►
From YouTube: W9 Stewards Council: Money Talk
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Flourish
before
taking
on
some
some
others
to
be
could
be
nice,
I'm
going
to
pass
it
to
edu.
I
don't
know
if
he
has
talked
yet.
B
Thank
you
andy.
So
the
question
is:
if
you
like
the
digitality
so
again,
I
think
there
is
a
very
interesting
idea
of
linking
in
some
way
or
another,
the
dc
token
ownership
to
the
possibility
of
education.
I
think
we
have
not
yet,
like
you
know,
we
have
not
yet
linked
these
two
things
together.
B
Yet,
like
you
are
owner
of
it
like,
I
want
to
go
beyond
of
the
ownership
of
a
token
I
want
to,
for
example,
if
someone
random
bought
the
dec
token
that
they
get,
you
know
a
message
or
or
like
some
form
of
incentive
that
hey.
There
are
more
things
that
comes
attached.
With
this
token
there's
a
governance
like
because
people
can
buy
these
tokens
just
for
buying
as
an
investment,
but
they
don't
know
what
is
behind.
B
That's
one
section,
the
other
section
for
the
tc
token
that
I
think
is
important
is
to
at
some
point
have,
for
example,
tc
academy,
more
involved
in
a
way
that,
if
you
are
the
owner
of
certain
amounts
of
tc
tokens,
maybe
or
one
tc
tokens-
I
don't
know
you
will
be,
you
can
go
to
the
tc
academy.
B
You
can
go
to
ask
questions
like
to
to,
to
you
know,
provide
not
only
engagement
to
token
holders,
but
also
letting
them
know
that
it's
not
only
economic
value,
but
that
there
could
be
educational
purposes
to
it
and
create
a
sustainability
format
around
education.
For
the
dc
token,
I
think
it's
a
utility
that
we
have
not
yet
explored
and
I'll
pass
it
to
you
to
you.
Nate.
C
That's
it's
amazing!
Yes,
it'd
be
really
cool
to
see
that
happen.
Use
tec,
stake
it
to
access
like
courses
in
the
te
academy,
it'd
be
really
cool
anyway.
I
think
that
utility
is
really
interesting.
I
would
like
to
see
it
being
I
I
like
the
idea
of
tipping.
C
I
like
I
like
the
idea
of
being
able
to
tip
people
in
the
te
community
with
tec
tokens,
not
not
necessarily
part
of
our
community,
but
people
in
in
big
te
projects
like
ocean
protocol
like,
like
the
tip
trent,
some
things
that
he's
working
on
right
now.
I
think
that
would
be
a
really
neat
feature
instead
of
having
you
know
and
kind
of
gamify
it
to
where
it's
like,
not
a
big
deal,
where
it's
just
kind
of
a
cultural
practice
that
we
have,
but
also
using
it
to
fund
fund
research.
C
D
So
I
I
really
like
the
idea
of
staking,
because
in
omega
working
group
we
were
talking
about
how
to
make
this
library
self
sustainable,
because
we
wanted
to
integrate
these
cool
web
3
met
like
meta
profiles,
reputation
points
in
it,
so
this
requires
too
much
money,
but
the
common
pool
has
certain
amount
of
money.
So
we
don't.
We
cannot
ask
for
100k
for
a
library
right,
so
we
want.
Maybe
we
can
use
it
some
sort
of
like
signaling
mechanism
within
library
or
for
for
certain
access.
D
D
If
you
don't
have
money,
if
you
don't
want
to
contribute,
you
can
apply
for
scholarship,
you
can
gain
access
to
it,
but
if
you
wanted
to
contribute-
and
if
you
have
some
money,
you
can
just
take
it
or
you
can
just
pay
it
for
it
for
tc
tokens,
so
I
think,
like
creating
utility
for
our
services
or
like
kind
of
products,
will
be
very
nice
for
the
health
of
the
tc,
for
example.
Like
one
last
thing,
I
come
up
to
my
mat
like
cleros
tokens
in
clear
score.
D
B
The
the
idea
of
staking-
and
for
me
it's
like
taking
away
the
concept
of
staking
necessarily
but
more
of
a
cultural
kind
of
you
know,
concept
of
ownership
like
if
you
you
know
when
you
own
a
car.
You
know
by
default
that
you
need
to
pay
insurance.
You
know
by
default
that
you
need
to
pay
gas.
You
know
by
default,
that
you
know
you
have
to
learn
the
transit
rules
yeah.
B
You
learn
certain
things
by
default,
that
you
know
when
you
acquire
a
car
for
me,
this
is
the
same
when
you
acquire
a
tc
token,
what
things
by
default
will
be
accessible
to
you,
whether
it's
taking
whether
any
other.
For
me
it
goes
beyond
the
staking
format.
It
goes
more
into
a
practice
that
we
incentivize
in
the
tc
that,
as
a
token,
it's
a
double.
It's
a
you
know
it's
a
two
side
of
the
coin
kind
of
thing.
B
A
I
wanted
to
add
something
also.
I've
noticed
that
several
people
come
to
the
server
asking
for
help
with
tokenomics
or
other
kind
of
talking
engineering
related
stuff,
and
perhaps
the
tc
could
be
used.
I
don't
I
don't
know,
I
don't
know.
How
does
the
red
guild
talk?
Economics
work,
but
perhaps
having
tc
making
tcd
token,
for
you
know
for
getting
a
token
engineer
to
work
on
on
on
a
project
or
something
could
be
great.
