![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/A2E1c4DrlLs/mqdefault.jpg)
►
From YouTube: Code Enforcement Board October 14, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
A
D
A
It
is
the
intention
of
this
board
to
promote,
protect
and
improve
the
health,
safety
and
welfare
of
the
citizens
of
tarpon
springs
by
providing
an
equitable,
effective
and
inexpensive
method
of
enforcing
various
codes
was
in
within
the
city
of
tarpon
springs.
Any
aggrieved
party
may
appeal
a
final
administrative
order
of
this
board
to
the
circuit
court.
Such
appeal
shall
be
filed
within
30
days
of
the
execution
of
the
order
to
be
appealed.
A
Florida
statute
286.0105
requires
any
party
appealing
a
decision
of
this
board
to
have
a
record
of
the
proceedings
to
support
such
an
appeal.
The
procedure
of
this
board
is
as
follows.
First,
the
city
will
present
its
witnesses
and
exhibits,
after
which
the
violator
is
able
to
ask
the
city's
witnesses
any
specific
questions
regarding
their
testimony.
A
A
A
E
E
For
204
leafwood
road
property
owner
is
2013-1
h,
homes
exhibit
one
includes
all
the
photographs
exhibit
two
concludes.
All
the
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violations
and
notice
of
hearings
exhibit
three.
Are
the
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case?
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four?
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
all
of
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator,
exact
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board?
E
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
pinellas
county,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
all
notice
of
violation.
The
notice
of
hearings
were
sent
return,
receipt
requested
and
first
class
mail,
and
thank
you
for
accepting
all
the
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
E
E
So
a
courtesy
letter
was
mailed
on
may
21st
of
2021..
On
june,
8th
of
2021,
I
conducted
a
re-inspection.
The
trash
cans
were
still
in
the
right-of-way,
and
the
structure
on
the
side
had
not
been
repaired.
On
june
10th,
a
notice
of
violation
was
mailed,
it
was
marked
delivered
to
the
property
owner
and
the
registered
agent.
E
E
E
E
I
knocked
on
the
door
and
spoke
to
the
tenant
at
length.
I
explained
that
the
dilapidated
structure
over
the
pump
needs
to
be
removed
or
repaired
because
the
wood
is
rotting
and
falling
apart.
He
stated
that
he
would
have
it
either
repaired
or
removed.
In
two
weeks
on
september
29th
of
2021,
I
did
a
reinspection
and
the
cover
had
still
not
been
repaired.
E
E
E
Okay,
so
you
can
basically
see
I'll
use
my
little
light.
This
is
the
structure
I
was
talking
about
when
the
case
first
started.
They
had
their
cans
in
public
view
and
a
few
other
things
it
was,
and
that
was
it,
and
this
was
the
structure.
It's
basically
a
housing
over
a
pump,
probably
to
keep
the
sun
damage
off
of
it,
and
it's
basically
dilapidated.
E
E
So,
basically,
what
I'm
asking
the
board
members
is
to
find
this
property,
in
violation
of
8-40
the
duty
to
maintain
private
property,
and
that
concludes
my
testimony.
G
C
G
H
G
H
A
A
A
E
E
The
address
is
803
peninsula
road,
the
property
is
under
stephen
king
and
edward
mitchell
exhibit
one
contains
all
the
photographs
exhibit
two
contains.
All
the
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearings
exhibit
three:
are
the
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case?
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four?
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign?
All
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
are
exact
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board.
E
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
pinellas
county,
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
I'll
notice,
a
violation,
a
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
return,
receipt
requested
and
first
class
mail
and
madam
chair,
please
accept
all
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
Thank.
E
Actually,
I
think,
as
of
yesterday
on
august
24th
of
2021,
I
conducted
the
initial
inspection.
The
property
was
overgrown.
There
were
several
papers
in
the
driveway,
so
it
definitely
appeared
that
the
house
was
vacant.
On
august
27
of
2021,
I
noticed
a
violation
was
mailed
and
the
green
card
was
returned
unclaimed.
E
On
september
8th
of
2021,
we
received
an
additional
complaint
regarding
the
property's
on
september
10th
of
2021
I
conducted
the
re-inspection
and
the
property
was
still
overgrown.
