►
From YouTube: W24 Legal WG: Proposal terms!
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
And
so
the
plans
for
the
weekend
I'll
start,
it's
gonna
be
a
busy
fun
weekend
for
for
me,
because
we
are
launching
the
green
folks
tomorrow
night,
the
pack
sale
on
the
wax
blockchain
and
everything
is
heating.
Up
we've
been
giving
away
drops
all
the
week
and
we
we
still
have
to
give
two
more
today
people's
going
crazy
and
we're
doing
a
bunch
of
experiments.
We
are
putting
a
ton
of
a
hell
of
offer
on
the
market
for
the
first
time.
No
another
collection
has
thrown
away
so
much
offer.
A
Some
of
the
treasure
hunters
are
gonna,
be
not
so
happy
because
all
they
want
is
grab
one
of
those
three
drops
and
try
to
get
their
money
once
there's
a
scarcity
and
we're
not
playing
that
game
and
and
it's
fun,
you
know
it's
trying
for
the
first
time
a
lot
of
new
things
running
with
the
smart
contracts
setting
up
the
webpage.
A
It's
it's
fun,
it's
cool
and
but
it's
gonna
be
busy
a
busy
weekend
and
we
give
24
hour
period
before
everyone
can
open
up
the
packs
and
and
in
a
couple
of
weeks,
we'll
start
introducing
a
bunch
of
game.
A
B
Thanks
tanty,
my
plans
for
tomorrow
is
to,
of
course,
do
this
sprint
review
video
for
common
staff,
and
I
will
be
also
hosting
a
free
binance
tutorial
among
my
friends,
because
a
lot
of
people
are
asking
me
about
crypto
and
they
don't
know
how
to
start
here
and
a
lot
of
people
are
getting
scammed
here
also,
so
I
just
offered
my
service,
not
my
service,
but
just
offered
help
to
them,
so
they
can
start
by
themselves
instead
of
trusting
the
wrong
people
so
yeah,
I
would
do
that
tomorrow
on
google,
so
yeah.
C
Thanks
ivy.
Well,
I
think
that
tomorrow
I
will
go
to
visit
my
parents
and,
like
I
was
talking
with
my
brother,
that
I
don't
understand:
uni
swap
b3,
so
he
told
me
that
we
are
going
to
have
like
a
study
session
like
half
hour
after
this
call.
So
if
anyone
wants
to
join
we're,
gonna
be
in
the
ethereum
latam
discord,
so
I
will
post
it
in
legal
if
anyone
wants
to
join
and
I'll
pass
to
seven.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
D
Thanks
juan
yeah,
I
might
join
that
call
looks
interesting
regarding
the
weekend
yeah
tomorrow.
I
I
start
like
a
new
routine
with
a
friend
like
we
go
with
like
every
weekend.
We
go
through,
as
I
don't
know,
the
english
word,
but
a
sim
of
a
mountain
and
yeah,
it's
being
fun,
the
pinnacle
of
the
mountain
yeah,
the
pinnacle,
thank
you
santi
and
yeah,
and
then
the
sunday
using
more
forest
and
yeah.
What
about
you
manu.
E
Well
finishing
this
call:
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna
join
a
uni,
swap
v3
study
group
that
I
heard
somewhere
and
I'm
gonna
I'm
reading.
E
E
And
I'll
meditate
I'm
going
to
play
with
my
little
nephews
on
sunday
I'll
be
with
my
parents,
my
sisters,
visiting
town
and
just
writing
and
working
on
the
video
too
pass
it
to
you.
D8N1.
F
Hi
guys
yeah
lovely
to
meet
you
all
great
to
be
here.
I'm
gonna
learn
a
lot
by
listening
in
on
this
cool
my
weekend,
so
I've
just
started
a
new
job
this
week,
and
so
I've
got
to
run
up
a
few
things
over
the
weekend.
It's
kind
of
fun
and
kind
of
work
at
the
same
time,
so
I'm
gonna
really
enjoy
running
up
like
a
a
bunch
of
a
tutorial
and
and
a
demonstrator.
F
So
that's
that
that'll
be
my
saturday
and
then
and
then
sunday
will
be
a
day
of
rest.
