►
Description
Toronto and East York Community Council, meeting 9, October 10, 2019
Agenda and background materials:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/decisionBodyProfile.do?function=doPrepare&meetingId=15420
Meeting Navigation:
0:10:01 - Call to order
B
A
Would
like
to
welcome
you
all
to
the
ninth
meeting
of
the
Toronto
East
York
Community
Council,
the
chair
and
members
gratefully
acknowledged
that
the
Toronto
East
York
Community
Council
meets
on
the
traditional
territory
of
many
nations,
including
the
Mississauga's
of
the
credit,
the
Anishinaabe,
the
Chippewa
de
joder
nashoni
and
the
wind
at
people's
and
is
now
home
to
many
diverse
First,
Nations,
Inuit
and
maytee
peoples.
We
also
acknowledge
that
Toronto
is
covered
by
treaty
13
with
the
Mississauga's
of
the
credit.
B
B
I'm
just
asking
because
there
we
had
the
lower
Coxwell
piece
and
it
turns
out
staff
didn't
realize
that
the
boundaries
had
changed.
So
that
is
a
joint
street
with
the
parking
lot
actually
being
in
the
new
Ward
14.
So
I
think
it's
really
important
for
years
to
come.
When
somebody
looks
that
they
understand
that
that
section
of
the
street
is
both
words,
so
I'm
asking
that
that
we
return
next
meeting
to
sort
that
out,
because
it's
a
bylaw
it
was
an
actual
violet
change.
So
I'm.
A
So
yeah,
so
what
I'm
gonna
rule
is
that
the
minutes
accurately
reflect
what
we
did.
Yes,
so
we
can
go
ahead
and
approve
the
minutes,
but
I
will.
The
clerk
is
now
aware
that
we
may
have
to
reconsider
that
item.
I
see
councillor
Bradford
nodding
his
head,
so
we'll
arrange
to
have
that
on
the
next
agenda.
A
A
A
Councillor
cressie
is
on
a
board.
Meeting
conference
call
and
may
be
late
and
councillor
bylaw
also
had
a
meeting
this
morning
and
will
be
a
bit
late,
so
I'm
going
to
be
holding
their
items
until
we
know
how
to
dispose
of
them,
but
it
means
we're
at
bare
quorum.
So
nobody
can
leave
the
room
until
one
of
them
is
made
available.
A
I
have
apologies
from
those
counselors
personally
I
blame
it
on
premier,
for
it
so
item
te
9.25
appointments
to
be
IAS,
that's
councillors
by
Lao
and
Layton.
So
I'll
hold
that
for
now
item
te
nine
point:
two:
six
proposed
official
naming
of
future
parks
at
250,
Davenport
road-
that's
councillor
Layton,
so
I'll
hold
that
until
councillor
Crecy,
who
I
believe
has
instructions,
arrives.
A
C
A
A
A
C
A
C
B
A
B
A
Item
te
9.3
four,
four:
six:
two
Wellington
Street
West
zoning
amendment
preliminary
report,
councillor
Cressey
I'll,
hold
that
it's
like
we're.
Gonna
have
two
meetings:
item
te,
9.3,
573,
Queens,
Park,
Crescent,
official
plan
amendment
and
zoning
bylaw
amendment
applications;
preliminary
report,
that's
councillor;
Layton
I'll
hold
that.
B
A
Te
nine
point:
three:
six
designation
of
fire
routes,
an
amendment
to
Chapter,
eight,
eight,
zero
fire
routes,
138
st.
helens,
that's
counselor,
bylaw
I'll
hold
on
this-
is
what
we
do
when
we
have
a
shorter
agenda.
We
make
up
for
it
by
holding
everything
item
te.
Nine
point:
three:
seven:
construction,
staging
area,
time
extension
for
Avenue
Road,
that's
counselor
late,
now
hold
on.
A
A
A
Well
done
councillor
Matt,
Lowe
and
we'll
all
take
note
of
that
and
bring
it
up
in
the
meetings
we
have
about
construction
staging
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
done,
I,
like
checking
the
items
off
that
felt.
Good
item
te.
Nine
point:
four
for
construction
staging
area,
two
one,
nine
two,
two
three
one
Dundas
Street
East
councillor
want
an
yes.
C
Thank
you
very
much.
I
would
like
to
move
an
amendment
and
add
a
one
additional
clause
to
the
long
list
of
conditions
that's
already
contained
in
the
staff
report
and
while
the
clerk's
get
that
on
the
screen
is
just
to
direct
the
applicant
to
create
a
publicly
accessible
web
site,
with
regular
construction
updates
and
post.
That
website
address
on
the
construction
site
hoarding,
which
will
be
prominently
placed
and
legible
from
twenty
meters
on
all
elevations
from
the
construction
site
and
then
there's
a
series
of
this
of
recommendations.
A
A
B
A
A
B
A
A
D
C
A
B
B
A
B
A
A
A
Item
te
nine
point:
six
to
instil
it
proposed
installation
of
speedbumps,
first
east
west
public
Lane,
north
of
Dundas
Street
West
between
Manning
Avenue
and
Euclid
Avenue.
That's
consolation.
I
will
hold
on
te
nine
point:
six:
three
traffic
calming
speed,
humps
Sibley
Avenue
councillor
Bradford
thanks.
E
E
A
B
G
A
B
A
C
Thank
you
very
much
mr.
speaker,
I'd
like
to
move
the
the
recommendation
Kane
tain
in
the
letter,
and
stipulate
that
this
is
a
very
exciting
public
art
installation
that
is
also
functioning
as
a
fence
at
Church
Street
public
school.
We
brought
together
the
very
best
of
two
technical
and
artistic
worlds.
One
is
the
designers
and
the
technical
experts
around
lighting
who
worked
with
us
on
the
the
Yorkville
bench
project,
as
well
as
the
artists
who
worked
on
the
aluminous
veil.
As
a
councillor
Fletcher
will
know.
A
H
A
We're
at
that
moment
I
need
a
motion
to
introduce
new
business
item
68
through
80
councillor
Matt
Lowe,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried.
Have
these
conservative
68
480
were
circulated,
so
we
can
do
those
now
or
not
item
te
9.68
speed,
limit
reduction,
niagara
ste,
that's
counselor
crises,
so
I'll
hold
that.
A
Item
te,
9.6,
9,
reopening
of
item,
t
2.59,
speed,
hump,
pull
results,
Pendred
street,
that's
councillor,
cressie,
so
hold
on
item
te,
nine
point:
seven:
zero
parking
amendments,
Elizabeth
Street,
that's
councillor,
Layton,
so
I'll
hold
on
Wow
item
te,
nine
point:
seven
one
McMurran
Street,
that's
councillor
Layton,
so
I'll
hold
on
item
te,
nine
point:
seven
to
speed,
limit
reduction,
McCall
Street,
that's
councillor
cressie
and
councillor
Lee
and
so
on.
A
D
Obviously,
move
the
recommendations
contained
in
my
letter
and
just
for
context
when,
when
I
first
took
office
for
the
neighbourhood
in
the
last
election,
I
initiated,
what's
called
a
bathroom
st.
Claire
framework,
a
framework
study
which
has
led
to
a
framework
to
provide
a
vision
for
future
growth
in
the
area
and
there's
there
is
a
lot
of
development
pressure
coming
our
way
in
the
neighborhood
and
what
residents
have
been
concerned
about
is
the
cumulative
effect
of
that
development
pressure.
A
Okay
on
the
contents
in
the
letter,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
that
carries
item
te,
9.75
installation
of
speed,
humps
on
Harvey
Avenue,
Rochdale
Avenue
in
Kitchener,
Avenue,
that's
councillor
by
Lao,
so
I
will
not
I'm
gonna
have
firm
words
with
some
of
our
colleagues
later.
On
item
te
nine
point:
seven:
six:
reopening
of
the
item:
te
8.5
for
traffic
calming
speed,
humps
Gladstone
have
a
new
peel
Avenue
to
Dundas
West,
that's
councillor
bylaw,
so
I
will
hold
that
item
te.
A
A
B
A
C
Thank
you
very
much,
I'd
like
to
move
the
recommendations
in
the
staff
report
and
to
name
the
specific
lane,
staffer
Lane,
as
well
as
anvil
alley.
I'll
just
speak
very
quickly
to
it.
Dudley's
hardware
store
has
been
a
long-standing
a
hardware
store
within
the
church
and
Wellesley
catchment
area.
Our
neighborhood
and
the
laneway,
that's
closest
to
that
store,
is
now
Kimiko
anvil
alley.
This
is
a
name
that
was
canvassed
by
the
community.
There
was
some
very
good
support
for
that
and
then
there's
another
Lane
that
actually
reflects
the
number
of
barbershops
in
the
church.
C
Phone
calls
Lee
neighborhood
a
lot
of
the
handsome
and
dapper
people
go
to
get
their
haircuts,
I've
gone
there
myself
and
as
a
handsome
and
dapper
person,
and
and
these
and
this
Lane
will
be
called
dapper
Lane.
So
it's
part
of
the
ongoing
a
body
of
work
that
has
been
happening
in
the
church
and
Wellesley
neighborhood.
We
are
actively
naming
all
the
the
sort
of
orphan
Lane
ways
and
alleyways,
and
the
community
is
having
some
fun.
C
A
A
A
I
So
much
for
having
me
and
good
morning,
everyone,
my
name
is
Stefan
Moors,
my
wife
and
I
live
at
52
birch
Avenue,
which
is
seven
doors
down
from
the
development.
We
lived
there
with
our
three
sons,
who
are
all
students
in
Cottingham
public
school
down
the
block
and
today,
while
I'm
here
speaking
with
my
own
words,
I
very
much
represent
over
20
households,
40
residents
on
birch
Avenue,
which
is
a
street
of
only
about
40
residences
or
50
residences
in
general,
maybe
60
or
70,
but
I'm.
I
In
fact,
I
was
a
developer
for
a
decade,
myself
and
I
believe
in
density,
I,
firmly
believe
in
a
lot
of
the
other
elements
of
this
project
does
represent,
and
yet,
over
the
past
year,
my
neighbors
and
I
have
been
part
of
a
group
of
more
than
more
than
40
of
us
and
about
more
than
40
meetings,
whether
with
city
councilor,
with
the
developer,
with
their
group
with
city
planning
and
many
varying
mixes
of
that
group,
and
given
what
we
learned
over
that
time.
To
my
brief
remarks
today
could
take
a
couple
of
different
paths.
I
It
could
be
a
really
angry
rant
and
a
pretty
angry
bunch
of
people
I'm,
not
one
of
the
more
angry
ones,
I'm
a
little
one
of
the
more
surprised
ones.
