►
From YouTube: 3 Community stewards call
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
B
Thank
you,
juan
yeah,
I'm
excited
today
I
was
starting
the
thing
on
the
grounds
and
I
was
putting
some
money
and
then
I
was
like
wow.
All
my
money
is
gone
and
I
didn't
contribute
to
anything.
But
sam
then
explain
me
like
this
money
is
there
you
just
have
to
click
in
here
and
then
it's
fine
and
it
was
wow
thanks,
because
I
was
feeling
so
bad
because
you
know
I
was
trying
to
contribute
that
I
was
thinking
man.
I
lose
my
money
and
I
don't
contribute.
That's
no
good
but
yeah.
B
Now
it's
that's
awesome
and
yeah,
I'm
great,
I'm
really
great
and
I'll
pass
it
to.
C
Leave
it-
and
here
are
you
there,
okay
I'll,
take
a
while,
since
he
comes
back
yeah,
I'm
great
today.
C
How
do
you
say
it
wiz?
What
wizards.
C
Yeah
that
so
I
don't
know
if
I
will
get
to
go
pick
it
up
or
not
so
I'm
feeling
kind
of
like.
Oh
will.
I
be
able
to
run
before
the
storm
so
yeah
other
than
that.
I'm
great
and
I
passed
to
jake.
D
They're
so
fun,
especially
when
you're
stuck
in
them
and
you're
outside
in
your
car.
You
can't
leave
it's
so
cool.
Oh
my
god
anyways!
I
missed
the
onboarding
call
that
sucked,
because
I
had
to
call
paypal,
don't
ever
call
paypal.
If
you
can
avoid
having
to
talk
to
paypal.
Do
it
don't
ever
call
paypal?
That's
a
freaking
nightmare,
it's
horrible!
D
What's
faithful
going
on
for
like
four
weeks
now
too,
and
it's
just
so
other
than
that,
I'm
great
besides
that
I've
like
made
no
progress
with
paypal
and
it's
been
a
month
and
that's
awesome.
Thanks.
Paypal
really
really
love
how
big
you
are.
Yes,
I'm
reading
the
google
doc
at
the
same
time.
So
I'm
not
really
I'm
sorry
who
oh
hi
tam
you
gotta
go
now.
F
I
feel
very
good
for
those
of
you
who
don't
know
tonight
is
poker
night,
so
my
favorite
night
of
the
week
and
I'm
looking
I'm
a
little
nervous
too,
because
I'm
looking
at
our
agenda,
which
I'm
sure
we'll
never
get
through
all
of
it.
There's
there's
like
five
sessions
of
agendas
in
here,
and
I
threw
my
things
on
the
bottom,
not
to
me
they're
the
lowest
priority.
So
I
wonder
if
we
can
prioritize
those,
especially
the
road
map
and
zenboard
and
maybe
time
box
it
to
something.
F
This,
but
can
we
please
get
through
these
two
and
I
will
pass
it
to
if
everyone
deems
it
a
priority,
and
I
will
pass
to
tonga,
I
don't
believe
you've
gone
yet.
C
Yeah
this
is
the
this
is
the
steward.
It's
called,
but
you're
welcome
to
to
watch
it
for
sure
yeah.
H
I
A
No,
I
I
already
passed.
I
I
don't
know
if
yes,
but
she
let's
leave
her
some
time
to
eat.
E
I'm
in
between
bites
it's
okay,
I
feel
good.
Today
I
finally
got
the
blog
out
that
felt
nice
and
my
goal
this
week
is
just
like
one
thing
per
day:
that's
it!
I
just
wanna
everyday
ship,
one
thing
until
the
holiday,
and
I
guess
we
distractions
eating
for
the
first
part
and
yeah.
I
guess
we
have
a
lot
to
go
into
so,
let's
roll.
C
Griff
is
coming
or
I
just
message
him,
but
I
think
we
can
start
because,
yes,
there
is
so
much
in
the
agenda,
so
I
did
want
to
go
on
a
little
session
about
the
community
stewards
working
group
and
I
think
that
will
help
us
to
be
organized
in
the
in
the
longer
run,
and
also
I
I
wrote
under
each
one
of
the
for
the
agenda
items,
the
ones
that
I
thought
we
could
that
perhaps
this
call
is
not
the
best
place
for
it,
but
then
we
can
also
discuss
that
on
like
what
is
the
most
important
things
that
we
discuss
in
this
call.
C
So
for
gravity
and
discussions
on
questions
on
becoming
a
hatcher.
