►
Description
North York Community Council, meeting 32, July 4, 2018 - Part 1 of 2
Agenda and background materials:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=12973
Part 2 of 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Us8MsURbIs#t=13m51s
Meeting Navigation:
0:11:17 - Call to order
2:06:44 - Meeting resume
B
C
D
C
C
B
B
C
C
B
Pedestrian
crossing
Bathurst
and
Neptune
Drive
I'll
move
staff
recommendation.
Thank
you.
40
short
term
parking,
Ridley
councillor,
Carmichael,
grep,
move
staff
recommendations,
ok,
41
u-turn,
prohibitions,
John,
whomp,
Wanless,
public
school
move,
staff,
recommendation,
42,
pedestrian
crossover,
pilot
Rosewell,
move
staff,
recommendations,
43
speed,
limit
reduction,
Wilburn.
E
B
C
B
B
Same
yes,
then
request
for
a
u-turn,
prohibition
on
in
front
of
Allenby
jr.
public
school
yeah
yeah,
and
would
you
also
move
one
for
councillor,
Cole,
sure
naming
of
the
laneway
of
Eglinton
west
and
different
as
Fairbank
village,
lien?
Okay,
page
two
councillor
robinson,
you
have
a
few
here.
I
do!
Thank
you,
one
which
will
be
known
as
item
78
regarding
speed,
limit
reduction
on
walnuts
and
Roth
Muir.
E
B
You
please
introduce
one
a
report
from
the
director
and
building
chief
chief
building
official
regarding
residential
demolition
on
elders,
Lee,
oh
I'm,
sorry,
that's!
Okay,
then,
back
to
Robinson,
no
still
Fillion
st.
Paschal
bail
on
Catholic
school
request
for
a
report;
okay
and
then
councillor
Robinson
speed,
limit
reduction
in
the
Lawrence
Park
neighborhood.
Yes,.
B
Now
one
two
three
four:
there
are
five
notices
from
from
Josh
Cole
you'll
introduce
okay.
The
first
is
the
York
Beltline
deficiencies.
The
second
is
speed
bumps
in
Lawrence
Heights,
then,
regarding
Lawrence
Heights,
revitalization
2.0
then
supports
for
Lawrence
Heights,
then
fence
removal
along
the
Allen
Greenway.
B
G
Yes,
thank
you
very
much.
My
name
is
Anne
Lavery
and
I
own
a
building
across
the
street
at
82,
Bartley,
Drive
I,
understand,
through
speaking
to
the
developer.
That
I
should
have
spoken
to
Cynthia
earlier,
but
I
am
a
landlord
I,
don't
live
on
the
property.
I
subsequently
moved
I've
got
the
paperwork
here.
I
am
my
major
concern
about
this.
Is
the
increased
size
of
the
park
oddly
enough
I'm
not
here
to
fit
an
agenda,
not
the
developers,
not
the
builders,
not
the
ministries.
I
would
like
to
see
a
safe
area
for
the
children.
G
The
park
that's
being
expanded.
Now
has
three
roads
bordering
it.
What
was
a
small,
safe,
cornered
Park
is
now
gonna
be
sticking
out
like
a
peninsula
with
three
very
busy
roads
around
it.
The
park
is
not
that
large
to
support
kids
running,
throwing
balls
for
dogs,
while
I
am
in
support
of
development
and
for
clean
green
spaces.
The
additional
area
may
not
be
the
best
placement
for
it,
especially
when
you
look
at
two
of
the
roads
that
line
up
on
Bartley.
The
creation
of
the
new
road
that
runs
into
Bartley
will
be
about
30
feet.
G
To
the
it
will
not
lineup
put
it
that
way
as
a
four
cornered
area,
there'll
be
a
distance.
So
here
we
have
children
on
a
busy
street
with
not
even
a
four-way,
stop
I'm
proposing
that
the
new
road
be
straightened,
so
it
can
line
up.
So
we
create
a
four-way,
stop,
not
a
stop,
but
technically
an
area
where
children
would
be
able
to
look
across
the
street
understand
who
has
the
right-of-way,
because
now
the
way
it's
designed.
Thank
you.
It's
not
that
clear.
G
If
you
look
to
a
lower
screen,
partly
the
existing
Road
to
the
south
that
exists,
the
new
proposed
Road
is
the
public
street
to
the
north.
I
propose
that
those
two
roads,
north
and
south,
actually
yes
line
up,
and
that
would
create
a
much
more
needed
flow.
However,
that
could
interrupt
the
additional
park.
That
park
is
not
fully
seen,
but
if
you
would
continue
around
the
corner
to
the
existing
park,
where
it
exists
on
the
far
left
side
of
your
screen,
it
has
three
roads
around
it
because
there's
another
road
going
into
another
community.
G
It's
really
not
that
safe
for
the
children
again
I
support
public
spaces,
but
let's
make
a
safe
place.
First,
I
propose.
One
of
the
things
that
could
be
done
is
take
that
chunk
of
10%
land,
which
I
understand
is
dedicated
from
the
ministry,
and
you
move
it
to
the
east
side
of
Bart
Leon
Teasdale.
This
way
the
community
could
be
bookended
by
green
spaces.
G
G
It
looks
great
on
paper.
I
understand
that
I
really
do
like
I
said
I'm
in
supportive
community
I,
like
the
development
I
like
the
new
road
I
hope
it
does,
connect
to
the
most
northerly
piece
of
section,
there's
another
community
that
wants
to
to
make
a
full
access
road
back
onto
Teasdale,
fully
in
support
of
it.
As
I
said,
my
major
concern
is
creating
a
small,
safe
Park
into
a
larger
unsafe
Park
and
to
create
the
line
up
of
the
streets
and
I'm.
F
G
You
I
think
it's
I
know
it's
a
poor
terminology,
but
I
just
look
at
it
and
it's
like
poor
feng,
shui
and
I'm.
Really
sorry
about
that.
I'm
good
at
visualizing
and
putting
myself
in
there
I've
driven
there,
I've
I've
walked
around
there.
I've
been
in
the
park.
I
can
see
on
paper.
It
looks
good.
I
will
say
that
I'm.
You
know
well.
F
F
Morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
council,
my
name
is
Roy.
Vera
Kelly
I
represented
the
the
application.
The
proposal
is
for
84
townhouses,
a
public
park
and
a
new
public
street
we've
consulted
heavily
with
planning
staff
in
the
community
to
develop
the
plan.
The
proposed
Park,
999
square
meters
or
10
percent
of
the
total
lands
is
an
extension
of
the
existing
Bartlett
Park,
which
was
a
request
by
by
planning
staff
to
be
located
at
this
location.
F
The
proposed
Street,
which
is
20
to
49
square
meters,
or
let
us
call
it
18%
of
the
land-
is
a
new
Street
connecting
Bartley
eventually
through
to
tails,
though
the
cul-de-sac
is
a
temporary
measure.
Until
the
land
to
the
north
are
constructed,
lands
of
the
north
have
been
approved.
The
townhouses
are
freehold
67
of
them,
17
condos
for
a
total
of
8
84
units,
4
stories
a
night,
there's
no
rooftop
landscaped
areas
anymore.
We
got
rid
of
that
and
the
units
are,
as
I
said,
four-bedroom
1600
square
feet.
F
As
for
the
road,
the
road
configuration
has
been
tested
by
WSP
our
traffic
engineers
and
also
by
city
staff,
track
traffic
engineers
and
they
deem
it
they
deem
this
configuration
to
be
safe
and
and
acceptable
if
they
thought
it
was
unsafe.
We
would
have
done
something
originally,
but
it
is
as
per
their
recommendation
safe,
otherwise,
I
seek
to
Council
to
approve
the
recommendations.
If
there's
any
questions
I'm
here
to
answer
questions.
C
F
B
B
I
F
B
F
First
of
all,
my
name
is
Peter
Smith
I'm,
a
land
use
planner
and
a
partner
with
Mouse
fields.
We
are
the
the
planners
and
the
agents
for
the
applicant,
which
is
DCMS
DCMS
Realty,
which
is
the
real
estate
development
arm
for
Verve
senior
living
I
recognize
that
you
have
a
very,
very
long
agenda
today.
So
I
will
be
extraordinarily
brief
and
just
simply
say
we
reviewed
the
staff
recommendations.
We
support
the
staff
recommendations,
we're
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
community
council
may
have,
and
thank
you
very
much
for
for
your
attention
for
staffs
work.
F
J
We
were
promised
that
the
initial
proposal
meeting
that
the
roads,
such
as
Godstone
Kings
lake
and
allenbury
Crescent,
would
not
have
any
construction
traffic
and
there
would
be
no
disruption
to
the
streets
or
to
the
residential
neighborhood
other
than
the
activity
on
Fairview
Mall
Drive.
That's
what
was
promised
to
us
and
what
it's
actually
occurred
to
date
has
been
nothing
short
of
blatant
disregard
to
those
promises
that
garnered
our
approval.
