►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting - April 27, 2022
Description
Salt Lake City Planning Commission Meeting - April 27, 2022
https://www.slc.gov/planning/
https://www.slc.gov/planning/planning-commission-agendas-minutes/
A
To
the
salt
lake
city
planning
commission
meeting
for
april
27th,
it
is
5
30,
so
I
will
call
the
meeting
to
order.
Let
me
get
my
cheat
sheet
out
here,
so
we're
going
to
begin
tonight
with
approval
for
the
minutes.
But
since
this
is
your
first
meeting
levi,
I
won't
call
on
you
for
a
vote.
A
C
C
A
A
Who's
my
acting
director
tonight,
john
or
I
can't
see
who
it
is.
A
F
I
was
just
going
to
mention
as
a
reminder
for
those
who
are
new
just
to
make
sure
you
speak
clearly
in
the
microphone
because
it
is
recorded
so
that
we
can
make
sure
we
get
our
minutes.
So
for
those
who
are
new
and
not-
and
it
also
helps
for
the
audience
to
be
able
to
hear
well
too
so,
yeah.
A
Levi,
would
you
like
to
introduce
yourself
to
everyone
please
and
yeah
there
you
go
it
all.
G
C
A
There
you
go
so
yeah
just
to
the
point
where
you
feel
very
uncomfortable,
that's
exactly
where
you
should
be
speaking:
let's
close
it
up,
okay,
so
it
gets
on
the
recording
for
the
record.
Welcome
levi,
if
you
have
questions
at
any
time,
always
feel
free
to
reach
out
to
staff,
but
you
can
also
email
me
and
I'm
happy
to
tell
you
who
you
should
talk
to,
but
you
feel
free
to
reach
out
to
anybody.
A
Okay
and
I,
if
you're
like
me,
you
will
have
a
lot
of
questions
in
the
beginning
as
we
move
forward.
Okay,
we
will
move
on
to
the
public
hearing
portion
of
our
agenda.
The
first
item
up
is
a
conditional
use
permit
for
an
adu
at
approximately
617
east
dregs
avenue.
This
will
be
case.
Number
pln,
pcm
2022-0.
A
H
The
ada
will
be
in
an
existing
detached
garage
that
will
be
converted.
Staff
recommends.
Approval
of
the
conditional
use
permit
here
is
a
vicinity
map
of
the
subject
property.
It
is
located
in
the
sugar
house
neighborhood
in
the
r-17000
single-family
residential
zone.
The
site
is
developed
with
an
existing
single-family
home
with
a
detached
accessory
structure
where
the
proposed
adu
will
be
all
neighboring
uses
are
single-family
residential
and
the
adu
will
be
at
least
20
feet
from
any
neighboring
structure.
H
Here's
the
site
plan
that
has
been
provided
by
the
applicant.
This
is
the
single
family
residential
home,
and
this
is
the
detached
garage
towards
the
rear
of
the
property.
The
current
conditions
of
the
property
in
regards
to
lot
coverage
and
setbacks
are
existing.
The
proposed
adu
and
existing
garage
is
approximately
592
square
feet.
H
H
H
Here
are
the
elevations
that
have
been
provided
by
the
applicant.
This
is
the
single
family
home
on
the
property
oops.
Sorry-
and
this
is
the
proposed
parking
area
that
was
shown
on
the
site
plan,
and
then
this
is
the
adu.
Obviously,
once
it's
already
been
converted,
there
will
be
windows
on
all
facades
of
the
adu.
H
Here
are
some
pictures
that
I
took
of
the
site
showing
the
existing
conditions.
This
is
a
picture
taken
from
the
street
in
front
of
the
home.
This
is
the
front
of
the
single
family
home.
Oh
I'm
sorry
about
that,
and
then
this
is
the
alley
along
the
eastern
property
line.
This
is
how
the
adu
will
be
accessed.
H
H
D
Riley,
maybe
this
is
throwing
one
a
little
too
bad
at
you
or
your
first
day,
but
what
makes
this
a
redo
versus
just
a
new
construction?
How?
Because,
if
it's,
if
it's
you
know,
are
we
keeping
the
actual
exterior
of
the
garage
or
okay
all
right?
Thank
you.
A
May
not
know
this
offhand,
but
there
is
an
ordinance
remind
me
amy
about
the
percentage
of
a
building.
If
you
can
do
so
much
remodeling,
if
you
keep
a
percentage
and
then
you
maintain
whatever
existing,
maybe
non-conformity
or
whatever.
What
is
that
percentage.
F
It's
really
quite
high,
you
can,
you
can
remove
up
to
75
percent
of
a
structure
and
it's
not
counted
as
a
demolition
up
to
that
75.
Anything
above
that
would
be
considered
a
demolition.
I
If
is,
are
there
any
other
property
types
besides
adus
that
can
front
on
an
alley?
Can
a
regular
single-family
home
front
on
an
alley
or
just
an
adu.
H
I'm
not
sure
that
might
be
a
question
that
amy
could
answer
better.
Okay,
so.
E
You
can
have
a
use
fronting
an
alley
if
they
were
to
go
through
like
a
planned
development
process,
since
they
wouldn't
have
frontage
on
a
public
street.
So
yes,
potentially,
but
they
would
have
to
go
through
a
process.
But
we
do
allow
adus
to
front
on
an
alley.
Is.
I
That
do
the
adus
have
to
follow
the
like.
Are
there
any
rules
that
was
that
was
one
of
the
concerns
of
the
neighbors.
Is
that
how
close
is
this
door
going
to
be
to
the
street
and
stuff
like
that?
The
alley
things
like
that?
Will
this
adu
be
required
to
follow
whatever
rules?
There
are
for
other
residences
that
front
on
an
alley.
E
Yeah,
so
I
think
riley's
analysis
is
in
the
zoning
standards
attachment.
E
Sorry,
her
analysis
related
to
those
specific
adu
standards
is
an
attachment
d.
So
there
are
specific
standards
in
terms
of
how
close
it
can
be
to
another
primary
residence
on
a
property
setbacks,
those
types
of
things:
it
is
an
existing
legal
non-conforming
structure,
so
there
may
be
some
existing
non-conformances
that
can
remain.
E
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Riley
we
have
the
applicant
tom
barracco
is
it
did.
I
say
your
last
name
correctly:
yeah.
J
A
If
you'll
just
stated
in
the
microphone
for
the
record.
A
Then,
commissioners,
do
you
have
any
questions
for
the
applicant
at
this
time?
Okay,
mr
rocco
hold
tight,
we'll
open
the
public
comment
period.
If
anything
comes
up
during
that
I'll.
Give
you
a
moment
afterwards
to
address
that.
So
just
hang
tight.
A
A
It's
a
matter
of
musical
chairs,
so,
commissioners,
if
you
have
any
final
questions,
you
can
go
ahead
and
address
them
now
or
I'm
open
for
a
motion.
B
M
A
C
A
Rick
amy,
yes
levi,
yes,
maureen,
yes
and
andra.
Yes,
okay,
that
motion
passes
unanimously.
Congratulations,
mr
bronco!
You
can
work
with
staff
and
good
luck
on
your
build
all
right.
Let's
move
on
to
the
next
agenda
item!
This
is
going
to
be
465
south
main
street,
the
apartment
tower
design
review,
and
that
is
case
number
pln
pcm
2021-00586.
C
N
All
right,
thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
commission.
N
Welcome
to
all
the
new
people
I
haven't
met
most
of
you,
but
I'm
lex
strauber,
I'm
a
senior
planner
with
this
planning
division
and
what
you
have
before
you
tonight
is
a
request
for
additional
mid-block
building
height
located
at
approximately
465
south
main
street,
and
just
to
get
you
oriented
here.
This
is
the
site.
N
N
The
overall
building
height
is
proposed
to
be
179
feet.
217
units
ground
floor
uses
include,
leasing,
office,
retail
lobby
and
a
parking
port
cochair
upper
floor
uses
our
residential
exterior
materials
include
aluminum
metal
panels,
glass,
fiber,
reinforced
concrete
panels,
aluminum
metal
panel
fins,
glass
and
storefront
glazing,
they're,
proposing
126
parking
stalls
which
meets
code.
N
N
It
can
go
up
to
375
feet
and
they
have
proposed
that
for
179,
but
once
you
hit
165
feet,
heading
towards
mid
block
the
code
limits
building
height
to
100
feet
unless
they
go
through
this
design
review
process
before
you
to
request
additional
height,
so
their
their
height
would
be
179
feet
for
the
entire
building,
which
would
exceed
boy.
Riley
was
right.
N
The
amount's
touchy
the
179
feet
for
the
entire
length
of
that
facade
of
the
building
or
actually
the
whole
building.
