►
From YouTube: W2 0mega WG: Ethical engineering
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Our
token
engineering
team
needs
to
connect
to,
and
we
literally
have
no
real
process
so
with
this
whole
ecosystem
value
flows
that
we
started
with
the
book
and
and
my
work
with
dada
invisible
economy
and
with
bosom
protocol.
Now
it
really
seems
it
is
needed
and
it
is
helpful,
but
again
it's
a
process
refinement
that
we
are
creating
and
refining
while
everyone
is
building
right.
A
So
that's
the
typical
case,
and
then
we
still
have
you
know
the
people
who
build
in
they
don't
just
build
or
test
and
prod
they
build
in
prod,
meaning
they
just
deploy
and
see
what
happens
and
to
be
honest,
when
you
are
doing
this
generic
token
protocols,
especially
the
financial
games,
it's
what
you
can
do
like
you
can
do
simulations,
but
they're
not
going
to
tell
you
more
or
are
better
in
insights
than
and
or
they're,
not
going
to
prevent
you
from
those
typical
mistakes
that
or
errors
or
marks
that
will
come
out
and
so
on
so
anyways.
A
That's
that,
with
respect
to
ethical
engineering
for
today,
I
just
want
to
maybe
wrap
up
with
you
guys
and
also
ask
with
respect
to
the
questions
that
we
had
from
last
time
and
I'd
like
to
show
some
questions
that
shall
lead
us
to
those
areas
where
the
engineers
actually
try
to
figure
out
their
ethos
and
answer
and
what
type
of
questions
we
can
ask
so
that
they
can
answer.
A
You
know
as
truly
as
possible
and
then
basically
maybe
before
that
just
really
also
get
from
your
sides
with
respect
to
community
proposals
etc.
What
questions
can
we
ask?
That
also
makes
them
think
about?
A
Okay,
the
things
that
I'm
currently
working
with
you
know,
I'm
not
the
only
one
who
asked
those
questions
can
I
make
this
a
project
proposal
and
then
a
to
share
the
results
with
everyone,
but
also
help
everyone's
input
or
support,
and
so
on
so
that
type
of
questions
I
I
was
hearing
that
you
had
found
or
encountered
or
would
like
to
pose
right,
libby,
olivia,
sorry
yeah.
Maybe
we
can
I'll
put
up
the
one
second
put
up
our
proposal.
A
Maybe
we
can
recapture
a
little
bit
from
last
time
and
add
some
more
with
respect
to
more
concrete
questions
and,
at
the
end,
I'll
show
some
more
of
those
philosophical
questions.
This
is
what
they
are
yeah
and
then,
let's
see.
B
C
Yeah,
I
think
these
discussions
have
been
very
present
for
us,
especially
when,
like
discussing
the
narrative
of
the
tec
and
and
yesterday,
we
I
think
we
got
to
a
consensus
that
the
punch
line
is
going
to
be
advancing
token
engineering
and-
and
I
think,
there's
still
a
lot
of
questions
about
what
is
token
engineering.
And
how
can
we
like
when
someone
asks
about
what
is
token
engineering?
C
How
can
we
yeah
answer
this
question
in
the
best
way,
and
I've
been
thinking
a
lot
about
how
we
don't
talk
so
much
about
economies,
but
that,
from
my
understanding
token
engineering
is
like
this
discipline
that
is
making
making
economies
making
new
economies
based
on.
C
A
C
A
So
in
your
in
your
experience
now
also
like
also
with
tech,
so
I
realized
also,
finally
taking
some
time
and
processing
and
also
looking
through
what
what
mostly
the
working
groups
were
active
to
now
have
accomplished
with
the
community
that
was
active.
A
this
is
really
amazing
and
b.
I
realized
that
it
really
connected
to
to
those.
Rather
also
you
know,
social
sciences,
or
you
know
just
typical
political
science
governance.
That's
where,
basically,
especially
also
the
common
stack
network,
is
super,
strong
and
etc.
A
That's
that
was
my
a
little
enlightenment,
basically
that
we
actually,
through
this
process,
also
really
brought
together
more
disciplines
before
that.
I
think
we're
really
just
super
techy
and
super
engineering
heavy.
Focusing
on
these.