As
construction
began.
J
We
were
given
noticed
by
Fram
the
construction
company
by
means
of
a
letter
in
our
door
of
a
disruption
for
two
days
at
the
corner
of
God
stone
and
Kings
Lake.
That
was
required
because
the
special
concrete-pouring
vehicle
needed
to
be
placed
there
for
the
foundation
pour
of
the
condominium
buildings,
okay
for
the
poor,
but
it
wasn't
a
two-day
destruction.
J
The
pouring
vehicle
that
that
turned
into
a
full
construction
entrance
that
is
operational
to
this
day,
God,
stone
and
Kings
Lake
have
for
two
years
now
been
ripped
up
to
the
point
where
gaping
holes
were
left
in
the
road,
often
unmarked
and
damaging
many
residential
vehicles,
including
my
own.
We
were
promised
that
Fram
would
clean
the
street
regularly
that
didn't
happen
and
heavy
construction
equipment
traveled
along
God
stone
in
King's
Lake,
leaving
massive
trails
of
dirt
and
damaging
the
roadway
I've
got
pictures
of
that
here.
If
you
like
to
see
them.
J
In
fact,
last
year
constructed
the
construction
entrance
opened
up
further
along
Kings
lake,
where
the
curb
was
removed
and
the
sidewalk
torn
out.
The
sidewalk
has
since
been
hastily
patched
and
the
curb
has
yet
to
be
replaced
to
this
day.
I
walked
right
by
it
this
morning,
all
the
while
construction
masses
encroach
further
into
our
neighborhood
and
yet
another
access
point
established
all
off
of
King
allenbury
Crescent
for
a
short
period.
I
brought
these
matters
to
the
attention
of
Shelley
Carroll's
office.
In
writing.
J
Each
time
these
infractions
occurred
and
have
the
responses
here
that
say
and
I
quote,
we
were
caught
off
guard
by
the
new
construction
entrance.
However,
each
time
I
contacted
mr.
Carroll's
office,
I
was
told
they
are
not
prepared
to
do
anything
other
than
the
construction
company.
Let
the
construction
company
have
its
way.
On
one
occasion,
November
24th
2014,
Miss
Carol's
office
indicated.
We
are
also
discussing
the
possibility
of
holding
a
community
meeting
in
the
new
year.
If
residents
concerned
are
not
officially
responded
to.
That
meeting
has
never
occurred.
J
To
my
knowledge,
we
also
got
a
notice
by
mail
this
year
that
an
additional
row
of
townhouses
was
going
to
be
constructed
on
the
corner
of
God
stone
and
Kings
Lake,
no
meeting
or
discussion
about
that
either,
and
they
have
now
been
added
to
the
project.
Reducing
parkette
space,
which
we
were
told,
was
going
to
enhance
that
corner
at
the
outset.
They
also
proposed
that
minimal
underground
parking
would
be
built.
That
was
a
concern
to
many
of
the
meeting
that
thought.
J
It
seemed
that
with
the
construction,
when
the
construction
got
underway,
even
though
a
pretty
big
hole
was
being
dug
that
wouldn't
be
adequate,
their
claim
was
that
most
people
would
take
the
TTC.
Well,
it's
not
turning
out
that
way.
They
have
cars
and
maybe
because
it's
the
cost
of
availability
or
residents
already
in
the
project
are
jamming
up
our
streets
by
continually
parking
along
Kings
Lake,
where
parking
is
prohibited
and
they
park
all
day
and
overnight.
J
On
allenbury
Gardens
Crescent,
where
two-hour
parking
limit
signs
are
posted,
I
even
had
a
resident,
come
to
my
door
the
other
day
and
asked
if
he
could
rent
my
space
in
my
driveway.
We
have
much
more
traffic
congestion
now
and
the
project
is
less
than
half
completed.
There
are
at
least
two
more
condo
buildings
and
I
think
a
third
to
be
built
in
that
property.
J
We
have
much
more
traffic
congestion
in
the
project,
and
now
we
have
the
latest
amendment
proposal.
Yet
another
increase
in
the
number
of
dwelling
units
and
to
go
even
higher
on
their
proposed
building
II
I'm
upset
that
we
were
told
on
this
project
that
there
were
there
wasn't
that
it
has
not
been.
We
were
told
that
the
project
is
not
being
constructed
in
the
manner
or
to
the
specification
that
was
ongoingly
presented
originally
presented.
Thank.
B
K
Morning
my
name
is
Vincent
and
I'm.
The
chief
development
officer
at
Toronto,
Community
Housing
I'm
here
today
to
support
the
report
prepared
by
City
Planning
staff,
specifically
the
recommendation
to
approve
the
rezoning,
an
official
plan
amendment
for
building
ii
at
allenburg
gardens.
As
you
would
appreciate,
our
revitalization
projects
are
extremely
important.
They
offer
significant
benefits
to
not
only
TCH
C,
but
the
city
as
a
whole.
K
The
benefits
include:
quality
housing,
a
healthy
mixed
income,
mixed-use
community,
improved
Community
Design,
a
reduction
in
deferred
maintenance
backlog
and
the
ability
to
generate
revenue
for
reinvestment
in
TCH
sees
water
portfolio.
The
revitalization
of
Allen,
berry
gardens
has
been
ongoing
since
2010
and
building
II
will
be
the
final
phase
of
this
project.
Over
the
past
eight
years,
TC
HC
has
worked
collaboratively
with
our
developer
partner,
Fran
building
Group
affected
tenants,
various
community
agencies,
the
local
city,
councillor
and
staff,
with
the
city
of
Toronto
to
realize
the
vision
for
an
improved
allenbury
gardens.
K
Allenbury
Gardens
is
truly
a
showcase
of
these
benefits.
When
the
revitalization
is
completed,
allenbury
gardens
will
be
a
mix
ten-year
community.
The
project
will
replace
all
127
rental
units
previously
located
in
the
community
and
it
will
create
just
over
1,000
market
condominium
units,
the
construction
of
Market
buildings,
funds,
the
on-site
replacement
of
rental
units
and
any
additional
profit
will
be
used
to
fund
unit
repairs
or
revitalizations
in
other
TCH
C
communities.
As
you
all
know,
revitalization
goes
beyond
bricks
and
mortar,
with
TCH
C's
partnership
with
fran
building
group.
K
We
have
provided
32
job
placements
to
tenants
and
awarded
$20,000
in
scholarships
and
bursaries
for
TC
HC
tenants
have
purchased
market
units
in
the
new
allenbury
gardens
condominiums
through
the
foundation
program
with
funds
from
the
affordable
housing
office.
Construction
for
phase
1
is
now
completed
in
2017
TC
HC
tenants
moved
back
into
30
new
townhouses
and
the
first
group
of
market
residents
moved
into
the
first
condo
building
the
second
condo
building
connect
condos
was
occupied
earlier
this
year.
K
The
application
before
you
today
captures
the
final
phase
of
the
allenbury
Gardens
project,
increasing
the
number
of
units
to
371
units
for
the
last
market.
Building.
Since
the
approval
of
the
original
master
plan
in
2013,
there
has
been
significant
change
in
the
Sheppard
East
corridor.
Heights
and
densities
continue
to
be
shaped
by
the
proximity
to
public
transit,
transforming
Sheppard
east
into
an
urban
Avenue
Toronto
kamini
housing
wants
to
create
something
special
for
the
final
building
and
allenbury
Gardens.
K
Our
vision
is
a
building
that
bookends
the
site
capitalizing
on
its
location
along
the
highway
and
accommodating
a
density
in
a
harmonious
form
compatible
with
the
surrounding
context.
The
added
density
will
increase
profit
to
TC
HC,
which
will
be
used
to
fund
unit
repairs
and
new
unit
construction
in
other
parts
of
our
portfolio.
K
Many
contributors
have
helped
us
to
achieve
this
outcome.
With
this
opportunity,
we
wish
to
thank
our
developer
partner,
Fram
current
councillor,
Jonathan
xylem
and
former
councillor
Shelley
Carroll
city
staff,
members
of
the
surrounding
community
and
the
tenants
of
allenburg
Gardens
for
their
hard
work
in
helping
to
shape
a
better
and
more
complete
community.
As
I
have
said
today,
revitalization
projects
benefit
TC,
HC
and
the
city
as
a
whole.
Allen
Barry
Gardens
has
been
a
true
city
building
project.
L
K
L
Want
to
belabor
this
yeah
when
neighbors
call
a
counselor's
office
and
they
call
you
I
would
suggest
that
that
should
be
your
utmost
concern
to
go
visit
the
site
and
see
what's
happening.
If
you
haven't
I
would
suggest
you
do,
and
if
your
partner
is
Framm.
I
would
suggest
that,
because
you
are
an
organisation
of
the
City
of
Toronto
and
a
public
organization,
you
should
do
above
and
beyond
any
other
standard.
L
K
L
L
C
Thank
you,
madam
Speaker.
