►
From YouTube: Salt Lake City Work Session Meeting - 9/12/2023
Description
To view the agenda for this meeting visit https://slc.primegov.com/public/portal
A
Today's
city
council
meeting
our
meetings
are
public
and
you
are
welcome
to
join
us
in
person
or
by
watching
from
the
council's
agenda
page
Zoom,
Facebook,
YouTube
or
slcv.
We
hope
you'll
continue
to
join
us
in
whatever
manner
you
feel
most
comfortable
today
is
a
work
session
meeting
and
although
we
have
a
limited
formal
meeting
tonight,
there
is
no
public
comment
scheduled
for
today's
formal
meeting.
Please
join
us
on
September
19th
a
week
from
today
2023
during
our
700
p.m.
formal
meeting.
To
share
your
comments.
A
We
of
course
welcome
your
feedback
Anytime
by
mail
to
PO,
box1,
14547,
Salt,
Lake,
City
84114,
or
by
email
at
council.com,
slcgov.com
or
via
our
24-hour
phone
comment
line.
80535
7654
written
comments
we
receive
on
agenda
topics
are
shared
with
council
members
and
posted
to
our
website
SLC
council.com.
Now
we
will
begin
our
work
session.
The
first
item
on
our
agenda
is
updates
from
the
administration
Tim
cosgro
from
the
mayor's
office
is
here
and
then
we
have
Andrew
Johnson
online
and
Laura
briefer
as
well,
director
of
Public
Utilities
or
yes,
Public.
B
C
B
You
as
you're
as
you're
aware
we
have
the
community
engagement,
feed
pack
feedback
page
that
you
can
always
check
on
see
our
latest
surveys
and
provide
feed
feedback
to
our
office
next
slide.
We're
we'll
go
right
into
this.
Last
week,
our
Sal
Lake
City
Corp
volunteer
Corp
LED,
an
very
inspirational
weekend
of
service
and
recognition
of
9911,
the
national
day
of
service
and
Remembrance
our
office,
assisted
in
coordinating
dozens
of
projects.
B
S
for
hundreds
of
volunteers
to
unite
as
a
community
all
across
our
city,
folks
came
together
to
write
letters
to
First,
Responders
pack,
hygiene
kits,
beautify,
Parks,
clean
up,
Alleyways,
plant
trees
and
so
much
more.
The
mayor's
office
joined
the
ballpark
residence
and
spent
the
morning
beautifying
people's
freeway,
Park
and
cleaning
up
an
Alleyway
in
the
neighborhood.
We
are
especially
grateful
to
our
partners,
my
hometown,
the
Church
of
Jesus
Christ
of
Latter
Day
Saints
and
the
ballpark
Community
for
all
their
contributions.
B
You
can
learn
more
about
those
volunteer
opportunities
by
looking
at
our
volunteer
Corp
link
on
the
mayor's
website.
Next
slide
and,
as
you
know,
we
do
mayor's
Community
office
hours,
where
the
mayor's
liaison
go
out
to
into
to
the
community
to
engage
and
interact
interface
with
the
constituents
so
that
we're
not
just
waiting
in
the
office
for
phone
calls
and
people
to
come
see
us.
These
are
our
locations
for
what's
left
for
the
rest
of
the
month.
B
I
know
Josh
and
I
will
both
be
at
9th
and
Ninth
Street
Festival,
which
happens
to
be
at
Liberty
Park
this
this
weekend,
Davis
Park,
Salt,
Lake,
City,
main
library,
soron,
Multicultural,
Unity
center
and
M,
some
Park
and
next
slide.
Some
of
the
September
event
highlights
that
we
have
still
coming
up.
These
are
sponsored
Ace
events.
We
have
the
sand
light
sand
lot,
movie,
exciting
sand
lot
movie
at
Jefferson
Park,
it's
about
1250,
Southwest
Temple!
That's
this
Friday!
B
A
D
Thank
you,
Mr
chair,
you
can
see
on
the
screen.
Still
very
high
utilization
rates
of
the
Resource
Centers
we
I
would
anticipate
that's
going
to
continue
through
the
balance
of
the
the
fall
into
the
winter
overflow
season.
Speaking
of
that,
we
are
about
one
month
away
from
opening
St
Vincent
depal
generally
about
the
15th
of
October
and
I
would
anticipate
sequentially
the
other
overflow
options
for
the
winter
opening
up
starting
that
week
forward
into
November.
D
You
can
see
also
the
fifth
West
and
Rio
Grand
area
is
on
tab
for
encampment
inap
impact
mitigation
work
this
week
and
a
number
of
camps
still
across
the
city.
The
vaa
Outreach
team
I
think
I
mentioned
this
last
time
has
seen
a
turnover
in
their
staff,
which
happens
periodically,
just
not
generally
all
at
once,
and
so
they've
been
really
down
in
Num,
so
their
engagements
have
gone
down,
but
I
anticipate
those
will
go
back
up
again
in
the
next
month
or
so
Pioneer
Park
had
a
resource.
D
Fair
last
week
went
very
well
and
we
can
get
you
details
of
that
and
thank
you
to
council,
ralda,
moros
and
her
office
for
so
many
efforts
across
this
year
and
going
forward
in
those
events,
and
then
kayak
court
is
Friday
the
22nd
this
month
and
we
would
anticipate
there'll,
be
one
more
kayak
Court
in
October
for
the
year
and
shut
it
down
until
the
spring.
At
that
point,
I
believe,
that's
all
the
updates
today.
Any
questions
Mr
chair
or
council
members,
council.
A
E
Department
good
afternoon,
I
think
I
have
a
presentation
to
pull
up,
but
I
could
do
it
without
a
presentation
as
well.
There
we
go
I'm
just
doing
a
brief
and
water
supply
update
actually
was
looking
back
on
my
records
and
my
last
update
to
all
of
you
was
the
same
week
last
year.
So
we
have
some
interesting
comparisons
that
we
can
make
between
this
year
and
last
year.
You'll
see
on
my
cover
slide.
E
We've
got
Great
Salt
Lake,
showing
at
its
current
levels,
which
is
still
far
below
what
is
ideal
for
Great
Salt
Lake
next
slide,
please
so
our
drought
and
climate
status.
We
are
nearing
the
end
of
the
water
year,
which
is
October
1st
the
water
year
typically
starts
April.
1St
I
have
some
figures
on
the
right
hand
of
the
slide
that
shows
the
drought
status
this
week
last
year.
E
The
dark
red
means
extreme
drought
on
the
top
and
then
the
bottom
shows
the
state
of
Utah's
current
drought
status,
which
you
can
see
most
of
the
drought
status
has
been
removed,
particularly
in
our
region.
So
last
winter
snowpack
made
a
really
big
difference.
Removing
What's
called
the
meteorological
drought
status
from
most
of
Utah
on
the
US
drought
monitor.
However,
there's
different
types
of
drought
status
that
the
National
Weather
Service
recognizes.
Other
types
of
drought
are
hydrological
agricultural
and
socioeconomic.
E
We
are
currently
still
in
a
hydrological
drought,
given
the
levels
of
Great,
Salt,
Lake
and
I.
Think
that's
important.
Great
Salt
Lake
is
up
about
four
feet:
4
feet
from
the
low
point
last
year,
due
to
The
Bountiful
snow
pack,
we
had
it
was
at
4188
ft
above
mean
sea
level
last
year
and
currently
sits
at
4192
above
mean
sea
level
that
is
still
below
the
level
needed
for
most
environmental
and
economic
indicators
for
Great
Salt
Lake
I
did
look
ahead
for
the
next
few
months.
E
The
national
weather
service
has
a
really
interesting
modeling
tool
that
looks
at
precipitation
and
temperature.
