►
Description
TheSoftgov Working Group researches and applies best practices for governance, social collaboration and contribution rewards while implementing Ostrom’s 8 principles for governing the commons in its foundation.
We gather every Tuesday at 7pm CET.
Steward: Liviade
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
I
think
that
what
worked
really
well
were
the
debates
and
conversations
and
forum
posts
to
the
proposals.
I
think
what
could
have
been
done
better.
Is
you
know
it's
just
a
lot
of
information.
This
isn't
what
I
said.
Other
people
have
said
this,
but
sort
of
separating
them
out
and
maybe
taking
on
one
module
at
a
time
instead
of
all
of
them
together.
That
really
resonated.
I
think,
that's
something
that
could
have.
I
mean
it
arguably
would
have
taken
the
same
amount
of
time
hard
to
know.
A
You
know
keeping
the
level
of
engagement
so
high
for
so
long
on.
So
many
different
modules
is,
could
be
tricky
too
understanding
our
voting
better.
You
know
the
quadratic
rank
choice,
voting
it
only
dawned
on
me
when
we
were
doing
it
that
I
was
like.
Actually,
I
have
no
idea
what's
happening
so
maybe
like
understanding
those
decision
space
like
the
hat
like
how
the
how
voting,
how
some
of
these
the
new
votings
work,
you
know
not
the
the
more
simpler
votings.
A
Yeah,
I
think,
overall,
I
really
give
us
a
lot
of
credit
for
how
we
handled
turret
like
creating
the
platform
for
education
versus
turning
it
into
some
sort
of
like
competition
for
a
winning
proposal.
A
I
really
feel,
like
all
of
the
debates
were
moderated
in
a
way
that
surfaced
strengths
and
weaknesses
in
in
a
you
know.
Like
can
I
say
I
can't
say
bipartisan,
but
in
like
a
omni
biharism
way,
I
thought
I
actually
thought
the
way
we
handled
that
from.
I
guess
a
political
perspective
like
it
didn't
turn
into
a
slugfest.
You
know
it
didn't
turn
into
like
a
mud
wrestling
or
something.
A
Deteriorate
into
into
something
that
it
could
have,
actually
you
know
a
sort
of
borderline
it
could
have
gone,
it
could
have
wrankled
a
community
versus
then
uniting
a
community,
and
I
think
the
way
we
approached
it
was
very
uniting
I'm
not
going
to
go
on.
I
think
we
we,
I
think
so
that
was
like
technically
and
culturally
and
personally
so
from
those
three
perspectives.
I
think
I
have
it
covered
yeah
and
I'll
pass
to
chile.
C
Thank
you
tom.
What
did
we
learn?
It
was
interesting
like
I
I
I
have
to
admit
like
I.
I
was
afraid
of
being
super
sad
because
communism
wasn't
gonna
turn
out
like
winning
in
the
end,
but
it
was
just
like.
C
I
wish
I
could
be
more
critical
about
it,
but,
to
be
honest,
I
learned
so
so
much
and
I
would
rephrase
what
tam
just
said
like
about
it
being
like
a
mod
fight
to
like
I
was
so
happy
like
it
didn't
turn
into
a
complete
bloodbath
because,
like
when,
when
I
took
like
two
steps
back
like
reflecting
on
on
what
we
were
picking
and
and
I've
also
like
with
all
of
the
work
with
like
the
taoist
and
in
this
thing,
like
I've,
been
reflecting
a
lot
up
on
on
just
latin
american
history
and
how,
in
latin
america,
the
the
decision
making
process
has
not
always
been
like
the
same
as
in
the
rest
of
the
world.
C
I
feel
that
there
are
regions
that
have
like
their
own
particularities,
so
so
yeah
like
this.
This
is
why
I'm
saying
like
I
can't
be
like
really
critical,
because,
like
it,
it
was
like
so
so
big
just
to
imagine
like
the
effect
that
this
can
have
in
in
societies.
C
So
I
I
learned
a
lot
from
from
always
being
like
vulnerable
throughout
the
whole
process
and
also
getting
to
take
in
feedback
from
from
from
people,
as
as
they
are
also
in
a
safe
space
to
be
vulnerable,
and
I
feel
that
that
is
that
is
already
making
like
a
huge
difference
in
how
and
how
people
can
reflect
on
each
other's
decisions
and
and
and
from
time
to
time
like
open
up
to,
instead
of
being,
like
all
political,
also
get
to
understand
what
we
emotionally
go
through
as
a
collective,
so
so
yeah.
C
I
I'm
still
very,
very
excited
and
hyped
for
for
the
last
process
that
we
did,
and
I
can't
wait
to
have
the
comments
upgrade
process
like
all
of
us
together.
I
I
know
that
it's
gonna
be
like
a
lot
of
learning
as
well
I'll
pass
it
to
wonka.
