►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting - February 24, 2021
Description
Planning Commission Meeting - February 24, 2021
https://www.slc.gov/planning/
https://www.slc.gov/planning/planning-commission-agendas-minutes/
A
A
A
A
B
Yes,
so
there
are
multiple
ways
to
watch
this,
whether
it's
through
the
webex
link
or
through
youtube.
If
you
are
watching
this
and
you
would
like
to
participate
in
the
meeting,
there
is
multiple
ways
to
do
that.
B
If
you
are
logged
into
the
webex
you'll
be
able
to
speak
to
us
when
it's
your
time
and
turn
and
I'll
show
you
how
to
indicate
that
in
just
a
moment,
if
you're
not
or
if
you
have
any
trouble
attempting
to
speak
or
there's
any
sort
of
issues
with
your
microphone
or
connection,
you
can
always
send
emails
to
the
email
address
on
the
bottom.
It's
planning.commons
slcgov.com
and
we
will
be
monitoring
that
throughout
the
meeting
any
comments
we
get
about
a
topic
that
happens
to
receive
it
before
the
public
hearing.
B
B
There's
a
little
hand
in
the
bottom
right
hand
of
the
corner,
and
it
is
small
and
it's
easy
to
miss
it.
But
when
it
comes
time
for
your
item
when
we're
discussing
that
item
and
if
you
would
like
to
speak,
just
click
on
that
button
indicate
that
and
that
will
show
to
us
that
you're
interested
in
speaking,
you
should
be
able
to
look
at
your
own
name
and
see
that
their
little
hand
is
raised
once
you're
done
speaking
and
you
don't
have.
You
would
not
like
to
speak
on
further
matters.
A
Okay,
I
do
not
think
that
we
need
to
read
the
anchor
location
announcement
today,
but
we
will
not
be
meeting
in
an
active
location,
obviously
we'll
be
meeting
only
online
today.
So
I
have
I'm
going
to
be
asking
for
an
approval
of
the
minutes
for
january
january.
10Th.
Excuse
me
not
january,
not
january
10th
february,.
D
A
I
have
a
motion
from
carolyn
a
second
from
john
to
approve
the
minutes,
so
I'm
going
to
go
through
roll
call
vote
here
and
this
will
be
maureen.
Yes,
amy.
C
A
And
is
crystal
here
this
evening:
she
is
not
okay.
Thank
you
all
right.
The
minutes
are
approved.
Now.
Moving
on
to
the
report
of
the
chair
and
the
vice
chair,
I
have
no
report
amy.
I
have
nothing
as
well.
Thank
you
and
the
report
of
the
director.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
So
we'll
move
right
along
we're
going
to
start
the
set
of
public
hearings
that
we
have
for
this
evening
and
the
first
one
is
modifications
to
izzy
south
design
review
at
approximately
534
east
2100
south.
B
Hey
caitlin,
can
I
interrupt
you
just
for
a
moment.
I
just
wanted
to
let
the
your
presenter
group
know
I
was
able
to
make
ian
percy
and
max
korres
a
panelist.
I
have
not
been
able
to
make
ryan
mcmullen
or
ian
percy
into
a
panelist.
B
I
can
unmute
them
during
their
time,
but
they
wouldn't
be
able
to
share
their
screen,
and
so
what
they
may
want
to
do
is
during
this
time
to
maybe
exit
and
try
and
re-enter
the
meeting,
and
maybe
to
send
that
presentation
to
somebody
like
justin
who
was
able
to
make
it
into
the
meeting.
So
I
just
want
to
give
them
some
time.
E
Is
everyone
able
to
see
my
screen?
Yes,
we
are.
Thank
you
very
much
all
right,
so
this
is
for
the
izzy
south
development
that
is
located
at
534,
east
2100
south
and
just
for
a
little
bit
of
background
information
on
this
project.
This
professional
has
already
gone
through
a
design
review
and
special
exception
approval
processes
with
the
planning
commission.
The
project
has
already
been
approved.
E
It
was
approved
by
the
planning
commission
in
their
december
2nd
2020
meeting,
where
the
planning
commission
found
that
it
met
all
of
the
standards
set
forth
in
the
ordinance
which
includes
building
size,
building
heights
parking
number
of
units
all
of
those
things.
So
the
only
thing
that
the
planning
commission
will
be
considering
for
this
development
this
evening
is
requested
change
to
the
exterior
materials.
E
These
material
changes
will
also
be
reflected
in
the
southern
facade
of
the
building,
where
a
portion
of
the
wood
will
be
replaced
with
the
eifs.
E
Here
is
another
view
of
that
same
face
of
the
building
and
just
for
the
planning
commission's
information.
We
have
a
table
here
on
the
screen
that
indicates
the
exchange
materials
both
for
the
metal,
paneling
and
the
eif.
E
E
F
Okay,
thank
you.
So
I
am
justin
hepler
with
ajc
architects.
I
am
representing
highboy
ventures
on
presenting
this
project.
Thank
you
both
to
the
planning
commission
and
to
caitlin
for
the
time
tonight
and
for
the
effort
that
we
put
into
this.
What
we
are
doing
is
asking
for
a
materiality
change
that
we
believe
helps
add
some
additional
dimensional
quality
to
the
facade.
One
of
the
things
we
heard
when
we
were
presenting
this
a
few
months
ago
to
the
public
is
that
they
felt
like
it
may
be
a
little
bit
too
monolithic.
F
As
we've
been
developing
the
north
building
across
the
street.
We
played
around
with
the
idea
of
changing
the
color
and
materiality
of
the
portion
on
the
third
floor
that
pushes
back
along
2100
south
and
liked
the
architectural
quality
it
brought
to
the
building.
We
were
trying
to
be
very
simple
in
our
material
choices
when
we
designed
this
project
may
be
too
simple,
and
so
by
adding
that
dimensional
quality
of
pushing
back
and
not
repeating
the
platform
siding
up
on
the
third
floor.
F
Making
the
architectural
episodes
have
more
character
and
helping
to
create
that
dimensional
pushback
on
the
third
floor,
so
we
thought
it
was
worth
coming
back
and
asking
if
we
could
do
that
on
the
south
assad
we
reached
out
to
mali
understood
that
this
would
be
part
of
that
process.
The
other
thing
we
are
asking
for
on
the
south
or
on
the
north
facade
of
the
south
building,
is
to
take
that
metal
panel,
that
is,
on
the
pop-out
element
of
the
townhouse
gable
forms
and
push
it
around
the
corner.
F
We
believe
that
makes
that
less
busy
and
results
in
a
simpler
presentation
that
expresses
the
architecture
more
successfully,
so
that
would
be
on
the
north
facade
of
the
south
building
then
as
we
rotate.
So
this
is
an
overall
view,
and
you
see
that
pushed
back
from
above
with
the
different
material,
color
and
texture
on
with
the
efis
product.
Instead
of
the
siding
moving
to
the
south
facade
of
the
south
building,
we
thought
that
also
helped
pop
the
three
wood
elements
that
were
already
designed
to
pop
out.
F
If
we
took
the
facade
of
the
pushed
back
elements
and
changed
those
to
the
efus
with
the
with
the
gray
color
tone,
and
so
we
felt
like
it
helped
add
dimensional
character
to
the
back
of
the
building.
Also,
so,
for
those
reasons
we
thought
it
was
worth
coming
back
and
asking
if
we
could
have
the
council's
permission
to,
or
the
commission's
permission
to
make
these
adjustments
as
we
look
towards
the
end
of
construction
documents
and
get
ready
to
wrap
this
up
and
submit
it
to
the
city.
F
D
D
A
Are
there
any
other
comments?
Are
the
other
people
wishing
to
speak.
B
We
do
have
several
and
I'll
call
on
them
just
as
a
reminder
if
people
showed
up
late,
if
you'd
like
to
speak,
please
make
sure
to
indicate
so
by
clicking
on
the
little
hand,
on
the
bottom
right
hand,
side
corner
of
your
screen.
So
we
know
who
to
call
on.
A
And
also,
if
you,
if
you
will
also
state
your
name
and
you
will
have
two
minutes
to
talk.
B
G
Yes,
I
would
absolutely
I
apologize
for
the
beeping.
I
just
walked
into
a
room-
that's
fine!
G
So
I'm
now
I'm
aware
that
this
project
has
been
approved,
and
this
may
not
be
the
correct
venue
for
this,
but
in
general
I
just
had
some
comments
for
the
development
you
should
see.
As
a
salt
lake
city
resident
for
15
years,
I
have
been
well
frequently
bothered
by
the
amount
of
high-priced
housing
that
has
come
up
and
the
lack
of
low-income
housing.
G
A
B
You
it
looks
like
our
next
speaker
is
going
to
be
eli
kaufman
eli
kaufman.
You
are
unmuted.
If
you'd
like
to
speak.
You
have
two
minutes
to
do
so.
H
Alright,
well,
I've
been
a
resident
of
our
sugar
house,
my
whole
life.
I
grew
up
in
this
neighborhood
and
I
grew
up
in
salt
lake,
and
I
agree
with
what
devon
has
said.
H
I
think
that,
even
though
this
project
has
already
been
approved,
I
would
have
liked
to
be
able
to
comment
on
it
sooner,
but
it's
been
very
difficult
to
figure
out
how
and
where
I
can
engage
in
these
meetings,
because
the
city
council
website
is
not
welcoming
and
makes
it
very
difficult
to
register
makes
it
difficult
to
know
which
which
issues
will
be
discussed
at
each
at
each
meeting,
and
I
just
want
to
say
that,
like
most
of
the
people
I
know
in
salt
lake
can
afford
apartments
that
are
around
half
of
what
apartments
like
this
cost,
and
I
really
think
that
it's
out
of
touch
for
everyone
to
be
focusing
entirely
on
these
minor
design
changes
which,
as
an
artist
seem
very
irrelevant
and
minuscule,
and
focusing
a
lot
more
on
who's,
actually
going
to
live
in
these,
because
I've
seen
plenty
of
luxury
apartment
buildings
go
up
all
over
all
over
town
and
they're,
almost
all
empty,
because
nobody
in
salt
lake
can
afford
them.
H
H
They
should
be
priced
much
lower.