A
I
don't
know.
For
example,
one
hive
is
working
on
quests,
which
is
kind
of
a
bounty
board,
and
we
have
celeste
also
and
would
be
nice
if
we
could
like
leverage
those
tools
to
make
some
offerings
for
for
people
in
tc.
C
Yeah,
that's
awesome,
and
so
these
are
the
kind
of
questions
that
we
want
to
talk
about
today
and
so
the
questions
to
reflect
on
and
share
during
this
hour
discussion.
What
can
we
do
to
improve
and
incentivize
interactions
with
the
abc?
What
are
some
ideas
for
revenue
generation
for
the
tec
and
working
groups?
How
do
we
feel
about
managing
the
entry
and
exit
tributes?
Are
permanent
roles
within
working
group,
sustainable
thoughts
about
token
swaps,
liquidity
provisions
and
are
there
any
other
money
issues
we
can
address
and
talk
about,
and
so
considering?
C
There's
not
too
many
of
us
in
here.
I
just
want
to
take
this
time
to
to
make
sure
that
we
evaluate
some
of
these
questions
have
take
as
much
time
as
you
want
to
speak
and
just
express
your
thoughts.
I
just
want
to
put
all
the
thoughts
on
paper,
but
before
I
do
that,
I
want
to
ask
durgados
the
opening
question
as
well,
so
the
opening
questions
is
if
you
could
develop
a
utility
for
the
tec
token.
What
would
it
be.
E
E
The
previously
mentioned
eight
forms
of
wealth.
You
know
so
so
we
could
just
know
better.
You
know
what
what
has
gone
into
this.
What
from
from
what
is
this
token
constructed?
Do
you
know
what
I
mean
from
the
social
perspective?
Did
somebody
come
here
because
it
was
like
wow
there's
just
a
bunch
of
super
geniuses
here.
So
that's
why
I'm
liking
this.
You
know
I
want
to
know
what
was
valued
and
I'd
like
to
know
in
a
better
way.
E
You
know
what
was
measured
just
because
just
the
token
just
flattens
everything
if
you
know
what
I'm
saying
like.
I
appreciate
the
praise
and
I
like
the
fact
that
that
people
say
hey.
You
know
you
did
this
or
that
that's
all
great,
it's
just
I'd
like
to
be
able
to
see
that
reflected
in
the
in
the
token
somehow,
but
I
know
that
I'm
a
little
bit
of
an
outlier
in
that
sense.
C
No
thank
you
durgados,
and
does
anybody
want
to
start
off
with
some
thoughts
around
some
of
these
agenda
questions
that
that
are
listed
on
this
document.
B
Yeah
I
can
start
before
I
lose
my
voice,
and
so
so
you
basically
once
want
us
to
answer
these
questions
right.
C
B
Right
I
expressed
this
yesterday
to
to
mitch
regarding
the
abc
interaction
of
converting,
because
the
only
like
someone
who
who
someone
outside
the
dc
bought
dc
tokens
and
that
person
went
through
the
entire
process
of
acquiring
x-I
and
passing
on
and
doing
all
these
steps
to
the
quality
easy
token.
Then
they
went
to
the
converter,
and
you
see
the
pricing,
the
coin
echo,
but
the
product
the
amount
that
you
get.
B
It's,
not
what
you,
if
you
do,
a
simple
math,
it's
not
what
you
get
from
dc
converter,
because
you
have
to
click
on
the
question
mark
small
question
mark
to
check.
Actually
they're
gonna
lose
this
much
when
it
should
be
something
that
should
be
there
without
a
question
mark,
like
transparency
wise,
I
felt
that
it's
way
too
shady
as
an
interaction
with
the
with
with
with
that
front
end
to
have
that
not
so
publicly
immediately
put
totally
agree.
B
I
felt
that
was
that.
That's
I'm
like
that's
something
I
do
not
like.
F
Actually,
regarding
that
topic
on
the
analytics,
we
have
like
the
three
prices
like
the
minting
price,
the
burning
price
and
the
honey
swap
price,
which
is
the
one
from
coin
gecko.
So
if
you
check
out
there
like
it's
more
transparent
and
easy
to
understand,.
B
C
You
know
if,
if
you're,
if
you're
going
to
end
up
paying
an
entry
tribute
to
22,
that
it
needs
to
be
transparent
and
say,
hey
we're
we're
taking
22,
because
this
is
how
our
economic
model
works,
and
I
think
we
should
lean
into
that.
And
so
I
have
a
big
big
big
issue
with
it.
B
Yeah
and
overall
understand
like
people
like,
if
you
tell
me,
that's
your
entry
fee,
that's
perfect,
and
but
if,
as
I'm
a
contributor,
that
is
like,
if
someone's
strange,
who
doesn't
have
much
of
a
question
fine,
but
if
someone
who
is
part
of
our
community-
and
they
just
want
to
buy
200
dec
because
they
just
want
to
you
know-
be
part
of
the
governance
that
just
happened
with
umberto,
then
you
know
the
price.
B
Not
everyone
has
a
lot
of
income
to
afford
that
kind
of
percentage
when
you
entry
the
entry
percentage
first.
Secondly,
I
don't
know
what
it's
used
for
like.
There
is
no
explanation.
What
is
why
this
entity
works?
So,
yes,
we
work
on
educating
the
community
about
the
entry
tribute
when
we
did
the
parameters
that
doesn't
mean
we
cannot
take
for
granted
that
everyone
who
goes
in
as
a
new
buying
the
tc
will
know
what
this
entry
treatment
is.