D
Thanks
chewie
yeah,
I
think
what
it's
really
cool
about
this
kind
of
events
that
involve
so
many
people
is
that
it
impacts
us
in
a
different
way
to
each
one
of
us,
even
though
that
it's
like
the
same
event
happening.
So
it's
super
interesting.
I
at
least
from
my
point
of
view.
I
felt
I
learned
a
lot.
That's
what
I
liked
the
most.
D
I
learned
a
lot
from
the
params
parties,
the
debates
and
I
I
also
think
that
the
the
winning
proposal
will
will
be
like
a
really
cool
system
for
our
economy,
and
I
am
also
excited
to
to
learn
more
on
the
on
the
talk.
Talk
like
formal
token
engineering
side
of
the
picture
because
yeah
by
interacting
with
it,
you
like
break
the
ice
and-
and
sometimes
you
feel
a
little
bit
like
threatened
by
some
topics
but
like
interacting
this
way
with
them.
D
It
will
it
make
it
like
really
easy,
really,
fun,
really
participative,
participatory
and
now
I
I
think
that
it
will
be
really
cool
to
also
be
more
on
the
back
end
of
the
of
the
picture
too,
and
and
learn
from
yeah
for
not
only
by
choosing
the
params
in
a
dashboard
but
being
able
to
to
make
myself
the
params
or
the
implementation
of
them
in
in
other
organizations.
I
think
that
that
that
was
really
cool
and
I
will
pass
to
grief.
B
Wow
get
ready,
I
have
a
lot
to
say
now
I'll
try
to
keep
it
short
I'll,
try
to
keep
it
as
short
as
I
can,
but
there's
a
you
know
it
was,
I
would
say
first
off,
let
me
start
with
the
good
stuff.
It
was
great
I
mean
my
god.
We
learned
so
much
as
a
community.
I
think
I
I
can't
imagine
that
there's
another
community
who
understands
anywhere
near
as
complex
of
a
system
as
this
for
their
dow.
B
I
I
don't,
I
don't
even
think
there's
I
I
don't
think
it
even
comes
close
in
crypto
of
having,
like
all
the
stewards,
have
such
a
deep
understanding
of
the
decision
making
that
was
made
on
why
this
economy
works
the
way
it
does,
and
I
think
that'll
pay
dividends
for
a
long
time,
but
I
will
say
that
we
made
it
relatively
inaccessible
for
people
who
just
want
to
dive
in.
We
did
the
best
that
we
could
but
obviously
make
going
one
module
at
a
time.
B
B
I
agree
with
everything
that
everyone
else
has
said
up
to
this
point
so
like
plus
one
on
that
and
I'll
try
to
say
things
that
weren't
said
in
the
common
swarm.
We
know
when
we
did.
The
hatch
like
there
was
a
huge
delay
between
the
hatch
and
the
actual
upgrade,
and
that
was
mostly
because
of
gardens
and
and
some
and
the
parameter
dashboard
needed
to
be
built,
and
so
I
think
for
future
comments.
B
It'll
be
a
lot
easier
because
these
tool,
this
tooling,
will
be
there,
but
probably
not
for
the
very
next
comments,
because
we
have
a
lot
of
improvements
to
make
first
off.
The
hatch
will
definitely
just
go
straight
into
a
gardens.
Not
have
this,
like
hatched
out
to
migration
thing
that
we
have
to
do,
which
made
a
lot
of
things
very
complicated
we
will
probably
still
maintain.
B
I
would,
I
think
we
have
to
maintain
the
rage
quit
premise
for
legal
reasons,
but
it's
really
annoying
like
right
now.
Today
I
have
to
sort
out
this,
like
you
know
exactly.
How
are
we
going
to
tweak?
Luckily,
no
one
rage
quit,
so
you
know
we're.
We
can
just
use
the
numbers
that
we
know,
and
I
think
it
all
becomes
official
tomorrow
at
like
basically
24
hours
from
now,
so
in
about
24
hours.
If
no
one
else
is
rage
quit
then
I
won't
have
to
do
any.
B
We
won't
like
me,
noggin,
vitor
and
sam
and
paula
won't
have
to
do
any
adjusting.
We
can
just
use
what
we're
gonna
come
up
with
today,
but
like
it's
this
like
last
minute,
these
last
minute
changes
are
so
annoying
and
we
just
need
to
not
do
them
ever
like
it
would
be
so
great
to
have
to
be
able
to
actually
design
the
parameter
set
that
we're
going
to
use.
But
this,
like
rage,
quit
mechanism,
really
prevents
that
from
being
possible.
B
We
have
to
make
assumptions
and
then
those
assumptions
are
there's
they're
like
I'm,
I'm
always
considering
rage
quitting
some
just
to
get
it
exactly
right
on.
You
know
the
the
amount
at
the
last
minute,
I'm
not
going
to,
because
it's
too
much,
but
if
we
were
closer,
you
know
if
more
people
rage
quit.
I
was
just
gonna
just
do
it,
so
it
could
just
be
exactly
as
we
you
know,
but
that's
not
cool
either.