Both
of
those
things
are
really
important,
as
we
continue
to
monitor
what
happens
over
the
next
water
year
and
the
good
news
right
now
is
from
October
through
December.
They
are
forecasting
equal
chances
of
average
above
or
below
precipitation.
This
time
last
year
it
was
was
all
below
average
forecast.
So
that's
pretty
good
news
for
us
we'll
continue
to
monitor
that.
E
However,
temperature
is
expected
to
be
of
above
average
through
December
next
slide.
Please
we'll
focus
in
on
Salt
Lake,
City's,
water
supply
for
our
service
area,
and
at
this
time
and
this
year,
water
supply
is
adequate
to
meet
demand.
Our
wasach
front
Stream
flow
are
normal,
which
is
great
news,
as
we
do.
Every
summer
we
are
using
groundwater
resources
to
make
up
some
demand
too
and
Deer
Creek
Reservoir
is
at
90%
full
last
year.
At
this
time
it
was
45%
full.
So
that's
also
good
news.
E
Please
a
few
statistics
on
Salt
Lake,
City's
water
demand.
We
calculated
between
April,
1st
and
September
7th
that
our
service
area
has
saved
over
1
billion
gallons
of
water
compared
to
the
average
of
the
last
three
years.
The
graph
on
the
right
hand,
side
of
the
slide,
shows
on
the
Y
AIS
the
amount
of
water
used
in
million
gallons
per
day
and
on
the
xaxis,
the
months
of
the
year
from
January
through
December.
The
light
blue
line
is
water
use
in
the
year
2000.
E
The
red
line
is
the
average
of
the
last
three
years
and
the
dark
blue
shaded
area
is
the
Water
use
to
date
this
year.
So
you
can
see
we're
well
below
our
Baseline
year
of
the
year
2000
and
we
are
below
the
average
of
the
last
three
years.
I
thought
it'd
be
interesting
to
share
some
statistics
since
the
Baseline
year.
So
since
the
year
2000,
the
population
estimate
grew
15%
over
our
entire
service
area
between
2000
and
present
day.
E
Our
overall
water
use
demand,
however,
decreased
by
31%,
and
our
per
capita
use
across
the
service
area
decreased
by
40%,
and
so
you
can
see
the
impact
of
conservation
across
our
community.
Of
course,
there's
still
more
to
do,
but
that's
really
good
news.
We
entered
into
stage
two
of
our
water
shortage
contingency
plan
last
year
based
on
drought,
and
we
have
not
yet
I
have
not
yet
made
a
a
recommendation
to
move
from
stage
two.
You
might
recall
that
stage.
E
Two
of
our
water
shortage
contingency
plan
is
still
voluntary
conservation
for
most
in
our
community
for
residents
and
commercial
users,
but
mandatory
water
conservation
for
institutional
and
government
users,
and
it
still
felt
appropriate
to
me
that
we
remain
in
stage
two
given
lake
levels
of
Great.
Salt
Lake
we'll
be
evaluating
that
again
after
this
winter
to
see
what
our
snow
pack
looks
like
and
next
slide.
E
This
is
my
final
slide,
just
a
few
water
conservation
tips
for
the
fall
things
that
people
can
do
to
reduce
water
use
and
start
planning
for
the
the
winter
and
next
spring.
Adjusting
your
irrigation
for
cooler
weather
is
really
important
right
now
and
you
can
see
the
chart
on
the
right
of
the
slide
is
from
the
State
Division
of
Water
Resources
recommendations
for
weekly
lawn
watering
for
this
week
and
for
Salt
Lake
County.
It's
one
irrigation
per
week,
so
anywhere
in
our
service
area.
E
That
is
the
recommendation.
If,
if
you're
watering
a
lawn,
you
could
also
start
planning
a
water-wise
landscape
for
next
year,
you
could
see
if
you
qualify
for
a
lawn
removal
rebate
program
and
there's
lots
of
great
information
on
those
programs
at
Utah,
waterers,
savers.com
checking
indoor
plumbing
is
also
always
a
good
idea,
and
then
we
have
lots
and
lots
of
resour
resources
on
our
slc.gov
utilities
website
for
additional
information,
and
also
with
respect
to
the
new
water
Maps
tool
that
we're
providing
to
our
residents.
A
Thank
you,
director,
briefer
council
members
right
appreciate
that
good
job
Salt
Lake
City
saving
water.
Let's
keep
at
it
item
number
two
on
our
work
session
is
an
ordinance
about
our
anti-gentrification
and
dis
displacement.
Plan
called
thriving
in
in
place.
Allison
Roland
from
Council
staff
will
give
us
a
brief
introduction,
and
then
we
have
Angela
price
here.
The
direct
policy
director
from
Community
neighborhoods
I
see
Blake
Thomas
and
a
couple
others
here
in
the.
F
Thank
you
Mr
chair,
so
this
is
an
opportunity
to
for
the
council
to
ask
questions,
provide
feedback
and
discuss
whether
the
city's
anti-displacement
plan,
known
as
thriving
in
place,
is
ready
to
consider
for
adoption.
The
Planning
Commission
unanimously
recommended
adoption
in
its
July
meeting.
You
have
a
public
hearing
scheduled
on
October
3rd
and
potential
action
on
octo
on
October
17th.
F
In
the
most
recent
conversations
that
you
have
had
on
this
document,
the
council
re
requested
the
department
to
focus
specifically
on
developing
policies
for
for
a
2-year
action
plan
and
devising
alternatives
to
the
existing
housing
loss
mitigation
ordinance.
These
are
both
included
in
this
full
version
of
the
plan,
and
it
also
outlines
what
would
be
needed
for
implementation.
This
would
include
ordinance
changes,
ongoing
state
level,
advocacy,
new,
Community,
Partnerships
and
budget
and
Staffing
increases,
and
the
budget
needs
are
significant
for
the
full
implementation
of
this
plan.
F
Some
of
the
proposed
policies
and
programs
would
be
entirely
new
and
others
would
build
on
City
work
that
is
already
underway,
but
they
may
be
modified
or
expanded
significantly
and
any
of
the
near
near-term
action.
Priorities
that
require
Council
action
will
be
transmitted
separately
by
the
department.
F
The
staff
report
on
this
item
lists
potential
policy,
questions
for
the
council,
both
scattered
throughout
and
at
the
end,
and
you
could
request
Standalone
briefings
on
some
of
of
the
proposals
in
the
plan
and
there's
a
list
of
ones
that
we
believe
you
may
be
interested
in
in
the
policy
question
section
at
the
end,
and
you
may
wish
to
have
a
standalone
briefing
on
the
potential
sources
of
new
funds
for
the
programs
and
policies
recommended
and
that's
covered
in
near-term
priority
4A.
So
with
that
introduction,
I'll
pass
it
on
to
Angela.
G
Thank
you
Allison.
Can
you
guys
hear
me?
Okay?
Yes,
we
can
perfect
Mr
chff,
it's
okay,
I
I'
like
to
propose
that
I
spend
about
15
minutes
going
through
our
slides,
really
kind
of
talking
about
the
mechanics
of
the
plan
and
then
take
some
time
afterwards
for
your
questions
and
to
dive
into
the
policies
deeper.
Does
that
seem
like
an
okay
plan
for
you.
A
G
Maximize
our
time,
yeah,
that's
that's
the
intention
here.
So
I
have
David
Driscoll
the
consultant
that
has
been
the
Project
Lead
online,
so
we
have
him
here
for
the
next
hour
or
so
to
answer
any
questions
as
well.
This
plan
has
been
a
culmination
of
work
by
a
city
stakeholder
team
with
representatives
from
almost
single
Department,
a
project
team
that
consists
of
our
consultants
and
what
I
call
our
a
team
which
was
cons,
which
was
the
RDA,
the
planning,
Division
and
K
admin.
