►
From YouTube: W92 Softgov WG: Sentiment Analysis Poll, Value Theory, DAI Instability & Dealing with Change
Description
The Softgov Working Group researches and applies best practices for governance, social collaboration and contribution rewards while implementing Ostrom’s 8 principles for governing the commons in its foundation.
We gather every Tuesday at 7pm CET.
Steward: Liviade
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
C
D
C
Welcome
guys
yeah
so
for
today
there
is
not
much
planned,
but
there
are
a
few
things
that
I
think
could
be
worth
discussing.
So
sofkav
was
working
in
in
that
sorry
about
the.
I
think
it's
loud
behind
me
here.
C
C
And
I
think
we
get,
we
have
some
enters
already
a
little
dark
here.
C
So
there's
that
happening
and
also
so
I
don't
think,
there's
much
to
be
done
there.
Only
if
you
haven't
participated
yet
please
do
so
and
rex
brought
up
something
a
discussion
about
what
to
do
about
x,
die.
C
Should
we
diversify
our
holdings?
How
is
the
tc
gonna
resist
if
there
is
some
type
of
yeah
instability
to
the
chain?
So
I
think
this
is
more
of
a
simple
conversation
but
yeah.
I
think
we
should
definitely
just
bring
awareness
to
everyone
in
the
community
and
just
start
a
discussion
discussing
it
more.
So
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
share
something
rex.
A
A
What
to
do
in
the
case
that
they
be
sanctioned
or
whether
this
is
a
this
negatively
impacts
the
level
of
decentralization
and
there's
still
it's
all
very
much
up
in
the
air
as
to
what
they
would
like
to
do.
There's
been
suggestions
to
start
to
sell
off
usdc
for
freeze
which
would
and
and
move
away
from,
the
peg,
which
would
impact
x
dive
for
it
as
a
one
to
one
to
die
and,
by
extension,
our
common
pool.
A
So
I've
been
speaking
with
nate
and
gideon
and
there's
a
lot
of
different
ideas
as
to
what
to
do,
because,
ultimately,
what
we
do
know
because
well
nate
was
saying
that
our
common
pool
is
built
for
a
a
stable
asset
and
a
volatile
asset,
not
too
volatile
assets.
So
that
could
be
problematic
and
not
only
that.
But
a
sell-off
event
in
in
die
would
yeah.
A
C
B
B
I
don't
know,
if
maybe
that's
a
different
point-
the
agenda,
but
before
I
forget,
regarding
the
the
stakeholder
sentiment
analysis
being
that
I'm
leading
the
marketing
efforts,
I
I
do
have
you
know
the
subscription
list
of
all
the
people
in
hubspot
and
we
also
have
a
tool
that
we
haven't
been
using
a
lot
which
are
hubspot
forms
which
they're
they're,
basically,
google
forms,
but
the
inputs
get
saved
into
the
hotspot
crm
that
we
have.
So,
if
you
like.
B
I'm
sending
out
the
the
I'm
sending
out
the
special
edition
newsletter
with
the
audit.
Maybe
I
can
do
something
similar
next
week
for
the
token
holders,
just
an
email,
with
a
call
to
action
to
ask
them
how
they
feel
about
what
we're
doing
and
current
market
circumstances.
So
that's
that's
the
table.
C
You
mean
sending
a
newsletter
to
everyone
to
with
that
on
the
topic
is
that
what
he
said.
B
Yeah
well
wouldn't
be
a
newsletter
but
yeah
sending
an
email
like
a
mass
email
and
just
asking
people
to
whatever
information.
We
were
asking
them
to
assess
the
sentiment
analysis
to
assess.
So
I
don't
know
how
you're
going
about
it.
But
those
are
the
tools
that
I
have
and.
C
Nice,
thank
you.
I
thought
you
were
talking
about
what
rex
was
talking
about
yeah
that
could
be
good
to
include
into
some
type
of
email.
I've
been
messaging
people
one-on-one
and
also
I
posted.
I
tagged
everyone
here
on
this
chord
too.
C
C
About
police
that
has
been
going
around,
and
and
also
this
next
big
decision
that
we
should
make
about
about
die
next
time,
but
it
just
sounds
like
we
need
to
post
on
the
forum
and
then
yeah
right.
In
the
conversation
there.
