►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Board August 20, 2018
Description
Description
C
D
E
E
F
C
G
H
H
H
A
D
D
D
Do
you
swear
affirm
that
test
me
about
to
give
tonight
is
a
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but
the
truth
so
Swan.
This
is
a
quasi-judicial
proceeding
where
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Board
acts
in
a
quasi
to
show
up,
rather
than
a
legislative
capacity
at
a
quadrille
hearing,
and
is
not
the
board's
function
to
make
law,
but
rather
to
apply
law.
That's
already
established
in
a
quadrille
hearing.
D
The
board
is
required
by
law
to
make
findings
of
fact,
based
upon
the
evidence,
presented
the
hearing
and
apply
those
findings
of
fact
to
previously
establish
criteria
contained
in
the
code
of
audiences
in
order
to
make
a
legal
decision
regarding
the
application
before
it.
The
Board
may
only
consider
evidence
at
this
hearing
that
the
law
considers
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
to
the
issues.
D
If
the
competent,
substantial,
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrate
to
the
applicant
has
met
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
oranges
and
the
bores
are
parted
by
law
to
find
in
favor
of
the
applicant.
By
the
same
token,
if
the
Comba
did
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
of
the
hearing
demonstrates,
the
applicant
has
failed
to
meet
the
criteria.
Establishing
the
code
of
orang
TSA's
and
the
boards
of
crabber
law
to
find
against
the
applicant
there
any
members
of
the
board
tonight
we
shouldn't
disclose
any
expert
that
communication
or
conflict.
A
You
all
right
next
on
our
list
is
application
number
1869,
rezoning
of
epoxy
of
approximately
0.628
acres
located
at
Lucille
Drive,
including
plus
four
five
and
six
Ferguson's
Cedar
bluffs
Edition
from
our
one
hundred
single-family
residential
district
to
our
one
hundred
a
signal
single-family
residential
district.
Thank
you
thank.
I
You
nice
principal
planner.
This
is
a
request
for
rezoning
for
approximately
0.68
acres
of
a
real
property
located
on
the
corner
of
Lucille
Drive
and
West
Bayshore
Drive
from
our
100
to
our
100.
A
both
titled
single-family
residential,
the
applicant
is
Anita
produce
the
future
land
use
designation
for
this
parcel
is
residential
low.
I
I
I
With
respect
to
your
review
criteria,
the
r100,
a
single-family
district
permits
the
maximum
densities
intensities
and
uses
that
are
consistent
with
the
residential
low
future
land-use
category,
and
it
is
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan,
basically,
the
allowable
uses
for
our
100
and
our
100
a
match
they're
exactly
the
same,
so
the
available
uses
for
this
property
are
appropriate.
Based
on
that
with
respect
to
item
three,
the
city
has
planned
for
and
maintain
sufficient
facilities
for
this
subdivision
for
build-out
of
single-family
homes
in
this
area.
I
I
I
I
I
A
I
Again,
the
applicant
can
answer
that,
but
under
their
compliance
with
standards
item
two
there
is
an
estimated
size
for
each
of
the
each
of
the
Lots
lot
for
is
estimated
at
ten
thousand
four
hundred
and
eighty
square
feet
about
five
at
ninety:
nine
thousand
five
hundred
and
three
square
feet
and
lot
six
at
9594
square
feet.
So.
I
A
E
So
the
review
by
I
believe
your
office
number
one
states.
The
amendment
is
consistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies.
The
city
of
serpents
brings
comprehensive
plan.
That
being
said,
on
the
first
page,
the
background
page,
if
I
may,
the
countrywide
land
use
designation
is
residential,
low,
medium
rlm
in
the
city's
future
land
use
designation
is
residential,
low
RL,
the
immediate
and
extended
surrounding
area
is
located
in
the
area.
I
Residential
low
is
up
to
five
units
per
acre,
and
this
plat,
this
area
of
developed
single-family
complies
with
that
density.
That's
zero
to
five
units
per
acre
is
the
allow
is
basically
the
density
for
residential
low
and
for
the
county,
hard
residential,
low,
medium
and
Serie
complies
with
with
that
density.
So.