Does
that
make
sense
to
everyone?
Is
that
a
good
example?
All
right
here
are
a
couple
slides
of
just
the
property
itself.
This
is
taken
from
fifth
south.
You
can
see
the
track
station
over
here.
On
main,
this
is
looking
north
got
the
kengarf
building
over
here,
there's
one
more
shot
of
that
and
one
additional
shot
from
maine.
N
N
I
don't
know
if
there
are
people
here
this
evening
to
speak
to
this,
but
I
just
wanted
to
let
you
know
that,
and
that
concludes
my
presentation.
If
you
have
any
questions,
I'd
be
trying
to
I'd,
be
happy
to
try
to
answer
those
for
you.
N
You
know
what
that's
a
really
good
question
and
I
know
that
kelsey
in
our
office
is
working
on
building
height
in
the
downtown
area.
This
is
where
we
want
tall
buildings
to
contribute
to
our
skyline.
Yes,
I
absolutely
agree
with
you
brenda,
but
I
really
can't
answer
that
question.
I'm
hoping
that
through
that
text
amendment
that
kelsey
is
working
on
that
that
might
be
changed,
and
maybe
these
guys
can
give
some
insight.
F
Yeah
well
they're
we're
currently
working
with
a
consulting
group
to
actually
do
a
study
height
through
all
of
downtown,
so
d1,
d2,
d3d4
and
gateway
makes
use
to
kind
of
find
appropriate
heights
for
the
block.
F
This
is
an
old
I
mean
this
has
been
in
the
code
since
95
that
heights
on
the
corners,
not
in
the
middle.
However,
I
don't
think
any
project's
ever
been
rejected
for
height
in
the
mid
block
that
I'm
aware
of
so
you
know,
I
think
that
it's
kind
of
all
those
ideas
if
you're
going
to
be
in
the
mid
block,
we
want
to
make
sure
what
are
you
doing
to
contribute
to
that
portion
of
the
block
and
the
skyline
so
we're
forcing
it
through
design
review.
A
Do
you
have
a
presentation
that
needs
the
laptop
I'm
just
loading
it
up?
Okay,
perfect!
So
once
you
sit
down
and
you'd
state
your
name
for
the
record
and
then
when
you
get
your
presentation
up,
you'll
have
up
to
10
minutes.
G
Are
you
just
scrolling?
Oh
yeah,
we're
jumping,
so
I
think
you've
seen
in
your
packets
we're
trying
to
revitalize
this
area
and
actually
bring
the
cbd
down
further
south
which,
as
part
of
that,
so
we're
going
to
be
doing
the
materials
that
are
requested
of
us
that
are
in
the
cbd
north
of
us.
G
Our
street
frontage
is
all
primarily
glass,
we're
90
on
the
bottom
and
on
main
and
nine,
and
just
under
that
87
on
the
sides
we're
trying
to
make
sure
it's
very
vibrant
corner
and
active
corners.
They
see
activity
inside
we've
got
retail
on
this
northwest
corner,
that's
in
the
lower
lower
left
and
then
our
leasing,
office
and
entryway.
G
G
Our
upper
floor
so
exterior
wise
again.
This
shows
the
height.
This
is
our
main
street
facade.
So
we
have
that
179
feet.
It
jumps
up
to
181
just
at
that
mechanical
unit
screen.
That's
there
on
the
northwest
corner
and
then
the
materials
that
lex
described
earlier.
G
G
Currently,
we
won't
be
casting
shadows
on
any
anybody
else
really
from
where
they
are,
but
who's
to
say
in
the
future
and
just
renderings
more.
This
is
fist.
South
elevation
is
from
just
on
the
other
side
of
the
track
station
on
main
and
looking
on.
The
other
side
of
the
da
office
is
what's
on
your
lower
right.
G
Is
our
entry
corner
so
looking
across
the
corner
from
fist
south
looking
up
towards
main
street,
you
can
see
how
open
that
is.
This
is
our
entrance
to
the
main
main
space.
We
have
a
secondary
entrance
that
goes
into
our
second
set
of
elevators,
depending
on
where
the
tenants
live,
and
then
our
northwest
corner
is
at
this
point
it's
a
retail
space,
we're
hoping
for
a
restaurant
or
a
coffee
shop.
So
we've
got
a
lot
of
activity
again.
This
kind
of
primarily
shows
the
openness
or
the
glass
on
that
facade.
G
A
G
A
So
then,
because
yeah
so
the
way
it
was
described
in
the
packet
was
that
fifth
south
would
be
your
leasing,
office
and
kind
of
that.
That
portion
and
then
main
street
would
be
commercial
retail,
along
with
your
parking
entrance
yeah
so
so
so
go
through.
Then
what
what
we're
seeing,
what
we're
going
to
see
on
main
street
and
then
fifth
south,
since
it's
different
from
what
was
in
the
staff
report.
O
So
I'll
take
this,
so
the
the
retail
is
actually
going
to
be
this
portion
from
right
about
here
all
the
way
across
the
facade
and
then
there's
our
garage
entry.
And
then
this
this
whole
portion
is
part
of
the
leasing
office,
but
it.
But
what
we're
doing
there
is,
is
providing
a
link
to
the
track
station,
because
in
order
to
make
it
leasable
and
in
order
for
for
our
tenants
to
really
make
it
a
home,
we
wanted
to
create
something
that
invited
co-working.
O
So
it's
a
it's
a
open
space,
that's
both
for
our
tenants
and
for
people
who
aren't
our
tenants
to
really
take
part
in
the
building
and
make
it
integral
along
fifth
south
there's,
there's
really
not
going
to
be
a
lot
of
parking
opportunities
and
for
retail
along
that
front.
It's
not
as
viable
and-
and
so
we
push
the
retail
over
to
where
the
mid
block
crossing
is
to
really
activate
that
corner.
Rather
than
leave
it
dead
because.
A
O
G
A
D
G
Just
trying
to
make
it
bigger
so
this
area
here
over
there
on
the
the
northwest
corner
so.
D
Okay
and
that's
all
the
retail
you
have
on
the
ground
floor.
D
O
Actually,
our
parking
entry,
and
so
so
this
will
actually
feel
architecturally.
This
space
will
be
designed
to
be
to
match
our
leasing
office
and
really
kind
of
carry
that
whole
design
over,
but
the
vehicles
will
be
brought
in
here
and
then
they
get
transferred
into
a
mechanical
parking
system,
so
it'll
be
self-valid.
O
It's
just
for
vehicular
circulation
so
that
we
can
get
pedestrians
and
vehicles
separated
from
each
other
and
you
can
get
the
vehicles
in
and
out
without.
G
O
D
G
D
C
O
G
G
B
G
M
G
If
you
look
back
at
the
elevations
that
we
showed
it's,
it's
like
a
sawtooth
yeah
go
to
the
renderings,
because
that
shows
this
still
looks
flat.
But
if,
if
we
go
into
that,
there's
a
lot
of
ins
and
outs,
so
it's
kind
of
a
sawtooth
facade.
It's
not
meant
to
be
just
a
flat
space.
We're
trying
to
articulate
that
to
to
not
have
a
flat
facade.
O
M
G
Haven't
done
it
here
as
far
as
the
landscape
we'll
be
meeting
whatever
the
codes
are,
I
know
some
of
our
original
drawings
concepts
had
showed
benches
out
there
and
everybody
frowned
on
that.
So
we're
trying
to
to
keep
it
open
and
we'll
meet
whatever's
needed,
but
we're
we're
planning
on
having
it
more
hardscape
than
not
just
to
not
have
the
maintenance
or
invite
people
to
try
and
camp
out
in
front
of
our
building.
C
There
we
go,
I
think
everyone
can
hear
me
now.
217
units
with
126
parking
stalls.
G
I
had
150
parking
stalls,
so
I'm
not
sure
on
that,
but
it's
still
so
we
we
had
in
that.
The
the
current
code
only
wants
us
to
have
0.5,
which
would
be
half
of
that
so
100
and
something
in
there
and
we've
used
the
exception
where
we
have
the
proximity
to
the
track
station
and
fitness
center
on
site
that
we
can
increase
that.
But
that's
just
the
max
that
we're
able
to
provide
in
that
space
that
we
have.
A
A
After
the
public
comment
period,
then,
okay,
all
right,
if
you
guys
just
want
to
hang
tight,
we
will
open
the
public
comment
period.
Is
there
anyone
here
tonight
that
wishes
to
speak
on
this
agenda?
Item
okay,
seeing
none
we'll
close
the
public
comment
period
and
bring
it
back
to
the
commissioners
for
a
final
discussion
and
a
vote
go
ahead.
