►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning June 19, 2017
Description
Description
B
B
B
E
A
A
B
D
D
E
E
B
D
F
Is
a
quasi
judicial
proceeding
where
the
playing
and
Zoning
Board
acts
in
a
quasi
judicial
rather
than
a
legislative
capacity
at
a
quasi
judicial
hearing?
It
is
not
the
board's
function
to
make
fault,
but
rather
to
apply
law.
That's
already
been
a
stab
at
sponsored
additional
hearing.
The
board
is
required
by
law
to
make
findings
of
fact,
based
upon
the
evidence
presented
at
the
hearing
and
a-five
those
findings.
Of
fact,
the
previously
established
criteria
contained
in
the
Code
of
Ordinances
in
order
to
make
a
legal
decision
regarding
the
application
before
it.
F
The
board
may
only
consider
evidence
at
this
hearing
that
if
the
law
considers
confident
substantial
and
relevant
for
the
issues,
if
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
absent
has
met
the
criteria
established
in
the
Code
of
Ordinances
and
the
board
is
required
by
law,
the
finding
favor
of
the
applicant
editing
token.
It's
a
confident,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
failed
to
meet
the
criteria
establishing
the
Code
of
Ordinances
and
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
against
the
applicant
journey.
F
Members
of
the
board
wishing
to
disclose
ex
parte
de
communication
or
comfort
interests
tonight,
anyone
from
the
audience
going
to
give
testimony
tonight
they
could
please
stand
raise
the
right
hand
to
be
sworn
in.
Swear
affirm
that
test
me
that
you're
about
to
give
in
the
proceeding
is
the
truth.
The
whole
truth,
nothing
about
the
so
sworn.
D
Next
item
is
item
number
three
application:
17
47
ordinance,
2017,
21
and
ordinance
2017
22.
The
hunt
annex
request
to
amend
the
future
land
use
from
residential,
low
and
residential
medium
to
residential
office
general
and
rezone
from
our
100.
A
and
residential
multifamily
RM
15
to
residential
office
ro
for
approximately
0.4
five
acres
of
real
property
located
on
the
south
side
of
Keystone
Road
proximally
200
feet,
east
of
the
intersection
of
Keystone
Road
and
Lake
tarpon
Avenue
and
we'll
begin
with
the
staff
report.
Good.
A
Evening
again,
this
request
is
to
amend
the
future
land
use
designation
from
our
L
residential
low
in
our
M
residential
medium
to
residential
office
general
in
to
amend
the
zoning
designation
from
our
180
singleton
residential
in
our
M
15
residential
multifamily
to
our
o
residential
office.
The
applicant
is
the
tarpon
turtle
annex
LLC
again,
the
property
is
located
on
the
south
side
of
Keystone
Road,
approximately
200
feet
northeast
of
the
intersection
of
Keystone
or
Lake
tarpon
Avenue
in
the
property
size.
A
As
a
point
is
0.45
acres,
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
read
to
rezone
and
to
amend
the
future
land
use
of
the
two
parcels.
Totaling
point
for
two
acres
located
again
on
the
on
Keystone
on
Keystone
Road,
the
proposed
future
land
use
change
is
to
consolidate
the
holdings
that
the
applicant
currently
holds.
The
applicant
currently
has
the
property
right
on
the
corner
of
tarpon
Avenue
in
Keystone
Road,
and
these
parcels
are
adjacent
to
that
part.
To
that
property
right
now.
A
There
will
to
make
the
rezone
happen
so
that
they
can
have
a
unified
project
along
there,
where
there
would
be
a
new
office
building
that
would
be
installed
on
these
properties,
where
they,
if
they
were
to
be
resumed,
so
essentially
it's
taking
two
residential
zone
parcels
and
providing
for
an
access
through
the
existing
commercial
site.
Right
now,
this
property
abuts,
the
property,
is
adjacent
to
meyers
lane.
Where
you
all
are
aware,
we
have
a
home
that
was
built
along
an
alleyway
and
actually
into
the
alleyway.
A
These
parcels
would
actually
access
through
that
all
alleyway,
because
there's
nothing
in
the
access
management
plan
that
would
allow
them
to
access
onto
keystone
road
directly
with
the
driveway.
It's
not
appropriate,
given
the
drainage
that
was
added
there
in
the
new
configuration
of
Keystone
Road.
So
as
a
result
of
that,
after
working
with
staff
and
talking
to
the
folks
at
the
at
the
county,
we
determined
that
trying
to
put
a
residential
driveway
across
that
rather
large
conveyance
for
stormwater
into
the
roadway.
