►
From YouTube: Government Management Committee - February 20, 2018
Description
Government Management Committee, meeting 25, February 20, 2018
Agenda and background materials:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=13032
Meeting Navigation:
0:08:41 - Call to Order
Agenda Items:
0:15:34 - GM25.1 - (9:45 AM) Apportionment of Property Taxes - February 20, 2018 Hearing (Ward All)
0:16:48 - GM25.2 - (9:45 AM) Cancellation, Reduction or Refund of Property Taxes - February 20, 2018 Hearing (Ward All)
0:10:49 - GM25.3 - Provision of Proprietary Software, Support, and Professional Services from CSDC Systems Inc. (Ward All)
0:17:30 - GM25.4 - Purchasing By-law Amendments - Supplier Code of Conduct and Other Clarifications (Ward All)
0:12:13 - GM25.5 - Real Estate Acquisitions - TTC College Park Station Easier Access Project (Ward 27)
0:12:29 - GM25.6 - Termination of the Offer to Donate Land from Mount Pleasant Group of Cemeteries to the City of Toronto (Ward 23)
0:12:42 - GM25.7 - Real Estate Acquisitions - TTC Sherbourne Subway Station Easier Access Project - Expropriation of a Portion of the Property at 425 Bloor Street East (Ward 28)
0:13:01 - GM25.8 - Acquisition of Portland Slip, Spadina Slip and Spadina Quay Marina (Ward 20)
0:23:42 - GM25.9 - Amendment to Blanket Contract No. 47020391 - to TBM Service Group Inc., for Custodial Services Various City Divisions (Ward All)
0:13:36 - GM25.10 - Union Station Revitalization Project - Contract Amendments (Ward 28)
0:13:56 - GM25.11 - Redevelopment of St. Lawrence Market North - Construction Contract Award (Ward 28)
0:14:12 - GM25.12 - Recognition of Civic Leadership - David Pecaut Square (Ward 20)
1:01:52 - GM25.13 - Enactment of By-laws
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Okay,
good
morning,
everybody
I'm
gonna
call
this
meeting
to
order.
I
would
like
to
welcome
everybody
to
meeting
number
25
of
the
government
management
committee.
I
want
to
welcome.
There
are
no
other
members
from
outside
the
committee
for
those
of
us
in
the
room
today,
there's
a
screen
in
the
black
corner.
A
You
can
provide
real-time
updates
concerning
where
we
are
in
the
agenda
and
what's
coming
up
next,
if
you're,
following
us
from
home
or
on
the
internet,
you
can
follow
the
agenda
and
debate
on
your
computer
tablet
or
smartphone
at
WRO
CA
/,
Council
I
would
also
like
to
gratefully
acknowledge
that
we
are
meeting
on
the
traditional
territory,
the
Mississauga's
of
the
new
credit
first
nation,
the
Hana
of
Shawnee
and
the
hearin
when
debt
and
home
to
many
diverse
indigenous
peoples.
I
would
also
like
to
acknowledge
at
this
time
mrs.
inning
Wang's
name.
A
A
Alright
and
setting
up
so
our
agenda
before
us,
so
there's
no
speakers
this
morning,
so
I'm
just
gonna
go
through
the
agenda.
Are
there
any
declarations
of
a
conflict
under
the
Ontario
Municipal
conflict?
Any
declarations
of
interest
under
the
municipal
conflict
of
interest
Act,
seeing
none
on
my
right
confirmation
of
minutes
of
the
January
11th
2018
meeting
counselor
tri-c,
all
in
favor
carried.
So
there
are
no
speakers
or
presentations
this
morning
there
is
one,
an
add-on
item
that
will
get
to
the
end
of
the
agenda.
I'm.
A
Just
it's
on
the
pink
sheets
in
front
of
you.
First
item
is
a
parchment
of
taxes,
which
is
a
9.45
a.m.
statutory
meeting.
So
welcome
back
to
that.
Our
second
one
is
a
cancellation
reduction
and
refund
of
property
taxes.
It's
also
a
9:45
a.m.
scheduled
statutory
meeting
right
part
of
the
agenda
item
number
three
is
a
provision
of
proprietary
software
support
and
professional
services
from
CSD
SC
Systems
Incorporated.