The
line
of
questioning,
but
the
style
may
be
a
little
different
with
similar
to
to
councilor
shiners,
we're
always
concerned
when
we
have
all
these
lovely
plans
here,
and
they
look
all
great
on
paper
and
the
communities
kind
of
bought
into
them.
And
then
the
third
party
construction
company
makes
a
complete
mess
of
the
construction
site,
shows
total
disrespect
for
the
local
neighborhood.
There's
styrofoam
and
insulation
blowing
all
over
the
place.
C
K
B
C
F
And
just
before,
I
move
the
motion.
I
want
to
thank
mr.
Tong
and
mr.
Dyk
for
coming
out
here
today
to
express
their
concerns.
Mr.
dick
I
think
your
concerns
are
definitely
heard
and
it's
appreciated
that
you've
come
here
today
to
express
them.
I
know:
when
construction
happens,
it's
a
hindrance
to
a
lot.
L
L
Have
that
and
many
of
our
my
colleagues
have
the
same
thing
and
I
recall
on
many
occasions
when
I
would
have
to
place
one
phone
call
to
the
developer,
to
say
it
wasn't
right,
it
wasn't
being
kept
clean.
Please
don't
have
me,
call
you
again
and
they
would
put
daily
washing
out
on
the
street
or
sweeping
on
the
street
during
excavation.
L
They
would
put
people
on
the
side
of
the
street
to
make
sure
was
right
and
they
would
maintain
it
and
if
they
didn't
and
I
had
to
make
a
second
call,
it
really
wasn't
a
nice
second
call,
because
it's
not
our
job
as
councillors
to
be
the
ones
that
are
policing
the
area.
It's
those
that
are
responsible
for
the
development
and
the
developer.
B
C
You
and
good
morning
my
name
is
Tyler
Peck
I'm
from
WMD
Associates.
We
are
the
planning
consultants
on
behalf
of
the
owners
of
the
site
school
sites.
Acquisition
Corp
I
also
recognize
that
you
have
a
very
busy
agenda
today.
So
I
will
try
to
be
brief.
I
just
like
to
start
by
thanking
staff
for
working
with
us
on
this
file.
Up
to
this
point
and
to
councilor
Pasternak's
office
for
assisting
with
the
earlier
community
consultation,
the
proposal
which
is
the
subject
of
these
applications.
C
The
zoning
bylaw
amendment
and
draft
plan
of
subdivision
applications
is
for
the
development
of
single
detached
homes
on
a
new
public
street
off
Patricia
Avenue,
just
east
of
Bathurst
Street
on
lands
previously
declared
surplus
and
severed
by
the
Toronto
District
School
Board.
The
development
is
consistent
with
the
provincial
policy
statement,
conforms
the
growth
plan
and
conforms
with
the
relevant
City
of
Toronto
Official
Plan
policies.
I
will
simply
conclude
by
noting
that
we
concur
with
the
staff
report
recommending
approval
and
we
are
available
for
questions
if
there
are
any
from
the
community
council.
Thank
you.
C
B
M
B
M
F
M
That
is
to
notice
area
the
community
consultation
meeting
be
extended
to
include
in
addition
to
120
meters.
All
they
know
is
the
residents
in
the
area
bounded
by
Glen
Grove
Avenue
to
the
north,
Dale
meant
a
view
to
the
west.
Hillhurst
to
the
south.
Bathurst
to
East
under
the
applicant
will
pay
the
city
for
the
cost
associated
with
extending
the
notice
area.
M
E
F
E
M
O
B
E
M
N
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
committee,
my
name
is
David
McKay
I'm,
a
partner
with
MH
BC
planning,
I
represent
Policy,
Investments
Limited
and
a
number
of
other
landowners
who
owned
land
at
the
southwest
corner
of
Kiel
and
Finch.
A
letter
has
been
submitted
by
our
clients
planning
lawyer,
mr.
Orosco
we've
reviewed
the
report,
and
while
we
appreciate
the
efforts
have
gone
into
the
report
on
this
matter,
we
feel
that
there
is
a
loss
of.
N
Opportunity
to
fully
and
utilize
the
transit
infrastructure
that
is
being
proposed,
a
long
pinch
as
well
as
the
subway
that
the
city
and
the
problems
have
spent
billions
of
dollars
on
for
this
area.
We
feel
that
a
mid-rise
bill
form,
especially
adjacent
to
the
transit
station,
is,
is
low.
We
think
that
additional
heightened
density
should
be
contemplated
at
that
area.
There
are
also
concerns
with
the
park
that
is
proposed
on
our
clients,
property,
which
achieves
approximately
20%
of
our
clients,
lands
without
any
justification
for
either
the
location
or
the
amount
of
parkland
in
that
area.
N
B
L
N
The
provincial
growth
targets
in
the
growth
planner
significantly
low,
in
my
opinion,
near
of
tuner
jobs
and
persons
from
jobs
per
hectare,
is,
is
next
to
nothing.
It
doesn't
fully
utilize
the
infrastructure
that
you've
you've
invested
in
here
and
I'm,
not
saying
we
should
be
doing
like
in
Vaughan,
where
they're
pouring
tons
of
density
in
at
fifty
five
storeys
in
that
area,
that's
appropriate
at
the
end
of
the
subway
line
in
a
brand
new
community
and
new
downtown,
but
I'm
saying
a
mid-rise
form
should
be
some
accommodation
for
increased.
N
L
N
The
there's
no
density
being
chillin
in
the
plans
they've
talked
about
a
mid-rise
forum
which
would
be
between
ten
and
twelve
stories,
so
I
think
something
higher
than
that.
You
know
in
the
higher
teens
and
low
20s
would
be
appropriate
around
this,
the
subway
station.
Obviously
we
do
know
that
there
is
restrictions
from
Downsview
at
this
time,
but
those
will
be
lifted
in
the
future
once
the
airport
closes.
Thank
you.
P
I'm
chairs,
members
of
council
and
member
of
staff,
my
name
is
Zhang
hua
from
cane
Fuels
Association,
and
thank
you
very
much
for
the
opportunity
today.
I
have
written
a
letter
dated
July
the
3rd,
which
you
have
in
your
package
and
I'm
here
to
provide
some
additional
information
and
also
answer
some
of
your
questions
that
you
may
have
fuel
association.
If
you're
not
familiar
with
it
is
a
company
that
is
an
organization
that
includes
companies
that
provide
fuels
to
Canadians
across
the
country
and
they
are
finding
distribution
of
fuel
products.
P
P
P
Did
you
know
that
this
complex
of
these
three
fuel
terminals
is
being
supplied
directly
via
pipelines
from
the
refineries
in
Sarnia
Nanticoke
and
even
Montreal.
These
pipelines
run
parallel
within
the
energy
corridor,
which
also
includes
some
natural
gas
pipeline
I
do
electric
towers
and
power
lines.
This
is
the
largest
volume
fuel
storage
distribution
industry,
complex
in
Canada,
which
is
strategically
located
not
only
adjacent
to
the
pipeline,
but
also
in
the
middle
of
the
Greater
Toronto
Area
for
an
efficient
fuel
delivery
system
by
tank
trucks
to
various
customers.
P
This
is
24
hours
a
day
and
seven
days
a
week,
this
terminal
complex
provides
approximately
95%
of
the
liquid
transportation
fuels
gasoline
and
diesel,
for
example,
heating
oil
and
other
fuels
used
by
business
governments,
public
transit,
private
motorists
serving
approximately
8
million
people
within
the
GTA
and
beyond
industrial
assets.
Within
the
City
of
Toronto
do
not
get
much
more
strategic
than
these,
and
the
absolute
need
need
to
be
protected.
P
As
the
study
continues
to
progress
and
embarks
into
its
new
phases,
leading
to
the
the
develop
of
the
secretary
plan.
We
continue
to
urge
the
city,
planning,
staff
and
council
to
be
mindful
of
the
implication
related
to
the
issue
of
the
potential
proximity
between
sensitive
uses,
such
as
residential
uses
in
the
employment
areas
where
the
fuel
storage
distribution
terminals
are
located.
P
In
summary,
and
a
consideration
for
sensitive
uses
such
as
residential
uses,
east
of
keel
street,
resulting
from
redesigning
of
employment,
land
to
non
employment,
use
or
zoning
to
allow
for
new
sensitive
uses
must
be
avoided
in
order
to
protect
the
long-term
operational
integrity
of
these
terminals.
I.
Thank
you
for
your
attention.
Happy
to
answer.
Any
questions
are.
O
B
C
B
A
A
Representing
other
five
homeowners
from
28
30
34
36
marathon
Road,
which
is
just
south
of
development,
it's
it's
been
happening
for
five
years.
It's
we
progress
pretty
well
from
proposed
town
houses
to
semi-detached
now
the
tage,
which
is
fantastic
and
I'm,
appreciate
council
Pasternak
for
support.