A
Just
noting
this
can
be
feasible
for
a
single
to
a
residential
home
and
that's
about
what
you
can
get
on
this
particular
property
trying
to
access
through
the
alleyway
that
has
a
building
blocking.
It
is
not
going
to
be
feasible
either
because
there's
about
three
foot
of
clearance
on
the
alleyway,
the
building
is
that
far
over
into
the
10-foot
wide
alley.
So
that
being
a
being
the
case,
it's
very
limited
for
residential
development
here.
A
So
with
that,
that's
the
basics
of
this
and
I'll
go
through
the
criteria
for
the
reason
for
the
comprehensive
plan
amendment
and
then
the
rezone
again.
The
comprehensive
plan
amendment
is
a
legislative
action.
The
countywide
rules
for
the
locational
characteristics
of
traffic
generation,
characterization
of
existing
proposed
land
use,
are
shown
in
the
tables
below.
This
is
basically
just
to
lay
out
so
that
you
can
see
the
difference
between
residential,
very
low
and
residential
multifamily
and
the
proposed
future
land-use
category,
which
is
the
residential
general
office
again.
A
The
category
that
this
will
go
to
will
go
from
into
on
a
countywide
plan,
because
that's
the
next
step
after
this
goes
to
the
first
reading.
Before
the
BIA
see,
it
will
then
go
to
the
county
and
the
county
will
actually
have
to
amend
their
land
use
as
well
to
change
the
land
use.
This
is
a
residential
zone
piece
on
the
countywide
plan
as
well.
A
A
The
proposed
our
own
zoning
designation
is
consistent
with
the
proposed
ROG
future
land
use
category.
The
designation
of
the
property
to
a
non
resolute,
owning
district
will
allow
for
shared
access
and
will
reduce
the
number
of
curved
pucks
along
the
Keystone
Road
and
encourage
encouraged
by
the
future
Land
Use
Plan.
And
what
it's
talking
about
here
and
future
values
policy
is
actually
in
the
countywide
plan
as
well.
The
available
uses
to
which
the
property
may
be
put
are
appropriate
to
the
property
in
question
on
our
compatible
with
the
existing
and
planned
uses.
A
Again,
we
would
agree
with
that
that
ro
is
not
while
the
plan,
the
countywide
plan
restricts
the
extension
of
office
into
the
area.
In
this
particular
case,
there
is
no
feasible
way
to
get
single-family
residential
use
on
these
properties
being
with
that
that
the
plane
is
going
to
be
amended
and
the
county
is
amenable
to
that
staff
feels
that
it
is
consistent
with
the
available
uses
and
the
planned
uses
in
the
area
adjacent
to
it.
The
amendment
shall
provide
for
efficient
and
orderly
development.
A
Consider
the
impact
of
growth
patterns
in
the
cost
of
the
city
to
provide
public
facilities
there
oppose
you.
Rezoning
will
allow
for
the
expansion
of
the
existing
our
rezoning
district
running
on
the
four-lane
divided
highway.
The
proposed
use
is
more
appropriate
to
this
location
than
residential
use,
which
is
primary
allowed
under
the
existing
zoning
designation,
due
to
constraints
on
the
construction
of
the
direct
driveway
access
of
the
location,
the
lack
of
alternative
access
to
the
site.
Subject:
property.
A
Oh
sorry,
the
amendment
will
not
adversely
affect
lorg,
see
the
capacity
of
the
fiscal
ability
of
the
city
to
provide
public
facilities,
including
transportation,
waste,
solid
waste,
drainage,
recreation,
fire
protection,
library,
services,
other
similar
facilities.
Compliance
with
the
adopted
level
service
standards
can
be
demonstrated
if
necessary.
The
subject
property
is
0.4
acres
and
the
proposed
rezoning
would
be
for
an
office
than
the
proposed
rezoning
would
allow
for
a
maximum
fer
of
0.25
and
a
maximum
is
our
0.75.
A
However,
the
ISR
is
further
restricted
again
by
the
countywide
plan,
because
this
is
in
the
scenic
corridor
to
0.375
to
the
Lord.
We
consistent
with
the
countywide
rules,
which
is
the
reason
why
they
will
have
a
restrictive
covenant
before
this
moves
much
further
along
based
on
these
maxes.