C
Well,
rex
was
explaining
now
that
I
mean
with
the
instability
of
ex-dive
will
be
affected,
and
what
are
we
gonna
do
about?
It.
C
And
you
had
on
that
text
you
sent
me
rex.
There
was
three
like
options
for
how
how
to
go
about
it
that
you
had
written.
I
think
there
could
be
a
oop
he's
gone.
B
Is
it
that
only
you
get
to
see
the
results
I
completed
it
and
I
I
wanted
to
see
sort
of
like
the
results
I
was
expecting.
Is
it
only
you
that
you
can
see
the
the
distribution
of
opinions
across
the
different
questions.
C
C
It's
just
a
little
bit
of
a
bummer,
because
the
latest
ones
I
mean.
Probably
people
won't,
go
back
to
it
and
and
answer
the
ones
that
are
missing.
So
I
think
that
would
look
a
little
scattered
in
the
final
analysis.
You
know
you
wouldn't
look
so
accurate
because
it's
not
taking
all
opinions
into
account.
So
I
don't
know
if
it's
the
best.
The
best
option
is
to
accept
them
or
not.
B
Yeah
I
just
I
just
went
back
and
there's
10
more
questions
which
I
will
feel
but,
like
you
said,
not
a
lot
of
people
will
go
back.
B
B
The
multi-dimensional
meaning
of
value
away
from
just
like
economic
value
or
quantitative,
so,
depending
on
I'm
reading
a
book
that
approaches
value
from
different
contexts
from
like
value
like
what
value
is
for
philosophy,
what
values
for
psychology,
what
values
for
sociology
with
values
for
neuroscience
and
the
finality
of
it.
I
hope
is
that
it
will
bring
out
new
avenues
for
us
to
come
up
with
ways
to
create
a
utility
for
the
tc
away
from
governance
value,
so
I'll,
be
preparing
that
and
posting
it
on
the
forum.
Eventually.
E
I
have
something
to
I
think
overall,
first
of
all
we
are
about,
or
we
are
currently
going
through,
a
lot
of
changes,
changes
and
those
are
things
that
we
can.
I
guess
there's
not
really
much
to
do
about
them
now,
but
we
can
cert.
We
should
certainly
be
aware
of
them
and
just
prepare
because
they
are
likely
just
getting
started
and
there's
another
thing.
I
don't
even
know.
E
If
I
am,
I
should
be
talking
about
that
here,
because
I
don't
know
how:
how
open
is
that,
but,
for
example,
in
sample
we've
had
a
bit
of
a
blocker
with
a
member
of
the
community
for
with
a
project,
and
we
haven't
been
able
to
address
that,
and
so
like.
E
I
guess
just
wondering
how,
from
from
our
instance
and
culture
whatever
how.
How
should
we
just
approach
that
I
don't
know,
I
don't
want
to
give
too
much
detail
because
I'm
I'm
not
even
I
don't
know
if
I'm
supposed
to
talk
about
that,
but
that
doesn't
still
concern
me.
C
C
E
Well,
I
guess
you
know
the
the
stewards
of
reformation
proposal.
Also
sampo
is
making
a
lot
of
things
and
he's
trying
to
move
as
fast
as
possible.
The
communications
working
group
is
going
under
a
major
reap.
I
don't
know
like
they
are
redoing
the
the
working
group.
E
As
far
as
I
know,
in
a
lot
of
senses,
and
so
I
guess
that's
those
are
things
that
in
one
way
or
another
are
going
to
impact
all
of
the
people
in
the
community,
and
I
don't
know
if
there's
anything
we
can
do
about
it
or
if
we
should
do
anything
at
all.
C
E
That's
the
thing
I
don't.
I
don't
know
right
now.
Everything
feels
like
I
don't
know
if
that's
because
it
is
also
summer
and
there's
not
a
lot
of
movement,
but
everything
feels
like
it's
moving
pretty
fast,
but
at
the
same
time
you
don't
really
have
that
much
people
or
that
much
engagement,
and
so
it's
like,
I
don't
know,
I'm
I'm
like
in
a
limbo.
E
I
don't
feel
anything
concrete
and
just
a
lot
of
discussions,
and
I
don't
I
don't
even
know
where
are
we
standing
overall
because
I
feel
like
we
are
changing
so
much
things
that
it's
like
are
we?
Is
there
going
to
be
anything
left
from
the
tc?