G
We
have
a
community
working
group
that
was
over
30
representatives
and
over
2500
residents
have
waited
on
this
plan.
This
plan
truly
is
a
community-driven
plan
that
we
should
be
really
excited
about
implementing.
We
would
also
like
to
thank
mayor
mendenhal
for
her
vision
as
she
took
office
to
understand
displacement
pressures
in
Salt,
Lake
City
and
for
the
council
and
the
mayor's
leadership.
Over
the
past
four
years,
we've
seen
over
a
400%
increase
in
the
investment
in
housing.
G
The
data
that
I
presented
back
in
December
and
January
is
staggering,
but
it
would
be
far
worse
if
it
wasn't
for
the
work
of
this
body
and
this
Administration.
So
I
just
want
to
give
some
gratitude
there.
You
can
go
to
slide
the
next
slide
please
or
am
I
able
to
advance
these
on
my
own,
no
okay,
I'm
just
going
to
turn
that
so
I
can
see
it
better.
As
I
said,
this
is
a
community-driven
plan
to
understand
displacement
and
develop
a
plan
of
action.
G
The
2-year
plan
we
have
here
or
the
placem
that
you
have
in
front
of
you
is
a
road
map
that
will
serve
as
a
foundation
for
you
as
you're,
making
policy
decisions
around
housing
in
the
coming
years.
Next
slide,
the
plan
was
developed
into
two
phases.
We
briefed
you
on
phase,
one
back
in
December
and
January.
That
was
the
listening
and
learning
where
we
went
through
the
community
engagement
and
the
data.
This
is
Phase
2,
where
we
have
the
actual
policy
Solutions
before
you
next
slide.
G
Please
this
again
I'm
not
going
to
go
into
the
details
here,
but
what's
really
exciting
about
this,
is
we
had
over
2500
people
Weighing
on
this,
while
we
were
concurrently
also
working
on
the
city's
5-year
housing
plan,
housing
SLC,
one
of
my
favorite
parts
of
this
project
is
the
pictures
from
the
seven
youth
workshops
where
we
engaged
youth
in
our
Westside
communities
to
understand
what
their
neighborhood
meant
to
them.
So
this
again,
this
plan
really
is
driven
by
our
residents
next
slide.
G
Please.
We
also
analyzed
and
mapped
data
and
displacement
and
I
know
when
we
saw
this
data
back
in
December.
It
was
staggering
for
all
of
us
and
and
really
a
call
to
action
on
what
we
knew
was
happening
in
Salt
Lake,
but
also
what's
happening
in
the
region.
This
data
is
not
unique
to
the
capital
city.
It
is
the
exact
same
from
Brigham
City,
all
the
way
down
to
Provo.
So
while
we
are
leading
out
on
this,
this
is
a
Statewide
and
a
regional
issue.
G
Next
slide,
please
you'll
see
the
hash
marks
here
again
showing
areas
where
we
have
high
displacement
and
that
there
are
no
more
affordable
tracks,
not
just
in
Salt
Lake
City,
but
cities
throughout
the
entire
region.
We
only
have
two
tracks
that
people
can
go
to
if
they're
displaced
and
next
slide.
Please,
the
key
takeaways
are
displacement.
Pressures
are
high
in
Salt,
Lake,
City
and
getting
worse.
Displacement
is
impacting
many
people,
specifically
communities
of
color.
G
G
Next
slide,
please!
So
what's
the
plan
we
want
to
help
our
lower
income
tenants
stay
in
place.
We
want
to
create
more
affordable
housing
and
we
want
to
partner
with
our
impacted
communities.
We
need
to
be
both
Pro
tenant
and
pro
housing
at
the
same
time.
So
that
means
that
we
want
to
protect
our
tenants.
We
want
them
to
stay
in
their
existing
housing
and
we
also
need
to
be
creating
more
housing,
specifically
those
really
deeply
affordable
units
that
are
so
hard
to
make
pencil.
That
really
only
happen
through
those
public
private
Partnerships.
G
Next
slide,
please.
So
we
have
broken
this
into
several
kind
of
highlevel
goals
again
helping
T,
lower
income
tenants
stay
in
place
by
increasing
our
tenant
resources.
Some
of
these
things,
you
guys
have
already
started
doing,
making
it
easier
to
act,
re
resources
and
services,
creating
more
affordable
housing
by
incentivizing,
the
development
of
those
deeply
affordable
units
and
the
preservation
of
our
existing
naturally
occurring,
affordable,
housing
and
then
partnering
with
impacted
communities
and
others.
G
We
heard
from
so
many
residents
that
they
want
to
stay
engaged
in
this
process
and
they
want
to
be
part
of
the
solutions.
Next
slide,
please
it's
important
to
keep
in
mind
that
there
are
no
magic
fixes
and
our
success
is
going
to
be
incremental.
State
preemption
was
hands
down
one
of
the
biggest
challenges
that
we
encountered
in
drafting
the
22
policies.
G
In
this
plan
we
have
a
finite
amount
of
resources
and
cap
capacity
within
the
city,
and
there
are
so
many
forces
like
Market
minimum
wage
caps
and
child
care
costs
that
are
beyond
our
control
and
we
need
to
work
differently.
We
need
to
work
together
and
we're
starting
to
see
those
Partnerships
forming
both
within
the
city
but
within
our
Community
Partners
as
well.
Next
next
slide,
please.
So
we
have
the
action
framework,
which
again
is
the
pl.
What
we've
coined
is
the
place
Mar
placement
in
front
of
you.
G
It
consists
of
six
interrelated
goals
to
protect
tenants
from
displacement,
preserve
the
affordable
housing
we
have
and
produce
more
housing,
expanding
funding,
partnering
and
collabor,
collaborating
and
advocating
for
tenants
at
the
state
level.
Next
slide,
please
again
laid
out
here
before
you
are
the
22
goals.
It's
important
to
note
that
this
is
a
foundational
plan.
This
is
not
saying
that
we
have
all
of
the
answers
on
on
how
each
one
of
these
policies
are
going
to
be
developed.
G
We,
the
focus
of
thriving
in
place,
is
really
to
set
the
foundation
and
the
road
map
for
these
22
policies,
and
these
will
be
coming
before
this
body
through
potential
budget
requests
in
the
future
through
ordinances
through
resolutions.
Some
of
these
are
already
existing.
Some
of
them
will
be
new,
so
I
think
it's
important
to
focus
on
that.
This
is
the
road
map
that
will
help
us
guide
where
we
want
to
be
headed
for
our
anti-displacement
strategies
in
the
future.
G
Next
slide,
please,
within
the
plan
we
have
a
purpose
context,
steps
lead,
Partners
schedule,
resources,
food
for
thought
and
near-term
priority.
When
we
drafted
this
RFP,
we
had
several
really
strong
intentions.
A
we
didn't
want
this
to
be
a
plan
that
sat
on
the
Shelf.
This
work
is
way
too
important
for
us
to
have
a
500
page
document
that
we
spend
copious
amounts
of
time,
drafting
that
we
aren't
able
to
actually
digest.
G
We
wanted
this
to
provide
the
framework
for
us
to
be
able
to
know
what
our
steps
are
to
be
able
to
do
this
work
and
to
have
best
practices,
and
we
also
wanted
to
have
buyin
from
all
of
the
Departments
within
the
city
that
these
policies
touch.
So
we
kept
the
plan
short
intentionally
because
we
want
it
to
be
usable
and
we
want
it
to
be
something
that
our
community
can
understand
and
digest,
and
it's
something
something
that
can
guide
your
your
body
when
you're
making
policy
decisions
in
the
future
next
slide.
G
Please
I'll
go
into
more
detail
on
the
replacement
of
the
housing
loss
mitigation
ordinance.
But,
as
I
said
earlier,
this
was
one
of
the
impetus
of
the
thriving
in
place
study.
