►
Description
City Council, meeting 41, May 22, 2018 - Regular Meeting - Part 2 of 2
Agenda and background materials:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=13092
Part 1 of 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jursrRzL-SE#t=4m44s
Meeting Navigation:
0:03:11 - Meeting resume
2:28:14 - Meeting resume
A
Okay,
members
of
council,
this
meeting
is
now
resumed
for
the
benefit
of
those
who
are
connected
to
the
Internet.
The
city
clerk
has
posted
all
of
the
agenda
materials
for
today's
meeting
at
Toronto
dot,
CA,
slash
council
before
we
begin
understand
that
councillor
care
Gianna's
would
just
like
to
make
an
announcement.
Madam.
B
B
B
The
graffiti
was
very
negatory
towards
the
Muslim
community
and
I
want
to
thank
the
staff
of
Transportation,
as
well
as
the
staff
of
solid
waste,
two
individuals,
Edison
Alexander
and
Johnny,
one
that
went
above
and
they
called
of
the
byung
above
the
call
of
duty,
and
they
made
sure
that
this
morning
before
the
students
came
in
this
was
cleared
and
the
graffiti
was
gone.
The
graffiti
was
very
graphic.
B
It
was
towards
one
particular
religion
of
a
Muslim
religion,
and
this
is
something
that
we
need
to
get
them
and
make
sure
that
we
never
never
never
absolutely
allow
anybody
to
get
away
and
with
that
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
my
colleague
Glen
to
say
his
words
and
I
want
to
thank
him
for
involving
me
as
the
newcomers
advocated,
and
we
were
able
to
work
things
out
again.
Thanks
to
the
staff
and
the
two
individuals.
Thank.
C
You
Madame
speaker
through
you
I,
wanted
to
stand
on
a
point
of
privilege
as
well
to
convey
my
solidarity
and
best
wishes
with
the
students
and
the
families
and
parents
who
go
to
the
Wally,
all
Ostra
school,
it's
a
school
that
has
about
250,
kids,
going
to
it
and
on
a
bike
ride
home
last
night
on
a
holiday
Monday
evening,
we
came
across
some
very
ugly
graphic
racist
hateful
comments.
Spray-Painted
on
the
side
of
the
school
wall,
I
had
obviously
a
mix
of
emotions.
C
My
first
reaction
and
again
I
got
by
serendipity
a
call
from
councillor
Janice,
as
this
was
going
on
through
the
magic
of
3-1-1
and
through
the
magic
of
councillor.
Cara
Janice
a
cellphone
getting
a
hold
of
our
staff.
We
said
to
our
staff
at
10:30
at
night.
This
has
to
be
removed
before
the
children
get
here
8:30
tomorrow
morning
and
to
our
staffs
credit.
They
didn't
talk
about
boundaries.
They
didn't
talk
about
whose
property
it
was
our
staff
said.
This
is
unacceptable.
C
C
10:30
p.m.
that's,
especially
Edison
Alexander
John
I
am
Cody
Hannon
Cameron,
Chapman,
Jack
Ramsey
thanks
these
individuals
and
the
quick
action
of
everybody,
those
250
children
and
their
parents
came
home,
came
to
school,
not
with
a
big
banner
of
racism,
but
a
big
banner
of
support
from
us
and
our
staff
as
we
walked
the
kids
past.
Some
of
the
things
that
had
happened
so
madam
chair,
Scarborough
and
Toronto
is
a
place
that
we're
all
proud
of
this
type
of
hatred.
C
D
A
E
E
A
F
A
madam
Speaker
I
move
that
report
from
meeting
30
for
the
executive
committee
listed
on
the
agenda
of
council
be
presented
for
consideration
and
I
just
like
to
deal
with
a
couple
of
the
matters
that
we
dealt
with
that
a
very
busy
meeting.
Madam
Speaker,
the
first,
which
is
before
us,
is
one
of
my
key
items
at
this
meeting
coming
up
very
shortly
is
the
Eglinton
East
LRT
project.
F
This,
of
course,
is
a
key
element
in
the
council,
approved
a
transit
network
plan
in
Scarborough,
and
it
contains
this
report
does
unanimously
approved
by
the
executive
committee.
The
the
recommendation
to
council
that
we
extend
the
Eglinton
LRT
to
Malvern,
and
this
would
include
in
the
planning
and
design
process,
would
allow
City
Council
when
it
comes
back
with
that
planning
and
design
work
done
to
consider
the
entire
project
instead
of
looking
at
it
in
pieces,
and
it
will
come
back
with
recommendations
with
respect
to
funding
and
phasing
and
the
business
case
analysis.
F
Secondly,
it
is
to
integrate
the
the
report
contains
the
recommendation
from
among
three
options
as
to
how
this
line
can
be
best
integrated
with
the
U
of
T,
Scarborough
campus,
and
also
there's
one
particular
intersection
that
is
dealt
with
in
Scarborough,
where
there
it's
a
complicated
matter,
we're
tunneling.
It's
recommended
just
underneath
that,
inter
intersection,
so
I
think
what's
important
here.
F
The
second
thing
that
was
done
was
at
the
executive
committee
again
with
the
animus
approval
was
the
approval
of
the
senior
strategy
2.0,
and
this
has
27
recommendations
and
at
18
of
them
short-term
nine
in
the
medium-term.
But
they
really
are
things
that
I
think.
In
most
cases
are
going
to
involve
some
degree
or
another
of
cooperation
with
the
other
governments,
but
they're
things
that
simply
have
to
be
addressed
better
and
in
a
more
coordinated
and
ease
of
easily
navigable
form
than
is
the
case
today.
F
So
the
first
thing
that's
happening
is
a
services
transition
team
and
it's
going
to
be
responsible
for
developing
a
governance
structure
that
can
allow
all
of
this
to
happen
in
this
kind
of
coordinated
way.
That's
more
easily
dealt
with
by
seniors
and
their
to
report
back
to
us
with
recommendations
on
the
structure
of
this
entity
and
I.
F
Think
if
you
put
these
two
things
together,
the
seniors
housing
entity,
forty
CHC
of
the
eighty
three
buildings
and
the
senior
strategy
2.0
we're
going
to
be
taking
a
big
step
forward
as
a
city
with
respect
to
how
we
look
after
our
seniors.
So
those
are
the
matters
that
will
will
be
the
priority
items
first
and
together
with
the
other
other
items
in
the
executive
committee
report,
which
I
commend
to
the
members
of
council.
Thank
you
very
thank.
A
E
I
do
madam
Speaker.
Thank
you
that
the
report
from
meeting
twelve
of
the
Audit
Committee
listed
on
the
agenda
Council
be
presented
for
consideration.
I'll
take
just
a
quick
moment
to
cover
the
four
items
for
members
of
council.
We
have
a
you
12.6,
which
would
be
a
familiar
report.
Those
are
the
business
improvement
areas
audited,
financial
statements,
there's
a
tranche
and
the
package
there
and
I
hope
you
familiarize
yourself
with
that.
A
you
12.3
is
the
review
of
Toronto
Transit
Commission
procurement
policies
with
respect
to
the
specifics
around
wheel,
trans,
accessible
taxi
service
procurement.
E
This
is
a
receive
for
information
report,
but
the
details
in
it
talked
about
in
earlier
procurement
that
the
Auditor
General
followed
up
on
and
provided
some
advice
to
the
Toronto
Transit
Commission
on
how
to
improve
their
procurement
processes.
Around
the
specifics
of
acquiring
taxis
for
to
supplement
real
transit
services,
we
have
a
reporter
near
au
12.2,
which
is
the
children's
services
division
opportunities
to
achieve
greater
value
for
child
care
from
public
funds.
There
are
twenty
recommendations
coming
from
the
committee.
I
would
recommend
that
members
familiarize
themselves
with
that
report
has
been
held.
E
It
is
quite
lengthy
and
very
detailed
in
nature
if
I
can
be
of
any
assistance
or
may
facilitate
a
connection
for
questions
about
this.
Please
don't
hesitate
to
ask
and
finally
au
12.1,
another
lengthy
report,
Toronto
Court
Services
collection
of
provincial
offense
default
fines.
You
may
have
seen
this
in
the
news.
It
spoke
to
hundreds
of
millions
of
dollars
in
uncollected
fines
over
the
last
number
of
years
and
the
auditors
come
up
with
31
recommendations
to
strengthen
this
process
in
collecting
these
fines
and
there's
two
purposes
for
that.
E
E
A
G
G
As
many
of
us
know,
in
this
chamber
aging
an
aging
population
with
aging
parents
requires
a
massive
infrastructure
in
the
long
term
to
provide
supportive
care,
as
we
age,
there's
enormous
shortage
of
such
beds,
an
affordability
issue
as
well,
so
a
strategic
plan
going
forward
with
all
three
levels
of
government
at
the
table
is
part
of
a
vital
conversation
planning
for
our
aging
population.
There's
a
couple
of
other
items
and
the
agenda.
G
A
A
H
A
A
I
B
The
report
from
meeting
29
of
the
planning
and
growth
management
committee
listed
on
the
agenda
of
council
be
presented
for
consideration.
Has
it
become
customary
I've?
Looked
within
the
council
agenda,
there's
460
new
units
but
zero,
affordable
housing
units.
There
are
a
number
of
settlements,
we've
taken
section
37
which
are
confidential.
They
may
take
some
cash,
but
they
don't
take.