I
knew
when
when
I
started
not
that
dramatic,
but
in
some
sense.
C
Yeah,
I
think
that's
a
legitimate
concern.
I
think
that,
but
that's
just
my
opinion.
I
think
the
financial.
C
C
Some
sort
of
a
blocker
to
the
structure
we
had
because
it
was
a
costly
structure
and,
and
then
a
lot
of
the
I
mean.
The
mission
of
the
tec
is
also
connected
to
its
financial
stability.
So
I
feel
like
now.
We
are
in
some
sort
of
contention
phase
where
a
lot
is
slowing
down
a
lot
that
is
not
focusing
directly
on
the
financial
stability,
and
I
think
we've
been
discussing
over
the
last
few
weeks
of
like
how
can
we
focus
a
little
bit
more.
C
Our
support
on
that
direction
and
anything
that's
needed
from
sample
or
understanding
like
partnerships
with
other
communities,
so
yeah,
something
that
came
up
in
the
last
retro
hall
was
that
it
would
be
really
cool
to
have
a
template
for
partnering
with
other
communities,
and
I
think
that's
something.
Softcove
could
do,
for
example,
but
it
does
feel
like.
C
What
each
one
is
offering,
and-
and
that's
why
we
were
doing
this
like
sentiment,
analysis
poll
and
I
think
the
results
from
that
will
be
cool
to
spark
a
discussion
on
what
is
the
direction
to
follow
and
how
is
everyone
feeling
about
the
tc
so
yeah
with
the
reach
out,
like
maybe
maybe
either
by
last,
but
maybe
next
week?
We
could
do
that
close
the
poll
and
look
at
the
results.
E
Yeah
with
what
you
said
of
there
was
something
you
said
about.
E
I
can't
remember,
but
I
thought
of
the
people
that's
been
sort
of
left
out
because
of
the
you
know,
because
of
how
we
are
trying
to
spend
less
money,
and
I'm
wondering
I'm
especially
wondering
if
there's
anything
we
could
do
about
those
people
like
just
sort
of
understanding
and
making
sure
when
we
make
these
changes
that
we
we
make
them
feel
as
good
as
possible
about
them.
You
know
having
probably
having
potentially
to
leave
an
income.
They
have
been
relying
on
for
some
time.
E
I
know
this
is
especially
true
for
for
for
the
comms
working
group,
because
that
was
the
biggest
working
group
and
I
don't
know
I
guess
I'm
I'm
personally
lucky,
because
I
wasn't
that
involved
anyways,
but
I'm
not.
I
don't
know
I
get
the
feeling
that
some
guys
there
may
not
feel
that
good
and
or
if
we
have
been
communicating
that
they
will
the
best
way
possible,
or
I
don't
know.
C
Yeah
yeah,
I
think
that's
a
good
point
to
bring
people
together
and
see
if
how
everyone
is
feeling,
but
also,
I
feel
like
it's
somehow
clear
from
the
structure
of
a
dao
that
there
is
not
security
in
the
first
place
I
mean,
I
think
this
is
still
something
we
are
trying
to
figure
it
out
as
a
as
the
ecosystem.
C
Not
like
you
have
a
contract
that
you
know
you're
going
to
be
paid
every
month.
If
you're
doing
with
your
like
what
you
agreed
to
be
doing,
I
think,
by
the
default.
This
is
already
different
in
a
dow,
so
yeah
yeah,
I
think
there
are
more
conversations
should
be
had
about
that.
But
I
don't
know
if
security
was
ever
something
that
was
offered.
E
I
mean
not
like
security
but
like
when
it
comes
the
time
of
these
contributors.
You
know
realizing
they
probably
won't
be
compensated
anymore.
Are
we
making
like?
Are
we
just
like?
Are
we
just
not
passing
proposals
like
just
like?
They
were
numbers,
or
are
we
just
like
really
approaching
them,
and
I
don't
know,
are
we
being
responsible
about
them
in
a
human
way?
E
C
I
don't
communicate
so
closely
with
the
comms
team,
but
maybe
there
is
some
sort,
but
maybe
we
could
make
an
event
or
something
maybe
there's
something
that
we
could
do
like
a
transition
party
for
the
tc,
some
type
of
celebration
for
the
structure
that
is
no
longer.
E
Yeah
and
I'm
mentioning
the
comments
becomes
group
because
I'm
more
familiar
with
the
situation,
but
I
don't
know
even
the
stewards,
because
that's
another
group
that's
been
having
a
lot
of
changes
lately.
