►
From YouTube: W11 Stewards Council: LASERTAG
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
We
have
a
lot
to
talk
about
today
and,
like
main
talking
points
yeah,
the
the
the
the
first
rewards
quantify
round
close
today,
the
work
is
done.
The
first
quantification
round
is
done,
and
that
is
a
good
news
in
in
the
new
system.
So
I'm
really
happy
about
that.
Let's
talk
about
what's
next,
so
that
that
initial
work
is
done
and
then
we
have
to
do
the
rest
of
the
work
and
we
also
have
to
plan
for
for
the
second
quantification
round.
A
And
but
before
we
do
that,
let's
do
a
quick
round
of
status
updates
for
from
development
for
praise
and
and
the
source
grade
implementation.
A
So
let's
start
with
the
praise
and
nebs:
would
you
like
to
start
yeah?
Okay,
so.
B
I
was
mostly
working
on
export.
I
had
a
lot
of
bugs
to
fix
there
and
looks
like
it's.
It's
fine.
Now
it's
working
like
instead
and
today
we
talked
about
what
what
I
should
do
next,
so
I
started
with
file
upload
for
settings,
so
administrators
can
change,
logo
and
stuff,
like
that,
it's
a
component
that
we
will
use
in
different
places
in
the
app.
A
Yeah,
we
agreed
to
spend
a
little
bit
more
time
on
sort
of
the
making
praise
more
stable
and
before
we
start
adding
new
new
glossy
features.
But
we
have
some
some
work
to
do
left
left
to
do
there.
B
Yeah
so
last
week
I
finished
up
a
few
well
one
bigger
ticket
that
was
improving
the
distribution
of
quantifiers
over
the
range
of
baskets
of
praise
to
assign
them
to,
and
that
seems
to
be
a
bunch
more
reliable
now.
B
So
now,
I'm
working
on
modifying
the
authentication
architecture
to
support
refresh
tokens
so
that
the
user
only
has
a
short
lived
access
token,
which
they
can
refresh
for
a
new
one
using
their
refresh
token
within
a
longer
time
period.
So
yeah
I'll
do
I'll.
Do
that
and
then
I
I'll
gr
I'll
just
once
I
get
that
done
I'll.
Just
grab
whatever's
available
from
the
zenhub
backlog.
A
A
A
A
A
So
maybe
that's
that's
it
for
for
praise,
status,
updates
and
mateo
is
not
here
for
source
cred
updates.
I
can
tell
you
the
the
little
I
know
I
haven't
actually
been
able
to.
I
haven't
had
time.
I
haven't
looked
at
it
yet
the
the
the
new
setup
of
the
source,
credit
instance,
but
mateo
tells
me
that
the
instance
has
been
configured
with
the
the
parameters
we
have
been
discussing,
that
we
discussed
with
seth
from
source
cred
and
the
instance
has
been
reset.
A
So
all
the
old
grain
distributions
have
been
removed,
the
the
test
distributions
we
did
last
spring
so
basically
the
according
to
mateo.
The
the
source
grid
system
is
configured
and
up
and
running
and
yeah,
so
hopefully
that
that
work
stream
and
that
issue
is
completed,
and
so
one
of
the
final
checks
will
be
to
to
configure
source
grid
to
do
grain
distributions
on
the
schedule
that
we
like,
so
that
it
does
the
the
first
screen
distribution
on
in
the
end
of
july
last
year
and
then
do
a
distribution
every
week.
C
Well,
we
did
it
in
three
days
and
we
kind
of
said
that
we
were
gonna
have
like
a
post
review
session.
I
think
that's
kind
of
what
we
outlined
for
people
that
want
to
join
and
like
ask
questions
and
do
any
last
last
modifications,
and
so
we
can
try
and
set
that
up,
but
I
think
like
because
we
already
had
like
a
session
yesterday.
C
I
don't
think
we'll
be
able
to
effectively
find
a
time
today
for
something
on
thursday
or
friday.