They
should
be
considering
the
income
of
the
average
salt
lake
city
person.
We
should
be
considering
the
fact
that
the
minimum
wage
in
salt
lake
is
much
lower
than
federal
minimum
wage.
I
mean
a
lot
of
people
supposedly
living
wage
in
salt
lake
is
around
11,
but
a
lot
of
people.
H
I
know,
make
a
lot
less
than
that,
like
11
an
hour,
and
so
considering
that
I
don't
know
how
any
of
us
are
supposed
to
consider
all
these
new
buildings
that
you
guys
are
approving
for
people
like
us
like
sure
they
might
look
nice,
but
who
are
they
for
because
they're
not
for
salt
lake
city
residents,
and
I
think
that
it's
important
that
in
the
future,
you
guys
keep
that
in
mind,
but
also
moving
forward
with
projects
that
have
already
been
approved.
How
can
that
be
changed?
H
Or
how
can
that
be
modified
so
that
it
can
more
be
more
welcome
to
people
who
are
actually
working
and
living
in
this
city?
Because
if
you
keep
approving
all
these
projects
that
are
for
people
who
aren't
from
here
and
who
aren't
working
these
working
working-class
jobs?
There's
not
going
to
be
anybody
left
in
salt
lake
to
clean
your
toilets
and
serve
your
food,
because
we.
A
B
It
looks
like
our
next
individual
would
like
to
speak.
I
believe
it's
ian
dexter
or
not
exactly
sure.
I'm
saying
your
first
name
right,
but
you
have
two
minutes
so
go
ahead.
Sir.
I
Cool
I
currently
live
in
sugar
house.
I've
been
living
in
salt
lake
city,
my
entire
life,
I've
watched
and
like
felt
in
the
world
in
like
my
life
around
me
as
the
rent,
has
gone
up
as
these
huge,
fairly
ugly,
fairly
ridiculous
apartments
like-
and
I
say-
and
I
mentioned
this
like
as
far
as
we're
talking
about
the
aesthetics.
I
This
is
not
good
and
I
wouldn't
really
care
if
this
was
serving
a
purpose,
but
all
it's
going
to
do
is
sit
empty,
because
no
one
in
the
city
can
afford
this
project,
like
people
aren't
going
to
be
able
to
afford
to
live
here.
I
think
that
it's
pretty
morally
bankrupt
for
the
city
government,
for
any
city
board
to
be
zoning
and
approving
projects
on
behalf
of
these
developers
at
the
expense
of
the
actual
people
who
live
in
these
neighborhoods.
That's
all.
Thank
you.
B
G
A
G
G
I
I
think
it's
lower
quality
and
less
durable
material
than
what
was
part
of
this
proposal,
and
I
think
that
would,
at
least
in
my
opinion,
would
be
more
consistent
with
the
encouragement
in
numerous
planning
documents
to
use
durable
materials,
and
so
I
would
encourage
consideration
to
use
wood
or
some
other
more
durable
material.
B
J
Hi,
my
name
is
michelle
maurer.
I
am
with
wasatch,
tennis,
united
and
I'm
just
as
a
salt
lake
city
taxpayer.
I
am
just
here
to
voice
my
disappointment
and
my
discouragement
in
the
rezoning
of
this
area.
J
As
it's
been
said,
there
is
a
lot
of
unaffordable
housing
that
continues
to
pop
up,
and
it's
really,
it's
really
discouraging,
to
see
to
see
people
who
have
to
you
know
they
get
evicted
from
their
homes,
because
salt
lake
wants
to
bring
in
money
and
push
out
people
who
have
lived
here,
their
entire
lives-
and
I
know
like
so
I
just
had
a
friend
today-
who
got
an
eviction
notice
and
she's
lived
in
salt
lake.
J
Her
whole
life-
and
you
know
so
these
tech
bros
can
they
like
bought
the
place,
and
so
now
she's
being
kicked
out
of
her
home,
and
I
know
that's
not
directly,
it's
not
directly.
You
know
this
lot,
obviously,
but
it
is
tied.
J
We
do
not
want
us,
our
neighbors,
our
family,
our
friends,
to
be
kicked
out
of
salt
lake
because
we
can't
afford
it.
It's
pretty
transparent.
What's
going
on
here,
the
attraction
of
outside
money
and
the
destruction
of
old
amazing
things
that
are,
you
know
home
to
salt
lake,
to
see
them
being
torn
down
and
to
see
these
these
unaffordable,
condominiums
etc.
Go
up.
J
J
It's
really
really
wild
and
I
know
y'all
aren't
like
you
don't
you
know:
you're,
not
you're,
not
chief
police,
mike
brown,
but
to
see
cops,
harass
and
shelter.
People
who
are
camping
outside
of
condominiums
that
are
empty
that
are
huge.
Just
the
juxtaposition
of
that
is
awful
and
y'all
are
directly
here.
That's
two
minutes.
Thank
you.
K
There
is
paula,
mendoza.
B
E
Hi,
my
name
is
paula
mendoza,
I'm
a
member
of
the
organization,
wasatch
tennis,
united
and
I'm
here
to
voice
my
opposition
to
this
rezoning
development.
Even
though.
C
C
To
academic
and
professional
success,
this
rezone
only
benefits
developers
looking
out
for
their
bottom
line
and
does
not
take
into
consideration
the
communities
directly
affected
in
this
area.
These
developments
will
no
longer
go
unnoticed.
They
displace
and
destabilize
the
community
by
making
housing
debilitatingly
expensive
for
families
and
individuals
to
afford
to
live.
Thank.
A
If
that
is
all
the,
if
we
received
any
emails
on
this.
K
K
There
is
one
from
a
constituent
named
wanda
and
another
from
david
fernandez.
They
are
both
in
your
dropbox
and
I
direct
your
attention
to
those
and
then
I
have
a
few
more.
Let's
see,
I
have
at
least
one
more
to
read
into
the
record.
K
So
this
one
is
from
lynn
schwartz
for
the
planning
commission.
This
is
a
classic
bait
and
switch
by
the
developer.
The
original
design
approval
was
for
specific
materials,
giving
the
building
a
specific
appearance
almost
as
soon
as
design
approval
was
given.
The
developer
asked
to
use
cheaper
materials,
less
durable
and
cheaper
thesis
do
not
lead
to
better
lead.
Sorry
do
not
lead
to
a
better
project.
K
A
All
right,
thank
you.
There
being
no
other
comments,
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
bring
this
back
to
the
commission
for
discussion.
Also,
I'm
going
to
ask
if
the
if
the
applicant
would
like
to
address
the
comments
from
from
from
from
public.
F
So
I'll
just
say
a
few
brief
things.
Thank
you
for
everyone's
comments
in
this
material
change.
Regarding
the
durability,
the
product
is
all
up
high
on
the
third
floor.
It
definitely
is
all
the
materials
proposed
originally
are
all
down
on
the
street.
F
We
stayed
loyal
to
that
and
we
don't
think
that
adding
any
of
the
aephis
product
down
low
would
do
anything
to
the
building,
to
enhance
the
architecture
and
again
we're
not
looking
to
it's
it's
kind
of
sixes
in
the
swap,
so
we're
just
looking
to
what,
in
our
minds,
enhance
the
architecture
of
the
building.
So
if
anyone
has
any
questions,
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
them.
M
I
do
the
first.
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
address
some
of
the
comments
that
were
made.
I
definitely
you
know,
feel
the
the
frustration
and
the
passion
that
those
comments
were
made
with
you
know
under
for
me.
You
know
if
we
were
to
stop
all
development
in
salt
lake
city,
we're
in
the
middle
of
a
huge
housing
shortage.
M
That's
just
going
to
continue
to
raise
the
price
on
every
house
in
salt
lake
city.
The
purpose
of
these
types
of
densification
projects
is
not
necessarily
to
replace
single-family
homes
with
affordable
housing.
It's
to
provide
housing
for
more
people,
which
will
then
in
turn
create
more
affordable
housing
throughout
the
city.
M
It
may
not
be
affordable
to
everyone
in
that
specific
development,
but
overall
it
should
bring
down
housing
costs
throughout
the
city,
and
that's
really
what
the
purpose
of
these
projects
are,
and
I
just
kind
of
wanted
to
get
that
out
there
to
kind
of
clarify.
I
mean
the
more
housing
there
is,
obviously
the
cheaper
and
more
affordable
the
rest
will
be
so
and
then
to
kind
of
bring
it
back
to
the
topic.
M
I
would
agree
with
the
changes
to
the
front
of
the
facades
where
we're
turning
the
corner
with
materials
anytime,
we
can
do
that.
I
think
it
just
makes
the
building
look
more
complete.
When
you
add
you
know
a
material
change
at
a
corner,
it
typically
makes
the
building
feel
unfinished
and
can
kind
of
cheapen.
The
look
I
feel
like
this
really
accentuates
the
architecture
in
a
better
cleaner
way,
and
it
still
is
a
durable
material.
M
F
So
we
could
go
with
the
panelized
cement
board.
Yes,
we
think
it
makes
sense
to
have
a
less
busy
material
up
on
top,
which
is
why
we
kind
of
landed
a
defest.
We
could
do
evas
or
stucco,
but
if
you
were
open
to
a
panelized
cement
board.
We
also
could
look
at
that
as
as
an
alternate
option,
so
we
would
like
it.
We
would
like
direction
in
this
meeting,
so
we
can
wrap
it
wrap
up
the
design.
M
Definitely
all
right!
Okay,
I
I
see
where
you
guys
broke
up
the
facade
in
the
ethos
and
I
think
keeping
that
patterning
with
the
cement
board.
I
you
know
if
you
did
need
to
add
a
horizontal
seam,
just
keep
it
low
and
maybe
line
it
up
with
the
bottom
of
the
window,
and
that
might
be
enough
to
get
you
the
height.
M
I
agree
with
the
color
change.
I
think
it
makes
everything
else
pop
with
the
wood
and
I
think
it
makes
the
entry
more
defined.
I
think
there
was
way
too
much
wood
on
the
front,
and
so
I
agree
100
with
your
change
for
the
design.
I
also
agree
with
it
on
the
back.
