►
Description
Toronto and East York Community Council, meeting 8, September 16, 2019 - Part 1 of 2
Agenda and background materials:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=15417
Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xF4bsdgl8UY
Meeting Navigation:
0:11:34 - Call to order
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
Good
morning,
everyone
welcome
to
meeting
8
of
the
Toronto
East
York
community
council,
the
chair
and
members
gratefully
acknowledged.
The
Toronto
East
York
Community
Council
meets
on
the
traditional
territory
of
many
nations,
including
the
Mississauga
of
the
credit,
the
honor
snob
ik,
the
Chippewa,
the
Haudenosaunee
and
the
wind
at
people's,
and
is
now
home
to
many
diverse
First,
Nations,
Inuit
and
maytee
people.
We
also
credit
acknowledge
that
Toronto
is
covered
by
treaty.
Thirteen
with
the
Mississauga's
of
the
credit.
Are
there
any
declarations
of
interest?
C
B
B
We
started
at
26
I
know
in
27
item
te,
eight
point:
two:
seven:
three:
six
for
Huron
Street
official
plan
amendment
and
zoning
bylaw
amendment
applications,
preliminary
report,
councillor
Layton,
I'll,
move
the
staff
recommendations.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
item
te;
eight
point:
two:
eight:
four:
zero:
nine
Huron
Street,
the
zoning
bylaw
amendment
and
rental
housing,
demolition
applications,
preliminary
report,
councillor
Layton.
B
B
Those
in
favor
opposed
carried
item
T
8.3
to
installation,
removal
of
on
street
accessible
parking
spaces,
August
2019
come
see
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
item;
T.
Eight
point:
three:
three:
installation
of
on
Street,
accessible
parking
spaces,
August,
twenty
nineteen
nine
delegates.
Only
in
your
word
cancer
by
that
morning.
B
Those
in
favor
opposed
carried
item
T,
eight
point:
three:
four:
temporary
adjustments
to
parking
regulations
for
2019,
Toronto,
Christmas
market,
delegated
notice
of
pending
report;
there's.
No,
there
are
deputations
on
this
yeah,
okay
and
three
five.
There
are
deputations
as
well.
Okay,
so
we'll
hold
both
of
those.
B
C
F
B
So
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
item
te,
8.4
extension
of
permit
parking
hours,
hai
park
between
Anette
Street
and
Dundas
Street
West
I'll
move
approval.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
item
T
8.43
extension
of
permit
parking
hours,
Hector
Avenue
between
Davenport
Road
and
Lolita
Avenue
Raines
Avenue
between
Davenport
Road,
Malita,
Avenue,
Malita
Avenue
between
Raines
Avenue
and
Christie
Street,
councillor
Matt,
Lowe
longest
title
of
the
morning.
Well,.
B
B
D
Thank
you
very
much.
I'll
move
the
recommendations
in
the
letter
and
please
people
don't
stop
in
front
of
the
two
in
front
of
the
Tim
Hortons
to
get
a
coffee
where
the
TTC
pulls
their
bus
in
this
has
been
a
constant
frustration
of
the
turning
bus
at
Christie.
It
does
this
little
loop
around
the
Bloor
and
there's
this
cars
park
there
so
like
a
bus
full
of
people.
F
D
I
C
B
J
B
H
B
G
B
H
B
C
B
A
B
B
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carried,
it
was
councillor
Mavic
studio
to
put
all
the
speed
humps.
Now
it's
yours
item
te
8.57
nominations
for
appointment
to
bore
the
board
of
management
of
the
Ralph
Thornton
Community
Centre
councillor
Fletcher
Ralph
Thornton
community
centre
board
moving
approval.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
item
te
8.58
appointment
of
a
public
member
to
the
Mosport
Park
arena
board,
councillor
Wong
town.
B
D
B
B
H
A
B
C
A
B
F
F
Recommendations,
these
are
for
no
right
turn
on
red,
which
have
to
be
done
in
order
to
finish
off
the
staff
recommended
design.
This
intersection
we
intended
to
have
a
Dutch
kind
of
Dutch
intersection
there,
but
it's
too
small.
So
this
is
the
intersection
where
Douglas
Crosby
was
tragically
killed.
So
this
is
what
staff
have
presented.
I
think
it's
very
fulsome
I'd
like
to
move
it
here,
I'm,
not
moving
those
here,
I'm
moving
the
complimentary,
no
right
turn
on
red
directions:
okay,.
B
All
those
in
favor
we
recorded
vote
councillor,
Cressy
councillor,
Bradford,
councillor,
bylaw,
councillor,
Fletcher,
councillor,
perks,
councillor
wong-tam,
councillor
late
and
councillor
Matt,
Lowe,
that's
unanimous
item
te
8.7
for
Knox,
Avenue,
slowing
down
traffic
and
keeping
people
safe
councillor
Fletcher.
Yes,.
F
B
B
Okay,
so
now
we
go
back
to
the
930
items,
we
will
begin
with
item
te
8.1
naming
of
an
existing
public
Lane
north
of
st.
Clair
Avenue
West,
extending
between
Dufferin
Street
and
st.
Clair
Gardens.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item,
seeing
none
counselor
by
law?
Thank.
C
B
A
B
B
F
B
C
B
B
B
B
G
You
thanks
everybody.
Good
morning
my
name
is
Mari.
Miyagi
I
live
at
65,
Jefferson
207,
that's
in
Liberty,
Village
I'm,
a
photographer
by
trade
and
I've
lived
there
for
going
on
13
years
now
so
safe
to
say
these
judgments
will
affect
us
deeply
I've
been
able
to
not
only
live
there,
but
operate
my
business
as
well,
and
it's
afforded
me
you
know
I,
guess
a
competitive
advantage
as
well
as
a
lifestyle
advantage
for
these
many
years,
but
more
than
my
case,
it's
also
the
case
of
the
community.
G
G
B
B
M
J
You
know
the
drill.
Thank
you
good
morning,
counselor
perk
members
of
committee.
Thank
you
for
hearing
us
today.
I
am
here
on
behalf
of
a
of
13
tenants.
Existing
tenants
of
the
of
the
building
or
buildings
and
I
wanted
to
speak
primarily
to
the
proposed
tenant,
relocation
and
assistance
plan.
I
want
to
start
out
by
saying.
Firstly,
we
recognize
that
the
new
proposed
relocation
and
assistance
plan
is
a
market
improvement
over
the
plan
that
came
before
committee
and
Council
last
year
and
at
the
recognition
of
live
work.
J
J
They
are
as
follows:
firstly,
the
principle
of
like-for-like
replacement:
this
is
a
very
unique
situation
of
a
heritage
building
hosting
an
artistic
community
which
is
important
for
the
city's
cultural
services
in
terms
of
like
for,
like
replacement
council,
is
faced
with
the
ability
to
have
design
improvements
that
will
benefit
my
clients.
It's
a
blank
slate
right
now,
as
proposed
and
in
our
view
at
least
twelve
of
the
replacement
units,
or
thirteen
of
the
replacement
units
for
my
client,
should
allow
for
things
like
higher
ceilings
and
larger
units
to
mirror
what
the
existing
tenants
have.
J
Again,
it's
a
unique
situation,
but
because
we're
dealing
with
what
is
really
a
blank
slate
that
is
possible
to
achieve
the
best
way
to
achieve
this
may
be
through
something
like
a
design
charrette
there
as
a
side
issue.
But
an
important
issue
is
the
issue
of
mezzanine
the
replacement
units,
as
proposed,
you
would
go,
for
example,
for
one
bedroom
for
one
bedroom,
but
that
doesn't
necessarily
reflect
the
reality
of
what
the
current
tenants
in
their
artistic
communities
are
living
through.
J
So,
for
example,
the
mezzanine
Xin,
the
current
units
aren't
counted
by
city
staff
because
they
don't
necessarily
meet
Ontario
Building
Code
requirements.
However,
they
are
part
of
the
living
space.
My
clients
inhabit.
They
are
also
part
of
the
living
space
which
my
clients
have
to
pay
for
through
their
rent,
and
we
think
the
cities,
the
city
in
terms
of
the
like
for,
like
replacement,
should
recognize
this
principle
as
well,
and
so
that
the
units
should
be
larger,
or
at
least
the
13
units
should
be
larger
than
proposed
at
present.
J
Thirdly,
my
clients
would
like
staff
to
meet
with
them
to
ensure
that
the
new
rents
proposed
are
accurate
and
also
which
is
not
set
about
in
the
report,
but
which
is
an
important
part
for
my
clients.
Is
that
the
rent
increases
so
that
my
clients
will
be
relocating
out
of
the
building
they
now
inhabit
for
a
period
we
understand
of
36
months
or
three
years
when
they
return
to
their
units.
J
J
They
aren't
in
the
units
so
when
they
return
after
three
years,
if
three
years
is
the
period
they'll
have
paid
a
4%,
one
person
will
be
required
to
pay
4%
one-time
increase
plus
three
years
increases
of
2%
guideline,
which
is
a
10%
increase
over
their
current
rents,
and
we
don't
think
that
is
equitable
or
fair
that
we
at
my
clients,
understand.
Of
course,
there
are
guideline
increases,
but
a
10%
guideline
increase
is
certainly
not
and
the
4%
one-time
increases
not
warranted,
so
the
plan
should
be
amended
to
recognize.
J
J
B
N
Thank
You
counselor
perks
are
you
chair
today,
I
am
very
good.
Okay,
I
have
started.
