of
redwood
road
in
between
indiana
and
500
south,
and
you
see
the
slc
parks
department
marked
out
as
well
as
fleet,
to
give
you
an
idea
of
exactly
the
the
property
location
and
it's
a
the
portions
are
marked
in
orange
of
these
two
parcels.
H
H
H
H
L
H
There
are
a
number
of
uses
and
again
in
their
list
of
desired
uses
that
were
not
allowed.
We
said
that
again,
some
of
the
desired
uses
included
a
performing
arts
center,
an
outdoor
amphitheater,
maybe
short-term
rentals,
and
looking
at
the
zoning
ordinance
and
the
definitions,
some
of
those
uses
may
be
allowed
by
interpretation.
H
It
may
be
a
matter
of
the
scale
and
size
because,
when
you
say
outdoor
amphitheater
there,
we
also
allow
plazas
in
a
zone,
so
it
may
be
just
a
matter
of
what
size
and
scale
and
in
the
absence
of
a
specific
development
proposal,
we
don't
know
exactly
how
that
would
fit
in.
The
other
thing
that
was
discussed
is
that
some
of
those
uses
were
not
specifically
allowed
in
fbu
and
two
might
be
allowed
through
a
development
agreement.
H
H
Next
was
another
concern
that
the
planning
commission
brought
up
was
that,
typically,
when
you're
looking
at
an
area
where
you
have
residential
uses,
we're
looking
often
at
what
are
the
impacts
on
the
surrounding
properties?
If
you
build
this
new
use
in
this
case,
it's
a
little
different,
because
we
would
be
introducing
a
more
residential
use
into
an
area
that
has
been
traditionally
industrial.
H
So
we're
looking
at
it
more
in
terms
of
what
are
the
impacts
of
those
other
properties
on
this
use,
and
the
surrounding
zoning
is
mostly
m1
light
industrial
which
doesn't
require
any
buffering
unless
it
butts
residential.
However,
since
those
properties
are
already
developed
and
being
used
until
they
came
in
for
some
kind
of
adjustment
in
their
site
plan
or
new
use
or
something,
they
wouldn't
be
obligated
to
provide
buffering
between
themselves
and
a
residential
use.
So
one
of
the
things
that
the
planning
commission
considered
was
looking
at
a
requirement
for
additional
buffering
on
the
property.
H
Next
and
standards
of
review,
we
we
look
at
that
consistency
with
city
plans
and
policies.
In
this
case
the
property
is
under
the
area
covered
by
the
west
side
master
plan.
H
There
was
neither
support
nor
anything
in
that
plan.
That
was
against
this
use.
I
think,
basically,
when
you
look
at
the
context
of
the
plan,
there
was
not
really
a
vision
at
the
time
that
the
plan
was
written,
that
there
would
be
the
development
pressure
to
look
at
other
uses
west
of
redwood
road.
So
it's
not
that
the
plan
prohibited
it
it's.
I
don't
think
we
had
fully
contemplated
that
there
would
come
a
time
where
we
were
looking
at
this
kind
of
development
west
of
redwood.
H
It
is
supported
by
other
city
plans
and
policies
and
the
purpose
of
the
zoning
ordinance.
We
also
look
at
the
extent
on
adjacent
properties,
as
I
mentioned,
with
buffering
and
then
the
consistency
with
any
overlay
districts
and
adequacy
of
public
services
and
facilities
to
serve
the
property
next
slide.
H
H
H
That's
all
I
have
I'd
be
for
presentation.
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
J
Yeah,
I
have
a
quick
question.
Correct
me:
if
I'm
wrong,
there's
two
different
parcels
that
we
are
trying
to
rezone
and
those
are
the
east
side-
is
I'm
trying
to
find
the
page.
I
had
it
a
minute
ago.
J
Is
the
the
two
parcels
personal,
a
and
parcel
b
24
28.5
acres
and
the
other
one
which
is
up
north
8.5
0.6
acres?
Is
that
correct.
J
And
my
question
is,
if
I
remember
right,
we
are,
we
are,
there
is
a
pilot
program,
so
there
is
a
smaller
version
of
this
village
and
that
will
be
will
fit
well
within
parcel
eight,
a
right
which
is
the
28.5
acres.
H
Let
me
double
check,
but
yes,
it
fits
within
the
kind
of
southeast
corner
of
the
southern
parcel,
the
one
on
indiana
avenue
and.
J
Why
what
is
the
purpose
of
rezoning
to
two
parcels
when
the
project
is
staged
and
there
is
steps
to
to
meet
and
to
go
into
the
next
stages.
H
Again,
if
you
were
to
do
just
the
the
the
pilot
project
area,
the
eight
acres,
you
could
certainly
do
that.
But
then,
if
at
some
point
in
time
this
were
successful
and
the
village
were
to
be
expanded,
it
would
have
to
go
through
another
re-zone,
starting
with
community
council
input
planning,
commission
city
council,
so
it
wouldn't
be-
you
wouldn't
be
expanding.
The
area
would
be
going
through
a
rezone
process
again
for
additional
area.
F
Can
I
follow
up
on
that?
Alternatively,
why
not
just
rezone
all
of
it
like
we're
splitting
we're
having
like
a
split
zone
here,
which
is
something
that
every
time
we
have
another
rezone
somebody's
like
look,
you
guys
split
the
zone.
You
should
just
make
it
all
the
same.
So
right
so
like
the
excluded,
13.5
acres,
I
mean
I'm
just
playing
devil's
advocate
with
you.
J
You
know-
and
I
I
and
let
me
let
me
say
this-
I
as
the
representative
for
this
area.
J
I
recently
heard
it
all
on
this-
some
very
angry
comments
and
very
positive
comments
on
this,
and
I
also
spend
a
lot
of
time
talking
to
the
administration
and
and
and
with
the
on
with
the
people
proposing
this
project,
and
one
of
the
main
concerns
of
the
community
is:
is
this
gonna
get
out
of
hand
and
having
an
opportunity
for,
and
I
know
that
this
is
more
work
and
it's
a
lot
of
stages
for
the
administration
and
for
the
planning
commission
and
but
having
a
little
bit
of
security
to
protect
the
community
in
case
there
are
issues.
J
I
think
that
is
a
positive
thing,
regardless
of
all
the
work,
and
I
know
I
apologize
for
that
in
advance.
If
that's
what
we're
going
to
do,
but
it
will
give
us
a
little
more
tools
to
make
sure
that
the
project
does
happen
and
does
happen
like
we
all
want
it
to
happen.
If
that's,
you
know,
if
that,
if
that,
if
this
moves
forward,
but
I
I
think
that
would
be
a
security
for
the
community,
so
thank
you.
K
I
I
also
think
it's
a
good
idea
to
do
the
eight
acres.
I
I
understand
this
blizzard
concern,
but
in
this
case
I'm
looking
at
this
as
two
separate
parcels,
not
one
parcel
that
would
be
split
zoning
because
I
think
we're
we're
saying
I
I
don't
know
if
we're
saying
this,
but
if
we
as
a
city
are
saying
okay,
we're
going
to
go
forward
and
use
this
eight
acres
as
a
pilot
project
and
then
at
some
point
we
can
evaluate
whether
it's
accessible
and
then
there'll
be
a
whole
nother
process.
K
I
think,
in
this
case
it's
a
good
idea
to
have
that
whole
process
start
over
again,
so
that
the
community
can
get
input
and
give
him
give
feedback
onto
how
it's
working.
We
can
maybe
hear
from
some
of
the
residents
or
clients
of
this
of
the
village
and
see
whether
or
not
it
was
actually
successful,
be
able
to
evaluate
that
from
all
different
lenses
again
and
then
assuming,
and
I
hope
that
it
is
very
successful.
K
D
Kind
of
switching
gears-
I
know
that
the
forum
based
zoning
in
other
areas
of
the
city
attracts
some
criticism,
in
that
it
gives
the
developer
too
much
latitude
and
freedom
to
do
what
they
deem
appropriate.
Have
you,
council,
member,
pui
or
planning?
Have
you
heard
that
I
know
that
at
the
other
side
academy,
the
other
side,
village
are
pretty
open
to
most
things
and
development
agreements,
but
I
feel
like
that's
something
we
really
are
going
to
have
to
guard
against.
M
I
think
there's
some
well
one.
Yes,
we
have
heard
heard
that
and
two
we
have
we're
working
on
a
transmittal
that
actually
addresses
those
things,
so
that
went
through
the
planning
commission
last
month,
so
you'll
be
getting
it
hopefully
relatively
soon,
but
two.
I
think
this
is
quite
a
bit
different
than
most
development
in
the
fb
on
two,
which
is
fairly
constrained
to
small
parcels.
Even
the
larger
parcels
have
been
developed
have
been
fairly
fairly
constrained.
The
other
thing,
too,
is
that,
given
the
nature
of
the
site,
it's
very
likely.
M
In
fact,
I
think
it's
almost
probable
that
this
goes
through
some
sort
of
a
planned
development
to
address
some
of
those
things
just
because
you
have
so
many
uses
in
so
many
buildings
without
street
frontage,
depending
on
whatever
that
layout,
that
all
we
have
is
that
concept
plan
right,
but
I
think
it.
I
think
it's
highly
likely
that
there
will
be
more
eyes
on
whatever
that
proposed
site
plan
is
than
there
normally
would
be.
If
it
was
a
you
know,
12
000,
15,
000
square
foot
lot
at
a
track
station.
A
Thank
you
I,
before
contemporary
police,
I'm
also
in
agreement
with
just
rezoning
and
the
split
rezoning
just
for
the
the
pilot
program.
I
think
it'd
be
nice
just
to
stop
there
and
then
look
at
the
remaining
land
at
that
time,
but
I'm
gonna
go
back
to
the
form
base,
2,
the
short-term
rentals
and
the
buffer
zoning.
You
kind
of
just
mention
those
in
some
type
of
a
development
agreement,
but
it'd
be
nice
for
us
to
see
what
that
development
agreement
is.
A
I
mean
it's,
I
know
it's
out
there,
but
what
are
some
of
the
specifics
on
that
buffering
and
what
are
the
specifics
on
the
other
items
that
are
not
permitted
in
form
base
that
is
requested,
and
how
is
that
development.
M
A
M
Yeah
and-
and
I
think
as
far
as
procedurally-
if
if
we,
if
the
city
chooses
and
the
council
chooses
to
use
the
development
agreement
in
this
case,
then
we
probably
need
to
discuss
that
adoption
process
for
that,
because
normally
when
development
agreements
either
they
go
the
other
way
right,
where
they're
restricting
something
for
some
reason,
which
those
are
more
they're
easier
to
put
together
right.
M
But
here
we
have
a
development
agreement
which
many
cities
do,
which
we
don't
do
this
very
often
in
salt
lake
city,
but
it
it's
a
it
could
potentially
expand
uses
beyond
what's
allowed
in
that
zone.
For
example,
we
talked
about
the
amphitheater
thing,
and
so
that
is
something
that
actually
would
have
to
be
that
development
agreement
when
it's
expanding
does
have
to
be
adopted
by
the
city
council
under
state
code.
A
J
So,
just
to
be
clear,
we're
talking
about
the
parcel
a
which
is
the
28.5
acres
and
not
well
that's
what
I
was
talking
unknown
parcel
b,
which
is
the
8.6
acres,
which
is
the
one
up
north
and
it's
still
like
a
very
large
right.
That's
still
about
you're
we're.
A
Talking
about
councilmember
mono,
and
I
were
talking
about
eight
acres
out
of
that
28
acres,
so
the
southeast
corner
of
it
just
for
the
pilot
program.
Oh.
J
A
So
the
zoning
on
the
so
just
the
eight
acres
for
the
pilot
program,
which
is
at
which
is
that
bottom
southeast
corner
in
that
one
map,
yeah.
A
We're
looking
just
to
re-zone.
M
Can
we
generally
try
to
keep
things
following
property
lines,
because
we
don't
we
generally
don't
like
split
zone
properties,
but
there
are
obviously
extenuating
circumstances
and
proposals
that
where
that
may
be
the
best
approach.
J
So
let
me
ask
the
follow-up
question
to
that,
though,
I
also
have
seen
this
project
evolved
and
change
and
there's
a
lot
of
feedback
from
the
community
and
from
many
of
the
council
members
here
about
what
we
wish
to
see
on
here
and
the
change.
The
plan
has
changed
a
little
bit
and
shaped
by
the
community
and
by
the
administration,
but
I
am
worrying
that
if
we,
while
they
sell
them,
the
plans
are
not
set
in
stone
that
if
we
limit
them
so
much,
I
know
I'm
not
saying
that
we
shouldn't
limit
them.
J
I
guess
that
was
my
point
originally
that
we
should
maybe
stagger
it
and
make
steps,
but
can
we
give
them
a
little
wiggle
room
and
not
just
go
with
by
eight?
Let's
go
by
ten,
and
you
know-
and
I
know
that
might
seem
splitting
hairs,
but
we
are
asking
many
of
us
have
asked
them,
for
you
know
a
bodega
many
many
of
us
are
asking
them
right
now
for
a
commercial
for
the
cookies.
J
Many
of
us
are
asking
them
for
you
know
all
these
other
amenities,
and
I
worry
that
they
are
going
to
try
to
fit
all
of
these
things
that
we're
asking
them
and
a
very
you
know,
tight
space.
I
think
if
we
give
them
a
little
more
space,
if
we're
going
to
go
that
if
the
pendulum
is
going
to
go
all
the
other
side,
let's
make
sure
that
this
is
successful,
because
the
last
thing
I
want
is
to
prove
that
this
isn't,
because
that
is
really
not
good
for
anybody.
J
So
if
we're
gonna
go
with-
and
I
don't
know
if
that's
possible,
if
we
can
actually
say
no
eight
per
ten,
is
there
a
way
or
something
to
do
something
yeah?
So
what.
M
We
would
do
is
that
we
would
work
with
the
with
the
representatives
from
the
other
side
and
come
up
with
a
legal
description
of
that
area
to
be
rezoned,
which
we
have
that
now,
but
it
would
be
something
that
we'd
have
to
modify
a
little
bit
and
then
that
would
we
can
work
with
them
to
expand
it,
to
figure
out
what
is
the
right
area
and
and
everything
else.
Okay,.
F
Think
to
your
point,
I
recognize
both
what
you
said
when
I
pushed
it
back
a
little
bit
and
this.
But
in
that
case,
in
my
opinion
I
would
just
want
to
go
and
do
the
28
like
the
that
parcel
parcel.
Eight
the
whole
parcel,
because
it's
going
to
take
a
while
to
build
the
thing,
be
it
build
anything,
and
I
can
promise
you.
A
So
it's
there
is
that
the
city
owns
the
land
and
I
like,
if
we
are
not
going
to
continue
using
this,
I
like
this
land
to
be
continued
to
be
pl
public
land,
so
we
can
do
something
with
it
at
that
point,
instead
of
rezoning
to
fbn,
u2
and
saying
oh,
we
want
to
use
this
in
some
other
way,
because
the
city
does
own
the
land
and
we
are
leasing
the
this
property
to
them
so
rezone
it
for
the
the
pilot
plus
a
few,
so
that
we
can
then
say:
yes,
we
agree
with
it.
A
We
can
expand
it
otherwise.
Now
we
still
have
this
pl
zoned
area
that
we
can
use
for
a
park
or
some
other
means
that's
outside
of
an
fbn
tube.
That's
my
only
consideration
at
this
point.
I
want
it
to
succeed,
but
I
also
want
to
be
able
to
make
sure
that
we
keep
it
at
the
zoning
is
stuck
with
it
is
so
if
we
end
up
having
a
another
issue,
we
don't
have
to
try
to
rezone
it
and
that
causes
other
problems.
Well,.
J
E
M
M
J
All
of
that
is
in
parcel
a
so
all
you
can
see
right,
there
is
parcel.
A
parcel
b
is
probably
is
north
of
that
which
everybody
seems
to
agree
that
we're
not
going
to
touch.
D
This
is
an
area
that
has
required
our
infrastructure
development
for
a
very
long
time
and
has
not
been
prioritized,
and
now,
if
we're
going
to
place
people
there,
I
think
the
rezone
sets
the
tone
for
it
to
be
a
reasonable
priority
for
us
to
do
that.
Infrastructure,
development
and
the
only
public
use
of
this
public
land
right
now
is
people
leaving
dead
tires
out
there.
There
is
literally
nothing
else
happening
on
this
public
land,
except
the
occasional
hypodermic
needle
being
left
there
and
tires.
D
B
B
B
Of
okay,
I
don't
think
that
there's
a
big
risk
in
us
rezoning
this
entire
structure,
it's
what
was
it's,
what
was
told
to
the
public?
It's
what
was
the
discussion?
It's
been
the
frame
of
the
discussion,
the
entire
time.
I
think
that,
given
the
high
amount
of
of
work,
the
workload
that
we
have
put
on
planning
recently,
I
don't
see
any
justification
for
why
we
would
ask
them
to
redouble
their
work
on
the
same
piece
of
land
in
the
foreseeable
future.
I
would
rezone
both
parcels
today.
