►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Board July 16, 2018
Description
Description
A
B
D
E
B
F
F
The
law
considers
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
to
the
issues
if
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
of
the
applicant
has
met
the
criteria
established
in
the
Code
of
Ordinances
and
the
board's
required
by
law
to
find
in
favor
of
the
applicant.
By
the
same
token,
if
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates,
the
applicant
has
failed
to
meet
the
criteria
establishing
the
code
of
Orden
tsa's,
then
the
boar's
of
harbor
law
to
fight
against
the
applicant.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
board
tonight?
F
B
G
H
Nice
principal
plan
rule
this
is
a
application
for
rezoning
in
order
to
basically
provide
for
a
rezoning
ordinance
for
an
annexation
that
you've
already
reviewed
for
Frederick
and
either
Slater.
This
is
at
12:53,
North
Pinellas
and
the
ordinance
should
have
been
included
with
that
annexation.
It
was
not
so.
This
is
a
bit
of
a
cleanup
item,
but
just
a
young
review
of
this
ordinance.
H
B
H
H
H
This
report
fills
in
all
those
rezoning
standards
that
you
must
review
and
provides
for
the
ordinance.
This
item
would
provide
for
adoption
of
that
ordinance.
The
biggest
difference
and
you've
had
annexations
before
were
the
difference
in
zoning
doesn't
doesn't
warrant
doing
a
rezoning
ordinance.
Those
would
be
instances
where
the
city,
zoning
and
the
county
zoning
either
match
or
the
sitting
zoning
doesn't
quite
allow
for
as
much
as
the
county
zoning.
H
So
it's
the
impact,
isn't
there
in
this
case
the
biggest
difference
there,
both
residential
office
type
districts,
but
the
county
only
route
only
allows
single
a
single-family
residence
as
one
unit
accessory
to
office,
whereas
the
city's
district
is
a
true
mixed
office,
residential
type
district
that
allows
a
little
more
flex
of.
We
wanted
to
be
sure
that
the
applicant
was
was
protected,
with
an
ordinance
to
be
able
to
take
full
advantage
of
the
city.
Zoning
district.
B
B
A
B
B
H
H
The
t4c
district
requires
parking
to
be
accessed
from
rear
alleys,
but
this
alley
has
been
deemed
not
usable
by
the
city
and
so
not
available
pursuant
of
the
transect
code
standards.
So
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
use
the
front
of
the
property
for
the
driveway,
and
this
is
substantially
in
character
with
the
existing
homes
that
are
on
that
Street.
And
the
other
item
is
some:
the
side,
setbacks,
t4c
and
the
transit
code
in
this
case
wants
you
to
maximize
the
the
coverage
of
the
lot
with
respect
to
side
setbacks.
H
H
H
The
use
will
fit
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
and
will
not
adversely
affect
property
values
and
the
city
will
be
able
to
provide
facilities
for
this
use.
Staff
is
recommending
approval
resolution
20
1813,
with
the
condition
that
the
conditional
use
will
expire
within
one
year
of
approval.
If
a
building
permit
is
not
issued
for
the
property,
and
this
item
was
provided
with
proper
public
notice,
there
were
no
responses
received.
Are
there
any
question?
I
have.
B
Well,
200
feet:
I
just
find
that
is
I.
Think
people
should
have
further
access,
especially
in
recent
developments
in
a
historic
district
residents.
I
mean
200.
Feet
is
only
three
Lots
on
either
side,
sometimes
or
four
Lots
on
either
side
and
I.
Understand
that,
but
I'd
still
like
to
get
that
changed
a
little
bit
to
a
wider
area.
I,
don't
know
how
we
go
about
doing
that,
but
that
I'm
okay
with
this
on
this
case,
but
I
just
like
to
go
on
record.
B
H
The
sign
setbacks
in
this
district
call
for
a
maximum
setback
of
5
feet
for
single-family
I.
Think
that
something
staff
may
want
to
look
at
her
future
I'm,
not
sure
exactly.
