►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Board July 17, 2017
Description
Description
A
C
A
D
F
A
G
D
D
G
G
A
A
A
I
Is
a
quasi-judicial
meeting
rather
than
a
legislative
meeting
and
a
quasi-judicial
meeting,
the
board's
job
is
to
apply
law
already
in
place
rather
than
to
make
law
at
a
constitutional
meeting.
The
board
must
listen
to
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
if
they
hear
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence,
and
they
follow
the
criteria
they
are
bound
to
go
forward
with
it.
Vice
versa,
if
they
feel
that
the
evidence
presented
tonight
is
neither
competent
substantial
relevant
to
the
issues
and
they
shall
not
go
forward.
Is
there
anyone
wishing
to
give
any
evidence
tonight
if
they
could?
I
I
D
Number
four
on
the
agenda
is
the
application
1756
ordinance,
2017
26
westcoast
word
if
the
application
requests
a
conditional
use
permit
to
allow
a
school
of
general
education
to
be
developed,
the
property
located
at
431
East,
Spruce
Street
in
the
industrial,
restricted
zoning
district
and
we'll
begin
with
the
staff
report.
Just.
J
To
correct
that,
there's
was
a
typo
on
the
thing
it's
actually
a
resolution,
2017
26,
and
with
that
the
approval
of
a
conditional
youth.
The
request
is
to
approve
a
conditional
use
to
allow
a
school
of
general
education
to
be
developed
on
a
property
located
at
431
East
Bruce
Street.
The
applicant
is
westcoast
word
Church,
they're,
also
the
owner
of
the
property,
the
surrounding
land
uses,
the
majority
of
the
area
is
zone
either
residential
or
land
conservation.
J
However,
this
property
and
the
property
to
the
west
or
zoned,
resident
or
industrial,
restrictive,
and
with
that
this
property
had
previously
had
a
conditional
use
on
it
for
an
adult
daycare.
This
request
is
now
changing
that
use
or
requesting
to
change
that
use
to
a
private
school
to
serve
children
between
the
ages
of
two
and
six
months.
Essentially,
it's
an
existing
building
and
they're
looking
to
change
the
configuration
of
the
building
provide,
the
parking
will
remain
the
same,
but
to
provide
additional
play
area
in
the
rear
to
support
the
school.
J
The
proposed
used
in
subject
to
the
condition
use
review
in
the
industrial
restrictive
district
advocate
parking
is
available
to
accommodate
the
use
and
the
use
complies
with
all
other
development
codes
of
the
comprehensive
zoning
and
land
development
code.
The
area
contains
a
mixture
of
light
industrial
office
and
Civic
uses
in
the
proposed
school
is
appropriate
and
is
compatible
with
the
existing
and
planned
uses
in
the
area.
Judicial
use
of
the
property
is
consistent
with
the
goals
objectives.
J
If
the
Comprehensive
Plan
the
use
is
proposed
for
this
location
is
within
an
existing
building
and
the
site
does
not
contain
any
resources
of
environmental
historical
significance.
The
proposed
condition
is
surrounded
by
compatible
uses.
The
proposed
use
of
the
property
will
not
affect
the
joining
property
values.
The
use
is
is
proposed
within
the
existing
building
will
not
affect
or
impact
nor
exceed
the
capacity
with
the
fiscal
ability
of
the
city
to
provide
facilities
and
services,
and
the
proposed
use
is
located
within
an
existing
building
in
a
predominantly
industrial
area.
J
The
useful,
not
Atlas,
adversely
impact,
have
adversely
will
not
adversely
impact
upon
the
growth
patterns
or
affect
the
cost
of
the
city
to
provide
public
services
and
with
that
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
resolution.
2017
26
with
the
following
conditions.
The
property
is
to
be
used
as
a
school
of
general
education.
All
other
uses
are
subject
to
further
review
and
subsequent
approval
consistent
with
the
land
development
code
and
the
conditional
use
will
expire
within
one
year
of
the
approval.
If
a
building
permit
is
not
issued
for
the
property.
C
J
H
J
It'll
be
a
daycare
with
a
school
I
mean
they're,
providing
edge
they're,
basically
providing
everything
from
two
months
up
to
six
months,
so
being
that
two-year-olds
aren't
going
to
be
going
to
kindergarten
or
doing
that
type
of
thing.
They
would
be
in
that,
like
a
nurseries
in
a
nursing
foot,
you
know
a
nursery
school
or
a
daycare
type
setting.
