►
From YouTube: North York Community Council - December 3, 2020
Description
North York Community Council, meeting 20, December 3, 2020
Agenda and background materials:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=17131
A
Okay
well
good
morning,
everybody,
my
name
is
councilor
james
pasternak,
I'm
the
chair
of
north
york,
community
council.
The
clerk
has
confirmed
that
we
have
quorum
and
I'd
like
to
call
meeting
20
to
order
welcome
everybody.
This
meeting
is
being
held
using
the
city's
webex
technology
with
members
of
council
participating
by
video
conference
city
staff
are
also
connecting
to
the
media
meeting
by
video
conference.
A
city
hall
remains
closed.
The
public
continues
to
participate
electronically
and
can
watch
the
meeting
streaming
live
on
youtube
at
youtube.com,
backslash
toronto
city
council
live
because
we're
meeting
remotely.
A
We
ask
for
your
patience
for
any
delays
and
technical
issues.
Of
course,
we
currently
have
people
registered
to
speak
and
we've
been
connected
to
the
meeting
who
have
been
connected
to
the
meeting
by
audio.
The
list
of
speakers
can
be
found
online
by
visiting
north
york,
community
council
page
at
toronto,
dot,
ca,
backslash,
council
and
clicking
the
speakers
box
for
today's
meeting.
A
A
A
I'd
like
to
remind
staff
to
keep
their
mics
muted
and
their
videos
turned
off
unless
they
need
to
answer
questions
or
speak
to
the
committee.
This
will
make
it
easier
for
me
as
chair
and
for
those
watching
on
youtube
to
observe
members
as
they
participate
in
the
debate
and
vote
on
items
as
part
of
each
agenda
item.
I
ask
members
to
raise
their
hand
or
unmute
their
mic.
A
A
If
there
are
any
visiting
members
of
council
attending
the
meeting
today,
I
encourage
you
to
turn
on
your
video
so
that
I
know
that
you
are
present
and
can
give
you
the
opportunity
to
ask
questions
of
staff
or
speak.
This
will
also
assist
the
clerk's
staff
to
record
attendance
for
the
meeting
this
year
has
been
a
difficult
one,
particularly
for
our
students,
who
have
been
working
hard
and
studying
hard
for
their
future.
A
Over
the
past
four
months,
some
counselors
have
been
hosts
to
students
from
the
muslim
youth
fellowship,
including
my
office.
This
program
was
delayed
due
to
the
pandemic
and
once
it
resumed,
it
was
in
a
remote
environment,
meaning
the
students
wouldn't
be
able
to
get
the
full
city
council
experience
they
are.
They
did,
however,
persevere
and
became
part
of
our
teams
and
contributed
greatly
to
our
files.
A
I'd
like
to
take
this
opportunity
to
thank
zubir
ahmed
from
my
office
and
all
the
other
fellows
and
their
contributions.
I
wish
them
all
the
best
in
their
future
endeavors.
It
was
a
very
successful
program,
although
we
were
in
different
locations
and
meeting
remotely
today.
The
community
council
would
like
to
acknowledge
that
the
land
we
are
on
is
a
traditional
territory
of
many
nations,
including
the
mississauga
of
the
credit,
the
ashwanabe,
the
chippewa
haudenoshi
the
windup
peoples
and
is
now
home
to
many
diverse
first
nations
inuit
meteo
people.
A
A
I
see
none
next,
we
need
a
motion
to
confirm
the
minutes.
From
our
last
meeting
of
november,
the
4th
2020
have
someone
move.
Those
councilor
call
all
those
in
favor
opposed
that
is
carried
before
we
begin
I'd
like
to
welcome
councillor
robinson
back.
It
is
so
great
to
see
you.
We
certainly
missed
you
here
at
north
york,
community
council,
your
participation,
your
wisdom
and
I
understand
you'd
like
to
share
a
few
words.
B
I
have
to
get
used
to
the
technology.
Thank
you
very
much.
Chair,
pastor,
knock,
and
I
just
want
to
take
one
minute
to
thank
the
members
of
north
york,
community
council,
councilman,
wong,
counselor,
fillion,
councillor,
cole,
counselor
carol
and,
of
course,
the
chair
council,
counselor,
pastor,
knack,
I'm
just
so
grateful
for
your
assistance
through
the
last
year,
particularly
with
the
north
york
community
council
items
specific
to
ward
15..
So
each
and
every
one
of
you
helped
me
in
a
different
way,
with
various
developments
etc,
and
my
staff
liaised
closely
with
you.
B
So
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
that.
I'm
you
know
internally
grateful
for
your
support
and
health
because,
as
you
well
know,
what
we
do
at
north
york,
community
council
almost
matters
most
because
it
directly
affects
our
residents,
our
communities,
our
neighborhoods.
So
just
thank
you
very
much
for
your
support
and
a
special
thanks
to
the
to
the
chair,
councillor
pasternak,
because
he
he
did
work
with
my
staff
monthly
on
the
items
before
you
over
the
past
year.
So
thank
you.
A
A
So
now,
on
to
business
before
we
move
through
the
agenda,
we
have
a
request
from
the
clerk
who
had
two
new
items
of
business
for
the
election
of
the
chair
and
vice
chair.
I
know
we
chatted
about
that
just
before
the
meeting,
and
then
we
have.
We
have
several
new
walk-on
items.
I've
never
seen
so
many
which
we'll
deal
with
in
a
second.
So
I
think
we're
dealing
with
the
clerks
too
two
items.
A
All
we're
doing
now
is
asking
that
they
be
added
to
the
agenda
so,
but
we're
not
proceeding
we're
we're
not
not
proceeding
with
the
election
of
the
chair
or
vice
chair.
So
would
someone
like
to
move?
First
of
all,
I
a
motion
to
add
them
to
the
agenda.
All
those
in
favor
pose
that
is
carried
and
when
it
comes
to
the
election
of
the
chair
and
the
vice
chair,
I
think
the
consensus
is
we're
going
to
defer
it
to
january
I'll
move
the
deferral.
A
A
A
A
You
can
challenge
the
chair,
which
is
fine
with
me,
or
we
can
I'm
wondering
whether
we
can
just
hold
it
down
for
a
minute
and
see
whether
we
amend
the
motion
to
that
it
it's
applicable
to
businesses
in
north
york,
and
then
we
amended
the
council
to
include
the
whole
city
and
under
our
rules
of
order
that
might
wiggle
by
so.
Do
you
want
to
do
you
want
to
think
about
that?