I
suggest
that
we
talk
about
them
in
the
respective
working
groups
and
and
then
we
can
have
more
time
for
this
call.
So
I
don't
know
if
juan
and
jess
do
you.
C
C
Sorry,
what
was
the
disco?
What
was
you
which
questions?
There's
three
agenda
points
that
I
suggest
moving
to
the
working
groups
instead
of
discussing
it
here,
the
one
discussion
off
the
hatch
and
then
the
gravity
posts.
E
Totally,
I
was
just
writing
and
I
just
wanted
to
say
just
mostly
everybody
was
in
the
last
call,
but
whoever
wasn't
just
that
come
to
the
coms
working
group
next
tuesday,
because
we're
going
to
have
a
discussion
around
the
narrative.
Now
that
the
legal
working
group
is
making
the
recommendation
that
we
ask
people
to
join
the
seastack
association.
So
it's
a
really
important
discussion.
E
A
On
my
topics,
I
just
wanted
to
say
something
really
short,
that
I
invite
the
stewards
to
review
to
see
the
the
documents,
because
there
is
the
idea
of
starting
a
training
from
january
to
february
for
the
gravity
group,
so
yeah,
we
are
running
like
an
open
call
and
that's
it
for
tomorrow
we
have
the
gravity,
call
and
we'll
discuss
this.
F
C
Okay,
so
just
a
little
background
for
why,
I
think
it's
important
that
we
become
a
working
group
that
the
community
stewards
are
not
just
a
role,
but
that
we
have
more
of
a
structure
for
how
we
evolve
our
coordination.
C
So
now
I
think
everybody's
seeing
how
things
are
getting
like
crazier
and
crazier,
and
it's
not
gonna,
be
any
different
after
the
hatch
is,
is
just
gonna
like
increase.
If
anything,
so
we
already
have
a
lot
more
working
groups
than
we
initially
started
with,
and
I
think
also
that,
for
example,
the
tc
lab
is
also
a
working
group
and
that
we
should
also
invite
sean
to
be
part
of
this
group
and
with
the
group
getting
bigger,
we
start
to
have
like
a
yeah
to
have
a
necessity
to
coordinate
better
around
everything.
C
We're
doing-
and
I
think
this
the
time
of
this
meeting
is
becoming
shorter
and
shorter.
Hence
how
many
topics
we
have
in
the
agenda.
So
how
can
we
prepare
to
be
the
most
organized
possible
and
that
the
most
important
things
come
to
this
call
for
us
to
discuss
and
understand
what
is
the
structure?
So
I
was
thinking.
Maybe
we
could
use
this
meeting
for
a
sprint
planning
and
a
sprint
review,
so
we
could
have
like
one
call
every
two
weeks.
C
So
we
can
like
mostly
coordinate
and
americans,
pick
more
on
that
we've
been
doing
a
similar
process
for
the
common
stack
and
I
think
it
would
be
very
helpful
to
apply
it
here
also
and
then,
in
the
other
week
we
do
half
of
the
session
of
the
meeting
to
go
through
all
the
issues
and
see
if
we
have
any
blocks
and
if
we
need
coordination
around
them
and
then
the
other
half
of
the
meeting
for
two
topics
of
discussion
that
perhaps
we
could
vote
what
are
the
most
important
ones
or
we
could
have
some
type
of
consensus
to
work
on
them.
C
C
C
So
I
just
want
to
pass
around
and
have
a
quick
temperature
check
on,
and
if
this
is
something
everyone
agrees
with
and
and
then
I
thought
we
could
use
like
15
minutes
to
work
on
the
template
together,
we
can
all
like
just
write
down
everything
we
think
and
then
I
can
organize
it
later.
E
C
Yeah,
maybe
that
wasn't
clear
just
if,
if
you
agree
with
transforming
this
into
a
working
group
with
having
this
structure
for
our
calls,
I
have
a
sprint
planning
and
nice
print
review
and
discussion,
and
if
we
can
use
this
next
15
minutes
to
fill
up
the
the
manifesto.
E
I
F
Yeah,
so
I
love
the
idea
of
us
working
on
the
manifesto
together
right
now.
I
also
don't
have
a
set
thing
in
mind
on
what
this
group
is
going
to
be,
so
I'm
super
curious
to
hear
what
we
come
up
with
as
a
as
a
group
for
the
the
sprint
planning.
I
just
love
it
so
much.