The
proposed
rezoning
would
allow
up
to
49,000
and
a
half
square
feet
of
building
floor
area
in
7350
0.75
square
feet
of
impervious
services
for
the
office,
such
as
development,
would
have
a
minimal
impact
on
the
public
facilities
in
the
area.
A
We
have
adequate
water
and
sewer
to
serve
the
existing
building
and
again
the
utilities
would
come
through
as
well
as
well
as
as
access
through
the
existing
site.
So
there
would
be
probably
a
master
meter
at
the
at
the
original
building
and
that
and
the
other
building
will
be
serviced
off,
that
master
meter.
Technical
review
team
reviewed
this
application
on
April
15
2000
had
no
objections
to
the
request.
A
We
did
not
receive
any
pour
a
couple
public
correspondence.
However.
This
was
advertising
newspaper
in
mailers
were
sent
out.
There
was
a
sign
posted
on
the
property,
however,
that
you
see
posted
on
the
property
because
of
the
large
right
drainage
right-of-way
there.
You
can't
really
see
the
sign
from
Keystone
run.
A
Unfortunately,
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
the
following
future
land
use
from
RL,
residential,
low
and
RM
residential
medium
to
ROG
residential
office
general
and
zoning
from
our
100,
a
single
Center,
residential
and
RM
15
residential
multifamily
to
our
oh
I
can
answer
any
questions
that
you
might
have.
Thank.
A
The
process
for
the
countywide
land
use
change
is
that
the
local
municipal,
the
local
municipality,
needs
to
start
the
process
go
through
their
Planning
and
Zoning
in
their
initial
public
hearing
then
send
the
application
package
to
the
county,
and
then
they
will
change
the
land
use
on
the
countywide
plan.
This.
D
Is
it
possible
for
the
property
access
the
easement,
not
easement?
It's
an
alleyway,
that's
planted
alongside
the
property,
it's
already
owned
by
the
applicant
at
the
corner.
There,
whatever
Lots,
no
Lots,
26,
26
and
through
23
I,
think
the
applicant
owns
already
and
right
on
the
edge
of
that
the
edge
it's
away
from
Keystone
road
there's
an
alleyway
there.
That's.
A
The
10-foot
wide
alley
that
goes
down
to
Meyers
Lane
that
has
a
building
in
the
middle
of
it.
So,
yes,
they
can
access
that
alleyway,
but
currently,
with
the
structure,
that's
along
with
it
that's
currently
litigation.
There
is
no
physical
means
to
actually
go
through
onto
Meyers
Lane
right
now.
Okay,.
D
A
Goes
right
into
the
drainage
easement
right
here
this
alleyway
here,
that's
adjacent!
This
alleyway
goes
out
to
Myers
Lane.
It
does
not
go
through
to
Lake
tarpon
Avenue
anymore.
There
was
a
vacay
that
was
done
when
the
original
property
building
was
built,
the
original
building
that
was
built
there
by
the
architect.
He
actually
did
a
vacate
vacated
that
portion
that
alleyway
actually
used
to
run
between
Lake
tarpon,
Avenue
and
Myers
Lane,
but
it
was
vacated
when
the
original
building
was
put
in
as
a
result.
A
D
A
This
portion
of
the
aiwei
actually
has
not
been
vacant
at
this
points,
partly
the
right
of
the
right.
The
public
is
right
to
traverse.
The
alleys
that
you
see
on
here
are
actually
not
owned
by
the
applicant
they're
their
own.
They
are
still
city
property
until
such
time
as
they
come
through
a
vacation
process.
They
still
right
to
traverse
those
those
alleyways.
D
D
A
D
A
What
it
will
probably
happen
is
they
will
probably
connect
the
parking
lots
here
there.
What
you
don't
see
here
is
there's
actually
a
plan
building
a
lot
26
here
that
has
actually
been
constructed
at
this
point,
but
we've
got
done
through
all
the
permitting
process
and
actually
has
approved
it
mid
2012
13
somewhere
in
there
there
was
a
building
Bronson
building
is
what
it
was
called
that
was
actually
permitted
for
this
property.
It's
actually
not
that
constructed,
but
it's
all
the
way
through
the
permitting
process.
A
So
at
this
point,
I'm
not
sure,
based
on
that
building,
where
that
building
actually
lays.
If
it
goes
as
far
back
as
that
property
line
or
not
I
mean
there
are
setbacks
and
ro
that
are
like
8
feet,
so
it
may
be.
A
portion
of
that
may
actually
go
into
that.
Alleyway
I.