But
the
key
concern
which
we
had
on
marathon
has
not
been
addressed,
and
this
is
Heights
of
the
buildings.
A
A
Okay,
so
so
sorry,
so
so
elevation
elevation
difference,
there
is
a
meter
or
so
even
more
elevation
difference
between
our
back
yards
and
proposed
available.
Plus
we
have
seven
eight
meters,
our
houses,
and
we
have
a
proposed
eleven
point.
Five,
just
next
immediately
to
our,
which
really
concerned
for
all
homeowners
that
that's
I
think
all
we
have
so
Heights
of
the
building
proposed
and
that
proponent
or
developer
proposed
to
change
it
from
ten
to
eleven
point
five.
It's
a
huge
huge
concern
for
all
homeowners
on
Marathon
Crescent,
which
are
presently
here.
Thank
you.
B
E
So
while
I
support
this
report,
I
just
wanted
to
make
mention
of
these
public
meetings
are
very
difficult
to
see
people
in
the
young
Edgington
area
who
have
lived
there.
It's
been
their
neighborhood,
it's
been
their
life
for
twenty
thirty
years
being
uprooted
and
very
fearful
about
what
their
future
holds,
given
the
the
cost
of
rent,
rentals
or
the
lack
of
rentals
in
in
the
city,
but
also,
more
importantly,
the
cost.
So
again,
I
just
want
to
emphasize
the
over
intensification
in
the
young
England
to
the
area.
E
B
M
Have
an
amendment
Sheriff
so
first
all
the
office
staff
recommendations
and,
second,
that
we
request
the
director
Community
Planning
North
York
district
to
report
back
in
q2
on
potential
amendments
to
the
existing
bylaws
in
the
arts
district,
which
would
require
a
ground
floor
or
rented
retail
display
areas
or
the
commercial
oriented
uses
at
the
front
of
live
work.
Units.
Thank.
B
E
You
again,
madam
chair
I,
just
want
to
again
highlight
that
I
will
be
supporting
staff
recommendations.
This
has
been
a
long
process,
it's
not
complete,
but
the
good
news
is
that
Sunnybrook,
who,
which
is
really
a
world-renowned
trauma
center,
is
adding
a
very
important
wing
that
will
help
people
of
all
ages
with
mental
health
issues,
and
so
we're
not
perfectly
happy
with
the
location
of
this
addition,
and
it
doesn't
seem
to
have
a
big
impact
on
the
ravine.
So
we're
happy
about
that.
E
B
M
B
B
H
H
H
My
name
is
Frank
Connick
and
I'm,
one
of
the
residents
neighboring
the
proposed
condo
tower
development
on
Claver
Avenue
near
Dufferin
Street.
It
also
seems
I,
somehow
I,
always
end
up
being
the
spokesperson
for
the
community,
so
I
have
a
little
quick
presentation.
Hopefully,
I
should
turn
into
five
minutes.
First
and
foremost,
I
would
sincerely
like
to
thank
council
Cole
and
his
staff,
basically
for
their
help
with
the
community
on
this
issue
and
being
available
to
facilitate
and
share
the
various
community
meetings
we've
had
on
this
on
this
issue.
H
We
understand
there
are
a
lot
of
people
vying
for
your
time
and
we
truly
sincerely
appreciate
the
help
you
have
given
us.
So
again.
We
thank
you.
I
have
a
limited
time
up
here
and
the
council
has
a
long
list
of
items
for
discussion,
so
I
have
only
two
points
and
a
question
for
your
consideration
and
I
will
hopefully
stay
just
within
the
five
minute.
A
lot
meant,
if
not
my
wife,
will
continue
within
her
five
minutes.
H
One
point
is
generic
and
deals
with
the
overall
process
of
how
these
sizeable
developments
are
handled
by
the
city.
The
other
is
very
specific
and
is
a
request
for
his
development.
If
approved,
it
is
to
ask
the
developer
to
enclose
or
glass
in
the
terraces
or
balconies
on
the
east
side
of
the
building.
Now
here's
more
detail
on
point
one:
the
process.
This
is
the
very
first
time
most
of
us
in
our
local
group
got
exposed
to
the
land
development
process
attending
the
various
meetings.
H
We
were
shocked
to
discover
that
there
seems
to
be
a
different
standard
when
it
comes
to
the
application
of
laws
and
regulations
for
rank-and-file
citizen
versus
a
sizable
developer.
Now
this
sounds
like
a
paranoiac
statement,
but
unfortunately
there's
proof
to
back
up
this
observation.
There
is
no
negotiations
or
wiggle
room
with
a
legal
framework
that
the
rank-and-file
citizen,
normal
encounters
in
daily
life,
for
example,
under
traffic
law,
there's
no
negotiation
with
a
police
officer.
H
If
you
can
roll
through
a
stop
sign,
there's
no
other
traffic,
take
it
or
if
you
have
only
one
headlight
working
on
your
car.
If
you
can
still
see
clearly
ahead,
there's
no
discussion,
you
got
a
ticket
under
municipal
regulations,
I
understand.
We
now
have
a.
We
now
have
garbage
inspectors.
We
can
charge
you
as
a
resident
if
you
put
the
wrong
thing
in
wrong
bin,
in
other
words
in
the
garbage
bin.
Instead
of
the
recycling
bin,
you
can
park
your
car
in
your
own
lawn
or
arbitrarily
widen
your
driveway.
H
The
rules
are
clear,
firm
and
non-negotiable.
For
a
rank-and-file
citizen,
however,
a
developer
of
a
significant
project
can
negotiate
all
sorts
of
variances
and
exceptions
after
all.
That
is
why
we
are
here
today,
for
example,
I
understand
from
city
staff
that
some
developers
proposed
say
a
14
story
building
when
there's
say
a
five
story
limit
the
idea
being
that
they
can
negotiate
this
down
or
up
to
a
ten
story.
Building,
for
example,
I
understand
the
Treviso
complex,
just
north
of
our
neighborhood
different
Lawrence
is
one
such
example,
where
basically,
the
the
limits
get
ramped
up.
H
Furthermore,
if
variances
and
exceptions
are
allowed
in
one
case,
other
developers
will
now
ratchet
the
first
development
to
justify
the
same
allowances
for
theirs,
and
then
we
may
as
well
forget
about
our
the
worth
of
our
buy
lost
official
plan
and
land
use
studies.
To
sum
up,
my
point
is
that
we
either
have
or
seem
to
have
a
two-tier
legal
framework,
one
for
the
rank-and-file
citizen
and
one
for
sizeable
developers
what
are
perceived
or
real.
The
appears
this
way.
H
As
of
this
in
this
case,
if
that's
the
limit,
then
anything
over
three
stories
should
clearly
not
be
allowed.
Even
the
perception
of
a
two-tiered
system
can
lead
to
a
loss
of
trust
and
faith
in
the
system
by
the
average
citizen
now
very
quickly.
Let
me
now,
if
focus
from
the
generic
point,
one
to
point
to
that
has
a
specific
request
for
its
development.
An
eight
story:
condo
will
have
a
drastic
impact
on
the
neighborhood
residence
that
is
beyond
debate.
There
will
be
more
traffic
and
congestion,
noise
and
a
loss
of
privacy
for
immediate
neighbors.
H
C
O
F
I'm
Maria
Santoro
I'm,
Frank's,
wife
I'm,
just
going
to
continue
with
our
points
here,
plus
we'll
have
to
put
up
with
absolute
hell
when
the
project
is
under
construction,
dust,
noise,
heavy
trucks
and
equipment,
idling
and
Street
blockages.
Obviously,
we,
the
neighboring
residence,
would
be
happy
if
this
development
would
not
would
not
happen,
but
this
is
not
under.
Control
is
up
to
the
council
and
your
vote.
F
There
was
one
question
I'd
like
to
leave
for
later
follow-up
by
city
staff
before
I
make
the
second
point:
what
happened
to
the
proposal
from
the
last
community
meeting
that
Claver
Avenue
was
to
be
closed
at
the
east
end
of
the
proposed
development
forming
two
cul-de-sacs
or
dead-end
streets
on
each
side,
with
trees
planted
as
a
possible
barrier.
This
would
prevent
through
traffic,
reducing
the
impact
on
cleaver
residents
and
give
the
development
better
access
to
their
garage.
This
would
resolve
the
traffic
and
congestion
concerns
if
the
development
would
be
approved
at
its
proposed
height.
F
We,
the
neighboring
residents,
have
one
request
outside
of
the
street
closure
just
noted
that
the
developer
enclosed,
the
terraces
or
balconies
on
the
east
side
with
glass
or
windows.
This
would
help
alleviate
the
second
of
the
two
main
concerns
noise.
There
are
always
be
that
one
apartment
unit
where
they'll
have
parties
until
the
early
morning
hours
and
often
on
the
balcony
or
Terrace
in
the
summer.
We
have
this
experience
already
with
the
Trevizo
development
at
lawrence
and
darin.
Oh,
there
were
two
blocks
away.