On
september,
13th
of
2021,
a
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed.
The
green
card
was
returned,
attempted
not
known.
On
october
1st
of
2021,
the
sign
was
posted
and
the
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed
on
october
13th
of
2021.
E
E
But
again
he
is
hoping
to
have
it
in
compliance.
Let
me
make
sure
I'm
telling
you
the
right
thing
within
a
week
right
within
one
week,
okay,
so
this
is
the
initial
picture.
The
whole
the
property
is
overgrown.
Actually,
a
lot
of
the
grass
has
since
died,
but
there
is
a
large
section
that
is.
E
Let
me
this
section
right
here
and
a
couple.
Other
sections
are
really
high
right
now.
I
didn't
take
another
picture
yesterday,
but
it's
it's
really
overgrown
and
that's
the
reason
why
I
took
it
to
code
board
so
fast
because
it
was
really
getting
out
of
control.
It
wasn't
just
a
little
overgrown,
but
those
are
the
only
two
pictures
I
have,
but
it's
definitely
over
12
inches.
E
F
I
C
H
F
I
move
the
respondent.
She'll
have
to
eight
1025
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
with
8-52
or
suffer
a
fine
of
25
dollars
per
day
for
each
day.
Thereafter,
the
respondent
remains
in
violation.
Second,.
C
A
A
A
E
E
For
1116
gulf
oaks
drive
for
mrs
london
eves
exhibit
one
contains
all
the
photographs
exhibit
two
or
all
the
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit.
Three
are
the
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case?
Summary
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four?
Is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
all
of
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
property
owner
exact
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board?
E
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
record,
as
determined
by
the
pinellas
county,
property,
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases.
All
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
return,
receipt
requested
in
first
class
mail
and
madam
chair.
Please
accept
all
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
E
Thank
you
so.
E
On
august
10th
of
2021
we
conducted
the
initial
inspection.
There
was
a
large
amount
of
material
excuse
me.
There
were
materials
present.
There
were
a
few
buckets,
a
bucket
for
small
for
a
small
excavator,
a
wheelbarrow
and
possibly
a
small
compressor.
So
on
august
18th
of
2021,
a
courtesy
letter
was
mailed.
On
august
25th
of
2021
I
conducted
the
re-inspection.
E
The
excavator
bug
bucket
and
dead
tree
were
still
present.
Trash
cans
were
stored
in
public
view.
This
time
by
the
garage
door
on
august
25th
of
2021,
a
notice
of
violation
was
mailed
and
per
the
post
office
tracking.
It
was
delivered
and
left
with
an
individual.
On
august
31st
of
2021
I
conducted
a
re-inspection.
E
E
E
It
was
left
with
an
individual
on
october
1st
of
2021,
the
sign
was
posted
and
the
affidavit
of
posting
was
signed
on
october
4th
a
final
inspection
was
completed.
All
of
the
debris
had
been
removed
and
was
not
in
public
view.
I
decided
to
take
this
decode
board
to
establish
it,
because
this
was
not
the
first
time.
We've
had
a
debris
case
for
this
property,
and
I
had
done
many
inspections
where
the
debris
was
still
there.
Hence
the
reason
I've
decided
to
to
request
it
being
established
I'll,
go
ahead
and
show
the
pictures.
E
E
E
E
Sorry,
okay,
so
I
went
out
again
and
the
the
excavator
was
now
present.
E
E
A
J
So
when
the
mail
lady
delivered-
and
I
had
to
sign
that
right
so
every
day
we
would
come
home
to
like
a
sorry,
we
missed
you
and
we
never
I
signed
once,
but
this
was
pre.
You
know
before
anything
happened,
and
so
when
we
were
getting
fined,
I'm
not
sure
why
I
didn't
know
we
were
getting
fined
because,
except
kept
saying
sorry
we
missed
you.
Sorry
we
missed
you
and
I
thought
it
was
just
a
package
getting
delivered
or
whatever
and
then
finally,
I
realized
we
were
getting
fined.
J
E
B
J
J
Saw
no
so
I
understand
we
tried
to
get
it
all
taken
care
of.
However,
it's
you
know
sometimes
it's
out
for
like
a
day
or
two
and
then
our
neighbor
calls
like
the
next
hour
or
whatever.