You
know
I'll
take
the
day
off
and-
and
I
I
live
in
cornwall
in
the
southwest
of
england,
so
I'll
probably
be
on
the
beach
somewhere,
there's
the
the
weather's
starting
to
turn
up.
Now,
it's
quite
nice.
Yes,
that's
my
plan.
It's
lovely
to
hear
about
your
plans
for
the
weekend
and
yeah
it'd
be
great
to
hear
what
you've
got
to
get
hear.
What
you
guys.
A
G
Hey
good
morning
afternoon
and
everything
else
to
you
guys,
you
know
we're
down
in
southern
california
today,
so
I
think
gyms
are
starting
to
open
up,
so
I'm
hoping
I'll
be
able
to
get
in
the
gym,
and
I
get
life
a
little
bit
back
to
normal
around
here.
So
that
would
be
really
nice.
A
Great
all
right:
okay,
let's
jump
into
the
agenda,
you
guys
have
the
link
on
the
legal
there's.
The
link
announcing
this
meeting
with
all
the
all
the
links
there
and
my
idea
for
today
was
hopefully
and
you
sean
will
tell
us
we
might
be
able
to
end
the
document
for
the
proposal
terms,
if
not
all
formatted,
on
on
the
content
side,
and
then
I
would
like
to
jump
into
the
conversation
we
had
regarding
the
the
third-party.
A
You
know,
usage
from
the
members
of
the
dao,
the
content
published
on
third
party
services
that
we
may
not
control
at
least
have
something
regarding
that
direction,
and
and
finally
there's,
I
posted
an
image
of
the
rules
that
apparently
suga
and
some
of
the
guys
on
now
have
been
working
on.
A
B
G
Yeah
things
like
this,
where
you
know
look,
this
may
be
complete
and
we
don't
need
anything
else
and
I
can
take.
G
I
can
take
the
highlighting
off
or
in
proposals
where
we're
not
exactly
sure
if
we're
staking
tec
or
wrapped
x
die,
and
so,
if
those
are
param
issues
that
are
going
to
be
decided,
you
know
in
the
near
future,
then
it's
relatively
easy
to
just
update
the
document.
G
You
know,
even
if
it's
in
multiple
places
once
we
know
the
answer,
if
it's
more
complicated
than
that,
like
I'm
gonna,
know
until
the
the
commons
dow
hatches
what
those
parameters
are
again,
probably
fine,
it's
just
the
documents
aren't,
you
know
quote
unquote
complete
until
we
know
those
answers.
A
Hi
griff
and
hi
the
news,
the
new
guys
that
join
actually,
I
was
wondering
I
guess
we
will
go
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
because
I
have
no
clue
I've.
Never
you
know
jumped
into
this
question
before,
but
I
guess,
after
we're
done
with
the
hatch
and
migrated
to
the
final
dial
or
before
that,
will
we
be
boating
these
parameters
on
on
a
service
like
token
lock
or
something
like
that
with.
A
And
that's
one
and
that's
gonna
and
that's
gonna,
be
after
we
migrate
before
if
before
before.
Okay,
all
right,
okay-
and
I
would-
I
would
suggest
that
we
leave
it
as
this
because
highlighted
we
know
that
those
are
the
things
that
we
need
to
either
delete
or
just
update
whenever
we
have
voted
together,
so
I
prefer
to
keep
it
highlighted,
it's
an
easy
way
to
just
jump
into
the
document
and
figure
out
what
needs
to
you
know.
G
Does
anyone
mind
if
I
just
finalize
it?
No,
I'm
sorry
santi!
I
didn't
hear
you
because
you
paused
for
a
second
does
anyone
mind
if
I
just
put
a
little
sentence
at
the
top
that
says:
hey
look.
The
highlights
are
because
we're
waiting
on
the
final
parameter
voting
and
once
we
know
some
of
these
issues,
the
document
will
be
updated.
G
This
way
in
case
it
is
posted
anywhere
people
understand
why
there's
highlights
there
or
understand
why
you
know
this
won't
be
in
a
different
document,
but
some
things
are
are
left
blank
and
obviously
some
of
that's
intentional,
because
we
don't
know
the
answer
quite
yet.
So
a
lot
of
people
don't
mind
I'll.