For
a
few
minutes.
A
A
D
D
A
D
A
D
C
The
only
thing
I'd
like
to
hold
it
down
just
to
talk
about
for
a
couple
of
minutes,
because
there
is
an
urgency
here,
given
our
small
retailers,
are
basically
shut
down
during
this
very
important
month
and
that's
why?
If
we
wait
for
council
to
go
through
everything,
it'll
be
long
gone
where
there
are
opportunities
to
recoup
some
sales
is
lost.
So
that's
why
I
thought
I'd
bring
it
here,
because
it's
been
brought
to
my
attention
by
so
many
people.
E
A
C
No,
no,
the
the
excuse,
mr
chair,
what
I
was
asking
is
for
north
air
community
council
to
request
the
toronto
city
council
asked
the
province
to
basically
limit
the
operation
of
big
box
stores
to
just
a
central
item
for
toronto
city
council.
To
consider
that
and
then,
if
they
do
agree,
then
they
would
ask
the
province
to
consider
the
limiting
of
the
operation
of
big
box
doors
to
essential
items.
All
right.
E
C
A
I'm
getting
a
lot
of
shaking
heads
around
here.
Look
I
mean
let
let's
hold
it
down
for
for
a
few
minutes
and
think
it
through
and
and
move
on
move
on
with
the
agenda.
I
I
support
you
counselor
cole.
I
I
think
this
is
what's
going
on
there.
For
these
big
box
stores
to
be
selling
non-essential
items
is
outrageous.
It's
totally
outrageous
and
it's
hurting
our
independent,
smaller
businesses.
D
Would
also
say
that's
a
good
idea.
I
was
in
a
meeting
yesterday.
Sorry,
I
was
in
a
meeting
yesterday
with
the
mayor
with
the
canadian
federation
of
independent
business
and
with
the
retail
council
of
canada
and
a
couple
of
other
org
in
the
ontario
fed
chamber
of
commerce.
They
all
have
an
interest
in
this
and
walking
on
items
means
they
don't
get
to
say
anything
and,
and
I'm
not
sure
whether
that's
you
know
them
themselves
and
other
people,
business
owners
and
the
public.
A
C
A
C
C
D
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
deputy
mayor,
so
I'm
going
to
I
regretfully
deeply,
regretfully
rule
that
it
cannot
be
moved
onto
this
agenda.
I
strongly
urge
you
to
bring
it
to
economic
and
community
development.
I
will
wholeheartedly
support
it
at
council.
I
think
it's
an
important
thing
to
say
so
and
I'll
call
councilor
thompson
if
that
helps,
but
it's
an
important
message
that
we
have
to
get
out.
A
A
A
A
D
A
A
All
those
in
favor
posed
that
is
carried
item
number
eight
also,
my
preliminary
report
official
plan,
zoning
bylaw
amendment
application,
rental,
housing,
demolition
conversion,
824,
shepard
avenue,
west
and
a
series
of
other
addresses
this
is
merely.
I
know
the
community
is
very
concerned
about
this
application,
but
this
is
merely
organizing
a
public
consultation.
A
I
will
I
will
move
the
staff
recommendations
and
then
be
in
touch
with
planning
to
consult
on
any
kind
of
expansion
of
the
catchment
area.
All
those
in
favor
posed
that
is
carried
item,
number
nine
preliminary
report,
zoning
by
law,
amendment
lifting
of
holding
provision,
applications,
17
55,
stills
avenue
west.
So
this
also
is
my
item.
I
had
some
emails
late
last
night
about
this
being
on
here
and
the
community
wanting
more
say
and
more
consultation.
Well,
this
is
exactly
what
this
is:
we're
going
to
be
scheduling
a
community
consultation.
A
A
A
D
A
D
A
E
G
So
I'll
move
the
staff
recommendations
with
an
additional
motion
that
perhaps
the
clerk
can
put
on
the
screen
but
I'll
read
it
out.
City
council
direct
that
on-site
parkland
dedication
pursuant
to
section
42
of
the
planning
act,
be
conveyed
to
the
city
in
the
event
that
the
proposal
in
some
form
is
approved.
A
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
E
C
Well,
what
it
is
is
that
we've
been
dealing
with
the
construction
of
a
new
series
of
stacked
townhouses,
and
so
we
were
trying
to
deal
with
the
new
impact
on
traffic
and
parking
on
prior
hill,
and
so
staff
came
up
with
certain
changes
to
parking.
But
then
the
people
couldn't
get
out
of
their
driveways,
so
staff
has
come
back
and
consulted
with
the
community
recommended
these
changes.
A
D
Oh
no,
I
know
I
we
did
this
last
meeting
and
we
kind
of
like
went.
We
did
this
extensively,
so
all
I
want
to
say
is
I'm
voting
against
it
because
we
did
a
deep
dive
on
this
one
and
I've
got.
I
don't
think
I
got
nothing
else
to
say
or
think
about.
We've
kind
of
extensively
looked
at
this
and
I'd
vote
against
the
reopening,
adding.
A
D
D
D
E
E
A
C
E
A
D
A
G
A
Okay,
all
those
in
favor
of
moving
the
recommendations,
representation
of
the
local
toronto
local
peel
body,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
that
is
carried
item,
2030
request
at
the
local
toronto
local
appeal
body,
113,
ridley
boulevard
need
a
motion
to
add
it
as
a
new
item,
all
those
in
favor,
oh
we'll,
have
to
do
verbal.
We've
lost
four
counselors
here,
so
I
can't
see
the
vote
okay.
A
A
A
A
C
E
D
A
I'd
rather
get
these
new
items
done
with
voice
votes:
okay,
okay,
so
yeah,
I
I
do
apologize
counselors
we're
just
having
a
lot
of
technical
problems
at
this
end,
so
people
are
popping
in
and
out
of
the
image.
So
I
don't
know
how
people
are
voting.
So
I
this
is
on
2023,
it's
the
duke
eggs,
bia
bar
li
by
law,
harmonization,
it's
a
request
for
a
staff
report.
I
have
councilor
cole
in
favor
councillor
carroll
in
favor,
counselor
filian.
How
are
you
voting.
A
D
B
A
C
D
A
E
A
C
A
D
B
A
G
Yeah
sure,
let's
just
do
it,
it'll
only
take
a
sec
so
there,
as
probably
most
of
us
have
heard
metrolinx,
is
currently
looking
at
removing
stations.
Cummer
is
one
of
the
stations
they
are
considering.
