►
From YouTube: W7 Softgov WG: The Stocks, Flows, Units, and Resources of the Token Engineering Commons
Description
Question of the day:
How do you feel about TEC focusing on token engineering vs. generalizing to all of the commons?
00:00 - Question of the day
20:00 - Introduction to today’s topic and updates and the importance of the book club
“We are an institution, a set of rules and other working constraints.”
Parameters are a huge part of softgov. How is each rule connected to our values and how do they effect our behaviour?
27:00 - What are the stocks, flows, units, and resources that we have available in TEC?
The people, the token, the energy, the intention that we share. Awareness of where we put our attention.
“Human resources” vs. Knowledge, skills, abilities.The flow is the skills that we all contribute.
The commons becomes the ability to orchestrate the skills and abilities of everyone coming together, but focusing on the potentialities of what we can all do together. The stock is the community, the intellectual capital that we bring to this effort. The flow is the world that we are living in in six months. And what does the world look like in 2022 and beyond.
‘Value of use’ and ‘Value of exchange’ - Our stock is the value that comes from the usage of the knowledge that we all bring. It may not yet be as profitable as we value it, but the exchange flow will be unlocked over time with the TEC tokens. We are creating value and giving it an exchange value by utilizing the knowledge we have through the technology mechanisms that we are producing. This is what makes our network regenerative. We are providing knowledge on how we can gather and manage funds towards token engineering products. We are all making the structure for these products to be regenerative. The soft-value will be reflected in the value of the token.
Consider the 8 forms of wealth from hinduism.
42:00 - The scope of proposals and Thursday Showcases
47:00 - Shared token tooling vs. Instance deployments for the Thursday showcases
52:00 - Sourcecred update
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
A
And
yeah,
since
I
proposed,
I
think
I
should
start-
and
I
was
thinking
like
if
it's
focus
I
mean
it's,
it's
good.
I
mean
it's
cooler,
but
but
at
the
same
time
I
think
only
the
token
engineering
would
be
more
exclusive
because
I
feel
it's
like
like
most
of
the
people
is
like
maybe
interested
on
other
things
of
the
comments,
but
talking
engineering,
it's
like
more
engineering
stuff
and
not,
I
think
it's
harder
for
some
people,
but
at
the
same
time
I
think
just
focusing
on
that.
A
A
B
So,
in
my
opinion,
you
should
focus
more
in
the
general
aspects
and
then
go
to
the
details,
and
te
is
right
now
the
main
focus,
but
eventually
there
hopefully
will
be
more
more
iterations
of
the
commons
so
yeah.
I
guess
that
we
should
focus
on
our
main
problems
right
now,
but
thinking
that
it
it
must
be
replicable.
I
mean
I
think,
that's
the
the
word
for
many
other
commons.
C
Thanks
yeah
yeah.
I
do
think
that
this
that
this
commons
in
specifics
should
be
focused
on
t
because
it's
the
token
engineering
commons,
but
I
think
we
are
learning
so
much
with
the
cultural
build
and
that's
one
of
the
purposes
that
we
have
with
this
process
that
doing
a
use
case.
Study
on
how
the
tec
is
being
built.
We
would
have
better
tools
to
build
other
comments.
C
So
there
is
a
lot
of
what
we're
learning
here
that
it's
gonna
fall
into
how
to
build
the
commons
in
general.
But
I
think
it's
nice
that
especially
now
closer
to
the
to
the
launch
that
we
focus
more
and
more
on
te,
because
it's
like
we're
preparing
we're
preparing
the
house
for
for
the
tea
inhabitants
to
to
come
in
and
I'll
pass
to.
D
Griff
yeah,
I
agree.
I
I
I
think
it's
really
important
that
we
just
really
focus
on
te
commons
and
not
general
commons.
It's
the
the
dream
here
is
at
least
what
I
really
want
to
see
is
a
world
where,
instead
of
having
one
monopoly
over
public
goods
like
we
have
where
government
controls
every
public,
that's
vertical,
we
have
lots
of
small
independent
groups
that
have
their
specialty
kind
of
like
a
startup
or
a
small
organization
that
they
know
token
engineering
or
they
know
public
roads.
D
You
know
they
know
public
health
in
this
area
and
they
can
really
like
expand
on
their
specialty
knowledge
and
provide
services
for
their
community,
so
with
the
and
strategically
for
the
common
stack
having
the
token
engineering
community
get
sucked
into
perfecting
their
their
commons.
