![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/8dNVf51PiTs/mqdefault.jpg)
►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Board November 16, 2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
C
B
I
think
she
said
to
the.
B
C
C
G
D
A
Us
to
item
two,
the
approval
of
minutes
from
october
19
2020..
Do
I
hear
a
motion.
G
A
Second,
can
we
have
a
roll
call.
H
H
A
I
This
is
a
constitutional
proceeding
where
the
planning
and
zoning
board
acts
in
a
quasi-judicial
rather
than
a
legislative
capacity
at
a
quasi-judicial
hearing.
It
is
not
the
board's
function
to
make
law,
but
rather
to
apply
law
that
has
already
been
established
in
a
quasi-judicial
hearing.
The
board
is
required
by
law
to
make
findings
of
fact,
based
upon
the
evidence
presented
at
the
hearing
and
apply
those
findings
of
fact
to
previously
established
criteria
contained
in
the
code
of
ordinances
in
order
to
make
a
legal
decision
regarding
the
application
before
it.
I
The
board
may
only
consider
evidence
at
this
hearing
that
the
law
considers
confidence
substantial
and
relevant
to
the
issues.
If
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
met
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
defined
in
favor
of
the
applicant.
I
By
the
same
token,
if
the
competent,
substantial
and
relevant
evidence
at
the
hearing
demonstrates
that
the
applicant
has
failed
to
meet
the
criteria
established
in
the
code
of
ordinance,
then
the
board
is
required
by
law
to
find
against
the
applicant.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
board
wishing
to
disclose
any
ex
parte
communications
or
conflicts
of
interest
this
evening.
A
I
do
have
a
question
on
the
one
the
the
the
rezoning
related
to
include
isles.
I
do
reside
in
that
neighborhood
do
do.
I
need
to
recuse
for
that
item.
I
And
do
you
stand
to
benefit
either
financially
or
in
some
way
from
the
approval
or
denial
of
the
application
either
way.
I
Okay,
then
no
I
mean
we
we've
been
through
this
before
so
no,
but
it's
on
the
record
at
least
now
so,
okay,
but
no,
I
don't
think
that
is
to
be
a
conflict
of
interest
underneath
the
voting
conflicts.
I
A
C
C
C
Since
there
aren't
very
many
people
here,
I
think
your
seating
is
fine.
Just
know
that
10
sorry
6
feet
is
3
seats
if
you're
trying
to
social
distance
or
if
you're
in
groups,
that's
fine,
too
restrooms.
Obviously,
on
the
first
floor
of
city
hall,
please
confine
your
movements
to
the
auditorium
and
the
restrooms,
and
going
in
and
out
of
city
hall.
C
Thank
you
for
that,
and
our
first
item
is
application
18128..
This
is
coming
back
before
you
as
a
a
site
plan
modification.
C
C
This
is
a
site
plan
for
a
medical
office
that
was
approved
by
the
board
of
commissioners
in
may,
and
one
of
the
conditions
of
approval
was
that
the
applicant
provide
documentation
that
the
site
plan
permanent
impacts
to
wetlands
match
that
of
the
approved
permit
from
the
southwest
florida.
Water
management
district.
C
C
Basically,
the
plan.
The
shift
in
the
plan
is
about
a
five
foot
shift
to
the
east,
of
the
entire
area
of
phil
and
and
of
the
drainage
pond.
So
the
differences
you'll
see
will
be
the
driveway
cut
to
mirrors.
Boulevard
is
now
25
feet
wide
rather
than
30
feet.
Well,
that's!
That's!
Probably
the
biggest
difference
and
the
storm
water
pond
has
shifted
to
the
east.
C
C
Additional
condition
to
this
new
resolution
just
ensuring
that
the
site,
when
the
site
plan
comes
in
that
the
driveway
is
properly
marked
and
controlled
according
to
whatever
pinellas
county,
approves,
whether
that's
a
write-in
write-out,
sorry
a
write-out
only
or
whether
a
left
turn
can
be
made
out
of
the
site.
There.
C
And
I
think
that
is
it.
We
do
have
the
applicant
here.
If
you
would
like
to
hear
an
applicant
presentation-
oh
just
one
matter
of
housekeeping
on
this
one
we
are,
we
will
be
asking
the
board
when
this
goes
forward
to
repeal
the
existing
resolution
and
adopt
the
new
resolution
that's
kind
of
legally
how
we
have
to
handle
it.
A
J
B
Pat,
can
you
just
show
us
what
was
approved
in
back?
What
was
it
may
and
then
what's
being
changed
now,
because
I'm
looking
at,
I
quite
don't
understand
it
on
on
the
these
site
plans.
Can
you
show
us
up
on
the.
B
C
C
C
On
the
new
plan,
you
have
a
25-foot
driveway
on
the
south
side,
going
to
mirrors
same
storm
water
pond.
The
dumpster
is
a
little
closer
to
the
pond,
but
the
shift
doesn't
affect
the
layout
of
the
parking
or
the
driveways
or
any
of
that
and
a
24
foot
wide
driveway
is
sufficient
by
our
code.
Obviously,
the
applicant
will
need
approval
from
pinellas
county
for
that
drive.
For
that
connection,.
B
C
The
the
original
wetland
permit,
which
is
in
your
path,
was
in
your
packet,
was
issued
for
0.99
acres
of
permanent
wetland
impacts,
so
those
wetlands
would
be
filled.
Those
have
been
mitigated.
The
mitigation
has
been
completed
and
is
currently
being
monitored.
C
C
E
Yes,
sir
good
evening,
jd
elsa
park,
sycamore
engineering,
8370,
west
hillsboro,
avenue
suite
205,
denver
florida,
three,
three
six
one
five
and
I
already
sworn
as
mentioned
by
the
staff
report.
That's
really
the
minimus.
It
changed
from
previously
approved
site
plan
and
most
likely,
as
you
notice
and,
and
you
know,
clarify
that
it's
only
strip
of
a
green
area
on
the
west
side
had
been
eliminated
mostly.
E
So
it's
really
minor
change,
but
to
be
sure
we
came
back
and
with
the
process
to
be
sure,
this
is
approved
and
blessed
by
everybody.
So
I
want
to
bring
to
your
attention
kindly
that's
approval,
which
is
the
same
as
before.
To
this
construction
plan
is
consists
of
two
phases:
phase,
one
which
is
the
clearance
to
the
site
and,
of
course,
remove
the
mug
and
clay
from
the
wetland
area
and
later
add
the
fill
for
that
and
stabilize
the
fill.
E
That's
the
first
one,
which
will
be
after
the
which
will
be
after
the
approval
from
the
bocc.
The
second
phase
will
be
later
on
when
of
course
get
approval
to
the
construction
plan
and
do
the
site
work
and
construction
to
the
building,
so
that
which
is
shown
clearly
in
the
set
of
plan.
You
see
as
phase
one
and
phase
two,
nothing
to
add,
except
if
you
have
any
other
question.
G
Applicant,
I
do
michael
cascudas,
I
I
guess
your
intent
is
for
class
a
medical
office
space.
E
G
I
A
Seeing
none,
I
guess,
do:
do
we
have
any
email
or
mail
comments
related
to
the
project.
C
D
I
Okay,
so
then,
to
answer
your
question,
you
would
either
move
to
approve
application
18-128,
which
repeals
resolution
2020-08
and
approves
resolution
2020-78.
B
With
the
conditions,
as
cited.
A
H
A
F
A
C
C
Yes,
this
is
the
proposed
pincha
penny
on
alternate
19
this
site.
Some
of
you
may
be
familiar
with.
This
was
a
previously
occupied
site
at
914,
south
pinellas.
C
T5A
transect
the
special
area
plan,
and
this
is
actually
right
across
the
street
from
the
one
we
just
talked
about,
so
it
fronts
on
south
pinellas
and
the
side
street.