Just
put
a
little
note
at
the
top
of
the
document.
That
says
that's
what
the
highlights.
A
Sounds
great
sounds
great
yeah.
It's
like
saying
this
is
not
the
final.
You
know
document
we
need
to
finalize
it
with
these
sperms
and
yeah,
so
yeah
perfect.
A
G
Okay,
no,
I
think
formatting.
I
got
it
done
unless
anyone
has
any
any
thoughts.
They're
welcome
to
text
me
during
the
week
and
I'll
make
any
changes
that
that
people
want,
but
format-wise,
I
think
we're
there.
I
think
everything's
kind
of
it
looks
right
now,
we'll
see
when
we
convert
it.
I
think
I
have
to
convert
it
to
pdf
before
it
gets.
You
know
put
anywhere
else
so
sometimes
that
pdf
process
introduces
some
formatting
issues,
but
nothing
that
can't
be
fixed
easily.
G
Yeah,
that's
what
I
was
thinking
too.
Really.
I
think
the
I
think
the
only
question
is
where
exactly
but
I
mean
in
the
legal
section
but
where
in
the
legal
side
and
so.
I
Actually,
after
your
questions,
I
I
took
a
look
at
the
at
the
boundaries
and
agreements
and
I
feel
like
it's.
It
should
be
closer
to
the
legal
section,
but
then
yeah,
I
think,
there's
just
a
they're
not
fully
integrated
now,
but
they
could
be.
I
think
we
could
put
them
all
together.
G
And
I
think
that's
that's
kind
of
leads
into.
I
think
the
the
second
point
of
today's
call
is
last
week
I
said:
hey,
look,
I'm
going
to
start
looking
at
all
the
legal
stuff
across
the
different
media,
the
tec
forum,
the
git
book
and
and
see
if
we
can
start
a
identifying
the
stuff
that
needs
to
be
filled
in
so
at
least
we
know
what
needs
to
be
out
there
and
then
two
making
sure
the
documents
are
the
same
across
different
mediums
because
we're
not
centralized
and
someone
can
go
into
the
git
book.
G
You
know
and
look
at
legal
101.
If
they
have
editing
permissions,
they
can
make
a
change
now.
Maybe
it's
not
a
big
change.
You
know
maybe
just
a
formatting
change.
You
know
I'm
not
saying
they're
making
substantive
edits,
because
I
doubt
anyone
would
do
that
without
letting
everyone
else
know.
But
if
something
is
deleted,
a
sentence
is
deleted.
Maybe
a
keyword
is
deleted
and
it's
not
deleted
elsewhere.
G
Then
you
start
getting
these
documents
that
say
they're
the
same
thing
that
start
looking
a
little
bit
different
and
they
start
kind
of
growing
apart
from
each
other.
So
at
least
for
right
now,
while
it's
possible,
I
started
this
week
reaching
out
to
libby
with
a
couple
of
a
couple
of
questions
and
saying:
hey.
G
Look
here
are
the
things
I
noticed
that
need
to
be
filled
in
in
the
legal
section,
whether
that's
the
hash
terms
or
in
the
tec
form,
which
I
don't
think
libby
and
I
have
gotten
to
yet
but
like
in
the
forum
where
there's
just
wholesale
different
documents.
G
You
know
come
along
with
the
forum
or
wherever,
wherever
the
forum
kind
of
started
from,
and
so
I'm
just
going
to
try
this
week
to
like
get
a
more
consistent
where,
if
these
documents
are
supposed
to
appear
in
three
places,
they're
appearing
in
three
places,
the
proposal
terms,
the
hatch
terms,
the
you
know
too
long
didn't
read
whatever
this
way,
if
someone's
looking
at
the
forum
or
on
git
book
they're
they're,
getting
the
same
story,
they're
getting
the
same
information.
A
There's
now
that
you
mentioned
this
sean,
it
passes
me
a
question
here,
let's
say
with
no
meaning
of
doing
harm.
A
They
just
jump
in
and
they
make
a
mistake
that
deletes
some
sentence
or
whatever.
Maybe
we
should
keep
a
copy
like
the
original
copy
of
the
document
somewhere,
which
are
not
I
and
I
mean
a
copy
which
are
not
accessible
for
for
for
some
people
or
for
everyone
just
for
one
or
two
per
people.
