►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustments 4-27-22
Description
Regular Session
A
B
A
F
A
G
G
A
E
This
is
a
quasi-judicial
rather
than
excuse
me.
This
is
a
quasi-judicial
proceeding
where
the
board
of
adjustment
acts
in
a
quasi-judicial
rather
than
a
legislative
capacity
at
a
quasi-judicial
hearing.
It
is
not
the
board's
function
to
make
law,
but
rather
to
apply
law
that
has
already
been
established
in
a
quasi-judicial
hearing.
E
The
board
is
required
by
law
to
make
findings
of
fact,
based
upon
the
evidence
presented
at
the
hearing
and
apply
those
findings
of
fact
to
previous
established
previously
established
criteria
contained
in
the
code
of
ordinances
in
order
to
make
a
legal
decision
regarding
the
application
before
it.
The
board
may
only
consider
evidence
at
this
hearing
that
the
law
considers
competence,
substantial
and
relevant
to
the
issues.
E
E
A
G
All
right,
allie
keem,
with
planning
and
zoning
this
subject:
property
is
located
again
on
west
martin
luther
king
junior
boulevard,
it's
on
the
south
side
of
the
street,
and
it's
outlined
in
yellow
on
your
screen.
The
property
is
located
in
the
r-70
one
and
two
family
residential
zoning
district.
There's
a
mix
of
residential
zoning
in
this
area,
there's
r60
to
the
north,
which
is
also
a
one
and
two
family
zoning
and
then
residential
multifamily
to
the
south
of
the
site.
G
The
land
development
code
states
that
the
maximum
total
driveway
width,
measured
at
the
property
line,
shall
not
exceed
33
of
the
lot
width
or
28
feet.
Whichever
is
less,
this
property
has
a
lot
width
of
70
feet.
So
therefore,
it's
a
lot
of
maximum
driveway
total
width
of
23
feet
again.
The
existing
is
29
and
a
half
feet
and
they
are
proposing
45.5
feet.
The
site
plan
that's
shown
here
is
provided
by
the
applicant.
G
G
I
did
take
a
look
at
those
and
got
an
approximate
average
of
their
total
width
and
the
properties
that
are.
I
have
it's
kind
of
hard
to
see
here,
but
the
shaded
or
dotted
blue
lines
are
the
properties
that
have
the
circular
driveways
and
that
average
width
was
34.5
feet.
And
one
thing
to
note
is
this:
property
does
have
the
smallest
width,
that's
70
feet
wide.
G
C
So
ali
just
so
I'm
clear
the
the
current
driveway.
Obviously,
since
it's
requested
to
be
replaced,
it
must
be
an
older
driveway
and
so
the
current
owners
from
their
epic
some
of
the
things
they
haven't
probably
lived
there
after
the
original
driveway
was
installed
and
just
just
wondering
if
in
a
driveway
situation,
because
we've
dealt
with
some
of
them
before
when
it's
just
a
repaving,
does
that
get
permitted
and
then
does
it
also
have
to
in
a
repaving
or
is.
H
F
G
G
I
wasn't
able
to
determine
that
in
my
history
at
this
point,
but
because
they're
proposing
to
replace
it,
it
had
to
comply
regardless,
but
if
it
was
legally
permitted
in
the
past
and
it's
considerably
not
conforming,
I
think
that
we
would
look
at
it
as
typical
maintenance
if
they
had
to
resurface
it.
Thank.
A
G
Yeah,
I
think
we'd
have
to
look
at
it
too,
because
if
they
had
to
physically
remove
the
entire
driveway
to
put
something
else,
new
in
it'd
have
to
comply.
If
it's
just
a
matter
of,
I
don't
know,
say,
fixing
a
portion
of
it.
That
might
be
a
different
case,
so
we'd
have
to
look
at
it
in
more
detail,
but
general
maintenance
wouldn't
trigger
it
to
come
into
compliance.
Thank
you.
I
have
a
question,
sir.
G
They
would
not
be
allowed
to
do
that.
The
code
is
very
specific
for,
after
the
fact
variances
okay.
Well,
let
me
take
a
step
back.
I
see
what
you're
saying
so
again.
We
would
look
at
the
permit
history
and
if
we
found
that
say
it
was
properly
permitted
but
constructed
incorrectly
or
the
permit
was
issued
an
error
in
those
situations.