There
is
apricot
court.
So
that's
right
there,
across
from
manatee,
plaza
and
just
south
of
the
ace
hardware,
is.
C
I
believe
it
was
a
yeah,
I
think
it
may
have
been
a
gas
station.
It
was
also
a
real
retail
shop
there
as
well.
I
believe
it
burned
down
and
was
demolished,
so
the
site
itself
is
actually
a
lot
of.
It
is
asphalt
on
the
site
and
the
applicant
is
proposing
a
3460
square
foot,
retail
building
with
parking
oops.
C
C
There
is
also
pedestrian
access
from
south
pinellas
avenue
and
really
you've
got
the
store
area
and
then,
as
those
of
you
with
a
pool
now
they
need
an
area
to
store
their
tanks
for
their
glory
and
those
types
of
things
that
would
be
down
in
this
area.
C
This
isn't
a
flood
zone,
so
it
is
a
bit
challenging
as
far
as
some
the
elevation
so
we'll
show
you
those
elevations
in
a
minute,
but
that's
what
well
there
they
are
that's
what
the
steps
in
the
front
and
the
ramp
in
the
back
is
kind
of
all
about
is
getting
that
building
up
to
elevation.
C
The
project
does
meet
the
t5a
standards
with
respect
to
the
building
placement
form
function,
obviously
parking
and
landscaping.
The
only
item
it
does
not
meet
is
what's
called
clear
glazing
for
the
frontage.
Your
transact
code
calls
for
a
70
percent
on
like
a
shop
front
or
storefront.
C
We
are
suggesting
that
this
standard
be
allowed
to
be
waived
or
reduced,
based
on
the
fact
that
a
good
portion
of
that
front
is
really
above
eye
level
because
of
the
elevation
of
the
building.
If
you
look
to
the
left
there
on
the
building
frontage,
that's
where
the
tanks
are
being
stored,
that
area
does
meet
the
70
windows
storefront
type
of
standard,
but
the
other
part
doesn't
quite
need
it,
but
staff
feels
that
it
it.
C
G
My
concern
is
when
we
have
a
super
high
tide,
you
said
tanks
being
stored
and
I
would
imagine
with
they
would
be
stored
with
pool
chemicals
on
a
very
high
tide.
Believe
it
or
not,
the
alternate
19
does
flood,
and
my
concern
is
that,
whatever
I
don't
know,
if
that's
a
condition,
is
that
whatever
takes
are
in
there,
whatever
chemicals
that
are
stored,
be
at
a
point
or
or
contain
to
such
that
any
flooding
they
would
be
protected
because
of
saltwater
erosion
or
corrosion
of
any
tanks?
C
That
has
been
addressed,
the
standards
for
flooding
and
also
the
standards
for
fire
and
for
any
failure,
the
tanks
themselves
or
the
fire
marshal
and
building
officials
were
satisfied
with
with
those
standards.
G
Just
by
concern
because,
like
I
said,
we
have
on
severe
high
tides,
the
alternate
nineteen
does
flood
in
salt,
water
and
just
wanna
make
sure
containment
of
chemicals
is
paramount.
G
C
B
C
If
you're
asking
how
close
it
is,
I'd
have
to
look.
There
should
not
be
a
traffic
visibility
problem
there.
No,
I
mean
the
driveway.
G
I'd
like
to
follow
up
just
just
based
on
the
plan:
do
you
know
what
the
setback
of
that
building
is
from
the
road.
B
No,
I'm
sorry
the
no
just
from
the
rendering
it
it
looks
like
again.
I
don't
know
if
that's
a
parked
car
or
or
a
car
on
pinellas
avenue,
but
the
wall
from
this.
Obviously,
the
stairs
going
up
to
this
pitch
penny
that
you
know
that
car
is
right
there
on
the
wall.
G
A
G
Help
some
yeah,
my,
I
think
I
kind
of
mirror
mr
kulianis's
concern
is
once
construction
starts
and
you
realize
that
you've
got
a
bad
sight
line
to
southbound
traffic,
it's
kind
of
too
late
in
the
game
to
to
push
the
building
back.
I
don't
know
if
there's
enough
space
to
require
an
additional
setback
just
to
just
because
I
think
your
comment
was
you
believe
that
that's
not
going
to
be
an
issue
with
sightline,
but
but.
D
G
A
point
where
construction
starts-
and
you
realize
you
know
oops-
there
is
going
to
be
a
sight
line
problem.
Would
it
be
more
prudent
to
look
at
it
addition
adding
some
more
setbacks,
so
we
can
at
least
assure
any
southbound
anybody
leaving
that
parking
lot,
that
they
have
some
type
of
sight
line
to
oncoming
traffic.
I
think
that's
what
mr.
C
G
C
C
So
I
don't
know
exactly
what
the
proposed
signage
is:
that's
a
rendering,
but
the
signage
would
come
in
as
a
separate
permit
and
I
believe
we
have
renee
on
the
zoo
call.
Renee
vinson
is
our
planning
director
and
she'd
like
to.
K
Hello,
everybody
I'm
actually
across
the
hallway
in
my
office,
but
listening
regarding
the
setback
from
alt
19,
just
looking
at
the
at
the
scale,
graphically
I'm
going
to
say,
you've
got
at
least
20
feet
from
the
edge
of
pavement
to
the
to
the
building
wall.
K
A
A
D
A
A
Well,
in
terms
of
addressing
this,
would
it
be
suitable
to
to
place
a
condition
that
the
the
city
engineer
would
go
back
and
verify
that
we're
not
creating
a
potential
sight
line
problem
there
and
that
all
the
the
vision
triangles
are
met,
since
that
driveway
is
actually
off-site
it?
It
could
have
been
missed,
possibly
from
because
it's
not
really
shown
on
this
plan,
but
it's
definitely
impacted.
A
A
G
K
Saying
yes
from
like
from
the
edge
of
pavement,
you
know
by
the
time
you
actually
from
the
edge
of
the
sidewalk
back
just
looking
at
a
graphically
on
my
screen
with
scale.
It
looks
like
it's.
You
know
right
around
20
feet.
G
Okay,
I
guess
I
wonder
if
we
can
make
that
as
a
condition
then,
because
20
foot
would
be,
I
think,
appropriate
as
a
sight
line,
and
you
know
I
at
least
if
we
have
a
minimum.
G
You
know
it's
hard
without
it
without
a
scale.
I
know
you're
looking
at
a
scale
and
I'm
going
to
rely
on
you
to
say
it's
20
foot.
So
I'm
going
to
take
you
at
your
word
that
you
measured
at
20,
foot
and
and
therefore
based
on
your
what
you're,
what
you're
looking
at
so
I
I
would
ask.
Maybe
we
consider
that,
as
a
as
a
requirement
that
at
least
the
building
would
be
at
least
20
foot
from
the
from
from
the
edge
of
pavement.
I
Might
I
make
a
suggestion
that,
instead
of
giving
a
specific
setback
since
there
are
setbacks
already
listed
within
the
transect
code,
that
the
property
owner
has
a
right
to
that,
the
condition
be
that
there
be
a
a
line
of
sight
or
a
you
know,
site
triangle
be
approved
based
on
the
position
of
the
building,
and
you
know
that's
more
of
a
safety
concern,
but
the
code
is
specific
as
to
what
setbacks
are
permissible
as
of
right
within
it.
So
I
don't
know
necessarily
placing
a
condition
on
the
exact
setback
as
appropriate.
C
A
B
I,
like,
can
I
ask
a
question
the
and
I
don't
know
if
this
is
a
rene
or
a
pat
question.
So
the
the
plan
for
tarpon
is.
Is
that
area
is
that
area?