That
will
be
useful,
but
I'm
wondering
what
you
guys
think.
C
I
mean
even
then,
there
wasn't
like
a
lot
of
quantifiers
that
were
able
to
show
up.
It
was
mostly
people
who
hadn't
registered
yet
that
wanted
to
ask
questions.
A
I'm
thinking
when
more
and
more
of
the
developments
and
development
and
startup
the
work
streams
in
this
working
group,
it
becomes
finished.
A
What
do
we
use
this
wednesday
session
for
and
we
we
plan
that
the
quant
should
take
three
days
monday
to
wednesday
so
shouldn't
we
move
towards
using
the
the
wednesday
evening
session
or
depending
on
where
you
live
this
session.
Basically
of
doing
the
post
quant
analysis
during
this
session
every
two
weeks
then.
D
This
session
should
really
be
a
practice
that
every
quantifier
understand
that
they
will
commit
to
this
session
when
they
start
to
quantify
like
th.
This
is
part
of
the
analysis
that
we'll
have
later
and
having
the
inputs
from
the
quantification
is
very
important,
and
that
was
why
we
used
to
do
quantifications
all
together
in
the
same
room,
and
there
are
some
components
from
that
that
we
can't
lose
it.
D
D
C
So
yeah,
then,
do
we
I'm
thinking
for
this
week,
since
it's
like
it's
super
short
notice
and
ideally
like.
I
should
have
set
this
up
last
friday
to
have
like
this
live
tweak
session
this
week,
but
it
was
like
because
we
already
had
like
this
live
stuff
going.
A
No
worries
and
we
we
won't
be
able
to
do
any
real
payouts
anyway,
since
we
essentially
none
of
the
actual
appraised
receivers,
have
activated
their
accounts
in
the
new
prey
systems.
We
don't
have
any
ethereum
addresses,
so
it
will
still
take
a
little
bit
of
time
before
we
can
do
the
first
payout
for
for
this
first
quant.
So
so
we
could.
We
could
do
the
the
the
post,
quant
tweak
session
and
beginning
of
next
week
as
well
or
something
it's
a.
A
C
So
then,
what
I
can
do
is
I
can
set
up
a
tweak
session
for
next
week
and
then
we
can
close
the
quant
on
friday
and
open
up
the
next
quant
session,
which
will
be
all
of
august
at
the
end
of
next
week.
Or
do
we
want
to
do
it
quicker
than
that.
A
How
long
time
did
you
did
it?
Did
it
take.
A
Yeah,
because
I
I
mean
I
ideally,
we
would
like
to
get
back
to
present
time
as
soon
as
possible.
So
so
I
ideally
if
we
could
stomach
it,
we
would
like
to
do
like
one
month
every
week
for
the
you
know
it's
august
september
october
november
december
january
february.
You
know
it's
the
first,
the
upcoming
seven
weeks
and
then
be
back
the
present
time.
C
My
idea
is,
I
can
just
I
can
reach
out
to
the
quantifiers
and
check
in
with
them
like
one-on-one
and
then
we'll
close
this
session
I'll
close
the
coin
actually
on
friday
and
then
I'll
set
up
the
lettuce
meat
for
the
the
live
tweak
session
will
open
up
august
2021
on
monday
and
we'll
have
a
tweak
session
already
going
that
can
be
scheduled
for
next
week
and
I'll
do
that
now.
Basically,.
A
The
tweak
session
next
week
would
be
for,
for
this
first
rewards
round
or
for
the
second
one.
A
Yeah
but
but
we
we
don't
need,
it
doesn't
need
to
be
open
in
in
the
prey
system,
because
the
the
the
tweak
session
takes
place
in
in
in
google
spreadsheets.
So
so
we
we
could
close
down
the.
D
D
A
Yeah,
let
me
show
you
how
I
how
I
have
envisioned
this
to
happen
and
it's
using
a
and
the
so.