Instead,
though,
I
think,
rather
than
sitting
complaining
about
the
multiple
variances
which
we
believe
are
extreme
across
the
board,
I'm
gonna
reflect
a
few.
What
we
hope
are
constructive
comments
that
planning
and
others
might
consider
in
their
own
neighborhoods
when
when
they
are
evaluating
plans
of
this
size,
so.
I
I'd
like
to
describe
it
in
three
quick,
different
components:
one
the
experience
with
city
planning,
the
second,
the
experience
with
the
developer
themselves
and
the
third
the
experience
with
our
counselor.
As
far
as
their
experience
with
the
city,
I
will
tell
you
that
we
will
thank
them
for
being
cordial
and
available
Kevin.
Thank
you
for
you
and
your
team
for
always
being
available
to
us
when
we
reach
out
to
you
is
sincerely
appreciated.
Well,
we
disagree
on
a
number
of
the
decisions
that
were
made.
I
You
you
guys
are
the
pros
and
we
respect
that
those
decisions
were
made.
We
fundamentally
believe
that
the
variance
is
requested
and
the
degree
of
variance
requested
and
the
financial
windfall
to
that
will
bestow
upon
this
developer
or
others
in
a
similar
circumstance
is
remarkably
disproportionate
on
a
number
of
levels.
We
recognize
that
Planning
has
decided.
It
fits
within
the
official
plan,
and
so
therefore,
this
degree
of
variance
is
appropriate
and
we
recognize
that
it's
a
losing
fight
to
try
and
fight
that,
so
we're
not
going
to
take
that
battle.
I
What
we
will
do,
though,
is
ask
that
the
group
decide
if
such
variance
is
in
such
windfalls
are
appropriate
and
deemed
legitimate
under
the
Official
Plan.
Why
is
there
no
mechanism
for
a
section
37?
Don't
designation
donation
or
voluntary
contribution
or
non
involuntary
contribution
for
buildings
under
10,000
square
meters?
I
The
windfalls
bestowed
in
these
sized
buildings
is
genuinely
large,
and
yet
there's
not
one
ounce
of
obligation
for
a
developer
to
come
in
and
contribute
anything
in
any
formulaic
manner
to
a
local
community.
So
that
to
me
is
a
fundamental
question
that
I
think
this
group
should
really
ask
itself
and
decide.
You
know.
Is
that
something
we
want
to
consider?
So
that's
something
we
leave
with
you
as
a
bunch
of
shock
residents,
who
are
just
absolutely
in
awe
that
a
building
that
we
think
is
way
bigger
and
larger
and
mast
and
all
the
rest.
I
But
you
know
the
Planning
Group
approved
it,
but
why
is
there
no
way
for
them
to
extract
some
kind
of
proportionate
contribution
from
the
developer,
so
I
think
that's
the
single
first
thing
we'd
like
people
to
consider.
The
second
is
our
experience
with
the
developer
themselves.
Initially,
we
didn't
think
it
started.
Well,
you
know
we
thought
the
level
of
engagement
was
absolutely
minimal
and
we're
a
little
disappointed
with
that.
You
know,
as
a
community
living
seven
doors
down,
you'd
expect
to
get
a
little
bit
more
warmth,
a
little
bit
more
engagement.
I
What
we
will
say
they
didn't
have
to
come
to
the
table
with
anything
when
we
did
reach
out
as
a
group.
It
took
a
bit
of
time,
but
eventually
you
know
Jordan
teen.
Thank
you
guys.
Wherever
you
are.
Thank
you
for
guys
coming
to
the
table
when
you
didn't
have
to
you
know
you
did
and
it
was
appreciated
and
continues
to
be
appreciated.
As
a
result,
they
made
a
financial
commitment,
voluntary
section
37.
The
community
is
very
appreciative
of
it.
I
recognize
they
got
30
seconds
left.
What
I
will
say.
I
Lastly,
is
our
experience
with
our
counselor
and
his
exceptional
assistant
Denise,
wherever
you
are?
Thank
you
Denise
I.
You
should
raise
your
hand.
You've
been
exceptional
to
work
with
I
just
want
to
say.
Thank
you
guys
for
listening
for
being
realistic
in
a
system
that
we
tried
our
best
to
navigate
on
our
own.
We
felt
very
supported
and
we
felt
like
we
got
some
backing,
but
not
binary.
We
felt
like
it
was
a
consistent,
steady,
consistent
and
steady
supportive,
yet
realistic
approach,
I
know
I'm
at
five
minutes.
I
My
final
thought
would
simply
be
this:
isn't
about
being
anti-development,
it's
not
being
about
anti
developer.
It's
simply
that
when
disproportionate
benefits
are
bestowed
on
any
development
or
development
application.
We
hope
that
you'll
look
at
the
system
for
the
medium
and
smaller
size
buildings
to
consider
that.
Why
is
there
no
obligatory
community
contribution?
Okay,.
A
J
Mr.
chairman
members
of
committee,
I'm
Michael
Goldberg
I'm
a
principal
at
Goldberg
group
and
we're
the
planning
consultants
for
the
applicant
I
think
staff
for
their
for
their
judicious
review
of
this
application.
I
think
that
this
really
is
a
very
good
example
of
how
moderate
intensification
within
the
neighborhoods
can
in
fact
happen,
and
it
might
be
a
model.
Pursuant
to
the
resolution
that
was
passed
by
council
earlier
this
summer,
I
understand
that
there
will
be.
J
We
are
here
to
express
support
of
the
staff
recommendations,
but
I
also
understand
that
there
will
be
an
additional
motion
concerning
the
voluntary
section,
37
contribution
and
I'm
here,
to
indicate
that
what
was
offered
is
what
continues
to
be
offered
voluntarily
by
the
by
the
applicant
and
I
really
have
no
further
comments.
Mr.
chair,
thank.
A
D
This
this
proposal
took
several
different
meetings,
working
group
meetings,
discussions
there
were
times
when
it
seemed
I
think
you
know
we
described
it
as
a
bit
of
a
quagmire.
There
was
no
way
through.
There
was
no
way
to
resolve
it.
The
community
was
dead,
set
against
this
development.
There
were
significant
concerns
about
the
precedent
that
it
possibly
could
set
from
the
neighborhood,
and
there
are
already
concerns
around
parking
and
other
significant
concerns
that
they
were
worried
about
being
exacerbated,
but
I
think
we
dealt
with
this
pragmatically
and
we
realized
what
we
were
dealing
with.
D
We
realized
what
was
in
front
of
us,
and
our
entire
attention
went
into.
How
do
you
leave
this
better
than
you
found
it
and
I
want
to
acknowledge
Jordon,
Maserati,
Mara
suti
rather
and
his
team
for
willing
his
willingness,
their
willingness
to
be
at
the
table,
figuratively
and
literally
with
us
to
arrive
at
a
plan
that
will
benefit
the
community.
D
It
was
a
difficult
conversation,
but
we
arrived
and
I
again
just
want
to
acknowledge
everyone
for
being
the
grown-ups
at
the
table
that
were
necessary
to
perhaps
you
know,
make
make
some
lemonade
out
of
the
lemons
that
we
were
dealing
with
initially,
but
ultimately,
I
think
this
is
going
to
be
a
win-win
for
everyone.
So
thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
A
You
so
why
don't
we
take
the
amendment
and
the
item
together?
All
those
in
favor
opposed
that
carries
item
te.
Nine
point:
six:
three:
two:
five,
eight
two:
three:
two:
six:
zero
Dundas
Street
West
draft
plan
of
common
elements,
condominium
and
part
lock,
control
exempt
exemption
applications
final
report.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
want
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
I
see
none?
Are
there
any
questions
of
staff?
A
Item
te,
nine
point:
seven
one,
one,
seven,
two
one:
two:
seven
Broadway
Avenue
rental
housing,
demolition,
application,
I
have
a
listed
deputy
Bob
Murphy
Bob.
Are
you
here
good
morning?
How
are
you
today
hanging
in
there
we'll
find
out
so
Bob?
You
have
five
minutes
to
speak
and
you
can
watch
your
time
on
the
clock
over
there
to
my
right.
Thank
you.
The.
K
Promis'd
report
is
not
here,
but
I
did
read.
The
interim
report,
which
was
June
18th
I
was
part
of
a
group
with
Ann
Johnson
and
Kay
Gardner,
who
fought
five
years
to
save
seven.
Ninety
eight
hundred
840
Eglinton
Avenue
West.
At
one
point,
the
developer
asked
for
an
order
that
council
give
him
his
demolition
permit.
The
City
Council
for
whatever
reason
the
city's
Council,
for
whatever
reason
did
not
tell
the
court.
K
The
buildings
are
in
receivership
because
of
a
gray
Mac
mortgage,
so
the
court
it
ordered
issuance
of
the
demolition
permit
when
it
came
to
a
vote,
June
Rowland's
left
so
did
Jack
Layton
Joanne
Campbell,
David,
Revell,
Joe,
Pantalone
Ian,
any
others.
Roland
said
at
the
time.
There
are
thousands
of
these
buildings
in
this
city
and
in
fact,
without
them,
no
housing
policy
is
possible
in
this
city.
K
K
131
people
will
go
without
housing
because
of
him.
We
will
not
know
who
they
are
only
that
the
housing
they
might
have
found
was
occupied
by
tenants,
displaced
from
Broadway
Avenue
for
him
and
if
Kathleen
Wynne
was
so
progressive,
why
didn't
she
make
a
component
of
affordable
housing
mandatory
for
anything
built
under
her
growth
plan?
I
was
at
OMB
Lab
July
29th,
when
the
other
buildings
referred
to
in
this
report
in
councillor
Robinson's,
Ward
and
Kathleen
Wynne's
writing
were
there
for
rezoning
the
OMB
allowed
member
Reed
Rossi
asked
the
city's
planner
was
good
planning.
K
She
said
under
oath,
yes,
but
there
was
no
planning
before
the
board
that
day
just
designed,
and
there
is
a
difference
between
planning
and
design.
If
I
may
cite
as
Authority
counselor
Matt
Lowe,
who
told
the
North
Toronto
Post
that
while
he
supports
the
intent
of
the
growth
plan,
nothing
in
the
provincial
legislation
ensured
that
infrastructure
would
keep
up
with
that
pace
of
growth.
If
that
is
so,
the
provincial
planners
will
have
signed
off
on
a
plan
that
does
not
meet
professional
standards
of
what
a
plan
is
supposed
to
be.
K
That
is
what
the
city
planner
should
have
said
in
response
to
read.
Rossi's
question
the
growth
plan:
a
provincial
regulation
does
not
meet
the
standard
of
section
2
of
the
Planning
Act,
most
notably
subsections
H,
IJ,
P
and
L.
