►
From YouTube: City Council - July 27, 2018 - Part 1 of 2
Description
City Council, meeting 44, July 27, 2018 - Part 1 of 2
Agenda and background materials:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=13094
Part 2 of 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLcsuHwDjzY#t=9m10s
Meeting Navigation:
0:15:45 - Meeting resume
A
Okay,
thank
you,
memories
account.
So
if
you
can,
please
take
your
seats,
this
meeting
is
now
resumed
members
of
council.
We
will
now
review
and
confirm
the
order
paper
to
this
point.
Council
is
completed
454
items.
There
are
15
items
left
on
the
agenda.
Today's
meeting
must
end
by
7:30
p.m.
under
councils
policy
of
ending
meetings
before
sundown
on
Fridays
to
permit
religious
observance.
A
Members
before
I
take
the
release
a
member
holds
I
wish
to
rule
on
item
T
34
point
148
on
traffic
management
plan
for
Glenn
Road.
It
has
been
brought
to
my
attention
that
several
the
recommendations
on
that
item
are
delegated
to
community
council
not
promptly
before
City
Council.
As
a
result,
I
am
ruling
that
only
recommendation
to
to
install
pedestrian
cross
over
on
a
TTC
route
is
in
order.
The
balance
of
the
recommendations
are
on
compulsory
and
all
always
stop.
A
E
A
G
H
I
I
A
D
A
A
E
D
E
F
On
a
point
of
order,
as
you
know,
the
mayor
has
introduced
a
an
urgent
issue.
One
of
the
things
we
need
to
be
mindful
of
is
that
the
current
registration
deadline
is
at
p.m.
today.
This
council
needs
to
get
its
thinking
in
order
on
what
to
do
about
that
before
2
p.m.
today,
for
example,
I
have
been.
It
has
been
suggested
to
me
that
the
deadline
for
running
for
mayor
closes
it
too,
despite
the
Premier's
announcement.
J
A
K
On
a
point
of
order,
I
don't
understand
why
we're
reordering
the
order
paper
we
just
adopted
it.
I
I,
don't
understand
what
all
this
speculation
is.
We've
got
business
before
us.
We
need
to
move
on
with
it.
If
somebody's
worried
about
a
looming
deadline,
that's
been
around
for
a
year,
I,
don't
understand
why
it's
an
issue
with
minutes
to
go
and.
A
M
K
D
N
E
So
I
stood
up
and
asked
if
we
were
going
to
be
continuing
with
the
agenda
that
we
started
five
days
ago.
Monday
and
I
was
told
yes,
because
I
have
a
number
of
important
issues:
constituent
based
and
citywide
issues
that
we've
been
working
through
an
agenda
and
now
it's
being
proposed
to
change
it.
I,
don't
understand.
I
was
told
by
the
chair
that
we
were
working
through
the
agenda
and
finishing
our
work
as
a
city
council,
you're.
A
E
Vote
so
my
question
is:
there's
developments
before
us
that
we
haven't
addressed
that
our
time
sensitive?
Is
there
any
chance?
We
would
run
out
of
time
today
that
the
end
of
the
day
would
come
I
believe
at
7:00
7:30
that
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
complete
the
agenda
items
before
us
that
affect
our
neighborhoods.
Our
wards
in
our
communities
well,.
A
F
F
K
You,
madam
Speaker
I,
would
just
urge
council
to
focus
on
our
business
at
hand,
which
is
the
order
paper
I'm,
not
really
sure
why
there
is
this
mad
rush
now
to
try
to
reorder
things
to
try
to
accommodate
speculation
on
legislation
that
may
be
forthcoming.
All
there
was
was
a
press
announcement,
that's
what
it
was
this
morning
and
suddenly
now
people
are
twisting
into
pretzels
to
try
to
reorganize
things
around
a
deadline
at
2
o'clock
today,
which
is
the
closing
of
the
nominations
which
has
been
in
place
for
months
and
months
and
months.
K
So
I'm
not
really
sure
why
there's
suddenly
a
crisis
right
now
if
people
were
intending
to
sign
up
for
an
election
which
is
still
you
know,
which
is
still
going
forward
because
I'm
going
to
just
not
despite
an
announcement
I,
don't
know
why
we
have
to
reorder
to
a
paper
to
have
a
debate
in
the
next
couple
of
minutes.
Let's
proceed
with
the
the
the
information
before
us:
let's
get
through
the
15
decisions,
we
failed
to
make
last
night
and
then
get
on
with
business
before
council.
Thank.
D
D
I
think
it's
fair
to
say
that
there
is
no
more
urgent
matter
affecting
the
lives
of
the
residents
of
this
city,
then,
as
it
relates
to
what
the
terms
and
protocols
and
practices
will
be
for
this
election,
an
election
that
has
a
filing
deadline
at
2
p.m.
perhaps,
and
so
to
not
respect
the
thousands
of
Torontonians
who
are
either
already
running
or
have
concerns
with
this
by
us.
Dealing
with
this
urgent
matter
seems
to
me
like
we
would
be
putting
our
heads
in
the
sand.
D
A
O
N
J
J
J
This
doesn't
tell
me
much
I
want
to
understand
with
questions
of
the
clerk
I
want
to
understand
what
the
implications
are
of
the
announcement
and
whether
or
not
an
election
is
even
possible
on
the
short
timelines
that
that
we've
heard
about
I
think
it's
extremely
important
to
deal
with
this
as
our
top
item.
So
please
members,
you
know
the
entire
community
is
waiting
to
see
what
the
mayor
intends
to
do
and
I
saw
an
announcement
this
morning
and
I
have
of
him
as
well.
P
You,
madam
Speaker
I,
believe
that
we
should
just
proceed
with
the
the
business
at
hand
and
yes
discuss
the
mayor
of
the
mayor's
motion
in
a
due
course.
The
reality
is
that
the
deadline
for
signing
up
to
run
is
2
p.m.
if
there
is
any
legislation
coming
forward.
That
alters
that
it's
outside
of
our
control.
You
know,
there's
nothing.
We
can
do
about
it.
The
legislation
will
come
next
week.
Perhaps,
and
if
it's
retroactive
and
says
you
know,
by
the
way
the
fact
that
people
signed
up
by
2:00
p.m.
P
that's
all
history,
we
now
have
to
sign
so
that
people
run
in
different
geographic
areas.
That's
fine!
The
only
person
that's
unaffected
by
it
in
the
legislation,
with
respect
to
how
he
registers
is
the
mayor,
because
those
running
for
mayor
will
be
running
across
the
same
geographic
area.
So
we
can
talk
about
later
after
we
finish
our
normal
business
about
how
we
plan
to
deal
with
the
item
and
what
options
we
have.
But
the
reality
is
it's
outside
of
our
control.
As
of
right
now,
there's
nothing.
G
So
I
I'm,
when
I
woke
up
this
morning,
I
was
actually
very
happy
to
have
learned
that
someone's
listening
and
for
me
the
quicker
we
talk
about
this.
The
better
so
I
would
suggest
that
we
talk
about
this.
Why
not
I
know
that
my
constituents
want
us
to
talk
about
it
and
I
know
my
constituents
want
us
to
do
exactly
what
the
province
is
suggesting.
We
do,
and
so
I
want
to
remind
everybody
that
we've
been
here
already
a
week
and
it's
Friday
and
we
have
to
be
out
of
here
by
7:30.
C
Thank
you
very
much.
Madam
Speaker
I
mean.
Obviously
this
is
a
very
important
issue.
The
city
is
abuzz
with
the
news.
We
are
all
responding
as
quickly
as
we
can.
I
cannot
imagine
how
we
could
possibly
just
go
about
business
as
if
nothing
had
happened.
This
is
big
and
council
needs
the
lead
and
show
leadership
that
we're
able
to
have
this
conversation
and
we
need
to
be
able
to
stand
up
to
what's
happening
at
Queen's,
Park
I.
Think
it's
also
important.
C
Madam
Speaker,
is
that
a
background
from
Queens
Park
Oh
was
was
just
released
and
this
background
er
from
Queens
part
answer
a
particular
question.
Do
any
of
these
changes
impact
the
powers
of
the
mayors
of
Mayor
of
Toronto
or
the
mayoral
campaign?
The
answer
to
that
FAQ
was
no.
The
deadline
for
nomination
for
mayor
would
remain
July
28
to
27,
2008
een
and
the
powers
of
mayor's
office
would
remain
unchanged
under
act.
How
is
it
that
everything
else
changes
based
on
the
announcement
that
the
pre-marriage
is
made,
but
the
mayor's
powers
would
remain
intact?
C
How
is
it
that
everything
changes,
except
for
the
election
process
for
the
mayor
I,
would
like
to
know?
Madam
Speaker,
exactly
what
transpired
when
the
mayor
spoke
to
the
premier
I
think
that
we
have
a
lot
of
questions
that
have
to
be
answered
now,
given
the
tan
lines
that
are
before
us
and
we
cannot
allow,
we
cannot
allow
the
local,
no
I'm,
sorry
I'm
speaking
you
can.
We
cannot
allow
our
democratic
process
to
be
usurped
through
background
deals
and
back-channeling.
C
This
is
just
undemocratic
and
I,
find
it
exhale
II
offensive
that
we're
finding
throughout
all
of
this,
through
press
releases
through
press
announcements
to
press
leaks,
and
we
have
someone
who
actually
perhaps
may
have
brokered
a
deal
I'm
so
upset
and
I'm
speaker.
We
need
to
debate
this
today.
We
need
to
do
it
now.
M
The
improving
3-1-1
service
times,
which
was
a
member
motion,
that
a
proposed
by
law
to
regulate
residential
construction
dust
are
all
somehow
more
important
than
a
fundamental
shift
in
democracy
in
the
City
of
Toronto.
Make
no
mistake:
this
is
a
fundamental
shift
in
democracy
in
the
City
of
Toronto,
we're
just
that
overnight.
In
the
middle
of
the
night,
we're
changing
everything
at
City,
Hall,
we're
reducing
all
the
councillors
by
the
way
were
chained.
You
know
you're
Ward's,
by
the
way
the
mayor's
date
stays
the
same.
It
is
an
attack
on
democracy,
this
seat.
M
These
are
Trump
tactics.
This
is
a
Trump
Toronto
act
and
it
should
not
go
undiscussed
till
after
we're
finished,
talking
about
dust
or
a
site
plan
or
a
planning
matter,
that's
not
at
the
OMB,
so
I
think
we
should
give
our
head
to
shake,
because
this
is
a
little
bit
of
a
unknown
territory.