This
is
what
what
nagan
has
been
working
on
this
it
was
not
gonna
expect
from
us
is
that
we
we
export.
A
A
Corrections
like
we
have
discussed,
you
know
the
the
quantifier
go,
go
together
as
a
group
and
saying
like
we
need
to
do
this
and
this
it's
not
something
that
it's,
that
the
prey
system
doesn't
allow,
for
instance,
so
so
in
in
this
case,.
A
C
C
A
We
we
have
discussed
that
we
would
like
to
have
the
the
possibility
of
doing
manual
corrections,
for
instance,
in
in
the
text
you
describe
you
describe,
the
ability
to
you
know,
add
contributions
that
have
not
been
placed
at
all.
For
instance,.
D
A
D
A
To
be
clear,
I
would
be
super
happy
if
we
could
skip
this
step
because
exporting
all
the
data
into
a
a
google
spreadsheet
and
and
allowing
for
manual
adjustments
there,
and
that
is,
of
course,
a
source
of
uncertainty
and
yeah.
It
would
be
better
if
we
skipped
this
step
and
we
just
exported
the
the
data
directly
to.
A
The
quantifiers
would
go
together
as
a
group,
and
they
would
look
over
this,
this
list
of
this
list
of
of
praise
and
then
see
if,
if
anything,
looked
weird
and
and.
A
I
believe
still
that
a
spreadsheet,
like
this
allows
you
to
view
the
full
period
phrase
in
in
you
get
a
better
overview
than
having
to
click
through
one
one
by
one
in
in
the
pray
system.
A
Yeah,
the
the
the
view
looks
currently
like
this.
Of
course,
we
can
make
new
views
for
specific
needs
that
takes
some
some
time,
but
we
can
also
share
this
view
that
you
see
on
my
screen
now.
Look
at
the
individual
phrase.
A
Yeah.
Everyone
agreed
that
this
was
a
really
small
contribution.
Nothing
weird
with
that.
Go
back!
Take
the
next
one,
but
of
course
that
is
a
bit
cumbersome.
If
you
know
it's
in
this
case
somewhere
over
800
praise
for
two
weeks.
A
B
D
D
A
And
let's
discuss
that,
what
what
are
we
looking
for
when
the
the
quant,
the
quantification
is
finished?
It's
done,
everyone
has
done
their
their
work
and
we
want
to
look
it
through
everything.
What
what
are
we
looking
for
we're?
Looking
for
outliers,
like
you
said
like
where
everyone
else
agrees,
and
someone
gives
something
a
top
score.
A
D
Like
like
people
are
doing
this
on
their
own,
and
there
is
no
there's
no
type
of
check
or
of
seeing
like
having
an
awareness
of
what
other
people
I
don't
know
what
is
exactly
the
fear
there,
maybe
just
that
someone
quantified
quantifies
in
a
very
random
way
like
not
even
reading
through
the
stuff
or
like
do
we
have
any
type
of
control?
If
that
happens,
you
know
if
a
person
is
just
I'll
give
whatever
value
here.
A
A
B
Sorry,
can
you
hear
me
so
there's
there's
the
reward
board
review
phase
where
you're
talking
about
like
these
aggregate
numbers
and
like
oh
in
in
overall
like?
Is
there
weirdness
or
is
there
stuff
missing?
That
seems
like
one
dashboard
view,
and
then
it
sounds
like
what
you're
talking
about
now
is
for
the
quantifiers
themselves
to
go
back
and
review
their
work
together.
Is
that
is
that
a
third
phase.
C
B
So
I
think
we're
going
to
definitely
need
like
this
kind
of
review,
dashboard
view
or
maybe
like
several
review
different
review,
dashboard
views
that
do
a
couple
like
the
things
you
described
to
like
identify,
outliers
or
inconsistencies
that
could
be
obvious
or
like
autumn
automatically
identified.