My
name
is
Terry
de
Merson
I'm
a
resident
in
25
Liberty
I've
been
there
for
15
years,
I've
seen
Liberty
Village
change
in
every
aspect,
but
I've
seen
Toronto
change
in
aspects
which
frighten
anyone
who
is
not
a
homeowner
rental
rates
have
skyrocketed,
we're
looking
at
predatory
capitalists
who
are
coming
in
buying
buildings
with
the
intention
of
removing
tenants
at
their
profit.
This
is
the
case
here.
N
We
have
essentially
a
developer,
who
has
bought
a
slew
of
properties
through
Liberty
Village
in
the
last
few
years,
who
even
councillor
perks
last
year,
amay
the
third
in
this
very
council
when
this
matter
was
before
council
at
him
at
his
tactics
and
hoped
that
Toronto
would
have
better
developers
who
didn't
behave
that
way.
We
still
have
actions
which
are
being
thrust
upon
us
as
a
community
which
is
detrimental
to
us,
and
let
me
explain
how
we
are
losing
what
we
have.
N
Thank
you.
Apart
from
that
Thank
You
councillor
council,
for
allowing
the
developer
to
contribute
into
some
type
of
housing
and
a
section
37
monies
which
are
1.25
million,
you
are
helping
the
most
needy
in
the
city,
but
it's
not
at
the
developer's
expense.
It's
at
the
expense
of
people
who
are
trying
to
help
themselves.
We
are
not
far
above
the
homeless
right
now.
Some
of
us
have
been
struggling
under
the
circumstances
that
we
have
and
that
have
been
brought
upon
us
the
last
few
years
and
we're
losing
now
we're
losing
our
workspaces.
N
The
city
has
said:
oh
we're
gonna
grant
live
work
into
this
community.
We
asked
that
a
year
ago
we've
asked
that
all
along.
We
appreciate
the
fact
that
that
is
being
done
now
against
the
zoning
against
the
city
plan,
which
does
not
allow
residential
into
the
inviting
to
the
employment
lands,
but
it
is
being
done.
It's
political
will.
Thank
you
for
that,
but
on
the
backside
of
that,
we
are
not
gaining
we're
losing
square
footage,
we're
losing
the
character
of
our
homes,
we're
losing
the
ability
to
work
in
our
homes
last
year,
May.
The
third.
N
The
proposal
was
a
failure.
It
was
a
failure
for
us.
It
passed
we're
not
certain
the
reason
that
it
was
turned
down
afterwards.
Obviously
a
business
matter,
and
we
are
here
again.
Yes,
we
are
getting
a
little
bit
more,
but
you
cannot
measure
this
as
a
success
against
previously.
What
was
a
failure
when
we
are
still
losing
the
true
measure
of
success
will
be
how
many
of
us
will
be
able
to
return
to
our
studios,
because
we
are
not
being
provided
with
what
we
have
now.
N
Let
me
speak
to
mezzanine
for
a
minute
each
one
of
us.
The
city
has
assessed
four
years
ago
when
they
came
in
that
our
mezzanine
czar
illegal
under
the
previous
landlord.
Somehow
they
were
built.
My
mezzanine
was
there
15
years
ago.
It
adds
roughly
one
third
square
footage
to
my
space
and
it
allows
me
a
wide
open
space.
I
have
roughly
22
foot
ceiling
through
some
of
the
areas
where
the
mezzanine
is
not
located.
This
allows
me
to
conduct
my
work
as
a
photographer.
N
Let's
talk
language,
emotional
poverty,
poor
cranky,
k-chill,
a
Dane
I
can
speak
in
Ukranian
all
day,
but
language
is
useless.
Unless
we
understand
it,
your
language
for
live
work.
Artist
studios
was
never
applied
to
us.
You
use
the
language
of
one-bedroom
apartments,
that's
not
what
we
have.
We
have
large
open
spaces
and
the
political
will
was
there
to
add
the
zoning
to
get
live
work
back,
but
the
political
will
was
not
there
to
give
us
what
we
have
now
and
we're
losing,
and
it
is
detrimental
to
every
one
of
us.
Language
is
important.
N
Moving
forward
under
renovation
under
all
these
things
that
the
city
is
involved
with
I
hope
the
language
changes
I
hope
we
still
have
time
to
discuss
these
matters
so
that
we
do
not
lose
out.
The
way
we're
losing
now
but
like
for,
like
is
really
what
what
we're
after
here,
we
don't
want
more
and
we
cannot
do
with
less
I
spoke
last
time
to
heritage
heritage
was
political
will,
councilor
perc
says
well.
N
Do
we
have
time
to
review
because
the
Heritage
Board
agreed
that
it
was
worth
preserving
the
entire
complex
we
had
a
year
to
do
this?
The
political
will
wasn't
there.
There
are
two
matters
that
have
to
be
a
vet
amended
to
this
re
for
one,
but
who
matters
when
we
spoke
to
Jeremy
Clarett
recently,
since
the
report
came
out
had
to
do
with
the
fact
that
the
developer
was
willing
to
compensate
us
and
a
gap
after
36
months.
N
B
A
Through
the
chair,
when
we
did
an
assessment
of
the
existing
conditions-
yes,
there
are
a
number
of
mezzanines
that
were
noted
in
a
number
of
the
existing
rental
dwelling
units.
Those
existing
runs
on
units
I
had
a
mezzanine
that
met
Toronto
building
code
standards
or
the
standards
on
the
Ontario
Building
Code
were
included
in
the
G
FA
calculations
for
those
existing
units,
the
units
that
did
not
meet
the
building
code
requirements
so
mezzanine
that
again
was
not
constructed
in
a
manner
that
met
those
code.
Requirements
were
not
included
in
the
G
FA
calculations.
A
H
A
That
in
terms
of
ceiling
height,
they
are
a
regular
residential
unit.
There
are
some
units
that
are
two
stories
and
then
there
are
eight
units
that
are
located
in
the
existing
heritage.
Building
those
Heights
would
be
maintained,
but
but
about
half
of
the
units
would
have
regular
residential
dwelling
unit
Heights
and.
H
It's
not
a
ten
year
old
building,
it's
it's!
It's
significantly
older
and
the
building
code
itself
has
been
amended
through
the
years
and
I
think
it's
at
various
times.
There
wasn't
even
a
building
code,
probably
at
the
construction
of
this
building.
There
might
not
have
been
a
fully
thought-out,
Ontario,
Building,
Code.
A
H
A
Are
a
variety
of
different
unit
sizes
and
given
that
they're
only
thirteen
returning
tenants,
potentially,
they
could
elect
a
larger
unit
than
what
they
would
normally
have
had
opportunity
with
respect
to
the
ceiling
heights
again,
eight
of
the
units
will
have
the
same
ceiling
height
as
I
do
now.
There
are
about
four
or
five
two-story
townhouses,
but
the
remaining
would
have
regular
residential
ceiling
heights.
H
And
then,
finally,
in
the
report,
it
stipulates
that
there
are
42
existing
rental
units.
There
are
42
of
them
coming
back
online
and
yet
I
think
I
heard
you
say,
there's
about
13
returning
tenants,
recognizing
that
the
vacancy
rate
in
the
City
of
Toronto
is
practically
zero
to
less
than
1%.
What
happened
to
the
remaining
tenants
I.
A
A
E
Well,
thank
you,
chair
and
I'll
move
the
recommendations
here
and
say
a
few
words.
First
of
all,
I
want
to
thank
the
deputies
and
all
the
tenants
who
have
been
working
closely
both
with
our
city
staff,
but
also
with
our
office
over
the
last
six
to
nine
months
and
as
well.
I
want
to
thank
our
city
staff
because
there
have
been
a
lot
of
changes
in
the
last
over
the
course
of
the
last
year
and
that's
in
large
part
due
to
their
hard
work.
E
I
think
the
context
here
and
we've
talked
about
this
today
is
a
site
that
was
Riis
owned
and
had
critical
rental
units
within
it
live
work,
rental
units,
but
rental
units
within
it,
and
so
from
a
city
perspective.
On
the
one
hand,
we
have
the
objective
of
maintaining
purpose-built
rental,
not
losing
units,
and
then
we
have
another
objective:
that
one
of
the
deputing
spokes
here
councillor.
B
E
Those
two
objectives,
one
of
maintaining
rental,
the
other
is
of
sharing
arts
and
culture
within
our
city,
and
what
we're
looking
at
here
today
is
I.
Think
a
vastly
thanks
to
staff,
improved
rental
replacement
policy
that
allows
for
both
there
have
been
not
only
significant
improvements
to
meet
both
of
those
objectives
around
arts
and
culture
and
rental.
But
I
will
tell
you
having
worked
on
far
too
many
section,
111
agreements
around
rent
or
a
replacement
that
this
is
among
the
best
rental
replacement
packages
I've
ever
seen.
E
That
goes
far
and
above
the
act
at
the
provincial
level,
it
allows
for
42
rental
replacement
units
on
site.
That
wasn't
the
case
before
it
ensures
that
for
14
units
at
affordable
and
mid-range
rents
are
protected.
There
has
been
an
increase
in
sizes
that,
due
to
building
code
issues
is
not
where
we
wish
it
could
be,
but
I
think,
because
the
process
of
moving
getting
a
unit
back
is
one
thing.
Then
you
actually
have
to
go
through
a
process
and
moving.
That
is
not
easy.
E
That
is
not
fun
and
based
on
the
enhanced
relocation
assistance
package.
Here
it
goes
far
and
above
based
on
negotiations,
what
is
required?
What
is
required
under
the
Act
is
120
days
to
vacate
there
240
days
permitted
here,
there's
additional
compensation
for
moving
allowance.
There's
additional
compensation
in
in
full.
Stop
that's
in
place
and
so
listen.
This
is
not
easy
for
tenants.