A
B
A
A
A
A
Number
six
is
the
termination
of
the
offer
to
donate
land
from
the
Mount
Pleasant
group
of
cemeteries
to
the
City
of
Toronto
councillor
chance.
Moving
that
all
in
a
favor
carry
number
7
is
real
estate
acquisitions,
TTC,
Sherbourne,
subway
station
easier
access
project.
It's
an
expropriation
of
a
portion
of
the
property
at
4:25,
Bloor,
Street,
East
I'll,
move
that
councillor
choices,
moving
number
7
all
in
favor
carry.
A
A
This
is
my
favorite
construction
project
in
the
city
right
now,
GM
25
point
11
redevelopment,
the
st.
Lawrence
Market
North
construction
contract
award,
it's
in
Ward
number,
28,
counselor,
Troi,
see
I'll,
move
it
you're
moving
it
all
in
favor
of
the
recommendations
in
number
11
carried
and
then
the
one
on
the
Pink
Sheets.
A
C
C
C
A
A
A
Seeing
none
I
do
have
an
amendment
to
the
recommendations.
The
government
management
committee
approved
the
apportionment
of
property
taxes
and
the
amounts
identified
in
Appendix
A
and
B.
Under
the
columns
entitled
a
portion
tax,
an
apportioned
phase-in,
slash,
capping
excluding
the
following
application
from
Appendix
A
Ward
18,
11:22,
Queen,
Street
West
in
2017
tax.
Here
it
might
have
any
questions
of
the
mover,
seeing
none
all
in
favor
of
the
amendment
in
favor
of
the
item,
as
amended
carried.
A
Then
our
next
item
is
number
two
cancellation
reduction
or
refund
of
property
taxes.
As
of
February
20th
2018
hearing
there's
nobody
registered
to
Depew
it
on
this
item.
So
I'm
gonna
ask
if
there's
anybody
in
the
room
that
would
like
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item.
It's
the
cancellation
reduction
and
refund
of
property
taxes
as
of
February
20th
2018.
Would
anybody
like
to
make
a
presentation
in
the
Committee
on
this
item
and
one
last
time?
A
A
C
E
The
chair,
yes,
staff,
can
was
we're
consulting
with
what
we
call
the
broader
construction
Association
consultation
group,
which
is
made
up
of
various
construction
associations
about
the
provision
related
to
suspending
suppliers
that
are
in
litigation
with
the
city.
They
had
felt
that
it
was
overly
broad
and
they
didn't
have
any
chance
to
consult
with
prior.
E
So
we
worked
with
them
to
work,
a
solution
that
would
make
more
sense
for
for
these
all
suppliers,
as
well
as
the
city,
and
we
changed
it
from
a
specific
litigation
suspension
for
someone
who's
in
litigation
with
the
city
into
relating
it
more
to
contractor
performance.
So
if
there's
excessive
claims
or
other
issues
in
their
performance,
we
can
still
consider
that
in
the
realm
of
suspension.
Well.
C
E
It
is
not
intended
to
be
something
that
is
weighted
last
less
compared
to
others,
it's
just
as
part
of
we're
just
connecting
it
back
to
performance
of
past
contracts
for
consideration,
not
that
it's
one
thing
is
more
important
or
less
important
than
the
other.
These
are
all
things
that
we
could
consider
or
suspension
that
relate
to
past
performances
of
contracts.
C
D
Actually,
through
through
the
chair,
the
original
provision
was
that
we
could
exclude
someone
in
litigation.
We
had
to
come
up
with
additional
information
and
procedures,
and
we
had
to
show
that
the
litigation
would
in
fact
affect
their
performance
so
that
this
is
actually
just
a
natural
evolution
of
that
showing
that
there
it's
not
the
litigation.
That's
the
issue,
it's
the
fact
that
it's
roomed
the
sort
of
the
supplier
city
relationship
and
therefore
we
should
be
showing
this
through
the
performance
measurement
process.
Now.
C
E
But
circumstances
can
change,
and
we
want
to
be
make
sure
that
there's
an
opportunity
for
the
contractors
to
bring
that
forward
and
that,
depending
on
how
the
suspension
was
decided,
if
there's
society
by
council,
any
lifting
of
such
suspension
would
have
to
come
back
here
with
a
good,
valid
business.
Reason.
C
E
The
chair
just
to
be
clear.
We,
the
committee
and
Council,
adopted
this
in
July
of
2016.