F
G
G
G
G
A
D
What
we've
been
looking
at
from
the
get-go
is
both
practicality
and
hazards
that
are
collateral
from
the
the
current
construction
of
the
driveway
and
and
the
driveway's
proximity
to
the
intersection.
The
access
egress
is
not
good.
As
far
as
the
homeowner
is
concerned,
the
amount
of
space
in
the
driveway
is
not
viable
for
him.
There
is
not
enough
space
to
park
cars
and
parking
on
the
street.
There
again
is
not
a
viable
solution.
D
D
That's
all
pretty
standard.
I
mean
in
order
to
to
comply
with
existing
code
when
we
change
the
driveway
out
his
his.
Why
his
ark
would
have
to
go
down
to
six
or
seven
feet?
You
can't
get
a
vehicle
on
six
or
seven
feet
and
the
ability
to
pull
out
of
that
driveway
from
a
straight
drive
is
not
I
mean
from
from
any
standpoint.
It's
it's
just,
not
an
acceptable
situation.
The
traffic
coming
up
from
that
intersection
and
traffic
coming
down
from
from
at
19,
it's
it's
it
creates,
creates
a
hazard.
D
B
D
B
D
D
I
I
I
Almost
like
it's
a
roundabout,
they
can't
see
me,
I
can't
see
them.
That's
the
problem.
I've
had
numerous
occasions
where
people
will
come
around
that
corner
and
get
it
on
and
then
they'll
slam
their
horn
on
me.
I
can't
back
out
what
I
wanted
to
do
was
be
able
to
back
and
then
go
around
the
circular
driveway.
It's
too
tight
way
too
tight
to
do
that.
If
I
had
about
seven
feet
on
each
side,
that
would
give
me
plenty
of
room
because
you
can't
park
on
the
street
it'd
be
dangerous
to
park
on
the
street.
I
People
are
just
plummeting
through
that
stops
and
you
they
can't
see
me,
and
I
can't
see
them
because
there's
lots
of
foliage
in
my
neighbor's
lawn.
So
I
might
be
a
hundred
feet.
75
80
100
feet
from
that
supposed
stop
sign
and
people
people
kind
of
they
they
may
stop
here,
but
then
they
rev
around
the
corner.
So
it's
just
really
an
encumbrance,
and
I
would
hope
that
we
could
get
some
solution
to
that.
It
would
be
awesome.
B
I
The
pavers
are
so
beautiful.
It's
going
to
beautify
the
neighborhood,
I
mean
that's
gorgeous
on
the
next
street,
over
manatee
boulevard,
they're,
all
pavered
and
they're
all
big
driveways.
I
know
the
zoning
is
different
over
there.
Setbacks
are
different
front.
Setbacks
are
different,
they
allow
for
new
things
and
it's
a
wonderful
subdivision.
I
would
just
hope
we
could
look
at
that
and
maybe
come
up
with
a
solution
because
I'm
afraid
someone's
going
to
slam
into
me.
I
B
I
I
think
what
my
contractor
is
going
to
state
is
where
the
yellow
is
up.
There,
we're
coming
over
seven
feet
there
just
to
go
up
about
three
four
feet
and
then
seven
feet
on
the
other
side
to
come
up
circular,
to
aesthetically,
be
able
to
negotiate
rounded,
so
we're
adding
some
pavers
in
there.
What
ira,
400
square
feet
or
something
a
permeable
surface.
D
In
other
words,
the
logistics
we're
talking
about
is
is
increasing
the
width
of
the
flares
and
I've
I've
gone
through
this
with
pinellas
county.
I
mean
they.
They
have
mandated
now
that
every
flare
has
got
to
be
minimally
five
feet
and
their
their
justification,
for
that
is
is
hazards,
so
the
people
can
easily
access
their
driveways
or
ingress
their
driveways
without
having
to
worry
that
they
can't
see
they
can
move
to
the
side.
It's
maneuverable.
D
E
I
C
D
I
I
D
D
You
can't
make
that
you
can't
navigate
that
in
order
to
be
able
to
navigate
and
and
do
it
safely,
you
need
some
additional
space
out
in
the
right
of
way
so
that
he
can
maneuver
to
the
side.
That
way,
he's
able
to
visibly
see.
What's
coming
and
what's
going
right
now
you
don't
have
that
luxury
and
if
the
city
of
tarpon
springs
says
well
on
top
of
all
that,
not
only
can't
you
widen
it,
but
now
you've
got
to
bring
the
width
of
both
down.