F
Thanks
chris,
I
agree
with
almost
everything
I
would
still
only
rezone
personally
and
going
back
to
something
that
that
dan
said
I
mean
at
the
end
of
the
day,
if
we
own
the
land,
we
own
the
land,
and
we
can
still
I
mean
yes,
we
might
have
to
go
through
the
process
of
rezoning
it
back,
but
it's
still
our
land,
it's
not
like
rezoning,
it
doesn't
mean
we
don't
own
it
and
can't
figure
out
the
next
step
of
what
we
want
to
do
with
it.
So
I'm,
okay.
F
I
understand
council,
member,
bowie's
and
and
the
comments
that
he
has
gotten
and
the
concerns
that
he's
trying
to
address
with
his
constituents
and
so
for
me.
That's
why
I'm
still
with
partially
come
back,
but
but
splitting
it
up
into
parcels.
Just
really
I
mean
into
parts
of
parcels
seems
silly
to
me.
J
I
mean
to
be
clear
to
be
clear.
I
that
was
my
original
point
here,
which
is
you
know,
let's
stick
with
parcel
a
so
we're
back
to
this
point,
and
I
think
I
think
I'm
gonna
leave
that
point
there,
because
I
think
everybody
is
sort
of
have
different
opinions
on
this,
and
maybe
we
can
talk
more
about
this.
I
do
have
a
concern.
J
Let's
say-
and
I
mentioned
this
last
last
week-
we
are
in
charge
of
securing
securing
the
rest
of
the
properties
here,
and
my
concern
is
how
we're
going
to
secure
these
properties
and
how
we're
going
to
prevent
shenanigans
from
happening
and
who's
gonna.
Do
we
need
a
fence?
Do
we
need
a
you
know?
Do
we
need
a
channeling
fence
to
make
sure
that
there
is
no
I'm
sorry
and
no
unsanctioned
camping,
happening
or
or
some
other
things
happening
on
that
area
that
we're
not
touching
for
a
while?
J
So
I
that
is
one
of
my
concerns
there
that
well,
you
know,
I
think
the
provider
has
very
good
faith
and
an
amazing
plan.
You
know
the
other
parts
that
are
not
touching,
I
think,
are
maybe
prone
to
some
of
this
happening.
So
I'm
a
little
worried
about
how
to
secure
those
properties
and
if
there's
any
ideas
on
how
we
can
secure
those
properties.
Maybe
in
the
indiana
side.
A
I
have
something
about
the
former,
but
go
ahead.
Councilmember
velmoros.
E
Thank
you.
I
I'm
a
little
bit
in
I'm
okay
with
what
has
been
said
about
zoning
more
than
than
what's
proposed.
I
am
more
interested
in
the
economic
development
part
that
I
mentioned
last
week,
and
how
else
can
we
support
a
disadvantaged
neighborhood
with
an
economic
development
idea,
item
proposal,
whatever
whatever
that
might
be,
and
I
wanted
to
ask
nick
you
said
that
some
of
the
so
some
things
are
excluded
in
the
form
based
on
so
through
a
development
agreement.
E
Then
we
could
do
I
mean
I
know
those
tosa
has
the
amphitheater,
so
that
would
be
something
that
would
have
to
be
in
a
development
agreement
and
but
it's
not
finalized
yet,
but
it
looks
like
they
might
be
open
to
that,
and
I'm
also
interested
that
as
we
do
the
housing
that
we
also
do
a
development
agreement
for
retail
or
storefront,
if
it's
not
already
in
the
lease
that
the
administration
has
has
been
working
on.
E
I
would
like
for
for
this
pilot
for
this
project
to
be
successful
as
a
tool
for
for
a
homeless
and
mentally
ill
neighbors
that
we
can
help.
But
I
would
also
like
this
to
be
an
amenity
to
the
neighborhood,
and
that
means
also
a
place
where
people
where
the
neighborhood
and
other
people
come
come
come
come
over
and
visit
and
maybe
and
maybe
a
storefront
retail.
I
know
they're
working
with
a
cookie
wholesale
idea.
Maybe
that's
something
I
would
like
to
see
along
those
lines,
but
I
would
like
it
to
see
like.
E
I
would
like
to
see
commitment
up
front
more
than
later
as
a
phase
two
phase.
Three,
I
I've
talked
to
people
at
dosa.
They
seemed
like
they
were
interested
hi.
Our
friends
are
petro
ashler
minis
and
I
and
I
think,
there's
an
interest,
and
I
wanted
to
propose
to
accounts
to
the
council
member.
E
If
you
guys
are
agreeable
to
that
that
we
do
that
development
agreement
up
front
as
well
for
economic
development,
commercial,
slash,
retail
storefront,
whatever
that,
however,
that
might
be,
it
could
be
a
win-win
for
the
neighborhood
in
a
way
and
if
every
you
know
my
my
positive
entrepreneurial
side
says,
this
could
be
amazing
and
I
have
a
feeling
that
maybe
other
people
will
be
interested
in
building
here
once
we
re-zone
and
now
there's
opportunities
for
other
businesses
and
residential
and
that
we
might
be
asked
in
the
future
by
other
groups.
E
Hey,
we
want
to
be
part
of
it.
So
that's
my
my
positive
anna
thinking
about
all
the
possibilities
that
this
property
and
this
parcel
could
be,
and
so
that's
what
I
would
like
to
see.
K
This
is
an
interesting
conversation
and
I
can
tell
we
have
a
lot
of
different
thoughts
on
this.
I
still
am
where
I
was
at
the
beginning
of
this
and
last
week,
where
I
think
it's
better
to
rezone
only
a
portion
of
that-
and
I
know
that
that's
more
work
for
in
the
future
and
redoing
the
whole
process
that
we're
doing
right
now.
K
But
in
this
case-
and
I
know
that's
more
staff
time,
but
in
this
case
I
think
it's
justified,
because
this
is
a
pilot
project
and
I
know
we're
not
talking
about
the
public
benefits,
analysis
or
necessarily
the
operation
of
the
tiny
home
village.
But
I
think
there
are
enough
questions
to
me
that
I
think
an
additional
legislative
check-in
before
we
expand
beyond
the
public.
The
pilot
project
is
justified
in
this
case,
so
I
and-
and
I
like
what
councilmember
police
said
about.
Well,
maybe
it's
not
just
eight.
K
Maybe
we
go
to
ten
so
that
we
have
some
flexibility
and
the
these
additional
storefront
or
whatever
else.
It's
not
just
what
is
currently
in
that
eight
acres,
but
that's
still
where
I'm
at
on
this
is
that
I'd
like
to
keep
it
to?
I
would
I'd
be
fine
with
the
ten
I
I,
but
between
eight
and
ten
acres,
so
that
we
can
truly
look
at
it
as
a
pilot
project
and
then
check
in
again
and
give
everybody
another
opportunity
to
to
weigh
in
mr
chair.
Can
I.
D
B
On
last
week
is
limited
to
the
eight
acre
pilot
site.
So
if
that
resolution
is
adopted
by
the
council,
that
would
authorize
the
city
to
enter
into
a
discounted
land
lease
for
only
that
eight
acres
and
the
information
submitted
and
discussed
in
the
last
briefing
indicates
that
for
future
for
future
expansion
efforts,
a
new
pba
would
need
to
be
submitted
to
the
council.
B
So
I
think
the
council
may
want
to
consider
when
authorizing
future
phases,
whether
they
want
to
look
at
both
the
pba
and
the
re-zone
or
or
whether
the
rezone
should
happen
right
now
and
then
future
efforts
would
just
be
authorized
through
and
the
next
pba
authorizing
new
discounted
land
leases.
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
clear
for
the
public
right.
A
Thank
you
and
I'm
going
to
one
comment
in
councilman
fowler
and
I'm
gonna.
Thank
you
very
much
for
that
clarification.
So
I'm,
of
course,
I'm
agreeing
with
councilman
mano
on
that
side
of
the
house
of
basically
the
pba
and
the
zoning
for
the
pilot
program,
another
pba
another
rezoning
for
the
expansion.
A
Now
I'm
going
to
transition
back
to
the
public
benefits
side
house-
and
I
know
that's
not
part
of
the
discussion
but
we're
having
a
public
hearing
on
it
next
week
and
my
my
concerns
and
comments
still
go
back
to
last
week's
after
I
read
the
pro
forma
again
and
look
to
it
and
I
still
have
a
lot
of
concerns
with
the
the
the
profit
loss
of
the
the
the
private
enterprises.
A
The
thrift
store
the
cookies
and
the
rentals
I'm
concerned
about
that
and
I'm
concerned
that
those
are
not
going
to
make
as
much
money
and
then
we're
going
to
be
asked
to
support
some
of
that
and
I
and
I
realized-
I
want
to
make
sure
that
that
is
coming
from
the
other
side,
village
and
their
own
donations
in
other
places,
and
also
along
with
that
is
the
one
question
that's
been
raised
on
the
vouchers
for
the
tiny
homes
there's
a
voucher
program,
and
I
want
to
make
just
clarifications.
A
I
don't
know
the
answer
to
this.
I
was
you
to
have
a
voucher
program.
You
need
to
have
a
12
month
lease
and
not
month
to
month,
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
there's
been
some
a
legal
answer
on
how
you
get
a
use
of
voucher
on
a
month
to
month
by
say
12
month
lease
not
for
here.
Not,
I
don't
need
an
answer
here,
but
just
next
next
week,
when
we
do
that
so
council
member,
I
think
fellow
yeah
thank.
A
F
Tammy,
thank
you
for
that
clarification.
It
is
helpful
and
I
think
what
I
would
sort
of
pose
to
other
council
members
that
what
having
what
rezoning
that
whole
parcel
right
now
would
do
is
not
just
say
now.
You
can
expand
as
much
as
you
want
because
of
what
you
just
said.
Each
expansion
has
to
come
back
to
do
a
public
benefits
analysis.
The
pilot
program
after
that
has
has
to
happen
after
that
happens,
has
to
come
back
with
a
public
benefits
analysis.
F
Yet,
instead
of
sitting
and
doing
you
know
six
months
of
now
new
rezones
new,
this
we're.
Actually,
if
we
like
the
pro
the
program,
we
can
actually
continue
to
expand
it
rather
quickly
than
having
to
go
through
all
of
the
reason
and
the
application
and
the
planning
commission
and
the
staffing
and
all
of
that
right
and-
and
I
bring
this
up
because
we
have
it.
F
Yet
here
are
all
the
needs
that
we
have
and
and
making
it
a
little
bit
more
cumbersome
on
ourselves
and
our
staff
when
in
fact
they
tosa
would
have
to
come
back
with
to
us
for
another
public
benefits
analysis.
And
so,
if
we
didn't
like
it,
we
were
like
cool
thanks
have
fun.
I
we
don't
have
to
expand
their
program,
we're
just
eliminating
an
extra
step
instead
of
an
extra
hurdle
for
ourselves
that,
but
that's
just
me
real
quick
brian.
A
I'm
going
to
finish
the
conversation
here.
That
was
a
great
discussion.
We
as
just
kind
of
repeat
public
benefits,
analysis,
public
hearing
and
the
rezoning
public
hearing
is
next
tuesday,
seven
o'clock
during
the
formal
meeting.
I
appreciate
that
very
much
we'll
go
on
a
10-minute
break
and
we'll
be
back
at
5
13.
B
B
B
A
B
Ballpark
station
area
plan,
or
rather
the
discussion
of
the
resolution.
It's
your
opportunity
to
consider
adoption
of
the
administration's,
updated
version
of
the
ballpark
station
area
plan
focuses
on
the
area
between
9th
south
and
17th
south
and
between
the
I-15,
freeway
and
state
street,
and
it's
focused
on
the
vicinity
of.
B
O
Thank
you.
So
the
purpose
of
my
presentation
is
to
just
briefly
review
the
ballpark
station
area
plan
with
the
council
and
with
the
final
modifications
for
the
potential
adoption
of
the
ballpark
station
area
plan
planning
commission.
During
their
27th
july,
27
public
hearing
recommended
adoption
of
the
small
area
plan
with
the
one
modification
that
allison
had
commented
on,
and
that
will
be
further
described
later
on
in
this
presentation
and
next
slide.
Please.
O
The
ballpark
station
area
plan
was
initiated
by
the
mayor
in
december
2020.
The
small
area
plan
is
located
within
two
master
plan
areas
which
are
the
central
community
and
downtown
master
plans.
The
plan
is
intended
to
capitalize
on
community
assets
and
guide
future
development
and
redevelopment
in
the
community
and
next
slide.
O
The
timeline
of
the
project
has
been
reviewed
earlier
with
the
council
during
that
mid-july
meeting
so
I'll
just
give
a
brief
overview
of
this
summer's
process
with
the
project
and
mention
a
correction
on
this
slide.
So
it
says
the
survey
was
conducted
in
march
2020,
that
should
say
march
2021
and
fast
forward
to
june
8th,
where
the
planning
commission
had
a
work
session
in
order
to
direct
staff
on
any
modifications
that
they
have
to
the
stationary
plan,
and
those
modifications
will
be
reviewed
later
on.
O
O
O
O
And
next
slide,
please
so
the
first
key
concept
is
that
the
ballpark
plan
proposes
the
six
big
moves
in
the
community.
This,
these
six
big
moves
have
the
intention
of
transforming
the
neighborhood,
as
pressure
for
redevelopment
occurs.
Next
slide
included
in
the
plan
are
the
goal.
Strategies
and
actions
goals
are
generally
broad
in
nature
and
direct
overall
future
development
in
the
community
strategies
are
more
focused
than
a
goal
and
describe
generally,
what
is
needed
to
implement
the
larger
goal
and
actions
describe
workable
measures
to
implement
the
goal
next
slide.
O
O
O
First,
are
the
june
8th
work
session
modifications,
so
the
first
modification
was
on
an
action
item
which
is
on
page
20
of
the
draft
plan
that
called
for
raised
sidewalks.
The
action
item
was
modified
so
to
improve
pedestrian
crossings.
The
language
highlight
the
pedestrian
and
calm
traffic
was
recommended
instead
of
raised
crosswalks.
O
The
majority
of
the
discussion
during
the
planning
commission
work
session
concern
more
direct
access
for
bike
routes
and
possibly
having
bike
routes
on
1300
south.
On
page
45
of
the
draft
plan
in
the
implementation
plan,
it's
now
recommended
that
a
future
study
be
conducted
to
possibly
reconfigure
1300
south
to
allow
for
different
modes
of
transport.
O
The
language
was
also
amended
in
the
implementation
plan
to
include
the
process
for
this
future
study
and
the
technical
considerations
for
implementation
and
planning
staff
collaborated
with
our
transportation
division
on
this
change.
The
last
modification
was
on
the
future.
Land
use
maps,
jefferson
park
mixed
use
area,
and
this
is
located
on
page
18..
O
K
O
So
the
difference
in
that
area,
so
the
avenue
streets
are
generally
the
streets
that
travel
east,
west
and
the
other
streets
with
the
exception
of
jefferson
street,
and
it
just
happened
that
all
of
the
avenue
streets
in
that
area
were
east-west
streets
and
were
generally
smaller
buildings
scale
and
so
jefferson
street
was
included
in
that
area.
I
can't
remember
off
the
top
of
my
head
what
the
building
scale.
I
think
it
was
two
to
four
stories
on
the
avenue
streets.
K
G
And
some
of
the
lower
scale,
but
also
recognizing,
especially
like
second
west,
where
we
already
have
a
lot
of
taller
buildings
and
not
trying
to
pretend
that
they're
going
to
go
away
or
something
like
that.
So
because
on
the
streets
like
meat
avenue
of
gold's,
avenue,
paxton
avenue.
And
as
you
go
down
to
make
sure
that
those
have
a
little
bit
lower
scale.
O
O
O
With
this
new
modification,
a
view
shed
of
the
wasatch
range
from
ballpark
is
called
out
to
limit
building
heights
to
two
to
or
excuse
me
three
to
four
stories
in
this
location
and
then
between
the
utah
pride
center,
which
is
located
at
about
1380
south
to
kensington
street.
The
building
height
recommendation
was
updated
to
three
to
four
stories
and
finally,
kensington
street
to
1700
south
along
main
street
was
also
updated
to
recommend
buildings
with
a
height
no
greater
than
three
stories
with
stoops
and
yards
that
front
on
main
street.
O
And
you
can
go
to
the
next
slide,
so
that
finishes
up
my
presentation:
okay,.
K
Can
I
ask
one
more
a
question
on
that
main
street:
the
changes
in
scales,
so
the
planning
commission
requested
that
the
that
the
scale
was
increased
in
all
locations
or
it
was
only
increased
in
that
northern
location
part
of
the
neighborhood
was
already
a
higher
and
then
below
13
south
there
was
no
change
made.
Am
I
understanding
that
correctly
from
the
previous.
K
Yeah,
due
to
the
planning
commission's
july
27th
south
of
pride
center
has
not
changed,
but
north
of
13th
has
am.
I
understanding
that
correctly.
G
I
think
we
added
we
just
added
less
height
on
those
other
areas
of
main
street
and
allowed
them
as
you
progress
north
you're,
getting
closer
downtown
to
gradually
increase
the
height
and
scale.