So
there
is
no
explanation
there
is.
B
There
is
just
like
a
flat
fee
that
you
have
to
pay,
and
there
is
for
me
that's
way
too
not
just
harder
than
sense.
The
revenue
generation
for
the
dc
and
the
working
groups,
I
feel
that
every
working
group
should
have
a
form
either
partnership
or
a
form
of
of
revenue
or
a
possibility
of
building
up
a
a
revenue
format
for
the
working
group
to
be
sustainable.
B
I
think
that's
an
uncomfortable
conversation,
but
I
feel
it's
necessary
to
get
us
outside
of
her
comfort
zone,
of
having
a
budget
passed
on
for
the
next
six
or
five
or
three
months
and
then
be
aware
that
it
needs
to
be
whatever
whatever
we
are
doing.
We
need
to
think
more
holistically
in
a
way
that
how
this
not
only
benefits
an
advanced
stock
engineer,
which
sounds
really
good,
but
also
how
it
it
becomes
certain
level
of
profit
profit,
and
I
already
explained
about
the
entrance
attribute.
B
I
feel
it's
too
much
on
the
intro
to
it.
For
that.
That's
another
topic,
permanent
roles
within
working
groups,
sustainable,
I
don't
think
they
are
sustainable.
I
do
believe
that
roles
within
a
working
group
should
be
in
constant
change
and
revision.
B
I
feel
it
brings
more
dynamic
to
a
working
group
to
the
flower
that
we
have
a
talk
engineer
to
have
people
different
people
nurturing
that
flower
and
people
you
know
if
they
want
to
change
the
position
and
learn
like.
I
feel
that
professionally
wise
having
permanent
roles
are
something
that
we
take
for
granted.
It's
something
that
is
not
correct
and
that's
it
yeah.
B
I
the
only
other
money
issue
that
I
think
we
can
address
or
talk
about
because
the
other
ones
I
will
not
comment
on,
including
prediction
or
token
swap
and
yeah.
I
feel
we
should
be
more
aware
that
money
is
not
gonna
be
forever.
I
feel
we
are
just
hanging
around.
Let
time
pass
without
actually
making
a
conscious
effort
to
become
profitable,
and
I
feel
we
are
sleeping
or
not.
That's
it
and
I
passed
it
on
to
can.
F
Like,
for
example,
like
you
said,
like
there's,
no
like
permanent
roles
like
there
is
not
such
a
thing
like,
even
if
you
say
I'm
the
permanent
steward
of
community
transparency
or
whatever
you
know
like
the
the
reality
is
like
you
have
to
make
a
proposal,
and
you
know
if
this
proposal
you
make
like
it
pass
it
past
now
for
three
months:
six
months,
whatever
you
like,
everyone
adds,
but
then
in
the
next
three
months
you
need.
You
know
you
need
to
show
like
the
community.
F
F
They
really
need
to
do
research
and
they,
the
information
like
I
feel
like
we
are
being
very
hard
on
ourselves,
like
all
the
information
is
on
the
forum
post
like
if
people
doesn't
read
like
that,
doesn't
mean
with
failing,
like
I
mean,
of
course
like
we
can
do
better,
but
all
the
information
is
there
like.
It
is
like
for
sure,
and
we've
been
working
so
hard,
like-
I
don't
know
another
community
that
worked
so
hard
on
educating
people
more
than
us,
and
actually
one
thing.
F
You
know
this
is
what
we
need
to
inform
people.
I
feel
I
mean
if
we
want,
you
know
to
be,
like
you
know,
be
cool
and
like
otherwise,
like
I
feel
it's
you
know
like.
If
you
don't
show,
I
mean
I'm
still
like
you
know,
the
goldilocks
strategy
is,
it
is
public
like
it's
not
like.
Someone
is
hiding
it
like
to
er
yeah
to
make
more
money
from
the
people
from
from
the
community,
but
yeah.
I
think
we
should
work
harder
on
people.
F
Voted
on
on
those
strategies,
right,
like
you
know,
if
people
voted
without
knowing
what
they
were
voting
for,
I
mean
we
also
worked
hard
with
the
voting
for
fledge
and
all
the
debates
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
answer
that
because
I
really
feel
like
we're
doing
a
good
job
overall.
B
Oh
yeah,
like
just
just
to
answer
briefly
to
that.
Yes,
we
are
doing
a
great
job
on
that,
like
I
do
not
take
that
out.
That
doesn't
mean
we
just
see
them.
We
should
just
sit
on
what
has
been
accomplished
and
take
that
as
a
as
a
basis.
I
think
that
the
term
of
yes,
I
always
remember
michael
sargon,
comment
on
transparency-
is
nothing
without
accessibility.
B
B
For
me
like
there
is
no
such
thing
as
going
to
going
to
change
heroes
for
usd
in
exchange
house,
and
I
will
like
know
like,
and
you
know
what
you're
getting
like.
There
is
no
hidden
question
mark
for
you.
You
will
see
everything
on
on
when
you
do
this
exchange.
So
for
me
it's
sorry
for
the
analogy
with
the
real
world.
That's
just
to
have
a
clarity
on
things
I.
F
Actually
been
working
on
banking
for
like
four
years
and
actually
what
banking
is
doing,
they're
hiding
information
from
customers
which
is
worth
like
the
banks
are
using,
like
you
know,
if
the
dollar
rate
is
1.1,
the
bank
is
just
giving.1.08
and
they
just
hiding
it
and
they
say.