B
Is
it
ideal
to
have
retail
up
close
to
the
street,
or
is
it
more
ideal
to
have
retail
setback
with
parking
in
front?
It's
because
it
seems
like
from
probably
walgreens
north
no
yeah,
walgreens
south
everything's
set
back
right
winn-dixie.
B
H
B
K
So
I
think
I'll
answer
that
so
yes,
this
crucial
area
plan
is
that,
through
a
very
extensive
community
involvement
and
through
its
adoption,
so
that
entire
area
of
south
pinellas
really
is
is
part
of
a
redevelopment
area
and
is
intended
to
redevelop
in
accordance
with
that
smart
code,
and
so
you
do
see
the
reduced
setbacks
with
the
intent
to
push
parking
to
the
rear.
Obviously
you
know
when
you
have
these
first
projects.
K
It
sets
up
a
bit
of
a
juxtaposition
with
you
know,
with
existing,
you
know,
parcels
and
existing
development,
so
there's
going
to
be
growing
pains
along
the
way.
I
do
think
it's
very
appropriate.
To
put
you
know,
a
condition
in
place
that
says
that
you
know
the
visibility
triangle
will
be
evaluated
with
the
adjacent
ace
hardware.
K
Those
entrances
and
exits
are
somewhat.
I
don't
want
to
say
informal
there,
but
they're
they're.
Definitely
you
know
they
are
close,
so
we
we
do
need
to
do
that.
A
All
right
well,
do
we
do.
We
know
exactly
how
we're
wording,
an
additional
condition
to
address
that.
G
May
have
said
that
there
is
a
a
requirement
and
I
can't
remember
the
phraseology.
A
A
Seeing
none
does
the
developer
owner
have
a.
C
He
may
be
joining
by
zoom.
Sorry.
C
We
should
ask
if
the
applicant
is
available
by
zoom.
L
H
Yes,
I'm
jim
ice
president,
ceo
of
sepgut
corporation,
I
just
want
to
let
you
know
I'm
here.
I
don't
know
if
my
civils
on
the
phone
are
here,
so
I
just
want
to
let
you
know
I
am
on
the
zoo
and
can
answer
any
questions.
That's
non-technical.
L
A
B
D
H
D
I
G
20-120
with
the
additional
condition
and
I'll,
let
was
it
the
sight
line,
or
would
you
call
it
again
the.
G
B
D
A
A
All
right
that
brings
us
to
item
number
six
application:
number
20-135,
future
land
use
map
amendment
and
rezoning
for
8.61
acres
located
in
anclote
isles
subdivision
from
the
future
land
use
map,
designation,
commercial
recreation
to
residential
low
and
from
zoning
designation,
waterfront
development,
wd1
district
to
residential
plan
development.
Rpd
district.
C
C
This
is
the
anclote
aisle
subdivision
and
your
agenda
had
the
original
agenda
in
the
packet.
C
2135.
anclote
isles
is
located
up
north
of
the
encloat
river
off
of
the
uncle
road.
Once
you
pass
anclote
isles
marina,
you
will
see
marina
drive
and
that
leads
out
to
anclote
aisles
which
is
or
aisle.
Maybe
that's
how
you
say
it,
which
is
a
19
unit.
C
C
C
So
what
you
have
before
you
is
a
subdivision
built
on
property
that
has
been
under
the
commercial
recreation,
future
land
use
and
the
waterfront
development
zoning.
C
Since,
before
the
code
was
adopted
before
1990
for
sure
the
area
was,
then
I
believe
the
marina
and
the
island
were
under
a
a
common
owner
and
there
was
some
sort
of
a
project
going
and
the
subdivision
was
was
kind
of
split
off
as
a
stand-alone
single-family
subdivision
that
was
developed,
but
unfortunately,
at
that
time
the
future
land
use
and
the
zoning
were
not
a
change
to
align
with
the
land
use
that
was
being
approved.
C
So
the
idea
with
this
with
these
changes
is
to
align
what's
out
there
and
what
we
project
to
be
out
there
into
the
planning
horizon
with,
with
the
correct
future
land
use
designation,
which
we're
proposing
as
residential
low
and
a
residential
planned
development.
Zoning
district.
C
This
shows
the
future
land
use
map.
The
areas
is
pretty
much
as
residential
around
it
to
the
southeast.
There
there
are
there's
an
industrial
future
land
use,
but
pretty
much.
What
you've
got
along
this
area
of
the
river
is
marinas
and
residential,
but
the
site,
as
you
can
see,
is
pretty
well
buffered
from
any
industrial
activity
because
of
the
river
and
the
tributaries
there.
C
This
proposal
is
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
with
the
county-wide
plan
there
will
need
to
be
a
change
to
the
county-wide
map
they
have
it
designated
as
resort
again
a
holdover
from
the
previous
future.
Ladies,
I
mean
the
existing
future
land
use
map,
but
previous
to
the
planning
of
the
property.
C
C
I
will
also
say
that
the
uses
in
the
residential
plan
development
district,
the
those
are
outlined
in
your
staff
report-
they
pretty
much-
are
very
close
to
the
single
family
districts.
The
r
100
r
100.
A
this
application
is
the
applicant,
is
the
city
of
tarpon
springs.
It
was
initiated
by
a
majority
of
the
homeowners
there
in
the
subdivision.
C
Our
code
allows
the
petitioning
of
the
board
of
commissioners
by
a
group
of
property
owners
to
have
something
rezoned
or
redesignated
on
a
future
land
use
map.
That's
what
this
homeowners
group
of
homeowners
did
and
the
board
would
then
initiate
the
amendment
and
that's
what
you
have
before
you,
the
city
initiating
that
amendment.
So
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
the
future
land
use
map,
change
from
commercial
recreation
to
residential
low
and
approval
of
the
amendment
to
the
zoning
map
from
waterfront
development
to
residential
plan
development.
G
C
A
Seeing
none
do
we
have
any
letters
or
emails.
G
F
Yes,
who
seconded
that.
D
G
A
A
A
All
right
that
brings
us
to
item
number
seven
application
numbers,
2106,
2107
and
2123
all
pertaining
to
the
72.62
acres
of
property
located
at
42501
u.s,
highway
19,
north
2106
and
2107
are
preliminary
plan,
development
and
rezoning
from
general
business
zoning
districts
to
residential
plan
development.
A
C
C
The
property
ownership
is
over,
72
acres
about
eight
and
a
half
acres,
or
so
that
is
submerged
land,
so
you've
got
a
proposed
development
on
about
64
acres
of
land,
rezoning
to
rpd
and
again
the
conditional
use
to
allow
residential.
C
C
It
is
on
the
east
side,
surrounded
pretty
much
by
residential
uses,
mobile
homes
to
the
south
single
family,
to
the
east,
to
the
north
across
the
river,
you've
got
the
st
luke's
eye
center
and
again
some
commercial
and
some
apartments
up
that
way
and
across
19
again
you've
got
some
vacant
single
family
mobile
home
and
that
sort
of
thing
those
areas
include
both
properties.
That
are
in
the
city
and
in
the
unincorporated
county,
so
this
shows
the
future
land
use
map.
C
This
gives
a
project
overview
of
404
multi
family
units
in
five
buildings.
This
is
again
a
64
acre
site
with
approximately
42
acres
of
uplands.
There
will
be
no
change
to
the
future
land
use
designations
that
are
on
the
property.
C
Basically,
some
of
the
things
I
guess
to
highlight
would
be,
and,
and
I'm
not
going
to
go
into
a
lot
of
detail,
the
applicant
does
have
a
presentation
and
I'm
sure
we'll
get
into
questions,
but
this
site
is
proposed
with
a
single
access
of
and
the
access
detail
is
there
of
actually
three
lanes
which
is
with
with
a
gated
entrance
and
the
gate
is
set
back
fairly
substantially
from
us
19..