B
So
I
don't
know
it's
it's
like
we're
doing
the
best
that
we
can
to
get
as
close
as
possible,
but
it'd
be
really
nice
if
we
could
actually
design
that
real
economy
through
this
process
and
not
have
to
make
these
last
minute
adjustments
because
of
the
ragequit
mechanism,
so
definitely
going
to
think
on
that
for
a
while,
also
just
like
timelines
being
so
difficult
and
how
to
deal
with
that.
I
think
that'll
be
so
much
easier
for
people
who
aren't
blazing
a
trail.
You
know
it's
like
we're.
B
B
Our
first
road
map
said
2020
guys
so
anyway,
the
other
other
lessons
learned,
I
yeah.
I
guess
the
the
big
thing
is.
I
would
really
like
for
it
to
be
able
to
have
like
collaborative
economic
drop-in.
You
know
the
stewards
were
the
ones
that
made
all
the
last
proposals
right.
It
wasn't
anything
that
emerged
organically,
like
there
was
collaboration
that
happened
through
other
people
outside
of
our
close-knit
community,
but
it
would
be
really
nice
to
have
been
able
to.
B
I
didn't
see
it.
Stick
like
the
collaborative
economics
process.
Wasn't
sticky
so
yeah,
that's,
probably
it
and
and
then
yeah,
I'm
excited
to
see
how
we
could
get
more
like
classical
people
who
label
themselves
as
token
engineers
in
and
for
future
comments.
You
know
the
builder
group,
being
the
more
integrated
into
the
the
the
stakeholder
group
would
be
nice
as
well
yeah,
but
that's
about
it.
I
think
I
think
the
launch
is
going
really
well.
B
Overall,
things
were
smoother
than
I
expected,
because
crypto
launches
are
just
a
mess
and
I
think
the
the
educational
like
the
education
that
we've
developed
into
our
community
is
like
I
I
well.
Hopefully.
Hopefully
it
pays
off,
because
it
was
a
lot
of
work
and
I
think
it
will
pay
off,
but
I
guess
we
have
to
see.
I
feel
like
I
love
to
do
this
again.
Lessons
learned
like
in
three
months
and
just
see
like
how
how
it
paid
off
and
and
be
able
to
understand
I'll
pass
it
to
zeptimus.
E
Thank
you,
griff.
No,
I
didn't
go
yeah,
I
mean
overall.
I
think
we
had
a
a
good
lunch
and
this
is
like
the
first.
You
know
the
first
time
we
do
it
together
so,
but
I
think
like
there's
something
like
we
could
do
better
like
in
future,
or
even
you
know,
even
in
the
tc
like,
I
think
like,
for
example,
like
our
governance
tools,
are
different
on
chain
and
off
chain.
E
E
Aligned
like
the
decisions
on
chain
and
option
and
then
yeah,
I
also
agree
with
grief
like
it
was
supposed
to
launch
in
2020.
I
mean
most
of
the
thing
was
because
the
epson
it
happens,
I
mean
those
things
happen.
I'm
actually
was
supposed
to
play
a
video
game
that
was
supposed
to
launch
in
2020
and
still
didn't
launch.
So
we
we
want
that
race
and
yeah.
I
mean
I
mean
overall.
I.
E
Another
thing
that
which
is
great
right
like
even
if
we
had
like
this
governance,
different
like
then
when,
when
okay,
we
have
this
decision
that
we
we
decided
collectively
and
then
like
no
one
opposes
it
on
the
on
chain,
which
means
like,
like
we
as
a
community,
agree
on
that.
So
that's
great
and
yeah.
I
think
I
don't
leave
anything
I'll
pass
it
to
lauren.
G
Yeah,
everyone
said
a
lot
of
really
good
things.
I
I
think
lessons
learned.
I
I
mean
lessons
learned
like
for
me
are
really
about
like
the
timing
and
the
bandwidth
of
things
it
was
like.
I
I
think
I
mean
I
think
it
was
really
great
that
we
extended
the
like
the
time
for
doing
param
parties
and
debates,
but
I
also
think
it
was
really
awkward,
and
I
think
that
this
is
like
a
lesson
learned.
G
We
already
discussed-
and
I
think
that,
like
in
the
future
creating
more
play,
and
I
think
that
the
reason
that
we
ended
up
having
to
do
it
really
is
that
we
just
didn't,
have
so
much
bandwidth
like
pushing
really
hard
on
getting
people
coming
in.
I
think
that
many
people
wearing
many
hats.
It's
like
a
symptom
that
I'm
seeing
or
like
a
a
problem
that
I'm
seeing
in
like
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
doubts,
which
kind
of
like
kind
of
slows
our
ability
to
meet
deadlines.
G
So
I
think
that's
really
like
the
main
thing,
but
you
know
we
end
up
meaning
I
mean
we
meet,
we
the
extension
and
then
I
think
we
got
a
lot
of
participate,
participation
and
then
ended
up
with
good
proposals
and
a
lot
of
people
learning
I
I
don't.