Oh,
it's
a
commission
blah
blah
blah,
but
they
just
hiding
information.
F
F
I
mean,
of
course,
like
we
want
to
do
the
our
best,
but
you
know
like
we
should
we
compare
ourselves
with
right
like
the
thing
is
like
what
we're
doing
is
like
the
first
people
doing
it
and,
of
course
like
we
need
to
do
better,
but
we're
also
learning
by
doing
right
and-
and
I
feel
like
you
know,
if
you
look
dtc
three
months
ago,
I
feel
like
we
grow
a
lot
and
if
you
look
every
time
like
that
would
be
a
good
metric
to
measure
like
how
do
we
see
each
other,
the
community
every
three
months.
E
C
Before
before
we
keep
going
hold
on
a
sec,
I
just
want
to
say
hello
to
black
honey
girl,
welcome
to
the
tc
stewart's
weekly
council,
we're
talking
about
money
issues
right
now.
If
you
look
in
our
stewards
chat,
you
can
follow
along
with
us,
but
outside
of
that
welcome
and
I'll
pass
it
back
to
you.
Jurgenos.
E
Yeah,
I
I
think
it's
I
think
it's
it's
a
bad
idea
to
get
into
comparison
thinking.
I
hear
this
a
lot
in
a
lot
of
meetings.
It's
as
somebody
says,
suggests
hey
you
know
we
can
do
this
better
and
it's
like
well
we're
doing
it
better
than
anybody
and
imagine
what
the
bank's
doing-
and
that's
just
I
don't
know
that.
That's
I'm
not
criticizing!
You
specifically
septimus,
but
I
just
you
know.
I
think
I
think
we
we
all
have
to
examine
where
we
are
right
now
and
say.
E
So
if
we're
trying
to
be
ethical,
we
have
an
entire
group,
that's
focused
on
ethics
and
we
have
a
simple
ui
issue
that
could
fix
that
getting
into
what
about
ism
and
comparisons
and
all
that
isn't
needed.
We
just
need
to
appreciate
that
everybody's
here
to
improve
what's
going
on
and
I'm
not
sure
that
we
need
to
constantly
you
know,
pat
ourselves,
on
the
back
for
all
the
great
stuff
we
we
have
already
done
right.
E
We're
still
moving
forward
and
trying
to
improve
as
a
group
and
and
now
there's
money
involved,
so
we
have
to
be
better
in
some
way
right.
So
I'm
just
suggesting
that
you
know
when,
when
people
suggest
improvements
that
we
don't
sort
of
automatically
go
to
this
thing,
where
I'm
not
sure
why
we
need
to
talk
about
it
in
this
comparison
thing
like
we're
doing
so
much
better
than
xyz
or
then
banks
or
other
things.
I
I'm
just
I'm
not
sure
what
to
what
good
that's
doing
us.
E
There's
there's
just
kind
of
a
social
layer
thing
going
on
here.
I'm
not
sure
what
exactly,
but
I
like
anybody
else's
feedback
on
on
that
particular
thing,
because
I
feel
like
it's
a
little
bit
suppressive
difference.
If
we
start
getting
into
comparing
the
way
things
are
you
know
or
what
about
ism?
You
know
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
poor
thinking
strategy.
So
I'd
like
to
hear
what
anyone
else
might
have
to
say
about
that.
F
I
feel
like
I
didn't
explain
myself
well,
like
I
what
I
was
saying
like
you
know,
we
don't
have
someone
to
compare,
because
what
I
was
feeling
is
like
we
were
being
so
hard
on
ourselves.
Like
you
know,
and
of
course,
like
I
loved
you
know,
the
way
like
to
improve
is
questioning
everything,
but
at
the
same
time
you
know
don't
like
I
was
feeling
like
we
were
criticizing
like
the
job
that
was
being
done,
which
I
feel
it
was.
C
So
hey
ygg
eddie
just
notified
me
that
I
got
my
calendar
mixed
up,
and
so
we
are
doing
the
tc
stewards
council
today
and
we
will
do
our
tac
stewards
weekly
tomorrow.
So
my
apologies
to
everyone
who
is
expecting
to
do
the
easy
stewards
weekly
call.
So
this
is
the
to
uc
stewards
council
and
we're
doing
the
money.
Talk.
The
agendas
and
stewards
channel
text
channel
chat,
so
apologies
to
everyone.
C
So
we
have
a
question
that
we're
trying
to
answer
is
the
opening
question
was
if
you
could
develop
a
utility
for
the
tec
token.
What
would
it
be.
F
Actually,
I
think
it's
also
worth
sharing
here.
I
think
it's
having
a
chat
with
grief
like
a
couple
of
weeks
ago
and
yeah
I
mean
I
don't
know
like
if
you
guys
know
how
etfs
work,
but
the
idea
would
be.
I
mean,
of
course
like
we
would
need
some
much
more
liquidity
on
the
secondary
markets,
but
then
we
were
also
you
know
debating
like
an
interesting
mechanic
would
be,
you
know,
make
the
like.
F
We
still
have
the
abc,
but
then
they
see
like
we
had
in
the
contract,
like
only
the
commons,
can
benefit
from
the
the
abc,
which
would
mean,
like
you
know,
every
time
like
there's
an
arbitrage
opportunity
in
the
real
in
the
secondary
market
and
in
the
in
the
bonding
group
like
the
tc
is
taking
this
all.