C
C
Pool
fitness
center
that
sort
of
recreational
items
plus
some
some
working
space
for
collaboration
and
work
area.
It's
got
several
recreational
amenities
proposed
for
the
site,
including
preservation
of
one
of
the
areas
of
pinelands
there
to
the
southeast,
where
a
nature
trail
will
be
established,
so
that's
kind
of
some
of
the
main
features
of
the
site.
In
addition
to
the
buildings,
you
have
the
parking
and
some
parking
garages.
C
This
is
just
a
a
conceptual
rendering
of
the
elevation
of
the
site
elevations
of
the
buildings.
C
C
The
applicant
also
proposes
to
designate
and
donate
an
area
to
the
to
the
northwest
along
the
river
and
donate
that
to
the
city
as
a
park.
Property.
C
C
C
The
landscaping
is,
does
exceed
our
code
requirements
and,
of
course,
some
of
that
is
going
to
include
the
mitigation
for
tree
removal
as
part
of
their
tree
mitigation
plant,
and
this
is
the
list
of
species
all
florida
native
or
florida
friendly
species
that
are
going
on
the
site.
C
So
you
have
really
kind
of
three
criteria:
standards
that
you're
looking
at
or
three
three
items,
you're
looking
at
standards
for
so
I've
kind
of
tried
to
to
summarize
some
of
these
items
that
are
repetitive
so,
for
example,
for
the
preliminary
plan
development,
the
rezoning
and
the
conditional
use,
they
all
have
to
be
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
C
C
Basically,
the
environmental
criteria
are
met
in
this
case.
Our
wetlands
and
significant
uplands
criteria
and
part
of
that
is
accomplished
by
clustering,
the
design
into
the
five
buildings
reducing
the
density
below
the
maximum
allowable,
which
is
some
in
your
staff
report.
I
believe
it's
485
units
are
allowable
on
the
site
and
they're
going
for
404
units
and
they're,
also
providing
the
open
space,
recreational
amenities
and
some
sustainable.
C
C
C
If
you're
going
to
put
you
know,
400
units
next
to
tarpon,
mall
or
next
to
some
industrial
or
something
on
19.,
it's
looking
for
you
to
not
set
up
conflicts.
The
applicant
is
leaving
the
commercial
general
in
place.
There's
really
no
reason
to
change
it
and
the
residential
use
is
allowed.
C
We
believe
that,
because
the
area
is
mostly
residential
and
buffered,
that
you're
really
not
setting
up
any
potential
conflicts
with
respect
to
land
use,
the
applicant
has
requested
two
waivers.
One
is
a
waiver
to
the
height
limit,
which
is
45
feet
in
the
residential
plan
development
district.
C
The
applicant
is
asking
for
53
feet
in
order
to
cluster
those
units
and
keep
it
to
five
buildings,
and
we
believe
because
of
the
location
right
up
on
right
there
on
19
and
the
substantial
open
space
and
river
buffers
that
the
height
can
be
compatible
visually
compatible
with
the
area
and
there's
also
a
waiver.
I've
got
a
typo
there.
C
We
have
19
conditions
listed
and
I
won't
go
all
over
all
those
or
read
them
unless
you
want
me
to
read
them
into
the
record,
I
will
say
if
you've
had
a
chance
and
for
any
member
of
the
public,
I
did
leave
copies
of
the
staff
report
at
the
back
of
the
room.
C
C
C
C
C
C
G
C
G
Okay,
do
we
have,
as
far
as
the
fire
department
have
you
checked
with
the
fire
department
to
see
if
they
have
the
adequate
equipment
to
reach
that
height.
C
C
The
applicant-
would
be
donating
that
land
assisting
the
city
with
some
type
of
assistance,
to
put
some
probably
minimal
improvements.
It's
it's
just
it's
kind
of
meant
to
be
intended
at
this
point
anyway
to
be
a
passive
type
park.
Maybe
a
kayak
pull
out
or
something
like
that
and
yes,
I
believe
the
city
would
would
be
maintaining
that,
but
I
would
not
be
able
to
speak
for
the
final
arrangements
between
the
applicant
and
the
city
that
would
be
up
to
the
board.
B
C
B
C
C
C
D
D
You
mentioned
that
part
of
the
property
was
in
tarpon
springs
and
part
of
it
was
in
the
county.
Is
that
correct.
C
G
H
G
I'm
sorry
the
trc
response
to
item
12
says
this
does
not
address
a
conservation
of
the
uplands
proposed
for
the
preservation,
and
I
guess
that's
something
that
either
conservation
needs
been.
Our
preservation
designation,
be
a
future
land
use
plan
map
I
mean,
so
why
can't
we
address?
Because
that's
that's
a
highly.
You
know.
One
of
the
issues
that
they
we've
always
had
with
this
property
is
the
conservation
it's
right
along
the
ankle
river.
Is
there
a
reason
why
there
can't
be
a
comprehensive
conservation
plan
moving
forward
or
nor
do
we?
C
The
way
that
comment
was
resolved,
the
wetlands
would
be
put
into
a
preservation,
future
lando's,
designation
or
well
that
some
of
them
already
are,
but.
C
That
means
that
the
the
future
land
use
designation
under
preservation
will
basically
very
much
limit
what
can
be
done
there.
It
will
preserve
the
wetlands
in
their
undisturbed
state
other
than
maintaining
them
free
of
invasive
exotic
vegetation
and
those
sorts
of
things.
C
C
So
that's
what
that
change
does
and
but
at
the
same
time
it
allows
the
applicant
to
maintain
a
hiking
trail
that
sort
of
recreational
amenity
in
that
area.
That's
consistent
with
that
with
that
future
land
use-
and
I
I
do
have
that
future
land
use
per
category
described
in
the
staff
report,
so
we
can
go
over
that
if
you
wish.
A
So
so,
once
once
this
is
built
out
is
the
plans
we
we
see
here
or
the
the
final
version
of
them.
There
would
be
no
opportunity
for
any
further
density
or
construction
of
anything,
but
but
some
amenities
in
the
preservation
or
the
recreation
areas.
C
The
other
listed
species
in
the
applicant
can
correct
me
if
I,
if
I
don't
touch
on
them,
that
they
have
to
address
would
be
the
gopher
tortoises
and
indigo
snakes.
Technically,
because
this
is
it's
because
of
the
presence
of
gopher
tortoises
they
I
believe
I
might
have
gotten
out
wrong,
but
I
believe
they
have
to
assume
there
could
be
indigo
snakes
and
they
have
to
do
an
indigo
snake
management
plan.
So
you've
they've
got
to
do
plans
for
all
of
them.
J
J
J
The
morgan
group
is
exclusively
a
multi-family
which
means
apartment
developer
and
over
the
course
of
their
history.
They
have
built
over
20
000
apartments
at
total
construction
cost
of
over
three
billion
dollars.
They
know
exactly
what
they're
doing
in
terms
of
developing
a
site
like
this,
which
certainly
does
have
some
complexities,
some
of
which
have
been
touched
upon
and
the
questions
that
have
just
come
to
us
from
the
board.
J
There
are
three
agenda
items
before
you
tonight,
that's
as
explained
by
ms
mcneese
and
that's
the
preliminary
development
plan
with
two
waivers,
a
rezoning
and
the
conditional
use
and
with
the
permission
of
the
board,
we'd
like
to
present
our
case
in
its
entirety,
that
would
be
applicable
to
all
three
applications
as
opposed
to
breaking
down
one
at
a
time.
If
that
is
acceptable
to
the
board,
absolutely
yeah.
Thank
you.
J
We
do
have
a
very
inclusive
presentation.