Instead,
a
city
planning
report
on
another
oversize
project
at
Yonge
and
Heath
includes
the
phrase
that
the
growth
plan
provides
a
strategic
framework
for
managing
growth.
K
Apparently,
the
phrase
strategic
framework
means
who
cares
about
infrastructure
Midtown
and
focus,
took
the
growth
plan
which
conveyed
no
density
or
zoning
rights
and
converted
it
to
as
the
right
zoning
rights,
throwing
in
some
empty
rhetoric
about
social
services
and
infrastructure.
When
June
Rowland's
and
Jack
Layton
and
Joanne
Campbell
and
David
Revell
stood
up
for
the
rights
of
tenants
not
to
be
treated
like
second-class
citizens
to
be
shunted
about
at
the
whim
of
a
speculator.
They
had
no
power
or
authority
to
do
so
today.
K
This
Community
Council
has
that
prerogative
and
the
right
use
of
that
prog
ative
is
to
exercise
it
in
favor
of
tenants
and
housing
and
to
refuse
this
application
section
2l
of
the
Planning
Act
is
of
particular
interest.
It
speaks
to
the
protection
of
the
financial
and
economic
well-being
of
the
province
and
its
municipalities.
Now,
councillor
perks
and
councillor
cressie
have
both
called
for
above
inflation.
Property
tax
increases
to
subsidize
condo
developers,
John
Sewell
wrote
in
2011.
Well,
I
don't
mean
it
that
way.
K
K
He
the
developers
spoke
with
me
before
this
session
and
he
did
say
that
as
long
as
the
tenant
remains
in
the
unit
its
for
perpetuity
it's
if
the
tenant
moves
and
another
tenant
comes
in,
it
would
be
for
the
20
years.
So
there
are
a
few
tenants
from
117
who
have
come
down
to
speak
to
that.
In
any
event,
do.
B
K
Yeah
because
it
I
I
think
the
short
way
of
explaining
it
is
if
a
tenant
left,
it
would
be
decontrolled
that,
as
long
as
the
tenant
remains
its
perpetuity,
but
if
the
tenant
moves
then
it's
decontrol
and
which
is
it
is,
it
does
represent
a
loss
of
rental
housing
in
the
long
run,
because
these
two
buildings,
as
long
as
they
stay
there
they've
been
there
a
long
time,
they
will
always
stand
as
a
source
of
rental
housing.
Thank.
B
A
J
A
J
J
How
long
did
we
stay
in
the
building,
but
as
we
browse
along
east
or
west
side
and
along
Yonge,
the
the
rent
is
too
high
and
the
compensation
that
the
Builder
would
offer
us
is
not
enough,
sir,
even
for
a
year
they
they,
they
gave
us
the
option
that
we
can
go
back
after
the
after
the
construction
of
the
rental
building.
But
the
problem
is:
when
is
the
construction
of
the
rental
building
and.
J
We
just
want
also
to
know
the
class
that
they
said
that
you
will
pay
the
similar
end,
which
is
vague
on
the
tenants.
What
is
similar
rent
is
it
similar
rent
along
the
community
or
the
similar
rent
that
the
rent
that
we
will
leave
from
the
time
that
we
will
leave
that
they
will
give
us
that,
for
example,
I'm
paying
a
900
a
month?
Will
that
900
a
month
Vida
the
rent?
When
we
come
back?
That's
the
only
thing.
J
Sorry,
it's
hard
to
get
a
it's
hard
to
get
one
bedroom
right
now,
which
is
I'm
paying,
for
example,
I'm,
paying
900
and
right
now
it's
between
1600
to
1800
dollars
a
month,
and
we
are
only
immigrant
sir.
We
came
here.
We
came
here
for
a
better
life
for
our
children
for
our
grandchildren.
But
how
can
we?
How
can
we
survive
with
the
1600
1800
a
month,
wherein
we
are
only
earning
a
middle
income
for
a
month?
We
only
get
a
paid
paycheck.
J
That's
only
my
concern,
sir,
if
city
or
the
Builder
could
give
us
a
place
that
that
could
suffice
on
our
income
or
that
could
suffice
on
our
current
rent,
because
the
compensation
that
they
will
give
us
is
not
really
enough.
It's
not
it's
just
for
a
year,
sir
and
construction
would
be,
they
say,
is
3
years.
So
the
two
the
two
remaining
years.
Where
will
we
get
the
difference
of
600
or
700
a
month.
J
J
A
J
J
So,
but
the
problem
is,
we
don't
know
when
is
the
building
and
a
build
or
they
gonna
tear
up
when
so,
my
concern
is
if
we
move
somewhere
if
we
move
somewhere
instead
of
getting
the
compensation,
in
my
case
or
in
the
on
behalf
of
my
countenance,
we
would
like
the
owner
instead
paying
the
difference
in
case
of
you
know,
in
rental.
If
we
go
somewhere
and
then
the
rent
is
one
thousand
and
then
they
pay
the
difference,
because
right
now
I'm
paying
1440
for
a
month.
B
B
J
B
J
Had
a
meeting
last
year
with
the
city
and
the
owner.
B
A
A
F
F
F
This
application
is
to
demolish
a
hunt
existing
to
existing
buildings,
131
units
and
replace
them
in
an
adjacent
site
at
100
Broadway
in
223
233
red
path.
Currently,
only
86
units
are
occupied
out
of
those
86
units.
59
have
not
been
provided
previous
notice
before
the
development
applications
have
occurred.
Additional
36
have
and
they're
aware
that
these
development
approvals
in
a
demolition
was
to
occur.
F
Through
you,
mr.
chair,
miss
Fletcher,
raised
a
question
about
the
perpetuity
of
these
rental
councillor
Fletcher
raised
a
question
about
the
perpetuity
rental
housing
units.
I
think
it's
important
to
note
that
the
replacement
units
are
being
provided
in
an
adjacent
site
that
was
approved
and
will
be
under
construction
shortly.
It's
a
smaller
scale
building,
so
it's
anticipated
that
building
will
be
built
in
a
shorter
course
as
well.
It's
a
rental
purpose
building.
F
Council
I
think
it's
also
important
just
to
clarify
some
of
the
rental
compensation
terms
that
are
being
provided
by
our
client,
because
in
my
experience
in
dealing
with
a
number
of
these
projects,
these
financial
compensations
that
have
been
agreed
to
with
the
city
are
generous.
Our
clients
offering
three
months
in
accordance
with
the
Residential
Tenancies
Act.
Of
course,
the
tenure
payment
is
significant.
F
I've
seen
one
month
for
five
years,
this
is
five
months
for
five
years,
so
it's
increasing
by
four
months
for
each
category
of
tenure,
there's
also
a
special
needs
payment,
which
is
typical
for
anyone
with
special
needs
additional
four
months
payment.
What's
important
here
to
note
too,
is
our
client
is
going
above
and
beyond
those
standard
conditions,
they're
hiring
a
full-time
leasing
agent
that
is
planning
to
work
with
these
individuals
to
find
them
homes
in
the
interim
and
our
client
hasn't
provided
notice.
F
Yet
because
the
section
111
agreement
hasn't
been
registered
on
title
and
there'll
be
a
six-month
opportunity
to
find
new
housing
from
the
date.
The
section
111
agreement
is
registered
on
title
there's
also
significant
improvements
that
are
being
provided
as
part
of
this
demolition
and
the
redevelopment
of
the
of
the
property.
The
property
has
passed
its
useful
life
life,
it's
in
need
of
repair
and
what
we'll
see
a
significant
improvement.
The
new
building
will
have
an
energy
space
which
the
current
building
does
not
have,
and
tenants
will
have
access
to
that
amenity
space.
F
The
new
units
will
also
have
ensuite
laundry
central
air
conditioning
a
private
balcony.
Again,
those
are
amenities
that
aren't
currently
being
provided
in
the
existing
units.
So
when
the
tenants
who
all
have
a
right
to
return
do
return,
the
Equality
of
their
of
their
housing
will
be
vastly
improved
just
more
generally
on
the
merits
of
the
development
application
as
a
whole.
F
The
rental
housing
unit
mix
is
being
increased
in
a
beneficial
way
to
families.
Right
now,
there
are
98
one-bedroom
apartment
units.
The
replacement
is
going
to
be
18
one-bedroom,
an
80
two-bedroom,
so
an
increase
there,
the
development
that's
being
that
was
approved
by
council
and
that
now
is
subject
to
this
demolition
control.
Application
is
also
providing
a
62
person
daycare
facility
on-site,
as
well
as
a
beautiful
public
park
on
the
corner
of
Broadway
and
Mount
Pleasant.
F
So,
overall,
there
are
a
number
of
community
benefits
that
are
being
introduced
as
part
of
this
development
on
a
client
has
worked
hard
with
staff
for
the
last
year
and
gone,
and
what
is
my
respectful
submission
above
and
beyond?
What
are
the
typical
standard
requirements
with
respect
to
rental
housing?
F
Can
answer
that
councillor
Fletcher
through
mr.
chair?
There
was
a
question
raised
about
if
I've
got
an
affordable
unit
today,
that's
at
$900
what
will
be
the
rent
when
I
come
back
the
the
way,
the
typical
fashion
in
which
this
is
structured
is
that
you
will
tenant
with
an
existing
rent
will
pay
the
exact
same
rent
when
they
return,
subject
to
a
4%
increase
for
a
new
built.
So.
F
F
No,
that's
that's
not
correct,
so
so
there's
a
hundred
and
thirty
one
units
there's
a
rental
there's
a
breakdown
of
existing
units,
so
many
units
are
affordable,
so
many
units
are
met.
Our
mid-range
and
so
many
units
are
high
range,
there's
72,
affordable
units
in
this
building,
58
mid-range
and
only
one
high-end.
So
out
of
those
130
units
which
have
either
affordable
or
mid-range
rents,
those
will
be
replaced
on-site
at
those
affordable,
mid
rate
rents.
So.
F
F
B
F
Through
you,
mr.
chair
I,
think
it's
important
to
know.
Out
of
those
86
units,
59
were
pre
approval,
tenants,
so
tenants
who
existed,
who
lived
in
the
building
before
it
was
notification
about
the
development
applications
were
provided.
36
of
those
units
of
those
individuals
who
are
exist
who
reside
in
the
building
today
were
aware
when
they
moved
in
about
those
development
applications
and
with
respect
to
those
36.
Our
client
is
offering,
although
it's
not
always
typical,
a
right
of
return
and
he's
also
offering
to
provide
moving
expenses
for
those
individuals.