Removing
the
unfortunate
thing
is,
we
have
nothing
official
on
that
and
in
the
meantime,
we
have
multiple
planning
applications
that
are
predicated
on
that
subway
station
being
there.
We
have
one
of
them
as
a
a
report
today.
G
I
think
it's
item
number
three,
so
it
obviously
makes
a
very
big
difference
from
a
planning
point
of
view
whether
you
have
a
subway
station
there
or
not.
So
some
of
these
projects,
including
one
massive
one,
has
a
multi-week
omb
hearing
scheduled
for
may,
and
so
our
planning
staff
really
need
an
answer
about
conversation.
G
G
G
No,
it
has
nothing
to
do
with
designs.
It's
it
was
part
of
the
planned
extension.
North
has
been
for
many
years
to
the
point
where
you
know.
Major
developments
have
already
been
approved,
for
example,
at
newton
brook
plaza,
based
on
there
being
a
subway
right
there
right
where
the
development
is,
and
there
are
other
applications
that
are
also
right
there
at
the
intersection
that
are
based
on
there
being
a
subway
station
there.
G
However,
recently
you
know
some
months
ago,
metrolinx
began
looking
at
removing
stations,
I
believe,
as
a
cost
saving
measure,
and
so
we
need
the
planning
staff
in
particular
planning
and
legal.
With
all
these
hearings
coming
up
need
need
to
know.
Is
there
a
station
there
or
not,
or
if
you're
still
undecided
and
considering
getting
rid
of
the
station,
then
let
us
know
that,
and
in
the
latter
case
I
imagine
we
would
ask
for
a
postponement
of
the
hearings,
but
we
need
an
answer.
A
A
E
E
So
here's
what
happens,
planning
approves
density
and
then
the
transit
never
comes,
and
that
is
the
story
of
shepard
avenue
east,
particularly
east
of
dawn
mills.
We
are
approving
densities
for
an
lrt
that
will
never
happen
and
for
a
subway
that
replaces
the
lrt
but
won't
come
until
2040
or
later
and
and
so
there's
a
disconnect
there.
But
I
have
an
even
more
meaningful
example
that
is
very
similar
to
cancer
billions.
E
We
right
now
have
planning
considering
an
application
that
you
know
you
you
could
you
could?
Definitely
you
could
definitely
see
happening
if
it
if
it's
happening
right
beside
the
alignment
of
an
oriole
go
station
and
the
leslie
shepherd
subway
station.
That
would
be
a
wonderful
thing,
something
that
that
we
wanted
for
30
years,
but
the
conversation
about
it
is
going
on
in
three
different
rooms,
with
no
coordination
and
no
definitive
answer.
This
will
or
will
not
happen.
E
Here's
the
budget
and
here's
when
and
that
puts
our
planning
and
the
the
community
and
local
council
at
a
great
disadvantage
in
deciding
whether
or
not
to
support
something
you
don't
want
to
put
something
on
a
site.
If
that
the
transit
will
never
come,
you
need
to
know,
and
transit
expansion
office
really
needs
to
start
to
be
aligned
to
understand.
That
planning
needs
that
that
information
sooner
rather
than
later
and
as
council,
we
need
to
really
put
the
arrow
in
their
quiver
to
say.
E
I
need
this
answer
now,
because
of
planning,
and
so
asking
for
this
right
now
before
they
end
up
in
front
of
an
lpat
is
something
that
counselor
philly
and
community
needs,
and
the
motion
says
just
tell
us
one
way
or
the
other
by
the
end
of
january,
and
I
think
that's
more
than
reasonable
it
will.
It
won't
be
built
till
till
heaven
knows
when,
but
tell
us
reasonably
whether
or
not
it's
even
on
the
map
and
we're
giving
you
two
months
to
do
so.
That's
a
very
reasonable
request
of
metro
links.
Those
are
my
comments.
A
A
B
A
A
E
D
A
A
A
D
Thank
you
good
morning,
mr
chair
counselors
and
staff,
and
helping
members
of
the
public
who
might
be
joining.
My
name
is
tatiana
trevik,
I'm
the
planning
consultant
here
today.
On
behalf
of
the
proponents,
I
would
like
to
thank
north
york,
community
planning
and
transportation
staff
for
what
has
been
a
very
collaborative
process,
and
it's
been
a
good
experience
working
with
you
on
this
and
we've
appreciated
inputs
in
clarifying
clarifying
and
refining
the
proposed
amendments.
D
I
do
think
the
final
report
provided
by
staff
is
very
clear
and
summarized
as
well
what
we're
seeking
approval
for,
and
we
agree
with
its
recommendations,
so
I'll,
be
here
to
answer
any
questions
from
council.
If
there
are
any
I'll
keep
your
remarks
really
brief.
What
we've
tried
to
do
with
the
zoning
by
law?
A
A
A
G
G
And
so
I
had
went
into
discussions
with
the
applicant
who,
I'm
happy
to
say,
was
extremely
cooperative.
The
the
the
understanding
was,
it
wouldn't
cost
them
money
or
time,
and
we
came
up
with
a
formula
whereby
we
basically
doubled
the
size
of
the
community
centers,
so
that
it
will
be
a
fully
functioning
full-sized
community
center
in
a
key
location,
and
it
is
at
minimal
additional
cost
to
the.
G
A
Yes,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
that
is
carried
timed
item,
20.3
request
for
direction,
report
official
plan
and
zoning
bylaw
amendment
applications,
41
chatsworth
drive.
Do
we
have
christine
jennings
on
the
line?
Christy
jennings?
Yes,
good
morning,
oh
hi,
miss
jennings.
I
assume
you're
the
applicant
is
that
correct.
D
D
Our
client
and
its
consultants
have
been
working
hard
to
try
to
address
staff's
terms.
On
november
16th,
our
client
submitted
an
updated
submission
package
to
city
staff,
which
they
thought
would
satisfy
many
of
these
concerns,
since
this
updated
submission
was
only
sent
to
staff.
Two
weeks
ago,
staff
of
courts
have
not
had
a
fulsome
opportunity
to
review
it
and
and
provide
comments.
D
Despite
the
refusal
report
before
you
today
and
despite
our
clients
appeal
to
the
lpat,
our
client
is
still
very
interested
in
settlement.
We
welcome
and
look
forward
to
further
conversations
in
the
future
in
an
attempt
to
address
the
concerns
raised
and
reach
a
full
agreement.
Thank
you
for
your
time
today.
Those
are
all
of
my
submissions.