I
mean.
I
know
a
lot
of
those
are
car
dealerships.
So
who
knows
when
those
kind
of
things
will
change
over
but
one
day,
hopefully
when
you're
starting
to
see
redevelopment
there,
but.
K
G
K
Okay,
I
I
mean,
I
think,
that's
great.
I
I
would
personally
probably
support
a
little
bit
higher
heights
along,
I
mean
it's
main
street
and
the
street
is
enormous,
so
even
south
of
13th,
I
would
probably
support
higher
densities,
but
I
think
what's
written
in
the
plan
is
is
better
than
what
we
have
now
so.
O
So
any
questions
or
comments,
john
and
I
are
both
here
to
answer
questions,
and
then
susan
lundmark,
who
is
the
from
transportation,
who
is
the
original
project
manager,
is
here
virtually
as
well
and
she's
available
for
comments
or
questions.
F
Yeah,
I
am
interested
in
a
couple
of
questions
that
came
up
in
this
staff
report.
Number
one
being
the
oh
sorry
cindy
lou,
usually
I'm
the
loudest
one
in
the
room.
So
it's
a
surprise
number
one
being
the.
F
The
ways
that
wfrc
and
uta
would
continue
to
participate
in
this
plan
and
the
implementation
of
the
plan.
I
know
they
were
partners
in
the
beginning
of
it,
hi
sues
and
so
wondering
if
they're
going
to
continue
to
be
partners
as
we
move
forward
with
this
plan.
P
I
can
start
with
wfrc
they're,
certainly
very
supportive
of
the
plan
and,
of
course,
but,
and
they
are
primarily
like
the
the
funding
agency
for
it
in
terms
of
the
grant
that
we
received,
and
so
as
far
as
I
know,
they
typically
try
to
support
throughout
the
process,
but
aren't
usually
involved
with
full-on
implementation
that
I
know
of,
because
that's
usually
left
to
the
cities
and
the
jurisdictions
and
and
those
partners.
P
Last
time
I
talked
to
uta,
though
they
are
definitely
planning
to
move
forward
with
a
redevelopment.
Well,
I
shouldn't
say
definitely
the
last
time
I
talked
to
them.
They
were
planning
to
move
forward
with
redevelopment
on
that
ballpark
track
station
park
and
ride
area,
and
that
so
they
are
definitely
ready
for
this
plan
to
be
adopted
so
that
they
can
start
on
their
own
process.
P
That's
required
for
that
kind
of
redevelopment
in
that
area.
I
haven't
talked
to
them
about
specifics,
but
they
were
involved
with
the
creation
of
the
conceptual
designs
and
and
kind
of
every
step
of
the
way.
In
terms
of
the
plan
in
general,
but
specifically
for
what
is
on
their
property
in
terms
of
the
redevelopment
and
also
the
track
station
itself,
if
that
helps.
J
Mr
thank
you.
I
quick
question
on.
You
know
the
the
I
mean
I
don't
know
if
this
is
appropriate
here,
but
I
mean
I
love
this
area
and
I
wanted
to
see
it
explode
in
the
very
best
way
and-
and
I
will
like
to
see
all
of
these
things
happen.
I
also
we
with
the
rda
has
been
trying
very
hard
to
work
on
this
area,
but
there
is
also
limited
resources.
J
Unlimited
tax
collection
from
from
this
from
this
zone
are,
we
is
the
administration
hoping
that
maybe
the
hrt
zones
zone
in
the
ballpark
area
might
help
us
fund
some
of
this.
Maybe
this
is
a
question
for
the
follow-up,
but
are
we
hoping
to
capture
some
of
funds
that
we
were
not
capturing
before
through
the
rda
to
try
to
make
this
plan
a
reality?
J
I
I
something
I
learned
and
when
I
was
in
the
county,
the
city
produces
more
documents
and
plans
than
the
county
does,
even
when
the
county
still
was
the
municipal
government
for
the
all
their
incorporated
areas,
and
many
of
those
plans
are
dreams
that
you
know.
You
know
that
we
all
wish
to
happen
and
they
don't
end
up
happening.
J
I
think
this
council
and
this
administration
want
this
one
to
happen,
and
there
is,
I
felt,
like
the
all
the
stars
are
aligning
about
this
one,
but
money
is,
you
know,
always
a
concern,
so
is
the
administration
also
thinking
about
how
we're
going
to
make
it
happen,
and,
and
that
is
a
question-
thank
you.
G
I
think
the
implementation
part
of
the
plan
is
just
as
important
as
the
ideas
right
and
that,
if
you
don't
have
an
implementation
plan,
then
a
lot
of
times
the
plan
just
sits
on
the
shelf
and
gathers
dust
so
and
that's
definitely
what
we
do
not
want
to
happen,
which
is
why
our
plan
is
to
immediately
start
to
change
the
zoning
in
that
neighborhood
to
reflect
whatever
the
plan
is
adopted
and
what
it
looks
like
to
start
putting
these
things
in
a
place
that
will
help
for
when
private
developers
are
looking
to
redevelop
their
sites.
G
That
they're
forced
to
add
things
like
you
know,
more
better
sidewalks,
improved
outdoor
spaces,
things
that
you
know.
We
can't
expect
it
for
everything,
but
they
can
help
take
care
of
some
of
that
implementation
that
we,
as
a
city
may
not
be
able
to
do
immediately.
K
I
think
it's
a
great
question,
councilmember
pued,
that
I
think
there's
two
ways
to
answer
that
right:
the
city
we
and
uta
and
other
public
agencies
own
land
in
there,
and
so
those
are
parcels
where
it
would
be
either
public
partnership,
partnership
or
funding
that
is
necessary.
But
a
lot
of,
what's
anticipated
in
this
plan,
is
just
future
development
on
privately
owned
land.
So,
to
the
extent
that
this
is
approved
and
the
visions
there
are
are
come
to
come,
you
know
come
to
fruition,
then
they,
you
would
see
that
taxi
increment.
K
That
is
already
being
collected
from
the
the
from
the
the
rda
zone
or
even
more
if,
as
we
found
out
today,
if
we
did
the
htr
z,
that
would
be
even
more
taxing
entities
that
would
be
participating
and
potentially
to
a
much
higher
level.
Those.
I
think
this
is
the
path
forward
to
start
to
see
that
that
tax
increment
collected.
So
I
think
that
this
plan
is
a
tool
in
order
to
bring
that
increment
in
and
and
allow
us
to
do
some
of
those
things
on
our
own
public
lands.
K
I'm
super
excited
about
this
plan
because
you
all
know
I
live
in
the
ballpark,
neighborhood
and-
and
I
see
great
potential
in
that-
and
I
think
I
see
it
as
one
of
the
most
underutilized
under
sort
of
the
with
the
highest
potential
and
on
the
least
capitalized
potential
in
our
neighborhood
in
our
city,
great
access
to
downtown
great
access
to
transit,
to
the
freeway
to
and
actually
mixed-use
neighborhood,
whereas
we
talked
about
building
mixed-use
neighborhoods,
and
you
know
something
like
a
small
corner
of
commercial
space
and
an
otherwise
big
expanse
of
residential
space.
K
I
guess
technically
is
a
mixed-use
neighborhood,
but
this
is
like
truly
fully
integrated
mixed
use.
That
can
you
can
walk
to
like
pretty
big
employment,
centers,
big
retail,
centers
and
big
residential
centers
that
are
actually
the
correct
mix
or
I
what
I
see
as
a
great
mix
for
urban
living,
and
I
think
that
this
plan
really
sets
that
path
forward.
And
so
I'm
very
excited
about
what
I'm
seeing
here.
M
Just
one
additional
comment
to
make,
as
many
of
you
are
aware,
last
year
the
state
legislature
passed
a
law
about
requiring
cities
to
adopt
stationary
plans
on
the
transit
transit
stations.
So
this
will
be
the
first
one
that
we
actually
send
off
for
that
certification
once
it's
adopted,
it
might
even
be
the
first
one
under
that
bill
to
be
done,
but
you'll
be
hearing
more
about
those
in
the
coming
months.
So
and
then.
B
I
do,
oh
sorry,
sorry.
I
I
had
some
about
the
parts
of
the
plan
that
talk
about
reconfiguring
the
track
station
and
so
can
you
I
was
trying
to
find
in
the
document
exactly
what
that
would
look
like
or
why.
Why
that's
important
and
I'm
saying
that
out
of
ignorance,
I'm
not
to
argue.
But
why
is
that
important.
O
Yeah,
so
the
track
station
at
1300,
south
right
now
only
has
and
correct
me.
If
I'm
wrong
sues
only
has
an
access
to
the
south,
and
then
the
conversion
to
an
urban
station
would
allow
for
an
access
to
the
north,
and,
I
believe,
that's
adjacent
to
paxton
avenue.
O
G
Okay,
it
also
adds
crossings
at
the
lights
like
a
lighted
crossing
at
the
train
station
or
at
the
the
tracks
themselves.
So
right
now,
I'm
sure
if
you've
been
down
there
to
get
you
want
to
go
ball
game.
You
don't
have
a
lot
of
options
to
cross,
and
so
I
think
that
will
really
help
improve
getting
people
safe
because
people
already
do
it
right,
the
you
know
the
arms
go
down
and
people
are
running
back
and
forth,
and
so
this
will
create
a
safer
way
for
them
to
do
that.
B
P
Do
you
want
to
I
can
I
can
try
to
clarify,
because
I
think
it's
a
couple
different
things
in
terms
of
there's.
We
we
do
already
have
funding
and
are
moving
forward.
Transportation.
Division
is
moving
forward
with
crosswalks
adjacent
to
the
gate,
arms
to
cross
1300
south,
but
there
is
also
a
recommendation
to
to
reconfigure
the
platform,
the
station
platform
to
allow
access.
It's
like
it
is
at
the
north,
as
nan
was
saying,
but
it's
from
the
west.
P
So
right
now
you
can't
access
it
from
the
west,
where
there's
quite
a
bit
of
redevelopment
going
on
and
housing
development.
That's
going
on
and
at
the
time
that
we
were
working
on
the
plan,
there
was
no
pedestrian
access.
That
would
allow
like
say
for
peop
developers
who
are
trying
to
get
litec
and
they
and
they
want
to
show
that
they're
within
a
certain
distance
of
a
track
station.
But
the
walking
pathway
was
too
long
and
actually
now
uta
and
transportation
division.
P
Do
you
have
a
crosswalk
at
the
north
end
there
that's
at
lucy
and
paxton,
it's
the
paxton
crossing
up
there,
so
that
does
mitigate
it
to
some
degree,
but
just
in
terms
of
kind
of
access
and
livability
and
getting
to
the
train
platform
itself.
Other
urban
stations
have
access
from
both
sides,
and
so
there
was
a
desire,
through
this
plan,
to
kind
of
update
this
to
reflect
a
more
urban
environment
as
density
increases
in
the
area
and
to
allow
for
access
on
both
sides.
So
uta
was
open
to
it.
They
they
don't
have.
G
G
G
A
G
G
The
second
major
item
is
3.9
million
for
planning
on
design
on
planning
and
design.
So
the
initial
phase
of
construction
for
two
new
taxiways
contemplated
in
the
draft
proposed
airport
master
plan
that
you
all
heard
about
not
too
long
ago
and
we'll
hear
about
again
soon.
The
third
item
is
nine
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
planning
and
design
on
utility
service
capacity
upgrades
at
the
tooele
valley
facility,
so
the
tooele
valley
wing
of
the
airport.
G
Finally,
just
over
one
million
dollars
is
requested
to
reflect
the
compensation
plan,
adjustment
and
the
mayor
recommended
and
council
adopted
fiscal
year
23
budget
for
non-represented
employees.
So
that's
congruent
with
what
was
done
throughout
the
rest
of
the
city
because
of
the
timing
of
the
airport's
budget
presentation
that
information
that
adjustment
was
not
made
until
now,
when
the
request
is
in
front
of
you.
L
Thank
you
so
much
great
to
be
here.
We've
been
hinting
at
the
big
one
here
for
some
time
and
it's
really
kind
of
an
exciting
moment
to
be
able
to
bring
this
to
you,
and
I
have
to
say
you
know.
Two
years
ago
we
celebrated
our
second
anniversary
of
opening
today
april
may
june
of
2020.
L
The
idea
of
expanding
by
16,
additional
gates
didn't
seem
terribly
obvious,
and
yet
by
really
the
following
late
summer
and
fall,
it
was
apparent
that
traffic
was
returning
significantly
to
salt
lake
and
it
really
has
continued
we're
we're
post
2019
at
this
stage,
and
so
we
some
time
ago,
about
a
year
ago,
gave
the
project
management
team
the
authority
to
do
the
preliminary
engineering
and
architectural
work
on
the
16
gate
expansion,
which
is
the
only
expansion
that
we
can
do
prior
to
the
construction
of
a
concourse
c.
L
So
the
reason
we
did
that
is
that
it
takes
about
a
year
really
to
do
all
of
that.
And
if
we
were
to
push
the
button
today
and
start
doing
that,
we
would
have
have
to
demobilize
the
construction
team
prior
to
beginning
construction,
which
would
be
very,
very
expensive
sure
enough.
We
went
around
to
the
airlines
and
kind
of
probe
their
interest
on
these
16
gates
and
they
asked
for
22,
which
we
didn't
have,
so
we
had
to
go
through
the
process
of
allocating
gates
to
those
airlines
that
were
that
were
interested.
L
Obviously,
the
lead
in
something
like
this
on
the
airline
side
is
delta,
they're,
the
largest
carrier
they're,
the
only
hub
carrier,
and
I
think
that
that's
something
I
want
to
address
before.
I
turn
it
over
to
shane,
andresen,
who's,
director
of
commercial
and
properties
in
the
primary
airline
contact
with
the
airport,
and
that
is
that
delta
has
really
changed
their
their
view
of
salt
lake
back
when
this
program
was
authorized-
and
I
think
2012
everybody's
you
know
coming
out
of
the
great
recession-
they'd
been
through
bankruptcy.
L
There
wasn't
really
a
lot
of
enthusiasm
for
spending
billions
and
billions
on
new
airports
in
the
industry,
but
they
recognized
that
salt
lake
really
did
need
to
reconstruct
its
facilities.
They
were
very
old
and
not
built
as
a
hub
at
all
and
they
convinced
the
city,
the
airport
at
that
time,
to
use
a
a
planning
metric
of
one
and
a
half
percent
annual
growth
from
2012
on
2014.
First
shovel
grows
into
the
ground.
Growth
is
five
six
eight
in
one
case,
twelve
percent
a
year.
L
Now
we
had
a
little
hiccup
I'll
say
this
during
covid,
but
frankly,
very
little.
It
returned
pretty
quickly,
and
so
that
has
really
forced
just
a
tremendous
amount
of
attention
on
how
we
can
expand
and
how
quickly
we
can
expand
to
do
this
and
to
pay
for
it.
L
L
The
original
agreement
negotiated
in
2012
was
built
to
finance
a
one
concourse
1.9
billion
dollar
project.
This.
If
it
is
approved
will
make
this
about
a
six
billion
dollar
project,
and
we
said
that
we
felt
the
financial
metrics
of
the
airline
use
agreement
were
not
sufficient
to.
You,
know,
convince
and
satisfy
the
rating
agencies
and
investors
who
would
be
buying
the
bonds
to
build
this,
that
we
were
capable
of
doing
so.
L
I've
been
through
four
of
these
airline
use
agreement
negotiations
and
they
generally
fall
into
the
category
of
you
know:
unmedicated
root
canal,
they're,
very
intense
and
difficult,
and
I
would
say
that
this
one
was
quite
remarkable.
We
did
a
lot
of
effort
on
our
part
to
put
forward
to
them
what
we
thought
would
be
an
acceptable
business
term
and
there
was
really
never
any
debate
whatsoever,
lots
of
nits
and
gnats,
but
nothing
significant
and
not
to
get
into
the
weeds
too
far.
L
But
the
basic
kind
of
negotiating
point
was
you:
airlines
give
us
a
stronger
guarantee
and
we
airport
will
give
you
a
larger
share
of
ancillary
revenues,
which
is
a
very
common
technique.
So
in
good
times
they
do
really
well.
So
if
they
throw
more
traffic
into
salt
lake
they're
going
to
do
better
in
bad
times,
we're
protected
and
our
debt
service
is
paid
and
the
bills
get
paid.
L
They
refer
to
it
as
the
atlanta
of
the
west,
and
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense
because
really
historically
delta
was
not
a
western
airline,
despite
the
fact
that
they
purchased
western
airlines.
They
were
in
eastern
airlines,
so
they
did
everything
in
atlanta
and
I
think
it's
just
a
remarkable
statement
about
their
commitment
here
to
salt
lake
and
the
growth
they've
seen
the
business
deal
that
we
put
forward
to
them
was
predicated
on
one
and
a
half
percent
annual
growth
appropriately
conservative
for
the
financial
markets.
They
tell
us
to
expect
between
three
and
five
percent.
