►
Description
The Transparency Working Group promotes transparency, openness and mutual monitoring as a high-level ideal that we're moving towards at the TEC. The way that we get there is by empowering people to share this experience with the Transparency Audits and making information available to everyone.
We gather every two weeks on Mondays at 3pm CET.
Stewards: Ivy and Zeptimus
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Yeah,
okay
yeah,
my
my
intention.
My
biggest
intention
is,
like
I
start
to
see
like
a
lot
of
stuff
to
do
and
yeah
when
you
choose
me
to
organ,
like
my
biggest
intention
is
to
organize
all
this
stuff
and
yeah:
have
it
ready
for
the
spring
planning
and
they
can
have
a
better
look,
how
we
take
all
these
issues
because,
like
I,
I
have
some
issues
that
I
was
working
on,
but
then
others
come
on
top
and
yeah.
A
There's
like
some
weeks
since
I'm
not
working
on
the
admins
conduct
for
admins
and
yeah
and
distractions.
None
I'll
pass
it
to
then.
B
C
Thanks
dan,
so
yeah,
my
intention
is
to
catch
up
with
yousef.
I
know
you've
been
doing
a
lot
in
the
past
week
for
transparency,
and
I
wanted
to
know
where
I
can
step
in
to
help
and
yeah.
I
also
want
to
get
an
update
on
the
hatch,
walkthrough
videos,
so
yep
no
distraction
and
I
pass
it
to
one.
D
Thanks
ivy,
hello,
guys,
yeah.
My
intention
is
to
sing
with
you
start
this
week
that
I
was
also
doing
some
gravity
stuff,
so
yeah
just
getting
in
touch
with.
You
is
my
intention
and
to
help
with
everything
I
can
and
there's
no
distractions.
A
Okay,
cool
yeah,
the
the
first
bullet.
I
I
open
a
forum
post
for
market
data
and
transparency
on
the
common
pool.
I
put
it
on
the
agenda.
If
someone
had
any
questions
on
on
this
topic,
otherwise
I
would
jump
on
the
other
topics,
but
basically
it's
with
it
around
on
the
unconference,
with
a
bunch
of
people
and
on
the
forum
post.
We
I
put
like
the
biggest
conclusions
we
had
and
yeah
they
were
with
the
forum
post
is
like
have
a
deeper
discussion
on
this
topic
and
yeah.
A
The
new
processes,
when
we're
giving
credentials,
for
example
like
actually
and
the
first
one,
was
acid
laser
he's
doing
very
cool
designs
for
our
youtube
or
youtube
channel,
and
he
will
have.
He
will
put
like
every
working
group
with
different
color,
so
it
will
be
super
organized
like
the
youtube
will
be
much
more
visual
and
which
is
great
and
yeah.
We
already
implemented
the
like.
A
After,
like
the
forum
vote,
we
implemented
the
the
new
process
of
you
know
like
having
people
requesting
access
through
the
typhoon
or
the
amp
like
it
doesn't
matter
like.
Where
do
they
ask
this?
But
what's
important
is
like
after
someone
is
asking
for
any
kind
of
access,
we
put
a
ball
on
on
the
storage
channel
channel
and
if
no
one's
blocked
it
in
24
hours,
we
just
give
the
the
credentials
to
the
contributor,
but
what
we
need
to
do
is
yeah.
Have
it
documented
and
yeah.
A
A
Yeah
like
and
we
should
match
it
on
the
on
the
git
book.
C
Okay,
yeah:
I
can
take
that
if
take
it.
A
C
A
Nice,
thank
you
and
okay.
This
next
topic
is
not
that
much
about
transparency
is
more
about
softcup,
but
yeah,
I'm
working
with
levy
on
on
the
on
how
to
improve
the
advice
process,
and
I
would
like
to
do
a
round
on,
if
you
guys
have
any
yeah
any
ideas
or,
for
example,
like
right
now
like
what
I
feel
is
missing
on
the
advice
process
is
a
lack
of
engagement
like
like
the
community
is
not
full.
You
know
it's
very
hard
to
get
engagement,
and
especially
from
software
mother.
A
Experts
on
the
topic
and
what
we
were
discussing
with
levy
is
like,
at
least
for
example,
when
we
take
decisions
like
and
we're
doing
some
trials
with
the
glass
one
we
take
contrast,
fancy
or
for
the
the
credentials
management,
and
the
idea
is
like
on
this
process.