We've
had
an
edict
by
a
premier
who,
quite
frankly,
did
not
campaign
on
this.
We
are
being
signaled
out
centered
out
as
the
City
of
Toronto.
Only
our
city
and
saying
it
will
be
more
efficient.
M
Well,
if
any
of
you
councillors
think
you
can
run
your
double
ward
with
the
same
amount
of
staff,
you
know
that
that
is
just
as
real
as
a
mega
mall
a
ferris
wheel
or
a
mini
rail.
You
know
that's
not
real!
That's
a
fairy
tale!
So
this
twenty
five
million
dollars
fairy
tale
territory,
Trump
territory,
all
facts,
all
news:
let's
have
that
debate.
A
Q
That's
not
my
insight.
It's
the
inside
of
a
counselor
counselor,
Matt
Lowe,
but
I.
Think
that's
what
that's
what's
before
us
and
they
want
us
to
go
over
the
top
and
go
crazy
on
this
and
not
think
this
through
in
a
fair
and
reasonable
manner,
and
that's
what
we're
here
to
do
as
civic
leaders
is
to
do
things
in
a
fair
and
reasonable
manner.
There
is
a
major
change
happening
to
governance
in
this
city
and
we
need
to
address
it
not
after
stop
signs
and
fence
issues.
We
need
to
deal
with
it
now.
A
N
Madam
Speaker,
madam
Speaker
I,
will
put
it
plainly
it's
about
time.
This
gets
done
it's
about
time
that
we
align
ourselves.
Provincial
municipal
and
federally
I
represented
a
federal
Riding
of
110,000
people
and
right
now,
in
this
scheme
of
things,
Ward
43
will
have
sixty
nine
thousand
people
when
Ward's
downtown
will
have
about
thirty
thousand.
For
example,
word
twenty
will
have
thirty
thousand.
This
is
not
representation.
This
is
dis
representation.
This
will
fit
downtown
against
the
suburbs.
N
There's
going
to
be
more
councillors,
downtown,
leading
the
way
that
things
get
done
and
the
people
of
Scarborough
the
people
of
North
York
and
the
people
of
Etobicoke
will
be
treated
as
second-class
citizens.
I
realized
that
this
might
be
the
very
last
moment.
That's
been
done,
but
we
should
have
moved
along
this
way.
A
long
time
ago,
I
presented
a
motion.
It
was
voted
down.
I
realized
for
a
lot
of
my
colleagues
could
be
job
preservation,
councilor.
D
Madam
Speaker,
as
we
heard
since
last
night,
there's
been
a
lot
of
uneasiness,
a
lot
of
frustration
and
and
and
not
not
just
for
the
people
who
are
here,
but
for
the
people
who
have
signed
up
hundreds
of
people
who
have
signed
up
actually
to
take
on
many
of
the
people.
Here
they
are
waiting
to
hear
more
details.
You
know
there
are
teams
and
are
waiting
to
hear
more
details.
More.
D
More
importantly,
Torontonians
are
waiting
to
hear
more
details
and
that's
why
there
was
a
press
conference
this
morning
at
early
in
the
morning
and
there's
that's
why
there
was
a
press
conference
from
our
mayor.
There
was
a
press
conference
by
premier,
so
there
obviously
indicates
that
this
matter
is
of
don't
need
and
and
communication
needs
to
be
shared
sooner
with
public
on
this,
with
with
the
deadline
looming,
so
I
would
urge
councilors
to
support
that.
We
move
that
we
move
that
more
discussion
to
the
top
priority
and
have
the
discussion
right
away.
D
H
Madam
Speaker
I'm
I'm
I,
don't
understand
why
this
wouldn't
just
by
nature,
be
a
top
urgent
issue
for
us
to
discuss
today,
I'm
hearing
from
several
residents
as
I'm
sure
many
of
you
are
as
well
that
they're
confused
this.
This
kind
of
this
was
a
surprise
to
to
most
and
I
mean
this
runs
the
gamut
it
runs
there
are
there
are.
There
are
candidates
out
there,
for
example,
who
have
left
jobs,
left
careers,
but
their
lives
on
hold
to
to
run
for
office,
and
they
don't
know
what
what's
happening
right
now.
H
Residents
have
donated
to
their
campaigns
and
they
don't
know
what
happens
now.
That
money
is
sometimes
it's
been
spent
in
some
occasions
on
on
literature
and
staff,
and
so
there's
a
lot
of
confusion
out
there.
People
don't
know
what's
happening
and
they
want
to
understand
what
is
the
state
of
their
local
democracy.
They
also
want
to
understand
what
is
the
the
City
Council
going
to
do
about
it?
What
response
do
we
have?
There
was
an
announcement.
H
The
first
time
I
had
heard
about
a
possible
referendum,
but
I
understand
the
legislation
doesn't
allow
for
that
any
longer.
After
the
merge
first
date,
people
have
also
asked:
is
the
city
going
to
take
legal
action?
Are
we
going
to
request
some
sort
of
injunction?
I,
don't
know
I,
don't
know
if
that
would
be
advised
and
that's
something
that
we
would
have
to
discuss
this
council.
H
H
L
L
All
of
maybe
ten
minutes
ago,
the
premier
of
this
province
had
a
press
conference
approximately
one
hour
ago,
I
hear
some
accusations
being
made
about
deals
and
back
channels
and
sweetheart
this,
and
that
I
hear
about
legislation
I've
seen,
none
of
it
I
would
actually
prefer
to
do
the
business
that
we
were
actually
elected
to
do,
to
take
care
of
the
city
and
to
run
the
city.
First,
before
we
talk
about
her
own
jobs,
I
wasn't
elected
to
sit
here
and
to
protect
my
own
job.
L
L
Let's
do
we
were
elected
to
do
finish
our
business
and
then,
if
that
takes
an
hour
or
two
hours
or
three
hours,
that
means
that
we'll
have
one
or
two
or
three
hours
more
time
to
digest
this
motion
that
was
just
put
in
front
of
us
to
find
out
and
allow
our
staff
to
find
out
his
legislation
out
there.
We
don't
know
is
there
more
than
a
press
release
out
there?
L
We
don't
know
and
if
there
is
only
a
press
release
out
there,
I'd
like
to
actually
get
a
copy
of
it
and
read
it
and
think
about
it
to
move
forward
now,
with
zero
information,
zero
press
releases
zero
paper,
zero
legislation,
zero
knowledge,
buyer
stuff.
What
are
we
actually
gonna
talk
about
if
we
reorder
the
the
order
paper
us
protecting
our
jobs
and
keeping
our
Council
the
same
size?
It's
a
fair
debate,
but
I
think
we
should
actually
do
the
business
first.
I
thought
we
were
elected
to
do
so.
L
B
You
Manish
speaker,
I,
see
no
reason
to
change
the
order
of
the
agenda
this
morning.
I
think
the
people's
business
comes
first.
The
rules
have
been
established
this
morning
by
the
province,
whether
we
like
it
or
not,
and
to
try
and
move
an
agenda.
I
mean
this
is
exactly
what
the
premier
spoke
about
this
morning
in
its
press
conference
right
where
30
people
are
gonna,
take
four
hours
to
debate
the
order
of
an
agenda.
B
If
that's
not
a
waste
of
the
people's
time
and
taxpayers,
money
I,
don't
know
what
is
let's
get
on
with
city
business.
We
know
the
decision
has
been
made.
This
is
like
what
we're
trying
to
do
here
is
like
a
four-year-old
boy
going
up
to
his
dad
or
his
mom
and
telling
them
where
they're
gonna
go
eat
dinner
that
night,
it's
not
how
it
works.
It's
been
I've
been
told
to
us
what
the
situation
is.
B
R
Speaker
I
actually
have
a
question
for
the
mayor.
As
he's
put
this
motion
forward.
Mr.
mayor,
we're
just
so
I
can't
ask
him
a
question.
Okay,
I
will
hold
my
questions
for
the
mayor
for
later,
so
I
do
support
councilor
qiraji,
honest
in
this
case.
He
says:
let's
get
on,
let's
debate
this.
Let's
talk
about
this
and
let's
make
this
the
top
priority.
That
is
what
he
said:
I
don't
necessary.
R
But
our
offices
are
being
inundated
with
calls
and
emails
from
our
residents
saying
what's
happening,
we
do
represent
our
residents.
No
one
has
asked
our
residents
their
opinion
and
I
think
that
is
despicable.
We
should
be
talking
to
residents
our
three
million
residents
who,
yes,
they
pay
for
us
to
be
here,
but
we
are
here
representing
them
and
suddenly
that's
it.
They
won't
have
the
access
to
representation
as
they
believe
they
need
as
they
are
using
and
they
want
I
do
believe.
R
D
A
Let's
continue
with
our
agenda
may
be.
Members
of
council
would
like
to
release
some
of
the
items
so
we'll
get
most
of
it
completed.
That
would
be
a
great
idea.
Okay,
councillor
Robinson,
you
were,
you
wanted
to
speak
on
licensing
now
as
27.2.
Yes,
thank
you,
madam
chair.
Well,
done
council
perks,
you
have
question
on
this.
No
okay,
your
name,
sir
okay,
councillor
Robinson,.
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
This
is
I've
got
some
motions
if
the
clerk
should
have
kindly
put
them
on
the
screen,
just
basically
further
the
good
work
that
staff
have
done
on
dust,
which
is
a
very
important
issue
in
this
city
and
in
my
community
and
neighborhoods,
it
affects
people's
health
and
is
it
for
the
environment
very
important.
Now.
E
It's
on
the
screen,
and
so
what
this
motion
talks
about
is
public
notification,
updating
public
materials
in
the
and
the
first
one.
The
second
one
is
continuing
to
really
find
ways
to
minimize
the
negative
impacts
of
residential
infill
construction
and
then,
lastly,
trying
to
really
broaden
this
report
into
the
multi
residential
areas
like
Yonge
and
Eglinton,
where
people
feel
like
they're
living
in
clouds
of
dust
every
day.
I
want
to
say
that
this
is
an
excellent
report.
I'm
very
happy
stuff
pulled
this
together.
I
did
move
the
orig
notions
in
May
of
2014.
E
So
again,
it's
taken
four
years
to
get
here.
I
would
have
loved
to
seen
this
turned
around
in
six
months,
given
the
impact
it
has
on
the
environment
and
health.
But
the
extensive
work
is
in
this
in
this
report
and
prior
to
this
construction,
Dossett
dust
has
currently
really
been
unregulated,
so
good.