You
know
ai
control,
what
tools
we
need
and
so
on,
and
that
was
important.
Now
we
have
these
tools
but
then
like.
Why
are
we
using
them?
A
So
from
from
your
experience,
like
those
people,
also
governance
law,
legal
backgrounds,
if
you
have
encountered,
we
know
and
we
have
political
scientists
right,
they
do
feel
their
part.
They
are
token
engineers,
or
would
you
say
they
feel
like
still
this
disconnect
of
token
engineers
are
doing
the
engineering
heavy
stuff
and
we
do
something
else.
C
A
A
Also
disseminate,
or
at
the
very
least
talk
about
or
with
questions
bring
that
awareness.
Through
those
questions
we
are
going
to
basically
spread
in
the.
C
Yeah
I'm
curious
if
one
person
can
be
a
token
engineer
or
if
it's
always
or
if
you
always
need
a
team
like.
A
Can
you
yeah,
I
think
we
have
those
polymaths,
but
that's
what
it
is
right.
It's
literally
you
have
this
math
understanding,
that's
your
main
language,
but
then
you
have
I
for,
for
whatever
reasons
have
gone
through
all
of
that
and
actually
have
gone
deeper
than
just
look
into
how
all
of
that
might
connect
on
a
high
level.
I
mean
what
I've
done.
The
past
year
is
really.
I
appeared
into
everything
and
every
time
my
brain
exploded-
and
I
felt
like
you
know,
starting
from
zero
understanding,
nothing
and
so
on.
A
A
Typically,
it's
the
split
right
engineering,
heavy
tank,
heavy
science
versus
the
the
social
sciences
side,
and
then
we
have
those
interconnections
and
I
think
let's
say
the
best-
is
that
token
engineering
teams
make
that
flower
come
to
life
and
they
have
a
process
and
they
have
a
common
language
which
is
currently
with
the
help
of
everyone
appearing
right.
A
I'm
I'm
kind
of
already
quest
interviewing
you
olivia.
I
hope
it's
okay
with
that.
These
are
these
type
of
questions,
basically,
because
you
had
also
a
lot
of
insights
into
all
of
the
working
groups.
A
A
C
I
think
I
think
the
the
working
groups
emerged
from
okay,
so
I
was
thinking
the
other
day.
What
is
the
difference
between
what
we
are
doing
in
like
a
grant
giving
process
and
I
think
grants
the
way
we
know
them
today?
They
are
given
from
a
centralized
entity
yeah.
A
C
Be
organized
and
and
then
the
governance
itself,
the
challenges
of
the
governance
bring
all
the
necessities
of
like
multiple
disciplines,
so
conflict,
conflict
resolution
and
cultural
agreements,
communications
and
transparency.
C
C
When
you're,
organizing
yourself
within
others,
you
need
some
types
of
tools
to
make
transactions
to
like
the
very
organizational.
C
To
be
organized,
you
need
to
be
exchanging
things
and
they
can
be
material
and
material
so
like
it
happens
that
this
is
the
token
engineering
commons,
but
for
other
comments.
Maybe
we
would
also
need
this
similar
body
of
organization
to
allow
the
government
to
happen,
and
then
this
would
build
other
economies.
A
And
so
that
was
something
you
know
again,
it's
of
course
this
is,
it
literally
emerged
right
I
mean
it
was
kind
of
roughly
planned,
but
literally
what
emerged
in
token
engineering
comments.
A
I've
also
seen
in
in
data,
not
that
structured,
because
it's
always
like,
I
think,
that's
why
I
resonate
so
so
much
with
them.
It's
like
okay,
if
this
has
been
done
before
you
know,
shouldn't
be
questioned
radically,
so
that
that,
but
even
through
all
of
that
medical
questioning,
there
is
really
a
similar
pattern.
Like
this
deliberation
in
working
groups
was
more
about
sense.
Making.
A
You
know
really
really
free,
but
still
the
same
questions
emerged
right
like
how
are
we
going
to
implement
the
infrastructure
that
needs
to
be
implemented
or
those
decisions
or
free
use
like
these
typical
technical
questions
like
griff
had
taken
on
right
and
then
soft
golf
that
you
have
taken
on
decision
making
governance
decision
making
and
we
do
make
decisions
all
the
time
you
know
every
community
might
have
their
own
style
or
or
discover
it
or
they
copy
something.