There's
no
better
group
who's
going
to
want
to
like
tweak
the
bonding
curve
to
make
it
like
really
tight.
You
know
who's
going
to
want
to
in
make
conviction,
voting
even
better
and
better
and
who's.
You
know
uniquely
positioned
to
do
so.
D
It's
the
te
community
so
having
having
a
focus
on
te
public
goods
and
making
sure
that
we,
you
know,
satisfy
the
needs
of
this
community.
I
think
will
hopefully
we'll
make
it
so
that
every
everybody
who
copies
what
this
community
does
will
have
a
better
time.
You
know,
and
so
then,
as
olivia
said,
they
can
just
take
what
the
te
commons
does
and
then
just
replicate
it
and
replicate
it
and
that's
kind
of
the
dream.
D
The
other
thing
that
came
up
in
the
last
call
that
I
thought
was
interesting
is
that
that
durga
does
said
is
that
it's
really
hard
to
onboard
new
users.
It's
like
what
is
a
meta
mask
address.
What
is
a
dow
when
you
vote?
Does
it
take
your
coins
now
there's
a
lot
of
these
questions
that
most
of
the
token
engineering
community
will
not
have,
and
it
makes
it
our
delight
for
starting
the
first
one
a
lot
easier.
D
E
E
C
I
Thanks,
so
I
don't
know
how
much
more
I
can
contribute
based
on
what
was
already
said,
but
livia.
What
you
expressed
in
graph
would
you
express,
I
think,
is-
is
a
good
way
of
viewing
it.
We
have
this
set
of
knowledge
that
we're
building
and
we're
applying
it
in
one
case
for
the
token
engineering
commons
at
first
and
then
can
reuse
it
for
a
future
commons.
I
think
it's
a
smart
way
to
approach
it
and
I
don't
know
who
to
prostitute.
Can
I
pass
it
back
to
you,
liv.
J
J
And
the
only
thing
I'll
add
is,
I
see
us
maybe
engaging
more
with
dow
to
dao,
because
many
daos
are
trying
to
do.
I
see
many
daos
doing
the
same
thing,
but
the
unique
thing
about
this
community
is.
We
really
are
focused
on
creating
this
library
of
tools
and
templates
that
anyone
can
use,
whereas
other
dows,
maybe
don't
even-
have
a
mission
at
all
or
are
so
focused
on
dowing
to
dower
or
setting
up
the
dow
that
they
get
pulled
off.
J
So
I
hope
this
is
helpful
as
a
reflection
as
well
that
we
can
focus
a
bit
on
yeah
this
library
aspect
so
focusing
on
the
te,
but
I
also
see
that
we're
struggling
to
engage
or
identify
groups
that
are
also
doing
the
same
thing.
So
that's
kind
of
the
number
one
I
guess
pain,
point
that
I'm
seeing
right
now
is
who
else
outside
of
our
bubble
is
focused
on
building
these
tools
in
library.
K
K
L
L
M
And
I
think
that
that's
one
of
the
things
that
we
are
trying
to
do
to
complement
the
labor
of
of
developing
knowledge
that
the
token
engineers
are
doing
and
trying
to
up
to
apply
it
to
different
type
of
commons.
But
first
it
would
be
for
t
e
commons.
That
are
the
ones
that
they
are
specially
focused
on.
N
So
throughout
this
I've
been
listening
and
thinking
about
hindu
mythology
and
the
only
reason
I'm
going
to
say.
That
is
because
there
is
actually
one
deity
whose
entire
job
is
only
to
deal
with
humans
in
the
pantheon
of
those
things.
And
it
seems
to
me
that
if
you
had
a
person
or
a
person's
whose
job
it
was
to
really
look
after
the
community
as
a
whole
and
how
they
are
holding
together,
that
they
feel
welcome.
N
Aside
from
the
fact
that
everyone
here
tends
to
make
everyone
feel
welcome
and
that
they
find
their
place
and
that
they
have
all
the
tools
they
need
and
and
to
both
contribute
and
to
benefit
from
the
community.
Then
perhaps
the
the
I
think
correct,
ongoing
focus
on
the
te
community
might
be
sort
of
turbocharged,
while
maintaining,
I
think,
the
kind
of
cultural
emphasis,
because
we're
all
people
here
right.
