![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi_webp/L9wmgatJtuI/mqdefault.webp)
►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning June 18, 2018
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
D
A
E
Is
a
quasi-judicial
proceeding
where
the
Planning
and
Zoning
for
an
accident
causes
a
show
rather
than
a
legislative
capacity
at
a
quasi-judicial
hearing.
It
is
not
the
board's
function
of
make
law,
but
rather
to
apply
wall
that
has
already
been
established
in
a
quasi
ditional
hearing
the
board's
required
by
law
to
make
findings
of
fact,
based
upon
the
evidence
presented
of
the
hearing
and
apply
those
findings
of
fact
to
previously
establish
criteria
contained
in
the
Code
of
Ordinances
in
order
to
make
a
legal
decision
regarding
application
before
it.
E
The
board
may
only
consider
evidence
at
this
hearing
that
the
law
considers
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
to
the
if
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates,
the
applicant
has
met
the
criteria
established
in
the
Code
of
Ordinances
and
the
board's
required
by
law
to
find
in
favor
of
the
apple.
By
the
same
token,
if
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates,
the
admin
has
failed
me,
the
criteria
establishing
the
Code
of
Ordinances
and
the
board's
required
by
law
defined
against
the
afternoon.
E
There
are
any
members
of
the
board
tonight
wishing
to
disclose
any
ex
parte
communication
or
conflict
event
if
you're
gonna
be
speaking
tonight.
If
you
could,
please
stand
to
be
sworn
in,
raise
your
right
hand.
You
swear
from
the
truth.
You
swear
affirm
the
testimony
about
to
get
tonight's,
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
by
the
mr.
Swann.
F
F
F
The
proposal
conforms
to
the
Industrial
Limited
and
industrial
restricted
districts,
there's
no
land
users.
Zoning
change
needed
the
site
plan
was
reviewed
by
the
TRC
on
April,
26
2018
and
those
some
notes
are
in
your
packet.
This
site
will
provide
for
or
comply
with
adequate
facilities,
requirements
of
the
code
and
comprehensive
plan
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
the
site
plan,
with
the
conditions
listed
on
pages
three
and
four
of
your
staff
report.
Just
in
summary,
the
developer
is
required
to
meet
the
code
and
to
obtain
any
necessary
permits
from
state
authorities.
F
The
developer
is
responsible
for
connecting
the
sidewalk
to
us.
19,
any
lighting
would
have
to
be
cut
off
lighting.
If
there's
any
lighting
that
is
going
to
be
installed
on
the
site
or
on
the
buildings
would
have
to
be
shielded
and
directed
away
from
the
adjacent
residential
areas.
Primarily
in
the
back
is
where
you
have
some
residential
and
then
the
stormwater
pond
will
need
to
comply
with
the
original
permit.
That's
just
an
assurance.
They
do
have
existing
stormwater.
F
This
was
a
site
that
is
accommodated
by
our
recent
code
and
code
change
where
we
have
impervious
over
previous
impervious.
All
this
requires
is
to
ensure
that
that
stormwater
pond
is
functioning
as
originally
permitted
and
that'll
be
done
at
some
building
permit
stage
and
and
CEO
stage,
and
then
the
applicant
has
indicated
that
they
will
pay
a
fee
in
lieu
for
public
art,
but
just
to
ensure
that
that
section
is
addressed
and
the
construction
plans
will
be
consistent
with
the
site
plan
and
a
site
plan
will
expire
in
one
year.
A
C
F
Specifically
and
and
the
applicant
can
probably
give
you
the
technical
details,
if
you
need
that
our
stormwater
review
staff
consultant
to
staff
wanted
to
ensure
that
the
the
pond
itself
has
the
capacity
as
it
was
originally
designed
to
hold
the
design
stormwater.
So
he
wanted
to
confirm
that
the
elevation
of
the
bank
is
as
originally
permit.
A
A
F
The
you
know
the
homes
are
back
behind,
basically
behind
the
the
existing
flammer
Ford
that
the
the
property
directly
behind
this
addition
is
really
kind
of
a
wetland,
drainage
area
yeah.