A
From
like
this
meta
golf
or
any
repositories,
they
say:
hey
democracy
is
this,
and
this
is
how
it
rolls
or
democracy
is
the
other
thing
or
you
can
say
no
we're
going
to
reinvent
something
else
like
the
ietf
did,
with
the
humming
and
rough
condenses
and
running
coats,
and
we
reject
kings
and
so
on
so,
but
that
is
also
happening
like
or
even
in
more
streamlined
projects
that
maybe
also
have
you
know,
corporates
or
investors
in
their
back.
A
Be
the
problem
that
when
you
start
small,
everyone
is
in
the
same
boat,
sharing
the
same
passion,
same
idea,
saying
yes
to
the
same
things
and
know
to
the
same
things,
but
when
that
thing
grows
or
basically
you
have
a
token
and
it's
out
there
right
and
anyone
can
participate,
because
that's
what
we
mean
with
this
far
end
of
the
decentralization
of
token
economies
that
shall
reach
that
point
or
be
bootstrapped
like
that
right,
any
world
views
will
come
in
and
clash
and
the
one
thing
about
basically
figuring
out
that
there
has
been
a
clash
or
a
conflict
number
one
oftentimes,
that's
not
even
doesn't
surface
soon
enough
right
and
then.
A
Secondly,
what
is
a?
What
is
this
this
process?
One
can
take
without
it
being
too
too
automated
or
too
clean-cut
were
also
not
being
you
know,
everyone
needs
to
sit,
hold
their
hands,
which
is
not
possible
anyways
and
then
you
know
find
their
way
to
each
other
again
so,
but
that
seems
to
be
a
topic
that
is
also,
I
think,
people
don't
and
and
groups
and
and
even
startups,
don't
think
of
it
soon
enough
and
then
comes
in
community
anyways
and,
I
think
olivia.
A
So
I
really
believe
that
one
fundamental
value
add
of
token
engineering.
Commons
already
is
this
experience
with
the
working
groups,
because,
if
a
token
engineer
knows
or
a
token
engineering
community,
a
team
forms
within
any
type
of
organization
that
says
we're
going
to
decentralize
now
or
in
10
years.
These
are
the
topics
that
will
emerge
and
they
need
to
take
care
of.
A
So
that's
why
I
was
super
excited
on
monday
to
actually
say
hey.
If
we
can
make
these
things
really
accessible
usable
and
as
a
token
engineer,
you
go
into
a
project
and
they
expect
from
you.
You
know
to
be
able
to
deal
with
all
of
that.
The
first
thing
you
say:
okay,
look!
This
is
the
base
layer
we
need,
so
I
don't
have
to
you
know:
firefight,
that's
kind
of
already
something
we
could
put
out
there.
A
So
I'd
be
super
happy
to
somehow
help
with
that
and
and
then
I
think
we
could
have
questions
to
see
whether
you
know
part
practitioning
or
practicing
token
engineers
out.
There
feel
the
pain
if
they
don't
have
such
basis.
A
A
C
C
Not
undermine
that
and
to
really
understand
that
we
don't
need
to
vote
to
make
decisions
that,
like
voting,
only
addresses
a
few
types
of
decisions
that
need
to
be
made
that
way.
But
when
we
are
in
a
call
in
all
of
those
working
groups,
we're
making
decisions
all
the
time-
and
I
think
that's
the
that's
the
beauty
of
it
and
the
and
that's
why
it
works.
C
So
I
think
more
and
more,
even
when
scaling
and
we're
gonna
see
if
all
this
works,
when
the
token
actually
comes
right
like
when,
when
it
scales
and
when
he
has
something
of
value
when
people
come
from
different
backgrounds
continue
to
have
the
spaces
where
we
can
like
face
to
face
make
decisions.
A
Yeah,
okay,
so,
okay,
basically,
then,
okay,
basically,
I
would
put
this
together,
but
then
also
asked
literally
of
you,
or
maybe
also
from
the
community
steward,
to
to
put
together
questions
also
from
their
inside.
Maybe
that
would
help
others
who
are
currently.