N
So
we
we
should
maybe
have
like
somebody
who's
really
thinking
in
those
terms
to
try
to
make
that
happen
beyond
conflict
resolution.
But
more
like
a
like
an
ombudsman
or
somebody.
Who's
like
a
cheerleader
for
the
whole
organization
might
go
a
long
way
toward
allowing
us
to
continue
focusing
on
just
the
token
engineering
side
of
it
and
the
human
side
of
it.
F
Actually,
I
I
already
went,
but
I
had
a,
I
had
a
call
in
my
mind
and
I
I'm
taking
advantage
of
the
fact
that
I
discover
how
how
to
post
individual
videos-
and
my
connection
is
better
now
but
anyway
anyway,
I'm
I'm
always
very
curious
about
how
you
know
anybody.
That's
besides,
crypto
blockchain
can
see
and
tap
into
these
things.
So
I
I
agree.
F
I
completely
agree
on
the
focus
on
de
and
and
understanding
what
goes
I
mean
an
ordering
this
and
and
when
we
order
this
and
and
we
we
prepare
like
lessons,
learns
cases
best
practices,
then
that
can
be
replicable
for
other
organizations,
but
I
I
will
say,
maintain
the
focus
and
be
aware
that
there
is
a
world
huge
world,
besides
crypto
blockchain,
that
is,
that
is
bailey.
Basically
what
because
I
live
there,
I
need
so
many
other
communities.
C
We're
getting
there,
hopefully
hi
lansky,
welcome
cool
thanks
everyone
for
all
the
answers,
and
that's
very
interesting
to
kick
off
today,
because
it's
kind
of
on
the
line
of
what
we're
going
to
talk
about.
I
think
zap.
You
had
like
a
crystal
ball
or
something
that
we
we're
gonna
talk
about
the
scope
of
what
we're
doing,
and
I
also
want
to
give
just
a
quick
overview
on
what's
been
happening
on
softgov.
C
So
we've
been
having
these
last
sessions
in
in
a
structure
of
showing
a
little
bit
of
the
work
that
has
been
happening
and
then
the
second
half
to
pose
some
questions
or
reflections
that
we
all
have
inputs.
And
then
we
have
a
data
collection
that
goes
to
the
forum
from
the
forum.
There
are
more
inputs,
they
have
a
time
to
mature
and
then
from
there
we're
going
to
have
a
proposal
for
each
one
of
them
because
we're
following.
C
A
proposal
for
each
principle
that
we
want
to
implement
and
parallel
to
that,
the
book
club
is
happening,
and
I
wish
the
book
club
was
actually
the
softcove
working
group.
I
wish
this
started
before,
because
now
that
I'm
going
deeper
into
the
book,
it's
like.
Oh
my
god,
like
why
we
didn't
talk
about
this
before
like
why
this
wasn't
in
the
very
foundation
of
everything
that's
happening.
But
then
I
want
to
start
with
this
with
this
quote.
C
That
says,
oh
by
the
way,
the
agenda
is
in
the
soft
gov,
so
you
guys
can
follow
this
quote.
That
says
giving
the
levels
of
uncertainty
about
the
basic
structure
of
the
problems
appropriators
face.
The
only
reasonable
assumption
to
make
about
the
discovery
and
calculation
process
employed
is
that
appropriators
engage
in
a
considerable
amount
of
trial
and
error
learning,
and
that's
pretty
much
what
we've
been
doing.
C
Trier
and
error,
and
I'm
working
with
ata
to
like
do
an
overview
of
all
the
trials
and
errors
that
we've
been
having
and
how
we
can
use
all
of
this
knowledge
that
we
are
producing
as
we
go
to
the
future
comments.
As
this,
like
first
question,
brought
up
so
yeah
here
underneath
there's
also
a
quote
that
I
thought
it
was
interesting
to
share
about
institutions
and
you
guys
can
read
at
your
own
pace
and
she
has
a
really
well-defined
meaning
of
institutions,
and
in
this
case
we
are
an
institution
as
well.
C
That
is
a
set
of
working
rules
and
many
other
constraints,
and
this
starts
to
go
into
the
parameters
that
griff
was
talking
and
the
comms
call
and
parameters
are
a
huge
part
of
soft
golf
and
off
the
rules
that
we've
been
talking
like
in
more
depth
about.