F
F
Is
is,
is,
is
done
by
is
affordable,
is
calculated
beige
on
the
CMHC
rent.
I.
Don't
have
that
exact
number
before
me,
but
it
says
it's
an
average
that's
taken
in
the
City
of
Toronto
and
it's
done
on
I
I.
F
B
F
Probably
do
councillor
Fletcher,
but
what
I
can
say.
I
know
we're
speaking
about
individuals,
but
I.
Think
it's
important
to
note
that,
even
if
the
unit's
vacant,
the
last
rent
that
was
paid,
is
going
to
be
categorized
as
either
affordable
and
mid-range
and
replaced
in
the
new
building
as
affordable
or
mid-range.
B
F
A
The
flesh
are
those
all
your
questions.
Okay,
thank
you.
Are
there
any
other
members
who
wish
to
ask
the
deputy
any
questions?
No
seeing
none.
Thank
you
very
much.
Are
there
any
other
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
Okay,
I
see
none!
Oh
yes,
oh
I'm!
Sorry,
sorry,
I,
didn't
see
you
there
you
were.
You
were
in
my
blind
spot.
A
J
J
J
Yeah
I
don't
know
like.
Basically,
they
got
the
approval
to
smash
down
127
Broadway,
the
building
beside
that
the
building
across
the
street
from
it
to
build
these
condos
and
I.
Don't
think
it's
better
for
the
letter
going
to
be
thrown
on
the
street.
Basically,
you
can't
afford
to
pay
1,800
2,000
$2,400
a
month
for
rent,
so.
A
J
A
A
G
G
What
I've
noticed
is
a
really
diverse
group
of
people
that
I
live
with
in
that
area
and
I
know
that
I
a
person
who
makes
a
salary
that
will
allow
enough
wiggle
room
that
I
would
be
able
to
technically
afford
the
high
rents
in
this
city.
But
I
am
one
person
and
I
am
supporting
one
person
and
I
live
in
a
building
and
around
buildings
where
there
are
families
that
have
to
make
their
money
stretch
away
farther.
G
G
So
when
we
talk
about
these
buildings
going
up
and
developments
increasing
I'm,
not
sure
that
those
kinds
of
long-term
impacts
on
our
communities
and
our
citizenry
and
our
society
are
always
taken
into
consideration.
So
I'm
not
suffering
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
standing
here,
saying
that
I'm
a
person
who's
suffering
I
am
luckier
than
most
so
I'm.
G
Actually
here
also
to
speak
for
the
people
who
are
not
as
lucky
as
me,
but
I
worry
I
worry
about
what
my
life
savings
are
going
to
be
like
when
I
have
to
spend
so
much
money
on
rent
and
so
much
money
on
transit
and
so
much
money
on
all
these
things
that
keep
going
up
and
up
in
this
city.
So
I
know
that
this
building
is
coming
down.
G
I'm,
not
here,
to
say,
stop
it
at
this
point,
because
I
know
that
that's
not
realistic.
So
I'm,
taking
this
opportunity
to
say
here,
are
some
of
the
real-life
impacts
for
people
like
me,
and
my
neighbors
and
I
just
want
this
part
of
the
city
council
to
at
least
hear
this
message
again.
I'm
sure
I'm,
not
the
first
person
who
said
this,
but
I
want
it
to
be
heard
again,
that
the
pace
of
development
is
irrevocably
changing
the
fabric
of
this
city,
and
it
worries
me
how
it's
changing
it.
G
Also
and
I
literally
did
I
came
home
one
day
and
they've
been
ripped
down
and
I
thought
we're
literally
tearing
out
the
lungs
of
this
city
so
that
concrete
structures
can
go
up
and
we
know
what
concrete
does
to
the
environment.
So
I
also
want
to
talk
about
environmental
impact
of
all
these
condo
buildings
going
up
and
blocking
Sun.
G
A
A
B
Thank
you.
Just
I
just
want
to
understand
a
little
bit
better,
their
rental
replacement
for
this
building.
So
there's
a
hundred
and
thirty-one
units
that
exist
there
and
we've
heard
from
the
developer
that
when
it's
finished
72
will
be
affordable.
58
will
be
what
we're
calling
mid.
But
it's
not
in
our
official
plan,
1.5
average
market
rent
and
one
high-end
is
that
right
through.
C
B
B
B
B
B
D
Where
that
policy
failed
by
the
provincial
government
was
that
there
is
nothing
in
that
that
ensured
that
our
quality
of
life
in
the
Yonge
and
Eglinton
neighbourhood
would
keep
up
with
the
pace
of
growth.
And
what
happened
over
the
ensuing
years
was
that
we
have
found
ourselves
with
a
dearth
of
infrastructure.
D
We
have
found
ourselves
with
a
dearth
of
capacity
in
our
schools.
The
TDSB
had
to
take
the
sixth
grade
classes,
out
of
all
the
elementary
schools
and
put
them
into
Hodgson,
which
itself
will
have
to
have
an
addition.
Soon,
we
don't
have
enough
affordable
childcare.
We
don't
have
enough
of
a
number
of
different
social
services
in
infrastructure
and
park
space
to
provide
the
quality
of
life
that
every
residence,
no
matter
where
you
live
in
the
city
should
be
able
to
expect.
We
have
a
broken
governance
structure
when
it
comes
to
planning
in
this
city.
D
So
what
we
did
in
this
generation
is
that
we
worked
on
a
plan
called
Midtown
and
focus
which
actually
turns
the
narrative
around
that
focuses
on
social
services
and
infrastructure
and
parks,
and
we
finally
got
it
approved
last
year
and
then
Doug
Ford
was
elected,
and
then
this
year
he
announced
that
he
was
scrapping
that
plan
in
favour
of
the
development
industry's
interests
and
he
they
imposed
their
own
OPA
405
their
own
Midtown
plan.
That
gives
the
development
industry
that
have
been
providing
campaign
funds
to
his
coffers.
D
D
So
what
we
do
here
is
when
we're
subject
to
wrongheaded
provincial
policy.
We
have
to
pragmatically
think
about
okay.
How
do
you
on
the
ground
make
life
better
for
everyone,
who's
subject
to
those
decisions?
So
what
we
did
in
that
development
is
fight
for
childcare,
because
if
even
if
we
knew
we
were
not
going
to
win
at
the
OMB,
we
needed
to
make
sure
that
we
had
social
services
to
provide
a
better
quality
of
life
for
people,
young
families
who
can't
afford
childcare
or
can't
find
childcare
in
the
area.
D
But
what
we're
did
what
words
are
considering
right
now
is
an
agreement
to
like
they'd,
only
be
already
ruled
on
the
development
this
is
about.
Can
the
tenants
have
a
an
affordable
way
through
this
journey
and
that's
what
we
are
considering
today?
We
had.
We
have
planning
staff
that
have
worked
on
this
and
they
have
recommended
not
only
a
standard
agreement
but
improvements
upon
the
standard
agreement
for
those
tenants.
D
What
is
clear
to
me
is
that
there
is
I
think
a
lot
of
misunderstanding
of
this
process
and
unfortunately,
sometimes
they're
individuals
who
deliberately
go
out
and
convey
misinformation
and
that's
wrong
and
that's
mean-
and
it's
not
fair.
So
what
I
want
to
do
is
my
assistant.
Denis
is
here
she's
already
reached
out
to
a
few
of
you.
Who've
come
here.
D
That's
your
right
and
that's
our
job
to
make
sure
that
you've
got
that
to
conclude:
I
love,
Yonge
and
Eglinton.
It's
my
home!
It's
where
we
are
raising
our
daughter
for
the
long
run,
it's
a
neighborhood
that
has
so
much
potential
and
so
much
to
it
there's
a
reason
we
live
there
and
the
reason
we
love
that
neighborhood.
D
But
I
am
concerned
that
the
policies
that
are
that
that
we
are
subject
to
by
the
provincial
government
they're
not
giving
us
an
opportunity
to
catch
up
with
the
quality
of
life
needs
that
we
have
it's
not
about
development
versus
no
development.
It's
about,
like
I,
said
earlier,
leaving
the
place
better
than
they
found
it
and
right
now
the
developers
are
getting
rich
and
we're
in
our
quality
of
life
was
getting
poorer
and
that's
not
right,
and
that
has
to
change.
A
Thank
you,
I'd,
like
to
just
make
a
couple
of
quick
remarks
on
this.
This
issue
of
rental
replacement
is
is
difficult
for
any
of
us
when
we
have
to
deal
with
it,
but
of
course
it's
most
difficult
for
the
tenants.
This
is
losing
your
home
and
no
matter
how
well
we
do
in
negotiating
with
the
applicant
you're
still
losing
your
home
for
a
period
of
time
and
that's
an
unacceptable
circumstance.
I
do
want
to
note
that
the
protections
in
chapter
111
of
the
Toronto
Code
are
the
best
protections
anywhere
in
the
province
of
Ontario.
A
It's
unique
its
leading
its
cutting
edge,
it's
the
best,
but
still
it's
unable
to
give
the
kind
of
protections
that
everyone
around
this
table
would
give.
If
we
had
better
tools
what
I'm
going
to
recommend
to
members
of
Toronto,
Community,
Council
and
members,
the
public
generally
on
the
planning
and
Housing
Committee.
We
recently
established
subcommittee
councillor
Bradford
councillor
Fletcher,
chairing
it
myself
to
investigate
ways
that
the
City
of
Toronto
can
do
a
better
job,
protecting
tenants
rights,
things
like
dealing
with
renovations,
of
which
these
are
similar,
to
which
these
are
similar.
A
So
I'm
going
to
make
sure
that
this
item
is
brought
up
at
that
subcommittee
and
make
sure
that
that
that
there's,
a
notice
sent
out
that
members,
the
public
who've
been
through
this
process,
will
be
able
to
come
and
talk
to
us
a
little
bit
about.
If
there's
a
way,
we
can
do
better.
So
with
that,
are
there
any
other
members
who
wish
to
speak
to
the
item?
Seeing
no
counselor
one
time
counselor
one
time,
yeah.
C
Just
very
quickly
Thank
You
mr.
chair
I,
want
to
just
echo
the
the
comments
and
concerns
I've
been
raised
by
members
of
the
committee
and
specifically
from
the
local
councillor.
Thank
you
to
the
deputies
to
came
out
to
speak.
Today
we
were
just
sort
of
I
was
sitting
as
I
was
listening
to
the
deputies
about
some
of
the
the
very
large
development
applications
that
are
coming
in
the
core
of
the
city,
the
downtown
heart
of
the
city.
C
We
are
struggling
with
exactly
the
same
issues
that
you're
struggling
with
at
Yonge
and
Eglinton,
and
there
are
times
where
there
is
just
it.