J
Of
general,
education
generally
is
for
those
children
who
are
of
school
age
that
are
at
providing
are
asking
are
being
provided
with
education
for
on
a
Monday
through
Friday,
scheduled
from
usually
8:00
to
3:00
p.m.
and
generally
they're
students
of
school-age,
in
this
case,
they're
asking
to
also
have
school
children
that
are
younger
than
that
age.
But,
however,
did
care
I
believe
is
not
allowed
here.
So
those
those
children
that
are
less
than
school-age
children
will
have
to
be
limited,
and
we
can
further
limit
that
here
in
the
conditions
tonight.
J
G
J
A
D
K
The
building
was
a
adult
daycare
center
with
consultation,
open
route
spaces,
a
lot
of
restrooms
places
to
take
people
in
meals
on
wheels.
So
in
reality
the
building
is
set
up
very
well
right
now
to
receive
the
children
there's
classrooms
already
set
up,
and
in
my
letter
of
introduction,
the
the
exiting
is
great.
We
had
the
fire
marshal
and
he
was
very
happy
with
it.
K
It's
a
fully
sprinklered
building
I
would
clarify
that
we
are
talking
about
children
that
are
infants
to
the
five
and
six
year
old
and
each
one
of
those
has
a
separate
classroom.
Infants
ones
and
twos
twos
and
threes
threes
and
fours,
fours
and
fives,
fives
and
sixes,
and
they
are
in
a
educational
environment,
has.
K
Hearing
that
we're
in
that
process
right
now,
so
we
will
be.
We've
already
had
the
inspection
and
there's
a
few
things
that
we
need
to
do.
We
will
come
back
in
for
building
permits
as
soon
as
we
know,
we
have
a
zoning
approval
to
add
a
couple
exterior
doors
and
some
those
kinds
of
things,
but
the
building
is
very
well
set
up
for
it.
Now
it's
a
great
use
for
it
and.
K
K
K
H
K
D
B
L
J
B
Just
for
the
record
chairman
and
the
code
does
define
schools
of
general
education
as
a
public,
froakie,
old,
private
school
college
or
university,
or
a
school
for
the
mentally
or
physically
handicapped,
giving
regular
instruction
at
least
five
days
per
week,
except
holidays
for
normal
school
year.
So
there's
no
age
restriction
on
the
codes
definition
of
a
school
general
education.
It's
just
a
requirement
that
there
be
instruction
given
at
least
5
days
per
week.
Thank.
H
C
D
D
G
A
A
A
D
Item
on
the
agenda
item
number
five
application:
17
62
for
resolution,
2017
27
on
behalf
of
Live
Oak
properties.
It's
the
request
for
a
conditional
use
permit
to
allow
a
portion
of
the
building
to
be
used
as
a
commercial
recreation
facility,
the
property
located
at
425,
East,
Spruce,
Street
and
we'll
begin
with
the
staff
report
again.
J
This
is
a
conditional
use,
permit
the
proportion
of
a
building
an
existing
building
to
be
used
for
commercial
recreation
facility
at
the
property
located
at
425
East
Spruce
Street,
the
application
the
applicant
is
live
of
properties
of
Tarpon,
Springs
and
they're.
Also
the
owner.
The
surrounding
area
on
this
particular
property
is
actually
mostly
industrial,
restrictive
with
a
small
area
to
the
south.
That
is
our
seventy.
A
and
with
that
the
site
for
the
conditional
use
is
located
within
an
existing
structure
that
contains
an
existing
commercial
printing
business.
J
The
use
is
to
allow
a
fitness
center
that
provides
both
indoor
and
outdoor
fitness
related
activities
on
the
site.
Patrons
will
arrive
and
depart
at
staggered
time
intervals
during
normal
business
hours
from
5:00
a.m.
to
8:30
p.m.
pardon
for
the
two
businesses
will
be
shared
in
adequate
on-site.
Parking
is
available
to
accommodate
both
businesses
uses
subject
to
the
conditional
use
review
in
the
industrial
zoning
district
use
complies
with
the
parking
and
all
other
development
standards
of
the
Comprehensive
Plan,
comprehensive
zoning
and
land
development
code.
J
The
fitness
center
is
compatible
with
the
light
manufacturing
business
that
is
located
on
the
same
site
as
well
as
the
uses
of
the
surrounding
property.