So
like
the
wagon.
I
think
that's
kind
of
I.
J
Right
and
then
we
put
the
all
the
wood
and
stuff,
but
we
have
to
have
the
excavator
to
pick
up
the
the
the
tree,
and
then
we
couldn't
get
that
we
tried
to
put
it
the
garbage
and
then
the
garbage
said.
Well,
we
can't
do
it
unless
we
cut
so
we
it
was
like
a
process
to
get
everything
done
and
out
of
the
yard.
But
as
you
can
see,
we
kind
of
took
care
of
that
now
and
it's
all
clear,
but
I
just
wanted
to
say
it
was
it
was
a
process.
It
wasn't
one.
A
J
However,
the
housing
process
is
a
long
process,
so
we're
trying
to
get
a
lot,
so
we
can
store
all
the
things
and
our
fence
is
kind
of.
We
have
to
go
to
the
permit
office
to
get
the
new
fence
because
it's
it
doesn't
open
the
right
way.
So
it's
a
process
that
we're
trying
to
fix.
We
don't
like
coming
here.
Every
day
I
don't
like
taking
off
work.
My
husband
doesn't
like
taking
off
work
so
we're
trying
it's
just
not
a
quick
fix
kind
of
thing.
C
H
J
E
I
guess
I
would
so
basically
I
I've
tried
to
give
ample
opportunity
for
this
to
be
addressed
by
the
weight
and
size
of
the
small
excavator
that
he
uses
if
it
is
stored
behind
the
the
fence,
where
it
can't
be
seen.
That's
fine.
E
I
do
realize
that
you
get
a
lot
of
complaints
which
I
have
to
go
out
every
time
I
get
one
but
there's
a
way
to
stay
in
compliance
where
you're
not
going
to
have
to
deal
with
code
enforcement
all
the
time
and
that's
to
either
do
what
you're
trying
to
do
by
getting
a
different
location
to
store
it
or
to
get
it
behind
that
fence.
Every
time
it's
it's
back
at
your
property
and
and
that
would
include
the
excavator
bucket
all
that
equipment
would
have
to
be
where
it's
not
visible
to
the
public.
Okay,.
J
And
I
just
I
don't
I
don't
know
if
you
can
answer
this,
but
our
whole
street
kind
of
is
out
of
compliance
and
we're
kind
of
dealing
with
that.
I
I
moved
based
on
the
testimony
evidence
facts
presented
in
law
that,
at
the
time
of
the
alleged
violations,
section
8-52
of
the
code
of
ordinance
of
the
city
of
tarpon
springs
was
in
full
force.
In
effect,
at
the
time
of
the
notice
of
violation,
the
respondent
was
in
violation
of
said,
code
sections.
However,
they
are
now
in
compliance.
G
C
H
K
Some
so
mammoth
over
here
sorry
randy
mora
with
city
attorney's
office.
What,
as
to
the
case
with
the
debris
in
the
excavator
you've,
been
found
in
violation
at
the
time
that
she
went
out,
but
now
in
compliance,
no
fine
has
attached.
There's
not
been
a
motion
to
impose
a
fine
for
this
case.
That
case
is
considered
closed.
At
this
time.
A
E
E
Five
21-8005
six
eleven.
Sixteen
goal
folks
drive
for
miss
london
eaves,
and
this
is
a
repeat
violation
case
for
case
number:
two:
one
dash
eight
zero,
zero;
four
one:
nine
in
violation
of
city
code,
four,
two
dot:
zero:
zero,
the
previous
fines
totaled
one
thousand
one
hundred
and
forty
eight
dollars
and
fifty
cents
that
aren't
paid
so
repeat
violator
case
also
for
two
one
dash.
E
E
In
violation
of
42.00,
that
case
was
to
establish,
and
so
no
fines
were
owed
for
that
one
exhibit
1
contains
all
the
photographs
exhibit
2
contains.
All
the
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearing
exhibit
3
contains
the
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case.
Summary
previous
board
orders
and
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
4,
contains
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
and
exhibit
5
is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs.
E
E
E
Okay,
we
have
had
contact
with
contact
with
ms
eves
on
september
22nd
of
2021.