You
know
it
is
literally
heartbreaking
to
see
the
the
rapid
change
and
intensification
that's
happening
in
neighborhoods,
and
the
fact
that
the
city
is
grappling
to
keep
up
with
the
change
and
I
know
that
you
know
it
is
very
difficult
as
a
local
councillor
to
see
an
application
refer,
rezoning
come
in
that
could
affect
over
a
hundred
existing
tenants.
C
Despite
the
fact
there
are
times
where
we
are,
our
hands
are
tied
because
of
what
is
happening
to
us,
whether
it's
provincial
legislation
or
perhaps
limitations
into
what
we
can
legislatively
do,
but
if
there
is
going
to
be
a
good
deal
to
be
extracted
from
this
situation,
I've
every
confidence
that
the
local
councillor
working
with
his
local
community
will
get
you
that
outcome.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
coming
out
today
and
and
mr.
chair.
We
look
forward
to
seeing
the
the
recommendations
coming
out
of
that
particular
Subcommittee
on
tenant
issues.
Thank
you.
Okay,.
B
I,
do
and
I
want
to
say
that
all
of
the
residents
of
131
are
very
lucky
to
have
councillor
Matt
low,
he's
it's
tremendous
tenant
advocate
and
I
know.
It's
been
swimming
upstream
with
all
of
this
going
on
there,
as
I
note
here
in
the
report
that
these
hundred
and
thirty-one
units
will
join
a
number
of
other
units
that
are
going
to
the
193
other
replacement
rental
units,
so
we're
a
large
rental
replacement.
B
B
That
I'm
just
unclear
from
the
developments
lawyer
how
many
of
those
will
be
at
average
market,
rent
I,
know
52
of
them
have
to
fifty
nine
of
them
have
to
be
exact.
He
said
there
be
86,
so
there's
a
whole
number
of
numbers
and
I
think
I'd
like
to
ask
the
staff
I'd
prefer
to
have
a
chart
when
we
get
this.
This
is
all
for
me
at
the
moment
from
planning
staff.
B
So
for
that
time,
that's
what
I
would
like
to
see
in
a
lot
clearer
way
and
I
do
feel
for
everybody
that
is
there
all
the
condos
going
up
and
any
rental
buildings
have
now
been
put
into
a
much
larger
building.
413
units
is
a
lot
bigger
than
a
smaller
walk-up
of
131
and
that
we
are
transforming
our
communities
in
a
way.
B
That
is
what
many
people
are
feeling
and
I
know
that
the
councillors
from
Yonge
and
Eglinton
of
them
that
meet
there
are
concerned
about
more
than
just
the
buildings
they're
concerned
about
the
traffic
they're
concerned
about
the
impact
of
construction.
So
I
think
that
I
think
that
this
would
be
better
if
we're
getting
this
affordable
to
have
it
clear
I'll
also
just
go
back
to
one
of
the
things.
I
always
say:
I,
don't
think,
there's
any
city
land
here,
but
if
there's
ever
any
city-owned
land
I
don't
care.
B
If
it's
parking
authority,
Toronto
Community
Housing,
whoever
it
is
that
we
have
not
done
well
in
the
past
in
getting
new,
affordable
housing
and
that
curtain
has
to
drop
down
very
hard
at
this
point.
So
I
know
you're
here
for
a
development
application,
but
this
council
is
very
much
seized
with
affordable
housing
and
the
affordability
of
these
units
is
very
important.
Thanks.
A
B
G
J
G
A
A
A
If
you
will
turn
to
item
te
25,
which
is
on
page
43
of
your
agenda,
summary
sheets
I'll,
just
quickly
move
through
those
items
that
we
held,
because
some
members
of
council
couldn't
be
here
for
9:30.
If
I
can
ask
members
of
the
public,
this
is
a
bit
of
an
echo,
a
room
members
of
the
public
at
the
back
of
the
room,
hello,
hello,
hello.
A
If
I
could
ask
you,
if
you
have
conversations,
could
you
take
them
outside
the
room
so
that
we
can
continue
our
business
thanks
very
much
okay
councillor
by
Lao,
I'm
gonna
need
you
here.
Okay,
so
item
te
item,
te
9.25,
appointments
to
business
improvement,
areas,
boards
of
management
counselor
by
Lao
te
9.25.
It's
the
BIA
boards
motion
to
approve
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
nine
point:
two:
six
proposed
official
naming
of
future
Park
at
250,
Davenport
Road,
councillor
cressie
on.
E
Gonna
move
the
staff,
recommendations
and
I
just
want
to
say
on
this
one.
A
lot
of
work
has
gone
into
it.
The
architecture
itself
is
almost
public
art,
but
I'm
glad
to
see
the
public
art
is
going
to
be
situated
in
the
Pops
in
the
courtyard
to
try
to
draw
people
in,
but
I'll
move
the
staff
recommendations.
A
E
Gonna
move
the
staff,
recommendations
and
I
just
want
to
say,
because
we
often
whip
through
public
art
plans
that
this
site
is
located
just
nearby
to
OCAD
and
the
AG
o
and
in
fact
it's
part
of
an
artist
to
ally
space.
That's
been
created,
but
the
proposal
in
front
of
us
also
includes
at
the
expense
of
the
upland
Terra,
the
developer,
a
mentoring
bursaries
for
OCAD.
You,
students
to
be
engaged
in
the
process,
which
I
just
think
is
an
excellent
initiative,
and
so
with
that
I
want
to
commend
both
the
community
in
LAN
tera.
A
Okay,
so
on
the
item,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried.
Now
we
jump
forward
to
nine
point
three
to
the
King
Parliament
secondary
plan
review
proposed
secondary
plan.
That
was
both
councillor
Krusty
in
one
time
we
did
hold
it
so
just
to
make
sure
that
you
had
no
issues.
No
thank
you
we'd
like
to
move
it
I'll,
just
move
it.
Okay,
councillor
long
Tam,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
that
carried
nine
point.
Three
three
has
speakers?
E
Gonna
move
the
wong-tam
special,
which
is
the
expanded
notice
and
just
to
say
that,
while
we're
thrilled
to
see
a
proposal
for
a
senior's
building
in
King
Spadina,
which
is
great
for
a
mixed
neighborhood.
This
goes
right
through
our
height
limit
within
the
West
precinct
to
King
Spadina.
And
so
we
want
seniors,
but
not
at
the
expense
of
a
detailed
height
rationale
that
we
need
to
see
in
line
with
planning
principles.
So.
A
E
A
A
E
A
E
A
A
E
A
E
I
have
an
amendment
or
nine
amendments
if
they
can
be
put
up
on
the
screen
I
seriously.
I
do
so
it's
part
of
this
construction
staging
area.
This
is
located
at
Spadina
and
Bremner
for
York
Boulevard.
It
is
a
very
challenging
and
congested
area.
We've
worked
very
closely
with
both
the
developer,
as
well
as
the
community
on
a
comprehensive
construction
management
plan
and
with
these
nine
amendments,
dealing
with
everything
from
lighting
and
cycling
to
public
communications
and
signage
I'm
happy
to
move
this
forward.
A
A
I'm
gonna,
see
if
I
can
work
with
the
clerk's
office
to
bring
us
some
something
consolidated
of
all
the
different
ways
we
have
ever
tried
to
constrain
these
for
the
benefit
of
the
public
and
see
if
I
know
it's
a
lot
of
work,
but
we'll
figure
out
a
way
to
do
it.
That's
not
gonna
crunch
you
in
too
much
in
terms
of
time
so
that
we
can
maybe
develop
a
bit
of
a
package
or
a
suite
that
staff
have
available
to
help
councillors
as
they
develop.
These
with
the
other.
A
E
A
A
Yes,
aye
counselor
counselor
bylaw.
This
is
nine
point
four
six.
It's
the
installation,
removal
of
on
street
accessible
parking
spaces
September
the
delegated
I
assume,
there's
no
problem,
but
I
thought
I
should
give
you
a
chance
to
look
at
yeah.
Okay,
so
I'll
move
it
all.
Those
in
favor
opposed
carried.
E
B
A
B
J
A
J
A
A
E
A
Just
to
rehear
well,
the
minutes
will
reflect
that
councillor.
Layton
was
not
present
in
the
meeting.
That's
why
so
he'll
be
marked
absent,
so
that
and
since
he's
not
here,
can't
declare
conflict
anyway.
Okay,
item
te,
nine,
okay.
So,
on
that
item
the
recommendations
in
the
communication,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
that
carries
item
te.
Nine
point:
seven:
zero
parking
amendments,
Elizabeth
Street,
councillor,
crusty
on
behalf
of
councillor
late
I,.
A
E
E
A
C
A
Those
in
favor
opposed
that
carries
item
te.
Nine
point:
seven,
six
reopening
of
item
te,
eight
point:
five
for
traffic
calming
speed,
humps
Gladstone,
Avenue,
Peel,
Avenue,
two
Dundas
West
Street
on
the
reopening.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
councillor
bylaw.
How
would
you
like
to
proceed?
Let's
make
sure
we're
coordinated
this
time
to
approve
the
speed
hump.
J
A
Move
the
alternate
recommendations
so
delete
the
original
recommendations.
Yeah
I
do
sit
with
the
the
one
end
to
from
your
lever,
we're
all
clear
on
that.
Good.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carry
item
te,
nine
point:
seven,
seven
parking
amendments,
Edwin,
Avenue,
Ruskin,
Avenue
to
DuPont
Street
councillor
by
Lao,
approved
recommendations
in
the
letter
on
the
recommendations.
In
the
letter,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carry.
A
The
recommendations
in
the
letter,
all
those
in
favor,
opposed
carry
item
te,
nine
point:
seven,
nine
parking
amendments,
Westmoreland
Avenue
between
Bloor,
Street,
West
and
Shanley
Street
councillor
bylaw,
approve
recommendations
in
the
letter.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carried.
Okay,
you've
just
witnessed
the
clerk's
Department
performing
at
an
Olympic
champion
level
well
done,
and
we
will
now
return
to
oh.
B
G
A
Members
I'll
counselor
Fletcher
is
stepped
out,
so
you
know
what
you
know.
What
oh
do
you?
What
we
were
thinking
of
introducing
the
new
the
remaining
new
business?
Okay
can
I
have
a
motion
to
introduce
items.
Te.
Eight,
nine
point:
eight
one
through
nine
point,
eight
for
all
the
motion:
councillor
Fletcher,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
members.
These
have
been
circulated,
so
we
can
dispose
of
them
now
councillor
Fletcher.
Yes,
yes,
on
item
te,
nine
point:
eight
one
creating
new,
affordable
housing
on
Danforth
councillor
Fletcher.