F
We
can
hear
such
activities
as
noise
carries
quite
far
from
the
balconies.
Someone
even
complained
that
she
had
debris
thrown
from
a
balcony,
barely
miss
her
as
she
was
walking
by
on
the
sidewalk
and
closing
the
balconies
or
terraces,
with
glass
or
windows
with
mosquito
screens
for
ventilation,
if
needed,
would
alleviate
the
noise
and
debris
concerns
and
partially
even
the
privacy
concern
for
those
immediately
nearby.
In
closing
I
understand,
consultations
on
this
project
will
continue
and
I
request
that
the
applicants
be
asked
to
work
with
the
community
to
finalize
site
plan
matters.
B
Q
Sure
my
hope
in
testing,
my
name
is
Tony
Bolton
Tustin.
The
planning
consultant
here
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
and
I
will
try
to
convince
you
not
to
defer
this
item.
First
of
all,
I
wanted
to
let
you
know
that
the
the
manner
in
which
the
applicant
conducted
themselves
through
this
process.
They
say
they
started
this.
This
journey
with
a
commitment.
The
commitment
was
to
design
and
propose
a
building
that
was
compliant
with
the
mid-rise
guidelines.
That
doesn't
happen
very
often.
Q
In
fact,
the
former
chief
planner
has
used
the
manner
in
which
the
applicant
has
behaved
in
this
process
and
the
actual
application
itself
and
described
it
as
a
poster
child
for
how
an
applicant
should
behave
and
and
how
they
should
conduct
themselves
and
propose
something
that
is
in
fact
compliant
with
the
mid-rise
guide.
So
this
this
particular
application,
and
it's
it's
trajectory
through
the
municipal
approvals
process,
started
off
on
the
right
foot.
Q
I
know
it
might
be
difficult
for
members
of
the
community
to
understand
the
difference
between
this
application
and
other
applications
that
started
their
process
through
the
approvals
process
in
a
manner
that
was
compliant
with
the
mid-rise
guidelines.
The
the
minor
tweak
was
so
insignificant
that
it
it
barely
deserves
mention
in
terms
of
the
change
that
was
derived
through
the
process.
The
report
you
have
before
you
from
the
Planning
Department.
If
it
was
a
report
card,
my
my
client
would
score
a
hundred
percent
on
a
report
card.
Q
You
could
not
find
a
more
glowing
report
in
terms
of
an
assessment
of
all
the
key
attributes
of
a
proposal.
All
the
key
issues
raised
and
the
manner
in
which
they've
been
addressed.
I
want
to
end
by
commending
the
Planning
Department
for
its
efforts
to
answer
questions
from
the
community
I
know
it's
a
very
difficult
message
to
hear
that
the
application
is
not
only
reasonable.
It's
appropriate
I
commend
mr.
Durham
Oh
mr.
Q
rosovsky
for
their
efforts
in
terms
of
their
thoroughness
and
the
completeness
of
this
report
and
I
would
ask
community
counsel
not
to
defer
this
item.
There
could
very
well
be
an
L
appealed
by
the
between
the
this
term
of
council
in
the
next
term
of
council.
Staff
needs
instructions
and
direction.
I
believe
Community
Council
has
in
its
possession
what
it
needs
to
provide
counsel
staff
with
in
terms
of
those
key
directions
and
instructions
to
proceed.
Those
are
my
submissions
I.
Thank
you.
M
You,
madam
chair,
I,
guess
I'll
start
by
commending
the
applicant
because,
as
his
representative
said,
the
applicants
been
excellent
and
responsive
and
certainly
has
been
a
kind
of
a
model,
developer
and
so
I
think
that's
to
be
commended.
My
reasons
for
deferral
are
less
about
substance
of.
What's
in
the
report
here
you
know
I
I
think
the
community
knows
something's
gonna
be
built
built
here
and
it's
probably
gonna.
Look
a
lot
like
what's
in
front
of
us
right
now.
M
It's
not,
and
it's
not
I
mean
it's
not
gonna,
be
three
storeys
either
when
we
know
it's
gonna
be
something
like
this.
My
issue
is:
is
that
I
receive
this
report
last
night
and
again,
plantings
been
excellent.
This
and
I
know
there's
this
mad
rush
to
get
reports
in
right
now
so
I'm
not
putting
any
blame
on
planning
at
all.
They've
been
excellent
on
this
file.
M
I
received
this
at
9:30
last
night,
I
believe
the
community
members
probably
would
be
seeing
it
here
printed
out
if
they
picked
up
a
copy
today
or
maybe
not
at
all,
and
so
it's
it's
it's
it's
for
that
reason
and
I
actually
feel
bad
for
the
applicant
that
we're
in
this
situation,
but
it's
for
that
reason.
I
am
suggesting
deferral,
it's
not
to
punish
them
because
of
our
break.
I
wish
there
was
a
meeting.
You
know
in
a
month's
time
where
we,
the
community,
could
see
this
and
so
I
am
moving
the
deferral.
M
J
My
name
is
domain
II
do
a
and
I
initials
are
G
I'm
the
solicitor
for
the
longtime
owners
of
the
site.
I
have
with
me
the
owner
and
their
engineer.
Development
of
the
site
consists
of
phases.
Phase
one
at
the
north
is
a
building
with
74,
affordable
rental
housing
units.
J
38
former
tenants
have
already
exercised
their
rights
of
first
refusal
staff
seek
to
impose
conditions
on
the
phase
which
will
negatively
impact
later
phases.
My
client
has
appealed
to
L
Pat,
it's
going
to
be
heard
in
mid-november,
then.
Presumably
all
Pat
will
take
time
to
consider.
Meanwhile,
affordable
rental
housing
units
are
not
being
built.
J
D
D
D
B
C
C
E
I'll
be
very
brief:
I'd
like
to
move
staff
recommendations
and
just
basically
echo
my
earlier
comments
about
the
over
intensification
of
young
Eglinton
and
the
impact
on
many
people
in
many
ways,
including
lack
of
infrastructure,
transit
really
livability,
but
also
the
impact
it's
having
on
people
that
rent
and
so
I
won't
go
into
it
again.
But
I
would
echo
those
repeat
those
comments
and
move
staff
recommendations
on
20
to
30,
12,
ok,.
C
C
E
Again,
I
will
move
staff
recommendations
again.
I
could
make
the
same
echo
the
same
comments,
but
on
this
on
this
round,
I
would
like
to
thank
staff
actually
planning
staff
in
North
York
for
their
ongoing
support
of
the
community's
concerns
and
continuing
to
fight
the
good
fight,
as
they
have
in
the
former
reports
that
I've
just
gone
through
and
so
simply
think
stuff
and
move
staff
recommendations.
C
B
B
D
D
We
can
do
it
quickly.
It's
a
preliminary
report,
so
I'm
just
adding
the
following
to
the
recommendations:
one
given
the
proximity
to
existing
buildings
that
the
applicant
be
requested
to
comply
fully
with
the
height
limit
and
the
secondary
plan
to
that
the
applicant
they
requested
to
make
better
use
of
its
entire
site
in
order
to
potentially
reduce
I'ts
and/or
minimize
impacts
on
adjacent
buildings.
R
R
B
R
R
B
F
B
B
B
F
B
B
F
New
park
that
has
just
been
built
and
open
this
year
and
is
being
heavily
used
by
the
community,
which
is
great,
and
we
need
a
an
additional
stop
sign
on
one
side
of
the
park
to
help
direct
the
flow
of
traffic
and
protect
the
residents.
Children,
caregivers
that
use
the
park
and
a
study
wasn't
able
to
be
done.
C
F
E
M
R
E
E
B
B
D
E
B
E
Again,
madam
Speaker,
this
has
been
a
frustrating
situation
just
because
the
there's
a
number
of
volunteers
have
worked
for
six
on
these
initiatives
and
there
was
a
staff
report
being
written.
It
just
didn't
make
the
deadline
so
I
think
a
stock
would
just
shake
their
head
in
support
of
these
initiatives
that
have
been
vetted
well
vetted
through
your
division.
E
Thumbs
up,
I,
see
and
again
I've
mentioned
this
to
some
of
you
that
very
important
to
try
to
put
every
measure
in
place
to
protect
school
zones,
and
this
is
Blythe
what
Junior
public
school,
very
popular,
in
fact,
they're
adding
portables,
because
they
have
such
pressure
on
this
school.
So
you'll
see
that
staff
fully
support
this.
It
just
simply
didn't
make
it
into
a
staff
report
because
of
timing
about
a
lot
of
work,
went
into
it
by
school
parents
as
well
as
neighbors
in
the
in
the
Lawrence
Park
area
and
I.
E
B
E
You,
madam
chair,
again,
request
to
lower
the
speed
limits.