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
have
had
like
any.
F
I
just
I
just
have
two
two
comments
in
regards
to
this
yeah.
I
think
it's
really
important
what
you
are
mentioning
and
I
think,
depending
on
the
approach
we
give
to
to
this,
it's
kind
of
like
saying:
okay,
we
are
a
company.
You
know
that
we
are
just
like
coding
coding
expenses,
so
people
won't
get
compensated
or
are
we
actually
more
of
a
community
or
commons
right,
and
how
does
that
actually?
Look
like
you
know
like?
Are
we,
and
this
kind
of
like
makes
me
think
about?
F
Also
maybe
what
manu
has
been
working
on
value
theory,
and
this
is
something
that
has
been
talked
about
a
lot
right?
What
is
the
value
that
the
tec
can
provide
to
its
contributors,
not
just
like
economically,
but
also
like
in
as
experience
as
knowledge
as
reputation,
as
you
know,
like
all
sorts
of
things
that
that
that
have
been
discussed?
So
maybe
there's
some
like
link
between
these
these
ideas
right.
F
How
can
we,
how
can
we
make
feel
contributors
and
participants
included
in
a
regular
basis,
no
matter
if
they
are
being
compensated
or
not
right
as
part
of
the
community
and
and
that
they
are
still
getting
like
a
like
like
a
good
experience?
They
they
are
getting
something
from
from
the
tc
as
well,
so
they
don't
have
to
leave
right,
or
at
least
maybe
they
they
do
the
effort
to.
F
E
Yeah,
I
guess
not
not
even
people
staying
that'd
be
great,
but
not
not
a
bit
more
like
when,
when
we
have
financial
problems
we
tend
to,
you
know,
go
to
the
forum
or
whatever
discussion
method.
We
have
and
just
say
no
to
everything
and
not.
It
is
not
always
on
the
best
way
or
the
best
note-
and
I
know
nobody
has
any
you
know
ill
intentions,
but
there's
people
on
the
other
side.
That
may
be
like
okay,
why?
Why
aren't
you
cutting
your
expenses
or
you
know
what?
E
Why
is
it
me
that
I
have
to
to
let
go
of
of
what
I've
been
having
and
doing
in
the
tc
just
like
sort
of
finding
a
method
to?
Even
if
these
proposals
don't
pass
to?
E
Let
them
know
that
you
know,
probably
wasn't
their
fault
or
anything
or
or
just
you
know,
just
explain
the
best
way
possible,
because
I
feel
like
it's
it's
different
when
we
have
these
the
this
financial
stress,
if,
if
the,
if,
if
these
situations
were
to
happen
on
another
time,
everyone
would
probably
be
more
cool
and
discussions
wouldn't
be
so
harsh,
but
as
we
we
have,
this
stress
over
us
comments
are
not
always
phrased
in
the
best
way
possible
and
that
that's
kind
of
what
what
concerns
me
do.
E
E
I
wouldn't
say
rude,
but
I
guess
not
really
receptive
or
just
you
know,
just
a
plain
old,
whatever
not
explaining
that
much,
because
I
guess
I
I
tend
to
think
that
when
you
you
say
no
to
something
you
sort
of
kind
of
either
explain
or
give
an
alternative,
especially
in
these
situations,
and
a
lot
of
this
is
I'm
feeling
that
sometimes,
unless
you
come
directly
to
the
to
the
person
or
whatever
and
have
a
chat
you
are,
you
can
be
sure
that,
like
what's
the
reasoning
behind
it-
and
I
don't
know
if
people
take-
I
don't
know
how
people
take
that.
B
It
is
for
me,
I
think
it
is
the
dark
side
of
being
at
the
vanguard.
I
mean
we
are
pioneering
new
technologies,
and
some
of
the
assumptions
that
we
might
have
of
the
hypotheses
might
be
wrong.
B
At
least
in
terms
of
like
the
salary,
and
that's
because
we
had
a
bloated
budget,
I
think
and
however
it
was,
I
think
it
was
bloated,
given
our
resources,
but
it
was
by
no
means
high
in
terms
of
the
industry
average,
and
so
I
think
that's
impacting
the
culture.
At
least
the
contributors
are
the
people.