L
Annual
growth,
which
have
compounded
is
pretty
scary,
because
that
puts
us
into
sort
of
the
next
generation
pretty
quickly,
but
it's
also
very
encouraging
and
I
think
the
the
biggest
statement
of
commitment
that
they
could
make
and
it's
pretty
extraordinary
one.
Their
existing
lease
expires
in
2034.,
and
this
is
something
I
asked
them
to
do
right
after
I
got
here,
because
all
the
leases
would
have
expired
in
2024
and
the
airport
wouldn't
be
done
by
the
time.
L
The
lease
expired
and
that's
a
fairly
challenging
metric
to
put
in
front
of
financial
investors,
so
they
voluntarily
extended
their
lease
by
10
years.
None
of
the
other
airlines
would
sign
up.
They
were
happy
to
let
delta
you
know,
carry
the
water
on
that.
Their
leases,
all
expire
in
2024,
so
they'll
have
an
opportunity
to
extend,
and
I'm
sure
they
will
delta
asked
us
to
extend
their
lease
by
an
additional
10
years
with
another
10-year
option,
which
means
their
lease
will
expire
in
2054..
L
So
a
really,
I
think,
a
very
positive
development,
a
good
statement
by
delta.
This
will
go
to
their
board
in
december.
It
is
substantial
enough
that
it
requires
their
corporate
board
approval
and
represents
really
a
commitment
of
just
billions
and
billions
in
terms
of
their
annual
commitment
here
in
in
salt
lake.
Thank.
L
Yes,
you
bet
the
other
two
items
here.
Number
two
is
really
allows
us
to
take
advantage
of
the
buildback
better
bill
congress,
appropriated
20
billion
for
airports.
L
We
have
to
have
projects
on
which
we
can
spend
it
pretty
quickly.
This
one
falls
into
that
category.
It
is
an
enabling
project
for
a
future.
Concours
c
we've
gotten
very
strong
indications
from
the
faa
that
this
will
be
looked
upon.
Favorably
and
then
one
of
my
favorites,
to
be
honest,
is
tuala
valley
airport.
L
So
this
is
an
effort
to
do
the
planning
that
will
be
required
to
actually
build
those
facilities,
but
the
12
valley
airport
has
an
instrument
landing
system
which
is
unheard
of
for
small
airports
like
this,
and
at
a
time
when
airlines
are
being
pressed
to
do
more
flight
training
and
that
sort
of
thing
tuella
is
perfectly
positioned
to
do
that
and
then
finally,
the
non-representative
employee
compensation
study.
This
is
just
the
financial
implementation
of
that
and
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
to
the
council.
Thank
you
to
the
administration.
L
I
know
our
workforce
first
of
all,
they're
not
really
expecting
this.
They
don't
see
it
coming.
It'll
be
really
deeply
appreciated
and
it
comes
at
a
very
timely
moment
for
us.
So
I'll
turn
it
over
to
shane
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
some
of
the
details
and
obviously
any
questions
about
any
subject.
Anytime
always
welcome.
Q
Thanks
bill,
so
if
we
could
advance
a
couple
slides
to
the
slide
with
the
airline
logos,
that
would
be
great
yeah,
one
more
so,
as
bill
mentioned
ever
since
the
shovels
went
in
the
ground.
Really,
we've
been
on
a
fast
track
in
salt
lake
city
with
growth,
and
you
know
the
pandemic
slowed
things
down
a
little
bit,
but
since
we've
come
through
the
pandemic,
we've
had
two
new
carriers
in
salt
lake
city.
This
year
we
had
euro
wings
discover
which
flies
non-stop
seasonally
to
frankfurt.
Q
Germany
and
we've
also
had
spirit
airlines
which
flies
to
those
three
destinations
that
are
on
the
screen.
There.
We've
also
had
the
resumption
of
service
by
klm
air,
canada,
delta's,
paris
and
london
flights
have
resumed,
and
then
we
also
had,
like
I
mentioned,
that
the
new
non-stop
to
frankfurt,
which
is,
is
really
pleasant
for
us
to
have
construction
through
phase
three
really
just
represents
a
replacement
airport.
It
doesn't
have
any
growth
planned
for
new
entrants
or
new
facilities,
new
space
beyond
what
was
really
planned
in
in
the
old
airport.
Q
So
phase
fours
gives
us
that
opportunity
to
have
not
only
some
gates
that
new
entrants
can
use,
but
also
just
additional
support
space.
That's
that's
needed
today.
We
have
the
hard
stand.
It's
not
a
pleasant
customer
experience
it's
necessary
just
because
of
the
the
way
we've
come
back,
but
it's
obviously
not
a
long-term
solution.
So
one
we're
looking
forward
to
getting
rid
of
as
soon
as
possible
november.
Q
So
this
slide
is
really
busy,
but
the
one
takeaway
that
a
couple
takeaways-
I
guess
I
would
mention-
is
as
bill
mentioned
when
we
approached
the
airlines
earlier
this
year.
We
asked
them
how
many
gates
they
likely
see
they
need
through
2027
or
when
2027
would
would
be
around
when
these
gates
would
come
online
and
as
bill
mentioned,
they
had
22
requests
and
of
course
we
can
only
build
16,
because
we've
got
a
taxi
lane
there.
So
gates
are
critically
important
right
now,
as
you
can
see
there
in
green.
Q
That's
that
represents
everything
that's
open
today
and
then
in
yellow
in
may
of
next
year,
we'll
have
five
gates
open
on
concourse,
a
really
for
the
next
five
years.
We'll
have
gates
open
every
year
through
2027.
Assuming
this
phase
four
expansion
is
amendment
is
approved,
so
it's
great
we're
going
to
have
94
contact
gates.
When
all
is
said
and
done,
that's
loading
bridge
gates
in
the
legacy
airport
we
had
around
56
loading
bridge
contact
gates.
Concourse
e,
as
you
know,
was
all
ground
load
which
was
sky
west
next
slide.
Please.
Q
The
the
key
thing
about
this
budget
amendment
today
is
that
it
allows
us
to
not
demobilize
the
construction
crews
that
are
already
on
site.
They
can
start
the
procurement
for
phase
four
starting
this
month
and
start
awards
of
those
contracts
early
next
year
and
never
have
to
demobilize
any
of
the
crews
that
are
on
site.
Q
So
it's
a
significant
savings
to
the
project
overall,
with
the
ability
to
just
continue
phase
four
will
have
adequate
concession
space
and
one
of
the
things
I'm
really
pleased
to
have
is
a
planned
common
use,
lounge,
so
delta.
Right
now
has
a
lounge
on
concourse
a
they'll
have
a
lounge
on
concourse
b
there
will
be
a
third-party
lounge
on
concourse
b
as
well,
that
will
be
accessible
to
any
airline
passenger,
not
just
a
delta
passenger,
so
stay.
L
Here
too,
the
delta
lounge
of
both
of
them,
so
the
one
on
a
and
the
one
on
b
will
total
60
000
square
feet.
So
they'll
have
more
lounge
space
in
salt
lake
than
they
do
anywhere
else
other
than
atlanta,
and
that's
likely
the
way
it'll
be
for
some
time,
because
you
can't
just
manufacture
these
things.
Q
It's
not
dedicated
to
any
airline,
but
lesson
learned
from
phase
one
we're
going
to
have
a
little
bit
of
breathing
room
to
get
us
through
until
we
need
concours
c
at
the
far
end
of
this,
of
the
the
get
the
concourse
there,
you
can
see
there's
a
hard
stand.
We
are
planning
a
five
position,
hard
stand
that
will
give
us
a
little
bit
more
flexibility
until
concourse
c
is
necessary,
but
we
don't
have
any
plans
for
that
any
users
for
on
opening
day,
yet,
of
course,
we're
five
years
away
next
slide.
Please.
Q
So
just
a
couple
of
images
here
that
are
actually
a
little
dated,
but
gives
you
a
view
of
the
progress
on
the
left.
There
you'll
see
the
a
expansion,
the
22
gates
that
are
under
construction
now,
as
I
mentioned,
five
will
open
up
in
may
and
then
the
balance
of
them
will
open
in
november
of
23.
At
that
point,
the
hard
stand
which
you
can
see
in
the
distance
of
that
photo
closes
we're
really
excited
about
that,
and
then
the
photo
on
the
right
is
looking
south
towards
the
terminal.
Q
Q
Bill
mentioned
the
taxiways
and
the
3.9
million
that's
being
requested
to
at
least
initially
fund
the
design
you
can
see
here
where
they're
going
to
be
located.
These
are
really
critical
for
the
efficiency
of
the
airfield.
It
gives
aircraft
another
back
and
forth
point
between
the
two,
the
east
and
the
west
runway
and
also
gives
cargo
operations
a
lot
more
direct
access
to
the
runways
and
de-icing
pads
in
the
winter,
and
it
also
facilitates
concourse
c
in
the
future.
Q
Q
And
I
think
this
is
the
last
one
as
bill
mentioned
water
and
sewer,
not
a
very
sexy
thing
to
talk
about,
but
something
that's
really
necessary
in
in
twilla.
It's
something
that
brady
has
been
working
on,
I
think
for
just
about,
since
he
walked
in
the
door
at
the
airport
and
we're
closer
than
we
ever
are.
So
this
nine
hundred
thousand
dollars
will
fund
the
design
work
necessary
to
get
water
and
sewer
from
a
connection
point
that
grants
fill
city
has
to
the
airport.
Q
One
of
the
things
that
I
think
is
is
really
exciting
about
this.
Is
we
just
signed
a
long-term
lease
with
the
bureau
of
bureau
of
land
management
they're
going
to
be
operating
and
developing
a
single
engine?
Air
tanker
base
at
the
twill
airport
for
firefighting,
so
they'll
be
putting
out
fires
for
a
really
long
time
in
our
region
and
they're
going
to
be
spending
over
seven
million
dollars
on
that
facility
out
in
tooele.
So
I
think
that
is
my
last
slide.
So
we'll
just
take
any
questions
you
may
have.
A
L
Ga,
you
probably
know
we've
overachieved,
I
would
say
at
salt
lake
international
on
general
aviation.
We
rank,
I
think,
20th
largest
in
the
country
currently
47th
largest
in
the
world,
which
is
amazing
and
17th
largest
in
the
world
in
aircraft
activity,
and
that
owes
largely
to
the
volume
of
ga
aircraft,
which
is
too
much
right.
And
so
we,
this
is
one
more
opportunity
for
us
that
in
south
valley
to
expand
general
aviation
opportunities.
A
And
that
land
on
the
ga
side
of
the
runways
will
that
just
be
just
mothballed
as
far
as
the
hangars
are
concerned,
and
the
fuel
and
the
the
in
antwilla?
No,
no
no.
Q
In
in
oh
in
salt
lake
city,
so
we
actually
have
an
unprecedented
demand
right
now
for
corporate
hangars,
we
have
quite
a
few
that
need
to
be
demolished
because
they're
past
their
useful
lives,
so
we
are
going
to
slowly
tear
down
the
t-hangers
and
then
build
corporate
hangar
corporate
aircraft
hangers.
This.
L
I
E
Councilmember,
it
made
me
excited
to
hear
about
delta
and
wanting
to
add
more
of
their
educational
training
yeah,
and
it
also
makes
me
wonder
if
we're
like,
as
a
city,
we're
equipped
to
help
them
with
that
human
resource.
One.
Do
we
have
the
employees
you
know
to
to
fulfill
those
jobs
and
or
is
there
an
opportunity
where
they're
looking
at
also
maybe
them
providing
the
education
so
that
they
can
employ
people
within
the
community
within
the
state.
L
L
They
do
have
a
terrific
training
program
and
they
have
one
thing
to
offer
that
none
of
the
others
of
us
do,
which
is
flight
benefits,
and
there
are
just
a
lot
of
people
out
there
who
are
ready
to
go
to
work,
for
you
know
basically
unlimited
personal
flying,
but
we'll
you
know
this.
L
Will
this
is
a
developing
project
and
we're
gonna
take
advantage
of
every
opportunity
we
can
to
get
them
plugged
into
networks
for
recruiting,
retaining
and
training
their
workforce,
and
they
will
also
be
bringing
people
to
salt
lake
from
all
over
the
west.
So
if
you're
a
flight
attendant
in
seattle,
you're
not
going
to
have
to
go
to
atlanta
anymore
you're,
going
to
come
to
salt
lake
or
la
or
or
whatever,.
L
E
Anything
we
can
do
to
help
and
include
you
know
our
younger
population
to
get
interested
in
all
these
amazing.
You
know
diverse
jobs
that
are
not.
You
know
my
right
now.
This
is
a
new
industry.
I
see
it
in
my
head,
as
you
know,
another
thing
that
salt
lake
city
provides.
E
I
know
us,
but
this
you
know
what
I'm
saying
the
hub
provides.
So
that's
it.
J
I
I
wanted
to
say
that
this
airport
is
amazing
and
I
fascinated
by
all
the
work
that
is
being
done
to
make
it
happen.
I
did
have
a
question
and,
as
you
know,
I'm
flying
a
lot
these
days
about
the
vendors
that
we
are
creating
and
are
amazing,
because
it
reflect
this
community
and
the
local
business
concessions.
You
mean
yes
yeah
and
I
was
wondering
if
there
is
a
way
to
encourage
or
even
require
some
of
these
stores
to
use
less
plastic.
J
I
am
I'm
driving
I'm
getting
there
with
all
sorts
of
plastic
that
three
minutes
later
I
eat
fast
ends
up
in
the
in
the
bin.
So
I
wonder
if
you
know
we
can
push
a
little
bit
on
that.
I
think
it
will
be
a
big
deal.
Q
Yes,
definitely
we're
actually
getting
ready
to
release
an
rfp
for
phase
three
concessions,
so
everything
up
in
the
central
node
and
then
the
first
eight
gates
on
concourse
b
and
part
of
that
solicitation.
We
ask
the
proposers
to
tell
us
what
are
their
sustainability
practices?
It's
something
we
actually
measure
and
we
give
points
in
the
evaluation
and
who
we
select
an
award.
Q
One
of
the
things
I'm
proud
about
is
in
phase
three.
We're
gonna
actually
have,
for
the
first
time
a
liquid
dump
station,
which
doesn't
sound
like
much,
but
instead
of
somebody
going
and
dropping
in
their
soda
full
of
ice
into
a
garbage
can,
which
then
goes
to
the
landfill
and
is
paid
for
in
in
weight,
they're
going
to
be
able
to
just
pour
it
down
a
drain
and
then
recycle
the
bottle
or
recycle
the
cup
right
next
door.
So
we're
always
thinking
of
of
things
like
that.
D
I
think
councilmember
plee
and
I
were
kind
of
sharing
a
brain.
A
little
bit.
I
was
just
traveling
like
literally
last
night
at
midnight
was
the
happiest
person
pushing
her
hand,
cart
down
that
eight-year
trek
to
get
from
gate
b
to
the
front
door,
and
I
I
love
our
airport
like
every
time
I
have
to
eat
at
a
chain
store
or
shane
restaurant
in
another
airport.
D
So
I
thank
you
for
how
you're
amplifying
and
encouraging
our
local
economy
as
we
grow
this,
and
also
welcoming,
in
nationwide
multinational
corporations
like
delta,
to
invest
in
our
community
and
to
grow
roots
here
that
are
going
to
ignore
to
our
benefit.
You
know
if
we
can
just
convince
you
not
to
pave
over
wetlands.
A
R
Welcome
to
capital
city
news,
your
source
for
staying,
informed
and
engaged
with
salt
lake
city
government,
I'm
your
host
brian
young,
with
salt
lake
city
tv.
On
our
episode
today
we
have
an
interview
with
sophia
nicholas
who's,
the
sustainability
deputy
director
to
talk
about
the
solar
salt
lake
city
program
for
our
history
minute.
We
talk
about
revenge
of
the
ninja,
an
infamous
film
shot
here
in
salt
lake
city
before
we
get
to
those.
Let's
take
a
look
at
our
legislative
update,
our
look
back
our
look
ahead
and,
of
course,
our
road
construction
update.
N
At
its
august
16th
meeting
the
city
council
voted
to
add
an
85
million
general
obligation,
bond
for
parks
and
public
lands
projects
to
the
november
ballot,
and
they
also
approved
a
proposed
67.5
million
dollar
sales.
Tax
revenue
bond
voters
in
salt
lake
will
decide
whether
to
approve
the
go
bond
which
is
key
to
implementing
the
reimagined
nature.
Public
lands
master
plan.
N
Only
the
geo
bond
will
be
on
the
november
ballot.
The
city
council
also
heard
a
briefing
on
amendments
to
the
city's
budget
and
the
council
heard
a
report
on
the
2021
election,
which
the
city
conducted
on
a
pilot
basis
as
a
ranked
choice,
voting
without
a
primary
to
learn.
More
visit,
slc.gov
council
salt
lake
city,
mayor
erin,
mendenhall,
salt
lake
city,
school
district
staff
and
students,
uta
staff
and
the
salt
lake
education
foundation
celebrated
an
innovative
new
program
that
will
give
free
transit
passes
to
k-12
students
and
staff
in
salt
lake
city
school
district.