Yes,.
B
I'd
like
to
move
this,
we're
starting
a
planning,
study
and
I
would
like
to
add
that,
as
one
of
the
into
the
terms
of
reference
I,
don't
think
it
was
on.
The
other
part
of
the
Danforth
house
or
Bradford
might
want
to
do
something
like
that,
his
section,
but
it
has
to
be
part
of
the
terms
of
reference
where
we
can
put
at
affordable
housing
how
we're
integrating
it.
Okay,.
B
A
B
A
E
I'm
going
to
move
the
recommendations
in
my
letter
and
if
you'd
indulge
me
for
30
seconds
here
since
2004,
this
City
of
Toronto,
through
our
staff,
have
identified
that
the
Bathurst
and
lakeshore
intersection
a
five
armed
intersection
is
deeply
unsafe.
Since
2004
in
2014
and
15,
it
was
identified
through
a
comprehensive
Bathurst
key
neighbourhood
plan
that
we
needed
immediate
improvements
to
that
intersection.
E
2014
and
15.
Nothing
happened
in
May
of
2019
city
staff.
At
my
urging
brought
forward
a
report
saying
they
would
close
Fleet
Street
and
make
immediate
improvements
that
would
be
in
place
by
the
end
of
the
summer.
It's
now
October,
nothing
has
happened
in
recent
meetings.
I've
been
told
that
staff
are
now
reconsidering
what
to
do
at
this
intersection.
E
That's
15
years,
city
staff
have
demonstrated
that
in
just
the
last
year,
one
year
alone,
the
pedestrian
island
and
the
barrier
is
surrounding.
It
have
been
knocked
down
by
cars.
Six
times
that
we
know
of
and
so
I
know,
our
staff
are
exceptional
in
working
hard
and
I
know
that
some
intersections,
like
Bathurst
and
lakeshore,
are
hard
to
deal
with,
but
as
a
city
councilor
at
some
point,
I,
don't
know
what
more
I
can
do.
I
can
move
motion
after
motion
report
after
report
says
that
this
is
an
unacceptably
dangerous
intersection
report.
E
A
The
recommendation
in
councillor
Krusty's
letter,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried.
Okay
members.
My
foggy
old
brain
is
correct.
We
now
go
back
to
te
nine-point
eight
two,
two
eight
Gloucester
Street
and
oh,
oh
right,
see
the
foggy
old
brain
didn't
work,
so
we
can
go
to
council
crest,
te
9.1,
naming
of
an
existing
public
Lane
south
of
Barton
Avenue,
extending
easterly
from
Clinton
Street.
This
is
one
of
councillor
late,
I,.
A
A
Okay,
so
now
we
can
go
to
nine
point.
Eight
I'll
introduce
it
again.
So
it's
properly
introduced
two
through
eight
Gloucester
Street
and
six,
oh
one
through
six
thirteen
Yonge
Street
the
zoning
amendment
application
removal
of
the
holding
symbol.
H
final
report:
are
there
do
I?
Have
anyone
registered?
A
A
C
A
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carry
item
te,
nine
point:
nine
96
banana
Avenue
and
three
seven,
nine,
three,
eight
three,
three:
eight
five
and
three:
nine
one:
Adelaide
Street
West
zoning
bylaw
amendment
application
final
report:
are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item,
seeing
none
any
questions
of
staff?
None
councillor,
Krusty
I,
thank.
E
You
very
much
mr.
chair
I
have
an
amendment
if
it
can
be
put
on
the
screen
I,
which
is
to
adjust
the
section
37
so
that
it
is
a
little
more
flexible
around
community
facilities,
and/or
public
green
space
and
the
second
is
to
seek
to
increase
the
amount
of
affordable
housing
within
the
area
through
the
sale
of
the
city-owned
laneway
on
the
site,
and
with
that
I
will
move
the
staff
recommendations
with
that
amendment.
Just
a
few
words
on
this.
These
are
three
heritage
buildings
located
within
the
West
Precinct
of
King
Spadina.
E
Why
is
this
a
good
thing?
Well,
it's
a
good
thing
from
the
perspective
of
heritage
retention.
It's
a
great
thing
from
the
perspective
of
commercial
development
meeting
our
emerging
king
Spadina
secondary
plan
guidelines,
and
it
also
aligns
with
our
Spadina
Avenue
corridor,
which
is
to
encourage
office
and
commercial.
If
you
were
going
to
try
and
do
this
as
a
residential,
it
might
be
a
lot
harder.
But
for
the
reasons
that
says,
this
meets
our
city
planning
framework
within
King
Spadina,
for
commercial,
for
the
Spadina
Avenue
and
for
heritage.
This
is
a
very
creative
fix.
E
Not
many
I
can
tell
you.
Development
partners
could
find
a
way
to
pull
this
off
and
work
with
the
city
in
the
community
to
do
so.
Allied
has
done
it
and
so
kudos
to
their
creativity,
but,
more
importantly,
for
the
substance
of
what's
in
front
of
us
and
with
my
amendments
I'm
happy
to
move
the
staff
recommendations.
A
Okay,
any
other
members
to
speak,
seeing
none
we'll
take
the
amendment.
First
on
the
amendment
all
those
in
favor
carried
then
on
the
amended
item.
All
those
in
favor
carried
item
te
9.10
alterations
to
designated
heritage
properties,
intention
to
designate
under
part
4
section
29
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act,
an
authority
to
enter
into
a
heritage
of
easement
agreement,
96
Spadina
Avenue
and
379,
and
3
a3
Adelaide
Street
west
councillor,
Crescent
I.
E
A
A
Item
te
9.11
alterations
to
designated
heritage
properties,
intention
to
designate
under
part
4
section
29
of
the
Ontario
Heritage
Act
Authority,
and
enter
into
a
heritage,
easement
agreement,
one
three,
nine
one:
four
one
and
one
four
three
Portland
Street:
are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
Oh.
E
A
A
A
C
I
would
like
staff
to
do
a
peer
review
of
that
evaluation.
Then
report
back
to
the
November
meeting
of
the
trial,
Preservation
Board,
with
their
findings,
to
see
if
that
lines
up,
I
recognize
that
it's
a
fairly
tight
timeline,
so
I
would
just
say
if
the
preservation
staff
cannot
report
back
to
November
12th
and
do
it
as
soon
as
possible.
We
will
understand-
and
with
that
I'll,
be
asking
this
committee
for
this-
a
community
council
for
for
support.
Okay,.
A
A
A
Okay,
so
we've
already
voted
on
this.
That's
what
you
just
voted
on.
If
you
were
worried.
Okay
item
te,
9.15
residential
application,
demolition
application,
59
Elm
Street-
are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
Seeing
none
questions
of
staff?
None
councillor,
cressie.
E
A
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
item
te
I've
lost
my
one:
seven
residential
demolition
application,
54
a
and
58
Scholars
Street
and
one
three
one:
five
Bay
Street.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
Seeing
none
questions
of
staff?
No
councillor
Cressy
on.
A
A
C
Yes,
thank
you
very
much.
I
will
be
moving
a
an
amendment
if
I
can.
If
the
clerk's
can
put
that
on
the
screen,
please,
the
amendment
is
to
prove
the
application
to
demolish
the
subject
residential
buildings.
There
will
be
a
series
of
conditions
that
will
be
attached
to
that,
including
the
fact
that
there
has
to
be
full
heritage
restoration,
so
there's
got
to
be
proper
documentation.
C
However,
you
bring
it
back
together,
a
letter
of
credit
in
case
it
doesn't
happen,
although
we've
never
never
had
to
cash,
that
in
and
and
then
prior
to
the
release
of
the
letter
of
credit.
All
of
this
has
been
done
to
the
satisfaction
of
our
senior
manager
of
heritage
preservation
services.
So
there's
quite
a
bit
of
supervision
and
conditions
attached
to
this.
Okay.
A
A
A
A
K
D
H
D
D
D
K
F
D
A
Okay,
so
do
you
want
to
ask
formally
or
offline
okay
go
ahead?
You
have
the
floor
actually,
no
before
it.
You
know.
Sorry,
procedurally,
are
there
any
other
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
Seeing
none.
Thank
you
very
much.
Sir
councillor
Matt
load
floor
is
yours
for
questions
of
study.
My.
D
Question
is
simply
that
if
we
chose
staff
recommendation
three,
which
I
and
again
we
deputy
and
I,
have
not
spoken
about
this,
and
so
I
was
surprised
by
his
response.
If
we
chose
recommendation
three
as
I
intend
to
do,
would
there
be
any
necessary
delays,
or
is
this
simply
about
considering
conditions
to
ensure
that
the
site
is
is
in
you
know,
in
a
state
that
is
met
above
the
community
due
to
the
demolition.
K
D
For
example,
hypothetically,
if
we
were
to
arrange
a
meeting
soon
after
this
meeting
and
and
and
and
we're
able
to
discuss
and
resolve
the
appropriate
conditions
within
an
hour's
meeting,
would
there
be
much
time
after
to
you
know?
Would
this
impact
any
delays,
or
could
it
just
be
resolved
in
that
hour?
If
we,
if
we
chose
to
resolve
it,
then
I.
D
D
So
I
am
gonna,
given
that
and
I
hope.
That's
reassuring,
reassuring
to
the
the
applicant
I
am
going
to
ask
that
you
support
the
recommendation.
Three.
The
this
is
a
really
interesting
thing.
I've
never
come
up
about
this
before,
because
I
didn't
represent
the
City
of
York
prior
to
the
last
election,
but
the
City
of
York,
even
though
it
is
always
due
to
our
by
law,
not
really
the
choice
of
Community
Council,
whether
or
not
to
approve
or
oppose
a
demolition.
D
We
actually
don't
have
a
choice.
We
have
to
approve
it,
but
the
City
of
Toronto
City
of
York
has
a
bylaw
that
that
that
that
conditions
to
beautify
the
site
need
to
be
considered
as
part
of
that
demolition
approval.
So
I
think
it's
in
the
community's
interest
that
if
we
have
that
tool
to
use,
then
we
should
use
it.
D
That
being
said,
and
I
want
to
give
this
just
as
a
sort
of
a
nod
of
assurance
to
the
applicant
this,
we
don't
have
the
ability
to
oppose
we're
not
intending
to
oppose,
but
we
do
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
a
meaningful
conversation
about
ensuring
that
the
site.
You
know
it
doesn't
look
like
this
awful
derelict
site.
D
I
joined
the
interim
and
I
think
that
we
could
very
quickly
arrive
at
a
resolution
to
make
sure
that
things
move
forward
in
the
right
course,
but
at
the
same
time,
is
sensitive
to
the
community
and
I.