Several
years
ago,
I
was
before
the
the
council,
and
you
directed
us
to
include
this
in
the
thriving
in
place.
At
that
time
it
was
just
a
a
dream
of
a
gentrification
study,
but
we
are
going
to
the
new
policy
is
going
to
support,
tenants,
it's
going
to
preserve
and
create
affordable
housing
and
improve
our
Data
Systems.
G
Some
of
these
policies
have
already
been
worked
on,
like
the
affordable
housing
incentives
policy
that
the
planning
division
has
been
working
on
for
several
years,
and
then
you
were
so
generous
to
grant
funding
this
year
for
the
tenant,
relocation
assistance
and
also
for
the
Tenant
Resource
navigation
Center
in
the
budget
process.
Next
slide,
please,
you
can
see
here
some
of
the
other
near-term
action
priorities.
G
It's
important
to
note
that
the
near-term
action
priorities
on
the
front
of
the
placement
are
the
exact
same
as
the
back
of
the
placement,
the
2-year
action
plan
and
then
they're
also
outlined
here
within
this
project
management.
Graphic
next
slide.
We
have
proposed
three
City
action
teams:
one
is
ATT
tenant
support,
one
is
affordable,
housing
development,
anti-displacement
policy.
We
have
started
reaching
out
to
departments
to
form
kind
of
our
implementation
team
within
the
city.
I.
G
We
can
go
into
more
detail
on
the
2-year
action
plan
here
in
a
second
next
slide,
please,
this
plan
has
gone
through
a
45
day,
Community
engagement
plan
after
it
was
drafted
and
we
had
um,
1500
unique
visitors.
This
engagement
plan
was
from
the
beginning
of
June.
Through
the
middle
of
July.
There
was
strong
support
for
the
actions
proposed.
We
did
make
a
few
modifications
based
on
feedback
from
the
community
and
the
Planning
Commission,
seeing
more
quantifiable
goals.
G
One
of
the
things
that
we
heard
frequently
from
the
public
and
from
our
community
working
group
that
I
want
to
pass
along
to
you,
is
there's
a
strong
desire
to
see
publicly
owned
lands
used
to
create
affordable
housing.
Next
slide,
please
one
of
the
other
questions
that
we
got
often
because
we
were
running
these
plans
in
tandem,
is
how
does
housing,
SLC
and
thriving
in
place?
G
Work
together,
housing
SLC
will
be
amended
and
thriving
in
place
will
be
included
as
an
addendum
to
housing
SLC,
and
there
were
numerous
policies
that
are
in
thriving
in
place
that
were
included
within
housing
SLC,
and
then
you
can
see
here.
These
are
the
four
goals
that
are
in
the
adopted
plan
of
housing
SLC
and
how
they
tie
to
the
action
priorities
outlined
within
tip
next
slide.
G
Please,
the
community
wants
to
be
engaged
with
us
and
we
started
to
build
some
really
great
Partnerships
and
and
really
holding
space
for
people
to
be
able
to
tell
their
story
of
the
very
traumatic
experiences
that
some
residents
are
facing
being
displaced
from
their
communities.
So
we
want
to
continue
that
work
and
then
there
was
also
a
lot
of
comment
on
the
accessibility
of
the
plan
and
and
making
sure
that
people
are
able
to
access
this.
G
Please,
and
we
received
a
unanimous
positive
recommendation
from
the
Planning
Commission
on
July
26,
to
adopt
thriving
in
place
as
the
city's
anti-gentrification
strategy
and
mitigation
plan
and
as
an
addendum
to
housing.
Slc
with
that.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
Happy
to
answer
any
questions
or
get
graner
on
any
of
the
policies
within
thriving
in
place.
H
Question
then
Dugan,
so
I
I
mean
I,
see
number
six
here,
Advocate
at
at
the
state
level,
for
the
tenants
issues-
and
you
know
how
much
I
talk
about
this
and
and
and
I
mean
many
of
us
are
potentially
going
in
a
few
minutes
to
to
Sandy
to
talk.
You
know
with
the
Sandy
City
Council
in
a
few
minutes
about
you,
know
a
shelter,
a
potential
shelter
in
the
city
of
Sandi
which
doesn't
relate,
but
you
know
the
idea
is
that
we
all
on
this
together.
H
Now,
how
can
we
better
serve
our
our
residents
by
advocating
at
the
state
level?
You
know
the
findings
on
the
on
the
report
were
shocking
to
all
of
us
right,
especially
related
to
the
half
of
our
residents,
are
rent
burden,
and
it's
it's
you
know
it's
leading
is
a
leading
cost
for
displacement
and
many
of
them
becoming
unsheltered.
H
G
G
A
great
example
is
what
you're
going
to
do
this
evening
right
of
having
conversations
with
other
cities
and
helping
them
see
the
importance
of
having
affordable
housing
within
their
communities,
because
the
ground
swell
really
happens
where,
when
all
of
the
the
cities
come
together
and
say,
we
want
this
change
to
happen
within
our
communities
and
we're
seeing
we're
seeing
that
traction
happening,
but
certainly
not
as
quick
as
as
we
would
probably
like
here
within
the
capitol
city.
I
think.
G
There's
I
was
on
a
panel
last
week
talking
about
how
we
have
focused
so
much
of
our
attention
on
the
production
of
affordable
housing,
which
we
need
to
continue
focusing
our
attention
there.
But
we
have
focused
so
little
attention
from
a
policy
space
on
the
keeping
people
in
housing
that
they
already
have,
and
so
there's
conversations
happening
around
funding
the
preser,
the
Utah
preservation
fund.
G
That
happened
in
the
commission
on
housing
affordability,
but
we
really
need
to
I
think
not
shift,
because
I
don't
want
to
take
the
intention
away
from
the
development
of
affordable
housing,
but
keeping
people
housed
keeps
people
off
of
the
streets.
And
so
those
are
really
conver
really
important.
Conversations
that
we
need
to
be
having
with
our
fellow
communities
and
with
our.
I
Wharton
great
question
and
thank
you
for
that,
because
I
was
gonna.
My
question
was
more
on
the
eviction
side
of
the
house.
I
think
it's
protection
number
one
C
about
the
services
to
provide
them
so
that
we
keep
them
in
the
housing
and
back
to
the
conversation
with
our
state
legislators
and
municipalities
on
how
we
make
sure
that
there
is
protection.
I
G
Yeah
I
I
can
add
a
little
bit
more
to
that.
So
there
was
a
recent
study
done
in
California
of
experiencing
homelessness
and
82%
of
the
respondents.
In
that
study
said
if
they
had5
to
$10,000
of
emergency
funding,
they
would
not
have
been
homeless.
That
is
a
small
drop
in
the
bucket
when
we're
considering
the
trauma
and
the
the
lifelong
experience
that
somebody
has
even
for
a
brief
spell
of
homelessness.
G
So
I
think
those
conversations
are
things
that
we
need
to
be
having
both
at
the
city
level
and
at
the
state
level.
There
was
also
a
recent
study
done
by
Jen
wood
at
kemy
Gardner
policy
Institute,
where
he
analyzed
the
state
of
Utah
against
all
states
within
the
country
on
four
different
policies
and
one
of
them.
We
have
a
three-day
pay
or
quit
here
in
Utah,
which
means
that
when
you
are
served
to
evict
that
you're
being
evicted
from
your
house,
you
have
3
days
to
get
out.
G
We
recently
were
just
able
to
change
that
to
business
days,
which
is
helpful,
but
when
somebody's
in
crisis-
and
they
have
only
3
days
to
get
out-
and
we
have
a
3%
vacancy
rate
in
Salt,
Lake,
County
and
double
digigit
rent
increases-
it
makes
it
really
challenging
for
people
to
find
housing.