B
I
D
B
A
C
C
I
D
You
see
the
way
the
suv
is
sitting
there,
assume
that
suv
backs
down
that
circular
driveway
as
it
comes
down
now,
there's
very
limited
viewing
access.
If
we
widen
that
flare
eight
more
feet,
he
has
the
ability
to
come
to
the
side,
and
it
gives
him
a
much
broader
view
of
what's
going
on,
even
if
he
has
to
pull
over
for
a
few
minutes
if
he
has
to
come
straight
back
into
the
street,
and
you
have
somebody
come
around
that
corner
fast.
A
A
A
G
Okay,
so
yes,
let
me
provide
a
little
clarity
about
the
measurement,
so
how
the
code
is
written.
Is
it
measures
the
total
width
is
limited
at
the
property
line,
which
is
also
the
right-of-way
line,
so
our
measurement
is
along
the
property
line
so
anywhere
the
drive
touches
that
property
line
that
counts
towards
the
the
measurement
the
code
does
allow
for
you
to
have
flares
to
get
out
like
the
most
driveways
do
into
the
right-of-way
street.
But
the
issue
is
because
it's
how
the
widening
is
going.
D
D
It's
a
wonderful
thing
for
parking
the
cars,
but
it
doesn't
address
the
hazards
that
he's
facing,
and
that's
that's
why
I'm
I'm
crying
I'm
I'm
kind
of
locked
between
a
rock
and
a
hard
place,
no
pun
intended,
but
that's
what
we're
trying
to
deal
with
we're,
not
just
I
mean
obviously
for
as
a
homeowner
said,
aesthetically
it's
going
to
be
fantastic,
but
from
a
practical
aspect,
we're
dealing
with
a
hazard
and
that's
what
we're
trying
to
mitigate
okay.
Thank
you.
B
Yes,
can
we
go
to
the
picture
where
the
pickup
truck
was
in
the
driveway,
with
the
escu
right
there,
if
that
pickup,
that
pickup
truck
looks
like
it's
part
bar
as
you
come
into
the
house
to
the
left
of
the
driveway
rather
than
to
the
right
of
the
driveway?
So
if
you
park
it
to
the
right
of
the
driveway,
don't
you
have
enough
room
for
that
suv
to
go
out.
I
No,
the
problem
is,
if
I
back
up
the
moment
I
back
up-
and
I
can't
see
that
street,
where
the
stop
sign
is
over
to
my
right.
People
come
running
around
that
corner
and
they're
beeping
their
horns.
Incessantly
like
you're
supposed
to
watch
out,
there's
driveways
here
people
I
can't
see
them,
they
can't
see
me
I
could.
If
I
extended
my
had
some
pavers,
I
could
pull
up
and
then
come
out
this
way
and
I'm
not
taking
up
all
the
rocks.
The
rocks
are
beautiful.
D
And
mr
burrows,
I
I
indifference
to
you
you're
kind
of
talking
two
different
ends.
I
understood
your
question
and
yes,
if
he
backed
it
up,
it
could
probably
come
around
it.
You
really.
If
you
were
out
there,
you
would
see
the
space.
When
I
go
to
the
house
and
his
two
cars
are
up
there.
I
can
barely
park
on
the
driveway.
A
A
E
C
F
Now
the
city's
response
to
that
says
they
didn't
meet
that,
but
I
would
argue
that
they're
competent
and
substantial
evidence
that
this
is
a
dangerous
situation
and
it
needs
to
be
corrected
and
it's
not
going
to
harm
anybody.
Second,
so
it
does
it.
It
does
rise
out
of
the
physical
surroundings,
also
the
shape
that
it's
currently
in
the
conditions
or
special
circumstances
peculiar
to
the
property
have
not
been
self-created
or
have
resulted
from
an
action
by
the
applicant
or
with
prior
knowledge
or
approval
of
the
applicant.
F
F
They
are
arguing
that
it
does
that
if
we
follow
the
letter
of
the
law
that
we
would
deny
them
reasonable
use,
their
own
personal
safety
and
the
safety
of
the
vehicle
granting
the
variants
will
not
confer
any
special
privilege.
Well,
we
know
that's
true,
because
there
are
those
pavers
all
over
the
place
and
they
are
various
sizes
in
various
driveways
right
across
the
street
or
two
streets
over
granting.
The
variance
will
not
substantially
diminish
property
values.
Well,
no,
it's
going
to
make
them
go
up
because
it's
going
to
make
it
look
nice.
C
I
have
a
problem
with
the
extent
of
the
width
that
they're
proposing.