D
J
I
A
K
Good
evening,
mr.
chairman
and
members
of
the
Planning
Commission,
my
name
is
Cindy
tera
panty
at
22,
North
Spring,
Boulevard
I,
represent
miss
proto's,
who
is
the
applicant
I'm
passing
out
I
think
this
will
answer
a
bunch
of
your
questions
and
then
I'll
have
a
few
more
comments
on
the
plaque
called
Ferguson's
Cedar
bluffs
edition
was
plaited
in
1958,
and
a
copy
of
that
is
what
I'm
passing
out
to
you
today.
So
there
is
as
Miss
McNeese
stated,
it
is
under
one
parcel
ID,
but
there
are
three
plaited
Lots.
K
So
when
everyone
gets
one
I'll
walk
you
through
exactly
how
they're
laid
out.
If
you
look
at
let's
first
start
with
this,
the
Lots
one
two
and
three
on
the
east
side
of
Bay
Shore,
Lots,
two
and
three
are
where
mrs.
produce
existing
home
is
they're,
not
included
in
this
application
lot.
One
at
the
corner
is
also
not
part
of
this
application.
It
is
a
single
lot
of
record
and
the
city
has
already
given
a
non-conforming
a
lot
of
record,
so
that
could
be
built
on
separately
as
a
plaited
lot.
K
K
Four,
which
is
the
southernmost
lot,
is
ten
thousand
four
hundred
eighty
square
feet
lot.
Five,
the
middle
one
is
ninety
five
hundred
square
feet
in
lot.
Six
is
ninety
five
hundred
square
feet
also
also
to
answer
our
miss
the
Chairman's
questions,
starting
from
the
north
with
lot
six,
it's
a
hundred
and
six
feet
deep,
a
lot
fives
121
feet
deep
and
a
lot
for
as
137
feet.
Deep.
You
can
see,
obviously,
by
the
geometry
they
get
a
little
larger,
Lots,
four
and
five,
or
about
78
feet
of
frontage
on
the
road
lot.
K
The
difference
between
the
edger
staff
has
said
in
your
staff
report,
the
only
difference
between
our
100
and
our
100,
a
there's
two
differences.
Actually
one
is
the
lot
size
in
our
100,
which
we
are
today.
It's
10,000
square
feet
in
our
100,
a
it's
7,000
square
feet.
So
each
lot
would
clearly
meet
that
and
be
greatly
over
that.
Obviously,
the
other
difference
is
to
the
rear
yard
setback
in
our
100.
It's
35
feet,
30
feet
and
in
our
100
a
it's
25
feet
the
front
setbacks.
K
K
Additionally,
I'll
call
your
attention
in
your
staff
report.
The
very
last
map
in
your
staff
report
shows
our
one
hundred
area
and
it's
one
of
the
yellow
maps.
It's
the
very
last
map,
but
in
your
staff
report
it
shows
the
are
one
hundred
a
area
to
the
south.
The
large
area,
which
is
one
lot
off
our
property,
miss
protocell,
is
the
Bayshore
Heights
and
that
was
approved
in
nineteen.
Excuse
me,
two
thousand
four
or
five
I
believe
no
more
recently
2014
scuse
me
for
a
similar
situation.
There
were
platted
Lots.
K
But
anyway,
the
way
that
they
were
able
to
achieve
that
and
to
redevelop
that
site
from
a
vacant
piece
of
property
into
buildable
Lots
in
some
very
a
very
nice
neighborhood,
was
to
do
the
r108,
so
we're
merely
asking
for
the
same
request
as
the
Bayshore
heights,
and
it
exists
right
in
the
immediate
neighborhood.
It's
clearly
consistent
with
the
comp
plan,
as
your
staff
has
pointed
out,
it's
consistent
with
the
criteria
for
rezoning
same
exact
uses
all
the
dimensional
requirements
save
for
the
rear
setback
are
the
same.
K
And
finally,
we
just
ask
that
that
we
get
the
fair
treatment
to
the
property
owner.
They
bought
them
as
three
plat.
Well,
six
plaited
Lots,
originally
at
the
three
that
we're
talking
about
today,
they
bottom
is
three
planted.