N
S
N
The
passes
will
be
available
beginning
with
the
through
2022-2020
school
year
and
will
be
valid
on
uta
bus
tracks.
The
s
line
streetcar
and
uta
on
demand
in
salt
lake
city's,
hot
and
dry
climate
trees
need
to
have
supplemental
watering
to
survive.
It
is
the
responsibility
of
the
adjacent
property
owner
to
water
trees
in
the
park
strip,
salt
lake
city,
urban
forestry
provides
a
watering
bag
with
each
newly
planted
tree.
N
If
you
need
any
help
figuring
out
tree
watering
and
other
ways
to
help
with
water
conservation
visit.
The
city's
website
for
ideas,
salt
lake
city
has
begun
installing
20
miles
per
hour.
Speed
limit
signs
throughout
the
city
marking
the
final
step
of
implementing
a
recently
adopted
ordinance
that
lowers
the
speed
limit
from
25
miles
per
hour
on
local
streets.
N
The
ordinance
impacts,
approximately
420
miles
or
70
percent
of
the
city's
public
streets.
Replacing
the
approximately
575
signs
from
25
miles
per
hour
to
20
miles
per
hour
will
continue
into
august
in
order
to
increase
safety
on
city
streets,
while
lowering
the
speed
limit
is
an
important
move.
City
officials
recognize
that
this
is
only
the
first
step
towards
safer
livable
streets.
N
You
may
have
noticed
that
main
street
resurfacing
has
been
going
on
for
the
past
few
weeks.
Prep
work
included,
crack
seal
and
inlays,
and
chip
seal
aggregate
has
now
been
put
down
to
prolong
the
life
of
the
road.
Once
the
seal
has
been
completed.
A
new
striping
pattern
is
put
on
top.
The
new
street
design
includes
going
from
two
lanes
each
way
to
one
lane
each
way,
as
well
as
providing
designated
bike
lanes
separate
from
street
parking.
N
This
project
will
not
only
make
the
road
last
longer,
but
also
will
allow
for
more
bikes
and
slower
traffic
to
easily
navigate
the
route
learn
more
at
the
life
on
state
bikeways
study
website
200,
south
road
reconstruction
continues,
as
our
crews
move,
westward,
you'll
notice,
new
bus
islands
and
curb
bull
bouts
around
900
east.
Our
crews
are
following
the
path
of
a
new
dominion,
gas
line,
installation.
N
R
P
The
city's
been
invested
in
making
impactful
climate
programs
for
over
20
years.
We
have
some
ambitious
climate
goals,
including
including
helping
our
whole
community
go
to
100
renewable
electricity
by
2030..
While
we've
been
focusing
on
the
utility
scale.
With
that
goal,
we
also
recognize
the
importance
of
rooftop
solar.
So
that's
the
solar
that
goes
on
your
your
homes.
P
We've
had
a
lot
of
interest
in
the
program
already,
but
we
will
be
keeping
the
registration,
the
interest
enrollment
form
open
until
september,
2nd
or
until
we
reach
50,
confirmed
contracts.
So
on
that
website,
you
can
see
more
about
the
workshops
that
we
have
coming
up.
We
have
a
whole
list
of
frequently
asked
questions.
P
R
It's
time
now
for
the
history
minute
from
the
late
1960s
to
the
early
1990s.
Canon
films
was
a
major
player
in
the
world
of
low
budget
action
movies
and
martial
arts
films
among
many
other
sorts
in
the
early
1980s.
They
set
their
sights
on
a
growing
interest
in
ninjas
and
released
enter
the
ninja
in
1981
as
they
worked
to
put
together
a
sequel
they
realized,
shooting
in
los
angeles,
might
be
too
expensive.
R
The
utah
film
commission
sprung
into
action
hoping
to
lure
canon
films
to
use
the
state
as
a
cheaper
alternative,
offering
them
incentives
to
film
in
salt
lake
city.
They
assured
canon
that
filming
of
revenge
of
the
ninja
would
not
require
location
fees,
permits
or
union
deals,
cannon
left
at
the
chance
and
began
filming
across
the
city
and
above
it
an
elaborate
fight
scene
was
staged
at
the
old
liberty
park
playground
and
for
two
weeks
the
deadly
finale
was
filmed
atop,
the
american
towers
condominiums
at
44
west
broadway.
R
It
was
two
whole
weeks,
film,
crews
and
helicopters
circled
the
roof
of
the
building,
getting
the
shots
that
would
make
an
iconic
ninja
fight
revenge
of
the
ninja
starred
sho
kasugi,
as
a
man
forced
to
leave
his
home
country
after
a
ninja
attack,
but
finds
himself
in
salt
lake
city,
embroiled
in
the
local
mob
and
drug
trade
that
threatens
his
family.
Naturally,
he
strikes
out
for
revenge
against
these
dark
forces.
R
R
R
Welcome
to
capital
city
news,
your
source
for
staying,
informed
and
engaged
with
salt
lake
city
government,
I'm
your
host
brian
young,
with
salt
lake
city
tv,
for
our
episode.
Today,
we
spoke
with
the
park
rangers
of
the
new
park
ranger
program.
Our
history
minute
is
about
the
bands,
the
monkeys,
but
before
we
get
to
those
we're
going
to
take
a
look
at
our
legislative
update,
our
look
backs
some
public
safety
announcements
and
our
road
construction
update.
N
And
it's
august
29th
meeting
the
city
council
held
their
second
truth
and
taxation
hearing,
as
required
by
state
law
for
the
new
budget.
They
then
adopted
the
final
rate
of
tax
levy
for
all
city
funds,
including
the
library
fund
and
ratified
the
budget
adopted
by
the
council
in
june
2022
to
learn
more
visit,
slc.gov
council.
N
N
Salt
lake
city
mayor
erin
mendenhall,
along
with
several
key
partners,
celebrated
the
completion
of
the
new
harrison
community
garden.
The
garden
is
located
at
700
east
harrison
avenue
just
south
of
liberty
park
as
the
latest
addition
to
salt
lake
city's
green
city
growers
program.
The
harrison
garden
is
run
by
the
non-profit,
wasatch
community
gardens
and
provides
plots
for
as
many
as
50
gardeners
to
grow
vegetables.
N
For
you
know
that
was
grass
that
is
now
a
garden
we're
creating
and
building
a
sense
of
community
that
will
expand
beyond
the
gates
that
you
see
here
and
reach
far
into
the
neighborhoods
and
to
salt
lake
city
residents
interested
in
renting
a
plot
in
their
local
community
garden.
Can
contact
wasatch
community
gardens
at
801
359-2658.
K
N
N
Salt
lake
city
has
begun
installing
20
miles
per
hour.
Speed
limit
signs
throughout
the
city
marking
the
final
step
of
implementing
a
recently
adopted
ordinance
that
lowers
the
speed
limit
from
25
miles
per
hour
on
local
streets.
The
ordinance
impacts,
approximately
420
miles
or
70
percent
of
the
city's
public
streets.
N
N
Highland
drive
and
1100
east
between
I-80
and
1700
south
is
scheduled
to
be
reconstructed
in
2023.
This
corridor
into
sugar
house
is
in
dire
need
of
reconstruction
and
an
update.
You
can
look
at
highlandsoc.org
to
get
more
information
on
the
new
roadway
design,
we'll
be
putting
in
a
multi-use
path.
Road
reconstruction
will
start
summer
of
2023
and
we're
coordinating
with
all
the
other
projects
in
the
area.
Both
private
and
public
2100
south
between
yuma
street
and
1100
east
will
be
getting
a
new
sewer
line.
N
G
F
F
G
B
G
We're
actually
not
police
officers,
so
we
won't
be
writing
any
tickets.
We
will
be
our.
Our
primary
goal
is
to
promote
voluntary
compliance
through
education.
So
if
we
do
see
somebody
breaking
a
rule
or
not
not
complying,
then
we're
just
going
to
go
up
to
them
and
remind
them
of
what
the
rules
are,
but
we
won't
be
writing
any
tickets.
The.
B
Park
ranger
program
is
a
response
to
a
growing
salt
lake
city.
That
has
a
lot
of
diverse
different
issues,
and
that
means
that
we
need
a
lot
of
diverse
approaches
to
deal
with
modern
issues.
So
our
role
is
voluntary
compliance.
A
lot
of
the
stuff
that
happens
in
our
parks
doesn't
need
law
enforcement
when
it
does,
we
can
reach
out
to
them
and
we
urge
people
in
our
parks
that,
if
something
is
an
emergency,
still
call
the
police
right.
That
is
their
job.
B
B
Here,
stuff
with
you
know,
people
at
the
dog
park
or
something
like
that
dogs
off
leash.
Those
issues,
don't
really
necessarily
need
police
attention,
but
there
it's
a
really
good
opportunity
for
us
to
give
to
spread
education
and
to
kind
of
like
share
the
guidelines.
Please
say
hello
when
we're
in
the
parks
wave
us
down.
If
you
need
us
or
if
you
don't
just
come,
say
hi
chat
us
up.
R
It's
time
again
to
take
a
look
back
at
the
history
of
salt
lake
city
in
1968,
the
monkeys
were
one
of
the
most
popular
musical
acts
in
the
world.
To
that
point,
all
of
their
albums
had
reached
number
one
in
the
united
states
and
their
hit
television
show
had
just
wrapped
up
airing
its
second
and
final
season.
R
R
the
monkeys
came
to
town,
visited
radio
stations
and
prepared
for
their
concert
originally
scheduled
to
be
shot
at
lagoon.
Unfortunately,
technical
difficulties
caused
a
last-minute
venue
change
and
they
ended
up
in
the
valley
music
hall
playing
to
4
000
screaming
fans,
even
though
another
5
000
were
still
lined
up
at
lagoon.
R
The
monkeys
recorded
mike
nesmon's
original
song
circle
sky
there
on
the
stage
in
the
round,
and
they
played
it
numerous
times
for
the
cameras.
Then
the
monkeys
traveled
up
to
lagoon
and
did
a
free
30-minute
show
for
everyone
waiting
there
to
see
them
in
the
first
place.
These
were
tiny
shows
compared
to
what
they
were
accustomed
to
usually
filling
arenas
of
10,
000
fans
or
more.
As
for
the
valley,
music
hall,
it
suffered
fire
damage
in
the
70s
and
is
now
known
as
the
bountiful
regional
center.
R
The
concert
version
of
circle
sky
appeared
in
the
final
version
of
head,
though
the
film
ended
up
being
a
critical
failure
and
found
life
as
more
of
a
cult.
Obscurity,
that's
it
for
another
episode
of
capital
city
news.
Remember.
The
best
way
to
stay
engaged
is
to
stay
informed.
You
can
do
that
by
following
us
on
social
media,
at
slc,
gov
subscribing
to
us
on
youtube
or
watching
us
on
channel
17.,
so
reporting
in
from
pioneer
park.
I'm
brian
young.
R
Welcome
to
capital
city
news,
your
source
for
staying,
informed
and
engaged
with
salt
lake
city
government,
I'm
your
host
brian
young,
with
salt
lake
city
tv.
On
our
episode
today
we
have
an
interview
with
sophia
nicholas
who's,
the
sustainability
deputy
director
to
talk
about
the
solar
salt
lake
city
program
for
our
history
minute.
We
talk
about
revenge
of
the
ninja,
an
infamous
film
shot
here
in
salt
lake
city
before
we
get
to
those.
Let's
take
a
look
at
our
legislative
update,
our
look
back
our
look
ahead
and,
of
course,
our
road
construction
update.
N
At
its
august
16th
meeting
the
city
council
voted
to
add
an
85
million
general
obligation,
bond
for
parks
and
public
lands
projects
to
the
november
ballot,
and
they
also
approved
a
proposed
67.5
million
dollar
sales.
Tax
revenue
bond
voters
in
salt
lake
will
decide
whether
to
approve
the
go
bond
which
is
key
to
implementing
the
reimagined
nature.
Public
lands
master
plan.
N
Only
the
geo
bond
will
be
on
the
november
ballot.
The
city
council
also
heard
a
briefing
on
amendments
to
the
city's
budget
and
the
council
heard
a
report
on
the
2021
election,
which
the
city
conducted
on
a
pilot
basis
as
a
ranked
choice,
voting
without
a
primary
to
learn.
More
visit,
slc.gov
council
salt
lake
city,
mayor
erin,
mendenhall,
salt
lake
city,
school
district
staff
and
students,
uta
staff
and
the
salt
lake
education
foundation
celebrated
an
innovative
new
program
that
will
give
free
transit
passes
to
k-12
students
and
staff
in
salt
lake
city
school
district.
N
S
N
The
passes
will
be
available
beginning
with
the
2022
through
2023
school
year
and
will
be
valid
on
uta
bus
tracks.
The
s
line
street
car
and
uta
on
demand
in
salt
lake
city's,
hot
and
dry
climate
trees
need
to
have
supplemental
watering
to
survive.
It
is
the
responsibility
of
the
adjacent
property
owner
to
water
trees
in
the
park
strip,
salt
lake
city,
urban
forestry
provides
a
watering
bag
with
each
newly
planted
tree.
If
you
need
any
help
figuring
out
tree
watering
and
other
ways
to
help
with
water
conservation
visit.
N
The
city's
website
for
ideas,
salt
lake
city
has
begun
installing
20
miles
per
hour.
Speed
limit
signs
throughout
the
city
marking
the
final
step
of
implementing
a
recently
adopted
ordinance
that
lowers
the
speed
limit
from
25
miles
per
hour
on
local
streets.
The
ordinance
impacts,
approximately
420
miles
or
70
percent
of
the
city's
public
streets.
N
N
You
may
have
noticed
that
main
street
resurfacing
has
been
going
on
for
the
past
few
weeks.
Prep
work
included,
crack
seal
and
inlays,
and
chip
seal
aggregate
has
now
been
put
down
to
prolong
the
life
of
the
road.
Once
the
seal
has
been
completed.
A
new
striping
pattern
is
put
on
top.
The
new
street
design
includes
going
from
two
lanes
each
way
to
one
lane
each
way,
as
well
as
providing
designated
bike
lanes
separate
from
street
parking.
N
This
project
will
not
only
make
the
road
last
longer,
but
also
will
allow
for
more
bikes
and
slower
traffic
to
easily
navigate
the
route
learn
more
at
the
life
on
state
bikeways
study
website
200,
south
road
reconstruction
continues,
as
our
crews
move,
westward,
you'll
notice,
new
bus
islands
and
curb
bull
bouts
around
900
east.
Our
crews
are
following
the
path
of
a
new
dominion,
gas
line,
installation.
N
R
B
B
S
Today,
we
understand
and
we
feel
the
urgency
and
the
sense
of
frustration
that
is
on
our
streets
in
our
neighborhoods
and
with
our
businesses
day
in
and
day
out,
and
the
excitement
that
we
have
to
bring
you
this
six
million
dollar
funding
request,
which
is
would
be
distributed
through
grants
targeted
through
details.
That
andrew
can
tell
you
about,
but
basically
situated
to
support
projects
that
are
already
in
the
queue
and
have
been
through
state
funding
requests
and
some
who
have
received
county
support.
S
These
are
capital
dollars,
not
operational
dollars,
and
they
fit
finally
into
an
answer
that
we've
been
asking
every
april
15th
when
the
winter
shelter
closes
about.
Where
should
people
go
and
part
of
the
focus
of
the
grant?
Rfp
will
be
requesting
that
the
majority
of
the
beds
in
any
of
the
projects
that
apply
would
be
open
by
that
time.
S
That
needs
to
be
solved
so
in
wrapping
up
beside
the
opportunity
of
the
six
million
dollars
to
help
support
the
creation
of
more
than
400
permanent
homes
and
units
for
people,
and
some
of
those
transitional
is
really
the
partnership.
That's
gotten
us
to
this
point
and
as
wayne
nederhauser
said
today,
it's
a
phenomenal
time
where
we
finally
have
the
state
and
the
county
and
the
city
working
together
with
shared
responsibility
and
shared
investment
on
many
solutions,
and
tonight
we're
just
here
to
ask
you
to
support
this.
One
piece
of
housing.
C
I
know
that
in
your
package,
you've
gotten
a
lot
of
details
already.
I
can
go
through
some
of
those
now,
if
that'd
be
helpful
or
if
the
questions
you
have
perhaps
that'd
be
more
efficient.
Mr
chair,
how
would
you
like
to
proceed.
C
So
you'll
see
it's
a
six
million
dollar
request.
Out
of,
I
think
the
cip
fund
of
about
7.1
million
that
was
still
remaining
from
an
allocation
during
the
budget
process.
C
We
are
asking
for
that
those
funds
to
build
into
a
grant
program.
It
would
be
a
very
quick
turnaround
grant
program
because
the
intention
is
to
help
a
housing
program
that
would
focus
on
those
who
are
unsheltered
or
in
the
resource.
Centers,
homeless,
individuals,
individuals
experiencing
homelessness
and
the
intent
is
to
get
as
many
beds
as
possible
available
before
the
end
of
the
winter
cycle
in
april,
and
so
what
you're
talking
about
are
programs
that
are
probably
already
under
construction.