I
don't
really
know
how
it
would
be
possible.
I
mean
the
the
stewards
participating
a
lot
in
the
in
the
collaborative
economics
and
kind
of
like
showing
the
proposals
and
being
the
leaders
on
it.
G
It's
like
it's
like
really
hard,
not
to
end
up
like
that,
because
it's
like
the
people
who
come
into
the
community
are
the
people
who
like
and
then
get
engaged
and
then
get
super
active
generally
end
up
kind
of
coming
into
these
conversations
and
becoming
stewards
eventually.
So
I
think
it's
I
don't
know
I.
I
don't
really
know
how
that
problem
could
possibly
be
solved,
but
I
think
yeah,
lessons
learned
for
me
are
really
to
do
with
bandwidth.
G
How
can
we
make
sure
that
we're
not
all
being
overloaded
so
that
we
can
like
meet
our
deadlines
better
or
like
expand
our
team
in
such
a
way
that
we
have
more
support
yeah?
I
I
I'll
pass
it
to
tam
tim.
Did
you
go?
G
I
Hey
yeah
lesson
learned
for
me
is
just
how
much
education
and
and
work
goes
into
kind
of
doing
something
that
is
grassroots
and
to
to
do
something
in
that
way,
and
I've
I've
been
a
little
later,
so
I've
been
doing
a
lot
of
that
learning
and
kind
of
trying
to
catch
up
and
yeah.
It's
just
amazing
how
much
work
you
all
have
put
into
that
engaging
newcomers
and.
J
I
Educating
people
yeah,
so
that's
it
for
me.
H
Thank
you
and
jeremy.
Do
you
have
something
to
share.
F
So
what
I
learned
was
a
totally
different
since
I
was
in
the
bleachers
from
the
outside
in
so
it
has
a
different
feel
to
it
than
like
the
lived
experience
of
like
having
gone
through
it.
But
so
it's
very
it's
very
brainy
the
what
I've
learned
right.
All
of
the
like.
F
The
participation
is
the
thing
that
sticks
out
with
me,
the
most
right
just
seeing
how
many
people
were
sort
of
actively
engaged,
and
I
have
a
hypothesis
that
I'd
like
to
check
actually
right
now.
F
Does
anybody
think
if
that
was
a
function
of
time
right
griff?
You
mentioned
that
there's
was
a
large
delay
of
two
years,
or
so
did
that
was
that
an
enabling
force
for
the
amount
of
people
who
participated
we
might
have
been
higher?
Had
you
launched
earlier.
H
Yeah
think,
thank
you.
Everyone
for
sharing.
H
I
think
I
was
my
thoughts
were
contemplated
in
everything
that
was
said,
and
I
think
I
I
echo
a
lot
of
that
of
how
can
we
have
more
people
engaged
a
lot
of
what
lauren
said,
how
more
people
engaged
in
single
functions
instead
of
like
multi-purpose
people
that
are
involved
in
everything,
then
maybe
we
could
have
been
like
more
time
efficient,
but
also
that
feels
almost
utopian
like
I
don't
know
if
like
if
we
needed
to
have
this
working
this
way
to
get
this
outcomes
and
then
maybe
with
more
clarity.
H
Now
from
those
learnings
and
refining
the
process,
then
we
can
start
to
engage
with
more
people,
because
it's
a
super,
complex
subject,
so
I
think,
with
time
will
make
it
more
simple
and
then
that
will
like
end
up
involving
getting
more
people
involved,
but
those
are
all
super
great
questions
and
just
reflections
and
I'll
try
to
I
get
this
more
organized
than
a
blog
post.
Maybe
you
can
help
me
nate,
since
you
like
doing
this
stuff.
H
Cool
and
well,
we
have
just
30
minutes
left
and
I
don't
think
we'll
be
able
to
go
through
all
of
those
questions,
but
I
it's
something
that
has
been
coming
up
in
both
the
research
group
and
the
reward
systems
I
mean
in
in
in
the
research
group
for
the
reward
systems
and
then
the
case
studies
talks,
we've
been
having
so
just
a
reflection
on
the
culture
of
praise
and
what
directions
are
we
taking
and
we're?
Why
bringing
this
to
sofkava
not
to
the
reward
systems
working
group?
H
Just
because
I
think
here
we
have
more
space
to
debate
and
get
into
the
like
more
philosophical
points
of
this
question
and
then
the
re,
the
reward
working
group
has
been
more
implementation
and
hands-on.
So
we
can
chew
on
this
concept
and
bring
it
there
in
a
more
objective
manner,
so
I've
I've.
I
perceive
that
the.
H
H
Yeah,
okay,
okay,
so
just
just
bear
with
me,
but
I
noticed
that
the
engagement
and
praise
has
slowed
down
a
lot
and
I
have
a
few
theories
for
it.