You
know
that
that
are
attending
that
and
the
fact
that
yeah,
like
like
kenty,
said
when
people,
I
think
in
terms
of
there
was
a
discussion
yesterday,
like
private
profit
versus
common
benefit.
B
I
think
framing
it
like
that
is
it's
tricky
because
profit
carries
with
it
some
connotations.
So
if
you
frame
private
profit
versus
common
benefit,
I
would
lean
towards
common
benefit,
just
sort
of
like
because
the
stigma
profit
has
but
really
for
me,
and
maybe
for
a
lot
of
people
here.
It
has
not
been
private
profit
but
personal
income
right
and
even
the
crisis
or
given
the
decrease
in
the
price
of
btc
and
eve.
There
were
a
couple
token
holders,
big
token
holders
that
sold.
B
I
don't
know
I
I
don't
know
their
circumstances,
maybe
they
lost
money
and
they
had
to
cash
out
of
dc.
I
think
maybe
if
they
had
been
value
aligned,
they
would
have
waited
more.
I
think
maybe
they
used
the
crisis
as
an
opportunity
to
cash
out.
I
don't
know
I
I
I'm
I'm
speculating
but
yeah.
I
think
the
common
benefit
has
so
like
trumped
personal
things
and
again
it's
it's.
Not
it's
really
not
not
a
complaint.
B
I'm
certainly
not
happy,
but
I'm
I'm
using
the
discontent
as
fuel
to
come
up
with
a
solution.
I
don't
want
to
complain,
I'm
I'm
really
like
and
I
don't
want
to
leave
the
tc
in
a
worse
position
that
I
came
in
and
and
so
I'm
trying
to
find
ways
to
create
utility
for
the
token
so
so
that
more
people
can
can
drive
demand
for
for
the
token
increase
of
price
and
maybe
allow
us
to
fund
more
initiatives,
paid
people
more
and
bringing.
B
Honestly
and
yeah,
I
think
we're
doing
the
best
we
can,
but.
B
But
yeah
it's
it's
tricky,
it
is.
We
can
discuss
it
in
private
entity
and
maybe
come
up
with
some
concise
ideas
to
post
in
the
forum,
because
I
do
feel
we're
trying
to
say-
and
it's
very
nuanced-
it
has
to
be
explained
in
a
way
that
is
not
complaining
or
or
or
pointing
fingers
at
people,
because
certainly
we
all
have
our
best
intentions
at
heart
and
we're
just
it's
trial
and
error
right
like
we're
at
the
cutting
edge.
So
that's
what
happens
yeah!
That's
what
I
think.
C
I
think
it
could
be
very
fruitful
to
have
these
conversations
in
public
actually
like
if
you,
if
you
would
like
to
share
more
about
what
you're
thinking,
if
you
guys
would
like
to
share
more
about
in
the
open
chat.
I
think
those
moments
are
great
opportunities
for
like
people
to
jump
in
and
share
what
they
think,
and
I
wish
we
don't
need
to
be
afraid
you
know
of,
like
I
think,
resilience
comes
into
when
there
is
difficult
conversations
happening
in
the
open.
E
And
I
guess
just
want
to
clarify
that
a
lot
of
this
isn't
isn't
necessarily
because
it
has
happened,
but
because
I
think
that
if
we
don't
take
care
of
that,
it
will
happen
the
first
one
of
the
first
conversations
we
had
on
on.
You
know
on
being
more
careful
with
money
was
after
the
first
audit
that
was
released
around
april.
E
So
it
just
has
been
a
few
months,
and
we
already
have
two
or
three
working
groups
undergoing
major
changes,
especially
on
the
financial
side,
and
that's
likely
going
to
keep
happening
because
we
still
don't
have
a
clean
path
to
make
money,
and
so
when,
when
the
common
pool
goes
to
it,
it
is
at
600
something
I
think
when
it
goes
down
to
400
or
something.
What
are
we
going
to
do?
E
We,
if
we
don't
take
care
of
that,
we're
likely
going
to
be
a
bit
more
harsh
with
everybody
just
because,
just
because
we
we
want
to
take
care
of
the
tc
and
we
don't
want
to
drain
all
money.
But
we
are,
we
gotta
be
careful
with
how
we
communicate
that
to
to
others,
and
that's
that's
something
we
we
should.
You
know
that's
something
we
should
take
care
of
as
a
preventive
way.