C
Renovating
existing
buildings
most
likely
have
some
foundational
funding
through
other
sources,
and
so
some
of
the
requirements
we
would
anticipate
putting
on
this
would
be.
We
want
to
make
sure
they're
large,
so
at
least
it
says
100
beds
in
there.
C
But
some
of
the
programs
were
we're
aware
of
right
now
would
sort
of
run
the
gamut
between
things
that
are
more
transitional
in
nature.
That
would
be
like
a
medically
vulnerable
kind
of
concept
where
it
may
not
be
permanent
housing
with
subsidies
and
leases
and
those
kind
of
things,
but
still
fill
that
so
niche
to
places
that
are
full
permanent
supportive
housing
with
on-site
case
management.
Those
kind
of
things
where
you
would
live
with
the
lease
in
a
unit,
the
other
pieces
too.
This
would
be
they'd
have
to
be
majority
completed
by
april
april.
C
15Th,
I
think,
is
a
date
in
there,
and
that
means,
if
you
have
a
hundred
or
a
hundred
bed
facility,
making
sure
at
least
50
of
them
are
completed
by
then
we
would
anticipate
that
with
the
programs
that
we're
aware
of
out
there
that
might
apply
for
this
concept.
C
They
would
be
online
much
earlier
than
that,
but
there
are
some
that
are
probably
in
a
rolling
sort
of
phase
where
they
would
do
renovations
on
units
as
they
came
available
throughout
several
months.
So
those
are
some
of
the
guidelines.
We'd
want
to
put
in
place
for
this
project,
because
the
intent
again
is
make
sure
we
get
immediate
access
to
housing
options
for
folks
before
the
end
of
the
winter
time.
That's
a
phase.
C
One
and
you'll
see
there's
a
phase
two
in
here
that
really
incorporates
what
the
council
allocated
during
the
budget
process
of
28.1
million
dollars.
I
believe
that's
between
the
rda
and
can
and
all
those
funds
have
specific
requirements
and
expectations
on
them.
That
would
probably
be
very
good
for
other
programs
or
projects
that
are
a
little
farther
out
in
the
queue,
and
so
you
know
that
today,
during
the
rda
meeting
talked
about
the
nofa
has
been
rolled
out.
That's
actually
part
of
that
phase.
C
Two
concept
we
put
forward-
and
you
saw
this-
that's
the
board-
put
on
the
expectations
of
what
else
money
would
go
towards,
but
then
we'd
also
see
other
programs.
Perhaps
in
that
phase
two
they
were
getting
federal
tax
credits
that
have
not
been
started
yet
because
they
need
to
do
environmental
work
on
ground
or
they
do
purchase
things.
There's
a
lot
of
other
programs
that
could
come
on
sort
of
that
next
phase
into
next
summer.
Next
year
and
the
year
after.
S
So
collectively
this
would
be
about
26
million
dollars
between
the
20.1
you
approved
in
the
budget,
six
million
now
from
cip
if
it's
approved,
and
that
is
a
lot
more
than
we've
ever
done
in
a
single
year.
Even
looking
back
to
the
21
million
through
the
rda
years
ago,
we
didn't
end
up,
we
reserved,
I
think,
4.5
or
4.2
of
that
for
areas
of
high
opportunity
and,
as
you
know,
some
of
that
money
is
still
in
the
coffers,
because
the
difficulty
in
distributing
it.
S
K
Thank
you,
mayor
and
andrew
I'm
really
excited
about
the
investment
that
we're
making
in
affordable
housing
this
year.
That's
so
incredibly
important,
probably
more
important
now
than
it
has
ever
been
because
of
how
expensive
housing
is
now
compared
to
how
where
it's
been.
K
My
question
is
related
to,
and
I
get
the
the
reason
why
and
the
the
but
the
april
requirement,
and
I
think
that
you,
the
the
question,
is,
does
that
april
requirement
put
mean
that
the
money,
the
six
million
dollars,
is
only
going
to
go
to
those
projects
that
are
possibly
going
to
happen
anyway,
and
would
our
six
million
dollars
be
better
utilized
for
projects
that,
like
actually
wouldn't
happen,
because
a
project
that's
going
to
be
open
by
april,
to
me
feels
like
a
project
that's
really
far
along
in
the
planning
process
and
has
other
funding?
K
S
Yeah,
the
the
20.1
million
that
you
approved
in
the
budget
process
is
great
for
those
kind
of
projects
that
are
still
being
contemplated,
they're
still
putting
together
their
capital
stacks
and
they
may
not
even
have
begun
the
rezone
process
or
other
thresholds
that
they'll
have
to
cross
that
there's
a
lot
of
money
available
for
that
and
it's
and
it's
even
just
within
this
fiscal
year.
So
this
six
million
and
andrew
can
talk
about
the
specifics
of.
S
C
What
we
do
know,
though,
is
that
I'll
say
one
project
is
looking
to
get
enough
of
the
capital
in
its
bank
before
it
makes
the
acquisition,
which
is
important
so
that
every
bit
of
this
counts,
so
they
asked
for
the
state
for
money.
They
asked
the
county
for
money.
They
got
that's
the
city
for
money,
they're,
counting
on
those
to
get
to
that
threshold.
C
They
could
get
it
somewhere
else,
but
it
might
take
them
longer
into
the
year.
We
may
not
see
that
to
the
mayor's
point.
Another
one
may
be
phasing
in
renovation
of
rooms,
and
so
they
may
keep
renovating
rooms
until
they
get
enough
money,
but
they
may
run
out
and
we
get
not
as
many
units
per
se,
and
so
those
are
the
things
that
perhaps
they
may
do
fine
without
the
city
investment,
but
with
the
city
investment,
they
could
do
guaranteed
more
more
quickly.
S
I'll
add
from
a
service
perspective
as
well
we're
hoping
that
these
units
will
be
able
to
serve
some
of
the
currently
chronically
homeless
population
and
those
who
say
no
to
congregate,
facilities
and
end
up
staying
on
the
streets
through
winter,
for
example,
once
when
we,
when
we
are
able
to
to
have
people
come
in
for
winter
shelter,
the
transition
into
their
own
unit
of
permanent
housing
is
far
easier
than
if
they
have
to
exit
the
winter.
Shelter
begin
living
on
the
streets
full
time
again
and
then
be
found
and
brought
back
in
that.
K
Makes
sense,
I
guess
I
would
just
say-
and
I
don't
know
how
it's
written
exactly
in
the
budget
amendment,
but
I
would
advocate
for
flexibility
for
your
team
to
say
you
know:
here's
where
here's
all
the
applications
that
came
in
this
one's
not
going
to
be
done
by
april,
but
it's
really
a
much
better
use
of
our
money.
I
would
want
you
to
have
that
flexibility
to
make
that
decision.
K
Of
course,
if
it's
a
project
that
really
does
need
a
gap
and
really
shows
that
and
could
be
done
by
april,
then
that
was
where
we
should
put
the
priority,
but
I
wouldn't
want
to
put
it
as
a
to
your
point
with
the
nofa
for
high
opportunity
zones
put
put
that
as
a
restriction
that
makes
it
hard
to
find
the
projects
that
fit.
But
it
sounds
like
you
know
that
there
are
plenty
of
projects
that
would
fit.
So
maybe
that's
a
it's
a
moot
point.
C
Yeah
and
the
the
grant
program
itself
is
important
to
us,
because
we
want
that
level
as
quickly
as
we
want
to
turn
the
money
away
around.
We
want
to
make
sure
we're
vetting
them
the
state's
vetted
a
lot
of
programs
in
their
process,
but
for
the
accountability
for
our
citizens.
C
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
eyes
on
the
financials,
all
their
pro
formers,
all
those
kind
of
things,
and
therefore
we
have
some
assurances
so
that
when
we
put
a
contract
together,
we
know
we're
going
to
get
particularly
when
we're
trying
to
focus
on
unsheltered
individuals
in
this
city.
When
we
put
money
into
a
project,
as
you
all
know,
from
the
rda
side,
we
can
ask
certain
concessions
and
important
pieces
of
that.
So
that's
important
to
us
as
a
city.
D
So
I
have
spoken
about
this
at
length
with
both
of
you
and
I
know
the
questions
that
we'll
be
getting
council
member
poi
and
I
will
be
getting
in
our
emails
and
our
text
messages
as
soon
as
you
know,
we're
done
discussing
this
are
things
along
the
lines
of
west
side
right
along.
We
saw
where
the
state
is
targeting
their
investment
and
even
though
it
technically
straddles
two
districts.
D
The
way
it
is
until
the
construction
is
done
and
we
can
open
these
units
and
then
the
secondary
thing
of
it
feels
like
we're,
concentrating
deeply
affordable
in
one
area
of
the
city
that
already
suffers
from
food
deserts
that
already
suffers
from
schools
under
stress
and
all
of
those
other
communal
issues,
and
if
we
want
to
be
the
transformative
city
government
that
we
all
want
to
be,
we
need
to
address
that.
So
I'd
like
to
give
you
both
the
chance.
I
know
we
have
had
individually
lots
of
conversations.
D
B
S
S
It
would
be,
and
so,
as
an
administration
we're
working
on
an
affordable
housing
overlay
conversation,
we
have
financial
money
in
the
game.
We
have
a
redevelopment
project
area,
that's
been
on
north
temple
for
a
long
time,
and
for
all
of
this,
we
still
haven't
been
able
to
transform
the
reality
of
north
temple
and
of
much
of
the
area
surrounding
that.
S
So
I
want
you
to
know
that.
I
feel
that,
and
that
is
a
huge
part
of
my
work
every
day
and
andrew's
as
well,
we're
not
going
to
give
up
and
we
look
at
property
opportunities
that
rocky
mount
power
holds
with
their
100
acre
district.
There
we
look
at
the
investment
fund
we
put
together
as
an
rda
for
catalytic
investment
and
transformative
opportunities
around
north
temple.
I
look
at
the
fair
park
and
that
incredible
amount
of
land
and
how
much
ownership
the
state
has
for
state
offices
along
north
temple.
S
S
That's
playing
out
in
three
or
four
cities
concentrated
along
the
around
the
state
of
utah,
and
we
are
one
of
those
and
to
recognize
what
the
projects
are,
that
the
state
just
funded
with
the
27.5,
the
55,
all
together,
55
million
the
state,
the
county,
no
city
said:
oh,
we
have
a
project.
These
are
private
operators.
These
are
non-profit
organizations,
these
are
housing
developers.
S
S
The
market
still
plays.
Those
properties
are
easier
to
acquire
the
ones
that
came
onto
the
list.
So
it's
it's
a
very
difficult
thing
to
balance
for
us,
but
I
want
you
to
know-
and
I
want
all
of
our
west
side
residents-
to
know
that
whatever
that
tool
is
we're
going
to
find
it
and
then
we're
going
to
lean
with
all
of
our
might
on
it.
D
Thank
you,
and
I
will
testify
that
the
conversations
you
and
I
have
had
privately,
even
when
we
have
to
breathe
deeply
through
those
conversations
with
each
other
bear
out
that
truth
and
andrew.
Thank
you
for
surrendering
your
standing
meeting
times
to
invite
in
non-traditional
entities
like
economic
development,
rda
planning
to
make
sure
that
we
are
looking
at
everything
in
our
tool
belt
to
make
sure
that,
while
still
looking
for
those
long
term,
we're
not
neglecting
these
immediate
issues
or
the
intermediate
things
that
we
can
do
to
to
make
sure
that
we
thrive.
Thank
you.
C
The
efforts
that
were
put
into
ensuring
that
didn't
happen
paid
off
quite
well
and
that
restaurant
did
even
better
post
than
it
did
pre.
There's
a
lot
of
reasons
for
that,
and
I
think
that's
a
good
template
for
us
as
a
city
with
economic
development,
housing
and
the
council
to
mimic
and
to
build
off
of
for
other
areas
upon
north
temple.
I'm
bringing
north
temple
up
because
the
state
did
fund
at
least
two
projects
along
that
corridor.
F
Thank
you.
So
this
is
this
grant
program's
going
to
be
run
by
can.
C
F
So
a
few
years
ago-
and
it's
not
I'd
not
bashing
any
department
at
all,
but
a
few
years
ago
we
sort
of
had
a
lot
of
philosophical.
Both
of
you
are
on.
The
council
had
a
philosophical
discussion
where
we
kind
of
decided
like
what
what
department
should
kind
of
do,
what
things
we
weren't
continuously
reinventing
the
wheel
and
I'm
just
curious.
We
already
have
like
the
rda
is.
F
Is
they
specialize
in
development
and
we
have
all
sorts
of
housing
pots
over
there
and
they
already
have
established
processes
and
rfps
and
have
the
same
align
a
lot
of
the
same
alignment
of
what
we,
as
a
council
and
board,
have
already
talked
about
without
needing
to
kind
of
again
reinvent
the
will.
So
why
not
just
kind
of
fund
one
of
those
pots
that
already
exist
and
then
add
another
criteria,
because
we
know
that
that
money
gets
out
quickly.
We
know
that
again,
there's
processes
developers
know
where
to
go.
S
I
think
efficiency
is
the
reason
that
we're
there,
because
this
is
existing
money
in
cip
and
instead
of
trying
to
navigate
a
transfer
from
cip
to
rda,
to
administer
the
program
or
the
the
grant
distribution
that
we
just
as
we'll
be
distributing
12
million
of
the
hud
dollars
through
can
for
affordable
housing
this
year
and
the
6
million
through
the
nofa
with
rda.
That's
out
there
they're
doing
their
separate,
affordable
housing
work
this
one
already
being
in
cip
just
fit
with.
Can
unless
there's
another
reason.
I
don't
know
about
an
angela
prices
here
as
well.
C
Sure
we
worked
with
tammy
hunsucker
in
cannes
to
pull
this
together.
C
Two
probably
reasons
primarily
the
first
one
is
because
this
is
really
focused
on
folks
experiencing
homelessness
and
existing
programs
that
we're
going
to
want
to
track
to
make
sure
that
the
right
fo,
the
folks
who
are
experiencing
homelessness,
get
into
the
units
instead
of
just
back
into
the
system
that
we're
not
sure
who
gets
in
those
units.
There's
a
tracking
mechanism
that
heart
through
can
and
the
state
can
help
to
ensure
we
get
the
movement
of
folks
who
are
camping
or
in
the
resource
centers
into
those
units.
That's
the
primary
reason.
C
C
But
I
think
there's
still
to
your
point,
a
good
discussion
to
be
had
about
where
we
choose
to
put
certain
funds
for
development,
and
we
are
having
discussions
between
hand
and
can
and
all
of
our
housing
funds
and
our
master
list
of
housing
units
and
tracking
those.
So
I
think
that
discussion
is
still
going
forward
with
us
to
make
sure
it's
unified
and
we're
not
at
odds
with
each
other.
That
was
the
rationale
for
this
one.
F
Okay,
my
other
question
is
whether
or
not
because
clearly
this
seems
like
an
expedited,
as
is
stated,
an
expedited
idea
of
getting
this
money
out
there
so
and
if
this
may
go
to
katie
and
the
legal
side
of
things
once
an
application
comes
out,
does
that
come
back
to
the
council
for
approvals?
C
I
think
that
my
intent
would
be
yes,
because
this
is
one
of
those
times
where
we
are
expediting
things
and
trying
to
make
things
happen
quickly.
There's
a
balancing
act
to
be
had
between
approval
of
things
in
the
council
sort
of
approving
everything,
but
I
think
we
want
to
make
sure
that
you
are
aware
of
what
is
being
proposed.
You
feel
comfortable
with
it,
because
there
are
implications
that
we
brought
up
earlier
about,
if
it's
on
say
a
north
temple
court
or
there's
other
concerns.
F
Yes,
I
imagine
that's
true
once
it's
approved
that
goes
back
to
the
administration
of
course,
but
and
then
my
final
question
I
may
be
quiet,
we
don't
know
yet
is:
oh
you
mentioned
that
as
we
know,
but
just
to
remind
me
that
the
state
approved
funding
along
north
temple
for
two
projects.
When,
when
did
that
happen
again,
I
can't
remember.
S
Friday
afternoon,
okay,
thanks
and
to
the
to
your
middle
question,
I
know
blake
thomas
is
on.
I
think
tammy
might
be
in
the
room-
I
don't
know,
but
the
process,
the
timeline
that
can's
looking
at
I'm
happy
to.
If
council
staff
doesn't
know
what
that
timeline
looks
at.
Let
us
get
that
to
you
and
that
way,
chair
and
vice
chair
can
look
at
maybe
holding
a
spot
on
an
agenda
when
we
plan
to
have
the
results
back
to
bring
to
the
council
yeah
happy
to
coordinate
with
that.
A
C
We
anticipate
from
the
projects
we've
seen
out
there
that
might
apply
for
this,
that
more
than
400
units
could
be
made
available
by
by
april
by
mid
april.
J
Chair
very
quickly,
I
it
was
this
morning
seeing
the
county
and
represented
from
the
state
and
the
city
together
was
moving,
and
I
told
this
to
a
few
people
there,
because
it
reinforces
the
the
reality
that
this
is
not
a
salt
lake
city
problem
alone.