The
purchasing
bylaw
became
in
force
in
January
1st
of
2017,
and
it's
been
taken
over
the
year
and
a
half
to
have
discussions
about
how
that
might
whether
it
should
remain
as
it
is
or
changed.
So
this
is
why
we've
brought
it
forth
now,
so.
C
Well,
I'll
move
the
staff
recommendations
but
I
think
we're
just
opening
ourselves
up
for
constant
Appeals
of
any
suspensions
we
ever
do
and
that
we've
weakened
the
provisions
but
you've.
Given
us
your
professional
advice
and
so
I
guess
we'll
adopt
it
and
I
guess.
If
there
is
a
if
this
becomes
an
issue,
you
would
report
back
to
us.
A
A
Sorry
did
I
miss
one
sorry,
yes,
I
did
number
nine
amendment
to
blanket
contract
number
four:
seven:
zero:
two
zero
three
nine
one,
two
TBM
service
group
incorporated
for
custodial
services
for
various
city
divisions,
I,
was
held
by
councillor
Davis.
Don't
sir,
do
you
have
questions
to
stop?
I
have
a
lot.
C
Of
questions
all
right,
the
first
one
you
don't
need
to
answer,
but
why
it
wasn't
here
on
time,
but
you
noted
that
in
the
report,
what
I'm
struggling
with
is
to
really
understand.
What's
going
on,
so
we
approved
a
new
standard
which
I
gather
is
a
new
standard
of
caretaking
that
we
are
attempting
to
put
in
across
all
contracts
and
to
consolidate
I
didn't
realize
we
were
consolidating
all
of
the
existing
contracts
and
just
bringing
them
into
this
contract,
as
the
others
expire.
F
No
I,
don't
through
the
chat,
I,
don't
believe
that's
the
case,
and
the
contract
with
TBM
service
group
represents
roughly
about
thirty
percent
of
the
total
square
footage
under
management,
so
roughly
around
3.8
million
square
feet
of
12
million
square
feet
that
we
have
under
management
of
the
corporate
sites.
However,
the
contract
is
structured
such
that
it
has
flexibility
to
allow
additional
sites
to
be
added
within
the
the
structure
of
that
particular
contract.
So,
as
we
have
additional
demands
from
client
divisions,
then
we
can
look
at
this
contract
to
my.
C
F
C
C
F
C
C
F
C
F
C
F
C
We
were
supposed
to
how
much
are
we
projecting?
We
projected
that
on
an
annualized
basis,
we
would
save
1.5
million
I
understand
it's
an
anomaly.
2017
is
this
kind
of
a
transition?
Are
you
projecting?
You
would
have
been
projecting
I
presume
before
the
changes
to
the
wage
policy,
the
minimum
wage
legislation,
you
would
have
been
projecting
1.5
million.
That.
F
We
did
meet
the
cssm
standard,
but
moving
up
from
the
cssm
standard
at
the
start
of
the
year,
we
gradually
added
some
services
so
that
the
level
of
savings
was
not
fully
realized
and
also
it
took
us
you
into
halfway
through
the
year
to
start
getting
closer
to
the
standard.
We
worked
very
carefully
and
closely
with
our
clients
to
achieve
that
and.
C
F
C
Which
division
is
having
difficulty
adapting
to
the
new
which
divisions
the
customer
service
and
customer
satisfaction
has
not
been
reported
here
very
clearly,
I'd
like
to
know.
Where
is
the
cleaning
being
done
to
a
standard
that
people
are
satisfied
with
or
and
which
divisions
are
not
satisfied?
With
the
new
standard
basic
standard?
Two.
F
Of
our
major
partners
on
this
account
with
TBM
services
are
the
TPS
and
Tess,
as
well
as
many
internal
clients
at
the
Civic
Center
buildings,
we're
working
very
closely
with
those
groups
to
ensure
that
they
do
indeed
get
the
service
level.
An
expectation
standard
that
yeah
that
they
are
requesting.
Having
said
that,
we
start
with
the
base
CSS
M
standard
and
work
our
way
up
from
that
standard,
to
ensure
that
we
right
size,
their
service
delivery.
A
C
C
What
would
have
been
the
comparative
cost
between
in-house
and
contracted
services?