H
One
of
them
is
maybe
it's
just
because
the
gamification
of
the
leaderboard
is
not
happening,
so
people
are
not
seeing
the
outcome
of
their
praise,
so
they're
not
praising
not
engaging
with
praise
so
much,
and
my
other
theory
is
that
the
community
call
praise
created
some
type
of
like
in
a
like
a
not
so
positive
type
of
engagement
that
limited
praise
to
that
call
and-
and
then
people
started
to
like
oh
save
my
praise
for
the
community
call
and
I'll
praise
it
there
and
then,
and
then
don't
praise
and
other
times
and
then
a
lot
starts
to
get
missed,
because
that
is
the
moment
that
we're
praising
and
then
there's
some
type
of
anxiety.
H
H
H
If
this
is
a
correct
prediction
of
like
how
engagement
is
being
affected
and
then
the
second
one
when
we
go,
it
would
be
good
to
hear
opinions
about,
because
I
think
it's
a
very,
I
was
afraid
to
to
talk
about
this
at
first,
because
I
was
like.
Oh
my
god.
Is
that
like
something
that
people
love
so
much
and
then
problematizing,
it
might
like
not
be
the
best
option,
but
I
I
think
it's
worth
anyway,
just
as
having
the
collection.
H
B
Oh,
it's
okay,
but
I
I
I'll
say:
yeah
leaderboard,
also
like
not
having
yeah
this
in
no
direct
feedback,
like
you
just
praised
it's
like
when
is
it
going
to
be
quantity?
Is
it
going
to
be
quantity?
How
much
tc
is
actually
going
to
be
rewarded
and
all
the
ambiguity
is
like
it?
It
has
less
of
a
impact.
B
I
guess-
and
the
other
thing
that
I
think
would
be
nice
is
if
we
praised
in
other
channels
and
didn't
hide
it
in
the
praise
channel,
because
it
really
doesn't
get
seen
as
much
like
the
praise
who
goes
to
the
praise
channel,
only
people
who
get
praised
maybe
to
see
what
was
there
you
know
but
like
if
we
dished
it
in
other
channels,
it
could
other
people
be
like
yeah
and
also
praise
this
person.
You
know
it
might,
it
might
be
more
engaged
able
to
be
engaged
and
on
the
community
call.
B
I
think
that
there's
positive
and
negatives
right,
yeah,
there's
people
saving
their
praise
for
the
community
call,
but
then
there's
also
people
being
exposed
to
the
praise
culture
for
the
first
time
and
then
making
praise
because
of
it
right.
So,
in
the
end
like
what
are
the
metrics
are
the
is
the
metrics
to
get
more
praise
from
a
diverse
group
of
people.
B
If
so,
I
think
the
community
call
actually
sort
of
forces
that,
because
people
who
are
praising
might
not
praise
and
like
everyone,
who's
at
the
call
praises-
and
it's
like
25
20
20-ish
people
all
giving
signals,
whereas
otherwise,
I
feel
like
we
might
be
more
dominated
by
just
a
few
people
who
are
willing
to
put
in
the
time
to
praise
so
it
has
his
frozen
x-con
nate.
Did
you
have
more
to
say,
though,.
K
Yeah
yeah,
so
I
guess
you
know
I
I
noticed
like
with
my
own
practice
towards
praise,
which
I
think
is
really
something
that
we
should
stress
to
community
members
and
how
to
how
to
do
it
and
the
responsibility
that
it
comes
along
with
praise
within
this
community,
because
it
is
part
of
a
reward
system.
K
K
I
think
that
praise
kind
of
lost
its
meaning
and
so
receiving
praise
didn't
feel
as
good
as
well
as
giving
praise
didn't
feel
as
good,
and
so
I
think
that
type
of
intrinsic
motivation
be
gets
more,
intrinsic
motivation
and
and
so
like
it's
it's
an
interesting
concept
and
approach
towards
things.
So
I
think
the
the
gamification
of
leaderboard
is
really
a
really
good
observation
and
then
the
community
call
yeah.
K
I
I
I
try
to
practice
like
I
want
to
get
better
at
giving
praise
in
the
moment
when
it's
deserved
and
being
very
specific
about
the
praise
that
I
dish
when
I
get
to
the
community
call
I
feel
like
I,
you
know
I
I've
messed
up
and
I
forgot
to
write
down
my
praise,
and
so
I'm
just
dishing
out
praise.
That's
not
it's
just
flattering,
you
know
it's
not
genuine,
it's
not.
K
It
doesn't
have
a
lot
of
meaning
behind
it
and
that's
not
what
we
want
to
be
doing
and
I'm
very
guilty
of
that,
and
I
assume
a
lot
of
other
people
are
as
well.
But
you
know
it's
just
one
of
those
things
where
I
do
think
we
have
to
stress
the
importance
of
how
we
praise
and
the
way
we
do
it
to
the
rest
of
the
community
members
so
that
it
keeps
persisting
within
the
culture
itself.