This
is
good
news.
It
really
will
require
builders
to
take
specific
precautions
to
minimize
the
generation
and
distribution
of
dust
and
really
provides
an
opportunity
to
better
protect
the
neighborhoods.
E
I
have
family
members
with
asthma
that
suffer
from
respiratory
illness
and
I
was
unfit,
was
unsettling
to
hear
counselor
Fletcher's
comments
earlier
saying
that
this
was
not
an
important
issue,
because
it
affects
every
neighborhood
in
community
and
all
of
Toronto
to
ensure
that
we're
keeping
the
environment
top
of
mind
and
an
individual
residents.
Health
I
think
that
those
people
out
there
struggling
with
respiratory
issues
would
be
unhappy
to
hear
that
those
comments,
so
I
will
just
finish
by
saying
I
hope
you'll
support
these
motions.
They
further
enhance
the
report.
E
A
H
I
want
to
add,
though,
that
whether
it
be
dust
whether
it
be
noise,
whether
it
be
the
other
impacts
of
infill
development
residents
in
my
community
and
I,
share
a
concern
that
there
is
a
dearth
of
by
law
enforcement
to
adequately
address.
When
people
just
ignore
the
things
that
we
say
they
should
or
shouldn't
do
and
I
do
have
a
concern,
then,
without
a
dearth
of
enforcement.
H
When
it
comes
to
the
impact
of
dust
and
noise
and
a
number
of
other
bylaw
infractions
that
we
see
all
the
time
that
we're
not
doing
a
good
enough
job
to
not
only
say
these
are
expectations,
but
then
follow
through
with
the
expectations
that
we
said
so.
I
hope
that
in
the
next
budget
that
we
see
that
we
seriously
consider
better
ways
to
provide
by
law
enforcement
to
protect
residents
when
they're
adversely
impacted
I'm,
not
saying
infill.
Infill
development
by
nature
isn't
wrong.
H
K
Speaker
I'm,
going
to
support
the
report
before
us.
I
do
have
some
concerns
about
further
putting
pressure
on
our
MLS
staff.
We
challenge
them
with
a
lot
every
day
and
we
know
that
many
of
the
issues
that
they
deal
with
are
really
rooted
in
conflict
between
individuals
and
that's.
My
fear.
Is
that
sometimes
what
happens
that
in
and
around
construction
sites
seem
to
get
magnified
because
there's
an
underlying
conflict.
K
It's
not
just
dust,
but
it's
about
the
noise,
the
deliveries
and
maybe
just
some
unhappiness,
but
the
fact
that
there
is
work
going
on
there
do
an
earlier
disagreement.
But,
needless
to
say,
like
many
other
councillors,
I
do
get
a
lot
of
calls
about
dust
and
it
is.
It
is
a
big
challenge,
sometimes
because
we
know
that
construction
dust
typically
falls
into
the
jurisdiction
of
the
Ministry
of
Labour,
and
it's
it's
a
larger
process
to
get
somebody
involved
to
try
to
determine
when
there's
a
problem
with
dust.
K
But
one
of
the
things
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
I
pointed
out
to
councillors
was
something
called.
The
good
neighbor
guide
that
we
approved
recently
a
council.
It's
an
excellent
document
and
it
helps
people
understand
how
to
cope
with
changes
related
to
construction
in
and
around
their
homes
and
those
constructors
that
do
the
work.
One
of
the
things
that
I've
done
at
Community
Council
is,
although
the
good
neighbor
guide
is
targeted
towards
small
residential
infill
construction
is
I,
have
actually
asked
the
clerk
to
provide
copies
to
larger
developers,
they're
doing
bigger
jobs.
K
To
say,
look,
we
know
it's
aimed
at
a
smaller
neighbor,
but
the
principle
in
this
is
the
same.
If
you're
going
to
be
building
in
and
around
residences
people
that
live
there,
twenty
four
seven
hours
a
day
make
sure
that
you're
considerate
for
the
needs
and
the
concerns
and
the
disruption
that
you're
causing
to
them.
Even
though
you're
running
a
commercial
operation,
it
shouldn't
affect
the
people's
lives
and
the
people
that
are
trying
to
have
a
quiet
enjoyment
of
their
home
and
I.
K
In
so
far,
it
I
found
the
developers
to
be
quite
responsive
and
are
willing
to
set
up
a
process
in
and
around
this.
So
the
addition
of
enforcement
on
dust
is
an
extra
tool
or
an
extra
arrow
in
our
quiver
to
try
to
deal
with
problems,
but
it
really
does
begin
with.
You
know:
everyone
that's
involved
and
affected
by
these
processes,
understanding
their
rights
and
the
processes
around
this
as
I
ate
in
the
good
neighbour
guide
and,
frankly,
the
role
of
the
counselor,
the
counselor
to
help
mediate.
K
The
issues
that
occur
between
people
to
try
to
resolve
the
dust
issues
before
it
comes
to
an
enforcement.
So
I
hope
councillors
will
keep
that
in
mind
that
we
don't
just
shovel
off
problems
to
MLS,
but
we
actually
figure
out
a
way
to
solve
the
issue
proactively
through
communication
between
the
two
different
parties-
and
you
know,
I'll-
be
watching
this
file
closely
because
of
all
of
the
conflict
that
can
be
buried
in
this,
but
I
think
it's
a
step
forward
and
I
appreciate
it.
Thank
you.
I
You
very
much
speaker
speaker.
I
rise
to
lend
my
voice
and
support
to
this
particular
issue.
In
in
my
ward,
I
would
say
over
the
last
six
months,
this
has
been
a
real
issue.
We
have
a
lot
of
construction
activities
taking
place
and
oftentimes.
There
is
an
adverse
impact
to
our
residents,
which
sometimes
they
themselves
try
to
resolve
it
with
contractors,
developers
and
the
workers
are
working
on
the
specific
sites
oftentimes
not
successfully,
and
so
they
seek
to
intervene.
Our
asked
for
our
intervention
and
so
on.
I
But
it
does
pose
a
health
issue
to
the
overall
surrounding
neighborhood
and
our
residents
and
I
think
that
by
not
having
regulations
and
so
on,
it's
easy
for
those
who
do
not
wish
to
be
good,
neighbors
and
so
on
and
or
those
who
don't
seem
to
care
about
the
communities
and
the
neighborhoods,
where
they're
doing
the
work
and
so
I
think
it's
extremely
important.
And
while
there
is
in
the
conversation
that
a
moment
ago,
I
think
cancer
Holliday
talked
about
the
intervention
and
the
involvement
of
counselors.
I
That's
extremely
important
and-
and
you
know,
MLS
because
they're
the
ones
who
would
be
asked
to
go
out
and
deal
with
the
issue.
If
the
counselors
office
is
not
able
to
deal
with
it.
But
we
need
to
ensure
that
we
have
the
process
and
procedures
in
place
in
order
to
address
this
really
important
issue.
It's
not
by
the
way.
Madam
Speaker.
I
Only
the
dust
there's
also
what
happens
with
respect
to
trucks
that
are
leaving
construction
sites
where
the
dirt
and
the
debris
that
actually
is
caused
by
the
accident
entrance
onto
site,
creates
a
huge
problem.
I
can
tell
you
about
it.
The
experience
we
had
on
Lawrence
Avenue
at
at
birch
mound,
where,
in
fact,
when
you
drove
in
that
area,
you
saw
clouds
of
dirt
and
dust
that
you
had
to
drive
through
the
contractors.
I
The
GCS
on
the
site
didn't
see
this
as
a
problem
because
it
wasn't
affecting
the
site
itself,
but
it
was
creating
an
imposition,
a
negative
impact
in
the
community
as
a
whole.
In
fact,
speaker
I
can
argue
that
it
was
a
safety
issue
and
so
I
think
we
need
to
ensure
that
we
can
address
these
issues
through
regulations.
It's
unfortunate
that
we
have
to
regulate
so
much,
but
unfortunately,
without
the
regulations
and
so
on.
We
don't
have
as
much
cooperation,
and
so
this
is
why
this
is
a
good
thing.
I
It
does
create
a
degree
of
certainty
to
the
neighborhood
and
to
the
residents
that
something
is
done,
and
there
is
obviously
procedures
and
rules
and
regulations
on
our
books
to
be
able
to
deal
with
so
I
think
it's
a
good
proposed
bylaw
for
us
and
I,
wouldn't
urge
all
of
us
to
support
it.
Speaker.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
A
Yes,
because
we
just
adopted
the
order
paper,
Council
McMahon
we've
gone
that
to
that
twice
now
yeah
but
hold
on.
We
have
to
I,
know
I,
don't
know
what's
going
on,
like
council
McMahon.
In
order
to
do
that,
we
have
to.
We
have
to
have
two-thirds
vote.
We
just
we
just
voted
on
the
order
paper.
David.
N
A
A
A
D
A
H
H
A
few
minutes
and
just
say
that
this
is
a
result
of
the
discussions
that
have
happened.
The
applicant
very
recently
submitted
a
revised
proposal
with
revised
plans
dated
July
the
20th.
So
at
this
time,
members
of
the
community
have
not
yet
had
an
opportunity
to
review
and
comment
on
the
revised
plans.
H
Finally,
in
order
to
attempt
to
reach
a
resolution
of
this
matter,
this
motion
also
recommends
that
council
instruct
the
city
solicitor
to
consult
with
the
parties
and
participants
to
the
l-pad
appeal
and
request
at
the
upcoming
ALP,
a
pre
hearing
on
September
the
6th
2018
that
the
parties
and
participants
schedule
and
engage
in
mediation.
So
this
is
on
two
different
items:
I
guess
we're
moving
the
first
one
on
item
44
and
then
there's
another
item
45,
because
there
are
related
matters.
H
B
C
L
C
C
A
A
J
A
A
S
Thank
you,
madam
Speaker
I'm.
Just
quickly
releasing
SC
32
point
14
without
an
amendment
if
the
clerk's
could
put
it
up
on
the
screen.
I've
spoken
with
most
councillors
in
the
chamber
about
this
motion
on
an
item
in
my
ward
regarding
stack
townhouses,
which
is
the
preference
of
the
applicants
and
the
residents
in
my
word
and
so
I'm
moving
the
motion
and
hopefully
I
hope
everybody
will
support
it.
We've
had
many
public
meetings
on
this
and
the
residents
are
extremely
supportive
and,
and
so
is
the
applicant.
We
appreciate
your
support.
Thank
you.