Wouldn't
you
agree
and
now
we're
in
a
different
place,
where
we
now
are
paying
much
more
for
this
contract,
opening
up
the
contract
and
giving
them
funding
to
accommodate
legislative
change.
Have
you
looked
at
what
the
in-house
comparison
is
like
now,
the.
F
The
impact
of
the
through
the
share
the
impact
of
the
additional
fair
wage
amount
is
consistent
with
you
know,
impacts
internally,
so
you
know,
as
you
may
be
aware,
TBM
is
registered
with
Luna.
They
follow
the
same
or
similar
fair
wage
practices
and
we've
gone
to
other
users
of
this
type
of
contract,
such
as
the
libraries
board.
They
use
the
the
similar
supplier
and
through
consensus
with
them.
F
F
Standard
through
the
chair,
the
standard
that
we're
getting
is
consistent
with
the
cssm
standard,
plus
any
additional
requirement
that
each
client
has
such
as
a
test
or
TPS.
But
generally
you
know
we
had
worked
for
over
two
years
with
the
facility
mount
service
standards
committee
to
Agria
standard
that
was
applicable
across
the
citywide
landscape
in
order
to
ensure
a
standard
that
was
acceptable
and
consistent.
I
read.
F
As
through
the
chair,
as
outlined
in
in
our
report,
we
are
working
through
those
challenges
with
our
clients
we're
working
as
partners
with
them.
This
is,
you
know,
quite
a
significant
shift
in
the
way
the
service
is
provided
and
also
the
level
of
service.
So,
having
said
that,
we're
also,
you
know
trying
to
balance
that,
with
you
know
the
direction
that
we
get
through
Council
of
the
direction
that
we
get
from
the
AG's
office
to
ensure
that
we
are
providing
the
best
value
for
the
city.
F
So
in
that
case
we
do
look
at
both
aspects
of
delivery,
whether
it
be
through
an
external
service
provision
through
TBM
or
similar
contracts
or
self
perform.
You
know
within
our
own
resources
and
we
do
still
use
extensive
self
performed
delivery.
You
know
tea.
Byung
represents
you
know
about
a
third
of
our
total
delivery.
F
C
Okay,
because
they
definitely
need
a
higher
standard
than
the
basic
I,
don't
know
what
the
basic
standard
is,
but
I
know
at
the
library
there's
a
lot
of
unhappiness
about
the
standard
of
cleaning
in
libraries.
So
what
we've
done
on
the
cost
side
is
we've
said:
okay,
the
library's
already
negotiated
some
deal
with
them,
and
so
we're
going
to
it,
because
it's
fair
is
that
we
think
it's
fair
well.
D
C
F
E
Through
the
changes
to
clarify,
they,
I
was
part
of
the
poverty
reduction
strategy
report
adopted
by
Council
last
month,
and
it's
the
pilots
with
respect
to
some
of
those
additional
criteria
that
government
management
was
considering
with
when
the
bill
when
the
minimum
wage
was
not
quite
not
yet
enforce.
I.
Think
in
in
the
timeline,
though,
there
is
a
note
on
living,
wage
I
have
to
go.
Look
it
up
to
see
when
it
is
I'm,
not
sure
if
it's
within
the
two-year
frame
frame
right
now.
Okay,.
D
B
B
In
terms
of
when
we
are
talking
about
wages,
it's
kind
of
hard
for
me
to
contextualize
this
because
I
don't
know
what
kind
of
wages
are
currently
being
paid.
Is
that
something
that
is
shared
to
us
and
do
we
know
what's
what's
being
adjusted
because
of
the
increased
support
from
what
to
what
or
what
percentage
is
being
adjusted?
Yes,.
B
F
Through
the
chair,
we
work
closely
whenever
we
add
sites
or
we
make
adjustments
to
the
service.
We
work
very
closely
with
the
client
to
ensure
that
they
have
adequate
presence
of
this
service
provider
at
their
sites.
In
the
case,
as
an
example
of
the
TPS,
there
was
a
move
towards
a
desk
site,
pickup
moving
to
a
centralized
pickup,
so
that
did
take
us
some
time
to
to
move
to
that
level.
That
did
result
in
some
reaction
of
a
number
of
staff
and
the
hours
visiting.
F
However,
that
was
an
efficiency
that
was
present
within
the
whole
citywide
network.