So
yeah.
K
Those
are
just
my
thoughts
around
it,
but
I
will
pass
it
over
to
ben's
or
whoever
else.
If
you
have
any
comments.
I
Yeah,
I
actually
do
this
is
more
of
a
kind
of
my
own
personal
view
on
on
praise
and
and
like
how
it's
how
I've
kind
of
I
haven't
really
come
to
this.
I'm
kind
of
just
now.
Coming
to
this,
I
I'm
not
someone
who
you
know
is
doing
things
for
for
praise,
but
it
does
feel
good
to
get
it
and
I
think.
I
Like
I
almost
don't
engage
as
much
as
questions,
because
I
I
feel
like
that's
like
a
burden
on
the
person
who
I'm
asking
or
things
like
that,
it's
not
because
I
don't
want
to
look
to
look
like.
I
don't
know
what
I'm
doing
it's
more
like.
I
I
don't
want
to
slow
things
down
or
be
a
burden
or
something,
and
I'm
kind
of
coming
around
to
the
idea
of
like
it's,
not
a
it's,
not
a
one-way
thing.
When
we're
you
know
engaging
with
people
within
our
community
and
and
praise
actually
like
gives
kind
of
like
creates
an
exchange
like
you
you
with
that
you
know
now.
I
can
give
someone
praise
for
helping
me
and
it's
like
I'm
not
just
taking.
I
know
I'm
not
anyway,
but
I
don't
know.
I
That's
just
something
that
has
helped
me
in
my
own
thinking
is
like
you
know
that
that
sort
of
dynamic.
E
H
Yeah
one
for
that
is,
does
it
feel
better
because
it's
live
like
what?
If
does
it
feel
better?
Because
otherwise
you
don't
receive
the
praise
or
if
you
just
received
a
praise
that
is
unexpected
at
any
time.
Would
that
feel
better
or
there
is
like
a
predictability
of
the
praise
time
that
it
creates
some
type
of
tension
of
like
oh,
am
I
gonna
get
praise?
E
No,
I
mean,
I
feel
it's
just
more.
I
don't
know
like
especially
like
when
the
people
have
like
they
got
the
camera
on
and
they're
teaching
you
the
praise.
I
don't
know,
I
just
think
it
feels
like.
Even
if
it's
the
same
price
like
you
know,
they
praise
you
for
the
same
thing,
but
if
they
tell
you,
I
think
it
feels
better
than
if
they
tell
you
in
the
chat.
A
I
just
want
to
maybe
add
one
thing
about
the
community
call.
I
look
at
that
praise
beginning
as
two
things,
one
as
an
opportunity
for
people
who've
been
in
our
community
for
a
long
time
to
model
praise
behavior
and
on
the
other
side,
for
people
who
are
new
to
our
community
to
exercise
so
to
sort
of
give
it
a
go
to
practice
praise.
D
I
also
think
that
something
that
maybe
affected
the
amount
of
praise
given
is
that
I
think
several
of
us
use
this.
This
word
like
that.
We
were
on
a
limbo
like
yeah,
before
the
praise
was
for
the
distribution
of
impact
hours
and
now
between
the
reward
between
the
the
implementation
of
the
reward
system
and
af
and
the
the
the
hatch
like
things
felt
like
okay
praise.
D
Somehow
we
we
knew,
and
we
know
that
it
was
going
to
be
retroactively
done,
but
it
felt
like
a
little
bit
like
outdated
and
I
feel
like
when
praise
comes
and
like
updates
to
to
to
our
present
time
with
that,
where
you
feel
like
the
praise
that
you
give
today
is
going
to
somehow
be
recognized
to
that
person
soon,
yeah
that
that
encouraged
you
to
to
praise
more.
H
Okay,
so
I
can
pass
through
the
other
topic.
This
is
just
an
idea
that
I
wanted
to
to
share,
so
we
were
talking
about
subject
matter
experts
with
nate
and
carol
the
other
day
and
how
how
how
do
we?
How
do?
How
can
we
create
awareness
of
who
are
subject
matter,
experts
how
what
what
defines
one?
What
is
the
definition
of
the
role,
how
to
interact
with
them?
H
All
of
this,
they
have
turned
the
role
of
subject
matter
experts,
something
kind
of
difficult
to
define
since
we
started
and
it
doesn't,
it
didn't
really
pick
up
and
and
also
with
this
question
of
like
oh,
where
are
the
token
engineers,
it
seems
to
be
a
recurring
thought
that
token
engineers
are
not
around,
and
so
I
was
thinking
what,
if
that
the
flower
of
token
engineering
became
categories
of
praise
and
that
they
were
somehow
introduced
to
the
quantification,
so
every
type
of
contribution
could
populate
one
of
these
flowers,
so
it
would
not
be
like
who
are
the
people
that
are
attached
to
those
names?