Don't
actually
know
that
from
looking
at
the
the
survey
you're
not
going
to
see
that
future
development
there,
but
they
can
access
there
and
they
can
access
to
the
existing
paid
parking
lot.
But.
D
A
D
A
D
A
These
are
again
the
TRC
comments.
The
technical
review
comments:
you
don't
that
by
your
own
regulations,
the
restrictive
covenant
not
bound
to
be
part
of
this
application.
I
asked
the
applicant
to
bring
it
forward.
They
have
not
brought
it
forward.
It
will
not
move
forward
to
BOC
until
it
comes
forward
now
that
is
completely
up
to
you
whether
you
want
to
have
a
cut
discussion
with
the
applicant,
but
it
is
appropriate
for
the
applicant
to
have
those
restrictive
covenants
put
in
place
prior
to
the
board
the
BOC
hearing.
D
The
ordinance
ordinance
2017,
there's
22
and
the
findings
number
two,
and
it
says
the
amendment
shall
provide
for
efficient
and
orderly
development.
If
we
don't
know
what
this
restrictions
are
going
to
be,
you
know,
we
don't
know
how
orderly
it's
going
to
be.
I
mean
you're
telling
us
that's
what
the
plan
is
chair.
A
If
you
want
to
defer
this
application
or
acquire
the
I
require
the
applicant
of
the
restrictive
covenant,
you
are
completely
allowed
to
do
that
at
this
point
in
time,
they
were
asked
to
bring
them
forward
at
the
TRC
did
not
bring
them
forward.
The
Census
Board
does
not
see
that
I
didn't
see
any
clothes,
pointing
their
application,
having
them
pay
for
an
additional
advertising
fee
simply
because
they
haven't
got
the
research
of
covenants
complete
at
this
point
in
time.
A
B
A
B
B
A
E
Just
regarding
the
restrictive
covenants
since
we're
on
the
topic,
my
understanding
is
that
the
restrictive
covenant
is
essentially
they're
going
to
either
have
a
refractive
covenant
or
cross
access
to
cross
mr.
Vinson.
Well,
you
were
talking
about
in
terms
of
linking
the
property
for
parking,
drainage,
etc.
So,
in
terms
of
the
application,
if
they
don't
get
that
restrictive
covenant
in
place,
regardless
of
whether
we
approve
it's
not
or
not,
the
application
does
not
continues
that
correct.
It.
A
Correct
it's
going
to
be
an
agreement
that
the
board
is
going
to
basically
agree
to
that.
These
are
the
restrictions
that
they're
they're,
basically
agreeing
to
put
on
their
property
ahead
of
site
planning,
and
that's
everything
and
that's
really
just
to
protect
the
city
if
they
were
to
convey
the
property
now
I,
don't
think
Mr
Hunt
has
any
interest
in
doing
that.
He's
really
pretty
much
settled
that
this
is
his
right.
E
So
it's
cut
and
dry
in
the
sense
that
you
either
have
that
restrictive
covenant
in
place
or
you
don't
and
if
you
don't,
then
you
don't
progress,
correct
right.
So
mr.
hunt
owns
the
property
next
door
to
this
vacant
land,
which
has
already
developed
as
an
office
and
for
my
edification
and
to
recap
this:
the
reason
why
this
application
is
even
coming
before
us
tonight
is
because
ro
is
already
in
place
next
door
correct.
That's.
A
Areas,
that's
the
all
the
areas
on
the
property,
including
your
building,
your
parking
lot
any
other
areas
that
will
not
allow
water
to
penetrate,
for
whatever
reason
those
are
considered
impervious
surfaces
and
so
there's
a
ratio
between
the
size
of
the
lot
and
the
amount
of
coverage.
Essentially,
a
lot
coverage
that
you
can
have
and
that's
what
you're
in
pervious
surface
ratio
is
thank.
A
F
E
A
Correct
on
this
opportunity
it
goes
no.
This
one
is
not
actually
going
to
have
to
go
to
the
state
because
it's
under
the
ten
acre
threshold,
so
the
state
doesn't
have
to
see
it's
a
local
matter.
You
do
still
need
to
progress
over
to
the
countywide
plan,
because
the
kind
of
a
plane
you
see
amended
in
this
case
right.
D
E
Addition
to
that
I
thought
staff
made
good
points
at
the
Technical
Review
Committee
meeting
regarding
the
prot
aura
and
also
in
the
backup
regarding
the
proximity,
the
frontage
on
Keystone
road
and
the
drainage
access,
and
also
I
thought
that
the
mention
in
from
TRC
was
a
productive
conversation
in
the
fact
that
they
even
mentioned
and
put
in
their
comments
of
restrictive
covenants
for
what
we've
already
talked
about,
which
is
the
access
and
the
drainage
and
things
to
that
nature.