We've
heard
from
so
many
of
our
service
providers
that
one
of
their
biggest
barriers
is
application
fees.
G
So
there
is
some
really
easy:
I,
don't
want
to
say
easy,
but
there's
some
loow
hanging
fruit
here
that
isn't
a
very
big
cost
investment
that
we
could
be
advocating.
For
you
know
at
the
state
level
that
would
have
a
really
big
impact.
I
just
recently
met
with
Seattle
and
they
changed
their
three-day
payer
quit
to
14
days,
and
that
has
made
a
tremendous
different
within
their
difference
within
their
community
and
it
allows
for
the
service
providers
to
get
in
and
mediate.
A
G
Yeah,
that's
a
great
question.
Thank
you.
So
we
have
already
drafted
the
community
benefit
policy
and
it's
currently
out
for
45-day
public
engagement
and
we'll
be
going
for
before
the
Planning
Commission
in
the
beginning
of
November.
That's
the
replacement
of
the
housing
loss
mitigation
ordinance
when
let
me
actually
take
a
step
back
for
a
second.
G
So
we
wanted
to
pick
policies
that
a
we
knew
were
really
impactful
and
things
that
we've
been
hearing
over
and
over
and
over
again
through
the
engagement
process
and
through
our
interactions
with
you
and
the
mayor,
but
we
also
wanted
to
ensure
that
these
were
things
that
were
mostly
within
our
existing
scope
of
services.
So
certainly
some
of
these
are
going
to
stretch
our
staff
thin.
There's
no
doubt
about
that.
One
thing
that
we
continue
here
is
improvements
to
the
tenant
landlord
initiative.
That
would
require
more
Staffing.
G
We
didn't
put
that
on
here,
but
that
is
something
we
could
bump
up,
but
it
would
require
more
Staffing
for
business
licensing.
I
think
the
other
things
that
are
on
here
are
really
focused
on
policies
within
the
city.
You
guys
were
so
gracious
and
put
$92,000
in
the
budget
this
year
for
a
tenant,
navigation,
Center
and
then
$180,000
for
the
tenant
relocation
assistance
program.
So
we
have
that
seed
money
already
that
we
can
start
working
on
this
and
a
lot
of
the
other
stuff.
G
The
implementation
teams,
so
we
are
still
working
on
what
the
details
of
that
will
be
I,
think
that
and
we
I
would
welcome
your
feedback
on
this.
One
implementation
team
will
be
within
the
city
and
I
think
it
will
be
an
extension
of
what
called
our
our
a
team,
which
was
the
planning
division.
Housing
stability
RDA
can
admin
the
the
Departments
and
divisions
that
really
work
on
housing
policy.
I.
G
Do
think
that
we
have
would
like
to
continue
having
conversations
and
having
the
community
weigh
in
on
the
policies
and
I
think
that
that
was
a
really
beneficial
and
it
helped
us
course
correct
through
the
development
of
this
plan.
So
we
envision
that
we
will
have
an
extension
of
that
as
well.
I,
don't
know
that
it
will
be
the
same
exact
team
that
we've
been
working
with
but
including
the
existing
Community
working
group
has
developers.
It
has
Community
Advocates.
G
M
Thank
you
and
thank
you
for
continuing
to
feed
my
passion
for
color
coding,
I
love
this
so
procedurally.
Well
like
philosophically
everything
on
here
looks
amazing.
I
see
the
necessity
for
it.
I
hate,
creating
Independence
when
we
can't
deliver
so
I'm
concerned
or
asking
a
question
about
what
does
our
adoption
of
this
actually
mean
for
us
committing
to
either
retaining
in
house
and
paying
for
things?
Is
there
a
point
in
the
future
where
we
revisit
this?
M
The
only
thing
that's
clear
to
me
from
what
I've
seen
that
we
are
going
to
go
externally
for
is
the
regional
anti-displacement
Coalition
and
the
Community
Partnership.
Are
there
other
activities
that
we're
looking
to
Outsource
partner
with
people
to
to
you
know?
Maybe
do
P
public
private
partner
ship
with
I'm
just
concerned,
cuz
I
know
the
number
of
things
Weighing
on
our
general
fund
balance
and
I
want
to
do
this.
Well,.
G
Yeah
no
I
I
appreciate
that
concern.
I.
Think
that's
a
really
great
question,
so
we
haven't
so
I'm
going
to
use
the
tenant
relocation
assistance
program.
As
an
example,
we
were
we
received
$180,000
as
I
mentioned
this
year
through
the
budget
process.
We
have
started
the
conver
Sation
internally
of
what
that
program
would
look
like
and
if
that
would
be
best
managed
by
a
community
partner
and
through
the
funds,
were
granted
through
the
funding,
our
future
budget.
So
would
it
make
the
most
sense
for
that
to
go
through
a
community
partner?
G
Have
them
run
that
program?
You
know
we
we
don't,
we
would
have.
We
have
some
staffing
capacity,
but
we
are
concerned
about
the
same
exact
thing,
so
each
one
of
these
items
would
come
before
you
as
we
work
on
the
implementation
of
them
to
say:
is
this
a
priority
and
do
we
have
budget
to
put
towards
this
and,
as
we
start
to
dive
into
the
specifics
of
each
one
of
these
new
programs
and
policies
or
ramping
up
existing
programs
or
policies
or
even
just
revisiting,
do
we
want
to
continue
doing
this?
G
Does
this
still
work
right?
Because
we
constantly
have
to
be
recalibrating
and
there's
metrics
within
the
plan
for
us
to
be
doing
that
we
would
be
bringing
those
before
you
saying.
Does
it
make
sense
for
this
to
be
an
in-house?
Does
this
make
sense
for
this
to
be
run
by
a
community
partner,
but
certainly
welcome
any
feedback?
I
think
I
mean
you
run
a
nonprofit,
so
you
know
the
concerns
of.
We
certainly
don't
want
to
say.
G
Oh,
we
have
funding
for
a
year
ramp
up
your
Staffing
and
we
saw
those
challenges
when
we
first
rolled
out.
Rent
assistance
during
the
pandemic
of
the
service
providers
were
constantly
trying
to
keep
people
staffed,
not
knowing
if
they
were
going
to
how
long
they
were
going
to
have
funding.
You
know
from
from
not
just
the
city
but
from
other
partners
as
well
as
we
were
waiting
for
the
HUD
money
to
roll
out
so
I
think
that's
something
that
we
need
to
be
really
cognizant
of.
M
So
is
it
then
fair
to
say
that
the
under
first
things
first,
the
council-
adoption
is
a
conceptual
adoption
and
then
we'll
be
involved
later
in
execution
stages,
is
to
make
sure
that
each
one
is
being
put
on
the
correct
shelf.
We
just
want
to
make
sure
this
exists
in
the
ecosystem.
Whatever
way
it
can
exist
strongest
most
sustainably
for
the
community.
That's.
F
Council
member
excuse
me
if
I
could
just
mention
to
since
I
mentioned
at
the
beginning
that
some
of
these
implementation
or
full
implementation
of
the
plan
would
would
mean
a
significant
amount
of
City
investment.
Since
I
said
that
I'll
I'll
mention
that
a
lot
of
that
has
to
do
with
property
acquisition,
it's
just
that
dwarfs
almost
any
other
expense.
N
Angela,
thank
you
so
much
I,
you
know
I
had
a
question
about
this
three
business
eviction
law
that
we
were
able
to
get
to
like
it
used
to
be
three
days
and
now
it's
business
day.
So
we
move
forward.
But
any
can
you
show
any
light
on
the
logic
of
this
rule,
this
UTA
State
rule
just
a
quick
thing
so
that
the
public
knows
that
it's
not
the
city
we're
dealing
like.
G
Your
place,
yeah
I,
can
speak
to
that.