That
way
we
preserve
that,
if
anything,
let's
let's
say,
we've
been
working
on
the
proposal
here.
A
A
We
may
run
into
an
issue
because
we
we
don't
have
whatever
we
thought
we
had
as
the
terms
posted
on
the
occur
on
the
place
we
we
were
expecting
to
be
so,
should
we
keep
a
copy
of
these
and
and
the
other
legal
documents,
so
someone
takes
care
or
a
group
of
people
take
care
of
that
like
the
original
copies.
G
Yeah,
so
you
know
in
in
in
practice
a
you
know,
it's
very
rare
for
people
to
have
access
to
whether
it's
legal
documents
or
not,
for
you
know,
drafting
documents,
it's
very
rare
for
people
to
have
as
much
access
to
documents
like
like
we
have
in
in
this
community,
where
you
know,
theoretically,
someone
could
go
into
the
get
book
and
make
changes
to
the
legal
section
be
able
to
tell
right,
I
mean
because
it
tells
you
who's
saved
and
who
merged
and
all
that
stuff.
G
But
normally
you
would
never
ever
do
that
because
you
wouldn't
want
you
know
all
that
stuff
would
have
been
done
in-house
before
it
was
ever
published
publicly,
and
so
it's
probably
not
a
bad
idea
to
you
know
once
there's
a
point
in
time
where
we
say
I
just
I,
like
literally
just
now
looked
at
the
forum
looked
at
git
book
and
these
documents
are
correct,
like
this.
G
Is
that
point
in
time
either
download
a
copy
but
probably
also
print
a
copy,
if
that's
possible,
so
that
you
have
the
ability
to
say,
hey,
look,
something
looks
different.
Someone
may
have
gone
in
and
changed
and
if
50
people
have
editing
powers
or
even
10
people
have
editing
powers,
it
can
be
hard
to
kind
of
look
back
and
go
well
who
changed
what?
Where,
when?
If
you
need
to
go
back
and
do
that
and
again
99
of
the
time
it
won't
be
malicious.
G
I
doubt,
but
you
know,
the
whole
legal
side
is
kind
of
devoted
to
that
one
percent
of
the
time
things
go
bad,
so
you
know
someone
could
go
in
and
go.
You
know
what
I
really
dislike.
You
know
class
action
waivers.
I
think
they're,
really
bad.
I'm
gonna
go
into
the
hash
terms
and
delete
that
sentence.
You
know
right
now
that
multiple
people
have
the
power
to
do
that.
I
doubt
they
would,
but
it's
not
a
bad
idea.
I
think
it's
a
good
idea.
I
I
I
thought
you
were
just
talking
about
the
gift
book,
so
maybe
for
this
not
to
be
confusing,
we
could
make
the
git
book
just
the
the
one
source
of
truth
and
pay,
the
link
of
the
gift
book
and
all
of
the
legal
and
all
of
the
forum
posts
that
talk
about
legal
and.
B
I
Leave
that
post
there
as
a
historical
like
something
you
know
like
we
don't
want
to
edit,
whatever
other
people
wrote
and
then
just
put
on
top
like
yeah
source
of
truth
for
legal
is
the
get
book
and
then
from
the
get
book.
We
extract
the
pdfs
and
and
it's
easier
to
see,
who
edited
what
in
the
get
book,
because
you
can
see
in
the
in
the
bottom
of
the
page,
like
the
names
stay
there
right,
and
it's
not
that
many
people
that
have
access
to.
G
Right,
yeah,
even
with
you,
know,
10
people,
which
again
is
not
that
many
at
all,
especially
compared
to
the
kind
of
input
you
would
have
with
a
big
you
know
corporation,
but
then
it
would
always
be
the
legal
department
that
would
have
the
document
until
it
was
ready
to
go
public
so
like
no
one
could
ever
make
a
change
that
the
public
could
see,
and
here
it's
just
a
little
bit
different,
because
a
lot
of
stuff
is
going
to
be
publicly
available.
There's
just
more
opportunity
even.