F
I
really
think
that
all
of
the
project
managers
for
each
working
group
planning
their
own
work
from
sprint
to
sprint
is
the
best
way
we
can
move
forward,
and
I,
like
the
idea
of
us
doing
one
week
of
a
sprint
of
the
the
sprint
planning
for
an
hour
and
then
the
next
week
is
sort
of
like
a
check-in
blockers
other
things
and
then
the
last
week
would
be
a
retrospective.
F
I
don't
know
if
we
would
do
a
review
because
we
might
have
something
to
show
we
might
have
something
to
show,
and
then
we
could
also
record
that
and
publish
the
those
those
sprint
reviews
for
the
larger
community
as
well.
The
way
we're
doing
with
common
stack.
A
Well,
I
think
that
my
initial
ideas
is
that
the
success
of
this
group
would
be
to
coordinate
smoothly
the
work
between
all
the
different
working
groups
and
the
failure
would
be
that
the
working
groups
are
developing
work
with
the
connection
between
each
other.
That's
like
my
good.
G
G
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
think,
what
is
going,
what
the
this
is.
Basically,
the
process
that
we
use
for
the
common
stack,
and
I
think
it's
would
be
a
really
good
idea
to
just
support
something
that
feels
like
it's
evolved
and
with
with
a
lot
of
the
same
people.
G
That's
already
working
seems
like
the
right
way
to
go
and
then
yeah,
I
think
the
plan
seems
good.
We
might
need
more
of
that
time
on
we'll
have
to
have
extra
meetings
to
do
it
so
that,
like
the
friday
retrospective
at
the
end
of
the
two
weeks,
will
be
a
thing
and
yeah.
What
was
the
other
thing?
Oh
yeah
yeah,
let's
hack
the
manifesto
today
and
I'll
pass
this
up.
B
D
Yeah
cause
before
I
even
knew
this
group
existed
that's
kind
of
what
I
was
looking
forward
because
everybody
gets
off
on
their
own
and
that's
great
I
like
that,
but
we
do
need
to
be
able
to
come
together
at
some
point
because
of
how
much
stuff
interacts
with
each
other.
I
really
would
like
to
know
personally
where
other
people
are
so
if
I
end
up
with
part
of
my
project
into
someone
else's,
I
want
to
know
exactly
what's
going
on
there,
so
we
can
help
work
together,
so
yeah
having
having
meetups.
D
However,
that
has
got
to
look
like
what
tam
said
sounded
perfect
to
me,
so
that
that's
awesome
and
then
yeah
here
I
am,
let's
go.
C
C
C
C
F
I'm
working
in
another
dog
take
that
as
a
we
could
start
now
too,
and
I
could
continue
while
was
while
we
were
starting.
F
C
Okay,
so
let's
review
it
and
then
not
sure
what
is
the
best
way
to
do
it
is
there
anything
somebody
wants
to
share
from
this.
G
I
I
would
just
say
you
know
we
got
to
recognize
we're.
Basically
the
overhead.
You
know
we
are
the
operations
and
it's
okay.
You
know,
but
that's
that's
what
this
working
group
really
feels
like
it's,
just
like
the
management
and
coordination
of
making
sure
that
everything
is
greased
up
and
oiled.
You
know
so
you
know
every
other
working
group
is
really
sexy
and
fun
and
we're
the
one
that
everyone
is
like.
Well,
you
know
that's
just
like
how
non-profits
work
there's
overhead.
G
So
it's
okay,
you
know,
but
we
just
have
to
accept
that.
I
hope
that
doesn't
become
lame.
C
Saying
so,
one
thing
I
would
like
to
bring
up
is
that.
C
Otherwise
we
would
start
to
have
like
some
bad
administration
of
what
is
happening
if
some
people
are
like
not
so
active
or
if
they
don't
have,
or
if
our
responsibilities
are
not
in
equilibrium,
you
know,
maybe
that's
something
to
to
think
about
like
how
we
off
board
is
there
like?
C
C
Is
it
like
a
process
to
not
have
this
keyword
be
a
steward
anymore
or
like?
What
do
you
guys
think
about
that.
E
G
A
Well,
I
I
think
that
there
is.
A
When
questions
around
these
topics
that
what
I'm
proposing
is
that
that
would
be
a
function
of
the
gravity
group,
and
that
is
something
that
would
be
like
with
continuous
work-
and
I
don't
have
an
answer
for
this
moment,
but
I
totally
agree
that
there
should
be
like
a
boundary
and
and
when,
like
people,
don't
commit
to
our
rules
or
when
they
just
simply
don't
want
to
be
involved
anymore.