You
know
all
all
these
advantages
just
go
directly
to
the
common
pool
and
then
also
like
the
entry
and
exit
tribute,
so
that
would
that
would
be
another
mechanism
to
reward
even
more
the
commons
but
yeah.
A
See
some
stuff
as
well
regarding
the
the
user
interfacing
in
yeah.
I
think
that
should
be
fixed,
because
I
mean
I
don't
know
after
what
the
guys
said
it's
kind
of
hard
to,
because
I
don't
want
it
to
sound
like
like,
like
a
comparison,
but
at
least
on,
I
think
on
d5
people
are
pretty
used
to
to
having
that
kind
of
information
up
front
like
you
go
to
pretty
much
any
any
decks,
and
you
know
you
get
defeats
information
and
all
that.
A
A
I
think
that's
a
hard
one,
because
I
mean
people
would
would
rather
go
to
to
adex
and
do
all
operations
like,
oh
because
you
can
interact
with
pretty
much
any
token
on
a
decks.
But
I
think
something
that
could
be.
A
I
don't
know
how
hard,
but
should
be
you
know
should
be
doable,
is
to
perhaps
try
to
and
make
honey
swap
aggregate
abcs
as
well,
because
for
those
who
haven't
hasn't
used
honey
swap
you
can
honestly
aggregates
liquidity
from
every
decks
on
on
xli
on
nasa's
chain,
and
maybe
honeysuck
could
aggregate
the
abc
so
each
time
that
you
try
to
swap
x
die
to
take
it's
sort
of.
A
If,
if
the
price
is
the
best,
it
suggests
go
in
and
buy
from
the
abc
directly
or
something
also
call
swap
which
I
guess
gnosis
is
trying
to
to
to
make
the
the
prominent
aggregator
on
nasa's
chain,
which
also
is
an
aggregator.
Could
we
maybe
someone
can
just
go
and
ask
like
hey
hey?
Is
it
doable?
Can
we
just
plug
the
adc
in.
C
Yeah
yeah,
I
agree
with
that.
I
think
that
my
big
thing
is:
how
do
we?
How
do
we
put
the
abc
out
in
front?
You
know.
I
think
I
mentioned
that
in
one
of
my
forum.
Posts
on
this
topic
was
you
know,
having
having
a
b
economies
that
use
this
abc
model
this
this,
this
type
of
floating
pool
capital,
augmented
bonding
curve
and
having
like
a
special
section
for
public
goods.
C
It's
where
people
who
are
interacting
with
these
abc
economies
understand
that
they,
a
portion
of
their
their
purchase
of
these
tokens,
are
going
to
do
fun,
public
goods
and
and
having
a
dedicated
section
with
indexes
that
allow
them
to
interact
with
public
goods
and
not
other
non-profit
opportunities
is
something
that
we
could
push
for
and
kind
of
bring
this
type
of
model
to
them.
Instead
of
being
like
you
know,
one
token
out
of
a
hundred
and
a
drop
down
menu
with
a
bunch
of
scam
coins
and
other
things.
C
So
I
think
separating
these
two
things
would
help
a
lot,
but
it's
one
of
those
things
that
just
needs
to
be
developed,
or
I
ideas
around
so
ygg.
I
wanted
to
ask
if
you
had
any
thoughts
on
on
this
topic
as
well.
G
Yeah
super
interesting
topic,
thanks
nate
and
awesome
ideas
so
far,
and
I
am
late
so
I
don't
know-
I
might
repeat
something
that
came
up
earlier,
but
something
pretty
concrete
that
comes
to
my
mind
is
like
frozen
minting
on
the
curves.
G
Maybe
it
doesn't
even
have
to
be
frozen,
but
we're
having
a
case
where
we're
working
with
a
third
party.
This
was
a
connection
through
edu
and
communitas
and
I
don't
think,
there's
anything
I
need.
I
don't
need
to
hold
back
details,
so
the
idea
is
collaborating
with
romedao
on
collaborative
modeling
of
their
ecosystem
through
the
tec
labs
and
I'm
thinking
do
we
have
a
well-established
way
of
receiving
funding
from
a
partner
that
we
are
collaborating
with,
because
we
gave
them
a
budget.
G
We
essentially
communicated
the
the
budget
of
the
te
labs
and
how
that's
funded
by
the
common
pool
and
that
it'd
be
nice,
since
we're
sort
of
benefiting
a
partner
in
this
case
it'd
be
nice
to
have
that
common.
Those
common
pool
resources
replenished
if
possible.
So
how
can
we
receive
funding?
And,
of
course,
we
can
have
a
direct
working
group
controlled
multi-sig,
this
kind
of
thing,
but
I
think
I
think
it'd
be
great
if
they
just
meant
just
buy
tc
tokens
on
the
curve
like
that.
G
If
you
want
to
fund
us
just
mint
tokens
on
the
curve,
that's
all
you
really
have
to
do,
because
that's
increasing
the
value
of
the
tokens
and
it's
providing
the
tribute
through
the
curve,
and
so
that
alone
is
enough.
Like
I,
I
just
think
we
need
the
process
to
be
transparent
and
well
defined
like
okay.
If
you
want
to
fund
us,
this
amount,
what
does
and
and
even
modeled
like
you
know
what
happens
if
you
meant
sixteen
thousand
dollars
of
tec
tokens
on
the
curve
like?