An
initial
inspection
was
conducted.
The
trailer
was
parked
in
the
front
yard,
with
the
excavator
loaded
on
it.
On
september,
22nd
of
2021,
the
repeat,
violation
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
and
per
the
posting
track
per
the
posting
tracking.
The
notice
was
left
with
the
individual.
E
L
E
So
this
was
the
initial
inspection,
with
the
trailer
parked
with
the
excavator
on
it.
E
A
J
E
You
can
put
in
the
certified
number
that
we
use
and
that's
what
brian
did
is
he
pulled
up
their
website
put
in
the
tracking
number
and
what
I
testified
to
is
what
the
united
states
postal
office
has
in
their
tracking
saying
that
it
was
delivered
to
a
person
to
an
individual,
but
everything
we
mailed
was
also
mailed,
first
class,
so
that
there
shouldn't
have
been
any
reason
why
you
shouldn't
have
received
that
mail.
J
Well,
this
was,
I
guess
it
doesn't
retain
to
this,
but
this
was
when
the
fines
first
started.
We
weren't
aware
for
I
wouldn't
I
want
to
say
like
two
months
I
didn't
get
anything
from
the
mail
and
then
I
finally
got
the
one
in
the
mail
in
the
mailbox,
and
that
was
when
I
was
aware,
and
then
I
called.
E
Right,
well,
we
mail
and
we
we
do.
We
mail
everything,
first
class,
just
regular
mail
as
well
as
certified
mail
and,
of
course,
the
board
orders
are
also
mailed
from
the
city
clerk's
office.
Every
time
it's
gone
through
code
board
and
had
a
order
found
in
violation.
Those
have
been
mailed
to
you.
Also,
okay,
okay,.
E
A
G
H
C
H
K
So
mammons,
in
summary,
you
were
found
in
violation
for
that
12-day
period.
The
board
has
approved
a
fine
of
2
400,
in
addition
to
the
65
and
50
cents,
in
administrative
fees,
owing
to
this
property,
being
in
repeat
violation
on
as
to
this
particular
code.
Provision.
K
I'll
note
that,
though
I
didn't
say
as
much
on
the
last
case
not
trying
to
confuse
the
two,
but
with
the
last
case
you
would
now
be
considered.
If
were
that
to
recur,
you
would
be
considered
a
repeat
violator
if
that
occurs
in
the
next
five
years,
and
this
emanates
from
being
repeat
violators
to
this
issue.
A
A
A
H
A
E
Okay,
oh
did
they
have
any
objections.
A
E
E
For
715
east
lime
street,
the
name
of
the
property
owner
is
lime.
Street
properties
llc
exhibit
1,
contains
all
the
photographs
exhibit
2
is
all
the
notices
to
include
the
notice
of
violation
and
notice
of
hearings,
exhibit
three
of
the
administrative
documents
to
include
the
case.
Summary
previous
board
orders
and
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
records
exhibit
four
is
the
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
copy
of
the
sign
exhibit
five?
Is
the
affidavit
of
prosecution
costs?
E
All
of
the
photographs
and
exhibits
that
were
given
to
the
violator
are
exact
copies
of
what
is
being
presented
to
the
board.
All
notices
were
mailed
to
the
property
owner
of
records,
as
determined
by
the
pinellas
county
property
appraiser
and
tax
collector
databases,
I'll
notice,
a
violation.
The
notice
of
hearings
are
sent
return,
receipt
requested
and
first
class
mail
and
madam
chair,
please
accept
all
the
exhibits
into
the
record
as
evidence.
E
Okay,
we
did
have
contact
with
the
property
owner
and
the
property
managers
on
september
3rd
of
2021
I
conducted
the
initial
inspection
debris
was
located
throughout
the
property.
Several
dumpster
enclosures
were
either
missing
or
in
disrepair
on
september
3rd.
The
repeat,
violation
notice
of
hearing
was
mailed
and
per
the
postal
tracking.
E
It
was
in
transit
to
the
next
facility.
On
september,
7th
of
2021.
We
received
a
phone
call
from
the
property
manager
and
he
had
questions.
Regarding
the
case
on
september
13th
of
2021,
we
received
an
email
saying
that
the
property
was
in
compliance,
so
I
conducted
a
re-inspection
on
september.