This
is
hardest
of
all,
but
we
are
operating.
This
isn't
a
question
of
political
will.
E
It's
a
question
of
the
law
and
we
operate
under
pullet
under
provincial
laws
and
through
the
diligence
and
hard
work
of
staff
and
tenants
who
have
advocated
for
their
rights
working
together,
we've
been
able
to
do
under
the
law
to
go
above
and
beyond
what
would
have
been
permitted
through
those
negotiations.
I
wish
it
was.
E
We
all
wish
it
was
different,
but
this
is
based
on
the
law
in
front
of
us
and
based
on
a
significant
negotiation,
the
best
that
the
city
can
do
under
its
provisions
to
ensure
that
people
can
not
only
return
to
on-site
but
continue
to
practice
both
living
in
a
rental
but
also
their
arts
and
cultural
craft
as
well.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
B
You
any
questions
for
the
mover,
anyone
else
to
speak.
Okay,
so
we'll
take
this
amendment
and
the
rest
of
the
item
all
together
as
one
vote
all
those
in
favor
all
those
opposed
that
carries.
Thank
you
very
much.
We
now
move
to
item
te,
8.1,
156,
Yonge,
Street,
21,
Melinda,
Street,
18
to
30,
well,
Wellington
Street,
West,
1,
8,
7,
2,
1,
9,
9,
Bay,
Street
and
25
King
Street
was
owning
amendment
application
final
report.
We
do
have
two
deputies.
B
A
Drill,
sir
good
morning,
mr.
Jerry
Council
we're
not
going
to
take
five
minutes.
This
is
mr.
Toby
Wu
I'm
George
stark
from
urban
strategies.
We
we
did
appear
before
you
earlier
in
the
summertime
and
referred
back
to
allow
us
to
complete
a
section,
37
discussion.
We
want
to
just
appear
today
to
thank
the.
J
J
A
B
H
Thank
you
very
much.
I
would
like
to
move
the
the
recommendations
in
the
staff
report,
plus
the
that
of
the
supplementary
report,
just
slightly
amending
the
section
37
agreement,
as
mr.
dark
had
alluded
to
as
spoken
to
I
should
say
there
is
a
sizeable
contribution
going
directly
into
the
affordable
housing.
Resolving
a
revolving
fund.
H
I
want
to
thank
the
applicant
for
further
patience
and
working
with
myself
and
city
staff,
but,
more
importantly,
I
think
that
this
this
particular
application
represents
for
the
the
financial
district
and
you'll
note
that
there's
a
letter
support
from
the
financial
district
bi
as
well
supporting
the
recommendations
of
the
staff
as
well
as
the
package
that
I've
just
noted,
is
that
there
is
a
there
is
some
enthusiasm
about.
You
know
what
can
happen
with
the
revitalization
commerce
court,
which
is
one
of
the
iconic
significant
costs
a
building
in
the
city.
H
We
know
that
there's
lots
of
changes
afoot,
especially
in
the
global
financial
markets
when
it
comes
to
office,
buildings
and
office
locations
and
I
think
that
they're
getting
ahead
of
what
they
are
going
to
be
having
to
compete
with
as
headquarters
around
the
world
have
choices
of
where
they
get
to
go,
and
so
this
will
be
a
very
significant
addition
to
the
the
financial
core
of
the
city
and
I.
Look
forward
to
to
this
this
project
coming
to
completion
and
thank
you
to
City,
Planning
staff.
H
B
H
Of
course,
so
the
streetscape
improvement
is
broken
up
into
two
pieces.
One
specifically,
that's
touching
all
the
spaces
that
are
budding
the
the
site
itself
and
it's
a
significant
site.
It
is
Commerce
Court
and
then
a
portion
of
that
5.1
million
is
also
to
the
streetscape
improvements
throughout
the
financial
district
catchment
area
and
then
the
twelve
point.
H
Four
million
dollars
will
be
obviously
put
into
the
resolving
fund
and
we
have
worked
it
with
Sean
Gadd
in
the
past,
as
he's
identified
projects
that
that
he
could
draw
from
and
he's
brought
that
to
our
attention,
or
perhaps
I've
actually
suggested
to
developers
in
cancer.
But
cancer
Belle
Isle
is
nodding.
Is
that
I've
actually
specifically
sought
out
sites
in
Ward,
13
and
and
and
drawn
from
those
funds.
So
the
just
by
way
of
example,
63
and
50
63
and
65
Homewood
Avenue
is
probably
a
great
example.
H
We
turned
that
around
very
quickly
and
it
is
now
home
for
a
number
of
indigenous
men
who
have
been
experiencing
homelessness,
homelessness
run
by
Nami
res.
Sometimes
we
will
actually
draw
those
funds,
and
so
that's
for
new
housing.
Sometimes,
we've
drawn
those
funds
specifically
for
capital
improvements
for
THC
just
about
every
single
building
in
the
old
Ward
27
has
received
some
form
of
affordable
housing
dollars
from
section
37,
so
it
really
depends
on
what
opportunities
exist
and
and
often
often
times.
H
It's
fine
way:
I'm
reading,
that's
5.1!
So
if
you
actually
move
your
eyes
further
yeah,
so
it's
roughly
5.1
and
it's
carved
out
in
three
point:
two:
seven
one
four
adjacent
to
the
through
the
site.
One
point:
eight
to
nine,
which
is
the
balance
of
the
five
point:
one,
that's
a
jade
that
is
in
the
financial
district
catchment
area
and
then
there's
an
additional
twelve
point.
Four.
So
it's
not
five
point
one
out
of
the
twelve
point,
four
seat.
F
H
F
H
H
F
A
The
chair
I
do
agree
that
the
the
language
and
the
recommendations
is
confusing
the
way
it's
it's
written
and
I
think
we
should.
We
should
perhaps
revise
that
and
bring
it
back.
The
the
intention
was,
as
the
counselor
has
stated,
that
there
is
just
over
five
million
for
streetscape
improvements
adjacent
to
the
site
and
within
the
financial
district
12.4
for
affordable
housing,
plus
1
million
for
public
art.
So
there
are
three
separate
allocations
and
I
do
think.
F
B
Move
just
to
expedite
the
business
I
think
everyone
understands
what
the
intention
is.
Can
we
approve
this
here
and
have
you
work
with
the
applicants
and
the
councillor
to
make
sure
you
have
language
that
completely
is
crystal
clear
to
everybody
in
time
for
council?
Is
that
a
possible
way
of
going
forward,
yeah
and.
H
H
A
B
F
F
I'd
just
like
to
reopen
eight
point:
four
one,
which
is
the
Rivertown
pilot
project
and
have
a
recommendation,
alter
the
recommendation
so
that
it
reads
that
the
traffic
management
pilot
project
expected
to
be
from
May
20-22,
September
2020.
So
putting
a
time
frame
on
that.
Mr.
chair
and
I
believe
that.
B
So
motion
to
reopen
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
on
the
amended
item.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
okay
item
te
8.1
to
city,
initiated
zoning,
bylaw
amendment
McCleary,
media
of
city,
turning
base
in
Portland's
185
to
450
Commissioner,
Street,
North,
101
to
495
Commissioner,
Street,
South,
six
to
five
to
relate
11,
Lake,
Shore,
Boulevard,
East,
so
17
to
75
Basin,
Street,
185,
Villiers,
Street,
one
one:
five
Soldier
Street
one
to
zero,
Bichette
Street,
and
also
please
note
that,
as
in
the
last
item,
there
is
also
a
supplementary
item.
F
A
B
P
B
P
Adrienne
litovsky,
my
planning
firm,
is
johnston
litovsky
and
before
I,
get
into
my
presentation.
I
do
note
that
I
am
registered
to
speak
twice
once
for
two
different
clients,
but
I
realize
now
that
in
fact
one
of
those
deputations
should
actually
be
under
item
13,
so
I
apologize
for
the
confusion,
but
so
I
have
only
one
deputation
under
this
item
here.
P
P
They
either
have
or
are
indeed
very
close
to
securing
building
permit
approval,
and
the
only
reason
really
I'm
here
today
is
to
simply
go
on
the
record
that
we
are
here
and
we
are
monitoring
this
by
law
city,
initiated
zoning
bylaw
amendment,
and
we
note
that
the
proposed
changes
in
many
ways
extend
use
permissions
and
prohibitions
that
were
put
forward
by
an
interim
Control
bylaw
and
on
this
particular
property,
my
clients
property.
They
would,
in
fact
the
new
exception
would
removed
the
warehouse
storage
class-a,
which
is
a
self
storage
use.
P
However,
I
do
also
note
that
there
is
a
provision
near
the
end
of
the
amendment
in
front
of
you.
That
would
then
exempt
my
clients
property
from
this
prohibition
to
allow
their
site
plan
to
proceed
so
just
here
to
say
that
we're
grateful
for
that
inclusion
and
my
client
will
indeed
be
proceeding.
If
anything,
though
I
guess
the
the
one
concern
my
client
would
have
is
to
simply
note
that
this
was
a
bit
of
a
surprise.
P
The
amendment
we
weren't
aware
of
this
coming
forward
and
and
one
reason
why
I
say
that,
as
my
client
did
not
receive
public,
the
public
notice
or
a
notice
of
the
intended
zoning
change
and
I
would
like
to
so.
Therefore,
we
didn't
really
have
the
opportunity
to
write
in
another
wise,
fairly
simple
letter
to
note
that
I'm
just
here
today
to
make
sure
that
we're
on
record
and
I'm
look
forward
to
working
with
staff
to
fix
the
notice
issue.