This
is
a
complex
side,
we're
anticipating
a
number
of
questions
from
the
board,
and
we've
tried
to
anticipate
as
best
we
could
and
build
them
the
answers
into
our
presentation.
So
we
can
wait
till
the
end.
You
all
are
always
very
good
about
that.
I
hopefully
will
answer
most
of
your
questions
during
the
course
of
our
presentation.
J
In
order
to
obtain
your
approval
tonight.
This
is
a
quasi-digital
hearing.
We
have
to
carry
our
burden
of
meeting.
The
a
criteria
of
those
criteria
are
planning
related.
Our
planning
expert
is
missing
terra
panty,
who
will
be
speaking
momentarily
after
she
speaks.
We
don't
have
any
other
formal
presentation.
J
That
said,
we
do
have
several
subject
matter:
experts
on
the
development
team
that
are
here
tonight
that
can
respond
to
some
of
the
specific
questions
that
you
might
well
have
and
we
believe
that
we'll
be
able
to
answer
appropriately.
So
thank
you
very
much
with
that.
I'm
going
to
ask
ms
tara
penny
to
come
forward.
M
I
know
we'll
go
back
to
some
of
your
questions
that
you
had
earlier,
but
I
did
want
to
talk
about
the
project
a
little
bit
and
how
we
first
envisioned
the
project
and
how
morgan
envisioned
that,
from
the
very
beginning
of
the
conceptual
design
of
the
project,
the
applicant
and
all
of
its
consultants
have
been
very
mindful
of
the
unique
nature
of
this
site
and
especially
its
environmental
characteristics.
M
M
M
In
recognition
of
this
outstanding
florida
waterway,
the
residential
buildings
and
parking
are
substantially
set
back
from
the
anklet
river.
The
closest
building
I'll
show
you
in
a
moment
on
a
site
plan.
The
closest
building
is
175
feet
from
the
shoreline.
The
other
four
buildings
are
in
the
range
of
350
to
400
feet
from
the
shoreline.
M
M
Morgan
group
proposes
to
maintain
and
preserve
97
percent
of
the
wetlands
on
the
site.
There's
only
one
small
wetland
impact
of
less
than
an
acre
and
I'll
show
you
in
a
moment
on
that
site
plan,
but
it's
right
around
building
two
and
if
those
wetlands
were
to
remain,
they
really
inhibit
an
effective
and
efficient
design
for
both
the
buildings
and
the
parking
area.
M
The
site
contains
two
eagles
nests
and
I'll
point
those
out
in
a
moment
between
the
storm
water
pond
and
the
anklet
river
and
kind
of
the
center
of
that
area.
The
project
proposes
the
gold
standard
of
treatment
for
these
eagle
nests.
First
of
all,
within
a
hundred
feet
of
the
eagle's
nest,
there
is
no
improvements
proposed
at
all
within
330
feet:
radius
of
the
nest,
the
only
improvements
would
be
a
portion
of
the
storm
water
pond.
M
Obviously
that's
at
grade
within
the
660
feet,
radius
of
the
nest,
the
only
improvement
would
be
the
balance
of
the
pond
and
some
at-grade
parking.
We
all
recognize
and
the
the
applicant
recognizes
that
work
to
build
the
pond
and
the
parking
in
the
660
feet
will
have
to
be
done
outside
of
the
nesting
season,
which
is
october.
To
may.
M
And
this
is
the
illustrated
site
plan
and
it's
a
little
easier
to
see
some
of
the
features
of
the
site.
The
there
are
five
buildings
four
right
in
here,
and
this
is
the
fifth
one
along
here.
The
clubhouse
is
located
in
pools
located
in
this
area.
The
proposed
area
for
this
park
to
be
donated
to
the
city
is
in
that
northwest
corner.
This
is,
of
course,
one
of
the
stormwater,
the
large
stormwater
pond.
The
eagle
two
needle
nests
are
right
in
this
area.
M
The
project
proposes
a
boat
dock
subject
to
permitting,
of
course,
and
a
kayak
launch,
and
a
second
kayak
and
canoe
launch
in
this
area.
What
I
was
speaking
about
here
these
are
the
wetlands
that
surround
these
two
peninsulas.
The
western
peninsula,
the
southwest
peninsula
will
be
constructed
with
one
sing.
One
apartment
building
the
eastern
peninsula
will
remain
undeveloped,
except
for
a
nature
trail
and
associated
improvements
related
to
that
trail.
M
What
I
believe
it
was
mr
cascudas
was
asking
about.
Perhaps
mr
coleonus
was
the
the
wetland
protection,
and
what
we're
talking
about
now
is
the
preservation
plan.
Category
is
currently
on
whoops.
I
went
back
wrong
way.
M
The
preservation
plan
category
is
currently
on
most
of
the
wetlands
today,
of
course
again
in
this
area
and
then
a
little
wetland
up
in
this
area
that
we
have
also
received
approval
from
swift
mud
for
our
wetland,
jurisdictional
line,
and
what
ms
mcneese
was
speaking
of
is
that
the
the
preservation
plan
counter
will
be
adjusted
to
be
coterminous
to
be
the
same
boundary
as
what
that
jurisdictional
line
is
with
swift
mud.
M
So
all
the
wetlands
on
the
site,
except
for
the
small
one
acre
area,
which
is
there's
two
wetlands,
actually
that
make
up
the
one
acre.
One
is
right
in
here.
One
is
right
in
here:
those
two
would
not
be
protected,
but
all
the
rest
of
the
wetlands,
some
30
acres,
would
be
protected
with
the
preservation
plan
category,
in
addition
to
being
governed
by
this
site
plan.
M
The
other
protection
that
miss
mcneese
was
speaking
of
was
to
protect,
and
I
believe
the
chairman
was
speaking
of
this.
There
are.
There
is
an
area
of
at
least
I
think,
where
it's
10
or
12,
acres
or
so
of
upland
area
which
is
not
proposed
for
the
development,
and
that
is
in
this
area.
That's
the
southeast
peninsula
and
a
little
piece
of
property
right
on
our
eastern
border.
There
are
uplands
in
that
area.
M
It
is
potentially
developable
without
this
amendment,
but
we
are
proposing
to
place
the
the
recreation
open
space
plan
category
on
those
two
areas.
So
the
only
thing
that
can
be
done
in
that
area
is
again
recreation
open
space,
which
would
be
a
line
of
course,
with
the
proposed
trail
in
that
area.
M
The
third
item:
I
want
to
talk
about
in
just
a
little
bit
more
detail
and
give
you
a
graphic
of
that
is
the
eagle
nest
protection
so
the
two
red
circles:
that's
the
hundred
foot
dis
radius
from
the
eagles
nest.
So
you
can
see
here's
the
storm
water
pond.
We
were
just
looking
at
here's,
the
four
main
buildings
and
the
fifth
is
on
the
peninsula
to
the
south.
This
is
the
very
edge
of
the
property,
and
19
is
just
a
little
bit
over
here
to
the
west.
M
So
within
the
hundred
feet
again
no
improvements
whatsoever
within
330.
Only
the
retention
pond
and
again
you
can
see
that
that's
the
yellow
circle.
All
you
can
see
in
that
area
that
will
be
constructed
would
be
a
portion
of
the
retention
pond
and
then
the
660
is
the
green
circles
and
there's
two
nests.
That's
why
you're
seeing
two
circles
that
are
closely
similar,
but
not
exact
so
again
in
the
green
area,
there
will
be
no
vertical
improvements.
M
M
The
project's
been
designed
to
comply
with
all
but
two
of
the
city's
site,
development
regulations
and
the
additional
requirements
of
rpd.
We
meet
the
lot
size
and
width
the
setbacks
and
actually
exceed,
in
many
cases,
the
setbacks,
the
open
space,
the
isr,
the
parking
and
a
50-foot
wetland
buffer
against
all
of
our
wetlands.