13Th
of
2021,
most
of
the
debris
had
been
removed.
The
enclosure
on
the
southwest
side
of
the
property
had
not
been
repaired,
two
dumpsters
were
missing
enclosures
and
the
sofa
on
the
north
side
of
the
property
was
still
present.
E
On
september,
16th
of
2021,
we
received
an
email
stating
all
items
had
been
corrected,
except
for
the
removal
of
the
dumpster
without
the
enclosure.
On
september
17th
of
2021,
we
received
an
email
saying
that
all
of
the
items
were
in
compliance.
I
conducted
a
re-inspection
on
september,
17th
of
2021.
All
the
trash
and
debris
had
been
removed.
All
enclosures
had
been
repaired,
the
dumpsters
that
did
not
have
enclosures
had
been
removed
and
I
believe
larger
size
dumpsters
were
put
in
place
where
the
enclosures
already
existed.
E
E
This
was
the
initial
inspection,
basically,
the
they
have
a
corral
area
that
was
badly
damaged
where
you
pretty
much
could
see
through
it
and
it
contained
a
lot
of
debris.
E
Here's
another
picture
of
it
with
the
gate
closed
again.
Here's
the
here's
one
of
the
dumpsters
that
did
have
an
enclosure
there
was
debris
on
the
outside
and
the
gates
were
in
disrepair.
E
E
I
don't
know
why
I'm
having
so
much
trouble
with
my
mouse
today,
okay,
so
what
I'm
asking
the
board
members
is
to
find
the
property
in
repeat:
violation
of
city
code,
8-52,
nuisance
prohibitions,
city
code,
139.00,
dumpster,
enclosures,
city
code,
139.01,
dumpster,
screening
requirements.
E
Yes-
and
that
was
my
error-
that's
okay!
So
the
correct
compliance
date
is
september.
17Th
six
june
17th
was
a
typo,
but
we
can't
change
it
once
it's
been
published.
E
A
A
E
Yes,
everything's
been
all
the
enclosures
have
been
repaired.
The
dumpsters
that
did
not
have
enclosures
were
simply
removed
to
get
it
in
compliance
faster
and
larger
dumpsters
were
put
in
its
place
that
already
had
the
enclosures,
but,
yes,
all
the
debris
has
been
removed
and
all
the
enclosures
have
been
repaired.
Thank.
M
I
got
a
pictures
if
you
want
us
today
how
everything
looks
and
it's
like.
As
you
know,
it's
a
apartment
complex,
it's
hard
because
there's
a
lot
of
people
moving
and
moving
out,
and
they
we
always
gonna,
have
the
stuff
around
the
property
and
some
people.
They
don't
care.
They
just
drive
around
and
drop
the
stuff,
and
we
only
have
one
maintenance
which
is
hard
to
keep
the
world
orders
and
with
the
dumpster
clean
he
cleaned
the
property
every
day
and
what
we're
doing
going
forward
is
like
we
have
from
the
other
property.
M
Somebody
came
with
a
trailer
and
clean
if
it's
anything
weekly
and
get
everything
away
from
the
downstairs
trying
to
keep
the
property
clean.
If
I
don't
know,
if
you
need
a
picture.
A
E
K
M
F
L
M
A
M
E
E
G
C
C
M
K
So,
as
a
repeat
violator,
you
were
found
to
be
in
violation
for
a
14-day
period,
as
announced,
the
fine
is
75
dollars
a
day
which
times
those
fourteen
days
comes
out
to
one
thousand
and
fifty
dollars
on
top
of
the
one
thousand
and
fifty
dollars,
they've
added
the
seventy
dollars
and
fifty
cents
in
administrative
fees.
Otherwise,
you
are
already
deemed
to
be
in
compliance
and
they've
received
your
testimony
on
what
your
best
practices
plan
is
going
forward.
But
the
case
is
closed
with
the
one
thousand.
Fifty
dollar,
fine,
plus
admin
costs.
L
A
G
E
Cases
when
I
did
the
reinspection,
they
were
not
in
compliance,
so
just
make.
K
L
K
Clarity
in
the
record
and
okay,
we
can
clarify
who's
present
for
each.