Units
in
cash
has
not
gotten
as
affordable
units,
otherwise
they
would
have
been
incorporated
within
the
development
because
there's
no
land
to
build
them
upon.
B
So
we
could
probably
still
do
better
as
a
group
I
would
bring
your
attention
to
an
Alaskan,
the
speaker.
She
couldn't
time
item
PG,
29.1
I'll
ask
her
later
minimizing
the
negative
impacts
of
residential
infill
construction,
an
update.
It
is
a
new
bylaw
and
a
policy.
The
staff
brought
forward
to
the
committee
that
I
think
you
would
be
well
to
hear
will
appreciate
the
changes
it
will
help
us
in
dealing
with
the
impacts
of
residential
development.
A
A
D
A
A
I
K
J
C
D
A
A
D
D
Items
through
ten
hours
of
community
council
meetings,
it
was
really
an
extraordinary
amount
of
work
for
them
and
also
to
congratulate
members
of
community
Shore
community
council
because
we
were
able
to
hold
quorum
throughout
the
entire
ten
hours.
Thank
you
very
much
and
I've.
Just
just
might
madam
Speaker.
It
represents
about
fourth
four-fifths
of
what
the
other
community
councils
are
dealing
with.
Thank
you.
D
F
Speaker,
this
concerns
item
PW,
29.3,
approving
accountability
and
the
utility
cut
process
I'd
like
to
declare
an
interest
in
that
item
on
account
of
my
previously
disclosed
involvement
with
the
Rogers
group.
This
is
an
item
that
affects
utility
cuts,
of
which
Rogers
does
many
and
would
be
affected
by
the
proposed
changes.
Thank.
A
P
P
Thank
you,
madam
Speaker
I
have
1966
petitions
sign
here,
just
about
34
short
of
2004,
a
message
of
connecting
Malvern
to
the
aquiline
and
East
LRT.
So
this
this
petition
instead
of
reading
the
whole
thing
I'll
just
briefly,
summarizing
asking
the
City
Council
to
consider
extension
to
bow
burn
to
the
Aquino
and
East
LRT,
which
straight
which
was
initially
supposed
to
go
only
to
Scarborough
to
campus.
You
have
T
to
be
extended
to
malgo,
and
so
there
is
1966
Malvern
residents
signed
petition
here
present
it
on
behalf
of
the
community.
A
Memories,
I
will
not
review
the
order
paper.
We
have
two
deferred
items
on
this
agenda:
the
X
33
point
10
on
program,
advisory
bodies,
key
activities
for
2017
and
ey
2955.
On
a
three
hundred
fifty
year
old
oak
tree
choral,
cable
dry.
The
mayor
has
designated
the
following
items
as
his
key
matters
for
this
meeting.
The
first
key
matter
will
be
item
IX
34.1
on
Eglinton,
east
light,
rail
transit
project
updated
next
steps,
and
the
second
key
item
will
be
item
IX
34.2
on
the
Toronto
senior
strategy.
A
These
will
be
our
first
and
second
item
of
business
today.
I
also
propose
the
following
items
be
considered
together:
e^x
34.3
on
implementing
tenets;
first,
creating
a
senior's
Hollett
housing
unit
at
Toronto,
Community,
Housing
and
transitioning
towards
a
seniors
housing
and
services
identity
at
the
city
with
the
mayor's
key.
Second
key
item:
item
e
acts
34.2
on
the
toronto
seniors
strategy,
2.0,
and
the
mayor
has
consented
to
considering
this
item
with
this
key
matter.
A
The
following
related
planning
and
growth
management
committee
items,
PG,
29.4,
TL,
core
downtown
plan,
official
plan,
amendment
PG,
29.5,
downtown
parks
and
public
round
plan
in
PG,
29.6,
downtown
mobility
strategy
in
PG,
29.7,
downtown
community
services
and
facilities
strategy
notices,
a
motion
to
schedule
to
be
dealt
with
2:00
p.m.
tomorrow.
Only
if
the
mayor's
key
matters
have
been
completed,
I
propose
that
city
council
set
a
time
for
a
closed
session.
If
required
later
in
the
meeting,
the
city
clerk
has
noted.
A
The
items
that
members
wish
to
hold
I
will
now
go
to
the
items
listed
on
the
order
paper
to
take
additional
holds
and
I
will
recognize
request
to
make
matters
in
a
time
specific
after
I
go
through
the
items
for
additional
holds.
Once
the
order
paper
has
been
approved
by
council
any
change,
we
need
a
two-thirds
vote,
page
three
councillor
Fletcher,
sorry,.
Q
I
Q
I
We
don't
often
stand
up
here
and
give
kudos
to
our
staff
for
actually
getting
in
there
and
changing
people's
lives,
but
I
have
to
say
this
was
brought
forward
by
Michael
McDonald
in
my
office,
and
I
want
to
publicly
acknowledge
that
one
person
can
make
a
whole
lot
of
difference
at
City
Hall
and
thank
you
to
Michael
McDonald
for
doing
this,
for
our
constituent,
which
turned
out
to
be
helpful
to
many
constituents
throughout
Toronto.
Thank
you.
Thank
You.
H
F
A
D
D
D
Thank
you.
Madam
chair
I
have
held
PW
29.1
the
Metrolinx
projects.
I
could
release
that
no
I
just
have
some
technical
amendments
that
were
given
to
me
by
transportation
staff.
So
the
clerk's
have
those.
If
you
want
to
hold
it,
no
I'll
continue
to
hold
it,
but
you
would
like
to
yes,
you,
okay,
yeah,
all
right,
Thank,
You,.
Q
B
C
A
C
C
You,
madam
Speaker
I,
have
two
holds
on
page
nine:
under
Scarborough
Community
Council,
SC
30.3,
the
Scarborough,
Center
transportation,
master
plan
final
report
and
on
page
nine
under
Scarborough
Community
Council
as
well.
Sc
30.4,
1250,
Markham,
Road
zoning
amendment
and
site
plan
applications
request
for
Direction
report.
Thank.
D
A
E
A
D
A
P
D
S
H
I,
if
I
could
just
indulge
15
seconds
of
City
Council's
time-
and
this
is
regarding
item
te
32
point
4
3
I
just
wanted
to
express
my
thanks
to
the
developer
for
taking
seriously
a
request
I
made
about
considering
childcare
in
the
podium
of
the
building.
As
it
was
one
of
the
last
sites
in
Liberty
Village
that
currently
have
zero
childcare,
they
managed
to
come
back
with
a
reasonable
rezoning
request
that
would
allow
them
to
hand
over
the
keys
for
a
50
child
facility
to
the
city
at
no
cost
to
us.
Thank.
A
D
Much
very
much
madam
Speaker
I'm
still
in
page
11,
it's
te
32
point:
1964,
266,
Wellesley,
Street,
es
552
to
570,
Church,
Street
and
City
own
public
Lane,
wave
official
plan,
amendment,
zoning
amendment
and
rental
housing,
demolition,
application
request
for
direction;
I'm,
just
hoping
that
we
can
have
a
recorded
vote
on
this
and
you
can.
If
you
want
to
vote
YES.
It's
to
the
doctor
staff
recommend.
E
J
D
D
H
D
A
E
B
A
D
Madam
Speaker
I'd
like
to
time
on
page
five
audit
committee,
au,
12.2,
Children's,
Services
Division,
and
have
a
report
from
the
Auditor
General.
Please,
if
we
could
do
it
after
the
infill
item,
that
would
be
fine
with
me
following
members
motion
infill
and
then
that
one
or
we
could
do
it
tomorrow
morning,
Wow.
D
Yes,
thank
you.
Madam
Speaker
I
have
been
asked
by
City
Clerk's
to
move
this
motion
and
that
I'll
move
once
it's
up
on
the
screen
and
then
accordance
with
section
27
60
of
council
procedures
that
see
how
to
remove
CA
21.1
had
an
appointment
to
the
public
member
appointment.
I'm
a
public
member
to
the
child,
public
library
board
for
the
Civic
appointments
committee
and
bring
the
item
forward
to
say,
counts
for
consideration.
A
D
K
P
F
T
P
A
A
T
A
Thank
you,
members
of
council
I,
want
to
stress
the
importance
of
preparing
your
motions
in
advance.
The
clerk
staff
are
here
to
help
you
prepare
your
motions
in
particular.
If
you
intent
intend
to
move
a
motion
during
the
release
of
holt
I
will
insist
that
your
motion
be
prepared
in
advance
and
given
to
the
clerk.
If
you
do
not
have
a
motion
ready,
I
will
not
recognize
you
and
I'm
also
reminding
members
that
you
must
state
your
motion.
A
First
before
you
speak
to
it
remember,
city
council
follows
a
routine
for
the
processing
and
adding
of
any
motions
without
notice
during
the
meeting.
Please
remember
that
emotion
with
our
notice
must
include
a
reason
for
urgency.
If
you
have
an
urgent
motion
without
notice,
you
wish
to
bring
forward
at
this
meeting.
Please
give
your
motion
to
the
city
clerk
staff.
They
will
prepare
the
necessary
procedure
motion
for
my
review.
Along
with
your
motion.
The
chair
must
agree.
The
motion
is
urgent.
A
Before
you
can
seek
leave
to
introduce
it
at
this
meeting,
it
will
require
30
votes
that
emotion
without
notice
to
the
agenda
during
the
meeting.