O
Minutes
Luke
said
well
I'm,
vice
president
and
chief
commercial
officer
for
Windsor
sulk,
we're
here
to
unbarring
on
behalf
of
would
result.
The
purpose
of
this
presentation
is
to
provide
comments
on
the
proposed
amendments
to
zoning
bylaw
four,
three,
eight
eight
six-
and
to
describe
the
impact
that
those
amendments
will
have
on
the
Windsor
salts
operation,
who
we
are
Windsor.
Salt
produces
and
supplies
over
200
evaporated
and
rock
salt
products,
including
as
control
salt,
and
has
been
operating
for
over
225
years
and
employs
over
800
people
across
Canada
when
this
Windsor
salt
has
supplied.
O
This
is
the
City
of
Toronto
eyes,
control
salt
requirements,
either
in
whole
or
in
part,
for
over
50
years,
the
city
used
approximately
180,000
tons
of
salt
to
keep
it
Street
in
sidewalks,
safe
Windsor
salt
supplies.
More
than
half
of
the
eyes
control
to
the
city.
We
supply
an
additional
75,000
tons
to
the
Ontario
Ministry
of
Transportation.
The
salt
delivered
to
and
from
the
facility
is
used
by
public
and
private
customers,
including
the
city
and
the
in
Kiel
Ice
Cube
controls.
Salt
is
a
critical
component
of
the
city's
winter
maintenance.
O
Compatibility
remains
a
serious
concern
with
this
proposed
bylaw,
an
integral
part,
integral
feature
of
the
ports
land
is
that
it
contains
an
operating
Commerce
and
commercial
industrial
port.
It
is
a
commercial
reality
that
industrial
uses,
including
ours,
generate
emission,
including
noise
and
dust
that
are
not
compatible
with
more
sensitive
uses.
Nonetheless,
several
of
the
district's
proposed
in
the
bylaw
permit
users
that
are
not
compatible
with
the
existing
industrial
uses.
As
the
port
plans,
the
maritime
hub
permits
public
garden
museum
and
eating
establishment
uses.
O
These
users
should
only
be
permitted
if
they
are
located
a
sufficient
distance
from
the
existing
industrial
uses.
Similarly,
parks
and
open
spaces
should
not
be
located
near
the
exiting
existing
industrial
uses.
In
addition
to
the
noise
thus
and
vibration
associated
with
heavy
industrial
uses.
There
are
safety
concerns
that
make
perk
and
open
space,
particularly
inappropriate
for
the
area.
Transport
Canada
imposes
strict
security
requirements
whenever
vessels
are
docked
at
the
facility
and
our
own
company
policy
is
as
trick
as
this.
O
B
F
O
F
I'd
like
to
ask
so
this
isn't
new
to
you
and
I'd
like
to
ask
if
you
have
ever
seen
any
of
the
designs
that
have
been
shown
for
very
ultra
modern
buildings,
beautiful
modern
design
for
salt
retention,
that's
used
in
a
number
of
parts
of
the
world
that
we
don't
use
here.
Have
you
seen
any
of
those
I've.
O
F
O
O
F
The
dawn
Greenway,
it's
always
run
there
and
there's
provisions
and
work
to
make
sure
that
everything
is
compatible
and
that's
why
I'm
asking
you
about
the
kind
of
new
ultra
modern
designs
that
you
could
as
the
Portland's
changes.
If
your
salt
remains
there
and
I
understand
it
will
to
contain
it
in
a
way
that
adds
to
the
landscape.
Well,.
B
H
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
answers.
I
think
that
was
very
illuminating
for
me.
With
respect
to
competing
uses
in
a
legacy
industrial
area,
do
you
see
it
viable
into
the
foreseeable
future,
even
the
near
future
that
Windsor
salts
can
stay
and
continue
to
operate?
If
there
are
sensitive
uses
being
introduced,
a
can.
The
two
coexists
we.
O
Don't
think
so
we
don't
think
so.
We
think
that
there's
a
tis,
a
safety
hazard
and
the
noise
and
the
dust
coming
out
of
the
vessel
when
we
unload
we'll
always
be
a
factor.
You
know
we
have
stockpiles
all
across
Canada
and
we
have
quite
a
bit
of
experience
on
this
and
when
we
see
the
designs
we
feel
there
will
be
an
issue.
What
we're
asking
is
certainly
for
a
study
in
evaluating
these
risks.
I.
H
Recognized
in
the
report
the
there
is
an
additional
phase
of
work
that
still
needs
to
come
in
as
specifically
getting
into
the
bill
from
and
the
design
components
are
you
are
you
jumping
ahead
by
saying
that
it
will
not
be
compatible
because
that
work
hasn't
even
begun?
Yet,
as
I
read,
this
report
well.
H
Your
company
be
undertaking
individual
Studies
on
you
on
your
own,
to
perhaps
consider
some
of
the
comments
and
the
suggestions
coming
from
councillor
Fletcher
modern
structures,
structures
that
could
probably
mitigate
some
of
the
environmental
impacts.
Some
some
some
improvements
that
could
allow
for
the
coexistence
of
the
of
the
industrial
use
and
the
sensitive
use.
O
H
Guess
I'm
I'm
asking
will
is
Windsor
salt
prepare
to
undertake
some
of
those
studies
recognizing
that
this
that
this
new
planning
regime
is
coming
into
effect
and
recognizing
that
the
harbour
has
always
had
a
industrial
legacy,
but
harbors
across
the
world
are
evolving
they're
changing
and
so
are
you
being
proactive
to
take
a
look
at
how
you
can
still
stay
in
place
and
continue
to
operate
for
the
next
150
years
by
making
some
of
those
modern
adjustments?
It's.
O
It's
to
make
modern
adjustments,
of
course,
we'll
look
at
what
we
have
what's
possible,
but,
prior
to
that,
we
don't
have
the
definite
plans,
the
definite
final
structures.
It
becomes
very
difficult
to
do
as
some
studies
and
one
factor
that
we
have
to
to
weigh
in
here
is
that
you
know
so
at
the
port.
The
only
salt
could
come
in
at
the
economical
price
is
with
vessels,
and
it
does
create
a
safety
hazard
if
the
area
is
not
well
protected.
O
So
over
and
above
noise
and
dust,
we
are
very
concerned
about
safety
and
from
what
we
saw
in
the
studies
that
we've
made.
We
would
have
issues
with
environment
with
the
federal
laws
on
safety,
so
I'm,
not
sure
which
one
comes
first,
the
chicken
or
the
egg.
Here
the
study
from
the
leave
means
the
Toronto
City
about
their
views,
and
then
we
could
take
it
from
there
with
once
we
have
the
infrastructure,
but
to
start
without
the
final
plans
is
kind
of
difficult
to
do.
I
understand.
B
F
G
F
The
Don
Greenway,
which
has
been
a
design
and
then
implemented
nested
into
the
Portland's
planning
framework
designed
in
1985
and
finally
in
2017
I
guess
it
became
written
in
stone
put
in
the
Bible
there
you're
not
planning
to
build
that
tomorrow.
That's
just
in
there
as
its
location
as
things
change.
That's.
G
Correct
the
policy
framework
continues
to
show
the
Greenway
in
that
location.
The
zoning
bylaw
that's
recommended
by
this
report
permits
a
park
in
that
location,
as
does
the
current
zoning
bylaw
enforced
today.
However,
this
does
not
create
any
timeline
to
implement
that
green
space
and
it
certainly
doesn't
provide
any
budget
or
a
specific
design
to
implement
that
Queen.
So.
F
I
think
the
applicant-
and
you
may
have
made
this
clear
previously
or
perhaps
it
wasn't
clear
to
them,
but
the
dawn
Greenway
is
not
expected
to
be
built
at
this
moment
and
interfere
in
any
way
with
their
salt
operation.
It
just
is
being
ensconced
in
that
plan
so
that
that's
now
the
Bible
when
things
change.
That
is
something
that
is
the
location
it
will
be
built
in
at
some
point
in
time.
That's.
G
Correct
and
that's
the
reason
why
the
staff
recommendations
are
to
address
potential
issues
related
to
the
interface
between
industrial
operations
and
the
Greenway
through
a
set
of
urban
design
guidelines,
so
that
at
some
point
in
future,
when
there
is
actually
intent
to
implement
that
Greenway,
there
is
a
set
of
principles
in
place
for
a
park
designer
or
landscape
architect.
To
rely
on
to
understand
how
to
manage
those
two
adjacent
uses
and.
F
We
do
have
two
adjacent
uses
that
Sugar
Beach.
We
have
unloading
and
loaning
of
sugar.
We
have
big
boats
there,
we
have
a
park
there.
There
we
have
some
experience
and
making
sure
that
everybody's,
safe
and
everybody's
business
gets
to
be
done,
whether
it's
public
business
or
a
private
business
such
as
the
important
salt,
storage
and
distribution
that
exists
there
on
the
in
the
attorney
in
the
Ship
Channel
I'd.
G
F
Just
going
to
be
supporting
this
I
think
that
there
has
been
a
long
process.
I
hope
I
clarified,
that
with
mr.
connect
what
I'm
sorry
I'm
moving
the
supplementary
and
I'm
moving
the
motions,
I'm
moving,
all
the
motions.
Thank
you
very
much
that
there
is
always
always
a
very
robust
consultation
with
land
users
in
the
port
and
the
types
of
uses
that
we're
looking
at
being
contiguous,
very,
very
carefully
done
and
carefully
planned.
I
would
like
to
say
that
I
have
been
shown
by
by
mr.
F
F
This
salt
is
actually
one
of
them
and
I
know.
Staff
are
looking
at.
Is
there
anywhere
to
relocate
any
of
these
really
considerably
important
industries
or
city
divisions
and
departments?