So
it's
going
to
be
really
helpful
to
hear
more
about
them
and
to
understand
what
each
one
of
these,
how
each
one
of
these
rules
are
connected
to
our
values
and
how
they
affect
our
behavior.
C
C
D
Yeah
I
mean
the
main
thing
is
following
following
eleanor
ostrom's
principles:
number
three
where
it's
like
people
should
be
able
to
choose
the
rules
that
they
are
governed
by
and
that's
why
we
want
to
make
sure
that
the
parameters
are
out
there.
Some
parameters
are
going
to
affect
the
day-to-day.
For
instance,
the
reserve
ratio
on
the
augmented
bonding
curve
is
going
to
determine
how
much
when
someone
buys.
How
much
does
the
price
move?
You
know,
but
a
lot
of
parameters
won't
really
affect
the
day-to-day.
D
Right,
but
right
now
it's
not
about
really
choosing
one
parameter
or
another,
and-
and
it's
just
you
know-
jake
and
I
and
and
jess
and
tonga
and
sean
were-
were
pushing
trying
to
push
the
the
information
out
about
each
of
these
parameters.
So
people
can
understand
what
they
mean
and
when,
but
in
the
end,
this
system
needs
to
be
designed
from
a
holistic
perspective.
We
can't
just
say:
oh,
we
need
this
parameter
to
be
that
because
it
it
affects
all
the
other
parameters.
D
So
maybe
it
makes
sense
to
have
a
long
hatch
or
a
short
hatch
and
whatever.
Maybe
that
will
affect
other
parameters
and
they
all
need
to
match.
With
with
what
we
decide
so
yeah,
I
don't
know
if
that's
what
you're
going
for,
but
I'm
very
excited
to
inspire
you
guys
to
help
me
in
the
forum
start
debating
some
of
these
parameters,
especially
the
hatch
one
on
friday,
jake
and
sam
are
hosting
a
call
so
that
we
can
be
the
first
dow
ever
to
have
the
community,
not
the
devs,
decide.
D
C
C
And
there
is
a
sense
of
it
feels
it
feels
like
you're
finally
tapping
into
something
when
you
start
to
see
that
so
many
problems
are
similar
to
one
another,
and
there
is
even
a
part
that
she
talks
about
having
two
layers
of
rules
and
that's
pretty
much.
The
dandelion
vote
and
the
conviction
voting.
That
one
is
one
determines
how
appropriators
will
use
the
the.
C
Will
use
the
units
of
the
system
and
another
one
is
how
they
will
change
the
way
that
they
use
the
units
of
the
system.
So
one
is
about
the
rules
of
the
game
and
the
other
is
about
how
to
play
the
game,
and-
and
I
want
to
pass
this
question
around-
of
what
is
our
stock
and
what
is
our
unit
flow?
I
know
this
language
might
be
like.
Maybe
we
don't
need
to
use
it,
but-
and
we
might
as
well
get
familiar
with
it
since
we
are
like
getting
more
in-depth
into
this
work,
so.
C
C
C
C
L
E
Yeah,
I
think
the
primary
stock
is
the
people
and
that's
the
situation
we're
in
now
we
have
wonderful,
beautiful
shining
faces
showing
up
to
all
these
calls
really
high
capacity,
a
really
diverse
set
of
skills,
a
lot
of
energy
that
everyone
brings.
So
that's
the
stock,
maybe
that's
the
same
as
a
resource,
and
then
I
think
I
got
confused
on
what
exactly
is
a
unit,
but
I'll
speak
to
what
santi
is
saying.
I
think
we
have
the
stock
and
the
flow
is
everything
that's
evolving,
so
it's
our
organizational
process.
It's
the
token.
E
It's
the
belief
systems
that
we're
laying
the
cultural
build
and
it's
how
we
engage
and
how
that
process
evolves,
that
dynamic
process
of
engagement.
How
we
come
together,
make
decisions,
move
forward,
collaborate,
build
things
ship
things
represent
ourselves.
I
think
that's
the
flow,
but
I
think
the
fundamental
stock
is
the
people.
J
Yeah
I'll
just
take
that
and
get
a
little
more
meta
with
it.
Maybe
the
stock
I
mean
the
value
is
always
in
the
network
and
I
think
the
other
aspect
of
stock
that
we
have,
or
the
big
value,
is
looking
at
how
to
share
that
value
and
looking
at
a
cooperative
structure
versus
an
extractive
individual
structure.