G
If
it's
10
people,
because
if
one
person
out
of
those
10
decide
you
know
the
community
no
longer
aligns
with
their
values,
it
can
become
messy,
but
yeah
we'll
keep
working
on
it
and
and
the
reason
why
this
kind
of
came
up
is
from
our
conversation
of
well.
What
should
we
do
and
how
should
we
communicate
to
members
about
any?
G
You
know
third
party
sites
we
use
and
then
the
fact
that
you
know,
although
we
don't
want
to
keep
data
or
keep
anything
involved
with
that,
we
can't
attest
to
what
third
parties
do
and
then
obviously
you
may
make
contributions
to
the
community.
What
happens
if
you
become
unhappy
with
the
community
and
what
you
like?
What
are
your
options
kind
of
from
there?
G
So
I'm
basically
like
I,
I
may
just
make
a
one-page
document
about
that
santee
because
I
don't
think
it's
very
long.
I
don't
think
it's
it's
a
big
thing
to
write,
but
I
just
don't
know
where
it
belongs.
Like
does.
It
belong
in.
A
A
Because
and
not
many
people
should
have
access
to
that
and
there
should
be
a
place
where,
at
the
same
time,
like
I
don't
know
like
a
any
file
storage
system,
that
a
few
people
has
access
to
and
those
are
regional
documents
and
in
the
event
we
need
to
rescue
them
because
someone
has
messed
around
or
we
need
to
change
them.
We
use
those
original
documents
to
work
with.
J
A
G
Okay,
libby
we'll
keep
talking
this
week
and
I
think
we're
already
starting
to
make
progress
on,
because
I
saw
your
answers
to
some
of
those
questions
that
we've
been
going
over
the
last
couple
of
days.
So
I
think
we'll
we'll
keep
making
progress
in
that
and
then
so
for
the
thing
we
spoke
about
last
week
with
you
know,
content
creation
and
where
that
should
go,
I
just
don't
know
where
it
goes.
G
I'm
going
to
write
a
page
this
week
about
it,
get
everyone's
feedback
during
the
next
meeting
and
then
we'll
decide
where
it
goes.
But
I
just
don't
have
an
answer
on
top
of
my
head.
It
may
just
be
a
separate
section.
It
may
not
even
be
legal
like
it
may
not
belong
in
legal.
I'm
not
saying
it's
illegal,
I'm
saying
it
may
not
belong
in
the
legal
section
it.
G
It
just
isn't
clear
to
me
because
it's
almost
more
like
a
less
of
a
hey,
look
you're,
giving
up
all
your
rights
to
any
meme
you
create
in
the
community,
because
that
doesn't
sound
consistent,
but
it
seems
more.
Like
a
hey
look,
we
know
you're
going
to
create
things
there.
May
come
a
point
in
time
where
either
you
want
stuff
deleted
or
removed,
and
in
some
of
these
places
that
may
be
possible
right
in
discord,
you
may
be
able
to
basically
wipe
everything
you
did
in
the
community.
G
It
may
take
a
lot
of
time
to
go
through
every
post.
You
made
and
delete
it,
but
you
can-
and
of
course
you
know
if,
if
you
know
soft
governance
or
gravity
doesn't
work
in
that
situation,
and
you
just
I'm
gonna
remove
everything
I
did
in
this
community
to
the
extent.
I
can
then
of
course
go
ahead
and
do
it
you
know,
but
I
just
don't
know
where
that
belongs
like.
I
don't
know
where
that
that.
A
B
G
A
G
Right
right,
well,
you
know
in
like
I
don't
want
to
say
this
is
a
similar
problem
that
any
law
firm
has,
but
usually
the
way.
Oddly
enough,
the
way
to
solve
it
is
to
decentralize
the
document.
Right
because
years
ago,
when
I
started
practicing
law
15
years
ago,
servers
were
not
common.
Yet
so
a
lot
of
stuff
was
kept
locally
on
your
computer.
G
There
wasn't
a
place
to
upload
the
cloud.
Wasn't
there,
you
might
have
a
server
depending
on
the
size
of
the
firm
you
worked
at
and
if
you
had
a
server
yeah.
That
document
might
get
uploaded
to
the
server
and
then
therefore
distributable
to
anyone
who
could
see
it
and
then
permissions
to
access
the
server
most
people
didn't
have
like.
You,
then
would
centralize
access
to
the
distributed
system.