So
I
thought
that
that
was
nice
to
seeing
TRC's
comments.
D
One
other
question
on
the
deed
was
in
our
backup
regarding
the
tool,
though
well
through
the
lots,
it
mentions
that
the
buyer,
the
applicant
took
property,
subject
to
the
terms
and
conditions
of
a
stipulation
and
settlement
agreement.
It
gives
a
reported,
or
our
book
and
page
in
the
public
records
of
Noah's
County
I
wasn't
able
to
wasn't
able
to
bring
it
up
when
I
went
to
the
official
records
website
or.
A
Have
a
copy
of
the
stipulated
settlement
agreement?
That's
something
that
I
can
look.
I
can
look
up.
I
know
that
the
that
there
is
right
of
ways
and
things
in
the
area
that
are
a
little
different
here
because
of
the
county
acquiring
parts
of
Keystone.
Road,
there's
been
a
bust
in
the
survey
as
well
to
the
north.
So
there's
some
issues
with
the
serving
here.
I
certainly
can
look
and
see
if
I
can
get
a
copy
of
it
and
send
it
along
I.
D
F
G
G
One
three
three
four
East
Lake
Road
number
one
or
two
Impala
Marber
Florida.
Let
me
say
that
just
following
your
staff
report,
they
raised
a
number
of
good
points.
I
do
want
to
put
in
the
record
a
letter
from
Landon
Murray
and
associates.
John
Landon
is
a
very
well
recognized
engineer,
who
places
emphasis
of
his
opinion
that
number
one
that
it
would
be
expensive
permit,
design
and
construct
driveways
for
residential
homes
of
the
site.
Pinellas
County
is
also
an
agreement
that
your
staff
is
agreement.
G
John
also
indicates
here
brings
out
the
point
which
the
county
had
concerns
about,
that
there
are
five
right-hand
turns
within
aisles
and
feet.
The
last
three
turns
did
not
have
a
deceleration
lane.
It
is
a
dangerous
situation
again,
as
Pinellas
County
has
pointed
out,
so
the
road
does
not
need
two
more
connections.
So,
as
it's
been
discussed,
this
project,
if
you
approve
it,
was
ford,
will
go
through
mr.
Han's
current
property,
which
alleviates
all
those
issues
and
all
those
problems
that
I
may
put
that
in
the
record.
G
There's
another
condition
to
make
you
aware
of
is
right
in
front
of
this
property.
The
road
does
occur,
Keystone
Road
does
occur,
which
is
a
major
arterial,
carrying
a
lot
of
traffic
day
and
night,
and
it
is
condition
that's
very
loud
and
it's
a
condition
where,
for
residential
home
would
just
being
bombarded
by
headlights,
they
will
throughout
the
night.
So
beyond
that,
and
those
conditions
that
we've
discussed
and
the
heavy
impact
of
a
major
arterial
at
this
particular
point.
G
G
First
foot
regard
the
chairman:
the
process
you're
following
is
the
process.
All
cities
and
kind
of
all
cities
follow
in
terms
of
who
the
applicant
hablas
forward.
Secondly,
whatever
may
be
in
the
deed,
this
property
won't
meet
every
requirement
law
regulation-
that's
required
under
the
code
and
under
under
this
zoning
category.
In
regard
to
the
restrictive
covenant,
I
think
it
was
made
very
clear.
We
are
in
the
process
of
writing
that
up
we
work
with
your
staff.
G
Your
staff
brought
that
up
at
the
beginning
of
this
process,
which
we
are
happy
to
work
with
them
and
agree
to
so
we're
getting
that
paperwork
dinner,
we'll
have
it
at
the
BOC
and,
as
we've
been
told,
that
is
a
normal
course
of
process
for
reviewable
covenant
restriction.
So
mr.
hunt,
as
you
know,
him
has
number
of
properties
in
town
he's
tremendously
improved
them
made
them
all
very
viable,
very
good,
responsible,
taxpaying
properties,
which
will
be
the
same
here.
G
So
you
really
have
a
leap
of
faith
in
terms
of
his
good
work
in
the
area
is
a
long
term
presence
of
developing
and
running
real
estate
throughout
the
Pinellas
County
area,
which
I
think
speaks
for
itself,
so
that
we
appreciate
your
attention
and
consideration.