They
can
just
take
a
a
a
path
to
follow.
C
Yeah,
I
think,
there's
definitely
the
conflict
point,
but
there
is
one
that
it's
more
simple
too,
that
it's
just
like.
Oh
there's,
no
reason
for
you
to
be
here
anymore.
F
Yeah,
I
have
some
thoughts
because
a
it's
a
really
interesting
question.
There
are
some
working
groups
that
have
a
finite
end.
You
know
like
they,
they
finish
the
work
and
then
there's
there's
there's
nothing
left
like
the
working
group
dissolves,
and
I
think
the
question
is
like
what
what
do
we
do
with
the
stewards
when
the
working
group
dissolves,
whether
there's
some
other
working
group
that
you
know
they
start
to
work
on?
It's
it's
an
interesting
question.
I
don't
know
what
the
answer
is.
F
To
be
honest,
so
it's
a
very
good
question
and
then
there's
like
I
guess
first.
I
also
want
to
say
that
ivy
I
added
ivy
to
this
list
because
she's
going
to
help
us
do
she's
joining
us
as
a
project
coordinator
common
stack,
and
I
think
she
can
help
with
some
of
the
coordination,
at
least
in
the
beginning
for
this,
and
then
I
think
you
know
the
other
question
I
feel
like.
Well,
I'm
not
a
steward
of
this
group.
F
You
know-
and
I
don't
think
I'm
I
don't
know
like
so
you
know
I
feel,
like
I'm
very
involved
in
this
right
now,
because
we're
we're
sort
of
we're
getting
the
the
balls
rolling
with
tec,
but
eventually
I
don't
think
that
I
would
be
part
of
this,
this
community,
this
tc
stewards
group
as
well.
So
maybe
that's.
You
know
a
use
case
that
we
can.
C
A
I
I
also
was
proposing
that,
for
the
gravity
group,
there
was
like
an
as
a
specific
code
of
conduct
so,
like
maybe
we
can
words
commit
to
certain
additional
requirements
like
confidentiality
on
sensitive
topics
or
like
self-determination,
because
that
would
leave
like
make
us
be
able
to
have
also
like
a
boundary
of
trust
between
us
and
and
what
can
we
like
not
expect
from
from
a
star
wars
from
a
steward
and
what
can
be
like
an
unwanted
behavior.
For
this.
E
Role
also,
I
feel
like
it
should
really
maybe
be
up
to
the
individual
in
a
way
like
just
because
something
dissolves
like
maybe
the
person's
really
excited
and
loves
being
a
student
there's
always
going
to
be
more,
you
know
work
that
means
stewarding,
so
I
don't
think
there'll
be
an
issue
of
like
not
enough
work.
I
think
maybe
just
up
to
the
individual,
like
some
people,
just
wanna,
be
put
in
three
months
and
then
take
a
break.
E
Maybe
can
they
come
back
at
some
point
like,
I
think
we
can
be
a
little
bit
fluid,
but
leave
it
up
to
the
individuals,
especially
if
they've
like
honored
us,
with
putting
in
so
much
work,
then
I
think
they
should
be
welcome
to
stay
if
they
like.
G
I
I
I
generally
think
this
should
be
an
open
call.
I
don't
necessarily
like
tongue
is
here
it's
great
that
he's
here
and
I
I
don't
think
that
we
should
kick
him
out
because
he's
not
a
steward.
You
know
he's
because
he's
not
leading
a
project,
so
people
should
be
able
to
come
and
listen,
but
if
they
don't
have
stuff
to
move
on
the
github
board
then
like
they
probably
won't
be
participating
actively.
G
You
know,
as
far
as
like
what
I
think
is
more
challenging
is
when
let's
say
that
we
put
someone,
someone
ends
up
taking
the
leadership
of
a
certain
task
and
just
keeps
dropping
it.
You
know,
then
it's
like
how
do
we
feel
like
hey?
Actually,
this
thing
needs
to
get
done
and
you're
not
doing
it
like.
G
A
Yes,
as
I
was
saying
that
the
next
phase
that
we
are
trying
to
to
start
in
the
gravity
group
involves
people
in
answering
questions
in
a
in
a
collective.
A
C
Cool,
so
maybe
we
can
move
on.
I
will
organize
the
the
manifesto
with
all
the
answers
we
got
and
then
then
circle
back
with
everyone
until
we
reach
the
final
form
and
last
thing,
if
you
have
anything,
if
if
we
should
continue
to
do
an
onboarding
process
for
the
stewards,
that
is
a
30
minutes
call,
I
don't
know
if
that
was.