J
So
I
think
that
in
itself
is
a
value
I
think
the
unit
of
exchange
I
mean
very
practically
is
going
to
be
our
token
or
the
value,
but
the
other
unit
could
be
just
like
energy
or
connection
and
how
we
kind
of
all
influence
each
other
in
those
connections
and
then
the
last
part
I
kind
of
agree
with
sean.
I
mean
the
flow
is
what's
emerging
and
some
of
that
can
be
intentional
and
conscious
and
other
parts
of
that
are
more
subconscious
or
unconscious,
maybe
in
how
they
develop
when
there
is
not
awareness.
J
It's
like
you
know
when
you
observe
a
particle,
it
changes
the
state.
So
I
think,
having
that
awareness
of
where
we
put
our
attention
is
where
the
energy
flows
and
where
we
don't
notice
or
don't
put
attention,
maybe
will
flow
in
a
different
way.
So
we
can
affect
the
flow
a
little
bit
with
a
directing
awareness,
but
there's
also
a
natural
emergence.
B
B
B
I
I'll
go
next
first,
I
want
to
say
thank
you
for
asking
this
question
challenging.
I
like
it.
I
like
what
everyone
said.
I
like
what
matteo
said
about
human
resources,
not
being
resources,
and
it
sort
of
got
me
thinking
that
you
know
the
stock
is
the
community,
but
more
than
the
community.
It's
the
intellectual
capital
that
we
bring
to
the
the
this
effort,
and
if
I
look
at
it
that
way,
then,
if
the
intellectual
in
the
intellectual
capital
is
the
stock,
then
the
flow
is.
I
M
I
was
reading
today
marks,
and
I
associate
this
like
to
value
of
use
and
to
value
of
exchange,
and
I
think
that
our
stock
is
the
value
that
comes
from
the
usage
of
the
people
and
the
knowledge
we
have
that
maybe
is
not
as
profitable
as
it
is
currently
valued
now,
but
we
have
this
exchange
value.
That
would
be
the
unit
flow.
M
I
think
that
would
be
the
the
tech
tokens
that
with
time
they
they
their
exchange
value
would
relate
to
the
value
of
use
that
we
are
giving.
So
what
I'm
trying
to
say
is
that
we
are
we're
creating
value
and
giving
it
an
exchange
value,
but
the
exchange
value
depends
on
on
this
value
that
we
make
of
the
technology
of
the
knowledge
and
of
the
people
we
have.
C
Thanks
that
was
the
point
I
wanted
to
arrive
that
if,
if
it
had
a
really
good
flow
with
everyone,
that
is
what
everyone
said,
and
this
is
so
beautiful
that
we
could
all
see
the
stock,
that
that
is
the
whole
structure,
but
that
everyone
identified
the
knowledge
and
and
the
human
inputs
that
we
all
give
and
the
value
that
we
produce-
and
this
is
actually
what's
going
to
make
our
system
regenerative,
because
that
is
the
provision
structure
that
we
have.
So
what
is
that
we
are
providing?
C
N
Right,
sorry,
it
sounded
like
you're
wrapping
up,
and
I
I
just
hadn't
had
a
chance
to
say
something.
I
I
actually
what
I'm
hearing
everybody
you
know
what
I'm
hearing
is.
I'm
hearing
the
eight
forms
of
wealth
from
hinduism
inner
wealth,
physical
wealth,
family
and
social
wealth,
career
wealth,
economic
wealth,
circle
of
genius,
that
is
to
say
people
who
are
around
you
who
inspire
you
to
be
better
than
you
are,
and
I
think
a
lot
of
people
in
this
group
are
doing
that
for
everyone.
N
Each
other
adventure
success,
that
is
to
say
we're
all
having
a
big
mystery,
we're
all
on
a
big
adventure.
We
don't
know
where
it's
going
to
go
where
it's
going
to
lead
and
then
the
impact
wealth
which
is
to
be
part
of
something
greater
than
itself,
and
my
input
about
that
is,
it
would
sure,
be
nice
to
actually
have
some
way
in
which
we
could.
N
We
could
itemize
that
stuff
on
the
back
end
before
it
gets
reduced
down
to
a
token
and
or
we
would
structure
the
token
in
such
a
way
that
it
could
be
accumulated
in
such
a
way.