Amy.
A
A
I
think
that
is
because
the
standards
don't
necessarily
go
into
that
relationship
of,
and
I
think
this
is
my
personal
opinion
on
this
one.
I
think
allowing
like
leasing,
offices
and
amenities
for
the
tenants
to
be
allowed.
The
code
allows
that
to
be
considered,
retail
commercial,
which
I
think
is
not
at
all,
should
not
have
been
that
way.
A
But
that's
what
the
code
says
so
in
that
regard
they
meet
the
standards
and
that,
but
it's
you
know,
I
would
like
to
see
more
actual
public
type
retail,
especially
if
you're
across
the
street
from
a
truck
stop.
That's
the
whole
kind
of
point
of
revitalizing
that
you
don't
need
to
have
the
kind
of
parking
requirements
or
the
the
car
capacity
and
we're
not
going
to
create
a
vital
landscape
here
or
streetscape.
A
If
we
just
continue
to
have
amenities
for
tenants
and
like
a
restaurant,
so
I
mean
that's
my
personal
view
and
I
wish
that
we
were
seeing
a
better
representation
of
true
retail
on
both,
because
we
have
two
some
really
good
streets
here.
But
the
code
allows
tenant
amenities
to
be
considered,
retail,
which
I
think
is
wrong.
But
I,
but.
D
Whole
first
floor
facade
is
different.
The
whole
pedestrian
level
facade
is
different
than
it
was
so,
for
example,
you
know
we're
not
seeing
those
what
appear
to
be.
I
don't
know
if
this
is
the
leasing
office
facade.
This
is.
G
D
You
know
shown
in
the
plans
that
we're
looking
at,
I
don't
think
so.
That's
the
least,
that's
the
leasing
office.
They
are
shown,
but
they're
shown
in
front
of
the
glass
not
behind
the
glass.
N
D
N
D
D
N
A
Sorry,
no,
no,
I'm
the
thank
you
lex
and
I
just
so.
I
think
this
is
a
good
discussion,
because
there's
nothing
that
seems
to
be
a
hard
line
for
these
things,
there's
a
little
bit
of
fluidity
for
them,
but
I
do
think
it
does
present
a
question
for
the
commission
on
like
what
are
we
actually
reviewing
yeah.
A
Your
valuation.
N
My
mistake,
I
put
the
wrong
plans
in
the
dropbox,
that's
what
I'm
saying,
okay
and,
and
so
what
you're
seeing
is.
It
is
a
is
a
plan
set
from
may
5th
of
2021
and
and
those
are
not
the
correct
plans.
A
So
and.
G
Just
different,
I
can
understand
that,
because
we
did
at
the
first
of
the
year,
revise
things
and
that's
why
we
kind
of
got
tabled
to
this
point.
D
A
M
D
Yeah,
I
I'm
not,
I
mean
I'm
with
you
amy.
I
don't
think
we
should
count.
You
know
lobby,
space
and,
and
you
know,
leasing
office
as
retail
stuff,
but
I'm
also
know
that
in
the
life
and
history
of
a
building
that
might
last
25
or
50
or
75
or
100
years,
those
spaces
will
become
what
they
will
become.
It's
not
there's
like
there's
a
there
have
to
be
a
leasing
office
forever.
D
D
D
A
Mr
america,
mr
curtis,
what
are
your
feelings
about?
Making
some
modifications
to
the
articulation.
A
O
This
is
a
very,
very
active
mid-block
crossing
anybody
getting
off
the
track.
Stop.
90
percent
of
them
are
going
to
the
mid
block
and
then
crossing
the
street,
and
so
what
we
provided
as
you
come
across
that
street
is,
is
actually
the
this
this
image
and
we
wanted
this
portion
of
the
facade
to
look
special
and
to
be
completely
different
than
the
leasing
portion,
so
the
leasing
portion
is
actually
set
back
about
was
a
foot.
O
It's
set
back
about
a
foot
in
its
glass
and
it's
got
some
articulated
metal
that
comes
around
and
wraps
just
in
front
of
where
the
parking
system
is
and
then
over
here
that
sawtooth
concrete
comes
down
through
the
system
and
becomes
the
corner
in
the
original
design.
We
had
a
garage
door
and
no
activity
at
the
mid
block
crossing,
which
was
an
absolute
miss
when
it
comes
to
the
pedestrians,
because,
as
you're
coming
across
that
mid-block
crossing
first
thing
you
see
is
our
coffee
shop.
O
D
Yeah,
okay
and
and
there's
some
kind
of
other
articulation
there.
O
P
D
M
O
M
And
I
guess:
how
do
we
differentiate
these
businesses
architecturally?
Is
there
a
way
that
you're
going
to
allow
them
to
make
any
changes
to?
That
is
like
what
are
your
plans
for
wayfinding
between
the
businesses.
O
It'll
be
treated
just
like
any
other
retail
business
along
main
street
or
state
street
that
space
could
be
one
tenant.
It
could
be.
C
O
Tenants,
it's
really
up
to
the
tenant
improvement
and
how
they
treat
this
space,
but
the
the
facade
itself,
99
of
tenants,
don't
ever
touch
that
right.
M
G
M
Part
of
my
earlier
question
was:
what
are
you
going
to
do
like
to
finish
this
off
because,
like
wayfinding
is
a
huge
part
of
this
and
then
creating
space
for
identification
and
understanding
like
that
adds
texture
to
a
street
walk?
Just
blank
glass?
Doesn't
do
that
so
having
something
there
that
allows
you
to
attach
signs,
or
you
can
attach
it
to
your
your
stair,
stepping
facade
and
drill
into
your
concrete
or
you're,
going
to
have
an
element
at
the
top
of
the
window
that
allows
people
to
be
able
to
create
the
wayfinding
like
that.
N
M
M
Helps
you
guys
out
too,
because
if
you,
if
people
don't
know,
what's
there,
they're
not
going
to
go
and
then
they'll
be
vacant
and
then
you're
just
going
to
have
empty
retail
space?
So
those
are
the
key
things
for
me
when
you're
designing
this
ground
floor
is
way
finding
and
then
engagement
with
the
the
pedestrian
get
people
excited
to
go
into
your
business,
not
just
a
glass
box.
O
No,
that's
a
that's
a
really
good
point
and
that's
something
we
will
work
with
the
city
on
as
we
proceed
to
make
sure
that
these
spaces
are
defined
in
such
a
way.
B
I
I
do
note
that
it
is
one
of
the
two
recommendations
in
the
staff
report
that
signage
be
delegated
subject
to
the
salt
lake
city
lighting
master
plan.
So
right,
but
it's
not.
M
The
signage
itself,
it's
the
curation
of
the
signage
and
the.
How
do
you
weigh
fine,
that's
more
of
what
I'm
talking
about
and
I
think
you're
close.
I
think
it's
just
that.
Just
the
glass
feels
like
a
placeholder
is
what
I'm
getting
at,
and
I
think
there
could
be
more
there
that
allows
you
to
curate
that
better
for
the
the
business
owner
so
that
they're
successful
and
then
you're
successful,
because
you
get
getting
your
rent.
So
those
are
just
comments,
but.
A
I
A
B
I
would
be
happy
to
make
a
motion.
Okay,
I
want
to
preface
my
motion
by
saying
I'm
extraordinarily
disappointed
that
transportation
signed
off
on
not
making
on
basically
damning
that
to
be
a
permanent,
auto
through
fair
but
conditional
on
transportation.
Having
made
that
decision,
it
seems
like
this
approves
all
standards
so
based
on
the
analysis
and
findings
in
the
staff
report
that
the
standards
for
design
review
have
been
substantially
met.
B
A
D
K
A
D
I'm
I'm
unhappy
that
we
have
the
wrong
documents
because
it
seems
like,
as
a
matter
of
record,
we
should
have
the
right
documents
when
we're
voting
on
on
up.
So
I'm
going
to
vote
no.
A
I
Can
I
what
can
I
can?
I
say
yes,
no
or
abstain.
F
A
F
A
P
P
P
This
is
a
master
plan
and
zoning
map
amendments
for
1902,
1932,
1944
and
1954
north
rose
park
lane
the
petition
was
initiated
by
the
public
lands
department.
It's
a
request
to
amend
the
rose
park,
small
area
plan,
future
land
use
map
from
low
density
residential
to
open
space,
which
would
then
facilitate
a
rezone
request
from
r1
7000
single
family
residential
to
open
space
as
well.
The
property
consists
of
four
lots
and
is
approximately
3.6
acres.
P
When
combined
the
properties
are
owned
by
salt
lake
city
and
then
the
purpose
behind
the
amendments
is
to
consolidate
the
parcels
and
incorp
incorporate
them
into
the
regional
athletic
center,
which
is
located
to
the
north.