So
that
is
another
step
in
all
of
the
Portland's
planning
is
currently
being
worked
on,
but
I'd
say
perhaps
missing
from
forecasting
that
that's
actually
what's
under
way
here
in
this
report.
Thank
you.
Thank.
B
You
are
there
any
questions,
anyone
else
speak.
No,
let's
take
the
amendment.
The
supplementary
and
the
main
report
all
has
one
vote,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
that
carries.
So
we
mount
now
move
to
te
8.1
tree
the
Portland
zoning
study.
Zoning
review
study
final
report.
This
is
related
but
separate
mr.
sub
wah.
Did
you
have
comments
on
this
one?
You
registered
no
Lena
kaliba
morning,
Lena.
M
M
Name
is
Lena
Conover
I'm
French
assault
representing
the
Toronto
interesting
network
of
Portland's
group.
Joining
me
is
Christian
Chen
retained
by
the
ten
as
a
planner
to
review
the
zoning
bylaw
and
the
Portland's
planning
framework
I'm
following
ten
members
in
a
Portland's
will
be
directly
affected
by
the
proposed
zoning
bylaw
amendment.
M
So
the
following
members
are
directly
affected
by
the
proposed
zoning
bylaw
amendment
lafarge
on
Folsom
Street
and
Commissioner
Street,
st.
Mary
cement
on
Commissioner,
Street,
wins
assault
on
Unwin,
Avenue
and
other
ten
members
in
the
Portland's,
not
in
the
zoning
bylaw
area,
our
water
per
crew,
pond
Basin,
Street
and
red
bath
sugar.
Having
storage
in
the
port.
M
If
you
go
to
the
tins
letter
filed
for
the
item
813,
where
attendance
identified,
the
members
big-picture
concerns
number
of
the
tins.
Initial
concerns
were
addressed
and
clarified
after
the
views
of
the
Portland's
planning
framework
and
a
zoning
study
and
last
Friday's
meeting
with
the
chief
planner,
the
planning
staff
and
general
manager
of
Economic
Development
and
culture
team
members
in
the
Portland's.
Our
marine
based
industries,
a
marine
being
a
greenhorn
of
transportation,
were
access
to
the
dock
wall
and
hastened
adequate
space
adjacent
to
the
dock.
All
are
critical.
M
M
Interface
with
the
vessels
along
the
dark
wall
would
be
impossible
with
the
water
sits
promenade
a
walkway
with
the
interface
of
the
bus.
We
need
to
provide
port
security,
which
is
regulated
by
Transport,
Canada
and
health
to
safety
concerns
as
well
with
anywhere
around
operating
the
vessels,
operational
uncertainty,
wins
result,
location
and
with
the
construction
of
domcrean
south.
Any
new.
The
peaches
in
the
area
would
eliminate
winters
also
operation
like
that
that
ports,
toronto,
has
also
expressed
a
concern
regards
to
limiting
access
to
the
to
the
dock
wall.
M
Thank
you
to
the
city
staff
for
the
last
Friday's
meeting
and
clarification
on
his
only
bylaw
regulations
on
visual
barrier
requirements,
parking
requirements,
open
and
park
storage.
We
note
that
the
city
considered
existing
team
member
use
and
operations
in
the
Portland's
is
legally
non
complying
and
the
proposed
the
zoning
bylaws
permit.
The
land
uses
operations
of
the
ten
members
on
the
sites
and
we
would
like
to
look
at
the
future.
The
of
the
the
Portland's
not
only
ten
years,
but
also
twenty
twenty
thirty
years
in
the
future.
M
As
we
can
probably
imagine,
cars
focused
in
are
still
on
the
roads
in
the
future
as
well,
and
we
wish
to
secure
future
opportunities
to
discuss
the
proposed
zoning
bylaw
amendment
with
the
City
Planning
and
create
EO
to
clarify
and
resolve
ten
members
concerns
prior
to
the
October
second,
a
city
council
meeting,
and
we
also
request
to
be
provided
notice
to
the
city's
decision
in
regards
to
the
Toronto
and
Easter
of
Community
Council
item
813.
We
thank
you
for
the
time.
Okay,
any
questions.
B
P
For
this
deputation,
we
are
acting
on
behalf
of
the
Fajr
wholesome
the
owners
and
operators
of
the
cement
terminal
at
fifty-four,
Polson
Street
and
this
property
would
be
subject
to
the
new.
Oh
sorry,
forgive
me
that
they
do
operate,
that
for
the
fifty-four
applause
on
C
Street
cement
terminal,
but
in
this
particular
case
they
also
operate
the
concrete
batching
and
aggregate
storage
facility
at
five
thirty,
five
Commissioner
Street.
P
P
We've
had
an
ongoing
discussion
with
them
over
quite
quite
some
time,
and
you
will
see
that
you
have
on
file
today
a
letter
from
Miss
Kim,
Mullin
of
wood,
bull,
saying
very
much
the
same
thing
and
that
we
appreciate
the
changes
that
have
been
made
to
the
bylaw
to
accommodate
the
existing
facility
of
five
three
five
commissioners.
There
really
only
remain
a
couple
of
technical
concerns
which
are
set
out
in
miss
Mullens
letter.
Specifically,
there
is
a
requirement
in
the
bile
off
for
an
opaque
barrier
or
screen
for
open
storage
areas.
P
There
have
been
some
beneficial
changes
to
lafarge
in
terms
of
how
that
scream
would
be
defined.
Questions
on
our
part,
however,
remain
and
seeking
some
clarity
as
to
exactly
where,
in
the
property
that
scream
may
be
required
there,
one
provision
it
stated.
Such
a
screen
would
be
required
along
the
street
frontage
or
the
way
the
wording
is
provided
in
the
bylaw.
P
It
may
also
be
required
on
all
lot
lines
and
I
think
in
the
far
gist
case
at
the
Commissioner
Street
facility,
a
screen
along
the
commissioner
Street
front
I,
don't
think
that
is
an
issue,
but
the
baila
could
be
read
in
such
a
way
that
the
screen
may
be
required
around
the
entire
property,
which
of
course,
is
problematic,
because
a
good
portion
of
that
lot
line
is
the
seawall
and
we're
shipping
has
received,
materials
are
received
by
boat,
and
so
a
screen
doesn't
make
much
sense
there.
So
I'm
sure
this
is
a
matter.
P
We
can
clear
clarify
with
staff
us
another
smaller
item
that
would
I
believe
still
needs.
Some
discussion
is
a
provision
in
the
bylaw
whereby
parking
would
not
otherwise
be
permitted
in
the
front
yard.
In
this
particular
instance,
that
is
where
parking
is
today,
and
so
there
would
be
a
bit
of
a
conflict
created
by
the
bylaw
there
and
secondly,
due
to
the
nature
of
the
facility.
B
F
You've
had
a
couple
of
meetings
now,
with
some
of
the
deputies
just
around
their
concerns
and
trying
to
accommodate
anything
as
well
as
accommodate
meet
the
plan.
That's
in
place,
so
are
you
prepared,
even
if
this
just
passes
and
goes
straight
to
Council?
Do
you
have
time
that
you
could
continue
to
meet
to
clarify
some
of
these
issues
like
this,
where
they're
parking
etc?
F
And
it's
also
my
understanding
that
the
dock
wall
and
the
use
of
the
dock
wall
is
pretty
robust
part
of
everybody's
plan
at
the
moment
in
particular,
because
it
means
nobody
is
driving
anything,
it's
a
very
efficient
climate
friendly
way
to
bring
materials
in.
Could
you
comment
on
both
of
those
please.
G
Do
you,
mr.
chair,
would
we
be
willing
to
meet
with
the
stake,
hold
the
industrial
stakeholders
and
the
par
times?
Absolutely
we've
met
with
them
before
one
of
the
principles
of
the
bottle
others
come
forward,
as
you
can
see,
is
that
well
we
are
setting
the
stage
for
the
ongoing
evolution
of
the
Portland's.
We
certainly
are
not
interested
in
pushing
out
existing
industrial
users.
G
Users
we'd
rather
have
them
continue
to
evolve,
where
they're
located
and
certainly
take
advantage
of
the
unique
resource
that
is
the
port
in
Toronto,
so
we'd
be
happy
to
continue
to
meet
with
them
up
to
the
October
2nd
meeting
and
with
respect
to
the
dock
wall
access.
Certainly,
the
the
intent
of
that
bylaw
provision
is
to
screen
undesirable
activity,
but
certainly
not
to
prohibit
or
obstruct
access
between
the
dock
wall
and
shipping,
an
activity
that
occurs
along
the
dock
wall
and
the
properties
that
rely
on
that
transportation
solution
and.
F
F
Can
I
just
ask
a
follow-up,
perhaps
for
council
you
could.
Let
me
know
s.
Rock
went
from
its
the
silo
location
into
the
East
port
area
and
they
have
a
site
plan
that
requires
a
number
of
things,
including
beautification
of
the
site.
I'm,
not
sure
all
those
requirements
have
been
met
yet
so
perhaps
without
moving
emotion.
You
could
undertake
I'd
counsel
to
let
me
know
exactly
what's
missing
as
far
as
their
compliance
with
the
site
plan.
G
G
F
F
I'll
move
on
number
13
I
want
to
thank
the
staff
and
mr.
Williams
for
meeting
with
those
who
are
concerned,
the
industrial
users
in
the
port,
recognizing
that
the
city
has
been
very
careful
to
be
clear
that
there's
uses
there.
That
will
remain
there
for
the
foreseeable
future.
It's
kind
of
how
East
meets
West
and
if
there
are
any
physical
changes
that
simply
kind
of
update
those
industries.