So
we
drove
the
effectiveness
of
the
overall
contract
by
ensuring
that,
within
that
client,
the
TPS
and
the
other
clients,
such
as
test
strategies
such
as
the
centralized
site,
that's
pickup,
going
away
to
a
centralized
model
were
leveraged.
So
in
those
cases
you
perhaps
would
see
some
less
frequency
of
staff
moving
around,
but
that
is
something
that
is
done
in
certainly
in
the
office
locations
in
the
the
major
Civic
Center's
the
office
locations.
B
B
F
Understanding
is
that
the
original,
through
the
chair,
my
understanding,
is
that
the
original
shift
was
over
five
or
six
years
ago.
There
was
actually
a
council
direction
to
provide
the
external
services
for
the
whole
of
the
police
portfolio.
However,
as
that
was
in
transition
in
motion,
there
was
a
secondary
direction
by
counsel
to
stop
the
external
services
provision
so
partway,
maybe
five
or
six
years
ago.
It
was
stopped.
However,
what
we
did
do
was
continue
to
maintain
the
external
services
that
were
already
provided
and
through
contracts
such
as
the
TBM
contract.
F
The
share
we
have
we're
constantly
doing
comparisons
of
the
internal
service
cost
versus
the
external
cost.
At
this
time.
It's
our
position
that
the
TBM
contract
provides
good
value
and
I.
Would
you
know,
expand
that
that
line
of
thinking
and
in
going
to
the
actual
budgeted
amounts
in
this
report
are
all
being
met.
So
we
work
closely
with
our
partners
at
TPS
and
test.
All
of
their
budgets
are
being
met.
What
was
planned
is
being
met.
F
B
C
Well,
I
do
think
that
council
should
see
this.
It's
a
report
that
has
exceeded
the
blanket
amounts
that
were
authorized
it
is.
It
has
resulted
in
three
hundred
thousand
less
savings
and
I'm.
It's
completely
justified
because
of
the
minimum
wage,
but
I
don't
understand
why
it
is
that
we
have
seen
the
inability
to
introduce
this
system
in
a
way
that
is
satisfactory
to
the
various
divisions
who
use
it.
C
I'm
I
do
think
that
now,
the
with
the
cost
of
the
fair
wage
going
up
that
the
differences
between
an
in-house
and
a
contracted
service
has
been
shrunk
significantly.
On
top
of
this,
we
are,
we've
had
to
hire
additional
staff
to
monitor
the
contract
and
to
ensure
compliance
with
the
standards.
I
understand
this
arises
out
of
the
Auditor
General's
report
and
the
need
to
make
sure
we're
only
for
the
cleaning
that
we're
providing
and
the
square
footage
and
consistent.
C
I
also
don't
believe
that
City
Council
approved
migrating
all
existing
contracts
into
one
I
think
having
this
one
contract
is
leaves
us
vulnerable
and
so
I
would
amend
it,
I
guess
to
say:
City,
Council,
replace,
government
management
and
just
say
City
Council
grant
Authority
and
it
will
go
to
Council.
Thank
you.
C
I
I,
just
and
I
will
say
it
every
time
we
talk
out
of
one
side
of
our
mouth
saying
we
want
decent
jobs,
good-paying
jobs,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
people
are
paid
a
living
wage
with
benefits
and
out
of
the
other
side
of
our
mouths.
We
contracted
out
to
the
private
sector
with
the
notion
that
the
primary
objective
is
getting
the
lowest
price
and
I
think
we
we
should
be
a
better
model
employer
and
that
we
should
be
providing
decent
in-house
jobs
as
opposed
to
contract.
A
Okay,
so
I'm
going
to
move
the
recommendations
in
the
report.
So
if
you
look
at
the
report
this
this
cleaning
contract
custodial
issue,
that's
been
to
the
Auditor
General
has
been
reviewed
twice.
The
Auditor
General
gave
us
guidance.
The
Auditor
General's
report
was
approved
at
City
Council.
This
has
been
as
government
management
committee
twice
as
we
made
sure
that
staff
have
adhered
to.
What
the
Auditor
General
has
told
us
to
do.
Staff
have
it
here
to
our
guidance
and
the
guidance
of
the
Auditor
General's
Office.
A
We
have
a
fair
wage
office
that
has
been
in
existence,
I
think
since
1893.