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
granting
a
variance
to
keep
the
current
size
that
exists
if
they
had
come
before
us,
with
a
variance
keeping
with
the
size.
To
me
that
makes
sense.
I
I
drive
plenty
of
suvs
and
I've
driven
trucks,
and
if
it
means
that
I
have
to
do
a
k
turn
onto
the
shells,
I
would
do
that,
but
you
know
it
also
depends
how
people
go
into
the
driveway,
how
people
park
their
cars
on
the
driveway.
C
A
A
So
just
as
you
have
inherited
a
driveway
that
is
non-conforming,
that
is,
you
know
beyond
the
maximum
allowed
width.
So
too,
would
god
forbid
you
ever
sell
your
home
at
any
time.
I
want
to
keep
you
here,
but
if
you
do,
the
next
property
owner
is
now
inheriting
that,
so
it
is
a
challenging
situation.
G
F
G
The
the
bible,
the
apron
that
typically
is
fully
within
the
right
of
way
that's
different
than
what
this
requirement
is.
This
requirement
is
specifically
the
measurement
along
the
property
line
and,
as
I
mentioned,
the
city
does
allow
you
to
have
an
apron
going
out
into
the
right-of-way,
but
the
issue
just
so.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
it's
clear,
because
the
widening
is
also
it's
not
fully
in
the
right
of
way.
This
is
the
right
of
way.
This
is
the
private
property,
so.
D
E
Point
of
order-
I
I
didn't
want
to
interrupt,
but
the
public
hearing
has
been
closed
and
there's
a
motion
in
a
second
in
discussion
on
the
floor.
So
there
really
shouldn't
be
any
more
testimony
given
from
either
the
city
or
the
applicant
unless
we
like
to
withdraw
the
motion
pursuant
to
robert's
rules
and
then
go
back
to
the
public
hearing.
A
A
F
G
A
E
G
All
right,
this
property
is
located
on
the
west
side
of
north
walton
avenue
outlined
in
red
on
the
screen.
The
property,
as
well
as
all
surrounding
property,
is
zoned
r
70a,
which
is
a
single
family
residential
zoning
district.
There
is
some
residential
office
zoning
to
the
south
along
orange
street.
G
G
There
are
two
existing
sheds
on
the
property.
The
applicant
has
indicated
that
if
they
get
approval
of
this,
they
will
be
removing
those
and
consolidating
their
storage
space
into
the
the
one
new
structure.
In
addition
to
utilizing
this
for
storage
they've.
Also
indicated
that
they'll
from
time
to
time
put
a
personal
vehicle
within
the
structure.
G
G
G
If
the,
if
a
detached
garage
which
is
kind
of
a
hybrid
of
both,
is
300
square
feet
or
less
in
this
zoning
district,
it
will
reduce
the
of
your
setback
also
to
five
feet.
So
if
the
proposed
structure
was
smaller
again
they're
proposing
400
square
feet
in
size,
they
would
be
able
to
take
advantage
of
these
reduced
step
backs
and
there
are
your
decision
criteria
and
if
you
have
any
questions,
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
them.
A
G
G
G
F
G
G
C
A
J
So
if
we
have
to
come
20
off
the
back
and
then
another
20,
that
only
gives
us
20
square
feet
to
even
try
to
maneuver
a
vehicle
in,
and
we
have
trucks
that
are
17
foot
long,
not
lifted
or
anything
just
normal
size
trucks
we're
trying
to
stay
away
from
the
back
where
she
has
a
septic.
The
leech
field
runs
there
where
it
says,
storage,
which
is
really
a
carport
right
behind.
That
is
where
the
actual
tank
is
so
the
leach
field
runs
there
and
runs
in
between
both
those
sheds.
J
So
I
have
the
two
drains
so
we're
looking
to
put
it
in
the
far
corner.
So
we
can
condense
stuff,
put
tools
in
it.
If
we
have
to
access
it
for
him
to
work
on
a
vehicle
or
for
his
workshop
we're
trying
to
be
able
to
have
enough
clearance
to
be
able
to
maneuver.
So
we're
not
hitting
our
house
trying
to
back
out
or
move.
J
I'm
calling
it
I
consider
it
a
garage.
The
company
we
purchased
it
from
considers
calls
it
a
carport.
So
it's
going
to
be
a
20
by
20..