D
F
A
A
F
F
F
F
A
townhouse
project
backing
onto
yorkville's
road,
it
will
be
much
larger
than
any
residential
building
in
the
vicinity.
The
city
has
refused
a
similar
application,
almost
directly
across
yorkfield's
road
at
tucson
vehicle.
The
reason
given
there
were
concerns
with
the
proposed
development
and
the
potential
impacts
for
the
neighborhood
character,
catholic
congestion
and
pedestrian
safety.
F
F
When
we
look
at
bayview
avenue
just
four
streets
west,
the
curriculum
property
is
almost
adjacent
to
yorknow
strategic,
and
this
type
of
building
will
have
an
extremely
negative
impact
on
all
of
the
other
buildings,
and
the
residences
in
the
vicinity
and
parking
will
also
be
negatively
effective,
especially
during
the
two
hour
period
in
the
morning
and
mid
afternoon.
When
parents
are
parking
for
to
drop
off
and
pick
up
their
children,
it
will
create
a
dangerous
situation
for
the
other
homes
on
the
street,
for
the
parked
cars,
but
mostly
for
the
children
and
other
pedestrians.
F
There
was
a
very
heavy
pedestrian
traffic
because
there
are
tpc
bus
stops
on
both
sides
of
york
mills
road.
Much
of
this
heavy
pedestrian
traffic
consists
of
children
crossing
at
the
light
at
the
corner
of
sandfield
and
new
york
mills
directly.
Besides,
sixteen
curriculum
and
the
children
do
do
not
just
attend
europe,
mills
collegiate,
but
also
at
the
end
of
a
secondary
school,
which
was
located
immediately
beside
yorkville's
collegiate.
F
A
A
A
B
Yes,
thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
would
like
to
move,
stop
recommendations
and
I
want
to
thank
barney
and
I'm
sorry
we
didn't
get
to
hear
from
jim,
but
barney.
That
was
a
great
perspective
and
the
right
one,
because
I
was
at
a
meeting
in
your
neighborhood
last
week
last
night,
actually
a
virtual
meeting
with
the
york
mills
association,
their
agm
and
really
the
concerns
that
came
out
of
that
meeting.
Very
much
reflect
your
concerns
and
the
general
community's
concerns
so
precedent
setting
issues
on
york,
mills.
B
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Cancer
robinson
staff
recs
are
being
moved
all
those
in
favor
opposed.
That
is
carried
item
number
five
time
for
ten
o'clock
status
report.
Zoning
bylaw
amendment
application,
59.95,
5997,
young
street
country
philly.
I
do
not
see
any
deputies
on
the
list.
Are
there
any
questions
for
staff.
G
Yes,
so
quickly,
this
is
basically
a
preliminary
report.
We
did
have
a
preliminary
report
at
an
earlier
meeting
and
I
sent
it
back
with
the
request
that
the
applicant
revised
their
proposal.
They
declined
to
do
so
so
staff
are
just
bringing
this
back
as
a
formality
so
that
we
schedule
a
community
meeting
regardless.
B
A
B
A
B
B
I'd
like
to
I'd
like
to
move
the
first
stock
recommendation
to
deny
these
applications
and
I'll
tell
you
why
there's
no
plans
in
place
for
these
for
these
sites
and
if
you've,
driven
up
up
and
down
bayview
avenue,
recently
you've
seen
there's
a
it's
like
a
ghost
town,
there's
our
so
many
vacant
sites,
and
it's
really
travesty.
So
I
I
until
there's
a
plan
in
place
and
there's
been
a
permit
issued,
which
there
has
not
been
we've
checked
with
staff.
B
A
Right,
okay,
so
what
I'll
do
is?
I
think
we
have
to
take
three
votes,
even
even
though
you'd
like
to
bundle
them
four
votes.
So
on
2020
local
council,
council,
robinson
27,
10
bayview
avenue
is
removing
option
number
one
refusal
all
those
in
favor
opposed
that
is
carried
item.
2021
demolition
for
the
same
address,
councilor
robinson
is
moving
option.
A
F
F
F
Seniors
are
continuously
encouraged
to
join
the
benefits
of
gardening
with
germany
and
the
city.
Turning
a
blind
eye
to
these
considerations
seems
to
me
that
it's
mean
spirited.
I
think
that
the
physical
and
mental
health
being
of
the
owner
of
the
tree
is
just
as
important
as
the
life
of
the
tree
and
regarding
setting
up
precedent.
F
You
say
I
could
move
to
a
place
where
there
is
no
tree
and
that
I'd
be
able
to
garden,
but
this
is
this
is
something
I
cannot
take
on
at
this
stage
of
my
life
point
that
I
make
is
that
this
plane
wasn't
wasn't
planted
by
myself.
It
was
planted
by
a
previous
owner
and
it
seems
unjust
that
I
have
to
be
impacted
for
the
rest
of
my
life
from
growing
vegetables
and
enjoying
some
beneficial
gardening.
F
F
This
is
this:
property
is
rented
and
renters
come
and
go,
and
I've
been
the
subject
of
much
harassment
in
the
fall,
because
little
kids,
the
parents
worry
about
walnuts
falling
on
little
kids.
Presently
there
is
a
renter
next
door
with
dogs
and
they're
really
upset
with
me.
They
expect
me
to
go
and
pick
up
the
walnuts
from
not
only
my
own
yard,
their
own,
their
own
yard.
As
well,
it's
something
I
cannot
do.
F
F
F
C
F
The
cost
involved
the
labor
there
isn't
one
tree,
there's
the
cost
involved
in
proving
I
can't
afford
it
and
it's
ongoing.
It's
not
going
to
be
a
one-time
deal.
It's
it's
got
to
happen
every
couple
of
years,
the
the
annual
labor
involved.
It's
something
I
can't
you
know
it's
becoming
difficult
and
it's
only
going
to
get
more
difficult
as
time
goes
on.
F
I
think
the
gardening
aspect
is
very
important.
You
know
that
during
this
pandemic,
there's
been
a
huge
increase
in
our
city
and
you
know
with
people
gardening.
Why
should
why
am
I
being
penalized?
Why
shouldn't
I
be
allowed
that
same
privilege
in
my
own
backyard,
where
I
could
socialize
with
neighbors
who
are
outdoors?
That
gives
me
a
chance
to
talk
to
people.
You
know
I
live
alone
in
isolation.