Motions
added
to
the
agenda
in
this
way
are
not
subject
to
a
vote.
To
waive
referral
to
a
committee
or
agency
I
will
be
reviewing
all
motions
carefully
and
will
advise
council
after
each
recess,
which
motions
need
a
motion
to
add
to
the
agenda.
Now
we
will
continue.
B
Yes,
thank
you
very
much
I'm
on
speaker,
I,
think
this
is
a
very
good
project
and
I
look
forward
to
to
it
happening,
and
these
questions
are
in
that
context
one
is:
have
we,
as
staff
done,
an
analysis
of
utility
relocations
that
need
to
occur?
Is
there
a
lot
of
work
that
way
we
found
those
a
big
obstacle
in
the
Eglinton
connects
through.
L
B
L
B
O
B
O
This
stage
to
the
speaker,
the
the
asset
will
be
funded
entirely
by
way
of
the
city.
The
the
city
will
also
be
the
procurement
lead.
However,
this
city
through
the
TTC
may
engage
I,
oh
and
the
delivery
of
the
project
that
termination
has
yet
to
be
made.
When
will
that
be
made,
it's
likely
to
be
made
when
once
council
approves
a
definitive
funding
commitment
to
the
project
again
in
q1
of
2019,
okay,.
L
B
L
B
L
B
B
J
L
L
The
speaker,
the
old,
the
the
approved
da,
was
based
on
a
60
meter
train.
One
of
the
recommendations
is
also
related
to
MTO
work
on
the
bridge
crossing
the
401
that
they
need
to
take
account
of
the
fact
that
we're
using
90
meter
trains
not
60,
meter
trains,
but
it
will
be
90,
meter,
trains,
the
full
length
so.
L
L
The
speaker
no
Council
has
approved,
approved
the
work
that
we're
undertaking
to
this
point.
We've
got
a
budget
that
will
take
us
to
5%
design
and
we
need
to
update
a
business
case.
What
we're
seeking
is
Authority
on
three
key
parts
of
the
of
the
line
in
order
to
be
able
to
advance
that
design
further
and.
L
J
I
I
quickly,
I
read
through
this
quickly,
I
have
to
confess,
but
the
it
talks
about
the
the
intersection
overpasses
or
bypass
just
a
couple
of
locations
and
it
it.
It
said:
the
same
measuring
stick
was
used
when
looking
at
the
Eglinton,
West,
LRT
and
I
thought,
but
I
didn't
see.
Those
numbers
in
this
report
is
that
is
there
a
reason
why
they're
not
here?
Are
they
here
through.
J
L
J
P
Madam
Speaker
I
just
wanted
to
get
some
clarification
or
confirmation
as
to
how
this
changes,
how
Malvern
gets
connected
to
at
least
a
Lottie
from
the
previous
plants
that
were
there
as
potential
extreme
to
Malvern,
as
as
a
potential
latest
step?
How
does
this
change
in
in
terms
of
Malvern
being
connected?
Does
it
mean
we
are
connected
into
the
one
program
or
one
project
for
the
initial
artists
through.
L
L
O
P
L
K
A
K
L
O
K
O
K
O
O
So
through
the
speaker,
council
has
already
approved
a
priority
list
of
projects
in
2016
that
list.
In
fact,
the
the
cost
of
bringing
on
those
projects
exceeds
the
envelope,
and
so
we
will
have
to
come
back
I.
My
educated
assumption
would
be
in
2019
sometime
in
2019
to
seek
Council's
approval
of
that
priority
list.
I
thought.
K
K
K
I
suspect
the
priorities
and
the
money
will
not
match,
and
so
we
will
be
making
choices
about
what
funding
we're
going
to
spend
the
federal
and
provincial
money
on,
and
that's
that
nine
eight
point
nine
billion
and
surely
we
should
be
using
the
priorities
established
through
the
planning
process.
That
was
always
the
intention
to
look
at
where
the
money
will
go.
O
Through
the
speaker,
I
think
it's
absolutely
fair
to
be
able
to
prioritize
the
projects
through
some
form
of
lens
and
I.
Think
that's
a
planning
lens
and
so
I
think
staff
would
be
coming
forward
in
2019,
both
with
business
cases
and
analysis,
as
well
as
priorities
for
that
funding
envelope.
I
should
also
add
that
that
eight
point
nine
billion
dollars
will
be
matched
through
city
funding,
so
the
envelope
is
in
fact
in
excess
of
about
thirteen
billion
dollars.
Thank.
H
Yes,
hello
and
thank
you
very
much
and
through
you
and
I'm
speaker,
so
talk
me
through
this
I
find
this
business
case
fascinating
and
jelly
just
looking
through
what
questions
we
were
asking
and
so
I
just
want
to
go
through
sort
of
the
two
bigger
questions,
so
the
the
Kingston
Lawrence
Morningside
intersection.
Can
you
talk
us
quickly
through
the
analysis
and
what
we
looked
at
that
got
us
to
this?
This
decision
to
underground
so.
L
Through
the
the
speaker,
we
had
extensive
traffic
and
travel
analysis
done
of
that
intersection.
It's
one
of
the
most
one
of
the
busiest
and
most
congested
intersections
in
the
city,
largely
because
of
the
volume
of
traffic
coming
in
Kingston
Road
from
the
east
and
looked
at
different
scenarios
or
different
options
for
the
way
the
LRT
could
run
through
that
intersection
and
and
what
would
be
the
impact
on
on
traffic
in
the
area.
So
you.
H
You
decided
that,
because
of
the
flow
of
traffic,
the
economic
activity
versus
the
cost,
it
was
actually
a
better
investment
to
underground
it
right
through
the
speaker.
Yes,
that
is
correct
and
you
looked
at
things
like
trip
duration,
average
time
average
time
per
mode.
Occupancy
apin
see
factors
peak
hour,
all
those
things
through.
L
H
L
H
H
L
L
H
L
H
H
D
L
L
D
L
L
L
D
J
D
A
G
O
G
O
G
So
if
five
years
ago,
in
May
of
2013,
council
declared
the
link
between
young
and
shepherd
and
shepherdess
station
to
be
a
phase,
two
Metrolinx
funded
project,
there's
a
vote
of
24
to
19
to
carry
I'm
just
wondering
how
much
work
has
been
done.
A
lot
of
work
has
been
done
on
this,
which
is
not
not
a
phase
2
project
but
I'm
just
wondering
how
much
work
has
been
done
on
North
York
relief
line.
L
G
A
number
of
motions
supporting
this.
This
motion
have
been
passed
over
the
last
five
years,
including
asking
staff
to
report
back
on
the
viability
and
cost
of
an
environmental
assessment,
asking
staff
to
use
the
feeling
congested
model
to
provide
a
cost
range
and
funding
options
for
an
environmental
assessment
reporting
back
on
the
efficacy
of
completing
that
line.
Now,
maybe
I
missed
something,
but
I
haven't
seen
any
report
or
response
to
any
of
these
motions.
Supporting
councils
direction.
L
Through
the
speaker,
as
I
mentioned,
we
will
be
addressing
addressing
that
Shepard
West
extension
as
part
of
our
update
of
the
the
transit
priorities
in
the
official
plan.
In
terms
of
how
decisions
were
made
about
funding
I.
We
are
following
the
direction
of
council
that
that
gave
us
funding
to
advance
the
design
of
the
Eglinton
East.
L
L
G
One
last
question:
when
we
did
the
guess:
the
York
University
rapid
rocket,
Express
bus
lane
up
off
of
Dufferin
and
and
through
to
the
university
through
up
to
I,
guess,
keel
and
so
forth.
They
made
a
financial
contribution.
If
my
notes
here
are
correct,
a
transit,
high
level
transit
going
into
university
campuses
is
that
is
that
a
safe
assumption
might
my
notes
indicate
they
made
a
financial
contribution
and
paid
half
I?
Don't
know
whether,
through.
L
C
You,
madam
Speaker
I,
think
I'll
have
some
I,
guess:
I'll
call
it
transit
questions
and
maybe
some
finance
questions
as
well,
but
through
you,
madam
speaker,
to
the
appropriate
staff
I'm
wondering
in
this
report.
You
talk
a
lot
about
the
Kennedy
station.
I'll
call
it
interchange
where
we
have
the
go
train
tracks,
the
crosstown
and
the
subway
all
merging
together
and
one
I'll
call
it
not.
Is
it
your
submission
to
us
that
all
of
this
can
work
and
sort
of
get
through
that
funnel
and
our
crosstown
can
actually
get
through?
Okay.
L
C
C
L
C
C
L
C
L
C
O
O
B
You
very
much
speaker
through
you
to
staff
I,
think
the
question
was
asked
by
a
councillor
Pasternak
regarding
funding
or
contribution
by
UFT
to
this
transit
line,
going
up
into
their
campus
and
beyond
what
the
York
University
contribute
with
respect
to
the
York
Region
line.
Did
they
contribute
any
funding
for
the
subway
expansion
through.
O
The
speaker,
no
York
University,
did
not
make
any
financial
contribution
towards
the
capital
costs
of
the
20
or
Spadina
subway
extension.
Why
was
that?
Well?
It
was
essentially
a
fully
funded
project
when
council
first
approved
it
back
in
2008.
The
contributions
were
made
by
the
province,
the
federal
government
as
well
as
York
Region,
and
it
was
fully
funded
so.