That
continues
to
do
very
diligent
work
to
make
sure
that
these
contracts
are
all
adhere
to
that.
The
guidelines
of
counsel
and
the
Auditor
General
are
adhered
to,
and
this
has
been
the
council.
Already.
It's
been
approved
by
council
staff
are
following
the
guidelines
that
were
ultimately
approved
by
council
and
so
I'm
gonna
be
I'm.
A
B
F
Through
the
chair,
we
we
do
have
a
comparator
or
number
and
so
very
at
a
rough
order
of
magnitude.
The
external
service
provision
is
at
around
16
to
17
dollars
per
hour,
and
the
internal
service
provision
is
around
$20
per
hour,
representing
a
very
rough
order
of
magnitude
of
sorry
20
to
24
dollars
per
hour.
So
representing
a
rough
order
of
magnitude
over
25
to
30
percent
difference
just
in
the
wage.
B
D
A
So
this
is
sir,
so
councillor
Davis
your
motions
out
of
order,
because
this,
the
item
before
us
today
was
delegated
to
us
by
under
the
financial
control
bylaws
by
City
Council.
So
it's
been
delegated
us
to
take
care
of
and
to
deal
with,
I
can't
send
it
back
to
City
Council.
It's
been
delegated
to
us,
so
I'm
reeling.
C
A
A
A
A
A
D
A
A
C
C
C
A
C
Said
so,
they've
already
decided
who's
going
to
be
honored
on
it
and
they
do.
We
know
what
it's
going
to
look
like
or
where
it
would
be
located,
and
what
is
the
I
understand?
It's
David
Pico
square.
It
doesn't
mean,
though,
that
there's
an
automatic
recognition
of
civic
actions
choice.
So
funders,
yes,
funders,
is
that
these
people,
who
are
going
to
be
honored,
are
our
people.
Who've
made
donations
so.
A
So
my
understanding
is:
it's
a
statue,
our
monument
dedicated
to
civic
leadership,
it's
going
in
david
pico
square,
there's
a
public
art
and
monument
donation
policy.
It
has
to
adhere
to,
and
we
also
have
a
landlord
that
actually
owns
pecos
square,
that
we
have
to
negotiate
with
them.
I
understand
as
well
before
we
can
put
something
there.
So
this
isn't
improving
this,
isn't
the
ultimate
approval.
D
C
D
A
cool
thank
you,
mr.
chair
I,
don't
know
if
I'm
asking
this
of
you
as
the
mover
or
to
staff,
but
the
the
way
the
recommendation
reads.
It
sounds
like
we're
installing
something
and
we
don't
know
what
that
something
is
and
the
way
the
appendix
reads
is
that
these
names
and
corporations
specifically
will
be
sited
on
whatever
it
is
that
we
install
and
so
I'm
just
wondering
if
there
can
be
some
tweaking
to
the
motion
of
the
wording
that
reflects
what
we
just
heard
from
staff
as
opposed
to.
D
Yeah,
but
this
is
the
sorry
I
guess
my
other
question
to
you
is:
does
does
the
public
art
monument
donation
policy
prescribe
or
dictate
whether
beemo
will
be
on
the
plaque
or
not
through
the
chair?
Yes,
through
the
internal
review
process,
there
is
a
review
of
both
content
and
the
proposed
composition
of
the
display,
and
so
that
is
part
of
the
internal
review
that
would
come
forward
as
part
of
a
recommendation
and
then
that
final
recommendation
would
include
what
the
it
is.
Yes,.
C
A
B
So
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
the
clarity
between
the
two
parts
of
the
process.
So
it
here
says
that
we
are
moving
a
recommendation
that
council
approved
the
request.
So
at
what
point?
Does
the
authority
of
the
council,
or
in
case
of
a
decision
in
case
of
a
conflict
against
between?
What's
what
the
staff
come
up
with
and
what
the
council,
this
kind
of
sporting,
but
at
the
same
time
I
would
I
wonder
which
one
would
get
which
one
would
supersede
the
other
through.
D
B
C
If
this
goes
to
council
right
now
in
the
form
we
have
it,
it
tells
us
it
doesn't
tell
us
enough
and
I,
don't
think
we
should
take
anything
forward
to
council
this
as
approve
I,
think
they
should.
It
should
be
referred
that
the
government
management
committee
refer
to
the
appropriate
staff.
The
request
from.