I
think
it
breaks
up
the
mass
because
there's
a
lot
of
mass
all
the
way
across
the
building,
and
I
think
this
helps
break
up
that
and
I
think
it's
an
improvement.
A
So
I'm
going
to
also
agree
with
you
on
on
that
on
both
of
those
both
of
those
issues.
You
could
also
use
the
metal
panel
on
that
upper
floor
as
well,
if
you
did
but,
but
I
kind
of
agreed
that
cement
board
would
actually
be
better
yeah.
B
Commissioner
shear,
if
I
could
interrupt
yeah
just
I
think
one
of
the
other,
your
partners,
ryan
mcmullen,
indicated
to
molly
that
he
might
want
to
speak
he's
in
the
attendee
list,
but
some
reason
the
system
won't
always
allow
us
to
make
the
panel.
So
I
was
going
to
unmute
him
and.
A
A
M
A
N
A
C
A
C
A
O
O
This
is
the
location
of
the
subject:
rezone
and
master
plan
amendment.
It's
the
old
snow
grove
ice
cream
factory
parcel
along
with
the
adjacent
office
mini
complex
there
to
the
east.
O
It's
on
21st,
south
between
eighth
and
ninth,
east
and
commonwealth
planning
staffs
has
provided
you
with
an
analysis
of
the
proposal
and
the
staff
report,
and
we
assert
that
the
standards
have
been
met
for
the
proposed
zoning
map
amendment
and
we
likewise
assert
that
it
is
appropriate
to
amend
the
associated
future
land
use
map
in
the
master
plan.
O
So
the
question
is:
what
are
these
amendments
really
about,
and
I
want
to
distill
these
requests
to
the
simplest
terms
possible.
First
off
the
property
is
currently
zoned
and
master
planned
for
multi-family,
residential
or
mixed-use
type
development.
The
uses
allowed,
regardless
of
the
outcome
of
the
requested
amendments,
will
remain.
The
same
use
is
not
the
issue
here,
as
I
outlined
in
the
staff
report
on
page
nine
of
and
that's
of
your
pdf.
O
O
O
So
the
crux
of
the
request
before
you
is
whether
or
not
to
allow
the
opportunity
for
an
additional
15
feet
of
building
height
if
the
applicant
chooses
to
pursue
a
development
through
the
design
review
process
just
to
just
just
so
you're
aware,
you're,
probably
going
to
hear
public
testimony
momentarily
regarding
what
can
be
built
on
the
property
in
the
future.
O
You
will
probably
hear
concerns
for
traffic
parking
congestion,
noise,
dust,
architectural
styles,
disrepair,
the
surrounding
streets,
lack
of
infrastructure,
the
need
for
affordable
housing,
no
need
for
more
luxury
housing,
no
need
for
more
retail
sidewalk
widths,
danger
for
drivers
and
pedestrians
crime.
The
list
goes
on.
These
are
not
the
issues
on
the
table
tonight.
O
O
O
A
Mr
trump,
I
would
like
to
make
it
clear
to
the
all
of
the
attendees
and
anyone
who
is
waiting
to
comment
that
we
are
very
happy
to
entertain
comments
on
any
part
of
this
proposal.
At
this
point.
N
Max
I've
got
a
question
for
you,
so
in
some
ways
we're
taking
the
sugar
house
business
district
and
it's
extending
down
now
past
ninth
east
right-
and
I
look
at
the
broader
zoning
map-
and
you
have
this-
you
know
cc
sort
of
zone,
but
then
it
goes
to
the
form-based
sc
and
form-based
sc
zones,
and
I
wonder
if
you
could
maybe
talk
about
this
reason.
N
Context
of
those
two
zones,
particularly
height
use
and
kind
of
you,
know,
intensity
of
what
what
what
could
or
may
be
developed
in
an
fb
kind
of
sc
zone.
I
mean
mainly
I'm
looking
like
in
the
master
plan
or
the
current
zoning
map.
Was
there
a
vision
that
you
have
this
business
district
and
sugar
house
that
would
kind
of
phase
its
way
out
as
it
moves
further
kind
of
west
to
24.
N
South
or
you
know,
is
this
cc
lot
because
it
is
kind
of
unique
the
cc
a
lot
kind
of
sits
there
kind
of
sandwiched
between
the
sugar
house,
business
district,
2
and
the
fbse
with
the
you
know
are
we
are
we
zone.
You
know
is
this
because
it
sits
there
in
this
weird
spot?
Is
it?
Is
that
appropriate
enough
for
that
spot,
which.
O
O
And-
and
you
bring
up
a
good
point,
though
there
there
is
meant
to
be
a
transition
between
the
sugar
house,
business
district
zone
and
the
form
based
zone,
and
this
parcel
conglomeration
of
parcels
is
somewhat
of
an
anomaly.
It
would
be
an
extension
of
the
sugar
house,
business
district
zone
and
the
the
intent
is
to
make
a
smoother
transition
between
those
two.
B
Commissioner,
while
you
were
talking
about
it,
I
brought
up
the
fb.
Fbsc
actually
allows
it's
a
maximum
billing
height
of
60
feet,
but
you
can
request
15
additional
feet
for
residential
uses
if
a
minimum
of
10
percent
are
affordable
and
se
is
locked
at
45
feet,.
G
P
P
Good
evening
kind
of
still
getting
used
to
these
types
of
meetings,
my
name
is
mark
isaac.
I
represent
the
ownership
group
group
on
the
dryer
snail
grove
project.
Some
of
you
may
recognize
me.
I've
worked
on
a
number
of
projects
through
the
sugar
house
area.
The
interesting
thing
about
this
application
in
this
location
is
the
adjacency
of
services
on
ninth
east
with
the
smiths
and
the
s
line.
P
Transit,
stop
on
ninth
east
and
some
of
the
other
accoutrements,
with
the
four-sided
block
four-sided
streets
and
stuff
has
allowed
for
real
good
layout,
real
good
look
and
real
real
good
design.
Iterations.
P
Our
idea
was
with
the
application
is
we
could
build
up
to
45
feet
of
height
with
planning,
commission
and
planning
staff
support
in
the
original
cc
zone?
We
thought
about
going
to
the
form
base
code
further
to
the
west
and
and
extending
that
easterly
or
carrying
the
sugar
house
central
business
district
2
zone
further
west.
The
idea
with
the
sugar
house
central
business
district
zone
further
west
was
it
was
well
received
from
the
sugar
house,
land
use
committee
and
the
sugar
house
community
council
as
a
good
extension
of
the
zone.
P
With
this
zoning
change
to
the
sugarhouse
central
business
district,
we
have
all
that
design
guidelines
that
are
requirements
of
those
zones
in
those
conditions
and
they
require
the
15-foot
setback
above
first
or
second
floor
of
height.
They
require
a
lot
more
material
with
regards
to
masonry,
brick
facades
and
more
of
the
commercial
glass
lines
and
stuff.
P
But
we
thought
what
we
would
try
to
do
is
if
we
could
get
an
extra
floor
of
height
and
go
to
60
feet.
However,
many
units
we
accomplish
on
the
top
of
that
added
floor
through
the
re-zone
acceptance
by
your
body
and
the
and
the
community
council
land
use
committee
and
then
obviously
the
planning
staff,
whatever
amount
of
units
we
could
achieve.
P
I
know
that
the
staff
and
you
guys
have
been
looking
at
different
ways
to
do
that
in
codes
and
conditions,
and
we
thought
that
this
would
be
a
unique
way
that
we
could
do
something
in
the
community
of
sugar
house
where
we
would
earmark
53
units
at
an
80
ami
and
have
a
workforce
housing
element
of
our
project
in
return
for
the
the
approval
of
the
additional
height.
P
A
K
H
I
I
really
like
I,
the
sugar
house
rezone,
makes
sense
the
extension
to
60
feet.
I
think
I'm
following
your
reasoning
makes
sense
for
a
lot
of
reasons.
I
would
like
to
strongly
encourage
that
the
snow
grow
sign
be
continued
in
the
in
the
project
development.
At
some
point,
I
don't
think
that's
anything
we
can
require,
but
I
would
love
to
see
that
used
in
that
project.
P
To
talk
about
preserving
character
heritage
in
history,
we're
going
to
save
the
original
signage,
we're
going
to
incorporate
the
ice
cream
cone
onto
the
east
flank.
It
will
be
above
art,
gallery
space
on
9th
east
and
on
an
upper
balcony
and
lit
with
the
mural
behind
it.
The
whole
idea
is
so
the
the
ice
cream
cone
is
visible
with
estee's
pizza
and
the
wing
company,
the
cool
little
retail,
but
it's
also
visible
all
the
way
down
to
the
streetcar
line
we've
already
reached
out,
and
it
was
a
yes
go
sign
originally
built.
A
Actually
matt
was
next
john.
If
you're
go,
oh
was
that
you
left
sometimes.
O
O
Just
in
case
you,
you
aren't
aware
the
the
developer
marks
group
has
submitted
an
application
for
design
review
and
that
is
currently
being
processed
by
the
planning
division,
and
you
will
see
that
in
one
of
your
meetings
shortly.
N
N
Hey
so
for
lex,
I
just
again,
I'm
just
trying
to
get
my
better
understanding
of
how
this
kind
of
rezone
fits
into
the
kind
of
property
in
his
own
place.
One
of
the
things
that
I
really
thought
was
unfortunate
and
disliked
about
the
izzy
project
was
the
impact
that
it
had
on
the
residential
districts
that
were
right
behind
it,
and
so
as
we're
adding
a
new
zone.
Here,
I'm
trying
to
read
the
sugar,
the
zoning
code
about
the
sugars,
business
district
and
your
staff
report.
N
So
what
would
the
setback
there
is
that
r15000
zone
that's
immediately
to
the
south
of
this
project?
What
was
what
are
the
setback
requirements
and
the
buffering
that
would
you
know
that's
in
the
sugar
specific
business
zone
that
would
kind
of
mitigate
whatever
happens
with
that
residential
software?
Just
talk
about
that,
please.
O
Sure,
one
of
the
things
that
I
tried
to
demonstrate
in
the
staff
report,
with
the
photographs
that
I
included,
was
the
fact
that,
commonwealth,
with
the
exception
of
the
the
house
on
the
corner
of
nut
of
eighth,
east
and
commonwealth,
that
commonwealth
street
essentially
serves
as
an
alley.
It's
a
city
street,
but
yes,
it
abuts
r15
000,
but
it
it
it's
access
to
all
the
garages
for
those
houses
that
are
around
the
corner
on
elm
there's
a
considerable
distance
between
this
property
and
those
houses.
O
This
the
sugar
house,
business
district
zone
in
terms
of
setbacks,
is
an
urban
zone.
It's
it's
designed
to
be
built
to
the
sidewalk
it's
designed
to
be
built
to
the
street,
but
in
terms
of
the
setback
you
know
to
that
r1
5000
to
the
south,
there's
a
considerable
distance
between
the
property
lines
and
those
houses.
N
So
I
mean
your
staff
report
kind
of
outlines
buffer
yards
and
it
outlines
this.
You
know
the
three
feet
of
building
height
above
30
feet
responds
with
the
core
spreading
one
foot
of
setback.
How
does
that
apply
when
you
have
a
street,
unlike
the
izzy
development,
that
was
right
up
against
the
houses
when
you
have
a
street?
Does
that
setback
requirements
still
kick
in
even
with
the
street
there,
or
is
the
street
come
into
play
and
count
as
part
of
that.
O
The
street
comes
into
play
that
setback,
and
I
wrote
that
many
many
years
ago
that
regulation
and
it
was
it-
was
for
where
it
was
on
the
north
side
of
21st
south
more
towards
11th
east,
where
there
are
properties
that
abutted,
the
sugar
house
business
district
zone
that
are
zoned
residentially
they
directly
above
there's
no
street
between
them
to
buffer,
and
so
that
step
back
in
that
decrease
of
building
height
and
step
back
was
written
for
that
type
of
scenario.
N
So
if
I'm
on
commonwealth
after
this
project's
developed,
am
I
looking
straight
up
at
a
60-foot
building,
or
am
I
looking
at
a
building
that
is
kind
of
staircased
up,
like
the
other
sugar
house,
districts
are
on
20,
you
know
long,
island
and
stuff.
I
mean
what
is
how
what
is
the
experience
on
commonwealth
going
to
be
if
this
zone
change
goes
through
or
what
could
it
be?.
P
O
Well,
there
will
have
to
there's
a
there's,
a
step
back
required
at
30
feet.
That's
in
the
sugar
house
business
district
zone,
if
you're,
if
you
own
one
of
those
houses
on
elm
you're,
going
to
step
into
your
backyard,
you
will
see
this
building.
There's
no
doubt
about
it.
N
O
You're
going
to
look
at
you're
going
to
look
at
30,
it's
30
feet,
it's
just
like
anywhere
else
in
the
sugar
house,
business
district,
all
those
buildings
that
exceed
that
height
that
step
back
was
designed
so
that
the
as
a
from
a
pedestrian
perspective
along
commonwealth,
that
you
would
perceive
30
feet
as
opposed
to
60.
N
B
O
N
A
Right
thanks
for
that
reminder,
okay,
and
also
that
is
something
that
I
want,
make
sure
that
the
public
knows
that
we
will
be.
This
is
a
discussion
about
the
zoning.
We
will
be
looking
at
the
design
if
the
zoning
goes
through,
so
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
open
up
the
public
meeting
and
see
if
there
are
anyone
who
would
like
to
speak.
A
D
D
We
talked
about
bringing
this
zone
all
the
way
along
21st
south
to
7th
east,
but
at
that
time
there
were
lots
of
buildings,
mostly
west
of
ninth
south,
that
were
would
have
been
non-conforming
if
that
happened,
and
so
we
just
couldn't
get
any
traction
on
that.
But
I
think
there
are
many
of
us
that
have
wanted
this
to
happen
for
some
years.
It's
not
just
a
fly-by-night
thing
and
then
to
address
the
wasatch
tenants.
United
mark
has
already
said
there
will
be
affordable
housing
in
this
building.
D
So
I
hope
you
heard
me
one
thing
that
community
council
works
hard
at
is
making
sure
that
that
happens
and
it's
like
pulling
teeth.
Now
the
sugar
house,
business
district
2
zone
is
designed
for
a
more
neighborhood
scale.
Walkable
community,
9th
east
and
21st
south
are
now
on
a
15
minute
bus
schedule,
and
this
is
within
a
quarter
mile
of
the
sugar
house
track
station.
D
So
we're
hoping
for
walkability.
Through
this,
we
have
engineering
students
at
the
university
of
utah
working
with
transportation,
to
try
to
rework
21st
south
with
that
barrier
of
too
many
cars
from
7th
east
to
13th
east,
because
that's
going
to
be
reconstructed
in
a
couple
of
years
and
we're
hoping
to
add
some
bike
lanes
and
make
it
more
comfortable
for
pedestrians
to
walk,
and
we
like
the
fact
that
this
has
design
guidelines.
D
That's
a
big
thing.
One
of
our
pet
peeves
is
over-the-counter
permanence,
so
mark
has
been
to
our
meetings
at
least
twice
to
land
use,
at
least
once
to
the
main
council
and
numerous
other
small
meetings
and
we've
been
working
through.
We
like
the
design
and
you'll,
see
that
soon,
so
we
hope
you'll
prove
the
reason.
B
All
right,
we
have
a
number
of
them
I'll
start
at
the
top
of
my
list
here
and
molly.
If
you'll
help
keep
an
eye
on
that
too.
So
I
don't
skip
anybody
david
fernandez.
You
can
go
ahead
and
speak.
We.
O
Yeah,
my
only
comment
was
basically
on
the
zoning
lex
and.
C
Mark
have
done
a
good
job
on
their
presentation
and
what
the
building
is
going
to
look
like,
but
my
comment
was
basically
the
fact
that
the
zoning
in
sugar
houses,
this
factory,
is
very
rare
and
there's
no
way
that
this
would
ever
become
a
factory
again
and
there's
communities
in
this
in
this
valley.
That
would
just
love
to
have
this
property
and
plant
actually
in
their
in
their
community.
C
I'm
just
I'm
just
saddened
that
this
has
to
be
torn
down
and
something
else
put
in
its
place.
My
my
concern
and
my
objection
is
basically
the
fact
that
the
zoning
is
being
changed
to
eliminate
a
a
factory
that
basically
could
be
used
somewhere
else
and
other
communities
would
kill
for
this
opportunity.
C
B
You
all
right.
Next,
we
have
ellie
kaufman
if
you'd
like
this
week,.
H
All
right,
so,
I
think
that
the
first
thing
that
needs
to
be
addressed
here
is
that
you
guys
are
claiming
that
this
property
will
be
used
to
develop
affordable
housing,
which
is
defined
by
the
city
as
1
300,
affordable
housing
to
me
is
about
700,
including
utilities.
So
I
don't
want
to
hear
that
that
is
justifying
the
use
of
this
property
to
develop
more
floors
of
unaffordable
housing,
because
calling
1,
300
affordable,
is
completely
out
of
touch
with
the
majority
of
salt
lake
city
and
what
we
make.
H
I
also
want
to
note
that
mark
isaac
is
saying
that
he
has
worked
with
the
community.
We
are
the
community
and
we
are
telling
you
that
we
disagree
with
you,
so
you
need
to
take
that.
To
note
also,
I
want
to
say
to
john
lee's
remark
that
luxury
apartments
make
housing
affordable
for
everyone.
No,
they
don't
if
this
turns
into
luxury
housing,
even
affordable,
quote
on
quote,
as
in
1
300.
H
H
I
also
want
to
say
that
putting
in
murals
and
things
like
that
on
this
building
square,
that's
nice
as
an
artist.
I
would
love
an
opportunity
like
that
to
contribute,
except
that
I
know
that
it's
going
to
be
on
a
building
that
I
could
never
afford
to
live
in
and
that
kind
of
hurts,
because
you
want
artists
to
make
these
neighborhoods
look
nice,
but
you
don't
want
us
to
be
able
to
live
there
and
I
think
that's
important
to
know.
H
I
also
think
that
the
taller
these
are
built,
the
more
units
there
will
be
that
are
unaffordable
and
that's
not
helping
anyone.
I
also
want
to
say
that
what's
the
point
of
more
luxury
housing
when
all
of
the
other
luxury
housing
is
still
empty,
because
none
of
us
can
actually
afford
it.
I
think
that
people
are
saying
we're
getting
off
topic
as
though
these
issues
should
not
always
be
on
the
table,
and
I
think
you
all
need
to
know
that
you
are
being
complicit
in
displacing
low-income
families
from
this
area.
B
Okay,
it
looks
like
the
next
individual
is
ian
daxter
ian.
If
you
want
to
go
ahead,
you
have
two
minutes.
I
Yeah,
can
you
hear
me
yes
cool,
so
first
I
want
to
address
lex.
The
reason
these
hearings
are
held
is
not
because
we're
going
to
just
talk
about
you
know
some
bureaucratic
point
about
these
zoning
measures.
It's
because
we
you
need
to
hear
from
the
community
about
the
effects
that
are
concerned
it's
going
to
have
on
the
community
this
rezone.
So
these
concerns
are
totally
valid
to
bring
up,
and
I
think
it's
ridiculous
for
you
to
act
like
this
is
somehow
unfounded.
I
All
these
things,
the
aesthetics
all
of
it
whatever
this
is
part
of
it,
I'm
not
done
second
to
address
lee.
There
are
vacancies
every
year
in
utah
for
the
last
little
bit
like
last
year.
Vacancies
went
up
so
did
rent
the
supply
side.
Affordable
housing
does
not
exist
on
the
same
market
as
all
the
other
housing.
A
1700
apartment
is
not
it's
not
there,
because
they
need
to
fill
it
it's
there
because
they
need
to
it's.
It's
a
matter
of
capital
storage.
This
is
from
the
state
report.
I
This
is
what
the
state
report
on
affordable
housing
is
thinking
about,
the
majority
of
the
building
in
the
city
yeah.
I
this
was
already
mentioned
by
eli,
but
income
limits
when
you
look
at
the
ami
brackets,
what
the
research,
what
the
redevelopment
agency
defines
is
affordable
is
anything
in
the
moderate
income
bracket
or
lower,
that
is,
that
comes
out
to
about
1300
somewhere
around
there
other
affordable.
You
know
brackets
like
fair
market
or
whatever
960,
that's
ridiculous.
I
It's
just
simply
not
affordable,
especially
when
you
look
at
the
living
wage
of
the
city,
which
is
about
11.60.
This
is
from
the
state
report
on
affordable
housing.
You
can
all
go
and
read
it.
I'm
sure
a
lot
of
you
have.
I
think
that
it's
silly
for
you
to
act
ignorant,
try
to
shamelessly
bribe
us
with
unsubstantiated
promises,
yeah
11.60
after
utilities.
I
So
I
mean
if,
if
the
developer
is
ready
to
promise
in
paper
and
actually
work
with
like
public
institutions
to
be
bound
to
build,
affordable
housing
on
that
level,
on
that
income
level,
I
think
we
should,
but
I
don't
think
that
I
think
it's
really
cynical
for
you
to
just
say,
like
oh
yeah,
if
you
approve
our
thing,
we're
going
to
give
you
what
you
want
yeah,
eventually
the
day
is
going
to
come
where
you
have
to
actually
look
at
us
and
you
have
to
meet
in
public
and
it's
going
to
be
really
not
fun
if
we
have
to
bring
an
army
of
people
who
are
pissed
off
because
they
can't
afford
to
live
in
their
house.
I
A
Mr
dexter,
your
time
is
up.
Thank
you
for
your
comments.
B
All
right,
we
will
go
to
michelle
maurer
michelle.
Would
you
like
to
speak
two
minutes.
G
J
My
name
is
michelle
maurer
yeah.
I
just
want
to
echo,
what's
been
said
by
eli
and
isaac
or
sorry
like
an
ian
yeah.
This,
the
yeah
like
what
lex
is
saying
like
listing
all
these
reasons
why
it
might
be
kind
of
trying
to
not
use
a
cuss
word.
You
know
not
ideal
like
things
like
traffic
congestion,
short
sidewalks
like
it
can
be
an
eyesore
all
these
things
and
how
this
meeting
isn't
really
about
these
issues.
J
You're
the
planning
commission
so
yeah,
it
kind
of
is.
We
are
here
to
tell
you
that
that's
what
this
is
about.
This
is
about
y'all
kicking
out
people,
people
being
kicked
out
of
their
homes
because
they
can't
afford
any
longer
housing
in
the
area
where
you
keep
putting
up
these
unaffordable
complexes
yeah
and
to
reiterate
what
the
city
means
by
affordable
and
how
they're
pulling
teeth
out
to
to
make
affordable
housing
a
possibility
like
come
come
on.
J
That's
not
the
thirteen
hundred
dollars
in
in
that
range
like
that's
not
you
clearly
are
so
disconnected
and
it's
the
same
pattern.
We
see
across
all
these
issues
with
the
city
you
all
are
so
disconnected
and
you
clearly
don't
give
a
fudge
about
these
people
who
are
being
are
so
vastly
impacted
by
your
decisions,
and
it
is
deplorable
yeah.
This
was
mentioned,
but
mark
isaac
saying
that
he's
they've
been
working
with
the
community.
No,
like
eli
said
we
are
the
community.
J
The
snellgrove
family
does
not
represent
the
entire
community
and
it's
really
really
like
disturbing
to
hear
y'all
discuss
and
have
fun
about
like
how
can
we
incorporate
an
ice
cream
cone,
that's
kind
of
irrelevant
when
people
are
being
evicted
or
being
slowly
pushed
out
of
the
place?
They've
lived
their
whole
lives
because
of
y'all,
because
you
guys
just
keep
putting
up
these
buildings
was
that
a
someone's
sigh
am
I
yeah
yeah.
J
So
if
this
zoning
is
approved
just
yeah,
it
just
shows
how
out
of
touch
you
all
are,
and
we
are
demanding
that
the
zoning
not
be
approved
and
again.
G
Thank
you.
I'm
gonna
make
a
more
general
comment,
although
I
am
supportive
of
the
rezone.
I
want
to
just
talk
for
a
minute
about
the
cc
zone
which
exists
in
a
few
pockets
along
2100
south.
This
actually
came
to
my
attention
a
few
days
ago,
when
I
saw
a
blog
post
about
a
new
in-n-out
burger
being
proposed
near
state
street
in
2100
south
in
an
area
of
salt
lake
city
that
has
probably
the
best
transit
and
connections.
G
So
I
want
to.
I
want
to
talk
about
the
power
of
the
planning
commission
to
initiate
a
petition,
I've
kind
of
exhausted
options
over
the
years
for
the
planet,
for
the
city
council
to
initiate
a
petition
to
rezone
2100
south,
and
I
haven't
unfortunately,
seen
much
movement
from
the
administration
on
this
either.
G
The
planning
commission
can
initiate
petitions
other
than
the
property
owner
and
I
would
like
to
request
the
planning
commission
to
consider
a
petition
to
rezone
all
of
the
remaining
cc
parcels
on
2100
south
to
zones
that
are
compatible
with
the
master
plans
in
this
area.
We
have
a
wonderful
vision
for
salt
lake
called
plans
lake.
It
talks
on
page
9
about
place
making
it
talks
on
pages
17-21
about
neighborhoods
and
affordable
housing
and
growth.
G
It
talks
on
page
23
about
affordable
transportation
and
mobility
and
other
choices,
and
it
talks
on
page
31
about
beautiful
city.
I
think
many
of
you
are
probably
familiar
with
with
many
of
these
ideas.
We
have
really
fantastic
master
plans
and
it
doesn't
get
past
me
that
we
have
master
plans
that
talk
about
affordable
housing,
that's
not
being
implemented,
so
I
would
request
the
planning
commission
to
initiate
a
petition
to
rezone,
not
just
this
parcel,
but
all
of
the
cc
parcels
and
eliminate
them
across
the
2100
south
corridor.
B
All
right,
the
next
participant
we
have
is
lexi
langford
lexi.
You
have
two
minutes.
C
Hi
I.
P
C
You
all
can
hear
me
okay,
yes,
I
just
want
to
reiterate
the
fact
that
these
are
our
homes.
This
is
where
we
have
been
living.
This
is
you
know.
I've
spent
my
savings
to
be
able
to
try
to
get
a
nice
place
for
myself
and
with
all
due
respect
or
no
respect.
C
Mark
isis
is
trying
to
stuff
his
pockets
with
money
and
that
extra
floor.
The
extra
low-income
housing
is
not
going
to
keep
you
for
people
who
really
need
it.
It
is
helping
the
rich
get
richer
and
as
the
voters,
I
really
really
hope
that
you
see
that
and
you
care
about
the
community
more
than
you
care
about
helping
people
make
more
money
than
they
even
need.
B
C
Yes,
thank
you.
I'm
a
property
owner,
we
own
a
home
right
behind
commonwealth
avenue
there
on
on
elm
and
I'm
not
an
indie
person.
We
support
more
high
density
housing
and
we
support
turning
the
ice
cream
factory
into
a
residential
project.
It
could
be
good
for
all
concern.
C
My
one
concern,
though,
is
the
aesthetic
of
it
to
the
amateur
these
buildings
all
look
alike.
Anyone
driving
down
the
street
will
know.
Oh
that's
2019..
Oh
that's,
20
20.,
the
architects
seem
to
never
have
had
a
futuristic
or
a
retro.
Look.
They
all
seem
to
copy
each
other,
and
what
I
wondered
is:
is
it
possible
that
we
could
build
more
traditional,
looking
buildings
that
are
newer,
but
they
look
older?
C
A
Is
there
anyone
else.
B
There's
there's
a
couple
more
individuals.
The
next
person
up
is
tyler
adams
tyler.
If
you
want
to
go
ahead.
C
I
want
to
echo
what
a
few
of
the
commoners
said
earlier
about
the
affordable
housing.
That's
affordable,
housing
I
mean
1300
a
month
is
a
joke.
I
currently
own
a
home
on
elm
and
my
mortgage
is
less
than
that.
That's
right,
I
own
a
piece
of
sugar
house
for
less
than
what
you
want
to
give
an
affordable
home
to
someone
for,
and
that's
just
not
the
way
to
go
about
it.
C
If
you
want
to
set
up
affordable
housing
for
people,
you
have
to
set
up
programs
for
people
who
actually,
because
I
can
tell
you-
there's
no
way
how
I
would
ever
pay
1300
a
month
just
be
right
on
2500
south.
Secondly,
I
want
this
question
answered
because
it
seems
like
you
continually
to
ignore
everyone's
questions
here.
C
B
Okay,
I'll,
try
and
unmute
you
one
more
time,
your
hand
is
up,
so
if
you
didn't
want
to
speak
that's
this
is
your
time
if
you'd
like.
B
K
Things,
yes,
I
do,
and
again,
as
with
the
previous
item,
there
were
a
number
of
emails
that
came
in
within
the
last
24
hours.
If
we
received
those
emails
prior
to
5
pm
today
they
were
pdf'd
and
put
in
your
dropbox.
So
I
bring
your
attention
to
all
of
those
emails
and
there
are
a
number
of
them,
probably
10
or
12,
at
least
so
anything
received
after
five
is
what
I'm
about
to
read
to
you.
The
first
is
from
stephanie
christian
subject:
21st
south
smell
grove.
K
I
am
writing
to
express
my
opposition
to
the
reasoning
proposal
on
21st
south
near
the
old
smell
groves.
Adding
the
proposed
amount
of
housing
to
that
area
of
21st
staff
will
create
an
unsustainable
amount
of
congestion.
The
congestion
is
already
an
issue
that
needs
to
be
addressed.
I
am
not
opposed
to
dense
housing,
however.
The
additional
traffic
and
needs
need
to
be
addressed
more
thoroughly
than
what
is
proposed.
K
K
Traffic
is
insane,
especially
on
21st,
south
from
7th
east
to
1300
east
the
roads
aren't
designed
for
the
drastic
increase
in
traffic.
I
have
lived
in
sugar
house
for
48
years
and
have
watched
it
deteriorate.
Cramming
another
condo
into
the
area
only
benefits
the
developers
because
it
certainly
isn't
benefiting
residents.
When
will
enough
be
enough?
K
How
about
focusing
on
open
spaces
and
developing
unique
features
that
will
add
to
the
community
instead
of
another
chain,
restaurant
or
retail
store
that
would
be
out
of
business
in
six
months
instead
of
telling
taxpayers
of
proposed
building
how
about
asking
area
residents?
What
we'd
like
to
see?
I
guarantee
no
one
will
say
more
condos
in
retail.
A
K
All
right
is
the
q,
a
active.
B
B
Let's,
let's
try
this
camila,
you
are.
R
Okay,
thanks
for
unmuting
me,
I
didn't
know
if
it
was
working
or
not.
I
just
wanted
to
comment
on
lex's
comment.
He
said,
there's
a
considerable
amount
of
distance
between
the
houses
on
that
bought
up
against
commonwealth
and
the
factory.
There
is
not
a
considerable
distance.
There
is
no
sidewalk
on
the
back
side
of
those
garages
and
there
is
no
park
strip
along
the
sidewalk
on
the
other
side
of
the
factory.
R
It
is
used
as
a
as
an
alleyway,
but
it's
also
used
to
get
to
the
houses
that
are
on
the
rest
of
elm
avenue
and
the
businesses
like
trolley
wing
company
and
estee
and
all
of
those
right
there.
You
know
people
come
along
and
use
both
of
those
treats.
R
I
was
told
in
the
initial
meeting
when
they
talked
about
the
reason
that
rezoning
from
commercial
to
the
sugar
house,
business
district
meant
that
we
would
have
opportunity
to
comment
if
we
rezoned
it
as
it
currently
sits
as
a
commercial.
R
R
There's
no,
there
isn't
a
lot
of
space.
I
do
agree
with
whoever
mentioned
that
they
should
put
trees.
I
don't
know
how
you're
going
to
fit
trees
there,
if
you're
putting
property
right
up
against
the
sidewalk,
I'm
not
opposed
to
the
development.
I
just
think
that
you
need
to
make
sure
you
consider
the
residents
that
are
around
some
earlier
mentioned,
that
you
know
you
could
go
up
30
feet
and
then
step
back
and
then
you
know
continue
the
setback.
So
it's
not
like
a
giant
60-foot
tower
right
there.
R
Please
consider
that
when
you're
building
this
so
that
the
residents
can
actually
continue
enjoying
the
space.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
so
I'm
going
to
close
the
public
hearing.
B
We
can
try
one
last
time:
annie
your
hand
is
up,
did
you
want
to
speak?
Can
you
hear
me
yes
and
it's.
C
Working
great
okay,
great
thanks
guys,
so
I
just
want
to
say
first
of
all,
I'm
with
wasatch
tennis,
united
and
I
do
want
to
mention.
We've
said
this
a
few
times,
but
the
thirteen
hundred
dollars
a
month
I
mean
mathematically-
I
mean
I
was
taught
that
you're
about
to
take
up
thirty
percent
of
your
income,
so
you
have
to
make
at
least
52
k
a
year
and
the
average
income
of
utah's
somewhere
around.
Like
38
I
mean-
and
I.
C
What
I
think
seems
mark
isaacs
said,
but
I
think
he
only
said
10
would
have
been
affordable
housing
which
is
not
reflective
of
the
population
at
all
and
so
yeah.
It
doesn't
make
much
sense
to
me
if
you're
trying
to
like
say,
hey,
we're
doing
a
good
thing
for
the
local
economy
and
the
local
people
when
badges
isn't
a
correct
representation
of
the
population
at
all,
and
again
I
mean
like
commonwealth,
you
guys
do
on
another
note.
It
is
hardly
a
street
so
to
to
like.
A
I
would
like
to
emphasize
that
we
are
dealing
with
a
rezone
request
and
the
reason
request
has
to
do
with
height
density
access.
Other
things
like
that
that
have
to
do
with
zoning.
The
planning
commission
does
not
deal
directly
with
whether
or
not
a
project
has
affordable
housing.
So
my
question
is:
the
applicant
is
actually
saying
they're
going
to
building
build,
affordable
housing,
but
that
is
not
something
we
can
write
into.
The
zoning
change
recommendations.
Q
Sorry
trying
to
find
the
mute
button-
yes,
that
is
correct.
That
is,
that
is
not
something
that
is
part
of
this
recommendation
that
the
planning
commission
can
offer
to
the
city
council.
Q
N
N
N
Sorry,
just
I'm
just
trying
to
again
get
more
into
commonwealth
here,
so
this
address
one
of
the
comments
made
by
the
by
the
public
was
it
under
the
shirt
house
business
district.
There
aren't
their
requirements
for
minimum
sidewalk
widths
and,
if
parking's
in
front
and
all
that
sort
of
stuff
or
within
the
design
or
within
the
zone
or
no.
O
N
I
understand
lex
but
like
I'm
looking
at
a
rezone
how
the
impact
is
based
on
the
residential
districts
that
are
right,
there
neighboring
it
I'm
just
trying
to
get
my
mind
better
around
how
that
impact
is
so.
I
do
think
these
are
zoning
questions.
I
don't
think
these
are
design
questions.
I'm
asking.
C
B
Commissioner,
in
general,
I
think
the
standard
is
five
feet.
I
think
we've
seen
along
highland
and
those
other
places
where
the
developers
were
willing
to
offer
more
sidewalk.
But
I
don't
know
that
there
was
ever
that
mandate
to
install
it
from
our
side
of
things.
N
A
So
it
looks
like
currently
that
the
right-of-way
that
there's
no
space
between
the
actual
cartway,
the
road
itself
and
the
building
is
very
little
where
a
sidewalk
would
go
so
sidewalk
normally
goes
in
the
right
way,
not
on
the
property
itself.
M
Okay,
so
I've
got
a
question
for
staff
is
in
the
during
the
remainder
of
this
process.
If
there
is
a
stipulation
of
affordable
housing,
what
is
the
process
of
that
being
maintained
over
time?
I
know
it's
not
part
of
the
rezone,
but
if
it's
part
of
the
design
review
or
some
sort
of
a
stipulation
and
allowing
the
building,
what
what
are
the
recourses
that
the
city
takes?
If
that's
not
held
up
just
for
clarity,.
B
You
know,
commissioner,
I
don't
know
that
we
have
ever
required
affordable
housing
through
the
design
review.
I
think
we've
had
people
who
suggested
it.
You
know.
I
think
it
would
be
difficult
for
us
to
enforce
that,
to
be
honest
with
you,
because
it's
not
continuing
to
like
we
don't
have
a
city-wide,
affordable
housing
bank
that
we
work
with
if
they
were
working
with
a
local
non-profit
that
might
be
different.
B
M
A
Q
Oftentimes
when
there
is
an
affordable
housing
trying
to
find
the
right
words
here,
not
necessarily
an
offer,
but
a
promise,
a
commitment
to
affordable
housing,
there
will
be
some
some
form
of
or
deed
restriction
on
the
property
for
a
given
number
of
years.
Again,
I
don't
know
that
that
could
happen
here,
even
if
it
is
voluntary.
B
Paul,
I
guess
if,
if,
for
example,
through
this
rezone
process
and
the
master
plan
amendment,
the
owners
of
the
property
were
willing
to
enter
into
a
development
agreement
with
the
city
requiring
a
deed
restriction,
I
suppose
they
could
do
that
if
on
a
voluntary
case,
but
I
think
it
would
have
to
be
on
a
council
level
couldn't
necessarily
be
done
on
the
planning
commission
on
the
design
review
level.
Q
Yeah,
so
in
a
recent
case,
the
council
did
as
part
of
a,
I
think
it
was
part
of
a
rezone,
require
a
commitment
of
affordable
housing,
and
that
mechanism
is,
it's
still
unclear.
How
that's
in
my
mind,
that's
unclear
how
that
that's
being
executed.
Q
Q
M
It
might
be
a
good
discussion
topic
for
a
future
meeting
when
we
have
a
light
schedule,
but
I
think
it's
an
important
one
to
have,
especially
with
you
know
how
important
we
say
it
is
I'd
like
it
to.
H
I
mean,
as
I
understand
it
today,
the
question
before
us
is:
should
this
be
a
factory
or
should
we
be
expanding
the
sugar
house
business
district
and
I
think
probably
we
all
agree
towards
that,
but
I
I
want
to
echo
what
john's
saying
is.
I
would
appreciate
we
last
meeting.
We
talked
about
future
education
for
the
commission
and
our
tools
as
a
commission
to
impact
affordable
housing
are
pretty
limited.
H
B
Commissioner,
I
can
mention
that
to
the
director.
I
do
know
that
he
was
planning
on
trying
to
provide
some
future
education
opportunities.
S
One
really
quick,
I
kind
of
wanted
to
address
two
of
the
questions
and
I
only
wrote
down
first
names,
so
kimia
and
tom.
You
know
I'm
just
your
average
citizen.
So
when
I
started
getting
involved
in
community
stuff,
I
had
to
learn
a
lot
of
jargon,
and
so
I
wanted
to
address
kimia's
question
about
this
coming
back
to
her
or
to
the
public.
This
is
part
of
the
jargon
part.
S
So
when
the
proposal
for
sugarhouse
business
district
2
then
would
require
a
design
review,
the
current
cc
zone
would
not
require
a
design
review.
That
is
the
function
of
bringing
it
back
to
the
community
to
participate
and
to
give
their
voice
to
that.
So
it
does.
It
does
accomplish
that,
but
I
think
also
when,
in
response
to
tom's
question
about
design,
I've
learned
that
when
we
call
it
design
review,
it
doesn't
mean
design
that
your
average
person
thinks
what
design
means.
S
So
we
don't.
We
don't
get
the
purview
of
looking
at
the
architecture.
I
personally
hate
modern
architecture,
other
people
on
the
commission,
like
it
other
people,
don't
it
is
that
beauty
in
the
eye
of
the
beholder
bit.
But
it
is
not
part
of
our
purview
to
talk
about
actually
how
things
are
designed.
We
talk
a
lot
about
how
sites
function
and
how
they
engage
based
on
master
plans,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
throw
that
out
for
them.
S
I
hope
that
they
do
follow
this
process
and
continue
to
participate
when
the
actual
proposal
comes
before
them,
but
as
a
sugar
house
resident
and
somebody
who's
been
very
involved
in
in
land
use
for
about
15
years
in
my
neighborhood.
Now
I'm
pretty
much
in
support
of
giving
this
the
sugar
house
business
district
too,
because
it
makes
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense,
and
it
is
something
that
we've
addressed
verbally
as
a
community
council
for
a
long
time.
So
I
support
that
zoning
change.
A
So
do
we
have
if
you
have
no
further
comments,
burning
comments,
brenda.
K
I
have
two
comments
to
follow
up
on
what
amy
just
said
about
design
and
design
review.
K
K
K
K
The
other
thing
that
I
wanted
to
just
quickly
mentioned
to
those
from
wasatch,
tenants,
united
and
and
others
who
are
interested
in
engaging
in
an
affordable
housing
conversation.
Our
office
is
working
on
an
affordable
housing.
Zoning
overlay
that.
K
A
Thank
you
molly,
so
bringing.
K
H
I
just
want
to
add
quickly
that
I
also
hope
we
don't
lose
soaring
suggestion
of
petitioning
to
extend
the
community.
There's
the
sugar
house
business
zone
west
down
21st
south,
and
the
other
comment
I
would
make
in
my
preamble
is,
as
we
consider
the
affordable
housing
overlay.
I
personally
I'm
really
struggling
with
the
questions
of
density
at
all
costs
versus
neighborhood
character
versus
affordable
housing,
so
I
hope
planning
commission
as
they
will,
since
you're
amazing
will
consider
all
of
that.
H
But
here's
my
motion
based
on
the
analysis
and
findings
in
the
staff
report,
that
amendments
for
master
plans
and
the
standards
for
zoning
map
amendments
have
been
substantially
met.
Testimony
in
the
proposal
presented,
I
moved
that
the
planning
commission
forward
a
positive
recommendation
to
the
city
council
in
support
of
the
proposed
amendments
located
at
approximately
850
and
870
east
21st,
south.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Okay.
I
have
a
motion
from
crystal
and
a
second
from
adrian,
and
is
this
just
for
the
master
plan
for
the
zoning
and
or
is
it
for
both
zoning
and
masterpin.
K
Sorry
did
we
get
the
pln
numbers
included
in
that
motion?
No,
I'm
sorry!
Sorry
it's
at
the
top
of
the
motion
sheet,
if
you
could
just
amend
your
motion
to
include
those
those
pln
number
cases.
H
Yes,
thank
you.
I'm
in
my
motion
to
approve
the
amendment
for
the
proposal
pln.
M
A
N
Yeah,
so
just
to
the
wasatch
chance
association,
I
want
to
say
thank
you
for
coming.
I
think
it's
important
to
have
your
kind
of
comments
here,
because
it
keeps
reminding
us
of
how
critical
initiatives
is.
I
would
also
add,
I
think,.
F
N
You
have
more
allies
both
on
this
body
and
in
the
planning
department
and
on
the
city
council.
Then
maybe
you
you
feel,
and
so
we
do
we.
We
all
of
us,
want
to
address
this
issue
and
it's
something
that's
there.
I
do
and
also
I
mean,
there's
certain
things
that
we
control
and
we
can't,
but
we
don't
set
the
rate
of
what
is
considered,
affordable
and
so
making
sure
that
we
look
and
discuss
that
with
the
property
agencies
is
important.
C
You
find,
you
know,
come
and
connect
with
the
city
in
other
ways,
as
you've
been
invited
to
do,
and
this
could
be
the
start
of
it
decades.
A
A
To
move
on
to
item
number
three
in
our
agenda,
which
is
the
riley
plan,
development
and
preliminary
subdivision
flats
at
approximately
1159
east
1300
sap,
and
it
is
case,
number
pln,
pcm,
2020-0068
and.
L
Yeah,
of
course,
thank
you
all
right,
so
I
am
presenting
a
plan,
development
and
preliminary
subdivision
plot
tonight,
so
the
plane
development
is
located
in
the
r1
5000
zoning
district.
The
purpose
of
a
plan
development
is
to
support
the
efficient
use
of
land
and
resources
and
also
allow
flexibility
in
the
zoning
ordinance.
The
applicant
is
asking
for
zoning
modifications.
L
For
a
few
reasons.
The
plan
development
is
proposed
for
two
lots
law.
One
is
requesting
a
well.
Both
lots
are
requesting
a
lot
with
reduction.
The
r1
5000
zone
requires
50
feet
per
lot
for
new
lots
and
lot.
One
is
proposed
to
be
46
feet
and
lot.
2
is
proposed
to
be
40
0.25
feet.
The
second
modification
to
the
zoning
ordinance
would
be
for
the
interior
side
yard
setback
of
lot,
one
which
would
be
reducing
the
setback
from
four
feet
to
three
feet
other
than
a
lot
with
on
lot.
L
Two.
It
would
meet
all
other
zoning
requirements
and
then
I'm
also
bringing
the
subdivision
flat
to
you
because
lot
run
exceeds
the
maximum
lot
size
of
7
500
square
feet.
It's
just
a
bit
over
and
is
about
7
538
square
feet.
So
I
am
I'm
bringing
it
to
you,
because
if
it
does
exceed
the
7
500,
it
needs
to
go
through
the
subdivision
process.
Even
just
a
little
bit.
Staff
is
recommending
approval
of
both
the
plan,
development
and
the
subdivision.
With
the
conditions
listed
in
the
staff
report.
L
So
here's
a
little
ariel,
the
subject:
property
is
in
red
and
then
the
proposed
boundary
line
is
down
the
middle.
The
subject
properties
are,
would
both
be
accessed
via
private
alleyway
off
of
1300
south.
There
is
an
easement
in
place
and
which
allows
them
alleyway
access.
L
Some
property
photos
lot
number
two,
the
I'll
go
into
the
parking
requirements
in
just
a
moment,
but
the
subject:
property
is
top
left
existing
driving
driveway,
which
will
remain
to
service
lot
to
parking
is
top
right
and
then
the
bottom
photos
are
the
rear
yard
of
the
existing
property.
L
L
There
is
a
duplex
right
next
door
to
the
subject:
property
to
the
east
and
then
to
the
west
of
the
property.
Is
a
single
family
home
which
is
set
back
considerably
farther
than
the
current
home
is,
and
then
there
are
also
single-family
homes
across
the
street
on
1300
south.
L
So,
while
reviewing
the
plan
development
proposal,
one
of
the
considerations
was
a
lot
with,
which
is
why
they
need
to
come
to
the
planning
commission.
The
current
law
is
86
feet
wide
in
2010
the
so
the
the
parcel
origin
was
originally
two
separate
parcels
and
it
was
consolidated
and
consolidated
in
2010.
L
This
was
done
through
salt
lake
county
and
did
not
receive
salt
lake
city
planning
approval,
so
the
applicant
is
essentially
coming
back,
but
it's
a
new
property
and
we're
coming
back
to
re-subdivide
the
property
into
what
was
there
originally
so
the
currently
the
property
is
the
widest
on
the
block
base
at
86
feet
and
the
average
lot
width
on
the
on
1300
south.
The
north
side
of
the
street
is
52
feet
and
the
average
lot
width
on
the
south
side
of
the
street
is
48
feet.
L
The
r1
5000
zone
requires
a
side
yard
setback
of
10
feet
on
one
side
and
four
feet
on
the
other.
The
applicant
is
proposing
that
lot.
One
has
a
10
foot
setback
on
the
west.
The
current
home
is
actually
15
feet,
but
the
clutch
would
technically
show
10
feet
if
the
house
were
to
be
removed,
which
they
are
not
proposing
and
then
they're
proposing
that
lot.
One
has
a
reduced
side
yield
setback
from
four
feet
to
three
feet.
L
Lot
number
two
would
meet
all
applicable
setbacks
for
the
r1
5000
zone
and
then
the
proposed
front
yard
setback
is
approximately
33
feet,
which
is
the
average
of
the
block
base.
L
Consideration
number
two
is
the
driveway
and
parking
location.
This
is
the
the
main
comment
from
the
public
is
where
these
people
are
going.
You
know
where
the
tenant's
gonna
park
or
where
the
or
the
new
property
owners
are
gonna
park.
So.
P
L
South
does
not
allow
parking
on
the
north
side
of
the
street.
There
is
a
shared
bike
lane.
There
is
parking
lot
on
the
south
side
of
the
street.
So
if
this
were
to
be
approved,
the
the
zone
requires
two
off
street
parking
spaces
per
single
family
detached
dwelling.
So
what
I
did
was
I'm
I'm
showing
in
yellow
the
the
top
left.
Is
the
alleyway
easement
so
lot
number
one.
L
If
subdivided
would
access
rear
rear
yard
parking
via
this
alleyway
and
this
was
approved
by
the
transportation
division,
so
they
would
access
rear
parking
and
then
the
existing
driveway
off
of
1300
south
would
then
be
on
lot
number
two,
and
that
was
the
driveway
would
lead
to
either
a
detached
garage
or
parking
both
could
be
accessed
via
that
alleyway.
L
The
bottom
left-hand
photo
is
a
photo
of
where
the
proposed
parking
for
lot
number
one
is
and
then
lot
number
two
the
bottom
right
hand
photo
would
be
axis
via
that.
Driveway
there
is
an
existing
garage
and
code
does
not
allow
a
detached
accessory
structure
to
be
located
on
a
lot
without
a
principal
dwelling
unit,
so
prior
to
recording
the
final
plan.
The
applicant
would
need
to
demolish
the
garage
which
was
already
a
part
of
their
plan
for
the
property,
and
so
I
showed
on
the
site
plan.
L
You
have
the
private
alley,
which
is
at
the
top
of
the
page
and
then
existing
garage
and
then
the
the
pink
outline
is
the
buildable
area
for
each
lot
lot
number
one
a
little
bit
over
7
500
square
feet
and
then
lot
number
two
is
about
6
900
square
feet,
so
both
of
them
exceed
the
minimum
loss
size
of
5
000
square
feet
for
the
zone.