In
the
open
space
area
they
are
vacant
other
than
there
is
one.
Existing
single
family
home
on
1932
north
rose
park
lane
and
that's
this
third
parcel
staff
is
recommending
that
the
planning
commission
forward
a
positive
recommend
recommendation
to
the
city
council
standards
of
review.
P
There's
not
specific
standards
for
master
plan
amendments,
but
the
standards
for
zoning
map
amendments
are
below
and
in
the
staff
report.
P
Considerations,
master
plan
policies,
so
the
rose
park,
small
area
plans
update
to
the
airport
in
jordan,
river
master
plan,
the
land
use
is
designated
as
low,
f,
low
density,
residential
and
then
the
master
plan
needs
to
be
amended
amended
prior
to
rezoning.
The
property.
P
Recreational
and
open
space
lane
uses
make
up
the
largest
portion
of
the
land
in
this
northern
study
area
and
the
low
density
residential
uses
were
intended
to
be
accessory
to
agricultural
uses
that
were
originally
along
rose
park.
Lane
plant
salt
lake
calls
for
enhancing
existing
parks
and
recreational
facilities,
allowing
for
modifications
to
enhance
usability
and
promote
more
activity,
and
the
plan
states
that
new
growth
should
be
directed
towards
areas
that
have
the
potential
to
be
people
oriented,
and
you
can
see
when
I
show
pictures
of
this
site.
P
Compatibility
of
the
existing
properties,
so
yep,
as
I
mentioned
before,
there
are
three
of
the
four
properties
are
vacant.
There's
an
existing
single
family
home
that
has
frontage
on-roads
park
lane.
P
P
A
quick
zoning
comparison,
I
think
the
main
thing
to
take
away
from
this
is
that
if
it
was
rezoned
to
open
space,
they
do
have
a
landscape
buffer,
especially
or
when
butting
a
single-family
zoning
district.
It
includes
additional
landscaping
and
then,
depending
on
the
height
of
a
building,
the
the
setbacks
increase
so
for
the
maximum
height
of
the
building
can
be
35
feet
on
lots
that
are
four
acres
or
less,
but
for
each
foot
of
height
in
excess
of
20
feet,
the
required
yard
increases
by
per
foot
basis.
P
And
then
housing
loss
mitigation,
so
the
existing
property
is
vacant.
It
has
been
for
a
long
time
and
the
apple
camp
is
intends
to
demolish
or
demo
it
which
is
supported
by
residents.
So
I
was
asked
to
touch
on
housing
loss
mitigation,
which
you'll
see
with
a
lot
of
these
reasons.
So
when
is
it
triggered
it's
any
application
of
a
demolition
permit
that,
if
issued,
would
would
result
in
the
loss
of
one
or
more
residential
units
in
a
residential
zone.
P
Any
petition
for
conditional
use
permit
to
authorize
or
expand
vehicle
parking
in
a
residential
or
mixed
use
zone
or
any
petition
for
a
zoning
change
that
would
permit
a
non-residential
use
of
land.
So
in
this
case
it
is
triggered
by
the
petition
for
the
zoning
change
that
would
permit
residential
use
of
land
and
then
there's
three
mitigation
options.
P
So
you
can
do
replacement
housing
like
for,
like
you,
can
pay
a
fee
based
on
the
difference
between
the
housing
value
and
the
replacement
cost,
or
you
can
play
a
flat
mitigation
fee
applicants
proposing
option
b
when
they
took
the
replacement
cost
that
they
exceed
the
market
value
of
the
existing
single-family
home.
So
there
is
no
mitigation
fee
required
for
this
specific
property.
P
P
P
P
Five,
two
also
a
pause
to
afford
a
positive
recommendation
for
the
zoning
map
amendment,
which
is
plm
pcm
2020153,
and
then
I
just
also
want
to
say
I
added
a
couple
comments
to
the
dropbox.
P
A
D
P
D
So
the
and
the
setbacks
are
smaller
for
an
open
space.
They're
like
15
feet
and
10
feet.
D
Feet
and
so
forth,
right,
okay,
that's!
I
just
wanted
some
clarity
on
that.
Okay
and
what
is
the
I
guess,
I'm
not
familiar
with
the
building.
That's
the
regional
athletic
complex!
What's
in
the
regional,
what's
in
that,
is
it
a
building
or
is
it
just
playing
fields.
C
Motocross
track
in
that
complex,
the
area
where
this
is
is
closer
to
fairly
large
open
play
fields
that
are
looked
like
soccer
fields.
To
me.
I
went
by
there
the
other
day,
and
so
there
are
buildings
associated
with
that
complex
that
are
really.
This
property
is
more
closely
associated
to
the
residential
neighborhood
than
it
is
to
that
recreational
complex
separated
by
some
distance.
As
you
look
at
the.
C
A
Okay,
let's
any
other
questions
for
staff.
A
Okay
is
michaela,
respikio
evans.
Here
there
you
go,
I'm
butchered
that
I'm
sure
please
come
up
and
state
your
name
for
the
record
and
then
let
us
know
what
your
position
is
with
parks,
public
lands.
A
All
right,
if
you
want
to
just
kind
of
touch
upon
what
your
your
plans
are,
what
you're,
considering
etc
just
give
us
an
overview
of
kind
of
how
you
feel
this
will
fit
into
the
regional
athletic
complex.
That
would
be
great.
I
J
I
Yes,
so
with
the
idea
of
acquiring
the
two
northern
properties,
there
was
discussion
with
city
council
when
that
went
through
with
the
budget
amendment
as
use
for
building
an
indoor
recreation
facility
that
would
complement
the
regional
athletic
complex,
I
think,
and
it
that
was
truly
the
idea.
However,
that
hasn't
been
ruled
out,
as
was
mentioned
before,
it
still
needs
to
be
a
feasibility
study,
as
well
as
significant
public
engagement.
So,
while
we've
discussed
the
idea
of
an
indoor
facility,
this
really
there's
been
no
idea.
I
That's
been
ruled
out
at
this
point,
so
it
could
end
up
being
a
3.6
acre
park,
a
dog
park
or
just
anything
of
that
sort,
and
we
really
won't
know
that
until
we
have
the
public
engagement
in
hand.
So
we
just
want
to
emphasize
at
this
point
that
right
now,
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
zoned
open
space
so
that
there's
some
long-term
protection
associated
with
that
land
and
then
we'll
move
forward
with
thinking
about
what
the
actual
future
of
that
land
looks
like.
A
A
So
the
petition
before
us
is
really
not
what
could
potentially
go
there,
even
though
that
was
in
the
report,
but
mostly
like,
is
the
zoning
appropriate
for
this
spot?
Did
you
have
anything
else
you
want
to
say,
or
does
commissioners
have
any
questions
for
you?
G
A
Q
Hello,
my
name
is
rhonda
devereaux
and
I'm
the
owner
and
operator
of
happy
horse
ranch
located
at
2575
north
rose
park.
Lane
I'd
like
to
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
express
my
views
on
the
proposed
rezone
of
the
four
properties
on
rose
park.
Lane
I'd
like
to
just
give
you
a
little
bit
of
history.
From
my
perspective,
I
bought
my
property
back
in
2000.
Q
the
land.
That's
now
known,
as
rack
was
a
big
hayfield
and
the
farmers
used
to
do
flood
irrigation.
We
had
thousands
of
birds
migrating
through
that
area.
For
years
and
years
when
rack
became
an
idea
and
a
proposal
it
was
sold
as
our
kids
need
a
place
to
play
soccer.
Our
kids
need
a
place
to
play
baseball.
Q
Q
There
was
conflicting
ideas
for
the
property
that
is
now
known
as
the
rack,
as
there
was
a
fraction
of
people
that
wanted
it
to
become
a
nature
center.
It
was
a
great
area
to
be
a
nature
center,
because
it's
right
along
the
jordan
river
and
with
the
flood
irrigation,
it
was
a
huge
flyway
with
birds
that
were
migrating
well.
Q
The
battle
for
the
nature
center
versus
the
soccer
fields
was
lost
to
the
soccer
fielder
one
to
the
soccer
fields,
and
they
put
forward
a
bond
that
we
voted
on
as
citizens
of
salt
lake,
because
our
kids
needed
a
place
to
play
soccer
that
bond
passed
and
then
that
facility
became
a
pay
to
play
facility.
It
has
nothing
to
do
with
the
kids
in
the
neighborhood
that
need
a
place
to
play.
Q
Q
I
think
I'm
supposed
to
get
five
minutes,
because
I'm
you
too
best
point.
F
Amanda
I
can
take
she's
representing
the
west
point
community
council
this
evening.
Q
Thank
you
to
minimize
the
traffic.
The
entrances
and
exits
were
designed
to
be
on
and
off
redwood
road,
which
is
not
the
case,
and
it's
also
my
understanding
that
they
had
to
drill
into
the
aquifer
in
order
to
get
water
that
was
clean
enough
to
water
all
those
fields
and
that's
just
something
to
consider
when
you're
developing
an
area
like
that.
Q
Now
they're
asking
to
re-zone
the
properties,
some
of
which
they
acquired
after
iraq,
has
already
been
in
fruition.
Well,
all
the
property
that
rack
has
has
not
been
developed.
There
are
still
lots
of
space
on
that
property
that
hasn't
been
developed
and
yet
they're
wanting
to
develop
another
piece
of
land.
The
neighborhood
is
sort
of
an
uproar
because
none
of
this
benefits
the
neighborhood.
We
have
the
traffic.
We
have
the
pollution,
we
have
difficulty
getting
on
and
off
the
freeway.
Q
It's
a
total
disaster
driving
up
and
down
rose
park
lane
with
the
ohv
park,
which
is
at
the
end
of
the
street,
operating
at
the
same
time.
Rack
is
operating
because
they
all
operate
spring
summer
and
fall.
You
can't
get
out
of
that
intersection.
There's
an
accident
every
week
at
the
intersection,
so
the
infrastructure
needs
to
be
taken
care
of
before
we
invite
more
people
to
enjoy,
and
the
neighborhood
needs
to
be
included
in
the
recreational
features
that
the
iraq
has
to
offer.
A
A
J
J
It
was
supposed
to
be
120
acres
and
it
was
cut
back
to
about
90
acres,
so
there
is
still
30
acres
on
the
north
end
to
be
developed,
and
you
know
it's
it's
just
it
comes
down
to
funding
and
you
know
being
able
to
to
develop
that
area.
We
did.
The
city
did
want
to
have
a
road
on
that
north
end
as
well,
and
that's
still
still
the
ideal.
But
it's
just
taken
some
time.
J
It
is
a
pay
to
play
complex
and
it
is.
It
is
tough
to
open
it
up
to
the
neighborhood
and
community,
because
salt
lake
city
doesn't
have
a
recreation
department
to
feed
that
programming
into
that
into
the
complex.
So
it
is
a
it
was
built
and
conceived
to
be
a
youth
sports
tourism
facility
and
that's
kind
of
what
that's
what
it
is
today.
J
So,
as
far
as
the
parcels
on
that
we've
bought,
it's
still
open
to
what
were
what
the
city
wants
to
do
with
what
parks
wants
to
do
with
that
property,
and
we
will
do
an
extensive
community
engagement
prior
to
building
so.
I
I
will
also
add
that
the
land
that
the
rack
is
currently
on
was
purchased
with
land
and
water
conservation
funds,
which
limits
what
can
be
actually
done
on
that
land.
So
we
actually
can't
construct
an
indoor
recreation
facility
on
the
existing
rack
land,
which
is
why
we're
looking
at
this
additional
land
for
the
potential.
But
again
that's
not
an
idea
that
we've
committed
to
in
any
way.
I
I
will
also
say
that
demolishing
that
house
is
a
priority
for
public
lands
and
it's
part
of
what
brings
us
here
today.
I
believe
that
the
housing
mitigation
loss
plan
is
part
of
the
application
before
you
and
we
needed
to
have
you
guys
review
that
before
we
could
move
forward
with
demolishing
that,
and
so
that
is
part
of
what
we're
talking
to
you
guys
about
today.
A
A
That
is
something
the
city
council
could
decide
on,
and
certainly
the
community
council
and
any
members
of
the
public
out.
There
will
have
more
opportunity
to
engage
in
this
process
as
it
moves
forward
to
the
city
council,
regardless
of
what
our
recommendation
is.
The
next
step
will
go
to
the
city
council,
and
that
is
that
is
something
that
they
could
do,
but
not
something
that
we
have
the
authority
to
instigate.
So
if
we
have
any
more
discussion
on
this,
now
is
the
time
where
I'm
open
for
a
motion,
but.
A
What
I
said
that
we're
here
we
can,
whatever
our
recommendation,
is
positive
or
negative,
it
will
move
on,
and
the
city
council
then
will
decide,
and
it
would
be
the
city
council's
decision
if
they
wanted
to
hold
off
for
a
year,
as
the
community
council
had
in
their
request.
I
was
just
stating
that
we
do
not
have
the
authority
to
hold
this
for
a
year
right,
we're
making
a
recommendation,
and
that
will
be
up
to
the
city
council,
how
they
want
to
proceed.
C
J
J
I
I
feel
that
you
know
it
was.
It
was
purchased
with
residents
funding
so
and
they
did
approved
the
bond
so
yeah.
You
know
I
get
that
frustration
on
that
side
so,
but
looking
at
all
the
all
of
the
information
going
back,
it
looked
like
it
was
conceived
to
be
a
a
draw
to
draw
tournaments
from
out
of
state
teams
and
and
kind
of
be
that
use
youth
sports
tourism.
A
There's
definitely
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
discussion.
We
could
have
about
the
rack,
but
I
want
to
kind
of
pull
us
back
and
focus
us
on
what
the
question
is
before
us
tonight
and
is
that
is
these
parcels
is
open
space,
an
appropriate
zone
for
those,
and
what
recommendation
would
we
like
to
forward
on
to
the
city
council
andra.
B
Yeah,
I
guess
I'm
you
know
it
seems
like
this
is
the
existing
land
use
seems
bad.
I
think
we
all
agree
that
this
is
a
bad
use
of
land
to
have
one
vacant
house
on
there
and
I'm
guess
I'm
trying.
Can
you
just
review
again?
You
said
there
are
some
restrictions
on
what
the
zoning
can
be
because.
A
A
B
D
Yeah,
but
it's
not
about
the
current
use,
it's
about
the
current
zoning,
so
the
current
zoning
is
r17000,
which
is
what
the
exact,
which
is
the
exact
zoning
of
the
neighborhood
that
completely
surrounds
this
property.
So
and
amanda
correct
me:
if
I'm
wrong,
did
you
say
there
were
22?
If
you
built
it
out
at
r17,
you
would
have
22
housing
units.
P
You
could
go
into
22,
7,
000
square
foot.
D
D
Maybe
that's
not
could
contribute
to
housing
issues
that
we
have
and
we've
fought
over
far
less
than
that
in
our
meetings.
So,
and
so
you
know,
I'm
a
little
uneasy
actually
because
this
facility
would
necessarily
by
the
way
it's
designed
turned
by
the
way
the
roads
are
designed
in
this
area
already
turn
its
back
on
the
neighborhood.
That's
there
I
mean
you
literally
could
not.
If
you
wanted
to
walk
from
a
house
in
this
neighborhood
to
that
facility,
you
basically
have
to
go
all
the
way
out
to
rose
park
road,
so.
D
A
Yeah,
if
you
want
to
make
a
motion
for
that,
we
do
have
two
separate
files
for
two
separate
motions,
so
we
would
need
to
handle
one
first
and
then
we
go
to
the
second
one.
If
you're
ready
to
make
a
motion,
we
can
do
that
and
vote
on
it.
I
The
chart
this
chart
that
lists
the
permitted
and
conditional
uses
that
are
in
the
open
space
zoning
was
super
surprising
to
me.
It's
not,
it's
not
doesn't
mean
if,
if,
if
it's
rezoned
to
open
space,
that
does
not
mean
it's
going
to
be
a
field,
it
could
be
a
an
indoor
recreation
facility
there.
It
could
have
day
care
in
it.
I
mean
there's
like
an
adult
day.
Care
is
allowed.
I
A
B
A
A
A
G
C
A
Okay,
that
motion
passes
with
four.
Yes,
one
abstention
and
two
no's,
maybe
looking
for
a
next
motion
for
the
rose,
parklane
rezone.
A
A
Okay,
I
have
a
motion
from
amy
for
the
rezone
and
a
second
from
maureen.
Let's
go
ahead
and
take
a
vote.
John,
yes,
levi.
E
A
C
L
A
I'm
glad
it
wasn't
one
that
I
was
going
to
have
heartburn
over
so
the
next.
The
next
step
is
to
the
city
council,
so
the
community
council
will
have
more
of
an
opportunity
to
engage
in
that
process
as
well
with
you,
but
thank
you
for
coming
tonight.
I
appreciate
your
time.
Thank
you.
J
A
A
Yeah
just
for
anybody
in
the
public,
if
you
wish
to
speak,
I've
got
a
couple
cards.
You
can
fill
out
a
card
in
the
hallway,
but
I'll
also
take
your
raising
hands
later
on.
R
Slideshow
from
beginning
okay,
so
this
is
a
continuation
of
of
a
planned
development
that
was
reviewed
in
december
15th
and
it
was
stable
by
the
planning
commission.
R
Our
recommendation
is
for
approval
with
conditions
and
I'll
list
the
conditions
later.
So
this
is
the
site
and
the
existing
condition
where
there
is
a
restaurant
in
office
buildings
that
would
be
demolished
and
also
there's
the
parley's
creek
that
runs
through
the
property
as
an
underpass,
concrete
bat
covert.
R
So
these
are
the
revisions
that
were
done
by
the
applicant,
and
so
the
revision
consists
of
dividing
the
the
building
which
originally
the
the
first
request,
was
for
550
approximately
550
feet
long
now,
the
the
request
has
divided
the
building
into
two
65
feet:
tall
buildings,
mixed
shoes
and
connect
them
with
a
sky
bridge
with
94
residential
units,
with
a
still
with
ground,
retail
and
underground
parking
structure.
R
R
Another
thing
that
the
plan
planning
commission
asked
was
for
the
udot
access
to
be
approved.
However,
udot
has
looked
at
this
project
has
no
objections
but
will
not
give
final
approval
until
the
planning
commission
approves
the
project.
So
as
a
solution,
we
are
recommending
that
the
planning
commission
approves
this
project,
with
a
condition
that
you
udot
will
give
that
approval
at
the
time
of
a
building
permit.
R
R
You
know
much
better
experience
for
the
pedestrians
and
I
I
need
to
note
at
right
here
that
this
sidewalk
on
13th
south-
and
this
is
the
13th
south
sidewalk
it
is
the
public
right-of-way-
is
about
five
feet
wide,
and
so
the
23.5
feet
is
is
a
great
improvement,
although
one
of
the
reasons
is
because
of
utilities
also
not
just
because
of
pedestrian
access
but
and
then
on
the
state
street.
R
So
our
recommendation
is
that
it
is
our
opinion
that
the
project
meets
the
intent
of
the
zoning
ordinance,
the
plant
development
standards
and
the
applicable
master
plans,
in
that
it
recommends
that
the
planning
commission
approve
the
request
with
the
following
conditions
that
the
applicant
shall
comply
with
all
requirement
required,
department,
comments
and
conditions,
especially
because
there
is
a
condition
of
for
the
parley's
canyon
parlez
creek.
That
will
need
some
some
buffering,
but
that
would
be
finalized
at
the
building
permit
time
when
they're
getting
the
building.
R
A
A
So
I
feel
like
that
was
yeah.
Do
you
do
you
feel
like
it
needs
to
be
an
actual
condition.
A
A
Thank
you
and
do
you
have
their
presentation
ready
or
do
you
have
one
you
need
to
plug
in?
Oh,
you
have
a
laptop
okay,
no
you're
good.
So
please
state
your
names
for
the
record
and
then
you
guys
will
have
10
minutes.
S
Mike
nichols
owner
developer
of
the
coachman's
project.
S
I'd
just
like
to
start
by
thanking
you,
madam
chairman,
and
also
all
of
the
commission
here
for
taking
the
time
to
hear
this
again,
because
I
do
realize
that
it
was
tabled
with
some.
You
know
concerns,
and
I
agree
with
those
concerns.
I
do
want
to
say
that
the
original
concept
I
thought
was
great.
This
one
is
is
much
better,
so
we
looked
at
the
whole
thing,
put
our
thinking
caps
on
and
we
definitely
have
a
better
plan
set
of
plans
that
addresses.
S
I
think
I
personally
think
the
commission's
concerns,
so
we've
broken
up
the
building
into
two.
The
only
reason
we
have
a
sky
bridge
there
is
to
connect
the
condominium
owners
on
the
south
side
to
direct
parking.
That
is
on
the
second
level
other
than
that
I
wouldn't
even
have
to
do
that,
but
it
didn't
seem
feasible
to
bring
them
down
over
and
then
back
up
one.
S
So
that's
the
one
thing
we
created
two
completely
separate
buildings
with
a
50
foot
opening
there
we
eliminated
the
north
entrance,
and
I
think
we
made
a
really
really
neat
patio
there.
It's
going
to
be
an
outdoor
patio
for
either
restaurants
or
food
establishments
that
are
inside
that
running
in
that
building,
so
it
could
be
like
a
food
court
type
or
it
can
be
specific
to
a
restaurant.
Okay,
it's
going
to
have
just
wrought
iron,
fencing
to
kind
of
delineate
the
the
areas
and
on
both
sides,
but
I
think
it'll
be
neat.
S
It'll
have
18-foot
ceilings
in
there
and
it's
pretty
much
going
to
be
one
of
the
few
patios
that
can
be
utilized
most
of
the
year.
You
know
with
rain
or
anything
like
that.
It
wouldn't
affect
you
in
there.
Also,
we
reduced
the
unit
count
by
eight,
I
eliminated
all
the
studios.
I
listened
to
andra
there.
She
she
was
right.
S
There
was
no
need
for
that,
but
it
was
like.
I
said
at
the
time
we
felt
we
were
only
going
to
utilize
those
if
we
needed
to
absorb
some
some
areas
there,
that
we
couldn't
do
anything
with.
We
ended
up
with
my
team
here
doing
a
good
job
and
we
ended
up
with
23
one
bedroom,
55,
two
bedroom
and
16
three
bedroom.
Basically
on
the
corners.
The
three
bedrooms
are
where
they
exist.
S
We
also
did
not
eliminate
enemy,
any
amenity
space
that
was
on
the
second
level.
By
doing
this,
it's
still
there.
In
fact,
I
even
included
a
a
community
garden
on
top
of
that
one
level
there
also.
I
just
think
this
is
in
line
with
the
vision
of
the
area.
I
hope
we
address
the
commission's
concerns
and
I
think
it
will
be
a
focal
point
for
the
community,
as
well
as
a
catalyst
for
development
in
that
area,
and
I
ask
the
commission's
you
know
approval
on
this
project,
so
we
can
move
forward.
T
As
far
as
the
architecture
goes
and
the
design,
we
really
try
to
do
our
best
to
take
into
account
the
feedback
that
we
got
back
in
december,
which
was
that
it's
it's
rather
large.
It
reads
as
one
long
building,
and
so
what
we've
really
tried
to
do
is
pull
the
massing
back
on
the
upper
levels.
We
had
that
prior,
but
we've
pulled
it
back
even
further.
We've
changed
the
materials
at
those
same
sort
of
transition
points.
T
If
you
on
the
north
building,
which
is
one
contiguous
building,
we've
done
our
best
to
do
to
make
it
feel
and
look
as
if
it
were
two
separate
buildings.
There's
not
there's
plenty
of
precedent.
I
think
in
salt
lake,
where
property
lines
are
built
right
to
materials,
change
from
use
to
use
or
from
building
to
buildings.
We've
tried
to
mimic
that
here
and
as
you
as
the
building
reaches
upward
and
pulls
away
from
the
sidewalk
it
recesses
back
the
north
building
the
north.
T
T
Make
sure
that
this
that
the
the
outdoor
courtyard
that
mike's
just
mentioned
will
be
covered
but
accessible
and
and
usable
throughout
the
year,
and
you
know
really
make
this
a
a
a
place
that
people
can
shop
and
dine
and
live
and
work.
All
of
that,
you
know
everything
that
this
zone
is
designed
to
do
so.
We're
excited
to
be
here.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
I
want
to
say
real
quick.
I
know
your
planning
staff
doesn't
get
enough
time
on
the
record
for
a
little
praise.
I
think
you've
cut.
T
These
stunning
modern
craftsman,
condos
with
high
end
park
city,
feel,
will
offer
open
concept,
floor
plans,
nine
and
ten
foot
ceilings,
eight
foot
doors,
quartz,
countertops,
solid
surface
flooring,
balconies
as
well
as
extreme
amenities
such
as
hot
tubs,
fire
pits,
steam
shower
sauna,
multiple
gathering
areas
with
plenty
of
open
space
and
even
a
beanbag
toss.
I'm
personally
advocating
for
a
putting
green
on
the
project.
T
Honestly,
I
can
go
on
and
on
about
the
features
and
amenities.
But
more
importantly,
this
is
a
benefit
to
salt
lake
city
in
helping
alleviate
the
pressure
of
the
housing
shortage,
which
is
much
more
important
to
address.
80
to
90
percent
of
the
housing
units
being
constructed
in
salt
lake
city
are
rental
units
according
to
bankrate.com,
as
well
as
many
other
reputable
sources.