But
then
there's
it's
yeah.
The
trickiest
part
is
going
to
be
like
identifying
missing
items
so
maybe
like
a
de-duplicated
view
or
something.
B
B
D
C
Here
though,
matic
g
is
like
it
would
be
cool
to
take
this
exported
data
and
instead,
just
have
like
a
dashboard
view.
That's
a
bit
more
easier
to
process.
A
A
But
that
requires
the
quantifiers
as
a
group
or
an
administered
administrator,
to
be
able
to
to
finish
someone
else's
to
change
someone
else's
quantification,
and
that
is
currently
not
possibly
possible.
All
these,
these
dashboards
of
just
showing
information
in
in
different
ways,
new
new
ways
that
those
are
simple
to
add.
A
But
if
we
were
to
allow
administrators
or
other
quantifiers
to
change
each
other's
quantifications,
that
that
it
would
take
some
more
thought
and
it
will
take
slightly
longer
to
implement-
and
we
have
to
really
think
that,
through
before
we
do
it.
C
There
is
a
problem
because
then
it's
like
the
administrator
is
like
basically
praise
god,
but
we
assume,
on
the
other
end
of
this,
that
that
has
to
be
approved
by
the
reward
board,
so
it
like,
even
though
they
could
change
it.
It
could
still
be
rejected
by
the
reward
board.
So
it's
like
there
is
a
check
on
the
other
end,
and
that
would
be
the
simplest
solution
that
I
can
think
of.
A
And
one
feature
that
we
will
implement
that
we
haven't
there
is-
is
not
an
issue
about
this
yet,
but,
but
it
is
it's
high
up
on
the
list
in
the
back
of
my
head,
is
to
have
a
sort
of
a
change
log
so
or
a
a
log
built
into
the
system.
So
if
an
administrator
goes
in
and
changes
someone
someone
else
someone's
quant,
you
can
see
that
it
will
be
tracked.
It
won't
be
invisible.
So
for
basically
for
all
changes,
an
administration
changes,
the
setting
that
will
be
tracked.
D
So
if
someone
just
did
like
a
random
whatever,
and
it
has
nothing
to
do
with
what
other
quantifiers
did,
that
would
be
flagged
automated,
because
we
would,
we
would
be
looking
for
that
flag
with
our
human
process.
But
if
that
can
be
automated,
that's
even
better,
and
then,
if
we
can
see
that,
what's
that
christopher.
A
If,
if
someone
someone
praise
qualification,
looks
like
this,
they
have
just
you
know,
given
a
majority
of
their
their
assigned
praise
the
top
score,
which
is
something
that
has
happened
during
this
quantification,
that
that
is
really
easy
to
use
to
spot,
and-
and
I
think
we
should
do
that
kind
of
analysis,
then
the
opposite
also
do
some
some
simple
outlier
analysis.
If
someone
just
uses
the
ones
and
the
threes
or
someone
just
uses
the
144,
then
the
89s
we
can
analyze
that.
D
D
Better
to
bring
into
the
analysis
than
like
it
feels
I
don't
know
before
it
felt
really
easy
to
do
these
tweaks
of
the
praise,
but
now
the
more
we
talk
about
it,
the
more
it
feels
like
somehow
invasive
to
tweak
it
around
that.
Maybe
if
we
just
have
patterns
of
things
that
are
kind
of
off
when
we
can
see
them
than
with
time.
C
Yeah
the
big
thing,
the
other
thing
on
the
end
is
like
having
some
sort
of
administrative
control
is
like.
If
quantifier
goes
mia,
you
know
how
do
we
deal
with
that?
They
get
quantified
and
then
like
they're,
nowhere
to
be
found
like
how
can
we
make
sure
that
the
process
keeps
moving.
A
I
don't
know
if
we
came
up
with
any
conclusions,
but
one
creating
a
view
that
looks
like
this.