We've
worked
very
closely
with
staff
and
the
local
or
residents
Association,
the
Lawrence
Park
rapiers
Association,
better
known
as
LP
RA
they've
done
an
extensive
number
of
pulling
up
streets,
and
so
we
decided
to
take
a
critical
mass
approach
and
you'll
see
all
the
streets
that
were
have
identified,
because
this
neighborhood
is
sandwiched
between
Yonge
Street,
Mau,
pleasant
and
Bayview,
the
cut
through
traffic
and
thanks
much
very
much
two
ways.
The
ways
up.
It's
been
a
very
big
problem
for
this
neighborhood
particular
streets
like
st.
E
M
You,
madam
chair,
this
is
a
motion
to
we've,
been
doing
a
lot
of
work
on
New
York
Beltline,
we're
extending
its
Marley
and
that's
fully
funded.
It's
happening,
but
there's
some
kind
of
needling
things
like
road
markings
and
to
access
the
trail,
curb
cuts
and
mostly
signage,
it's
kind
of
a
hidden
trail
and
so
we're
trying
to
make
sure
that
people
actually
know
how
to
get
to
it.
And
so
that's
the
bulk
of
of
what
this
is
and
the
other.
M
There's
another
thing
where
they
want
to
look
at
closing
a
Southend
Loop
of
repli'd
Road,
where
it
doesn't
actually
go
anywhere
because
that's
become
a
real
hot
spot.
So
this
is
reporting
back.
It's
not
installing
them.
Without
that
report,
but
yeah
it's
shootings
and
vehicles
has
become
far
too
common
in
the
neighborhood
I'd.
M
The
the
effort
here
is
to
we're
about
to
go
into
the
second
phase
of
procurement,
so
phase
one
and
a
and
B
is
out
under
construction.
People
are
about
to
move
in.
The
communities
realized
that
myself
and
even
the
market
that
this
plan
came
up
with
was
probably
a
great
plan
in
two
thousand
eight
or
nine.
When
technology
wasn't
what
it
is
today,
we
didn't
have
automated
vehicles,
we're
not
on
the
cusp
of
being
a
reality.
M
It's
gonna
be
great,
but
one
that
reflects
2010
when
it
first
kind
of
was
conceived,
and
so
the
report
asked
to
look
at
ways.
We
can
use
technology
innovation
to
make
the
next
phase
of
the
revitalization
one
that
won't
be
immediately
outdated.
The
best
way
I
can
say
it
is
we
don't
want
to
be
building
the
SkyDome
here
and
so
the
minute
it's
complete,
it's
beautiful,
but
it's
also
obsolete.
Thank.
B
M
B
E
B
F
B
B
F
P
E
As
many
of
you've
heard
me
speak
about
in
the
past,
Bayview
Avenue
is
definitely
struggling
with
the
level
of
intensification
on
a
townhouse
front
and
really
it's
from
its
from
the
401
all
the
way
down
to
Lawrence,
Avenue
and
so
staff
have
basically
pulled
together.
This
report
and
I'm
asking
to
expand
the
notification
area
to
get
feedback
from
all
the
local
residents.
C
F
B
B
M
M
J
J
J
B
F
F
F
F
And
also
on
October
20th
in
the
evening
when
there's
a
reduced
amount
of
volume,
but
yet
a
confusion,
I
think
when
people
approach
this.
This
stop
sign.
I
know
that
mr.
Cole's
office
has
sent
out
a
poll
I
personally
spent
two
days
talking
to
all
the
residents
on
the
street
and
I
know
that
pretty
much
everybody
that
I
spoke
to
shares
the
sentiment
that
Fairholme
has
become
a
through
Fair
for
people
trying
to
avoid
the
busy
arteries.
We
need
measures
to
slow
down
traffic
and
keep
our
children
safe.
F
F
B
F
Show
the
accidents
the
screech
of
cars
from
my
house
is
we're
already
at
the
point
that
my
three
kids
don't
even
run
outside
to
see
what
happens
because
they've
heard
the
screech
from
our
family
room
and
they
say:
oh,
there
was
another
near
miss
at
the
intersection.
So,
while
the
two
accidents
that
Kelly
showed
you
are
not
representative,
the
amount
of
almost
near
misses
that
happen
at
this
intersection
with
cars
that
don't
even
know
exactly
which
way
they
should
be
going
and
I
admit,
even
as
a
driver
who
has
lived
there
for
six
years.
F
I
sometimes
forget
it's
not
expecting
a
four-way
stop
and
it's
not,
and
people
will
proceed
and
they're
not
quite
sure
where
to
go
just
to
add
further
support.
My
I
live
at
this
intersection.
I,
actually
don't
allow
my
kids
to
cross
at
it,
because
I'm
always
nervous
that
there's
gonna
be
a
car
flying
off
Florence
that
doesn't
see
them
so
I
require
them
to
walk
on
the.
F
M
You
know
earlier
I
tried
to
move
adoption
of
approval
of
installation
of
this
always
stop
I,
don't
think
I
can
say
it
much
better
than
these
three
constituents
have
expressed,
but
the
near
misses
are
constant.
The
traffic
volumes
I
mean
the
pictures
that
Kelly
showed
it
looks
busier
on
fair
home
and
going
north
on
and
going
out
sometimes
than
it
does
on
Lawrence
itself.
M
If
there's
ever
a
poster
child
aware
stop,
Sean
should
be,
and
considering
the
hours
and
hours
we
debated
just
recently,
a
council
of
you
know,
measures
we
want
to
take
and
the
millions
of
dollars
we
committed
to
keep
people
safe.
This
is
basically
a
cost
cost-free
way
to
make
a
neighborhood
save
for
where
thousands
of
kids
walk
right.
Through
this
pinch
point
trying
to
get
to
and
from
school
and
home,
and
so
I'm
moving
for
approval
of
the
installation
of
the
always
talked.
E
M
F
You,
madam
chair
staff's
recommendations
were
based
on
our
study,
which
disclosed
that,
based
on
the
collision,
experience
the
traffic
volumes
side,
street
vehicles
and
pedestrians,
the
council
approved
justifications
were
always
stop
was
not
met.
We
did
undertake
observations.
There
did
appear
to
be
clear
sightlines.
There
were
not
issues
with
pedestrians
crossing.
There
are
adjacent,
always
stop
or
controls
controlled
crossings
to
the
north
and
south.
That
was
the
the
basis
of
staffs
recommendations,
controlled.
E
Let
me
reframe
the
question:
do
you
do
you
feel
by
this
that
what
the
counselor
is
moving?
Do
you
feel
there's
any
safety
issue?
That's
what
I'm
getting
at.
Is
there
any
safety
issues,
because
I
had
your
stop
repeatedly
in
some
corridor,
say
it's
actually
good
backfire.
So
we
don't
want
that,
and
so
is
there
any
safety
issues
related
to
this
request
is
my
question:
refrain.
R
R
R
B
F
B
S
S
I'm
Angus
scheme
I'm
the
architect
and
I'm
here
representing
the
owner
of
35
Zdenek.
The
key
thing
here
is
the
an
intent
to
designate
has
been
expressed
by
the
city.
The
owner
opposes
that
intent.
I'm
gonna
go
through
telling
you
what
the
situation
is
now
and
it's
changed
very
much
like
you,
I've
been
quite
busy
rushing
to
get
this
stuff
ready.
S
S
To
make
it
clear,
the
owner
does
not
want
his
home
to
be
historically
designated
the
building
and
planning
applications
that
caused
all
this
have
been
cancelled.
The
owner
will
appeal
the
intent
to
designate
to
the
conservation
Review
Board.
The
city's
case
for
designation
is
weak.
Please
see
my
earlier
submission,
which
was
at
the
Heritage
Committee.
No
one
has
ever
called
this
house
historically
significant
before
not
the
city,
not
the
guidebooks.
No
one.
There
is
a
Heritage
District
study
of
the
whole
area
coming.
That
is
a
far
better
place
to
deal
with.
S
All
of
this,
the
owner
is
happy
to
work
with
heritage
and
will
consider
any
agreement
formalizing
his
intent
in
the
future
with
the
city
I
already
have
a
design
that
leaves
the
house
pretty
much
as
it
is,
and
the
owner
likes
it.
Paul
macca
at
Heritage
staff
said
they
can
likely
support
it.
So
please
save
the
city,
time
trouble
and
money
do
not
vote
to
designate
this
house
against
the
owners
wishes.
Now.
S
S
My
most
recent
one
I
think
was
in
2013
actually
for
articles
I'd
written
for
the
Toronto
Star
as
an
architect
and
historian
one
of
about
20
articles
for
Douglas
Cudmore.
There
Doug
found
me
because
back
in
the
90s
I
don't
know.
If
any
of
you
remember,
there
was
a
show
called
structures
on
the
community
TV
station
that
I
invented
and
it
was
very
popular
and
it
examined
the
history
and
architecture
of
Toronto
its
architects.