We
did
try
to
research
the
basis
for
that
back
with
former
staff,
and
even
the
people
that
worked
on
this
transit
couldn't
come
up
with
anything
on
that,
but
the
transit
code
does
allow
some
adjustments
by
warrant
for
for
purposes.
You
know
like
tree
preservation.
The
proposed
setbacks
in
this
case
are
seven
and
a
half
feet
on
both
sides.
B
B
I
H
In
these
cases,
where
the
code
requires
that
you
use
the
alley,
we
do
go,
take
a
look
at
it
this
one.
We
had
two
properties
also
to
the
west
that
she
looked
at
that
are
on
the
same
alley
and
we
had
the
same
conclusion:
it's
partially
blocked
at
one
end
what
was
fully
blocked
at
one
end,
it
has
some
drainage
infrastructure,
the
other
end.
H
B
H
H
B
J
B
Would
certainly
like
to
make
a
request
that
they
review
that
200-feet
I
think
in
many
cases
you
know
when
you
only
have
four
lots,
there's
a
lot
of
things
like
in
historic
district,
for
example.
You
know
in
in
the
fruit
bowl
as
we
call
it.
There
was
recently
a
okay
to
build
a
two-story
garage
in
the
back.
It
just
doesn't
fit
in
the
neighborhood.
F
E
A
couple
questions
please,
and
the
first
one
would
be
a
bit
of
an
education.
It
seems
to
me
that
there
are
two
parts
of
this
application
that
seemed
natural,
which
is
the
abandonment
of
the
existing
Ally,
because
once
hypothetically
once
we
grant
one
parcel
the
abandonment,
the
abandonment
of
the
ally,
that
now
everyone
gets
to
abandon
the
ally
and
once
we
grant
the
abandonment
of
the
setbacks
to
the
side,
we're
also
granting
every
other
property
owner
the
abandonment
of
those
things.
E
My
concern
is:
it
appears
that
perhaps
the
zoning
or
planning
rules
that
were
established
for
this
particular
section
of
our
partial-
and
this
is
where
I
might
need
to
manage
implication,
weird,
so
that
it
was
a
higher
density
and
in
fact
it
required
the
use
of
said
ally
and
that.
Thus,
this
decision
to
grant
said
thing,
which
seems
perfectly
reasonable
right,
now,
might
set
in
motion
a
complete
change
in
how
these
properties
are
actually
supposed
to
be
used.
E
Perhaps
that,
although
a
single
family
was
seven
and
a
half
foot
setbacks
to
reserve,
the
trees
seems
like
a
terrific
idea
and
it's
unfortunate
that
the
ally
is
not
maintained.
Per
the
way
that
it
should
be
is
not
our
challenge
is
that
our
current
zoning
and
planning
needs
to
follow
why
these
rules
were
laid
out.
E
They
want
a
certain
higher
density
and
the
Ally
to
be
used
to
take
advantage
of
how
this
was
done
and
that
perhaps
we
are
revisiting
a
decision
that
was
already
made
and
as
soon
as
we
establish
this,
we've
established
precedent
for
the
rest
of
the
property
sure
that
an
undeveloped
just
my
thoughts.
Perhaps
you
can
give
me
some
more
insight
on
that.
H
With
respect
to
the
ally,
we
are
not
all
you
say:
the
abandonment
of
the
allottee,
the
Ally
is
not
being
bacod
and
we
have
required
rear
access
to
Ally
pursuant
to
the
transect
code,
when
the
ally
is
available,
that's
what
the
code
says.
Available
means
they've
got
to
be
able
to
get
in
and
out
emergency
vehicles.
All
those
things
have
to
be
able
to
get
in
and
out
and
get
into
that
driveway
if
they
need
to
right
now.
This
Ally
doesn't
accommodate
that.
H
Respect
to
those
setbacks
and
again
the
maintenance
would
be
if
this
were
an
improved,
paved
ally
then,
and
it
would
be
maintained
as
such,
but
it
was
never
improved
with
respect
to
the
setbacks.
I
mean
you're
right.