You
know,
working
in
token
networks
that
we
find
you
know
that
we
find
out
from
these
questions,
whether
you
know
they
are
entirely
free
floating
or
whether
they
have
already
these
structures,
whether
they
feel
it's
helping
their
work.
To
actually
focus
on.
A
You
know,
making
ethical
engineering,
design
decisions
or
whether
this
is
you
know
far
off.
It
sounds
like
a
you
know,
a
virtual
world.
What
we
are
talking
about
here,
so
that
type
of
practitioner
versus
what
we
have
been
practicing
here
in
tech,
getting
the
the
the
spectrum
you
know
of
that
would
would
will
be
super
interesting
and
also,
maybe
some
hopefully
would
answer
a
bit
more
about,
maybe
some
examples
of
problems
they
have
encountered
where
they
had
to
make
decisions
or
trade-offs
where
they
knew.
A
You
know
I'm
just
developing
this
and
deploy
this
this
way,
because
it
was
the
best
I
could
or
because
this
is
what
I
was
asked
to
do,
and
you
know
I
had
no
say
so.
This
type
of
questions
I'd
like
to
get
out
there
and
to
see
like
I
know
it's
a
luxury,
and
I
know
that
not
many
token
engineers
who
actively
work
out
there
have
this
type
of
luxury
to
think
about
ethical
engineering,
but
that's
something
we
need
to
do
so.
That
part.
A
Last
time
we
gathered
some
questions
also
with
input
of
of
sparrow
a
lot.
Actually
some
questions
with
respect
to
you
know
their
motivations,
etc.
A
Then
we
have
this
part
about
their
environment
and
how
far
it
is
from
the
best
possible
version,
which
I
believe
really
the
token
entering
commons
practiced
and
is
practicing
it's
ever
evolving,
and
I
can
say
that
you
know
the
project
that
I've
seen
can
definitely
benefit
from
from
this
experience
as
well.
A
So
with
the
questions
we
can
make
them
aware
and
then
the
the
the
whole
philosophical
or
ethical
engineering
questions.
Let
me
try
and
share
those,
and
then
you
will
understand
my
so
working
with
the
polymath.
It's
always
a
pain
and
a
pleasure.
C
A
Yeah
yeah
and
I
have
a
hypothesis
but
just
a
hunch,
because
that
came
up
a
couple
of
times
as
well.
So
if
you
think
of
that,
as
the
you
know,
the
flower,
that
is
you
know,
engineering
and
more
social
sciences,
part,
I
think
the
whole
tao
and
our
tools,
and
so
on,
have
been
really
provided
from
from
the
social
science
background
people.
You
know
when
I
think
of
dao's
dog
stack,
felipe
you
guys
and
so
on,
and
the
the
more
okay.
A
This
is
math,
let's
either
put
it
in
smart
contracts
directly
or
in
in
a
model
that
comes
more
from
from
the
programmers
or
or
the
the
the
tech
side
and
could
be
interesting
like
and
I
believe,
really,
if
you,
when,
we
managed
to
to
match
that,
like
with
how
it
worked
out
or
is
working
out
now
with
tech
and
that
the
people
also
see.
A
I
think
we
need
to
make
that
more
accessible.
Nonetheless,
yeah,
when
the
people
see
that
basically
then
a
they
can
come
in
and
you
know
to
to
scratch
their
own
edge
to
help
us
build
those
tools
right
or
or
this
information
processes
or
test
out
alternatives.
A
Like
we
said
we,
we
had
all
of
these
tools:
praise
giving
being
this
community
really
this
relationship
building
thing
but
at
the
same
time
super
heavy
on
the
person.
You
know,
don't
forget
the
people
to
this
phrase
and
then
this
present
type
it
in
in
the
right
way
and
so
on
and
so
forth
versus
the
source.
Cred
type
with
you
know,
configure
weights.
A
A
It's
got
to
be
totally
different
so,
but
this
is
the
space
that
we
are
in
and
I
think
if
we
get
people
who
you
know
who
need
those
tools
who
are
building
those
and
who
are
using
those
if
you
get
them
excited
about
a
our
goal,
to
really
make
that
those
connect
to
really
make
it
super
easy
to
build
those
relationships,
even
if
you're
far
apart,
remote
globally
distributed
and
at
the
same
time,
be
it
as
automatable
as
possible,
so
that
people
actually
can
focus
on
their
relations
and
their
creative
spaces
and
don't
have
to
fill
out
what
could
be
uncovered
algorithmically.