S
Its
neighborhoods
I
got
to
that
simply
through
being
an
architect
and
having
an
interest
in
history,
I
created
the
historic
building
inventory
for
the
city
of
Cambridge
in
1993
I
completed
a
very
detailed
study
for
the
city
of
Kitchener
in
1992
on
an
industrial,
complex
and,
of
course,
I'm
an
architect.
My
work
has
always
been
with
older
houses
in
the
city,
so
that
means
from
1987
to
now
I
create
I
have
created
reports
like
the
staff
report.
S
You
have
I
think
at
least
60
of
them
for
Cambridge,
and
it's
why
I
could
look
at
it
quite
critically,
I'll
be
quick,
they
have
to
rely
on
the
Heritage
Act
and
if
they
see
breaks
down
into
three
qualifications,
the
things
either
significant
for
its
design
or
it's
significant
for
its
associative,
historical
value
or
it's
significant
as
a
part
of
its
context.
Now
what
you
have
here
at
thumb.
S
What
you
have
here
is
this
is
long
after
the
initial
real
estate
speculation
of
Lawrence
Park
had
failed
and
collapsed.
The
banks,
foreclosed
and
the
lots
were
sold
in
the
early
1920s
speculative
builders
moved
in
that's
who
purchased
this
property
then,
like
now,
the
speculative
builder
was
actually
a
piano
manufacturer.
He
put
the
land
in
his
wife's
name
and
he
got
his
son
to
draw
up
the
drawings
back.
Then
anyone
could
call
themselves
an
architect.
It
wasn't
till
1931
that
the
designation
of
architect
became
legal
in
the
province.
S
So
when
heritage
tells
you
that
there's
an
architect
involved,
it's
as
much
an
architect
as
you
me
or
anyone
else.
If
you
actually
look
at
the
drawings
in
heritage
as
a
report
of
the
original
building,
they
are
very,
very
poor,
drafted
drawings,
almost
no
information,
and
if
I
was
trying
to
hire
a
kid
based
on
those
drawings,
I'd,
probably
not
hire
them.
You
can
tell
by
the
letter
quality
the
line
weight,
the
person
just
learning
more
than
likely,
since
he
was
20
years
old
at
the
time.
S
It's
a
design
cribbed
out
of
one
of
the
many
architectural
plan
books
that
then
like
now
you
can
google
it
house
plans
you'll
get
about
a
hundred
thousand
hits
so
for
design.
I,
don't
think
the
house
qualifies
it's
a
knockoff
of
what's
called
arts
and
crafts
around
here,
which
are
essentially
knockoffs
of
very
expensive
buildings
built
in
the
Home
Counties
of
England
around
1900
by
famous
architects.
Excuse
me,
you're
a
little
over.
S
It's
a
so
easy
to
value
the
owner
of,
knocks,
knocks
lived
there
15
years
he's
not
even
the
longest
resident
he
was
kicked
out
after
he
died
because
he
couldn't
pay
the
the
mortgage
so
I'm,
not
sure
that
Knox
is
the
appropriate
name
for
the
building
either
as
associative
value
is
not
an
important
architect.
There's
no
question
of
that.
S
The
context
there
there
might
be
an
argument
to
keep
it,
but,
to
be
honest,
the
contextual
stuff
which
is
to
do
with
height,
massing
and
landscaping,
is
all
handled
through
a
lot
of
other
bylaws
enclosing
in
your
little
package.
I
gave
you
I
think
there's
a
solution
sitting
in
front
of
everybody
and
it's
a
design
that
basically
keeps
the
house
as
it
is.
The
owners
happy
with
it
heritage
seems
happy
with
it,
but
nonetheless
they're
persisting
with
the
idea
to
designate
which
I
understand
backstops
their
ability
to
control
what
happens.
I
know
on
the
street.
S
S
E
S
E
E
O
Counselor
through
the
chair
heritage
preservation
services
has
done
an
extensive
review
and
looking
at
the
area
previous
to
this
individual
report,
as
part
of
our
determination
and
counsels,
authorization
for
Lawrence,
Park,
West
being
a
potential
heritage
conservation
district.
As
such,
we
scanned
a
variety
of
properties
and
had
engagement
with
the
community.
The
this.
What
is
interesting
about
this
building
in
particular,
is
that
it
represents
a
phase
of
Lawrence
Park
at
the
interwar
and
the
from
the
1920s
and
I
think.
O
One
of
the
things
that's
most
important
for
it
is
is
that
it
continues
to
adopt
the
principles
that
were
originally
laid
out
for
the
for
the
neighborhood
and
it's
one
of
those
contributing
properties
that
we
we
look
to.
We
did
an
individual
research
of
this
property,
the
architect
himself,
while
not
registered
because
it
predated
when
he
designed
the
house
because
it
predated
the
creation
of
the
Ontario
Association
of
Architects.
O
He
actually
went
on
later
to
have
a
very
important
career
in
Toronto
in
designing
the
buildings
affiliated
with
Regent
Park
and
as
well
as
some
of
the
residential
apartment
buildings
in
North
York.
We
we
look
to
this
building
as
really
representative
and
in
important
parts
of
buildings
and
we've
reviewed
in
the
report
yourself.
What
is
the
provincial
criteria
that
makes
it
worthy
for
inclusion
on
the
city's
Heritage,
Register
and
part
for
designation.
E
O
Have
before
you
through
the
charity,
but
you
have
the
recommendations
from
the
Toronto
from
the
Toronto
Preservation
Board
and
they
made
the
recommendations.
Looking
at
the
the
report
presented
by
staff
and
had
the
benefit
of
mr.
Skeens
critique
and
making
its
recommendations
to
adopt
the
city's
staff
report.
E
O
Under
the
Ontario,
Heritage,
Act
and
and
an
owner
can
seek
permission
to
alter
the
building
and
would
come
back
forward
again
to
Toronto
Preservation
Board
and
to
City
Council.
My
colleague
acting
program
manager,
Paul
maca,
had
a
preliminary
discussion
with
the
with
the
project
architect
and
encouraged
them
to
submit
formal
drawings.
It
was
just
a
preliminary
just
sketch.
We
would
be
happy
to
continue
to
have
that
dialogue
so.
E
E
J
O
O
O
O
R
R
O
Didn't
attend
that
meeting,
but
I
have
notes
from
my
colleague,
Paul
maca,
saying
that
there
were
some
preliminary
suggestions
of
how
they
might
modify
it.
But
he
said
that
Tomek
has
written
to
me
confirming
that
there
would
still
be
changes
that
would
be
required
before
we
could
even
consider
it
and
specifically
at
the
alterations
to
the
historic
roof
structure.
L
O
O
We
certainly
would
be
looking
at
to
help
them
to
accommodate
their
family
needs
and
modernizing
the
house
that
they
need
there's
no
interior
to
the
extent
of
what's
being
proposed
for
an
addition.
This
is
new
information
as
of
last
night,
that
just
came
to
our
attention
of
what
they're
proposing
next
I
haven't
seen
anything
that's
submitted
for
drawings,
so.
L
L
O
L
What
I'm
asking
you
as
I'm
sorry
I,
haven't
seen
the
plans.
I
haven't
been
involved,
I,
don't
know
anything
about
it,
except
the
homeowner
wanted
to
do
some
major
renovations
to
their
home
and
they're
being
stopped
because
they've
told,
although
that's
the
house
wasn't
listed,
so
they
had
no
idea
that
there
was
an
interest
in
it
now
we're
saying
to
designate
it
when
they
won't
be
able
to
do
the
alteration.
So
my
question
was
after
you've,
seen
the
plans
last
night.
O
Would
suggest
that
we
could
we
could
meet
with
them
and
but
I
can't
it
all.
Just
happened
as
of
last
night
that
they've
now
notified
us
that
they've
withdrawn
their
applications,
a
committee
of
adjustment,
which
would
intent
we
didn't
imply
to
me
that
they
are
minor
and
their
changes,
their
suggestions
of
their
renovations.
S
L
So
the
motion
will
be
quite
simple
just
to
meet
and
discuss
them.
The
intent
of
it
is
that
and
I
look
at
it
as
if
any
of
us
had
purchased
his
home
and
it
wasn't
even
listed.
So
we
had
no
idea
that
there
was
an
interest
in
the
house
until
we
followed
the
rules
and
made
an
application
at
the
committee
of
adjustment
where
we
needed
some
variances
and
all
sudden
we're
told
there
might
be
an
interest
in
the
house
because
otherwise
I
could
have
brought
enough
with
keishon
for
a
building
permit.
L
If
I
didn't
need
variances
to
the
building
department
and
have
had
that
and
I
wouldn't
be
here
today,
being
told
that
I
might
not
be
that
I
might
have
to
save
the
house
as
it
is
and
I
don't
think.
That's
fair
I
think
that
there
might
be
a
way
to
find
a
compromise
in
the
middle
of
this,
with
some
plans
that
would
allow
the
owner
to
make
some
reasonable
modifications
to
the
home
that
they
may
have
and
still
save
the
heritage
character,
which
I
believe
is
what
this
community
likes
to
see.