At
least
you
know,
for
example,
who
is
affected
by
this
decision,
and
just
thinking
of
it
is
like
comms
for
sure
like
for
the
gmail
and
twitter
and
then
maybe
storage
too,
for
the
git.
A
A
B
Oh
I'm
just
just
sipping
into
the
logic
of
how
this
works
but
yeah.
I
I
basically
agree
with
what
you
guys
were
just
chatting
about
right.
Just
now
like
yeah,
maybe
not
tagging
everybody
all
of
the
time,
but
just
this
very
focus
on
internal
outcomes
and
specifics
and
I'm
curious
about
like
let's
say
which
of
these,
which
of
the
stewardship
groups,
are
more
in
line,
let's
say
with
transparency
and
which
are
in
that
sense.
B
So
how
do
you
make
some
of
them
go
all
the
way
up
to
the
ones
that
are,
you
know
actually
align
and
and
working
with
this
with
these
perspectives
and
also
just
having
like-
and
this
is
just
a
question,
but
I'm
curious:
do
you
guys
have
like
a
best
practices,
kind
of
like
approach,
documents
for
the
groups
or
something
like
that.
B
With,
like
the
basics,
I
know,
like
all,
the
groups
had
differences
in
in
a
way
and
and
and
the
biggest
thing
is,
of
course,
like
the
credentials.
It's
so
tricky.
A
B
No,
I
mean
it's
weird
yeah,
yeah
yeah,
I
mean
correct
condom,
it's
it's
like
it's.
It's
just
one
thing,
but
best
practices
is
just
like
a
operational
kind
of
approach
like
in
terms
of
the
the
the
common
flow
of
operations
of
the
stewardship
groups,
which
are
like
the
best
transparency
practices.
Like
you
record,
who
was
where
access
to
x,
I
don't
know
like
you
know,
like
those
very
specific
like
minimum
base,
transparency
and
all
the
way
up
is
like
oh
you're,
a
superstar
transparency
kind
of
guy.
B
D
But
yeah,
I
I
I
agree
with
what
dan
said
and
what
I
wrote
initially
was
to
make
a
slide
on
the
communicable.
D
But
now
that
I
have
hear
what
you
said,
I
think
that
yeah,
the
the
advice
process
is
not
is
something
really
big,
that
we
should
be
working
like
across
working
groups,
and
I
see
that
there's
a
lot
of
talk
happening
in
soft
gob
around
it
and
like
also
so
we
are
having
here
it
here.
So
maybe
we
can
like
yeah.
Take
this
issue
to
the
stewards
to
an
extra
perspective,
but,
like
a
very
practical
thing,
can
be
to
make
a
slide
on
the
community.
D
Call
where
people
can
like
say
what
are
some
of
the
topics
that
you
need
or
that
they
are
requesting
advice
for,
like
I
really
like
the
list
that
we
did
for
the
onboarding
and
that
suga
shares
about
the
needs
of
the
working
groups,
and
I
need
I
think
that
we
can
have
like
a
slide
that
also
encourages
not
for
onboarding
and
for
the
whole
community
to
engage
in
the
advice
process.
C
D
Well,
I
think
that
it
can
be
any
of
us
in
this
call,
and
I
I
won't
have
any
issue
to
try
to
assume
that
responsibility,
but
if
everyone
wants
to
do
it,
I
have
no
problem.
But
if,
like
I
assume
this
responsibility,
maybe
I
would
make
like
a
forum
post
asking
people.
What
are
the
topics
there
they're
currently
needing
and
just
paste
that
into
the
into
a
slide
in
the
community
call.
C
A
D
About
some
of
the
topics
that
are
needing
or
requesting
an
advice
process
right
now,
like
hey,
if
you
want
to,
I
don't
know,
advice
on
something.
These
are
the
topics
that
are
currently
like
needing
a
review
and
yeah.
I
have
heard
that
there
are
a
lot
of
like
some
guest
blog
posts
that
need
also
feedback,
so
I
think
that
we
can
make
like
a
list
of
things
that
are
requesting
an
eye
from
the
community.