So
the
city
generally
has
a
15-foot
buffer.
Swift
mud
has
a
25-foot
buffer
from
wetlands.
The
rpd's
district
has
a
50-foot
buffer
and
we
are
complying
with
that
on
all
of
our
all
of
the
wetlands
on
the
site.
M
The
rpd
district
is
created
to
allow
some
flexibility
in
design
so
that,
where
you
have
some
positives,
where
there
might
be
some
areas
that
you
need
some
waivers
or
some
variations
to
some
of
the
code,
it
allows
you
to
consider
those
and
for
the
board
of
commissioners
to
approve
them.
It
has
to
be.
Those
waivers
has
to
be
justified
by
on
one
or
more
of
these
factors.
Those
factors
are
a
superior
alternative
protection
of
significant
features,
deprivation,
a
reasonable
use
or
technically
impractical.
M
The
first
waivers,
the
staff
described
as
to
increase
the
height
from
45
feet
to
53
feet,
and
the
reason
primarily
we're
doing
this
is
is
with
the
ability
to
have
a
basically
an
extra
floor
just
about
it
allows
us
to
only
have
five
buildings
and
to
cluster
those
buildings
in
the
center
of
the
site.
It
reduces
the
number
of
buildings,
it
reduces
the
size
of
the
buildings,
the
footprint
of
the
buildings
on
the
ground,
and
it
allows
us
again
to
maintain
that
large
setback
from
both
the
eagle
and
from
the
anklet
river.
M
So
this
requested
height
waiver
meets
two
of
the
criteria.
It's
a
superior
alternative
because
we
have
fewer
buildings
and
therefore
a
smaller
project
footprint
and,
secondly,
it
protects
significant
features,
including
the
wetlands,
the
uplands,
the
river
and
the
eagle
nest.
This
one
is
pretty
clearly
a
great
idea
for
the
project.
M
The
second
waiver
is
to
allow
only
one
entrance
to
the
site
along
u.s
19.,
there's
no
other
existing
street
adjacent
to
this
property,
and
there's
only
one
other
right
away
that
could
potentially
provide
access.
This
right
away
is
called
hayes
road.
It
is
an
unimproved
right-of-way
and
it
comes
in
at
the
site
right
about
in
this
area.
Dead
ends
and
this
side
here
and
it
goes
east
all
the
way
over
to
jasmine.
M
It
currently
doesn't
provide
access
to
any
project
or
any
site
that
I'm
aware
of,
and
the
primary
reason
why
we
have
chosen
to
not
use
that
and
not
request
to
improve.
That
is
that,
if
built,
it
would
create
new
traffic
that
would
travel
from
this
multi-family
site
east
on
hayes
to
jasmine
and
and
intersect
and
impact
the
sail
harbor
neighborhood
to
the
east
of
the
project.
M
So
for
these
reasons,
we're
requesting
the
waiver
to
have
only
one
access
point
on
us
19..
As
ms
mcneese
pointed
out,
the
fire
marshal
has
looked
at
that
and
has
agreed
that
our
proposed
access
way
would
be
compatible
and
will
be
safe.
Just
in
case
there
is
some
activity
right
at
the
entrance
if
there's
a
an
accident
or
if
an
ambulance
or
other
vehicle
needs
to
get
in.
That's
why
there
are
three
lanes
there
that
will
provide
that
alternative
access.
M
So
our
second
waiver,
for
only
having
one
access
way,
is
it's
a
superior
alternative
by
avoiding
traffic
on
the
single
family,
neighborhood
and
it's
technically
impractical.
An
existing
40-foot
right
away
is
less
than
the
city's
minimum
of
50
and
there's
no
limited
ability
to
increase
that
right
away
and
as
part
of
our
application
package,
we've
submitted
detailed
narratives
describing
how
the
three
applications
comply
with
your
review
criteria,
and
I
like
to
focus
on
just
a
few
of
these.
M
We
comply
with
the
maximum
density
of
15
units,
an
acre,
and
actually
we
are
less
than
the
maximum
development
potential
that
could
be
built
on
the
site,
the
print
the
plan
protects
and
the
environmental
features
of
the
site,
including
on-site
preservation
of
97
percent
of
the
existing
wetlands,
significant
setbacks
from
the
ancoat
river
and
the
highest
level
of
protection
for
the
eagles
nest.
That
is
possible.
M
The
significant
upland
habitat
is
also
preserved
on
the
site
and
again
that's
in
located
in
two
general
places:
one
the
southeast
peninsula
and
then
here
this
section
between
the
pond
and
the
riverbank.
The
proposed
project
provides
new
multi-family
residential
use
to
promote
residential
diversity
in
the
city.
M
The
project
is
designed
as
a
livable
community
with
a
connect
connected
pedestrian
trail,
which
I
haven't
focused
on.
I
should
talk
about
that
a
little
bit
in
addition
to
this
trail
nature
trail
that
goes
through
this
upland
area.
This
trail
continues
and
and
meanders
along
the
the
storm
water
pond
along
here,
and
it
connects
with
all
five
of
the
buildings
on
the
site
connected
them
both
to
the
trail.
So
they
can
activate
and
use
that,
as
well
as
to
the
clubhouse
area.
M
M
So
if
you're
on
19
and
you're
going
to
the
development,
there
will
be
a
new
northbound
right
turn
lanes
that
you
can
get
off
the
main
line
of
us-19
and
safely
make
a
turn
into
the
development
we
also
proposing
new
left
turn
median
openings
to
the
north
of
the
site
and
the
south
of
the
site
that
will
allow
folks
to
make,
if
you're,
for
example,
if
you're
leaving
the
site
here,
if
you're
right
at
the
entrance
here
and
you're,
leaving
the
site
going
to
work
or
to
shop,
you
will
go
north
and
could
continue
north
and
go
wherever
you
like
in
that
northern
area
home
depot
lowe's
wherever
actually
home
depot
to
the
north.
M
But
if
you
wanted
to
turn
south,
you
would
come,
you
would
go
up
us-19,
make
a
u-turn
and
then
be
able
to
come
back
down
and
again
same
thing.
If
site
residents
are
approaching
the
project
and
coming
home
from
the
north,
perhaps
they
work
in
pasco
county
somewhere
as
they
come
south
on
u.s
19.
They
would
make
a
u-turn
right
in
this
area
and
then
come
back
in
and
turn
into
the
development.
All
those
improvements
would
be
done
at
the
developers,
expense.
M
The
project
does
propose
a
transportation
management
plan
to
encourage
non-vehicular
modes
of
traffic,
in
other
words,
walking
and
biking
and
through
that
overall
circulation
system
we
have.
We
also
have
a
variety
of
on-site
recreation
facilities
that
we've
talked
about.
We
have
electric
car
chargers
and
we
have
an
on-site
business
center
that
folks
can
use,
so
they
don't
have
to
run
out
to
another
place
to
do
what
activities
they
might
need
to
do.
M
The
project
proposes
to
donate
the
the
small
park
to
the
city,
and
that's
in
this
general
area
right
here
at
the
northwest
corner
of
the
property.
It's
a
1.84
acre
site.
The
idea
for
this
was
that
if
you
are
boating,
how
many
of
you
might
be
boaters
if
you're
on
the
anklet
river
and
enjoying
the
day,
you
might
want
to
pull
off
and
have
a
picnic
or
just
have
a
little
break.
So
there
would
be
an
area
where
you
could
pull
off.