E
Thank
you,
madam
Speaker
see
see
44
point.
37
I've
got
a
motion
the
clerks
of
to
refer.
This
I've
had
conversations
with
planning
staff
and
there's
lots
of
time
on
this
one.
So
there's
no
rush
because
the
hearings
not
scheduled
to
the
new
year,
and
so
we
will
and
there'll
be
I
understand
a
council
meeting
in
December,
so
I've
countless
legal
staff
help
me
drop
this
motion.
Okay,.
A
E
Use
items
I
have
a
few
motions
on
that:
I
could
quickly
describe
and
move
if
that
is
okay
with
people,
okay,
so
here's
emotions.
First,
one
is
the
concept
of
a
trash
eating
wheel,
Baltimore's
implemented
it.
What
it
does
is
it
pulls
the
plastics
from
the
Don
River
before
they
hit
Lake
Ontario,
and
so
that
is
the
intent
of
that.
E
You
want
me
to
describe
the
motions
or
not
just
for
G
amendment
we're
okay
and
the
next
two
are
also
ways
to
deal
with
me.
Waste
and
I
just
want
to
accounts,
madam
Speaker
just
think
stuff,
for
this
excellent
report
on
not
only
single-use
products
but
also
textile
waste,
as
well
as
misleading
advertising.
It's
a
result
of
a
lot
of
work
and,
unfortunately
Jim
McKay
his
last
day
was
yesterday,
but
I
would
like
to
think
he
and
his
team
for
this
excellent
report
that
will
really
support
our
long-term
waste
management
strategy.
B
C
A
O
T
The
speaker,
what's
before
you
is
a
request
for
interim
directions
report.
It
is
here
because
we
put
council
in
a
position
to
protect
itself
over
the
council
break
in
the
event
of
an
appeal.
Otherwise,
the
report
outlines
a
number
of
issues
that
we
have
with
the
application
that
was
just
filed
in
April
2018.
T
T
O
T
O
T
F
T
F
T
T
Staff
indicate
in
the
report
as
its
outlined
there
are
concerns
with
under
actually
under
utilizing
the
site
adjacent
to
a
planned
transit
station,
the
the
precedent
that
would
set
for
the
kind
of
development
along
along
Eglinton
in
that,
in
that
sense,
staff
feel
that
is
not
consistent
with
the
growth
plan.
It's
under
it's
under
utilizing
the
opportunity.
The
growth
plan
does
call
for
minimum
densities
that
evaluation
to
date
anyway.
It
hasn't
demonstrated
that
this
sets
the
right
precedent
to
achieve
those
kinds
of
densities
and.
T
J
L
You
through
you,
madam
speaker,
to
our
Senior
Planner,
if
you,
if
you,
if
you
are
the
opinion
that
these
townhouses
at
this
location
are
not
good
planning,
why
did
your
department
approve
so
much
bad
planning
on
the
north
side
across
the
street?
From
this
application,
your
staff
have
consistently
said
townhouses
long
Eglinton,
against
my
wishes
for
higher
density
urban
form.
So
am
I
correct
in
saying
that
your
planning
department
now
has
approved
three
townhouse
applications
across
the
street
from
this
one.
Well,.
L
L
T
The
speaker
I
think
the
city's
always
changing
and
certainly
we're
relying
out
new
transit
lines.
We
want
to
maximize
that
opportunity.
It
may
be
the
case
that
those
townhouses
were
approved
and
considered
prior
to
the
advent
of
for
the
Eglinton
LRT.
We
now
have
a
new
growth
plan
as
of
the
summer
of
2017.
T
Going
forward,
madam
Speaker,
we
really
do
want
to
work
hard
at
achieving
some
minimum
densities
in
close
proximity
to
these
transit
stations,
and
it
will
mean
moving
from
what
had
previously
be
considered
to
be
townhouse
sites,
perhaps
to
mid
rise
sites
and
other
sites
that
can
deliver
density
and
maximize
the
benefit
of
the
transit.
Investment
on
these
on
these
streets
are.
L
You
aware
that
the
last
85
unit,
townhouse
complex,
approved
in
that
area,
was
just
four
years
ago,
with
all
of
the
LRT
plans
approved
and
with
a
high-density
apartment,
building,
designation
on
the
site
and
the
Planning
Department.
The
developer
came
in
moderate
construction
back
then
at
the
original
application
because
they
changed,
but
when
the
applicant
came
in
all
of
the
same
status
quo
that
we
have
today
was
there,
it
was
a
high-rise
designation
for
apartment
buildings.
The
developer
asked
for
townhouses
and
and
your
staff
came
out
with
a
positive
staff
recommendation.
Four.
T
Years
ago,
we
didn't
have
the
growth
plan
that
we
have
now
in
the
minimum
densities
that
are
being
sought
in
close
proximity
to
transit
stations
and,
as
I
indicated,
the
city's
changing
and
evolving,
and
it
may
be
that
the
city
and
staff
have
considered
townhouse
development
to
be
an
intensification
along
main
streets.
We
want
to
work
toward
greater
intensification
and
utilization
of
these
kinds
of
sites.
We
were.
L
T
And
again,
what's
before,
council
is
an
interim
report.
I'm
asked
I'm
being
asked
in
a
series
of
questions
to
present
final
conclusions
and
I'm.
All
I'm
indicating
to
council
right
now
is.
Is
that
you
have
before
you
an
interim
report.
You
do
not
have
a
final
report.
We
do
not
feel
you're
in
a
final
position
to
weigh
all
the
issues
fairly.
Okay,.
T
P
Q
T
Generally,
the
growth
plan
that
has
been
adopted
and
brought
forward
by
the
province
in
August
or
in
the
summer
of
2017
calls
for
municipalities
to
update
their
official
plans
and
in
conjunction
with
laying
out
new
transportation
facilities.
High-Capacity
transit
calls
for
Miss
pallies
to
put
in
place
official
plan
policies
and
zoning
to
support
minimum
levels
of
density
in
close
proximity
to
the
to
the
transit
stations
on
the
Eglinton
East
line.
T
A
T
So
when,
when
this
application
came
in,
there
was
an
Avenue
segment
study
that
looked
at
laying
out
mid
rise
buildings
on
potentially
development
developable
sites
in
proximity
to
the
station.
However,
this
patience
for
stacked
townhouses,
which
staff
feel
at
this
stage
anyway
in
the
review,
would
we'd
be
under
utilizing
the
site
and
the
potential
of
the
site.
So.
Q
T
Q
T
Q
T
I
acknowledge
in
the
in
the
county
to
councillor
Berra
makers,
questions
and
answers
that
the
city
is
changing
and
the
arterioles
in
the
suburbs
are
changing,
and
certainly
there
were
times
when
townhouses
represented
intensification,
but
as
we
move
forward,
especially
when
we
lay
down
these
transit
lines,
we've
got
to
work
harder
at
delivering
density
in
close
proximity
to
these
transit
lines,
and
that's
a
way
to
do.
It
is
through
mid
rise
development
in
association
with
these
transit
stations.
Okay,.
Q
And
then
the
comments
about
single-family
residential
I
can
think
of
numerous
areas
along
Eglinton
and
Kingston
Road.
We
just
passed
a
building
in
in
Ward
44.
There
was
besides
single-family
residential,
where
there's
an
angular
plane
that
accommodates
that
single-family
residential
45-degree
angle,
airplane
I
believe
so.
T
Typically
in
it,
you
know
in
an
area
where
we're
introducing
a
new
built
form,
we
would
go
through
a
local
planning
study
and
we
would
develop
heightened
density
built
form
guidelines
that
bring
that
density
in
the
area
and
shape
the
built
form
in
a
way
that
mitigates
the
impact
on
adjoining
areas
and
one
of
those
devices
is
an
angular
plane.
Step
backs,
step,
backs
from
the
front,
created
right,
side,
walk,
wet
and
other
measures,
so
you
can
introduce
that
density
in
a
way
that
works
with
the
local
characteristics
of
that
community.
Okay,.
A
You
now
members
of
council
I:
did
a
forum
called
twice
members
of
counter
coming
down,
pushing
their
button
and
then
they're
leaving.
We
do
not
have
quorum
in
the
council
chambers.
So
please
can
you
please
remain
in
your
seats.
Oh
I'm
caught.
You
can't
just
push
your
button
and
leave.
You
need
to
sit
in
your
seats.
B
A
N
T
N
N
T
This
development
yeah
the
my
understanding
of
the
way
that
the
development
has
been
arrayed
is
that
the
ends
of
the
townhouse
blocks
front
on
to
the
main
streets
and
create
a
system
of
internal
Muse.
The
the
assessment
is
interim
and
I.
Don't
have
a
full
assessment
to
tell
you
how
conclusive
how
well
this
is
performing
against
the
townhouse
guideline.
I
appreciate.
N
N
N
T
Enough
through
the
speaker,
the
typically
a
mid-rise
would
would,
depending
on
where
it
is,
and
what
they
paid
for
the
land
etc,
and
all
that
you
can't
economics
of
that
development
would
typically
be
providing
fewer
larger
units
than
a
townhouse
development.
It's
just
a
different
animal
completely.
This
is
clearly
giving
you
more
two
in
three
bedrooms,
but
it's
not
to
say
that
a
mid-rise
development
could
not
be
brought
forward
that
didn't
have
a
robust
number
of
two
and
three-bedroom
units.
So
if
I.
N
Here
wish
to
support
townhouses
on
the
site
as
a
form
of
development
being
great
elated,
etc,
and
you
haven't
totally
commented
on
all
the
impacts
of
it.
Are
there
recommendations
that
you
could
give
to
me
as
a
way
to
review
this
development
and
make
sure
it's
a
good
quality
townhouse
development,
but
still
support
what
I
believe
the
local
councillor
wants
and
the
neighbors
want,
which
is
a
low-rise
four-story,
townhouse
style
of
development
through.
T
Let
me
add
to
that,
though,
if
counsel
at
this
point
wants
us
to
put
a
particular
view
on
townhouses,
a
those
those
recommendations
could
be
supplemented
by
by
a
direction
to
consider
townhouses.
The
issue
is
standing
here:
I
don't
have
a
full
assessment,
so
so
an
amendment
that
that
included
words
like
with
a
complete
assessment
of
the
townhouse
proposal
as
proposed,
would
help
so.
T
L
P
T
The
read
the
report
through
the
speaker,
the
report
outlines
concerns
that
we
have
and
and
certainly
giving
us
the
opportunity
to
continue
to
press
the
case
for
more
density.