A
So
this
is
our
one
one
of
those.
How
do
you
call
it
one
of
those
north
stars?
A
So,
okay-
and
basically
I
will
just
show
this-
this
has
been
super
heavy,
but
you
know
philosophy
heavy
ethics,
heavy,
but
then
also
these
are
questions
that
people
normally
don't
ask
themselves
unless
they're
philosophers,
but
if
you
want
actually
people
to
question
their
actions,
their
biases
as
engineers,
creating
those
policies
that
are
going
to
become
a
group's
economy
like
in
tech,
we're
saying,
yeah
your
economy,
your
parameters,
right,
you
have
to
come
and
be
interested
or
or
help
us
solve
this
challenge,
and
this
is
just
the
tech,
techie
tech
community
that
we
want
to
have
participating
in
that
decision
making,
so
that
the
economy
and
its
parameters
and
how
it's
deployed
is
legitimate
right.
A
Think
about
now.
I,
like
that.
All
of
the
projects
that
I
tried-
and
now
I
realize
just
the
gap
is
so
huge.
We
need
to
you
know
how
to
call
it
buy
it.
What
we
can
do
now,
imagine
all
of
this
god-like
technology
put
into
smart
microgrids.
You
know,
if
you
just
think
about
the
technology
side
of
it
everything
checks
out,
and
that
was
my
my
my.
How
do
you
call
it?
The
hit
is
here
almost
all
the
time
is,
it
makes
sense.
Technologically,
it
is
possible.
A
We
can
automate
all
the
things
and
everyone
has
access
to
free
electricity
right,
but
then
the
people
side
and
their
environments,
and
basically
that
we
are
coming
up
with
some
automation
of
their
utility
infrastructure,
which
isn't
just
you
know,
documents
or
knowledge,
it's
really
electricity
and
in
places
where
they
will
get
electricity
for
the
first
time.
A
That
is
a
huge
responsibility,
and
once
you
see
that
it
cannot
be
unseen
and
that's
why
I
you
know,
I
was
actually
super
happy
to
have
the
opportunity
to
dig
so
deep
into
the
ethics
and
philosophy
of
it,
and
I
must
say,
the
gap
is
still
huge.
A
So
how
are
we
going
to
actually
make
those
questions
askable
to
people
who
are
firefighting
out
there
right
that
they
actually
are
interested
in?
I
never
asked
myself
that.
Maybe
I
should
even
if
we
get
there,
it
would
be
super
cool,
but
these
are
such
fundamental
questions
that
actually
trigger
one
to
yeah.
A
Understand
that
there
are
really
really
fundamental
things
that
we
don't
reflect
upon
if
we
are
only
improving
kpis
and
parameters,
and
this
is
where,
for
example,
coming
from
a
corporate
world,
I
had
never
learned
anything
else
right
and
these
rabbit
hole.
Tokens
and
token
engineering
finally
got
me
into
these,
and
I
can
tell
like
design
thing
that
software
developers
also
concern
themselves
with,
but
now
that
they
that
they
do
have
this
god-like
technology.
A
They
must
right
because
again,
if
they're
super
good
engineers-
and
they
have
worked
well
with
the
community
they're-
going
to
create
those
token
economies,
of
course,
in
teams
and
in
decentralized
manner,
but
the
effects
and
ramifications
of
their
simple
algorithmic
decisions
are
going
to
affect
communities
lives
depending
on
what
it
is
embedded
in.
You
know
if
it's
just
digital
games,
it's
fine
right
or
if
it's
even
defy,
is
like
a
finance
game.
A
You
know,
and
if
you,
if
you
lose,
you
lose,
you
knew
it.
You
know,
do
your
own
research.
So
this
is
what
people
tell
each
other,
but
if
we
want
to
actually
bring
these
token
economies
to
infrastructures
and
make
those
full.