F
C
H
C
C
H
C
H
I
I
could
only
respond
by
saying
that
if
we
were
to
accept
that
argument
for
black
walnuts,
it
would
probably
be
extended
or-
or
there
would
be
precedent
that
we
might
be
concerned
about
that
it
would
be
extended
to
other
species
that
have
nuisance
attributes
as
well,
some
of
which
are
much
more
dominant
in
the
urban
forest.
Things
like
red
oak
trees
that
produce
nuts
things
like
fruit,
trees
or
anything
that
produces
flowers
or
other
other
fruits
that
fall
and
and
even
leaves
that
produce
a
seed
crop
like
maple
trees
or
leaves
falling.
H
C
Yes,
as
we
just
heard
from
the
deputy,
I
think
who
made
a
very
compelling
request
dealing
with
the
challenges
the
tree
does
give
her
in
terms
of
her
enjoyment
of
gardening,
the
labor
involved
in
picking
up
the
walnuts.
You
know
it
is
obviously
a
nuisance
to
her
and
she
is
challenged
by
her
knee
replacements,
etc.
C
The
the
the
challenge
here
is
that
we
have
many
many
requests
asking
for
trees
to
be
cut
down,
not
only
walnuts
and
trees
of
all
descriptions,
as
mr
bostock
said,
whether
they
are
walnut
trees
or
silver
maples
or
oak
trees,
etc,
and
we
do
get
these
constantly,
and
so
it
is
not
easy
to
weigh
these
pros
and
cons
and
the
human
you
know,
impact
of
these
and
then
the
macro
impact
of
the
community,
the
air
quality,
the
shade
quality,
etc.
So
it
is
not
an
easy
thing
for
us
as
counselors
to
do.
C
Unfortunately,
I'm
going
to
have
to
support
the
staff
recommendations
not
to
approve
removal,
because
the
long-term
benefits
of
having
our
trees
and
our
especially
in
our
city,
when
we're
losing
so
many,
is
something
that
we
have
to
side
with
and
as
much
as
I
regret
not
supporting
the
the
very
legitimate
plea
of
the
applicant
I'm
going
to
have
to
side
with
the
very
thought
out:
scientific
and
professional
advice
of
our
staff
and
this
and
not
recommending
it,
be
cut
down.
Since
it's
a
healthy,
vibrant
tree.
E
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
just
wanted
to
to
thank
staff
because
the
detail
of
alternative
gardening
advice
that
they
gave
in
the
report.
That
was
new
to
me
to
give
that
much
advice
on
how
to
get
around
gardening
near
a
black
walnut
tree
and
and
the
solutions
involved,
were
very
useful.
I've
never
seen
those
written
in
that
amount
of
detail
into
a
report
before
I've.
E
A
A
So
we
have
speakers
on
the
line
for
items
nine,
ten
and
fifteen.
So
if
it
is
the
will
committee,
I'd
like
to
go
back
to
item
nine
and
we'll
see
if
jeff
kenny
is
still
on
the
line,
yes,
yeah,
hello,
hello,
can
you
hear
me
yeah
so
counselors
if
you're
wondering
what
item
nine
is
it's
1755
steels
avenue
west
and
it
is
a
a
request
for
staff
to
schedule
a
community
consultation.
I
I
I
did
hear
that
there
was
interest
in
the
application
and
that
consultation
had
been
requested
and
wanted
to
indicate
on
behalf
of
our
client
sanofi,
that
we
do
support
the
request
for
consultation
and
also
wanted
to
point
out
that
our
client
does
continue
to
meet
monthly
with
the
ridgegate
ratepayers
association
and
will
continue
to
do
so.
In
light
of
this
project
and
the
request
for
further
consultation,
so
we
will
be
in
touch
with
councillor
pastrnak's
office,
and
these
are
my
brief
remarks.
Thank
you.
A
I
A
Okay,
I'll
just
talk
very
briefly
about
this
item.
I'll
move,
the
staff
recommendations.
Of
course
we
want
a
community
consultation,
is,
is
key
for
those
who
don't
know
this
is
this:
is
the
sanofi
pasteur
site,
one
of
the
leading
pharmaceutical
manufacturers
in
the
world
and
very
exciting?
Things
have
happened
on
that
site?
They
have
been
picked
when,
when
their
worldwide
headquarters
in
paris
looks
for
a
new
is
introducing
a
new
product
or
vaccine.
A
They
they
look
around
the
world
on
which
location
is
most
capable
of
producing
it,
and
often
toronto
gets
the
nod
and
that's
the
site,
so
they
have
a
fairly
ambitious
plans
for
the
site,
which
includes
the
item
before
you,
which
would
be
a
private
wastewater
treatment
facility
on
site,
reducing
water
consumption
and
sanitary
discharge,
so
it
seems
minor,
but
it's
something
that
is
important
to
consult
with
the
local
community
on,
because
we
want
to
see
the
built
form
of
the
structure.
We
want
to
hear
about
any
environmental
issues,
any
kind
of
noise.
A
How
often
this
thing
will
be
operating
any
kind
of
maintenance
schedules,
so
it's
very
important
that
we
have
this
meeting.
Unfortunately,
it
doesn't
look
like
we're
going
to
have
it
in
person.
It
looks
like
a
virtual
meeting
so
that
the
community
can
ask
some
tough
questions
about
what
the
final
building
will
look
like
and
what
what
its
impact
on
the
local
community
will
be
years
ago.
A
This
is
one
of
those
odd
situations
where
we
converted
residential
to
employment
lands
so
that
they
could
expand
their
their
site
to
take
on
some
worldwide
work
in
the
area
of
medicines
and
vaccines.
So
they're
doing
remarkable
work,
our
site,
toronto's
location,
is
doing
remarkable.
Work
saving
lives
worldwide
and
at
the
same
time,
we
we
do
oh
respect
to
the
local
community
to
hear
what
they
have
to
say.
So
I
will
move
the
staff
recommendations
to
organize
a
community
consultation.
I
I
Thank
you
very
much.
Yes,
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
with
you
today.
The
reason
why
I'm
speaking
to
a
preliminary
report
is
because
there
is
a
a
recommendation
in
addition
to
the
requirement
for
a
community
consultation
meeting,
there's
also
a
a
request
of
community
council
to
decide
whether
or
not
to
have
planning
staff
review,
our
combined
zoning
by-law
amendment
and
official
plan
amendment
in
advance
of
the
two-year
approval
of
the
young
eglinton
secondary
plan
in
advance
of
the
two
years
of
being
able
to
amend
that
secondary
plan.