Lots
just
want
the
ability
to
develop
and
sell
them
as
three
individual
Lots
same
as
what
they
what
they
thought
they
had
when
they
purchased
them
between
the
time
they
purchased
them.
The
city's
rules
on
non-conforming
Lots
changed
and
therefore
that's.
Why
we're
here
today
so
I?
That's
all
I
really
had
to
say
about
it.
J
Subdivision
in
that
doesn't
drain
to
anywhere
it
drains
from
essentially
I'm
mrs.
proptosis
side
to
my
side
of
the
property
it
does
it's
not
connected
to
their
drainage
system.
It
was
a
stupid
thing
to
do,
but
Swift
mud
said
that
they
were
supposed
to
put
it
in
there
so
that
they
didn't
affect
the
road
didn't
affect
the
natural
drainage
of
the
area.
J
Fine,
it's
but
anyway,
the
point
being.
That
was
fine
when
it
was
all
dirt
on
both
sides
of
the
property.
So
it
was
an
all
pervious
surface,
so
the
water
essentially
went
in
the
ground,
so
it
really
was
kind
of
a
moot
point.
We
do
get
water
in
that
culvert,
but
it
doesn't
really
cause
much
of
a
problem.
The
problem
that
I
have
is,
and
I
want
to
once
again
stress.
J
I,
don't
object
to
the
rezoning
is
that
that
the
houses
that
they
put
in
there
need
to
be
required
to
drain
onto
the
street
and
go
into
their
drainage
system,
not
all
drain
down
into
that
culvert
and
drain
into
my
property,
which
is
the
low
side
of
it,
because
we
never
have
any
water
problems
now,
but
we
will,
if
you
cover
with
impervious
surface,
seventy
percent
of
the
surface
area
there
you're
going
to
put
five
houses
essentially
across
the
street
from
us.
Mrs.
J
protists
only
has
four
of
those
Lots,
but
there's
another
lot
on
the
end
down
there.
So
what
I
ask
is
that
the
city
require
whoever
builds
their
that
they
drain
their
water
onto
the
street
into
that
collection
system
and
hopefully
close
that
culvert,
which
is
no
longer
serves
the
purpose
it
was
put
there
and
that's
really
the
reason
that
I'm
here.
C
G
G
G
J
In
the
bottom
of
that
culvert
so
that
the
water
wouldn't
sit
in
there
and
fill
with
mosquitoes,
they
did
drill
a
couple
of
holes
and
over
time
it
does
drain
into
there
the
ground.
The
problem
is
that
it's
there's
really
no
water
flowing
in
that
area
anywhere,
so
the
water
that
goes
in
that
culvert
essentially
falls
through
the
grates
and
there
rain
storms.
J
E
Pleased
I
forgot
your
name.
Forgive
me
Harry
and
drop
was
Harry
entropolis.
Thank
you
so
much
for
coming
and
chatting
with
us
tonight,
because
I
think
you
bring
up
a
great
point,
which
is
that
development
is
good,
but
responsible
development
is
even
better.
Now
Harry,
you
brought
up
a
very
critical
point
about
the
threat
of
flooding.
E
Let's
cut
the
brass
tacks:
what
happens
if
those
three
houses
are
built
and
it
doesn't
drain
to
the
street
or
it
doesn't
connect
or
that
culvert
isn't
build
in?
We
don't
have
the
power
to
go.
Okay,
we're
gonna,
prove
that,
but
we're
only
gonna
prove
it
if
we
get
XY
and
Z
and
you're
hoping
that
in
the
future
in
I,
don't
know
how
lucky
you
are,
but
I'm,
not
that
lucky
in
that
that
the
worst
case
scenario
happens
sometimes
well.
J
M
G
J
E
G
C
J
A
L
L
You
know
I'm.
Sorry,
we
ever
developed
all
that
acreage
back
there.
The
city
left,
hoping
it
would
stay
woods,
but
as
life
goes
on,
we
know
that's
not
gonna
happen
and
I
just
want
to
get
my
property
situated
like
the
other
Lots
and
maybe
I'll
sell
them.
Maybe
I
want
I,
don't
know
what's
gonna
happen,
but
I
wanted
to
come
back
to
the
planning
and
zoning,
because
when
I
was
mayor,
I
left
it
alone.