I
don't
think
that
was
happening
anymore.
E
E
The
kickoff
article
is
what
I
usually
send,
and
hopefully
soon
you
know
with
the
forum
welcome,
but
I
think
we
need
to
like
commit
to
this
process.
If
we
are
going
to
do
it,
and
I
do
think
it's
important,
so
people
don't
go
away.
B
I'd
like
to
add
here
like,
for
example,
when
somebody
new
is
like
the
other
day,
there
was
a
a
friend
of
tonga
who
was
new
and
I
and
someone
said
like
who
to
onboarding
him,
and
I
I
wanted
to
do
it,
but
I
hesitate
because
I
don't
know
the
exact
things
I
should
explain
to
him
and
if
we
have
like
some
kind
of
document
with
the
with
the
specific
things
we
should
say
or
explain
to
our
new
people.
That
would
be
so
great
to
to
be
like
super
fluent
and
yeah.
That's
what
I
think.
E
That's
the
forum
that
we
are
trying
to
finish
this
week
so
for
now
I've
just
been
sending
people
the
kickoff
article
and
I
get
them
to
say,
hi
or
send
emoji
in
praise
channel.
And
then
I
answer
their
questions
and
invite
them
to
the
thursday
call
and
then
yeah.
Hopefully
we're
going
to
finish
the
forum
this
week.
And
then
we
can
just
point
them
straight
to
the
forum,
because
that
will
have
everything.
C
Yeah,
it's
mostly
like
a
warm
welcome.
You
know,
so
the
person
has
a
single
point
of
contact.
That
is
not
the
whole
group
and
then
they
can
feel
comfortable
to
ask
any
questions
in
a
direct
way.
It's
like
yeah,
it's
this
one-on-one
check-in
and
I
was
I
was
asking
also
about
the
onboarding
of
stewards
like
because
we
used
to
have
a
30-minute
call
for
when
a
steward
is
on
boarded.
C
So
I
wonder
if
that's
interesting,
and
I
think
it
is
actually
by
this
conversation
that
we're
having
now
like
right,
that
zaptimus
like
would
like
some
clarity
on
how
to
onboard
contributors
and
just
maybe
this
is
a
practice
that
makes
sure
that
we
are
all
in
the
same
page,
and
we
can
continue
to
do
that
and
then
we
can
decide
for
each
as
steward
that
we
on
board,
who
is
gonna?
Do
it
maybe
have
like
a
rotative
thing.
F
Can
I
ask
how
many
stewards
are
we
expecting
to
like?
What
is
our
expectation
in
terms
of
how
many
of
us
there
can
possib?
There
could
be.
F
We'll
also
also
have
funding
for
right,
because
every
working
group
is
going
to
have
to
have
a
proposal
for
submitted
for
funding
to
continue
to
continue
that
working
group.
So
I
guess
it's
also
a
matter
of
like
budgeting
like
what
are
we
expecting
in
terms
of
the
kind
of
proposals
that
we'll
we'll
be
submitting.
E
E
F
F
F
I
think
anyone
can
do
it,
and
maybe
we
do
a
sort
of
tracking
the
way
we're
doing
with
the
the
new
proposals
we
either
have
a
spreadsheet
or
some
documents,
or
you
know,
even
even
that,
an
issue
that
we
throw
into
github
and
just
a
list
of
new
people,
and
then
you
know
every
week
some
person
appoints
themselves
or
is
appointed
responsible
for
onboarding,
that
new
group,
maybe
it's
like
a
weekly
thing,
you're
a
week
of
onboarding
and
then
there's
a
list
of
new
people
that
week
and
ever
we
could
rotate.
C
I
Santi,
I
think
onboarding,
it's
it's
gonna
be
more
and
more
important
as
we
launch,
because
there's
gonna
be
people
coming
into
the
project
that
that's
new
and
the
project
will
be
much
more
evolved
and
in
in
a
way.
I
think
it's
great
to
keep
the
sessions
the
30-minute
sessions,
but
maybe
a
hybrid
method
of
sending
them
or
giving
them
the
links
to
follow
or
a
path
to
follow
and
one
contact
person
they
can
have,
and
they
can
reach
out
that
that
would
maybe
I
tend
to
think
that
that
could
be
better.