G
How
much
is
that
tribute,
and
what
does
that
mean
for
our
economy?
How
much
is
that
really
stimulating
the
economy,
but
then
also,
if
we
wanna
like
go
to
really
develop
this
into
like
a
utility,
could
we
have
a
frozen
minting,
so
it's
like
a
long-term
partnership
like
a
partner
mints,
say
16
000
of
tec
tokens,
but
they're
also
frozen.
G
C
G
Well,
it
would
be,
it
would
be
a
s.
There
would
be
no
difference
in
the
minting
process,
but
we
would
have
the
property
of
those
tec
tokens
that
they
mint
would
be
non-transferable
for
a
certain
amount
of
time.
G
C
G
F
I
mean
I
don't
know
what
do
you
mean
by
liquidity
provision,
but
I'm
I've
been
proposing
to
the
gnosis
to
have
like
some
kind
of
liquidity
between
tc
and
gnosis,
like
50k
and
50k,
and
then
yeah.
They
were
saying
like
on
the
place.
I
made
the
proposal.
They
had
not
enough
liquidity,
they
only
had
like
20k
and
then
I
also
will
probably
do
a
meeting
next
week
to
explore
other
possibilities
and
then
also
paul
chu
from
one
hive
share
regarding
sharing
liquidity
of
the
nazis
ecosystem.
F
C
C
C
So
any
type
of
bear
market
they'll
pull
their
liquidity
as
soon
as
possible,
and
so
I
guess
what
I
was
trying
to
get
at
is
like
how
do
we
incentivize
liquidity
providers
to
provide
this
without
having
to
you
know,
give
some
type
of
reward
for
for
these
lps?
But
you
know
that's
a
hard
thing
to
accomplish,
but
just
ideas
around
liquidity
provision,
because
at
the
moment
we're
going
to
be
providing
majority
of
it.
A
I
think
that's
precisely
the
good
thing
about
like
dial
to
dial
partnerships
with
quality,
because
I
mean
usually
you
have
like
you
have
two
options.
You
either
make
some
kind
of
farms,
some
rewards
for
providing
it
or
you
make
it
your
own.
You
have,
I
think
we
can
think
it
like
this
way
like
right
now,
there's
not
a
the,
for
example.
A
The
price
impact
on
honey
swap
for
the
liquidity
is
really
big
for
for
big
amounts,
and
so
the
only
way
you
like
liquidity
providers
are
incentivized
by
primarily
by
the
fees,
and
so
you
have
to
kick
start
the
market
some
way
and
you
either
kick
started
with
rewards
in
a
firm
or
you
can
kick
start
it
by
providing
enough
liquidity.
A
F
I
also
like
to
share
like
what
the
other
way
around
like.
Why
do
we
also
worried
about
liquidity
on
secondary
market,
when
we
have
a
winding
curve
that
the
meaning
of
the
bonding
curve
feels
like
we
are
not
liquidity,
dependent.
C
C
Now,
how
we
go
about
incentivizing
interaction
on
the
abc
can
be
either
of
two
ways.
We
can
have
this
kind
of
open,
transparent
method
of
getting
individuals
to
buy
into
the
bonding
curve
and
generate
funds
through
the
common
pool
that
way
or
what
I
think
is
probably
more
pragmatic-
is
to
have
a
healthy,
secondary
market
and
lower
the
entry
tributes
and
have
our
bots
take
advantage
of
those
arbitrage
opportunities
which
will
gain
a
little
bit
more
higher
economic
velocity
on
the
bonding
curve
and
generate
more
funds
for
us.
C
We
have
very
little
liquidity
offered
on
our
secondary
market,
and
so
you
know,
if
we're
going
to
go
this
individual
route,
we
need
to
be
both
ethical
and
transparent,
about
the
tribute
that's
being
paid
out
and
and
be
okay,
with
a
little
bit
less
less
funds
going
to
the
common
pool
for
each
transaction
right
now
we're
just
kind
of
in
this
limbo
stage-
and
I
I
do
have
an
issue
with
the
22
and
two
and
this
plan
to
adjust
it.
You
know
every
two
weeks,
three
weeks
or
whatever
it
may
be.
C
I
think
we
should
just
find
an
optimal
entry
and
exit
tribute
and
and
and
evaluate
the
effectiveness
of
that
configuration
for
several
months
and
see
what
works
so.
The
the
entire
point
of
this
is
just
to
say
that
the
augmented
bonding
curve
is
the
engine
that
we
have
to
prove
works.
A
Oh,
oh,
I
want
it
also
to
add
or
just
kept
thinking
about
what
I
said.
It's
also
an
investment
for
for
the
dow.
Like
the
same
way,
people
get
fees
did
I
would
get
fees
if,
if
you
own
the
liquidity
as
well
but
yeah,
I
think
it's
it's
it's
a
complex
issue
because
I
don't
know,
I'm
not
sure
like
how
how
comfortable
or
how
accessible
is
for
people
to
just
default
to
the
abc,
instead
of
going
to
to
a
regular
decks
for
for
getting
tc
tokens.
C
Yeah,
the
the
decks
is
a
very
hard
thing
because,
because
we're
all
conditioned
to
actually
transact
through
dexes
rather
than
this
augmented
bonding
curve-
and
it's
really
not
that
very
it's
not
very
accessible
and
so
yeah.
I
I
don't
know
the
one
thing
that
I
do
want
to
talk
about
or
really
focus
on.