Cuz
I
didn't
want
controversy
because
it
was
me
as
mayor
and
fight
the
zoning
at
that
time.
L
I
thought
it
was
best
just
let
it
go.
The
development
came
in
and
everything's
changed.
Everything
has
and
like
I
said,
none
of
us
have
lighted.
None
of
the
new
homes
are
flooded,
it
ponds,
Harry's
the
lowest
point,
but
whoever
builds
there's
gonna
have
to
do
some
a
little
bit
of
fill
in
there.
All
homes
do
in
Florida
and
then
it
just
percolates
and
it
goes
back
into
the
ground.
So
you'll
know
that.
Thank.
K
I'll
be
very
brief,
again
Cindy
Tara
pani
for
mrs.
Prentiss,
the
applicant.
The
problem
with
the
culvert
is
not
mrs.
produce
issue
the
problem
with
the
culvert,
if
there's
a
code
enforcement
violations
or
if
it
needs
to
be
that
needs
to
be
handled
separately
with
all
due
respect.
However,
the
city
requires
these
three
Lots
to
be
graded.
If
they
grade
them
to
the
street,
that's
required,
then
that's
what
you
know
the
developer
will
do,
but
I
just
want
to
kind
of
separate
that
issue
that
that
culvert
issue
is
something
that
was
created
by
those
Lots.
K
K
K
M
K
M
A
K
A
Anyone
else
like
to
speak.
Rebuttals
all
right
and
I'd
like
to
close
this
to
public
comment
and
open
it
to
the
group
here.
I
want
to
remind
us
that
you
know
the
culvert,
like
mrs.
Terra
penny
said,
is
really
not
up
to
us
at
the
Planning
and
Zoning.
What
it
is
we
need
to
decide
if
it
is
acceptable
to
do
our
100
a
or
not,
if
and
as
she
pointed
out,
mrs.
A
Terra
pani,
that
the
city
would
have
to
address
the
drainage
I
think
it's
a
concern
of
all
of
us
in
Tarpon
who
I
don't
know
about
you
guys
my
house
sits
at
6
foot,
so
flooding
is
always
an
issue
for
me,
but
we're
here
strictly
to
say:
if
this
is
something
we
want
to
go
for
our
100
a
or
leave
it
as
it
is.
So
any
questions
with
anyone
here.
Any
concerns
I
have.
E
I
I
E
A
Happen
to
have
a
house
in
the
fruit
bowl
on
three
Lots
and
a
corner
lot.
So
when
I
first
bought
my
house,
it
was
on
one
lot
and
then
a
the
lot
next
door
to
me
came
available,
though
I
bought
that
and
then
the
next
lot
I'm
available.
So
now,
I
have
a
and
they're
50
foot
lot,
so
I
bought
I
have
a
hundred
feet.
So
my
house
now
entails
100
foot
so
two
Lots,
but
I'm,
probably
going
to
rezone
it
to
get
one
lot
again.
A
H
And
just
to
kind
of
point
with
that
and
follow
me.
So
if,
when
mrs.
proto's
purchased,
the
properties
back
in
1985,
I
think
it
was
if,
at
the
time
she
decided
to
build
three
houses
there
based
on
the
rules,
then
with
the
non-conforming
Lots,
we
wouldn't
even
be
having
obviously
any
discussion
today
that
accurate
it's
only
because
she
chose
at
the
time
to
not
develop
those
three
Lots
yeah.
I
I
and
this
mrs.
proto
scan
I'm
sure
answer.
This
I
only
saw
one
deed
on
the
property
record,
it
appeared
to
me
that
she
bought
the
three
already
combined,
whether
she
did
or
not.
If
they
were
three
separate
Lots
in
1985.
To
the
best
of
my
knowledge,
the
are
100
are
100
oz,
owning
district
was
in
effect
in
some
form.
I
If
they
were
separate
thoughts,
they
would
have
to
be
separated
back
or
she
could
do
two
together
in
one
separate
or
anything
like
that
good
example
when
an
owner
wants
to
build
on
two
lots
and
they
put
the
house
one
of
the
two
Lots
next
to
each
other,
and
they
want
to
put
a
house
on
the
middle.