A
Actually,
as
a
human
being,
you
know
one
can
ask
oneself
that
and
have
fun
with
the
answers,
and
actually,
if
you
know
like
myself,
if
you're
like,
I
don't
have
time
for
that
you're
missing
out
on
something
right,
so
that's
fun
as
it
is,
but
since
we
want
really
to
get
answers,
maybe
even
back
I'm
definitely
a
proponent
of
that.
We
need
to
make
those
translations
of
these
fundamental
questions
still
into
the
domain
of
the
people,
and
I
thought
to
make
this
an
exercise.
A
Like
us
token
engineers
we
could
have
a
com
translation
of
that
into
our
like.
Why
do
we
need
token
engineering
from
which
discipline
the
token
entering
start
from
everyone
has
their
own
answers
here,
like
some
will
say,
cybernetics
and
some
other.
A
So
I
think
we
will
have
some
nice
answers,
but
at
the
same
time
I
went
through
and
I
need
fabian's
input
a
bit
more,
but
also
if
you're
interested
would
be
super
cool,
especially
if
you
also
are
interested
to
look
through
these
more
fundamental
questions
and
maybe
give
some
feedback
or
some
some
help.
Also,
so
I'm
trying
to
figure
that
out
still
how
we
could
translate
it
to
to
token
engineers
and
basically
you
know
to
their
or
of
whom
we
know
to
their
lingo,
so
it
doesn't
sound.
A
Only
philosophical
and
the
other
thing
is
what
is
interesting
in
that
in
this
exercise
of
getting
those
philosophical
questions
that
will
hopefully
trigger
some
answers
about
ethos
and
ethics
in
the
token
engineering
community,
as
is,
we
can
also
translate
them
with
this
four
quadrants
that
regis
mentioned.
I
don't
know
if
you,
if
you
remember
yeah,
but
basically
that
we
are
always
you
know
feeling
and
then
making
decisions
in
these
in
these
four
quadrants.
You
know
the
the
individual
subjective,
then
my
behavior,
you
know
what
is
objectively
visible.
A
Then,
when
I'm
in
another
community,
but
they
are
all
still
my
values,
but
they
differ
in
what
type
of
v-
and
I
am
currently
active-
and
maybe
they
don't
differ
much
because
maybe
if
my
one
of
my
values
is
really
unflexible
and
I'm
just
that,
for
example,
maybe
I
don't
rome
through
very
different
communities
that
can
have
very
different
values
and
then
it's
so
the
systems,
all
the
structures
and
systems
we
live
and
operate
in
the
environment.
A
So
these
are
the
two
templates
and
from
that
I'm
trying
to
get
to
questions
that
a
are
insightful
to
get
a
feel
of
the
ethos
that
exist
and
then
also
that
dig
a
level
or
two
deeper
that
even
when
people
didn't
have
those
questions
that
they
start
to
to
ask
themselves
and
maybe
for
the
first
time
or
maybe
they're
super
happy
that
finally,
they
can
take
time
and
answer
those
won't
happen,
but
maybe
some
of
them
give
give
longer
answers,
etc.
A
So
this
is
what
I'm
hoping
for
these
three
parts
and
if
you
can
also
give
give
more
feedback
to
that
livia
that
would
be
super
interesting
and
I'll.
Share.
Share
that
and
basically
there's
just
one
practical
aspect
I
had
in
my
mind.
Is
you
know
how
do
we
keep
keep
this
up?
I
think
I
will
ask
for
someone
to
actually
help
with
the
organization
you
know
stuff.
A
You
know
maybe
some
a
newer
member
in
the
token
entering
community
who
might
be
interested
and
who
has
data
science
background
or
or
would
love
to
organize
the
questions
or
questionnaire
yeah
or
if
you
know
someone
who
might
be
interested
or
yeah.
B
A
A
So
this
is
the
link-
and
maybe
I'll
share
this
one
with
you,
because
I'd
like
to
have
some
feedback
on
the
bigger
questions
as
well,
but
what
I
would
love
to
share
with
the
the
people
who
participated
in
those
exploratory
works
right
now
until
now
the
questions
from
last
time,
intrinsic
motivations,
then
the
questions
today
that
we
talked
about
from
the
experience
with
token
engineering
comments-
and
you
know
if
you
want
to
start
that
part
in
this
proposal
document
already-
please
go
ahead
or
I'll
I'll
add
some
and
the
third
questions
are
the
ethical
philosophical
questions
you
want
to
get
onto.