I
I
The
floor
plate
also
has
to
accommodate
staffing
and
communal
eating
and
care
facility,
so
the
floor
plate
of
this
building
is
is
more
of
an
institutional
floor
plate
rather
than
a
residential
floor
plate,
and
I
just
wanted
to
to
point
that
out
for
you
in
your
consideration,
there's
also
a
commercial.
There
was
also
a
surface
parking
lot
at
the
rear
of
the
property
that
was
associated
with
the
commercial
functions
fronting
onto
mount
pleasant.
We
did
originally.
I
We
have
proposed
that
to
be
three
town
houses
located
on
that
that
surface
parking
lot.
We
understand
that
those
townhouses
are
of
concern
to
the
local
community
and
also
to
city
planning
staff
and
the
local
ward
councillor,
and
I
can
state
for
the
public
record
today
and
it's
included
in
my
letter
that
as
an
applicant,
we
are
have
agreed
to
remove
those
townhouses
from
the
rear
of
the
development.
I
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
this
does
not
predetermine
what
your
ultimate
decision
will
be
simply
allowing
our
application
to
go
through
the
normal
course
of
public
consultation
with
the
surrounding
community.
It
will
allow
for
the
continued
technical
review
of
our
application
by
the
various
city
divisions
and
certainly
if,
at
the
end
of
that
process,
there
is
still
concern
with
our
application.
E
D
So
through
you,
mr
chair,
the
the
report
gives
options
as
the
the
the
the
two
year
date
on
the
on
the
young
eglinton
secondary
plan
would
be
june
june
5th
of
this
year.
So
if
the
application
is
is
is
not
moved
forward,
then
then
the
applicant
would
have
to
actually
wait
till
till
the
end
of
that
additional
six
months
to
submit
that
that
official
plan
amendment.
B
B
Okay,
I
didn't
say
I
was
muted
sorry
about
that.
So
I'll
start
again
and
just
say,
thank
you
very
much
for
this
opportunity
just
to
share
with
council
community
council
the
the
issues
around
this
application.
It's
a
bit
of
a
challenge
this
one
and
while
I'm
very
very
concerned
about
making
sure
we
have
these
types
of
facilities
in
our
and
our
awards.
This
application
is
a
bit
premature
and
let
me
just
take
you
back.
Counselor
cole
will
remember
this
well.
B
The
secondary
plans
for
the
young
eglinton
area
were
approved
in
june
2019
by
the
minister
of
municipal
affairs
and,
as
you
know,
when
there's
a
new
secondary
plan,
that's
protected
from
appeal
for
two
years,
a
two-year
period.
So
the
point
is
that
we
want
to
not
avoid
a
rush
of
the
official
plan,
amendment
application
because
we
don't
want
to
undo
the
work
that
has
just
been
completed,
and
so
I'm
very
tentative
to
approve
this.
B
You
can
see
city
staff
has
said
you
know
one
way
or
the
other
and
left
it
to
us
to
decide.
But
you
know
there
was
extensive
engagement
on
the
young
eglinton
midtown
in
focus
extensive.
In
fact,
we
had
50
residents
that
were
in
attendance
at
the
planning
and
growth
management
committee
last
term
to
depute
on
this
item
and
I
received
hundreds
of
hundreds
of
emails,
and
so
while
the
young
eglinton
plan
was
passed
unanimously
by
our
city
council.
B
Unfortunately,
the
minister
of
municipal
affairs,
with
the
current
provincial
government,
completely
overhauled
the
plan
completely
loosening
key
policies
amending
the
permitted
height
limits,
etc,
etc,
and
that
was
such
a
setback.
What
a
tragedy
after
years
of
work
by
our
planning
staff,
the
local
city
councilors,
as
well
as
the
neighborhoods
and
community
associations,
years
of
works
years
of
meetings-
name,
shame
it's
disgusting
and
they
and
they
basically
overhauled
the
entire
plan.
B
So
I
what
my
position
is
now.
I
don't
want
to
approve
this
because
the
community's
already
dealing
with
these
impacts
of
this
decision-
and
I
don't
want
to
support
weakening
the
plan
further
by
allowing
amendments
before
the
two-year
period.
It's
a
bit
of
a
precedent-setting
move,
and
so
that's
why
I'm
opposed
and
I'm
not.
I
don't
think
the
we
need
to
welcome
these
types
of
precedents.
So
bottom
line
is
the
rezoning.
Application
will
still
be
reviewed
and
reported
on
regardless
of
our
decision
today.
B
B
But
I
just
do
not
support
setting
the
precedent
that
the
city
is
going
to
allow
amendments
to
a
brand
new
secondary
plan,
and
I
guess
I
just
just
regarding
the
the
application,
the
development
there's,
no
setbacks,
there's
no
transition,
it's
very
bulky,
it's
quite
imposing
on
the
street
skate
and
it
doesn't
step
back,
there's
setbacks
and
there's
step
backs.
It
doesn't
step
back
at
all
so
with
the
application.
There's
there's
issues
already,
but
this
this
puts
us
in
a
very
awkward
place.
B
B
I
also
understand
that
one
of
the
properties
listed
in
the
application
has
not
been
officially
sold
and
sarah,
you
may
know,
sarah
very
well,
the
south
eglinton
rapiers
and
residents
association.
They
have
submitted
a
letter
to
you
outlining
their
concern
and
they're
very
sophisticated,
probably
more
balanced
than
I
am
repairs.
Association
and
sarah
also
raises
the
point,
which
I
agree
with,
that
the
three
properties
on
battle
oil,
street
323,
323,
r
and
325-
should
retain
their
neighborhood
designation.
B
B
I
have
a,
unfortunately,
a
family
member
just
recently
just
a
new
new
diagnosis
on
on
dementia,
which
is
very
unsettling
for
our
family,
but
so
this
is
an
important
initiative
and
I
fully
support
the
concept,
but
the
there's
a
lot
of
work
to
be
done
to
get
where
we
need
to
go
so
I
will
be.
I
will
actually
be
mr
chair.
I
will
be
vote
voting
in
the
negative
on
this.
B
D
D
A
A
C
E
Just
briefly,
mr
chair,
I'm
going
to
support
the
the
local
councillor
on
this
because
you
know
six
months
doesn't
seem
like
a
lot
of
time.
But
the
issues
she's
outlined
that
she's
going
to
have
to
work
on
with
the
community
and
with
planners,
sounds
like
they're
going
to
spend
six
months
anyway.