This
is
the
main
phrase
list
screen
a
view
that
looks
like
this,
with
additional
columns
for
for
the
for
the
the
quant
scores
as
a
quantifier
one,
two
and
three
and
those
are
the
scores
that
would
allow
you
to
really
scroll
through
through
the
list
real
fast
and
see
you
can
read
the
the
praise
you
can
see
the
scores.
Does
anything
look
off.
You
can
have
the
discussion
you
scroll
through
the
list.
A
You
have
the
discussion
and,
if
anything
looks
weird,
you
just
click
on
on
this,
going
to
the
proceed
that
no
christopher
is
not
leading
the
reward
system
that
that
is
weird.
He
should
lower
his
score
for
this
one
and
an
administrator
could
do
a
change
on
on
this
screen.
Perhaps.
E
I
mean
what
what
is
the
magnitude
of
consequence
if
somebody
abuses
their
their
praise,
quantification
powers
in
in
a
single
period,
like,
I
think
that
you
know,
instead
of
having
the
power
of
an
administrator
to
go
in
and
change
things
because
of
a
sign
of
abuse
that
you
know
they
accept.
You
accept
the
that
that
abuse,
praise
and
then
just
say,
hey.
This
person
is
not
allowed
to
quantify
any
further
later
on.
E
A
Yeah,
I
I'm
my
hunch
says
that
abuse
is
not
the
biggest
thing,
but
we,
you
know
there
will
be
a
need
to
make
corrections.
Basically,
for
other
reasons,
so
in
in
this,
for
during
this
first
quant.
A
D
A
Yeah,
that
is,
that
is
the
big
thing
and
the
opposite.
Also,
you
know
praise
this
person
for
doing
this
semi-vague
description
and
then
during
the
scroll
through
discussion.
Someone
says
yeah,
but
you
know
that
was
a
huge
presentation
that
there
were
thousand
people
in
the
audience
and
that
person
had
worked
for
weeks
with
that
presentation.
Then
the
group
could
could
realize
that
and
adjust
that
together.
A
But
I
know
I
don't
know
if
we
should
have
the
ambition
to
to
do
that
level
of
analysis,
because
that
takes
time
now
we
did
two
weeks
yeah
we
did
two
weeks.
So
basically,
this
quant
is
as
big
as
the
regular
quants
will
be
going
forward.
D
Yeah,
I
think
the
problem
is
not
so
much
the
bigger
contributions,
because
usually
if
something
is
really
big,
a
lot
of
people
praise
for
that
something.
And
then
you
can
kind
of
understand
the
magnitude,
but
then
for
things
that
people
didn't
do
at
all
and
someone
just
thought
they
did
or
or
if
someone
maliciously
praises
for
some
reason,
then
those
are
the
hard
ones.
A
Yeah,
let
me
show
you
again
in
in
this
spreadsheet,
just
you,
so
you
see
what
this
is
the
possibility
we
have
currently,
if
you
hide
all
the
all
the
stuff
you
that
you
don't
need,
and
also
can
we
make
that
this
one.
A
E
In
the
brief
discussion,
because,
because
there's
like
a
a
gap
that
I
get
worried
about
when
I'm
looking
at
the
entire
reward
system
is
that
people
who
are
not
in
a
paid
role
and
or
not
getting
compensated
for
a
bounty
so
like
a
new
contributor,
actually
creating
some
type
of
work
for
the
tec
or
specific
working
group.
They
aren't
that
type
of
praise
for
that
type
of
work
may
not
be
recognized
and
it's
not
being
compensated
on
the
other
end,
and
I'm
wondering
how
we
distinguish
that
and
if
that's
just
the
benefit.
A
Of
that
those
practices,
we
hope
that
those
practices
will
will
form
in
the
the
quantifier
group
over
time
that
that
they
will
develop
a
culture
or
a
set
of
best
practices
to
reward
that
they
also
as
a
group
or
the
reward
board
made
more
in
the
analysis
that
the
final
analysis
can
can
make
those
kind
of
income
to
those
insights
and
also
communicate
those
to
the
to
the
community
like
how
can.