This
is
a
district
designed
or
that
that
wants
higher
density
right
right
now,
the
applicant
is
proposing
a
lower
density,
because
that's
what
what
he
can
do,
that's
what's
viable
for
his
property,
but
that's
why
it's
a
conditional
use.
H
So
the
applicant
is
on
notice
that
yes,
I
can
build
a
single-family
if
it's
approved
conditionally,
but
I
might
have
higher
densities
around
me.
On
the
other
hand,
the
district
is
on
notice,
like
you're,
saying
that
we
want
higher
density,
but
will
consider
this
single-family
home
as
a
conditional
use
if
we
think
it
meets
the
test.
So
that's
why
it
is
a
conditional
use
before
you
I.
H
E
E
H
In
this
alley,
so
there
the
the
access
would
be
from
Spruce
Street,
Sanford
Street
Pinellas
the
alley
right
now.
You
cannot
drive
from
from
Sanford
or
or
Pinellas
across
this
alley,
and
there
are
structures
and
drainage
where
the
alley
is
planted,
so
you
would
have
to
those
would
have
to
be
dealt
with.
H
E
F
F
B
Up
a
lot
more
questions,
though
I
mean,
but
the
city
owns
the
alley
and
the
city's
not
maintaining
it.
Is
that
correct
so
who?
Who
is
supposed
to
maintain
this
alleyway,
is
that
the
residents
I
mean
I'm
sure
these
people
would
like
to
have
a
driveway
or
something
or
a
garage
access
from
the
alleyway?
Why
has
the
city
allowed
this
these
alleyways
to
go
defunct
and
unusable?
H
You
know,
as
far
as
the
city's
program
on
proactively
I
mean
the
city
has
a
street
paving
program
right,
should
they
proactively
go
and
abandon
alleys
that
they
don't
think
they're
gonna
use
that
that's
that's
a
program
by
itself
this
code
and
your
land
development
code
requires
when
someone
builds
a
home
to
pave
the
street
or
pave
the
alley.
That's
how
the
city
gets
that
done.
B
B
E
Maskel,
so
it
seems
to
me
this
application
is
a
perfect
example
of
why
we
exist.
Is
that
there's
been
a
request
put
in
front
of
us?
That
brings
to
light
a
underlying
sleeping
issue
of
the
fact
that
we
have
these
alleyways,
whether
they're
needed
or
not
or
improved,
or
not,
in
this
case,
not
improved,
but
we're
about
to
grant
a
gift,
and
if
I
use
your
words
correctly.
Forgive
me
if
I
don't
that
the
purpose
of
the
application
is
so
that
someone
that
does
grant
such
a
request
may
in
fact
have
to
improve
said
alley.
E
H
Correct,
maybe
I
I
assumed
you
I
shouldn't
have
assumed,
but
yes,
it's
adjacent
to
their
property,
that's
the
portion
that
they
would
have
to
improve.
So
in
this
case,
or
in
any
case
along
to
sell
you,
death
pieces
of
pavement
and
you'd
still
have
to
resolve
the
issue
of
access
on
that
alley,
and
that's
that's
what
the
city
looks
at
when
they
go
to
evaluate
these
against
this
code.
E
The
spirit
of
pulling
it
just
all
together
and
being
the
last
time
that
I
speak.
So
thank
you
for
your
patience
and
I
understand
that
that
that
that
their
last
comment
is
that
I'm
not
concerned
whether
or
not
they
improve
the
alley
or
not.
That's
not
what
I'm
at
is
either
we
need
to
own
it
or
dissolve
it,
because
otherwise,
I'm
just
kind
of
a
long-term
thinker,
we're
gonna,
get
the
pleasure
of
dealing
with
this
for
every
home
within
this
entire
section.
Is
that
the
city
or
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Board?
J
I
Within
the
conditional
use,
application
is
there
in
a
nutshell,
I'm
gonna
see
the
back
up
presented
by
staff,
but
and
I
see
the
mention
in
the
alley
when
such
are
available,
but
within
this
conditional
use
application.
What
exactly
is
the
applicant
asking
for?
What
are
we
granting
him?
Is
there
anything
that
says
out
of
the
ordinary
were
not
requiring
him
to
use
the
alley?