I,
don't
know,
I
can't
predict
if
we'll
succeed
in
that.
Okay,
but
you
you're
not
and
then.
Ultimately,
it's
up
to
council
to
decide
what
happens
understood,
but
it
was
a
truncation
of
that
process.
But.
P
Your
and
I
appreciate
that
the
truncation
of
the
process
I
understand
that,
but
I
also
want
to
drive
at
the
reality
is
that
the
applicant
has
an
ex
may
have
an
expectation
that,
if,
in
fact,
he
were
to
follow
the
process
in
accordance
with
your
recommendations,
he
would
end
up
with
more
density.
Is
that
correct.
P
And
so
my
my
question
then
becomes
the
process
does
permit
an
applicant
who
has
an
expectation
of
more
density
and
Council
approves
this
particular
motion.
What's
to
prevent
the
applicant
from
appealing
the
applicant,
the
indecision
of
counsel,
on
the
basis
that
they
probably
have
a
very
strong
likelihood
of
great
of
getting
more
density
by
going
to
the
board.
Simply
because,
if
my
impression
is
correct,
they
would
have
the
support
of
planning
staff
at
the
board,
not
not
counsel,
not
counsel,
the
support,
because
councils
is
going
to
be
supporting
the
local
councillor.
P
T
L
L
S
Thank
You
mr.
speaker
and
thanks
so
much
I
think
thanks
for
planning
for
their
feedback
as
well.
So
this
is
an
item
that
I've
been
working
on
very
closely
with
my
residents
and
with
the
applicant
so
I
know,
councillor
DiGiorgio
was
asking
questions,
but
the
applicant
actually
wants
stock
townhouses.
My
residents
want
stock
townhouses,
as
we
both
know
that
there's
there
is
a
growth
strategy
in
place.
I
understand
that
this
is
a
main
arterial.
However,
on
the
north
side,
as
a
councillor
to
bear
maker
mentioned,
this
is
right
on
between
our
words.
S
There
are
many
townhomes.
There
are
many
applications
there
actually
currently
even
under
construction.
So
there's
nothing
different
here
than
what
Planning
has
approved
in
just
the
last
few
years
and
what
is
currently
right
on
Eglinton
Avenue,
so
I'm
gonna
take
you
back
actually
to
another
area
in
my
ward,
which
is
Corvette
and
Kennedy.
If
you
know
that,
probably
most
of
you
don't
because
you've
never
been
in
my
Ward
35,
but
it's
right
across
from
Pine
Hills
Cemetery.
This
was
an
area
that
had
townhouses
right
beside
it.
S
There
is
an
old
deer,
licked
Plaza
and
planning
had
recommended
a
10-story
building
instead
of
townhouses,
which
is
what
the
applicant
wanted.
I
actually
went
on
the
side
of
planning
and
guess
what
exists
today?
Nothing
do
you
know
why?
Because
there
is
no
economics
there
and
guess
where
it
is
three
blocks
from
the
new
LRT.
S
That's
going
to
come
in
to
kennedy
station
again
three
blocks
from
Kennedy
station
and
guess
what
it's
still
a
deer,
licked
old,
run-down
Plaza
that
remains
five
years
later,
because
people
don't
understand
the
urban
built
form
in
Scarborough
in
word:
35,
I'm!
Sorry,
it's
not
the
downtown!
But
right
now
we
don't
have
the
economic
growth.
S
I
barely
have
planning
applications
in
word
35
and
when
I
do
I'd
like
to
see
them
pass
and
I'm
sorry,
what
planning
thinks
there
should
be
an
Ehlert
on
Eglinton
Avenue
coming
way
across,
not
just
stopping
at
Eglinton
but
going
out
to
this
development,
yeah
when's.
That
can
happen
thirty
years
in
the
future.
When
we're
gonna
have
flying
cars,
no,
it's
never
going
to
happen.
There
may
be
a
proposal
mr.
Lyne
turn,
but
it's
never
going
to
happen.
Have
you
seen
transit
move
in
the
city,
I
haven't
so,
let's
get
on
with
it.
S
I
hope
you
can
propose
and
please
support
what
I'm
proposing
on
the
site,
which
is
four
storeys.
It
is
stacked,
townhouses
and
guess
what
people
live
in
three
four
bedroom
units:
inward,
thirty-five
I'm,
sorry
they're
still
not
living
in
condo
buildings
like
they
are
downtown
in
one
and
two
bedroom
units.
A
condo
building
of
12
stories
is
not
gonna
fly
ever
economics
on
the
site
and
guess,
what's
on
the
site,
a
caddies
strip,
joint,
okay,
caddies
strip,
joint
I
made
it.
S
Maybe
many
of
you
have
gone,
I
have
never
been
I,
do
know
the
owner
and
he
sold
it.
But
hello.
There
is
a
rumours
bar
a
caddy
strip
joint
and
a
bowling
alley
which
will
remain
dear
licked
if
this
isn't
past
today.
That's
right!
If
this
isn't
past
today,
so
I
really
hope
that
you'll
support
it
so
that
we
can
get
forward
with
moving
with
planning
and
with
some
actual
development
in
word,
35
and
I
can
get
some
section
37
money
for
once
in
word,
35.
Thank
you.
H
B
O
You-
and
this
may
seem
like
an
unimportant
issue
to
some
people,
because
it's
only
about
townhouses,
but
it's
not
about
townhouses.
That's
not
what
the
issue
is.
I
have
no
opinion
on
the
townhouses
I'm
agnostic
on
the
townhouses,
and
the
reason
for
that
is
because
I
don't
have
a
staff
report
telling
me
what
is
the
appropriate
thing
to
do
on
this
site?
What
is
happening
here?
We
cannot
allow
to
have
happen
in
this
chamber,
so
we
have
a
staff
report
saying
we
need
to
study
this
application
further
and
you
have
a
councillor.
O
No
disrespect
to
the
councillor
I
know
she's
doing
something
her
residents
probably
want,
but
you
have
staff
saying
we
haven't
had
a
chance
to
study
this.
Yet
we
need
to
continue
studying
it
and
you
have
a
councillor
saying
no
bring
forward
the
bills
for
townhouses,
because
I've
worked
that
out
with
my
residents
and
the
applicant.
So
imagine
if
we
all
start
doing
that
and
I
literally
and
I
tweeted
this
out
yesterday.
O
If
somebody
tries
to
do
something
like
this,
some
another
member
of
council
will
tackle
them
and
they
it
doesn't
go
didn't
go
through
but
like
especially
like
a
dis
meeting
like
the
dams
just
broken
loose.
It's
like
we
have
no
plant
like
it's
absurd
that
we
have
the
staff
saying
please
let
us
complete
our
planning
study
and
then
council
would
say.
No.
We
don't
want
to
hear
your
planning
advice,
we're
just
going
to
vote
for
the
the
deal
that
the
local
councillor
has
worked
out
like.
We
cannot
do
this.
O
Folks
and
again,
you
know
I'm
totally
open
if
I
were
still
here.
Maybe
townhouses
are
better.
Maybe
councillor
Holland
could
convince
us
of
that.
But
you
have
to
follow
the
process.
You
cannot
cut
the
staff
off
and
just
say
bring
in
the
bills.
You
know
we
saw
that
earlier
in
in
councilor
mammal
Edie's
Ward
on
his
Lincoln
Avenue.
We
fortunately
put
a
stop
to
it
and
we
have
to
put
a
stop
to
this
one.
So
please
do
not
support
councillor.
Hollins
recommendations,
support
the
staff
recommendations.
L
You,
madam
Speaker
I,
would
encourage
my
colleagues
to
support
the
recommendations
that
councillor
Holland
has
put
forward.
The
recommendations
are
nothing
unusual
or
extraordinary
or
untoward.
They
are
mirroring
a
built
form
that
has
been
replicated
all
throughout
that
area
at
the
insistence
of
our
Scarborough
Planning
Department,
sometimes
to
my
chagrin,
but
that
has
been
the
pattern
of
development
on
the
north
side
of
the
road
around
the
corner.
L
Then,
when
the
school
board
just
sold
off
the
pre-meal
garden
public
school
to
a
developer,
they
came
in
and
put
2485
townhouses
when
it
was
actually
zoned
for
high-density,
an
apartment
building
use
so
the
history
of
that
area.
The
pattern
of
that
area.
That's
consistent
with
this
application,
which
I
believe
is
the
better
product
in
the
end,
are
the
stack,
townhouses
and
I'm,
not
a
big
fan
of
the
stock
townhouses.
L
But
that's
what
our
planners
in
that
area
have
recommended
over
and
over
and
over
again
that's
what
the
residents
agreed
to
in
a
community
meeting
and
that's
what
is
the
built
form
in
the
entire
area
right
now
that
Plaza,
it's
a
very
famous
little
corner
of
Scarborough,
it's
known
as
as
as
the
Nob
Hill
hotel,
it
has
the
caddy
strip
club
right
now
it's
abandoned!
There's
nobody
in
there.
It's
all
fenced
off
and
I'll
say
for
the
record.
Gsi
I
did
go
to
the
Caddy's
strip
club
I.
L
Think
like
many
people,
to
my
surprise,
though,
the
young
women
who
invited
me
to
go
and
visit
them.
This
is
back
in
my
university
days
when
I
showed
up
to
meet
my
friends
at
the
strip
club
I
found
out
that
there
were
male
strippers
that
night.
So
it
was
a
very
interesting
evening
at
the
at
the
Caddy's
and
at
the
strip
club.
L
So
this
old
old
institution,
that's
that
time
in
the
Sun
has
gone
by
the
rooms
that
they
rent
at
the
hotel,
they're
the
the
rent
by
the
hour
rooms
that
they
had
there
we're
doing
nobody
any
good.
This
was
not
a
place
that
the
community,
like
they
didn't
like
living
next
to
it.
It's
it's
a
relic
of
the
past.
L
The
proposal
now
is
to
put
in
family
townhouses
next
to
single
family
homes
adjacent
on
the
south
side
adjacent
to
single
family
homes.
You
can
understand
why
the
residents
who
have
been
next
to
a
strip
club,
an
infamous
strip
club
and
a
nightclub
and
all
sorts
of
gang
and
motorcycle
activities
happening.
There
are
actually
pretty
pleased
that
they're
going
to
get
an
urban
form.
That's
it.
L
Yes,
it's
four
storeys
and
it's
higher
than
and
then
their
houses,
but
it's
acceptable
to
them
and
it's
exactly
the
same
as
what
was
built
on
the
other
side
of
the
street.