That's
helpful.
That's
why
I
asked
about
s
Rock,
because
they
really
did
attempt
to
do
that
and
understanding
there.
There
are
critical
industries
that
service
the
downtown
area.
F
Nobody
if
the
city
is
trying
to
run
anybody
out
of
town
I,
think
we've
been
clear
on
that,
the
entire
time
since
we
started
the
Portland's
planning
framework,
we've
got
to
work
around
those
until
there's
a
magic
spark
that
opens
up
or
we
don't
use
salt
anymore.
For
instance,
if
you
don't
want
your
roads
salted,
perhaps
councillor
Matt
Lowell,
we
can
get
rid
of
those,
but
I
think
your
residents
expect
that
when
we
get
rid
of
salt,
then
perhaps
that
industry
won't
be
required
there.
F
F
Cherry
beaches
coexisted
with
all
of
these
uses
forever.
As
you
well
know,
it's
a
big
use.
The
park
will
be
built
out
a
bit
more
and
for
the
foreseeable
future.
We'll
have
this
type
of
tension,
so
I
think
this
table,
that
is
with
planning
and
economic
development,
and
others
is
a
really
critical
place
to
kind
of
hammer
these
things
out
on
timing,
and
it
is
just
a
useful
way
to
do
that,
because
the
future
is
moving
you're.
F
Not
the
city
is
also
looking
at
where
I'm
just
going
to
speak
about
this
for
a
second
on
the
first
golf
site,
this
25
acres
worth
of
services
that
service
every
single
ward
of
each
and
every
one
of
us
parks,
roads,
MLS
and
in
order
to
free
that
entire
68
acre
site
up
those
have
to
be
moved.
There's
discussions
about
where
those
could
be
moved.
I
am
sure
you
agree
with
me,
colleagues,
that
we
can't
move
servicing
for
Toronto
and
East
York
or
downtown
up
way
up
into
the
outer
regions
of
the
city.
F
It's
not
efficient
and
I
simply
don't
get
to
service.
Our
parks
from
let's
say
North
York
doesn't
make
sense
to
me,
might
make
sense
to
you,
but
that's
still
a
discussion
that
we'll
be
having
around
those
other
properties
as
well,
so
just
to
bring
you
in
to
servicing
your
wards
and
where
everything
is.
Thank
you
thank.
B
H
B
Right
all
those
in
favor
opposed
Kerry
I
also
need
a
motion
to
introduce
a
few
new
pieces
of
business.
From
eight
point:
seven:
nine,
through
eight
point,
eight
three
they've
been
circulated.
Members
I
have
a
motion:
councillor
Bradford,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
Kerry.
Okay,
returning
to
the
regular
agenda,
te
8.1,
four,
two
one:
five
lakeshore
Boulevard
East
draft
plan
of
subdivision
final
report:
are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
B
B
Those
in
favor
opposed
carried
item
te
8.15,
one
for
one
Bay,
Street
application
to
remove
the
holding
symbol
from
the
zoning
bylaw
final
report.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
Seeing
none
are
there
any
questions
of
staff?
No
counselor
Cressy,
eight
one,
five,
four
one:
four
one
day,
I'm.
B
B
B
I
I
The
report
describes
the
public
reaction
and
some
of
the
changes
that
have
been
made.
Unfortunately,
I
think
the
new
plan
has
not
correctly
addressed
some
of
the
problems
that
were
inherent
with
the
size
of
the
design
and
I.
Don't
think
the
meeting
that
we
had,
that
was
on
April
9th
that
the
council
councilor
Crecy
was
at.
That
was
the
only
time
that
anyone
in
the
neighbourhood
had
seen
the
substantial
changes
that
were
made
to
this
plan.
I
For
instance,
one
of
the
taller
buildings
that
was
38
stories,
that's
been
reduced
to
30,
but
an
open
area
of
plaza
where
there's
an
iconic
smokestack
that
you
can
see
from
Wellington
Street
is
now
occupied
by
bleep
to
12
14
story.
Building
that
isn't
even
mentioned
in
the
plan.
I
believe
a
lot
of
the
impacts
of
these
buildings
will
have
a
negative
effect
on
Niagara
Street
and
the
Niagara
Street
area,
more
so
than
what
the
original
plan
was.
I
On
proceeding
with
the
development
I
know,
the
L
Papp
meeting
is
in
January,
so
I
don't
know
if
there's
time,
but
to
have
anything
done
between
then,
but
I
think
the
majority
of
people
in
our
in
the
neighborhood,
unless
they
were
at
the
meeting
that
that
was
in
that
Joe
was
that
would
have
no
idea
what
the
exact
nature
of
the
new
design
is
and
I.
Some
of
the
decisions,
especially
like
regarding
traffic
I,
think
you
have
to
have
more
neighbor
more
input
than
just
with
all
due
respect.
B
L
Hello,
my
name
is
Shelley
Ann
Pereira
I
live
at
801
King
Street,
King
and
Niagara
I
only
received
one
piece
of
information
on
this,
and
so
I
went
to
the
Appeal
Tribunal
and
they
informed
me
about
this
morning
and
that's
why
I'm
here,
I
Danny
I
moved
into
that
neighborhood,
because
my
building
is
what
13
stories
we
have
a
beautiful
roof
garden.
This
building
that
they
want
to
put
in
is
30
stories
and
22
stories.
It's
going
to
block
all
of
our
view.
It's
going
to
block
the
Sun
the
amount
of
traffic.
L
It's
going
to
happen
there,
it's
just
bad
as
it
is,
and
it's
going
to
make
it
worse.
I
agree.
The
previous
gentleman
that
we
haven't
had
been
provided
with
sufficient
information,
an
opportunity
to
put
our
voices
in
and
I
really
think
that
we
should
have
some
more
debate
about
this,
because
this
is
going
to
affect
everybody
in
that
area.
There's
a
beautiful
a
part.
L
The
people
walk
the
dogs
and
everything
there
and
this
this
building,
it's
just
going
to
block
into
our
entire
view
of
the
lake
that
is
not
fair
to
us,
because,
when
I
purchased,
I
purchased
to
have
that
beautiful
views
is
going
to
affect
my
property
value
and
I
think
we
need
more
consultation
on
this
because,
like
I
said,
I've
only
received
one
thing
for
the
you
know
the
tribe,
Appeal
Tribunal
and
this
whole
design.
It's
only
today,
I
actually
got
an
opportunity.
L
B
C
B
F
D
Drag
the
clock
for
a
little
bit
here
simply
because
the
application
was
first
put
in
when
I
was
the
local
councillor
and
was
it
was
very
unique
in
that
before
the
application
came
in
the
the
the
owner,
the
developer
did
a
series
of
workshops,
knowing
that
this
was
a
very
unique
site
and
needed
some
additional
care.
Now,
if
you
actually
rewind
even
further,
we
did
a
review
of
the
secondary
plan.
Not
that
long
ago
and
I
was
kind
of
of
the
opinion.
D
You
don't
redo
a
secondary
plan
and
then
allow
for
a
significant
change
to
that
secondary
plan,
because
the
community
was
out
front
of
the
development
on
this
particular
site.
They
said
one
tall
building
element.
It
could
have
some
mid
rise.
It
didn't
speak
to
density,
but
it
said
one
tall
building
element
in
a
rough
location
on
the
map
and
I
wasn't
convinced
that
that
there
was
cause
to
reopen
the
file,
but
the
other
difference
that
was
there
was
there
was
another
site
further
east,
now
the
stock
market,
otherwise
known,
as
was
28
Bathurst.
D
Thank
you
Joe,
that
in
in
that
time,
since
this
application
was
brought
forward
and
that
original
secondary
plan
was
done,
they
actually
contemplated
three
buildings
on
that
site.
It
was
a
builder
Anto
project.
We
managed
to
dial
it
back
to
be
no
buildings
on
that
site
and
the
future
site
of
a
park.
So
the
the
dynamics
of
the
neighborhood
changed
and
the
amount
of
developable
space
in
the
neighborhood
changed
quite
significantly.
D
We
made
sure
of
it,
but
it
that
was
typically
the
crowd
and
it
wasn't
until
the
third
meeting
that
the
the
building
elevations
started
to
play
and-
and
we
got
to
what
is
classically-
the
dialogue
in
this
chamber
and
at
other
public
meetings
about
building
height
and
massing.
But
there
were
some
innovative
elements
that
were
put
into
the
development
that
I
think.
D
At
least
Maeda
made
enough
of
the
case
that
it
was
time
to
look
at
the
conclusions
of
the
review
of
the
secondary
plan
with
a
new
set
of
eyes,
which
is
why,
at
that
point
in
time,
we
didn't
tell
the
developer
to
go
straight
to
the
L
pad,
because
we
thought
that
there
was
sufficient
information
there
to
say.
Perhaps
we
exam.
We
should
re-examine
this
one.
D
That
would
perhaps
constrain
him
on
the
site,
but
at
the
same
time,
do
better
justice
to
the
area's
heritage
than
the
city
actually
expected
from
him,
and
when
you
look
at
the
original
design
for
this
site,
when
it
had
a
previous
owner,
we
had
a
public
meeting.
There
were
pitchforks
and
torches
lit,
and
it
was
three
buildings
on
a
giant
podium
that
would
have
just
blocked
the
entire
neighborhood
off
from
from
from
the
South
I'm,
still
not
a
huge
fan
of
building
3.
D
But
again
what
one
of
those
pieces
was
the
proximity
to
the
railway
tracks
and
him
staff
are
satisfied.