So
the
3-day
payer
quate,
is
is
within
state
code,
and
that
means
that
a
tenant
has
three
days
to
vacate
their
property.
Once
they're
served
an
eviction
notice
and,
as
I
said,
the
Kempy
Gardener
report
analyzed
other
states
and
we're
the
only
I
think
it's
safe
to
say
we're
one
of
the
only
States
within
the
country
that
has
that
short
of
a
three
of
a
pay
or
quit
that
doesn't
have
a
rental
subsidy
program
as
well.
G
So
most
of
the
states
that
have
a
three-day
payer
quit
policy
also
have
a
tandem
policy
that
runs
with
that.
Where
you
can
get
the
rent
assistance,
we
don't
have
that
here
in
Utah,
and
so
it's
kind
of
a
double-edged
sword
for
our
tenants
and
then,
as
I
mentioned
having
high
vacancy
rates
and
rent
increases,
makes
it
or
I'm
sorry
low
vacancy
rates
and
double-
digit
rent
increases
makes
it
really
challenging
changing
the
three-day
pay
or
quit
would
be
my
dream
as
a
policy
director.
G
N
And
it
seems
like
I
mean
I,
don't
own
property,
that
I
rent
but
I
I
feel
like
this
is
like
an
an
urgent
matter.
I
mean
three
days,
you
know
that's,
so
there
must
be
some.
You
know
some
explanation,
or
maybe
we
know
what
the
explanation
is,
but
there
has
to
be
something
else,
or
at
least
some
sort
of
empathy.
N
I
guess
that's
what
I'm
trying
to
say,
whoever
are
making
those
decisions
and
whoever
owns
property
and
is
renting
and
you're
abiding
with
this
or
supporting
just
you
know,
just
take
a
moment
and
think
about
this
three
business
day.
You
know
rule
that
it's
really
harming
our
communities
and
the
people
that
have
to
leave
so
throwing
it
out
there
in.
N
G
Yeah
I
think
that's
a
really
important
message
and,
as
I
said,
I
I
saw
Wayne
Neer
Houser
speak
last
week
at
the
chamber
event
with
mayor
menden
Hall,
and
he
has
been
starting
to
talk
about
prevention,
a
lot
as
well,
and
so
the
message
is
starting
to
resonate
and
going
back
to
council
members
council
member
pu's
initial
question
of
what
can
we
do?
This
is
a
big
one
of
really
speaking
to
keeping
people
in
housing
as
a
homeless
prevention
strategy.
N
With
our
good
so
on
along
the
same
lines
with
our
good
tenant
good
landlord
program,
can
we
ask
or
can
we
add
that
that
eviction
process
is
long
like
longer?
So
you
add
more
days
if
you
want
to
participate
in
that,
or
is
that
completely
nonoss,
because
it's
a
state
law-
and
we
cannot
change
that.
But
this
is
our
program
and
we
subsidize
it.
G
Yeah
I
would
want
to
have
legal
councel
answer
that
question
specifically,
but
what
I'll
say
at
a
very
general
level
with
most
things
in
state
code,
is
that
if
we
offer
incentives,
we
typically
aren't
preempted
I,
don't
know.
If
that's
the
case
for
this,
but
for
example,
inclusionary
zoning.
We
can't
do,
but
we
can
incentivize
a
developer
through
giving
them
additional
density
or
okay
or
what
not
to
be
able
to
include
affordable
housing.
F
N
Do
explain
that
a
little
bit
because
I
know
a
lot
of
the
public
talk
about
the
housing,
long
mitigation
plans,
what
we're
going
to
do,
how
you
know
we
used
to
have
one
it
didn't
work
very
well!
It's
important
that
we
talk
about
that
and
see
what
Solutions
yeah
like
what's
the
equivalent
or
what
are
we
doing
to
replace
that
yeah.
G
So
I
can
dive
into
the
replacement
of
the
housing
loss,
mitigation,
ordinance
and
I
may
have
Nick
Norris
come
up
and
join
me
for
this
as
well.
Cuz
he's
been
working
on
drafting
it,
so
the
replacement
of
housing
loss
mitigation
is
going
to
be.
What
we're
proposing
is
called
the
community
benefit
policy.
It's
going
to
consist
of
four
amendments
to
the
city
code.
First,
it
will
amend.
G
G
The
the
kind
of
foundation
of
the
policy
is
that
when
an
applicant
comes
to
the
city
and
asks
for
a
zoning
map
or
a
general
plan
amendment
that
we
could
request
a
community
benefit
and
that
Community
benefit
could
be
affordable
housing,
it
could
be
historic
preservation,
it
could
be
infrastructure,
open
space,
there's
a
whole
list
of
things,
and
this
would
be
at
your
discretion
as
the
city
council
to
negotiate
through
a
development
agreement.
What
that
Community
benefit
would
be.
G
It
requires
the
replacement,
if
you
are
demol
demolishing
housing
units
that
you
replace
those
housing
units
like
for,
like
meaning
same
number
of
bedrooms
and
same
rent.
It
also
requires
the
the
tenant
relocation
assistance
be
provided
to
individuals
that
are
displaced,
and
this
is
a
really
important
piece
for
me
to
hover
on
for
a
second.
This
is
separate
from
the
tenant
relocation
assistance
that
you
funded
at
the
$180,000,
so
this
tenant
relocation
assistance
would
be
something
that
developer
would
pay
to
the
applicant
or
I'm
sorry
to
the
tenants
that
are
being
displaced.
G
It
also
we
we
phase
two
will
be
looking
at
a
community
preference
policy
where,
if
you
were
displaced
from
your
housing
that
you
could
potentially
be
first
in
the
queue
to
move
back
to
that
neighborhood,
so
that
we
can
preserve-
that's
not
included
in
this
first
draft,
but
that's
something
that
we
would
like
to
consider
in
the
future.
As
I
said,
this
is
currently
out
for
45-day
public
engagement
and
we
be
coming
before
you
guys,
maybe
this
year
or
the
first
part
of
next
year.
N
K
A
This
is
a
big
task
and
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
time
to
wait.
So
the
other
thing
is
that
the
things
that
we
have
on
our
plate,
I
will,
for
the
remaining
seven
meetings
or
whatnot
that
I'm
chair
make
sure
that
we're
prioritizing
getting
those
things
scheduled
and
I
hope
that
the
next
chair
will
do
the
same.
These
things
are
not.
These
are
not
things
that
we
can
that
we
have
time
we're
already
behind
in
that,
as
council
member
Wharton
mentioned
even
on
this
chart
that
you've
made
that's
really
pretty.
A
We
feel
like
we're
behind,
but
in
the
the
broad
context
of
the
problem
that
exists
in
our
city,
we're
even
more
behind.
So
that's
my
commitment
to
help
with
this
I
think
a
couple
of
us
are
going
to
leave
I'm
going
to
turn
the
chairing
of
the
meeting
over
to
Vice
chair
Petro,
but
we
don't
need
to
stop
this
I.
Think
councilor
Duan
had
a
comment
but
I'll
let
Council
or
vice
chair
Petro,
take
over
from
here.
M
I
Appreciate
all
this,
this
is
and
then
eviction
side
of
the
house
and
you
and
I
will
and
pizza
will
have
to
work
on
some
actions.
There
I
think
I
have
some
actions
in
that
that
regard
so
I
appreciate
that
my
next
question
is
really
on
the
2B
on
the
I
guess
the
preserved
side
of
the
house-
and
you
know
we-
we
want
to
keep
people
in
housing,
but
we
also
want
to
make
sure
that
they
have
they're
in
livable,
housing
and
they're,
not
having
issues
with
their
their
housing
and
the
quality.
I
You
know
just
the
safety
of
their
house,
health
and
safety
of
their
housing.