So
there's
that
there's
the
street
extension
that's
being
worked
on.
We
could
ask
the
applicant
as
far
as
specific
astana
lighting,
but
we
don't
anticipate
any
any
big
changes
with
the
any.
G
A
question
this
goes
back
to
the
storm
water
again
and
thank
you
for
reminding
us
that
it
was
just
at
our
last
meeting
that
we
made
that
accommodation
in
her
code.
So
currently,
this
parcel
is
completely
impervious,
except
for
the
stormwater
pond.
Today,.
G
F
One
giant
parking
lot,
but
that
also
provided
in
your
plan
set.
There
is
a
landscaping
plan
and
there
are
some
buffer
areas.
Some
parking
lot
landscaping
around
and
in
the
site
that
that's
provided,
but
it's
it's
mostly
paved.
It
does
does
meet
the
impervious
surface,
our
ratio
for
the
disparate
which
I'd
have
to
look
up.
G
G
There's
actually
been
a
calculation
or
an
evaluation
of
that
they're,
not
just
getting
a
pass
saying:
hey
we've
got
a
stormwater
in
place,
it's
a
big
parking
lot
now
someone's
actually
gone
and
done
the
calculations
and
the
existing
stormwater
system
is
designed
to
handle
exactly
what's
being
placed
on
there.
Yes,
thank
you.
D
H
H
As
far
as
the
last
question
with
the
impervious
area,
we
have
actually
reduced
the
total
impervious
by
almost
eight
and
square
feet,
so
the
original
stormwater
pond
was
constructed
to
accommodate
a
level
of
service
that
were
decreasing.
So
the
pond
is
built
to
accommodate
more
than
what
we're
proposing.
We
removed
a
portion
of
existing
parking
to
provide
a
landscape
buffer
along
the
north
side
of
Spruce
Street
and
then
providing
the
internal
landscape
islands,
as
required
with
the
new
code.
H
Trying
to
remember
what
the
previous
question
was.
I
think
the
other
one
was
regarding
the
stormwater
as
well,
and
then
the
lighting,
so
the
existing
parking
lot
is
not
expanding
any
further
to
the
west
toward
the
residential
homes.
There's
existing
lighting,
that's
on
site
now,
I,
don't
believe.
There's
any
proposed
changes
in
the
back
other
than
potentially
going
to
LED
lighting.
They
have
a
contract
with
Duke.
So
we're
not
going
to
be
adding
any
lighting
west
of
the
existing
lighting.
Now
the
only
change
would
be
to
possibly
modify
those
to
LED
lighting.
H
Any
of
the
the
major
changes
will
be
out
to
the
front
toward
19.
We
have
the
building
pushed
as
close
as
we
can
to
19
out
there's
a
Duke
Energy
easement
that
we
need
to
stay
out
of,
but
other
than
that,
where,
as
far
we're
as
far
west
as
we
can
be
up,
I
misspoke
earlier,
the
residences
are
to
the
east
I'm.
Sorry.
So
no
major
lighting
changes
to
the
east
of
the
project.
H
Will
be
larger
vehicles,
however,
the
amount
of
traffic
for
that
type
of
use
is
not
as
the
demand
isn't
as
high
or
the
uses
in
as
high
as
a
typical
car
sale
lot.
So
we
use
the
standard
ite
categories
for
commercial
vehicle
repair
and
vehicle
sales,
and
the
two
of
those
categories
fell
below
the
threshold
of
the
city's
requirement
for
a
traffic
study.
I
H
Yeah,
it
goes
okay,
it
does
go
all
the
way
connects
to
Jasmine,
so
there's
going
to
be
an
increase,
but
since
there
are
dual
businesses
on
both
sides
of
Street
Spruce
Street
we're
going
to
put
in
the
crosswalk
and
he's
going
to
have
the
flashing
pedestrian
signs
there.
So
there
will
be
a
button
to
accommodate
pedestrians
to
cross
and
it
will
be
more
than
just
the
typical
sign.
It
will
be.
The
lighted
sign
for
traffic,
so
I
think
that's.
That's
was
the
biggest
concern
as
any
potential
crossing
by
pedestrians.