E
You
improve
the
quality
of
praise,
it's
more
about
the
praiser,
because
it's
like.
Should
I
be
recognizing
this
work,
not
knowing
if
it's
being
compensated
or
not
through
praise
and
and
because,
if
that's
the
case,
then
it's
hard
to
know
what
to
praise
and
what
not
to
praise
as
appraiser
yeah,
because
I
just
want
to
be
able
to
recognize
that
person's
work.
Hopefully
I
know
their
situation
and
how
they're
being
compensated
for
it
all
right.
C
A
Yeah,
so
what
you're
seeing
on
the
screen
now
is
the
the
the
spreadsheet
with
all
the
noisy
columns
hidden
and
now
it
looks
a
little
bit
more
digestible.
You
can
actually
scroll
down
through
this.
Look
at
the
phrase,
the
reasons
you
can
see
the
scores
that
the
quantifiers
has
given
and
when
you
see
something
that
looks
off
you
can
make
a
correction.
You
can
add
to
the
to
the
final
to
the
average
score.
You
can
subtract
from
it.
A
You
make
a
correction
comment
and
that
produces
a
final
quant
score,
so
that
is
the
the
the
clunky
spreadsheet
based
process.
I
have
designed
and
talked
with
nagin
about,
and
then
we
export
this
spreadsheet
and
he
uses
that
in
the
the
analysis
dashboard.
A
So
in
this
case
I
have
it
identify
all
the
praise
that
belongs
to
the
common
stack
and
I
have
subtracted
the
the
average
score
that
they
had
been
given
so
basically
taking
the
score
down
to
zero
and
making
them
not
worth
anything
because
it's
their
own
community.
D
One
action
item
I
think
we
could
have
from
this
conversation
is
the
suggestion.
Matia
gave
to
create
a
visualization
in
some
type
of
automation
that
allows
us
to
spot
some
of
these
things
without
needing
to
go
through
everything
manually
and
then
once
we
have
them
spotted
just
work
on
those
ones
and
forget
about
the
rest
and
trust
that
the
tool
is
doing
the
best
work
and
then,
as
we
have
for
now
mitch
and
then,
as
we
have
the
analysis
happening,
we'll
have
more
data
to
see
the
behavior
over
time.
A
C
I
think
admin
can
make
changes,
but
with
the
changelog
like
it
has
to
be
traceable.
Somehow
I
think,
like
inevitably
we're
gonna
run
into
issues
and
it'd
be
cool
to
have
like
this
automated
system
and
eventually
not
have
to.
C
D
D
D
A
Yeah
good
input-
and
we
will
try
to
make
this
happen
quite
soon,
some
some
of
some
of
it
at
least
for
now.
We
have
the
the
spreadsheet
that
where
so,
we
can
make
changes,
even
though
it's
not
ideal,
I
I
agree.
Let's
see
it's,
we
went
off
on
a
slight
tangent.
We
got
stuck
in
one
subject.
No,
it's
super
important.
Let's
see
what
we
need
to
address,
we
have
a
little
over
10
minutes
left
and
what
else
so
closing
the
the
rewards
round.
A
A
It
doesn't
work
completely,
or
at
least
I
I
wasn't
able
to
get
it
running
completely,
so
it
shows
a
bunch
of
errors,
but
we
get
this
some
of
the
nice
graphs
further
down.
It's
a
lot
of
praise
people
like
the
praise,
rewards
distribution
and
the
praise
flows
showing
who,
who
sent
the
most
praise
and
who
received
the
most
praise,
and
not
surprisingly,
during
this
period
it
was
mont
manus
and
evie
who
sent
the
most
praise
and
and
the
big
receivers
were
libby
and
griff
and
nate.