Think
we
can
do
that
together
and
I
look
forward
to
working
on
that
with
you.
So
thank
you
very
much.
A
Okay,
members
I
just
want
to
draw
your
attention,
so
the
staff
recommendations
contain
an
error.
This
is
this
will
just
help
to
to
understand
what
we're
doing
in
the
staff
recommendations.
They
provide
three
options:
option
1
for
option
2
or
option
3.
However,
the
agenda
was
circulated
to
you
lists,
option
2
and
option
3,
don't
look
at
the
screen.
This
is
not
about
what's
in
the
screen.
This
is
about.
What's
in
the
staff
report
and
effectively
what
councilor
Matt
Lowe
is
doing,
despite
what
the
recommendations
in
the
staff
reports
say
is
picking
the
third
option.
A
Yes,
and
that
was
just
a
an
error
in
the
way
the
recommendations
were
written.
The
intention
was
always
to
have
three
options.
Counselor
Motlow
is
absolutely
correct
in
the
ways
proceeding
here,
which
is
to
select
one
of
the
options
option.
Three,
so
I
thought
just
to
make
sure
you
all
understand.
Okay,
so
on
counselor
mat
Lowe's
motion,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried.
C
C
A
A
A
A
Two.
Three.
No
okay
item
te
nine
point:
two
three
refusal
of
a
boulevard
cafe
permit
application
located
at
387,
Broadview
Avenue,
Simpson,
Avenue,
flanked
egde
I.
Have
two
speakers
listed
first
Zoe
Solano
Zoe.
Are
you
here,
hi
Zoe?
If
you
want
to
whatever
makes
you
comfortable
so
do
you
want
to
speak
together?
Are
you
each
going
to
speak
separately?
It's
it's:
okay,
counselor,
Fletcher,
you're,
okay,
world's
best
deputation!
Thank
you!
So
much
I.
You
completely
sold
me
on
your
position.
A
B
A
Item
t
9.2
for
refusal
of
a
boulevard
cafe
permit
application
located
at
10:42,
Gerrard
Street,
Galt,
Avenue,
flanked
äj--
members
of
the
green
sheets
say
there's
a
speaker,
however,
that
speaker
has
requested
that
their
name
removed.
Are
there
any
other
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item?
B
J
We
were
fortunate
enough
just
before
the
last
election
to
receive
approval
to
build
a
200,
bad
long-term
care
facility.
Rena
Mead
is
located
in
the
councillor,
perks,
writing
and
right
at
the
corner
of
Dundas
and
st.
John's,
we're
proposing
to
build
the
building
adjacent
to
the
medically
complex
and
rehab
hospital,
which
would
provide
a
nice
continuum.
What
I
wanted
to
do
is
not
really
talk
about
the
project,
but
just
about
the
need
and
how
we
demonstrated
the
need.
J
So
currently,
we
have
five
thousand
eight
hundred
and
seventy
nine
individuals
waiting
for
long
term
care
in
Toronto,
central
in
and
that's
where
we
are
located
of
the
forty
set
47%
of
the
long-term
care
bed
capacity
20
of
the
36
homes
need
to
be
redeveloped
to
meet
the
new
standard
and
from
the
current
assessment.
This
is
a
Toronto
central
in
document
which
I
will
leave
for
you
of
those.
J
J
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
we
have
been
meeting
with
the
the
local
residents
and
we're
trying
to
be
very
receptive
and
open,
but
we
also
have
200
people
that
we
will
be
caring
for
who,
quite
frankly,
have
worked
and
lived
their
whole
lives
in
the
City
of
Toronto
and
now
want
to
age
in
the
City
of
Toronto,
and
it's
a
real
tragedy
that
they
have
to
move
outside
of
the
City
of
Toronto
because
of
the
the
scarcity
of
long-term
care
beds.
So
really
that's.
Basically
all
I
wanted
to
talk
about
and
I
know.
J
There
are
members
of
the
team
here
and
members
of
the
community
who
will
also
be
speaking
to
it.
This
document
I
will
leave
for
you,
I
actually
presented
councillor.
Krusty
will
probably
remember
at
executive
committee
when
we
were
talking
about
development
fees
and
I
will
say
that
I
have
seen
in
many
many
documents
now
to
demonstrate
the
need
for
long
term
care.
J
A
J
A
F
L
And
our
family
moved
into
the
to
st.
John's
Road
in
1996.
We
were
delighted
to
move
in
to
a
family
friendly
and
very
caring
neighborhood
at
the
end
of
the
block
across
the
street
from
us
was
the
original
Runnymede
health
care
Runnymede
chronic
care
hospital
housed
in
a
very
old
the
old
Strathcona
public
school,
designed
by
James,
Ellis,
Junction
architect
and
built
in
1908
in
front
of
that
building,
were
Roman
Doric
columns,
supporting
a
porch
and
in
front
of
that
to
stately
native
Linden's.
L
L
Children
on
our
side
of
the
street
grew
up
very
aware
that
that
institution
housed
people
with
chronic
neurological
disorders.
We
could
hear
people
moaning
and
calling
for
help
so
for
sure.
In
the
neighborhood
we
understood
that
there
was
a
need
for
modernizing
the
facilities
for
the
residents
and
that
at
the
chronic
care
Hospital.
L
In
fact,
the
neighborhood
helped
fundraise
for
funds
to
rebuild
in
that
area
and
during
all
of
those
years
we
were
told
by
the
CEO
that
the
institution
would
be
rebuilt
and
there
would
be
underground
parking,
whoever
the
day
that
the
model
was
exposed.
We
could
see
it
was
a
six
story
structure
rather
than
a
two-story
structure,
and
there
was
no
underground
parking.
In
fact,
it
was
like
a
tripling
of
the
size
of
the
parking
lot
direct
across
the
street
from
us.
L
When
we
saw
that
model,
we
were
not
happy
with
it.
It
was
a
huge
departure
from
the
residential
tone
of
the
area
and
our
then
councillor
presided
over
a
series
of
community
meetings
to
try
to
mediate
some
kind
of
common
ground
and
a
model
that
would
be
acceptable
more
palatable
to
both
the
institution
and
the
residents,
and
we
ended
up
with
the
fourth
storey
building
that
is
now
located
on
the
north
side
of
the
property.
L
Now
we
had
a
meeting
on
October
1st
and
at
that
meeting
there
were
people
who
had
attended
the
original
meetings
that
were
presided
over
by
the
previous
CEO
and
the
meetings
that
were
presided
over
by
our
councilor
at
the
time.
So
on
October
1st
in
the
course
of
the
presentations
that
were
made
before
us,
it's
Nazi,
Town
Hall.
L
So
those
of
us
that
had
been
through
all
of
these
meetings
were
quite
in
shock
to
hear
that
and
the
you
know
the
prospect
of
living
through
yet
more
disruption,
dust,
noise,
vibration,
lack
of
communication
on
the
part
of
the
people
that
are
in
charge
of
the
building
and
and
by
the
Health
Care
Center
is
just
shocking
for
all
of
us.
In
fact,
I
would
call
it
community
busting,
because
it's
put
us
all
in
disarray
and
distress
around
that
now.
L
I
do
support
a
submission
that
was
made
by
a
neighbor
Gabriel
Gardo
cheat
good,
we
do
Chi
and
he
pulled
out
the
wording
from
the
zoning
changes
of
2002
and
he
can't
see
and
I
can't
see
anywhere
in
that
wording
where
it
talks
about
allowing
two
buildings.
It
talks
about
two
purposes
and
that's
fine,
but
to
build
yet
another
building
with
a
massive
footprint
and
in
an
area
where
we
have
two
and
a
half
storey
buildings
on
the
south
side
is
just
shocking
for
us.
L
Increased
parking
increase
pressures
on
the
neighborhood
for
parking,
more
pollution
lighting
all
night
long
losing
sunlight
and
I
do
want
to
add
one
other
thing:
I've
approached
our
MPP
booty-licker
pochi,
and
even
though
this
is
a
provincial
development,
she
knows
nothing.
She
has
not
been
apprised
of.
She
hasn't
been.
L
A
A
M
The
overwhelming
majority
of
the
Maltese
who
live
in
this
area
are
very
much
in
favor
of
this
project.
Most
of
them
are
aged
an
aging
population,
a
number,
a
good
number
of
them
have
problems
and
would
definitely
need,
and
if
they
applied,
will
qualify
for
long
term
care
and
need.
So
on
behalf
of
these
people,
I
would
like
to
show
the.
M
Disability
of
being
in
favor
of
such
a
project
I
come
from
a
tiny
country
which
is
half
the
size
of
Toronto,
and
we
have
very
similar
problems
related
to
long
term
care.
There's
a
shortage
and
a
very
acute
shortage,
and
just
to
tell
you,
on
my
way
to
to
coming
here,
I
took
the
subway
and
I
bumped
into
one
of
the
Maltese
people,
and
she
recognized
me
and
said
in
tears.
I'm
gonna
have
to
live
the
place.
M
I
I've
lived
for
for
the
last
61
years,
because
I
have
nowhere
to
go
I'm
on
the
list
waiting
to
get
into
one
of
the
long
long
care
places,
but
unfortunately
there
will
be
no
places
for
her
and
she'll
be
moving
way
out
of
the
city
and
being
uprooted
from
their
community
for
a
person.
That's
lived
there
for
so
many
many
years
decades.
Not
years
is
a
huge
shock.
M
It's
a
huge
shock
and
I
just
wanted
to
get
across
the
message
that
basically
the
Maltese
communities.
It
will
be
very
concerned
if
this
project
doesn't
go
ahead.
I
understand
the
the
the
concerns
of
the
residents,
and
there
are
a
number
of
these
residents
that
are
Maltese
themselves.
I've
visited
a
number
of
them
and
they've
overwhelmingly
showed
their
support
for
this
project.
A
number
of
them
mentioned
as
well.
You
know
my
property
will
gain
as
well
value
if
there
is
services
which
didn't
exist
in
the
area
and
now
will
exist.
A
H
My
name
is
Joe,
sherry
I'm,
the
president
of
the
Maltese
Canadian
Federation,
which
is
an
umbrella
of
the
clubs
associations
and
the
the
Maltese
community,
including
st.
Paul's
Church.
20
years
ago,
we
applied
as
a
community
for
a
home
for
serious
home
long-term
home.
At
the
time
we
applied
as
a
not-for-profit
and
unfortunately,
most
of
the
parents
that
were
given
out
at
the
time
were
for-profit
organizations.
H
The
the
environment
is
situated
close
to
the
church
in
Falls,
Church,
few
more
tea
shops
in
the
area
and
the
people
that
live
there
and
hopefully
we'll
be
able
to
find
space
and
beds.