A
A
A
Yeah,
I
think
that
this
is
a
a
great
idea
and
we
could
announce
it
like
after
the
you
know
I
put
like.
I
can
put
the
slides
for
the
like
the
updates
of
the
transparency
and
then
have
a
second
slide
for
the
like
the
advice
process.
That's
that
are
open
and
if
you,
if
you
want,
if
you
want
one,
you
could
announce
it
and
if
not,
I
could
do
it,
but
I
think
it's
a
fantastic
idea
and
yeah.
D
If,
if
you
want
that
can
be
something
that
I
would
like
to
start
and
then
I
can
like
continue
talking
with
you,
but
I
think
that
the
first
thing
would
be
to
make
like
a
forum
post,
yeah
asking
for
people
to
to
yeah
to
say
what
they
want
advice,
process
on
and
maybe
have
the
links
of
their
documents.
And
after
that
we
can
continue
like
yeah
working
on
this
together.
A
It's
a
whole
new
thing
like
who
should
help
the
credentials
of
a
dao
like
this
is
a
very
deep
topic
that
would
never
be
closed,
or
I
think
so,
and
you
know,
like
everything,
that's
open,
we
just
we
just
make
sure
like
we
update
that
list,
and
the
only
thing
should
be
like
in
the
community
called
just
keep
our
mind
on
the
community
hey
this.
Is
this
topic's
open?
If
someone
wants
to
yeah,
if
someone
wants
to
deep
inside
them
that
that
would
be
so
cool.
D
Yeah,
maybe,
and-
and
we
can
also
that
would
be
good
for
us
to
like
go
through
the
forum
and
and
also
continue
talking
with
contributors
who
to
see,
and
also
in
the
in
the
git
book
and
in
the
github,
so
that
yeah,
we
are
also
always
on
top
of
what
is
being
needed
in
the
community.
C
A
Hey
manu,
I
yeah,
I
wanted
to
say
hi
like
I
saw
you
there
and
we
were
discussing
before.
Like
I
know,
you
were
telling
me
that
you
would
like
to
get
some
some
tasks
and
one
of
the
tasks
like
I
feel
like
it
would
be
easy
to
start
with
on
transparency.
A
We
need
to
create
a
document
for
for
our
processes
when
we're
giving
credentials
to
new
contributors
and
basically
it's
it's
write
it
on
a
forum
post,
but
we
need
to
make
it
like
an
official
document
and
yeah
I'm
putting
on
the
on
the
git
book,
and
the
issue
is
if
this
one,
I
I'll
be
also
going
to,
is
going
to
work
with
this
issue.
A
A
We
we
we
take
the
type
form,
the
vm
or
what
how
the
contributor
approaches
and
then
we
make
a
poll
on
the
storage
channel
and
if
in
24
hours
like
there's,
no
one
against
giving
that
credential,
then
we
just
we
give
it
and
yeah
and
for
the
like
the
last
one
was
for
acid
laser
and
yeah
he's
going
to
work
on
sometimes
on
youtube.
He's
doing
a
very
amazing
work.
C
A
A
Okay
and
then
we
also
were
doing
a
round
on
the
advice
process,
basically
like
we
need
to
we're
questioning
questionating
like
our
advice
process,
because
there
is
a
lack
of
engagement
on
the
community
and
we
were
doing
a
round
on
yeah
on
how
we
make
it
better.
A
And
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
share
something
mano,
or
I
mean
I
know
you
just
came,
but
basically
what
we
were
saying
is
like
well,
it's
like
juan
was
suggesting
a
very
nice
thing
about
having
a
a
slide
in
the
community
called
saying
all
the
advice
process,
topics
that
are
open,
so
we
make
sure
like
the
community,
is
more
aware.
A
Dan
was
suggesting
best
practices
for
groups
and
how
the
operational
flow
would
work
and
yeah.
Maybe
it
would
be
like
another
document
yeah
and
some
guidelines,
and
I
I
don't
remember
who,
but
that
someone
also
suggested
turning
this
issue
to
the
red
perspective
of
the
stores
so
yeah.
We
can
also
get
more
engagement
on
the
stores,
but
yeah.
If
you
have
funny
anything
that
came
to
your
mind,
that'd,
be
so
cool.