L
E
Yeah,
it's
I'm,
not
sure
what
to
say,
I
think
I
will
support
the
deferral.
I
have
to
say
that
I.
Think
council,
though,
would
be
unlikely
to
not
support
a
heritage
designation
of
a
house,
so
maybe
this
body
would
have
more
influence
or
direction,
but
it's
a
very
challenging
situation,
because
the
applicant
did
not
know
that
this
was
coming
down
the
pike,
so
it
does
feel
a
bit
uncomfortable.
E
At
the
same
time,
we've
just
heard
from
staff
that
the
Toronto
Preservation
Board
would
like
to
see
it
designated
and
I
would
think
that
that
body
would
know
a
lot
about
much
more
than
I'll
ever
know
about
heritage,
and
we
do
want
to
preserve
these
nuggets
of
heritage
throughout
our
city
and
there
they're,
citing
a
very
impressive
architect,
who's
done,
work
in
Regent,
Park,
etc.
So
I
will
support
councilor
Shriners
motion
as
a
local
councillor
and
and
look
forward
to
further
conversations.
E
Maybe
there's
a
misunderstanding:
I
think
a
lot
of
people
think
heritage
is
just
rubber-stamp
and
there's
not
some
flexibility,
but
my
understanding
from
heritage
preservation.
Stop
that
there
is
lots
of
flexibility
when
addressing
these
things.
So
I
think
more
time
might
be
beneficial
in
this.
In
this
instance,
and
with
this
application
any.
B
R
B
L
M
B
Are
there
any
questions,
any
other
questions,
councillor
Burnside,
you
have
the
amendments
before
us
and
then
you're
also
moving
this
stuff
recommendations.
So
on
the
amendments
for
item
20,
all
in
favor
opposed
carry
and
the
report
of
staff
has
amended
all
in
favor
opposed
carried.
Thank
you.
Yes,
yes,
item
16,
please
1130
public
hearings,
I!
Don't.
B
B
B
T
F
F
B
F
I
For
Mattamy
homes,
which
is
the
applicant
in
this
matter,
I
understand
after
discussions
with
the
counselor
that
he
was
going
to
move
this
matter
without
directions
to
counsel
and
we
support
the
councillors
motion.
We
understood
there
was
something
he
wanted
to
speak
with
my
client
about,
and
we're
happy
to
do
that
and
I
just
reserved
the
opportunity
to
respond.
If
there's
anything,
I
need
to
want
to
hear
from
the
residents
no.
T
B
F
T
T
I'd
like
to
draw
attention
to
the
fact
that,
in
this
development,
there's
a
plan
to
have
47
homes
of
this
33
or
townhomes
and
14
are
detached
homes
of
the
33
townhomes.
There's
dedicated
parking
for
one
car
and
the
majority
of
these
buildings
are
three
plus
one
family
homes
and
I.
Think
it's
pretty
common
in
today's
society
to
have
most
families
have
two
cars.
T
So
with
that,
we
also
know
that
there
will
be
visitors
coming
to
visit
people
that
live
there,
which
could
easily
mean
another
additional
eight
people
wanting
to
come
visit,
family
or
friends
at
any
one
point
in
time.
So
this
leaves
a
gap
of
about
50
parking
spots
that
the
subdivision
plan
has
not
accommodated
for
which
means
that
the
cars
are
gonna
have
to
park
somewhere.
So
they
can
either
park
on
Don,
Wei,
East,
broadleaf,
Road
or
Merlot
Road,
and
none
of
these
streets
can
actually
accommodate
this
type
of
volume
of
parking.
T
So
what
we're
proposing
and
are
requesting
council
to
look
at
is
that,
owing
to
such
things
as
the
winding
streets,
pedestrians,
safety,
it's
a
school
bus
stops
that
found
this
whole
area.
This
has
been
raised
at
community
consultation,
which
has
been
documented
in
the
report
that
was
submitted.
We
like
to
have
the
plan
modified
so
that
there's
sufficient
parking
for
an
additional
24
cars
in
the
subdivision.
T
This
would
allow
this
would
assume
that
approximately
50%
of
the
townhomes
have
two
cars,
not
all
of
them,
and
it
would
allow
for
about
eight
guest
parking
spots
when
people
come
to
visit,
people
that
live
there.
I
think
this
would
be
a
good
move
from
a
safety
decision
for
the
neighborhood,
and
the
other
fact
is
that
the
green
belt
path
connects
into
malla
road
where
overflow
parking
might
occur
and
also
connects
into
broadleaf
at
the
same
location.
T
On
the
south
side
of
the
subdivision
plan,
the
additional
24
spots
will
be
a
good
recommendation
to
make
because
it
will
ultimately
be
in
the
best
interests
of
all
parties,
both
the
people
that
currently
live
in
the
neighborhood,
plus
the
new
people
that
be
moving
into
the
neighborhood
to
create
a
stable,
safe
environment.
Thank
you
are.
I
What
Paul
has
discussed
was
actually
discussed
at
a
area
meeting
and
I
just
like
to
add
to
his
parking
comments
that
the
church
on
the
corner,
which
abuts
this
development,
had
an
understanding
with
the
old
mallow
school
for
parking,
and
when
that
school
was
demolished
in
the
parking
lot
removed.
The
church
lost
more
than
50
percent
of
its
parking
spots,
so
for
any
Church
function
they
are
forced
to
park
on
the
dawn
way
and
mallow,
which
is
also
going
to
be
exhaust
exacerbated
by
the
new
residents
who
don't
have
sufficient
parking.
I
The
applicant
has
agreed
to
build
sort
of
a
small
park
to
abut
the
Toronto
City
Park,
and
there
are
that's
page
15
of
the
document,
and
then
there
are
more
pages
on
how
that's
supposed
to
happen.
The
community
discussed
this
and
we
are
pleased
that
madami
is
making
a
commitment
to
parkland
to
replace
some
of
our
park
area,
which
the
community
lost
as
a
result
of
the
demolition
of
mallow
road
school
parkland
is
an
essential
part
of
our
community.
We
are
one
of
the
12
green
neighborhoods.
I
If
it
were
the
responsibility
of
the
city
and
not
cept,
not
divided
between
two
different
bodies,
that
is
the
newly
designated
condominium
corporation
and
the
city,
so
in
essence,
we
would
like
to
see
the
city
maintain
and
own
this
additional
little
park
that
abuts
the
Toronto
City
Park,
which
is
yet
to
be
developed.
Thank
you.
F
A
A
L
L
D
D
F
M
M
R
R
F
M
R
Okay
right,
but
in,
but
you
can't
say
what
that
percentage
would
is
what
you're
asking
for
no
okay
and
we're
the
30
townhomes.
C
R
F
F
F
L
B
L
Between
now
and
council
they'll
work
with
my
colleague
to
find
something:
that's
amenable
to
have
a
decent
park
space
over
there
and
for
the
few
extra
dollars
that
it
would
be
in
size
and
the
size
of
this
development.
I
think
it's
the
appropriate
thing
to
do.
I
hope
that
my
colleagues
able
to
find
some
resolution
to
this.
B
R
Just
quickly
I'll
be
supporting
as
well
I
mean
the
calculation
I
did,
in
my
opinion,
the
amount
being
offered
by
the
developer,
who,
by
the
way,
is
not
a
new
kid
on
the
block.
It's
quite
an
established
developer.
It's
actually
embarrassing
and
the
developer
has
to
be
well
aware
of
the
needs
of
the
city
and
of
well
of
the
community.
R
The
small
community
they're
building
and
just
by
way
of
comparison,
I
have
a
development
in
lease
side,
and
you
know
the
the
Planning
Department
referred
to
anything
under
ten
thousand
square
meters,
not
being
required
for
section
37
agreement
in
the
spirit
of
community
building
I
had
a
development
that
was
well
under
ten
thousand
square
meters
and
that
particular
particular
developer.
Mr.
R
C
Just
just
very
briefly,
yes,
madam
ehome's
is
very
good
at
doing
its
mathematics
and
looking
at
its
square
footage
and
making
sure
that
they're
under
that
threshold.
That
requires
them
to
do
at
section
37.
We
learned
that
the
hard
way
on
Patricia
and
we
were
even
led
to
believe
we
would
get
a
voluntary
section,
37
contribution
which
they
later
said.
No
to
so
we
understand
this
file
very
well.
C
D
Just
to
add
having
a
park
virtually
on
site
next
door,
you
know
certainly
adds
value
to
the
to
the
units
from
sale
perspective.
So
that's
one
consideration.
Another
like
bird
side,
I
have
had
applicants
who,
even
though
they
were
less
than
10,000
square
meters,
have
contributed
generously
to
section
37
and
the
third
point:
when
we
get
an
embarrassingly
low
section,
37
like
this
one,
if
we
accept
it
that
that
then
gets
used
by
other
applicants
to
go
well,
they
only
paid
this.
Why
should
we
pay
way?
Should
we
pay
more?