And
so
I
we
don't
need
to
set
the
difficult
precedent
so
I'll
support
the
local
councilors
motion.
C
Yes,
I
I'm
also
going
to
support
the
local
councillor
on
this
because,
as
she
said
very
passionately,
is
the
community
basically
had
what
almost
seven
years
of
work
ripped
up
in
front
of
them
by
the
provincial
government
who
overruled
their
their
work?
They
did
on
their
midtown
and
focus
plant,
which
was
a
very
comprehensive
examination
of
planning
that
whole
young
eglinton
area
and
which
includes
three
awards.
C
A
couple
years
ago,
so
at
one
we
dealt
with
this
council
where
they
had
approved
39
stories
at
duplex
and
eglinton,
and
they
came
back
requesting
65
stories
and
then
I've
got
another
development
just
on
across
the
street.
On
duplex,
where
they've
been
given,
I
think
30
odd
stories
they're
going
to
come
back
for
40
50
stories.
C
C
I
mean
up
and
down
young
street
and
eglinton
like
I've,
got
I'm
sure
counselor
robin's
in
the
same
boat.
If
we
put
all
the
applications
before
us,
you
have
more
applications
than
the
rest
of
canada,
combined
just
in
one
corner
of
the
city,
so
anyways.
I
support
councillor
robinson's
position
on
this.
A
A
H
Thank
you
for
having
me
hello,
chair,
pastor,
knack
counselors,
and
so
thanks
for
this
opportunity
to
depute
on
the
item
today,
so
I
live
at
the
corner.
My
family
was
at
the
southwest
corner
of
avenue
for
glencairn,
and
we've
been
here
since
2011..
Our
daughter
attends
john
ross
robertson
public
school,
which
is
on
glen
grove,
one
block
north.
H
What
I've
observed
has
led
me
to
conclude
that
the
danger
of
this
section
of
avenue
road
at
glencairn
is
inherent
in
the
design
of
the
road
itself
and
that
that
danger
can't
be
fully
remedied
by
turning
and
crossing
restrictions
at
this
intersection
living
at
this
address
and
I've
sent
supporting
documents
and
photos
around
this.
I've
seen
accidents
happen
right
in
front
of
me.
My
family's
witnessed
the
aftermath
of
some
of
these
accidents.
They
the
accidents
happen,
as
indicated
in
previous
staff
reports,
at
a
frequency
of
one
major
accident
every
eight
to
ten
weeks.
H
The
most
recent
was
this
past
saturday
november
28th.
I
sent
photos
about
that
airbags
were
deployed
in
the
cars.
Ems
was
on
the
scene
and
this
doesn't
include
the
countless
close
calls
that
I've
witnessed
and
my
family's
witnessed,
and
the
many
minor
and
presumably
unreported
accidents
have
happened
at
this
intersection.
H
H
Due
to
the
horizontal
alignment
of
avenue
road,
I
sent
the
map
that
was
included
this
report
for
your
reference,
and
it
shows
the
bend
in
the
road
at
this
at
this
particular
point.
That
same
report
stated
that
the
traffic
study
conducted
at
this
intersection
june
2009
indicated
that
there's
a
minimum
vehicular
volume
of
77
and
a
collision
hazard
of
100
that
that
warrants
traffic
control
signals
for
this
intersection.
H
As
the
background
of
the
agenda
item
today,
states
for
the
three-year
period
ending
march
2020,
there
were
17
collisions
involving
east
eastbound,
left
turn
or
through
movements
at
this
intersection
that
were
reported
to
toronto
police
and
that
quotes
for
traffic
control
signals
to
be
justified
based
on
the
collision
hazard
warrant.
There
must
be
15,
potentially
preventable
collisions
over
three-year
puberty.
Therefore,
based
on
the
collision
history,
which
again
is
17
over
three
years
and
I'm
quoting
from
the
report,
traffic
control
signals
are
technically
warranted
at
this
intersection.
H
So
today,
you're
moving
on
accepting
full-time
prohibition
of
east
and
west
left
turns
and
through
movements
at
this
intersection
to
address
the
collision
patterns.
But
we
know
that
traffic
control
signals,
which
is
your
studies
have
shown
are
warranted,
are
the
better
option,
and
I
believe
that
this
to
be
this
is
true
and
necessary.
H
Why
do
I
believe
that
I
know
that
drivers
are
currently
ignoring
the
current
prohibitions
with
regularity,
and
it
would
be
comical
if
it
wasn't
so
dangerous.
You
can
stand
there
at
any
time
during
the
prohibitions
and
watch
drivers
go
left.
Northbound
or
through
the
intersection
and
mentioning
the
bent
as
I
refer
to
the
bend
in
the
road
here,
it's
highly
dangerous,
and
this
is
where
my
personal
concern
as
a
father
comes
in
with
my
two
children
at
the
nearby
school
and
many
student
pedestrians
in
the
area.
H
I
do
that
benden
avenue
road
eastbound
drivers,
if
I
can
explain
this
verbally
push
out
into
the
intersection
to
make
not
only
the
illegal
turn,
but
even
the
permitted
turn
when,
when
those
turns
or
through
through
passes,
are
allowed.
But
they
also
encroach
on
the
intersection
to
make
the
right
hand
turns
in
my
case,
facing
west.
So
there
would
be
a
southbound
turn
that
would
be
allowed
by
these
new
science
signage.
H
Yeah,
I'm
happy
to
do
that,
so
there's
no
enforcement
of
the
current
prohibitions.
I've
been
here
nine
years.
I've
seen
toronto
police
on
site
twice.
The
day-to-day
reality
is
the
drivers
are
constantly
crossing
during
their
prohibited
times.
They'll
do
so
if
you
make
the
prohibited
times,
24
hours
or
full
time
as
well,
glencairn's
the
only
street
other
than
lawrence
that
continues
from
dufferin
to
young
on
a
in
a
straight
line.
As
you
know,
it
holds
too
much
appeal
to
drivers
and
leads
them
straight
to
the
statistically
most
dangerous
stretch.
A
A
C
C
H
Through
the
chair,
we're
not
recommending
traffic
signals
now
it
doesn't
mean
that
that's
forever,
but
our
recommendation
is
a
much
quicker
and
more
targeted
approach
to
the
problem.
The
reason
that
the
traffic
control
signals
are
warranted
is
not
based
on
the
traffic
volume
it's
based
on
the
collision
pattern.