G
So
once
someone
uploaded
a
document,
you
know
say
they're
drafting
a
brief
and
then
they
get
fired
and
you're
like
you
know
what
screw
this
firm,
I'm
gonna
go,
delete
the
brief
they
can't
because
once
they
save
they
got
uploaded
to
the
server
they
don't
have
access
to
the
server
they
could
delete
their
local
copy,
but
that's
all
they
can
do,
and
so
it's
like
this
weird
mix
of
decentralization
and
centralization
kind
of
that
problem,
because
you
distribute
it
widely
via
the
server
and
then
you
only
have
very
few
people
control
access
to
that
system.
G
I
don't
know
because
I
don't
think
we'll
ever
have
a
situation
where
we're
gonna
want
that
centralized
control
over
a
document
where
we'll
say
well,
sean's
going
to
be
the
only
person
that
keeps
the
documents
that
are
legal
relate
like
I
don't
think,
that's
going
to
fly
and,
of
course,
if
I'm
the
one
that
gets
pissed
off,
then
that
doesn't
really
help
anyone.
Because
then,
if
I'm
the
one
to
control
the
document,
I
can
I
can
just
delete
it.
G
A
H
So
there
you
still
have
to
have
a
pinning
service
and
that's
what
will
happen
with
these
documents,
for
when
they
go
on
aragon,
they
will
end
up
being
pinned
on
ipfs
and
will
probably
have
two
services
for
it.
H
H
G
We
might
very
well
have
extra
time
because,
like
I
said
I'll
work
on
that
this
week
in
terms
of
content
creation-
and
you
know
any
complaints
about
that
and
then
I
think
the
only
thing
else
we
had
to
do
sante
this
week
was
look
at
the
discord
stuff.
Yes,.
A
A
A
C
A
All
right,
there's,
I
can
share
with
you
the
issue
I'll
check
it
out
I'll
share
with
you,
the
issue
where,
where
sh
suga's
requested
me,
if
we
could
check
on
legal
working
group
the
rules,
so
we
can
answer
from
directly
on
the
issue
and
and
then
everyone
will
notice
and
then,
if
you
get
in
touch
with
pi
bye-bye,
if
there's
any
change,
we
need
to
do
great.
H
H
Yeah
thanks
man
cool,
so
let's,
let's
start,
I
posted
some
links
in
legal
and
I
wanna.
I
wanna
of
course,
first
start
at
the
y.
So
we're
doing
something
kind
of
crazy
here
and
you
know
maybe
I'm
blowing
it
out
of
proportion
but
seriously.
When
I
look
at
this,
I
feel
like
we're
transitioning,
it's
like
a
similar
transition
from
monarchy
to
democracy,
we're
taking
the
the
power
of
economic
design
out
of
the
centralized
control.
This
is
the
first
time
it's
ever
happened
in
the
history
of
humanity.
I'm
not
joking
right.
H
Every
economy
has
always
been
designed
by
a
small
cabal
attack
in
crypto.
It's
a
technocracy
in
the
general
financial
world.
It's
a
bunch
of
you
know
it's
like
the
federal
reserve
or
some
government
agency,
but
we're
moving
away
from
that
all
right.
We're
taking
we're
we're
in
a
privileged
position
in
the
team.
It's
the
token
engineering
commons.
You
know
we
actually
have
a
community
that
can
design
economies
so
we're
going
to
take
an
approach
where
we
design
from
the
bottom
up
where
anyone
can
come
in
and
actually
tweak
the
parameters
and
their
proposal.
H
Anyone's
proposal
for
parameters
could
be
the
one
that
we
used.
This
is
never
been
done
before
and
it's
an
evolution,
it's
an
evolution
in
economics,
participatory
economics,
but
also
it's
an
iterative
design
process.
So
the
the
way
to
start
you
know
we
have
this
awesome
dashboard,
which
is
like
it's
like
where
the
meat
is
that's,
not
where
we
start
it's
an
iterative
design
process.
So
in
these
parties
that
we
do
it's
really.
Oh,
hey
speaking,
it's
not
a
part
chewy
where's,
the
music
man.