A
I
would
only
take
those
translations
to
the
proposal
document,
and
maybe
we
also
should
aim
for
not
30
questions,
but
fewer
right
so
and-
and
the
goal
should
be-
you
know,
get
those
questions
now
together.
Ask
the
the
participants
to
to
give
input,
improve
the
questions
or
maybe
reformulate
so
they're,
not
leading
or
anything
and
then
put
them
into
a
forms
right
and
basically
send
it
out
to
everyone.
We
know
who
are
currently
active
and
maybe
also
just
broadly
disseminate
and
see
what
comes
around
we're.
A
Also
currently,
a
lot
of
people
a
few
at
the
very
least,
are
in
kernel
of
the
bitcoin
community.
We
can
ask
a
share
there
as
well.
I
think
there
will
be
some
returns,
definitely
because
this
is
what,
for
example,
the
the
past
or
this
week's
topic
is
token
mechanism
design.
So
maybe
it's
a
good
time
to
distribute
those
questions
now
you
know,
have
you
considered.
C
C
Graphical
questions
and
having
the
the
space
to
ask
people
that,
because
I
feel
like
a
lot
of
people,
don't
even
consider,
but
I
think
it
would
also
be
great
to
have
some
more
specific
questions
to
to
focus
and
ground
the
the
body
of
questions
and
maybe
leave
them
optional
in
the
type
form.
So
people
can
answer
like
as
many
questions
as
they
want
and
submit
because
they
need
them
required,
because
then
we
even
get
a
feeling
of
like
what
people
feel
more
comfortable,
answering
or
not
and
yeah.
C
I
was
watching
this
talk
yesterday
that
talks
about
how
we
are
in
obsessively
extrovert
society,
and
now
this
affects
like
everything
and
ultimately
the
systems
we
live
in
and
that's
why
attention
is
so
needed,
and
everyone
is
fighting
for
attention,
because
everything
wants
to
capture
you
out
of
yourself
right,
like
it's
just
like,
and
the
people
that
are
more
funny
loud
aggressive,
like
all
of
this
extrovert
qualities
are
more
seen
in
this
moment
and
how
this
is
affecting
deeply
like
our
relationship
with
the
self
and
with
the
things
that
are
meaningful
to
us
and
and
this
touches
and
the
intrinsic
motivation
as
well
how
the
inner
world
has
been
so
neglected.
C
So
I
was
thinking
like
how
could
we
start
offering
this
balance
in
the
economy
to
what
would
an
economy
that
it's
not
only
extrovert
would
would
look
like
like
if
we
look
inside
what
are
the
things
that
would
come
out
like
if
we
had
more
of
a
balance
in
this
in
and
out.
So
this
might
be
interesting
to
to
ask.
C
A
A
Yes,
of
course,
it's
it's
good
to
find
information
and
find
the
things
that
you're
looking
for
and
a
ranking
mechanism
is
seems
practical,
but
that
has
this
if
it's
just
one-sided
or
if
it
only
ranks
one
way,
and
you
just
don't
see
the
things
that
don't
surface
don't
become
popular
and
so
on
and
so
forth,
and
then,
if
people
know
that
mechanism
again
like
you're
becoming
that,
oh
I
have
to
be
loud,
I
have
to
be
seen
I
have
to
so
you.
You
are
basically
optimizing
to
this.
It's
the
system
and
its
rules.
D
A
Exactly
and
that's
what
I
like
what
just
said
last
time
literally,
you
know
even
maybe
reading
those
questions
could
be.
A
You
know
if
they
first
at
first,
don't
have
an
answer
or
said
uninteresting
or
it
still
is
going
to
you
know,
be
processed,
and
maybe
that
awareness
is
even
enough
to
get
them
excited
or
interested
about
this
token
engineering
community
who
who
cares
about
those
balanced
and
diverse
views
and
so
on?
So
I
think
that's
really
something
we
can
yeah.
E
A
Cultivate
because,
as
I
said,
I've
never
been
in
such
a
diverse
environment
ever
before,
and
I
don't
see
it
that
much
either,
for
example,
in
the
invisible
economy.