H
So,
given
the
collision
pattern,
which
the
deputy
has
noted
in
conjunction
with
the
traffic
volumes
making
these
movements,
which
are
relatively
low
in
comparison,
these
prohibitions
will
be
a
much
more
focused
targeting
of
the
issue,
which
is
which,
as
we've
heard
is,
is
the
collisions
in
addition
to
the
regulatory
signage,
we
would
supplement
the
prohibition
with
a
right
turn.
Arrows
you'll
see
a
similar
treatment
at
avenue
and
briar
hill
and
castlefield,
so
that
is
staff's
recommendations.
C
C
C
H
Possible,
but
I
would
also
note
that
there
are
already
prohibitions
in
effect
during
the
weekday
peak
periods
the
morning
and
afternoon,
so
a
lot
of
the
traffic
volumes
that
would
be
going
through
at
those
times
are
prohibited,
so
we're
just
looking
at
the
the
off-peak
periods.
Now
when
that
movement
is
legal.
C
H
H
I
noted
through
the
chair
that,
because,
in
addition
to
the
signage
changes,
we
would
want
to
make
pavement
marking
changes
as
well
to
reinforce
the
prohibitions
we
couldn't
do
those
right
now.
We
would
have
to
wait
till
the
spring
and
we
would
want
to
make
sure
those
were
in
place
for
some
time
so
we're
thinking
approximately
a
year
in
a
year's
time,
a
follow-up
study
would
be
undertaken.
C
H
H
A
C
Yes,
as
you
heard
from
the
deputy,
this
is
a
very
dangerous
part
of
avenue
road
and
the
reason
why
it's
accentuated
here
is
because
there
is
a
curve
there.
I
I'm
not
sure
how
this
came
about
historically,
but
it
really
adds
to
the
precarious
of
crossing
of
the
the
avenue
road
east
to
west
at
the
glen
cairn
there,
and
as
many
of
you
know,
this
is
a
very
dangerous
part
of
avenue
road.
C
But
I
would
say
that
all
of
avenue
road
is
extremely
dangerous
because
of
the
volume
and
because
of
the
excessive
speed
of
cars
that
see
avenue
road
as
a
highway
to
downtown
and
as
a
highway
to
the
401,
and
so
therefore
that's
why?
Just
recently
we
had
the
most
dangerous
part
of
avenue.
Road
is
actually
at
roselawn,
castlefield
avenue
road,
where
we
just
erected.
C
Finally,
the
automated
speed
enforcement
devices
they're
installed
at
allenby
school,
where
teachers
have
been
hit,
students
have
been
hit,
and
so
we
we
finally
got
the
cameras
there
and
the
community
is
celebrating
further
the
cameras
to
finally
being
installed
there.
That's
just
the
south
of
it
so
and
so
the
the
speed
and
the
volume
of
traffic.
The
truck
movement
is
extremely
dangerous
here
up
up
and
down
avery
road-
and
here
we've
got
an
extension
of
the
situation
because
of
the
curb.
C
But
so
what
I'd
like
to
work
for
is
to
have
staff-
and
I
don't
know
if
I
can
do
a
verbal
motion
here.
I've
had
a
chance
to
it's
a
subsequent
to
my
discussion
with
dan
clement
that
I
would
like
to
have
a
report
back
within
the
the
year
about
the
possibility
of
erecting
traffic
signals
at
that
intersection
after
we
study
the
impact
of
the
turn
restrictions.
C
So
if
somehow
we
could
get
that
made
as
a
supplementary
motion
to
this
report,
it
would
ensure
that
staff
does
come
back
as
soon
as
possible
to
report
on
the
efficacy.
The
the
the
workings
of
these
new
traffic
turned
prohibitions
there
at
glencairn
and
and
avenue
road
and
meanwhile
keep
the
second
option
in
mind
for
erection
of
traffic
signals
at
that
intersection,
because
it
is
undoubtedly
one
that
meets
the
warrants.
C
So
we
we
obviously
have
to
do
something
as
quickly
as
possible,
and
this
alternative
the
staff
has
come
up
with,
but
putting
it
turned
prohibitions
does
help,
because
it's
immediate
impact-
and,
as
all
of
you
know,
trying
to
get
traffic
signals,
does
take
up
to
two
years,
at
least
if
you
meet
the
warrants
so
meanwhile
that
can
still
be
on
track
for
that.
As
we
see
how
well
these
turn
prohibitions
work
in
the
meantime.
C
So
the
drivers
don't
report
them.
I
mean
don't
ignore
them
and,
as
you
know,
it's
very
difficult
to
get
toronto
police
services
to
do
any
moving
violation
enforcements.
They.
You
know,
the
drop
off
has
been
dramatic
over
the
last
10
years
and
it's
almost
next
to
impossible
to
get
any
police
officers
to
do
any
kind
of
enforcements,
especially
given
their
huge
mandate
all
across
the
city.
So
that
is
what
I
hope
to
achieve
in
getting
something
done
quickly
and
then
looking
at
traffic
signals
being
implemented.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
councilor
cole.
Just
before
we
go
next
speaker.
If
there
is
the
next
speaker
just
in
fyi,
I
have
to
take
a
call
from
the
mayor
at
12
30
and
we
basically
have
the
current
item
which
we're
just
ready
to
vote
on
and
and
two
other
items.
So
I
am
hopeful
we
can
finish
in
the
next
25
minutes.
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
A
H
A
C
A
A
A
A
C
Yeah,
okay,
point
of
order.
I
just
wonder
if
I
could
add
an
amendment
reopen
item
2015,
the
one
dealing
with
the
turn
prohibitions
on
avenue,
road
and
glenn
karen,
because
I
did
get
the
motion
into
clerk
a
little
bit
late.
I've
been
involved
with
the
deputation
that
was
made.
I
just
wanted
to
add
a
small
amendment
to
what
was
already
passed.
I'd
like
to
to
reopen
the
item.
2015.,
that's
the
turn
for
operations.
C
A
G
C
A
A
C
B
B
A
Yes,
excellent,
excellent,
well,
your
our
special
participant
today,
so
we
wanted
to
give
you
that
honor.
Thank
you
all.
Those
in
favor
pose
that
is
carried,
and
now
I
can
now
I
can
go
into
my
speech.
That
concludes
our
business,
not
only
for
today,
but
the
year.
I
just
wanted
to
count
thank
counselors
for
their
hard
work
on
north
york
community
council
this
week
this
year
and
and
also
a
great
welcome
back
to
councillor
jay
robinson.
It
was
so
nice
to
have
you
as
part
of
our
meeting
today.