So
in
the
in
the
staff
report
it
talked
about
to
being
be
one
of
the
more
expensive
Endeavors
we
need
to
go
through,
but
making
sure
the
housing
is
safe
and
livable,
and
the
rehabilitation
of
that
housing
more
of
the
inside
of
it
than
just
the
full
structure
of
it
is
there?
Is
there
plans
or
is
there
ways
that
that
it's
broken
down
into
like
categories
on
that
cost
and
hey?
I
G
Yeah
I
appreciate
that
question.
We
haven't
gotten
that
granular,
let
when
we
created
the
2-year
action
plan,
we
didn't
want
to
tie
specific
budget
request
to
it
as
much
as
just
kind
of
showing
through
dollar
signs
like
these
are
more
fiscally
conservative
policies
that
we
could
work
on
versus
the
more
expensive
ones.
I
will
say
that
one
of
the
things
that
I've
heard
a
lot
from
tenants
is
fear
of
retaliation
and
coming
to
the
city.
Saying
hey.
My
unit
is
substandard,
and
so
we've
heard
a
lot
of
requests
of.
G
Could
the
city
create
a
rehab
program
that
would
both
an
inspection
program
that
we
would
just
do
random
inspections
and
and
look
at
housing
units,
and
so
there
isn't
this
retaliation
mentality
or
this
retaliation
that
happens
and
then
also
could
the
city
invest.
Some
money
in
rehabbing
naturally
occurring
affordable,
housing
and
maybe
deed
restricting
in
or
putting
some
sort
of
restricted
Covenant
on
it,
so
that
it
would
stay
as
such.
So
those
are
some
of
the
things
that
we've
heard
from
the
community.
G
That
I
think
would
be
things
that
you
guys
could
consider
in
the
future.
As
we
start
to
look
towards
that,
and
then
this
action
item
is
is
has
a
lot
of
ties
to
the
RDA
as
well
and
the
work
that
they
do
in
property
acquisition
and
so
I
think
there's
just
a
lot
of
opportunity
for
us
to
consider
different
things
that
we
want
to
do
there.
I
Okay,
thank
you
and
Madam,
chair
on
on
the
funding
side
of
the
house
item
4A
talks
about
new
taxes
on
short-term
rentals
does
this?
Does
the
state
need
to
approve
this
new
tax,
or
is
it
something
that
I
mean
I
got
to
think
they
have
to
approve
this
new
tax
and
can
we
use?
How
can
we
use
that
funding?
Can
we
use
that
funding
to
fund
something
of
like
the
rehabilitation.
G
G
So
I
think
that
some
of
the
work
that
you
guys
did
earlier
this
year
when
you
passed
the
ad
ordinance
and
added
additional
FTE
to
code
enforcement,
will
help
be
the
city
to
be
a
little
bit
more
proactive,
as
our
our
Cod
enforcement
team
has
been
stretched
super
thin
and
can
only
really
enforce
cases
that
are
coming
before
them.
I
think
as
we
look
at
our
tenant,
landlord,
Initiative,
Program
and
changes
to
that,
we
certain
look
at
some
fees
and
some
different
structures
there
to
be
able
to
generate
some
Revenue.
G
O
M
Council
members
I
don't
want
to
push
us
too
hard,
but
we're
significantly
behind
schedule.
Do
we
are
there
any
substantive
I
think
this
is
like
one
of
the
most
important
things
we'll
do
while
we're
on
Council,
so
I
don't
want
to
Short
change
it,
but
I
also
do
want
to
move
forward.
Okay,
Angie!
If
we
have
questions
that
inv
variably
will
come
up
at
3:00
in
the
morning.
I
will
remember
the
question.
I
am
not
asking
you
right
now.
Are
we
it's
okay
for
us
to
reach
out
to
you
and
and
to
get
more.
G
M
Thank
you
not
only
for
the
work.
Angela.
Sorry
I
keep
calling
thank
you
for
the
work,
not
even
that
you're
not
just
leading
out
on
here,
but
how
you
have
an
impact
beond
here
with
your
work
with
the
league
and
making
sure
that
we
know
that
we're
all
interconnected
and
it's
really
comforting
to
know
that
your
expertise
is
going
to
help
a
lot
of
people.
So
thank
you
so
much.
G
M
M
P
Gosh,
okay,
me
and
a
nutshell:
well,
a
little
bit
louder:
okay,
go
easy!
I'm,
a
little
nervous!
Go!
Okay!
In
a
nutshell:
I
guess
you
could
say:
I
could
give
you
the
short
version.
I've
been
here
18
months,
I've
been
in
dispatch
for
16
years,
but
I
guess
a
better
way
to
explain
me
is
that
I'm,
just
like
everybody
in
this
room?
L
P
That
I've
already
been
in
the
position
of
acting
for
about
six
months
now
and
I've
gotten
a
little
bit
protective
of
our
of
our
group
and
I'm
excited
to
see
where
we
can
take
it,
and
I
am
more
than
honored
and
excited
just
to
be
part
of
this
city,
because
it's
beautiful
it's
Innovative
I've
enjoyed
coming
as
work
sessions
and
I
share
the
passion
that
you
all
have
for
the
same
community
that
you're
representing
and
I.
Just
we
be
honored
to
do
the
same.
I
M
K
J
P
Thank
you
so
much
and
I.
If
I
could
just
say
I,
you
said
it's
a
difficult
task,
all
the
different,
diverse
models,
but
it's
not
difficult.
It's
challenging
and
this
city
is
just
leading
the
way
and
it's
nice
to
be
an
outsider
coming
in
to
see
that
kind
of
progress
and
I'm
really
excited
to
be
a
part
of
that.
So
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you.
M
C
M
Q
M
Thank
you,
so
much
council
members.
Any
questions
comments.
Thank
you
so
much
for
being
willing
to
serve
our
community
with
your
experience
and
expertise,
you'll
be
on
the
consent
agenda
and
you
don't
have
to
be
present,
but
thank
you
and
we
look
forward
to
seeing
what
you
do
on
the
commission.
Thank
you.
I
appreciate
it.
Next
we
have
Isaac
Estel
for
an
appointment
to
the
transportation
Advisory.
O
M
R
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
not
just
for
your
service
in
terms
of
being
a
part
of
this
Advisory
Board,
but
also
related
to
the
students
of
Salt
Lake,
City
I
know
putting
a
child
on
a
school
bus.
Is
such
a
scary
thing
for
parents
the
first
time
they
have
to
do
it
and
just
really
appreciate
the
fact
that
you
make
sure
our
kids
are
safe
as
they're
getting
to
and
from
school
the
trip
they
take
most
often
every
year.
O
M
M
All
right
so
Council
we
are,
we
recovered
a
lot
of
time,
we're
only
12
minutes
behind
so
I
vote
that
I
vote
that
we
still
take
30
minutes
for
dinner.
Do
you
agree?
Yeah
we
we've.
We
have
brain,
we
have
brain
shrapnel.
After
all,
the
stuff
we've
covered
all
right,
30
minutes
for
dinner,
we'll
come
back
at.
M
M
S
Hey
this
is
a
proposal
to
vacate
a
segment
of
city-owned
alley
adjacent
to
properties
at
801,
809,
8815
and
825
East
Wilmington
Avenue,
which
is
approximately
2170
South
in
Council
district
7.
This
alley
segment
as
John
mentioned,
is
adjacent
to
another
alley
segment,
which
is
the
subject
of
the
next
briefing.
The
Western
end
of
the
alley
has
been
used
for
more
than
20
years
as
a
driveway
for
the
property
at
2167,
South,
800,
East
I,
believe
the
applicant
is
in
the
audience
and
available
for
questions
and
with
that
I'll
turn
it
over
to.