I
I
don't
know
all
right,
because
sometimes
you
may
spend
30
minutes
and
no
one
may
show
up
just
because
they
cannot
be
at
that
specific
specific
time,
not
because
they
don't
want
to
be,
but
they
they
don't
have
the
schedule
free
on
that
specific
time
and
you've
been
waiting
there
and
no
one
shows
up.
So
I
think
we
could.
We
could
try
that
that
other
option
and
concerning
the
stewards,
I
think
we
have
to
see
how
everything
evolves.
I
agree.
For
instance,
we
have
the
case
of
of
craig.
I
He
was
he
was
busy
and
we
we
were
able.
You
know
to
help
him
on
on
the
onboarding
group,
and
now
eduardo
is
taking
care
of
leading
the
group
and
for
a
period
of
time,
libby
and
jessica
were
leading
that
and
they
are
still
helping.
So
I
think
we're
still
small
enough
to
manage
those
situations
easily
right
now,
but
it's
true
that
as
we
grow,
we
probably
will
need
to
have
something
put
together
and
it
will
be
great
if,
if
juan
carlos
came,
it
can
lead
on
that
and
I
will
pass
it
to
jay.
C
I
C
C
Yeah
that
was
just
like
a
collective
one.
You
know
just
an
open
collective
one,
but
then
the
the
one-on-one
should
be
just
first
for
stewards
just
so,
there
is
like
an
understanding
of
what
this
group
is.
E
With
one
more
thing
is,
maybe
we
have
a
steward
that
is
just
in
charge
of
this
would
be
a
great
idea,
but
yeah
santi.
I
totally
agree
with
you.
I
think
we
can.
We
start
with
what
we
have
now
and
then
we
move
towards
the
ideal
and
when
the
new
discord
comes,
a
lot
of
this
will
change,
because
the
onboarding
will
be
more
automated,
but
I
think
still
a
personal
touch.
D
Well,
thinking
longer
term
yeah,
I
would
definitely
think
it'd
be
better
to
have
specifically
to
automating
as
much
as
really
helpful,
because
these
new
people
coming
in
are
we
trying
to
direct
them
to
being
a
trusted
seed,
or
are
we
just
trying
to
educate
them
on
what
we
see,
because
you
know
a
lot
of
these
people
are
gonna,
not
really
know,
so
that
whole
path
should
be
separate
from
us.
D
D
Well,
I'm
going
to
come
to
an
end
on
that
at
some
point
and
the
quicker
the
better
as
far
as
I'm
concerned,
and
then
it's
like,
then
then
I
gotta
go
towards
I
gotta
go.
I
gotta
go
do
something
else.
You
know
what
I
mean
so
like
that
transition,
I'm
not
worried
about
it,
but
I
mean
there
will
be
a
transition
there.
I
gotta
go
jump
into
something
because
I
don't,
I
don't
even
know
like
if
I'm
really
like
with
tam
too.
D
I
don't
know
if
I'm
a
community
steward-
I
I
just
you
know
I
I
don't
know
about
that
either.
Oh,
there
was
one
more
thing:
oh
yeah,
as
far
as
like
and
then
being
around
large
and
balance
of
people
and
separate
groups,
and
then
other
people
that
are
directed
on
top
of
those
groups.
All
working
fluidly
together
as
time
goes
on.
I'm
talking
about
how
to
hold
people
accountable.
That
is
a
big
concern,
because
the
biggest
thing
I've
always
seen
in
my
time
is
complacency.
D
People
get
used
to
want
things
going
certain
ways
and
they
won't
change.
As
time
goes
on
and
the
bigger
this
gets,
it's
going
to
be
more
important
that
we
work
together
because
it'll
be
really
easy
to
drift
apart
and
then
it's
harder
to
reach
out
and
grab
other
people
and
be
like
hey
how's,
your
group
doing
why.
Why
are
we
slowing
down
here
now
and
now?
You're
a
blocker
and
then
dealing
with
that
as
it
comes?
D
B
Yeah,
I
didn't
go
yet,
and
we
were
talking
about
that.
I
think
that's
pretty
cool
and
I
also
would
like
I
mean
it's
only
10
minutes
left.
I
really
would
like
some
feedback
on
the
transparency
working
room
manifesto
and
I
think
that's
going
to
be
really
cool.
So
maybe
someone
didn't
go
yet.
Maybe
he
finished
and
then
I
just
share
my
screen
and
we
start.
F
At
the
the
road
map
which
I'm
sorry
septimus,
I
know
your
transparency
working
group
is
really
important,
but
we
need
to
communicate
to
people
what
our
dates
are
and
what
we're
doing
when-
and
I
think
that
has
to
take
priority
over
this
over
the
transparency
working
group.