I
begged
our
planning
staff
and
maybe
Scarborough
gain
is
just
always
being
neglected,
and
maybe
our
chief
planner
will
have
to
give
a
little
bit
more
thought
about
who
he
he
has
out
in
Scarborough
and
how
much
attention
that
we
have,
because
we're
standing
here
with
people
saying
well
we're
not
really
count.
J
L
L
So
little
attention
is
paid
to
our
part
of
this
city
that
when
we
have
community
meetings
when
we
come
to
agreements,
we
feel
that
we
are
not
being
listened
to
and
that's
why
people
our
our
making
agreements
with
their
own
residents,
because
it
appears
that
some
of
the
professionals
who
are
with
us
at
those
meetings
saying
thank
you.
But
who
are
you
you're,
not
a
professional
and
you're,
not
a
planner.
You
know
we'll
take
into
account
what
you
have
to
say,
but
we're
not
working
with
you
in
cooperation
with
you,
stick.
J
A
J
N
Speaker
as
chair
of
the
planning
and
growth
committee,
I'm
standing
to
ask
the
council
to
please
withdraw
the
remarks
and
not
speak
in
a
disparaging
manner
of
the
city
planning
staff.
They
definitely
on
occasion
have
opinions
different
than
I
or
you
might
have,
but
they
have
always
worked
in
a
professional
manner
and
the
way
that
you
were
speaking
about
them
does
not
make
it
appear
as
if
they
do.
Madam.
L
N
L
The
merits
of
the
merits
of
what's
before
us
is
there.
This
is
what
is
there
on
the
site
across
the
street
down
the
street
around
the
corner?
This
is
in
no
way
should
surprise.
Anybody,
in
fact,
I,
would
be
surprised
as
a
local
councillor
that
the
staff
would
recommend
anything
other
than
town
houses,
because
that's
what
they've
recommended
on
every
single
application
in
this
area
that
I'm
aware
of
so
madam
Speaker,
the
local
councillor,
has
done
a
very
good
job.
L
P
Thank
you,
madam
Speaker.
Madam
Speaker
I
would
urge
council
members
to
support
the
local
councillor
in
the
motion
that
she
has
brought
forward.
In
my
view,
the
the
process
is
being
followed
in
the
sense
that
there
was
a
meeting
held
at
community
council
I'll
call
it
a
statutory
public
meeting.
One
can
take
issue
as
to
whether
it
was
a
statutory
public
meeting,
a
community
council
where
the
community
had
an
opportunity
to
comment
on
a
proposed
bylaw
that
was
going
to
come
forward.
P
Yes,
it
was
not
a
proposed
bylaw
by
staff,
and
so
that
creates
a
bit
of
a
problem,
because
a
bylaw
proposed
by
staff
would
probably
say
here's
what
we
believe
is
in
compliance
with
the
growth
plan.
Here's
what
we
believe
is
in
conformity
with
the
Official
Plan.
What
we
believe
is
in
conformity
with
the
Official
Plan
is
something
that
is
a
little
bit
more
intensive.
That
is
something
a
little
more
in
conformity
with
mid-rise
buildings
being
built
on
this
particular
site.
P
But
putting
that
aside
for
the
moment,
look
at
what's
being
proposed
in
the
context
of
does
it
conform
with
the
Official
Plan?
Does
it
constitute
intensification?
It
may
not
be
as
intense
as
what
planning
staff
may
want
to
see
on
this
particular
site.
A
couple
of
days
ago,
we
dealt
with
one
where
Glenda
councillor
de
Beer
maker
was
willing
to
accept
much
more
intensification
than
what
was
being
proposed
by
staff.
So
there
is
this
difference
of
opinion
and,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
council
deals
with
differences
of
opinion
of
that
nature.
P
So,
just
to
reiterate,
there
is
an
intensification,
she's
getting
section
37,
you
know,
I
remember,
I
went
through
one
where
there
was
an
intensification,
I
got
no
section,
37
I
got
no
meeting
at
community
council
and
that
okay,
of
course,
I
ended
up
with
the
board
and
it's
still
at
the
board.
But
that
being
said,
I
urge
members
to
go
along
with
the
motion
proposed
by
the
local
council
and
by
the
way,
there's
one
language
bit
of
language
here
that
I've
never
seen
before
an
interim
directions
report.
P
A
F
Do
we
have
planning?
Why
do
we
have
an
official
plan?
Why
do
we
pay
mr.
Lyne
turn
and
his
staff
to
consult
with
Torontonians
when
a
development
application
comes
in?
Why
does
the
province
have
the
Planning
Act
the
provincial
day
of
provincial
policy
statements,
places
to
grow
act?
Why
is
there
so
much
law
around
what
people
are
allowed
to
do
in
terms
of
the
properties
they
own
and
redeveloping
them?
F
It's
very
simple:
it's
because
we
as
a
city
as
a
products
and
as
a
country
do
not
believe
that
the
private
interests
of
people
who
buy
land
in
order
to
develop
on
is
the
final
word
in
terms
of
how
our
city
grows.
We
don't
just
it's
not
a
free-for-all.
We
actually
ask
ourselves
questions.
Can
our
infrastructure
support
development
there?
Do
we
want
people
to
be
able
to
shop
locally?
Do
we
want
to
make
sure
that
you
don't
have
a
40-story
building
next
to
your
house?
Do
we
want
to
make
sure
we
have
parks?
F
Do
we
want
to
make
sure
that
there's
a
good
and
harmonious
balance
between
employment
and
where
people
live
these
things
we
call
the
public
interest.
The
reason
we
have
planning
is
so
that
private
land
owners
are
forced
to
account
for
the
public
interest
when
they
decide
to
try
to
make
a
property
make
a
profit
developing
their
property.
F
L
F
L
Stood
up
in
this
chamber
said
to
in
a
public
forum,
saying
I:
was
there
doing
what
a
developer
wanted?
I
have
never
ever
in
my
15
years
in
this
office,
done
what
a
developer
wanted
I
do.
What
is
right
for
my
community
if
it
happens
to
be
parallel
to
them
great,
if
it's
supposed
to
it
great
but
councillor
perks,
is
impugning
my
reputation,
saying
that
I
do
what
developers
want
yeah
I
would
ask
him
to
withdraw
that
mark
and
apologize
councillor.
F
F
A
A
F
We
as
a
council
review
what
the
public
interest
is,
how
we
balance
infrastructure,
how
we
balance
the
relationship
between
jobs
and
residences,
how
the
transit
system
works.
We
spend
hours
months
years
doing
this,
we
consult
broadly
with
the
public
on
this,
and
we
come
up
with
an
official
plan,
an
official
plan
which
is
tested
at
the
Ontario
Municipal
Board,
an
official
plan
which
has
to
meet
the
requirements
of
the
Planning
Act.
F
An
official
plan
which
requires
the
permission
of
the
minister
of
housing
years
are
spent
making
sure
that
our
city
doesn't
grow
in
a
lopsided,
haphazard
way
that
makes
transportation
impossible.
That
makes
providing
service
is
impossible.
That
makes
employment
uneven.
This
is
the
result
of
decades
of
work,
careful
work
to
make
sure
that
the
city
we
have
is
livable,
and
here,
as
the
chief
planner
said
for
the
first
time,
he
has
ever
seen
it
and
he
has
had
a
long
and
very
valuable
career
with
the
City
of
Toronto
and
a
predecessor
municipality.
F
A
councillor
is
saying:
no,
we
don't
want
planning
advice.
We
simply
want
the
application
to
go
through
it's
staggering.
It's
staggering!
It's
a
profound
failure
of
what
we
are
elected
to
do
here
and
if
you
have
vote
for
it,
you
might
as
well
just
say:
I,
don't
really
care
about
whether
or
not
we
plan
carefully
for
the
future
of
Toronto
I
just
want
to
deal
with
things
as
one
offs
and
that's
not
what
our
job
is.
B
You
madam
Speaker
I,
have
to
fundamentally
disagree
with
my
council
colleague,
councillor
perks,
that
you
know
it's
not
our
job
to
come
here
and
make
decisions
that
are
in
the
best
interest
of
voters,
but
to
come
here
and
always
just
rubber-stamp
staffs
recommendations
to
us.
That's
not
our
job.
Our
job
is
to
come
here
and
represent
our
residents
and
the
local
councillors.
B
So
when
we
look
at
condos
condos
con
those
condos
condos
right-
and
we
know
that,
there's
a
a
massive
need
for
more
ground,
related
family
size,
housing
units,
I'm
gonna,
say
listen,
we
need
a
balance.
The
market
needs
a
balance
and
certainly
whoever
is
building
out
this
site
knows
what
the
market
wants.
Now
the
local
councillors
in
favor
of
this
I
see
other
councillors
from
Scarborough
in
favor
of
this
they
know
what
their
communities
are.
All
about.
They've
been
to
the
community
meetings,
they've
heard
loud
and
clear
what
the
situation
is.
B
N
N
To
my
colleagues,
maybe
I
can
help
on
this.
I
have
a
motion
to
place.
This
is
an
amendment
to
councillor
Holland's
motion
and
what
it
does
is.
It
allows
us
to
look
at
the
application
as
it
was
submitted,
but
also
look
at
it,
considering
our
new
town
house
guidelines
to
make
sure
that
we
have
good
good.
A
good
development
here.
I
mean
I've
heard
the
debate.
Townhouses
are
across
the
road.
I've
looked
at
the
street
online
I
can
see
it
I
see
what
it
is
and
I
and
I
understand
it.
N
The
townhouses
across
the
road,
however,
face
the
street.
These
are
all
turned
sideways,
I,
don't
know
if
it's
good
development
in
that
manner,
I
want
to
be
sure
that
it
does
come
out
with
good,
develop.
Now
I
see
my
colleagues
shaking
their
heads.
Well,
we
shouldn't
do
that,
but
you
should
know
that
in
Scarborough
the
city-owned
land
with
Bill
Toronto-
and
we
could
not
sell
it
for
condominium
buildings,
no
one
would
buy
it
because
the
market
wasn't
there
and
I'm
talking
about
pieces
of
property
adjacent
to
other
condominium
buildings.
The
market
wasn't
there.
N
So
when
I
see
a
development
that
is
talking
about
townhouses
and
I
know
the
real
need
that
people
have
but
counsel
approaches
phone
goes
even
when
he's
not
here.
So
when
I
see
that
there's
an
application
for
almost
200
townhouses
and
76%
of
them
to
3
3
press
bedrooms.