So,
for
example,
I'm
very
inspired
by
seb
nem
because
she
made
me
feel
helpful
and
then
welcomed
here,
and
so
I'm
basically
going
to
value
her
in
that
particular
way,
probably
until
I'm
done
with
this
group.
So
but
there's
no
necessarily
way
for
the
the
group
to
measure
that
other
than
the
prey
system.
C
I
I
think
that
the
value
is
reflected
on
the
value
that
we
are
all
creating,
and
the
soft
value
is
reflected
in
the
value
of
the
token
that
it's
going
to
be
the
measure
of
everything
that
the
stock
is
producing,
like
all
the
value
that
we
are
all
collectively
bringing
to
the
system
has
a
unit
of
measure.
That
is
the
tc
token
that
will
allow
projects
to
happen
and
more
value
to
be
built
into
the
community
that
will
produce
more
value.
That
will
bring.
C
N
N
C
C
That's
that
we're
having
on
thursdays
and
and
then
we
started
to
have
this
discussion
of
what
is
in
the
scope
of
t
and
what
is
out
of
scope.
So
I
feel
like
we
don't
have
so
many
tea
representatives
here,
people
that
are
involved
in
previous
projects,
but
I
would
love
to
have
like
a
sense
making
from
from
all
of
us
that
we
are
so
involved
in
everything
that
is
happening
and
and
open
to
more
people
that
are
not
in
this
call
as
well.
C
So
in
the
beginning
of
the
cultural
build
we
had,
we
had
this
question
area.
This
type
form
that
people
filled
saying
if
they
wanted
the
scope
of
the
t.
Comments
should
be
to
fund
any
type
of
projects
or
to
fund
tea,
public
good
projects
or
to
fund
key
public
good
projects
for
the
token
engineering
field.
C
C
J
It'll
be
interesting
to
see
like
how
it
plays
out
as
well,
because
I
think
we
can
set
this
intention
in
what
we
want.
But
ultimately
it's
up
to
the
people
holding
the
token
who
will
vote
in
conviction,
voting,
voting
and
stake
their
token
so
yeah.
I
think
it'll
be
an
interesting
process
and
look
forward
to
hearing
everybody's
feedback.
J
If
you're
able
to
comment
on
the
post
once
it's
up
would
be
great
to
hear
what
you
think
or
have
that
a
little
bit
visible.
Even
if
it's
like
one
or
two
lines,
like
you
said
at
the
beginning
of
the
call
just
having
a
record
of
that
and
and
yeah
a
call
out
for,
I
got
the
link,
we
have
a
sheet
and
kind
of
putting
a
call
out
to
everybody.
J
If
you
know
any
projects
that
are
working
on
token
engineering
and
we're
kind
of
defining
that
as
tools
and
templates
and
a
work,
that's
replicable,
so
I
invited
the
spirit,
foundation
and
they're
working
on
a
infrastructure
for
first
nations,
crypto
economy
and
they're,
focusing
first
on
creating
a
collateral
pool,
because
many
first
nations
people
in
canada,
for
example,
like
can't
get
loans
for
housing
and
it's
a
huge
issue.
So
they're
creating
this
for
a
specific
purpose.
But
this
could
become
a
replicable
template.
J
So
it's
a
bit
on
the
line
but
call
out
for
more
projects.
If
you
know
anybody,
that's
working
on
token
engineering
that
would
be
interested
to
submit
a
proposal
for
funding.
I'm
gonna
put
the
link
in
the
soft
gov
chat
and
also
in
general
chat
for
you
to
either
dm
me
or
livvy,
or
go
ahead
and
comment
on
this
spreadsheet,
a
project
and
and
a
website
or
a
contact
that
you
would
like
us
to
talk
to
and
open
up
share
with
them.
How
to
submit
a
proposal
to
get
funding.
D
I
mean
mostly
just
echo
what
just
said.
I
think
we
covered
it
really
well
with
septimus's
question
and
in
the
end
it's
people
will
be
able
to
vote.
However,
they
want
with
conviction,
money
and
I
think
that's
the
real
powerful
thing,
but
then
we
also
get
to
set
the
stage
culturally,
with
the
initialization
of
mission,
vision,
values
and,
and
basically
saying
this
is
what
we
want
to
do.