But
I
am
100
behind
the
transparency
working
group.
B
B
Yeah
here
on
the
like,
like
everything,
should
be
transparent
or
we
wanna
decide
what
gonna
be
transparent
or
not
like
for
me,
it
should
be
everything
transparent,
but
at
the
same
time
there
were
some
objections
on
that
and
I
think
it's
interesting
to
discuss
but
and
yeah
what
yeah
and
then
another
thing
we
were
discussing
is
it's
very
important
to
have
like
agreement.
Some
people
is
going
to
be
recorded.
B
Olivia
give
us
a
great
feedback
what
this
on
the
terms
and
conditions,
and
I
think
that
would
be
really
cool
because
yeah
I
mean
and
wow
it's
it's
a
lot
of
things
going
on.
Another
thing
it's
important
is
for
example,
if
we
are
going
to
be
live
streaming,
I
mean
it's
going
to
be
stream.
I
remember,
for
example,
one
call
when
one
person
told
me
I
don't
want
that
thing
to
be
on
the
call,
and
I
had
to
edit
that
thing
and
then
I
remove
it.
So
it
went
never
public.
B
But
if
it's
stream,
it's
going
to
be
public
all
the
time
and
yeah
here,
leave
it
all
yeah,
that's
beyond
scope,
and
that's
true,
because
what
I
wanted
to
say
what
we
wanted
to
say
in
here
is
every
step
is
like
not
in
the
whole
deck,
but
in
the
working
group
like,
though
both
are
related
and
like
every
community
member
who
wants
to
participate
in
this
working
group.
B
I
should
know
all
the
steps
and
we
are
with
ivy
trying
to
build
a
system
where
it's
simple
for
everyone
who
wants
to
participate
and
yeah.
I.
C
I
think
we're
we
should
pass
to
them,
but
thanks
app
for
sharing
it
and
okay,
and
maybe
we
could
all
like
give
get
into
the
document
and
give
our
feedback
and
coordinate
about
it
in
the
chat.
We
can
have
those
discussions
in
the
chat
we
could
announce.
E
F
Sounds
good
actually,
I
gave
a
little
feedback,
but
I
do
think
that
there's
in
merits
more
discussion.
So
for
the
last
few
minutes
I
hope
I'm
sharing
the
right
thing
hold
on.
F
This
should
be
this
one.
I
think
okay,
so
we
did
our
working
session
last
week.
I
think
I'm
sharing
the
right
thing.
Is
this
correct?
F
F
Please,
okay,
so
this
is
from
our
work,
put
all
the
milestones
on
our
sprint
board,
and
this
is
what
I've
taken
and
sort
of
produced
from
that
and
the
the
idea
is
that
this
is
the
roadmap
to
the
tec
hatch.
So
we
really
don't
talk
about
post,
tec,
hatch.
Yet
and
more
specifically,
this
is
not
us
looking
at
what
we
need
to
do
as
a
community
stewards.
This
is
us
saying:
hey
community
interested
public
at
large.
This
is
what
tc
is
doing.
This
is
our
roadmap
patch.
F
So
I
was
faithful
to
the
work
that
we
built
here
together,
but
changed
some
of
the
wordings
to
be
more
public
friendly
and
I
would
love
if
we
could.
F
You
know
if
you
guys
can
give
me
the
you
know
some
feedback
on
some
of
the
wording
that
we're
and
what
is
the
message
really
that
we
want
to
send
to
the
community
about
what
our
working
groups
are
doing
like
you
know,
I
I
I
think
that
a
lot
of
this
was
pretty
as
generic
as
I
could
make
it
with
it
still
being
specific
to
tec.
F
So
I'll,
let
you
guys
you
guys.
Everyone
has
the
document
feel
free
to
jump
in.
If
you
don't
have
it
I'll,
publish
it.
Sorry
I'll
throw
it
in
the
meeting
notes.
Now,
that's
probably
where
I
should
have
done.
F
Oh
cool
good,
you
know
I've
sort
of
noticed
some
things
too,
just
in
terms
of
like
hey
together,
like
you
know,
for
example.
Here
are
the
call
for
proposals
for
programs
one
and
then
maybe
we're
a
little
bit.
I
don't
know
just
for
us
to
sort
of
look
at
and
point
to
where,
like
our
our
work
dovetails
nicely
to
the
same
goal
versus
where
we
have
some
staccato,
you
know
where,
where
we
can,
you
know
resync
a
little
bit
on
how
we
connect
everything
together.