H
H
So
I
brought
that
to
the
research
group
and
aloisius
gave
a
very
good
idea
to
how
to
bring
that
to
the
quantification
without
being
something
very,
I
don't
know
one
more
thing
to
do
and
they
said
what,
if
we
create
emojis
that
each
emoji
is
attached
to
one
different
paddle
and
we
start
praising
a
lot
with
those
emojis
or
like
bring
those
emojis
to
conversations
and
create
some
type
of
awareness
of
these
emojis
to
the
point
that
they
become
intuitive.
H
So
in
the
quantification
when
people
were
quantifying,
they
just
have
those
emojis
to
choose
from,
and
they
know
that
each
one
of
those
emojis
represent
each
one
of
the
petals,
and
we
could
have
like
a
something
that
you
can
easily
see.
What
is
what,
but
that,
with
time
that
would
become
like
very
easy
and
then
yeah.
K
I
I
like
it
a
lot.
I
I
think
it'd
be
interesting
to
see
how
we
implement
something
like
that,
especially
if
you
know
for
the
advice
process
in
particular
like
if
you
know
you're,
trying
to
make
a
decision
and-
and
you
have
a
certain
you
know,
couple
categories
that
it
may
fit
into
and
having
you
know,
an
emoji
that
does
that
it'd
be
really
cool
if
those
emojis
could
actually
ping
those
subject
matter,
experts
simultaneously,
but
I
don't
know
if
that's
something
discord
is
capable
of
doing.
K
But
you
know
my
only
concern
with
this
would
be
that
you
know
most
decisions
that
we
make
the
decision
spaces
that
we
have,
that
need
advice,
process,
aren't
necessarily
needed
by
you
know
token.
You
know
specific
types
of
experts
you
know
like.
If
I
wanted
to
change
something
in
discord,
I
would
probably
go
to
vive
iv
and
you
know
not
trent
mcconaughey
or
somebody
like
that.
K
K
We
need
the
people
who
were
most
impacted
by
that
type
of
decision
making,
and
so,
if
it
impacts
the
people
who
are
actually
having
to
implement
it,
that's
who
we
need
to
talk
to
and
those
people
become
the
subject
matter
expert,
regardless
of
their
classification.
So
those
are
my
thoughts
around
it.
H
Yeah,
just
a
quick
comment
on
that.
The
idea
would
be
that
we
would
identify
subject
matter,
experts
that
are
active
in
the
community.
So
I
think
it
would
bring
an
ease
to
this
feeling
that,
like
oh,
we
don't
have
token
engineers
that
are
active
that
are
around
that
are
present.
A
E
A
I'm
gonna
jump
in
yeah.
I
think
it's
a
really
cool
idea.
You
know,
and
I
want
to
just
sort
of
bring
something
in
from
communitas.
As
part
of
this
onboarding
experience,
we've
been
talking
about
allowing
people
to
self-assign
roles
using
emojis,
and
this
could
potentially
be
just
a
stop
of
the
onboarding
experience
where
you
know,
there's
a
a
way,
a
bot
that
allows
people
to
self-assign
their
own
subject
matter
expertise.
A
Maybe
it's
not
something
that
we
give
to
other
people,
but
people
will
assign
that
role
to
themselves
and
they
can
sort
of
come
in
and
out
of
those
roles.
However,
they
feel
comfortable
and
it
really
fits
in
nicely
to
how
we
are
we're
planning
that
this
experience
anyway.
So.
E
I
was
just
going
to
say,
like
I
think
it's
I
mean
I
think
after
what
tom
said,
like
self-assigning
roles,
I
think
it
would
be
nice
also
if
and
combine
it
with
what
libby
was
saying
about.
Like
you
know,
after
you
accomplish
a
certain
amount
of
tasks,
then
you
know
like
you,
I
don't
know
like
level
up
on
that
role
or
whatever,
but
so
you
encourage,
like
you,
encourage
people
to
self-assign.
So,
like
I
care
about
this
topic,
but
then
you
also
encourage
them
to
keep.
You
know,
keep
advancing
in
that
role.
B
I
I
I
am,
I
think,
it'd
be
super
cool
to
have
a
few
different
processes
that
we
can
use
to
try
to
categorize
praise
and
we're.
Probably
it's
probably
going
to
be
a
a
process
of
trying
different
things
and
seeing
what
works
and
what
doesn't
work
and
what
the
drawbacks
are.
Emojis
seem
like
an
easy
one
to
try.
I
I
do
think
a
lot
of
we
don't
want
to
make
it
too
hard
to
displace.
B
So
we
shouldn't
like
require
people
to
make
emojis,
but
like
hey,
it's
there
like
and
maybe
if
it
gets
adoption
and
people
start
using
it,
because
it's
somehow
fun
and
enjoyable,
then
that's
great.
I
also
think
dishing
it
in
channels
that
are
associated
with
category.
We
can
categorize
based
off
of
the
channel
that
I
was
dished
in
and
that's
a
nice
and
low
effort,
and
I
think
that
we'll
also
find
other
ways
to
create
low
effort.