We
want
to
support
te
public
goods,
and
that
goes
a
long
way.
You
know
it's
just
like
ethereum
said
at
the
beginning.
D
We
want
to
be
proof
of
stake
and
now
it
launched
today,
or
at
least
the
phase
zero
finally
launched
if
they
didn't
say
that
at
the
beginning,
that
that
was
the
cultural
idea
everyone
was
buying
into
there.
Never
would
have
happened
so
yeah,
even
though
it
took
many
years.
I
think
it's
important
to
set
these
cultural
standards,
but
then,
of
course,
you
know
when
people
have
tokens,
if
there's
a
really
good
project
that
people
want
to
fund,
they
will
so.
C
Yeah,
I
just
think
there
was
a
slight
different
difference
from
the
first
question.
That
was
like
comments
in
general
and
then
this
other
two
questions
are
either
te
projects,
for
example,
a
project
that
is
launching
a
commons.
I
mean
a
project
that
is
launching
a
token
in
a
way
that
it's
going
to
be
responsibly
engineered
or
a
project
that
is.
C
E
Just
one
comment
I
mean
it
could
be
two
separate
things,
so
we
could
have
instances
of
people
who
are
contributing
tool
like
the
tooling
for
deploying
public
goods,
but
we
could
also
have
a
forum
for
or
like
a
venue
for
people
to
showcase
how
they're
instancing
these
tools
and
deploying
community
so
spirit
foundation
would
fit
into
that
second
topic.
But
I
know
I'd
like
to
see
both
sides
essentially.
J
But
for
me
I
guess
the
key
in
track
two
is
that
they
are
open
and
willing
to
share
their
research,
documentation
and
code
that
they
are
open
source
so
that
somebody
else
and
we
that
we
have
a
a
place
for
that.
I
guess
for
me,
is
like
that,
where
the
line
would
be
like,
we
wouldn't
obviously
find
like
a
for-profit
or
anything,
but
also
that
they're
willing
to
engage
and
act
and
work
proactively
with
the
community
to
share
what
they
are
building
and
those
like
the
code
or
templates.
E
Yeah,
I
agree
with
that.
In
fact,
what
you're
saying
is
kind
of
merging
these
things
back
together,
because
if
someone
is
deploying
an
instance
of
a
tokenized
community
using
these
tools
but
they're
doing
it
completely
open
source,
then
that
is
a
contribution
to
the
general
good,
because
it's
it's
that
code
like
exactly
how
they
do
that
deployment
is
an
example.
You
know
it's
like
a
learning
resource
for
the
community.
D
D
N
C
Thanks
guys
for
the
inputs
there-
and
I
just
want
to
pass
to
matteo
and
santi
to
close
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
how
is
source
crab
going.
I
made
a
little
update
on
on
the
forum
post
about
it,
for
what
are
the
next
steps
and
and
how
we
should
schedule
a
meeting
for
that
and
if
you
guys
want
to
say
something
about
it,.
L
Yeah
we
we
mentioned
last
week.
We
mateo
deployed
the
instance
of
source
credit
in
our
community,
so
it's
up
and
running
and
right
now
we're
working
on
on
the
best
way
to
implement
it
and
to
measure
it
during
this
week's
week
or
for
the
hatch
takes
place,
and
so,
finally,
when
we
can
introduce
it
to
all
the
team
and
and
decide
if
they
want
to
implement
it
on
on
the
base
parameters
that
we're
going
to
try
to
figure
out
that
were
best
for
our
community
initia
sean
just
jumped
into
the
group.
L
So
it's
three
of
us
already
and
one
of
the
things
that
we're
going
to
be
doing
is
asking
everyone
who
wants
to
to
join
on
on
using
source
cred
measure
its
contribution.
His
her
contribution
is
to
provide
us
with
their
forum
account
and
their
ethereum
account.
So
we
can
consolidate
all
the
different
channels
right
now
for
the
beginning,
we're
not
going
to
be
considering
github
because
we're
using
it
up
on
top
of
tech
team,
basically
for
coordination,
and
we
don't
think
that
we
should
be
getting
credit
for
coordinating
issues
on
on
github.
L
D
B
And
yeah
I
yesterday
I
learned
how
to
make
some
merch
all
of
the
accounts
into
one.
So
that's
gonna
be
pretty
cool.