F
And
then
I
think,
once
we
get
some
once
we
get,
I
mean
I'd
love
to
publish
this
like
by
our
next
stewards.
Call,
you
know,
maybe
we
we
have
some
time
and
in
our
next
stewards
call
we
get
ready
to
publish
this
to
the
community
like
we
give
ourselves
a
week
to
massage
this
to
what
we
can
communicate
publicly
and
then
we
make
sure
that
we
alert
we
we
inform
our
community
of
what
we're
doing.
I
think
we
owe
it
to
them.
You
know.
F
I
dropped
it
in
the
stewart's
telegram
and
I
also
dropped
it
in
the
the
agenda.
If
you
look
for
my
name
there,
you
should
find
it.
F
So
in
the
last
two
minutes
I
would
just
like
us
to
I'd
just
like
us
to
you
know
just
initial
feedback:
do
you
think
that
we
can
like
it's
ready
to
go
or
do
you
think
that
we
take
some
time
and
you
know
commit
to
a
date
where
we
will
have
this
finalized
and
ready
to
publish
at
large?
F
G
E
I
think
we
kind
of
still
need
to
flesh
this
out
a
bit
more
or
maybe
not.
I
just
don't
know
it's
really
hard
to
say
how
realistic
these
timelines
are.
At
this
moment,
I
think
it'll
be
more
clarity
and
by
mid
or
end
of
january,
maybe
by
sprint
seven
I'll
have
like
hard
more
clarity
around
how
realistic
it
is
because
I've.
C
I
do
have
a
feeling,
though,
that
timelines
are
always
kind
of
bullshitting
and
then
sometimes
when
we
commit
to
it.
That
means
like
we
plan
life,
to
make
it
happen
in
that
way.
That's
kind
of
what
happened
with
the
road
map
that
we
did
for
for
the
tc
initially,
I
feel
like
it's
good
to
have
a
date.
F
So
my
what
I
think
we
owe
to
the
community
is
a
a
reversion,
a
revision
of
that
message,
so
that
they're
also
giving
accurate
information.
As
sort
of
you
know,
are
our
stakeholders
really.
C
F
I
mean
this-
I
didn't
make
this
up.
This
is
this
all
comes
from
this
session,
where
we
we
defined
our
highlight
I
just
starting
to
be
more
externally
focused,
so
that
somebody
can
look
at
and
understand
versus
some
of
the
our
our
own
internal
milestones,
which
were
really
specific
for
us
to
understand.
E
Yeah,
I
think
this
looks
great.
I
think
I
think
this
is
great
if
we
want
to
share
it
externally
to
have
something
and
then
we'll
just
adjust
it,
and
particularly,
I
think
in
january
we
could
have
a
prediction
market.
We
could
have
take
some
prediction
market
when
we
get
a
launch
dynamic,
bonding
curve.
Oh
wait,
it's
not
ready
bet,
everybody
bet.
Let's
get
into
the
games.
F
Is
there
anybody
who
wants
to
change
the
wording
because
we
can
we
can
I
I
want
to
just
to
give
everyone
time
to
and
wait.
You
know
wait
a
week
till
the
next
stewards
meeting,
but
if
we
can
share
it
earlier,
I
think
that's
even
better
to
be
honest,
but
I
will
we
will.
E
I
also
don't
think,
there's
a
rush.
I
mean
I
just
put
in
the
news
article
like
a
blurb
like
hey
we're,
adjusting
road
maps,
so
I
think,
if,
for
whatever
reason
it
comes
out
after
the
holidays,
it's
also
fine,
but
if
you're
feeling
like
super
urgent
about
it.
So
maybe
we
can
work
on
this
async
and
then
we
can
all
just
give
a
thumbs.
When
we
think
it's
ready
to
go,
we
could
say
for
the
rest
of
the
week
feedback
and
then
by
friday
everybody
gives
feedback.
And
then,
if
you.
F
G
G
E
Sorry
olivia
there
was
a
pop,
a
break
I
was
saying:
can
we
do
it
async
and
say
by
the
end
of
the
day
everybody
give
your
feedback
and
eduardo
in
the
morning
before
the
meeting
anyway.
I
think
we
can
show
this
to
community.
It's
fine.
I
don't
think
it's
going
to
change
like
so
much.
C
E
G
G
G
Yeah
there's
a
lot
of
people
stuck
inside
sad
about
their
christmas,
so.