K
I
was
just
asking
levy
because
apparently
groovy
bot
is
not
enabled
in
the
legal
group,
probably
because
whoever
set
it
up
thought
it
was
a
very
serious
like.
K
H
So
so
just
so,
you
know,
like
it's
really
fun,
to
be
an
economic
engineer,
you
know
and
to
feel
and
like
the
feeling
of
like
oh
wow,
I
just
proposed
an
economy,
it's
something
you
want
to
have
now.
We
only
have
like
you
know,
27
minutes
right
now.
So
maybe
you
can't
you
know
finish
it
today,
but
there's
so
many
calls
today
like
we
basically
have.
We
have
three
hours
straight
of
pram
parties,
so
it's
a
great
day
to
really
get
it
in,
especially
because
the
vote
closes
on
thursday.
H
H
Then
there's
also
the
dao
right
and
the
dao
is
a
molok
dao
and
there's
a
few
parameters
here
that
are
important.
You
have
to
decide
like
how
long
is
the
voting
period.
What
is
the
acceptance
criteria
like
how
many
you
know
how
many
people
have
to
vote?
Yes
and
really
the
acceptance
criteria?
H
I
like
to
look
at
it
as
the
rejection,
the
more
of
like
the
rejection
criteria
like
how
many
people
can
vote
no
and
a
proposal
still
fast.
I
think
that's
a
better
perspective
to
have
and
and
other
various
molecule
options.
So
so
you
can.
We
can
look
at
this
right.
This
is
the
original
goldilocks
proposal.
H
Now
this
is
goldilocks
v3
goldilocks
b3
wants
to
give
a
little
bit
more
power
to
the
builders,
so
it
ends
up
with
a
75
dollar
impact
hour
rate
versus
this
one,
which
is
oh
no,
this
is
75.
K
H
H
H
H
I
thought
we
changed
this
chart
to
not
have
a
variable
axis,
but
I
guess
we
didn't
I'll
have
to
fix
so
yeah.
So
this
is
75
right
and
this
is
50..
So
more
money
goes
to
builders.
Also,
you
can
see
this
black
piece
of
pie
got
got
larger
here,
because
two
is
a
big
fan
of
the
hatch
tribute,
so
you
can
kind
of
decide.
Well,
maybe
you
know,
maybe
I
like
the
we
need
to
talk
about
tribute.
You
know.
H
I
don't
really
like
this
high
hatch
membership
ratio.
So
I'm
just
going
to
go
in
here
and
iterate
on
this.
I'm
just
going
to
change
one
thing
and
make
my
own
proposal
because
I,
like
everything
else
about
it,
I'm
a
I'm
a
tributer
attribute
to
the
moon,
man.
Let's,
let's,
let's
collectively
decide
these
issues,
that's
not
sure,
I'm
actually
more
rich
quitter,
but
membership
ratio
is
an
interesting
is
an
interesting
parameter
and
I
work
for
the
common
stack.
So
I
like
it
below.
H
I'm
curious
to
see
who
else
proposed
stuff.
Oh,
let's,
oh
wow,
olivia's
is
just
an
emoji.
D
H
No,
the
hatch
tribute
the
tokens
if
they
redeem
their
tokens,
so
the
hatch
tribute
is
about
wrapped
x
die.
So
there's
two
tokens
in
the
system.
The
draft
x
die
and
hatch
tokens.
The
hatch
tokens
have
claimed
to
one
of
the
pools
that
has
wrapped
x
die,
but
there's
two
pools:
there's
a
redeemable
pool.
That's
the
token.
Every
every
hatch
token
has
an
equal
share
to
the
redeemable
pool
and
then
there's
the
non-redeemable
pool,
which
is
only
collectively
governed
by
votes.
H
So
the
house
tribune
decides
what
percentage
of
funds
that
are
collected
go
to
the
non-renewal
pool
and
what
percentage
goes
to
the
redeemable.
H
So
in
this
case,
if
the
attributes
15
and
we
raised
10
million
dollars,
1.5
million
dollars
will
be
in
the
non-redeemable
pool,
cannot
be
rage
quit
and
you
can
see
how
it
affects
the
rage
quit
percentage
so
directly.
So
if
it's
15
versus
one
percent.
D
A
H
I
J
H
H
H
I
really
love
what
I
love
most
about
this
experience.