We
do
require
a
unity,
a
title
on
the
two
Lots
we
don't
allow
them
to
stay
as
separate
lies.
I
I
I
H
C
H
A
E
H
I
I
would
just
note
that
in
your
minutes
we
did
have
that
we
would
that
there
could
be
a
discussion
item
on
the
noticing
requirements
that
you
wanted
to
talk
about.
If
you
want
to
do
any
discussion
on
that
this
evening,
I'm
prepared
to
give
you
a
little
bit
information.
If
not,
we
can
do
it
a
future
time.
I
I
I
Basically,
I
can
I
can
give
you
a
little
bit
of
information
on
where
we
are
with
land
development
code
changes
that
I
couldn't
really
talk
about
last
time
the
staff
is
reviewing
the
entire
land
development
code.
We
do
have
an
item
in
the
city's
draft
or
requested
budget
for
the
2019
fiscal
year
to
update
portions
of
the
land
development
code
that
needed.
This
would
be
something
that
could
be
on
that
list
and
could
be
reviewed
under
that
project.
I
I
Specificity
on,
if
there
is
some
particular
thing
items
that
you're
concerned
with
types
of
applications
with
respect
to,
if
it
was
just
the
distance
requirements
and
and
what
exactly
you're
concerned
with
and
what
you
would
like
to
see.
But
we'd
like
to
fold
that
under
the
hat
Laem
development
code
rewrite
project
assuming
it
stays
in
a
budget
and
it's
funded.
If
it
doesn't,
then
we
could
still
proceed
this
board.
One
of
the
duties
of
this
board
is
to
recommend
changes
to
the
code.
A
So
it's
one
street
away
from
me,
but
I'm
beyond
the
200
feet,
so
I
wasn't
notified
and
there
are
several
other
people
in
the
neighborhood
that
are
really
upset
that
you
know
what
kind
of
protections
do
we
have
as
a
historic
district
just
one
example
of
it
and
I've
been
on
this
board
a
few
times
when
people
in
other
neighborhoods
have
said.
We
didn't
know
that
was
happening.
Why
didn't
white?
A
Why
weren't,
we
noticed
200
feet
is
only
what
two
three
four
houses
on
either
side
of
you
and
when
you're
talking
about
a
historic
district
I
mean
there's
a
lot
of
protection
there,
and
it
just
goes
away
this.
In
this
particular
case.
The
roofs
is
really
interesting.
The
historic
district
agreed
that
they
could
build
this
two-story
garage
at
eighteen
point
five
feet
and
the
city
said:
oh
no,
you
can
do
twenty
point.
Five,
so
who
is
controlling
this
and
I?
A
Think
if
more
people
were
involved
in
a
notification
that
hey
this
thing
is
going
up
in
your
neighborhood
and
it
doesn't
really
conform
with
our
historic
district.
There
would
have
been
a
lot
more
people
say
so
so
I
I've
really
been
pushing
this
at
least
500
feet.
I
want
someone
said
well,
let's
just
anybody
in
a
historic
district
should
be
notified.
Well,
I
think
that
that
gets
out
of
hand,
then
I,
don't
think
anything
will
go,
but
I
think
500
feet
would
be
more
appropriate
at
least
there's
a
lot
more
people
in
that
immediate
area.
A
There's
going
to
notice
this
property
being
built
up
or
whatever
the
changes
are,
so
whatever
we
can
do
to
get
that
going.
I
know
a
lot
of
people
have
already
written
to
the
commissioners
and
asked
for
a
voice
on
there
to
talk
about
this
and
what's
going
on
in
the
neighborhood,
so
I
figure
that
at
least
500
beetle
at
least
help
in
that
respect.
So
whatever
we
need
to
do
to
that,
I
would
appreciate
it.
A
So
yes,
so
if
you're
201,
you
didn't
get
a
note,
so
you
know
I
just
think
that
it
needs
to
be
a
little
bit
broader
if
you're
talking
about
an
entire
neighborhood.
Just
like
we've
been
talking
tonight
about
this
piece
of
property.