Again,
it's
also
the
other
way
around.
Like
people
come
in
with
other,
let's
say
more
mainstream.
No
one
has
mainstream
opinions
here
in
crypto,
but
like
the
more
mainstream
crypto
opinion,
so
when
they
come
and
they
you
can't
see
their
their
that
they're
uneasy,
because
you
know
the
on
the
other
side
of
this
again.
A
There's
this
you
know
being
radical
and
not
going
for
the
obvious,
etc.
Again,
it's
so.
I
think
that
invisible
economy
in
that
part,
the
practical
set
again,
could
also
benefit
from
our
balance
when
it
really
wants
to
be,
you
know,
considered
by
interest
people
or
when
you
come
in
you're
like
okay.
These
are
just
radical,
I'm
just
gonna
go
away,
so
that's
the
the
current
thing,
so
that
balance
is
important
and
yeah.
A
We
can
at
the
very
least
ask
for
it,
but
I
think
also
it's
something.
We
need
to
actively
take
care
that
we
keep
it
that
we
cultivated
more.
So
that's
definitely
one
of
those.
You
know
if
I
would
put
those
invisible
valve
out
there.
Diversity
is
definitely
one.
A
E
I
just
got
distracted
right
now.
I
had
a
delivery,
but
overall
the
conversation
over
all
the
conversation
was
being
great
yeah.
I
really
love
this
of
the
ethical
engineering
and
I
think
all
these
questions
as
libby
said,
must
be,
if
not
answered,
but
listen
and
thinking
about
it,
and
I
think
that's
awesome.
I
really
love
the
discussion,
even
if
I
didn't
participate.
A
Cool
okay,
no
thank
you,
then.
Basically,
yeah
I'll
put
together
those
questions
and
if
you
can
add
you
know
the
ones
that
we
discussed
with
respect
to
tech
and
that
you
had
in
mind.
If
you
can
add
them,
I
think
from
today
we
can
already
have
the
starting
point
and
circulate,
and
I
will
find
you
know
a
bit
more
support.
A
I
don't
know
if
both
of
you
can
also
know
that
you've
heard
what's
what's
in
it,
that
we
find
someone
who
might
be
interested
in.
You
know
helping
with
the
answers
going
through
the
answers,
who's
also
interested
in
the
and
the
content
of
it.
A
You
know
and
then
basically
help
can
sort
before
you
know.
We
can
then
do
the
analysis
with
mikhail
and
everyone,
but
I
think
there
will
be
a
lot
of
sorting
and
coordinating
that
needs
to
be
done,
and
I
realized
that
I'm
like
stack
overflow
yeah,
it's.
A
I
took
a
yeah,
some
some
more
work
which
I'm
super
excited
about,
but
that
wasn't
planned
and
but
at
the
same
time
I
am
also
super
happy
that
we
started
this
working
group
and,
at
the
very
least,
we're
gonna
uncover
some
insights
that
are
going
to
be
helpful
for
the
other
and
for
the
community
as
well,
and
then
still
hoping
that
we
get
the
other
members
active
and
involved
that
you
know
this
thing
self-organizes
it
as
well,
but
I
think
it
at
first
we
need
you,
know
some
people
or
someone
more
who
could
be
helping
with
the
operational
and
coordination
part
of
this
whole
community
survey.
C
Perhaps,
to
have
on
google
meets
because
then
only
the
people
that
like
know
about
it,
would
join,
but
it's
also
cool
to
have
to
have
it
open,
poking
and
dropping
and.
A
Okay,
we'll
do
I
think
that
was
just
because
of
or
mostly
because
of
alberto,
but
I'll
just
ask
him
to
get
comfortable
with
this
card,
and
then
we
can.
We
can
do
that:
okay,
cool
and
then
yeah.
We
keep
every
two
weeks,
but
I
think
in
the
next
two
weeks
we
can
assume
closely
finish
that
question
list
and
make
it
that
we
can
distribute.
A
I
mean
if
we
could
make
that
rather
quickly
have
a
first
round
of
distribution.
You
know
a
set
in
in
the
kernel
community
as
well.
I
think
we
will
have
a
lot
more
turnout.