Utah
has
been
ranked
as
the
number
one
housing
market
for
the
strongest
pace
of
job
growth,
along
with
low
unemployment
and
low
local
and
state
taxes.
T
Utah's
housing
problem
continues
to
be
a
supply
and
demand
issue,
but
even
with
the
rapidly
rising
interest
rates,
we
don't
see
the
market
drastically
slowing
down,
because
there
is
absolutely
nothing
out
there
to
buy.
The
wasatch
front
in
general
has
seen
record
shattering
price
increases.
Experts
have
warned
of
severe
imbalances
where
demand
continues
to
outpace
supply,
with
utah's
rock
solid
economy
combined
with
millennials
finally
getting
their
lives
together
and
moving
out
of
their
parents
basements.
T
I
have
absolutely
no
doubt
that
we
will
sell
all
of
the
units
immediately.
In
fact,
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
a
way
to
phase
the
project,
so
I
don't
overwhelm
myself
with
the
amount
of
sales
and
interest
we
will
be
bombarded
with
upon
the
release.
Obviously,
the
location
is
everything
with
an
unbelievable
location,
a
mere
steps
away
from
tracks,
public
transportation,
smith's
ball
field,
as
well
as
the
planned
relocation
of
the
lds
hospital
to
the
new
sears
bill
to
the
sears
building.
T
Just
a
couple
of
blocks
away,
we
plan
to
offer
some
lucrative
partnerships
and
even
potential
discounts
to
organizations
such
as
the
salt,
lake,
bees
and
lds
hospitals
for
employees
and
contractors.
I
am
here
to
ensure
that
mr
nichols
vision
in
giving
back
to
the
community
becomes
a
reality.
He
has
a
huge
desire
to
repay
salt
lake
city
for
the
success
that
the
location
of
the
coachman's
diner
has
brought
his
family
for
over
half
a
century.
T
The
classy
and
ultimately
relaxing
atmosphere
that
this
housing
complex
will
create,
combined
with
the
security
system
and
cameras
that
we'll
be
utilizing
to
keep
the
residents
guests
and
personal
properties
safe
will
drastically
change
the
audience
of
all
the
surroundings.
The
curb
appeal
of
the
building
itself,
combined
with
the
added
luxury
retail
shops
on
the
ground
level,
will
stop
you
dead
in
its
tracks.
Honestly,
I'm
honored
to
be
part
of
this
team
and
create
such
a
vision
that
mike
had
thank
you.
A
Is
that
it?
Yes?
Okay,
thank
you
all
three
of
you.
I
appreciate
you
coming
back
and
I
believe
I
said
this
back
in
december
that
the
commission,
my
feeling,
was
that
the
commission
was
happy
to
see
something
go
on
here
and
we
do
think
this
was
a
pretty
important
corner
as
you
do
so.
I
appreciate
you
going
back
and
and
addressing
all
the
kind
of
concerns
we
brought
up
because
we
want
to
see
this
be
something
really
special.
A
Even
beyond
my
lifetime.
This
corner
will
still
be
there,
and
so
I
I
appreciate
the
work
you've
done
and
I
initially
when
I
looked
at
it
thought
this
was
a
big
improvement
and,
as
I
read
it,
I
was
pleased
to
see
many
parts
of
it.
So
I
think
you
you
did
a
good
job
in
in
addressing
our
concerns,
but
I
will
open
it
up
to
the
commission
for
any
questions
to
the
applicant
at
this
time.
A
Okay,
well,
hang
tight.
We
do
have
some
public
comment
periods.
Are
some
public
comments
that
I
know
once
I
close
that
I'll?
If
there's
anything
that
comes
up
during
that
time,
I'll,
let
you
have
the
opportunity
to
address
anything
that
that's
brought
up
during
that.
So
if
you
just
want
to
sit
there,
that
would
be
great
katja.
Could
you
bring
up
the
the
new
rendering
just
so
that
we
have
that
on
the
screen
to
look
at
as
we
go
through
this
okay?
I'm
gonna
open
the
public
comment
period.
A
Okay,
with
that,
when
I
call
your
name,
are
you
here
from
the
community
council?
Are
you
with
the
community
council
for
this
this
area
that
coachman's
is
in
okay?
That's
I'll
call
you
in
a
second!
So
when
I
call
you
up,
you'll
head
to
the
lectern
you'll
have
two
minutes.
I
will
time
you
and
let
you
know
when
that
time
is
up.
If
you
would
state
your
name
for
the
record.
A
This
is
a
public
comment
period,
so
it's
not
a
back
and
forth
q
a.
But
if
you
have
questions,
please
feel
free
to
post
them,
I'll,
write
them
down
and
I
will
ask
staff
or
the
applicant
after
the
public
comment.
Period
is
closed.
I
just
want
you
to
know.
We
won't
stop
your
time
to
answer
them
at
that
point.
So
first
up
I
do
have
rick
tanaka.
Is
that
you,
if
you
want
to
head
up
to
the
microphone
and
state
your
name
and
then
I'll,
give
you
two
minutes.
K
K
I'd
like
to
point
out
that
mike
has
you
know
striving
over
the
past
10
years
to
move
this
project
forward
and
which
you
may
or
may
not
know
that
this
is
it's
not
just
a
regular
project.
K
C
C
C
C
Maybe
probably,
I
think
so,
because
developers
don't
cross
that
line
between
rentals
and
condos
very
often
what
about
larger
units?
Yes,
I
think
we
probably
do
have
that
commitment.
What
about
a
commitment
to
anything
besides
market
rate
housing?
I'm
not
sure
about
that.
One?
Is
the
project
consistent
with
life
on
state,
except
for
its
length?
Yes,
generally,
although
it
would
be
part
of
the
neighborhood's
character
to
save
that
historic
sign,
and
we
have
an
ordinance
that
would
allow
that.
C
A
B
L
L
L
Western
region
is
a
non-profit
that
focuses
in
affordable
housing
and
what
mr
nichols
is
trying
to
provide
is
an
absolutely
necessity
product
from
our
perspective,
even
as
affordable
housing
providers,
his
for
sell
condos.
What
he's
proposing
is
going
to
be
a
even
a
great
transition
product
from
our
housing
into
a
home
ownership
product,
and
so
I
came
here
this
evening
as
a
representative
of
the
ownership
of
the
adjacent
property
to
say
that
we
100
support
his
development
and
what
he's
proposed
here
in
his
revised
plans.
F
My
name
is
eric
london,
I'm
a
real
estate
agent
and
he
basically
took
the
words
out
of
my
mouth.
I
was
just
going
to
say
to
put
affordable
housing
in
downtown
salt
lake
would
just
I
mean
anything
that
gets
listed
down
there.
Just
is
sold
immediately
and
so
to
have
94
units
to
sell
would
just
alleviate
some
of
that
the
pain
of
those
people
trying
to
get
houses
under
contract.
So
I
just
want
to
give
them
kudos
for
this
project.
A
Thank
you,
mr
london.
Does
anybody
else
wish
to
speak
on
this
item?
Okay,
seeing
none,
I
will
close
the
public
comment
period,
I'll
bring
it
back
to
the
commission.
Sorry.
E
That
I'll
read
so
this
is
from
jen
colby.
She
is.
These
she's
indicated
that
these
are
personal
comments.
I
think
the
planning
commission
for
tabling
the
coachman's
pud
in
december
overall
this
proposal
still
highlights
the
inadequacies
of
the
fbun2
zone
requirements.
Please
consider
additional
conditions
before
approving
on
the
positive
side.
At
least
this
project
is
redeveloping
a
commercial
site
rather
than
tearing
into
the
existing
housing
stock,
especially
the
historic
and
naturally
affordable
housing
left.
There
are
some
improvements
to
the
last
renderings.
E
Adding
more
multi-bedroom
apartments
is
a
good
reminder
that
simplistic
unit
counts
are
poor
metric
for
housing,
diversity
matters.
Unfortunately,
despite
the
major
rezoning
valuation
government
giving
to
the
property
owners,
there
appear
to
be
no
affordable
units,
while
more
bedrooms
may
make
it
possible
for
some
families
to
live
here
and
schools
are
nearby.
There
are
no
appealing
features
for
children's
for
children
in
the
netherlands,
not
confined
just
to
parks,
playgrounds
and
everywhere
in
amsterdam,
making
it
easier
for
families
to
live
in
an
urban
environment.
E
That's
from
not
just
bikes.
Video
worse,
the
complex
is
on
the
disastrously
engineered
us-style
streetscape,
an
urban
stroud,
a
dangerous
value
eroding
high-speed
street
road
hybrid,
which
functions
badly
as
both
see
strong
towns.