Is
this
this
method
of
slowly
changing
the
entry
and
exit
tributes
to
whatever
we
set
it
out
to
be?
I
think
it
was
22
and
three
and
then
we're
going
to
adjust
it
till
it's
like
what
12,
3
and
12..
C
I
think
this
is
kind
of
a
silly
process,
although
we
have
agreed
upon
it
with
the
parameters
of
our
commons
upgrade,
and
so
I
don't
know
how
people
feel
about
honoring.
This
agreement
in
this
method
that
we
chose
or
just
saying,
hey,
let's
just
find
something
that
works
and
encourage
behavior
around
it.
F
Like
I'm
pretty
sure
like,
if
we
propose
different
setup
of
tributes
like
the
community,
is
going
of
course
like
to
consider
them
and.
C
D
F
Changing
those
like,
of
course,
we
can
do
that
like
that,
doesn't
mean
that
that's
that's
the
reason
of
trouble
voting.
We
just
need
to.
You
know
like
reach
enough
enough
quorum
of
people
who
don't
like
this
process
and
then
yeah
explain
half
a
better
process
and
also
say
why
that
would
benefit
the
community
and
then
both.
A
Oh,
I
don't
know,
I
don't
really
feel
confident
talking
about
that,
because
I
guess
I'm
pretty
new
to
to
all
that
stuff,
but
it
really
does
sound
high
at
first
when,
like
I
like,
those
are
not
common
fees
for
protocols
and
crypto,
but
I
think
honoring
for
a
period
of
time
what
you
guys
agreed
upon
first-
and
you
know
keeping
track
of
if
it
does
work
or
not,
and
also
maybe
having
other
kind
of
you
know,
making
some
other
plans
to
make
revenue.
A
So
because
what
I
understand
now
is
like
the
fee
is
high.
Also
because
you
know
you
know
in
the
in
the
first
days
in
in
this
first.
A
As
much
xd
as
possible,
for
example,
and
just
trying
to
kick
start
everything
in
the
funding
and
also,
but
once
you
have
enough
enough
ways
to
to
to
receive
money
back
from
projects
or
any
kind
of
initiative,
I
think
it
should
be.
You
know
reduced
a
lot.
C
H
Well,
one
of
the
goals
that
I
am
aspiring
to
have
from
gravity
is
that
it
becomes
self-sustainable
and
we
right
now
are
working
on
our
educational
activities.
But
our
idea
is
that
all
those
activities
serve
as
funnels
and
as
ways
to
to
become
more
visible
in
the
space
and
to
offer
our
services
to
other
communities
so
that
we
don't
have
to
only
request
funds
to
the
tc,
but
that
we
can
receive
funding
from
the
differ.
H
The
diverse
communities
that
that
could
be
using
our
services
and
and
also
our
idea,
is
to
to,
in
some
point,
make
out
a
gardens
and
and
and
structure
ourselves
more
as
a
as
a
digital
commons.
H
I
I
want
to
know
from
ygg's
experience
how
how
are
you
seeing.
H
The
collaboration
between
organizations
and
also
more
about
the
proposal
inverter.
G
Thanks
swan,
I
had
a
feeling
you
were
going
to
pass
it
to
me
and
that's
great.
I
really
like
what
you're
saying
and
I
want
to.
I
was
going
to
stress
this
concept
of
upward
mobility,
so
I
see
tec
as
sort
of
the
entry
point
for
anyone
in
the
world
curious
about
token
engineering
or
just
looking
to
find
really
strongly
integrated
community
and
process
and
it's
sort
of
a
training
grounds.
G
I
think
tec
is
like
a
training
grounds
for
the
whole
space,
and
I
really
want
to
emphasize
this
concept
of
upward
mobility,
so
we
see
gravity
started
as
an
idea
and
it's
moved
up
towards
creating
courses
and
having
certifications
and
even
evolving
into
its
own
gardens
dow.
So
I
think
we
should
embrace
that
concept
of
push.
You
know
seeding
ideas
here
and
enabling
them
to
grow
into
their
their
sort
of
flower
into
their
own
being
and
the
more
that
we
all
move
up
together.
You
know,
as
juan
leads
into
actually
growing
the
gardens
dow.
G
Well,
that
creates
more
space
at
what
I
consider
the
sort
of
entry
level
of
people
hopping
into
calls
and
learning
about
the
organization
and,
as
we
all
move
up
together,
it
just
creates
a
bit
like
a
vacuum
that
can
suck
more
and
more
people
in
to,
but
it
takes.
I
think,
the
key
there
is
the
synergy
between
ever
all
the
different
limbs
like
education
is
obviously
so
critical.
G
This,
I
think
the
tec
should
be
an
educational
space
where
people
can
learn
about
process
and
the
ecosystem
and
the
tooling
and
all
of
these
things-
and
it's
all
we're
almost
finding
ourselves
between
in
this
typical,
like
government,
slash
private
industry
area
with
what
juan's
talking
about
like,
because
we
can
continue
to
fund
the
processes
of
the
tec
through
the
common
pool.
That's
almost
like
a
sort
of
government,
that's
a
common
right.
G
This
government
is
a
commons
and
so
it's
a
commoning
source,
but
then
we
can
also
seek
to
embed
revenue
streams
that
create
that
draw
in
external
flows
and
that's
almost
like
a
private
industry
approach
and
I
think,
with
what
we
have
available
to
us.