I'm
just
gonna
say:
is
this
the
the
connection
between
the
technical
and
the
social?
So
like
the
target
goal?
In
no
way
does
the
target
goal
have
any
impact
on
the
code
we
use
it
to
set
the
curve.
But,
honestly,
the
target
goal
is
a
social
parameter.
This
is
going
to
be
on
the
website
and
we're
going
to
have
a
zero
to
100
percent.
H
H
H
Yes,
in
the
commons
upgrade
there
will
be
more
tokens,
but
you
will
be
setting
the
initial
price
of
the
token,
like
the
the
psychological
price
of
right,
and
at
least
you
won't
be
setting
the
exact
price
but
you'll
be
setting
the
a
degree
you
know
like.
Is
this
token
worth
ten
thousand
dollars,
or
is
it
worth
fractions
like
for.
D
H
It
has
like
it
will
tell
you
like
how
much
how
many
tokens
you
get
for
different
amounts.
You
can
also
find
your
name
in
here,
of
course,
like
this
in
here.
E
H
H
Which
would
have
cost
220
to
miss
and
he
could
rage
quit
with
about
180
so
for
free
if
he
wants,
he
can
just
if
he
doesn't
feel
like
this
is
a
good
project.
You
know
he
contributed
to
it
and
he
can
leave
if
he
doesn't
like
it
with
180
bucks.
But
if
he
stays
then
you
know
we'll
upgrade
to
a
bonding
curve
and
it
will
probably
be
worth.
H
Then
there'll
also
be
lockup
times
and
these
sorts
of
things.
So
you
know
everybody
what's
interesting
about
the
rage.
Quit
value
is
like
it's,
this
mix
between
like
collective
ownership
and
like
we're
in
this
together
and
so
like.
If
you're
coming
in
then
it's
like
we
as
a
community.
We
make
the
decisions
and
versus
like
the
collective
being
held
accountable
to
the
individual,
and
how
do
we
want
to
balance
because
the
more
you
can
rage
quit
the
more
accountable
we
are
to
the
individuals
and
really
like.
H
But
then
there's
also
this
like.
If
you
have
a
low
hatch
tribute,
then
you
probably
want
a
high
support
required
because
you
don't
want,
like
20
of
the
community
disagreeing
and
then
half
of
those
people
rage
quitting
because
then
the
value
of
the
tec
is
lower.
So
you
want
a
higher.
You
need
a
higher.
H
I
But
if
you
think
like
how
much
we're
engaging
with
people
and
that
that's
gonna
be
like
they're,
just
being
asked
to
take
two
decisions
to
vote
two
times
and
then
if
we
can't
get
like
20
of
participation,
I
feel
like.
H
H
H
I
No
was
just
also
what
grief
said
about.
We
don't
know
how
many
people
that
percentage
takes
in
like
we
only
have
the
percentage,
so
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
a
little
more
people
are
required
to
make
a
vote
happen.
C
I
have
like
a
story
that
I
can
relate
to
the
hype
forum
and
that
sometimes
can
sabotage
decisions
like
in
colombia
when
we
had
like
our
peace
agreement,
then
to
like
legitimize,
we
have
a
plebiscite
and
people
had
to
vote
like
yes,
I
agree
with
the
disagreement
and,
like
they
said,
first
place
is
like
a
really
high
ground,
like
a
million
and
then
that
day.
C
Much
participation
and
like
we
are
a
country
who
didn't
like
pass
to
agree
the
the
the
peace
process
because
of
a
high
quorum
in
the
proposal.
A
Guys
we're
at
the
top
of
the
hour
we're
gonna
be
closing
for
today.
I
thank
you
great
for
joining
and
sharing
the
perms,
for
you
know
10th
time
now
this
week,
and
it
was
great
I
promise
I
will
do
my
homework
during
the
weekend
after
I
get
released
from
this.
A
H
D
H
D
Regarding
the
quorum,
when
you
were
this
way,
you're
saying
like
me
and
santa
have
like
three
percent
of
the
quorum,
but
like
I
was
understanding
core
of,
like
you
know,
like
one
person
is
like
it
doesn't
matter,
the
the
tokens
you
have.
The
query
means
like
a
person's
right
like.