Four
stories
which
are
taller
than
across
the
road
stack,
townhouses
I,
go
I,
think
that's
a
great
development,
because
if
not
it's
going
to
remain
a
strip
plaza
cuz,
no
one's
gonna
put
a
condominium
building.
N
You
can
all
ask
for
it
and
believe
me,
town
along
high-density
transit
lines
aren't
unique
because
they're
all
over
the
city,
in
fact,
in
the
community
that
I
represent
on
Sheppard
Avenue,
South,
Side,
high-rise
buildings
and
mid-rise
buildings.
On
the
north
side,
we
had
a
retail
store
and
behind
it
they
had
some
extra
land
and
they
pushed
in
48
stacked,
townhouses
near
a
subway
station
and
has
sold
out
in
a
weekend.
It
was
phenomenal,
but
the
city
staff
worked
and
worked
and
work
to
be
sure
that
it
was
a
good
townhouse
guidelines.
N
So
I
believe
you
should
support
the
request
to
allow
this
to
be
townhouses.
But
I
have
heard
what
my
colleagues
have
said
about,
but
you
can't
just
bring
forward
the
bills
and
you
can't
just
instruct
it
to
be
the
way
that
the
applicant
wants
it
to
be,
because
staff
haven't
had
their
opportunity
to
comment
on
that,
because
the
first
thing
they
said
is
we
prefer
to
get
more
density
we'd,
like
high-rise.
N
That
may
be
a
wish
of
a
dream,
but
if
you
try
that
the
site
will
never
gets
old
for
that,
it'll
just
sit
as
an
empty
site,
with
a
strip
joint
and
and
whatever
else
is
there
so
I'm
trying
to
put
this
forward
because
I
understand
the
residents
want
townhouses
the
councilor
supporting
them.
The
community
has
townhouses
and
I
would
like
to
see
townhouses
there,
because
I
believe
it
would
be
a
nice
form
of
higher
density
that
still
will
meet
the
growth
plan.
N
I
Thank
you
very
much
speaker,
Speaker
I
rise
to
support
the
motion
by
councillor,
Holland
and
I.
Think
that
the
motion,
the
amendment
to
the
motion
by
councillor
shiner,
actually
does
help
in
terms
of
allowing
for
a
staff
to
work
with
and
consider
the
town
house
guidelines
to
ensure
the
form
of
development
there
and
the
types
and
the
layout
and
so
on
is
going
to
be
such
that
meets
our
guidelines.
I
speaker
I'm
quite
familiar
with
this
particular
area.
I
In
fact,
when
I
was
a
staffer
here
many
years
ago,
that
was
in
fact
an
area
that
I
worked
in.
You
had
Horton
Orton,
Boulevard,
voice',
Swango,
Road
and
so
on.
I
know
the
residents
there
have
for
many
years
refused
to
support
a
high-rise
development
there.
How
do
I
know
this
because
the
owner
of
that
particular
site,
when
I
worked
as
a
staffer
came
in
on
numerous
occasions,
wanted
high-rise
development
there
later
on,
when
I
became
elected
he
and
his
daughter
and
others
came
in,
wanted
to
have
a
high-rise
development
there.
I
The
resident
were
strongly
in
opposition
to
a
high-rise
development
at
the
corner
of
Danforth
and
and
Eglinton
and
Lawrence
and
Eglinton
Avenue.
If
you
look
in
the
area
and
as
a
young
boy,
when
I
was
growing
up
across
the
street,
you
had
the
say,
vets
department
store
and
actually
it
had
a
conveyer
system
where
you
could
actually
walk
across
in
order
to
get
to
the
south
east
east
side
of
the
roadway
south
east
side
of
the
roadway
now
has
many
townhouses,
as
in
counts
of
Glenda.
I
Bear
makers
warning
I'm,
not
here,
to
criticize
the
professionalism
of
the
staff
or
anything
in
fact,
I'm
here
to
support
and
to
say
that
they're
excellent
in
terms
of
what
they
do
and
the
leadership
that
mr.
Lynn
turn
brings
in.
But
we
are
also
tasked
with
the
responsibility
of
responding
to
the
residents
and
while
the
staff
may
be
supportive
of
a
high-rise
at
this
particular
location,
it
is
contrary
to
that
of
the
wishes
of
the
community
and
also
the
local
councillor
and
I
can
tell
you
speaker
going
back
almost
20
years.
I
The
residents
didn't
support
the
high-rise
at
that
location
in
any
form,
because
the
owner
of
that
property
wanted
to
do
something
to
intensify
this
particular
area.
This
area
has
no
real
high
rise
in
the
immediate
area.
The
closest
one
I
would
venture
to
look
when
I
scan
the
area
would
be
at
McCowan
Road
on
an
Eglinton
and
that's
a
senior's
long-term
facility
at
that
location.
I
If
you
look,
then,
to
the
West
going
west,
you
go
over
to
Gilder,
which
is
over
my
ward
at
Midland
and
Eglinton,
where
you
have
a
number
of
high-rise
buildings
which
are
primarily
TCH,
see.
We've
had
challenges
for
such
a
long
time
in
Scarborough
with
people
not
wanting
to
develop
there.
Now
we
have
some
element
of
development
in
Council
to
bear
makers
Ward,
where
we
actually
had
a
development
here
or
people
are
saying
wow.
You
know
it's
39
stories.
It's
too
high
the
fact
of
the
matter.
We
have
not
had
any
for
a
long
time.
I
There's
more
people
moving
into
our
area,
there's
a
need
for
people
to
live
in
Scarborough
in
good
quality
housing.
I
would
submit
to
you
that
the
residents
there
have
spoken.
What
we
need
to
do
is
to
listen
to
them
the
idea,
in
terms
around
following
the
guidelines,
in
terms
of
the
amendment
that
the
sheriff
planning
and
growth
has
put
forward.
It's
one
I've
spoken
with
the
local
councillor,
she's
supportive
of
it.
I
It
gives
staff
the
opportunity
to
be
able
to
work
with
the
applicant,
the
local
councillor
and
the
residents,
but
let's
give
some
direction
of
support.
I
think
that's
what
the
local
councillor
is
asking
for
here
today,
because
in
and
around
that
area
there
are
really
no
high-rises
and
at
that
intersection,
quite
frankly,
speaker.
It
would
be
in
in,
in
my
view,
an
injustice
to
the
residents
there
to
put
a
high-rise
development
there,
where
everything
around
it
easy,
centrally
townhouses
and
a
lower
height
in
terms
of
structure
in
there.
I
G
So
I
look
at
these
applications
that
come
forward
and
I
try
and
relate
them
to
to
the
way
things
have
worked
in
my
area
night
and
I
get
policy
and
I
get
why
staff
move
in
particular
directions,
but
one
of
the
things
I
get
more
than
that
is
as
communities
and
how
communities
can
sometimes
be
your
best
friend
when
it
comes
to
development
because
they
they
they
have
concerns
about
density.
They
have
concerns
about
the
type
of
development
and
sometimes
when
they're
asked
they,
they
would
prefer
something
different
than
perhaps
what
our
policy
suggests.
G
That's
happened
more
than
once
in
my
ward,
over
the
last
28
years
and
and
while
I
I
do
respect
staffs
position.
I
think
there
comes
a
time
where
you've
got
a
respect.
Community's
position
with
respect
to
these
things
and
and
I'm
going
to
be
supporting
the
local
community
on
this
and
the
local
councillor.
G
I
would
take
a
really
good,
a
really
good
townhouse
complex,
that
that
looks
good
and
feels
good
and
is
spacious
over
an
apartment
building
in
that
spot
any
day
of
the
week
and
I
think
just
based
on
where,
where
this
Ward
lies,
it
probably
makes
sense
we're
not
in
the
downtown
part
of
the
city,
and
we
don't
have
to
build
skyscrapers
just
because
it
might
they
might
fit
in
with
the
policy,
so
I'll
be
supporting
the
local
councillor
on
this.
Thank.
A
K
You
forgive
me
for
just
a
moment
here
to
call
the
item
up.
Sorry,
I
just
wanted
to
understand
from
staff
there
there
is
a
there
was
a
change
made
at
community
council
and
there
were
additional
recommendations
added
to
the
staff
recommendations
concerning
the
OPA,
and
one
of
the
additional
recommendations
was
to
ask
the
general
manager
of
Transportation
to
undertake
a
corridor
study
and
they
forgive
me
I'm.
Just
looking
for
the
exact
wordings.
R
You
speaker,
yes,
we
are
planning
on
looking
at
the
Danforth
corridor.
This
particular
Avenue
study
covers
about
half
of
what
we
plan
to
look
at
overall
and
that
calling
it
a
complete
Street
study
implies
that
we
would
look
at
all
modes
of
transportation.
We'd
have
heavy
involvement
from
the
very
beginning
from
economic
development,
because
the
Danforth
quarters
you
know
traverses
many
business
communities
and-
and
we
would
spend
some
time
developing
in
terms
of
reference
with
stakeholder
input,
to
be
very
clear
and
deliberate
about
what
that
scope
would
cover.
So.
K
This
was
a
in
my
view,
a
little
bit
unusual
because
it
was
predominantly
a
planning
matter
and
somehow
the
Community
Council
has
woven
in
a
requirement
for
the
general
manager
to
report
on
this.
Is
this
typical
because
it's
it's
it's
like
an
adjunct
report
or
another
report,
or
maybe
an
even
and
in
the
report
through.
T
You've
found
a
speaker,
the
the
discussion
in
the
community
on
a
land.
You
study
often
covers
community
services
and
facilities,
the
public
realm,
it's
pretty
comprehensive
when
you
look
at
the
list
of
things
that
we
look
at
in
the
Official
Plan,
when
we
do
one
of
these
studies,
it's
pretty
comprehensive
and
there
was
a
great
deal
of
interest
in
the
community
to
talk
about
the
public
realm.
The
way
Danforth
is
functioning
loading
servicing
where
people
walk
where
people
drive
where
people
ride.
T
The
priority
piece
of
work
here
in
the
OPA
is
to
put
in
place
a
land-use
built
form
regime
so
that
we
get
out
in
front
of
applications
that
are
coming
in
on
Danforth,
and
so
we
can
directly
influence
to
change
it's
kind
of
like
a
stage
process.
The
next
piece
of
work
will
be
in
conjunction
with
analyzing
the
opportunities
and
the
complete
streets
framework,
so.