This
new
facility
will
stay
within
within
the
community.
It
is
a
known
fact
that
the
older,
the
people,
the
older
people,
get
from
any
walks
of
life,
the
more
there's
a
there's,
a
tendency
for
them
to
pull
to
their
roots
and
their
roots,
being
language
mostly,
and
anything,
cultural
that
has
to
do
with
their
with
their.
H
A
J
J
Want
to
make
a
couple
of
comments
about
community
consultation
and
also
the
information
that
we're
providing
throughout
planning
and
during
construction.
So
we
understand
it's
a
disruptive
process,
of
course,
to
any
community
to
have
a
building
of
any
size
built
and
especially
one
that
is
probably
a
little
bit
larger
than
its
neighbors.
J
So
we
want
to
assure
the
local
residents
that,
during
this
planning
phase,
the
door
is
open
to
have
discussions
to
get
ideas
about
anything
that
we
can
do
to
make
the
developer
less
impactful
I
realized
that
at
the
end
of
the
day
it
can
have.
You
know
it's
impossible
to
make
it
zero
impact.
But
there
are.
J
E
J
A
You
any
questions
to
the
deputy,
seeing
none.
Thank
you
very
much.
Are
there
any
other
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
make
a
deputation
on
this
item,
seeing
none
any
questions
of
staff?
No
members,
so
that
you
understand
what
we're
doing
this
is
a
preliminary
report
and
the
recommendation
is
that
we
have
a
public
meeting
on
October
1st,
which
we
did
so.
A
A
C
I
do
want
to
flag
this
for
the
developer,
which
is
Menkes
and
development.
We,
my
I,
was
actually
on
a
on
a
walk
of
the
Downtown
East
with
Giuliana
Carbone
ER
or
our
deputy
city
manager.
As
of
yesterday,
and
we
were
along
walking
on
Dundas
East
and
our
route
was
then
interrupted.
We
were
literally
unable
to
pass
the
sidewalk,
and
this
particular
this
particular
portion
of
the
street,
which
is
actually
a
bend
in
Dundas
East,
where
it
meets
George
Street,
is
extremely
dangerous.
C
The
visibility
is
very
poor
and
there
happens
to
be
a
public
school
right.
There
is
the
French
public
school
Gabrielle,
Roy
and
I
can
only
imagine
that
we
just
happen
to
be
stumbling
upon,
that
particular
passage
for
the
residents
and
the
business
operators
and
the
students
in
particular
that
have
to
pass
that
site
every
single
day.
I,
don't
know
how
long
that
path,
that
pedestrian
passage
was
was
closed,
but
I
know
that
it's
been
closed
for
more
than
at
least
four
days.
C
There
was
no
signage
whatsoever,
alerting
pedestrians
that
the
passageway
that
they
were
relying
on
was
going
to
properly
end,
and
at
that
point
in
time
to
be
quite
honest,
mr.
speaker,
I
was
with
our
deputy
city
manager,
trying
to
cross
to
the
north
side
of
Dundas
and
waiting
for
the
path
that
the
vehicle
traffic
to
slow
down
and
as
we
waited
for
for
one
minute,
two
minutes
three
minutes:
four
minutes:
five
minutes
and
so
forth.
There
were
other
pedestrians
that
gathered
with
us.
C
Only
were
we
able
to
cross
the
street
because
there
there
was
a
mass
of
individuals
that
had
gathered
and
we
were
able
to
be
granted
safe
passage
because
some
of
the
cars
decide
to
stop
for
us.
I
just
want
to
flag
this
for
Menkes
I'm
sure
you
probably
have
government
relations
people
who
are
watching
this,
this
videotape.
What
was
what
was
there
was
unacceptable
and
I
recognize
that
you
are
working
with
temporary
occupations
provided
by
them
by
staff.
C
We
will
be
asking
staff
to
go
out
to
investigate,
and
even
if
you
have
to
close
down
that
passage
for
whatever
reason,
whatever
emergency
condition
exists.
What
we
expect
you
to
do
at
the
very
minimum
is
provide
an
alternative,
safe
passage
route.
Pedestrians
cannot
lose
their
sidewalk
passage
to
construction
without
without
any
advance
notice.
C
It
was
extremely
dangerous
and
what
I
saw
there
with
our
deputy
city
manager
and
I'm
very
glad
that
there
were
no
students
at
that
time,
but
I
don't
know
how
the
students
quite
honestly
would
be
able
to
travel
westbound
asari
eastbound
on
Dundas
Avenue,
knowing
that
none
of
those
students
from
the
from
the
school
would
be
driving
home
anytime
soon,
so
they
will
rely
on
safe
passage.
They
will
rely
on
Menkes
to
make
sure
that
they
are
granted
safe
passage.
I
did
not
see
a
flag
man
on
post
or
flag
person
on
post.
C
There
was
no
consideration
whatsoever
for
the
pedestrian
experience,
so
I
just
flagged.
It
I'm
not
moving
any
additional
amendments.
You're
gonna
be
good,
given
your
the
occupancy,
but
I
will
be
back
in
24
36
hours
to
make
sure
that
everything
that
I
spoke
about
is
gonna,
be
remediated
the
next
time
around.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
any
questions
of
the
mover
or
sorry.
There's
no
motion
so
on
the
item.
All
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
we're
getting
very
close.
Everybody
I
know
that
we've
had
a
busy
morning
next
is
item
te
9.45
construction,
staging
portland
flood
protection
and
enabling
infrastructure
project
councillor
Fletcher.
A
A
C
A
J
J
Where
I
live
is
right
here
at
this
hen
here
our
property
backs
on
to
court
town
lane,
which
leads
into
Gilead
place,
so
our
property
would
be
here
and
then
Gilead
I
mean
court.
Town
Lane
leads
into
Gilead
now
I
realized
from
the
counselors
letter
and
and
I'm
quite
appreciated
that
counselor
Wan
includes
these
notices
in
her
email
list,
because
this
is
the
first
time
that
I
found
out
about
it.
I
had
no
idea
that
the
people
behind
us
from
the
Gilead
rowhouses
had
put
together
a
petition.
J
They
they
did
it
amongst
themselves.
They
didn't
include
those
on
King
Street
but
anyway.
What
I
do
want
to
say
is
that,
because
Gilead
is
only
one
Street,
this
is
the
front
King
Street
and,
as
you
can
see
on
this
picture
here,
the
only
signage
is
on
this
side,
which
it
says
30
miles
per
hour
and
on
the
opposite
side,
which
has
no
parking
signs
on
the
south
side.
Looking
north,
we
have
again
30
miles
per
hour
and
assigned
Elvis's
court.
Chum
Lane
I
think
that
to
put
speed,
humps
I'm.
A
Sorry
to
interrupt
you,
I'm
gonna,
hold
your
time.
I
have
a
little
tiny
piece
of
procedural
business.
I
have
to
do.
I
need
a
motion
to
extend
to
care
to
complete
the
business.
We've
got
three
but
they're.
All
just
little
technical
things
will
be
done
will
be
done
in
like
five
minutes,
because
I'm
motion
to
extend
counselor
Fletcher,
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried
I'm.
Very
sorry
to
have
interrupted
you,
okay,.
J
Okay,
so
the
background
on
Gilead
place,
rowhouses
wendy
owners
purchased
into
these
row
houses.
They
knew
the
area
opposite
them
was
own
industrial,
actually,
their
row
houses
are
built
on
former
industrial
lands.
Gilead
place
is
a
mixed-use
city
of
toronto,
public
Lane,
the
next
king
and
Front
Street.
J
So
when
whatever
safety
measures
are
implemented,
they
they
should
comply
with
city
regulations
and
the
access
of
emergency
vehicles,
solid
waste
and
snow
removal,
which
we
have
I
think
that
to
go
from
one
extreme,
where
possibly
there's
no
signage
or
no
way
of
mitigating
heavy
street
traffic,
which
really
there
isn't
I,
think
that
we
should
start
in
small
steps
and
I'm
suggesting
that
that
we
need
improve
signage.
Maybe
a
sign
that
says:
caution
are
slowed
down,
I,
think
they're.
J
Reducing
the
speed
from
30
to
15
is
a
good
way
to
go,
and
I
also
think
that
we
need
some
paints
on
the
pavement.
Our
street
pavement
markings
and
go
from
there
I
think
that
going
from
pretty
well
nothing
to
speed
bumps
on
a
street
that
has
that's
only
one
block.
It's
a
little
bit
overdone
or
a
suggestion.
Also
too,
with
this
Gilead
Street
has
two
entrances
to
court
town
lane
and
I'm
I'm,
pretty
well
wondering
where
these
speed
bumps
are
gonna.
A
A
C
You
doing
a
wonderful
job,
we
can
all
attest
to
that.
Thank
you
very
much
and
thank
you
Karolina
for
for
coming
out
to
to
speak
to
this
matter.
It's
great
to
know
that
people
do
read
our
newsletters,
because
sometimes
you
put
a
lot
of
effort
to
it
and
you're,
not
sure
who
is
out
there
responding.
So
this
is
fantastic.
C
We
would
be
able
to
incorporate
all
those
concerns
into
the
staffs
review
as
they
come
back
with
some
key
recommendations
for
us.
I,
don't
think,
there's
any
problem
in
exploring
every
single
option.
That's
out
there.
I
do
know
that
when
it
comes
to
these
mixed
use
environments,
we
are
oftentimes
challenged
with
heavy
vehicle
movement
fast
moving
vehicles,
even
though
these
are
people's
front
yards
or
backyards.
All
we
need
to
do
is
just
figure
out
how
to
design
and
and
build
out
a
street.
C
A
You
any
questions
of
councillor
wong-tam,
seeing
none
all
those
in
favor
opposed
carried.
Okay.
Now
we
have
to
do
a
little
bit
of
fancy.
Footwork
I
need
a
motion
to
add
9.85
councillor
Bradford,
so
we'll
take
that.
Do
that
piece
of
business,
accelerating
City,
Place
vision,
zero,
Street
safety
improvements,
Ward
10:
where
did
councilor
Cressey?
Go?
I'm
gonna
move
it.
Okay,
councillor
bradford
thanks.
A
A
C
A
A
A
D
My
name
is
counselor
Josh,
Matt,
Lowe
and
I
have
a
motion
that
the
which
I
endorse
that
the
Tron
Tony
Stewart
Community
Council,
pass
and
declare
as
bylaws
bills,
1401
to
14:23
1425,
to
14
to
28,
14:32,
1444
and
1446
to
1451
prepared
for
the
October
10th
2019
meeting
nine
of
the
community
council.
So.