This
is
a
big
big
task
and
a
big
challenge
is
a
human
crisis
that
we're
dealing
with
and
it
reflects
in
our
streets.
J
The
most-
and
I
seen
this
this
you
know,
group
of
people
saying
yes
select
city
is
overburdened
and
we
need
to
work
together
to
solve.
This
was
moving
and
I
loved
being
there,
even
though
there
were
rain
on
us
a
little
bit
and
it
was
hot
for
a
minute
too
and
cold.
J
It
was
all
the
things,
but
I
I
do
have
a
question
about
holding
the
providers
accountable
and-
and
I'm
not
you
know,
I
want
to
make
sure
that
the
work
is
done
correctly
and
there
is
not
you
know
what
standards
are
we
gonna
hold
them?
You
know
to
to
say
you're
using
this
money
wisely.
J
You
are
maximizing
these
dollars,
you
are,
you
know
not
having
gaps
or
whatever
it
is,
and
you
know
what
sort
of
reporting
are
they
having
back
to
our
city
and
our
to
our
taxpayers
and
arguably
to
the
many
neighbors
that
I
mean
they
email
me
and
text
me
every
day
about
what
they're
seeing
in
their
neighborhoods,
so
how?
How
do
we
hold
them
accountable
and
and
push
them
to
do
even
better?
J
S
Transitional
sea
change:
it
feels
to
not
stand
alone
at
a
microphone
to
talk
about
homelessness
and
to
have
the
state
and
the
county
leaderships
standing
there
and
saying
that
yeah.
We
all
agree
what
we
need
to
do
together
on
this
issue
today
and
and
to
have
evidence
like
our
mitigation
funding
and
the
winter
shelter
process.
That
just
happened,
we're
in
the
midst
of
change
of
recognizing
the
shared
responsibility
on
it.
So
because,
as
andrew
said,
a
lot
of
the
projects
that
we
we
are
expecting
will
be
interested
in
applying
for
these
grant
funds.
S
We've
already
watched,
go
through
the
state
process
and
likely
have
some
state
funding.
The
state
will
be
tracking
their
compliance,
which
is
a
really
unusual
and
nice
thing
for
us.
Typically,
when
we're
participating
in
deeply
affordable
housing,
we
may
not
have
that
oversight
component
taken
care
of
with
the
state.
So
the
timeline
part,
though
the
majority
open
by
april
15th,
is
not
in
the
state's
funding
guideline
or
requirements,
but
it
would
be
in
hours.
S
So
I'm
going
to
let
andrew
talk
about
how
we
might
be
able
to
do
that.
Compliance
because.
C
C
Yeah,
the
mayor
is
right
that
if,
if
one
of
these
projects
that
apply
for
this
grant
was
awarded
money
through
the
state
contract,
the
state
office
for
homeless
services
has
a
requirement
that
they
would
comply
with
their
expectations.
So
there's
some
good
monitoring
there
that
we're
working
with
them
on
and
coordinating
through
the
county
has
a
similar
process
if
they're
getting
county
funding.
C
So
part
of
the
show
today,
council,
member
about
having
city
county
and
state
together,
was
to
show
the
unity,
but
also
it
demonstrates,
what's
happening
behind
the
scenes:
staff,
wise
of
understanding,
each
other's
funding
sources,
what
the
priorities
are
for
each
entity
and
how
do
those
match
up,
and
how
do
we
work
together
so
that
we
can
be
more
efficient
across
the
board
in
this
one
of
the
things?
That
is,
a
city
that
we
are
still
growing
into
and
we're
gonna
have
to
get
better
at
this.
C
C
So
we
need
to
be
one
of
the
arguments
that's
been
made
about
what
the
city's
role
should
be
has
been
well,
if
the
city
just
does
all
of
it.
Won't
everybody
just
keep
coming
to
the
city
right,
never
ending,
process,
it's
possible,
but
what
we're
trying
to
get
to
now,
based
on
some
best
practices
elsewhere,
is
when
we
talk
about
a
rapid
intervention
team,
resolving
camps
on
a
by
name
basis.
C
The
reason
we
have
that
in
place
is
because
those
teams
know
them
on
individual
basis
and
by
name
and
we
can
ensure
that
those
folks
are
getting
into
the
units.
So
we
said
this
is
part
of
our
planning
process
that
rapid
intervention
team
we
started
a
couple
months
ago
was
in
preparation
for
this
very
point.
J
And
I-
and
let
me
finish
with
this-
the
one
of
the
things
and
you
know
the
ramadan
turning
into
an
overflow
I
mean,
I
think
we
were
all
worried.
I
mean
you
know
my
neighbors
were
worried,
but
it
worked
out
and
there
were
not
that
many
impacts
and
it
was
an
impressive
amount
of
work
to
make
that
happen.
But
there
are
some
takeaways
from
that
project
about
it
took
months
sometimes
to
staff
and
having
multiple
places
to
staff
was
a
problem
and
we
waste
wasted.
J
We
we
miss
a
lot
of
opportunities
to
house
people,
because
we
didn't
have
the
staff
and
by
we
I
mean
I'm
talking
about
the
service
providers
and
I'm
hoping
something
similar
might
still
happen
because
of
the
paid,
the
the
wages
that
they
are
receiving
because
of
the
market.
J
Because
of
you
know,
there
is
not
that
many
people
on
that
on
those
fields
and
for
whatever
other
reasons,
so
I'm
a
little
worried
about
that
that,
hopefully
we
can
tell
us
quickly
if
this
is
happening
or
tell
the
state
quickly
and
see
if
there
is
something
that
we
need
to
do
to
help,
and
I
don't
know
what
that
is.
But
I
worry
that
we
are
gonna
be
allocating
this
money
and
it's
gonna,
we're
gonna
suffer
the
same.
J
You
know
hopefully
not
and
I'm
you
know,
I'm
being
a
little
pessimistic
right
now
and
I'm
again
I
started
very
positive
about
this
and
I'm
happy
and
I'm
excited,
but
I
hope
that
we
can
find
the
same
errors
or
same
mistakes
or
the
same
and
recognize
the
same
problems
faster
than
last
time
and
again,
those
are
no
mistakes
that
we
made.
There's
some
mistakes
of
the
you
know
of
the
situation
that
we
were
in.
But
that
is
my
final
comment.
J
B
Yeah
also,
I
felt
like
I
agree
with
you
and
your
while
I
was
standing
there
during
the
press
conference
feeling
really
validated
for
the
fact
that
you
know
having
been
on
the
council
since
bringing
the
new
shelters
online,
the
closing
of
the
previous
shelter
and
their
own
home
and
us.
Having
said
for
so
long
that
this
is
a
bigger
problem.
B
So
the
question
I
have
is
actually
not
that
dramatic
and
it
was
like.
I
was
leading
up
to
something
really
big
right
there,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we
have
the
numbers
right
because
we
were
saying
400
beds
and
then
it
was
400
units
and
then
100
units.
So
it
says
100
units
in
here
by
april
it
says
100.
C
Yeah
so
we're
putting
it
out
there
as
that
transitional
to
permanent
supportive
housing
sort
of
continuum,
because
in
some
traditional
they'll
not
have
a
full
source
studio
apartment
it'll
be
a
bed
in
an
individual
room,
but
those
from
shared
things
in
a
full
studio
apartment
itself
contained
with
a
lease
and
everything
else
they
function.
C
Similarly,
in
the
sense
that
you
have
an
indoor
place,
that's
indefinite
right
and
some
privacy,
but
that's
why
we
say
beds
versus
units.
So
there
could
be
a
continuum
there
can.
F
I
L
B
I
S
B
Got
it,
and
well
anyway,
thanks
for
clarifying
that,
thanks
for
all
the
work
and
to
get
us
here,
I
really
hope
that
you
know
we've
been
doing
this
long
enough,
that
I
don't
know
that
we
want
to
say
that
the
problem's
fixed
or
anything
like
that,
but
like.
C
Yeah
we
a
couple
of
the
projects,
the
initial
numbers
would
say
100
or
somewhere
in
that
lane,
and
they
dropped
a
few
for
some.
I
know
at
least
one
dropped
a
few
for
like
staff
office
space
for
services.
So
that's
why
we
said
to
be
safe.
It
might
be
easier
to
hit
a
90
sort
of
threshold
than
100,
but
I
don't
know
that.
I
think
the
mayor
asked,
maybe
if
they
say
attorney,
would
have
a
opinion
on
the
language
there.
S
T
E
You
I
echo
everybody's
comments.
I
I
think,
like
chris
says
it
was
validating,
because
I
know
we've
been
talking
about
this
for
a
long
time.
So,
finally,
mayor
you've
been
able
to
be
the
glue
with
the
state
and
the
county.
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
that
because
it's
been
a
long
time
coming
and
finally,
we
got
some
support
from
the
other
cities,
as
it
was
demonstrated
today
with
mill,
creek,
stepping
up
and
the
other
cities
as
well.
In
terms
of
us.
E
E
Because
of
lack
of
I
mean
there's,
we
we
see
it
every
day
right
now,
when
we're
being
told
that
the
money
that
we
already
gave
away-
it's
not
enough
and
then
also
the
things
that
unfortunately,
there
are
some
projects
that
are
in
district,
four,
that
we
participated
financially
or
we
still
participate
financially,
are
still
problematic
for
the
neighborhoods
and
that's
where
I'm
super
worried
about
that
we're
going
the
same
direction.
E
This
is
a
little
bit
different
like
the
way
we're
doing
it,
but
essentially
we're
because
potentially
these
projects
are
more
advanced
in
that
sense
like
it's
not
in
the
future.
It's
but
again,
I
feel
like
we're
almost
doing
the
same
thing,
and
so
I
am
in
the
fence.
I'm
not
sure
what
to
do.
I
know
there's
when
we
had
a
small
group
meetings
there.
E
There
was
a
proposal,
potentially
that
andrew
talked
about
that.
I
think
it
was
the
mvp
group.
You
know,
and
I'm
not
sure
how
how
far
if
you,
if
you
have
been
able
to
ask
out
there
or
if
the
people
that
are
trying
to
do
that
project
have
been
able
to
ask
for
other
funding
sources.
E
So
maybe
you
know
not
counting
with
the
city
one
in
a
way,
because
I
know
there
are
philanthropists
out
there
that
would
love
to
support
projects
like
this,
especially
like
that
and
then
that
will
free
up
some
of
our
money
to
do
some
more
in
other
areas
that
we
can
use
for
homelessness
as
well,
but
other
things
that
we
probably
need
to
help
as
well
on.
So
that's,
maybe
I'm
not
only
in
on
all
of
the
you
know
projects.
E
C
I
I
think
that
it's
when
we
talk
about
private
developers
and
developing
housing
yeah
the
market
has
a
lot
of
fluctuations.
We
know
from
longer
projects
that
the
longer
their
projects
open
the
more
likely
that
inflation
other
supply
issues
will
cause
costs
to
rise
right
yeah.
One
of
the
hopes
is,
with
a
compressed
time
frame
of
six
to
nine
months.
C
That's
less
likely,
but
part
of
the
reason
for
doing
the
grant
and
vetting
the
the
proposals
is
to
look
at
the
numbers
from
ourselves
as
well
and
have
some
more
assurance
that
we
feel
comfortable
within
a
reason
on
that,
to
the
second
point
about
previous
experiences,
with
permanent
support
of
housing
projects
or
projects
that
have
not
seemed
as
peaceful
at
times
as
we
would
have
hoped.
C
I
think
that
we've
gone
back
at
your
request
actually
to
ask
about
what
further
needs
are
at
certain
projects
and
see
if
the
city
can
in
non-monetary
or
other
ways,
help
to
promote
or
help
them
get
what
they
need,
whether
it's
from
the
private
market
or
us
working
with
them
on
that.
So
I
think
that's
a
legitimate
concern.
C
F
Quick
question,
so
I
was
doing
some
math
and
I'm
not
very
good
at
math
and,
like
every
lawyer
would
say,
that's
why
we
went
into
love
because
we
don't
do
math,
but
if
we,
if
the
highest
limit,
is
2.5
million
it
from
what
I
looked
at,
it
would
only
fund
like
let's
say
they
need
whatever
projects
need.
We
go
to
the
max
of
that
2.5.
F
That
would
only
fund
2.2.4
projects
which
would
be
200
beds
and
so
curious
as
if
we
lowered
that
threshold
just
a
little
bit
even
to
like
2
million,
then
we're
increasing
the
opportunity
to
increase
the
amount
that
we
could
have
more
beds.
F
S
C
But
within
that
I
think,
there's
some
flexibility
for
us
to
make
some
decisions
once
we
see
who's
applying
and
how
many
beds,
if
it's
a
proportional
amount
per
bed,
a
200
bed
facility
versus
100
bed
facility
or
something
in
between
it-
does
leave
some
flexibility
based
on
what
we
see
from
the
funding
stack
of
each
of
these
projects.
That
might
apply
so
it
could
max
out
at
two
and
a
half,
but
it
might
be
just
three
or
two
something
like
that
or
more.
F
C
I
think,
knowing
if
your
intention
might
be
to
have
maybe
lowering
it
to
maximize
the
number
of
beds.
I
think
we
could
definitely
take
that
in
as
far
as
your
intent
when
you,
if
you
vote
for
this.
K
Just
the
2.5
is
the
maximum
per
project
and
the
100
or
90
is
the
minimum
number
of
units
per
project.
So
one
project
at
2.5
could
have
more
beds
right.
It's
like
a
larger
so
so.
C
A
C
D
So
I'm
not
as
a
pot
of
six
million
at
these
rates,
we're
not
going
to
have
like
20
projects
that
we're
going
to
give
to
bur.
It's
likely
that
we'll
have
a
smaller
number,
especially
with
the
timeline
turnaround.
D
C
C
I
think
in
the
application
process
we
may
ask
for
something
similar
that
might
be
helpful
to
get
some
of
the
details
that
way,
if
that
might
satisfy
the
same
intent.
D
C
S
Guess
I'm
curious
also
now
that
you
say
that
about
the
the
way
that
we
in
a
different
realm,
organize
the
homeless
resource
centers,
to
have
some
ongoing
accountability
to
the
city
about
complaints
received.
And
it's
a
that's
a
it's
a
different
scenario:
it's
not
housing,
but
something
that
wouldn't
require
their
upfront
legwork,
while
they're
putting
their
capital
stack
in
the
and
opening
the
doors,
but
well.
S
D
Yeah,
like
I
love
the
people
who
are
stepping
into
the
service
gap
for
us
and
are
willing
to
scale
their
models
to
to
reach
the
crisis,
but
any
of
us
who
have
ever
scaled
anything
before
know
that
that's
a
really
dangerous
time
for
quality
control
for
those
sorts
of
things
and
so
kind
of
doing
things
that
show
our
unsheltered
constituents
that
we're
concerned
about
their
ongoing
welfare.
It's
not
just
getting
a
roof
over
your
head
that
we're
concerned
about
and
something
that
shows
the
communities
that
we're
concerned
about
your
long-term
development.
D
S
A
B
B
So
this
is
for
the
council
to
consider
an
ordinance
amending
the
growing
salt
lake
implementation
plan
in
2022.
The
state
legislature
passed
a
amendment
to
require
that
an
implementation
plan
be
added
to
the
city's
annual
moderate
income
housing
plan,
and
they
require
that
this
be
adopted
by
october
1st,
the
department
of
community
and
neighborhoods
sitting
here
has
developed
this
new
implementation
plan,
which
will
supplement
the
city's
moderate
income
housing
plan,
which
is
part
of
the
growing
salt
lake
of
growing
salt
lake
city,
which
is
the
city's
existing
five-year
housing
plan.
B
So
it's
sort
of
a
russian
doll
of
plans
and
how,
in
housing,
the
planning
commission
unanimously
recommended
adoption
of
the
proposed
change
on
july
27
2022
and
the
full
growing
salt
lake
city
plan
is
scheduled
to
be
replaced
by
an
updated
housing
plan
in
early
2023.
B
B
It
feels
very
timely
that
we're
following
the
homeless
budget
amendment
discussion
as
the
implementation
plan,
is
really
an
effort
by
the
state,
through
negotiations
with
the
league
and
the
property
rights
coalition
to
hold
cities
accountable
to
develop,
affordable
housing.
And
it's
not
just
a
salt
lake
city
issue.
But
it's
a
state
wide
issue,
and
so
this
is
a
little
bit
challenging
for
us
when
we
were
in
our
last
year
of
our
housing
plan
to
have
to
quickly
create
an
implementation
plan
for
a
plan
that
expires
this
year.
B
And
so
we
are
asking
for
a
briefing
this
evening
on
the
amendment
to
growing
slc,
with
an
action
next
week
to
adopt
the
implementation
plan
so
that
we
can
be
in
compliance
with
state
requirements
by
october
1st.
In
order
to
be
in
compliance
or
once
we're
in
compliance,
then
we're
able
to
be
considered
for
state
funding
like
tiff,
ttif
and
arpa
funds.
So
it's
incredibly
important
that
we're
in
compliance
I'll
also
just
say
from
a
legislative
perspective.