It's
an
tc
is
a
natural
place
to
integrate
both
of
those
streams
and
embrace
both
of
those
approaches
and
yeah.
G
I
feel
like
I
kind
of
lost
my
train
of
thought.
I
had
a.
I
did
have
a
point
to
loop
back
to,
but
I
think
what
I'm
trying
to
say
is
really
embracing.
Tec
is
like
a
stimulus,
a
catalyzing
zone
where
new
emergence
can
unfold
and
just
continue
to
suck
people
in
to
get
involved,
and
I
think
upward
mobility
is
key
to
that,
because
we
need
you
need
to
have
a
direction
that
you
can
move
from.
G
Your
first
call
to
learning
all
the
ropes
to
joining
a
working
group
to
creating
your
own
idea
and
facilitating
you
know,
facilitating
a
call
or
creating
a
new
working
group
and
and
then
all
the
way,
through
flowering
into
like
what
juan
is
talking
about
starting
your
own
gardens
dao,
and
I
think
that
creates
a
continuous
need
for
tec,
like
a
really
a
longevity
where
it
can
continue
to
enable
the
growth
of
new
emergence.
G
Yeah
thanks
thanks
nate
I'll
pass
over
to
durgados.
E
Sorry
I
had
a
couple
of
blown
fuses
during
the
conversation,
so
I'm
not
sure
what
the
current
topic
is.
E
E
We
need
to
be
able
to
create
good
structures
and
gravity.
You
know
we
need
to
be
able
to
have
the
time
to
give
birth
to
some
of
these
things.
You
know,
and
I
feel
like
that's
kind
of
the
mission
of
token
engineering
comments
right
and
so
in
that
sense
I
I
I
feel
like
we.
We
can
basically
have
any
funding
model
that
we
want
really
ideas.
I
don't
know
everyone's
given
some
really
good
ideas.
I've
I'm
not
entirely.
E
I
come
from
a
bit
of
a
consulting
background,
so
pretty
much
everything
that
I'm
going
to
talk
about
is
going
to
sound
somewhat
like
that.
You.
F
E
So
there
are
three
different
funding
models
that
I
work
within
consulting
one
is
like
an
emergency:
oh
my
god,
we're
down!
You
know,
there's
a
problem
so
for
gravity
that
would
be
like
hey,
we
didn't
do
bother
doing
any
culture.
So
now
we
have
this
giant
issue
in
our
culture,
and
so
please
come
and
help
us
and
we'll
pay
to
do
that.
E
The
other
is
to
you
know,
work
on
an
education
model,
so
we
would
have
people
actively
funding
education
as
we
move
forward,
and
then
you
know
to
move
us
from
this
centralized
idea
to
this.
You
know
healed,
you
know,
aware
inc
radically,
inclusive
model
and-
and
you
know,
get
to
true
decentralization
instead
of
witnessing
a
few
people
with
more
power
than
other
people
struggle
to
give
away
their
power,
you
know
and
then
and
then
the
third
you
know
education
you'd.
You
have
to
pay
us
to
to
do
that.
E
Obviously,
because
it's
a
cultural
change
and
then
the
third
is
this
sort
of
maintenance
thing
where
we
would
just
exist
in
and
in
your
cult
in
your
culture
and
try
to
you
know,
work
out
what's
going
on,
so
I
guess
you
know
there
are
these
three
models
that
I
think
of
right
off
top
my
head,
so
emergencies,
sort
of
education
and
expertise
and
then
and
the
sort
of
long-term
you
know
sort
of
almost
like
a
retainer
kind
of
a
situation
for
a
lawyer.
E
So
I
I
don't
know
if
those
three
models
would
work
in
terms
of
different
work
groups,
but
this
is
kind
of
what
I've
been
suggesting
in
the
token
engineering
commons-
and
hopefully
that's
that's
relevant.
C
D
I
want
to
say
just
one
thing
I
think
approaching
some
of
the
working
group
as
service
dogs
will
be
a
beneficial
to
gain
revenue,
for
example,
for
a
prime
prime
dollars
launch
pad.
They
were
looking
for
service
providers.
Then
I
talked
with
juan
or
gravity,
maybe
one
of
the
service
providers
for
the
new
projects
as
conflict
resolution
dial.
So
this
can
be
also
applied
to
comms
and
other
working
groups.
D
Yeah
we
can
just
spread
it
out
and
also
maybe,
while
we
are
working.
We,
for
example,
for
the
omega,
as
I
said
stated
before,
we
can
try
to
like
create
a
library
that
is
like
a
working
product
that
can
generate
some
revenue,
so
become
self-sustainable
such
as
through,
like
minting
articles
in
it
or,
like
maybe
partnershiping,
with
web3
profile
dao,
so
that
they
can.
They
would
like
to
fund
it.
F
But
the
thing
I
also
see
with
this
services-
styles,
like
you
know,
if
gravity
or
any
service
like
they
will-
or
I
feel
like
you
know,
if
gravity
generates
some
value,
I
feel
like
the
value
would
stay
in
gravity
not
going,
but
you
know,
like
I
don't
feel
like
gravity
should
fund
tc,
so
that
wouldn't
generate
revenue
for
the
tc
would
generate
revenue
for
gravity
and
be
sustainable,
which
is
awesome
but
doesn't
imply
to
generate
revenue
to
the
tc
itself.
D
C
Good
point
we
are
at
the
top
of
the
hour.
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
to
everyone
for
this
talk
and
I
apologize
for
switching
up
the
stewards
council.