I
mean.
What's
the
purpose
of
the
conditional
use
application
basically
to
allow
him
to
build
a
house?
Yes,.
H
I
Yes,
if
you
don't
want
it's
in
this
district,
it's
a
maximum,
so
it's
not
as
if
the
application
was
reversed
and
you
have
to
property
owners,
and
the
guy
says:
hey
I
want
to
build
it
into
my
setback
and
I
want
to
build
two
feet
from
my
neighbor's
house.
It's
he's
asked
there's
a
maximum
versus
a
minimum
which
minimums
are
generally
all
over
town,
so
you're
in
the
special
area,
Plan
C,
it's
a
it's
a
maximum.
I
K
B
E
E
B
Good
motion
passes
next
is
that
applicant
number
1857
conditional
use
approval
for
two
single-family
residences
in
84,
a
residential
high
transect
of
the
special
area
planned
district
located
on
the
north
side
of
East
Orange
Street
and
the
easily
and
westerly
portions
of
lot
for
block
63
tarpon
springs
official
map
in
the
tee
for
a
transect
code
district.
Does
the
staff
have
any
comments.
H
H
H
This
property
is
located
in
the
city's
National
Register
and
local
historic
districts
and
of
this
structure,
or
both
of
the
structures
proposed
were
reviewed
and
approved
by
the
city's
Heritage
Preservation
Board
for
compliance
with
those
historic
district
standards
in
January
and
the
uses
not
proposed
on
an
environmentally
sensitive
site.
It
basically
fits
the
character,
the
neighborhood
and
will
not
adversely
affect
property
values,
and
the
city
can
serve
this
site
with
public
facilities
and
just
further
on
the
character.
H
This
block
is
made
up
of
pretty
much
all
residential
you
season,
one
institutional
use,
some
single-family,
some
multifamily
on
this
block
staff,
recommends
approval
of
resolution,
2018
14
with
two
conditions.
The
conditional
use
will
expire
within
one
year
of
approve
off
a
building
permit.
It's
not
issued
and
a
site
plan
needs
to
be
submitted,
which
includes
the
landscaping
plan,
which
is
really
minimal
requirements
for
this
district
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
the
T
for
a
district,
and
this
application
was
properly
noticed,
and
there
were
no
comments
received.
B
B
H
I
E
Do
we
have
a
board
member
that
has
got
a
spouse
or
relative?
That
is
making
a
submission
to
the
board?
That's
I
could
be
wrong.
That
just
seems
a
little
bit
on
to
me.
So
I
guess
my
question
is
yes.
My
first
question
is:
is
that
a
member
and
then
second
to
our
council?
Is
that
create
an
issue
that
maybe
we
should
discuss.
E
B
I
E
E
I
G
I
B
B
J
We
ran
this
project
through
a
year
ago
and
it
was
approved
a
year
ago
and
due
to
my
stupidity,
I
did
not
get
the
permit
application
in
within
a
year
because
it's
stretched
out
a
little
bit
getting
the
historical
board's
approval
and
so
forth,
and
then
we
completed
the
plans
after
that.
So
when
we
went
in
to
get
the
permit,
the
one
year
had
expired
by
about
3
weeks,
so
they
requested
that
we
run
it
back
through.
J
J
B
G
B
F
E
B
E
So
if
we
were
to
have
a
proper
discussion
on
that
would
would
it
be
appropriate
to
ask
for
staff
to
present
perhaps
what
other
municipalities
or
research
on
on
on
what
is
or
not
appropriate
in
other
places.
That
way
we
have
something
to
work
off
of,
because,
if
you're
like
me,
I,
don't
know
that
I
think.
A
E
A
Would
be
an
excellent
starting
point,
I
think,
because
a
lot
of
other
people
have
already
been
through
it
and
it's
probably
not
a
simple
situation
where
we
say
200
feet
to
500
feet,
because
that
doesn't
fit
every
situation.
It
needs
to
be
a
situational
thing.
We're
very
minor
things,
probably
don't
need
to
be
noticed
any
more
than
than
what
they.