U
Diana
hello
good
evening,
it's
so
late,
okay,
so
the
first
one
is
2167
South
800
East,
we
oh,
who
am
I
else.
Oh
next
slide!
Please
next
slide!
Please
thank
you.
So,
just
to
reiterate
what
Brian
went
over
this
alley
runs
be.
It
runs.
Excuse
me,
east
to
west,
between
Commonwealth
Avenue
and
Wilmington
Avenue.
The
portion
that
we're
talking
about
right
now
is
only
7.3
ft
wide
by
157
ft.
If
you
will,
it
has
not
been
used
and
we
have
looked
at
it
through
aerial
photography
for
about
20
plus
years.
U
It
has
basically
been
a
driveway
for
2167.
The
width
can
I.
Have
the
next
slide.
Please
the
next
width,
if
you
can
see
on
this
first
left
picture,
there's
a
little
dotted
green
line.
That
shows
that
width
so
from
that
to
that
fence
is
about
7.3
ft,
and
that
is
the
the
public
RightWay
Elly.
So
it's
it's
obviously
too
narrow
for
a
modern
car.
It
could
be
opened
up
for
pedestrians
or
bikers,
but
it
would
never
fit
a
car
and
then
the
other
part
of
it
belongs
to
the
to
the
owners
of
2167.
U
U
Please,
the
Planning
Commission
did
vote
10
to1
to
send
a
positive
recommendation
to
have
this
vacated.
At
that
time
we
had
put
staff
had
put
a
condition
that
a
utility
easement
would
be
established
in
place
of
the
existing
public
right
of
way
for
utilities
and
anything
else
that
went
through
their
phone
cable
in
talking
with
the
city
attorney's
office
that
was
done
by
the
city
attorney's
office.
So
we
have
taken
that
out
and
we're
still
dealing
with
that
to
try
to
get
that
easement
in
place.
U
So
that
will
be
done.
I
think
if
I
can
have
the
next
slide,
please,
and
then
this
shows
just
the
process
through
the
allei
vacation,
which
I'm
sure
you're
all
aware
of
the
four
check
marks
or
properties.
Those
would
be
the
people
that
would
get
the
property
from
that
7.3
ft
of
laway.
The
the
x
marks
2167
South,
800
East.
They
would
not
have
rights
to
it
because
they're
not
in
the
subdivision.
I
U
Don't
think
so
there
it
wasn't.
There
was
a
few
people
that
came
to
talk
about
it,
but
I
think
overall,
the
Planning
Commission
felt
very
comfortable
with
their
recommendation
to
you.
I
think
you
know.
One
planning,
commissioner,
did
have
an
issue
with
the
fact
of
closing
in
Alleyway,
but
this
has
been
closed
for
25
years.
It
has
never
been
through.
You
know,
passable
and
so
I
think
at
that
point
you
kind
of
have
to
think
you
know
and
really
7.3
ft
isn't
going
to
do
a
lot
to
help
that
that
passable.
M
U
M
M
S
Thanks
Madam
chair:
this
is
a
proposal
to
vacate
the
segment
just
east
of
the
one
we
just
discussed
and
it
is
adjacent
to
properties
at
825,
827
and
829
East
Wilmington
Avenue,
then,
on
the
other
side
of
the
alley,
the
property
is
at
820
826
and
8:30
East
Elm
Avenue.
The
alley,
as
stated
before,
is
approximately
20
160
South
to
the
West
is
the
other
alley
segment
that
we
just
discussed,
which
begins
at
800
East.
U
So
this
one
on
the
the
map
that
you
see
is
the
The
yellow
section,
the
yellow
line,
and
this
one
is
a
a
little
bit
different
because
it
is
17.3
ft.
So
it
could
accommodate
a
a
modern
vehicle.
But
again
you've
got
the
orange
section.
That
would
not
so
again
on
the
yellow
section.
It
has
been
blocked
by
dirt
that
had
changed
the
grade.
U
It
had
had
fences,
it
has
protruding
fences,
it
has
protruding
accessory
buildings
that
have
been
there
for
many
years,
so
the
the
laway
has
never
been
utilize
ized
in
20
plus
years
and,
and
that
goes
for
this
section
as
well
beyond
the
yellow
would
remain
open
and
there
are
some
properties
at
the
very
eastern
part
of
the
laway
that
do
use
the
LA
to
access
garages.
Can
I
have
the
next
slide
please.
So
this
is
kind
of
looking.
U
So
the
going
left
to
right
the
left
photo
is
the
very
end
of
this
section
of
the
yellow
section
of
the
alleyway.
You
can
see
how
this
fence
on
the
the
left
protrudes,
actually
a
little
bit
of
that
I
believe
a
little
bit
of
that
accessory
building
does
as
well
on
the
right
picture
that
black
fence
protrudes
next
slide.
Please.
I
U
I
U
Yeah,
so
next
slide
would
be
another
backup,
so
the
left
I'm
just
kind
of
walking
back
towards
the
east
and
then
the
the
picture
on
the
right
is
just
a
little
bit
more
to
the
east,
showing
you
the
entire
and
that
that's
pretty
much
at
the
point
of
that
picture
on
the
right.
That
is
kind
of
the
ending
point
of
the
second
La
vacation
application
and
then
next
slide.
U
Please
and
then
the
one
on
the
left
shows
more
of
the
entirety
of
the
the
alley
and
then
the
one
on
the
right
is
the
most
eastern
part
of
it,
and
this
shows
the
couple
of
properties
that
actually
access
it
to
the
their
garages
and
then
next
slide.
Please,
on
this
one,
the
Planning
Commission
voted
5
to2
to
send
a
positive
recommendation
and
again
there
wasn't
a
lot
of
discussion
in
the
hearing.
We
did
pick
up
one
more
commissioner,
that
kind
of
felt
like
the
LA
vac.
U
You
know,
La
vacation
was
not
necessary
and
probably
shouldn't
happen,
but
overall
it
was
a
positive
recommendation
to
you
and
then
the
next
slide.
Please
and
then
this
one
is
a
little
different
because
of
the
width
of
the
property.
All
six
would
get
part
of
this
La
vacation
would
would
take
the
the
property,
so
they
would
split
it
in
half
of
what
they.
I
U
U
I
U
T
M
and
just
you
know
just
for
any
of
those
encroachments,
there
would
actually
be
the
property
owner's
responsibility
to
remove.
We
would
go
through
the
the
enforcement
process
to
let
them
know
that
they
are
encroached
in
the
right
away.
They're
be
given
a
certain
amount
of
time,
but
they
would
be
on
on
the
owners
to
remove
those
fences,
buildings
or
anything
and
shape
that
out
back
up
to
where
it
was
okay.
U
V
Please
Rusty
Balo,
and
the
only
thing
I
would
add,
is
that,
interestingly
enough,
most
of
the
alleys
in
this
way
actually
run
north
south,
and
this
alley
happens
to
run
east
west
and
a
block
away.
You
have
the
sine
tracks,
which
has
a
perfect
walkable
path,
and
so
the
effort
that
it
would
take
to
restore
this
alley
when
you've
got
such
a
nice
spot
to
walk
regardless.
Just
a
block
away,
wouldn't
make
a
whole
lot
of
sense.
It
seems
like
so
anyway,
just
thought.
I'd,
add
that.
M
M
Formal.
Do
I
have
to
adjourn
the
work
session?
Oh
so
we
are
going
to
and
we
vote
for
that
or
do
I
just
get
to
call
it.
Okay,
so
I'm
going
to
call
for
a
recess
to
this
work
session
s,
so
we
can
convene
in
a
limited
formal
and
now
that
we're
in
our
work
session
we
are
going
to
move
into
closed
session
for
the
purposes
of
attorney.
Client
matters
is
that
accurate
advice
of
counsel
or
advice
of
counsel,
all
right
advice
of
counsel.