Here
I
mean
it
affects
a
lot
of
people
and,
and
you
think
about
it,
only
200
feet
200
feet
around
this
piece
of
property.
People
were
notified
about
it,
so
whatever
we
need
to
do
with
that,
I
would
like
to
see
that
proceeded
I.
F
I
Actually
so
it's
200
feet
and
that
this
is
codified.
Most
of
these
four
by
application
type
HPB
is
in
a
separate
section
of
the
code
for
heritage
preservation,
board
items
and
then
the
rest
are
back
in
the
administrative
items
and
it's
basically,
you
take
the
piece
of
land
that
the
owner
owns,
no
matter
where
they're
doing
a
project
on
that
land.
You
take
that
perimeter
and
go
200
feet
from
that,
so
it
would
have
been
her
entire
parcel
200
feet,
circumference
from
the
edge
of
that
entire
parcel
I'm.
F
I
F
C
M
H
In
this,
this
is
not
a
new
issue
either.
That's
you
know,
I
mean
this
has
come
for
the
City
Commission
a
few
times
of
questions
about
this
for
years.
So
I
I
would
fully
support
our
board,
whatever
we
can
do
to
make
some
kind
of
action,
not
just
for
necessarily
for
the
historic
district,
but
just
in
general,
just
kind
of
makes
more
sense
to
me
all.
C
C
A
I
I
E
D
E
Perhaps
that
might
make
it
a
little
bit
more
official
that
that
flag
in
the
ground,
so
if
even
if
it
wasn't
necessary,
I'd
make
a
motion
that
we
followed
the
recommendations
of
our
chairman
and
that
we
recommend
it
from
some
point
forward
that
a
notice
of
500
feet
is
given
for
proposal.
Land
use
changes
the
verbage
be
perfect
on
that,
but
I
think
the
concept
is.
A
I
And
I
think
staff
is
is
something
anytime.
We
have
a
change
to
the
code.
Obviously
we
have
to
analyze
a
change,
for
you
know
against
against
top
planning
standards,
there's
cost
to
applicants
things
that
I'm
sure
that
you
would
want
the
full
information
to
look
at
before
a
final
decision
is
made
and,
of
course
you
all
will
make
a
recommendation
to
the
board
on
any
lane
evelopment
code,
so
staff
would
ask
for
a
little
bit
of
leeway
to
have
time
to
research,
especially
since
you're
asking
for
all
of
them.
Mailed.
I
Let
me
clarify
mail
notices,
not
the
posting
or
the
glance
correct,
we're
just
talking
about
the
distance
for
mail
notices
and
the
intent
of
that
I
mean
I
didn't
really
want
to
get
into.
It
is
really
we
can
research
other
jurisdictions
as
well.
That's
the
part
that
lets
the
people
really
immediately
around
the
property
know
what's
happening
because
of
the
direct
impacts.
The
advertisement
and
the
posting
is
the
thing
that
lets
the
general
neighborhood
know.
L
I
H
I
Thing
is
when
you
guys
get
your
packet.
That
agenda
is
on
the
website
that
that,
like
you
know,
half
an
hour
later,
very
quick
with
that.
That's
one
nice
thing
at
our
last
historic
district.
It
was
discussed
and
that's
that's
a
that's
a
small
area
right,
that's
kind
of
manageable
in
comparison
at
the
rest
of
the
city.
I
So
if
you
live
that
her,
if
I
live
there,
I
would
check
the
agenda
the
first
Friday
of
the
month
to
see
what's
on,
you
know,
on
the
website,
I
mean
that
is
a
good
way
for
the
public
to
check
and
see.
What's
in
my
neighborhood
in
case
they
miss
a
postcard
or
a
sign
which
in
that
case
they
don't
have
the
benefit
of
the
saying
so.
But
these
are
the
kinds
of
things.
A
F
Question
when
you
do
your
research
with
the
other
cities,
do
you
think
that
you
can
see
if
anyone
has
any
kind
of
electronic
notification
that
they
do
and
just
to
kind
of
cut
down
on
well
postage
or
paper
and
mailing?
If
there
is
anything
like
if
I
was
a
concerned,
homeowner
and
I
wanted
to
sign
up
for
the
notifications.