L
F
K
Audio
recording
there
is
no
no
are
no
guests
or
attendees
in
the
audience
at
this
time,
but
again
for
clarity
in
the
record,
I
think
we
should
just
take
them
in
succession.
G
F
A
G
G
A
K
Ordinarily,
as
it
governs
your
excuse
me,
your
fine
reductions,
this
this
board
accepts
written
submissions,
but
parties
are
allowed
if
present
to
inquire
to,
or
rather
this
board
is
permitted
to
inquire
of
the
inspector
or
the
applicant
were
we
to
do
so.
We
would
do
so
in
equal
time
to
each
most
fine
reductions.
K
A
K
K
According
to
section
2-168
sub-d,
the
code
enforcement
board
may
reduce
a
fine
imposed
pursuant
to
this
article,
a
decision
of
the
code
enforcement
board
on
an
appeal
for
a
reduction
of
fines
imposed
pursuant
to
the
article
is
the
final
administrative
action
to
the
violator.
Nothing
present
prevents
you
from
settling
any
claims
on
any
cases.
K
And
you
are
entitled
to
collect
costs.
The
specific
criteria
as
set
forth
in
your
code
and
you're
routinely
advised
of
at
your
regular
sessions,
continue
to
apply.
K
K
Yep,
I'm
just
making
sure
I
read
before
I
add,
so
I
don't
read
and
stream
of
conscious
and
and
do
the
thing
where
you
say
now,
read
silently
to
yourself
out
loud
rule,
five
section,
four
of
the
code
enforcement
board
rules
of
procedure
states
that
within
60
working
days
after
the
affidavit
of
compliance
is
accepted
by
the
code
enforcement
board.
The
party
may
submit
a
written
request
to
the
board
for
reconsideration
of
a
fine.
The
letter
should
be
addressed
to
the
code
enforcement
board
and
signed,
including
a
copy
of
the
affidavit
of
compliance.
K
The
letter
must
include
conclusive
evidence
showing
extreme
or
undue
hardship
in
the
payment
of
the
fine
or
a
situation
which
prevented
you
from
bringing
the
property
into
compliance
within
the
time
period
established
by
this
board's
order
to
prove
hardship.
It's
recommended
that
a
party
include
at
least
two
years
of
financial
statements,
including
tax
returns
and
and
liability
asset
and
liability
statements.
The
clerk
will
add
the
request.
The
agenda,
as
has
been
done
with
those
before
this
this
this
afternoon.
K
The
board
will
make
its
determination,
based
solely
upon
the
letter,
though
persons
are
permitted
to
appear
and
have
additional
questions
asked
of
them.
The
inspector
may
submit
in
writing
information
regarding
the
case
that
he
or
she
feels
is
important
for
this
board
to
make
its
decision.
They
are
notified
by
mail.
Certified
mail
of
the
determination
made
by
this
board
and
the
board
considers
a
request
for
a
reduction
of
fines
until
the
affidavit
of
compliance
is
accepted,
will
not
consider
such
requests
until
an
affidavit
of
compliance
has
been
accepted.
K
Under
no
circumstances
may
the
amount
of
the
fine
be
reduced
below
the
city's
cost
of
the
action
and
under
no
circumstances
may
the
amount
of
the
fine
for
people
for
a
repeat
violation
be
reduced,
and
this
is
the
the
guidance
provided
to
you
rather
provided
the
instructions
provided
to
a
party
requesting
fine
reduction,
as
are
the
parties
being
heard
this
afternoon
and
apologies
for
the
administrative
delay
in
that.
A
E
A
A
K
The
narrower
point
of
a
recorded,
lien,
being
available
to
public
record
and
view
is,
is,
is
noted.
I
think
the
code
inspector
just
to
clarify
in
in
the
point
we
don't
have
record
evidence
on
who
did
the
title
search,
how
those
liens
were
recorded
if
they
were
disclosed
to
them
or
not.
We
don't
know
we
don't
on
the
evidence
presented
before
you.
I
don't
believe
that's
stipulated
or
addressed.
We.
I
C
C
C
M
H
K
A
H
H
Yes,
I'm
not
in
favor
of
reducing
any
fine,
where
somebody
walks
in
picks
up
a
piece
of
property
for
nothing
and
then
goes
ahead
and
finds
out.