B
Good
ux
ways
to
allow
for
categories
now,
giving
the
quantifiers
the
option
to
make
a
category
you
know
to
make
it
to
categorize
could
also
be
interesting.
You
know,
and
we
take-
I
I
think
it's
going
to
take
to
to
put
this
phrase
in
the
and
then
also
of
course,
there's
like
using
word
recognition
and
scanners
to
try
to
categorize.
So
I
think
I
think
all
of
these
processes
will
should
just
be
tried
if
there
is
value
for
categorizing
and
we
see
we'll
see
what
sticks.
B
H
Yeah
and-
and
I
think
we
talked
a
lot
about
those
two
of
the
words
like
how
to
use
just
the
words
to
categorize,
but
then
it
was,
it
was
really
easy.
Just
with
like
twitter
and
meetings.
That's
why
we
end
up
having
such
a
kind
of
a
biased
understanding.
In
the
end
of
the
praise
analysis,
you
know
that,
like
there
was
so
much
attention
going
to
twitter
and
meetings
mostly
because
those
were
the
only
words
that
were
accurately
showing
what
a
praise
was
for.
B
Yeah,
I
I
think
for
those
sorts
of
things
you
have
to
train
the
train.
The
bots
right
so
doing
one-off
is
never
going
to
work
very
well.
But
if
you
do
it
every
week
you
analyze
every
two
weeks.
You
analyze,
you
improve
it.
You
add
you
subtract,
you
adjust,
then
over
time
you
build
something
that
could
categorize
well,
but.
F
H
And
if
we
have
no
more
comments
about
that,
just
the
last
thing
that
came
up
today,
actually
then
x.
Trusted
c
then
suggested
this.
He
was
like
what,
if
there
is
an
opt-out
button
of
the
of
the
final
distribution
like
what,
if
a
person
doesn't
need,
either
the
tokens
or
the
if
a
person
doesn't
need
the
token
like
if
they
have
a
lot
of
governance
already
and
they
feel
well
off
financially
that
they
wouldn't
like
to
accumulate
more
power.
H
B
I
I
I
think
it
would
be
pretty
easy
to
implement
from
a
technical
level.
That's
for
sure
it's
just
a
quick
little
website
that
gives
a
list,
and
then
you
don't
distribute
to
those
people.
The
the
social
side
of
it
is
like
the.
Why
and
that
you
know,
would
we
promote
that
or
yeah?
I
don't
know,
that's
that's
an
interesting
thing
and
when
we
distribute
we're
just
actually
sending
it,
it's
not
like
people
have
to
claim
right.
K
I
like
that,
a
lot
actually-
and
I
think
that
can
go
back
to
like
the
gamification
of
the
leaderboard
too,
just
to
have
like
this
kind
of
competition
to
see
how
many
people
who
have
opted
out
and
kind
of
give
them
a
social
recognition
for,
for
you
know
giving
back
to
the
commons
and
just
saying
hey.
These
people
have
done
a
lot
and
they've
chosen
not
to
take
away
governance
and
take
away
value
from
this
awesome
economy.
B
A
Yeah,
I
wanted
to
say
the
same
thing.
I
actually
don't
look
at
it
as
something
to
commend
like
yeah.
You
didn't
accept
your
tokens,
but
I
I
think
that
there's
certain
use
cases.
Octopus
is
the
one
use
case
that
comes
to
mind
where
he
has
a
conflict
with
his
university
if
he
accepts
any
sort
of
payment
outside
of
the
university
he's
working
with.
So
I
think
that
there
are
some
people
who
will
want
to
opt
out
for
personal
or
professional
reasons
such
as
that
one
he's
the
one
that
comes
to
mind
immediately.
A
Comments
before
we
close
the
call,
I
guess
just
one
thing:
don't
you
opt
out
by
not
submitting
an
address.
H
H
C
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
add
that
maybe
like
under
that
circumstance
like
like
octopuses
situation,
like
I
wonder
if
there's
just
like
any
way
in
which
it
could
be
like
legally
interpreted
in
some
way
that
what
the
praise
system
recognizes
with
is
with
like
governance
tokens.
So
I
mean,
if
he's
not
able
to
like
be
paid
like,
maybe
like
we
could
support
in
some
way
like
with
our
own
legal
infrastructure,
that
the
reward
system
doesn't
give
out
like
payouts
or
or
cash.
C
I
mean
I'm
pretty
sure,
there's
something
like
that
already,
but
I
feel
that,
like
this
governance
in
vote,
weight
could
be
interpreted
as
like
what
he
is
rewarded
with
not
money
so
so
yeah
I
mean
this
this
way
I
mean
the
option
for
opting
out.
Is
there
but
we're
not
putting
people
under
that
situation
like
in
a
default
way.
H
Katie
was
calling
me
that
was
nice
to
see
okay,
so
we're
on
the
top
of
the
hour
and.