It's
tough
for
me
to
give
an
engineering
rationale
for
you
not
to
have
building
3
on
there
I
think
in
the
long
term,
though,
the
one
piece
of
the
secondary
plan
that
I
would
protect
the
most
is
that
City
of
Toronto
Works
yard
and
the
future
of
it
right
now.
It's
green
on
our
official
on
our
official
plan
map
and
I
really
hope
it
stays
that
way.
B
E
I.
Do
want
to
acknowledge
and
thank
the
applicant
for
being
part
of
that,
because
it's
easy,
as
we
see
often
for
applicants
to
use
the
legal
process
to
not
engage
with
the
community,
and
in
this
case
there
was
a
legal
process
underway,
but
continued
engagement
with
the
community
engagement,
especially
on
transportation.
That's
going
to
continue
going
forward.
This
project
is
a
significant
one
in
it's
a
large
one.
E
It
involves
four
buildings
ranging
from
two
to
thirty
stories
and
it
is
I
believe
a
project
that
will
ultimately
create
a
true
complete
community
and
by
that,
when
I
talk
about
a
complete
community,
a
community.
First
of
all
that
people
can
actually
live
in
whether
you're
raising
a
family
with
twenty
percent
two
bedrooms
and
ten
percent
three
bedrooms,
there's
actually
space
to
raise
your
kids
there,
whether
you're
on
a
low
or
high
income,
six
million
dollars
from
the
section
37
is
going
into
affordable
housing.
E
On-Site
on-site
in
the
development
which
is
critical
in
the
report,
speaks
to
a
commitment
to
seek
to
increase
that
where
we
can
so
it's
a
community
that
you
can
live
in
based
on
the
size
of
the
units
and
the
presence
of
affordable
housing,
a
community
that
is
livable
because
of
the
inclusion
of
on-site
parkland,
but
also
a
community
that
you
can
get
around
in
in
our
dense
and
increasingly
vibrant,
downtown,
core
walking
and
cycling.
In
fact,
we're
building
in
the
mixed-use
cycling
pedestrian
trail.
E
As
part
of
this,
those
are
important,
important
pieces
that
we
need
to
do
on
every
development
that
are
taking
place
here
now.
Many
of
the
changes
that
have
occurred
over
the
course
of
this
development,
especially
since
the
spring,
include
the
adjustments
of
heights
and
massing,
in
particular,
some
of
the
massing
related
to
buildings
on
Niagara
on
the
north
side.
Those
are
important
changes.
E
The
process
for
the
community
is
not
done
yet,
while
we
are
bringing
this
forward
to
council
for
the
broad
strokes
and
in
moving
this
forward,
as
it
relates
to
the
Transportation,
Study
and
construction
management.
Both
of
those
will
be
developed
and
done
in
consultation
with
the
neighborhood,
but
I
will
close
again
by
saying
that
it
changes
never
easy,
especially
in
our
neighborhoods,
but
in
this
growing
city
of
ours.
I
think
our
commitment
has
to
be
as
counselors
that
that
change
is
going
to
be
both
equitable
and
livable
and
I.
E
B
You
any
questions
the
mover,
no
anyone
else
to
speak.
No,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
that
carried
I
saw
that
boat
moving
right
along
this
takes
us
to
GE
8.1,
eight
alterations
to
a
property
designated
under
part,
five
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act
52,
Boswell
members
and
members
of
the
public.
Please
note
that
there's
also
in
a
supplementary
18a
attached.
This
are
there
any
members
of
the
public
for
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item.
A
Okay,
my
name
is
Therese
Sears
executive
director
of
urban
domain
Inc,
which
is
the
owner
of
39
Commissioner
Street.
If
you
are
not
familiar
with
the
building,
it's
this
handsome
historic
fire
hall
in
the
Portland's.
My
pride
and
joy
first
I
must
say
I'm
excited
about
the
Portland's
redevelopment
initiative
and
believe
it
will
create
an
incredible
vibrant
new
community
in
the
Portland's.
A
The
reason
I
am
here
is
really
for
a
point
of
information
and
to
put
my
voice
on
the
record,
it's
important
to
note
that
the
plans
for
39
Commissioner
Street
are
being
made
around
me.
Not
with
me.
Waterfront
Toronto
is
acting
like
it
already
owns
my
building,
and
it
does
not
still
I
do
not
want
to
stand
in
the
way
of
the
proposed
alterations,
because
I
do
think
that
they
go
a
long
way
in
bringing
the
waterfront
and
the
initiative
to
a
point
where
the
we're
out
in
the
dawn
can
happen.
B
B
B
I
Ahead
good
morning,
my
name
is
Patrick
Bernanke
I'm
I
work
for
a
Hydra
one
and
I'm
the
applicant
for
this
demolition
proposal.
This
is
my
colleague,
Jeff
Cridland,
he's
the
project
manager
of
this
project
and
we're
here
to
ensure
the
confidence
of
the
community
in
this
proposal
for
future
reliability
in
the
electrical
grids
that
we're
planning
on
doing
the
work
here
and
I
will
leave
the
work
with
to
have
jeff,
say
a
couple
words
about
this
project.
K
Thank
you
for
this
opportunity
to
to
speak
in
front
of
you
this.
This
project,
right
now
is
like
Patrick
was
saying,
is
to
to
bolster
the
reliability
of
power
in
the
Maine
and
Danforth
area.
With
the
with
the
support
of
Toronto
Hydro,
we
have.
We
have
our
demolition
permit
for
the
157
Stevenson
Avenue
and
we
were
looking
to
finish
with
the
the
demolition
permit
for
155.
K
We
need
these
two
pieces
of
property
to
to
expand
this
this
station
in
a
safe
and
a
outage
sensitive
process
of
putting
putting
these
new,
where
we're
gonna,
be
putting
in
two
new
transformers
into
this
into
this
property
and
to
support
like
I,
was
saying
earlier
to
support
Toronto
hydros
expected
growth
in
a
load.
That's
in
that's
in
the
the
Danforth
and
main.
K
I
Want
to
add
the
recommendations
that,
in
the
first
item,
saying
that
there's
no
permit
for
replacement
buildings
on
the
site.
We
have
not
applied
for
any
new
building
permits
as
of
right
now,
but
in
the
next
five
to
ten
years
there
will
be
a
proposal
for
proposed
new
buildings
there
that
will
replace
the
buildings
that
are
currently
going
to
be
demolished.
I
We
will
be
doing
a
couple
cable
vaults,
with
where
the
transformers
will
be
stationed
and
new
foundations
will
be
put
in
place
there
and
then,
in
the
next
five
to
ten
years
there
will
be
a
new
building
coming
up
where
the
location
of
the
residential
building
is
155,
and
that
will
be
a
new
building
there
in
the
next
couple
of
years
in
the
next
decade
or
so
I
think
that's
so
we
have
those
any
questions.
Okay,.
K
K
K
K
And
so
these
are
the
two
new
transformers
that
we
were
going.
We're
going
to
install
we'll
be
extending
this
connection
to
the
two
new
transformers.
The
old
transformers
are
prince
presently
sitting
here
and
here
and
what
we
need
to
do
is
build
this
new
structure
and
new
transformers
prior
to
tying
in
or
prior
then
to
taking
out
these
old
transformers
out
of
service.
I
Is
currently
one
repair
garage
there
where
it's
currently
used
to
be
like
a
doggy
daycare,
but
we
purchased
that
and
we
did
receive
the
demolition
permit
for
that
building.
So
it's
like
a
one-story,
brick
and
block
building
that
we're
proposing
to
demolish,
as
well
as
the
right
next
door.
There's
that
old
house
they're
called
155
Stevenson,
which
we
can
also
show
us
street
view.
If
you
want
I,
have
a
another
image.
I
Terms
of
the
zoning
not
entirely
sure
what
the
current
zoning
there
is
right
now,
I
think
there's
like
a
it's
in
industrial
area,
but
there
is
some
mixed-use
there
with
residential,
but
we
would
have
to
confirm
that
just
to
make
sure
that
it's
still
applicable
not
sure
what
we'd
have
to
do
in
terms
of
rezoning
or
if
we
have
to.
But
that's
why
we're
here
to
discuss
that
and
make
make
sure
we
all
have
a
collective
agreement
moving
forward.
Okay,.
K
So
we're
not
gonna
work
out
that
collective
agreement
here-
we're
not
gonna,
discuss
it
here,
but
we
should
have
a
conversation
about
that
and
your
plans
for
the
site.
I'm
gonna,
move
the
recommendations
and
I'm
comfortable
with
that.
But
this
is
this
is
something
that
we'll
need
to
discuss
absolutely.
B
Any
other
questions,
the
deputies,
no
questions
our
staff
are
sorry.
Are
there
any
other
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
side?
Seeing
none?
Thank
you
very
much.
Are
there
any
questions
of
staff?
No
councillor
Bradford.
When
do
you
move
the
recommendations,
so
you
have
an
option
which
one
is
they
remove
to
permit
the
so
number
to
permit
it
with
the
conditions?
Correct?
Okay,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried.
B
B
B
K
K
It's
based
on
the
cafe
Boulevard
permit
that
was
issued
for
this
location.
The
original
building
permit
application
was
submitted
on
September
10
2015.
The
building
permit
was
issued
on
February
22nd
2016
for
a
restaurant
interior
alteration
permit
number
one.
Five,
two
two
three
one,
six
BL
d00
be
a
the
outdoor
patio
drawing
was
submitted
to
Toronto
transportation
services
on
or
around
the
date
of,
November
15th.
The
drawings
were
received
by
a
front
count
front
counter
staff.
Our
architect
designer
was
informed
that
the
fees
would
be
determined
once
the
examiner
reviews,
the
scope
of
work.