A
A
Yep
yeah,
so
so
to
let
the
rest
of
the
group
know
we
we
plan
to
set
these
high
level
parameters
for
for
praise
and
for
source
credit
and
and
and
those
those
are
the
main
ones,
and
summarize
those
in
in
a
in
a
forum
post
that
we
can
duplicate
for
each
for
each
praise
period.
C
Yeah
anyway,
like
we'll,
do
this
high
level
stuff
and
then
we'll
make
sure
that
it's
it's
somewhere,
like
you,
said
public
and
then,
if
there's
advice
or
whatever
you
can
get,
that
might
be
worthwhile
to
look
at
look
at
membership
too.
C
C
Yeah,
that's
right.
We
did
have
a
process
for
it.
Okay
is
somebody
gonna,
take
the
lead
on
scheduling
that.
A
Yeah,
maybe
I'll
I
can
do
that.
Okay,
wonderful.
A
And
then
after
that
was
something
we
have
on
the
radar
as
well
is
launching
the
the
new
place,
but
or
I
see
as
launching
the
prey
spot,
I
think
the
community
will
see
it
as
launching
the
the
new
reward
system,
because
that
is
how
it's
going
to
be
perceived.
It's
going
to
you
know
start
using
the
the
bot
the
new
bots
start
receiving
actual
reward
payouts.
A
So
that
is
something
we
need
to
start
thinking
about
how
to
do.
We
have
talked
about
onboarding
sessions.
A
We
need
to
have
a
massive
push
for
members
to
activate
their
accounts
in
in
the
in
the
pay
system,
so
they
connect
their
ethereum
addresses,
so
they
can
receive
payouts
and
we
need
to
inform
the
community
about
yeah.
The
fact
that
this
is
happening
that
we
have
started
doing
quantifications
and.
A
A
We
are,
we
were
discussing
about
vive
ivs
of
this
week
and
there
might
be
some
some
small
fixes
needed
for
for
the
prey
spot.
So
so
those
can
be
taken
care
of
during
next
week
and
that
we
can
launch
the
thing
week
after.
A
And
who
should
we
involve
for
the
the
the
the
meaning
and
the
the
boosting
the
message
for
the
community.
D
A
A
I
need
to
read
up
on
this
a
little
bit
more,
but
but
in
general
I
I
I
would
like
the
the
the
praise
score
that
you
have
accumulated
in
the
pray
system
to
that
would
be
a
a
source
for
reputation
rather
than
the
the
payment
of
the
token
distribution.
A
Yeah
yeah
and
when
it
comes
to
the
the
payout
it's
it's
only.
The
question
who
will
keep
will
make
sure
that
everyone
not
only
try
to
get
an
ethereum
address
for
everyone,
but
also
check
all
the
ethereum
addresses
against
their
bright
id
to
make
sure
that
we
only
pay
rewards
to
to
write
id
verified
users.
A
A
Yeah
that
that
is
the
the
question
and
for
for
the
long
term
I
envisioned
some
some
sort
of
reputation
engine
where
you
can
install
plugins
to
the
the
prey
system,
and
you
know
define
how
you
would
like
to
track
reputation
yourself,
a
little
like
how
snapshot
uses
plugins.
So
we
can,
you
can
have
a
a
source
of
reputation
that
says
you
are
an
active
member.
A
Maybe
you
have
received
x
amount
of
trace
every
week,
you're
doing
x,
amount
of
weeks
that
and
we
call
that
an
active
member,
and
then
we
can
have
a
have
another
value,
saying
you're,
not
necessarily
an
active
member,
but
you
have
at
some
time
you
have
received
praise
so
that
yet
you
have
you
are.
B
B
A
A
A
Can
you,
if
you
will
please
say
please
post
a
text
message
in
the
in
the
in
the
in
the
channel
afterwards,
because
right
now
we
are
out
of
time.
So
thank
you.
Everyone
for
coming
to
this
meeting,
rather
good
discussion
and
yeah.