A
Okay,
like
imagine,
if
just
to
make
to
put
you
in
context
like
imagine
like,
if
I
I'm
changing
the
way
we
manage
the
credentials
and
then
I'm
I
I'm
not
talking
with
chewie
and
then
he's
like
hey
seth,
but
what's
going
on
in
here
like
I
need.
Isolation
cannot
log
in
on
youtube,
and
this
is
being
a
mess
like
it's
when
I,
when
we
take
decisions
like
this,
that
affect
others,
it's
important
to
get
their
advice
and
how
it
will
affect
them.
A
So
we
make
the
the
best
decisions
and
yeah
it's
we
were
like,
but
basically
we
were
finding
a
lack
of
engagement
and
we
need
to.
We
want
to
solve
it
somehow,
maybe
with
more
transparency,
it's
going
to
be
more
engagement.
If
people
see
it,
then
the
if
the
right
people
see
they
will
engage.
A
C
Basically,
the
advice
process
usually
is
for
like
before
we
submit
a
proposal
for
voting.
Usually
it
goes
through
the
advice
process,
but
it's
not
only
the
proposals
that
we
want.
The
advice
from
the
community
from
sometimes
just
the
simple
process
like
doing
the
transparency
audit.
Before
we
decided
to
do
the
transparency
audit
across
the
across
all
working
groups,
we
asked
for
a
we.
It
went
through
the
advice
process,
so
we
wanted
to
see
if
the
community
would
would
love
that
idea
before
we
decided
to
push
through
with
that
so
yeah.
C
So
the
advice
process
basically
yeah.
It's
before
the
proposal
goes
to
the
voting
process
or
before
a
a
specific
activity
or
a
decision
has
to
be
made
before
it
gets
before.
We
decide
on
something
we
put
them
in
the
advice
process
in
the.
A
E
No,
I
think
it's
I
mean
so
far.
It's
straightforward.
I
know
that
when
we
get
from
theory
to
practice
some
issues
might
arrive,
but
right
now
I
think
it's
straightforward.
We
can
move
on.
A
Nice,
okay,
next
next
topic
is
audit
for
credentials.
Me
and
ivy
were
chatting
about
this
issue
for
a
long
time,
and
I
think
we
could
schedule
a
call
this.
What
do
you
think
about
thursday.
A
And
yeah,
I
think
we
can
do
it
in
in
one
hour
max
two
hours
get
all
audited
for
the
credentials.
I
mean
it's
not
like.
There
are
too
much
and.
A
A
Okay,
yeah,
and
also
we
we
need
to
do
the
the
audit
for
labs
and
omega.
A
I
I
don't
know
like,
should
we
schedule
like
when
do
you
think
we
should
do
it
like?
I
don't
like
omera
is
still
doing
the
manifesto.
I
I
I
mean
I
don't
know
when
is
the
right
moment,
or
maybe
we
push
a
bit
then
like
yeah,
let's
go
around
like
how
did
ladders
and
omega
are
kind
of
relatively
new
working
groups?
A
Do
you
think
we
should
we
push
them
with
the
audit
or
we
should
like
not
push
them
like,
because
it's
not
obligatory
and
not
mandatory,
but
the
thing
is
like:
should
we
hey
guys,
there's
the
other?
That
would
be
nice,
you,
you
could
fill
it
up
or
or
you
guys
prefer
like,
let
them
their
space
and
integrate
when
they
feel
ready.
D
Yeah,
well,
I
think
that
for
sure
we
can
tell
them
and
they
can
reply
to
us
and,
if
they're
ready
and
they
feel
that
they
are
good
to
go.
We
can
like
accompany
them
as
as
the
same
way
that
we
have
done
that
you
have
done
with
the
other
groups
like
help
them
to
to
to
do
the
audit
and
maybe
yeah.
D
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
reach
out
to
them
and
that
that
could
even
help
them
if
they
feel
that
they
are
like
that,
they
need
to
to
to
evaluate
themselves
and
and
also
to
see
how
can
they
improve
so
yeah.
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
tell
them
and
the
well.
D
I
think
that
we
can
post
it
in
the
in
their
working
groups,
chats
who
would
be
joyful
to
accept
that
responsibility
in
the
case
of
yeah
that
the
steroid
of
each
working
group.
A
Nice
yeah,
I
think
it's
a
good
idea
to
reach
them
and
yeah
just
offer
some
help.
Who
do
you
pass
to.
E
Thank
funka,
sorry,
what
was
the
it
concerning
the
audit
for
labs
and
omega
right.
E
Yeah
I
mean
I
agree
with
with
what
huanka
had
to
say.
I
mean,
let's
see,
I
know
I
don't.
I
know
I'm
doing
user
testing
and
it's
like
I'm
in
contact
with
vitor.
The
second
part.
You
know
the
the
one
now
dealing.
We
completed
the
commerce
conflict
dashboard
and
it's
not
more
about
the
python
modeling.
E
So
concerning
token
freeze
and
token
thought,
so
I
think
that
concerns
labs.
So
maybe
after
after
that,
from
what
I
know,
perhaps
after
that
is
done
after
you
know,
I
get
them
some
feedback
and
they
implement
it.
Perhaps
that
would
be
a
good
like.
E
Like
a
division,
it's
just
some
ideas.
So
if
if
we,
if
we
were
to
wait,
you
know
a
week
or
so
and
while
we
wait,
we
go,
we
will
juan
casa,
we
reach
out
to
them
and
see
what
they
say
but
yeah
after
after
done
with
the
user
testing
for
the
modeling,
I
think
that
that
would
be
we
could
take
what
they've
done
and
and
yeah
audit.
That's
that's
my.
Those
are
my
two
sides
on
it.
A
C
B
C
To
ask
I
mean
we're,
not
push
we're
not
going
to
push
ygg
or
the
lab's
working
group
to
start
the
audit,
but
maybe
we
can
also
ask
ask
the
steward
or
them
if,
if
they
want
to
yeah,
if
they
want
to
start
audit
as
well.
C
Yeah
because
I
think
they
know
best-
which
is
the
right
timing
for
them
to
be
audit.
Rather
than.
C
If
they
have
time,
but
I
also
want
to
ask
you
that
if
the
te
services
is
that
a
working
group
would
be
also
yeah
but.
A
That's
even
new
newer,
so
I
would
start
with
those
two
that
are
are
new,
but
not
that
that's
the
newest
service
and
I
feel
like
also
especially
to
america.
It
would
be
very
good
to
do
the
audit
because
it
will
help
like
to
make
the
roadmap
and
finish
the
manifest.
You
know
it's
like
an
extra
push
to
get
the
documentation
ready.
C
Yeah,
I
agree
with
that
yeah.
I
think
that's
actually
our
purpose
in
making
the
and
doing
the
audit
to
give
them
a
little
nudge
like
to
create
or
like
a
little
reminder
to
them
to
make
a
roadmap
and
manifesto.
A
Okay,
I
do
want
to
say
something
mano.
E
E
I
mean,
I
think
something
perhaps
the
alpha
in
the
room
or
something
that's
very
closely
linked
with
morality,
at
least
for
me
is,
I
think,
really
depends
whether
you
have
like
a
tasty
conception
or
an
atheistic
conception
and
how
much
we
want
to.
I
mean
sure
we
want
to.
We
want
to
be
on
the
side
of
science,
but
not
not
scientism,
and
we
know
that
science,
it's
amoral
and
it
just
wants
to
advance
and
and
further
the
the
knowledge,
but
at
whatever
cost.
E
So
I
don't
know
it's
interesting
in
the
omega.
There
hasn't
been
much
talk
about.
What
are
we
gonna
like
like?
Is
it
gonna
be
the
mo
of
omega
that
yeah?
We
we're
gonna,
be
theistic
like
yeah,
there's
a
god
like
regardless
of
of
of
the
the
details,
or
is
it
gonna
be
more
like?
No,
it's
just
gonna
be
more
of
a
philosophy
and
which
is
gonna,
be
like
okay,
like
a
framework
where
it's
just
universe
and
it's
and
it's
deterministic,
and
all
that
kind
of
thing.
E
So
that
might
be
a
little
bit
of
topic,
but
because
omega
is
the
one
dealing
with
ethics
and-
and
it's
really
the
only
working
group
that
can
discuss
the
types
of
metaphysical,
maybe
and
and
philosophical
things,
then
I
don't
know
that
that
I
thought
that
was.
That
was
interesting
to
to
see
where,
where
because
I
think
in
the
end
that
that's
gonna
affect
the
way
they
they
evolve
as
a
group,
but
I
haven't
seen
them
discuss
that.
E
I
think
it's
it's
like
like
an
elephant
in
the
room
but
yeah.
I
was
just
curious
to
see
what
you
guys
think
I
don't
wanna.
E
I
understand
how
it's
complicated
and
I
really
don't
want
to
model
things
too
much,
but
I
mean
I
think
when
you
talk
about
ethics
and
morality,
you
kind
of
have
to
think
about
these
things.
Like
do
you
see
yourself
as
answering
to
to
a
higher
power
or
just
to
your
fellow
human
beings?
Yeah?
That's
it.
E
Yeah
yeah
the
documentation,
yeah,
sure,
yeah
and
and
and
again
when
I'd
be
interested
in
in
you
know,
perhaps
being
the
liaison.
E
From
transparency
to
to
omega
to
you
know,
help
them
with
the
documentation
and
and
and
what
and
I
agree
whatever
segment
decides-
I'm
not
gonna.
You
know
put
my
put
my
views
there,
it's
whatever
she's
a
steward
and
whatever
she's
like,
but
I'm
interested
in,
seeing
how
learning
about
how
the
how
they're
developing
a
framework
and
also
if
there
needs
to
be
like
a
person
in
charge
of
this
or
someone
more
involved
than
the
others,
then
then
I
can
I
can
take.
I
can.
A
Take
that
role
yeah,
that
would
be
fantastic
and
it
would
make
things
easier
because
I
feel
like
soul.
Sista
is
normally
so
occupied
like
busy,
yeah
and
yeah.
If
you,
if
you
could
talk
to
her
and
get
the
documentation
up
to
speed
and
you
do
the
audit
yourself,
you
know
I
mean
with
like
I
kind
of
offer-
help
with
ivy,
but
you
know
what
like
we
don't.
We
don't
know
the
roadmap
for
omega
and
that
stuff,
but
we
could
help
how
to
yeah
how
to
other
workers
are
doing
and
picture
consensus.
A
Maybe
I
mean
ldm,
subsista
and
ycg
and
also
we'll
put
in
their
working
group
like
the
like,
if
they're
interested
in
doing,
I
feel
like
it's
better,
for
I
feel
it's
better.
Instead
of
on
on
a
chat,
do
it
at
the
end,
because
if
you
do
it
on
a
chat
where
it's
public
people,
I
I
mean
imagine
like
socialista,
it's
busy
do
not
have
time
and
don't
want
to
do
the
audit
herself,
it's
like
if
you're
putting
it
in
public.
A
E
I
think
I
think,
maybe
I
don't
know
why
why
the
omega
work
group
meets
like
once
every
two
weeks.
I
said
because
because
she's
too
busy
with
her
things
and
she
can
only
you
know,
host
or
or
lead
the
group
once
every
two
weeks-
I
mean
it.
Ideally
it
ought
to
be
like
the
other
working
groups.
I
don't
think
it's
it's
any
less
important
than
the
other
things,
but
yeah
I
can.
I
can
reach
out
to
her
or
or
you
can
reach
out
to
her
septi.
E
A
A
A
A
A
It's
pretty
short
videos.
We
can
watch
them
together
and
make
the.
A
A
D
A
B
A
A
A
It
was
too
loud
or
it
was
fine.
Actually
I'm
going
to
pause
the
video.
I
think
it's
important
to
catch
the
people
attention,
because
if
you
reload
or
close
this
tab,
you
might
lose
your
money.
So
I
mean
it
happened
to
me
once
oh
yeah
52
die
and
yeah
like
it's
really
important,
that
people
get
this
tab,
quiet
and
let
it
work.
D
A
A
A
Okay
and
yeah,
we
are,
I
mean
on
the
tc.
We
used
to
end
five
minutes
before
on
the
top
of
the
hour,
so
we
are
on
the
top
of
the
hour
yeah.
Thank
you
so
much
guys
and
I'll
I'll.
I
wanted
to
do
the
the
the
issues
on
the
center
on
the
center.
Maybe
we
can
do
it
together,
ivy,
if
you
want
yeah
yeah
I'll
call
you
when,
when
when
we
both
are
ready,
we
just
do
it
in.
I
don't
think
it
will
take
us
more
than
10
minutes.