K
The
patio
was
built
based
on
these
drawings,
with
the
recommendation
that
the
railings
that
were
installed
be
clear
to
assist
in
the
view
based
on
the
the
corner,
location
of
the
patio,
and
this
recommendation
was
by
Toronto
transportation
services
at
the
time,
Toronto
municipals
the
license
and
Stan's
issued
the
permit
for
boulevard
carbaryl.
Our
boulevard
cafe
permit
on
July
14
2016.
K
This
particular
project
was
a
costly
one
which
exceeded
over
$50,000
to
construct,
and
one
is
one
of
the
major
reasons
why
we
signed
a
long-term
lease
in
this
particular
location,
because
it's
a
little
on
the
outskirts
of
Bloor
West
Village,
and
so
we
needed
something
to
attract.
Obviously,
our
customer
base.
K
We
we
then
were
in
the
process
of
renewing
the
patio
license,
and
we
were
at
that
point.
When
we
went
to
renew
we
basically
were
we
were.
It
was
stated
that
we
could
not
renew
due
to
the
fact
that
there
was
a
sight
line,
violation,
I,
believe
that
was
brought
up
so
basically,
two
years
later,
that's
what
we
received
a
notice
of
encroachment
and
sight
line,
obstruction,
I
believe
somebody
here
I'm
not
here.
B
Thank
you
very
much,
not
a
problem.
Thank
you.
Are
there
any
other
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item,
seeing
none
any
questions
of
staff?
No,
so
I'm
going
to
move
the
staff
recommendation,
which
is
to
deny
transportation
staff,
have
made
it
very
clear
in
the
report
that
this
is
a
sightline
issue
having
to
do
with
the
sight
line
of
drivers.
B
Turning
at
this
corner-
and
you
know
I,
as
all
members
of
council
know,
the
public
is
simply
not
willing
to
put
up
with
us
doing
anything
to
impair
the
safety
of
people
trying
to
cross
the
street
in
the
City
of
Toronto
anymore.
So
I'm
gonna
have
to
take
the
staff
recommendation
on
this.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
that
carries.
B
Te
8.22
refusal
of
a
boulevard
cafe
permit
application
to
include
a
permanent,
enclosed
look
located
at
one
zero,
zero
six
Bloor
Street
westward
West
Moreland
Avenue,
flanked
äj--.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
Seeing
none
any
questions
of
staff?
No
counselor,
pylab
I
would.
C
Like
to
move
to
print
so
move
approval,
this
is
a
very
exciting
project
in
the
neighborhood
that
we're
looking
forward
to
have
a
cinema
reopening
in
the
neighborhood,
and
this
is
the
restaurant
right
beside
it.
So
we're
hoping
that
it
all
comes
together
very
soon
and
that
we
can
start
enjoying
the
facility
and
the
preservation
of
this
great
heritage
facility.
B
Okay,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
item
te.
Eight
point:
two:
three
refusal
of
a
boulevard
cafe
permit
application
located
at
1640
du
Pont,
Street
Edwin,
Street,
flanked
äj--.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
Seeing
none
questions
of
staff
no
counselor
by
Lao
again.
C
B
C
You
and
once
again
would
like
to
move
approval.
This
is
one
of
our
many
breweries
that
we
have
very
close
to
what
we
all
hope.
It
will
be
a
great
public
round
that
Metrolinx
will
have
not
canceled
on
us
as
per
their
word,
but
it's
very
close
to
that
and
it's
a
small
patio
that
the
brewery
is
asking
for,
and
so
we
would
like
to
grant
it
to
them.
We.
B
B
So
with
that
on
the
motion
to
approve
all
those
in
favor
opposed
that
carriage
okay,
so
now
did
I
do
find
you.
No
refusal
of
a
boulevard
cafe
permit
application
located
at
five
five
to
College
Street.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation,
seeing
none
any
questions
of
staff,
counselor,
Layton
you're
out
of
your
seats.
D
B
B
H
B
H
B
H
H
The
Christmas
market
is
a
well-loved
seasonal,
instant
that
brings
hundreds
of
thousands
of
visitors
to
the
distillery
and
the
adjoining
neighborhoods
and
throughout
the
years
it's
growing
success
I
think
was
was
almost
unchecked,
which
means
that
there
were
visitors
coming
from
out
of
town,
largely
by
vehicle
or
movement.
That
was
really
just.
They
wanted
to
come
in
and
enjoy
the
the
festivities,
but
it
also
created
this
incredible
condition
that
was
very
difficult
for
the
local
residents
who
lived
there.
H
Last
winter
alone,
there
were
cars
that
were
parked
along
Lakeshore
and
that
had
to
walk
north
and
south
along
make
sure
to
reach
its
final
destination
and,
through
all
that
time,
surprisingly
enough,
there
was
never
a
traffic
plan
that
was
ever
conducted
by
the
producers
of
the
Christmas
market,
and
this
report
I
would
I'd
like
to
say
that,
even
though
it
doesn't
provide
any
history
to
the
report,
I
think
we
we
need
to
thank
a
certain
individuals.
I
know
that
there
are
staff
at
the
councillor
Krusty's
office,
that
really
champion
this.
H
I
just
want
to
highlight
that
there
are
significant
changes
to
traffic
operations
that
will
have
to
take
place
in
order
for
this
to
work.
I
know
that
traffic
operations
and
signage
will
not
do
it
on
its
own.
This
will
have
to
be
actively
enforced,
proactively,
communicated
because
there'll
be
visitors
who
have
come
for
years
without
having
to
had
any
significant
restrictions
on
vehicles,
so
that
will
that
will
have
to
be
in
place
along
with
the
traffic
operations
and
they
have
to
work
in
concert
with
one
another.
H
In
order
for
this
traffic
plan
to
really
bring
us
success,
so
I
want
to
thank
the
staff,
the
the
producers
of
the
5th
Christmas
market,
the
residents
of
the
local
community
for
their
incredible
patience
and,
and
everyone
else
involved.
I
know
we
still
have
a
lot
of
work
to
do.
I
think
that
we're
all
watching
and
we're
all
committed
to
making
sure
that
that
we
get
the
best
outcome
this
winter
and
we
welcome
everybody
to
the
market.
Thank
you.
E
I
have
a
technical
amendment
from
staff
that
I
can
move
and
I
think
councillor.
Wong-Tam
said
it
all
at
the
Christmas
market
has
succeeded
beyond
anybody's
wildest
imaginations,
which
has
created
challenges
for
those
who
live
there
and
I
just
want
to
thank
to
echo
councillor
Wong
Tam's
comments,
her
office
staff
in
my
own
office
city
staff,
the
Toronto
Christmas
market,
who
hired
be
a
group
to
do
a
comprehensive
transportation
study,
and
certainly
residents
of
good
room
and
warts
in
the
Distillery,
broader
neighbourhood
for
all
their
hard
work.
B
H
H
B
B
B
So
the
next
item
of
business
I
have
is
te
eight
point:
five,
nine,
the
refusal
of
an
application
for
a
boulevard
cafe
permit
located
at
one
six,
three:
eight
Bloor
Street
West
Union
unit,
two
Indian
Road
flank
egde.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
Yes,
sir.
A
Afternoon,
my
name
is
sandy
sandy
I
own,
the
Dairy
Queen
store
at
the
location
and
I
bought
the
store
five
years
ago.
It's
it's
great
for
the
for
the
people
in
the
area
summer
times
are
really
busy
and
I
have
a
letter
from
the
dentistry
which
is
which
is
right
beside
us.
They
have
no
objection
to
to
the
patio.
I
also
have
a
new
objection
letter
from
the
landlord
regarding
the
patio
as
well,
and
it's
a
great
place
for
patrons
to
come
and
enjoy
dessert
when
they
come
to
Dairy
Queen
Dairy
Queen.
A
B
A
B
B
B
B
That,
but
that's
not
the
issue
when
city
staff
sent
you
the
refusal,
if
they
make
it
clear
that
City
of
Toronto
does
not
permit
you,
irrespective
of
what
your
landlord
wants
or
what
the
dentist
wants.
The
City
of
Toronto
does
not
permit
you
to
have
a
patio
that
isn't
attached
to
your
business
that
was
communicated
to
you
by
city.
Yes,
that
was
in
the
letter
all
right.
Thank
you.
That's
what
I
wanted
to
understand.
I.
A
B
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
Are
there
any
other
questions?
No
seeing
none.
Thank
you.
Are
there
any
other
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item,
seeing
none
so
I'm
gonna
be
moving.
The
staff
recommendation,
which
is
to
deny
I,
think
it
would
be
very
dangerous
if
we
start
allowing
businesses
to
get
a
lease
on
parts
of
the
boulevard
that
aren't
attached
to
their
business
and
using
them
for
patios
and
I.
Don't
want
to
establish
that
precedent
here.
B
D
I
have
a
motion
to
approve
the
patio
with
the
following
conditions:
one
I'm
I'm
struggling
with,
but
I'm
gonna
get
better
at
and
it's
something
my
predecessor
did
councillor
panel
Oni
was
he
put
a
new.
He
put
a
new
tree
on
every
patio.
This
patio
already
heads,
trees,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
they're
maintained.
D
B
H
B
So
members
I
have
new
information
on
item
te.
Eight
point:
seven
seven
I
had
asked
to
have
some
staff
available
to
answer
questions
and
they
are
not
available
until
after
the
lunch
break
so
that
one
at
least
we're
gonna
have
to
hold
off
on
until
1:30
item
te.
Eight
point:
seven:
nine
approachment
agreement,
one
zero,
zero,
six
Bloor
Street,
West,
Ward,
nine.