B
I'm
in
meetings
every
day
talking
about
the
bills
that
we're
going
to
be
running
in
the
upcoming
session
and
there's
a
lot
of
conversation
happening
around
both
incentives
and
penalties
around
moderate
income
housing
plans.
So
it's
imperative
that
you
know
we,
as
the
capital
city,
are
setting
an
example
here,
but
also
that
we're
in
compliance
with
those
state
requirements
and
obviously
we
all
know
the
need
that
we
have
for
affordable
housing
in
the
city.
So
with
that
I'll
turn
the
time
over
to
rudy.
F
T
D
T
Up
and
you'll
get
your
check
for
the
hour.
Thank
you
for
having
us
thank
you
for
enjoying
this
long
day
and
you
can
advance
the
next
slide.
T
As
angela
and
allison
mentioned,
growing
slc,
which
is
our
current
five-year
housing
plan,
is
in
its
final
year.
It
will
expire
at
the
end
of
the
fiscal
year.
So
at
the
end
of
june
and
in
the
last
legislative
session,
the
legislature
passed
hb
462,
which
made
changes
to
the
requirements
of
moderate
income
housing
plans.
One
of
those
is
to
have
an
implementation
element
included
by
october
1st
of
2022.
T
T
We
are
also
in
the
process.
Engagement
has
already
started
for
a
new
housing
plan
which
we're
calling
housing
slc
we've
been
doing
a
bunch
of
work
to
engage
the
public
on
that
and
so
far
it's
been
great.
I
also
want
to
mention
that
the
new
housing
plan
is
is
working
in
tandem
with
the
thriving
in
place.
T
Effort
and
the
recommendations
that
come
out
of
thriving
in
place
will
be
included
into
the
new
housing
plan,
so
they
will
be
kind
of
one
in
the
same
thing
going
forward
and
during
all
of
that,
we
will
follow
resolution
14
of
2020
to
make
sure
that
you're
included
in
the
process
throughout
kind
of
every
step
of
the
way.
T
And
then
I
also
just
want
to
say
we're
hoping
that
the
new
housing
plan
be
adopted
before
the
budget
season
kicks
off,
so
that
any
any
financial
kind
of
investments
that
need
to
take
place
for
that
housing
plan
to
be
successful
can
be
rolled
into
the
budget,
and
we
don't
have
to
do
budget
amendments
kind
of
moving
forward.
But
it
can
all
be
kind
of
a
fluid
fluid
motion.
T
Can
you
advance
the
next
slide?
Please
so
hb
462
has
a
couple
of
key
requirements
that
we
need
to
be
mindful
of
one
of
those
is
the
implement
implementation
plan
requirement,
which
is
why
we're
all
here
and
in
that?
We
because
we
we're
a
city
with
a
fixed
transit
or
fixed
rail
public
transit
station.
T
We
we
have
to
have
a
minimum
of
four
strategies
in
the
implementation
plan
in
order
to
qualify
for
the
funding
that
angela
mentioned,
and
if
we
want
to
go
above
and
beyond,
we
can
have
at
least
six
strategies
that
we
consider
and
that
will
make
us
eligible
for
priority
consideration
for
that
funding.
T
T
T
So
the
work
that
we've
done
so
far
at
the
website
shown
on
the
slides
that
has
been
up
since
the
beginning
of
june
for
people
to
provide
comment
and
to
learn
more
about
what
we're
doing
all
of
the
items
in
the
implementation
plan
have
that
have
been
recommended
in
the
implementation
plan
have
gone
through
separate
engagement
processes
and
or
they
are
existing
programs.
That
kind
of
the
city
runs
every
year,
and
so
nothing
should
be
new
to
the
council,
that's
being
implemented
or
that's
being
recommended
for
consideration
and
the
strategies
include
funding.
T
We
included
12
strategies
instead
of
the
required
six,
so
we
do
have
some
flexibility
there
and
then
the
process
for
this
we
you
know
had.
As
was
mentioned,
we
had
a
planning
commission
hearing
on
july
27th
with
a
favorable
recommendation.
T
Tonight
we
have
this
briefing
and
next
week
we'll
have
a
public
hearing
and
potential
action,
and
then
we
just
need
this
adopted
before
october
1st
2022
to
be
in
compliance
with
state
law.
Next
slide,
please.
T
None
of
them
are
new
they're,
all
things
that
the
city
has
been
working
on
or
is
currently
doing,
and
I
want
to
point
out
that
items,
g
and
h
which
go
on
to
this
slide,
and
the
next
are
two
that
we
we
can
do
both,
but
we
have
to
do
at
least
one
of
them
in
order
to
to
meet
the
requirements.
T
T
These
just
kind
of
show
some
of
the
things
that
we're
thinking
of
doing,
and
I
want
to
point
out
that
there
is
flexibility
if
the
council
were
to
choose
to
do,
go
a
different
route
and
so
advance
the
next
slide
and
one
of
the
things
you
know-
and
it
was
mentioned
in
the
previous
item,
but
the
20.1
million
that
was
allocated
in
the
budget
this
past
year
is
one
of
those
items
that
will
count
towards
towards
this
implementation
plan.
T
So
this
slide
was
one
that
we
prepared
for
for
everybody
back
in
april
when
we
presented
on
housing
and
what
community
neighborhoods
was
doing.
It
kind
of
it
shows
the
the
process
and
and
where
everything
is
in
the
process,
for
a
number
of
ordinances
that,
if
the
council
were
to
so
choose,
could
be
added
to
this
implementation
plan
or
swapped
out
for
existing
things.
T
So
long,
as
you
know,
we're
still
meeting
the
the
basic
requirements
of
the
statute,
and
with
that,
I'm
we're
happy
to
take
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
F
Thank
you
quick
question
to
remind
myself.
Housing
stability
is
what
used
to
be
hand.
We
changed
the
name.
Okay,
second
thing
is,
I
mean
it
seems
like
because
we're
a
cool
city,
so
many
of
these
things
we
already
in
some
ways,
are
doing
so.
The
implementation
plan
is
sort
of
just
in
some
ways
codifying
if
you
will,
for
lack
of
better
term
right
now
what
we
are
already
doing
within
rda
within
housing
stability.
What
we've
been
doing
for
years.
T
Yes,
we
because
it's
like
it's
essentially
a
nine
month
implementation
plan.
We
didn't
want
to
throw
anything
new
that
was
going
to
be
really
difficult
to
lift.
We
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
were
able
to
accomplish
those
things
and-
and
we
are
doing
a
lot
of
really
great
things
that
are
kind
of
renewed
annually,
so
we
thought
at
least
for
some
of
those
we
just
put
those
right
in
to
because
they
count
as
strategies
so.
B
Yeah
and
that's
a
really
great
question,
the
reason
that
we
added
the
implementation
plan
is
we
really
wanted
it's
really
challenging
with
the
modern
income
housing
plan
and
the
reporting
that
we've
had
over
the
previous
years
to
capture
land
use
decisions
right
because
land
use
decisions
take
a
period
of
time
before
you
start
to
see
development
happen,
that's
responsive
to
that,
and
so
oftentimes
we
hear
from
the
property
rights
coalition
that
cities
aren't
doing
enough.
B
We're
not
zoning
appropriately,
not
necessarily
salt
lake,
but
the
implementation
plan
is
really
us.
You
know
us
being
the
league
coming
together
and
saying:
okay,
let's
put
a
little
bit
more
teeth
behind
our
moderate
income
housing
plans
rather
than
just
having
cities
say
you
know
we
might,
we
might
consider
density.
F
Yeah
and
I
appreciate
all
the
work
angela-
that
you've
done
with
this
and
up
at
the
hill
you're
our
resident
guru
on
this.
This
type
of
legislation
so
really
want
to.
Thank
you
for
all
of
the
work
and
in
some
ways
I
well
in
a
lot
of
ways.
F
I
appreciate
this
because
I
think
it
does
kind
of
help
us
think
forward
for
future
implementations
for
things
we're
not
doing,
but
what
we
could
be
doing
right,
but
at
the
same
time
I
appreciate
that
this
is
a
way
to
finally
get
credit
for
all
the
work
that
we've
been
doing
so
that
we
have
and
the
state
I
think,
and
to
your
point.
So
many
people
don't
realize
how
much
work
salt
lake
city
has
been
doing
over
the
years
and
not
just
the
few
years.
F
I've
been
on
this
council,
but
for
decades,
and
I
appreciate
that
this
kind
of
gives
us
that
opportunity
to
pat
ourselves
on
the
back
a
little
bit
well
still
creating
a
way
for
us
to
continue
thinking
creatively
about
these
issues.
A
A
G
Thanks,
mr
chair,
I've
got
an
an
intro
that
is
not
short,
so
bear
with
me.
G
The
sustainability
department
proposed
a
community
food
assessment
as
part
of
its
fiscal
year,
2023
budget
funded
at
125
000,
the
council
appropriated
the
money
but
held
it
pending
more
information
about
the
program
and
about
the
character
of
the
assessment
and
the
context
of
the
city's
policy
on
master
plan
documents.
Among
a
couple
of
other
questions,
the
administration
indicates
the
assessment
as
a
data
gathering,
effort
or
study
and
not
a
multi-year
planning
document.
In
other
words,
not
the
type
of
document
typically
classified
as
a
master
plan.
G
So
today
the
council
is
considering
whether
the
department
of
sustainability
has
satisfied
the
council's
budget
condition
for
the
food
assessment
funding.
The
department
informs
the
council
that
the
requested
125
000
budget
is
to
complete
the
food
assessment,
which
the
department
again
describes
as
a
data
collection
or
survey
project.
G
G
So,
let's
see
with
that,
mr
chair,
would
you
like
staff
to
walk
through
the
policy
questions
which
might
be
more
involved
than
a
typical
briefing
or
instead,
would
you
like
the
department
to
present
information
on
the
request
before
that.
G
G
The
first
okay,
the
first
the
first
question,
has
to
has
to
do
just
with
release
of
the
of
the
funding
appropriated
the
question
after
that
has
to
do
with
review
and
input
opportunities.
The
council
might
be
interested
in
such
as
a
preview
of
the
formal
scope
for
the
assessment.
Once
it's
fully
developed
again
going
back
to
resolution
14.
This
idea
that
there
are
certain
opportunities
for
council
oversight
and
whether
or
not
the
resolution
applies
strictly,
there
might
still
be
opportunities
for
the
council
to
get
involved,
as
the
scope
is
developed
and
finalized.
G
G
Next,
a
question
about
general
fund
priorities
and
whether
a
place
should
be
made
among
them
for
food
security
work.
It's
not
typically
the
ambit
of
city
governments
to
do
food
security
work
as
council
staff
understands
it,
except
for
this
city
government
of
course,
and
the
time
that
it
has
integrating
this
work
more
into
the
general
fund
might
involve
modifying
existing
priorities.
G
Given
the
limited
nature
of
general
fund
resources,
the
next
question
has
to
do
with
formalizing
the
one
of
the
advisory
boards
the
sustainability
department
utilizes
and
refers
to
in
making
requests
and
recommendations
in
the
food
security
context.
The
board
operates
not
unlike
a
city
board
or
commission,
but
is
not
formalized
the
same
way
in
terms
of
the
way
the
board
is
staffed
and
appointments
are
made.
So
council
members
might
be
interested
in
formalizing
them.
J
J
Go
ahead,
I
mean
this
is
an
important
work
has
been
done
here
by
the
administration,
I'm
sorry
for
interrupting
and
some
of
the
concerns
we
had
at
least
I
had
when
we
were
talking
about
this
during
budget
related
to
the
issue
of
other
other
organizations.
J
Doing
this
work
on
the
notion
of
that
this,
this
allocation
of
money
was
already
decided,
and
so
I
would
like
to
to
propose
a
struggle
that
I
think
puts
our
intent
together
and
that's
motion
number
four
to
support
the
releasing
of
the
125
000
for
the
city
sustainability
department
to
conduct
the
project
with
the
legislative
intent
that
the
department
work
with
other
entities,
doing
food
equity,
work
to
evaluate
and
report
back
to
the
city
council
on
whether
the
future
data
gathering
can
be
accomplished
by
a
regional
or
statewide
government
governmental
entity
to
continue
to
build
the
foundation
that
the
city
has
established
and
re
relieve
the
city's
taxpayers
of
funding
of
what
is
currently
a
regional,
beneficial
service.
K
Could
I
ask
a
question
about
this?
Yes,.
A
K
I
I
like
that
struggle.
I
also
motioned
three
on
this
motion
sheet.
I
it
seems
like
it
could
be
connected
with
motion
four.
It
doesn't
to
me
seem
like
that
they're
mutually
exclusive,
and
I
I
would
like
to
add
the
language
in
motion
three
as
a
friendly
amendment.
If
that,
if
I'm
reading
it
correctly-
and
it
seems
like
those
both
could
coexist.
K
Yeah
so
motion
three
seems
like
report
with
other
entities,
specifically
the
utah
state
extension
and
motion
four
seems
more
related
to
the
data
gathering,
but
seeing
collaborating
with
other
entities.
I
think
it's
more
than
just
the
data
gathering.
It's
like
actually
gathering
the
data
and
then
implementing
the
data.
I
think
both
of
those
things
should
be
collaborated
at
different
levels.
It's.
K
B
Ahead,
just
I
think
the
main
thing
that
our
sustainability
department
wants
to
know
tonight
is:
are
they
going.
B
Of
the
the
surrounding
words,
which
is
what
you're
doing
now,
then
then
that's
great,
and
we
can
bring
that
back
with
the
with
the
official
action.
But.
S
J
At
them,
no,
no
yeah!
Let
me
say
this,
so
this
is
what
I
intended
with
this
for
three
yes
and
it's
releasing
the
funds
for
the
for
the
study,
but
expecting
a
report
back
about
other
organizations
doing
similar
work
and
also
if
there
are
partners
that
are
doing
this,
and
if
this
is
a
work
that
needs
to
be
done
by
a
different
agency
or
bigger
agency
than
us
four
and
three.
Yes,.
D
Councilmember,
please
just
covered
my
concern.
I
think.
K
Can
I
just
clarify
my
what
I
believe
we
just
traveled
to
cindy's
point?
Yes,
do
this
assessment
continue
on
the
work
that
you're
already
doing,
but
if
in
a
perfect
world,
I
would
think
this
is
something
that
could
be.
We
could
continue
the
work
that
we're
doing
maybe
get
that
to
a
good
wrap,
wrap
it
up
to
a
good
spot
and
then
task
another
either
this
utah
state
agency
or
somebody
else
to
continue
that
work
absent
them
doing
that.
I
want
this
work
to
happen.
K
So
if
we're
the
only
agency
that
can
do
this,
I
would
continue
to
support
it,
but
it
seems
like
there
are
other
agencies
that
can,
and
so
my
goal
would
be
for
it
to
to
be
moved
under
those,
but
I
think
the
shop
hole
we
just
took
is
perfect.
That
return
and
report-
and
let
us
know
whether
or
not
that
is
possible.
E
E
But
if
there's
none
of
them,
because
maybe
some
of
the
state
ones
that
might
be
very
general
and
not
as
focused
as
they
should
be
in
salt
lake
city,
then
the
sustainability
department
can
say:
hey
they're
doing
all
of
this,
but
we
have
this
need
that
nobody
else
is
doing
and
probably
will
have
to
do
it.
So
here's
options
for
the
council
to
decide
if
you
want
to
do
or
not.
I.
A
K
B
F
L
A
B
A
Anyone
want
to
go
into
a
closed
session.
No,
mr.
K
M
L
As
an
ordained
minister,
it
is
my
ministry
to
help
people
with
their
spiritual
lives.
I
need
to
see
signs
of
trouble
like
meth
use.
Signs
like
sudden
mood,
swings,
hyperactivity
and
erratic
sleep
patterns
things
I
should
have
picked
up
on
and
one
of
the
most
important
people
in
my
life,
my
own
daughter.
E
B
T
E
August
9
2022:
this
is
the
meeting
of
the
board
of
directors
of
the
redevelopment
agency
of
salt
lake
city.
We
welcome
the
members
of
the
public
who
are
in
person
and
who
may
be
watching
our
usual
video
feeds.
Online
hybrid
board
meetings
allow
people
to
join
online
through
webex
or
in
person
at
the
city
and
county
building.
We
are
continuing
to
watch
covet
rates
to
make
the
safest
choice
for
all
of
us.
In
fact,
although
masks
are
no
longer
required
in
the
building,
since
covet
cases
are
rising,
we
encourage
people
to
wear
masks.
E
While
here
in
our
meeting
there
are
some
in
the
hallway.
If
anybody
needs
one,
we
will
continue
to
monitor
the
situation
and
take
any
reasonable
precautions
for
the
public
and
staff.
Let's
move
on
to
our
first
agenda
item,
which
is
section
a
comments.
We
start
our
already.
We
start
our
rda
meetings
with
comments
to
the
board.
Your
feedback
is
always
welcome
and
you
can
share
that
with
award
at
any
time
by
mailing
the
council
office
at
po
box,
145476
salt
lake
city,
utah,
84114
or
emailing
us
at
council.comments.slcgov.com.