L
L
The
photos
on
the
bottom
show
the
fence.
That's
along
the
rear
yard
of
the
subject,
property,
and
that
is
so
they'd
have
to
you,
know,
remove
the
fence
and
either
put
a
parking
pad
or
potentially
a
detached
garage
if
it
met
the
accessory
structure.
Standards
about
half
of
the
properties
on
this
alleyway
are
accessed
and
they
have
either
a
detached
garage
or
a
parking
pad
that
the
residents
or
property
owners
use.
L
And
then
the
consideration
number
three
so
the
applicant
has
not
submitted
building
plans
or
elevations
for
the
single
family
home
that
they're
proposing
on
lot
number
two.
They
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
property
could
be
subdivided
before
they
put
the
additional
appointments
into
the
building
plans,
but
a
condition
of
approval
would
be
to
make
sure
that
the
new
home
was
subject
to
the
front,
facade
controls,
and
so
the
new
single
family
dwelling
or
lot
too
would
be
constructed
using
quality
materials
such
as
brick
and
stone,
and
then
could
also
use
accent.
L
Materials
such
as
party
board,
siding
or
stucco,
and
these
are
material
found
on
the
street
and
in
the
swarming,
neighborhood
and
and
then
the
front
facade
controls
would
require
that
no
less
than
10
percent
of
the
front
facade.
L
Would
have
to
include
entrance
door
windows,
porch,
landing
architectural
features
that
address
the
street,
create
a
more
pedestrian
family
environment
and
then
those
architectural
features
could
not
total
less
than
ten
percent
of
the
front
facade.
So,
for
example,
the
the
new
dwelling,
wouldn't
the
main
access
to
the
new
dwelling,
wouldn't
be
able
to
be
on,
like
the
side
yard
of
the
property
and
and
then
I
wrote
down
the
the
definition
of
the
actual
definition
of
that
front.
L
Facade
control
section
of
code
is
to
mean
maintain
architectural
harmony
and
primary
orientation
along
the
street.
All
buildings
shall
be
required
to
include
an
entrance
door
and
other
features
as
windows,
balconies,
porches
and
other
architectural
features
in
the
front
facade
of
the
building
totaling,
not
less
than
10
of
the
front
facade
elevation
area,
excluding
any
area
used
for
roof
structures
for
buildings
constructed
on
a
corner
lot.
L
Before
we
published
the
staff
report,
I
clarified
what
the
stipulations
would
be
for
the
current
home,
because
there
aren't
submitted
building
plans
and
they
they
agreed
that
they'd
like
to
keep
with
the
architectural
character
of
the
neighborhood
and
use
the
same
building
material
palette,
and
then
consideration
number
four
reviewing
the
planned
development
objectives
and
citywide
master
plans.
L
So
this,
as
stated
in
their
narrative,
they
mostly
focus
on
master
plan
implementation,
which
is
one
subdividing
the
lot
back
into
it's
a
close
to
original
state
and
promoting
info
development,
which
is
one
of
the
goals
of
the
city
and
then
also
historic
preservation.
L
This
property
is
located
directly
east
of
a
neighborhood
commercial
zone
where
there
is
a
local
gross
grocery
store,
schools,
nearby,
public
public
schools
nearby
and
then,
as
well
as
restaurants
and
so
part
of
the
city-wide
and
community-wide
master
plans
is
to
preserve
the
existing
single-family
home
and
then
also
the
new
proposal
for
the
detached
single-family
home
would
meet
growth
and
housing
policies,
including
infill
development.
L
So
the
plan
development
standards,
modifications
which
will
result
in
a
better
product
and
also
complying
with
the
master
plan
expectations
for
the
area
and
then
the
preliminary
plot
is
the
proposed
subdivision
does
meet
the
preliminary
plot
section
of
code.
But
it
was
included
in
this
presentation
because
the
the
proposed
lot
size
exceeds
the
maximum
of
the
r1
5000
zone,
but
the
size
configuration
and
the
relationship
of
the
lot
width
to
the
lot
that
is
compatible.
So
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
both
the
plan,
development
and
the
preliminary
path
to
the
conditions.
A
Q
Amanda
did
a
great
job,
I
mean
there's
not
a
whole
lot.
I
can
add
you
an
excellent
job
presenting
the
opportunity.
The
one
thing
I
would
like
to
add
is
that
you
know
my
wife
and
I
are
both
graduates
from
westminster
college,
which
is
right
here
in
the
area
we're
familiar
with
the
community.
Q
We've
lived
in
the
community,
and
you
know
I'm
mainly
addressing
this
to
hopefully
not
get
bombarded
with
the
wasatch
tenant
community
that
and
I'm
not
a
developer,
trying
to
line
my
pockets,
but
this
was
a
specific
project
that
we
located,
because
there
was
an
opportunity
to
build
a
new
home
in
a
really
really
cool
area.
Q
We
have
committed
to
keeping
the
character
of
the
surrounding
neighborhood,
providing
ample
parking
and
doing
everything
we
can
and
also
comply
with
the
city's
master
plan
and
goals
of
being
able
to
provide
housing
in
this
area
and
redevelop
underutilized
area
so
open
to
any
questions
but
yeah.
I
appreciate
the
time
and
great
job
amanda.
A
Thank
you.
Does
the
commission
have
any
questions
for
the
applicant
or
for
staff.
A
Okay,
hearing
none,
I
will
move
to
the
public
hearing
and
does
the
community
council
wish
to
speak?
B
At
the
moment,
there
are
three
hands
up,
but
they
are
all
people
who
spoke
earlier
so
which
they
certainly
are
welcome
to
speak
again.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
if
you
do
not
want
to
speak
to
maybe
lower
your
hand
and
then
for
those
people
who
may
have
been
late
to
the
meeting.
If
you'd
like
to
speak,
there
is
a
little
small
hand
icon
on
the
bottom
right
hand,
corner
and
just
click
that
button,
and
that
would
indicate
to
us
that
you
would
like
to
speak.
B
C
B
B
Okay,
no,
that
sometimes
this
happens.
So
thank
you.
We
just
wanted
to
make
sure
you
didn't
lose
that
opportunity
so
other
than
that
I
don't
have
any
other
hands
raised.
A
S
Okay,
based
on
the
findings
listed
in
the
staff
report,
the
information
is
presented
and
input
received
during
the
public
hearing.
I
move
that
the
planning
commission
approved
the
plan
development
petition,
pln
pcm,
2020-00681
and
preliminary
subdivision
plot
pln
suv.
A
Thank
you,
okay.
The
motion
passes
unanimously.
Thank
you
all
for
your
time
and
consideration.
I'm
now
going
to
turn
the
meeting
over
to
amy.
S
Unmute
and
okay,
all
right,
we
will
move
on
to
the
fourth
on
our
agenda,
which
is
pln
pcm
2020-009.
L
So
this
conditional
use
request
is
for
an
attached
edu
at
1395,
east
michigan
avenue.
The
applicant
and
property
owner
is
prescott
muir.
He
is
per
proposing
a
963
square
foot
edu
in
the
basement
of
the
existing
single
family,
dwelling
it'll
be
the
basement,
is
walk
out
and
the
entrance
to
the
adu
will
be
located
in
the
rear
yard
of
the
subject.
Property
is
shown
on
the
page
and
then
the
the
applicant
is
proposing
that
the
tenant
parking
be
located
on
the
driveway
to
fulfill
the
one
off
street
parking
space
requirement.
L
The
planning
commission
can
waive
that
if
there
is
legal,
on-street
parking
or
if
the
property
is
located
within
a
quarter
mile
of
a
transit,
stop,
there
is
legal
on-street
parking
on
michigan
avenue
and
there
are
multiple
public
transit
stops
located
within
the
within
the
area
as
well.
Within
one-fourth
mile
here
is
a
landscaping
plan,
so
there
are
going
to
be
no
exterior
modifications
to
the
to
the
home,
the
applicant's
proposing
to
add
a
walkway
around
the
west
side,
or
I
just
lost
my
train
of
thought.
L
L
The
proposed
adu
encompasses
32
percent
of
the
gross
square
footage
of
the
home
for
adu
located
within
a
single
family
home.
The
adu
can
encompass
50
of
the
gross
square
footage,
and
so
this
falls
below
that.
L
And
then
here
are
some
property
photos,
so
the
proposed
walkway
would
go
just
to
the
left
of
the
the
subject
property,
so
the
top
left
of
the
walkway
would
wrap
around
that
and
then
the
top
right
photo
shows
where
the
entrance
of
the
walkway
is
proposed
to
be,
and
then
the
bottom
left
photo
is
the
rear
facade
where
the
adu
entrance
is
to
be
located,
and
then
legal
on-street
parking
is
shown
on
the
bottom
bottom
right.
L
C
Yes,
madam
chair
and
commissioners,
thanks
for
entertaining
this,
this
request,
I
I
think,
there's.
S
Okay,
stat
or
a
commission
any
questions
from
us
from
here
all
right
with
that
we'll
move
on
to
the
next
portion,
I'm
getting
the
feedback
somewhere.
Sorry
that
was
a
weird
feedback.
We'll
move
on
to
the
public
hearing
portion,
then
john
any
I
can't
really
tell
there's
any
hands
up
or
if
anybody
from
the
community
council
is
here.
B
S
I
did
notice
that
there
were
two
additional
comments
that
were
added
today
or
yesterday,
any
there's.
No,
nothing
else
from
that.
S
Okay,
going
going,
it's
gone,
we'll
close
the
public
hearing
and
bring
it
back
to
the
commission,
any
questions
or
comments
or,
if
somebody's
willing
to
make
a
motion.
S
Okay,
I
don't
hear
anybody
making
any
inquiries
so
please
go
ahead.
S
A
N
C
S
All
right
that
motion
passes
unanimously.
Thank
you.
I
like
taking
charge
of
these
really
easy
agenda
items
I
could
go
for
that.
I
believe
brenda
can
come
back
in
now
if
she
wants
to
close
the
meeting
altogether.
A
Yeah,
I
can
everybody
hear
me,
sorry,
yes,
so
so,
if
there
are
no
more
comments
or
issues
and
I
think
we
stand
adjourned,
thank
you
all
very
much.