E
Instead
of
just
fixing
it
after
it
happens,
because
some
communities
don't
don't
ever
get
back
after
that
stuff
happens
because
you
just
there.
So
there
are
some
things
you
just
can't
fix.
D
Yes,
thank
you,
but
I
what
I'm
seeing
is
different
moments
and
levels
of
the
same
thing
that
what
a
bear
talked
about
and
what
else
he
brought
with
him.
Well,
it's
about
this,
the
community
and
the
culture
that
we
want
to
have,
and
so
what
doing
something
about
it
sounds
like
a
priority
to
me.
It's
like
I
do
care
that
you
didn't
had
what
you
asked
for
yeah.
It's
sorry
that,
right
now
it's
it
isn't
possible,
but
it's
like
we
do
care
that
you
go
away.
D
So
it
sounds
like
really
important
and
also
taking
with
this
experience,
acknowledging
that
there
are
different
levels
of
community
building,
that
we
need
to
bring
more
into
substance
like
the
forms
of
capital
that
bird
was
mentioning
and
how
does
that
look
like,
and
how
can
we
leave
that
so
yeah?
I
think
it's
really
important.
This
topic.
D
And
I
don't
know
if
a
party
that
has
some
elements
where,
where
we
can
share
and
hear
about
their
experience,
how
they
feel
the
changes
are
coming
in
their
life
and
in
the
community.
C
Thank
you,
yeah
yeah.
Thank
you
all
for
sharing.
I
think
this
is.
It
is
really
important
indeed,
and
maybe-
and
sometimes
it's
easy
to
lose
perspective
of
who
is
being
affected
by
what-
and
I
think
this
was
one
of
the
maybe
one
of
the
learnings
from
having
the
stewards
group
having
the
format
it
did.
C
Like
it
was
supposed
to
create
more
awareness
about
everyone
involved
and
all
the
things
happening,
but
I
don't
know,
I
still
feel
like
there's
a
lot
of
perspectives
that
are
missing,
like
the
fact
that
I
don't
know
what's
happening
in
the
comms
group
feels
a
little
problematic
and
that
probably
the
comms
group
doesn't
know
what's
happening
here
and
like
we
lost
a
little
bit.
The
connection
between
the
working
groups
and
understanding
this,
like
the
initial
purpose
of
the
stewards
working
group,
was
okay.
How
can
we
keep
this
a
fractal?
C
How
can
we
have
all
of
the
working
groups
communicating
through
those
nodes
that
are
like
the
stewards
but
yeah
that's
easier
thought
than
done
and
to
your
point,
bear
too.
I
think
I
think
there
is
a
huge
value
that
the
tc
offered
to
everyone
so
far,
like
I
see,
for
example,
zaptimus
is
starting
to
get
paid
work
in
other
communities
about
making
params
param
parties
gravity
is
getting
paid
work
with
other
communities
offering
conflict
resolution
edu
just
found
a
full-time
job,
based
on
the
experience
that
he
had
on
tc.
C
I
mean,
I
think,
yeah
I
think
chewie
is
working
with
so
many
things
and
building
communities,
and
I
think
there
is
a
lot
of
value
that
was
that
was
really
acquired
here,
and
maybe
we
we
need
time
to
acknowledge
that
and
have
like
these
experiences
being
shared
and
people
listening
to
each
other
and
yeah
just
have
a
moment
for
it.
F
Yeah
yeah.
I
think
that
that
would
be
great
and
yeah.
I
totally
agree,
I
think
just
the
fact
of
of
us
being
here
in
the
tc
and
being
part
of
adele
is
already
of
huge
value
for
us
right
like
I
always
like
to
take
a
look
kind
of
like
at
the
macro
of
of
what
we're
doing,
and
it's
like
what
manu
was
saying
like
it's
pure
innovation.
You
know
like
if
we
talk
to
normal
people
or
people
like
you
know
that
they
don't
really
know
much
about
web3
they
they
really
don't
know.
F
So
just
having
the
the
opportunity
of
being
here
and
working
together
and
collaborating,
I
I
would
say
that
it's
of
a
lot
of
value
for
a
lot
of
people,
or
or
at
least
for
me,
that
that
that's
true
right
so
so
yeah
just
yeah.
I
totally
agree
and-
and
I
think
it
would
be
yeah-
maybe
that
could
be
also
part
of
this
celebration.