Use
is
consistent
with
all
elements
of
the
Comprehensive
Plan.
The
use
is
located
on
a
developed
site
that
does
not
contain
any
resources
of
environmentally
or
environmental
or
historical
significance.
The
use
is
compatible
with
the
area
and
it
will
not
adversely
affect
the
joining
property
values.
J
The
use
is
located
within
the
existing
building
and
will
not
adversely
impact
nor
exceed
the
capacity
or
fiscal
ability
of
the
city
to
provide
facilities
to
the
service
and
the
use
is
located
within
an
existing
building
in
a
predominantly
industrial
area.
The
use
will
not
adversely
impact
adversely
impact
upon
the
growth
patterns
or
affect
the
cost
of
the
city
in
providing
public
services,
and
with
that
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
resolution,
2017
27
with
the
following
conditions.
The
property
is
to
be
used
as
a
commercial
recreation
facility.
J
D
J
Any
changes
to
the
internal
portion
of
the
building
they
will
subsequently
so
they're
moving
balls
or
outlets,
or
any
that
type
of
thing
they'll
of
a
subsequent
renovation,
internal
renovation
and
completion
permit
with
that
they
may
want
to
restart
their
park,
and
why
are
those
type
of
things
we
make
those
those
things
available
to
the
applicant
at
the
time
of
permitting?
So
when
those
building
permits
are
pulled-
and
in
this
case
there
will
be
around
internal
renovation
permit
pulled
when
that
happens,
that's
when
this
conditional
use
will
be
activated.
D
D
D
D
A
A
J
Comment
I
have
is
I
just
wanted
to
follow
up
on
an
email
we
sent.
The
August
meeting
has
been
moved
to
August,
14th
and
I'd
like
to
thank
everybody,
who's
willing
to
do
that.
We
have
an
applicant.
It
really
needs
to
go
to
BOC
the
next
night
because
they
weren't
successful
in
making
it
to
this
meeting
and
they're
kind
of
getting
to
a
point
where
they're
heading
up
against
their
own
individual
deadlines.
J
As
a
result,
that
meeting
will
actually
not
be
in
this
room
because
there
is
a
performance
that
night
so
we'll
be
in
the
upstairs
conference
rooms.
You
just
want
to
let
everybody
know
today
that
we'll
definitely
be
in
the
conference
room
it'll.
Definitely
on
the
14th
at
this
point
right
now,
I
have
one
application.
I,
don't
know
if
there'll
be
another
successful
application
to
move
forward,
it
may
just
be
that
one
application.
Okay.
A
A
Yeah
I
have
a
limit
when
we've
met
here
before
with
mr.
Carr
was
here.
We
always
mentioned
about
the
by
you
and
the
broken
concrete
and
broken
stones
around
the
by
you
and
mention
that
you
know
who
do
we
talk
to
about?
Maybe
getting
the
sidewalk
foot
in
there
or
not
and
I
thought
I'd
bring
it
up
because
mr.
tariffs
panties
here
tonight
and
he
used
to
be
on
the
City
Council.
So
who
would
we
talk
to
about
that?
Who
do
we
bring
that
up
to
well.
G
No,
that's
really
a
my
understanding,
you
notice,
I
take
such
close
attention
is
I
think
it
was
presentation
by
somebody
at
the
last
Board
of
Commissioners
meeting
I
want
to
say.
Bob
Robertson
is
just
like
a
new
project
manager
of
all
projects,
basically
for
the
city,
who's
definitely
qualified
to
do
the
job
and
I
think
he
mentioned
that
there
was
some
scenarios
for
some
alternatives
or
different
scenarios.
I
suppose
multiple
scenarios
that
the
city
could
defend
is
working
on
as
a
potentially
selecting
or
discussion
among
the
community
in
the
Commission.
Is
that
right,
Heather?
J
At
the
last
board
meeting,
but
I
do
believe
that
Bob
is
working
on
some
alternatives
and
at
that
other
request
of
mr.
and
mr.
Carr,
for
something
to
happen
out
there.
Now
that's
one
of
those
things
that's
like
in
the
initial
vetting
process
and
they'll
be
public
hearings
that
everything
they
kind
of
select
an
option.
If
there's
a
viable
option
or
group
of
options
out
there,
so
I
would
key
I
would
stay
tuned
to
the
Commission
meetings
and
just
check
the
agendas
posted
online,
the
Friday
before
the
meeting.