It
has
the
roll-up
garage
door,
it's
nine
foot
tall,
it's
got
the
roll-up
garage
door,
eight
foot
wide
and
then
it'll
have
an
access
door
so
that
I'll
have
to
roll
up
the
garage.
J
Every
time
I
need
to
go
in
to
get
tools
or
anything
that's
in
there
and
it
that
will
all
face
the
back
side
of
the
house,
the
garage
door,
of
course,
because
that's
the
way
we're
going
to
have
to
be
able
to
access
it
to
go
in
not
exactly
sure
what
to
call
it.
I'm
calling
it
attached
garage
for
my
husband's
tools.
J
J
J
B
B
J
J
B
H
D
H
That
septic
tank
here
my
leash
field
goes
behind
my
house
right
down,
which
way
you
can
see
that
suck
the
second
drain
field.
This
is
my
my
lines
going
down
beside
my
house.
That's
the
reason
we
had
this
move
back,
10
foot
to
have
more
room
when
if
they
do
come
out
and
replace
my
septic
field,
we
have
more
room
instead
of
the
garage
being
way
over.
Here
we
wanted
to
set
back
10
more
feet.
H
A
J
A
A
J
Well,
because
you're
taking
it
40
feet
of
the
yard,
you
go
to
try
to
pull
a
vehicle
into
the
garage
right.
There,
you're
not
going
to
be
able
to
turn
around
and
back
up
within
20
feet
when
the
vehicle
is
about
17
foot.
You've
got
three
feet
to
try
to
maneuver
to
back
up
without
hitting
the
house
or
the
side
fence.
J
A
F
J
H
J
A
J
C
But
I
see
mr
burris's
question
from
earlier,
because,
if
you're
using
the
side
of
the
house
as
the
entrance
to
the
backyard
you're
coming
down
that
side,
which
is
the
top
of
our
picture,
there
you're
coming
down
that
house
and
then,
if
you're
saying
the
garage
door
and
most
garage
doors
are,
I
don't
know
eight
feet
or
so.
So
that's
not
half
of
the
blue,
but
a
good
chunk
of
the
blue
in
order
to
maneuver
that
vehicle
in
there
you're
going
to
have
to
drive
across
the
dotted
septic
drain
field.
Currently
once
you
to
get.
J
They
were
saying
it's
kind
of
exaggerated
on
the
diagram
as
to
how
wide
it
is,
but
it
doesn't
extend
past
my
house.
It
actually
come
ends
before
the
end
of
my
house,
so
we're
not
driving
on
the
leech
field,
the
leech
fields.
I
don't
know
how
many
feet
underneath
the
ground
anyways
right,
so
we're
accessing
it
through
the
the
fence.
We
have
that's
on
the
one
side
of
the
house
because
we
can't
access
it
on
the
other
side
right,
there's
no
access
on
the
other
side.
B
J
B
Then
the
other
solution,
the
only
solution
you
have
is
to
stay
within
the
20
feet
of
easement
in
the
back,
get
rid
of
the
shed
the
9x9
by
thirteen
by
one
in
one
shed
move
this
whole
thing
over
closer
to
the
brick
area,
and
that
way
you
will
get
your
garage
door
between
the
fence
and
the
blue
building,
so
you'll
be
able
to
maneuver
to
get
in
and
get
out.
There's
no
way,
you're
going
to
do
that
over
the
septic
tank
drain.
A
Yeah,
so
that
that's
kind
of
I
was
picturing,
something
like
that.
You
know
taking
right
the
2520
and
I
know
you
have
the
that
existing
smaller
shed
there,
which
is
full
so
but,
like
you
said
it's
almost
like
a
temporary
obstruction
into
your
permanent
long-term
vision
of
consolidating
cleaning
things
up.
I
get
it
I'm
in
the
middle
of
that
kind
of
stuff
myself.
H
To
10.,
we
don't
want
to
be
on
the
lease
field
if
they
ever
have
to
come
out
and
replace
that
separate
thing.
Yeah,
we
want
to
be
back
further.
You
can't
get
an
ambulance
you
can
it
ain't
like
a
driveway
back
there,
I'm
fenced
in
between
all
these
houses
beside
me,
so
my
my
fence
is
backed
up
to
another
fence
to
another
fence
to
another
fence.
All
of
my
asking
is
to
move
it
back.
10
foot
away
from
the
septic
drain
field.
H
Actually,
in
the
leash
field,
just
in
case
they
ever
have
to
come
in,
they
can
come
in
and
replace
all
that
they
have
plenty
more
room.