The
only
thing
is
that
that
must
be
made
manually,
so
everyone
that
is
joining
as
a
new
one
new
person.
We
have
to
check
again
from
the
form
with
all
that
information
and
and
set
the
identity
in
the
source
spread
between
the
accounts
that
that
person
decided
to
go
in.
B
A
I
have
a
question
on
that,
since
we
were
saying
before,
like
source,
credit
can
be
somehow
abused,
and
it's
going
to
be
manually.
It's
like
some
things
about
like
have
some
requirements
before
adding
someone
to
the
subscript
or
we
are
just
joining
like
everyone
who
manually
asked
us
and
we
just
put
them.
L
No,
basically
we're
we're
following
many
of
the
implementations
that
one
hive
has
gone
through.
Basically,
when
you,
when
you
jump
into
one
hive,
you
have
to
apply
somehow
providing
your
forum
account
your
github
account
and
your
ethereum
account,
so
they
can
distribute
whenever
they
decide
to
distribute.
They
have
all
the
information
from
you.
The
only
account
that
they
know
is
the
discord
because
you're
doing
that
on
discord.
So
we
are
we're
going
to
be
following
the
same
process.
L
We
need
to
know
everyone's
account
on
all
the
different
places
where
we're
grabbing
information
to
add
or
to
distribute
tokens
or
whatever
we
decide
to
distribute
at
the
very
end.
On
top
of
that,
we
just
don't
want
anyone
to
jump
into
the
channel
stumbling
upon
the
channel
and
getting
cred
just
because
they
are
there
knowing
nothing
about
anything
else.
But
you
know
there's
a
channel
here.
L
I
ended
up
joining,
so
it's
a
it's
another
hurdle
and
I'm
gonna
be
discussing
that
with
chris
on
wednesday
meeting,
while
he's
setting
up
the
server
and
the
bots
and
everything.
So
we
will
try
to
do
that
on
an
easy
way,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day
that
information
that
people
will
only
have
to
do
once
will
be
manually
incorporated
into
source
credit.
L
So
you
we
will
know
that
that
you
who
are
posting
in
forum
or
who
are
eventually
whenever
we
decide
to
do
what
or
if
we
decide
what
it
happened
from
the
very
beginning
you
are
using.
This
account
in
github
are
the
is
the
same
person.
That's
that's
posting
or
or
liking
in
in
discord.
Okay,
because
there
is
no
other
way
to
do
it.
D
L
I
don't
see
why
we
couldn't
just
tell
them,
give
us
the
permission
to
use
your
ethereum
address
that
we
already
have
on
on
on
on
file,
because
you
provided
when
you
join
the
common
stack.
We
could
just
don't
request
directly
the
address,
but
tell
them
we're
going
to
be
using
your
ethereum
address,
which
was
provided
already
when
you
join
something
like
that.
J
L
We
definitely
are
gonna
need
feedback
as
we
progress.
Okay,
the
the
first
thing
we
I
I
ideally
were
two
weeks
ago,
we
thought
we
were
ready
to
start.
You
know
playing
with
the
parameters,
but
but
then
mateo
had
a
conversation
with
the
guy
taking
care
of
all
sorts
great
in
in
in
one
hive
and
on
top
of
giving
us
some
inputs
on
how
they
are
fighting
gaming,
which
are
great.
L
We
figured
out
that
just
looking
at
the
the
information,
the
way
it
was
getting
it,
you
could
already
see
that
there
was
a
santiago
on
discord,
another
account
of
santiago
from
the
from
the
forum
and
another
account
from
github.
So
we
need
to
consolidate
that,
and
on
top
of
that
we
want
to
require
people
to
join,
to
give
us
their
accounts
and-
and
you
know
and
to
add
them
manually
into
the
system,
because
we
don't
want
anyone
to
jump
in
just
to
get
credit
just
without
knowing
anything
about
us.
L
So
after
that
we'll
start
playing
with
the
parameters.
Whatever
initial
parameters
we
decide
and
we'll
share
them
with
you
and
hopefully
shaw-
will
be
able
to
start
getting
some
information
and
and
we
will
be
able
to
share
them
with
you
a
little
bit
nicer,
not
just
numbers
and
and
from
those
tweakings
and
and
trimmings.
We
will
will
provide
you
with
an
initial
scenario.
We
could
use
to
just
launch
whenever
we
decide
it's
time
to
launch.