M
It
would
not
be,
would
not
be
a
dock
per
se,
but
just
an
area
where
you
could
pull
off
your
boat
and
anchor
or
if
your
canoe
or
kayak
pull
the
kayak
up
on
the
bank
and
and
the
kinds
of
improvements
we've
talked
to
the
city
about
which
are
still
yet
to
be
confirmed,
will
be
things
very
low-key,
like
picnic
bench,
picnic
table
things
like
that,
so
that,
if
you
wanted
to
get
off
the
boat
for
a
few
minutes,
have
a
lunch
at
the
picnic
table
that
you
could
do
so.
M
This
proposed
city
park
would
also
be
able
to
be
accessed
by
pedestrians
from
the
public
generally.
So
it's
a
little
hard
to
see
on
this
map,
but
generally
there
is
a
there's,
a
sidewalk
along
the
entire
length
of
the
property.
What
we're
proposing
is
part
of
this
site
is
about
this
area.
The
sidewalk
is
elevated,
so
we
will
propose
a
new
sidewalk
that
would
come
along
here
at
the
lower
grade
to
allow
people
to
then
walk
up
up
19
to
this
area.
M
M
The
project
the
residential
project
is
compatible
with
its
surrounding.
I
think
you
could
see
from
the
aerials
that
there's
all
residential
uses
in
this
area-
it's
not
a
commercial
section
of
us
19
at
all
and
and
the
only
other
non-residential
use
in
the
area
is
st
luke's
institute,
which
of
course,
is
on
the
north
bank
of
the
river.
M
Additionally,
the
developer
must
submit
a
final
development
plan
to
the
board
of
commissioners
for
their
review
and
approval,
which
shows
the
detailed
construction
plans
and,
of
course,
that
final
plan
must
be
consistent.
With
the
preliminary
plan
that
you
are
reviewing
tonight,
we
have
reviewed
and
are
in
agreement
with
the
proposed
conditions
in
the
staff
report
that
are
shown
on
pages
one.
M
Two
and
three
of
your
staff
report
with
one
small
footnote
condition
number
14
deals
with
the
park
donation
and
the
developer
would
prefer
to
donate
funds
to
the
city
for
the
construction
of
those
improvements,
rather
than
build.
Those
improvements
himself
so
that
we
would
ask
for
your
consideration
on
that
and
and
of
course
that
would
be
subject
to
the
city
commission.
Accepting
this
park
donation
I'm
going
to
stop
there.
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
information
about
this
project
and
we're
happy
to
answer
any
in
all
questions
that
you
have.
M
M
M
G
The
retention
area
is,
is
it
low
now
or
is
that
something
you're
you're
going
to
have
to
to
construct
the
the
retention
area
that
you
show
the
retention
pond
or
the
ponding
area.
G
Okay,
and
as
far
as
parking,
how
many
acres
does
the
parking
lot
or
how
many
parking
spaces
do
you
believe
that
the
property
is
gonna
hold.
M
M
Of
course,
the
city
does
require
does
require
that
and
we
would
comply
with
that.
Yes,
sir,.
M
It's
required
to
have
trees
and
shrubs
and
ground
cover.
Yes,
sir,.
G
And
as
as
mr
juliana
said
earlier,
is
there
any,
I
guess
future
request
to
put
a
traffic
light
out
there
or
in
a
cross
cut
through
19?
Or
do
you
know
that.
M
I
I
do
know
that
I
did
our
traffic
engineers
here.
So
if
you
want
to
ask
in
more
detail
but
but
basically
they
have
had
several
conversations
actually
had
a
pre-op
meeting
pre-application
meeting
with
fgot,
because
obviously
the
access
to
the
property
will
have
to
be
approved
by
dot.
M
M
N
M
M
M
Yes,
sir,
mr
the
the
developer
does
propose
these
to
be
clearly
market
rate
apartments.
The
anticipated
estimated
range
of
the
rents
is
1500
to
2500
per
month.
They
do
have
several
different
unit
styles.
They
have
one
two
and
three
bedrooms
within
the
project.
M
So
a
trip
is
one
car
going
to
or
from
the
site.
M
M
Peak
time
in
the
morning
when
people
go
into
work
in
the
afternoon
when
they're
coming
back,
there
are
certainly
some
folks
that
would
be
able
to
work
from
home,
as
many
of
us
are
doing
even
more
these
days,
but
that
is
the
am
and
pm
peak
trips
and
that
I
certainly
can
have
the
traffic
engineer
speak
to
it,
but
these
numbers
have
been
reviewed
and
approved
and
their
their
standard
trip
generation
numbers
based
on
national
standards.
M
Right,
I'm
going
to
ask
christopher
hatton
to
come
up
and
speak
to
that.
I
think
we
have
an
exhibit.
That
explains
that
a
little
better
and
remember,
I
probably
didn't
explain
it
very
clearly,
but
the
peak
hours
are
just
when
you
have
the
most
trips
in
the
morning
and
the
most
trips
in
the
afternoon.
Not
everybody
goes
to
work
at
nine
o'clock.
Some
people,
you
know,
do
shift
work.
I
mean
for
a
variety
of
reasons.
M
B
O
O
We
did
conduct
the
transportation
analysis,
both
with
city
staff's
review
and
their
transportation
consultant,
as
well
as
the
fdot
one
of
the
specific
questions
that
I
know
you're
specifically
talking
to
and
if
I
can
get
to
the
graphic
here,
which
shows
the
actual
project
access
on
us19
I'll
try
to
get
the
this
is
the
project
access
here.
So
us19
is
this
north
south
and
what
the
dot
actually
when
we
met
with
them
back
in
2019
and
again,
we
met
with
them
just
a
couple
of
months
ago
to
specifically
talk
about
access
to
us
19..
O
They
recommended
both
time
both
last
year
and
this
year,
based
upon
their
recent
studies
of
what
they
call
offset
left
turn
lanes,
which
means-
and
this
kind
of
goes
directly
to
your
question-
also
about
there
being
a
light.
There
actually
really
could
not
be
a
light
because
there
is
not
planned
for
a
full
median
opening.
So,
what's
planned
right
now,
as
cindy
had
mentioned,
is
a
northbound
right
turn
lane,
but,
as
she
also
explained
for
votes
to
go
south,
you
would
come
out
here.
O
You
would
basically
weave
across
19,
get
into
u-turn
and
then
head
south.
Obviously,
if
you're
coming
from
the
north
heading
southbound,
you
would
pass
here,
you
would
go
into
a
south
south
to
northbound
u-turn
and
go
into
the
the
project
driveway.
The
main
reason
for
that
per
the
fdot
is,
as
you
know,
obviously
at
full
median
openings.
This
is
where
vehicles
would
come
into
conflict
with
the
westbound
left
vehicles
coming
in
with
the
southbound
left
coming
in
as
well.
So
this
is
a
conflict
that
the
fdot
has
wanted
to
avoid
now.
O
The
position
that
basically
we're
taking
is
certainly
we
want
to
do
what's
safest
and
the
fdot
obviously
has
to
permit
this.
We
have
to
permit
it
through
the
fdot.
One
of
the
items
that
you
mentioned
is
how
can
folks
get
from
the
site
across
three
lanes
into
this
lane
to
do
a
u-turn.
So
one
of
the
things
we
did-
and
we
talked
to
the
fdot
about
this-
we
did
a
gap,
study
and
gaps
are
what
available
gaps
in
traffic.
That
would
allow
a
vehicle
to
travel
from
this.
O
Basically,
the
the
single
driveway
that
we
have
here
across
the
three
lanes
and
to
be
able
to
get
into
this
lane
to
make
that
northbound
a
southbound
u-turn.
So
we
basically
we
went
out
and
did
two
traffic
counts
and
we
did
calibrate
them
for
what
we
call
coveted
conditions.
So
we
looked
at
previous
counts
in
2019
conducted
counts
in
2020.
O
A
gap
study
and
what
you
will
see
here,
for
instance,
and
this
as
cindy
mentioned,
was
done
for
the
am
in
the
pmp
hour
when
the
the
traffic
is
heaviest
in
the
in
the
morning.