If
you
are
not
familiar
with
the
term
because
it
is
controlled
by
udot,
this
is
like
unlikely
to
change.
To
change.
Design
speeds
are
extremely
high.
A
In
is
there
yeah
that's
overtime?
I.
A
B
S
I
yeah,
I
don't
know
that
I
can
do
much
on
some
of
that
stuff.
I
mean,
I
think,
that
we
have
that
upper
level
enclosed
area
for
kids.
That
would
be
neat
because
you
don't
need
to
worry
about
them
running
out
into
the
street,
and
this
notion
that
everybody
keeps
saying
it's
right
up
against
right
up
against.
I
mean
there's
10
feet
of
of
hardscape
and
and
specified
sidewalk
between
the
curb
and
the
building
and
there's
also
12
feet.
S
If
you
count
the
insets,
that's
not
a
small
pedestrian
walk,
so
I
don't
know
why
this
keeps
coming
up.
I
think
it's
maybe
something
that
wasn't
articulated
properly,
but
I
mean
it's
10
feet
with
some
trees
with
the
the
grids
around
them.
I
mean
I
see
this
downtown
all
the
time
and
I
see
people
walking
on
both
sides,
not
not
just
on
one
side.
So
I
don't
know
you
know
exactly
where
this
keeps
coming
up.
A
That's
fine,
thank
you,
oh
so,
commissioners
and
open
this
up
for
a
discussion
or
questions
for
the
applicant
or
staff.
I
will
just
take
a
stab
the
the
question
of
the
135
foot
length
that
we
see
here.
I
I
normally
really
really
dislike
really
long
buildings.
That
was
one
of
the
main
problems
we
had
with
the
previous
design.
A
The
way
somebody
brought
up
that
if,
if
we
get
something
here,
will
I
allow
it
here,
but
what
I've
I've
always
felt
like
the
intent
of
that
building
length
was
to
break
it
up,
so
it
didn't
feel
so
massive
at
the
pedestrian
level,
and
I
think-
and
I
have
seen
a
few
and
this
would
be
one
of
them
where
the
design
the
functionality
accomplishes
that,
even
though
it
is
lengthy-
and
so
I
personally
then
look
at
is
the
intent
of
that
length
limit
being
met
with
your
design
and-
and
I
think
in
this
case
now,
this
new
one
is
oftentimes.
B
You
know
I
just
want
to
address
jen's
comments.
Jen
colby's
comments,
yeah
thanks
for
that.
I
think
all
of
us
think
state
street
is
fast
and
we
need
some
fast
streets,
but
there
are
far
far
too
many
fast
wide
streets
in
salt
lake,
but
I
don't
think
that's
the
purview
of
this
commission
to
address
on
the
the
affordability
issue.
I
guess
my
my
thought
is
that
it's
it's
through
filtering
and
there's
greater
substitution,
for
if
you
have
some
kind
of
larger
units,
maybe
you
don't
put
a
family
with.
B
You
know
a
three
and
a
five-year-old
in
there,
but
you
put
a
couple
who
has
a
living
parent
or
something
in
there
and
they're
not
encroaching
on
the
larger
homes?
You
know.
I
live
in
a
3,
000
square
foot
home
my
two
cats
and
I
my
two
cats
and
I
live
in
a
3000
square
foot
home
because
there
was
nothing
to
buy.
When
I
moved
to
salt
lake,
there
was
literally
nothing
that
was
appropriate,
appropriate
housing
in
the
owner
occupied
market,
and
so
that's
like.
B
A
Thank
you,
andrea
and
I
well,
I
think
affordability
is
on
everyone's
mind
and
it
is
an
important
topic
to
all
of
us
here.
A
M
That
was
me.
I
do
have
a
discussion
item.
You
know.
I
appreciate
the
passion
of
the
project.
I
appreciate
the
the
update
to
the
square
footage
and
and
kind
of
creating
these
larger
units
that
are
going
to
help
some
families.
My
concerns
are
more
and
like
I
feel
like
we
over
corrected
a
little
bit.
I
think
the
building
massing
is
is
close.
I
think
that
the
the
overall
kind
of
programming
of
the
building
is
is
is
good.
M
My
my
issues
are
that
the
building
distinctly
kind
of
starts
to
read
as
three
separate
buildings,
and
I
think
that's
really
good.
I
think
where
we
tried
to
make
it
mimic
kind
of
old-timey
free-form
construction,
where
buildings
got
built
right
next
to
each
other.
That
always
misses
the
mark
for
me,
because
it's
fake
and
it's
not
really
working
with
the
massing
of
the
building,
so
the
the
portion
all
the
way
to
the
right
kind
of
feels.
M
It's
just
very
generic
and
kind
of
unintentional.
I
think
what
you
had
before
was
was
actually
breaking
that
street
facade
up.
That's
one
of
the
things
we
look
at
most
as
commissioners
is:
how
does
a
person
interact
with
these
buildings?
What's
the
way
finding?
How
do
you
kind
of
navigate
the
street,
and
I
feel
like
it's
actually
moved
backwards
from
that
that
point
and
if
we
could
just
make
the
left
side
of
the
building,
basically
where
the
yellow
marker
is
closer
to
what
it
was
before
I
mean
it
was.
M
It
was
simpler,
it
was
cleaner.
The
detailing
was
was
much
more
appropriate
now,
just
all
this
yellow
and
the
changing
of
materials,
the
l-shaped
patterns
that
are
in
plane
changes
just
start
to
add
too
much.
If
that
makes
sense,
that's
my
discussion
kind
of
item
I'd
like
to
know
what
everyone
else
feels
about
the
engagement
of
the
street
and
how
those
storefronts
feel.
A
D
I'm
not
sure
that
these
issues
of
design
are
actually
part
of
our
purview
at
this
moment.
I'm
not.
I
don't
think,
but
I
happen
to
agree
with
john
that
the
first.
D
I
I
agree
that
the
simplicity
of
materials
in
the
first
one
and
the
expression
of
materials
in
the
first
one
is
better.
I
don't
know
that
we
can
say
you
must
do
it
this
way,
but
I
think
it's,
I
think
it's
something
to
look
at
in
terms
of
how
you
go
forward.
I
also
think
the
color
is
better
at
least
the
way
it's
rendered
in
the
original.
D
It's
not
yellow.
You
know
and
that's
kind
of
giving
me
a
little
heartburn,
and
I
really
like
the
sort
of
brownie
or
golder
tones
that
you
had
more
of
a
brickish
tone.
Then,
and
again
I
don't
think
these
things
of
color
are
there.
I
know
they're
not
part
of
what
we
do
here,
but
it's
just
something
to
go
back
and
look
at
the
way
that's
been
articulated
before
and
how
it
actually
kind
of
worked
better.
M
M
F
If
I
could
just
interrupt
yes,
unless
there's
a
condition
that
would
allow
staff
to
review
those
changes,
all
changes
have
to
come
back
to
planning
commissions.
So
if
we
prove
this
design,
which
I'm
saying
is
fine,
we
just
want
to
make
sure
you
carefully
articulate
that
condition
that
would
allow
staff
certain
ability
to
change
to
approve
certain
modifications.
D
A
D
Up
I,
I
would
like
it
to
be
a
condition
that
they're
that
they're
be
that,
if
the,
if
they
choose
to
review
their
design,
that
that
can
be
it
can
be
approved
at
the
staff
level.
D
D
I
Q
B
S
A
D
D
Coaching
mixed
use
located
at
approximately
1301
south
state
street
file,
plnpcm
2021-00898,
with
the
following
conditions
that
are
in
the
staff
report,
with
an
additional
condition
that
the
design
team
look
at
the
original
facade
materials
and
articulation
and
and
proceed
with
a
closer
rendition
in
that
regard
and
that
that
approval
of
that
any
of
those
changes
be
delegated
to
staff.
A
I
So
yeah
that
that
seems
pretty
specific,
that
that
last
condition.
A
Yeah,
so
I
wanted
to
clarify
so
it
is
to
just
to
review
with
staff
based
on
the
first
materials
and
and
ground
floor
articulation
for
that
area,
but
that
then
they
are
not
tied
into
having
to
mirror
that
they
they
can.
They
can
decide
what
they
want
to
proceed
with
is
what
I'm
getting
at.
Okay,
all
right,
I'm
clear
to
me.
So
I
have
a
motion
from
brenda
and
a
second
from
john
any
further
discussion
to
that
motion.
E
C
A
S
S
A
You
all
right
seeing
no
further
business
tonight.
I
will
adjourn
this
meeting
and
we'll
see
you
in
two
weeks.