You're
trying
to
tell
me,
come
off
the
back
of
the
fence,
20
foot
to
put
another
20
foot
garage
on
there.
That
won't
probably
give
me
20
foot
away
from
my
house
to
my
garage
and
I've
been
living
here
for
what
twenty
four
years.
B
H
And
I
haven't
asked
for
nothing
and
all
I
just
want
to
get
set
back
away
from
the
septic
drain,
I'm
not
backing
on
the
septic
field,
I'm
not
on
the
leash
field.
The
lease
field
is
right
behind
my
house
actually
is
past
is
way
before
the
house,
so
I'm
trying
to
work
that
all
in
there
too,
just
in
case
we're
going
to
have
a
problem
anyways,
because
the
house
been
built
since
1959.
H
A
E
E
E
A
Thank
you
that
that
helps
because,
yes,
we're
going
in
circles,
okay,
so
that
that
is
a
very
good
point
I
mean,
given
that
words
of
wisdom
do
we
have
any
other
questions
from
either
our
applicant
or
our
staff
when
we
are
talking,
because
that
that
is
the
thing
that
this
is
something
to
consider
is
the
reasonable
use
of
the
property
and
perhaps
ali?
Can
you
clarify
if
sheds
and
detached
garages
and
such
ancillary
structures
are
common
in
this
area?
A
J
J
A
A
E
C
A
Simon
no
comment,
okay,
so
if
we
I
do
see
that
as
well,
I've
lived
in
a
house
with
a
carport
only
and
it
presents
challenge
its
own
unique
challenges
and
the
you
know
long-range
needs
for
your
septic
and
the
environmental
impact
of
not
being
able
to
do
do.
That
appropriately
is
certainly
concerning,
not
only
for
you
but
for
you
know
your
neighbors.
A
G
F
F
C
A
F
Actually,
yes,
I
know
they
did
they.
They
were
openings
for
various
boards
last
night.
I
know
you
have
something
to
say
about
that,
so
I
had
found
out
that
the
planning
in
sony
is
going
to
do
some
meeting
with
the
board
of
commissioners,
and
we
had
done
something
like
that
in
the
past,
and
I
just
want
us
to
consider.
I
know
we
can't
do
it
tonight
for
whatever
meeting
but
at
some
point
to
consider
potentially
doing
that
to
meet
with
the
new
board.
E
Thank
you,
so
I'm
happy
to
take
that
there
has
been
rumor
and
innuendo
about
that,
but
there
has
not
been
a
scheduled
meeting
between
the
planning
and
zoning
board
and
the
board
of
commission.
And
yes,
we
did
have
a
very
irregular
meeting
between
the
board
of
commissioners
and
this
board
years
ago,
and
that
was
like,
I
said,
very
irregular
and
not
something
that
will
likely
happen
again
in
the
future.
E
C
A
Not
for
our
board
that
that
was
the
point
I
was
going
to
bring
up.
As
mr
urbowski
had
said,
last
night's
city
commission
meeting
there
were
appointments
to
five
other
city
boards,
not
ours.
Obviously,
so
I
had
inquired
about
that
because
you
know
we
do
have
a
vacancy
are
so
wonderfully
blessed
to
have.
You
know,
ms
simon,
here
stepping
up
as
an
alternate,
but
then
that
leaves
us
without
an
alternate
sitting
here,
so
there
have
not
been
any
applicants
for
our
board
thus
far.
I
don't
know
why.
A
So
my
thought
was
to
get
your
thoughts
on
us
asking
our
city
staff.
If
we
could
ask
the
people
who
did
not
receive
an
appointment
to
a
board
through
last
night's
process
because
they
have
standing
applications
open
with
the
city,
you
know
with
the
city
clerk
to
say:
would
you
be
interested
in
entertaining
the
idea
of
being
on
the
board
of
adjustment?
Because
there
are
citizens
who
have
expressed
an
interest
in
serving
so
maybe
they
don't
want
to
because
they
don't
know
how
wonderful
our
board
is.
A
G
G
I
don't
necessarily
know
if
they,
I
don't
know
if
they
advertise
for
the
board
of
adjustments
positions
at
the
same
time
that
they
did
the
ones
they
did
appointments
for
this
time,
but
I'll
follow
up
with
the
clerk's
office
and
then
if
and
we
can
send
something
definitely
through
connect,
tarpon
springs.
We
have,
I
want
to
say
we
have
just
under
600
registered
users
now,
which
is
excellent.
That
would
be
great.