We
look
very
much
forward
to
your
consideration
to
approve
this.
We
can
move
forward.
Thank
you.
Mr.
H
Taunton
1955
North,
Highland,
Avenue
tarpon
springs.
One
of
the
things
that
this
boys
not
aware
of
is
the
new
building.
That's
going
on
the
current
property
as
a
slab
poured,
so
your
comments
are
about
being
able
to
ingress.
Egress
from
the
existing
property
is
no
longer
feasible.
The
walls
will
be
going
up
on
that
building
in
the
next
two
weeks,
so
that
old
easement
has
been
vacated
for
a
long
long
time
and.
G
H
No
way
that
could
ever
be
revived
to
access
which
would
just
be
redundant
to
what
we're
trying
to
do
to
access
through
our
property,
with
this
present
rezoning
to
get
the
Lots
back
to
our
oath.
So
if
we
succeed
in
that,
then
all
the
aggravation
of
trying
to
get
an
NDS
egress
off
of
Keystone
road,
which
Pinellas
County
does
not
want
and
a
very
high
expense
and
as
Heather
has
put
out
the
easement
to
go,
is
that
15
to
8
or
10.
There's
a
10
foot
easement
going
to
residential,
which
is
which
is
ridiculous.
H
You
can't
come
into
a
commercial
property
with
a
10
foot
easement
in
between
two
residential
houses,
we're
all
going
to
have
rotten
tomatoes
thrown
out.
If
we
try
to
do
that,
so
the
most
easiest,
the
most
common
sense
to
this
and
guys
we've
studied
us
for
over
18
months-
and
we
have
a
lot
of
experience
in
this
and
that's
reason
our
mr.
Pressman
to
represent
us-
is
to
make
this
a
residential
office.
That's
what
everything
is.
The
new
building
is
going
up
as
we
speak
and
to
get
it
rezoned
to
residential
office
on
the
next.
H
To
lots
and
I
was
to
have
a
very
limited
fa,
are
very
limited,
I
mean
when
we
first
went
through
this
and
I've
been
doing
this
for
a
long
time,
as
the
percentages
of
how
we
got
to
FA
are
are
mind-boggling.
Would
you
agree,
I
mean
we
all
sit
in
this
room
one
day
go.
How
did
we
get
to
this
number?
The
doubler
is
very
acceptable.
We
as
a
developer,
you
don't
know
me
we
like
landscaping.
We
like
parking.
We
like
all
kinds
of
stuff.
H
A
lot
of
developers
like
to
put
up
the
maximum
square
footage
they
can
on
a
piece
of
property
and
then
make
everything
else,
work
I'm,
just
the
opposite.
We
like
big
green
areas.
We
like
retention
ponds.
We
like
lots
of
parking
and
we've
been
very,
very
successful
at
it
over
the
years,
and
that
was
the
main
concern
all
of
us
went
through
with
the
tarpon
turtle.
H
We
need
to
increase
parking,
I
didn't
ask
for
one
square
foot,
building
to
be
built,
less
increased
parking
and
to
all
the
landscaping
and
all
that
stuff,
but
I
want
to
eat
all
know
that
buildings
already
30%
done.
So
there
is
no
easement
issue
whatsoever
and
nobody
in
my
position,
I,
don't
think
in
your
position
would
want
to
access
through
a
10-foot
easement
through
a
residential
area.
So
really
it's
a
landlocked
situation
unless
we
allow
it
to
go
through
our
property.
That's
what
we're
asking
for
any
questions
any.
B
I
just
want
to
say
mr.
hunt
and
I
may
be
speaking
out
of
the
turn
right
now,
but
I
have
went
out
there
and
I
have
to
congratulate
you
on
what
you've
created
with
the
tarpon
turtle
in
your
parking
and
the
landscaping
and
the
design
of
your
parking.
You
certainly
have
improved
the
area
and
you've
done
an
outstanding
job
in
what
you've
designed.
B
H
E
E
You
took
a
problem
area
down
there
in
terms
of
the
parking
people
parking
on
the
street
etc,
and
you
did
the
right
thing
by
the
by
the
community
in
the
neighborhood
and
I
also
recalled
the
property
that
you
own
on
the
corner,
where
I
think
the
yellow
office
building
is
I
also
recall
that
sitting
vacant
for
a
long,
long
long
time,
I
think
you
I
think.
Did
you
read
on
that
or
that
already
have
the
zoning
it.