K
Underneath
the
and
I
think
this
is
to
the
general
manager
under
the
ten
years
cycling
network
plan,
I
recall
we
did
have
some
debates
about
corridor
studies
and
I
had
thought
at
the
time
that
we
removed
consideration
of
a
corridor
study
in
this
area.
Is
this
now
contrary
to
the
council's
direction,
or
is
it
something
different
so.
R
You
I
believe
that
the
corridor
study
there
was
a
number
of
corridors
that
were
identified
in
the
ten-year
cycling
plan
that
required
further
study
and
I
believe
the
Danforth
was
one
of
those
corridors.
This
particular
examination
and
look
at
this
is
a
complete
Street.
I
think
evolves
what
we
saw
in
2016
when
the
cycling
plan
was
completed
to
some
of
the
input
that
we
received
from
the
community
as
part
of
this
Danforth
Avenue
study
and
and
a
general
interest
in
really
trying
to
look
comprehensively
at
this
very
important
street
in
our
community.
So.
K
I
just
wanted
to
be
clear
on
that.
Did
we
did
counsel,
give
direction
to
do
a
corridor
study
on
Danforth,
or
do
we
have
that
deferred
or
or
put
aside
for
a
little
while
to
be
triggered
or
considered
at
a
future
date?
I?
Can
you
help
me
understand
I,
just
don't
remember
that
the
details
of
that
plan
share.
D
Accounts
are
through
the
speaker,
counsel
identified
several
major
corridor
studies
inside
the
network
plan
that
should
be
deferred
for
further
consideration
as
part
of
the
cycling
Network
plan
two-year
review,
which
will
come
to
Council
in
2019.
This
particular
corridor
study
was
identified
for
further
consideration
following
the
completion
of
the
Bloor
Street
bike
lanes
pilot
project,
so
that
pilot
project
has
been
completed
and
council
has
approved
that
as
permanent.
So
it's
within
the
the
nature
of
the
council
discussion
on
this
item
to
consider
the
next
steps
on
the
Danforth
quarter
study
at
this
time.
So.
K
D
The
speaker,
as
as
the
general
manager
just
mentioned,
the
terms
of
reference
of
the
study
would
be
defined
with
the
community
council
had
already
directed
that
any
major
quarter,
study
of
the
Danforth
be
looked
at
from
a
Complete
Streets
lens.
That
was
a
motion
that
was
made
by
council
Fraga
Dacus
at
the
time
of
the
consideration
of
the
ten-year
cycling
network
plan.
D
K
R
Initially,
we're
going
to
engage
with
them
about
defining
in
terms
of
reference,
so
we
can
make
sure
we're
doing
a
fulsome
look
at
all
the
components
that
are
relevant
for
this
area
and,
as
I
mentioned,
one
of
the
things
that
we've
had
lots
of
conversations
with
Mike
Williams
at
economic
development
that
this.
Because
of
the
nature
of
this
business
community.
We
really
need
to
ensure
that
we're
engaging
with
the
business
community
and
looking
at
a
robust
economic
development
study
as
an
initial
part
of
this.
And
so
that
would
be
going
to
the
community.
R
K
B
R
You
we've
brought
a
Complete
Streets
set
of
guidelines
to
the
Public
Works
infrastructure
committee
in
2017.
It's
a
set
of
guidelines
that
guideline
document
did
not
actually
come
to
full
Council
for
approval,
but
that's
the
guidance
around
which
we
would
be
engaging
with
the
community
about
Complete
Streets.
So.
T
E
You,
madam
chair,
I'll,
keep
my
comments
brief,
given
the
circumstances
and
the
other
looming
issues,
but
I
did
want
to
ask
the
general
manager
of
Transportation.
This
was
discussed
at
at
Toronto
East
York
council
correct
through
the
speaker.
Yes,
that's
why
it's
before
us.
It
came
through
that
body,
correct
versus
Public,
Works
and
infrastructure,
correct.
E
I
T
E
And
my
second
question
is
related
to
timing,
so
we've
heard
from
lots
of
certainly
in
the
Twitterverse
and
lots
of
people
on
social
media
upset
that
this
is
taking
so
long.
So
my
question
would
be
it
looks
like
this
is
kicking
off
in
the
2019
budget
year
2019
calendar
year.
Why
can't
it
similar
to
what
we
did
with
with
the
single
youth
strategy,
the
waste
strategy
we're
actually
going
to
be
having
consultations
in
September?
On
that
front,
we
were
able
to
move
that
at
public
works.
E
D
Thanks
Council
for
your
question
through
the
speaker,
the
transportation
services
work
program
is
very
full
for
the
the
fall
and
into
early
of
2019,
particularly
with
regard
to
delivering
on
the
public
transit
infrastructure
fund
dollars
for
road
safety
and
cycling
infrastructure,
as
well
as
the
vision,
zero
acceleration.
That
council
has
recently
directed
us
on
that.
So
we
are
very
active
in
in
delivering
all
of
those
initiatives,
so
we
will
be
looking
to
initiate
the
terms
of
reference
in
2019,
so.
E
D
E
Is
that
common
is
that
a
common
policy
approach?
Absolutely
because
again,
I
would
just
cite
this
example
of
the
single-use
products.
We
are
launching
those
those
consultations
in
September,
even
though
it
is
there
is
an
election
underway
I,
just
don't
like
seeing
the
city's
business
affected
by
a
very
long
election
cycle.
So
there's
a
bit
about
crayon
this
to
get
this
moving,
and
my
question
is:
why
couldn't
we,
if
you
know,
there's
added
stuff
for
vision,
zero,
there's
out
of
dollars?
Why
could
we
not
move
it
forward?
This
fall
through.
R
A
Okay,
if
I
can
please
have
members
of
council
like
pleased.
Please
take
your
seats,
councillor,
DG,
no
shine
or
perverts
Karianna.
J
Thank
you
very
much
speaker
I
have
two
motions.
The
first
motion
is
to
adopt
the
supplementary
report,
which
came
with
the
supplementary
report
and
that
what
that
supplementary
report
does
is
it
includes,
in
our
official
plan
amendment
changes
that
will
I
guess
authorize,
that's
not
exactly
the
word
but
allow
looking
at
the
lanes
and
building
a
complete
system
of
lanes
along
the
Danforth
as
one
of
the
proposals
that
we
would
like
to
see.
Secondly,.
J
The
one
that
councillor
Robinson
pointed
out
is
simply
we.
There
was
an
omission
that
was
supposed
to
include
the
chief
planner
executive
director,
so
I
want
to
thank
first
of
all
our
communities
and
our
planning
staff,
our
heritage
staff,
our
transportation
staff
and
everyone
involved.
In
this
study.
It
was
an
amazing,
an
amazing
example
of
a
good
planning
process
that
engaged
our
residents
at
a
level
that
I
have
never
seen
before.
J
We
had
a
hundred
and
fifty
to
two
hundred
residents
who
came
out
over
an
18-month
period
to
engage
in
discussions
about
their
vision
for
their
Main
Street
and
that
Main
Street
for
those
of
us
who
live
in
the
end
in
the
east
end
is
the
Danforth
and
all
of
the
things
that
we
love
about.
The
Danforth
came
out
through
this
consultation
and
many
much
of
what
we
heard
was.
J
Yes,
we
want
to
see
revitalization
and
we
know
that
growth
is
coming
and
that
we
and
want
to
anticipate
that
growth
and
we
want
to
preserve
the
character
of
our
Danforth.
So
while
we
are
we're
using
the
mid-rise
guidelines
as
the
framework
or
foundational
document,
we
did
have
the
ability
to
say
as
well,
though,
that
there
are
some
areas
that
will
remain
the
same
and
there
are
those
that
will
see
greater
intensification,
particularly
where
there
are
subway
stations.
The
other
thing
that
was
very
interesting
to
me
and
is
yet
to
come.
J
There
were
actually
two
pieces
of
work
yet
to
come.
One
of
them
is
the
Heritage
Preservation
report
and
we
are
looking
in
a
very
different
way
at
how
to
preserve
that
heritage,
character
of
the
Danforth
and,
as
you
all
know,
the
Danforth
developed
once
the
viaduct
was
built,
and
so
we
have
a
really
consistent
character
along
certain
parts
of
the
Danforth
as
well.
We
have
some
very
significant
heritage
property
that
go
back
to
when
the
railroad
was
first
built
and.
J
Finally
Oh
as,
secondly,
our
design
guidelines.
We
have
not
completed
the
design
guidelines
and
that's
a
little
bit
disappointing,
but
I
think
it's
that
it's
integrated
with
the
heritage
work
that
we're
doing,
and
we
will
see
that
in
a
future
report.
Finally,
yes,
what
what
kind
of
Transportation
what
our
public
realm
will
look
like
all
became
part
of
the
discussion
from
the
hundreds
of
people
who
attended
who
attended
our
workshops
and
well
I
guess
there
were
consultations,
not
just
workshops,
but
they
were
workshop
on
the
corridor
study.
J
Question
people
sat
with
hands
on
graphics
and
piece
together
their
vision
for
what
the
danforth
would
look
like.
What
would
the
public
realm
look
like?
How
do
we
create
a
safer
Street?
And
yes,
there
was
full
support
for
looking
to
the
future
for
putting
bike
lanes
on
Danforth,
so
that
is
going
to
be
a
difficult
discussion
in
the
community
and
I
know
that
councillor
Holliday
is
not
very
happy
and
there
will
be
others
who
will
have
his
point
of
view.
J
K
J
K
And,
and
in
that,
is
it
your
understanding
because
I'm
looking
at
it,
you
mentioned
lanes
when
you
introduce
that?
Are
we
talking
about
lanes
on
Danforth
Avenue
as
in
car
lanes,
or
are
we
talking
about
anyways
because
they're
actually
written
in
two
different
ways
in
the
public
report?
One
says
lanes
that
are
six
meters
wide
and
Lane
way,
so
I
just
want
to
clarify
it's
your
intention
because
you're
placing
the
motion
that
this
refers
to
the
lane
ways
that
are
in
all
of
them
in
the
backs
of
the
buildings.
It.
J
Is
lane
ways-
and
the
intention
of
that
is
that
we
have
many
private
lanes
still
that
create
a
situation
where
there
is
not
consistent
access
through
our
lanes
and
this,
in
fact,
there
have
been
situations
that
I've
been
trying
to
remedy
of
abandoned
properties
and
that
have
been
a
sheeted
to
the
province,
and
so
we
need
to
have
a
real
strategic
look
at.
Where
are
the
private
lanes?