What's
needed,
then
tries
to.
H
C
E
K
Yeah,
so
so
the
rules
says
as
framed.
Are
you
cannot
that
that
rule
stated
that
I
know
there
was
the
one
as
to
the
repeat
violator
under
no
circumstance
would
it
be
reduced
for
a
repeat
violator,
the
other
one
was
under
no
point.
Would
it
be
reduced
beyond
the
recoverable
costs?
A
reduction
to
zero
would
go
beyond
cost
zero.
Plus
monies
out
of
the
city
would
contribute
to
that.
I
I
defer
to
the
to
the
judgment
and
advice
of
your
city
attorney.
K
If
he's
opined
and
given
analysis
that
I
haven't
had
the
benefit
of
conducting,
but
I
would
say
that
on
its
face,
that
would
suggest
to
me
that
that
would
that
could
that
could
present
an
issue
as
it
relates
to
the
board's
rules
governing
fine
reductions.
K
Unless,
unless
you're
determining
that
the
fine
one
route,
for
example,
where
that
may
not
be
the
case-
and
I'm
not
sure
what
this
board's
determination
would
be,
is
if
the
fine
was
issued
in
error
and
so
you're
saying
it's
we're
not
reducing
the
fine
we're
eliminating
the
fine
because
it
was
improper,
and
so
it
would
be.
It
would
be
appropriate
to
reimburse
and
make
the
person
whole
for
our
mistake,
for
example,
again
that
that
would
belie
the
entire
process
we
ordinarily
go
through.
But.
G
G
K
G
Please
don't
leave
us
on
the
hook
right,
go
after
them.
That's
my
problem,
not
our
problem.
I
mean
that's
bad
investment,
but
okay,
so
for
I
make
a
motion
to
deny
the
fine
reduction
request
for
case
number
20-8-0-0-0-0-6-4-2-16-15.
I
K
And
so
to
be
clear
in
the
record,
sometimes
when
you're,
when
you're
moving
in
the
negative
as
opposed
to
the
affirmative,
people
can
get
confused.
So
I
want
to
make
sure
this
body
is
aware
of
what
it's
voting
on.
The
motion
on
the
floor
is
to
say
no
to
the
fine
reduction.
So
a
yes
or
I
vote
is
a
is
a
vote
in
favor
of
re
declining
or
refusing
the
request
before
you.
A
L
A
No
public
to
make
a
comment
for
this
board
and
staff.
I
want
to
thank
this
board,
for
always,
I
think,
really
trying
to
look
at
the
issues
and
be
respectful
to
people
and
the
point
is
to
ensure
compliance
and
not
to
be
heavy-handed,
and
I
think
everybody
tries
to
positively
do
that,
and
I
want
to
thank
bobby
for
sticking
with
us
and
our
staff
at
the
city
too.
We
appreciate
what
you
present
to
us.
A
A
lot
it
presents
a
lot
of
good
work,
we're
not
seeing
cases
that
are
two
or
three
years
old,
you're,
keeping
it
current
and
that's
the
whole
idea,
and
I
also
wanted
to
remind
everybody
that
the
meeting
for
november
date
has
been
changed.
F
A
Can
we
officially
approve
the
minutes
for
the
two
prior
meetings
that.
F
H
I
have
a
question
for
beth.
I
understand
that
that
now,
when
people
complain
that
their
names
are
put
down
and
people
are
notified,
complaint
complaint
is
notified.
E
The
only
caveat
to
that
was
if
it
was
a
life,
health
or
safety
issue
or
an
environmental
concern,
then
we
could
then
do
an
investigation
to
see
if
it
truly
was
a
safety
issue
or
an
environmental
issue.
However,
we
don't
go
tell
anyone
who
the
complainant
is.
However,
it
is
public
record
unless
they're
exempt
for
any
reason,
and
so
if
they
made
a
public
record
request,
then
we
would
have
to
supply
that
information
again
unless
that
person
was
exempt
for
any
reason
per
state
statute.
119.
C
B
K
There's
no
public
present
for
comments,
madam
chair,
but
at
this
point
you'd
be
at
board
and
staff
comments.
If
you
have
any
others.