O
B
Right
I
just
want
to
turn
my
attention
to
what
I
would
call
them,
and
then
we
we've
heard
the
questions
around
the
transit
business
case,
but
it
seems
to
me
that
there
is
an
economic
development
case.
That's
here
as
well.
We
have
create
ta.
We
have
obviously
area
Toronto
real
estate,
we're
building
transit
in
an
area
where
there
should
be
a
another
component
part
to
this,
which
is
to
look
at
economic
development
and
that
opportunity.
B
Since
we
have
this
organization
create
geo,
are
we
looking
at
assembling
and
and
perhaps
acquiring
land,
as
we
look
at
this
great
plan
to
build
transit
into
this
area
so
that
we
could
actually
have
an
opportunity
where
revenue
generation
could
actually
help
us
as
a
city
and
help
our
system
in
terms
of
generating
revenues,
to
to
build
further
transit
lines?
Go.
A
D
B
When
will
this
plan,
or
this
business
case
as
it
relates
to
economic
development
and
this
expansion
of
transit
plan?
When
will
this
come
forward?
Will
this
come
forward
together
with
respect
to
the
transit
information
that
will
come
forward
to
the
detail
plan
later,
or
will
it
come
at
some
later
date?
We're.
A
M
M
A
M
Basically,
I'm
replacing
what
the
executive
committee
has
submitted
with
a
plan
to
move
forward
with
the
original
Master
Agreement
to
move
forward
with
the
seven
stop.
Lrt
then
put
our
money
where
our
mouths
are
use
the
savings
to
actually,
rather
than
pretend
we
have
a
funding
plan
for
the
Eglinton
East
crosstown
to
actually
fund
it
now
to
move
forward
with
serving
those
residents
to
U
of
T
Scarborough
and
having
a
more
efficient
way
to
extend
to
Malvern.
M
We
still
have
to
work
on
the
funding
together,
but
to
ensure
that
we
actually
save
them
commute
time
now.
I,
don't
believe
that
there's
anyone
in
this
room
who
doesn't
agree
that
we
need
to
support
the
Eglinton
across
town
east.
This
is
part
of
the
plan
that
I've
been
arguing
for,
which
is
the
24
stop
plan
that
would
see
seven
stops
replacing
the
RT
so
that
we
don't
just
lose
four
stations
on
the
RT
most
residents
in
Scarborough
I
hear
from
don't
even
know
that
and
provide
the
additional
17
stops
to
U
of
T
Scarborough.
M
What
this
would
also
do
and
I
just
want
to
show
you
a
map
by
saving
the
federal
dollars,
along
with
the
city
contribution,
could
I
have
this
up
on
the
screen.
Madam
Speaker
see
this
is
what
I
just
find
so
ridiculous
under
John
Tory's
plan.
Just
to
get
this
one-stop
subway,
we
would
actually
be
spending
hundreds
of
millions
of
dollars
to
go
the
wrong
way
to
get
to
Malvern
if
we
were
to
extend
there,
so,
in
other
words,
we'd
be
going
all
the
way
east.
That's
great.
M
You
have
see
Scarborough
and
then
going
back
West
to
get
to
Malvern
Town
Center,
when,
according
to
the
original,
a
proved
plan
that
already
has
not
only
it
even
has
a
station
completely
designed,
we
would
be
able
to
move
forward
with
the
plan
that
would
actually
save
Melbourne
residents
commute
time.
So,
in
other
words,
John
Tory's
plan.
The
executive
committee
plan
would
actually
leave
Melbourne
residents
on
the
bus
longer.
B
Speaker
I
respect,
councilman,
Lowe's
presentation
and
so
on,
but
he
keeps
referring
to
John
Tory
in
his
maher
tori
or
Mayor
John
Tory
I,
don't
believe
that
addressing
the
name
of
the
individual
in
that
particular
manner
is
appropriate.
I
think
that
respecting
the
quorum
and
the
decorum
in
this
environment
we
ought
to
use
the
proper
name,
and
maybe
just
ask
you
to
ask
no.
M
Think
meritorious
plan
is
fundamentally
wrong
and
believe
Melbourne
residents
on
the
bus
longer
it
also
unnecessarily
spends
over
a
billion
dollars
on
a
line.
It
unfund
a
plan
that
could
be
funded
now.
You
know,
I've
been
to
Melbourne
and
I.
Hear
residents
tell
me
number
one
that
they
don't
even
understand
the
differences
between
the
different
plans.
I've
heard
that
from
people
who
are
who
are
writing
the
arty.
Now,
who
don't
understand
that
mayor,
Tory
and
others
want
to
replace
for
the
stops?
L
M
I
and
I
believe
Melbourne
residents
would
be
ripped
off
by
this
plan.
The
plan
that's
being
suggested
by
the
executive
committee.
Today,
we
could
right
now
if
we
chose
to
move
forward
with
the
master
agreement
to
build
seven
stops
that
was
envisaged
under
the
original
plan
and
add
an
additional
eight
stopped
to
serve
Melvyn
residents.
M
If
we
choose
to
fund
it,
we
could
fund
now
with
the
savings
of
not
moving
forward
with
the
boondoggle
of
a
one-stop
subway
but
use
the
federal
and
city
contributions
to
move
forward
with
the
seventeen
stop
extension
to
U
of
T
Scarborough.
If
we
put
politics
aside
and
put
people
first,
we
would
do
the
right
thing.
Unfortunately,
this
council
isn't
prepared
to
do
the
right
thing,
but
I
hope
you
will
because
I
know
your
better
selves
want
to
notice
with
this
I
find
it
remarkable.
M
Do
you
remember
the
the
2016
briefing
note
by
the
TTC,
the
controversial
one
that
said
unequivocally
that
that
putting
an
LRT
platform
at
Kennedy
was
going
to
be
impossible?
To
paraphrase
they
said
it
couldn't
be
done
now,
all
of
a
sudden,
all
of
a
sudden,
they
say
that
it
could
be
done
easily.
It
could
be
done
within
twelve
months
now
that
this
is
something
that
the
mayor
supports,
and,
over
and
over
again,
every
time
that
I've
asked
for
information
by
from.
A
A
P
Speaker
I
consistently
hear
folks
saying
that
people
in
Malvern
don't
understand
the
plan.
They
don't
know
about
this
as
if
these
are
people
who
have
very
limited
knowledge
or
capacity
to
understand
this
thing.
So
if
it's
very
important
that
1990
66
people
signed
a
petition
to
extend
ethylene
in
East
LRT
from
Scarborough
campus
to
Malvern,
because
they
see
a
value
in
that
transit
project,
so
to
call
that
project
as
a
useless
way
or
a
kind
of
you
know.
The
same
folks
will
argue
that
there
are
a
lot
of
people.
P
Traveling
with
in
Scarborough
need
to
also
understand.
There
are
people
who
are
going
with
in
Scarborough
that
needs
that
extra
transit
options
as
well.
But
having
said
that,
it's
I
just
want
to
thank
Mayor,
John
Tory
and
the
executive
committee
and
all
the
staff
for
hearing
the
people
of
Malvern
to
be
connected
to
the
18e
East
LRT.
P
With
this
subway
extension
with
the
smart
rack,
we're
taking
in
East
alati
going
to
mal
word,
we
get
all
of
the
all
of
the
words
connected,
and
now
it
doesn't
mean
that
future
connectivity
from
malware
and
to
Shepherd
station
or
to
the
Shepherd
station
support
subway
extension
would
not
be
connected
later.
But
it
is
for
us
to
think
back
and
make
sure
that
we
have
a
network
of
transit
options
for
our
residents
in
Malvern.
Now
many
residents
in
Malvern
have
been
very
engaged
in
transit.
Our
transit
town
halls
have
had
people
come
out
and
speak.
P
Our
community
organisations
are
active
and
it's
to
say
that
the
communities
there
who
come
from
very
complex
political
environments
in
their
countries
of
origin,
who
have
had
extensive
knowledge
about
transit
systems
that
are
much
more
complex
than
this
to
be
calling
those
folks
as
people
who
do
not
understand
what
they're
getting
or
what
they're
losing
or
what
they.
What
is
better
for
them
is,
is
it's
a
bit
of
white,
splaining,
I,
would
say
and
I
think
it's
very
important
for
us
to
take
the
context.
P
If
folks
want
to
come,
door-knocking
with
me,
anytime
come
with
me
and
we
can
talk
about
transit
options
as
to
what
people
see,
because
extension
of
Scarborough
subway
is
part
of
the
network.
Extension
of
LRT
at
least
LRT
to
Malvern
is
part
of
the
network.
Smart
track,
yes,
I
think
once
we
get
all
of
these
three
things
as
I
said
earlier,
all
ten
words
within
scarborough
will
be
connected
to
hire
or
a
transit,
and
that's
what
all
of
us
in
scarborough
are
looking
forward.
P
A
A
A
C
Thank
you,
madam
Speaker
I
rise,
certainly
to
support
the
study.
That's
before
us.
The
recommendations
that
are
before
us
and
I
am
a
strong
supporter
of
getting
the
LRT
long
line
not
to
stop
and
dead
end
at
Kennedy
Road,
but
to
go
further
east
to
the
end
of
Eglinton,
so
that
someday
this
city
we
truly
will
have
a
crosstown.
C
We
have
a
project
now,
where
we're
spending
billions
of
dollars
on
what's
called
an
Eglinton
crosstown,
the
only
problem
with
the
Eglinton
crosstown.
It's
really
the
Eglinton
downtown,
because
the
Eglinton
crosstown
pokes
across
the
Scarborough
border
and
dead
ends
at
the
Scarborough
subway
station.
It
doesn't
reach
80%
of
the
people
who
live
in
Scarborough,
so
how
we
came
to
a
conclusion
that
an
LRT
line
that
dead
ends
just
across
the
board.
Our
Scarborough
is
actually
a
crosstown,
simply
isn't
true.
C
They
drive
past
the
GO
train
tracks
on
Lawrence
Avenue
up
on
Finch
Avenue,
because
it's
not
connected
Rotman,
some
of
them
in
those
locations.
Don't
even
have
stations
right
now,
but
once
we
open
up
those
smart
track
stations,
people
will
have
more
flexibility,
more
options
and
they'll
get
to
work
faster
thanks
to
smart
track.
Thanks
to
this
LRT
line,
and
thanks
to
the
subway
system
that
is
now
supported
by
the
provincial
NDP,
the
provincial
Progressive
Conservative
Party,
the
provincial
Liberal
Party,
as
well
as
the
federal
Liberals,
the
federal
NDP
and
the
federal
Conservatives.
C
C
There
are
many
other
places
for
many
reasons
that
have
intensified
before
Scarborough
has
that
have
been
built
out
before
Scarborough
that
have
been
able
to
attract
the
office
investment
that
brings
with
them
tens
of
thousands
of
jobs,
while
Scarborough
was
losing
tens
of
thousands
of
jobs
after
a
many
free
trade
agreements
and
I'll
call
it
globalization
of
production,
where
the
good
middle-class
jobs
that
we
used
to
have
the
van
plants
and
the
car
plants
that
we
used
to
have
in
Scarborough
all
closed
down.
So
we
have,
we
have
created.
C
C
When
we
invest
the
money
in
the
Scarborough
waterfront
trail,
we
will
finally
decades
after
amalgamation,
two
hundred
years,
I
guess
since
people
first
settled
this
area,
bring
this
city
together
and
connect
us
so
that
people
who
are
living
downtown
Toronto
can
get
on
a
bike
bicycle
out
to
the
strip.
Scarborough
Bluffs
for
a
picnic
go
through
the
the
meadow
way.
C
As
somebody
who
was
working
for
the
former
scrubber
budget
chief
for
nine
years
out
in
that
area,
I
have
heard
over
and
over
and
over
again
from
the
people
who
own
those
lands
from
the
investors
and
of
the
people
who
own
the
office
towers,
we
can't
compete
with
downtown
Toronto
we're
too
far
away.
We
are
not
an
attractive
place
for
investment
right
now,
because
we
are
too
far
away.
C
We
will
move
forward
with
this
project
and
when
all
of
my
colleagues
who
tell
me
over
and
over
and
over
again
how
much
they
don't
support
the
subway
project,
but
they
actually
support
the
LRT
LRT
project.
I
hope
when
it
actually
comes
time
to
vote,
to
invest
money
in
Scarborough.
Your
words
will
be
the
same.
Your
actions
will
be
the
same
as
your
words,
I
hope.
No
one
will
say
to
us
later
on.
You
know
what
I
always
said:
I
support
an
LRT
in
Scarborough.
D
C
Out
of
order,
but
I
think
going
back
to
the
the
Toronto
Transit
Commission
Scarborough
rabbit,
transit,
environmental
project.
2010
is
the
exact
same
thing:
that's
rejecting
the
subway
and
going
back
to
the
councillor
Motlow
proposal.
So
I
would
ask
that
you
rule
this
out
of
order.
It's
canceling
the
starve
or
subway
councillor.
Matt
Lao
will
tell
you
that
Matt
low
councilor,
Matt
low
will
tell
you
how
low
this
motion
is
and
that
it
does
in
fact
delete
the
subway.
A
A
A
This
meeting
is
now
resumed
before
the
recess
City
Council
completed
the
mayor's
first
key
item,
the
mayor's
second
key
item,
which
is
item
IX
34.2
and
on
the
Toronto
senior
strategy,
and
that
item
will
be
considered
with
item
ax,
34.3,
unimplemented,
tennis,
first,
creating
a
seniors
housing
unit,
Toronto,
Community,
Housing
and
transitioning
towards
the
seniors
house,
housing
and
service
in
the
city.
Before
we
begin
those
items
I
would
take.
The
release
of
member
holds.
K
E
D
A
K
A
A
A
Q
Yes,
I
do
I
think
those
surprised
that
we
were
mixing
up
the
two
things
but
I
guess
we
have
our
own
internal
senior
strategy.
So
in
looking
at
all
of
the
recommendations
for
the
X
I
guess
is
thirty,
four,
the
seniors
portfolio.
That's
currently
in
TC,
see
as
part
of
tenants.
First,
there
was
a
determination
in
the
report
that
it
would
migrate.
Is
that
correct.
Q
S
Through
the
speaker,
we
are
approaching
this
on
two
tracks:
the
first
in
response
to
the
housing
condition
or
the
the
lived
experience
for
seniors
in
TCH
C.
We
are
working
with
the
Lyn
and
TC
HC
and
community
partners
to
create
a
better
service
model
to
meet
the
needs
of
those
seniors.
That
work
will
happen
regardless
of
any
directions
in
this
report.
S
Along
with
that,
we
are
looking
at
the
governance
model
and
what
the
report
is
recommending.
Staff
advice
is
that
we
said
we
have
deeper
due
diligence
to
do
before
we're
in
a
position
to
recommend
to
council
any
shifts
in
the
portfolio.
That's
the
intention
behind
the
transition
team
recommended
in
the
report.
We
would
come
back
early
in
in
2019
with
a
firm
recommendation
on
how
to
proceed.
That
could
be
to
move
the
housing
units
the
14,000
units
out
of
TC
HC.
S
Q
S
That's
correct:
the
recommendation
before
council
is
to
direct
TCH
C
to
create
a
standalone
unit
reporting
directly
to
the
CEO
and
president
within
the
TC
HC
organization.
That
is
something
we
would
advise
to
help
us
with
that
new
service
model.
It
may
also
be
a
step
to
a
further
move.
We
would
come
back
with
that
advice
in
2019
and.
Q
Q
Q
S
Q
S
S
S
S
A
K
Sir
Davis
I'm
sorry
I'm
gonna
ask
go
over
the
same
ground
because
these
are
the
same
questions.
I
was
struggling
with
and
I
still
not
clear.
So
there's
two
reports
with
two
complimentary
recommendations.
One
is
the
senior
strategy
which
says
very
clearly
that
recommendation
one
is
to
initiate
a
process
to
develop
a
seniors,
housing
and
services
entity
at
the
city,
dedicated
to
taking
a
service
system
management
approach.
So
when
you
say
at
the
city,
what
does
that
mean.
S
K
Recommends
that
you
design
and
implement
a
new
integrated
service
model
for
seniors
housing
to
promote
Aging
in
Place,
better
quality
of
life
and
successful
tendencies
for
seniors
in
TC
HC.
So
this
also
establishes
a
new
and
separate
management
structure
within
TC
HC.
One
says
within
the
city
and
the
other
says
within
TC
HC.
So.
S
K
S
S
Will
be
working
internally
in
within
the
city,
because
we
need
to
look
at
our
city
structure
and
how
we're
organized
at
the
same
time.
We
will
then
once
the
units
established
in
TC
HC,
once
we've
done
our
work
internally,
we
will
come
back
to
Council
with
a
recommendation
with
respect
to
the
next
step
and
the.
S
S
So,
on
page
13
of
the
report,
there's
actually
a
graphic
that
gives
you
the
continuum
of
the
second
report.
The
tenants
first
report,
yes
at
one
end
of
the
continuum,
is
where
we
are
a
service
system
manager,
with
oversight
through
contracts
at
the
other
end
is
where
we're
directly
delivering
everything.
The
work
before
staff
that
the
council
will
be
directing
us
to
do
is
to
do
the
undertake
the
due
diligence,
the
design
to
come
back
with
the
heart
advice,
to
counsel
about
which
end
of
this
continuum
we
should
be
headed
towards,
but
at
the.
K
End
of
the
day,
if
any
of
these
services
are
funded
by
why
the
problems
that
fall
clearly
within
provincial
jurisdiction,
so
are
we
contemplating
taking
on?
Because
there
was
a
motion,
I
guess,
counsel,
my
havoc
move
demotion
to
take
on
look
at
potentially
taking
on
service
system
management
for
long
term
care.
Is
that
part
of
this
as
well
through.
S
S
S
J
You
madam
Speaker,
to
mr.
Bollinger,
so
that
this
report
addresses
issues
of
housing
of
finance,
talks
about
dental
provisions,
active
living
fares,
but
there's
we
just.
We
just
approved
all
kinds
of
allocation
allocations
for
community
groups
to
help
at-risk
youth
and
so
on
and
in
impoverished
neighborhoods.
There's!
Nothing
in
here.
Correct
me.
If
I'm
wrong,
there's
nothing
that
in
here
that
addresses
the
issue
of
sort
of
loneliness,
that
seniors
feel
and
isolation,
and
we
have
a.
We
have
an
entire.
You
know:
Recreation
Department
in
the
City
of
Toronto
and
I
thought.
J
S
The
senior
strategy
2.0
does
talk
about
active
living,
centers
and
the
city
is
involved
with
the
province
and
the
expansion
of
that
program.
There
were
a
number
of
new
centers
funded.
We
are
also
working
with
provincial
colleagues
and
local
health
integration
network
colleagues
to
figure
out
how
we
pull
those
investments
together,
leverage
the
octave,
Living
Centers,
potentially
in
TC
HC
communities,
to
address
exactly
that.
So,
but
you.
J
S
S
J
Given
the
given
the
the
demographic
picture,
that's
portrayed,
which
of
course,
is
factual,
growing
seniors
population.
Do
you
think
that
this
goes
far
enough
in
addressing
that
very
important
issue?
Really,
it's
seniors
mental
health?
Do
you
think
that
this
goes
far
enough
or
could
we
be
doing
more?
Should
we
be
channeling,
you
know
more
efforts
and
really
it's
a
manpower.
It's
about
getting
people
out
of
their
homes
and
getting
them
into.
You
know
a
sort
of
a
social
network
through.
S
Speaker
the
recommendations
in
the
two
reports
I
believe
position
us
to
be
doing
that
doing
the
system
level.
Thinking
so
we're
making
smart
investments.
We
will
likely
need
more
resources
as
time
goes
on,
but
we
need
to
be
very
strategic
and
intentional
about
where
those
investments
are
occurring.
So.
J
It's
just
a
like
you're,
calm,
I'm,
just
gonna
refer
to
the
survey.
I
think
that
the
survey
you
know
you
know
it
I.
Imagine
it's
somewhat
helpful.
It
paints
a
little
bit
of
a
portrayal,
but
you
didn't
ask
you
know
a
question
of
happiness.
Are
you
happy
with
your
existence?
Are
you
happy
with
your
life?
Are
you
happy
with
city
services
thing
you
know.
What
is
your
satisfaction
level
with?
Do
you
think
that
that
would
have
been
a
worthwhile
question?
S
The
speaker
I
I,
would
we
didn't
include
that
kind
of
question.
We
did
work
with
dr.
semir
who's,
the
provincial
lead
Sinha
on
this
on
this
work
and
the
local
health
integration
Network.
So
we
were
aware
of
health
issues
and
undertaking
the
work
I,
don't
think
we
were
clear
on
what
we
would
do
with
the
answer
to
that
kind
of
question.
I
think
that
maybe
something
we
dig
into
more
deeply
and
as
we
go
along
okay.
J
So
my
last
question
is
a
little
bit
about
the
way
the
report
is
written
on
the
first
page.
It
refers
to
people
living
with
privilege,
so
my
mother,
my
mother,
came
to
the
City
of
Toronto
and
when
she
was
17,
she
was
raised
in
small
town.
Ontario
and
you
know
had
you
know.
Had
no
university
education
lived
above
a
store
for
her
first
17
years,
got
a
job
in
Toronto
eventually
raised
a
family.
Would
you
say
that
she
was
a
woman
of
privilege.
S
The
senior
strategy,
and
actually
any
work
that
we
do
looks
at
needs
within
the
population
relative
to
other
parts
of
the
population.
So
in
fact
an
individual
who
has
economic
impact
or
in
independence,
access
to
economic
resources
would
have
privilege
that
many
others
don't
have.
So
in
that
context,.
H
S
The
speaker
so
you're
referring
to
34.3.
Yes,
there
has
been
a
tenant,
Advisory
Group
involved
with
tenants.
First
from
the
very
beginning,
the
process
to
create
that
group
was
very
open.
We
worked
with
TCH,
see
many
of
the
members
of
the
tenant
advisory
committee
actually
were
at
executive
committee
and
previous
on
previous
reports.
S
S
H
Just
a
question
sorry
going
on
is
a
bit
of
different
tangent
building
in
my
ward,
855
Rose
law
and
classic
story
of
what
was
not
officially
a
seniors
building,
but
a
seniors
building
that
then
the
demographics
changed
dramatically
and
there's
significant
issues
now
in
the
building,
with
the
kind
of
a
mixed
population
of
tennis,
one
of
things
we've
identified.
Is
this
sir?
There's
a
preamble
to
this
question.
There's
a
lot
of
agencies
underneath
the
line'
who's
Capote
are
supposedly
serving
this
building,
but
it's
hard
to
determine
whether
they're
actually
doing
anything.
H
S
Is
very
much
through
the
speaker
that
is
very
much
the
focus
of
our
conversation
with
the
Lynn,
both
the
Lynn
and
city,
stop
understand
that
we
need
to
do
a
better
job
of
identifying
who
is
funded,
to
provide
services
and
at
a
specific
address,
and
how
the
coordination
and
the
communication
with
tenants
and
TCH
see
is
happening
in
those
buildings.
That's
exactly
the
model
development
were.
H
S
H
S
H
Have
we
ever
gone
through
it,
I
can
almost
like
an
asset
and
that
being
exercised
where
a
local
councillor
or
a
resident
or
tenant
could
point
to
and
see.
Clearly
the
at
least
the
agencies
who
purport
to
serve
the
building
they
live
in
or
the
building
where
their
constituents
live.
Does
that
does
that
exist
and
is
that
exercise
been
carried
out?
That's.
S
H
S
R
S
R
That's
interesting
because
I
had
heard
something
to
the
contrary,
but
I'm
glad
that
I
have
this
opportunity
to
ask
you
that,
and
you
have
clarified
for
me
my
next
question
and
I'm
not
sure
if
it's
to
you
but
I'll
direct
it
to
the
Deputy
Speaker
and
it
can
be
directed
to
the
appropriate
staff
but
I'm
just
wondering
about
fire
safety.
Physical
safety
in
some
of
our
buildings,
in
particular
in
the
seniors
buildings
and
I'm,
just
wondering
what
role
does
city
staff
play
outside
of
the
fire
department
like
the
through
sha
or
as
dfa?
S
F
Certainly
through
the
chair,
as
as
our
colleagues
said,
TFS
F
over
the
last
number
of
years,
councillor
has
certainly
worked
very
closely
with
s
sha
on
this
file
and
as
well
as
our
new
chair,
mismo
milsim,
and
the
new
board
with
TCH.
So
certainly
the
service
level
in
terms
of
fire
safety
inspection
councillor
since
May
of
16
has
increased.
As
you're
aware,
we
have
committed
to
conduct
full
inspections
of
originally
came
out
of
the
Neilson
Road
fire.
So
as
of
May
16,
every
seniors
TCH
Building
has
received
a
full
fire.
Safety
inspection
has
been
pre-planned.
F
R
Just
wondering
if
like
we
continue
to
have,
for
example,
in
a
senior's
building,
elevator
issues
in
seniors
buildings
in
a
high-rise
and
it's
been
reported,
the
fire
department's
been
there
I've
been
there
for
example,
and
continue
to
experience
issues
with
an
elevator
I'm,
just
wondering:
where
does
the
city
come
in
on
this,
since
we?
Actually,
it
is
our
facility,
as
a
city
I'm,
just
wondering
at
what
point
are
we
going
to
get
an
elevator
fixed,
I?
Look,
what
is
it
going
to
take
since
we
have?
R
F
Again
through
the
chair,
the
issue
of
elevator
fire
safety
actually
was
a
result,
resulted
in
a
intial
Technical
Advisory
Committee
that
was
struck.
Last
year,
city
of
Toronto
was
asked
to
sit
on
that
committee.
We
have
provided
comments.
I
know
there
was
a
draft
regulation
that
unfortunately
died
on
the
order
paper,
the
last
day
of
provincial
government,
so
we
we
certainly
had
input
into
that
councilor.
F
The
recommendations
certainly
were
an
improvement
in
light
of
what
the
limited
powers
we
do
have
under
the
fire
code
now
for
elevators,
it's
that
split
between
the
technical
standards,
Safety
Authority,
which
has
installation
and
maintenance
in
and
then
certainly
our
role
under
the
elevator
requirements.
So,
unfortunately,
the
the
regulation
did
die,
we're
hoping,
whichever
government
comes
back,
it
does
adopt
it
and
then
we
would
enforce
those
new
regulations.
Okay,.
A
You
just
a
question
not
to
staff.
Now
as
you're
aware
I'm,
a
1901
Western
Road
I
have
the
York
West
active
Senior
Center
that
have
been
there
for
years
and
I've
been
working
with
them
and
they're
doing
exactly
what
we're
recommending
in
this
report.
So
can
you
tell
me
and
you're
familiar
with
them
Chris
so?
Would
you
tell
me
what
they're
doing
in
1901
Western
Road
would
be
a
model
for
other
seniors
buildings
in
the
city
through.
S
The
Deputy
Speaker
yes,
that
address,
is
a
very
good
example
of
where
we
have
a
seniors
active
living
center,
funded
by
both
the
city
and
the
province,
providing
services
easily
accessible
to
the
tenants
of
that
building
and
to
the
local
community,
because
it's
important
in
this
conversation
that
it's
not
just
about
meeting
the
needs
of
those
seniors
in
their
own
building,
but
encouraging
the
interaction
with
their
local
community.
It's
a
it's
a
very
good
example
of
where
the
model
has
developed.
Naturally,
that's
what
we're
looking
to
recreate
so.
A
C
M
You
so
I
have
a
motion:
it's
just
a
an
amendment
to
recommendations,
9
and
15
to
support
what
is
a
provincial
II
supported
initiative
to
create
more
cohesive
communities
that
supports
social
inclusion,
such
as
the
Oasis
program
in
Kingston.
This
is
a
funded
program
by
the
provincial
government
and
just
just
to
to
extend
a
little
bit
more
on
that
there
are
models
that
we're
learning
about,
such
as
Oasis
and
it's
going
to
be
tested
in
400,
Walmer
and
Kallstrom
Havoc's
Ward's.
M
M
There
are
far
too
many
seniors
in
our
city
today
who
are
not
included
in
our
communities,
and
what
we
know
to
be
true
is
that
anyone
who
is
feeling
lonely
and
isolated
their
longevity
has
impacted
their
quality
of
life.
Their
health
today
is
impacted
and
that's
not
anything
we'd
want
for
our
own
parents
or
anyone.
We
love
so
to
support
communities
that
can
foster
that
sense
of
cohesion
and
opportunity
for
people
to
stay
engaged
in
their
own
lives,
along
with
their
own
community
I.
Think
it's
critically
important.
It's
thing
that
we
should
support.
M
M
It's
not
just
it's
sort
of
collectively
the
the
work
that
we
did
on
the
initial
senior
strategy.
I
thought
was
incredibly
important
and
incredibly
substantive
and
we
were
able
to
address
not
roughly
99%
of
all
those
recommendations
and
then
the
next
phase
of
the
strategy
has
really
been
sort
of
a
living
document,
as
we've
worked
with
remarkable
group
of
people,
whether
it
be
the
Toronto
seniors
forum,
the
accountability
table
the
expert
panel,
dr.
M
We
also
have,
through
the
accountability
table,
made
sure
that
we've
had
started
with
roughly
13.
It's
gone
to
about
60
different
stakeholders,
primary
stakeholders
across
the
city
to
come
together,
interdivisional
e
and
through
various
sectors
to
hold
our
feet
to
the
fire
so
that
we
continue
to
do
better
on
our
strategy.
We've
been
recognized
by
the
provincial
government,
we've
been
recognized
by
the
World
Health
Organization
on
this
initiative
and
I'm
very
proud
of
the
work
that
we've
done
and
I
really
appreciate
your
ongoing
support
as
a
council.
M
We've
we've
referred
to
seniors
that
way
they,
but
they
are
quickly
becoming
us
in
the
next
20
years.
One
in
five
of
us
are
going
to
be
over
the
age
of
65
and
that
demographic
is
going
to
continue
to
grow.
So
what
I,
really
respect
about
the
work
that
we're
doing
together
is
that,
rather
than
reacting
to
a
change
in
demographics
and
a
change
in
our
society
that
we
need
to
address
we're
working
proactively
to
make
sure
that
we
create
an
age-friendly
society.
What
does
that
mean?
M
It
means
that
we're
supporting
seniors,
but
by
doing
so
we're
also
supporting
young
parents
who
are
pushing
the
stroller
and
want
an
accessible
City,
we're
supporting
a
middle-aged
person
in
a
wheelchair
who
wants
a
caring,
respectful
and
inclusive
and
accessible
City.
We're
supporting
all
of
us
together,
so
I
really
just
wanted
to
acknowledge
and
it
by
the
way
in
crisp,
schillinger,
I
I
should
never
forget
Chris
for
the
leadership
that
he's
provided
along
with
our
acting
city
manager
and
everyone
else.
Who's
worked
together
towards
supporting
the
school.
So
thank
you
very
much.
M
D
Q
Q
Gosling
died
and
I
know,
councillor
Frankie
raucous
spoke
at
her
executive
about
the
two
deaths,
the
fire
deaths
at
greenwood
towers.
We
have
more
than
one
motion.
I'm
sorry
I
have
a
second
motion,
Thank
You
speaker
so
good,
and
that
is
to
request
a
status
update
on
recommendation
number
four
in
July
and
I'll
come
back
to
that
in
a
second.
So
the
first
one
is
just.
What
are
we
doing?
How
well
are
we
doing?
Let's
get
this
unit
together?
It
is
interim
and
I
was
pleased
to
hear
mr.
Q
brill
enger'
say
that
it
would
allow
the
city
to
have
a
little
bit
more
oversight.
That
has
been
the
goal
of
as
far
as
I
know,
tenants,
first
and
the
city
staff,
our
deputy
city
manager,
and
now
our
acting
city
manager
and
many
counselors,
that
we
are
much
clearer
on
what
Toronto
Community
Housing
is
doing,
particularly
when
we're
dealing
with
seniors
and
as
I
said,
2008
big
changes
were
made
in
dealing
with
seniors
and
units
contracted
out.
Q
Services
were
sent
to
the
seniors
building
with
the
thinking
that
they
were
easier
to
deal
with,
and
we've
had
a
lot
of
problems
because
they're
many
vulnerable
seniors
I'm
not
going
to
hold
my
breath
for
the
lens
I
can't
hold
my
breath
for
the
lens,
because
at
the
Hope
shelter
and
our
mayor
came
to
announced
that
the
lens
would
be
providing
funding
for
a
health.
A
nurse
practitioner
for
those
in
the
shelter
for
our
new
model
and
I
think
we
were
there.
It
was
very
cold
mr.
Q
mayor
it
might
have
been
February
and
the
money
was
on
the
way.
There
is
still
not
a
penny,
not
a
penny
in
the
model
for
assert
health
service
provider
at
our
shelter,
despite
the
fact,
but
being
our
new
model
and
the
Lin
saying
they
were
going
to
provide
that.
So,
let's
not
put
too
many
eggs
in
that
basket.
Q
We
have
to
drive
this
ourselves,
and
the
second
thing
I
want
to
do
is
just
have
a
report
back
in
July
before
we
go
on
our
hiatus,
leading
through
to
the
next
January
for
those
of
us
returning
and
those
of
us
not
coming
back,
but
we
should
know
exactly
how
many
housing
providers
might
be
able
to
take
advantage
of
some
of
these
homes.
Many
of
them
are
actually
ready
to
be
inhabited.
I.
Q
Remember
a
number
of
years
ago,
wigwam
on
which
is
a
native
Aboriginal
housing
provider
was
able
to
take
advantage
of
a
whole
number
of
single-family
homes,
that's
their
model
of
operation.
There
are
many
people
in
many
housing
providers
that
is
their
model.
They
use
single-family
homes,
EQ
home
uses
single-family
homes.
Instead,
co-op
uses
single
family
homes
wigwam
and
uses
single
family
homes.
There
are
a
lot
of
people
that
do.
We
are
not
very
good
at
the
business
of
single
family
homes,
so
we
have
a
lot
of
people
on
the
waiting
list.
Q
I
Redesignated
as
a
seniors
housing,
which
it
was
at
one
point,
we
have
215
bachelor
units
in
this
building
out
of
294
units.
We
have
families
living
in
these
bachelor
units,
which
is
simply
not
a
credible
housing
setup
for
in
any
in
any
definition,
I
think
it's
time
to
redress
what
we've
done
and
correct
the
error
of
having
designated
3
215
bachelor
units
as
family
units
I
think
that
it's
time
to
return
the
building
to
its
original
intent
and
that
it
be
an
actual
seniors
building.
I
H
A
H
H
K
K
We
are,
though,
as
everyone
knows,
the
largest
landlord.
We
probably
have
the
largest
seniors
population
of
any
institution,
certainly
in
the
province,
and
we
have
a
stake
in
making
sure
that
seniors
are
housed
properly
and
they
provide
are
provided
with
the
supports
that
they
need
to
remain
independent
and
to
assist
families
in
navigating
the
system.
K
So
I
hope
that
we're,
if
we're
going
to
develop
a
citywide
plan,
starting
with
those
units
that
belong
to
us
and
the
services
that
belong
to
us
and
then
figure
out
the
other
pieces,
how
they
can
be
brought
in
to
a
more
coordinated
approach
to
services,
then
I
think
we
have
to
be
looking.
System-Wide
and
I
know
that
that's
a
role
we've
given
create
you
know
in
in
its
new
in
its
new
role,
so
I
will
be
supporting
it.
K
Since
then
it's
been
very
hard
to
get
the
kind
of
supports.
We
need
for
those
seniors
that
have
multiple
issues
to
contend
with
everything
from
bedbugs
to
the
ability
to
care
for
themselves.
So
my
biggest
worry
is
that
once
again
we're
entering
into
an
area
where
there
is
joint
jurisdiction
and
that
sometimes,
when
we
want
to
solve
these
issues,
we
take
on
much
broader
responsibilities
and
without
sufficient
funds
and
without
sufficient
funds
as
well
I'm
concerned
there
is
one
staff
person
and
I
hope.
Mr.
brill
enger'
is
listening.
K
I
have
a
great
deal
of
concern
about
funding
this
properly,
so
I
would
urge
you,
when
the
budget
comes
to,
please
put
in
more
than
one
staff
person
like
this
is
a
huge
huge
undertaking.
It's
complicated,
multi-divisional
multi-age
see
em
City,
so
it's
going
to
have
to
take
someone
with
tremendous
support
and
with
authority
to
move
this
thing
forward.
So
please
make
sure
that
we
come.
We
have
the
resources
to
actually
make
this
project
a
success.
N
You,
madam
Speaker
I,
am
delighted
to
see
this
report,
given
that
I
have
eight
seniors
buildings
in
Ward
28,
so
I'm
pleased
to
support
the
recommendations
of
the
seniors
strategy
and
the
tenants
first
seniors
housing
unit
report,
older
Torontonians,
often
face
challenges
in
securing
and
maintaining
good
housing,
but
seniors
our
district
court
disproportionately
affected
by
poverty,
facing
increased
vulnerability
to
precarious
housing
and
safety
issues.
Creating
a
new
and
separate
seniors
unit
with
an
integrated
service
model
gives
the
necessary
focus
to
seniors
housing
within
the
vast
and
complex
tcht
portfolio.
N
Ward
28
has
a
large
number
of
TCH
C
seniors
buildings
and
our
communities
of
older
people
need
the
increased
supports
and
resources
that
will
be
provided
by
the
restructuring.
There
are
concrete
actions
in
the
report
that
I
can
see
will
get
results
for
our
residents
first,
even
within
lore
28,
our
senior
buildings
are
spread
out
across
large
distances.
Staff
support
for
residents
is
limited
due
to
being
stretched
out
across
many
different
buildings.
N
Creating
an
integrated
service
model
for
this
pro
folio
will
provide
the
structure
and
training
for
staff,
so
that
residents
have
fewer
hoops
to
jump
through
to
get
results.
The
integrated
service
model
moves
us
toward
real
wraparound
service
for
our
vulnerable
seniors.
I
am
pleased
that
this
model
commits
to
creating
the
supports
to
implement
the
program,
dedicating
staff
support
services
and
resources
that
will
connect
seniors
to
health
care
and
networks
as
well.
The
development
of
Senior
hubs
in
our
TCH
C
buildings
is
an
important
step,
bringing
better
services
to
our
older
residents.
N
Embedding
these
hubs
in
local
buildings,
through
partnerships
with
other
governments
and
organizations,
will
help
serve
our
TCH
C
residents,
as
well
as
all
other
seniors
in
need.
I
also
want
to
highlight
one
recommendation
in
senior
strategies
that
are
particularly
happy
to
see
that
I'm
happy
to
see,
recommend
recommendation
27,
which
focus
on
creating
Toronto
Police
Services
training
around
raising
awareness
of
aging
related
issues.
N
It
also
aims
to
create
additional
capacity
for
Public
Relation
campaigns
on
improving
the
safety
and
security
of
our
seniors.
This
is
an
issue
that
has
been
ongoing
with
our
seniors
and
their
safety
is
really
a
priority.
I'd
like
to
thank
city
staff
and
T
C
HC
staff
for
their
work
on
these
important
recommendations
and
I
also
want
to
acknowledge
the
importance
of
the
TC
HC
engagement
process
in
creating
these
plans
through
their
lived
experience.
N
T
Thank
you
so
much
Speaker
I
have
a
motion
which
is
on
the
on
the
screen
there.
It's
it's
sort
of
self-explanatory
and,
and
the
reason
I
do
this
speaker
is
this
particular
building
and
was
built
and
and
was
what
a
former
metropolitan
Toronto
seniors
building
it
was
built.
You
know
with
with
bachelors
with
a
common
room.
T
We
should
we
should
find
a
way
to
to
to
make
their
existence
their
existence
somewhat
more
pleasurable
and
in
what
this.
What
this
has
done,
what
this
change
in
policy
has
done,
as
actually
put
them
into
a
position
where,
where
we
have
made
their
quality
of
life
much
much
worse
and
and
we
didn't-
we
didn't-
have
to
do
that
and
so
I'm
hoping
that
people
will
support
this
motion
and-
and
we
can
take
a
look
at
this
building,
one
more
time-
the
the
North,
where
departments
there
on
Onkyo
Street.
Thank
you
so
much
speaker.
M
Madam's
figure
of
it
is
the
same
thing
of
councillor.
Prutas
I
would
I.
Would
you
know
ask
respectfully
to
my
my
friends
councillor?
Are
you
marrying
house
for
coal
and
anyone
else
who
would
move
sort
of
an
ad-hoc
motion
today
with
specific
with
regard
to
specific
buildings
and
their
wards?
First
of
all,
have
you
I?
M
Don't
doubt
your
sincerity
and
your
advocacy
for
the
residents
there?
No
doubt
but
have
you
discussed
the
consequences
and
the
impacts
of
if
this
motion
was
approved
today,
with
with
with
staff
to
understand
you
know,
does,
does
this
in
particular,
you
know
building
Meritage
will
it
have
impacts
on
the
waiting
list
for
others
to
access?
Has
this
been
really
thought
out,
or
is
this
more
of
a
sort
of
something
needs
to
be
done
cry
for
help
kind
of
motion,
yeah
I.
T
Think
it's
it
I
think.
Fundamentally,
it's
all
of
those
things
and
I
really
wanted
to
take
up
sort
of
not
have
my
time
take
up
more
than
two
minutes
and
I
try
to
keep
my
speech
under
two
minutes,
as
you
know,
so
that
you
know
people
wouldn't
say:
hey
Bruce
was
taking
up
time
over
here
come
but
yes,
absolutely
with
the
staff
over
the
years.
This
has
been
an
ongoing
issue
and
there
has
been
ongoing
dialogue
around
this.
So
what
happened?
T
Is
this
councillor
Matlock
yeah,
so
these
buildings
sort
of
when
they
were
transferred
into
the
Toronto
Community
Housing
portfolio
of
buildings?
This
came
from
Metro,
it
was
a
senior's
building.
It
was
a
completely
exclusively
a
senior's
complex.
It
did
get
how
seniors
it's
fundamentally
built
for
seniors
of
hundreds.
T
T
Majority
of
the
residents
are
still
seniors
correct.
It
was
but
but
bringing
in
a
small
minority
that
that
mixes
it
up
in
some
of
these
neighborhoods,
like
sort
of
this
Jane
Finch
it
it
creates
a
dynamic
which
makes
the
lively,
which
makes
life
for
seniors
very,
very
difficult,
ie
drugs
prostitution
it
brings
in
it,
brings
in
elements
into
the
into
this
into
the
into
the
lifestyle
of
seniors.
That
becomes
very,
very
difficult
for
them
to
to
deal
with.
So
so
what
you
have
is
you
have
these
seniors?
Who
basically
now
are
forced
to?
T
T
A
H
Thank
you,
madam
Speaker.
Here's
my
motion,
I
hold
it
in
my
hand.
It
can't
be
placed
on
the
screen
because
I
didn't
move
it
I'll
just
speak
to
so
my
motion
was
gonna,
be
very
similar
to
councilor
prutas
and
councillor
Audrey
Mary's
and
Spiti
55
Roselawn,
a
building
that
as
exactly
the
same
challenge,
is
largely
a
senior's
building
for
decades.
H
You
know
a
few
noble
programs
like
streets
of
homes
and
others
who
put
tenants
in
there
with
no
supports
who
completely
change
the
complexion
of
the
building,
to
the
point
where,
as
an
example,
this
past
summer,
we've
had
three
suicide
attempts.
Two
tragically
successful
numerous
drug
dealers
who
have
been
arrested
or
not
on
many
floors.
We
found
a
puppy
mill
recently.
We
we
just
as
a
building
that
is
in
a
situation
where,
quite
literally
seniors
will
not
participate
any
of
the
programs.
They
won't
leave
their
units
unit,
takeovers
or
rampant.
H
The
motion
I
expect
that
that
this
is
something
that
has
certainly
I've
already
been
advocating
for
and
trying
to
get
the
Lynn's
involved,
trying
to
get
TCH
involved
and-
and
we
have
to
do
more
and
that's
why
my
questions
were
about
you
know
how
do
we
actually
hold
these
agencies
to
account
who
purport
to
serve
these
buildings?
You
know
you
see
lots
of
lists.
Sadly,
when
three
people
tried
to
kill
themselves
in
this
building,
we
had
lots
of
people
deploy
and
big
lists
on
the
wall
of
all
the
people
who
age
ensues.
H
That
kind
of
slipped
through
and
they're
in
the
cracks
they're,
not
seniors
buildings
technically,
but
they
have
all
those
needs.
They've
got
to
be
treated
that
way.
They've
got
to
be
treated
better
and
and
by
every
measure
we
are
failing
our
tenants
in
buildings
like
at
8:55
Rosalyn.
Thank
you,
madam
Speaker.
Thank.
A
E
Q,
madam
speaker,
right
I
just
wanted
to
express
some
concern
with
some
of
the
motions
that
are
amending
the
portfolio
of
buildings.
We
don't
have
the
benefit
of
a
staff
reporter
advice
on
the
appropriateness
of
this
I
think
if
it
was
one
thing,
if
we
had
a
request
here
to
have
a
report
back
on
the
feasibility
of
adding
some
of
these
buildings
to
the
seniors
portfolio,
but
I'm
not
comfortable
in
supporting
some
of
the
motions
that
are
that
are
written
as
they
are
today.
E
A
D
D
D
Councillor
Giorgio,
please
councillor
McMahon
councillor,
wong-tam
remembers.
We
cancel
the
vote
and
restart
it,
so
your
buttons
may
be
lit
up
elsewhere.
You
said
please:
counselor
Carmichael
grab
Thank
You
councillor
mallow,
please
councillor
Kelly
councillor
carriage
Anna's
in
councillor,
Thompson.