The
seven
to
eight
am
period
is
the
highest
for
us
19..
This
is
traveling
northbound
and
for
four
four
to
five
p.m.
In
the
pm
peak
hour,
what
we
have
in
the
blue
area
is
the
number
of
available
gaps
so
for
that
one
hour
of
basically
five
seconds
or
greater,
and
that's
basically
the
time
when
a
vehicle
would
be
exiting.
O
Basically,
over
that
time
period,
there's
a
little
bit
over
200
gaps
and
what
is
needed
from
our
project
is
a
little
over
100
and
that's
the
exiting
going
back
to
that.
The
number
of
trips
that
you
were
talking
about
the
number
of
trips,
basically
we're
looking
at,
is
the
one
in
this
case
the
exiting
ones
that
would
basically
be
leaving
the
traffic
or
leaving
the
driveway
headed
north
and
getting
into
the
u-turn.
O
So,
basically,
we've
got
about
200
little
over
200,
available
gaps
and
we've
got
a
little
bit
more
than
100
needed
for
our
drive
for
our
patrons
during
the
pee
and
peak
hour.
Obviously,
you
have
less
leaving
because
you
have
more
people
basically
coming
home
from
work.
You've
got
about
150,
available
gaps,
and
at
that
point
we
need
only
about
65..
G
One
of
the
things
that
mr
penny
said
that
the
you'd
be
making
improvements
to
the
turn.
So
are
you
looking
to
make
making
like
a
double
left
turn?
Is
that
what
you're
talking
about
or
on
both
both
sides
of
the
on
the
northbound
side
and
the
southbound
side.
O
Yes,
those
improvements
are
specifically
this.
This
was
the
offset
left,
turn
lanes
that
the
def
dot
requested
and
then
basically
required
that
we
develop
is
this,
so
this,
obviously,
as
you
know,
would
need
to
be.
This
is
obviously
short
of
beckett
or
tarpon,
so
the
other
benefit
here
is
we're.
Providing
this
turn
away
from
adding
traffic
to
the
signal
right
now
and
obviously
the
signals
both
north
and
south
provide
the
some
of
these
gaps
that
are
out
there.
Okay,.
A
M
Yes,
sir,
mr
chairman,
we
compared
the
trip
comparison
of
versus
the
current
zoning
for
general
business.
If
you
had
f
for
commercial,
be
460
000
square
feet
of
commercial
can
be
built
on
the
site.
In
addition,
and
that
is.
M
That
would
propose
252
trips
as
compared
to
the
the
same
time
the
am
peak
145
trips
by
the
project,
so
76
fewer
trips
for
our
development
of
residential
to
compare
it
in
the
afternoon.
The
commercial
development
would
generate
over
1100
trips.
The
residential
project
proposed
tonight
would
generate
178
trips.
So
again,
our
the
residential
project
is
88
fewer
trips
than
the
commercial
development
that
could
be
put
on
this
under
the
gb
zoning.
J
C
You
have
one
email,
that's
in
your
packet
that
was
received,
while
the
project
was
in
the
under
review
by
the
technical
review
committee,
but
we've
had
nothing
else.
C
We
had
no
public
comments,
since
the
project
was
publicly
noticed.
N
Good
evening
how
are
y'all,
it
may
be
my
notice,
that's
already
in
your
packet.
This
is
julie,
wade,
1095,
mainsail
drive.
I
wanted
to
thank
ms
tarapani
and
mr
anderson
y'all
were
very
responsive
regarding
the
klostermann
distant
project,
and
I
appreciated
that
and
I've
looked
through
it's.
What
is
it
800
pages
that
were
previously
submitted,
and
I
think
it's
generally
good
use
of
the
site
with
many
amenities.
N
It's
an
already
disturbed
and
problematic
site
from
the
code
board
perspective.
We've
had
several
issues
there
and
I
appreciate
your
study
of
the
eagles,
I'm
not
even
sure
they
live
there
anymore
and
the
tortoise
relocation.
I
have
a
few
points.
I
really
am
concerned
about
the
traffic
and
I
have
read
all
the
studies,
but
u-turns
are
problematic
and
there
are
no
buses
that
travel
that
traverse.
That
area
and
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
car
lights
entering
or
exiting
aren't
going
to
shine
on
to
19.
I
couldn't
quite
get
the
elevation
straight.
N
As
I
looked
at
that.
I
would
hope
that
the
developer
might
improve
on
the
exterior
of
the
building
somewhat
they're,
quite
generic.
They
could
be
anywhere
in
the
united
states.
There's
nothing
that
says
florida
or
tarpon
springs
about
them.
That
can
certainly
be
addressed
later,
but
I'd
love
to
see
a
little
sparkle
on
the
exterior.
N
N
Is
there
an
art
contribution
being
made?
Is
there
any
contribution
to
public
housing,
because
these
are
certainly
not
available
economically
to
a
number
of
people?
I
appreciate
the
preservation
area.
It
creates
a
good
buffer
to
the
other
housing
but,
as
you
guys
have
pointed
out,
the
maintenance
of
that
area
is
important
if
it's
just
left,
it's
not
going
to
stay
where
it's
usable
very
long
and
I'm
not
sure
if
swift
mud
is
going
to
allow
that
little
park.
N
It's
a
great
idea,
but
I
know
what
trouble
the
city
had
putting
in
the
kayak
launch
before,
and
people
aren't
going
to
be
very
comfortable
going
into
a
gated
complex
as
a
walker
or
a
biker
to
use
it.
But
it's
it
sounds
like
a
nice
idea
and
I
wanted
to
know
if
there
were
any
chances
for
permeable
surfaces
throughout
the
project.
G
You
know
I
do
have
a
can.
I
go
back.
I
do
have
a
question
that
that
that
this
person
did
bring
up
with
regard,
and
maybe
somebody
can
answer
it
with
regard
to
like
the
eagles
nests
that
are
there.
You
know
you
talk
about
it
lumens,
which
is
the
lighting
criteria.
G
You
know
for
parking,
and
I
just
don't
know
how
that
would
impact.
Or
does
anybody
have
a
study
on
how
that
impacts,
eagle's
nest
or
stuff
like
that
that
have
lighting
at
night
and
and
how
that
affects
the
the
wildlife,
especially
eagles,
because
you
do
have
eight
two
eagles
nest.
There.
M
Thank
you,
mr
couscous.
I
don't
know
about
a
study,
but
what
I
do
know
is
that
the
lighting
fixtures
have
to
be.
You
know,
contained
yeah.
The
city's
requirements
contain
the
light
on
the
site
and
I'm
sure
that
the
lighting
issues
will
be
looked
at
when
we
go
through
the
permitting
process
for
the
eagle
nest
for
the
evil
impacts.
G
All
right,
I
just
want
to
also
thank
the
the
person
who
spoke
because
she
pointed
out
a
few
things
that
I
thought
were
were
insightful.
So
that
was
my
question.
A
All
right
do
I
hear
a
motion.
G
I
I'll
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion
in
in
part
of
my
motion.
You
know,
I've
lived
in
tarpon
springs
most
of
my
life.
D
G
You
know
it's
been
a
it's
always
been
a
small
quaint
community
and
sometimes
it's
tough
to
watch
it
grow
and
but
unfortunately,
those
are
the
times
that
we
live
in
and-
and
I
think
a
lot
of
people
know
the
secret
of
tarpon
springs
and
kind
of
want
to
live
here
and
and
so
in
any
event,
we
can't
as
much
as
we
hope
to
to
keep
this
as
a
sleepy
little
town.
Unfortunately,
sometimes
we
just
can't
do
it
so
I'd
like
to
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion.