►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Board May 15, 2017
Description
Tarpon Springs Planning and Zoning Board Meeting May 15, 2017
A
B
D
A
C
A
F
A
A
E
D
F
G
G
E
E
B
F
F
G
D
D
D
E
Next
are
the
City
Attorney
will
do
the
quasi
judicial
announcement
and
swearing
any
witnesses
who
wish
to
speak
tonight?
So
if
you
do
want
to
come
to
the
podium
and
speak
tonight
on
any
issue
when
the
time
is
right,
please
stand
and
raise
your
right
hand
and
take
the
oath
with
everyone
else.
Not
quite
yet.
G
E
H
Is
a
quasi
judicial
proceeding
where
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Board
acts
in
a
quasi
judicial
rather
than
a
legislative
capacity
at
a
quasi
judicial
hearing?
It
is
not
the
board's
function
to
make
law,
but
rather
to
apply
law
that
has
already
been
established
in
a
quasi
judicial
hearing.
The
board
is
required
by
the
law
to
make
findings
of
fact,
based
upon
the
evidence
presented
at
the
hearing
and
apply
those
findings
of
facts.
The
previously
established
criteria
indicating
the
Code
of
Ordinances
in
order
to
make
a
legal
decision
regarding
the
application
before
it.
H
The
board
may
only
consider
evidence
at
this
hearing
that
the
law
considers
confident
substantial
and
relevant
to
the
issues.
If
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
met
the
criteria
established
in
a
code
of
ordinance,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
in
favor
of
the
applicants.
By
the
same
token,
it's
a
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
failed
to
meet
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance
and
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
against
the
applicants.
H
Are
there
any
members
of
the
board
wishing
to
disclose
in
the
ex
parte
communications
or
conflicts
of
interest
this
evening,
seeing
none
if
there's
anyone
who
is
wishing
to
testify
this
evening,
if
you
could
stand
and
raise
your
right
hand
to
be
sworn
yes,
you
said
now:
do
you
swear
or
affirm
that
the
testimony
you're
about
to
give
is
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but
the
truth?
That's
fine!.
E
E
The
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
item
number
for
application:
17,
43,
ordinance,
2017
22.
You
loosest
its
request
for
a
zoning
amendment
to
rezone
a
fought,
approximately
point:
eight
zero,
a
KERS,
a
real
property
located
at
six
twenty
Bayshore
Drive
from
our
102.
Our
100th
day
will
begin
with
the
staff
report.
Good.
A
Evening
everybody,
this
application
again,
is
a
request
to
amend
the
zoning
designation
from
our
100
to
our
100,
a
for
property
located
at
6:20
Bayshore
heights.
Approximately
eight
tenths
of
an
acre,
the
existing
future
land
use
will
remain
the
same,
which
is
our
L
is
why
this
is
just
a
rezoning
amendment,
because
the
looming
of
the
future
land-use
category
for
our
100
and
our
108
is
the
same,
it's
residential
low,
which
is
why
you're
only
dealing
with
the
zoning
at
this
particular
time.
A
With
that
the
subject
property
was
located
in
the
Sun
subject
of
the
Sunset
Hills
Subdivision,
the
property
was
plotted
in
1946
sort
of
260
foot
wide
Lots.
The
existing
single-family
home
was
built
on
the
property
in
1954,
and
at
that
time
the
city
had
a
different
zoning
schema
that
we
have
right
now
in
54.
The
zoning
schema
actually
had
this
property
zoned
as
r1
AAA
and
essentially
under
r1.
A
A
a
60
foot
wide
Lots
were
allowed
now
again
that
zoning
schema
came
in
after
the
original
subdivision
was
already
plaited,
so
the
subdivision
was
planted
in
1924
the
16-foot
wide
Lots,
the
schema
at
the
time
in
54.
When
the
house
was
built
allowed
to
be
for
one
house
to
be
built
on
each
of
those
Lots
and
in
1976
we
changed
that
schema
and
went
within
what
you
ignite
now
is
the
r100
district.
Okay,
that
district
requires
75-foot
laws
at
the
time
that
this
house
was
built.
A
The
lot
it
was
built
across
it
was
built
across
both
Lots.
Both
Lots
were
used
for
that
one
home
site,
so
it
had
120
foot
of
frontage.
What
the
applicants
actually
asking
for
at
this
point
in
time
is
to
be
able
to
modify
the
that
home
site
by
removing
the
existing
structure.
That's
there
the
1954
house,
and
then
they
want
to
be
able
to
change
the
zoning
to
allow
for
sixty
five
foot
lot
rather
than
the
75
foot
lot.
That's
allowed
an
arm
are
100.
A
However,
the
house
was
built
at
a
different
time
in
a
different
error
and
with
that
the
proposed
one,
our
100,
a
zoning
designation
permits
a
maximum
density
and
intensities
of
uses
that
are
consistent
with
the
residential
low
future
land
use
designation.
The
proposed
zoning
does
not
conflict
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
Comprehensive
Plan.
The
proposed
are
100.
A
Sony
allows
for
the
same
uses
of
our
100
district.
The
proposed
uses
are
consistent
with
the
existing
and
planned
uses
in
the
surrounding
area.
A
The
proposed
are
100
a
is
consistent
with
the
existing
and
planned
growth
patterns
for
area.
The
our
100
zoning
district
will
allow
for
redevelopment.
That
is
consistent
with
the
original
plot.
Several
watts
to
the
north
and
west
have
already
been
rezoned
to
our
100.
To
allow
for
this
development
and
just
another
additional
comment
on
this
particular
analysis.
This
is
just
south
of
Bayshore
Heights.
The
Bayshore
Heights
subdivision
is
in
the
North
section.
A
The
impacts
on
public
facilities
are
not
expected
to
be
significant.
Under
the
proposed
zoning
district,
the
property
is
served
by
city
water.
The
wastewater
will
be
managed
by
on-site
septic
system.
Sewer
city
sewer
is
not
available
in
this
particular
part
of
the
section
now
be
sure.
Heights
de
is
connected
to
city
sewer,
and
there
are
other
properties
along
Peninsula
or
engulfed
that
are
connected
to
sewer
the
ones
that
are
on
Ford
Avenue.
It's
hit
or
miss
there
into
line.
A
There
is
a
line
that
comes
down,
but
it
doesn't
necessarily
come
to
the
area
where
the
other,
what's
that
have
been
rezone,
are
so
the
issue
of
whether
or
not
everything
is
connected
to
wastewater
and
that's
why
the
reasons
are
through.
That's
not
that's,
not
a
consistent
statement.
There
are
inconsistency
with
the
way
the
wastewater
has
been
done
in
that
Ford
peninsular
area.
The
some
lots
are
connected
in
some
lots
on
again,
the
proposed
zoning
is
expected
to
generate
the
same
volume
of
traffic
and
have
similar
impacts
on
our
public
facilities.
A
Any
future
development
is
subject
to
the
city's
mobility
management
provisions.
The
technical
review
team
saw
this
application
on
April
27th
2017
and
during
that
meeting
the
big
issue
was
the
fact
that
they
were
going
to
have
to
be
served
by
a
septic
system,
because
water
and
sewer
were
not
there
and
we've
acknowledged,
and
the
applicant
has
acknowledged
that
situation.
They
recognize
that,
if
the,
if
they
cannot
get
a
permitted
septic
system,
they
will
not
be
allowed
to
build
on
both
Lots.
They
recognize
that
that
that's
an
issue,
that's
a
state
permit.
A
This
board
does
not
have
any
purview
on
that
because
those
are
state
regulations
and
the
applicant
is
aware
of
that.
They
will
have
to
go
through
whatever
process
the
state
has
in
place
for
them
to
seek
relief
if
they
can't
get
a
septic
system
on
the
on
those
individual
Lots.
With
that
this
application
was
advertised,
there
was
a
sign
posted
on
the
property.
We
did
send
notification
within
200
feet
and
we
did
also
put
an
advertisement
in
the
newspaper
and
with
that
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
the
following
from
our
100
to
our
100.
A
In
the
immediate
future,
now
that
doesn't
mean
that
sewer
won't
come
to
that
area
at
some
point
time,
but
there
is
no
plan
right
now
in
the
immediate
future
in
the
next
three
to
five
years.
This
is
what
we
look
for
in
the
concurrency
analysis.
Is
it
imminent,
where
it
would
be
in
place
in
the
next
three
years
and
the
answer
that
question
is
now.
E
B
C
E
E
A
Will
will
will
change
that
in
the
staff
report
going
forward,
but
that
does
not
change
all
it
would.
Change
is
the
last
statement
that
the
current
land
development
code
was
adopted
in
1990
that
wouldn't
be
applicable.
It
wouldn't
matter
that
it
was
adopted
in
1990,
but
it
doesn't
change
when
the
property,
when
they
acquire
the
property,
doesn't
change
the
basis
for
wide
staffs,
recommending
approval
here,
where
it's
considered.
A
E
A
You
can't
start
signaling
to
the
market
that
we're
willing
to
what
change
you
know
whatts
just
to
the
west
and
north
of
this
lot,
and
then
very
north
of
this
lot
go
through
a
whole
subdivision
change
without
having
some
type
of
justification
for
that.
Why
were
those
other
ones
appropriate?
None
of
those
other
ones
are
contiguous
to
each
other.
They
are
all
in
a
situation
where
they
are
separated
throughout
the
section.
A
So
I
think
that
at
this
point
in
time,
the
board,
by
doing
the
types
of
those
types
of
zoning
changes
that
they've
done
in
this
area,
has
signified
that
there
that
this
is
a
transitional
area.
Those
zoning
changes
started
in
probably
the
mid
90s
and
they've
gone
through
up
through
2007
and
then
Bay
Shore
Heights
was
later
done
in
2014,
so
you've
signified
in
the
last
ten
years
that
this
is
a
transitional
area
by
allowing
those
zoning
changes
to
go
forward.
So
I
wouldn't
consider
this
a
true
case
of
spot
zoning
and.
A
G
A
G
A
A
Be
they
couldn't
ask
for
a
variance
under
the
that
section
of
code,
because
you
can't
give
a
dimensional
variance
for
the
width
of
a
lot.
So
that's
why
they
can't
go
to
the
variance
process.
This
is
their
relief
out
there.
Now
they
can
make
it
they
can
attempt
to
go
under
the
non-conforming
status.
The
problem
is
these:
Lots
have
been
held
together
for
so
long
at
this
point
in
time.
They
really
don't
meet
that
criteria
there
either.
A
So
that
would
be
something
that
staff
would
be
able
to
support,
but
you
can't
get
a
variance
for
a
lot
width,
which
is
the
reason
why
they
can't
go
that
route.
Their
only
option
at
this
particular
time
to
do
what
they
want
to
do
here,
which
is
use.
The
existing
Oracle
pattern
would
be
their
chance
to
rezone
right.
A
A
Yeah
you're
dealing
with
a
higher
density
there,
because
you
dealing
with
smaller
lot
sizes
and
when
you
do
that,
then
you
get
into
you're
going
to
have
to
change
the
land
use
category
and
go
up
to
a
higher
land
use
category
which
you
probably
be
in
this
case.
The
residential
urban
category,
which
there
is
our
one
there
are,
is
our
seventy
a
in
this
section
as
well.
This
the
section
is
not
a
purely
our
100
section,
like
we
deal
with
some
a
little
bit
farther
out,
there's
a
little
bit
closer
into
town.
A
One
was
done
in
1995,
one
was
done
in
2007
and
another
one
was
done
in
the
mid.
90S
I
wasn't
able
to
track
trace
back
exactly,
but
he
was
either
right
at
the
cusp
of
when
the
zoning
district
change
in
the
70s.
It
was
after
the
70s,
but
it
was
before
the
1990
codes
somewhere
in
that
time
frame.
I
just
wasn't
able
to
get
with
the
clerk
to
get
an
exact
date
on
that.
The.
G
Mean
the
way
I
see
it
is.
It
would
be
one
thing
if
there
wasn't
enough
land
to
meet
the
r100
criteria.
There's
enough
there's
more
than
enough
land.
There's
almost
yeah
I
mean
there's
almost
three
Lots
there.
The
issue
to
me
is
just
the
front:
yard
dimensions
can't
meet
the
75,
but
you
can
meet
the
60.
It's
not
that
you
know
she
even
needs
to
get
away
with
20
60
feet
and
the
front
yard
to
me
is
pretty
good-sized.
So
you
know
from
a
from
a
redevelopment
standpoint
as
we
continue
to
see
this
in
town.
G
From
my
perspective,
drive
around
town
and
there's
bacon
Lots
being
built
on
all
over
as
the
town
continues
to
grow
in
more
and
more
loss
or
redevelop
that
sit
on
two
Lots,
but
the
house
happens
to
be
in
the
middle
I.
Think
you're
going
to
see
application
applications
like
this
so
from
a
redevelopment
standpoint
to
have
two
waterfront
houses
on
the
tax
rolls
and
to
dock
the
intact,
and
everything
like
that,
considering
all
the
things
mentioned
and
I
would
move
approval
when
the
time
comes.
It's
not
now.
Yeah.
I
I
The
Board
of
Commissioners
sent
a
signal
to
the
market
that
60-foot
light
lots
are
appropriate
in
this
area
because
of
that
rezoning
it
resulted
in
60
foot
wide
Lots
being
developed
since
the
requirements
for
building
or
60
foot
in
width
and
are
no
different
in
the
uses.
The
change
in
zoning
would
be
compatible
with
the
surrounding
existing
land
uses
an
identical
to
the
r100
zoning
district.
I,
don't
know
if
you
have
any
questions
on
my
intent
is
to
build
myself
a
home
on
there
and
my
son
another
way
in
the
future.
I
I
J
Yes,
hi,
my
name
is
William
Church
I
live
at
six
one,
two
Bayshore
Drive,
which
is
just
further
south
I,
guess
you'd,
say
from
renée's
property
Brittany
actually
sold
me
the
house.
So
we're
quite
appreciative
of
that.
It's
a
beautiful
location,
loved
a
lot.
The
houses
down
there
now
needs
some
work,
and
you
know
she
came
in
recently
and
cleared
out.
J
The
LAT
and
thought
was
going
to
spruce
it
up
for
the
family,
but
except
the
son
lived
in
the
house,
but
as
I
actually
spent
some
time
in
the
property,
I
think
she
realized
how
beautiful
was.
My
issue
is
I'm
right
on
the
fence
line.
You
probably
can't
see
this
picture
too
well,
but
this
is
out
my
back
porch
and
right
next
to
this
fence
line
which
is
10
feet
away,
would
be
her
house
and
to
me
you
know,
I
bought
this.
J
This
view,
thinking
that
you
know
there
was
going
to
be
one
house
on
the
lot
and
now
that
there's
a
chance
for
two
of
them
and
one
right
next
to
the
fence
line
I
lose
that
entire
view.
Now
we
do
that
I
lose
a
vet
view,
but
I
also
have
to
put
up
a
privacy
fence,
because
you
know
I'll
be
looking
at
them
and
they'll
be
looking
at
me
as
I'm
sitting
in
my
backyard,
enjoying
some
quiet
enjoyment.
J
G
G
J
E
C
Remember
when
the
lots
of
purchase
on
the
plan
was
lived
there
next
to
her
uncle
mr.
Perret
son
passed
away.
So
it's
been
a
long
time
in
coming.
Do
this
when
mrs.
Thompson
and
her
husband
built
that
out,
they
sure
was
really
very
like
out
in
the
country
still
to
a
point
and
they
didn't
want.
They
built
it
on
the
two
Lots,
because
they
wanted
a
lot
of
popular
members.
He
was
saying
on
water
and
at
that
time
a
lot
of
homes
were
being
built
out
there
with
bars
off
BAM
out
on
the
water
side.
C
E
C
At
that
time,
mrs.
Thomson
was
thinking
of
putting
two
houses
on
that
lot.
Bring
I,
think
I'm,
nephew
down
or
a
need,
but
she
passed
away
at
their
material
of
it
is
a
very
large
blot
and,
like
I
said
it
was
purchased
in
Kate
and
they
came
to
the
Commission
not
coming
to
the
playing
zone,
and
at
that
time
so
I
was
married
in
in
the
early
90s.
They
said,
yes,
you
could
be
felt
to
houses
it.
D
A
Difference
offset
is
5
feet
because
you
can
go
down
to
a
minimum
of
2
of
10
foot
on
one
side.
You
have
to
make
up
the
additional
5
the
other
side,
because
it's
a
combined
setback
on
both
sides
of
25
feet
in
the
are
100
are
100
a
has
a
straight
10-foot
side
setback.
So
again
the
applicant
gets
to
decide
where
they
want
that
how
they
want
to
apportion
that
could
be
12-foot
on
on
either
side.
It
could
be
15
on
one
ten
on
the
other,
that's
determined
by
the
applicant.
A
D
A
E
I'm
concerned
about
spot
zoning,
I
know
you
said
in
the
past
twenty
years
or
so
there's
been
a
few
instances
of
that
I
think
if
it's
appropriate
to
change
the
zoning,
we
should
look
at
the
full
area
rather
than
one
one
area.
It's
a
beautiful
piece
of
property,
no
doubt
but
I'm
not
comfortable
with
it,
because
it
to
me
it
seems
like
spots
on
zoning.
E
D
D
D
E
Next
time,
when
the
agenda
is
item
number
four,
five
application,
17
45
resolution,
2017
21
request
for
conditional
use
and
site
plan
approval
to
allow
for
manufacturing
of
recreational
watercraft
in
the
ir
industrial
restricted
zoning
district
and
to
construct
a
new
seven
thousand
nine
hundred
and
eighty
square
foot
building
at
1430,
L
and
R
Industrial
Boulevard
and
we'll
begin
with
the
expense
report.
Thank.
A
You
again,
this
is
a
conditional
use
approval
to
allow
for
manufacture
of
recreation
watercraft
in
the
r
and
r
an
ir
or
the
industrial,
restrictive
district
and
approval
for
an
associated
site
plan
for
a
seven
thousand
nine
hundred
and
eighty
square
foot
building
the
owner
is
for
real
fishing
and
the
agent
for
the
application
is
wood.
Construction
Justin
are
Floyd
who
you
may
remember
from
reload.
A
Dorado
boats,
which
manufactures
custom
books
will
be
moving
to
the
property
from
outside
the
city,
and
the
property
is
currently
developed
with
an
existing
two-story,
six
thousand
three
hundred
square
foot
building
which
which
we
use
for
offices
and
to
support
the
and
as
a
support
facility
for
the
new
building
the
property
is
currently
vacant.
Even
though
there's
existing
building
there
there's
no
utilizing
that
building
at
this
time,
pursuant
to
the
criteria
for
the
conditional
use
laid
out
in
Section
two
zero.
A
Nine
point:
zero
one
standards
of
review,
the
reposed
use
is
subject
to
the
conditional
use
review
in
the
IR
district
and
the
proposed
design
complies
with
setbacks
and
other
performance
standards
of
the
IR
district.
The
reposed
uses
located
adjacent
to
other
use
like
uses
and
will
be
built
consistent
with
the
performance
standards
in
the
IR
district.
The
site
is
located
north
of
a
residential
e
developed
property
along
J
rubella
vard.
However,
the
area
has
a
mix
of
industrial
and
manufacturing
uses.
A
The
conditional
use
is
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
all
the
elements
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
It's
also
consistent
with
the
land-use
category.
That's
out
there,
which
is
industrial.
The
use
will
result
will
not
result
in
any
significant
adverse
impacts.
The
surrounding
area
has
a
mix
of
industrial
uses,
energy
center
properties
our
zone,
to
allow
for
development
of
more
on
your
manufacturing
industrial
uses.
So
you
do
have
some
large
vacant
tracts
that
are
across
the
street
from
this
particular
property
that
are
now
currently
set
for
m1
in
the
county
district.
A
So
that's
a
manufacturing
district,
so
you
will
see
more
manufacturing
in
this
general
area
and
that's
the
county's
plan
in
the
north
of
the
river
area
is
meant
to
be
an
employment
area.
As
a
result,
manufacturing
and
industrial
uses
over
time
will
become
more
prevalent
in
this
particular
area.
The
proposed
use
will
not
adversely
impact
or
affect
the
property
values
in
the
area.
A
The
development
is
not
required
will
not
require
the
extension
of
additional
public
services,
they're
already
served
by
our
services,
and
it
will
not
adversely
affect
the
ability
of
the
city
to
provide
adequate
public
facilities
to
the
site
currently
and
again,
and
currently
they're
connected
the
proposed
uses
consistent
majority
of
the
uses
in
the
area,
as
well
as
the
planned
uses
in
the
area.
The
condition
use
will
provide
for
effective
and
orderly
development
and
we'll
put
a
site
back
into
use
that
has
been
vacant
for
some
time
now
to
go
through
the
mystic
right.
A
Next
criteria
is
the
comm
site
planning
criteria
and
the
concurrency
criteria
in
your
backup.
There
is
the
concurrency
application
that
we
usually
moves
forward
with
the
site
plan
that
application
has
since
been
signed.
You
have
an
unsigned
copy,
but
there
has,
when
the
applicant
did
sign
the
application
tonight,
so
that
application
is
considered
a
full
and
competent
application
to
move
forward
with
that,
the
site
plan
for
the
seven
thousand
nine
hundred
square
foot
building
is
for
the
manufacturing
of
boats.
The
new
building
is
to
be
constructed
within
within
one
year.
A
Utilities
are
available,
the
access
is
from
their
existing
access
to
the
site.
Total
parking
is
twenty.
One
parking
spaces
will
be
provided,
including
180,
a
accessible
parking
space
under
the
landscaping
and
screening
section
there
is
a
15-foot
undisturbed,
landscape
buffer
is
being
provided
along
and
again.
That
should
be
the
south
property
line
not
properly
line,
so
that
correction
will
be
made
moving
forward.
This
is
the
only
property
line
that
actually
abuts
residential
development.
The
only
place
where
additional
landscaping
is
required.
A
There
no
right-of-way
issues,
no
fire
protection
issues,
with
the
exception
of
they've,
asked
for
a
couple
of
conditions
from
the
fire
marshal
just
to
make
sure
that
there
is
compliance
moving
forward
on
the
new
structure.
With
that
there
are
no
endangered
species
that
will
be
impacted.
There
is
no
transfer
development
requested.
The
environmental
has
no
environmental,
the
environment
has
no
significant
wetlands
or
environmental
issues.
The
flood
zone
for
the
property
was
shown
as
X,
but
it's
also
a
es
included
that
just
that
information
was
left
off
of
a
staff
report.
A
That
was
my
error,
so
we
just
want
to
include
that.
Not
only
is
in
the
X
flood
zone,
but
there's
a
portion,
the
AE
flood
zone
as
well.
The
staff
finds
that
the
proposed
development
application
is
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
Comprehensive
Plan
under
the
level
of
service
analysis.
The
only
on
clarification
that
I
would
like
to
make
is
under
drainage.
The
drainage
is
actually
off
site,
there's
a
shared
pond
between
this
pond
and
the
property
to
the
north.
A
1745
in
resolution,
2017
20
requesting
conditional
use,
permit
and
site
plan
approval
to
allow
manufacturing
of
recreation
watercraft
and
a
construction
of
a
7,000
900
square
foot,
building
at
1430
L&R
boulevard
in
the
ir
industrial
restricted
zoning
district
with
the
following
conditions.
The
developer
is
responsible
for
acquiring
all
jurisdictional
permits
and
for
meeting
the
minimum
criteria.
The
land
development
code
constructions
plans
shall
be
consistent
with
the
site
plan,
the
payment
of
all
requisite
all
of
our
because
it
feeds
attendance.
The
project
shall
be
paid
in
accordance
with
the
land
development
code.
A
The
existing
structure
will
not
be
required
to
be
retrofitted
with
sprinklers,
provided
that
the
west
wall
of
the
proposed
metal
structure
is
a
to
our
fire
rated
wall.
Separating
the
two
buildings,
the
proposed
metal
building
will
be
sprinkled,
sprinkle,
worship,
sprinkler,
protected.
The
fire
department
connection
will
be
out
and
away
from
the
building
within
a
hundred
feet
of
the
existing
fire
hydrant
to
the
north
side
of
the
driveway.
The
existing
gravel
grass
pad
in
front
of
the
proposed
metal
building
will
either
be
paved
your
ready
to
support
30
tons
of
fire
apparatus.
A
The
applicant
must
provide
shielded
lighting
and
direct
all
lighting
internal
to
the
to
the
project
it
should
just
be
to
project
way
should
be
removed.
The
conditional
use
and
site
plan
will
expire
within
one
year
approval
if
the
building
permit
it
is
not,
is
not
issued
for
the
property
and
with
that
I
can
answer
any
change.
Any
questions
you
may
have
thank.
G
A
Unfortunately,
personal
watercraft
under
the
I,
our
district
requires
the
conditional
use
I,
don't
make
it
up.
I
promise
I
promise
I
don't
make
it
up,
but
essentially
what
it
is
is
most
of
the
manufacturing
uses
and
I
are
are
kind
of
zoned
out
I
are
is
meant
to
be
one
of
those
zoning
districts,
that's
more
of
a
buffer
between
your
heavy
industrial
uses
and
residential
or
other
commercial
uses.
So
in
areas
that
most
the
areas
in
the
city
that
you
have
I
are
in
are
more
buffer
areas.
A
Now,
that's
not
to
say
that
we
haven't
had
uses
over
time
that
have
kind
of
skirted
the
the
use
and
that
type
of
thing
by
coming
in
as
another
use
and
then
more
things.
So
you
because
you
do
have
things
in
IR
that
do
not
belong
and
IR.
As
a
result,
they
do
need
to
meet
today's
code.
Today's
code
alt
requires
this
conditional
use,
unfortunately,
which
is
allowing
requiring
the
additional
step.
G
G
I
mean
obviously
it's
compatible
for
the
area,
as
my
thinking
I
mean
even
the
big
vacant
land
tract
that's
under
contract
right
now,
it's
gained
rezoning,
has
an
element
of
residential
and
more
industrial,
so
I
mean
I.
Think
it's
totally
compatible
and
I'm
happy
that
y'all
pick
tarpon
spring.
So
we
appreciate
that
that
wicked
luery
over
here
so
I'll
have
Spearman.
E
K
Thank
you
again
for
seeing
us
I
loved
your
comment,
mr.
Keeravani,
because
we
were
kind
of
shocked
by
the
same
thing
before
we
bought
the
property
in
nature,
is
allowable
use,
and
then
this
this
one
note
came
up
about
the
recreational
watercraft
to
our
surprise.
So
here
we
are,
but
nowhere
they
want
to
bring
approximately
20
to
21
jobs
to
tarpon
springs.
So
we
think
it's
a
it's!
A
win-win!
K
We've
looked
at
the
at
the
property
and
think
it's
going
to
you
know
overall
bring
some
some.
You
know
the
jobs
and
then
make
that
site.
Look
a
lot
better,
so
I,
don't
think
there's
any
any
issues
or
anything
that
will
come
up
that
we've
gone
through,
but
I'll
be
more
than
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
If
you
have
any
before.
E
E
E
B
C
E
C
D
A
Does
not
have
any
formal
Commons,
with
exception
of
two
like
to
welcome
both
mr.
Tanner
pani
and
our
alternate
member
to
the
board
I
look
forward
to
working
with
both
of
you.
If
you
have
any
questions,
please
give
me
me
or
Kim
a
contact,
information
and
we'd
be
glad
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
might
have
going
for
it.
I
know.
Talented,
probably
has
no
questions
for
me,
but
just
in
case
you
do
you
have
my
number
and
then
the
other
question.
A
The
other
comment
that
we
have
is
related
to
what
we
kind
of
talked
about
last
time:
we're
going
to
start
doing
some
research
on
what
other
communities
do
for
their
noticing
criteria
and
I'll
be
bringing
that
for
it.
I,
don't
know
how
soon
that's
going
to
be
because
the
principal
planner
has
a
sense
left
us
since
our
last
meeting.
So
as
a
result,
I
don't
know
how
quickly
I'll
get
that,
but
we
will
get
that
forward.
E
E
C
Don't
know
how
to
ask
this
a
Heather,
but
in
when
development
plans
come
before
us
and
we
have
thought
about
the
lighting.
On
these
reasons,
we
need
to
look
at
what
type
of
lighting
they're
putting
in,
because
on
base
or
height,
which
is
right
behind
me.
We
wanted
to
like
to
look
down
while
they
do
but
they're
not
a
deterrent
to
theft,
they're,
not
a
difference
to
people
walking
for
your
frothy
at
night.
It's
all
fair.
C
C
People
walking
through
my
yard,
at
night
they
parked
down
there,
they
meet
at
the
keep
calling
the
fleet.
So
we
need
to
look
very
closely
at
these
and
lights
that
they
put
up
in
these
areas
to
make
sure
it
really
like
better
than
the
ones
that
come
just
down
to
a
smaller
area,
because
the
residence
has
to
be
set
and
their
prospects,
and
these
are
I
feel,
firstly,
that
the
lights
on
a
development
are
for
for
the
air.
C
A
We
can
certainly
ask
for
the
those
projects
to
bring
forward
their
waiting
plans,
but
we
do
not
have
currently
the
lighting
standards
and
I
know.
I
had
put
together
something
for
you
guys
last
year
and
it
kind
of
got
lost
in
the
in
the
shuffle.
We'll
move
forward
on
that
just
as
soon
as
I've
got
some
time
to
spend,
spend
putting
that
back
together
for
you
guys
for
us
to
kind
of
go
through
it
through
it,
because
at
least
so
we
can
talk
about
that
information
because
we
never
really
get
to
talk
about.
A
C
Experience
other
than
asking
them
to
do
the
lights.
That
way,
we
need
to
be
something
because
it's
very
very
far
out
there
and
I'm
not
going
to
be
interested
saying
they
have
to
be
down
almost
to
the
side.
People
say
you
know
what
we're
talking
about.
We
talk
about
lights.
Lighting
is
a
factor
for
sure
when
it's
not
work.
A
E
You
putting
us
in
there
because
it's
the
lighting
that
you're
restricting
this
excessive
lighting
that
shines
onto
neighboring
properties,
and
if
you
live
next
to
a
development.
You
know
you
might
not
want
to
shine
it
into
your
own
windows.
We're
on
to
your
backyard
and
also
the
studies
have
been
shown
that
excessive
lighting
is
also
not
a
deterrent
to
security.
In
fact,
it's
harder
to
see
for
law
enforcement
or
anyone
else
to
see
what's
going
on
if
they
have
bright
light
shining
at
them.
C
Well,
you're
talking
about
it
lights
up
a
little
bit,
but
not
enough.
It's
still
dark
and
I'm
going
to
tell
you
can
goes
to
the
police
department.
I
see
how
my
house
I've
called
my
neighbors,
have
all
and
what
the
promises
are.
There
have
even
been
drug
deals.
Faxes,
we've
had
to
call
sleep
now.
The
developers
part
of
our
math
meet
sustained
all
this,
but
it's
the
life,
it's
not
the
developer.
Next
time
we
start
to
look
at
that
real
good
to
make
sure
the
lighting
in
this
cheap
life.